PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Annotations on the New Testament

Henry Hammond (1605-1660) · 3,231,271 words · 14361 min

Large work readerShowing section 102 of 115. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 102/115

[Paraphrase] 21. Continue in your zeal and constancy toward God, and in your hope and dependence on him for mercy to preserve you here, and to bring you to bliss eternal.

22. And of some have compassion, [note m] making a difference;

[Paraphrase] 22, 23. And for others that are any way corrupted by these false teachers, deal with them after different manners, as their condition requires: those that waver, and are unsteddy, rebuke, and so recover them out of their danger with mildness, do not cast them out of the Church, deal mildly and mercifully with them, receive and pardon them; and for others that are entangled and corrupted by these seducers, deal with them as the Angel did with Lot, proclaim the terrors of the Lord unto them, the approaching destruction that will suddenly overtake them, hasten them to fly for their life, to get out of this Sodom, this sinful, abominable and formidable condition, as men that are ready to have the vengeance of heaven fall upon them, and these men snatch as out of a fire, which will singe them if they stay but one minute in it, and will devour them if they make any longer abode there, and bring them to a hatred of all the beginnings and least degrees of impurity and uncleanness, as when a man would avoid the infection of the pestilence, he will fly from and not dare to touch any garment of an infected person: see Rev. 3. 4.

23. And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire: hating even the garments spotted by the flesh.]

[Paraphrase] 23. And for others that are any way corrupted by these false teachers, deal with them after different manners, as their condition requires: those that waver, and are unsteddy, rebuke, and so recover them out of their danger with mildness, do not cast them out of the Church, deal mildly and mercifully with them, receive and pardon them; and for others that are entangled and corrupted by these seducers, deal with them as the Angel did with Lot, proclaim the terrors of the Lord unto them, the approaching destruction that will suddenly overtake them, hasten them to fly for their life, to get out of this Sodom, this sinful, abominable and formidable condition, as men that are ready to have the vengeance of heaven fall upon them, and these men snatch as out of a fire, which will singe them if they stay but one minute in it, and will devour them if they make any longer abode there, and bring them to a hatred of all the beginnings and least degrees of impurity and uncleanness, as when a man would avoid the infection of the pestilence, he will fly from and not dare to touch any garment of an infected person: see Rev. 3. 4.

24. Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy,]

[Paraphrase] 24. Now to him who is able to support you from apostatizing, and having done so, to present you to himself, at his appearance to destroy his enemies, such as shall be accounted blameless before him, and to have matter of rejoicing and triumph, not of sadness or fear from that coming of his,

25. To the only wise God, our Savior, be glory and majesty, dominion and power, now and ever. Amen.]

[Paraphrase] 25. To him whose dispensations and methods of economy are so infinitely wise, and those so wonderfully expressed in this very matter, that none else can pretend to the like in any degree, to him who hath thus dealt with us in Jesus Christ, preserved us wonderfully who believe and keep constant to him, be ascribed all glory and divine greatness, all dominion over all men and creatures from all eternity through all time, (particularly at this time wherein his power shines so illustriously) and to all eternity. So be it.

Annotations on S. Jude.

[ a] V. 1. Before of old ordained to this condemnation ] The way to interpret this, as almost any other difficulty in this Epistle, will be by comparing it with the second of Peter, which is almost perfectly parallel to this. There these men are spoken of c. 2. 3. and the passage that there seems parallel to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 v. 1. bringing on themselves swift destruction, and, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for whom judgment for some while lingreth not, and their destruction doth not nod, ver. 3. which signifies in both places the certain and quick destruction that is likely to come upon those men who, by complying with the Jews, and professing themselves to be such, to avoid their persecutions, are by the Roman destroyers taken for Jews, and so speedily (soon after this time) devoured. Only in this place is mentioned the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , being formerly set forth, or written of, answerable to which is 2 Pet. 2. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , among you shall be false teachers, which being an affirmation that there shall be, must be grounded on some prophecy or prediction that there should. And that is clearly to be found in Christ 's prediction of the destruction of the Jews, Mat. 24. 10. before which there should come false prophets, all one with the false teachers in S. Peter (see 1 Joh. 2. 6.) by which the Gnostics are certainly to be understood; (see Note on Mat. 24. d.) And therefore at the writing of Saint Jude 's Epistle, these being actually come in, he speaks not of them by way of prophecy that they shall come, but applies to them the former prophecy, that they are the men that were before written or prophesied of by Christ in the Gospel of S. Matthew, and so capable of that title. Instead of this when S. John, 1 Joh. 2. 18. speaks of this very matter, he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as ye have heard that Antichrist cometh, so now there are many Antichrists, by which, saith he, we know that it is the last hour: just as S. Matthew had made it a prognostic of the coming of that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or fatal period of the Jews. By this it appears, first, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 formerly here refers to Christ 's time, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 forewritten of, to Mat. 24. or the passage there see down, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 judgment, or condemnation, to that great destruction that should fall about that time upon all the obdurate unbelieving Jews, and false teachers, Gnostics, or other abominable Christians, whose sin is set down in the following words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , impious, &c. their judgment or condemnation in these. As for the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 itself, it signifies no more then to be set forth, or exposed to public view (as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is anything pasted up upon a door to signify ought, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in Phavorinus ) and so we have it used. Gal. 3. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to whom Christ hath been set forth before their eyes; only by the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 added to it, it is here made to signify prophecy or prediction, somewhat formerly set forth, or declared of them. And that not only their sin, their false doctrine, and sly coming in was foretold, but their punishment and destruction also (by this famous coming of Christ to the destruction of his crucifiers) appears 2 Thess. 2. 8, &c. where S. Paul foretelling it, most probably refers to some prediction of Christ to this matter. And such is that of Mat. 16. 25. that they that will save their lives, shall lose them, and only they that hold out and continue constant in their confession of Christ, shall escape this ruin, Mat. 10. 22. and 24. 13. And so this is the full meaning of this phrase, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , men whose impostures first, and then their vengeance also have been foretold by Christ. Unless we should farther add to this, that the judgments that formerly f ll on the like wicked men, and the denuntiations of those judgments by Enoch, &c. v. 14. should here be referred to also, as emblematical and typical predictions of the punishment that is sure to fall on these men, upon that principle of divine judgment, that they who are parallel in the sins shall be also in the punishment.

[ b] Ib. Denying the only Lord God— ] The various readings in this place, some having, but the King's MS. leaving out, the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God, deserve to be considered. If 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God be not read, then the whole period will belong to Jesus Christ alone, without any mention of God the Father, and affirm of him, that he is our only Master and Lord, referring to his great work of our Redemption, by which he thus purchased us unto himself to be his peculiar servants, so as any other false God's or Devils, so as Simon Magus, that now set up against him, must never have any part of our honor, or worship, or obedience from him. But if 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God be read, then it will be doubtful which of these two senses is to be affixed to it. For 1. it may be thus rendered, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Our only Master, God and Lord, Jesus Christ, making those three the several attributes of Jesus Christ; viz. that he is, first, our only Master, secondly, our only God, and thirdly, our only Lord. And this, understood in the Catholic sense of the ancient Fathers and Councils, is a most divine truth, that Christ is our Master, by title of Redemption, and our only Master, not excluding God the Father and God the holy Ghost, (for as he and his Father are one, so he and the holy Ghost are one also) but all other pretenders, such as Simon, that thus assumed to himself to be that truly which Christ, said he, appeared to be here on earth; and so in like manner, in the same way of interpretation, that Christ is our only God, & only Lord. And this interpretation proceeds upon that way of punctation which is ordinarily retained in our Copies, no comma after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God, but all read in one coherent sense, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , our only master God and Lord Jesus Christ. A second rendering may also possibly belong to it, in case there were, or ought to be, a comma after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God. For then 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God, being separated from that which follows, would denote God the Father, and consequently 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the only master, must belong to him; which if it do, then it must be affirmed of these Gnostic-heretics, the followers and worshippers of Simon, that they did deny God the Father, our only master, as well as they denied our Lord Jesus Christ. And so indeed we read of him, that he assumed to be that God who appeared to Moses in mount Sinai, and accordingly the statue was erected to him at Rome: and that is the meaning of exalting himself above all that is called God, 2 Thess. 2. 4. and of what Irenaeus saith of him, that he affirmed himself to be sublimissimam virtutem, hoc est, eum qui sit super omnia Pater, the sublimest virtue, that is, him who is the Father above all things, and that the Jews God was one of his Angels, and a great deal more. See 2 Thess. 2. Note e.

[ c] V. 7. Eternal fire ] The phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in all other places, Mat. 18. 8. and 24. 41, 48. signifying the fire wherein the damned are tormented day and night for ever and ever, Rev. 20. 10. it is yet thought probable that in this place, being applied to these cities of Sodom, &c. it should be taken in another notion, for an utterly-destroying fire, such being the fire and brimstone that fell on those cities. But for this there appeareth no necessity; but on the other side there is a conjuncture of all circumstances of the Context to persuade the understanding it here of the fire of Hell, as in all the other places. For first, It is evident that Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them, signify in this place the inhabitants of those cities; for to those only, and not to the walls and buildings of the cities, belongs the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , having given themselves over to fornication. And then sure those that suffer the vengeance of eternal hell (and therein are set forth for an example what we Christians, falling into the like courses, are to expect) are not the walls but the inhabitants also. Now of these it is here affirmed in the Present-tense, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they that thus formerly sinned, are set forth a pattern, or an example (as men which are punished are) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , suffering, or undergoing, (at the present, when Jude writes it) the vengeance of eternal fire. Of the unbelieving Israelites he had affirmed. v. 5. that God 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (in the Aorist) destroyed them: of the Angels, v. 6. that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , having not kept but forsaken their principality, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Preter-tense, he hath kept them under darkness ineverlasting chains unto the judgment of the great day, and so of these cities in the Aorist, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , having given themselves over to fornication, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and having gone —But now in the latter part of the verse it is only in the Presenttense, they are proposed or set forth a pattern, or an example, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the Present, undergoing, or suffering, the vengeance of eternal fire; either not at all referring by those words to their long ago past destruction by fire and brimstone, which was notorious in sacred story, and so sufficiently intimated in the very mention precedent of Sodom and Gomorrah; or if he did, yet withal considering it as a judgment still continued, then begun as an essay significative of what followed, but still protracted without any release, they still suffer, or undergo, that vengeance of fire, which fire is withal 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , never likely to have an end. And this is the exactest and properest notion of these words, which I therefore prefer before any other.

