Acts and Monuments Volume 2 Part 1
-
Another reason against the Mass.
- Item, where S. Paul in express words willeth all things to be done in an edifying tongue, the Mass is celebrate in a tongue foreign, strange, and unknown to the people, so that although the matter therein contained were wholesome, and consonant to Scripture (as much as disagreeing from the same) yet for the straungenes of the tongue, it giveth but a sound, and worketh no edifying to the ignorant. Now both the tongue being strange to the ears of the people, and the matter also in the Mass contained, being repugnant to God's word, what defense can the Mass have, but utterly it is to be rejected?
- And for so much therefore, as the Mass so long used in a foreign language hath not hitherto come to the understanding of the simple and vulgare sort, to the intent they may themselves perceive the matter, and be their own judges, I have here set forth the chiefest parte thereof (which is the Canon) in English, so as I found it in a certain written copy, by Master Coverdale translated, adioining withal the Rubric and circumstance of the same in every point, as is in the Mass book contained.
The whole Canon of the Mass, with the Rubric thereof, as it standeth in the Massebooke, after Salisbury use. Translated word by word out of Laten into English.
AFter the Sanctus, the Priest immediately joining his hands together, and lifting up his eyes, beginneth these words: Te igitur clementissime, &c. that is to say: Therefore most gracious father, thorough Jesus Christ thy son our Lord, we humbly beseech thee.
Let him bow down his body, while he saith: And we desire
Here the Priest standing upright, must kiss the altar on the right hand of the sacrifice, saying: that thou accept and bless,
Here let the Priest make three crosses upon the chalice and the bread, saying: these ✚ gifts these ✚ presents: these ✚ holy and unspotted sacrifices.
When the signs are made upon the chalice, let him lift up his hands, saying thus: Which first of all we offer unto thee for thy holy Catholic Church: that thou vouchsafe to pacify, keep, unite, and govern it, throughout the whole world: with thy servant our Pope N. and our Bishop N.
That is his own Bishop only. and our King N.
And they are expressed by name.
Then let there follow. and all true believers, and such as have the Catholic and Apostolic faith in due estimation.
Here let him pray for the living.
Remember Lord thy servants & handmaids N. and N.
In the which prayer, a rule must be observed, for the order of charity. Five times let the Priests pray. First for himself. Secondly for father and mother, carnal and spiritual, and for other parents. Thirdly, for special friends, parishioners and others. Fourthly, for all that stand by. Fifthly, for all Christian people. And here may the Priest commend all his friends to God. But my counsel is, that none make ouerlong tarrying there partly for distraction of mind: partly because of immissions which may chance through evil Angels: And all that stand hereby round about, whose faith and devotion, unto thee is known and manifest: for whom we offer unto thee, or which themselves offer unto thee, this sacrifice of praise, for them and theirs: for the redemption of their souls, for the hope of their salvation, and health, and render their vows unto thee the eternal living and true God.
Communicating and worshipping the memorial, first of the glorious and ever virgin
Bowing down a little, let him say:
Mary the mother of our God and Lord Jesus Christ, & also of thy blessed Apostles and Martyrs, Peter, Paul, Andrew, James, John, Thomas, Phillip, Bartholomew, Matthew Simon & Tadeus, Timis, Cletus, Clemens, Sextus, Cornelius, Ciprianus, Laurence, Chrisogonus, John and Paul, Cosme and Damian, and of all thy Saints: By whose merits & prayers, grant thou, that in all things we may be defended with the help of thy protection, through the same Christ our Lord, Amen.
Here let the Priest behold the host with great veneration, saying:
Therefore Lord we beseech thee, that thou being pacified, wilt receive this oblation of our bond service, and of all thy household: and order our days in thy peace, and command us to be delivered from eternal damnation, & to be numbered in the flock of thine elect, through Christ our Lord, Amen.
Here again, let him behold the host, saying: Which oblation we beseech O almighty God in all things to make.
Here let him make three crosses upon both, when he saith: ✚ Blessed: ✚ appointed: ✚ ratified: reasonable and acceptable: that unto us it may be.
Here let him make a cross upon the bread, saying: ✚ The body.
Here upon the chalice.
And ✚ blood.
Here with hands joined together, let him say: Of thy most dearly beloved Son our Lord Jesus Christ.
Here let the Priest lift up his hands, and join them together, and afterward wipe his fingers, and lift up the host, saying: Who the next day afore he suffered, took bread into his holy and reverent hands: and his eyes being lift up into heaven
Here let him lift up his eyes.
Unto the God almighty his father.
Here let him bow down, and afterward creet himself up a little saying.
Rendring thanks unto thee, he ✚ blessed, he brake.
Here let him touch the host, saying: And gave unto his disciples, saying: take ye, and eat of this ye all for this is my body.
And these words must be pronounced with one breath, and under one pro • acion, without making of any pause between. After these words, let him bow himself to the host, and afterward lift it up above his forehead, that it may be seen of the people: and let him reverently lay it again before the chalice, in manner of a cross made with the same, and then let him uncover the chalice, and hold it between his hands, not putting his thombe and forefinger asunder, save only whē he blesseth, saying thus: Likewise after they had supped, he taking this excellent cup into his holy and reverent hands, rendering thanks also unto thee,
Here let him bow himself, saying: Blessed, and gave unto his disciples, saying: take, and drink of this ye all.
Here let him lift up the chalice a little, saying thus: For this is the cup of my blood, of the new and everlasting testament the mystery of faith: which for you and for many, shall be shed to the remission of sins.
Here let him lift the chalice to his breast, or further then his head, saying: As oft as ye do these things, ye shall do them in remembrance of me.
Here let him set down the chalice again, and rub his fingers over the chalice. Then let him lift up his arms, and cover the chalice. Then let him lift up his arms cross wise, his fingers being joined together until these words: De tuis donis (that is to say, of thine own rewards.)
Wherefore O Lord, we also thy servants, and thy holy people, being mindful as well of the blessed passion and resurrection, as of the glorious ascension of the same Christ thy son our Lord God, do offer unto thy excellent majesty, of thine own rewards and gifts.
Here let there be made five crosses: Namely the three first upon the host and cup, saying. ✚ a pure host: an holy host: ✚ an undefiled host.
The fourth upon the bread only, saying: The holy ✚ bread of eternal life.
The fifth upon the cup, saying: And ✚ cup of eternal salvation. Uouchsafe thou also with a merciful and pleasant countenance, to have respect hereunto, and to accept the same as thou diddest vouchsafe to accept the gifts of thy righteous servant Abel, and the sacrifice of our Patriarcke Abraham and the holy sacrifice, the undefiled host, that the high Priest Melchisadech did offer unto thee.
Here let the priest with his body bowed down, and his hands holden a cross, say: Supplices te rogamus (we humbly besecch thee) until these words, ex hac altaris participatione (of this partaking of the altar. And then let him stand up, kissing the altar on the right side of the sacrifice: and let him make a sign of the cross upon the host, and in his own face, when he saith omni benedictione coelesti (with all heavenly benediction.)
We humbly beseech thee O almighty God command thou these to be brought by the hands of thy holy Angel unto thy high altar in the presence of thy divine majesty: that as many of us as.
Here erecting up himself, let him kiss the altar on the right side of the sacrifice saying: Of this participation of the altar, shall receive thy sons holy.
Here let him make a sign of the cross vpō the host saying ✚ body.
Then upon the cup, saying: and ✚ blood may be replenished.
Here let him make a sign (in his own face, saying with all heavenly benediction and grace thorough the same Christ our Lord. Amen.
Here let him pray for the dead.
Remember Lord also the souls of thy servants and handmaydens. N. and N. which are gone before us with the mark of faith, and rest in the sleep of peace. We beseech thee O Lord, that unto them and unto all such as rest in Christ; thou wilt grant a place of refreshing of light, and of peace, through the same Christ our Lord. Amen.
Here let him smite once upon his breast, saying: Unto us sinners also thy servants, hoping of y e multitude of thy mercies, vouchsafe to give some portion and fellowship with thy holy Apostles, and Martyrs, with John, Stephen, Mathias, Barnabas, Ignatius, Alexander, Marcellinus, Peter, Felicitas, Perpetua, Agatha Lucia. Agnes, Cecilia, Anastacia: and with all thy Saints, within whose fellowship we beseech thee admit us, no • waying our merit, but granting us forgiveness, thorough Christ our Lord.
By whom O Lord, all these good things thou doest ever create.
Here let him make a sign over the chalice iii. times, saying.
Thou ✚ sanctifiest: thou quickenest: thou ✚ blessest, and givest unto us.
Here let him w t • cover the chalice, and make a sign of the cross with the host five times: first beyond the chalice on every side: secondly eauen with the chalice: thirdly, within the chalice: fourthly, like as at the first: Fifthly before the chalice.
Thorow ✚ him: and with ✚ him: and in him, is unto thee God father ✚ almighty▪ in the unity of the ✚ holy Ghost, all honor and glory.
Here let the Priest cover the chalice, and hold his hands still upon the altar till the pater noster be spoken saying thus.
Worlde without ende, Amen. Let us pray. Being advertised by wholesome precepts and taught by God's institution, we are bold to say.
Here let the Deacon take the paten, and hold it uncovered on the right side of the Priest his arm being stretched out an high until da propitius. Here let the Priest lift up his hands, saying: pater noster, &c. The quire must say: Sed libera nos &c.
Deliver us we beseech thee O Lord from all evil past, present, and for to come, and that by the intercession of the blessed, glorious, and our virgin Mary the mother of God, and thy blessed Apostles Peter and Paul and Andrew, with all Saints.
Here let the Deacon commit the patten to the Priest, kissing his hand: and let the Priest kiss the patten. Afterward let him put it to his left eye, and then to the right. After that, let him make a cross with the paten above upon his head, and so lay it down again into his place, saying: give peace graciously in our days: that we being helped through the succor of thy mercy, may both be always free from sin, and safe from all trouble.
Here let him uncover the chalice, and take the body, doing reverence, shifting it over in the holow room of the chalice, holding it between his thombes and forefingers: and let him break it into three partes: the first breaking, while there is said: Through the same our Lord Jesus Christ thy Son.
The second breaking.
Who with thee in the unity of the holy Ghost, liveth and reigneth God.
Here let him hold two pieces in his left hand, and the third piece in the right hand upon the brink of the chalice, saying this with open voice.
World without ende.
Let the quire answer Amen. Here let him make three crosses within the chalice with the third parte of the host, saying: The peace of the Lord ✚ be always ✚ with ✚ you.
Let the quire answer
And with thy spirit.
To say Agnus dei, let the Deacon and subdeacon approach near unto the Priest, both being on the right hand, the Deacon nearer, the subdeacon farther off▪ And let them say privately.
O lamb of God that takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us: O lamb of God that takest away the sins of the world, have mercy upon us: O lamb of God that takest away the sins of the world, grant us peace.
In Masses for the dead it is said thus.
O lamb of God that takest away the sins of the world, give them rest.
With this addition in the third repetition.
Euerlasting.
Here making a cross, let him put down the said third part of the host into the sacrament of the blood, saying: This holy mingling together of the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ be unto me, and to all that receive it, salvation of mind and body: an wholesome preparation both to deserve and to receive eternal life through the same Christ our Lord.
Afore the Paxe be given, let the Priest say: O Lord holy father almighty eternal God, grant me so worthily to take this holy body and blood of thy Son our Lord Jesus Christ, that by this I may merit to receive forgiveness of all my sins, and be replenished with thy holy spirit, and to have thy peace: for thou art GOD alone, neither is there any other without thee, whose glorious kingdom and Empire endureth continually, world without ende. Amen.
Here let the Priest kiss the corporas on the right side, and the brink of the chalice, and afterward let him say to the Deacon.
Peace be unto thee, and to the Church of God.
Aunswere. And with thy spirit.
On the right hand of the Priest, let the Deacon receive the pax of him, and reach it to the subdeacon. Then to the step of the query, let the Deacon himself bear the pax unto the rectors of the query. And let them bring it to the query, either of them to his own side, beginning at the eldest. But in feasts and feriall days when the query is not governed, the pax is borne from the deacon unto the query by two of the lowest of the seconde form, like as afore.
After the pax given, let the Priest say the prayers following, privately, before he communicate, holding the host with both his hands.
O God father, thou fountain & original of all goodness, who being moved with mercy, haste willed thine only-begotten son for our sakes, to descend into the lower partes of the world, and to be incarnate: whom I unworthy hold in my hands.
Here let the priest bow him self to the hoost, saying I worship thee, I glorify thee, I praise thee, with whole intention of mind and heart: And I beseech thee that thou fail not us thy servants, but forgive our sins so as with pure heart and chaste body we may be able to serve thee the only living and true God, through the same Christ our Lord. Amen.
O Lord Jesus Christ, thou son of y e living God, who according to the will of the father, the holy Ghost working with all, hast quickened the world through thy death: Deliver me I beseech thee, through this thy holy body, and this thy blood, from all my iniquities, and from all evils. And make me always obey thy commandments, and never suffer me to be separated from thee for evermore, thou Savior of the world: Who with God▪ the father and the same holy Ghost, livest and raignest God world without end. Amen.
O Lord Jesus Christ let not the sacrament of thy body & blood which I receive (though unworthy) be to my judgment and damnation: but thorough thy goodness, let it profit to the salvation of my body and soul. Amen.
To the body let him say with humilation afore he receive. Hail for evermore, thou most holy flesh of Christ: unto me afore all things and above all things the highest sweetness. The body of our Lord Jesus Christ be unto me sinner, the way and life, in the ✚ name of the father and of the son and of the holy Ghost. Amen.
Here let him take the body, a cross being first made with the same body afore his mouth, saying.
Hail for evermore, thou heavenly drink: unto me before all things and above all things, the highest sweetness. The body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ profit me sinner for a remedy everlasting into life eternal Amē. In the ✚ name of the Father, and of the Son and of the holy Ghost. Amen.
Here let him take the blood: which when it is received, let bow him self and say.
The Prayer.
I render thankes to thee O Lord holy Father almighty eternal God, which hast refreshed me out of the most holy body and blood of thy Son our Lord Jesus Christ. And I beseech thee that this Sacrament of our salvation, which I unworthy sinner have received, come not to my judgment nor condemnation after my merits, but to the profit of my body, and to the salvation of my soul into life everlasting. Amen.
Which prayer being said let the Priest go to the right side of the altar, with the chalice between his hands, his f • ngers being yet joined together as afore & let the Subdeacon approach near, and pour out wine and water into the chalice. And let the Priest rence his hands least any parcels of the body or blood be left behind in his fingers or in the chalice . But whē any Priest must celebrate twice in one day, then at the first Mass he must not receive any ablutiō, but put it in the Sacristie, or in a clean vessel till the end of the other Mass: and then let both the ablutions be received.
After the first ablution is said this prayer.
That we have received with mouth O Lord, let us take with a pure mind, and out of a temporal gift, let it be to us a remedy everlasting.
Here let him wash his fingers in the holow room of the chalice with wyne being poured in by the Subdeacon: which, when it is drunk up, let the prayer follow.
Lord let this communion purge us from sin, and make us to be partakers of the heavenly remedy.
After the receiving of the ablutions, let the Priest lay the chalice vpo the paten: that if ought remain behind, it may drop. And afterward bowing him self let him say.
Let us worship the sign of the Cross, whereby we have received the Sacrament of salvation.
Afterwarde let him wash his hands. In the mean season, let the Deacon fold up the corporas. When hands are washen, and the Priest returneth to the right ende of the altar let the Deacon reach the chalice to y e Priests mouth, that if ought of that which was poured in, do remain behind he may receive it. After that, let him say the communion with his Ministers. Then making a sign of the Cross in his own face, let the Priest turn him self to the people: and with his arms somewhat lifted up, and his hands joined together, let him say, Dominus vobiscum: and turning him again to the altar, let him say oremus: (let us pray.)
Then let him say the postcommon, according to the number and order of the aforesaid prayers. Before the Epistle, when the last postcommon is ended, and the Priest hath made a sign of the cross in his forehead, let him turn him again to the people, and say Dominus vobiscum. Then let the Deacon say Benedicamus domino. At another time is said Ite missa est. As oft as Ite missa est is said, it is always said in turning to the people. And when Benedicamus domino, or Requiescant in pace must be said, let it be said in turning to the altar. When these things are spoken, let the Priest (with his body howed down, and his hands joined together) in the middes before the altar, say with a still voice, this prayer.
O holy Trinity, let the office of my bond service please thee, and grant that this sacrifice which I unworthy have offered in the eyes of thy majesty, may be acceptable unto thee: and that unto me and all them for whom I have offered it it may avail to obtain remission, thou being merciful, who lyuest and reignest God, &c.
Which prayer being ended, let the Priest stand upright, crossing himself in his face, saying: In nomine patris, &c. And so, (when obeisance is made) after the same order wherein they came afore to the altar at the beginning of the Mass, so having on their apparayle with the censor bearer, and other Ministers, let them go their way again.
The ende of the Canon.
NOw it remaineth (as we have promised before) to entreat of the partes and parcels of the Mass, declaring likewise how and by whom this popish or rather apish Mass became so clamperd and patched together with so many divers and sundry additions: whereby it may the better appear what hath been the continuance of the same.
First, in the beginning of this Preface it was declared before, how this word Mass was never used nor known in the old primative Church among the first Christians, nor among the Grecians. Therefore they that deduce and derive the origin of the Mass from Saint James, and Basilius, are far deceived. As I think that Saint James was once Bishop at Jerusalem, so I think not contrary, but sometimes he ministered the Communion there in breaking of bread, and that not without the Lord's prayer, and other prayers of thanks giving. As we now in our Communion use like prayers, and these prayers make not the Communion to be a Mass. And like is to be said of Saint Peter: who though he did celebrate the Communion at Rome, yet it followeth not that he said Mass at Rome, as some report him to do.
Neither is it hard to fetch out the origin how this error first came up among the people, that Saint James said Mass at Jerusalem, if a man consider well histories and authors which have written. For in the history of Eusebius, Egesippus thus writeth of Saint James, Eum ab Apostolis primum constitutum fuisse Episcopum & liturgum, &c. upon the which word liturgus, it is not unlike, and diverse suppose this error to come, that Saint James did first set and institute the order of Mass. For so lightly the old translators, wheresoever they synde liturgia, or collecta, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they translated it Missa: whereupon, the greatest occasion of this error riseth to make the people believe the Mass to be so ancient to proceed from the Apostles, and from Saint James. Notwithstanding that error as it lightly came up, so it may be as lightly exploded. For how could Saint James say Mass then at Jerusalem, or Saint Peter at Rome, when as yet neither the name of Mass was heard, nor the partes thereof invented. And although Sigibertus in his Chronicles report, that in the City of Uasath, being delivered from the siege of the H •• es, the pastor of that Church did celebrate Mass with thanks giving about the year 453. yet Sigibert in so saying is to be taken, as speaking rather after the use and manner of his time, when he wrote it, then of that time when it was done. For in all the works of Saint Augustine, and of Chrysostom, and in all that age, the name of Mass is not found, but is called either the Supper of the Lord, or the Lord's board, or communion, Synaxis, sacrifice, oblation, mistery, celebration of the Sacrament, Eucharistia, the mystical table, Mistagogia, coena mystica, or with some other like term they nominate it. The name of Mass was not yet devised, nor the patches thereof compiled. Platina testifieth, that before Celestinus Pope, only the Epistle and Gospel were read at the Communion, which being done, the Communion ended. And Gregory saith, that the Apostles afore the ministration of the Sacrament, did use only the Lord's prayer, that is, the Pater noster. Let us hear what Walafridus Strabo writeth of that matter, lib. de rebus Ecclesiastic. Capitu. 22. Quod nunc agimus multiplici orationum, lectionum, cantilenarum, & consecrationum officio totum hoc Apostoli, & post ipsos proximi, (vt creditor) orationibus, & commemoratione passionis dominicae, sicut ipse praecepit, agebant simpliciter, &c. i. That which now is done in the Church with such a long circumstance of so many orisons, lessons, or readings, songs, and consecrations: all that the Apostles, and they that next succeeded the Apostles (as it is thought) did accomplish simply with prayer only, and with the commemoration of the Lord's passion, &c. it followeth in the same Author. And, as the report is, like as it is in the Roman Church upon Good Friday, where the Communion is wont to be taken without any Mass: so it was in the old time with them, &c.
Now how this Mass hath grown up and increased since, let us search out, by the Lord's help, out of Authors, so much as may be found.
The Introit • .
Coelestinus Pope gave the first Introite, as Platina and Sigibertus writeth.
The Psalm. Iudica me deus, &c.
And before the Priest do prepare himself to his Mass, first with the Psalm, Iudica me deus & discern causam meam, &c. that was ordained by the said Coelestinus.
And where they ascribe to Saint Ambrose the two prayers which be used in the preparation to the Mass, and be added to the books of Ambrose, Erasmus judgeth the same to be none of his, and that rightly as it seemeth, for therein is contained errors, not else to be found in the books of Ambrose, both in giving adoration to the bread in the Sacrament, and making invocation to Saints, namely, to blessed Mary: as in the second prayer, where he saith: Vt efficax haec mea sit deprecatio, beatae Mariae virginis suffragia peto, &c. i. And that this my prayer may be of efficacy, I desire the suffrage and intercession of blessed Mary the virgins, &c. Whereby it may appear, learned Ambrose not to be the author of such an error.
Chrysostom in the xi. homely upon the Gospel of Math. saith, that in his time (and afore his time) the use was to sing whole psalms, till they were entered and assembled together. And so belike Coelestinus borrowed this custom of the Greeks, and brought it into the Laten Church as Rupertus writeth.
