Church History of Britain
65. Then proceeded he to speak of the branches of the whole Kingdom, all being in hope to reap benefit by the continuance of Deans and Chapters lands as now employed. For all men (said he) are not born elder Brothers, nor all elder Brothers inheritors of Land. Divers of low degree, but generous Spirits would be glad to advance themselves, and archieve an estate by qualifying themselves by industry and virtue, to attain a share of Cathedral Endowments, as the common possession of the Realm, enclosed in no private men's estate.
66. And whereas travelers inform them, that all ranks and degrees of people in England, [Knights, Gentlemen, Yeamen,] live more freely and fashionably, than in any other Countries, he trusted their Honors would account it reasonable, that the Clergy had in some sort, a better maintenance then in neighbouring reformed Churches, and not with Jeroboams Priests, to be the basest of all the People.
67. Then did he instance in some famous Protestants of foreign parts, who had found great relief and comfort by being installed Prebendaries in our Cathedral and Collegiate Churches, as Dr. Saravia, preferred by Queen Elizabeth, Dr. Casaubon, (Father and Son ) by King James, Dr. Primrose, Mr. Vossius, in the reign of King Charles, and Dr. Peter Moulin alive at this day, and who intended to leave Sedan, (if the warlike preparations there proceeded) and come over into England, where he should have but sad welcome if all his livelihood, were taken away from him.
68. Nor could an Act be done, more to gratify the Church of Rome, than to destroy Deans and Chapters, seeing Sanders himself seemeth to complain, that Queen Elizabeth had left Provosts, Deans, Canons and Prebendaries, in Cathedral and Collegiate Churches, because he foresaw, such foundations would conduce to the stability of religion, so that by his words, a fatter Sacrifice could not be offered up, to such as himself, than the extirpation of them.
69. He went forwards to show the benefit the King, and Commonwealth reaped by such Lands, as paying greater sums to the Exchequer, for first fruits, tenths and subsidies, according to the proportion, than any other estates, & Corporations in the Kingdom. And are ready (said he) if called upon, cheerfully to contribute in an extraordinary manner to the charge of the Kingdom.
70. Now as he was by their Honors favor admitted to plead under that roof, where their noble Progenitors had given to the Clergy, so many Charters, Privileges, & Immunities, so he implored to find the ancient & honorable justice of the House unto his Brethren, who were not charged, much less convicted of any scandalous faults, justly for the same to forfeit their estates.
71. At last he led them to the highest degree of all considerations, viz. the honor of God, to whose worship and service such Fabrics and Lands were dedicated, and barred all alienation with (which he said is tremenda vox) curses and imprecations; he minded them of the censers of Korah and his complices, pronounced hallowed, because pretended to do God service therewith. And left any should wave this as a Levitical nicety, it was proverbial Divinity, as a received rule in every man's mouth. It is a snare to a man that devoureth that which is holy. He added the smart question of St. Paul, Thou that abhorrest Idols, doest thou commit Sacrilege? and concluded, that on the ruins of the rewards of learning, no structure can be raised but ignorance, and upon the chaos of ignorance, nothing can be built but profaneness and confusion.
72. This his speech was uttered with such becoming gravity, that it was generally well resented and wrought much on the House for the present, so that had the aliening of such Lands been then put to the Vote, some (who conceived themselves knowing of the sense of the House ) concluded it would have been carried on the Negative by more than six score suffrages.
73. In the afternoon Dr. Cornelius Burgess, as Speaker for his Party, made a vehement invective against Deans and Chapters, and the unprofitableness of such Corporations. He heavily aggravated the debauchednesse of Singingmen, not only useless, but hurtful by their vicious conversations. Yet he concluded with the utter unlawfulness, to convert such Endowments to any private Persons profit. So that the same Doctrine was delivered by both the Doctors, only they differed in their Applications, the former being for the continuing such lands to their ancient, the latter for diverting them to other, but neither for alienating them from public and pious employments.
74. If since Dr. Burgess hath been a large purchaser of such lands to himself, If since St. Andrew the first converted, and St. Paul the last converted Apostle have met in his purse, I doubt not but that he can give sufficient reason for the same, both to himself and any other, that shall question him therein. The rather because lately he read his learned Lectures in St. Paul's, on the Criticisms of Conscience, no less carefully then curiously weighing satisfaction to scruples, and if there be any fault, so able a Confessor, knows how to get his absolution.
75. A Bill brought up from the Commons to the Lord's against Bishops and Clergy-men, which having several branches was severally voted.
- 1. That they should have no votes in Parliament.
- 2. That they should not be in the Commission of the Peace, nor Judges in Temporal Courts.
- 3. Nor sit in the Star-Chamber, nor be Privy-Counselors.
The two last branches of this Bill passed by general consent; not above two dissenting. But the first branch was voted in the Negative, wherein all the Bishops gave their own voices for themselves. Yet had their suffrages been secluded, and the question only put to the lay-Lord's, it had been carried for the Bishops by sixteen decisive.
76. After some days debate, the Lord's who were against the Bishops, protested that the former manner of voting the Bill by branches, was unparlamentary and illegal. Wherefore they moved the House that they should be so joined together, as either to take the Bill in wholly or cast it all out. Whereupon the whole Bill was utterly cast out by many voices; had not the Bishops (as again they did) given their suffrages in the same.
77. Master Maynard made a Speech in the Committee of Lord's against the Canons, made by rhe Bishops in the last Convocation, therein with much learning endeavoring to prove
- 1. That in the Saxons times (as Malmesbury, Howden, Sir Henry Spelman &c. do witness) Laws and constitutions Ecclesiastical had the confirmation of Peers and sometimes of the People, to which great Councils our Parliaments do succeed.
- 2. That it appears out of the aforesaid Authors, and others, that there was some checking about the disuse of the general making of such Church Laws.
- 3. That for Kings to make Canons without consent of Parliament cannot stand, because built on a bad foundation, viz. on the Popes making Canons by his sole Power, so that the groundwork not being good the superstructure sinketh therewith.
- 4. He examined the Statute 25 of Henry 8, avouching that that clause, The Clergy shall not make Canons without the Kings leave, implieth not, that by his leave alone they may make them.
Lastly he endeavored to prove that these Canons were against the Kings Prerogative, the Rights, Liberties and Properties of the Subject, insisting herein on several particulars.
- 1. The first Canon puts a penalty on such as disobey them.
- 2. One of them determineth the Kings Power and the Subjects right.
- 3. It showeth that the Ordinance of Kings is by the Law of Nature, and then they should be in all places and all alike.
- 4. One of the Canons saith that the King may not be resisted.
- 5. Another makes a Holy Day, whereas that the Parliament saith there shall be such and no more.
This his Speech lost neither life nor luster, being reported to the Lord's by the Bishop of Lincoln a back friend to the Canons, because made during his absence and durance in the Tower.
78. One in the House of Commons heightened the offense of the Clergy herein, into Treason, which their more moderate adversaries abated into a Premunire. Many much insisted on the Clerks of the Convocation for presuming (being but private men after the dissolution of the Parliament) to grant subsidies, and so without Law, to give away the estates of their fellow-subjects.
78. A Bill was read to repeal that Statute of 1 Eliz. whereby the High-Commission Court is erected. This Bill afterwards forbad any Archbishop, Bishop &c. deriving power from the King to Assesse, or inflict any pain, penalty, amercement, imprisonment, or corporal punishment for any ecclesiastical offense or transgression. Forbidding them likewise to administer the Oath Ex officio or give Oath to Church-Wardens, Sides-men or any others, whereby their own or others offenses should be discovered.
DIGNISSIMO DOM. THOMAE FISHER BARONETTO.
CUM Insignia tua Gentilitia intueor, non sum adeo Heraldicae Artis ignarus, quin probe sciam, quid sibi velit Manus illa, Scutello inserta.
Te scilicet Baronettum designat, cùm omnes in illum Ordinem cooptati, ex Institution sua, ad Vltoniam, (Hiberniae Provinciam) forti dextrâ defendendam teneantur.
At sensum (praeter hunc vulgarem ) alium latiorem, & (quoad meipsum) laetiorem, Manui illi expansae, quae in tuo Clypeo spectabilis, subesse video. Index est summae tuae Munificentiae, quo nomine me tibi divinctissimum profiteor.
1. OMitting matters of greater consequence, know that the Bill against the High-Commission, was the third time read in the House of Lord's and passed it, which some days after was confirmed by his Majesty. Thus the edge of the Spiritual Sword, as to discipline, was taken away. For although I read of a Proviso made in the House of Lord's, that the general words in this Bill should extend only to the High-Commission Court, and not reach other Ecclesiastical jurisdiction: yet that Proviso being but written and the Statute printed, all coercive power of Church Consistories were taken away. Mr. Pim triumphed at this success, crying out, Digitus Det, it is the finger of God, that the Bishops should so supinely suffer themselves to be surprised in their power. Some disaffected to Episcopy observed a Justice, that seeing many simple souls were in the high Commission Court by captious interrogatories circumvented into a self-accusation, an unsuspected clause in this Statute should abolish all their lawful authority.
2. The Bishop of Lincoln brought up a Bill to regulate Bishops and their jurisdiction, consisting of several particulars:
- 1. That every Bishop being in his Diocese not sick should preach once every Lord's day, or pay five pounds to the poor to be levied by the next Justice of Peace, and distress made by the Constable.
- 2. That no Bishop shall be Justice of Peace, save the Dean of Westminster in Westminster, and St. Martines.
- 3. That every Bishop should have twelve assistants (besides the Dean and Chapter) four chosen by the King, four by the Lord's, and four by the Commons, for jurisdiction and ordination.
- 4. That in all vacancies they should present to the King, three of the ablest Divines in the Diocese, out of which his Majesty might choose one to be Bishop.
- 5. Deans and Prebends to be resident at the Cathedrals but sixty days.
- 6. That Sermons be preached therein twice every Lord's day, once every Holy day, and a Lecture on Wednesday with a salary of 100. Marks.
- 7. All Archbishops, Bishops, Collegiate Churches, &c. to give a fourth part of their fines and improved rents, to buy out Impropriations.
- 8. All double beneficed men to pay a moiety of their benefice to their Curates.
- 9. No appeal to the Court of Arches or Audience.
- 10. Canons and Ecclesiastical capitulations, to be drawn up and fitted to the Laws of the Land by sixteen learned men, chosen six by the King, five by the Lord's, and five by the Commons.
This Bill was but once read in the House, and no great matter made thereof: the Anti • piscopall party conceived it needless to shave their beards, whose heads they intended to cut off, designing an utter extirpation of Bishops.
3. By the way the mention of a moiety to the Curates, minds me of a crying sin of the English Clergy conceived by the most conscientious amongst them, a great incentive of Divine anger against them; namely, the miserable and scandalous Stipends afforded to their Curates. Which made Lay-men follow their pattern in Vicaridges unindowed, seeing such who knew most what belong to the work, allowed the least wages to the Ministry. Hence is it that God since hath changed his hand, making many who were poor Curates rich Rectors, and many wealthy Incumbents to become poor Curates. It will not be amiss to wish thankfulness without pride to the one, and patience without dejection to the other.
4. A Bill was sent up by the Commons against Matthew Wren Bishop of Eli, containing twenty five Articles, charging him for being Popishly affected, a suppressor of Preaching, and introducer of Arbitrary Power to the hazard of the estates and lives of many. They desired he might be sequestered from the Kings Person and Service.
5. To return to the Bishops, the Commons perceiving that they were so tenacious of their votes in Parliament, resolved vigorously to prosecute the impeachment against them for making of Canons, expecting the Bishops should willingly quit their votes as Barons to be acquitted of their premunire, whereby they forfeited all their Personal estates, yet the sound of so great a charge did not so afright them but that they persisted legally to defend their innocence.
6. The Bishops that were impeached for making Canons, craved time till Michaelmas Term to make their answer. This was vehemently opposed by some Lord's, and two questions were put.
- 1. Whether the Bishops should sit still in the House though without voting (to which themselves consented) whilst the circumstance of time for their answer was in debate.
- 2. What time they should have for their answer.
The first of these was carried for them by one present voice, and four Proxies; and for the second, time was allowed them till the tenth of November. And although the adverse Lord's pleaded that in offenses criminal, for matters of fact, no council should be allowed them, but to answer yea or no: yet on the Lord Keepers affirming it ordinary and just to allow council in such cases, it was permitted unto them.
7. Bishop Warner of Rochester is chosen by joint consent, to solicit the cause, sparing neither care nor cost therein. Of the Council he retained, two only appeared; Serjeant Jermin, who declined to plead for them, except the Bishops would first procure him a Warrant from the House of Commons (which they refused to do:) and Mr. Chuite, who being demanded of the Lord's whether he would plead for the Bishops, Yea (said he) so long as I have a tongue to plead with. Soon after he drew up a Demurrer in their behalf, that their offense in making Canons could not amount to a Premunire. This being shown to the Bishop of Lincoln, he protested that he never saw a stronger demurrer all the days of his life: and the notice hereof to the Lord's was probably the cause, that they waved any further prosecution of the charge, which henceforward sunk in silence.