[ d] V. 8. Dignities ] What the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies in this place, and the parallel of S. Peter, 2 Pet. 2. 10. is a little uncertain. Though it be literally rendered Glories, in the Abstract, yet there is no doubt but that it denotes the persons (the subjects of that glory or greatness ) in the Concrete, as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , powers, Rom. 13. 1. signifies rulers, or men in power and authority; and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 2 Pet. 2. 10. those in whom dominion is vested. But whether these be men or Angels, is not so clear. That they are Angels is made probable by these arguments; first, Because the appearance of Angels in the Old Testament is ordinarily expressed by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the glory of the Lord, the appearances of them being visible in bright shining clouds, as hath oft been said. And so agreeably Angels in the Plural, or the order or hierarchy of Angels considered together, may be called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Glories, that is, those glorious creatures that attend and wait on God. Secondly, 'It is observable Col. 2. 8. that the A postle speaking of Angels, useth the phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which he, that is, man, hath not seen, expressing the Angels by that periphrasis, those that are invisible spirits, never seen, nor consequently particularly known by any man, creatures above us, out of our reach. And so in like manner this Apostle here speaking more of these 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , glories, ver. 10. expresses them by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , those things which they know not, and 2 Pet. 2. 12. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , those which they are ignorant of, which is an expression directly parallel to that other used by S. Paul of Angels. Thirdly, Because of other dominions their contempt had been set down before, both in S. Peter and here, by the phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , setting at naught, making nothing of, and despising, scornfully behaving themselves toward their superiors, and so needed not be repeated again in these words. But yet on the other side it must be said, that what was before said of their setting dominion at naught, may refer to their doctrine of Christian liberty, or their not being subject to any ruler or Master, which is noted in them, 1 Tim. 6. 1. and then this of their practice superstructed on that doctrine, their speaking contumeliously of those that exercise that dominion, may be fit enough to be added to the former, and so may be set down in that phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they speak evil of glories. And that it doth so signify is most probable: First, because we find not in any Church-writers that the heresy of the Gnostics had anything in it of particular opposition or defiance to Angels, but on the contrary the Aeones, noting the Angels, make up a great part of their Divinity. A second argument may be taken from the mention of the gainsaying of Core, whereby this sin of these Gnostics is exemplified ver. 11. where as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 contradicting, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 evil speaking, are of the same importance; so we know the sin of Core consisted in the murmuring and rebelling against Moses and Aaron, that were by God set over them. And for thus doing the Gnostics are (2 Tim. 3.) distinctly compared to Jannes and Jambres the Egyptian Magicians (and such was Simon and Menander, and the chief of these) who by their sorceries resisted Moses coming in God's name to the Israelites and to Pharaoh, as these did the Apostles of Christ. And so this will be the meaning of the phrase, speaking ill of those that are set over them, that is, contumelious usage of the Apostles or Governors of the Church (who are called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the glory of Christ, 1 Cor. 8. 23.) with whom particularly they had many controversies and disputations (referred to ver. 9.) in which those contumelious speeches on the Gnostics part would be but effects of their great daring pride (mentioned 2 Pet. 2. 10. immediately before it) and of their discriminating themselves from all others, v. 19. and so is very probable to have been observable and accusable in them. See Note on the title of 2 John a.

[ e] V. 9. Body of Moses ] What the body of Moses here signifies, will easily be discerned by comparing it with the place from whence this controversy of the Angel with the Devil is here cited, and that is undoubtedly Zach. 3. 1. There we have Joshua the High-priest standing before the Angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him, or dispute or plead against him, as the standing at the right hand notes an accuser, impleading ano her, ( Let Satan stand at his right hand, 'Psal. 109.) And the only words which are there mentioned from the Angel (under the name of the Lord ) to Satan are these here set down, The Lord rebuke thee. Now the matter of controversy then between the Angel and the Devil, the good and bad Angel, was (that which is the subject of that present Vision) the reedifying of the Temple, and restoring of the service of God among the Jews at Jerusalem. This is called the body of the Jews, 2 Mac. 15. 12. where we have Onias praying for the whole body of the Jews: and may as fitly be styled the body of Moses, in the same manner as the Christian Church; or assembling of Christians for the serv ce of Christ, is called the body of Christ, 1 Cor. 12. 20, 25, 27. Eph. 1. 23. and 4. 12, 16. Col. 1. 18. Jam. 3. 2. The Judaical Temple and worship and service depending upon Moses, as the Lawgiver, or principle, or head under God, from whence it came; as Christ 's being the Lawgiver of the Christian Church, and instituting Apostles, &c. in it, is the reason why he is called the head of that, and the Church the body of Christ, as on the other side, we know he calls his body a Temple, Destroy this Temple, &c. and the Apostle of us, that our bodies are the Temples of the holy Ghost. Agreeable hereunto it is, that all Christians, as they live together in public communion, congregating together in assemblies, are called (in reference to this notion of body ) members and fellow-members, and the restoring the congregations or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , (see Note on 2 Cor. 13. c. and Ephes. 4. 12.) And so in Ignatius 's Epistle to the Church of Smyrna, he talks of congratulating with the Church of Syria, because they are in peace, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , their body is restored to them; where their restitution to the free public service of God (such as here Joshua and Zerubbabel were foretold to labor for, and Satan to labor against, and the Archangel to contend with him about it) is expressed by the restoring of their own body. One difficulty here still remaineth, how this example is proper to the point in hand, speaking evil of glories, or dignities, or dominions. And that which seems most reasonable is, that the Devil here is the same that in other places is called Belzebub the Prince of Devils, the Prince of the air, and Prince of darkness, and Rev. 9. 11. in the ancient MS. in the Kings Library, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Angel, the Prince of the Abyss, or Pit, who having been once a principal Angel in heaven, having lost that dignity, is now the Prince of hell, and otherwhere is noted by Principality or Power, he that hath power over the other devils. Now if Michael the Archangel in a quarrel with him, about a matter of such weight as was the restitution of the service of God among the Jews, would not use any bitterness or execration against him, then how unreasonable is it for these Gnostics, how without all excuse, thus to demean themselves toward the Apostles of Christ? That the Devil is here looked on in this notion, may be concluded by comparing it with 2 Pet. 2. 11. (which sure is parallel to this) where speaking evil of them must needs refer to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 glories or dignities, v. 10. And therefore if the Devil be comprehended there under that phrase, (as here he is distinctly named) it must follow that he is here looked on as a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or dignity, that is, as a Prince, though it be of devils.

[ f] V. 11. The error of Balaam ] This expression of S. Jude, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , hath much of difficulty in it. What is meant by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 error may appear by Rom. 1. 27. where it is clearly set to signify their seduction to Idolatry, of which the Gnostics were guilty, and whereby they fell into all those unnatural sins, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , contrary to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the beginning of that verse. Thus is the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 used 1 Thess. 2. 3. not only for seduction in general, but particularly that of the Gnostics, being there joined with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , uncleanness; and so perhaps Eph. 4. 14. where the cunning of the false teachers is said to be used 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for the contriving, or designing of deceit, or seduction, that is, for the infusing this great corruption of the Gnostics, all manner of lust and filthiness: so it is clearly taken, 2 Pet. 2. 18. where 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is interpreted by the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , lusts of the flesh, and filthiness, preceding in that verse; and as clearly 2 Pet. 3. 17. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , led away with the deceit of unruly men, referring to the seduction and abominable doctrines of the filthy Gnostics. For that this was the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the seduction into which Balaam brought the Israelites by his counsel to Balak (when, as the Jerusalem Targum reads, Numbers 25. 14. he advised Balak in these words, Veni nunc, consulam tibi quid populo huic facies: Fac eos peccare, Come now, I will counsel thee what thou shelt do to this people: Make them sin ) appears by Num. 25. 1. but especially by 2. Pet. 2. 15. and Rev. 2. 14. where this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is called in one 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the other 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the way, and, the doctrine of Balaam. Now for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , some probability there is by comparing it with that place of Rom. 1. 27. (which hath much agreement with this passage) that it should be a mistake in the Copy for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , burning, there, and denote burning in lust. And thus 'tis clear the Syriac read it, who render it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 exarserunt, or, as the new Paris Edition renders it, libidinose exarserunt, they burnt libidinously: but the word as it is, is capable of a very commodious interpretation, so as to agree with the notion given of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 1 Pet. 4. 4. for those unnatural sins of uncleanness and confusion of sexes. Thus when the Gloss of Phavorinus (as the printed Copies have it) renders 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 by nothing but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 were destroyed, and Hesychius by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (which must needs be false printed) that may very probably be a mistake of the Copy for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , used instead of this word in the parallel place 2 Pet. 2. 15. (So Psal. 13. 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 almost gone out of the way ) noting here those great declinations and deviations from the right way, these transgressions of the Law of Nature. And so 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will signify the breaking or running out (as a vessel, Luk. 5. 37.) into all confusion of lusts and base practices, such as wherein the Gnostics transcended and exceeded all the men in the word. Lastly, the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 hath difficulty and doubt in it, whether being used Adverbially it be to be rendered 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , by way of reward, or else 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for reward's sake. The parallel place, 2 Pet. 2. 15. inclines to the latter of these: for there on the mention of Balaam 'tis added, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , who loved the reward of unrighteousness, noting that what he did by his counsel for the bringing the Israelites to these sins, he did out of covetousness, or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to get reward from Balak. But the other place (which may pass for a parallel also) Rom. 1. 27. persuades the former: for there all their obduration of heart, v. 28. God's delivering them up to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , reprobate mind, in doing 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , going on senselessly in all their abominable sins, is said to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a retribution, or reward, or punishment, proportioned to their Idolatrous practice; and so here it will be true of the seduction of Balaam, or that Balaamitical filthiness, that the Gnostics were permitted to fall, or by God were delivered up to it without any restraints, as a punishment to their sin in converting Christianity into Licentiousness. And this seems to be the more probable rendering of the place, thus, that they fell into those filthy libidinous burnings, or confusions of lusts, the same that Balaam seduced the Israelites into, and this by way of reward, or just punishment from God, who thus punished them with desertion, and tradition unto this stupid senseless continuing and multiplying of these sins. Thus when the Syriac renders it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Latin interpreter reads verbatim, Et post errorem Balaam in mercede exarserunt, and the Latin Paris Edition in mercedem, both joining the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that they by way of reward, or for their punishment and reward, did thus fall into these libidinous burnings, not referring to that of Balaam 's doing what he did in contemplation of reward.