Gregory the great (as some write) called a Sinode at Rome, about the year of our Lord 594. In which Synod he appointed, that the introite of the Mass should be taken out of some psalm.
The Confiteor.
The Confiteor Pope Damasus brought into the Mass as it is written: albeit peradventure not this popish confiteor, which in the latter Church hath been used, stuffed full of Idolatry, & invocation of Saints, against y e word of God.
The Kyrie eleyson.
The Kyrie eleyson ix. times to be repeated in such a tongue, as few priests either understand, or do rightly pronounce, Gregory did institute, about 600. years after Christ, taking it out of the Greeks Church, and yet transposing it otherwise, then there was used. For among the Greeks this Kyrie eleyson (which they called their Litany) was song of all the people: The which Gregory ordained to be song only of the Quere, adding thereto also Christ eleyson, which the Grecians used not, as Gregory himself writing to the Bishop of Siracuse, doth testify.
Gloria in excelsis.
Next followeth Gloria in excelsis, &c. Which words were song of the Angels at the birth of our savior. Albeit these words also were corrupted, (as many other things were) in the Church. For where the words of the Angels himne were hominibus bona voluntas. i. to men good will, y e Mass said hominibus bonae voluntatis. i. to men of good will, &c. This himne was brought into the Mass by Pope Symmachus (and not by Telesphorus, as some not truly write that he ordained three Masses on Christmas day, for in his time there was no Mass. An. 140.) about the year of our Lord 510. And after, the said himne was augmented by Hillarius Pictauiensis, with those words that follow: Laudamus te, &c. singing it first in his own church, which was Anno. 340. And afterward brought into other Churches by Pope Symmachus. An. 510. as is aforesaid.
Dominus vobiscum, with the answer Oremus and the Collectes.
Dominus vobiscum: with the answer of y e people, although we have no certain author named by whom it came: Yet this is certain, that it was deduced out of the Greek church into the latin: as may appear by the Liturge of Chrysostom and Basilius (if the liturgy be rightly ascribed unto them) also by Origen, and other ancient writers: by whom, it may seem that the liturgy, or mass (as they call it) did first begin with Dominus vobiscum, and then sursum corda : after that Gratias agamus domino deo nostro and so following upon the same, vere dignum & iustum est &c. To the which beginning of the Canon, other additions after were put unto by others, as ye shall hear (by the Lord's grace) hereafter more at large.
Hugo de S. victor, writeth that this prayer was taken out of the ancient salutation of Booz saluting his harvest folks. And out of the book of Paralip. Where the prophet saluteth Azan the king with his company about him saying: Dominus vobiscum. Honorius writeth thus: Praesbiter cū salutatione veteris testamenti, & Episcopus cum salutatione noui testamenti salutat populum quia dignius est nouum quam vetus testamentum. i. As the Prieste saluteth the people with the words of the old Testament. Dominus vobiscum. So the Bish. useth the words of the new testament, saying: pax vobiscum. &c. Concerning the Collectes Walfr • dus writeth: that as they be diverse and uncertain, so they were made of diverse and sundry authors, as every of them thought it congrue. Hugo de S. victor affirmeth that chiefly they were made by Gelasius and Gregorius.
Why they were called collects, W. Durand and Micrologus show the cause, for that in the city of Rome they said them over the people collected together in the station day, therefore they were called collectae.
The Graduall with Alleluya Tracte & Sequenties.
The Responsorie, which is called the Graduall (being wont to be song at the steps going up) with alleluya, Honorius saith that Ambrose made them, but Pope Gregory ordained them to be received.
Upon festival days the Sequencies, which were wont to be song, were chiefly composed by an Abbot, called Nokkerus de S. Gallo, And by Pope Nicholas commanded to be song in the Mass.
The gradual the people were wont to sing when the Bishop was about to go up to the pulpit, or some higher standing, where the word of God might be the better and more sensibly heard at his mouth, reading the Epistle and the Gospel.
The Epistle and the Gospel.
The reading of the Epistle and the Gospel, although it was not used in the Apostles time: yet it seemeth to be of ancient continuance: as Hugo saith, Primis temporibus ab Epistola Pauli, missa incipiebatur, post quam sequebatur Euangelium, sicut nunc. i. In former time, the Mass begun first with the Epistle of S. Paul: after which Epistle thē followed the Gospel, as also now. &c.
Walafridus saith: it is uncertain who first ordered & disposed them so to be.
Some attribute them to Jerome, some to Damasus, some to Telesphorus aforesaid. This is certain, that Pope Anastasius ordained to stand up at the hearing of y e Gospel read, about the year of our savior .406.
Petrus Ciruelus, writeth thus: Legimus & circa annos Christianae Salutis .500. fere, iam institutas Epistolas in officio missali. &c. About 500. years almost, the Epistle saith he, was first brought into the mass.
Honorius lib. 1. Epistolam & Euangelium Alexander Papa legi ad missam cōstituit. Hieronimus autem praesbiter lexionariū, & Euangeliarium, vt hodie habet Ecclesia, collegit. Sed Damasus Papa, vt nunc moris est, legi censuit. Alexander saith he, appointed the Epistle, and the Gospel, to be read at Mass. The translation and the disposition of them, in that order, as they stand, Jerome the Priest collected: but Damasus would them to be read in the Church, so as the use is now
Betwixt the Epistle and the Gospel, the old Canons of the Spaniards did forbid any Hymn or Canticle to be song, in the order of the Mass, which now by the Romish order is broken.
The Creed.
The Creed was made by the Synod of Constantinople, but by Damasus the Pope, ordained to be song at y e Mass. And where some affirm that it was brought in by Pope Marcus, about the year of our Lord .340. to reconcile these two together, peradventure thus it may be takē, that the one brought in the Creed, or Symbole of Nicene counsel, the other appointed the Creed of Constantinople, as is said.
The Offertory.
After this, oblations were wont to be offered of the people to the Priest: and the Offertorye to be song of the query.
Of these oblations speaketh Irenaeus. Pro diuersis sacrificiorum ritibus, simplex oblatio panis & vini fidelibus sufficiat. &c.
Instead of the sondrye rites of sacrifices, let the simple oblation of bread and wine suffice the faithful.
Item, Walafrid. omnis populus intrans ecclesiam debet sacrificare, sicut docet ordo institutionis ecclesiasticae. i. Euerye person entering in the Church must do sacrifice, as the order of Ecclesiastical institution doth teach, what order this was, it is declared in ordine Romano by these words: populus dat oblationes suas, id est panem & vinum: primo masculi, deinde faeminae nouissime vero sacerdotes & Diaconi offerunt, sed solum panem, & hoc ante altare. i. The people give everyone his oblacions, that is, bread and wine: first the men, then the women, after them Priests and Deacons offer, but bread only. &c.
Likewise Bucardus testifieth the same In synodo Matiscon decretum est, vt in omnibus Dominicis diebus, alijsque festiuitatibus oblatio ab omnibus qui ad Missam conuenerint vtriusque sexus offeratur in Ecclesia, singulas oblationes offerentes, finita missa oblationes a praesbitero accipiant. i. In y e Sinod Matiscon it was ordained that every Sunday and festival day oblation was made of all the people which came to the mass, or liturgy, both men and women, in the church, every person bringing and offering his own oblation.
The liturgye being done, they receive the oblations of the priest. &c.
Thus ye may see what was their oblations and sacrifice in the ancient time, in their liturgy. Wherof now remaineth nothing, but the name only with the song.
This offertory some ascribe to Eutichianus about the year of our Lord .280. but thereof no certain evidence appeareth.
Nauclerus writeth that Pope Leo brought in that which is said in y e Mass: Orate pro me fratres & sorores. &c.
The Preface and the Canon.
THe Preface of the Canon from vere dignum & iustum est. &c. to per Christum Dominum nostrum is given to Gelasius. su • sum corda, seemeth to be borrowed out of the old manner of the Greek Church, S. Cyprian also maketh mention of the same and S. Aust. de vera religione. cap 3.
And therefore Thomas Waldēsis judgeth that this part of the preface cannot be attributed to Gelasius.
After Christum dominum nostrum, in the old liturgy then followed Qui predie quàm pateretur as Rhenanus supposeth, but then came Pope Gelasius the first, about y e year of our Lord 497. which inserted that which followeth: Te igitur clementissime. &c.
Whereby it is to be noted that Polidorus Virgilius (which ascribeth Qui predie to Pope Alexander) De invent. lib. 5. cap. 10. is deceived.
The like is also to be said of Panormitanus, who referreth the same clause Qui pridie. &c. to the Apostles. lib. de celebratione Missae Cap. Cum Martha.
Furthermore note (good reader) howe this doth agree with the long Canon of Saint Ambrose lib. 4 De sacramentis. cap. 5. Dicit Sacerdos: fac nobis hanc oblationem adscriptam, rationalem, acceptabilem quod est figura corporis & sanguinis Domini nostri Jesus Christi. Qui pridie quam pateretur, in sanctis manibus suis accepit panem, respexit ad coelum ad te sancte pater omnipotence aeterne Deus, gratias agens benedixit, fregit. &c. if it be true that either Panormitanus saith, or that Gelasius made Qui pridie. &c. Howe can this Canon then be fathered upon S. Ambrose? And by the same reason also his whole book entitled De Sacramentis may be suspected, as of diverse learned men it is.
Then came Pope Sixtus, 10. years after him, which brought into the Canon Sanctus, Sanctus, thrice to be song out of the book of Isaiah. And to annex it together, joined also that which goeth before: per quem maiestatem tuam. &c.
He that writeth the liturgy of Basilius, ascribeth it to his name: whether he doth it truly or no, I will not here contend. This is to be noted, that seeing in the said liturgye of Basilius, the same Particle, sanctus, sanctus sāctus Dominus Deus Sabaoth: pleni sunt coeli & terra gloria tua, osanna in excelsis, is song: Therefore it must needs follow, that either Leo which was about the year of our Lord. 460. borrowed this out of Basilius Liturgy, or else y e same is falsely attributed to Basilius.
After this followeth: Sanctum sacrificium immaculatam hostiam, till ye come to placatus accipias, which Leo the first did make and institute.
The words in the communion, Hoc quotiescunque feceritis in mei memoriam facietis, &c were put in by Pope Alexander. i. as Humbertus writeth: under Bishop Alexander martyr & papa .5. ab Apost. Petro passionem Domini inserēs Canoni Missae, ait: Hoc quotiescunque feceritis. &c.
Pope Gregory the third about the year of our Lord .732. put to his piece: Et eorum quorum memoria. &c.
This Gregory the 3. called a council at Rome where in he decreed that Images should not only be had in temples, but also worshipped, and that all gaynesayers should be counted as heretics.
Innocentius the 3. of that name affirmeth Pope Gelasius, which was about 490. years after Christ, to have made a great piece of that Canon, as he himself did something therein, about the year of our Lord .1215.
Panormitanus affirmeth that Gregory did add to the Canon, this clause, Diesque nostros in pace disponas.
Briefly Gregorius in registro saith that one Scholasticus made the most part of the Canon, finding also fault with the same, that in composing the Chanon, he would put in his own prayers, & leave out the Lord's prayer. &c.
Where is to be noted, for the reconciling of these writers together, of whom some impute the Canon to Gelasius, some again to Scholasticus: In my conjecture it may be said, that both these be one, and so the matter is reconciled. The reason that moveth me is this, for so I find In vetusto quodam libro de officio missae, after these words, Gelasius Papa ex Scolastico effectus in ordine 48. fecit tractatus & hymnos. &c.
The elevation and adoration.
The elevation and adoration of the sacrament, we cannot find to come in by any other, then by Honorius the iii. about the year of our Lord 1222. which ordained that the people then should kneel down and worship the sacrament.
The Pater noster.
Johannes Diaconus writing of Gregory, saith: Orationem dominicam mox post Canonem super hostiam censuit recitari. i that Gregory caused the Lord's prayer to be recited immediately after the Canon upon the host. &c.
Although the Apostles ever used the Lord's prayer at the supper of the Lord, as is said before: yet Gregory belike placed it so in that order after the Canon, and brought it in with those words: praeceptis salutaribus &c.
Gregorius in Reg. Dominica oratio apud Graecos ab omni populo: Apud nos vero a solo sacerdote cantatur. i. The Lord's prayer, saith he, among the Grecians was wont to • ee song generally of all the people: with us it is song only of the priest.
Agnus.
The Agnus Pope Sergius about the year of our Lord .700. brought into the Mass, as witnesseth Exposit. R. ord. propter officium confractionis dominici corporis, constitutum est a papa Sergio vt agnus dei decantetur. &c.
The Pax.
Innocentius ordained the paxe to be given to the people. Pacis ait, osculum dandum post confecta mysteria, vt constet populum ad omnia quae in mysterijs aguntur, praebuisse consensum. &c.
Peter Martyr in his commontaryes in Iud. saith that it it was brought in by Pope Leo .2. as it is said: and yet supposeth the same not to be so, saying that this was an ancient custom in the Apostles time, for Christians to salute one another with the kiss of peace. &c.
To this of Peter Martyr agreeth also Gabriel Biel. writing in these words: Porrexit in primitiua ecclesia sacerdos osculum pacis ministro, caeteris impartiednum, vt per hoc significaret, &c. i. In the primitive Church, the priest gave a kiss of peace to the minister, to be given by him to the people.
The distribution and communion.
After this followeth the comunion, where in our popish Mass and Ministers thereof do much alter and degenerate from ancient antiquity, two manner of ways.
First in that they make no communion thereof, receiving only to thenselves, contrary both to their own words: where they say after their receiving: Sacramenta que sumpsimus. &c. and also to the ancient examples and decrees of the Apostles and others. And where it is decreed in the Epistle of Anacletus. Paracta autē consecratione omnes communicent, qui noluerint Ecclesiasticis carere liminibus. Sic enim & Apostoli statuerunt, & S. Romana tenet ecclesia. &c. i. The consecration being done, let all communicate together, unless they will be thrust out of the church doors. &c.
Here note by the way (gentle Reader) how Gratianus the writer of the Popes decrees, is ouersene, which in his book De consecrate. dist. 2. referreth this saying of Anacletus to Pope Calixtus. And likewise also Chocleus writing against Musculus, followeth Gracianus in the same error.
Likewise in the Canons of the Apostles (if the Canons were theirs) we read: 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . &c. i. All the faithful which resort to the Church, and tarry not out the end of the service, and receive not the holy communion, such, as bringing in disorder to the Church, ought to be disseuered, &c. And again: Si quis episcopus, praesbiter, aut diaconus, aut quicunq́ue ex sacerdotali consortio, oblation facta • , non cōmunicauerint, causam dicito. &c.
For how can that be a communion called, which is not common but private to one? As Micrologus writeth: Nec enim proprie communio dici potest, nisi plures de eodem sacrificio participent. i. It cannot be called a communion, except mo then one do participate of one sacrifice. &c.
And Durand: In primitiua ecclesia omnes qui celebrationi Missarum intererant, singulis diebus communicare solebāt, eo q́uod Apostoli omnes de calice biberunt. &c. i. In the primitive time all that were present at the ministration, were wont every day to communicate, because that the apostles did altogether drink of the cup. &c.
Secondly, they alter and degenerate therein from ancient antiquity, in that when they communicate also with the people, yet they deprive them of the holy cup: which depravation was not in the church before the counsel o • Constance, about the yere of our Lord .1414. For before it was so autentikly received, that it was counted a sacrilege, to receive the one without the other, as appeareth by the words of Pope Gelasius: Cōperimus quod quidam sumpta tantum modo corporis sacri portion. &c. the whole in english is thus: we understand that there be some, which receiving the one part only of the holy body, abstain from the cup of the sacrate blood: who (because they be taught so to do, by what superstition I cannot tell) either let thē receive the sacrament whole together, or let them abstain from the whole sacrament altogether, because the division of that one and whole sacrament, cannot be without great sacrilege. &c.
Hytherto also pertaineth the testimony of S. Agustine in these words: Et ibi vos estis in mensa, & in calice nobiscum vos estis. Simul enim hoc sumimus, simul bibimus, quia simul viuimus. &c. i. There be you at the table, and at the cup there also be you with us: for together we receive, and together we drink, because we live together.
As also out of the book of Gregory it is manifest that not only the people received then in both kinds: but also the words were prescribed to the minister, what he should say in giving the cup: Item sacerdos calicem dando dicat: Sanguis Domini nostri Jesus Christi custodiat te ad vitam aeternam. i. Let the priest say in giving the cup: The blood of our lord Jesus Christ keep thee to everlasting life. Amen.
Further in rēdering the cause, why it should so be done, Thomas Aquine writeth: Nam hoc valet ad repraesentand • m passionem Christi, in qua seorsum fuit sanguis a corpore separatus. &c. Secundo, hoc est conueniens vsui huius sacramenti, vt seorsum exhibeatur corpus Christi fidelibus in cibum, & sanguis in potum. i. For that serveth to represent the passion of Christ, wherein his blood was parted severally from the body. &c Secondly, for that is convenient to the use of the sacrament, that the body should severally be given to the faithful to meat. and the blood to drink.
And therefore served the office of the deacōs as we read, vt oblata a populo super altare consecranda disponant, & perfectis mysterijs calicem sacrosancti sanguinis Domini, fidelibus propinent i. To lay the offerings of the people upon the altar to be hallowed, and when the mysteries be consecrated, to distribute the cup of the sacrate blood of the Lord to the faithful, &c.
But among all other testimonies to prove that the sacrament ought to be common to all people in both kinds, there is none more evident then the place of Jerome. Caeterum dominica caena omnibus debet esse communis, quia ill omnibus discipulis suis, qui aderant aequaliter tradidit sacramenta. i. The supper of the Lord ought to be indifferently common to all his disciples there present. &c.
And thus have ye heard the Canon described, which otherwise is called secretum. i. the secrete of the mass, being so termed, because the priest was wont to read it in secrete or in scilence. The reason thereof Pope Innocentius .iii. declareth in his third book, for that the holy words, saith he of the Canon, should not grow in contempt with the people by the daily use and hearing thereof. And bringeth in an example concerning the same of certain shepherds which in the fields using the same words of the Chanon vpō their bread and wine, the matter was turned saith he, into flesh and blood, and they plagued therefore from heaven: but with such popish tales the Church hath been long replenished.
The Postcommon.
After the Canon and communion, then followeth the Postcommon, with the collectes, which the mass book requireth always to be used in an odd number, sometime teaching to use but one, as in the sondayes in Lent: and sometime three: as in certain masses, from lowsonday, till the Ascension: but never to pass the number of seven.
Ite Missa est.
Last of all cometh Ite missa est, whereby the minister dimitteth and sendeth away all the congregation there present to their business, for as you heard before, it was decreed in ancient time, that it was not lawful to depart from the congregation in the time of holy ministration, before the end of the whole communion. And therefore, all things being accomplished, the minister turning to the assembly, pronounceth Ite missa est.
Where note that upon sondayes and festival days only when Gloria in excelsis, was song, Ite missa est was wont to be said: on the workedayes, Benedicamus Domino: sometime Requiescant in pace.
NOw concerning such trinckets as were to the foresaid Mass appertaining or circumstant, first the linnin Albes and Corporasses were brought in by Pope Marcus. Ann. 340. if that be true which is thought of some, where note again, that in the time of this Pope, it was nothing offensive for every honest Priest, to have his own proper wife. In the time also of this Marcus, was concilium Elib • rtinum, which condemned all kinds of Images and pictures in temples.
Contrary to the which counsel, Pope Gregory the third, about the year of our Lord. 732. calling a counsel at Rome, did not only stablish the Images before condemned, but condemned the gaynesayers for Heretics, as is aforesaid.
By Sixtus the second it was ordained that no liturgy should be done save only upon altars hallowed, about the year of our Lord 260. as some suppose. But as I see no firm probation upon the same: so have I probable conjecture the same not to be true.
Some there be that shame not to say that S. Clement brought in the Albe and vestmentes, to the popish mass.
Item that the sacrament of the blood of the Lord should be consecrate in chalices of glass and not of wood, as it was in time before, they say it was the ordinance of Pope Seuerinus.
After this came in golden chalices, and a true proverb with all. That once they had wooden chalices, and gold̄ Priests, now they have golden Chalices, and wooden Priests.
Schenianus ordained the ringing of bells, and burning of lamps in churches.
Uitalianus the playing on the organs.
Damasus by the instinct of Jerome appointed gloria patri after the psalms.
Pelagius devised the Memento for the dead.
Eutichianus as other say, brought in the Offertorye, which was then after a far other wise then it is, or hath been used now a great while. For what time as many of the Heathen being greatly accustomed with offerings▪ were converted unto Christ, and could not be well brought from their old long use of Offeringes, the Pope thought to bear somewhat with the weak, and permitted them to bring meares into the congregation or church, that whē the Byshoppe had blessed them, they that brought them, might distribute them to the poor, or take them to their own use. But afterward did Pope Gregory so help up this sentence: Non apparebis in conspectu Dei tui vacuus. &c. Thou shalt not appear in the sight of thy God empty. &c. that as he willed the people to lay their offerings upon the Aultare: so they did, and have not yet forgotten to do • so still.
Soul masses, and masses appplied for the dead, came in partly by Gregory, partly by Pelagius, which brought in the Memento as is said.
Wherein note (good Reader) and mark, how these two stand together, that which our Savior saith in his Euangely, hoc facite in mei commemorationem, do this in remembrance of me: and that which they say In quorum memoria Corpus Christi sumitur. &c. i. In whose commemoration the body of Christ is taken. &c. Christ would it to be done in his remembrance, and the Pope saith, do it in remembrance of the dead. &c. What can be more contrary.