8. Passe we now from the outworks of Episcopacy (I mean the Deans and Chapters ) this fiercely stormed (but as yet not taken) to the Bishops themselves, who began to shake, seeing their interest and respects in the House of Lord's did daily decay, and decline. Yea, about this time came forth the Lord Brook his book against Bishops, accusing them in respect of their parentage to be de faece populi, of the dregs of the people; and in respect of their studies no way fit for government, or to be Barons in Parliament.
9. Whereupon the Bishops taking this accusation to heart, meet together; and in their own necessary defense, thought fit to vindicate their extractions, some publicly, some in private discourse.
Dr. Williams began, then Archbishop of York (Canterbury being in the Tower) was accused, in the Star-Chamber, for purchasing the two ancientest Houses and inheritances in North-Wales (which are Penrhyne and Quowilocke ) in regard he was descended from them. So that he might as truly accuse all the ancient Nobility of Britain, as tax him for meanly descended.
Dr. Juxon Bishop of London did or might plead that his parents lived in good fashion, and gave him large allowance first in the University, then in Grays-Inn, where he lived as fashionably as other Gentlemen, so that the Lord Brooks might question the parentage of any Inns-of-Court-Gentlemen, as well as his.
Bishop Morton of Durham, averred that his father had been Lord Major of York, and born all the Offices of that City with credit and honor; so that the Lord Brook might as justly quarrel the descent of any Citizens Sons in England.
Bishop Curle of Winchester his father was for many years Auditor in the Court of Wards, to Queen Elizabeth, and King James: and the aforesaid Lord may as well condemn all the sons of Officers to be meanly born as accuse him.
Bishop Cook of Hereford, his Fathers family had continued in Darbyshire, in the same house, and in the same means, four hundred years at least, often Sheriffs of that County, and matched to all the best houses therein. So that the Lord Brook might as well have charged all the ancient Gentry of that shire for mean parentage as accuse him.
Bishop Owen of Asaph, that there was not a Gentleman in the two Counties of Carnarvan and Anglesey, of three hundred pounds a year, but was his Kinsman or allieman in the fourth degree; which he thinks, will sufficiently justify his parentage.
Bishop Goodman of Gloucester, that though his very name seemed to point out his descent from Yeomantry, yet (though the youngest son of the youngest brother) he had more left unto him, than the Lord Brook his father had to maintain him and all his family. That his grandfather by his father side, purchased the whole estate of Sir Thomas Exmew, Lord Major London 1517. and that by his mothers side he was descended of the best parentage of the City of London.
The rest of the Bishops might sufficiently vindicate their parentage, as most the Sons of Ministers, or Lay-Gentlemen, whose extractions ran not so low as to any such feculencie charged upon them.
10. But moe symptoms of their dying power in Parliament daily discovered themselves, some whereof we will recount, that posterity may perceive by what degrees they did lessen in the House, before they lost their Votes therein.
First, whereas it was customary, that in all Commissions, such a number of Bishops should be joined with the temporal Lord's, of late their due proportions were not observed.
The Clark of the Parliament, applying himself to the prevalent party, in the reading of Bills turned his back to the Bishops, who could not (and it seems he intended they should not) distinctly hear anything, as if their consent or dissent were little concerned therein.
When a Bill passed for exchange of Lands, betwixt the Bishop of London and Sir Nicolas Crisp, the temporal Lord's were offended that the Bishop was styled Right Honorable therein, which at last was expung'd and he intitled, one of his Majesty's most Honorable Privy Council; the honor being fixed upon his State employment, not Episcopal function.
On a solemn Fast in their going to Church, the temporal Lord's first took precedency of the Bishops (who quietly submitted themselves to come behind) on the same token, that one of the Lay-Lord's said, Is this a day Humiliation, wherein we show so much pride, in taking place of those to whom our ancestors ever allowed it?
But the main matter was, that the Bishops were denied all meddling even in the Commission of preparatory examinations concerning the Earl of Strafford, as causa sanguinis, and they as men of mercy not to deal in the condemnation of any person. The Bishops pleaded, though it was not proper for them to condemn the guilty, yet they might acquit the innocent, and such an one as yet that Earl was charitably presumed to be, until legally convicted to be otherwise. They alleged also in their own behalf, that a Commission was granted in the reign of Queen Elizabeth, to certain Privy-Counselors, for the examination of the Queen of Scots, even to her condemnation if just cause appeared, and John Whitgift Archbishop of Canterbury, first named therein. All would not prevail, the Bishops being forbidden any interposing in that matter.
11. It must not be forgotten, how about this time the Lord Kimbolton made a motion to persuade the Bishops, willingly to depart with their Votes in Parliament; adding, that if the same would surrender their suffrages, the temporal Lord's who remained in the House, were obliged in honor, to be more tender of and careful for the Bishops preservation in their Jurisdictions and Revenues. An instrument was employed by the Earl of Essex (or else he employed himself, conceiving the service acceptable) who dealt privately with several Bishops to secure themselves by prevention, to surrender that which would be taken away from them. But the Bishops persisted in the negative, refusing by any voluntary act to be accessory to their own injury, resolving to keep possession of their Votes, till a prevalent power outed them thereof.
12. Now no day passed, wherein some petition was not presented to the Lord's or Commons, from several persons against the Bishops as grand grievancers, causing the general decay of trade, obstructing the proceedings in Parliament, and what not? In so much, that the very Porters (as they said) were able no longer to undergo the burden of Episcopal tyranny, and petitioned against it. But hitherto these were but blunt petitions, the last was a sharp one (with point and edge) brought up for the same purpose by the armed Apprentices.
13. Now, seeing men's judgments are at such a distance, about the nature of this their practice, some terming it a tumult, mutiny, riot; others calling it courage, zeal, and industry; some admiring them as acted with a public spirit, above their age and education; others condemning them much, their countenancers more, their secret abettors and contrivers, most of all: I say, when men are thus divided in point of judgment, it will be safest for us to confine ourselves, merely to matter of fact. Wherein also we meet with much diversity of relation; though surely, what a Parliatary Chronicler writes thereof, must be believed.
Thus the Bishops were fain to shelter themselves from the shower of stones ready to fall upon them, and with great difficulty made their escape. Who otherwise on St. Stephans day, had gone St. Stephans way, to their graves.
14. As for the hubbub at Westminster Abbey lately mentioned, eye-witnesses have thus informed me of the manner thereof. Of thoses Apprences who coming up to the Parliament cried, No Bishops, no Bishops, some rudely rushing into the Abby Church, were reproved by a Virger for their irreverent behavior therein. Afterwards quitting the Church, the doors thereof by command from the Dean were shut up, to secure the Organs and Monuments therein, against the return of Apprentices. For though others could not foretell the intentions of such a tumult, who could not certainly tell their own, yet the suspicion was probable, by what was uttered amongst them. The multitude presently assault the Church, (under pretence that some of their party were detained therein) and force a pane out of the North door, but are beaten back by the officers & Scholars of the College. Here an unhappy tile was cast by an unknown hand, from the leads or battlements of the Church, which so bruised Sir Richard Wiseman (conductor of the Apprentices) that he died thereof, and so ended that days distemper.
15. To return to the Bishops, the next day twelve of them repaired to Jerusalem-Chamber in the Deans lodgings; and if any demand where were the rest of them to make up twenty six, take this account of their absence.
| 13 Dr. Laud Archbishop of Cant. was in the Tower. | ||
| 14 Dr. Juxon Bishop of London, was keeping his hospitality, (it being Christmas) at Fulham. | ||
| 15 So was Dr. Curle at Winchester-House, and it was conceived unsafe (though but cross the Thames ) to send unto him. | ||
| 16 So also was Dr. Warner of Rochester, returned to entertain his neighbors in the Country. | ||
| 17 Dr. Bridgeman of Chester | were not as yet come out of the Country. | |
| 18 Dr. Roberts of Bangor | ||
| 19 Dr. Manwaring Bishop of St. David's sat not in the house, as disabled long since by his censure in Parliament. | ||
| 26 Dr. Duppa Bishop of Salisbury, was attending his charge Prince Charles. | ||
| 21 Dr. John Prideaux | were not yet consecrated Bishops of | Worcester. |
| 22 Dr. Winniffe | Lincoln. | |
| 23 Dr. Ralf Brounrigge. | Exeter. | |
| 24 Dr. Henry King | Chichester. | |
| 25 Dr. John Westfield | Bristol. | |
| 20 Carlisle was void by the late death of Dr. Potter, only conferred by the King on Archbishop Ussher to hold it in Commendam. |
Thus have we made up their numbers, and must not forget that a secret item was given to some of the Bishops, by some of their well-wishers, to absent themselves in this licentious time of Christmas, though they had not the happiness to make use of the advice.
16. The other twelve Bishops being not yet fully recovered from their former fear, grief, and anger (which are confessed by all, to be but bad counsellors, in cases of importance) drew up in hast and disturbance such a Protestation, that posterity already hath had more years to discuss and examine, then they had hours, (I had almost said minutes) to contrive and compose, and (most of them implicitly relying on the conceived infallability of the Archbishop of York in point of common law ) all subscribed, as followeth.
To the Kings most excellent Majesty and the Lord's and Peers, now assembled in Parliament.
WHereas the Petitioners are called up by several and respective writs, and under great penalties to attend the Parliament, and have a clear and indubitable right to vote in Bills, and other matters whatsoever debatable in Parliament by the ancient customs, Laws and Statutes of this Realm, and ought to be protected by your Majesty quietly to attend, and prosecute that great service. They humbly remonstrate, and protest before God, your Majesty, and the noble Lord's, and Peers, now assembled in Parliament, That as they have an indubitate right to sit and vote in the House of the Lord's; so are they, if they may be protected from force and violence, most ready and willing to perform their duties accordingly. And that they do abominate all actions or opinions tending to Popery, and the maintenance thereof, as also all propension and inclination to any malignant party or any other side or party whatsoever, to the which their own reasons, and conscience shall not move them to adhere. But whereas they have been at several times violently menaced, affronted and assaulted by multitudes of people in their coming to perform their services in that Honorable House, and lately chased away, and put in danger of their lives, and can find no redress or protection upon sundry complaints made to both Houses in these particulars; They humbly protest before your Majesty, and the Noble House of Peers, that saving unto themselves all their rights and interest of sitting, and voting in that House at other times, they dare not sit or vote in the House of Peers, until your Majesty shall further secure them from all affronts, indignities and dangers in the premises. Lastly, whereas their fears are not built upon phantasies and conceits, but upon such grounds and objects as may well terrify men of resolution and much constancy; they do in all humility and duty protest before your Majesty, and Peers of that most Honorable House of Parliament, against all Laws, Orders, Votes, Resolutions, and Determinations, as in themselves Null and of none effect, which in their absence, since the 27 t h of this instant month of December 1641. have already passed; as likewise against all such as shall hereafter pass in that most Honorable House, during the time of this their forced and violent absence from the said most Honorable House: not denying, but if their absenting of themselves were willful and voluntary, that most honorable House might proceed in all their premises, their absence or this protestation notwithstanding. And humbly beseeching your most excellent Majesty to command the Clark of that house of Peers to enter this their Petition and Protestation among his Records.
They will ever pray God to bless &c.
- John Eborac.
- Jho. Duresme.
- Ro. Co. Lich.
- Jos. Norw.
- Jo. Asaph.
- Guli. Ba. and Wells.
- Geo. Heref.
- Robt. Oxford.
- Ma. Eli.
- Godfry Glouc.
- Jo. Peterburg.
- Morice Landasf.
This instrument they delivered to Archbishop Williams, who according to their desire, his own counsel, and promise, at the next opportunity, presented it to his Majesty.
17. His Majesty would not meddle therewith in this dangerous juncture of time, (his great Council then sitting) but wholly remitted the matter to the Parliament. The next morning, a Privy-Counselor brought this protestation into the house, at the reading whereof the anti-episcopal party much triumphed, that the Bishops had gratified them with such an advantage against themselves, which their adversaries might wish, but durst not hope for heretofore. A conference is desired with the Commons in the painted Chamber, and therein concluded, that the Bishops should be impeached of high Treason, for endeavoring to subvert the fundamental laws of the land, and the very being of Parliaments.
18. Hereupon the next day the twelve subscribes were voted to be committed to the Tower, save that Bishop Morton of Durham, and Hall of Norwich, found some favor, partly in respect of their old age; and partly in regard of the great good they had done with their pens and preaching, to the Church of God: So that they alone were sent to the custody of the black rod. The rest being brought into the Tower, had that honor granted them in the prison which was denied them in the Parliament, to be esteemed equal with, yea above, temporal Lord's, as appeared by the fees demanded of them; Though in fine Sir John Biron Lieutenant of the Tower, proved very courteous in removing the rigor thereof. The Archbishop of Cant. by a civil message, excused himself for not conversing with them, because he was committed on a different account from them, and probably they might mutually fare the worse, for any intercourse. And here we leave them prisoners for eighteen weeks together, and proceed.