[ g] V. 12. Trees whose fruit withereth ] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is a season of the year; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith Phavorinus, the season after the Summer, and again, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the season beginning from the fifteenth, or, say others, the 22. of August, continued to the same day of December. Thus is the year divided in Sextus Empiricus adv. Mathem. l. 5. c. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , making this to Winter, as the Spring is to Summer. And Olympiodorus in Meteor. p. 20. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . By which it appears that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 begins after both parts of Summer are ended, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , after the dog-star hath done shining, when it draweth toward Winter, and the season, though it begins in August on the 15. or 22. yet reacheth out to Christmas, that is, to the sharpest and depth of Winter, and is so called, because it begins from the end of the season of ripe fruit, that is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . In this sense of the Substantive, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the derivative Adjective, must signify that which belongs to that time: and so the Arabic Interpreter in the New Paris Edition of the Bible reads 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 autumnales, and so S. Jerome also; and so 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will be trees in that condition in which they use to be at that time of year, that is, bare, having lost their leaves, and having nothing desirable on them (like the waterless empty clouds precedent.) So in Cinnamus, after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which is the dissolving of the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and description of this season, by the decaying of the beauty of trees, &c. it presently follows, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the leaves or shade, ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith Hesychius) had now left the trees; and this a direct emblem of the Gnostics, and quite contrary to the godly man, described Psal. 1. 3, 4. whose leaf doth not wither: and then to these is fitly added 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 fruitless, trees that have neither the verdure of leaves, nor profit of fruit on them▪ trees which, beside that they bear no fruit, are deprived and naked, and bare of leaves also, and such are those that are come to the denying of Christian profession itself, as we know the Gnostics did. Another signification seems to be followed by the Syriac, who read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 quarum fructus emarcuit, or defecit, whose fruit hath withered, or failed, according to a notion of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a disease, in Phavorinus, that disease probably such as befalls fruit and trees, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a blast or sut, perhaps 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , aerugo, that spoils fruit and corn; for, saith Phavorinus and Hesychius, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and then 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will be blasted trees: and this will also do well to signify these rotten putrid Gnostics, a blasted sort of Christians, withal 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , without any kind of fruit on them. But the former of these is most agreeable to the nature of the word, and so fittest to be adhered to.

[ h] V. 14. Cometh with ten thousands of his Saints ] What the coming of God signifies, hath oft been said (see Mat. 16. 0. and 24. b.) executing vengeance upon wicked men, and that coming of his 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , with his Angels, Mat. 16. 27. those being the ministers and executioners of his vengeance, and withal his satellitium or guard, whose presence in any place is the only thing to determine God's omnipresence to one place more then to another. And these are the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 here, (not myriads of Saints or holy men, but such as are mentioned Heb. 12. 22. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 myriads of Angels, or, as the Targum on Deut. 33. 2. Myriads angelorum sanctorum, where we read only saints, from the Hebrew which reads of holy ones, that is, Angels, but I say) his holy myriads, or hosts, of Angels, with ten thousands in each, which makes his coming so solemn and so formidable a thing. And thus in the prophecy of Zechariah, chap. 14. 5. where we read, The Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee, it is to be read from the Hebrew, with all his holy ones, that is, with his guard of Angels, and that (it seemeth) here, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to execute judgment, and rebuke, &c. That Enoch thus prophesied in his time of these Gnostics under Christ, we are not told; but that he prophesied to them, that is, that his prophecy concerning the excision of the old world, for such sins as these are now guilty of, is very pertinent to them, and fit to be considered by them. Thus we see S. Peter Ep. 2. ch. 2. applies to them all the judgments that had ever befallen sinners, particularly that in Noah 's time, of which that Enoch prophesied, there is no question, and we have these remains of it. First, the name of his son Methuselah. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Sela in Hebrew signifies mission, sending or pouring out waters on the earth, Job 5. 10. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , he sends out waters on the fields; to which, saith Bochart, Arphaxad related when he called his first-born Sela, in memory of the Deluge, two years after which Arphaxad was born, Gen. 11. 6. And so in like manner Enoch, that prophesied of this destruction, and foresaw by the Spirit, that it would soon follow the death of this his son, he called his name 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , his death, emission. To this it is considerable, what we find in Stephanus Byzant. in the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , where mentioning Enoch, or Hannoch, he saith of him, that he lived 300. years and above, and that the inhabitants asked the Oracle how long he should live, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and the Oracle answered, that when he was dead all men should be destroyed (or, as the word will bear, corrupted, in that sense in which we find Gen. 6. 2. soon after Enoch's death, the earth was corrupt before God, which how it belongs to filthy lusts, hath oft been shown) which he applies to Deucalion 's flood, and the universal destr ••• tion there, and adds, that the news of this Oracle was so sadly received by the inhabitants, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (perhaps it should be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for so he hath it before in the Genitive case) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to wail for Enoch, is proverbially used, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for those that mourn excessively. Here 'tis possible that the confounding the two stories of Enoch and Methuselah made up this relation: For as to the latter part, of the flood following his death, that may best belong to the son Methuselah, whose name was thus prophetical; but for the years of his life, those seem to belong to Enoch, for he lived 365. years. Soudas, lightly mistaking his name, calls him Nannac. who, saith he, is reported to be a King before the flood, and foreseeing the approach thereof, he assembled all men to the Temple, and with tears 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 prayed to avert it: and Erasmus out of Hermogenes makes the same relation, and cites the Proverb, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , out of Herodes the Iambick writer, rendering it Cannacae more plorem, as if it referred to his tears for averting the Deluge, when it more probably refers to the people's lamenting, forecited from Stephanus. See Eupolemus in Eusebius Praepar. l. 9. who speaking of Methuselah, Enoch's son, saith, that he knew all by the Angels of God, and ( Enoch being all one with Atlas) by these all Astrology came to the Greeks.

[ i] V. 16. Great swelling words ] What is meant by the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 here, may best be guest by comparing it with Dan. 11. 36. where we have the same phrase, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 there the Context will sufficiently interpret it: The King shall do according to his will, and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every God, and shall speak (marvelous, we render) high swoln things against the God of God's. There doing according to his will, is casting off all fear or care of laws or justice; his exalting and magnifying himself above every God, is his Atheistical despising of all religion, whether the true or the false, the Jewish or Heathen worship; and his speaking the high swoln things against the God of God's, is undervaluing the God of Israel, the only true God, and setting up some body else, as superior to him, the same that is said of the Gnostic heresy, and their leader Simon, 2 Thess. 2. 4 that he opposeth, and exalteth himself over, or against, all that is called God, or worship. The same phrase is again used, Dan. 7. 8. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a mouth speaking great, or swelling, or lofty things. To one or both these passages of Daniel this place of Saint Jude seems to relate, joining these two together, walking after their own lusts, and their mouth speaketh 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , high swoln words, as Dan. 11. doing according to his will, and speaking high swoln words, &c. And therefore we have here reason to take it in the same sense that there it appeareth to be used in; and though here be not mention of the God of God's, against whom these stout things are spoken, yet to supply it from thence; and so it will agree most perfectly to the character of the Gnostics, 2 Thess. 2. 4. who certainly are the persons here described. For of them it is evident (see 2 Thess. 2. Note e.) that they attributed Divinity unto Simon, made him the uppermost God, and the God of Israel but a part of his creation, worship'd him and Helena his whore with sacrifices, &c. and so did the very thing that there is said of the King in Daniel. And whereas S. Peter in setting this down 2 Pet. 2. 18. adds unto it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of vanity, that may fitly be accorded with this in the notion of vanity for Idolatry, (see Rom. 8. Note h.) for such was their worship of Simon. See Note b.

[ k] Ib. Sensual ] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies here those that have no taste of any higher principle in them but of the sensitive soul, that suffer those affections to carry them away, to rule and have dominion over them. Contrary to these are the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 spiritual, they that move by an higher principle, that having the assistance of God's Spirit, and divine revelation, do act and move accordingly. From hence it is that Heretics, that pretend to greater purity then other men, and so separate from all others also, have generally desired to discriminate themselves from all others by calling themselves 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the spiritual, and all others 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , animales. And so particularly did the Gnostics & their followers in Irenaeus; they forsooth were the spiritual, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 naturally spiritual, and had no need of any of those graces and gracious actions which were required to other men, and by their 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a kind of Baptism they had, became invisible to the Judge, and all the sins they could commit, could no more pollute them then the Sun-beams could be defiled by shining on a dunghill, or Gold by being in a kennel, the very character (a little improved) of these here, v. 18. walking after their godless lusts.

[ l] V. 20. Praying in the Holy Ghost ] It is sufficiently known that the Apostles, and those that were by the holy Ghost set apart for the planting of the Church, had many miraculous gifts, especially 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or graces; not everyone all, but one one, another another. Among these, saith S. Chrysostom, there was in these first times, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the gift of prayer, as also the gift of healing, of singing, prophesying, &c. 1 Cor. 14. 26. (see Note on Ephes. 6. g.) This, saith he, was bestowed 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , upon someone, who did pray for the rest, and ask those things which were useful for them, and teach others how to form prayers. Some of these special prayers thus conceived, and frequently used by them, which were fit for the common perpetual use of all Christians, were received and kept by those whom they thus taught, and are they which the ancients mean by the Liturgies of S. James, &c. which, or some other in that disguise (or rather those with some other later mixtures) are still used by the Greek Church on solemn days. These extraordinary 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as long as they lasted, are here called (as other special gifts of the Spirit also are) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the holy Ghost, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Spirit, Ephes. 6. 18. the immediate moderatour, as it were, of all the petitions of the Church at that time. But when those extraordinary 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ceased, it is clear there was need of somewhat else to supply that place, and that would not be (in any reason) to let every man pray as he would ( or, for the preventing of that, and the ill consequents of it, it was that the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 gift of prayer had before been given) but set prepared forms, for the daily constant uses, and those provided by the Governors of the Church, Apostolical men, which had benefited under the prayers of those that had the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or gift, and remembered some forms of theirs, at least the method and manner used by them. And this is the original of Liturgy among Christians.