Innocentius the third, ordained that the Sacrament should be reserved in the Church. The same brought also in auriculare confession as a law, about the year of our Lord 1215. he did also constitute that no Archbishop should enjoy the pall, unless he were of his own religion: and therefore no great marvel if there be such unity in popery.
Uigilius ordained that the Priest should say mass having his face toward the east.
Platina writeth how the first latin mass was song in the sixte counsel of constantinople, which was about the year of our Lord, 680. so that the said Mass was there & then first allowed and not before. And yet they (I think) the greek Church should have known as soon the mass, if it had proceeded from James or Basilius, as the Latin Church did know it.
The opinion to think the Mass to help souls in Purgatory was confirmed by Pope Johannes 19. by reasō of a dream wherein he dreamed that he saw and heard the voices of devils lamenting and bewailing, that souls were delivered from them, by the saying of Masses and diriges. And therefore did approve and ratify the feast of all souls brought in by Odilo: moreover adjoined also to the same, the feast of all hallowes, about the year of our Lord. 1003.
Concerning lent fast, some think that Telesphorus, about the year of our Lord. 140. was the author thereof. But that peradventure may be as true, as that which they also attribute to him, that he ordained three masses of one priest to be said on Christmas day. Or if he did ordain that fast, yet he did ordain it but freely to be kept: for so I find among the decrees, that lent was commanded first to be fasted, but only of the Clergy or church men.
Pope Leo commanded the Sacrament to be censed.
Pope Boniface set in his foot for couerting of y e altars.
In S. Cyprians time, it seemeth that water was then mingled with the wyne, whereof we read mention in his second book of Epistles: which mixture is referred to Alexander the first, in the order of the Romaine Canon.
As concerning the breaking of the body in 3. partes we read also mention to be made in the same book of order, but no certain author thereof to be named. The words of the book be these: Tripliciter, inquit, corpus Domini intelligitur. Vnum quod resurrexit a mortuis, quod significat particula in sāguinem missa: Aliud quod adhuc viuit in terra significatū per particulam a sacerdote consumptam. Tertium, quod iam requiescit in Christo, quod etiam a tertia particula in altari reseruata apt figuratur. &c. i. Three ways is the body of the Lord understanded: One which rose again from the dead, being signified by that part, which is let fall to the blood in the chalice. The other is, that yet is living in the earth, which the part of the priest eaten doth signify. The third is that now resteth in Christ, which also is figured by that particle, that is reserved upon the alter.
Dedication of churches came in by Felix the third: and that Churches might not be hallowed but by a Byshoppe an. 492.
The canticle Gloria laus. &c. in the procession before the Mass▪ on Palmesonday, was instituted by Theodulphus bishop of Aurelia, as Sygibertus writeth, about the year of our Lord. 843.
Geuing of holy bread came in by this occasion, as it is to be gathered, partly out of Honorius, partly out of Durand, and other. The manner was in ancient time, that the Ministers were wont to receive certain meal of every house or family, wherewith a great loaf was made, called Panis Dominicus, able to serve in the Communion and to be distributed unto the people, which then was wont every day to be present and to receive, especially they that offered the meal: for whom it was wont therefore to be said in the Canon: Omnium circumstantium, qui tibi hoc sacrificium laudis offerunt. &c. But afterward the number of the people increasing, and pietye decreasing, as Durand writeth, it was then ordained to communicate but only upon sondayes.
At length followed the third constitution, that thrice a year, at least at Easter, every man should communicate, being thus provided, that instead of the daily communiō before used, the pax did serve. And instead of receiving upon the Sunday, bread was hallowed and sondaylye given and distributed unto the people, which also was called Eulogia: the constitution whereof seemeth to proceed from Pope Pius. For so we read in the decrees of the said Pope Pius: Vt de oblationibus quae offeruntur a populo, & consecrationibus supersunt, vel de panibus quos deferūt fideles ad ecclesiam, vel certe de suis praesbiter conuenienter partes incisas habeat in vase nitido & conuenienti, & post Missarum solennia qui communicare non fuerint parati, eulogias omni die dominico, & in dieb{us} festis exinde accipiāt. That is: That the Minister shall take of the oblations offered of the people, remaining of the consecration, or else of the bread, which the faith • ull bring unto the Church or else to take of their own bread and cut it conveniently in portions in a clean, & a convenient vessel: so that after the solemnity of the ministration being done, they that were not prepared and ready to communicate, may receive every sondaye or festival day, Eulogies, or benedictions with the same. Hec ill.
As concerning holly water which they used to sprinckle at the Church door, upon them that entered in, I will not say that it spronge from the Idolatrous use of the Gentiles.
This I say as I find in historia Sozomeni. Erat autem Romanis vetusta consuetudo vt quum limen templi transeūdū esset, sacerdos secundum morē ethnicum madidos quosdam olive ramusculos manu tenens ingredientes aspergebat. &c. i. It was an old custom among the Romans, that at the entering in at the Church door, the priest after the usual manner of the Ethniks, having in his hand moist branches of Olive, did sprinckle with the same such as entered in. &c.
To the which custom this our manner of giving of holy water is so like, that it seemeth to proceed out of the same.
In the book of the Popes decrees, & in the distinctions of Gratianus, there is a certain decree fathered upon Alexander the first, about the year of our Lord. 121. Which decree may well seme to be a bastard decree, neither agreing to such a father, nor such a time, concerning the conjuring of holy water. The words of the decree be these: Aquam sale conspersam in populis benedicimus, vt ea cuncti aspersi sanctificentur, & purificentur, quod omnibus sacerdotibus faciendum esse mandamus. Nam si cinis vitule aspersus populum sanctificabat, atque mundabat, multo magis aqua sale aspersa, diuinisque precibus sacrata populū sanctisicat atque mundat. Et si sale asperso per Helisaeum Prophetam sterilitas aquae sanata est: quanto magis diuinis precibus sacratus sal sterilitatem rerū aufert humanarum, & coinquinatos sanctisicat & purgat, & caetera bona multiplicat, & insidias diaboli auertit, & a phātasmatis versutijs homines defendit? That is: We bless water sprinkled with salt among the people, that all such as be sprinkled with the same may be sanctified and purified: which thing we charge and command all priests to do, for if the ashes of the Cow, in the old law, being sprinkled among y e people did sanctify, and cleanse them, much more water sprinkled with salt, and hallowed with godly prayers sanctifieth and cleanseth the people: and if that Heliseus the Prophet by the sprinkling of salt, did heal and help the barrenness of the water: how much more the salt being hallowed by godly prayers taketh away the barrenness of human things, and sanctifieth and purgeth them that be defiled: also multiplieth other things that be good and turneth away the snares of the devil, and defendeth mē from deceptions of phantasy. &c.
Thus ye have heard the author and father of holly water, which some also ascribe to Pope Sixtus which succeeded Alexander. But as y e Papists do not agree in the first author or institutor of this hallowing of Elementes, so I think the same untruly to be ascribed to either, but leaving the probation of this to farther leisure, let us now hear in our own tongue their own words, which y e use in this their coniuration.
The form and words used of the Priest in conjuring Salt.
I conjure thee thou creature of Salte by the ✚ living God, by the ✚ true God, by the holy God. &c. That thou mayest be made a conjured Salte, to the salvation of them that believe: And that unto all such as receive thee, thou mayest be health of soul and body: and that from out of y e place, wherein thou shalt be sprinkled, may fly away and depart all phantasy, wickedness, or craftiness of the devils subtlety, and every foul spirit. &c.
The form of conjuring water.
I conjure thee, thou creature of water in the name of ✚ God the father almighty, and in the name of Jesus Christ his son, our Lord, and in the virtue ✚ of the holy Ghost that thou become a conjured water to expel all power of the enemy. &c.
Who seeth not in these words blasphemy intolerable, how that which only is due to the blood of Christ, and promised to faith only in him, the same is transferred to earthly and insensate creatures, to be salvation both to body and spirit, inwardlye to give remission of sins, to give health and remedy against evils and devils, against all phantasies, wickedness, and all foul spirits, and to expel the power of the enemy. &c. If this be true whereto serveth the blood of Christ, and the virtue of Christian faith?
Therefore judge thyself (gentle Reader) whether thou think this trompery rightly to be fathered upon those ancient fathers aforenamed, or else whether it may seme more like truth that John Sleydan writeth, whose words in his second book de Monarchijs are these: Horum decreta sunt in libris inserta conciliorum, sed ex his plaeraque tam sunt leuicula, tam nugatoria, tam aliena prorsus a sacris literis, vt credibile sit ab alijs longo post tēpore fuisse conficta. &c. That is: The decrees of these foresaid Bishops and Martyrs be inserted in the book of Counsels, but of these decrees many thereof be so childish, so trifling, and so far disagreeing from the holy scripture, that it is very like that the same were feigned and counterfeited of others, long after their time. &c. Thus much saith Sleydane with moe words in that place. Unto whose testimony, if I might be so bold also to add my conjecture, I would suppose the coniuration of this foresaid water and Salte, to spring out of the same fountain, from whence proceeded the conjuring of flowers and branches, because I see the order and manner of them both to be so like and uniform, as may appear.
The manner of halowing flowers and branches.
I conjure thee, thou creature of flowers and branches in the name of ✚ God the father almighty: and in the name ✚ of Jesus Christ his son, our Lord: and in the virtue of the holy ✚ Ghost. Therefore be thou rooted out, and displāted from this creature of flowers and branches all thou strength of the adversary, all thou host of the devil, and all the power of the enemy: evē every assault of the devils. &c.
And thus much concerning the antiquity of holy bread and holy water: whereby thou mayst partly conjecture the same not to be so old, as Stephen Gardener, in his Letter against master Ridley above mentioned, would have, Pag. 753. being both deceived himself, and also going about to seduce other.
Furthermore as touching the reserving of relics & the memorial of saints brought into the mass, Gregory the third is the author thereof, who also added to the canon thereof, this clause: Quorum solennitates hodie in cōspectu diuinae maiestatis tuae celebrantur. &c.
Finally it were to long to recite everything in order devised and brought in particularly to the mass, and to y e Church. For after that man's brain was once set on devising, it never could make an end of heaping rite upon rite, and ceremony upon ceremonye, till all religion was turned well nigh to superstition. Thereof cometh oil and cream brought in by Pope Sylvester not wont to be hallowed but by a bishop. That the corporas should not be of silcke, but only of fine linen cloth. That the Psalms should be song on sides, the one side of the quier singing one verse the other another with gloria patri. &c. That baptism should be ministered at no other time in the yere but only at Easter and at whitsontide (save only to infantes and such as were in extreme infirmity) and that it should be required 40. days before: so determined by Pope Siricius: and therefore was it that fontes were hallowed only at these two seasons, the which hallowing they keep yet still, but the ordinance they have reject. Item that belles also were Christened. Item, no Prieste should wear a beard, or have long hair, so appointed by Pope Martin the first. Item that auriculare confession should be made, that the book of decrees and decretals should be stablished and transubstauntiation confirmed, in which three Acts Pope Innocentius the third was the chiefest doer, about the year of our Lord. 1215.
And thus have ye in sum the gatheringes of the mass, with the Chanon and all the appurtenaunce of the same, which, not much unlike to the Crow of Esope being patched with the feathers of so many birds, was so long a gethering, that the temple of Solomon was not so long in building, as the Popes Mass was in making. Whereby judge now thyself (good Reader) whether this Mass did proceed from James and other Apostles or no. And yet this was one of the principal causes for which so much turmoyle was made in the Church, with the bloodshed of so many Godly men, suffering in so many quarters of this realm: some consumed by fire, some pined away with hunger, some hanged, some slain, some racked, some tormented one way, some another: and that only or chiefelye, for the cause of this aforesaid popish Mass, as by the reading of this story following, by the grace of Christ our Lord, shall appear more at large. In whom I wish thee to continue in health and to persevere in the truth.
The first entering of Queen Mary to the Crown, with the alteration of Religion, and other perturbations happening the same time in this Realm of England.
W Hat time King Edward by long sickness began to appear more feeble and weak, in the mean while during the time of this his sickness, a certain marriage was provided, concluded and shortly also upon the same solempnised in the month of May, between the Lord Gilford, son to the Duke of Northumberland, and the Lady Jane the Duke of Suffolkes daughter, whose mother being then alive, was daughter to Mary King Henryes second sister, who first was married to the French king, and afterward to Charles Duke of Suffolk. But to make no long tariance hereupon, the marriage being ended, and the king waxing every day more sick then other, where as in deed there seemed in him no hope of recouerye, it was brought to pass by the consent not only of the Nobility, but also of all the chief Lawyers of the Realm, that the king by his Testament did appoint the foresaid Lady Jane, daughter to the Duke of Suffolk, to be inheretrice unto the crown of England, passing over his two sisters Mary and Elizabeth.
To this order subscribed all the kings Counsel, and chief of the Nobility, the Major and city of London, and almost all the Judges and chief Lawyers of this Realm, saving only Justice Hales of Kent, a man both fauoring true Religion, and also an upright judge as any hath been noted in this Realm, who giving his consent unto Lady Mary, would in no case subscribe to Lady Jane. Of this man (God willing) you shall perceive more in the sequel of this story. The causes laid against Lady Mary, were as well for that it was feared she would mary with a Straunger, and thereby entangle the crown: as also that she would clean alter Religion, used both in king Henry her father, and also in king Edward her brothers days, & so bring in the pope, to the utter destruction of the Realm, which indeed afterward came to pass, as by the course and sequel of this story may well appear.
Much probable matter they had thus to conjecture of her, by reason of her great stubbernnes shown and declared in her brothers days, as in the letters before mentioned, passing between her and king Edward, & the Counsel, may appear. The matter being thus concluded, and after confirmed by every man's hand, King Edward an Impe of so great hope, not long after this departed, by the vehemency of his sickness, when he was sixtene years of age: with whom also decaid in manner the whole flourishing estate and honor of the English nation.
When king Edward was dead, this Jane was established in the kingdom by the Nobles consent, and was forthwith published Queen by proclamation at London, and in other Cities where was any great resort, and was there so taken and named. Between this young Damsel and king Edward there was little difference in age, though in learning & knowledge of the tongues she was not only equal, but also superior unto him, being instructed of a Mayster right notablye learned. If her fortune had been as good as was her bringing up, joined with • inenesse of wit: undoubtedly she might have seemed comparable, not only to the house of the Uaspasians, Semp • onians, and mother of the Grachies, yea, to any other women beside that deserved high praise for their sigulart learning: but also to the university men, which have taken many degrees of the Schools.
In the mean time while these things were a working at London, Mary which had knowledge of her Brothers death, writeth to the Lord's of the Council in form as followeth.
A Letter of the Lady Mary, sent to the Lord's of the Counsel, wherein she claymeth the Crown after the decease of king Edward,
MY Lord's, we greete you well, and have received sure advertisement that our dearest Brother the king our late sovereign Lord, is departed to God's mercy: which news howe they be woeful unto our heart, he only knoweth, to whose will and pleasure we must and do humbly submit us and our willes. But in this so lamentable a case, that is to wit, now after his Majesty's departure and death, concerning the Crown and governance of this Realm of England, with the title of France, and all things thereto belonging, what hath been provided by Act of Parliament and the Testament and last will of our dearest Father, besides other circumstances advancing our right, you know, the Realm, and the whole world knoweth, the Rolls and Recordes appear by the authority of the king our said Father, and the king our said brother, and the subjects of this Realm, so that we verily trust that there is no good true subject, that is, can, or would pretend to be ignorant thereof, and of our parte we have of our selves caused, and as God shall aid and strength us, shall cause our right and title in this behalf to be published and proclaimed accordingly. And albeit this so weighty a matter seemeth strange, that the dying of our said brother upon Thursday at night last past, we hitherto had no knowledge from you thereof, yet we consider your wisdoms and prudence to be such, that having eftsoons amongst you debated, pondered, and well weighed this present case with our estate, with your own estate, the common wealth, and all our honors, we shall and may conceive great hope and trust with much assurance in your loyaltye and service, and therefore for the time interpret and take things not to the worst, and that ye yet will like Noble men work the best. Nevertheless we are not ignorant of your consultations, to undo the provisions made for our preferment, nor of the great bands and provisions forceable, wherewith ye be assembled and prepared, by whom, and to what ende, God and you know, and nature can but fear some evil. But be it that some consideration political, or whatsoever thing else hath moved you thereto, yet doubt you not my Lord's, but we can take all these your doings in gracious part, being also right ready to remit & fully pardon the same, with that freely to eschew bloodshed and vengeance against all those that can or will intend the same: trusting also assuredly you will take and accept this grace and virtue in good part as appeateyneth, and that we shall not be enforced to use the service of other our true subjects and friends which in this our just and right cause, God in whom our whole affiaunce is, shall send us. Wherefore my Lord's we require you and charge you, and every of you, that every of you, of your allegiance which you owe to God and us, and to none other, for our honor and the surety of our parson, only employ yourselves, & forth with upon receipt hereof, cause our right and title to the Crown and gou • rnement of this Realm to be proclaimed in our Citty of London, and other places as to your wisdoms shall seem good, and as to this case appertaineth, not failing hereof as our very trust is in you. And thus our Letter signed with our hand, shall be your sufficient warrant in this behalf.
Yeu • n under our Signet, at our Manor of Kenyngall, the ninth of July. 1553.
To this Letter of the Lady Mary, the Lord's of the Counsel make answer again as followeth.
Aunswere of the Lord's unto the Lady Mary's Letter.
MAdame, we have received your letters the ninth of this instant, declaring your supposed title, which you judge yourself to have to the Imperial crown of this Realm, & all the dominions thereunto belonging. For answer whereof, this is to advertise you, that forasmuch as our sovereign Lady Queen Jane is after the death of our sovereign Lord Edward the sixth, a prince of most noble memory invested and possessed with the just and right title in the Imperial Crown of this Realm, not only by good order of old ancient laws of this Realm, but also by our late sovereign Lord's Letters patentes signed with his own hand, and se • led with the great seal of England in presence of the most parte of the Nobles, Counselors, Judges, with diverse other grave and sage personages, assenting & subscribing to the same: We must therefore as of most bound duty and allegiance assent unto her said Grace, and to none other, except we should (which faithful subjects cannot) fall into grievous and unspeakable enormities. Wherefore we can no less do, but for the quiet both of the realm and you also, to advertise you, that forasmuch as the divorce made between the king of famous memory K Henry the 8. & the Lady Katherine your mother, was necessary to be had both by the everlasting laws of God, and also by the Ecclesiastical laws, & by the most part of the noble & learned Universities of Christendom, and confirmed also by the sundry acts of Parliamentes remaining yet in their force, and thereby you justly made illegitimate and vnheritable to the crown Imperial of this realm, and the rules and dominions, and possessions of the same: you will upon just consideration hereof, and of diverse other causes lawful to be alleged for the same, & for the just inheritance of the right line and godly order taken by the late king our sovereign Lord king Edward the sixth, and agreed upon by the Nobles and greatest personages aforesaid, surcease by any pretence to vex and molest any of our sovereign Lady Queen Jane her subjects from their true faith and allegiance due unto her grace: assuring you, that if you will for respect show yourself quiet and obedient (as you ought) you shall find us all and several ready to do you any service that we with duty may, and be glad with your quietness to preserve the common state of this realm: wherein you may be otherwise grievous unto us, to yourself, and to them. And thus we bid you most heartily well to fare,
from the Tower of London, this 9. of July. 1553.
Your Ladyships friends, showing yourself an obedient subject.
- Thomas Canterbury.
- The Marques of Winchester.
- John Bedford.
- Will. Morthhampton.
- Thom. Eli Chancellor.
- Northumberland.
- Henry Suffolk.
- Henry Arundell.
- Shrewesbury.
- Pembroke.
- Cobham.
- R. Riche.
- Huntingdon.
- Darcy.
- Cheyney.
- R. Cotton.
- John Gates.
- W. Peter.
- W. Cicelle.
- John Cheeke.
- John Mason.
- Edward North.
- R. Bows.
All these aforesaid, except only the Duke of Northumberland and syr John Gates, afterward were either by especial favor or special or general pardon discharged.
After this answer received, and the minds of the Lord's perceived, Lady Mary speedeth her self secretly away far of from the City, hoping chiefly upon the good will of the Commons, and yet perchance not destitute altogether of the secret aduertisementes of some of the Nobles. When the Counsel heard of her sodiene departure, and perceived her stoutness, & that all came not to pass as they supposed, they gathered speedily a power of mē together, appointing an army, and first assigned that the Duke of Suffolk should take that enterprise in hand, & so have the leading of the Bande. But afterward alterynge their minds, they thought it best to send forth the Duke of Northumberland, with certain other Lord's and Gentlemen, and that the Duke of Suffolk should keep the Tower, where the Lord Gilford and the Lady Jane the same time were lodged.
In the which expedition y e Gard also, albeit they were much unwilling at the first thereunto, yet notwithstanding through the vehement persuasions of the Lord Treasurer, M. Chomley, & other, they were induced to assist the duke, and to set forward with him.
These things thus agreed upon, and the Duke now being set forward after the best array out of London, having notwithstanding his times prescribed, and his journeys appointed by the Counsel, to the intent he would not seem to do anything but upon warrant, Mary in the mean while tossed with much travel up and down, to work the surest way for her best advantage, withdrew her self into the quarters of Norfolk and Suffolk, where she understood the Dukes name to be had in much hatred, for the service that had ben done there of late under king Edward, in subduing the rebels: and there gathering to her such aid of the commons in every side as she might, keepeth her self close for a space within Fremingham Castle. To whom first of all resorted the suffolke men: who being always forward in promoting the procedinges of the Gospel, promised her their aid & help, so that she would not attempt the alteration of the religion which her Brother king Edward had before established by laws and orders publicly enacted and received by the consent of the whole Realm in that behalf.