19. Now was the Bill against the Bishops sitting in Parliament brought up into the house of Lord's, and the matter agitated with much eagerness on both sides. Amongst those, who sided with them, none appeared in print more zealous, then the Lord Viscount Newwarke (afterward Earl of Kingstone, &c.) whose two speeches in Parliament although spoken some months before, yet for the entireness of the History may now seasonably be inserted.
I shall take the boldness to speak a word or two upon this subject, first as it is in itself, then as it is in the consequence: For the former, I think he is a great stranger in Antiquity, that is not well acquainted with that of their sitting here, they have done thus, and in this manner, almost since the conquest; and by the same power and the sameright the other Peers did, and your Lordships now do; and to be put from this their due, so much their due, by so many hundred years, strengthened and confirmed, and that without any offense, nay, pretence of any, seems to me to be very severe; if it be jus, I dare boldly say it is summum. That this hinders their Ecclesiastical vocation, an argument I hear much of, hath in my apprehension more of shadow than substance in it: if this be a reason, sure I am it might have been one six hundred years ago.
A Bishop, my Lord's, is not so circumscribed within the circumference of his Diocese, that his sometimes absence can be termed, no not in the most strict sense, a neglect or hindrance of his duty, no more then that of a Lieutenant from his County; they both have their subordinate Ministers, upon which their influences fall, though the distance be remote.
Besides, my Lord's, the lesser must yield to the greater good; to make wholesome and good Laws for the happy and well regulating of Church and Common-wealth, is certainly more advantageous to both, then the want of the personal execution of their office, and that but once in three years, & then peradventure but a month or two, can be prejudicall to either. I will go no further to prove this, which so long experience hath done so fully, so demonstratively.
And now my Lord's, by your Lordships good leave, I shall speak to the consequence as it reflects both on your Lordships, and my Lord's the Bishops. Dangers and inconveniences are ever best prevented e longinquo; this Precedent comes near to your Lordships, the bill indeed hath a direct aspect only upon them, but an oblique one upon your Lordships, and such a one, that mutato nomine de vobis. Pretences are never wanting, nay, sometimes the greatest evils appear in the most fair and specious outsides; witness the Ship-money, the most abominable, the most illegal thing that ever was, and yet this was painted over with color of the Law; What Bench is secure, if to allege be to convince, and which of your Lordships can say that he shall continue a member of this House, when at one blow six and twenty are cut off? It then behooves the Neighbor to look about him, cùm proximus ardet Ucalegon.
And for the Bishops, my Lord's, in what condition will you leave them? The House of Commons represents the meanest person, so did the Master his Slave, but they have none to do so much for them, and what justice can tie them to the observation of those Laws, to whose constitution they give no consent? the wisdom of former times gave proxies unto this House merely upon this ground, that everyone might have a hand in the making of that, which he had an Obligation to obey: This House could not represent, therefore proxies in room of persons were most justly allowed.
And now my Lord's, before I conclude, I beseech your Lordships to cast your eyes upon the Church, which I know is most dear and tender to your Lordships; you will see her suffer in her most principal members, and deprived of that honor which here and throughout all the Christian World ever since Christianity she constantly hath enjoyed; for what Nation or Kingdom is there in whose great and public assemblies, and that from her beginning, she had not some of hers, if I may not say as essential, I am sure I may say as integral parts thereof: and truly my Lord's, Christianity cannot alone boast of this, or challenge it only as hers, even Heathenism claims an equal share.
I never read of any of them, Civil or Barbarous, that gave not due honor to their Religion, so that it seems to me to have no other original, to flow from no other spring, then nature itself.
But I have done, and will trouble your Lordships no longer; how it may stand with the honor and justice of this house to pass this Bill, I most humbly submit unto your Lordships, the most proper and only Judges of them both.
I shall not speak to the preamble of the Bill that Bishops and Clergy-men ought not to intermeddle in temporal affairs. For, truly, My Lord's, I cannot bring it under any respect to be spoken of. Ought is a word of relation, and must either refer to Human or Divine Law: to prove the lawfulness of their intermedding by the former, would be to no more purpose, than to labor to convince that by reason, which is evident to sense. It is by all acknowledged. The unlawfulness by the later, the Bill by no means admits of, for, it excepts Universities and such persons as shall have honor descend upon them. And your Lordships know, that circumstance and chance alter not the nature and essence of a thing, nor can except any particular from an universal proposition by God himself delivered. I will therefore take these two as granted, first that they ought by our Law to intermeddle in Temporal affairs; secondly, that from doing so they are not inhibited by the Law of God, it leaves it at least as a thing indifferent. And now my Lord's, to apply myself to the business of the day, I shall consider the conveniency, and that in the several habitudes thereof. But, very briefly; first in that which it hath to them merely as men, quà tales: then as parts of the Commonwealth: Thirdly, from the best manner of constituting Laws: and lastly, from the practice of all times both Christian and Heathen.
Homo sum, nihil humanum à me alienum puto, was indeed the saying of the Comedian, but it might well have become the mouth of the greatest Philosopher. We allow to sense, all the works and operations of sense, and shall we restrain reason? Must only man be hindered from his proper actions? They are most fit to do reasonable things that are most reasonable. For, Science commonly is accompanied with conscience; so is not ignorance: they seldom or never meet. And why should we take that capacity from them, which God and nature have so liberally bestowed?
My Lord's, the politick body of the Common-wealth is analogical to the body natural: every member in that contributes something to the preservation of the whole, the superfluity or defect which hinders the performance of that duty, your Lordships know what the Philosopher calls, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , natures sin. And truly my Lord, to be part of the other body, and do nothing beneficial thereunto, cannot fall under a milder term. The Common-wealth subsists by Laws and their execution: and they that have neither head in the making, nor hand in the executing of them, confer not anything to the being or well being thereof. And can such be called members unless most unprofitable ones? only fruges consumere nati.
Me thinks it springs from nature itself, or the very depths of justice, that none should be tied by other laws then himself makes; for, what more natural and just, then to be bound only by his own consent? to be ruled by another's will is merely tyrannical. Nature there suffers violence, and man degenerates into beast. The most flourishing Estates were ever governed by Laws of an universal constitution; witness this our Kingdom, witness Senatus Populus{que} Romanus, the most glorious Common-wealth that ever was, and those many others in Greece and elsewhere of eternal memory.
Some things, my Lord's, are so evident in themselves that they are difficult in their proofs. Amongst them I reckon this conveniency I have spoken of: I will therefore use but a word or two more in this way. The long experience that all Christendom hath had hereof for these 1300. years, is certainly, argumentum ad hominem. Nay, my Lord's, I will go further (for the same reason runs through all Religions) never was there any Nation that employed not their religious men in the greatest affairs. But to come to the business that now lies before your Lordships. Bishops have voted here ever since Parliaments began, and long before were employed in the public. The good they have done your Lordships all well know, and at this day enjoy: for this I hope ye will not put them out, nor for the evil they may do, which yet your Lordships do not know, and I am confident never shall suffer. A position ought not to be destroyed by a supposition, & à posse ad esse non valet consequentia. My Lord's I have done with proving of this positively, I shall now by your good favors do it negatively in answering some inconveniences that may seem to arise.
For the Text, No man that wars intangles himself with the affairs of this life, which is the full sense of the word both in Greek and Latin, it makes not at all against them, except to intermeddle and entangle be terms equivalent. Besides my Lord's, though this was directed to a Church-man, yet it is of a general nature and reaches to all, Clergy and Laity, as the most learned and best expositors unanimously do agree. To end this, Argumentum symbolicum non est argumentativum.
It may be said that it is inconsistent with a spiritual vocation; Truly my Lord, Grace and Nature are in some respects incompatible, but in some others most harmoniously agree, it perfects nature, and raises it to a height above the common altitude, and makes it most fit for those great works of God himself, to make laws, to do Justice. There is then no inconsistency between themselves, it must arise out of Scripture, I am confident it doth not formally out of any place there, nor did I ever meet with any learned writer of these or other times that so expounded any Text.
But though in strict terms this be not inconsistent, yet it may peradventure hinder the duty of their other calling. My Lord's, there is not any that sits here, more for preaching then I am, I know it is the ordinary means to salvation, yet, I likewise know, there is not that full necessity of it as was in the primitive times. God defend that 1600 years acquaintance should make the Gospel of Christ no better known unto us. Neither, my Lord's, doth their office merely and wholly consist in preaching, but partly in that, partly in praying and administering the blessed Sacraments, in a godly and exemplary life, in wholesome admonitions, in exhortations to virtue, dehortations from vice, and partly in easing the burdened conscience. These my Lord's complete the office of a Churchman. Nor are they altogether tied to time or place, though I confess they are most properly exercised within their own verge, except upon good occasion, nor then the omission of some can be termed the breach of them all. I must add one more, an essential one, the very form of Episcopacy that distinguisheth it from the inferior Ministry, the orderly and good government of the Church: and how many of these, I am sure, not the last, my Lord's, is interrupted by their sitting here, once in 3 years, and then peradventure but a very short time: and can there be a greater occasion than the common good of the Church and State? I will tell your Lordships what the great and good Emperor Constantine did, in his expedition against the Persians, he had his Bishops with him, whom he consulted about his military affairs, as Eusebius has it in his life, lib. 4. c. 56.
Reward and punishment are the great negotiators in all worldly businesses; these may be said to make the Bishops swim against the stream of their consciences; And may not the same be said of the Laity? Have these no operations, but only upon them? Has the King neither frown, honor, nor offices, but only for Bishops? Is there nothing that answers their translations? Indeed my Lord's, I must needs say, that in charity it is a supposition not to be supposed; no nor in reason, that they will go against the light of their understanding. The holiness of their calling, their knowledge, their freedom from passions and affections to which youth is very obnoxious, their vicinity to the gates of death, which, though not shut to any, yet always stand wide open to old age: these my Lord's, will surely make them steer aright.
But of matter of fact there is no disputation, some of them have done ill, Crimine ab uno disce omnes, is a poetical not a logical argument. Some of the Judges have done so, some of the Magistrates, and Officers; and shall there be therefore neither Judge, Magistrate, nor Officer more? A personal crime goes not beyond the person that commits it, nor can another's fault be mine offense. If they have contracted any filth or corruption through their own or the vice of the times, cleanse and purge them thoroughly: But still remember the great difference between reformation and extirpation. And be pleased to think of your Trienniall Bill which will save you this labor for the time to come; fear of punishment will keep them in order, if they should not themselves through the love of virtue. I have now my Lord's, according to my poor ability, both shown the conveniences, and answered those inconveniences that seem to make against them. I should now propose those that make for them. As their falling into a condition worse then slaves, not represented by any, and then the dangers and inconveniences that may happen to your Lordships; but I have done this heretofore, and will not offer your Lordships, Cramben bis coctam.
These speeches (though they converted none of the opposite) confirmed those of the Episcopal party, making the Lord's very zealous in the Bishops behalf.
20. There were in the House, many other defenders of Episcopacy; as William, Lord Marques of Hartford; the Earl of Southampton, the Earl of Bristol, and the Lord Digby, his Son, and (the never to be forgotten) William, Earl of Bath, a learned Lord, and lover of learning, oftentimes on occasion, speaking for Bishops, once publicly prefessing it, one of the greatest Honors which ever happily happened to his family, that one thereof, ( Thomas Bourcher by name) was once dignified with the Archbishopric of Canterbury. Many other Lord's (though not haranging i • in long Orations, ) by their effectual Votes for Bishops, manifested their unfeigned affections unto them.
22. About this time, there were many vacant Cathedrals, which the King lately had, or now did furnish with new Bishops; Dr. Joseph Hall being removed from Exeter to Norwich, void by the death of Richard Montague, born in Westminster, bred in Eaton School, Fellow in Kings College; a great Grecian, and Church Antiquary, well read in the Fathers. But (all in his Diocese, not being so well skilled in Antiquity as himself) some charged him, with superstitious urging of Ceremonies, and being accused in Parliament, he appeared not (being very weak) but went a more compendious way, to answer all in the High-Court of Heaven.
22. As for new elected Bishops, his Majesty was most careful to choose them out of the most sound for Judgment, and blameless for Conversation.
- 1. Dr. John Prideaux, almost grown to the Kings-Professors-Chair in Oxford, he had set so long and close therein: Procuring by his painful and learned Lectures, deserved repute at home, and amongst Forain Protestants: he was made Bishop of Worcester.