[ m] V. 22 Making a difference] What 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Middle voice signifies, hath been said, Note on Jam. 2. c. and Note on c. 3. f. viz. to waver or doubt. And accordingly if it be here rendered (as in reason it must, and by Analogy with the use of the word in other places) it will be necessary to adhere to the reading of the Kings MS. (which the vulgar Latin also appears to have followed, and Nominative 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will have no sense) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Some indeed, viz. those that waver, though they are not yet fallen off, either 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 have pity on them, and out of compassion to such weaklings do all that may tend to the settling or confirming them, or else (as the Kings MS. reads) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , reprove them, after the manner of fraternal correption and admonition, by that means timely to reduce them to perseverance and constancy, before yet they fall off and make shipwreck of the faith: whereas others that are already fallen must be more nimbly handled, even snatched out of the fire, &c.




Annotations on S. Jude.

[ a] V. 1. Before of old ordained to this condemnation ] The way to interpret this, as almost any other difficulty in this Epistle, will be by comparing it with the second of Peter, which is almost perfectly parallel to this. There these men are spoken of c. 2. 3. and the passage that there seems parallel to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 v. 1. bringing on themselves swift destruction, and, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for whom judgment for some while lingreth not, and their destruction doth not nod, ver. 3. which signifies in both places the certain and quick destruction that is likely to come upon those men who, by complying with the Jews, and professing themselves to be such, to avoid their persecutions, are by the Roman destroyers taken for Jews, and so speedily (soon after this time) devoured. Only in this place is mentioned the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , being formerly set forth, or written of, answerable to which is 2 Pet. 2. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , among you shall be false teachers, which being an affirmation that there shall be, must be grounded on some prophecy or prediction that there should. And that is clearly to be found in Christ 's prediction of the destruction of the Jews, Mat. 24. 10. before which there should come false prophets, all one with the false teachers in S. Peter (see 1 Joh. 2. 6.) by which the Gnostics are certainly to be understood; (see Note on Mat. 24. d.) And therefore at the writing of Saint Jude 's Epistle, these being actually come in, he speaks not of them by way of prophecy that they shall come, but applies to them the former prophecy, that they are the men that were before written or prophesied of by Christ in the Gospel of S. Matthew, and so capable of that title. Instead of this when S. John, 1 Joh. 2. 18. speaks of this very matter, he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as ye have heard that Antichrist cometh, so now there are many Antichrists, by which, saith he, we know that it is the last hour: just as S. Matthew had made it a prognostic of the coming of that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or fatal period of the Jews. By this it appears, first, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 formerly here refers to Christ 's time, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 forewritten of, to Mat. 24. or the passage there see down, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 judgment, or condemnation, to that great destruction that should fall about that time upon all the obdurate unbelieving Jews, and false teachers, Gnostics, or other abominable Christians, whose sin is set down in the following words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , impious, &c. their judgment or condemnation in these. As for the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 itself, it signifies no more then to be set forth, or exposed to public view (as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is anything pasted up upon a door to signify ought, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in Phavorinus ) and so we have it used. Gal. 3. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to whom Christ hath been set forth before their eyes; only by the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 added to it, it is here made to signify prophecy or prediction, somewhat formerly set forth, or declared of them. And that not only their sin, their false doctrine, and sly coming in was foretold, but their punishment and destruction also (by this famous coming of Christ to the destruction of his crucifiers) appears 2 Thess. 2. 8, &c. where S. Paul foretelling it, most probably refers to some prediction of Christ to this matter. And such is that of Mat. 16. 25. that they that will save their lives, shall lose them, and only they that hold out and continue constant in their confession of Christ, shall escape this ruin, Mat. 10. 22. and 24. 13. And so this is the full meaning of this phrase, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , men whose impostures first, and then their vengeance also have been foretold by Christ. Unless we should farther add to this, that the judgments that formerly f ll on the like wicked men, and the denuntiations of those judgments by Enoch, &c. v. 14. should here be referred to also, as emblematical and typical predictions of the punishment that is sure to fall on these men, upon that principle of divine judgment, that they who are parallel in the sins shall be also in the punishment.

[ b] Ib. Denying the only Lord God— ] The various readings in this place, some having, but the King's MS. leaving out, the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God, deserve to be considered. If 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God be not read, then the whole period will belong to Jesus Christ alone, without any mention of God the Father, and affirm of him, that he is our only Master and Lord, referring to his great work of our Redemption, by which he thus purchased us unto himself to be his peculiar servants, so as any other false God's or Devils, so as Simon Magus, that now set up against him, must never have any part of our honor, or worship, or obedience from him. But if 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God be read, then it will be doubtful which of these two senses is to be affixed to it. For 1. it may be thus rendered, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Our only Master, God and Lord, Jesus Christ, making those three the several attributes of Jesus Christ; viz. that he is, first, our only Master, secondly, our only God, and thirdly, our only Lord. And this, understood in the Catholic sense of the ancient Fathers and Councils, is a most divine truth, that Christ is our Master, by title of Redemption, and our only Master, not excluding God the Father and God the holy Ghost, (for as he and his Father are one, so he and the holy Ghost are one also) but all other pretenders, such as Simon, that thus assumed to himself to be that truly which Christ, said he, appeared to be here on earth; and so in like manner, in the same way of interpretation, that Christ is our only God, & only Lord. And this interpretation proceeds upon that way of punctation which is ordinarily retained in our Copies, no comma after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God, but all read in one coherent sense, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , our only master God and Lord Jesus Christ. A second rendering may also possibly belong to it, in case there were, or ought to be, a comma after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God. For then 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 God, being separated from that which follows, would denote God the Father, and consequently 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the only master, must belong to him; which if it do, then it must be affirmed of these Gnostic-heretics, the followers and worshippers of Simon, that they did deny God the Father, our only master, as well as they denied our Lord Jesus Christ. And so indeed we read of him, that he assumed to be that God who appeared to Moses in mount Sinai, and accordingly the statue was erected to him at Rome: and that is the meaning of exalting himself above all that is called God, 2 Thess. 2. 4. and of what Irenaeus saith of him, that he affirmed himself to be sublimissimam virtutem, hoc est, eum qui sit super omnia Pater, the sublimest virtue, that is, him who is the Father above all things, and that the Jews God was one of his Angels, and a great deal more. See 2 Thess. 2. Note e.

[ c] V. 7. Eternal fire ] The phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in all other places, Mat. 18. 8. and 24. 41, 48. signifying the fire wherein the damned are tormented day and night for ever and ever, Rev. 20. 10. it is yet thought probable that in this place, being applied to these cities of Sodom, &c. it should be taken in another notion, for an utterly-destroying fire, such being the fire and brimstone that fell on those cities. But for this there appeareth no necessity; but on the other side there is a conjuncture of all circumstances of the Context to persuade the understanding it here of the fire of Hell, as in all the other places. For first, It is evident that Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them, signify in this place the inhabitants of those cities; for to those only, and not to the walls and buildings of the cities, belongs the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , having given themselves over to fornication. And then sure those that suffer the vengeance of eternal hell (and therein are set forth for an example what we Christians, falling into the like courses, are to expect) are not the walls but the inhabitants also. Now of these it is here affirmed in the Present-tense, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they that thus formerly sinned, are set forth a pattern, or an example (as men which are punished are) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , suffering, or undergoing, (at the present, when Jude writes it) the vengeance of eternal fire. Of the unbelieving Israelites he had affirmed. v. 5. that God 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (in the Aorist) destroyed them: of the Angels, v. 6. that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , having not kept but forsaken their principality, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Preter-tense, he hath kept them under darkness ineverlasting chains unto the judgment of the great day, and so of these cities in the Aorist, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , having given themselves over to fornication, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and having gone —But now in the latter part of the verse it is only in the Presenttense, they are proposed or set forth a pattern, or an example, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the Present, undergoing, or suffering, the vengeance of eternal fire; either not at all referring by those words to their long ago past destruction by fire and brimstone, which was notorious in sacred story, and so sufficiently intimated in the very mention precedent of Sodom and Gomorrah; or if he did, yet withal considering it as a judgment still continued, then begun as an essay significative of what followed, but still protracted without any release, they still suffer, or undergo, that vengeance of fire, which fire is withal 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , never likely to have an end. And this is the exactest and properest notion of these words, which I therefore prefer before any other.