To make the matter short, unto this condition she eftsoons agreed, with such promise made unto them, that no innouatiō should be made of religiō, as that no mā would or could then have misdoubted her. Which promise, if she had as constantly kept, as they did willingly preserve her with their bodies and weapons, she had done a deed both worthy her blood, & had also made her reign more stable to her self through former tranquility. For though a man be never so puissant of power, yet brech of promise is an evil upholder of quietness, fear is worser, but cruelty is y e worst of all.
Thus Mary being guarded with the power of y e Gospellers, did vanquish the Duke, and all those that came against her. In consideration whereof, it was (me thinks • an heavy word that she answered to the suffolke men afterwards, which did make supplication unto her grace to perform her promise: For so much (saith she) as you being but menbers, desire to rule your head you shall one day well perceive that members must obey their head, and not look to bear rule over the same. And not only that, but also to cause the more terror unto other, a certain Gentleman named M. Dobbe, dwelling about Wyndam side, for the same cause, that is, for advertising her by humble request, of her promise, was punished, being three sundry times set on the pillory to be a gasing stock unto all men. Divers other delivered her books and supplications made out of the Scripture, to exhort her to continue in the true doctrine then stablished, and for their good wills were sent to prison. But such is the cōditiō of man's nature (as here you see) that we are for the most part more ready always to seek friendship whē we stand in need of help, thē ready to requite a benefit once past & received. Howbeit against all this, one shoot anker we have, which may be a sure comfort to all miserable creatures, y e equity & fidelity are ever perfect and certeinely found with the Lord above, though the same being shut out of the doors in this world, be not to be found here among men. But seeing our intent is to write a story, not to treat of office, let us lay Suffolk men aside for a while, whose deserts for their redines and diligence with the Queen, I will not here stand upon. What she performed on her part, the thing it self, and the whole story of this persecution doth testify, as hereafter more plainly will appear.
On the contrary side, the Duke of Northumberlande, having his warrant under the broad Seal, with all furniture in readiness, as he took his voyage and was now forward in his way, what ado there was, what stirring on every side, what sending, what riding and posting, what letters, messages, and instructions went to and fro, what talking among the soldiers, what hartburning among y e people, what fair pretēses outwardly, inwardly what privy practices there were, what speeding of Ordinance daily and hourly out of the Tower, what rumors and coming down of soulders from all quarters there was, a world it was to see, & a process to declare, enough to make a whole Ilias. The greatest help that made for the Lady Mary, was the short iourneis of the Duke, which by commission were assigned to him before, as is above mentioned. For the longer the Duke lingered in his voyage, the Lady Mary the more increased in puissaunce, the hearts of the people being mightily bent unto her. Which after the Counsel at London perceived, and understood howe the common multitude did withdraw their hearts from them to stand with her, and that certain Noble men begā to go the other way, they turned their song, and proclaimed for Queen the Lady Mary, eldest daughter to king Henry the eight, and appointed by Parliament to succeed K. Edward dying without issue.
And so the Duke of Northumberland, being by counsel and advise sent forth against her, was left destitute and forsaken alone at Cambridge, with some of his sons, & a few other, among whom the Earl of Huntingdon was one: who there were arrested and brought to the Tower of London, as traitors to the Crown, notwithstanding that he had there proclaimed her Queen before.
Thus have you Mary now made a Queen, and the sword of authority put into her hand, which, how she afterward did use, we may see in sequel of this book. Therefore (as I say) when she had been thus advanced by y e gospellers, & saw all in quiet by means y t her enemies were conquered, sending the Duke captive to the Tower before (which was the xxv. of July) she followed not long after, being brought up the third day of August to Londō, with the great rejoicing of many men, but with a greater fear of moe, and yet with flatterye peradventure most great, of feigned hearts.
Thus coming up to London, her first lodging she took at the Tower, where as the foresaid Lady Jane with her husband the Lord Gilford, a little before her coming▪ were imprisoned: where they remained waiting her pleasure almost five months. But the Duke within a month after his coming to the Tower, being adjudged to death, was brought forth to the scaffolde, and there beheaded. Albeit he having a promise, and being put in hope of pardon (yea though his head were upon the block) if he would recant and hear mass, consented thereto, and denied in words that true religion, which before time, as well in K. Henry the 8. days, as in K. Edwards he had oft evidently declared himself both to favor and further: exhorting also the people to return to the Catholic faith (as he termed it. ) Whose recantation the papists forthwith did publish and set abroad, rejoicing not a little at his conversion or rather subversion, as then appeared.
Thus the Duke of Northumberland with Sir John Gates, and sir Thomas Palmer (which Palmer on the other side confessed his faith that he had learned in the gospel, and lamented that he had not lived more Gospellike) being put to death: In the mean time Queen Mary, entering thus her reign with the blood of these men: besides hearing Mass her self in the Tower, gave a heavy show and signification hereby, but especially by the sudden delivering of Stephen Gardener out of the Tower, that she was not minded to stand to that which she so deeply had promised to the Suffolk men before, concerning the not subuertyng or alteryng the state of religion: as in very deed the surmise of the people was therein nothing deceived.
Besides the premisses, other things also followed which every day more and more discomforted the people, declaring the Queen to bear no good will to the present state of religion: as, not only the releasing of Gardener being then made Lord Chancellor of England and B. of Winchester, Doct. Poynet being put out, but also that Boner was restored to his bishopric again, and D. Ridley displaced. Itē, D. Day to the bishopric of Chichester, John Scory being put out. Item, D. Tonstall to the bishopric of Duresme. Item, D. Heath to the bishopric of Worcester, and John Hooper committed to the Fleet. Item, D. Uesi • to Exceter, and Miles Coverdale put out. These things being marked and perceived, great heaviness and discomfort grew more and more to all good men's hearts: but contrary to the wicked, great rejoicing. In which discord of minds, and diversity of affections, was now to be seen a miserable face of things in the whole commō wealth of England. They that could dissemble, took no great care how the matter went. But such whose consciences were joined to truth, perceived already coals to be kindled, which after should be the destruction of many a true Christian man, as in deed it came to pass. In the mean while Queen Mary after these beginnings, remoouyng from y e Tower to Hampton Court, caused a Parliament to be sūmoned against the x. day of Octob. next ensuing, whereof more is to be said hereafter.
Ye heard before how diverse Bishops were removed, and other placed in their roumes: amongst whom was D. Ridley B. of London, a worthy man both of fame and learning. This D. Ridley in time of Queen Jane had made a Sermon at Paul's cross, so commanded by the Counsaile: declaring there his mind to the people, as touching the Lady Mary, and dissuading them, alleging there the incommodities and inconueniēces which might rise by receiving her to be their Queen, prophesieng as it were before, that which after came to pass, y t she would bring in foreign power to reign over them: besides the subuertyng also of Christian Religion then already established: showing moreover, that the same Mary being in his Diocese, he according to his duty, being then her Ordinary, had travailed much with her to reduce her to this Religion, and notwithstanding in all other points of civility, she shown her self gentle and tractable, yet in matters that concerned true faith and doctrine, she shown her self so stiff and obstinate, that there was no other hope of her to be conceived, but to disturb and overturn all that which with so great labors had been confirmed and planted by her brother afore. Shortly after this Sermon, Queen Mary was proclaimed, whereupon he speedily repairyng to Fremingham to salute the Queen, had such cold welcome there: that being despoiled of all his dignities, he was sent back upon a lame halting horse to the Tower.
After him preached also Master Rogers the next Sunday, entreatyng very learnedly upon the Gospel of the same day.
This so done, Queen Mary seeing all things yet not going so after her mind as she desired, deviseth with her Counsaile, to bring to pass that thing by other means, which as yet by open law she could not well accomplish, directing forth an Inhibition by Proclamation, that no man should preach or read openly in churches the word of God, besides other things also in the same Proclamation Inhibited, the copy whereof here followeth.
An inhibition of the Queen, for preaching, Printyng, &c.
THe Queens highness well remembering what great inconvenience and dangers have grown to this her highness Realm in times past, thorough the diversity of opinions in questions of religion, and hearing also that now of late, sithence the beginning of her most gracious Rain, the same contentions be again much revived thorough certain false and untrue reports and rumors spread by some light and evil disposed persons, hath thought good to do to understand to all her highness most loving subjects, her most gracious pleasure in manner following.
First, her Majesty being presented by the only goodness of God, settled in her just possession of the Imperial Crown of this Realm, and other Dominions thereunto belonging, cannot now hide that religion which God and the world knoweth she hath ever professed from her infancy hitherto. Which as her Majesty is minded to observe and maintain for her self by gods grace during her time, so doth her highness much desire and would be glad the same were of all her subjects quietly and charitably embraced.
And yet she doth signify unto all her majesties loving subjects, that of her most gracious disposition & clemency, her highness myndeth not to compel any her said subjects thereunto, unto such time as further order by common assent may be taken therein: forbidding nevertheless all her subjects of all degrees, at their peryls to move seditions, or stir unquietness in her people by interpreting the Laws of this Realm, after their brains and fantasies, but quietly to continue for the time, till (as before is said) further order may be taken, and therefore willeth and straitly chargeth and commandeth all her said good loving subjects, to live togethers in quiet sort and Christian charity, leaving those new found devilish terms of Papist or heretic, and such like, and applying their hole care, study and travail to live in the fear of God, exercising their conversations in such charitable & godly doing, as their lives may in deed express that great hunger and thirst of God's glory and holy word, which by rash talk & words many have pretended: and in so doing they shall best please God, and live without dangers of the laws, and maintain the tranquility of the Realm. Wherof as her highness shall be most glad, so if any man shall rashlye presume to make any assemblies of people, or at any public assemblies or otherwise, shall go about to stir the people to disorder or disquiet, she myndeth according to her duty, to see the same most surely reformed & punished according to her highness laws.
And furthermore, forasmuch also as it is well known, that sedition and false rumors have been nourished and maintained in this Realm by the subtlety and malice of some evil disposed persons, which take upon them without sufficient authority to preach & to interpret the word of God after their own brain in churches and other places, both public and private, & also by playing of Interludes, and printyng of false fond books, ballades, rymes, and other lewd treatises in the English tongue, concerning doctrine in matters now in question, and controversy touching the high points and mysteries of christen religion, which books, ballades, rymes, and treatises, are chiefly by the Printers and Stationers set out to sale to her graces subjects of an evil zeal, for lucre and covetousness of vile gain. Her highness therefore straitly chargeth and commandeth all and every of her said subjects, of whatsoever state, condition or degree they be, that none of them presume from henceforth to preach, or by way of reading in Churches or other public or private places, except in schools of the University, to interpret or teach any scriptures or any manner points of doctrine concerning religion, neither also to print any books, matter, ballade, ryme, Enterlude, process or treatise, nor to play any Enterlude, except they have her graces special license in writing for the same, upon pain to incur her highness indignation and displeasure.
And her highness also further chargeth and commandeth all and every her said subjects, that none of them of their own authority do presume to punish, or to rise against any offender in the causes abouesayde, or any other offender in words or deeds in the late rebellion▪ committed or done by the Duke of Northumberland or his complices, or to cease any of their goods, or violently to use any such offender by strikyng or imprisonyng, or threatenyng the same, but wholly to refer the punishment of all such offenders unto her highness and public authority, whereof her majesty myndeth to see due punishment, according to the order of her highness laws.
Neuertheles, as her highness myndeth not hereby to restrain and discourage any of her loving subjects, to give from time to time true information against any such offenders in the causes abovesaid, unto her grace or her Counsaile, for the punishment of every such offender, according to the effect of her highness laws provided in that part: so her said highness exhorteth and straitly chargeth her said subjects to observe her commandment & pleasure in every part aforesaid, as they will avoid her highness said indignation and most grievous displeasure. The severity and rigor whereof, as her highness shall be most sory to have cause to put the same in execution: so doth she utterly determine not to permit such unlawful and rebellious doings of her subjects, whereof may ensue the danger of her royal estate to remain unpunished, but to see her said laws touching these points, to be thoroughly executed, which extremities, she trusteth all her said loving subjects will foresee, dread, and avoid accordingly: her said highness straightly charging and commanding all Mayors, Sheriffs, Justices of Peace, Bailiffs, Constables, and all other public Officers and Ministers, diligently to see to the observing and executing of her said commandments and pleasure, and to apprehend all such as shall willfully offend in this part, committyng the same to the next Jail, there to remain without bail or maineprise, till upon certificate made to her highness or her privy Counsaile, of their names and doings, and vpō examination had of their offenses, some further order shall be taken for their punishment to the example of others, according to the effect and tenor of the laws aforesaid. Yeuen at our Manor of Richmond, the 18. day of August, in the 1. year of our most prosperous reign.
M. Bourne preaching at Paul's Cross.
ABout this time or not long before, Boner B. of London being restored, appointed M. Bourne a Canon of Paul's, to preach at the Cross, who afterward was B. of Bathe, he taking occasion of the Gospel of the day to speak somewhat largely in iustifieng of Boner being thē present: which Boner said he, upon the same text in that place, that day four years had preached before, and was upon the same most cruelly and unjustly cast into y e most vile Dungeon of the Marshalsey, and there kept during the time of King Edward. Hys words sounded so evil in the ears of the hearers, that they could not keep silence but began to murmur and to stir in such sort, that the Mayor and Aldermen with other estates thē present, feared much an uproar. But the truth is, that one hurled a dagger at the preacher, but who it was, it could not then be proved, albeit afterward it was known.
In fine, the stir was such, that the Preacher plucked in his head, and durst no more appear in that place. The matter of his Sermon tended much to the derogation and disprayse of King Edward: which thing the people in no case could abide. Then M. Bradford at the request of the Preachers brother, and other then being in the pul: pit, stood forth and spake so my •• ely, Christianly, and effectuously, that with few words he appeased all: and afterward he and M. Rogers conducted the Preacher betwixt them from the Pulpit to the Grammar school door, where they left him safe, as further in the story of Master Bradford is declared. But shortly after they were both rewarded with long imprisonment, and last of all, with fire in Smithfield.
By reason of this tumult at Paul's Cross, an order was taken by the Lord's of the Counsaile with the Mayor and Aldermen of London, that they calling the next day following a common counsel of the City, should thereby charge every householder to cause their children, apprentices, and other servants, to keep their own parish Churches upon the holydays, and not to suffer them to attempt any thing to the violatyng of the common peace. Willyng them also to signify the said assembly the Queens determination uttered unto them by her highness the 12. of August in the Tower. Which was, that albeit her graces conscience is stayed in matters of religion: yet she graciously meant not to compel or strayne other men's conscience otherwise then God shall (as she trusted) put in their harts a persuasion of the truth that she is in, thorough the opening of his word unto them, by godly virtuous, & learned preachers, &c.
Also it was then ordered, that every Alderman in his Ward, should forthwith send for the Curates of every parish within their liberties, and to warn them not only to forbear to preach themselves, but also not to suffer any other to preach, or make any open or solemn reading of scripture in their churches, unless the said preachers were severally licensed by the Queen.
After this Sermon at Paul's Cross aforenamed, the next day after it followed, that the Queens Gard was at the cross with their weapons to gard the Preacher. And when men withdrew themselves from the Sermon, order was taken by the Mayor, that the Ancients of all companies should be present, least the preacher should be discouraged by his small Auditory.
August. 1553.
The 5. of August, an. 1553. was one William Rutler committed (by the Counsaile) to the Marshalsey, for uttering certain words against Master Bourne Preacher, for his Sermon at Paul's Cross on Sunday last before.
The 16. of August, was Humfrey Palden committed to the Counter for words against the said Bournes sermon at Paul's cross.
A letter to the Sheriff of Buckingham and Bedford, for the apprehending of one Fisher person of Ammersham a preacher.
Another letter to the B. of Norwich, not to suffer any preacher or other to preach or expound the scripture openly without special license from the Queen.
The same day was M. Bradford, M. Uernon and M. Beacon preachers committed to the charge of the Lieuetenant of the Tower.
The same day also was M. John Rogers Preacher commanded to keep himself prisoner in his own house at Paul's, without having conference with any other thē those of his own household.
The 22. of August, there was two letters directed to M. Couerdall B. of Exceter, & M. Hooper B. of Gloucester, for their indelayed repair to the Court, and there to attend the Counsels pleasure.
The same day Fisher person of Ammersham made his appearance before the Counsaile, according to their letter the 16. of August, and was appointed the next day to bring in a note of his sermon.
The 24. of August was one John Meluin a Scotte and and Preacher sent to Newgate in London by the Counsaile.
The 26. of August there was a letter sent to the Mayor of Coventry and his brethren, for the apprehension of one Symonds of Worcester preacher, and then Vicar of S. Michaels in Coventry, and for the sending of him up to the counsel with his examinations and other matters they could charge him with. With a Commission to them to punish all such as had by means of his preaching▪ used any talk against the Queens proceedings.
The 29. of August, M. Hooper B. of Worcester made his personal appearance before the Counsaile, according to their letters the 22. of August.
The 31. of August, M. Couerdall B. of Exceter, made his appearance before the Counsaile, according to their letters the 22. of August.
September. 1553.
The 1. of September, M. Hooper and M. Couerdall appeared again before the Counsaile, whence M. Hooper was committed to the Fleet, and M. Couerdall commanded to attend the Lord's pleasure.
The 2. of September M. Hugh Saunders Vicar of S. Michaels in Coventry, was before the Counsaile for a sermon, and was commanded to appear again upon Monday next after.
The 4. of September a Letter was directed from the Counsaile to M. Hugh Latimer for his appearance before them.
About the 5. day of September the same year, Peter Martyr came to London from Oxford, where for a time he had been commanded to keep his house, & found there the Archbishop of Canterbury, who offered to defend the doctrine of the book of Common prayer, both by the scriptures and Doctors, assisted by Peter Martyr and a few other, as hereafter ye shall hear. But whilst they were in hope to come to Disputations, the Archbishop and other were imprisoned, but Peter Martyr was suffered to return whence he came.
The same day there was a letter sent to the Mayor of Coventry to set Hugh Symonds at liberty if he would recant his Sermon, or else to stay him, and to signify so much to the Counsaile.
The 13. of September M. Hugh Latimer appeared before the counsel according to their letter the 4. of September, and was committed to the Tower close prisoner, having his servant Agustine to attend him.
The same day the Archbishop of Canterbury appearing before the Counsaile, was commanded to appear the next day at after noon before them in the Star chamber.
The 14. of September, the Archbishop of Canterbury, according to their former days commandment, made his appearance before the Lord's in the Star chamber. Where, they charging him with treason, & spreadyng abroad of seditious bills, to the disquieting of the estate, they committed him from thence to the Tower of London, there to remain till further Justice and order at the Queens pleasure.
The 15. of September, there was a letter sent to M. Horne Dean of Durham, for his appearance before thē, and another was sent to him the 7. of October next after, for his speedy appearance.
The 16. of September, there was letters sent to the Mayors of Dover and Rye, to suffer all French Protestants to pass out of this Realm, except such, whose names shall be signified to them by the French Ambassador.
October. 1553.
The first day of October, Queen Mary was crowned at Westminster, and the x. day of the said month of October then following, began the parliament with a solemn Mass of the holy Ghost, after the popish manner, celebrated with great pomp in the pallaice of Westminster. To the which Mass among the other Lord's, according to the manner, should come the bishops, which yet remained vndeposed, which were the Archb. of York, D. Taylor B. of Lincoln, John Harley B. of Herford. Of the bishops, D. Taylor, and M. Harley presenting themselves according to their duty, and taking their place amongst the Lord's, after they saw the Mass begin, not abidyng the sight thereof, withdrew themselves from the company: for the which cause the Bishop of Lincoln being examined, and protestyng his faith, was upon the same commanded to attend: who not long after at Ankerwyke by sickness departed. M. Harley, because he was married, was excluded both from the Parliament, and from his bishopric.
Mass being done, the Queen accompanied with the Estates of the Realm, was brought into the Parliament house, there according to the manner, to enter and begin the consultation. At which consultation or Parliament were repealed all statutes made in the time of king Henry the 8. for Premunire, & statutes made in K. Edward the sixtes time for administration of common prayer & the sacraments in the English tongue: & further, the attainder of the duke of Northumberland was by this Parliament confirmed. In this mean while many men were forward in the erecting of altars & masses in churches. And such as would stick to the laws made in K. Edward's time, till other should be established: some of them were marked, & some presently apprehended. Among whom sir James Hales, a knight of Kent, and Justice of the Common place was one, who notwithstanding he had ventured his life in Queen Mary's cause, in that he would not subscribe to y e disheriting of her by the kings will, yet for that he did at a quarter Sessions give charge upon the statutes made in the time of Henry the 8. and Edward the 6. for the supremacy and religion, he was imprisoned in the Marshalsey, Counter, and Fleet, and so cruelly handled & put in fear by talk, that the Warden of the Fleet used to have in his hearing, of such torments as were in preparyng for heretics (or for what other cause God knoweth) y t he sought to rid himself out of this life, by wounding himself with a knife: and afterward was contented to say as they willed him: whereupon he was discharged, but after that he never rested till he had drowned himself in a river, half a mile from his house in Kent. Of whom more is to be seen when you come to his story.
During the time of this parliament, the Clergy likewise after their wonted manner, had a Conuocation, with a disputation also appointed by the Queens commandment, at Paul's Church in London the same time, which was about the 18. of October. In the which Conuocation, first M. John Harpesfield Bachelor of Divinity, made a sermon ad Clerum, the 16. of October. After the sermon done, it was assigned by the bishops, that they of the Clergye house, for avoiding confusion of words should choose them a Prolocutor. To the which room and office by common assent, was named Doc. Weston Dean of Westminster, and presented to the Bishops, with an Oration of M. Pie Dean of Chichester, and also of Master Wymbisley Archdeacon of London. Which D. Weston being chosen and brought unto the bishops, made his gratulatory Oration to the house, with the answer again of B. Boner.