- 2. D. Thomas Winniffo, Dean of St. Paul's; a grave, learned, and moderate Divine; made Bishop of Lincoln.
- 3. Dr. Ralph Brownrig, of most quick, and solid parts, equally eminent for disputing, and preaching, made Bishop of Exeter.
- 4. Dr. Henry King, acceptable on the account of his own merit, and on the score of a Pious, and popular Father, made Bishop of Chichester.
- 5. Dr. John Westfield, for many years the painful and profitable Preacher, of great St. Bartholomews London, made Bishop of Bristol. He died not long after.
Surely, si urbs defensa, fuisset his dextris, if Divine Providence had appointed, that Episcopacy (at this time) should have been kept up and maintained, more probable Persons for that purpose, could not have been picked out of England, so that envy and detraction might even feed on their own flesh, their teeth finding nothing in the aforesaid Elects to fasten upon.
23. But Episcopacy was so far from faring the better for them, that they fared the worse for it, insomuch that many, who much loved them in their Gowns, did not at all like them in their Rochets.
24. The Bill was again brought in, against Bishops Votes in Parliament, and that in a disadvantageous juncture of time, the Bishops then being under a threefold qualification.
- 1. Imprisoned in the Tower. Of these eleven besides Archbishop Laud, whose absence much weakened the party.
- 2. Lately Consecrated, and later inducted into the House of Lord's, as the Bishops of Worcester, Lincoln, Exeter, Chichester, Bristol, such their modesty, and manners, they conceived it fitting to practice their hearing, before speaking in the House. So that in some sort, they may be said, to have lost their Voices, before they found them in the Parliament.
- 3. The remainder of ancient Bishops, London, Salisbury, Bangor, &c. who seldom were seen (detained with other occasions) and more seldom heard in the Parliament.
So that the Adversaries of Episcopacy could not have obtained a fitter opportunity (the spirits of time at large being distilled thereinto) then in this very instant to accomplish their desires.
25. Only Dr. John Warner Bishop of Rochester, was he, in whom dying Episcopacy gave the last groan in the House of Lord's, one of good speech, and a cheerful spirit, and which made both, a good Purse, and which made all three, a good cause, as he conceived in his conscience, which made him very pertinently and valiantly defend the Antiquity and Justice of Bishops Votes in Parliament. This is he, of whose bounty many distressed souls since have tasted, whose reward no doubt is laid up for him in another World.
26. The main argument which was most insisted on, against their temporal Baronies, were the words of the Apostle, No man which warreth, entangleth himself with the affairs of this life. Their friends pleaded, 1. That the words equally concerned all Militant Christians, Bishops not being particularized therein. 2. That it was uncharitable to conclude their fingers more clasping of the World, or the World more glutinous to stick to their fingers, that they alone, of all persons, could not touch the World, but must be entangled therewith. But it was answered, that then, à fortiore, Clergy-men were concerned in the Text aforesaid not to meddle with Worldly matters, whose Governing of a whole Diocese, was so great an employment, that their attendance in Parliament must needs be detrimentall to so careful a vocation.
27. The Earl of Bristol engaged himself a valiant Champion in the Bishops behalf, he affirmed, that it was according to the Orders of the House, that no Bill being once cast out, should be brought in again at the same Sessions. Seeing therefore the Bill against Bishops Votes, had formerly been clearly carried by many decisive Votes for the Bishops, it was not only praeter, but contra Parliamentary, it should be brought again this Sessions.
28. But seeing this Parliament was extraordinary in the manner and continuance thereof (one Session being likely to last for many years ) it was not conceived fit they should be tied to the observance of such punctual niceties; and the resumption of the Bill was not only overruled by Votes, but also it was clearly carried in the Negative, that Bishops never more should vote as Peers in Parliament.
29. Nothing now wanted, save the Royal Assent, to pass the said Votes into a Law. The King appeared very unwilling therein, partly because he conceived it an injury, to give away the Bishops undoubted right, partly because he suspected, that the haters of the function, and lovers of the Lands of Bishops, would grow on his grants, and improve themselves on his concessions, so that such yielding unto them, would not satisfy their hunger, but quicken their Appetites to demand the more hereafter.
30. The importunity of others pressed upon him, that to prune off their Baronies, was the way to preserve their Bishoprics; that his Majesty lately obnoxious to the Parliament, for demanding the five Members, would now make plenary satisfaction, and give such assurance of his affections for the future, that all things would answer his desired expectation. This was set home unto him, by some (not the farthest ) relations, insomuch that at last he signed the Bill, as he was in St. Augustine's in Canterbury, passing with the Queen towards Dover, then undertaking her voyage into the Low-Countries.
31. Many expected, and more desired that the Kings condescension herein should put a period unto all differences. But their expectations were frustrate, and not long after the King apprehending himself in danger by tumults, deserted Whitehall, went into the North, erected his Standard at Nottingham, Edge-Hill -field was fought, and much English blood on both sides shed in several battles. But I seasonably remember that the Church is my Castle, viz. that the writing thereof is my House and Home, wherein I may stand on my own defense against all who assault me. It was good counsel King Joash gave to King Amaziah, Tarry at home. The practice whereof shall I hope secure me from many mischiefs.
32. About this time the word Malignant, was first born (as to the Common use ) in England; the deduction thereof being disputable, whether from malus ignis bad fire; or, malum lignum, bad fuel; but this is sure, betwixt both, the name made a combustion all over England. It was fixed as a note of disgrace on those of the Kings party, and (because one had as good be dumb, as not speak with the Volge ) possibly in that sense it may occur in our ensuing History. However the Royalists plead for themselves, that Malignity (a Scripture word ) properly denoteth activity in doing evil, whereas they being ever since on the suffering side, in their Persons, Credits, and Estates, conceive the name improperly applied unto them. Which plea the Parliamentary-party smile at instead of answering, taking notice of the affections of the Royalists, how Malignant they would have appeared, if success had befriended them.
33. Contemporary with Malignant, was the word, Plunder, which some make of Latin original, from planum dare, to level, or plane all to nothing. Others make it of Duch extraction, as if it were to plume or pluck the feathers of a Bird to the bare skin. Sure I am, we first heard thereof in the Swedish wars, and if the name and thing be sent back from whence it came, few English eyes would weep thereat.
34. By this time ten of the eleven Bishops, formerly subscribing their protestation to the Parliament, were (after some months durance) upon good bale given) released; two of them, finding great favor in their fees from the Lieutenant of the Tower, in respect of their great charge, and small estate. These now at liberty severally disposed themselves; some went home to their own Diocese, as the Bishops, of Norwich, Oxford, &c. Some continued in London, as the Bishop of Durham, not so rich in Age, as in all commendable Episcopal qualities. Some withdrew themselves into the Kings quarters; as Archbishop Williams, &c. Only Bishop Wren was still detained in the Tower, where his long imprisonment, (being never brought in to a public answer) hath converted many of his adversaries into a more charitable opinion of him.
35. The Bishops Votes in Parliament, being dead, and departed, (neither to be helped with flattery, nor hurt with malice ) one word of enquiry in what notion, they formerly voted in Parliament.
| Whether, as a distinct third Estate of the Clergy, or, | Whether, as so many single Barons in their temporal capacity. |
|
This was formerly received for a truth, countenanced with some passages in the old Statutes, reckoning the Lord's spiritual, and Lord's temporal, and the Commons, to be the three Estates, the King, (as Paramount of all) not comprehended therein. |
This is maintained by those, who account the King, the Lord's, and Commons the three Estates, amongst which Lord's the Bishops (though spiritual persons ) appeared as so many temporal Barons: Whose absence, is no whit prejudicial to the Acts past in Parliament. |
Some of the Aged Bishops had their Tongues so used to the language of a third Estate, that more then once they ran on that [reputed] Rock, in their Speeches, for which they were publicly shent, and enjoined an acknowledgement of their mistake.
36. The Convocation now not sitting, and matters of Religion many being brought under the Cognizance of the Parliament, their Wisdomes adjudged it, not only convenient but necessary, that some prime Clergy-man might be consulted with. In order whereunto, they resolved, to select some out of all Counties, whom they conceived best qualified, for their design herein, and the first of July was the day appointed for their meeting.
SECTION IX.
To Mr
-
Giles Vandepit Clegat
-
Peter Matthews
of London Merchants.
A Threefold Cable is not easily broken, and a Triplicate of Friends may be presumed effectual to protect my endeavors. Of whom two are of Dutch, the third in the midst of English Extraction, not falling there by casual confusion, but placed by designed Conjunction. Me thinks it is a good sight, to behold the Dutch embracing the English, and this Dedication may pass for the Emblem of the late Agreement, which God long continue, if for the mutual good of both Nations.
1. WHen on this day the Assembly of Divines, to consult about matters of Religion, met at Westminster in the Chapel of King Henry the Seventh. Then the constitution of this Assembly, as first elected, and designed, was to consist of about one hundred and twenty persons chosen by the Parliament (without respect of Dioceses ) in relation to Shires, two or more of a County. They thought it not safe to entrust the Clergy with their own choice, of whose general corruption they constantly complained, and therefore adjudged it unfit that the Distempered Patients should be or choose their own Physicians.
2. These Elects were of four several natures, as the quarters of the same body, easily distinguishable by these conditions or opinions.
First, men of Episcopal persuasion, as the Right Reverend James Usher Arch-Bishop of Armagh, Doctor Browmrig Bishop of Exeter, Doctor Westfield Bishop of Bristol, D r Daniel Featly, D r Richard Holdsworth &c.
Secondly, such who in their judgments favored the Presbyterian Discipline, or in process of time were brought over to embrace it, amongst whom (to mention those who seemed to be pillars, as on whose abilities the weight of the work most lay) we take special notice of.
-
Dr Hoyle Divinity Professor in Ireland.
-
-
Cambridge.
- D r Thomas Gouge of Black-Friars.
- D r Smith of Barkeway.
- M r Oliver Boules.
- M r Thomas Gataker.
- M r Henry Scudder.
- M r Anthony Tuckeners.
- M r Steven Marshall.
- M r John Arrowsmith.
- M r Herbert Palmer.
- M r Thomas Throughgood.
- M r Thomas Hill.
- M r Nathanael Hodges.
- M r Gibbons.
- M r Timothy Young.
- M r Richard Vincs.
- M r Thomas Coleman.
- M r Matthew Newcomen.
- M r Jeremiah Whitaker. &c.
-
-
Oxford.
- D r William Twisse.
- D r Cornelius Burgess.
- D r . Stanton.
- M r White of Dorchester.
- M r Harris of Hanwell.
- M r Edward Reynolds.
- M r Charles Herl.
- M r Corbet of Merton College.
- M r Conant.
- M r Francis Cheinell.
- M r Obadiah Sedgewick.
- M r Cartar Senior.
- M r Cartar Junior.
- M r Joseph Caryll.
- M r Strickland. &c.
I hope an et caetera (so distasteful elsewhere) may be permitted in the close of our Catalogue, and am confident that the rest here omitted as unknown unto me will take no exception. The like assurance I have, that none will cavil if not reckoned up in their just Seniority, both because they know I was none of the Register that entered their Admissions in the Universities, and because it may savor something of a Prelatical spirit to be offended about praecedencie.
Thirdly, some zealous Ministers, who formerly disliking conformity, to avoid the censures of Episcopal Consistories removed themselves beyond the Seas, chiefly to Holland, where some had plentiful, all comfortable subsistence, whence they returned home at the beginning of this Parliament. These afterwards proved Dissenting Brethren to some transactions in the Assembly, as Tho: Goodwin, Sidrach Symson, Philip Nye &c.
Fourthly, some members of the house of Lord's and Commons, were mingled amongst them, and voted jointly in their consultations, as the Earl of Pembroke, the Lord Say. The most learned Antiquary M r John Selden. M r Francis Rouse, M r Bulstrode Whitlock &c.
Thus was this Assemblie (as first chosen and intended) a Qwint-Essence of four Parties. Some conceive so motly a meeting promised no good results, whilst others grounded their hopes on what was the motive of the former to despair. The Miscellaneous nature of the Assembly. For what speedier way to make peace in a Distracted Church, then to take in all Interests to consult together. It had been little better then a Spiritual Monopolie, only to employ those of one Party, whilst if all men's Arguments, Objections Complaints, Desires, be indifferently admitted, an Expedient may be the sooner found out for their just and general satisfaction.
3. So much for the English party of this Assembly. For know, that Commissioners from Scotland were joined with them; some of the Nobility, as the Earl of Lothian, The Lord Lauderdale, The Lord Warristone. Others of the Clergy, as M r Alexander Henderson, M r . Galasphie &c. So that as Livy calleth the general meeting of Aetolia Pan-Aetol • um, this Assembly endeavored to put on the face of Pan-Britanicum, that the walls of the Palace wherein they met might in some sort be like the waves of the Sea, with the compass whereof they lived, as surrounding one Island and two Nations.