[ d] V. 8. Dignities ] What the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies in this place, and the parallel of S. Peter, 2 Pet. 2. 10. is a little uncertain. Though it be literally rendered Glories, in the Abstract, yet there is no doubt but that it denotes the persons (the subjects of that glory or greatness ) in the Concrete, as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , powers, Rom. 13. 1. signifies rulers, or men in power and authority; and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 2 Pet. 2. 10. those in whom dominion is vested. But whether these be men or Angels, is not so clear. That they are Angels is made probable by these arguments; first, Because the appearance of Angels in the Old Testament is ordinarily expressed by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the glory of the Lord, the appearances of them being visible in bright shining clouds, as hath oft been said. And so agreeably Angels in the Plural, or the order or hierarchy of Angels considered together, may be called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Glories, that is, those glorious creatures that attend and wait on God. Secondly, 'It is observable Col. 2. 8. that the A postle speaking of Angels, useth the phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which he, that is, man, hath not seen, expressing the Angels by that periphrasis, those that are invisible spirits, never seen, nor consequently particularly known by any man, creatures above us, out of our reach. And so in like manner this Apostle here speaking more of these 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , glories, ver. 10. expresses them by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , those things which they know not, and 2 Pet. 2. 12. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , those which they are ignorant of, which is an expression directly parallel to that other used by S. Paul of Angels. Thirdly, Because of other dominions their contempt had been set down before, both in S. Peter and here, by the phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , setting at naught, making nothing of, and despising, scornfully behaving themselves toward their superiors, and so needed not be repeated again in these words. But yet on the other side it must be said, that what was before said of their setting dominion at naught, may refer to their doctrine of Christian liberty, or their not being subject to any ruler or Master, which is noted in them, 1 Tim. 6. 1. and then this of their practice superstructed on that doctrine, their speaking contumeliously of those that exercise that dominion, may be fit enough to be added to the former, and so may be set down in that phrase 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they speak evil of glories. And that it doth so signify is most probable: First, because we find not in any Church-writers that the heresy of the Gnostics had anything in it of particular opposition or defiance to Angels, but on the contrary the Aeones, noting the Angels, make up a great part of their Divinity. A second argument may be taken from the mention of the gainsaying of Core, whereby this sin of these Gnostics is exemplified ver. 11. where as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 contradicting, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 evil speaking, are of the same importance; so we know the sin of Core consisted in the murmuring and rebelling against Moses and Aaron, that were by God set over them. And for thus doing the Gnostics are (2 Tim. 3.) distinctly compared to Jannes and Jambres the Egyptian Magicians (and such was Simon and Menander, and the chief of these) who by their sorceries resisted Moses coming in God's name to the Israelites and to Pharaoh, as these did the Apostles of Christ. And so this will be the meaning of the phrase, speaking ill of those that are set over them, that is, contumelious usage of the Apostles or Governors of the Church (who are called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the glory of Christ, 1 Cor. 8. 23.) with whom particularly they had many controversies and disputations (referred to ver. 9.) in which those contumelious speeches on the Gnostics part would be but effects of their great daring pride (mentioned 2 Pet. 2. 10. immediately before it) and of their discriminating themselves from all others, v. 19. and so is very probable to have been observable and accusable in them. See Note on the title of 2 John a.

[ e] V. 9. Body of Moses ] What the body of Moses here signifies, will easily be discerned by comparing it with the place from whence this controversy of the Angel with the Devil is here cited, and that is undoubtedly Zach. 3. 1. There we have Joshua the High-priest standing before the Angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him, or dispute or plead against him, as the standing at the right hand notes an accuser, impleading ano her, ( Let Satan stand at his right hand, 'Psal. 109.) And the only words which are there mentioned from the Angel (under the name of the Lord ) to Satan are these here set down, The Lord rebuke thee. Now the matter of controversy then between the Angel and the Devil, the good and bad Angel, was (that which is the subject of that present Vision) the reedifying of the Temple, and restoring of the service of God among the Jews at Jerusalem. This is called the body of the Jews, 2 Mac. 15. 12. where we have Onias praying for the whole body of the Jews: and may as fitly be styled the body of Moses, in the same manner as the Christian Church; or assembling of Christians for the serv ce of Christ, is called the body of Christ, 1 Cor. 12. 20, 25, 27. Eph. 1. 23. and 4. 12, 16. Col. 1. 18. Jam. 3. 2. The Judaical Temple and worship and service depending upon Moses, as the Lawgiver, or principle, or head under God, from whence it came; as Christ 's being the Lawgiver of the Christian Church, and instituting Apostles, &c. in it, is the reason why he is called the head of that, and the Church the body of Christ, as on the other side, we know he calls his body a Temple, Destroy this Temple, &c. and the Apostle of us, that our bodies are the Temples of the holy Ghost. Agreeable hereunto it is, that all Christians, as they live together in public communion, congregating together in assemblies, are called (in reference to this notion of body ) members and fellow-members, and the restoring the congregations or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , (see Note on 2 Cor. 13. c. and Ephes. 4. 12.) And so in Ignatius 's Epistle to the Church of Smyrna, he talks of congratulating with the Church of Syria, because they are in peace, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , their body is restored to them; where their restitution to the free public service of God (such as here Joshua and Zerubbabel were foretold to labor for, and Satan to labor against, and the Archangel to contend with him about it) is expressed by the restoring of their own body. One difficulty here still remaineth, how this example is proper to the point in hand, speaking evil of glories, or dignities, or dominions. And that which seems most reasonable is, that the Devil here is the same that in other places is called Belzebub the Prince of Devils, the Prince of the air, and Prince of darkness, and Rev. 9. 11. in the ancient MS. in the Kings Library, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Angel, the Prince of the Abyss, or Pit, who having been once a principal Angel in heaven, having lost that dignity, is now the Prince of hell, and otherwhere is noted by Principality or Power, he that hath power over the other devils. Now if Michael the Archangel in a quarrel with him, about a matter of such weight as was the restitution of the service of God among the Jews, would not use any bitterness or execration against him, then how unreasonable is it for these Gnostics, how without all excuse, thus to demean themselves toward the Apostles of Christ? That the Devil is here looked on in this notion, may be concluded by comparing it with 2 Pet. 2. 11. (which sure is parallel to this) where speaking evil of them must needs refer to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 glories or dignities, v. 10. And therefore if the Devil be comprehended there under that phrase, (as here he is distinctly named) it must follow that he is here looked on as a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or dignity, that is, as a Prince, though it be of devils.

[ f] V. 11. The error of Balaam ] This expression of S. Jude, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , hath much of difficulty in it. What is meant by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 error may appear by Rom. 1. 27. where it is clearly set to signify their seduction to Idolatry, of which the Gnostics were guilty, and whereby they fell into all those unnatural sins, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , contrary to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the beginning of that verse. Thus is the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 used 1 Thess. 2. 3. not only for seduction in general, but particularly that of the Gnostics, being there joined with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , uncleanness; and so perhaps Eph. 4. 14. where the cunning of the false teachers is said to be used 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for the contriving, or designing of deceit, or seduction, that is, for the infusing this great corruption of the Gnostics, all manner of lust and filthiness: so it is clearly taken, 2 Pet. 2. 18. where 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is interpreted by the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , lusts of the flesh, and filthiness, preceding in that verse; and as clearly 2 Pet. 3. 17. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , led away with the deceit of unruly men, referring to the seduction and abominable doctrines of the filthy Gnostics. For that this was the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the seduction into which Balaam brought the Israelites by his counsel to Balak (when, as the Jerusalem Targum reads, Numbers 25. 14. he advised Balak in these words, Veni nunc, consulam tibi quid populo huic facies: Fac eos peccare, Come now, I will counsel thee what thou shelt do to this people: Make them sin ) appears by Num. 25. 1. but especially by 2. Pet. 2. 15. and Rev. 2. 14. where this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is called in one 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the other 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the way, and, the doctrine of Balaam. Now for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , some probability there is by comparing it with that place of Rom. 1. 27. (which hath much agreement with this passage) that it should be a mistake in the Copy for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , burning, there, and denote burning in lust. And thus 'tis clear the Syriac read it, who render it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 exarserunt, or, as the new Paris Edition renders it, libidinose exarserunt, they burnt libidinously: but the word as it is, is capable of a very commodious interpretation, so as to agree with the notion given of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 1 Pet. 4. 4. for those unnatural sins of uncleanness and confusion of sexes. Thus when the Gloss of Phavorinus (as the printed Copies have it) renders 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 by nothing but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 were destroyed, and Hesychius by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (which must needs be false printed) that may very probably be a mistake of the Copy for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , used instead of this word in the parallel place 2 Pet. 2. 15. (So Psal. 13. 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 almost gone out of the way ) noting here those great declinations and deviations from the right way, these transgressions of the Law of Nature. And so 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will signify the breaking or running out (as a vessel, Luk. 5. 37.) into all confusion of lusts and base practices, such as wherein the Gnostics transcended and exceeded all the men in the word. Lastly, the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 hath difficulty and doubt in it, whether being used Adverbially it be to be rendered 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , by way of reward, or else 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for reward's sake. The parallel place, 2 Pet. 2. 15. inclines to the latter of these: for there on the mention of Balaam 'tis added, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , who loved the reward of unrighteousness, noting that what he did by his counsel for the bringing the Israelites to these sins, he did out of covetousness, or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to get reward from Balak. But the other place (which may pass for a parallel also) Rom. 1. 27. persuades the former: for there all their obduration of heart, v. 28. God's delivering them up to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , reprobate mind, in doing 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , going on senselessly in all their abominable sins, is said to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a retribution, or reward, or punishment, proportioned to their Idolatrous practice; and so here it will be true of the seduction of Balaam, or that Balaamitical filthiness, that the Gnostics were permitted to fall, or by God were delivered up to it without any restraints, as a punishment to their sin in converting Christianity into Licentiousness. And this seems to be the more probable rendering of the place, thus, that they fell into those filthy libidinous burnings, or confusions of lusts, the same that Balaam seduced the Israelites into, and this by way of reward, or just punishment from God, who thus punished them with desertion, and tradition unto this stupid senseless continuing and multiplying of these sins. Thus when the Syriac renders it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Latin interpreter reads verbatim, Et post errorem Balaam in mercede exarserunt, and the Latin Paris Edition in mercedem, both joining the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that they by way of reward, or for their punishment and reward, did thus fall into these libidinous burnings, not referring to that of Balaam 's doing what he did in contemplation of reward.