After these things thus sped in the convocation house, they proceeded next to the Disputation appointed, as is abovesaid, by the Queens Commandment, about the matter of the sacrament. Which disputation continued six days. Wherein D. Weston was chief on the Popes part who behaved himself outrageously in tauntyng and checking. In conclusion, such as disputed on the contrary part were driven some to flee, some to deny, & some to die, though to the most men's judgments that heard the disputation, they had the upper hand, as here may appear by y e report of the said disputation, the copy whereof we thought here to annex, as followeth.
The true report of the disputation had and begun in the Conuocation house at London, the 18 of October. Anno. 1553.
WHere as divers and uncertain rumoures be spread abroad of the Disputation had in the Conuocation house, to the intent that all men may know the certainty of all things therein done and said, as much as the memory of him that was present▪ thereat can bear away, he hath thought good at request, thoroughly to describe what was said therein on both parties of the matters argued and had in question, and of the enteraunce thereof.
Acte of the first day.
FIrst upon Wednesday, being the 18. of October, at after noon, M. Weston the Prolocutor certified the house that it was the Queens pleasure, that the company of the same house being learned men, assembled, should debate of matters of Religion, and constitute laws thereof, which her grace and the Parliament would ratify. And for that (said he) there is a book of late set forth, called the Catechism (which he shown forth) bearing the name of this honorable Synod, & yet put forth without your consents as I have learned, being a book very pestiferous, and full of heresies, and likewise a book of Common prayer very abominable (as it pleased him to term it) I thought it therefore best, first to begin with the articles of the Catechism, concerning the sacrament of the alter, to confirm the natural presence of Christ in the same, and also transubstantiation: Wherefore (said he) it shall be lawful on Friday next ensuing, for all men freely to speak their conscience in these matters, that all doubts may be removed, and they fully satisfied therein.
Acte of the second day.
The Friday coming, being the 20. of October, whē men had thought they should have entered Disputation of the questions proposed, the Prolocutor exhibited two several bills unto the house: the one for the natural presence of Christ in the sacrament of the alter, the other concerning the Catechism, that it was not of that houses agrement set forth, and that they did not agree thereunto: requiring all them to subscribe to the same, as he himself had done. Wherunto the whole house did immediately assent, except six, which were the Dean of Rochester, the Dean of Exceter, the Archdeacon of Winchester, the Archdeacon of Hertford, the Archdeacon of Stow, and one other. And while the rest were about to subscribe these two articles. John Philpot stood up and spake first concerning the Article of the Catechism, that he thought they were deceived in the title of the Catechism, in that it beareth the title of the Synod of London last before this, although many of them which then were present, were never made priuye thereof, in setting it forth, for that this house had granted the authority to make ecclesiastical laws unto certain persons to be appointed by the kings majesty, & what so ever ecclesiastical laws they or the most part of them did set forth, according to a statute in that behalf provided, it might be well said to be done in the Synod of London, although such as be of this house now, had no notice thereof before the promulgation. And in this point he thought the setter forth thereof, nothing to have slandered y e house as they by their subscription went about to persuade the world, since they had our Synodal authority unto them committed, to make such spiritual laws as they thought convenient and necessary.
And moreover he said, as concerning the article of the natural presence in the sacrament, that it was against reason and order of learning, and also very prejudicial to the truth, that men should be moved to subscribe before the matte were thoroughly examined and discussed. But when he saw that allegation might take no place, being as a mā astonied at the multitude of so many learned men as there were of purpose gathered together to maintain old traditions more then the truth of God's holy word, he made his request unto the Prolocutor, that where as there were so many ancient learned men present on that side, as in y e realm the like again were not to be found in such number, & that on the other side of them that had not subscribed, were not past v. or vi. both in age and learning far inferior unto them: therefore, that equality might be had in this disputation, he desired that the Prolocutor would be a mean unto the Lord's, that some of those that were learned, & setters forth of the same Catechism might be brought into the house to show their learning that moved them to set forth the same, and that D. Ridley & M. Rogers, with two or three mo, might be licenced to be present at this disputation, and to be associate with them.
This request was thought reasonable, and was proposed unto the Bishops, who made this answer: that it was not in them to call such persons unto our house, since some of them were prisoners. But they said, they would be petitioners in this behalf unto the Counsayle, and in case any were absent that ought to be of the house, they willed them to be taken in unto them if they listed. After this they mindyng to have entered into disputation, there came a Gentleman as messenger from the Lord great master, signifying unto the Prolocutor, that the L. great master, and the Earl of Devonshire would be present at the disputations, and therefore he deferred the same unto monday, at one of the clock at after noon.
The Acte of the third day.
Upon Monday the xiii. of October, at the time appointed, in the presence of many Erles, Lord's, Knights, gentlemen, and diverse other of the Court and of the City also, the Prolocutor made a Protestation, that they of the house had appointed this disputation, not to call the truth into doubt, to the which they had already all subscribed, saving v. or six, but that those gainsayers might be resolved of their arguments in the which they stood, as it shall appear unto you, not doubting but they will also condescēd unto us.
Then he demanded of M. Haddon whether he would reason against the questions proposed, or no. To whom he made answer, that he had certified him before in writing, that he would not, since the request of such learned men as were demanded to be assistent with them, would not be granted. M. Elmar likewise was asked. Who made the Prolocutor the like answer, adding moreover this, that they had done too much prejudice already to the truth, to subscribe before the matter was discussed: and little or nothing it might avail to reason for the truth, since all they were now determined to the contrary. After this he demanded of M. Cheyney, whom the Prolocutor said allowed the presence with them, but he denied the transubstantiation by the means of certain authorities upon the which he standeth, and desireth to be resolved, as you shall hear, whether he will propose his doubts concerning Transubstantiation or no. Yea, quoth he, I would gladly my doubts to be resolved, which move me not to believe Transubstantiation.
The first is out of S. Paul to the Cor. who speaking of the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ, calleth it oft times bread after the consecration.
The second is out of Origen, who speaking of this sacrament saith, that the material part thereof goeth down to the excrements.
The third is out of Theodoretus, who making mention of the sacramental bread and wine after the consecration, saith that they go not out of their former substance, form, and shape. These be some of my doubts among many other, wherein I require to be answered.
Then the Prolocutor assigned D. Moreman to answer him, who to Saint Paul answered him thus: That the Sacrament is called by him bread in deed, but it is thus to be understood, that it is the sacrament of bread, that is, the form of bread.
Then M. Cheyney inferred and alleged, that Hesychius called the sacrament both bread and flesh.
Yea quoth Moreman, Hesychius calleth it bread, because it was bread, & not because it is so. And passing over Origen, he came to Theodoretus, & said, that men mistook his authority, by interpreting a general into a special, as Peter Martyr hath done in y e place of Theodoret, interpretyng 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for substance, which is a special signification of y e word whereas 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , is a general word, as well to accidence, as to substane, and therefore I answer thus unto Theodoret, y t the sacramental bread and wine do not go out of their former substance, form, and shape, that is to say, not out of their accidental substance and shape.
After this M. Cheyney sat him down, & by and by M. Elmar stood up as one that could not abide to hear so fōd an answer to so grave an authority, & reasoned upon the authority of Theodoret alleged before by M. Cheyney▪ & declared that Moremans answer to Theodoret, was no just nor sufficient answer, but an illusion and a subtle evasion contrary to Theodorets meaning. For, said he, if 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , should signify an accident in the place alleged, as it is answered by M. Moreman, then were it a word superfluous set in Theodoret there, where do follow two other words which sufficiently do expound the accidēces of y e bread, y t is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which signify in English, shape and form: & so prove out of the same author by diverse allegations, y t 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in Greek could not be so generally taken in that place as Moreman for a shift would have it. But Moreman, as a man having no other salve for that sore, affirmed still that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which signifieth substance, must needs signify an accidental substance properly. To whose importunity, since he could have no other answer. Elmar as a man wearied with his importunity, gave place.
After this stood up John Philpot and said, y t he could prove that by the matter that Theodoret entreateth of in the place above alleged, and by the similitude which he maketh to prove his purpose, by no means M. Moremans interpretation of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , might be taken for an accidētall substance, as he for a shift would interpret it to be. For the matter which Theodoret entreateth of in y t place, is against Eutiches an heretic, which denied two natures of substance to remain in Christ being one person, and that his humanity after the accomplishment of y e mystery of our salvation, ascendyng into heaven, & being joined unto the Divinity, was absorpt or swallowed up of y e same, so that Christ should be no more but of one divine substance only by his opiniō. Against which opiniō Theodoret writeth, and by the similitude of the sacrament proveth the contrary against the heretic: that like as in the sacrament of the body of Christ after the consecratiō, there is the substance of Christ's humanity, with the substance of bread, remaining as it was before, not being absorpt of y e humanity of Christ, but joined by the divine operation thereunto, even so in the person of Christ being now in heaven, of whom this sacrament is a representation, there be two several substances, that is, his divinity & humanity united in one hypostasie or person, which is Christ, the humanity not being absorpt by the conjunction of the divinity, but remaining in his former substance.
And this similitude quoth Philpot, brought in of Theodoret to confound Eutiches, should prove nothing at all, if the very substance of the sacramental bread did not remain, as it did before. But if D. Moremans interpretation might take place for transubstantiatiō, then should the heretic have thereby a strong argument by Theodorets authority, so taken to maintain his heresy, and to prove himself a good christen man, and he might well say thus unto Theodoret. Like as thou Theodoret, if thou were of D. Moremans mind, doest say, that after the consecration in the sacrament, the substance of the bread is absorpt or transubstantiate into the human body of Christ coming thereunto, so that in the sacrament is now but one substance of the humanity alone, and not the substance of bread as it was before: even likewise may I affirm and conclude by thine own similitude, that the humanity ascending up by the power of God into heaven, & adjoined unto the deity, was by the might thereof absorpt & turned into one substance with the deity: so that now there remaineth but one divine substance in Christ, no more then in the sacramental signs of the Lord's supper, after y e consecration doth remain anymore then one substance, according to your belief and construction.
In answering to this D. Moreman stackerd, whose defect Philpot perceiving, spake on this wise. Well, M. Moreman, if you have no answer at this present ready, I pray you devise one, if you can conveniently, against our next meeting here again.
With that his saying the Prolocutor was grievously offended, telling him that he should not brag there, but that he should be fully answered· Then said Philpot, it is the thing that I only desire, to be answered directly in this behalf, & I desire of you, & of all the house at this present▪ that I may be sufficiently answered, which I am sure you are not able to do, saving Theodoretus authority and similitude upright, as he ought to be taken. None other answer then was made to Philpots reasons, but that he was commanded to silence.
Then stood up the Dean of Rochester offering him self to reason in the first question against the natural presence, wishing that the scripture and the ancient Doctors in this point might be weighed, believed, and followed. And against this natural presence he thought the saying of Christ in Saint Matthew to make sufficiently enough, if men would credit and follow scripture, who said there of himself, that poor men we should have always with us, but him we should not have always: which was spoken, quoth he, concerning the natural presence of Christ's body, therefore we ought to believe as he hath taught, that Christ is not naturally present on earth in the sacrament of the alter.
To this was answered by the Prolocutor, that we should not have Christ present always to exercise alms deeds upon him, but upon the poor.
But the Dean prosecuted his argument, and shown it out of S. Agustine further, that the same interpretation of the scripture alleged, was no sufficient answer, who writeth in the 50. treatise of S. John on this wise, on the same sentence: When as he said (saith S. Agustine) me shall ye not have always with you, he spake of the presence of his body. For by his majesty, by his providence, by his unspeakable & invisible grace, that is fulfilled which is said of him. Behold I am with you until the consummation of the world. But in the flesh which the word took upon him, in that which was borne of the virgin, in that which was apprehended of the Jews, which was crucified on the Cross, which was let down from the cross, which was wrapped in cloths, which was hid in the Sepulcher, which was manifested in the resurrection, you shall not have me always with you. And why? for after a bodily presence he was conversant with his disciples forty days, and they accompanying him, seeing and not following him, he ascended & is not here, for there he sitteth at the right hand of the father, and yet here he is, because he is not departed in the presence of his majesty. After another manner we have Christ always by presence of his majesty, but after the presence of his flesh it is rightly said: You shall not verily have me always with you. For the Church had him in the presence of his flesh a few days, and now by faith it apprehendeth him and seeth him, not with eyes.
To this authority D. Watson took upon him to answer, and said, he would answer S. Agustine by S. Agustine, and having a certain book in his hand of notes, he alleged out of the 70. treatise upon S. John, that after that mortal condition and manner we have not now Christ on the earth as he was heretofore before his passion.
Agaynst whose answer, John Philpot replied and said, that M. Watson had not fully answered S. Augustine by S. Augustine, as he would seem to have done, for that in the place above mentioned by M. Dean of Rochester, he doth not only teach the mortal state of Christ's body before his passion, but also the immortal condition of the same after his resurrection: in the which mortal body S. Augustine seemeth plainly to affirm, that Christ is not present upon the earth, neither in form visibly, neither in corporal substance invisibly, as in few lines after y e place above alleged. S. Augustine doth more plainly declare by these words, saying: Now these two manners of Christ's presence declared, which is by his majesty, providence, & grace now present in the world, which before his ascension was present in flesh, and being now placed at the right hand of the father, is absent in the same from the world, I think (saith Saint Augustine) that there remaineth no other question in this m • t • er.
Now quoth Philpot, if S. Augustine acknowledged no more presence of Christ to be now on earth, but only his divine presence, and touching his humanity to be in heaven, we ought to confess and believe the same. But if we put a third presence of Christ, that is, corporally to be present always in the sacrament of the alter invisibly, according to your suppositions, whereof S. Augustine maketh no mention at all in all his works: you shall seem to judge that which S. Augustine did never comprehend.
Why, quoth Watson, S. Augustine in the place by me alleged, maketh he not mention how S. Stephen being in this world, saw Christ after his ascension?
It is true, said Philpot, but he saw Christ, as the scripture telleth, in the heavens being open, standing at the right hand of God the father. Further to this Watson answered not.
Then the Prolocutor went about to furnish up an answer to S. Augustine, saying, that he is not now in the world after that manner of bodily presence, but yet present for all that in his body.
To whom Philpot answered, that the Prolocutor did grate much upon this word Secundum, in S. Augustine, which signifieth after the manner, or in form: but he doth not answer to id quod, which is that thing or substance of Christ, in the which Christ suffered, arose, and ascended into heaven, in the which thing and substance he is in heaven, and not on earth, as S. Augustine in the place specified most clearly doth define.
To this nothing else being answered, the Dean of Rochester proceeded in the maintenance of his argument, and read out of a book of Annotations, sundry authorities for the confirmation thereof. To the which Moreman, who was appointed to answer him, made no direct answer, but bade him make an argument, saying that master Dean had recited many words of Doctors, but he made not one argument.
Then said the Dean, the authorities of the doctors by me rehearsed, be sufficient arguments to prove mine intent, to the which my desire is to be answered of you. But still Moreman cried, make an argument to shift of the authority, which he could not answer unto. After this y e Dean made this argument out of the institution of the sacrament: Do this in remembrance of me: and thus ye shall show forth the Lord's death until he come.
The sacrament is the remembrance of Christ: Ergo, the sacrament is not very Christ: for yet he is not come. For these words, Until he come, do plainly signify the absence of Christ's body. Then the Prolocutor went about to show that these words Until he come, did not import any absence of Christ on the earth, by other places of scripture, where, Donec, until, was used in like sense: but directly to the purpose he answered nothing.
In conclusiō, the Dean fell to questioning with Moreman, whether Christ did eat the Paschal lamb with his disciples, or no? He answered, Yea. Further, he demanded whether he eat likewise the Sacrament with them, as he did institute it? Moreman answered, Yea. Then he asked what he did eat, and whether he eat his own natural body, as they imagine it to be, or no? Which when Moreman had affirmed, then said the Dean, it is a great absurdity by you granted, and so he sat down.
Against this absurdity, Philpot stood up and argued, saying, he could prove it by good reason deduced out of scripture, that Christ eat not his own natural body at the institution of the sacrament, and the reason is this.
Ba - Receiuing of Christ's body hath a promise of remission of sins with it annexed.
ro - Christ eating the sacrament, had no promise of remission of sin.
co. Ergo, Christ in the Sacrament did not eat his own body.
To this reason Moreman answered, denying the former part of the argument, that the sacrament had a promise of remission of sins annexed unto it.
Then Philpot shown this to be the promise in the sacrament: Which is given for you, which is shed for you for the remission of sins. But Moreman would not acknowledge that to be any promise, so that he drove Philpot to the 6. of S. John, to vouch this saying with these words: The bread which I will give, is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
Moreman answering nothing directly to this argument, Harpsfield start up to supply that which wanted in his behalf, and thinking to have answered Philpot, confirmed more strongly his argument, saying: Ye mistake the promise which is annexed to the body of Christ in the Sacrament: for it pertained not to Christ, but to his Disciples, to whom Christ said: This is my body which is given for you, and not for Christ himself.
You have said well for me, quoth Philpot, for that is mine argument. The promise of the body of Christ, took no effect in Christ: Ergo, Christ eat not his own body.
Then the prolocutor to shoulder out the matter, said: the argument was naught. For by the like argument he might go about to prove that Christ was not baptized, because the remission of sin which is annexed unto Baptism, took no effect in Christ. To the which Philpot replied, that like as Christ was baptized, so he eat the sacrament: but he took on him Baptism, not that he had any need thereof, or that it took any effect in him, but as our master, to give the church an example to follow him in the ministration of the sacrament, and thereby to exhibit unto us himself, and not to give himself to himself.
No more was said in this. But afterward the Prolocutor demanded of Philpot, whether he would argue against the natural presence, or no? To whom he answered, Yea, if he would hear his Argument without interruption, and assign one to answer him, and not many, which is a confusion to the Opponēt, & specially for him that was of an ill memory. By this time y e night was come on, wherefor the Prolocutor brake up the disputatiō for that time, and appointed Philpot to be the first that should begin the disputation the next day after, concerning the presence of Christ in the sacrament.
The Acte of the fourth day.
ON the Wednesday the xxv. of Octob. John. Philpot, as it was before appointed, was ready to have entered the disputation, mynding first to have made a certain Oration, and a true declaration in Latin of the matter of Christ's presence, which was then in question. Which thing the Prolocutor perceiving, by and by he forbade Philpot to make any Oration or declaration of any matter, commanding him also, that he should make no argument in Latin but to conclude on his arguments in English.
Then said Philpot, this is contrary to your order takē at the beginning of this disputatiō. For then you appointed that all the arguments should be made in Latin, and thereupon I have drawn and devised all mine arguments in Latin. And because you M. Prolocutor have said heretofore openly in this house, that I had no learning, I had thoght to have shown such learning as I have, in a brief Oration and short declaration of the questions now in controversy, thinking it so most convenient also, that in case I should speak otherwise in my declaration then should stand with learning, or then I were able to warrant and justify by gods word, it might the better be refourmed by such as were learned of the house, so that the unlearned sort being present, might take the less offense thereat. But this allegation prevailed nothing with the Prolocutor, who bade him still form an argument in English, or else to hold his peace.
Then said Philpot, You have sore disappointed me, thus suddenly to go from your former order: but I will accomplish your commandment, leaving mine oration apart: and I will come to my arguments, the which as well as so sudden a warning will serve, I will make in English. But before I bring forth any argument, I will in one word declare what manner of presence I disallow in the sacrament, to the intent y e hearers may the better understand to what end & effect mine arguments shall tend: not to deny utterly the presence of Christ in his Sacrament truly ministered according to his institution, but only to deny that gross & carnal presence which you of this house have already subscribed unto, to be in the sacrament of the alter contrary to the true & manifest meaning of the scriptures: that by Transubstantiation of the sacramental bread and wyne, Christ's natural body should by the virtue of the words pronounced by the Priest, be contained and included under the forms or accidences of bread & wyne. This kind of presence imagined by men, I do deny, quoth Philpot, and against this I will reason. But before he could make an end of that he would have said, he was interrupted of the Prolocutor, and commanded to descend to his argument. At whose unjust importunity Philpot being offended, and thinking to purchase him a remedy therefore, he fell down upon his knees before the Earls and Lord's which were there present, being a great number: whereof some were of the Queens counsel, beseeching them that he might have liberty to prosecute his arguments without interruption of any man: the which was gently granted him of the Lord's. But the Prolocutor putting in ure a point of the practice of Prelates, would not condescend thereunto, but still cried: hold your peace, or else make a short argument. I am about it, quoth Philpot, if you would let me alone. But first I must needs ask a question of my Respondent (who was D. Chedsey) concerning a word or twain of your supposition, that is, of the sacrament of the alter, what he meaneth thereby, and whether he take it as some of the ancient writers do, termyng the Lord's Supper the Sacrament of the alter partly because it is a Sacrament of that lively sacrifice which Christ offered for our sins upon the alter of the Cross, and partly because that Christ's body crucified for us, was that bloody sacrifice which the bloudsheddyng of all the beasts offered upon the alter in the old law, did prefigurate and signify unto us: in signification whereof the old writers sometime do call the Sacrament of the body and blood of Christ, among other names which they ascribe there unto the sacrament of the alter, or whether you take it otherwise, as for the sacrament of the altar, which is made of lime and stone, over the which the sacrament hangeth, and to be all one with the sacrament of the Mass, as it is at this present in many places. This done, I will direct mine arguments according as your answer shall give me occasion.