4. D r Twisse preached the first Sermon at the meeting of the Assembly, though the Schools not the Pulpit was his proper Element, (witness his Controversal writings ) and in his sermon he exhorted them faithfully to discharge their high calling to the glory of God and the honor of his Church. He much bemoaned that one thing was wanting, namely the Royal assent to give comfort and encouragement to them. Yet he hoped that by the efficacy of their fervent prayers, it might in due time be obtained, and that a happy union might be procured betwixt him and the Parliament. Sermon ended, the Ordinance was read, by which was declared the cause, ground, and intent of their Convention, namely, to consult with the Parliament for the settling of Religion, and Church-government: Then the list of their names was called over who were appointed to be present there, and a mark, (but no penalty) set on such who appeared not at the time prefixed.
5. The appearance of the persons elected answered not expectation, seeing of an hundred and twenty, but sixty nine were present, and those in Coats and Cloaks, of several forms and fashions, so that D r Westfield and some few others seemed the only Non-conformists amongst them, for their conformity whose gowns and Canonical habits differed from all the rest. For of the first sort of Royalists, Episcopal in their judgments very few appeared, and scarce any continued any time in the House (save D r Daniel Featly, of whom hereafter) alleging privately several reasons for their absence or Departure.
- 1. First, they had no call from the King, (having read how anciently the breath of Christian Emperors gave the first being to Councils ) Yea some on my knowledge had from his Majesty a flat command to the contrary.
- 2. They were not chosen by the Clergy, and so could not appear as Representatives, but in their personal capacities.
- 3. This meeting seemed set up to pluck down the Convocation (now neither sitting, nor legally dissolved) which solemnly was summoned for Ecclesiastical affairs.
- 4. If appearing there they should be beheld by the rest (what Joseph charged on his Brethren ) as spies come thither to see the nakedness of the Assembly.
- 5. Being few, they should easily be out-voted by the Opposite Party, and so only worn as Countenances to credit their proceedings.
However I have heard many of both Parties desire, that those Defenders of the Hierarchy had afforded their presence, as hoping that their learning and abilities, their temper and moderation might have conduced much to mitigate some violence and extremity in their proceedings. But God in his all ordering providence saw it unfitting, and whether or no any good had been effected by them, if present (seeing as yet no law to order men's conjectures) is left to the liberty of every man's opinion.
6. Soon after, the Assembly was completely constituted with all the Essentials thereunto, D r Twisse Prolocutor, M r Roborough and Adoniram Byfield, their Scribes and Notaries; And now their good success (next to the Parliaments ) was publicly prayed for by the Preachers in the City, and books dedicated unto them, under the title of the most Sacred Assembly, which because they did not disavow, by others they were interpreted to approve, four shillings a day sallary was allowed them, much too little as some thought for men of their merit, others grumbling at it as too much for what by them was performed. And now what place more proper for the building of Zion (as they propounded it,) then the Chamber of Jerusalem (the fairest in the Deans Lodgings, where King Henry the fourth died, and) where these Divines did daily meet together.
7. Be it here remembered, that some (besides those Episcopally affected ) chosen to be at this Assembly notwithstanding absented themselves, pretending age, indisposition, &c. as it is easy for able unwillingness to find out excuses, and make them probable. Fit it was therefore so many evacuities should be filled up, to mount the Meeting to a competent number and Assemblies, as well as Armies when grown thin, must be recruited. Hence it was that at several times the Lord's and Commons added more Members unto them, by the name of the Super-added Divines. Some of these though equal to the former in power, were conceived to fall short in parts, as chosen rather by the affections of others, then for their own abilities, the Original members of the Assembly not overpleased thereat, such addition making the former rather more, then more considerable.
8. One of the first public Acts, which I find by them performed, was the humble presenting of a Petition to both Houses, for the appointing of a solemn fast to be generally observed. And no wonder if their request met with fair acceptance, and full performance, seeing the Assemblies Petition, was the Parliaments intention and this solemn suite of the Divines did not create new, but quicken the old resolutions in both Houses, presently a Fast is appointed, and accordingly kept on the following Friday, M r Boules and M r Newcomen (whose sermons are since printed) preaching on the same, and all the rest of the particulars promised to be taken into speedy consideration.
9. It was now projected to find out some Band or Tie, for the straiter Union of the English and Scottish amongst themselves, and both to the Parliament. In order whereunto the Covenant was now presented. This Covenant was of Scottish extraction, born beyond Tweed, but now brought to be bred on the South-side thereof.
10. The House of Commons in Parliament, and the Assembly of Divines solemnly took the Covenant at S t . Margaret's in Westminster.
11. It was ordered by the Commons in Parliament that this Covenant be forthwith printed and published.
12. Divers Lord's, Knights, Gentlemen, Collonels, Officers, Soldiers and others, then residing in the City of London met at S t Margaret's in Westminster, and there took the said Covenant. M r Coleman preaching a Sermon before them concerning the piety and legality thereof.
13. It was commanded by the authority of both Houses, that the said Covenant on the Sabbath day ensuing, should be taken in all Churches and Chapels of London within the lines of Communication, and throughout the Kingdom in convenient time appointed thereunto, according to the Tenour following.
A Solemn league and Covenant, for Reformation and defense of Religion, the honor and happiness of the King, and the peace and safety of the three Kingdoms, of England, Scotland, and Ireland.
WE Noblemen, Barons, Knights, Gentlemen, Citizens, Burgesses, Ministers of the Gospel, and Commons, of all sorts in the Kingdom of England, Scotland, and Ireland, by the providence of God living under one King, and being of one Reformed Religion, having before our eyes the glory of God, and the advancement of the Kingdom of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the honor and happiness of the Kings Majesty and his posterity, and the true public liberty, safety and peace of the Kingdom, wherein every ones private condition is included; And calling to mind the Treacherous and Bloody Plots, Conspiracies, attempts, and Practises of the enemies of God, against the true Religion and the professors thereof in all places, especially in these three Kingdoms ever since the Reformation of Religion, and how much their rage, power, and presumption are of late, and at this time increased and exercised, whereof the deplorable estate of the Church and Kingdom of Ireland, the distressed estate of the Church and Kingdom of England, the dangerous estate of the Church and Kingdom of Scotland, are present and public Testimonies. We have now at last after (other means of Supplications, Remonstrances, Protestations, and sufferings ) for the preservation of our selves and our Religion from utter ruin and destruction, according to the commendable practices of these Kingdoms in former times, and the example of God's people in other nations, after mature deliberation resolved and determined to enter into a mutual solemn League and Covenant, wherein we all subscribe, and each one of us for himself, with our hands lifted up to the most High God do swear.
That we shall sincerely, really, and constantly, through the grace of God endeavor in our several places and callings, the preservation of the reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in Doctrine, Worship, Discipline, and Government, against our common enemies, the Reformation of Religion in the Kingdoms of England and Ireland, in Doctrine, Worship, Discipline, and Government, according to the word of God, and the example of the best reformed Churches, and shall endeavor to bring the Churches of God in the three Kingdoms to the nearest conjunction, and uniformity in Religion, Confession of Faith, form of Church-Government, directory for Worship and Catechizing; That we and our posterity after us may as Brethren live in faith and love, and the Lord may delight to dwell in the midst of us.
That we shall in like manner without respect of persons endeavor the extirpation of Popery, Prelacie, that is, Church-government by Arch-Bishops, Bishops, their Chancellors, and Commissaries, Deans, Deans and Chapters, Arch-Deacons and all other Ecclesiastical Officers, depending on that Hierarchy, Superstition, Heresy, Schism, Profaneness, and whatsoever shall be found to be contrary to sound Doctrine, and the power of godliness; lest we partake in other men's sins, and thereby be in danger to receive of their plagues, and that the Lord may be one, and his name one in the three Kingdoms.
We shall with the same sincerity, reality, and constancy in our several Vocations, endeavor with our estates and lives mutually to preserve the Rights and privileges of the Parliaments, and the due liberties of the kingdoms, and to preserve, and defend the Kings Majesty his person and authority, in the preservation and defense of the true Religion, and liberties of the Kingdoms, that the world may bear witness with our consciences of our loyalty, and that we have no thoughts or intentions to diminish his Majesty's just power and greatness.
We shall also with all faithfulness endeavor the discovery of all such as have been or shall be Incendiaries, Malignants, or evil instruments by hindering the Reformation of Religion, dividing the King from his people, or one of the Kingdoms from another, or making any faction or parties amongst the people contrary to this League and Covenant, that they may be brought to public trial, and receive condign punishment, as the degree of their offenses shall require or deserve, or the supreme Judicatories of both Kingdoms respectively, or others having power from them for that effect shall judge convenient.
And whereas the happiness of a blessed peace between these Kingdoms, denied in former times to our progenitors, is by the good providence of God granted unto us, and hath been lately concluded, and settled by both Parliaments, we shall each one of us according to our place, and interest, endeavor that they remain conjoined in a firm peace and union to all posterity, and that justice may be done upon the willful opposers thereof in manner expressed in the precedent Article.
We shall also according to our places and callings, in this common cause of Religion, liberty, and peace of the Kingdoms, assist, and defend all those that enter into this league and Covenant, in the maintaining and pursuing thereof, and shall not suffer ourselves directly, or indirectly, by whatsoever combination, persuasion, or terror to be divided, and withdrawn from this blessed Conjunction and union, whether to make defection to the contrary part, or to give ourselves to a detestable indifferency or neutrality in this cause, which so much concerneth the glory of God, the good of the Kingdoms, and honor of the King, but shall all the days of our lives zealously and constantly endeavor to continue therein against all opposition, and promote the same according to our power against all lets and impediments whatsoever; and what we are not able of ourselves to suppress or overcome, we shall reveal and make known, that it may be timely prevented or removed. All which we shall do as in the sight of God.
And because these Kingdoms are guilty of many sins and provocations against God, and his Son Jesus Christ, as is too manifest by our present distresses and dangers, the fruits thereof; We profess and declare before God and the world, our unfeigned desire to be humbled for our own sins, and for the sins of these Kingdoms, especially that we have not as we ought valued the inestimable benefit of the Gospel, that we have not labored for the purity and power thereof, and that we have not endeavored to receive Christ in our hearts, nor to walk worthy of him in our lives, which are the causes of other sins and transgressions so much abounding amongst us, and our true and unfeigned purpose, desire and endeavor for ourselves, and all others under our charge, both in public and in private, in all duties we owe to God and man, to amend our lives, and each one to go before another in the example of a real reformation, that the Lord may turn away his wrath and heavy indignation, and establish these Churches and Kingdoms in truth and peace. And this Covenant we make in the presence of Almighty God the searcher of all hearts, with a true intention to perform the same, as we shall answer at the great day, when the secrets of all hearts shall be disclosed, most humbly beseeching the Lord to strengthen us by his Holy Spirit to this end, and to bless our desires and proceedings with such success, as may be deliverance and safety to his people, and encouragement to other Christian Churches groaning under, or in danger of the yoke of Anti-Christian Tyranny, to join in the same or like Association and Covenant, to the glory of God, the enlargement of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, and the peace and tranquility of Christian Kingdoms, and Commonwealths.
We listen not to their fancy, who have reckoned the words in the Covenant, six hundred sixty six, Preface and Conclusion, as only circumstantial appendants, not accounted, and esteem him who trieth it, as well at leisure (aliàs as idle) as he that first made the observation. Much less applaud we their parallel, who (the number in branches agreeing) compare it to the superstitious and cruel Six Articles enacted by King Henry the Eighth. But let us consider the solid and serious exceptions alleged against it, not so light and slight as to be puffed away with the breath of the present age, but whose weight is likely to sink them down to the consideration of posterity.
14. First, seeing this Covenant (though not as first penned ) as Prosecuted had heavy penalties inflicted on the refusers thereof, such pressing is inconsistent with the nature of any Contract; wherein consent, not constraint is presumed. In a Covenant men should go of their own good 〈◊〉 , or be led by persuasions, not drawn by frights and fears, much less driven by forfeits and punishments.
15. Secondly, Subjects are so far from having the express or tacit consent of the King for the taking thereof, that by public Proclamation he hath forbidden the same. Now seeing Parents had power by the law of God to rescind such vows which their children made without their privity: by the equity of the same law this Covenant is void, if contrary to the flat command of him who is Parens Patriae.
16. Many words occur in this Covenant, some obsure, others of doubtful meaning, viz. Common enemies, Best-Reformed-Churches, Malignants, Highest Judicatories of both Kingdoms &c. Untill therefore the obscure be cleared, the doubtful stated and fixed, the same cannot (as it ought) be taken in judgment.
Exceptions to the Preface.
Therein it is suggested, that Supplications, Remonstrance, Protestations to the King, were formerly used; which proving ineffectual, occasioned the trying of this Covenant, as the last hopeful means to preserve Religion from ruin &c. Now, seeing many joined neither with their hands nor hearts in presenting these writings, such persons scrupled this Covenant, which they cannot take in truth, because founded on the failing of the aforesaid means, to the using whereof they concurred not in the laast degree.