[ g] V. 12. Trees whose fruit withereth ] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is a season of the year; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith Phavorinus, the season after the Summer, and again, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the season beginning from the fifteenth, or, say others, the 22. of August, continued to the same day of December. Thus is the year divided in Sextus Empiricus adv. Mathem. l. 5. c. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , making this to Winter, as the Spring is to Summer. And Olympiodorus in Meteor. p. 20. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . By which it appears that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 begins after both parts of Summer are ended, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , after the dog-star hath done shining, when it draweth toward Winter, and the season, though it begins in August on the 15. or 22. yet reacheth out to Christmas, that is, to the sharpest and depth of Winter, and is so called, because it begins from the end of the season of ripe fruit, that is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . In this sense of the Substantive, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the derivative Adjective, must signify that which belongs to that time: and so the Arabic Interpreter in the New Paris Edition of the Bible reads 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 autumnales, and so S. Jerome also; and so 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will be trees in that condition in which they use to be at that time of year, that is, bare, having lost their leaves, and having nothing desirable on them (like the waterless empty clouds precedent.) So in Cinnamus, after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which is the dissolving of the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and description of this season, by the decaying of the beauty of trees, &c. it presently follows, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the leaves or shade, ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith Hesychius) had now left the trees; and this a direct emblem of the Gnostics, and quite contrary to the godly man, described Psal. 1. 3, 4. whose leaf doth not wither: and then to these is fitly added 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 fruitless, trees that have neither the verdure of leaves, nor profit of fruit on them▪ trees which, beside that they bear no fruit, are deprived and naked, and bare of leaves also, and such are those that are come to the denying of Christian profession itself, as we know the Gnostics did. Another signification seems to be followed by the Syriac, who read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 quarum fructus emarcuit, or defecit, whose fruit hath withered, or failed, according to a notion of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a disease, in Phavorinus, that disease probably such as befalls fruit and trees, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a blast or sut, perhaps 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , aerugo, that spoils fruit and corn; for, saith Phavorinus and Hesychius, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and then 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will be blasted trees: and this will also do well to signify these rotten putrid Gnostics, a blasted sort of Christians, withal 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , without any kind of fruit on them. But the former of these is most agreeable to the nature of the word, and so fittest to be adhered to.

[ h] V. 14. Cometh with ten thousands of his Saints ] What the coming of God signifies, hath oft been said (see Mat. 16. 0. and 24. b.) executing vengeance upon wicked men, and that coming of his 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , with his Angels, Mat. 16. 27. those being the ministers and executioners of his vengeance, and withal his satellitium or guard, whose presence in any place is the only thing to determine God's omnipresence to one place more then to another. And these are the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 here, (not myriads of Saints or holy men, but such as are mentioned Heb. 12. 22. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 myriads of Angels, or, as the Targum on Deut. 33. 2. Myriads angelorum sanctorum, where we read only saints, from the Hebrew which reads of holy ones, that is, Angels, but I say) his holy myriads, or hosts, of Angels, with ten thousands in each, which makes his coming so solemn and so formidable a thing. And thus in the prophecy of Zechariah, chap. 14. 5. where we read, The Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee, it is to be read from the Hebrew, with all his holy ones, that is, with his guard of Angels, and that (it seemeth) here, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to execute judgment, and rebuke, &c. That Enoch thus prophesied in his time of these Gnostics under Christ, we are not told; but that he prophesied to them, that is, that his prophecy concerning the excision of the old world, for such sins as these are now guilty of, is very pertinent to them, and fit to be considered by them. Thus we see S. Peter Ep. 2. ch. 2. applies to them all the judgments that had ever befallen sinners, particularly that in Noah 's time, of which that Enoch prophesied, there is no question, and we have these remains of it. First, the name of his son Methuselah. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Sela in Hebrew signifies mission, sending or pouring out waters on the earth, Job 5. 10. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , he sends out waters on the fields; to which, saith Bochart, Arphaxad related when he called his first-born Sela, in memory of the Deluge, two years after which Arphaxad was born, Gen. 11. 6. And so in like manner Enoch, that prophesied of this destruction, and foresaw by the Spirit, that it would soon follow the death of this his son, he called his name 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , his death, emission. To this it is considerable, what we find in Stephanus Byzant. in the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , where mentioning Enoch, or Hannoch, he saith of him, that he lived 300. years and above, and that the inhabitants asked the Oracle how long he should live, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and the Oracle answered, that when he was dead all men should be destroyed (or, as the word will bear, corrupted, in that sense in which we find Gen. 6. 2. soon after Enoch's death, the earth was corrupt before God, which how it belongs to filthy lusts, hath oft been shown) which he applies to Deucalion 's flood, and the universal destr ••• tion there, and adds, that the news of this Oracle was so sadly received by the inhabitants, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (perhaps it should be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for so he hath it before in the Genitive case) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to wail for Enoch, is proverbially used, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for those that mourn excessively. Here 'tis possible that the confounding the two stories of Enoch and Methuselah made up this relation: For as to the latter part, of the flood following his death, that may best belong to the son Methuselah, whose name was thus prophetical; but for the years of his life, those seem to belong to Enoch, for he lived 365. years. Soudas, lightly mistaking his name, calls him Nannac. who, saith he, is reported to be a King before the flood, and foreseeing the approach thereof, he assembled all men to the Temple, and with tears 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 prayed to avert it: and Erasmus out of Hermogenes makes the same relation, and cites the Proverb, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , out of Herodes the Iambick writer, rendering it Cannacae more plorem, as if it referred to his tears for averting the Deluge, when it more probably refers to the people's lamenting, forecited from Stephanus. See Eupolemus in Eusebius Praepar. l. 9. who speaking of Methuselah, Enoch's son, saith, that he knew all by the Angels of God, and ( Enoch being all one with Atlas) by these all Astrology came to the Greeks.

[ i] V. 16. Great swelling words ] What is meant by the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 here, may best be guest by comparing it with Dan. 11. 36. where we have the same phrase, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 there the Context will sufficiently interpret it: The King shall do according to his will, and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every God, and shall speak (marvelous, we render) high swoln things against the God of God's. There doing according to his will, is casting off all fear or care of laws or justice; his exalting and magnifying himself above every God, is his Atheistical despising of all religion, whether the true or the false, the Jewish or Heathen worship; and his speaking the high swoln things against the God of God's, is undervaluing the God of Israel, the only true God, and setting up some body else, as superior to him, the same that is said of the Gnostic heresy, and their leader Simon, 2 Thess. 2. 4 that he opposeth, and exalteth himself over, or against, all that is called God, or worship. The same phrase is again used, Dan. 7. 8. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a mouth speaking great, or swelling, or lofty things. To one or both these passages of Daniel this place of Saint Jude seems to relate, joining these two together, walking after their own lusts, and their mouth speaketh 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , high swoln words, as Dan. 11. doing according to his will, and speaking high swoln words, &c. And therefore we have here reason to take it in the same sense that there it appeareth to be used in; and though here be not mention of the God of God's, against whom these stout things are spoken, yet to supply it from thence; and so it will agree most perfectly to the character of the Gnostics, 2 Thess. 2. 4. who certainly are the persons here described. For of them it is evident (see 2 Thess. 2. Note e.) that they attributed Divinity unto Simon, made him the uppermost God, and the God of Israel but a part of his creation, worship'd him and Helena his whore with sacrifices, &c. and so did the very thing that there is said of the King in Daniel. And whereas S. Peter in setting this down 2 Pet. 2. 18. adds unto it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of vanity, that may fitly be accorded with this in the notion of vanity for Idolatry, (see Rom. 8. Note h.) for such was their worship of Simon. See Note b.

[ k] Ib. Sensual ] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifies here those that have no taste of any higher principle in them but of the sensitive soul, that suffer those affections to carry them away, to rule and have dominion over them. Contrary to these are the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 spiritual, they that move by an higher principle, that having the assistance of God's Spirit, and divine revelation, do act and move accordingly. From hence it is that Heretics, that pretend to greater purity then other men, and so separate from all others also, have generally desired to discriminate themselves from all others by calling themselves 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the spiritual, and all others 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , animales. And so particularly did the Gnostics & their followers in Irenaeus; they forsooth were the spiritual, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 naturally spiritual, and had no need of any of those graces and gracious actions which were required to other men, and by their 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a kind of Baptism they had, became invisible to the Judge, and all the sins they could commit, could no more pollute them then the Sun-beams could be defiled by shining on a dunghill, or Gold by being in a kennel, the very character (a little improved) of these here, v. 18. walking after their godless lusts.

[ l] V. 20. Praying in the Holy Ghost ] It is sufficiently known that the Apostles, and those that were by the holy Ghost set apart for the planting of the Church, had many miraculous gifts, especially 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or graces; not everyone all, but one one, another another. Among these, saith S. Chrysostom, there was in these first times, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the gift of prayer, as also the gift of healing, of singing, prophesying, &c. 1 Cor. 14. 26. (see Note on Ephes. 6. g.) This, saith he, was bestowed 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , upon someone, who did pray for the rest, and ask those things which were useful for them, and teach others how to form prayers. Some of these special prayers thus conceived, and frequently used by them, which were fit for the common perpetual use of all Christians, were received and kept by those whom they thus taught, and are they which the ancients mean by the Liturgies of S. James, &c. which, or some other in that disguise (or rather those with some other later mixtures) are still used by the Greek Church on solemn days. These extraordinary 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as long as they lasted, are here called (as other special gifts of the Spirit also are) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the holy Ghost, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Spirit, Ephes. 6. 18. the immediate moderatour, as it were, of all the petitions of the Church at that time. But when those extraordinary 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ceased, it is clear there was need of somewhat else to supply that place, and that would not be (in any reason) to let every man pray as he would ( or, for the preventing of that, and the ill consequents of it, it was that the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 gift of prayer had before been given) but set prepared forms, for the daily constant uses, and those provided by the Governors of the Church, Apostolical men, which had benefited under the prayers of those that had the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or gift, and remembered some forms of theirs, at least the method and manner used by them. And this is the original of Liturgy among Christians.

[ m] V. 22 Making a difference] What 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Middle voice signifies, hath been said, Note on Jam. 2. c. and Note on c. 3. f. viz. to waver or doubt. And accordingly if it be here rendered (as in reason it must, and by Analogy with the use of the word in other places) it will be necessary to adhere to the reading of the Kings MS. (which the vulgar Latin also appears to have followed, and Nominative 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 will have no sense) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Some indeed, viz. those that waver, though they are not yet fallen off, either 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 have pity on them, and out of compassion to such weaklings do all that may tend to the settling or confirming them, or else (as the Kings MS. reads) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , reprove them, after the manner of fraternal correption and admonition, by that means timely to reduce them to perseverance and constancy, before yet they fall off and make shipwreck of the faith: whereas others that are already fallen must be more nimbly handled, even snatched out of the fire, &c.