Then made D. Chedsey this answer, that in their supposition they took the sacrament of the alter, and the sacrament of the Mass to be all one.
Then quoth Philpot, I will speak plain English, as M. Prolocutor willeth me, and make a short resolutiō thereof: that the sacrament of the alter which ye reckon to be all one with the mass, once justly abolished, & now put in full use again, is no sacrament at all, neither is Christ in any wise present in it: and this his saying he offered to prove before the whole house, if they listed to cal him thereunto: and likewise offered to vouche the same before the Queens grace, & her most honorable Counsaile, before the face of vi. of the best learned men of the house of the contrary opinion, and refused none. And if I shall not be able (quoth he) to maintain by God's word that I have said, & confound those vi. which shall take upon them to withstand me in this point, let me be burned with as many fagots as be in London, before the court gates. This he uttered with great vehemency of spirit.
At this the Prolocutor with diverse other, were very much offended, demanding of him whether he wist what he said, or no? Yea, quoth Philpot, I wote well what I say, desiring no mā to be offended with his saying, for that he spake no more thē by gods word he was able to prove. And praised be God, quoth he, that the Queens grace, hath granted us of this house (as our Prolocutor hath informed us) that we may freely utter our consciences in these matters of controversy in Religion: and therefore I will speak here my conscience freely grounded vpō gods holy word for the truth, albeit some of you here present mislike the same.
Then diverse of the house beside the Prolocutor, taunted & reprehended him for speaking so vnfaringly against the Sacrament of the Mass: and the Prolocutor said he was mad, & threatened him that he would send him to prison, if he would not cease his speaking.
Philpot seeing himself thus abused, & not permitted with free liberty to declare his mind, fell into an exclamation, casting his eyes up towards the heaven, and said, O Lord what a world is this, that the truth of thy holy word may not be spoken & abidden by? and for very sorrow and heaviness, the tears trickled out of his eyes.
After this, the Prolocutor being moved by some that were about him, was content that he should make an argument, so that he would be brief therein. I will be as brief, quoth Philpot, as I may conveniently be in uttering all that I have to say. And first I will begin to ground mine arguments upon the authority of scriptures, whereupon all the building of our faith ought to be grounded: & after I shall confirm the same by ancient doctors of the church. And I take the occasion of my first argument out of the 28. of Matthew, of the saying of the angel to the th • e Mary's seeking Christ at the sepulcher, saying: He is risen, he is not here: and in S. Luke in the 23. chap. the angel asketh thē, why they sought him that liveth among y e dead. Likewyse the scripture testifieth that Christ is risen, ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of y e father: all the which is spoken of his natural body: Ergo, it is not on earth included in the sacrament.
I will confirm this yet more effectually by the saying of Christ, in the 16. of S. John: I came (saith Christ) from my father into the world, and now I leave the world, and go away to my father. The which coming and going he meant of his natural body. Therefore we may affirm thereby, that it is not now in the world.
But I look here (quoth he) to be answered with a blind distinction of visibly and invisibly, that he is visibly departed in his humanity, but invisibly he remaineth, not withstanding in the sacrament. But that answer I prevent myself, that w t more expedition I may descend to the pith of mine arguments, whereof I have a dosen to propose, & will prove that no such distinction ought to take away the force of that argument, by the answer which Christ's disciples gave unto him, speaking these words: Now thou speakest plainly, and vttrest forth no Proverb. Which words S. Cyril interpretyng, saith: That Christ spake without any manner of ambiguity, or obscure speech. And therefore I conclude hereby thus, that if Christ spake plainly & without parable, saying: I leave the world now, and go away to my father, then that obscure, dark, & inperceptible presence of Christ's natural body to remain in the sacrament upon earth invisibly, contrary to the plain words of Christ, ought not to be allowed. For nothing can be more uncertain, or more parabolical & insensible, then so to say. Here now will I attend what you will answer, & so descend to the confirmation of all that I have said, by ancient writers.
Then D. Chedsey reciting his argument in such order as it was made, took upon him to answer severally to every parte therefore on this wise. First to the saying of the Angel, That Christ is not here: And why seek ye the living among the dead? He answered, that these sayings pertained nothing to the presence of Christ's natural body in the sacrament, but that they were spoken of Christ's body being in the Sepulchree when the three Mary's thought him to have been in the grave still. And therefore the Angel said: Why do ye seek him that liveth, among the dead? And to the authority of the 16. of John where Christ saith: Now I leave the world, and go to my Father. He meant that of his Ascension. And so likewise did Cyril, interpreating the saying of the disciples that knew plainly that Christ would visibly ascend into heaven, but that doeth not exclude the invisible presence of his natural body in the Sacrament. For S. Chrysostom writing to the people of Antioch, doeth affirm the same, comparing Helias and Christ together, and Helias cloak unto Christ's flesh. Helias (quoth he) when he was taken up in the fiery chariote, left his cloak behind him unto his disciple Helisaeus. But Christ ascending into heaven, took his flesh with him, and left also his flesh behind him. Whereby we may right well gather, that Christ's flesh is visibly ascended into heaven, and invisibly abideth still in the Sacrament of the altare.
To this Philpot replied, and said, you have not directly answered to the saying of the angel: Christ is risen, and is not here, because you have omitted that which was y e chiefest point of all. For (said he) I proceeded further, as thus: He is risen, ascended, and sitteth at the right hand of God the father: Ergo, he is not remaining on the earth. Neither is your answer to Cyril, by me alleged, sufficient. But by and by I will return to your interpretation of Cyril, and more plainly declare the same, after that I have first refelled the authority of Chrysostom, which is one of your chief Principles that you alleged to make for your gross carnal presence in the sacrament. Which being well weied and understanded, pertaineth nothing thereunto.
At that the Prolocutour startled, that one of the chief pillars in this point should be overthrown, & therefore recited the said authority in Latin first, & afterward Englished the same, wyllinge all that were present, to note that saying of Chrysostom, which he thought invincible on their side. But I shall make it appear, quoth Philpot, by and by to make little for your purpose. And as he was about to declare his mind in that behalf, the Prolocutor did interrupt him as he did, almost continually. Wherwith Philpot not being content, said: Master Prolocutour thinketh that he is in a Sophistry school, where he knoweth right well the manner is, that when the Respondent perceiveth that he is like to be enforced with an argument to the which he is not able to answer, then he doth what he can with cavillation & interruption to drive him from the same. This saying of Philpot was ill taken of the Prolocutor and his adherents: and the Prolocutor said, that Philpot could bring nothing to avoid that authority, but his own vain imagination. Hear quoth Philpot, and afterward judge. For I will do in this as all other authorities wherewith you shall charge me in refelling any of my arguments that I have to prosecute, answering either unto the same by sufficient authorities of scripture, or else by some other testimony of like authority to yours, & not of mine own imagination: the which if I do, I will it to be of no credit. And concerning the saying of Chrysostom, I have 2. ways to beat him from your purpose, the one out of Scripture, the other of Chrysostom him self, in the place here by you alleged.
First, where he seemeth to say, that Christ ascending, took his flesh with him, and least also his flesh behind him, truth it is: for we all do confess and believe that Christ took on him our human nature in the virgins Mary's womb, and through his passyon in the same, hath vnyted us to his flesh, and thereby are we become one flesh with him, so that Chrysostom might therefore right well say, that Christ ascending took his flesh which he received of the virgin Mary, away with him: and also left his flesh behind him, which are we that be his elect in this world, which are the menbers of Christ, and flesh of his flesh: as very aptly S. Paul to the Ephes. in the 5. chap. doth testify, saying: We are flesh of his flesh, and bones of his bones. And if percase any man will reply, that he entreateth there of the Sacrament, so that this interpretation cannot so aptly be applied unto him in that place, then will I yet interpret Chrysostom another way by himself. For in that place a few lines before those words, which were here no rather read, are these words: that Christ after he Ascended into heavē, lea • t unto us endued w t his Sacraments, his flesh in mysteries, that is, Sacramentally. And that mystical flesh Christ leaveth as well to his Church in the Sacrament of Baptism, as in the sacramental bread and wine. And that S. Paul justly doth witness, saying: As many of us as are baptized in Christ, have put upon us Christ. And thus you may understand that S. Chrysostom maketh nothing for your carnal and gross presence in the Sacrament, as you wrongfully take him.
Now in this mean while M. Pye rounded the Prolocutor in the ear to put Philpot to silence and to appoint some other, mistrusting lest he would shrodely shake their carnal presence in conclusion, if he held on long, seeing in the beginning he gave one of their chief foundations such a pluck. Then the Prolocutor said to Philpot, that he had reasoned sufficiently enough, & that some other should now supply his room. Wherwith he was not well content, saying: Why sir, I have a dosen Arguments concerning this matter to be proposed, and I have not yet scarce ouergone my first Argument: for I have not brought in any confirmation thereof out of any ancient writer (whereof I have for the same purpose many) being hitherto still letted by your oft interrupting of me.
Well, quoth y e Prolocutor, you shall speak no more now, and I command you to hold your peace. You perceive, quoth Philpot, that I have stuff enough for you, and am able to withstand your false supposition, and therefore you command me to silence. If you will not give place, quoth y e Prolocutor, I will send you to prison. This is not, quoth Philpot, according to youre promise made in this house, nor yet according to your brag made at Paul's cross, that men should be answered in this disputation, to whatsoever they cā say, since you will not suffer me of a dosen arguments to prosecute one.
Then M. Pie took upon him to promise that he should be answered another day. Philpot seeing he might not proceed in his purpose, being therewith justly offended, ended, saying thus: A sort of you here, which hitherto have lurked in corners, and dissembled with God & the world, are now gathered together to suppress the sincere truth of God's holy word, and to set forth every false devise, which by the Catholic doctrine of the Scripture, ye are not able to maintain.
Then stepped forth M. Elmar Chapleine to the Duke of Suffolk: whom M. Moreman took upon him to answer. Against whō M. Elmar objected diverse and sundry authorities for the confirming of the argument he toke the day before in hand to prove, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the sentence of Theodoret brought in by M. Cheiney, must needs signify substance, and not accidence. Whose reasons and approbations, because they were all grounded and brought out of the Greek I do pass over, for that they want their grace in English, and also their proper understanding. But his allegations so incombred M. Moreman, that he desired a day to oueruiew them, for at that instant he was without a convenient answer.
Then did the Prolocutor cal M. Haddon dean of Exeter, & Chaplain to the Duke of Suffolk, who prosecuted Theodoretes authority in confirminge M. Elmars argument. To whom D. Watson took upon him to give answer, who after long talk was so confounded, that he was not able to answer to the word Mysterium. But for as much as he seemed to doubt therein, M. Haddon took out of his bosom a Latin author to confirm his saying, & shown the same to M. Watson, asking him whether he thought y t translation to be true, or y t the Printer were in any fault. There may be a fault in the Printer, quoth Watson, for I am not remembered of this word. Then did M. Haddon take out of his bosom a Greek book, wherein he shown forth with his finger the same words, which M. Watson could not deny. His arguments further I omit to declare at large, because they were for the moste parte in Greek, about the boulting out of the true signification of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .
Thē stepped forth M. Perne, & in argument made declaration of his mind against transubstantiation, & confirmed the sayings and authorities alleged by M. Elmar & M. Haddon. To whom the Prolocutor answered, saying: I much marvel, M. Perne, that you will say thus, for so much as on friday last you subscribed to the contrary. Which his saying master Elmar did mislike, saying to the Prolocutor that he was to blame so to reprehend any man, partly for that this house (quoth he) is an house of free liberty for every man to speak his conscience, and partly for that you promised yester day, that notw t standing any man had subscribed, yet he should have free liberty to speak his mind. And for that the night did approach, and y e time was spent, the Prolocutor giving them praises for their learning, did yet notwithstanding conclude, that all reasoning set apart, the order of the holy church must be received, & all things must be ordered thereby.
The act of the fifth day.
ON Friday the 27. of Octob. D. Weston the Prolocutor did first propound the matter, showing that the Conuocation had spent 2. days in disputation already about one only doctor, which was Theodoret, & about one only word, which was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . Yet were they come the 3. day to answer all things that could be objected, so that they would shortly put out their arguments. So M. Haddon Dean of Exeter, desired leave to appose M. Watson, which with 2. other mo, that is, Morgan & Harpsfield, was appointed to answer. M. Haddon demanded this of him, whether any substance of bread or wine did remain after the consecration. Then Master Watson asked of him again, whether he thought there to be a real presence of Christ's body or no? M. Haddon said, it was not meet nor orderlike, that he which was appointed to be respondent, should be opponent, & he whose duty was to object, should answer. Yet M. Watson along while would not agree to answer, but that thing first being granted him. At last an order was set, and M. Haddon had leave to go forward with his argument.
Then he proved by Theodorets words, a substance of bread and wine to remain. For these are his words: The same they were before the sanctification, which they are after. M. Watson said, that Theodoret meant not the same substance, but the same essence. Whereupon they were driven again unto the discussing of the Greek word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and M. Haddon proved it to mean a substance, both by the Etimologie of the word, and by the words of the Doctor. For 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (quoth he) cometh of the Participle 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which descendeth of the verb 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and so cometh the Noun 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which signifieth substance.
Then M. Watson answered that it had not that signification only. But M. Haddon proved y t it must needs so signify in that place. Then he asked Watson when the bread & wine became Symboles? Wherunto he answered: after the consecration and not before. Then gathered M. Haddon this reason out of his author.
Da- The same thing, saith Theodoret, that the bread and wine were before they were Symboles, the same they remain still in nature and substance, after they are Symboles.
ti- Bread and wine they were before:
si. Therefore bread and wine they are after.
Then M. Watson fell to the denial of the author, and said he was a Nestorian: and he desired y t he might answer to master Cheiney, which stood by, for that he was more meet to dispute in the matter, because he had granted and subscribed unto the real presence. M. Cheyney desired patience of the honorable men to hear him, trusting that he should so open the matter, that the verity should appear: protesting furthermore, that he was no obstinate nor stubborn man, but would be conformable to all reason: and if they by their learning, which he acknowledged to be much more then his, could answer his reasons, then he would be ruled by them, and say as they said: for he would be no author of schism, nor hold anything contrary to the holy mother the church, which is Christ's spouse. D. Weston liked this well, and commended him highly, saying that he was a well learned and a sober man, & well exercised in all good learning, and in the Doctors, and finallye a man meet for his knowledge to dispute in that place: I pray you hear him, quoth he. Then Master Cheiney desired such as there were present to pray 2. words with him unto God, and to say, Vincat veritas, Lette the verity take place, and have the victory: and all that were present cried with a loud voice, Vincat veritas, vincat veritas.
Then said D. Weston to him, that it was hypocritical. Men may better say (quoth he) Vincit veritas, Truth hath gotten the victory. Master Cheyny said again, if he would give him leave, he would bring it to that point that he might well say so.
Then he began with M. Watson after this sort: you said, that M. Haddon was unmeet to dispute, because he granteth not the natural and real presence: but I say you are much more unmeet to answer, because you take away the substance of the sacrament.
M. Watson said, he had subscribed to the real presence, & should not go away from that. So said Weston also, & the rest of the Priests, in so much that for a great while he could have no leave to say anymore, till the Lord's spake, and willed that he should be heard.
Then he told them what he meant by his subscribing to the real presence, far otherwise then they supposed. So then he went forward, and prosecuted M. Haddons argument in proving that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 was a substance, using the same reason that M. Haddon did before him: and when he had received the same answer also that was made to M. Haddon, he said it was but a le • d refuge, when they could not answer, to deny the author, & proved the author to be a catholic doctor: and that being proved, he confirmed that was said of the nature and substance, further. The similitude of Theodorete is this, quoth he: As the token of Christ's body and blood after the invocation of the Prieste, do change their names, & yet continue the same substance, so the body of Christ after his ascension changed his name, & was called immortal, yet had it his former fashion, figure, & circumscription, and to speak at one word, the same substance of his body. Therefore said M. Cheiney, if in the former part of the similitude you deny the same substance to continue, then in y e later parte of the similitude which agreeth with it, I will deny the body of Christ after his ascensiō to have the former nature & substance. But y t were a great heresy: therefore it is also a great heresy to take away the substance of bread and wine after the sanctification.
Then was M. Watson enforced to say, that the substance of the body in the former parte of the similitude brought in by him, did signify quantity & other accidents of the sacramental tokens which be s • ene, and not the very substance of the same: and therefore Theodoret saith, Quae videntur. &c. that is, Those things which be seen. For according to Philosophy, the accidents of things be seen, and not the substances.
Then M. Cheiney appealed to the honorable mē, and desired that they should give no credit to them in so saying: for if they should so think as they would teache, after their Lordship’s had ridden 40. miles on horseback (as their business doth sometime require) they should not be able to say at night, that they saw their horses all y e day, but only the color of their horses: and by his reason Christ must go to school & learn of Aristotle to speak. For when he saw Nathanael under the fig tree, if Aristotle had stand by, he would have said no Christ, thou sawest not him, but the color of him. After this Watson said, what if it were granted that Theodoret was on the other side? whereas they had one of that opinion, there were an hundred on the other side.
Then the Prolocutor called for M. Morgan to help: and said, that Theodoret did not more then he might lawfully do. For first he granted the truth, and then for fear of such as were not fully instructed in the faith, he spake, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, covertly, and in a mystery: and this was lawful for him to do, for first he granted the truth, and called them the body of Christ, & blood of Christ. Then afterward he seemed to give somewhat to the senses, and to reason, but that Theodorete is of the same mind that they were of, the words following, quoth he, do declare. For that which followeth is a cause of that which went before, and therefore he saith: The immortality. &c. Whereby it doth appear, that he meant the divine nature, & not the human. Then was Morgan taken w t misalleging of the text. For the book had not this word (for). For the Greek word did rather signify (truly) & not (for) so that it might manifestly appear that it was the beginning of a new matter, & not a sentence rendering a cause of that he had said before.
Then was it said by Watson again: suppose that Theodoret be with you, which is one that we never heard 〈◊〉 printed, but two or three years ago: Yet he is but one, and what is one against the whole consent of the church? After this M. Cheyney inferred, that not only Theodorete was of that mind, that the substance of bread and wine do remain, but diverse other also, & specially Irenaeus, who making mention of this sacrament, saith thus: when the cup which is mingled with wine, and the bread that is broken, do receive the word of God, it is made the Euchariste of the body and blood of Christ, by the which the substance of our flesh is nourished, and doeth consist. If the thanks giving do nourish our body, then there is some substance besides Christ's body.
To the which reason both Watson and Morgan answered, that Ex quibus, By the which, in the sentence of Irenaeus, was referred to the next antecedent, that is, to the body and blood of Christ, and not to the wine which is in the cup, and the bread that is broken.
Master Cheiney replied, that it was not the body of Christ which norished our bodies. And let it be that Christ's flesh norisheth to immortality, yet it doth not answer that argument, although it be true, no more then that answer which was made to my allegation out of S. Paul: The bread which we break, &c. w t certain other like: whereunto you answered, that bread was not taken there in his proper signification, but for that it had been: no more then the rod of Aaron which was taken for the serpent, because it had been a serpent. After this M. Cheyney brought in Hesechius, and used the same reason that he did of the custom of burning of Symboles, and he asked them what was burnt. Master Watson said, we must not inquire nor ask, but if there were any fault, impute it to Christ. Then said M. Cheiney, whereof came those ashes? not of a substance? or can any substance arise of accidents?
Then was M. Harpsfield called in to see what he could say in the matter. Who told a fair tale of the omnipotency of God, and of the imbecility and weakness of man's reasons not able to attain to godly things. And he said, that it was convenient whatsoever we saw, felt, or tasted, not to trust our senses. And he told a tale out of S. Cyprian, how a woman saw the Sacrament burning in her cofer, and that which burned there, quoth Harpsfielde, burneth here, and becometh ashes. But what that was that burnt he could not tell. But M. Cheiney continued still, and forced them with this question, what it was that was burnt? It was either (said he) the substance of bread, or else the substance of the body of Christ, which were too much absurdity to grant. At length they answered, that it was a miracle, whereat M. Cheiney smiled, and said that he could then say no more.
Then D. Weston asked of the company there, whether those men were sufficiently answered or no: Certain Priests cried Yea, but they were not heard at all: for the great multitude which cried No, no. Which cry was heard and noised almost to the ende of Paul's. Whereat D. Weston being much moved, answered bitterly, that he asked not the judgment of the rude multitude & unlearned people, but of them which were of the house. Then asked he of M. Haddon and his fellows, whether they would answer them other three days. Haddon, Cheiney, and Elmar, said No. But the Archdeacon of Winchester stood up and said, that they should not say but they should be answered, and though all other did refuse to answer, yet he would not, but offered to answer them all one after another: with whose profer the Prolocutor was not contented, but raised on him, and said that he should go to Bedlem: to whom the Archdeacon soberly made this answer: that he was more worthy to be sent thither, who used himself so ragingly in that disputation, without any indifferent equality. Then rose D. Weston up, and said:
All the company hath subscribed to our Article, saving only these men which you see. What their reasons are, you have heard. We have answered them 3. days, upon promise (as it pleased him to descāt, without truth, for no such promise was made) that they should answer us again as long, as the order of disputation doeth require, and if they be able to defend their doctrine, let them so do.
Then M. Elmar stood up & proved how vain a man Weston was, for he affirmed that they never promised to dispute, but only to open & testify to the world their consciences: For whē they were required to subscribe, they refused, and said that they would show good reasons which moved them that they could not with their consciences subscribe, as they had partly already done, and were able to do more sufficiently: therefore (quoth he) it hath been ill called a disputation, & they were worthy to be blamed that were the authors of that name. For we meant not to dispute, nor now mean not to answer, before our arguments (quoth he) which we have to propound, be soluted, according as it was appointed: For by answering we should but incumber ourselves, and profit nothing, since the matter is already decreed upon and determined, whatsoever we shall prove, or dispute to the contrary.