17. It is pretended in the Preface, that this Covenant is according to the commendable practice of these Kingdoms in former times. Whereas indeed it is new in itself, following no former Precedents; a grand Divine of the Parliament-party publicly professing, that, We read not either in Divine or Hamane Histories, the like Oath extant in any age, as to the matter, persons, and other circumstances thereof.
Exceptions to the First Article.
18. They are unsatisfied to swear, to maintain the Preservation of the Reformed Religion of Scotland, in Doctrine, Worship, Discipline, and Government, as being ignorant (such their distance thence, and small intelligence there) of the particulars thereof. They are loath therefore to make a blind promise, for fear of a lame performance.
19. As for the Reforming of Religion (which necessarily implies a changing thereof) of England, and Ireland, in Doctrine, Worship, Discipline, and Government; they cannot consent thereunto without manifest scandal, both to Papists and Separatists. For (besides that they shall desert that just cause, which many pious Martyrs, Bishops, and Divines of our Church, have defended both with their ink and blood, writings and sufferings ) hereby they shall advantage the cavils of Papists against our Religion, taxing it of uncertainty, not knowing where to fix our feet, as always altering the same. Yea, they shall not only supply Papists with pleas for their Recusancy, Sectaries for their Separation, acknowledging something in our Church-Doctrine and Service, not well agreeing with God's-word; but also shall implicitly confess Papists unjustly punished by the Penal-Statutes, for not conforming with us to the same Public-Service, wherein some things are by ourselves, as well as them, misliked and disallowed.
20. Nor can they take this Covenant without injury and perjury to themselves. Injurie, by insnaring their consciences, credits, and estates, if endeavoring to reform Religion (under the notion of faulty and vicious) to which formerly they had subscribed, enjoined thereto by the Law of the Land, not yet abrogated, never as yet checked by the regrets of their own consciences, nor confuted by the reasons of others for the doing thereof.
21. Perjury, as contrary to the Protestation and solemn vow they had lately taken, and Oath of Supremacy, swearing therein to defend all the Kings Rights and Privileges, whereof His Spiritual Jurisdiction in reforming Church-matters, is a principal. Now, although a latter oath may be corroborative of the former, or constructive of a new obligation consistent therewith, yet can it not be inductive of a tie, contrary to an oath lawfully taken before.
Exceptions to the Second Article.
22. It grieveth them therein to see Prelacy so unequally yoke'd; Popery being put before it; Superstition, Heresy, Schism, and Profaneness following after. Such the pleasure of those that placed them, though nothing akin in themselves. But a captive by the power of others may be fettered to those whom he hates and abhors.
Consent they cannot to the extirpation of Prelacy, neither in respect,
-
Of
- 1 The thing itself, being persuaded that neither Papal Monarchy, nor Presbyterian Democracy, nor Independant Anarchy are so conformable to the Scriptures as Episcopal Aristocracy, being if (not of Divine in a strict sense) of Apostolical Institution, confirmed with Church-practice (the best Comment on Scripture when obscure) for 1500 years, and bottomed on the same foundation with Infants-Baptism, National Churches, observing the Lord's-day, and the like.
-
2
Themselves,
of
whom,
- 1 All when taking degrees in the University.
- 2 Most, as many as are entered into Holy-Orders
- 3 Not a few when lately petitioning the Parliament for the continuing of Episcopacy
-
4 Some being members of Cathedral,
and Collegiate Churches
- have subscribed with their hands, and with their corporal oaths avowed the justification and defense of that government.
- 3 Church of England, fearing many mischiefs from this alteration, (felt sooner than seen in all great and sudden changes) especially because the Ecclesiastical Government is so interwoven in many Statutes of the land. And, if Schisms so increase on the Suspension, what is to be expected on the Extirpation of Episcopacy.
-
4 His Majesty,
-
as contrary to
their
Oath
of
Supremacy,
wherein they
were bound
to maintain
His
- Privileges, amongst which a principal is, that He is Supreme moderator over all Causes and Persons Spiritual, wherein no change is to be attempted without his consent.
- Dignity, The Collations of Bishoprics and Deanries, with their profits in their vacancies belonging unto Him, and the First-fruits and Tenths of Ecclesiastical Dignities, a considerable part of the Royal Revenue.
-
as contrary to
their
Oath
of
Supremacy,
wherein they
were bound
to maintain
His
Here we omit their Plea, whose chief means consisting of Cathedral preferment, allege the like not done from the beginning of the world, that men (though deserving deprivation for their offenses) should be forced to swear sincerely, seriously, and from their souls, to endeavor the rooting out of that, whence their best livelihood doth depend.
Exceptions against the Third Article.
23. It grieveth them herein to be sworn, to the Preservation of the Privileges of Parliament, and liberties of the Kingdom, at large and without any restriction, being bound in the following words to defend the Kings person and Authority, as limited in the preservation and defense of true Religion, and the Liberties of the Realm; enlarging the former, that the later may be the more confined.
24. They are jealous what should be the cause of the inversion of the method, seeing in the Solemn Vow and Protestation, the Defense of the Kings Person and Authority is put first, which in this Covenant is postposed to the Privileges of Parliament. However, seeing the Protestation was first taken, the Covenant as the younger cannot disinherit the elder, of the possession which it hath quietly taken in men's consciences.
Exceptions to the Fourth Article.
25. They are unsatisfied whether the same imposeth not a necessity for children to prosecute their Parents even to death, under the notion of Malignants against all rules of Religion and humanity. For even in case of Idolatry, children under the old law were not bound publicly to accuse their Parents, so as to bring them to be stoned for the same; though such unnatural cruelty be foretold by our Savior, to fall out under the Gospel, of those that shall rise up against their Parents, and cause them to be put to death.
Exceptions to the Fifth Article.
26. They understand not what is meant therein by the happiness of a blessed peace betwixt these Kingdoms, whereof Ireland must needs be one, whilst the same is rent with a woeful war, and the other two lands distracted with homebred discords: whereof no settlement can be hoped until first all interests be equally stated, and the Kings Authority, Privileges of Parliament, and Liberties of Subjects justly bounded, and carefully preserved.
Exceptions to the Sixth Article.
27. They are unsatisfied therein as wholly hypothetical, supposing what as yet is not cleared by solid arguments, viz. that this is the common cause of Religion, Liberty, and peace of the Realms &c. And if the same be granted, it appeareth not to their conscience, that the means used to promote this Cause, are so lawful and free from just objections which may be raised from the Laws of God and man.
Exceptions to the Conclusion.
28. They quake at the mention, that the taking of this Covenant should encourage other Churches groaning under the yoke of Antichristian Tyranny, to join in the same, fearing the dangerous consequences this may produce to foreign Protestants, and enrage Popish Princes (in whose Dominions they live) to cruelty against them, as disaffected to their Government. Besides, when Divine Providence layeth such burdens on his servants, even the yoke of Antichrist is then the yoke of Christ, not to be thrown off with force, but to be born with the confession of the truth, prayers, patience, and Christian courage.
29. So much concerning the Covenant, which some three months after began to be rigorously and generally urged. Nor have I ought else to observe thereof, save to add in mine own defense, that I never saw the same, except at distance as hung up in Churches, nor ever had any occasion to read, or hear it read, till this day in writing my History, what ever hath been reported and printed to the contrary, of my taking thereof in London, who went away from the Savoy to the Kings quarters, long before any mention thereof in England.
30. True it is, there was an Oath which never exceeded the Line of Communication, meeting with so much opposition that it expired in the infancy thereof, about the time when the plot was discovered, for which M r Tomkins and M r Chaloner suffered. This was tendered to me, and taken by me in the Vestry of the Savoy-Church, but first protesting some limitations thereof to myself. This not satisfying was complained of by some persons present, to the Parliament, where it was ordered, that the next Lord's-day I should take the same oath in terminis terminantibus, in the face of the Church, which not agreeing with my conscience, I withdrew myself into the Kings parts, which (I hope) I may no less safely, than I do freely confess, because punished for the same with the loss of my livelihood, and since (I suppose) pardoned in the Act of Oblivion.
31. Now began the great and general purgation of the Clergy in the Parliaments quarters, many being outed for their misdemeanors by the Committee appointed for that purpose. Some of their offenses were so foul, it is a shame to report them, crying to Justice for punishment. Indeed Constantine the Christian Emperor was wont to say; If I see a Clergy-man offending, I will cover him with my cloak, but surely he meant such offenses as are frailties, and infirmities, no scandalous enormities. Such unsavory salt is good for nothing no not for the dunghill, because as the savor is lost which makes it useful, so the fretting is left, which makes it useless, whereby it is so far from being good compost to fatten ground, that it doth rather embarren it. Let Baal therefore plead for itself, nothing can be said in their Excuse, if (what was the main matter) their crimes were sufficiently proved.
32. But as to the point, hear what the Royal • sts at Oxford say for their Friends, whilst they conceive themselves to take just exceptions at the proceedings against these Ministers.
- 1. Some of their faults were so foul, that the foulness of them, is all that can be pleaded for them. For being Capital, the persons deserved to be outed of life, not of living, which leaves a suspicion of imperfect proof.
- 2. The Witnesses against them were seldom deposed on oath, but their bare complaints believed.
- 3. Many of the Complainers were factious people (those most accusing their Sermons who least heard them) and who since have deserted the Church, as hating the Profession of the Ministry.
- 4. Many were charged with delivering false-Doctrine, whose positions were sound, at the least disputable. Such those accused for preaching that Baptism Washeth away Original sin, which the most Learned, and honest in the Assembly in some sense will not deny, namely, that in the Children of God it cleanseth the condemning, and final peaceable commanding power of Original sin, though the stain and blemish thereof doth still remain.
- 5. Some were merely outed for their affections to the Kings cause, and what was malignity at London, was Loyalty at Oxford.
Yea many moderate men of the Opposite Party, much bemoaned such severity, that some Clergy-men, blameless for life, and Orthodox for Doctrine, were only ejected on the account of their faithfulness to the Kings Cause. And as much corruption was let out by this Ejection (many Scandalous Ministers deservedly punished) so at the same time the veins of the English Church were also emptied of much good blood (some inoffensive Pastors ) which hath made her Body Hydropical ever since, ill humors succeeding in the room, by reason of too large and sudden evacuation. But others of a more violent temper excused all, the present necessity of the Cause requiring it. All Pulpits in the Parliament quarters must be made like the whole earth before the building of Babel, of one language, and of one speech, or else all may be destroyed by the mixture of other Doctrines. And better a mischief to few, then an inconvenience to all. Safer that some (suppose unjustly) suffer, then that the success of the whole cause should be endangered.
33 Then came forth a Book called the First Century, containing the names of an hundred Divines sequestered for their faults with a promise of a second, which to my knowledge never came forth. Whether because the Author of the former was sensible that the subject was generally odious, or because the death of M r White, Licenser thereof, prevented any addition, or whether because dissuaded from the Design, suspecting a retaliation from Oxford. Sure I have been informed, that when some solicited his Majesty for leave to set forth a Book of the vicious lives of some Parliament Ministers, His Majesty blasted the design, partly because recrimination is no purgation, partly least the Public enemy of the Protestant Religion should make an advantage thereof.
34. To supply the vacant places, many young Students (whose Orders got the speed of their Degrees ) left the Universities. Other Ministers turned Duallists and Pluralists, it being now charity, what was formerly coveto • sness, to hold two or three Benefices. These could plead for themselves, the practice of M r Sanders the Martyr, who held two Livings at good distance, because he could not resign one but into the hands of a Papist, as these men would not surrender them to Malignants. Many Vicaridges of great Cure, but small value were without Ministers, (whilst rich matches have many Suitors, they may die Virgins that have no portions to prefer them) which was often complained of, seldom redressed, it passing for a currant maxim, it was safer for people to fast then to feed on the poison of Malignant Pastors.
35. Let us now look a little into the Assembly of Divines, where we shall not find them (as we might justly expect) all of one tongue and of one language, there being some not concurring with the major part, and therefore styled Dissenting Brethren. I know the Scotchs Writers call them of the Separation, but because mollifying terms are the best Poultesses to be applied to the first swellings of Church-differences, we decline these words of distaste. They are also commonly called Independents, though they themselves (if summoned by that name) will return to Vouz avez thereunto, as to a word odious and offensive in the common seund and notation thereof. For Independency taken for absolute subsistence
-
Without relation to
- 1 God
- 2 King or State
- 3 Other Churches
-
4 Particular Christians
- is
- Profane & Blasphemous.
- Seditious and Treacherous.
- Proud and Ambitious.
- Churlish and Uncharitable.
These Dissenting Brethren or Congregationalists were but five in the Assembly, though many more of their judgments dispersed in the land.