A PREMONITION Concerning the Interpretation OF THE APOCALYPSE.

HAving gone through all the other parts of the New Testament, I came to this last of the Apocalypse, as to a rock that many had miscarried and split upon, with a full resolution not to venture on the expounding of one word in it, but only to perform one office to it, common to the rest, the review of the Translation: But it pleased God otherwise to dispose of it; for before I had read (with that design of translating only) to the end of the first verse of the book, these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which must come to pass presently, had such an impression on my mind, offering themselves as a key to the whole prophecy, (in like manner as, this generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled, Mat. 24. 34. have demonstrated infallibly to what coming of Christ that whole Chapter did belong) that I could not resist the force of them, but attempt presently a general survey of the whole Book, to see whether those words might not probably be extended to all thy prophecies of it, and have a literal truth in them, viz. that the things foretold and represented in the ensuing visions were presently, speedily, to come to pass, one after another, after the writing of them. But before I could prudently pass this judgment, which was to be founded in understanding the subject-matter of all the Visions, some other evidences I met with, concurring with this, and giving me abundant grounds of confidence of this one thing, that although I should not be able to understand one period of all these Visions, yet I must be obliged to think that they belonged to those times that were then immediately ensuing and that they had accordingly their completion, and consequently that they that pretended to find in those Visions the predictions of events in these later ages, and those so nicely defined as to belong to particular acts and persons in this and some other kingdoms (a far narrower circuit also then that which reasonably was to be assigned to that one Christian prophecy for the Universal Church of Christ ) had much mistaken the drift of it.

The arguments that induced this conclusion were these; First, that this was again immediately inculcated, v. 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for the time is nigh, and that rendered as a proof that these seven Churches, to whom the prophecy was written, were concerned to observe and consider the contents of it, Blessed is he that reads, and he that hears, &c. ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith Arethas, that so hears as to practice) for the time, or season, the point of time is near at hand. Secondly, that as here in the front, so c. 22. 6. at the close, or shutting up of all these Visions, and of S. John 's Epistle to the seven Churches, which contained them, 'tis there again added, that God hath sent his Angel to show to his servants, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the things that must be speedily, or suddenly; and immediately upon the back of that are set the words of Christ, the Author of this prophecy, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Behold I come quickly, not in the notion of his final coming to judgment (which hath been the cause of a great deal of mistake, see Note on Mat. 24. b.) but of his coming to destroy his enemies, the Jews, &c. and then, Blessed is he that observes, or keeps, the prophecies of this book, parallel to what had been said at the beginning, c. 1. 3. Thirdly, that v. 10. the command is given to John, not to seal the prophecies of the book, which that it signifies that they were of present use to those times, and therefore to be kept open, and not to be laid up as things that posterity was only or principally concerned in, appears by that reason rendered of it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , because the time in nigh, the same which had here at the beginning been given, as the reason that he that considered the prophecies was blessed in so doing.

This being thus far deduced out of such plain words, so many times repeated, the next thing that offered itself to me was, to examine and search what was the design of Christ 's sending these Visions in a letter to the seven Churches. For by that somewhat might generally be collected of the matter of them, What that design was, appeared soon very visibly also from plain words, which had no figure in them, viz. that they and all Christians of those times, being by the terrors of the then pressing persecutions from the Jews, and by the subtle insinuations of the Gnostics (who taught it lawful to disclaim and forswear Christ in time of persecution) in danger of lose their constancy, might be fortified by what they here find of the speediness of God's revenge on his enemies, and deliverance of believers that continued constant to him. This is the full importance of c. 1. 3. and the same again c. 22. 7. Blessed are they that keep, &c. for the time is nigh. So in the proeme, or salutation, by John prefixed to this Epistle of Christ (which from v. 4. to v. 9. was the result of his observations upon the Visions, and was not any part of the Visions themselves, and so gives us his notion and interpretation of this matter) we have these words, v. 7. Behold he cometh with clouds, &c. Where the coming of Christ being a known and solemn phrase to signify remarkable judgment or vengeance on sinners (and in the first place on the Jews that crucified him) and deliverance for persevering believers, (see Note on Mat. 24. b.) and the addition of the mention of clouds referring to God's presence by Angels, the ministers of his power, whether in punishing or protecting, this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or coming, in the Present, agrees perfectly and literally with what was before observed of the speediness of its approach at that time, & is an express signification what was the design of sending the Visions to the Churches, viz. to fortify them by that consideration.