The act of the sixte day.
ON Mondaye following, being the 30. of October, the Prolocutor demanded of John Philpot Archdeacon of Winchester, whether he would answer in the questions before propounded to their objections, or no? To whom he made this answer, that he would willingly so do, if, according to their former determination, they would first answer sufficiently to some of his arguments, as they had promised to do: whereof he had a dozen, not half of the first being yet decided: And if they would answer fully, and sufficiently but to one of his Arguments, he promised that he would answer all the objections that they should bring.
Then the Prolocutor bade him propound his Argument, and it should be resolutely answered by one of them: whereunto M. Morgan was appointed. Upon Wensday last (quoth he) I was enforced to silence before I had prosecuted half of mine Argument: the sum whereof was this (as was gathered by the just context of the scripture) that the human body of Christ was ascended into heaven, and placed on the right hand of God the father: wherefore it could not be situate upon earth in the sacrament of the altare, invisible after the imagination of man. The argument was denied by Morgan: For the proof whereof, Philpot said, that this was it wherewith he had to confirm his first argument, if they would have suffered him y e other day, as now he trusted they would.
Fe - One self and same nature (quoth he) receiveth not in it self anything that is contrary to it self.
ri - But the body of Christ is an human nature, distinct from the Deity, and is a proper nature of it self.
o. Ergo, it cannot receive any thing that is contrary to that nature, and that varieth from it self.
But bodily to be present, and bodily to be absent, to be on earth, and to be in heaven, and all at one present time, be things contrary to the nature of an human body, Ergo, it cannot be said of the human body of Christ, that the self same body is both in heaven, & also in earth at one instant, either visibly or invisibly.
Morgan denied the Major, that is, the first parte of the argument. The which Philpot vouched out of Vigilius an ancient writer. But Morgan caviled that it was no scripture, and bade him prove the same out of scripture.
Philpot said he could also so do, and right well deduce the same out of S. Paul, who saith, that Christ is like unto us in all points, except sin: and therefore like as one of our bodies cannot receive in it self anything contrary to the nature of a body, as to be in Paul's church, and at Westminster at one instant, or to be at Londō visibly, & at Lincoln invisibly at one time: for that is so contrary to the nature of a body, and of all creatures (as Didimus and Basilius affirm) that an invisible creature, as an Angel, cannot be at one time in diverse places, wherefor he concluded, that the body of Christ might not be in moe places then in one, which is in heaven, and so consequently, not to be contained in the sacrament of the altare.
To this the Prolocutor took upon him to answer, saying, that it was not true that Christ was like unto us in all points, as Philpot took it, except sin, For y t Christ was not conceived by the seed of man, as we be.
Whereunto Philpot again replied, that Christ's conception was prophesied before by the Angel to be supernatural, but after he had received our nature by the operation of the holy Ghost in the virgins womb, he became in all points like unto us, except sin.
Then Morgan inferred that this saying of Paul did not plainly prove his purpose. Well, quoth Philpot, I perceive that you do answer but by cavillation, yet am I not destitute of other scriptures to confirm my first argument, although you refuse the probation of so ancient and catholic a doctor as Vigilius is. Sainte Peter in the sermon that he made in the third of the Acts, making mention of Christ, saith these words, whom heaven must receive until the consummation of all things. &c. Which words are spoken of his humanity. If heaven must hold Christ, then can he not be here on earth in the Sacrament, as is pretended.
Then Morgan laughing at this, and giving no direct answer at all, Harpfield stood up, being one of the Bishop of London's chaplaines, and took upon him to answer to the saying of S. Peter, & demanded of Philpot, whether he would, ex necessitate, that is, of necessity, force Christ to any place, or no?
Philpot said, that he would no otherwise force Christ of necessity to any place, then he is taught by the words of the holy Ghost, which sound thus: that Christ's human body must abide in heaven until the day of judgment, as I rehearsed out of the chapter before mentioned.
Why quoth Harpsfield, do you not know that Christ is God omnipotent? Yes said Philpot, I know that right well, neither doubt I anything at all of his omnipotency. But of Christ's omnipotency what he may do, is not our question, but rather what he doeth. I know he may make a stone in the wall a man, if he list, and also that he may make moe worlds, but doeth he therefore so? It were no good consequent so to conclude: he may do this, or that, therefore he doth it.
Ba - Only so much is to be believed of God's omnipotency, as is in the word expressed.
ra - That Christ's body is both in heaven and here also really in the sacrament, is not expressed in the word.
co. Ergo, it is not to be believed that the body of Christ, being in heaven is here also really in the sacrament.
Why quoth the Prolocutor, then you will put Christ in prison in heaven. To the which Philpot answered, do you reckon heaven to be a prison? God grant us all to come to that prison.
After this, Harpsfield inferred that this word Oportet in S. Peter, which signifieth in English must, did not import so much as I would infer of necessity, as by other places of Scripture it may appear, as in the first to Tim. where Paul saith, Oportet Episcopum esse vnius vxoris virum: A bishop must be the husband of one wife. Here quoth he, Oportet doeth not import such a necessity, but that he that never was married may be a Bishop.
To this Philpot said again, that the places were not like which he went about to compare, and that in comparing of the Scriptures we must not consider the naked words, but the meaning rather of the Scriptures, for y t in the place by him alleged, S. Paul doeth declare of what quality a Bishop ought to be. But in the other S. Peter teacheth us the place where Christ must necessarily be until the ende of the world: which we ought to believe to be true. And this comparison of this word Oportet, doeth no more answer mine argument, then if I should say of you now being here Oportet te hic esse, you must needs be here, which importeth such necessity for the time, that you can no otherwise be but here, & yet you would go about in words to avoid this necessity with another Oportet, in another sense, as this, Oportet te esse virū bonum, you must be a good man, where Oportet doeth not in very deed conclude any such necessity, but that you may be an evil man. Thus you may see that your answer is not sufficient, & as it were, no answer to mine argument.
Then the Prolocutour brought in another Oportet, to help this matter (if it might be) saying, what say you to this, Oportet heresies esse, must heresies needs be therefore because of this word Oportet?
Yea truly, quoth Philpotte, it cannot otherwise be, if you will add that which followeth immediately upon these words of Paul, that is, Vt qui electi sunt, manifestentur, that is: That such as be y e elect of God, may be manifested and known.
Why, quoth the Prolocutor, the time hath been that no heresies were. I know no such time quoth Philpot. For since the time of Abel and Cain, heresies have been, and then began they. Then said the Prolocutor, will you now answer Morgan an argument or two? I will quoth Philpot, if I may first be answered to my argument any thing according to truth and learning. What quoth the Prolocutor, you will never be answered. Howe I am answered, quoth Philpot, let all men that are here present, judge: and specially such as be learned, & with what cavillations you have dallied with me.
First to the ancient authority of Vigilius, you have answered nothing at all, but only denying it to be scripture y t he saith. Secondly, to the saying of S. Peter in the acts, ye have answered thus, demanding of me whether I would keep Christ in prison or no, let men now judge if this be a sufficient answer or no.
Then stood Morgane up again, and asked Philpotte whether he would be ruled by the universal church, or no.
Yes, quoth he, if it be the true Catholic Church. And since you speak so much of the Church, I would fain that you would declare what the church is.
The church, quoth Morgan, is diffused and dispearsed throughout the whole world. That is a diffuse definition quod Philpot, for I am yet as uncertain as I was before what you mean by y e church: but I knowledge no church, but that which is grounded and founded on God's word, as S. Paul saith, upon the foundation of the Apostles & Prophets, and upon the scriptures of God.
What quoth Moreman, was the Scripture before the church? yea quoth Philpot. But I will prove nay, quoth Moreman, and I will begin at Christ's time. The Church of Christ was before any scripture written. For Matthew was the first that wrote the Gospel, about a dosen years after Christ, Ergo, the church was before the scripture.
To whom Philpot answering, denied this argument. Which when Moreman could not prove, Philpot shown that his argument was Elenchus, or a fallace, that is, a deceiveable argument. For he took the Scripture only to be that, which is written by men in letters, whereas in very deed, all Prophecy, uttered by the spirit of God, was counted to be Scripture before it was written in paper & ink, for that it was written in the hearts, and graven in the minds, yea, and inspired in the mouths of good men, and of Christ's Apostles by the spirit of Christ: As the salutation of the Angel was the scripture of Christ, and the word of God before it was written. At that Moreman cried, fie, fie, wondering that the Scripture of God should be counted scripture, before it was written, and affirmed that he had no knowledge that said so.
To whom Philpot answered, that concerning knowledge in this behalf, for the trial of the truth about y e questions in controversy, he would wish himself no worse matched then with Moreman.
At the which saying the Prolocutor was grievously offended, saying, that it was arrogantly spoken of him, that would compare with such a worshipful learned man as Moreman was, being himself a man unlearned, yea a mad man, meter to be sent to Bedlem, then to be among such a sort of learned and grave men as there were, and a man that never would be answered, and one that troubled the whole house: and therefore he did command him that he should come no more into the house, demanding of the house whether they would agree thereupon, or no. To whom a great number aunsweraed, yea. Then said Philpot again, that he might think himself happy that was out of that company.
After this, Morgan rose up, and rounded the Prolocutor in the ear. And then again the Prolocutor spake to Philpot and said, least you should slander the house, & say that we will not suffer you to declare youre mind, we are content you shall come into the house as you have done before, so that you be appareled with a long gown & a tippette as we be, and that you shall not speak, but when I command you. Then quoth Philpot, I had rather be absent altogether.
Thus they reasoning to and fro, at length about the 13. of December, Q. Mary, to take up the matter, sendeth her commandment to Boner Byshoppe of London, that he should dissolve and break up the convocation. The copy of which commandment here followeth.
The precept of the Queen to Boner, Bishop of London, for the dissolving of the foresaid Conuocation.
MAria. &c. Reuerendo in Christo patri & Domino, Domino Edmundo London. Episcopo, salutem. Cum praesens cō •• catio Cleri Cantuariensis prouinciae apud Samctum Paulum London. iam modo tenta & instans existit, certis tamen vrgentibus causis & considerationibus nos specialiter mouentibus, de aduisamento Consilij nostri ipsam praesentem conuocationem duximus dissoluendam: Et ideo vobis mandamus quod eandem praesentem conuocationem apud sanctum Paulum praedictum debito modo asque aliqua dilatione dissoluatis. dissoluiue faciatis prout conuenit, significantes ex parte nostra vniuersis & singulis Episcopis, nec non Archidiaconis, Decanis, & omnibus alijs personis Ecclesiasticis quibuscunque dictae Cantuariensis Prouinciae quorum interest, vel interesse poterit, quod ipsi & eorum quilibet huic mandato nostro exequendo intendentes sint & obedientes prout decet. Teste meipsa apud Westmonasterium 13. die Decembris. Anno regni nostri primo.
During the time of this disputation, the 20. day of Nouēber, y e Major of Coventry sent up unto y e Lord's of the Coūsel Baldwine Clarke, I. Carelesse, Tho. Wilcockes, and Richard Estlin, for their behavior upon All halowe day last before. Whereupon Carelesse and Wylcocks were committed to the gatehouse, and Clarke and Astelyn to the Marshalsey.
The same day there was a letter directed to Sir Christopher Heydon, and Sir William Farmer knight, for the apprehension of John Huntingdon preacher, for making a rime against D. Stokes and the sacrament. Who appearing before the counsel the 3. of December next after, was upon his humble submission and promise, to amend as well in doctrine as living, again suffered to depart.
In the days of king Henry, and also of king Edward reigning after him, diverse noble men, Bishops and other, were cast into the Tower, some charged with treason as Lord courtney and the Duke of Norfolk (whose son Lord Henry Earl of Surrey had been the same time beheaded, a worthy & ingenious gentlemen, for what cause, or by whom, I have not hear to deal, this is certain, that not many years after his death, followed the beheading of both the L. Semers, and at last of the Duke of Northumberland also) some for y e Popes supremacy, and suspicious letters tending to sedition, as Tonstal B. of Durham, and other for other things, all which continued there prisoners til Q. Mary's coming in. Unto whom the said Q. eftsoons granted their pardon, and restored them to their former dignities. Amongst whom also was Gardener B. of Winchester, whom she not only freed out of captivity, but also advanced him to be high chancelor of England. Furthermore to the L. Courtney she shown such favor, that she made him Earl of Devonshire, in so much that there was a suspicion amongst many, that she would marie him, but that proved otherwise.
The same time Bonner also had been prisonner in the Marshalsey, whom likewise Queen Mary delivered, & restored to the Bishopric of London again, displacing Doct. Ridley, with diverse other good Bishops moe, as is above mentioned, as Cranmer from Canterb. the Archbyshoppe of York likewise, Poynette from Winchester, John Hooper from Worcester, Barlow from Bath, Harley from Hereforde, Taylor from Lincoln, Ferrar from S. David's, Coverdale from Excester, Scorye from Chichester, &c. with a great number of Archdeacons, Deans, and briefly all such beneficed men, which either were married, or would constantly adheere to their profession. All which were removed from their livings, and other of the contrary sect set in the same, as Cardinal Poole (who was then sent for) Gardener, Heath, White, Daye, Troublefield, &c.
And as touching Cranmer, of whom mention was made before, for so much as there was a rumor spread of him the same time at London, that he had recanted, and caused Mass to be said at Caunterburye, for purging of himself he published abroad a declaration of his truth and constancy in that behalf, protestinge that he neither had so done, nor mineded so to do: adding moreover, that if it would so please the Queen, he with Peter Martyr, and certain other whom he would choose, would in open disputation sustain the cause of the doctrine taught and set forth before in the time of king Edward, against all persons whomsoever. But while he was in expectation to have this disputation obtained, he with other bishops wer laid fast in the Tower, and P. Martyr permitted to depart the realm, and so wen • he to Argentine.
After this, in the month of Nouemb. the Archbyshop Cranmer (notwithstanding he had earnestly refused to subscribe to the kings will, in disheriting his sister Mary, • lledging many grave and pithy reasons for her legitimation, was in Guild hall of London arraigned and attainted of treason, with the L. Jane, and three of the Duke of Northumberlandes sons, which at the intreatye of certain persons were had again to the Tower, and there kept for a time. All which notwithstanding, Cranmer being pardoned of treason, stood only in the action and case of doctrine, why • h they called heresy, whereof he was right glad and joyful.
This being done in November, the people, and especially the Churchmen, perceiving the Queen so eagerlye set upon her old religion, they likewise for their partes, to show themselves no less forward to serve the Queens appetite (as the manner is of the multitude, commonly to frame themselves after the humor of the Prince and time present) began in their Quiers to set up the pageants of s. Katherine, and of S. Nicholas, and of their processions in Latin, after all their old solemnity with their gaye garde • iance, and gray ami • es.
And when the month of December was come, the Parliament brake up, but first of all such statutes were repealed, which were made either of Premunire, or touched any alteration of religion and administration of Sacraments under king Edward. In the which parliament also communication was moved of the Queens marriage, with king Phillip the Emperors son.
In this mean while Cardinal Poole being sent for by Q. Mary, was by the Emperor requested to stay with him, to the intent (as some think) that his presence in England should not be a let to the marriage which he intended between Philip his son and Q. Mary. For the making whereof, he sent a most ample Ambassade, with full power to make up the marriage betwixt them: which took such success that after they had communed of the matter a few days, they knit up the knot.
Anno. 1554.
The 13. of January 1554. Doctor Crome for his preaching upon Christmas day without license, was committed to the Fleet.
The 21. of January, M. Thomas Wootten Esquire, was for matters of religion committed to the Fleet close prisonner.
This mention of marriage was about the beginning of January, and was very evil takē of the people, & of many of the nobility, who for his, and for religion, conspiring among themselves, made a rebellion: whereof sir Thomas Wyate knight was one of the chief beginners: who being in Kent, said (as many else perceived) that the Queen and the Counsel would by foreign marriage bring upon this Realm moste miserable servitude, & establish popish religion. About the 25. of January news came to London of this stir in Kent, and shortly after of the D. of Suffolk, who was fled into Warwikeshier & Lecestershire: there to gather a power. The Queen therefore caused them both with the two Carewes of Devonshire to be proclaimed Traitors: and sent into Kent against Wyate, Thomas D. of Norfolk, who being about Rochester bridge forsaken of them that went with him, returned s •• e to London without anymore harm done unto him, and without bloodshed on either party.
Furthermore to apprehend the Duke of Suffolk, being fled into Warwikeshiere, was sent the Earl of Huntingdon in post, who entering the City of Coventry before the Duke, disappointed him of his purpose. Wherefore the Duke in great distress committed himself to the keeping of a servant of his named Underwoode in Astley Park, who like a false traitor bewrayed him. And so was brought up to the Tower of London.
In the mean while Sir Peter Carewe hearing of that was done, fled into France, but the other were taken, and Wyat came towards London in the beginning of February. The Queen hearing of Wyates coming, came into the City to the Guilde Hall, where she made a vehement Oration against Wyate: the contents, at least, the effect whereof here followeth, as nere as out of her own mouth could be penned.
The Oration of Queen Marie in the Guild Hall.
I Am come unto you in mine own person, to tell you that, which already you see and know, that is, how traitorously and rebelliously, a number of Kentish mē have assembled them selves against both us and you. Their pretence (as they said at the first) was for a marriage determined for us: to the which, and to all the Articles thereof ye have been made privy. But sithens we have caused certain of our privy Counsaile to go again unto them, and to demand the cause of this their rebellion, and it appeared then unto our said Counsel, that the matter of the marriage seemed to be but as a Spanish cloak to cover their pretenced purpose against our religion, so that they arrogantly and traitorously demanded to have the governance of our person, the keeping of the Tower, and the placing of our Counsailers.
Now loving subjects, what I am ye right well know, I am your Queen, to whom at my Coronation when I was wedded to the Realm, and laws of the same (the spousall Ring whereof I have on my finger, which never hitherto was, nor hereafter shall be left off) you promised your allegeaunce and obedience unto me. And that I am the right, and true inheritor of the crown of this Realm of England I take all Christendom to witness. My Father, as ye all know, possessed the same regal state, which now rightly is descended unto me: and to him always ye shown yourselves most faithful and loving subjects, and therefore I doubt not, but ye will show yourselves likewise to me, and that ye will not suffer a vile Traitour to have the order & governance of our person, and to occupy our estate, especially being so vile a Traitor as Wyat is. Who most certainly as he hath abused mine ignorant subjects, which be on his side, so doth he intend and purpose the destruction of you, and spoil of your goods. And this I say to you in the word of a Prince, I cannot tell how naturally the mother loveth the child, for I was never the mother of any, but certainly, if a Prince and governor may as naturally and earnestly love her subjects, as the Mother doeth the Child, then assure yourselves, that I being your Lady and Maistres, do as earnestly and as tenderly love & favor you. And I thus loving you, cannot but think that ye as heartily and faithfully love me, and then I doubt not, but we shall give these rebels a short & speedy overthrow.
As concerning the Marriage, ye shall understand that I enterprised not the doing thereof without advise, and that by the advice of all our privy Counsel, who so considered and weighed the great commodities that might ensue thereof, that they not only thought it very honorable, but also expedient, both for the wealth of the Realm, and also of you our Subjects. And as touching myself, I assure you, I am not so bente to my will, neither so precise, nor affectionate, that either for mine own pleasure, I would choose where I lust, or that I am so desirous, as needs I would have one. For God I thank him, to whom be the praise therefore, I have hitherto lived a Virgin, and doubt nothing, but with God's grace am able so to live still. But if as my progenitors have done before, it might please God that I might leave some fruit of my body behind me, to be your Governor, I trust you would not only rejoice thereat, but also I know it would be to your great comfort. And certainly, if I either did think or know, that this Marriage were to the hurt of any of you my Commons, or to the empeachment of any part or parcel of the royal state of this realm of England, I would never consent thereunto, neither would I ever mary while I lived. And in the word of a Queen I promise you, that if it shall not probably appear to all the Nobility and Commons in the high Court of Parliament, that this Marryage shall be for the high benefit & commodity of all the whole Realm, then I will abstain from Marriage while I live.
And now good Subjects, pluck up your hearts, and like true men, stand fast against these rebels, both our enemies and yours, and fear them not: for I assure you I fear them nothing at all, And I will leave with you my Lord Haward, & my Lord Treasoror, who shall be assistants with the Mayor for your defense.
Here is to be noted, that at the coming of Queen Mary to the Guild hall, being bruted before that she was coming w t harnessed men, such a fear came among them that a number of the Londoners fearing least they should be there entrapped & put to death, made out of the gate before her entering in. Furthermore note, that when she had ended her Oration (which she seemed to have perfectly conned without book) Winchester standing by her, when the Oration was done, with great admiration cried to y e people: O how happy are we, to whom God hath given such a wise and learned Prince. &c.
Two days after, which was the 3. of February, the L. Cobham was committed to the Tower, and M. Wyat entered into Southwarke. Who, for so much as he could not enter y t way into London, returning another way by Kingstone with his army, came up through the streets to Ludgate, and returning thence, he was resisted at Temple bar, and there yielded himself to Sir Clement Parson, and so was brought by him to the Courte, & with him the residue of his army (for before, Sir George Harpar & almost half of his men ran away from him at Kingstone bridge) were also taken, and about an 100. killed, and they that were taken were had to prison, and a great many of them were hanged, and he himself afterward executed at the Tower hill, and then quartered, whose head after being set up upon Haihil, was thence stolen away, and great search made for the same. Of which story ye shall here more (the Lord willing) hereafter.