- 1 Namely, Thomas Goodwin bred first in Christ's-Col, then fellow of Katherine Hall in Cambridge.
- 2 Philip Nye, who had his education in Oxford.
-
William Bridge,
fellow of
Immanuel College
in
Cambridge.
- all three still alive.
- 4 Sidrach Simson, of Queens
-
5
Jeremiah Burroughs,
of
Immanuel
- Col. in Cambridge, both deceased.
It is our unhappiness, that in writing their story, we have little save what we have collected out of the writings of pens professedly engaged against them, and therefore the less credit is to be given thereunto However in this Narration there is nothing of my own, so that if any falsehoods therein, they must be charged on their account whom the Reader shall behold cited in the margin. Otherwise I confess my personal respects to some of the afore named dissenters, for favors received from them.
36. Some ten years since the sinful corruptions (to use their own language) of the worship and government in this Church, taking hold on their consciences, unable any longer to comport therewith, they deserted their Native Country. This we believe the true cause of their departure, not what some suggest, that one for debt, and another for danger (to answer some ill interpreted words concerning the Scots ) were forced to forsake the Land, And although I will not say they left not an hoof of their Estates behind them here, they will confess they conveyed over the most considerable part thereof. Many wealthy Merchants and their families went over with them, so that of all Exiles (for so they style themselves) these may seem most like Voluntary Travelers for good company, though of all Travelers most like to Exiles.
37. Their reception beyond the seas in Holland was fair and civil, where the States (who though they tolerate, own not all Religions ) were interpreted to acknowledge them and their Churches by many signs of their favor. First,
By granting them their own Churches to assemble in for Divine Worship, where their own Country men met also the same day (but at different hours) for the same purpose.
By permitting the ringing of a Bell to call people to their Public meetings, which loudly sounded the States consent unto them, as not allowed to such clandestine Sects, which shelter themselves rather under the permission, then Protection thereof.
By assigning a full and liberal maintenance annually for their Ministers, as also wine for their Communions.
Nor can there be a better evidence of giving the right hand of Fellowship then to give the full hand of liberality. A moitie of this people fixed at Roterdam where they landed, the other travelled up higher for better air to Wianen, and thence, soon after removed to Arnhein, a sweet and pleasant City. No part of Holland (largely taken) affording more of England therein, resembled in their letters to their Friends to Hertford, or Bury in Suffolk.
38. Then fall they to consult of Church-Discipline, professing themselves a mere abrasa tabula, with Virgin judgments, longing only to be married to the truth. Yea they looked upon the word of Christ ( Reader, it is their own expression) as impartially and unprejudicedly, as men made of flesh and blood are like to do in any juncture of time that may fall out, the place they went to, the condition they were in, and company they went with, affording no temptation to bias them anyway.
39. And first they lay down two grand ground-works, on which their following Fabric was to be erected.
- 1. Only to take what was held forth in God's word, leaving nothing to Church-practice, or human prudence, as but the Iron legs and Clay toes of that Statute, whose head and whole body ought to be of pure Scripture-Gold.
- 2. Not to make their present judgment binding unto them for the future.
Their adversaries cavil hereat, as a reserve able to rout all the Armys of Arguments which are brought against them, that because one day teacheth another, they will not be tied on Tewsday morning, to maintain their Tenants on Monday night, if a new discovery intervene.
40. In pursuance of these principles they pitched on a middle way (as generally the posture of truth ) betwixt Presbytery, as too rigorous, imperious, and conclusive, and Brownism, as too vage, loose, and uncertain. Their main platform was, that Churches should not be subordinate, Parochial to Provincial, Provincial, to National, (as Daughter to Mother, Mother to Grandmother, ) but Coordinate, without Superiority, except Sentority of Sisters, containing no powerful influence therein. Thus the Church formerly like a Chain with links of dependency on one another, should hereafter become like an heap of rings, each entire in itself, but (as they thought) far purer then was ever seen before.
41. The manner of their Church-service, according to their own relation, was performed in form following.
-
1. Public and solemn prayers for Kings and all in Authority.
Reading the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament with exposition thereof on occasion.
Administration of the two Sacraments, Baptism to Infants, and the Lord's Supper.
Singing of Psalms, and collection for the Poor every Lord's-day.
For Public Officers they had Pastors, Teachers, and Ruling Elders (not Lay but Ecclesiastic persons ) and Deacons.
As for Church-censures, they resolved only on Admonition and Excommunication, the latter whereof was never handselled in their Church, as no reason that the rod (though made) should be used where the Children are all quiet and dutiful. Synods they account useful, and in some cases necessary, yet so that their power is but Official, not Authoritative, whereby they may declare the truth, not enjoin obedience thereunto. Or take it in the language of one of their Grandees. Actus regiminis à Synodis debent porrigi non peragi, the latter belonging to the liberty of several Congregations. Their Adversaries object, that none can give in an exact account of all their opinions, daily capable of alteration and increase. Whilst such Countries, whose immovable Mountains, and stable Valleys keep a fixed position, may be easily surveyed, no Geographer can accurately describe some part of Arabia, where the flitting sands driven with the winds have their frequent removals, so that the Traveler findeth a hole at his return, where he left a hill at his departure. Such the uncertainty of these Congregationalists in their judgments, only they plead for themselves, it is not the wind of every Doctrine, but the Sun of the Truth which with its New lights makes them renounce their old, and embrace new resolutions.
42. Soon after a heavy Schism happened in the Church of Roterdam, betwixt M r Bridge, and M r Simson, the two Pastors thereof. Insomuch, that the latter rent himself saith one from M r Bridge his Church to the great offense thereof, though more probable, as another reporteth, M r Simson dismissed with the consent of the Church. However many bitter letters passed betwixt them, and more sent over to their Friends in England full of invectives, blackness of the tongue always accompanying the paroxisms of such distempers. Their Presbyterian Adversaries make great use hereof to their disgrace. If such Infant-Churches, whilst their hands could scarce hold anything fell a scratching, and their feet spurning and kicking one another, before they could well go alone, how stubborn and vexatious would they be when arrived at riper years.
43. This Schism was seconded with another in the same Church, wherein they deposed one of their Ministers (M r Ward I conceive his name) which was beheld as a bold and daring deed, especially because herein they consulted not their Sister-Church at Arnhein, which publicly was professed mutually to be done in cases of concernment. Here the Presbyterians triumph in their conceived discovery of the nakedness and weakness of the Congregational way, which for want of Ecclesiastical Subordination is too short to reach out a redress to such grievances. For seeing par in parem non habet potestatem, Equalls have no power over their Equalls, the agrieved party could not right himself by any appeal unto a Superior. But such consider not the end, as well as the beginning of this difference, wherein the Church of Arnhein interposing (not as a Judge to punish Offenders, but as a Brother to check the failings of a Brother ) matters were so ordered, that M r Ward was restored to his place, when both he and the Church had mutually confessed their sinful carriage in the matter; but enough, (if not too much hereof) seeing everything put in a Pamphlet is not fit to be recorded in a Chronicle.
44. More concord crowned the Congregation at Arnheim, where M r Goodwin and M r Nye were Pastors, wherein besides those Church-Ordinances formerly mentioned, actually admitted and exercised, some others stood Candidates, and fair Probationers on their good behavior, namely, if under Trial they were found convenient; Such were
- 1. The Holy Kiss.
- 2. Prophesyings when Private Christians at fit times made public use of their parts and gifts in the Congregation.
- 3. Hymns and, which if no better Divinity then Music, might much be scrupled at.
- 4. Widows as Essential She-Ministers in the Church, which if it be so, our late Civil-Wars in England have afforded us plenty for the place.
- 5. Anointing of dying people, as a standing Apostolical Ordinance.
45. Other things were in agitation, when now the news ariveth, that the Parliament sitting at Westminster had broken the yoke of Ceremonies, and proclaimed a year of Jubilee to all tender consciences. Home then they hasted with all convenient speed: For only England is England indeed, though some parts of Holland may be like unto it. Over they came in a very good plight and Equipage, which the Presbyterians (and those I assure you are quick-sighted when pleased to pry) took notice of. Not a hair of their head singed, nor any smell of the fire of persecution upon their Clothes. However they were not to be blamed, if setting their best foot forward in their return, and appearing in the handsomest and chearfullest fashion for the credit of their cause, and to show that they were not dejected with their sufferings.
46. Presently they fall upon gathering of Congregations, but chiefly in or about the City of London. Trent may be good, and Severn better, but oh the Thames is the best for the plentiful taking of fish therein. They did pick (I will not say steal ) hence a Master, thence a Mistress of a Family, a Son out of a Third, a Servant out of a Fourth Parish, all which met together in their Congregation. Some prevented calling by their coming, of OLD Parishioners to become NEW Church-Members, and so forward were they of themselves, that they needed no force to compel, nor art to persuade them. Thus a new Inn never wanteth Guests at the first setting up, especially if hanging out a fair Sign, and promising more cleanness and neatness then is in any of their Neighbors.
47. The Presbyterians found themselves much agrieved hereat. They accounted this practice of the Dissenting Brethren but Ecclesiastical felony, for at the best, that they were but Spiritual Interlopers for the same. They justly feared (if this fashion continued) the falling of the Roof, or foundring of the Foundations of their own Parishes, whence so many Corner Stones, Pillars, Rafters, and Beams, were taken by the other to build their Congregations. They complained that these new Pastors though slighting Tithes and set maintenance, yet so ordered the matter by gathering their Churches, that these gleanings of Ephraim became better then the Vintage of Abi-ezer.
48. Not long after when the Assembly of Divines was called, these five Congregationalists were chosen members thereof, but came not up with a full consent to all things acted therein. As accounting that the pressing of an exact occurrence to the Presbyterian Government, was but a kind of a Conseience-Prison, whilst accurate conformity to the Scotch Church was the very Dungeon thereof, A reginsine ecclesiastic • (say they) uti nunc in Scotia viget longius distamus, quippe quod (ut nobis videtur) non tantum à scriptures, sed ab ecclesiarum reformatarum suorumque Theologorum sententijs ( qui sub Episcoporum tyrannide diu duriterque passi sunt) plurimum distit. No wonder therefore if they desired a Toleratien to be indulged them, and they excused for being concluded by the Votes of the Assembly.
49. But the Presbyterians highly opposed their Toleration, and such who desired most ease and liberty for their sides when bound with Episcopacy, now girt their own government the closest about the consciences of others. They tax the Dissenting Brethren for Singularity, as if these men (like the five senses of the Church ) should discover more in matter of Discipline then all the Assembly besides, some moving their ejection out of the same, except in some convenient time they would comply therewith.
50. Hopeless to speed here, the Dissenters seasonably presented an Apologetical narrative to the Parliament, styled by them the most sacred resuge or Asylum for mistaken and misjudged innocence. Herein they petitioned Pathetically for some favor, whose conscience could not join with the Assembly in all particulars, concluding with that pitiful close (enough to force tears from any tender heart) that they pursued no other interest or design, but a subsistence (be it the poorest and meanest) in their own land, as not knowing where else with safety health and livelihood to set their feet on earth, and subscribed their names.
- Thomas Goodwin.
- Philip Nye.
- Sidrach Simson.
- Jeremiah Burroughs.
- William Bridge.
If since their condition be altered and bettered, that they (then wanting where to set their feet) since lie down at their length in the fat of the land, surely they have returned proportionable gratitude to God for the same. Sure it is that at the present these Petitioners found such favor with some potent persons in Parliament, that they were secured from farther trouble, and from lying at a posture of defense, are now grown able not only to encounter but invade all opposers; yea to open and shut the door of preferment to others, so unsearchable are the dispensations of Divine Providence in making sudden and unexpected changes, (as in whole nations) so in private men's estates, according to the Counsel of his will.
51. Such as desire further instruction in the Tenants of these Congregationalists, may have their recourse to those many Pamphlets written pro and con thereof. The worst is, some of them speak so loud, we can scarce understanding what they say, so hard is it to collect their judgments, such the violence of their passions. Only I will add, that for the main, the Churches of New-England are the same in Discipline with these Dissenting Brethren.
52. Only I will add, that of all the Authors I have perused concerning the opinions of these Dissenting Brethren, none to me was more informative, then M r John Norton, (One of no less learning then modesty ) Minister in New-England in his answer to Apollonius Pastor in the Church of Middle-borrough.
53. Look we now again into the Assembly of Divin • s, where we find D r Cornelius Burgess, and M r Herbert Palmer the Assessors therein, and I am informed by some (more skillful in such niceties then myself) that Two at the least, of that Office, are of the Qu • rum Essential to every lawful Assembly. But I miss D r William Twisse their Prolocutor lately deceased; He was bred in New-College in Oxford, good with the Trowell, but better with the Sword, more happy in Pol • mical Divinity, then edifying Doctrine. Therefore he was chosen by the States of Holland to be Professor of Divini • y there, which he thankfully refused. M r Charles Herle Fellow of Exeter College of Oxford succeeded him in his place, one so much Christian, Scholar and Gentleman, that he can unite in affection with those who are disjoin'd in judgment from him.