The 12. day of February was beheaded the lady Jane, to whom was sent M. Fecknam, alias Howman, from the Queen 2. days before her death, to commune with her, and to reduce her from the doctrine of Christ, to Queen Mary's religion. The effect of which communication here followeth.
The communication had between the Lady Jane and Fecknam.
Madam, I lament your heavy case, and yet I doubt not, but that you bear out this sorrow of yours with a constant and patient mind.
You are welcome unto me sir, if your coming be to give Christian exhortation. And as for my heavy case (I thank God) I do so little lament it, that rather I accompt the same for a more manifest declaration of God's favor toward me, then ever he shown me at any time before: And therefore there is no cause why either you, or other, which bear me good will, should lament or be grieved with this my case, being a thing so profitable for my soul health.
I am here come to you at this present sent from the Queen and her counsel, to instruct you in the true doctrine of y e right faith: although I have so great confidence in you, that I shall have (I trust) little need to travail with you much therein.
Forsooth I heartily thank the Queens highness, which is not vnmindful of her humble subject: and I hope likewise that you no less will do your duty therein both truly and faithfully according to that you were sent for.
What is then required of a Christian?
That he should believe in God the Father, y e Son, and the holy Ghost, three persons and one God.
What? is there nothing else to be required or looked for in a Christian, but to believe in him?
Yes, we must also love him with all our heart, with all our soul, and with all our mind, and our neighbor as our self.
Why? then faith justifieth not, nor saveth not.
Yes verily, faith (as Paul saith) only justifieth.
Why? S. Paul saith: If I have all faith without love it is nothing.
True it is: for how cā I love him whom I trust not? or how can I trust him whom I love not? Faith and love go both together, and yet love is comprehended in faith.
How shall we love our neighbor?
To love our neighbor is to feed the hungry, to cloth the naked, and give drink to the thirsty, and to do to him, as we would do to our selves.
Why? then it is necessary unto salvation, to do good works also, and it is not sufficient only to believe.
I deny that, and I affirm that faith only saveth: but it is meet for a Christian, in token that he followeth his Master Christ, to do good works: yet may we not say that they profit to our salvation. For whē we have done all, yet we be unprofitable servants, and faith only in Christ's blood saveth us.
How many Sacraments are there?
No, there are seven.
By what Scripture find you that?
By the Sacrament of Baptism I am washed with water, and regenerated by the spirit, and that washing is a token to me that I am the child of God. The Sacrament of the Lord's Supper offered unto me, is a sure seal and testimony that I am by the blood of Christ, which he shed for me on the Cross, made partaker of the everlasting kingdom.
Why? what do you receive in that Sacrament? Do you not receive the very body and blood of Christ?
No surely, I do not so believe. I think that at the Supper I neither receive flesh nor blood, but bread and wine: Which bread when it is broken, and the wine when it is drunken, putteth me in remembrance howe that for my sins the body of Christ was broken, & his bloodshed on the Cross, and with that bread and wine I receive the benefits that come by the breaking of his body, & shedding of his blood for our sins on the Cross.
Why? doeth not Christ speak these words: Take eat, this is my body? Require you any plainer words? doeth he not say it is his body?
I grant he saith so: and so he saith, I am the vine, I am the door, but he is never the more for that the door not the vine. Doth not S. Paul say, He calleth things that are not as though they were? God forbid that I should say that I eat the very natural body and blood of Christ: for then either I should pluck away my redemption, either else there were two bodies, or two Christ's. One body was tormented on the Cross. And if they did eat another body, then had he two bodies: either else if his body were eaten, than was it not broken upon the Cross: or if it were broken upon the Cross, it was not eaten of his Disciples.
Why? is it not possible that Christ by his power could make his body both to be eaten and broken, as to be borne of a woman without seed of man, and as to walk upon the sea having a body, and other such like miracles as he wrought by his power only?
Yes verily: if God would have done at his Supper any miracle, he might have done so: but I say that then he minded no work nor miracle, but only to break his body, and shed his blood on the Cross for our sins. But I pray you to answer me to this one question: where was Christ when he said: Take, eat, this is my body? Was he not at the table when he said so? He was at that time alive, and suffered not till the next day. What took he but bread? What brake he but bread? and what gave he but bread? Look what he took, he brake: and look what he brake, he gave: and look what he gave, they did eat: and yet all this while he himself was alive, and at Supper before his disciples, or else they were deceived.
You ground your faith upon such authors as say and unsay both with a breath, and not upon the Church, to whom ye ought to give credit.
No, I ground my faith on God's word, and not upon the Church. For if the Church be a good Church, the faith of the Church must be tried by God's word, and not God's word by the Church, either yet my Faithe. Shall I believe the Church because of antiquitye? or shall I give credit to the Church that taketh away from me the half parte of the Lord's Supper, and will not let any man receive it in both kinds? Whych thing if they deny to us, then deny they to us part of our salvation. And I say that it is an evil Church, and not the Spouse of Christ, but the Spouse of the Devil that altereth the Lord's Supper, and both taketh from it, and addeth to it. To that Church (say I) God will add plagues, and from that Church will he take their parte out of the book of life. Do they learn that of S. Paul, when he ministered to the Corinthians in both kinds? Shall I believe this Church? God forbid.
Why? shall the church alter God's will & ordinance for a good intent? How did king Saul? The Lord God defend.
With these and such like persuasions he would have had her leave to the Church, but it would not be. There were many more things whereof they reasoned, but these were the chiefest.
After this Fecknam took his leave, saying, that he was sory for her: For I am sure (quoth he) that we two shall never meet.
True it is (said she) that we shall never meet, except God turn your heart. For I am assured, unless you repent and turn to God, you are in an evil case: and I pray God, in the bowels of his mercy, to send you his holy spirit: for he hath given you his great gift of utterance, if it pleased him also to open the eyes of your heart.
A letter of the Lady Jane sent unto her father.
FAther, although it hath pleased God to hasten my death by you, by whom my life should rather have been lengthened: yet can I so patiently take it, as I yield God more hearty thanks for shortening my woeful days, then if all the world had been given into my possession with life lengthened at my own will. And albeit I am well assured of your impacient dolours, redoubled manyfold ways, both in bewailing your own woe, and especially (as I hear) my unfortunate state, yet my dear father (if I may without offense rejoice in my own mishaps) me seems in this I may accompt myself blessed, that washing my hands with the innocence of my fact, my giltles blood may cry before the Lord, mercy to the innocent. And yet though I must needs acknowledge, that being constrained, and, as you wot well enough, continually assayed, in taking upon me I seemed to consent, and therein grievously offended the Queen and her laws: yet do I assuredly trust that this mine offense towards God is so much the less, in that being in so royal estate as I was, mine enforced honor being never with mine innocent heart. And thus good father I have opened unto you the state wherein I presently stand. Whose death at hand, although to you perhaps it may seme right woeful, to me there is nothing that can be more welcome, then from this vale of misery to aspire to that heavenly throne of all joy and pleasure with Christ our Savior. In whose steadfast faith (if it may be lawful for the daughter so to write to the Father) the Lord that hitherto hath strengthened you, so continue you that at the last we may meet in heaven with the Father, the Son, and the holy Ghost.
At what time her father was flourishing in freedom and prosperity in the time of King Edward, there belonged unto him a certain learned man, student and Graduate of the University of Oxford. Who then being Chaplayne to the said Duke, and a sincere Preacher (as he appeared) of the Gospel, according to the doctrine of that time set forth and received, shortly after that the state of Religion began to alter by Queen Mary, altered also in his profession with the time, and of a Protestant, became a friend and defender of the Popes proceedings. At whose sudden mutation and inconstant mutability, this Christian Lady being not a little aggrieved, and most of all lamenting the dangerous state of his soul, in sliding so away for fear from the way of truth, writeth her mind unto him in a sharp and vehement letter: which as it appeareth to proceed of an earnest and zealous heart, so would God it might take such effect with him, as to reduce him to repentance, and to take better hold again for the health and wealth of his own soul. The copy of the letter is this as followeth.
Another letter of the Lady Jane to M. Harding, late Chaplayne to the Duke of Suffolk her father, and then fallen from the truth of God's most holy word.
SO oft as I call to mind the dreadful and fearful saying of God: That he which layeth hold upon the plough, and looketh back, is not meet for the kingdom of heaven: and on the other side, the comfortable words of our Savior Christ to all those that forsaking themselves, do follow him: I cannot but marvel at thee and lament thy case: which seemedst sometime to be the lively member of Christ, but now the deformed imp of the devil, sometime the beautiful temple of God, but now the stinking and filthy kenel of Satan, sometime the unspotted spouse of Christ, but now the unshamefast paramour of Antichrist, sometime my faithful brother, but now a stranger and Apostate, sometime a stout Christian soldier, but now a cowardly runneaway. Yea, when I consider these things, I cannot but speak to thee, and cry out upon thee, thou seed of Satan, and not of Judah, whom the devil hath deceived, the world hath begiled, and the desire of life subverted, and made thee of a Christian an Infidel: wherefore hast thou taken the Testament of the Lord in thy mouth? Wherefore hast thou preached the law and the will of God to others? Wherefore hast thou instructed other to be strong in Christ, when y u thyself doest now so shamefully shrink, and so horrible abuse the Testament and law of the Lord? When thou thyself preachest, not to steal, yet most abominably stealest, not from men but from God, and committing most heinous sacrilege, robbest Christ thy Lord of his right members thy body and soul, and chosest rather to live miserably with shame to the world, then to die and gloriously with honor to reign with christ in whom even in death is life? Why doest thou now show thyself most weak, when in deed thou oughtest to be most strong? The strength of a for • is unknown before the assault: but thou yeldest thy hold before any battrie be made.
Oh wretched and unhappy man, what art thou but dust and ashes? and wilt thou resist thy maker that fashioned thee and framed thee? Wilt thou now forsake him y t called thee from the custom gathering among y e Romish Antichristians, to be an Ambassador & messenger of his eternal word? He that first framed thee, and since thy first creation and birth preserved thee, nourished and kept thee, yea and inspired thee with the spirit of knowledge (I cannot say of grace) shall he not now possess thee? Darest thou deliver up thyself to another, being not thine own but his? How canst thou having knowledge, or how darest thou neglect the law of the Lord, and follow the vain traditions of men: and whereas thou hast been a public professor of his name, become now a defacer of his glory? Wilt thou refuse the true God, and worship the invention of man, the golden calf, the whore of Babylon, y e Romish Religion, the abhominable Idol, the most wicked mass? Wilt thou torment again, rent, and tear the most precious body of our Savior Christ with thy bodily and fleshly teeth? Wilt thou take upon thee to offer up any sacrifice unto God for our sins, considering that Christ offered up himself (as Paul saith upon the cross a lively sacrifice once for all? Can neither the punishment of the Israelites (which for their Idolatry they so oft received) nor the terrible threatenings of the Prophets, nor the curses of God's own mouth fear thee to honor any other God then him? Doest thou so regard him that spared not his dear and only son for thee, so diminishing, yea, utterly extinguishing his glory that thou wilt attribute the praise and honor due unto him to the Idols, which have mouths and speak not, eyes and see not, ears and hear not: which shall perish with them that made them?
What saith the Prophet Baruch, where he recited the Epistle of Jeremiah written to the captive Jews? Did he not forwarne them that in Babylon they should see God's of gold, silver, wood, & stone borne upon men's shoulders, to cast a fear before the Heathen: But be not ye afraid of them (saith Jeremiah) nor do as other do? But when you see other worship thē, say you in your hearts: it is thou (O Lord) that oughtest only to be worshipped: for as for those God's, the Carpenter framed them and polished them, yea gilded be they, and laid over with silver, and vain things and cannot speak. He showeth moreover, the abuse of their deckings, howe the Priests took off their ornaments and aparelled their women withal: how one holdeth a scepter, another a sword in his hand, and yet can they judge in no matter, nor defend themselves, much less any other, from either battle or murder, nor yet from gnawing of worms, nor any other evil thing. These, & such like words, speaketh Jeremiah unto them, whereby he proveth them to be but vain things, and no God's. And at last he concludeth thus: Confounded be they that worship them. They were warned by Jeremiah, and thou as Ieremye hast warned other, and art warned thyself by many Scriptures in many places. God saith: he is a jealous God, which will have all honor, glory, and worship given to him only. And Christ saith in the 4. of Luke to Satan which tempted him: even to the same Satan, the same Belzebub, the same devil, which hath prevailed against thee: It is written (saith he) thou shalt honor the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
These and such like do prohibit thee and all Christians to worship any other God then which was before all worlds, and laid the foundations both of heaven and earth: and wilt thou honor a detestable Idol, invented by Romish Popes, and the abhominable College of crafty Cardinals? Christ offered himself up once for all, and wilt thou offer him up again daily at thy pleasure? But thou wilt say, thou doest it for a good intent. O sink of sin: Oh child of perdition: doest y u dream therein of a good intent, where thy conscience beareth thee witness of God's threatened wrath against thee? How did Saul? who for that he disobeyed the word of the Lord for a good intent was thrown from his worldly and temporal kingdom. Shalt thou then that doest deface God's honor, and rob him of his right, inherit the eternal and heavenly kingdom? Wilt thou for a good intent dishonor God, offend thy brother, and danger thy soul, wherefore Christ hath shed his most precious blood? Wilt thou for a good intent pluck Christ out of heaven, and make his death void, and deface the triumph of his cross by offering him up daily? Wilt thou either for fear of death, or hope of life, deny and refuse thy God, who enriched thy poverty, healed thy infirmity, and yielded to thee his victory, if thou couldest have kept it? Doest y u not consider that the thread of thy life hangeth upon him that made thee, who can (as his will is) either twine it harder to last the longer, or untwine it again to break it the sooner? Doest thou not then remember the saying of David a notable King, to teach thee a miserable wretch, in his 104. Psalm, where he saith thus: When thou takest away thy spirit (oh Lord) from men, they die and are turned again to their dust: but when thou lettest thy breath go forth, they shall be made, and thou shalt renew the face of the earth. Remember the saying of Christ in his Gospel: Whosoever seeketh to save his life, shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, shall find it. And in the same place: Whosoever loveth father or mother above me, is not meet for me. He that will follow me, let him forsake himself, and take up his cross and follow me. What cross? the cross of infamy and shame, of misery and poverty, of affliction and persecution for his names sake. Let the oft falling of those heavenly showers, pierce thy stony heart. Let the two edged sword of God's holy word there asunder the sinowes of worldly respects, even to the very marrow of thy carnal heart, that thou mayest once again forsake thyself and embrace Christ. And like as good subjects will not refuse to hazard all in the defense of their earthly and temporal Governor, so fly not like a white liuered milkesop from the standing wherein thy chief captain Christ hath set thee in array of this life. Viriliter age, confortetur cor tuum, sustine dominum. Fight manfully, come life, come death: the quarrel is God's, and undoubtedly the victory is ours.
But thou wilt say, I will not break unity. What? not the unity of Satan and his members? not the unity of darkness, the agreement of Antichrist and his adherents? Nay thou deceauest thyself with the • ond imagination of such an unity as is among the enemies of Christ. Were not the false Prophets in an unity? Were not Joseph's bre • thren and Jacob's sons in an unity? Were not the Heathen, as the Amelechites, the Ph • resites and Jebusites in an unity? Were not the Scribes and Pharisees in an unity? Doth not King David testify: Conuenerunt in vnum aduersus dominum? Yea thieves, murderers, conspirators, have their unity. But what unity? Tully saith of amity: Amicitia non est, nisi inter bonos. But mark my friend, yea friend, if thou be not God's enemy: there is no unity but where Christ knitteth the knot among such as be his. Yea, be well assured, that where his truth is resident, there it is verified that he himself saith: Non veni mittere pacem in terram, sed gladium, &c. but to set one against another, the son against the father, and the daughter against the mother in law. Deceaue not thyself therefore with the glittering and glorious name of unity: for Antichrist hath this unity, not yet in deed, but in name. The agreement of ill men is not an unity, but a conspiracy.
Thou hast heard some threatenings, some curses, and some admonitions out of the scripture to those that love themselves above Christ. Thou hast heard also the sharp and biting words to those that deny him for love of life: Sayth he not: He that denieth me before men, I will deny him before my father in heaven? And to the same effect writeth Paul Heb. 6. It is impossible (saith he) that they which were once lightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were partakers of the holy Ghost, and have tasted of the good word of God, if they fall and slide away, crucifyeng to themselves the son of God afresh, and making of him a mockingstocke, should be renewed again by repentance. And again saith he: if we shall willingly sin after we have received the knowledge of his truth, there is no oblation left for sin, but the terrible expectation of judgment and fire which shall devour the adversaries. Thus S. Paul writeth, and this thou readest, and doest thou not quake and tremble?
Well, if these terrible and thundering threatenings cannot stir thee to cleave unto Christ, and forsake the world: yet let the sweet consolations and promises of the scriptures, let the example of Christ and his Apostles, holy Martyrs and Confessors encourage thee to take faster hold by Christ. Hearken what he saith: Blessed are you when men revile you, and persecute you for my sake: rejoice and be glad, for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the Prophets that were before you. Hear what Isaiah the Prophet saith: Fear not the curse of men, be not afraid of their blasphemies, for woormes and moths shall eat them up like cloth and wool, but my righteousness shall endure forever, and my saving health from generation to generation. What art thou then (saith he) that fearest a mortal man, the child of man which vadeth away like the flower: and forgettest the Lord that made thee, that spread out the heavens, and laid the foundation of the earth▪ I am thy Lord thy God, that make the sea to rage, and be still, whose name is the Lord of hosts. I shall put my word in thy mouth, and defend thee with the turning of an hand. And our Savior Christ saith to his Disciples: They shall accuse you and bring you before Princes and Rulers for my names sake, and some of you they shall persecute and kill: but fear you not (saith he) nor care you not what you shall say: for it is the spirit of your father that speaketh within you. Even the very he • es of your head are all numbered. Lay up treasure for yourselves (saith he) where no thief cometh, nor moth corrupteth. Fear not them that kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul, but fear him that hath power to destroy both soul and body. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.
Let these and such like consolations taken out of the Scriptures, strengthen you to godward. Let not the examples of holy men and women go out of your mind, as Daniel and the rest of the prophets, of the three children, of Eleazarus that constant father, of the vii. of the Machabies children, of Peter, Paul, Stephen, and other Apostles and holy Martyrs in the beginning of the Church: As of good Simeon Archbishop of Seloma, and Zetrophone, with infinite other under Sapores the King of the Persians and Indians, who contemned all torments devised by the tyraunts for their saviors sake. Return, return again into Christ's war, and as becometh a faithful warrior, put on that armor that S. Paul teacheth to be most necessary for a Christian man. And above all things take to you the shield of faith, and be you provoked by Christ's own example to withstand the devil, to forsake the world, and to become a true and faithful member of his mystical body, who spared not his own body for our sins.
Throw down yourself with the fear of his threatened vengeance for this so great and heinous an offense of Apostasy: and comfort yourself on the other part with the mercy, blood and promise of him that is ready to turn unto you whensoever you turn unto him. Disdayne not to come again with the lost son, seeing you have so wādred with him. Be not ashamed to turn again with him from the swill of strangers, to the delicates of your most benign and loving father, acknowledging that you have sinned against heaven and earth. Against heaven, by stayning the glorious name of God, and causing his most sincere and pure word to be evil spoken of through you. Against earth, by offending so many of your weak brethren to whom you have been a stumbling block through your sudden sliding. Be not abashed to come home again with Mary, and weep bitterly with Peter, not only with shedding the tears of your bodily eyes, but also pouring out the streams of your heart, to wash away out of the sight of God the filth and mire of your offensive fall. Be not abashed to say with the Publican, Lord be merciful unto me a sinner. Remember the horrible history of Julian of old, and the lamentable case of Spyra of late, whose case (me think) should be yet so green in your remembrance, that being a thing of our time, you should fear the like inconvenience, seeing you are fallen into the like offense.
Last of all, let the lively remembrance of the last day be always afore your eyes, remembering the terror that such shall be in at that time, with the runnagates and fugitiues from Christ, which setting more by the world then by heaven, more by their life, then by him that gave them life, did shrink, yea, did clean fall away from him that forsook not them: and contrariwise, the inestimable joys prepared for them, that fearing no peril, nor dreading death, have manfully fought, and victoriously triumphed over all power of darkness, over hell, death, and damnation, thorough their most redoubted Captain Christ, who now stretcheth out his arms to receive you, ready to fall upon your neck and kiss you, and last of all to feast you with the deynties and delicates of his own precious blood, which undoubtedly, if it might stand with his determinate purpose, he would not set to shed again, rather then you should be lost. To whom with the Father and the holy Ghost be all honor, praise and glory everlasting. Amen.
A Letter written by the Lady Jane in the ende of the New Testament in Greek, the which she sent unto her sister Lady Katherine, the night before she suffered.
I Have here sent you (good Sister Katherine) a book, which although it be not outwardly trimmed with gold, yet inwardly it is more worth then precious stones. It is the book (dear Sister) of the law of the Lord. It is his Testament and last will which he bequeathed unto us wretches: which shall lead you to the path of eternal joy: and if you with a good mind read it, and with an earnest mind do purpose to follow it, it shall bring you to an immortal and everlasting life. It shall teache you to live, and learn you to die. It shall win you more then you should have gained by the possession of your woeful fathers lands. For, as if God had prospered him, you should have inherited his lands: so if you apply diligently this book, seeking to direct your life after it, you shall be an inheritor of such riches, as neither the covetous shall withdraw from you, neither thief shall steal, neither yet the moths corrupt. Desire with David (good Sister) to understand the law of the Lord your God Live still to die, that you (by death) may purchase eternal life.