54. The Assembly met with many difficulties, some complaining of M r Selden, that advantaged by his skill in Antiquity Commonlaw, and the Oriental tongues, he employed them rather to pose then profit, perplex then inform the members thereof, in the fourteen queries he propounded. Whose intent therein was to humble the Jure-divino-ship of Presbytery, which though Hinted and Held forth, is not so made out in Scripture, but being too Scant on many occasions it must be peeced with prudential Additions. This great Scholar, not over loving of any (and lest of these ) Clergy-men, delighted himself in raising of scruples for the vexing of others, and some stick not to say, that those who will not feed on the flesh of God's-word cast most bones to others, to break their teeth therewith.
55. More trouble was caused to the Assembly by the Opinions of the Erastians, and it is worth our enquiry into the first Author thereof. They were so called from Thomas Erastus a D r of Physic, born at Baden in Switz • rland, lived Professor in Hidelbridge, and died at Basil, about the year one thousand five hundred eighty three. He was of the Privy Council to Frederick, the first Protestant Prince Palatine of that name, and this Erastus (like our M r Perkins ) being lame of his right, wrote all with his left hand, and amongst the rest, one against Theodor. Beza, de Excommunicatione, to this effect, that the power, and excommunication in a Christian State, principally resides in secular power as the most competent Judge, when and how the same shall be exercised.
56. M r John Coleman a modst and learned man, beneficed in Lincolnshire, and M r John Lightfoot, well skilled in Rabinical Learning were the chief members of the Assembly, who (for the main) maintained the tenets of Erastus. These often produced the Hebrew Original for the power of Princes in ecclesiastical matters. For though the New Testament be silent of the Temporal Magistrate, ( Princes then being Pagans ) his▪ • ermedling in Church-matters, the Old is very vocal therein, where the Authority of the Kings of Judah; as nursing fathers to the Church is very considerable.
57. No wonder if the Prince Palatine (constantly present at their debates) heard the Erastians with much delight, as wellcoming their Opinions for Country sake, (his Natives as first born in Hidelbridge ) though otherwise in his own judgment no favourer thereof. But other Parliament men listened very favourably to their Arguments ( Interest is a good quickener of Attention ) hearing their own power enlarged thereby, and making use of their Erastiens for a Check, to such who pressed conformity to the Scotch Church in all particulars.
58. Indeed once the Assembly stretched themselves beyond their own line, in meddling with what was not committed by the Parliament, to their cogniz • nce and consultation, for which they were afterward staked down, and tied up with a shorter tedder. For though the wise Parliament made use of the Presbyterian zeal and activity, for the extirpation of Bishops, yet they discreetly resolved to hold a strict hand over them; as not coming by their own power to advise, but called to advise with the Parliament. Nor were they to cut out their own work, but to make up what was cut to their own hands, and seeing a Praemunire is a rod, as well for a Presbyter, as a Praelate (if either trespass on the state by their over activity) though they felt not this rod, it was shown to them, and shak'd over them, and they shrewdly and justly shent for their over-meddling, which made them the wiser and warier for the time to come.
59. Indeed the major part of the Assembly endeavored the settling of the Scotch Government in all particulars that though Tweed parted their Countries, nothing might divide their Church Discipline, and this was labored by the Scotch Commissioners with all industry and probable means to obtain the same; But it could not be effected, nor was it ever settled by Act of Parliament. For as in Heraldry the same seeming Lions in color and posture, rampa • t and langued alike,) are not the self-same, if the one be armed with nails and teeth, the other deprived of both, so cannot the English be termed the same with the Scotch-Presbytery, the former being in a manner absolute in itself, the latter depended on the State in the Execution of the power thereof.
60. Insomuch that the Parliament kept the Coercive power in their own hands, not trusting them to carry the KEYS AT THEIR GIRDLE, so that the power of excommunication, was not entrusted with them, but ultimately resolved into a Committee of eminent persons of Parliament, whereof Thomas Earl of Arundel (presumed present because absent with leave beyond the seas) is the first person nominated.
61. A Treaty was kept at Vxbridge betwixt the Commissioners of the King and Parliament, many well meaning people promising themselves good success thereby, whilst others thought this Treatie was born with a dying countenance, saying there wanted a third to interpose to make their distances up by powerful persuasion, no hope of good in either without condescension in both parties. One may smile at their inference, who presumed that the Kings Commissioners, coming to Vxbridg, two parts of three to meet those of the Parliament, would proportionably comply in their yieldings. A weak Topical conjecture, confuted by the formerly going of the Parliaments Commissioners clean through to Oxford, and yet little condescension to their propositions.
62. Here M r Christopher Love (waiting on the Parliament Commissioners in a general relation) gave great offense to the Roialists in his Sermon, showing the impossibility of an agreement, such the dangerous errors, and malicious practice • of the opposite party; many condemned his want of charity, more of discreti • n in this juncture of time, when there should be a cessation from Invectives drives for the time being. But men's censures must fall the more lightly upon his memory, because since he hath suffered, and so satisfied here for his saults in this or any other kind.
63. with the Commissioners on both sides, certain Clergy-men were sent in their presence to debate the point of Church-government▪
-
For the King.
-
D
r
- Benjamin
- Henry
- Henry
- Steward
- Shelden
- Laney
- Hammond
- Ferne
-
For the Parliament.
- M r Steven Marshall.
- M r Richard Vines.
64. D r Laney proffered to prove the great benefits which had accrued to God's Church in all Ages by the Government by Bishops, but the Scotch-Commissioners would in no wise hear him, whereupon the Doctor was contentedly silent. Some discourses rather then disputes passed betwixt D r Steward, and M r Marshal, leaving no great impressions in the memories of those that were present thereat.
65. Only M r Vines was much applauded by his own party, for proving the sufficiency of ordination by Presbyters, because Ministers made by Presbyterian Government in France and the Low-Countries, were owned and acknowledged by our Bishops for lawfully ordained for all intents and purposes, both to Preach and Sacramentize, and no reordination required of them. Thus the goodness of Bishops in their charity to others, was made use of against themselves, and the necessity of the Episcopal function.
66. To return to the Assembly; the Monuments which they have left to posterity of their meeting, are chiefly these, Articles of Religion drawn up by them, and a double Catechism, one the lesser, the other the greater, whereof at first very few were printed for Parliament men, meaner folk not attaining so great a Treasure, besides their Directory whereof hereafter.
67. As for the conclusion of this Assembly it dwinled away by degrees, though never legally dissolved. Many of them after the taking of Oxford returning to their own cures, and others living in London absented themselves, as disliking the managing of matters. Such as remained, (having survived their great respect) and being too few to maintain the dignity of an Assembly, contented themselves with the notion of a Committee, chiefly employed to examine their abilities, and good affections, who were presented to livings. Till at last as in Philosphy, accidentia non corrumpuntur. sed definunt, they vanish with the Parliament, and now the execution of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury comes next under our pen, whose trial being most of civil concernment, is so largely done in a book of that subject, that by us it may be justly omitted.
68. Next followed the execution of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, Sherif Chambers of London, bringing over night the warrant for the same, and acquainting him therewith. In preparation to so sad a work, he betook himself to his own, and desired also the prayers of others, and particularly of D r Holdsworth fellow prisoner in that place for a year and half, though all that time there had not been the least converse betwixt them. On the morrow he was brought out of the Tower to the Scaffold, which he ascended with a cheerful countenance, (as rather to gain a Crown, then lose an Head ) imputed by his friends to the clearedness, by his foes to the seardeness of his Conscience. The Beholders that day were so divided betwixt Bemoaners and Insulters, it was hard to decide which of them made up the major part of the company.
69. He made a Sermon-Speech, taking for his Text the two first verses of the •• . Chap. of the Epistle to the Hebrews. Let us run with patience the ra • e which is • et before us; Looking unto Jesus the Author and finisher of our saith, who for the joy that was set before him, endured the Cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the thro • e of God. Craving leave to make use of his notes, (for the infirmity of his aged memory) he dilated thereon about half an hour, which discourse, because common, (as publicly printed) we hear forbear to insert. For the main, He protested his own innocence and integrity, as never intending any subversion of Laws and Liberty, no enemy to Parliaments (though a mistaker of some miscarriages) and a Protestant in Doctrine and Discipline, according to the established laws of the land. Speech ended, He betook himself a while to his prayers, and after wards prepared himself for the fatal stroke.
70. S r John Clotworthy (a member of the House of Commons ) being present interrogated him concerning his assurance of Salvation, and whereon the same was grounded. Some censured this interruption for uncivil and unseasonable, as intended to r • ffle his soul with passion, just as he was fairly folding it up, to deliver it into the hands of his Redeemer. But the Arch-Bishop calmly returned, that his assurance was evidenced unto him by that inward comfort which he found in his own soul. Then lying down on the block, and praying Lord receive my Soul, the Executioner dexterously did his office, and at one blow severed his Head from his Body. Instantly his face ( ruddy in the last moment) turned white as ashes, confuting their falsehoods, who gave it out that he had purposely painted it, to fortify his cheeks against discovery of fear in the paleness of his complexion. His corps were privately interred in the Church of Alhal • owes Barking without any solemnity, save that some will say, He had, (in those days) a fair Funeral, who had the Common-Prayer read thereat.
71. He was born Anno 1573 of honest parents at Reading in Bark-shire, a place, for the position thereof, almost equally distanced from Oxford the Sc •• of his breeding, and London the principal stage of his preserment. His Mother was Sister to S r William Web, (born also at Reading) Salter, and Anno 1591 Lord Majon of London. Here the Arch-Bishop afterwards built an Almshouse, and endowed it with two hundred pounds per annum, as appeareth by his own Dia • y, which if evidence against him for his faults may be used as a witness of his good works. Hence was he sent to S t Johns College in Oxford, where he attained to such eminency of learning, that one since hath ranked him amongst the greatest Scholers of our Nation. He afterwards married Charles Blunt Earl of Devon-shire to the Lady Rich, which proved (if intended an advantage under his feet, to make him higher in the notice of the world) a covering to his face, and was often cast a rubb in his way, when running in his full speed to preferment, till after some difficulty, his greatness at the last made a shift to stride over it.
72. In some sort He may be said to have served in all offices in the Church, from a Common-Soldier, to a kind of General therein. There was neither Order, Office, Degree, nor Dignity in College, Church or University, but he passed thorough it.
- 1. Order, Deacon, Priest, Bishop, Arch-Bishop.
- 2. Office, Scholar, Fellow, President, of S t Johns College, Proctor, and Chancellor of Oxford.
- 3. Degree, Bachelor, and Master of Arts, Bachelor and Doctor of Divinity.
- 4. Dignity, Vicar, Prebendary of Stanford, Parson of Ibstock, Prebendary of Wesiminster, Arch-Deacon of Huntingdon, Dean of Colchester, Bishop of S t David's in Wales, Bath and Wells, and London, in England, and finally Arch-Bishop of Canterbury.
It was said of D r George Ablot, his Predecessor, that he suddenly started to be a bishop, without ever having Pastoral charge, whereas this man was a great Traveler in all Cli •• a • es of Church-prefermen, sufficient to acquaint him with an experiment knowledge of the conditions of all such persons who at last were subjected to his Authority.
73. He is generally charged with Popish inclinations, and the story is commonly told and believed, of a Lady (still alive) who turning Papist, and being demanded of the Arch-Bishop the cause of her changing her religion, tartly returned, My Lord it was because I ever hated a • oud. And being desired to explain her meaning herein, I perceived (said she) that your Lordship and many others, are making for Rome as fast as • e •• , and therefore to prevent a press, I went before you. Be the tale true or false, take Papist for a Trent-Papist, embracing all the derisions of that council, and surely this Arch-Bishop would have been made Fuel for the • ire, before ever or that persuasion. Witness his book against Fisher, wherein he giveth no less account of his sincerity then ability to defend the most dominative points wherein we and the Papists dissent.
74. However most apparent it is by several passages in his life, that he endeavored to take up many controversies betwixt us and the Church of Rome, so to compremise the difference, and to bring us to a Vi • nity, if not Contiguity therewith, an impossible design (if granted lawfully) as some every way his equals did adjudge. For composition is impossible with such, who will not agree except all they sue for, and all the charges of their suite be to the utmost farthing awarded unto them. Our reconciliation with Rome is clogged with the same impossibilities: She may be gone to, but will never be met with, such her • ride or as Peevishness not to stir a step to obviate any of a different Religion. Rome will never so far un-Pope itself, as to part with her pretended Supremacy and Infallibility, which cuts off all possbility of Protestants Treaty with her, if possibly without prejudice to God's glory and the truth, other controversies might be composed. Which done,