Proceeding therefore by these degrees, it presently appeared by demonstrable evidences, that the first part of that which was thus suddenly to come to pass, was the illustrious destruction of the Jews (which was also, of all things imaginable, the surest and opportunest comfort and fortification to the Christians at that time, who were virulently persecuted by them, and indeed, as Tertullian saith, owed the beginning of all their persecutions to the Jews. ) This appeared first, by the latter part of the seventh verse of the first chapter, where the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as many as pierced Christ, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 all the tribes of the land, most clearly denote the Jews (as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the earth or the land hath been often shown to signify, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the land among the Jewish writers, see Note on Mat. 24. b.) whose wailing (there mentioned in the very words that are used, Mat. 24. 31.) was to be for the miseries that came upon them, Jam. 5. 1. For although some few words in this seventh verse (as the looking on him whom they had pierced ) would seem to make that seventh verse parallel to that of Zach. 12. 10. and so, that it should belong to the contrition or repentance of the Jews for the crucifying of Christ, as that seems to do (and if it do, may have had its completion at several times in many thousands of that nation, (see Act. 21. 20.) about three thousand being converted in one day, Act. 2. 39, and 41.) yet the whole frame of the words of this seventh verse together, Behold he cometh with clouds, and every eye shall see him, and all that had pierced him, & all the tribes of the land shall mourn over, or upon, him, doth much more fully agree with the like words, Mat. 24. 30. where in the destruction (or the coming of the Son of man to this destruction) of the Jews we have these words, And then shall all the tribes of the land mourn, and shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory, which clearly belongs to the destruction of the Jews. To which I shall only add, that because that royal coming of Christ consisted of two parts, to destroy the impenitent Jews remarkably, and as remarkably to rescue or save the penitent believers (and therefore in that pace of Matthew it follows, v. 31. and his Angels shall gather the elect, &c. which belongs to that delivering of the penitent Christian Jews ) therefore that also of the Jews repenting for the crucifixion of Christ (that is, of those Jews that at any time did repent) may here be taken in, in the richness of this divine writing; and so the ordinary sense of the word in Zacharias also will not be left out by this interpretation, which applies this verse to the destruction of the Jews. So c. 6, 9, 10, 11, the souls beneath the altar, that cry for vengeance of all the blood that was shed in the land, is just parallel to that of Mat. 23. 35. that on the Jews of that generation should come all the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the blood that had been shed on the land, &c. And accordingly all the rest of that sixth chap. of the great earthquake, the sun become black, and moon as blood, and the stars falling from heaven, &c. are the very particulars mentioned in the immediate subsequent discourse of Christ, Mat. 24. So most especially c. 11. 8. that the scene of these tragedies is the city where our Lord was crucified, that is, certainly and literally Jerusalem, called Sodom there, but that only 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 mystically or spiritually (or in the vision) as the text specifies. So saith S. Jerome, Jerusalem ex eo tempore non appellatur civitas sancta, sed sanctitatem & pristinum nomen amittens, spiritualiter vocatur Sodoma & Aegyptus, Jerusalem is called Sodom and Egypt, referring to that place of Apoc. c. 11. which must therefore in his opinion be understood of Jerusalem. And so that Comment, which Bishop Tunstall set out for S. Ambrose 's, interprets the sixth chap. to be meant of the Jews. And in Arethas on c. 6. 12. concerning the earthquake, we find these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , some expound this tropologically of Vespasian 's siege, where the thing of which he makes doubt in that interpretation is the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the figurativenesse of the speech; (whereas perhaps it may be understood of real earthquakes; see Note on c. 6. f.) but he objects not against the interpretation or application of it to those times of Vespasian and the Jews. So Rupertus Tuitiensis interprets that chapter of the Jews: and I shall not need make use of the suffrages frages and consent of many more, who have been forced to acknowledge that truth. But I must suppose that it will be objected and pretended, that this destruction of Jerusalem was past at the time of John 's receiving and writing this Vision, because' tis affirmed by Eusebius, out of Irenaeus, that twas received or seen ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 it was seen ) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , at the end of Domitian's reign. To this I might reply from the opinion of S. Augustine, & some others, that these Visions were not all predictions of what was future, but the description of what had passed from the first coming of Christ; and from venerable Bede, that John recapitulates from the suffering of Christ; and Rupertus Tuitiensis, that the Apocalypse comprehends what had been, what is, and what should be the state of the Church; and this to very good purpose, by what was past to confirm Christians in what was future, and now farther to be declared. And 'twould be no great objection against this, that 'tis all set down as a prophecy, for 'tis no new thing for prophecies sometimes to speak in the future tense of things that are past; as Dan. 7. 17. These great beasts, which are four, are four kings, which shall arise out of the earth, where yet the Chaldean Monarchy was long before risen, and now near expiration. But to pass this over, I answer more distinctly to the testimony of Irenaeus; First, that what he affirms concerning John 's vision at the end of Domitian, is not of all, but particularly of that Vision of the number of the beast, c. 13. 18. Thus will Eusebius 's words be understood, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , &c. If the name of Antichrist ought to be proclaimed openly now, it would have been declared by him that saw the revelation, for it was not seen any long time ago. Where 'tis clear that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 was seen may belong to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the name of the beast, as before 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , declared, did. And that it not only may, but must be so understood, appears by the Latin of Irenaeus (which only is extant) which reads it thus, Antichristi nomen per ipsum utique editum fuisset, qui & Apocalypsin viderat; neque enim ante multum temporis visum est, sed pene sub nostro seculo ad finem Domitiani imperii, The name of Antichrist would have been published by him, who saw the Apocalypse; for it was not seen any long time since, but almost under our age at the end of Domitian's Empire. Where the word visum in the neuter, seen, not visa in the feminine, belongs apparently to the name, not to the Apocalypse. Secondly, I answer, that although it should still be acknowledged to be the opinion of Irenaeus, that John received the Revelation and all his Visions at the end of Domitian; yet on the other side 'tis the affirmation of Epiphanius, that John prophesied in the time of Claudius Caesar, when, saith he, he was in the I will Patmus. And that which may give authority to Epiphanius 's testimony is this, First, that Epiphanius in that place is a writing against the Montanists, about the authority of the Apocalypse, and that the later it were seen or written, the more it would have been for his turn toward confuting or answering them, whose objection it was, that the Church of Thyatira, mentioned in the Apocalypse, was not yet a Church when that was said to be revealed. And therefore if it had been but uncertain whether it were written so early or no, he would without all question have made use of this as some advantage against his adversaries, whom he was then in confuting. Secondly, that Epiphanius is so far from doing this, that he doth twice in the same place expressly affirm, first, that his being in the Isle of Patmus, secondly, that his seeing these Visions there, yea and his return from the Island, were in the time of Claudius. Having said this for the confirming this assertion of Epiphanius to have as much authority as his testimony can give it, four arguments I shall add for the truth of it. The first negative, to the disparagement of that relation that affirms him banished by Domitian, and returned after his death in Nerva's reign. For of the persecution by Domitian there be but two authors mentioned by Eusebius, Tertullian and Hegesippus: but of Tertullian he hath these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Domitian went about to do as Nero had done, being a part of his cruelty, or, as Tertullian's words are, portio Neronis de crudelitate, a portion of Nero for cruelty: sed facile coeptum repressit, restitutis etiam quos relegaverat, but he ceased from it presently, and recalled those whom he had banished: which no way agrees with his banishing John, and not recalling him all his life, as is supposed in the other relation, and affirmed by Eusebius. And therefore Baronius, that is for his banishment under Domitian, in the tenth year of his reign, is forced fairly to reject Tertullian's authority in this matter, giving for it his proof out of Dio, viz. that Nerva released those who were condemned of impiety, and restored those who were banished. Which affirmation of Dio's being granted, as far as belongs to those who were in exile, or stood condemned at Nerva's coming to the Empire, doth no way prejudice the truth of Tertullian's words, of Domitian's having repress'd his severity against the Christians, and revoked the banished, (wherein he is much a more competent witness then Baronius. ) No more doth his killing of his unckle Clemens, and banishing his cosin Flavia Domitilla; for that was five years after this time of John's supposed banishment, in the fifteenth or last year of Domitian's reign. In the relation of Hegesippus (a most ancient writer, that lived in those times) there is no more but this, that Domitian had made a decree for the putting to death all that were of the linage of David; that some delators had accused some of the children of Jude, the kinsman of our Savior, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as such who were of David's seed; that Jocatus brought these to Domitian, but upon examination being found to be plain men, and such as believed not Christ's kingdom to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , of this world, or earthy, but heavenly, and Angelical, to begin at the end of the world, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , he set them free, and by Edict took off the persecution against the Church, and they being released became Bishops in the Church, and continued peaceably, and live till Trajanus 's days. And this certainly agrees very little with the other relation, nor can any account probably be rendered why, when the persecution of Christians was taken off by the Edict, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 peace restored to the Church of Christ, and when the profession of Christianity, in the sons of Jude, being by the them avowed to the Emperor, was not yet thought fit to be punished in the least, yet John should be banished, and continue in his exile till Nerva's reign, for no other crime but that of being a Christian. Where by the way Baronius 's artifice much fails him; Tertullian, saith he, fell into his error by following Hegesippus 's authority, but Hegesippus, saith he, spake apparently de ea persecutione quae mota est in Judaeos, of that persecution that was raised against the Jews, not against the Christians. How true that is, will now appear, when the express words are, that by that Emperors Edict the persecution against the Church (sure that was not of Jews, but Christians) ceased. Secondly, that about the ninth year of Claudius the Christians were pursued, and banished by the Roman Powers. That at that time Claudius banished the Jews out of Rome, is evident by Josephus, and acknowledged by all; and that by the Jews the Christians are meant, appears by Sueonius in the life Claudius, c. 25. Judaeos impulsore Chresto assidue tumultuants Româ expulit, He banished the Jews out of Rome for the tumults which they daily raised by the impulsion of Chrestus. By Chrestus it is certain that the Roman writers meant Christ calling him Chrest, and his followers Chrestians, as Terutllian observes Apol. c. 3. And so they that were acted by the impulson of Chrest, in that narration, must, though called Jews, necessarily be resolved to be Christians: And what was done at Rome, is to be supposed to have been done also in other parts of the Emperors dominions; and so that edict, mentioned Act. 18. 2. was in reason to reach to Ephesus, and may justly be thought to have involved S. John there. And accordingly Chronologers have placed this banishment of his to Patmus in that year. Thirdly, that about Claudius 's time it was that the unbelieving Jews began and continued to oppose and persecute the Christian Jews, and thereupon the Gnostics compliances (and making as if they were Jews, to avoid persecutions) are so oft taken notice of by S. Paul, Gal. 6. 12. and elsewhere. And by all the Epistles both of him and the rest of the Apostles, written from about that time of Claudius, the Gnostics are everywhere touched on, as the pests that were creeping into the Churches, against which they endeavored to fortify the believers, and assure them that those persecutions of the Jews should be shortly ended by their destruction (that night of sadness far spent, and the day of deliverance and refreshment at hand, Rom. 13. 12. and c. 16. 20.) and that then the complying Gnostics, which were so solicitous to save their lives, should lose them, that is, should perish with them. Accordingly, to the very same purpose is most of the Vision here, that concerned the seven Churches, c. 2. 2, 4, 9, 14, 20. and c. 3. 9, 10 &c. and much of the following prophecy, to assure them that god would take revenge on these impenitent and impure professors, and rescue the constant Christians. And that makes it very reasonable to believe, that this Vision was received about the same time also. A fourth argument will be taken from the account of the eight Kings, or Emperors, c. 17. 10. which cannot, I believe, otherwise be made intelligible, but by beginning the account from Claudius, so that he, and Nero, Galba, Otho, Vitellius, shall be the five that were fallen, and then Vespasian (in whose time I suppose these Visions were committed to writing by S. John ) being the sixth, shall be the one is, and Titus the seventh, that is not yet come, and when he comes shall stay but a little while, reigning but two years and two months, and then the beast that was and is not, and is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goes to destruction, will fall out to be Domitian, to whom (and to whom only of all the Emperors, nay of all men in any story) all those distinctive characters will appertain, as that he exercised the office of the Emperor, and was called Emperor at Rome, when Vespasian was gone into Judea, and after his return became a private man again, delivered up the Empire to him, and so was, and is not, and then was the eighth (reckoning from Claudius as the first) and the son of one of the seven, viz. of Vespasian, and should be a bloody persecutor, and accordingly punished, and so go to destruction. This seems to me to be a demonstrative character of the time wherein the first of these Visions was delivered, and will father yield some answer to the authority of Irenaeus, by interpreting his words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of the conclusion of that reign of his at Rome, when his father Vespasian was in Judea, in respect of which it is said of him, that he was and is not, that is, that reign of his was come to its 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or end was now concluded; making this not improbably that Authors meaning, that John did first (in this time of Claudius ) receive some Visions concerning this destruction of the Jews, and the other attendants of it, and afterward in Vespasian 's time, while he was in Judea, and Domitian reigned at Rome, receive more visions, that particularly of the number of the beast. For I suppose the several visions of this book were (as those of Isaiah c. 1. 1. Jeremiah 1. 2, 3. Hosea 1. 1. Amos 1. 1. Micah 1. 1. in the reigns of several Kings) received at several times, not all at once, or in one day. And if against that presumption it be objected, that they were here sent all together to the Churches of Asia, and therefore were all received and written at the same time, to this the answer is most obvious, from what we see done in the forementioned prophecies of Isaiah, &c. in the Old Testament, which though clearly received in several Kings reigns, and each sent to that King or the people under him to whom they belonged, as 'tis evident that of Hezekiah was, (and not concealed and reserved till after their death who were concerned in them) were yet long after the time of receiving the first of them, put into a book, and a title, comprehending them all, prefixed to them. And accordingly there is no difficulty to conceive that John, having first received the Vision of the seven Churches, and, according to direction, c. 1. 11. speedily sent it to them, did after that, (as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , c. 4. 1. literally imports) receive more visions, at several times, and after all, put them together into a book or volumne, and dedicate them anew to the seven Churches, c. 1. 3. and this about the forementioned end of Domitians reigning in his Father stead, that is, Vespasian 's time, when he was returning from Judea to resume his power again. I can forsee but one farther objection against this date of these Visions, viz. that in the Epistle to the Church of Pergamos, c. 2. 13. there is the mention and very name of Antipas the Martyr, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 who was killed, which may be thought to imply that this Vision was received after that part of Domitian 's reign wherein Antipas is affirmed to have been slain. To this I answer, that this naming of Antipas by way of prophecy may be as easily and probably believed of the Spirit of God, before the time of his suffering, as the naming of Cyrus before he was born, which we know was done in the Old Testament, nay as Christ 's telling. S. Peter that he should be put to death, and particularly crucified, or as Agabus telling S. Paul what should befall him at Jerusalem, Act. 21. 10. or, as I conceive, Simeon 's telling the mother of Christ, that a sword should pass through her soul, Luk. 2. 35. Saint Hilary, in his Prologue to the Psalms offers instances of this; As, saith he, when in some of the Psalms, of which Moses was the author, there is yet mention of things after Moses, viz. of Samuel, Psal. 99. 6. before he was born, nulli mirum aut difficile videri oprtere, this ought not to seem strange or hard to any, when in the books of the Kings, Josiah is by name prophesied of before he was born, 1 King. 13. 2. And if Zacharias the son of Barachias, Mat. 23. be that Zacharias the son of Baruch that was killed close before the siege of Jerusalem, (of which there is little reason to doubt) there is then a direct example of what is here thus said of Antipas, the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ye have killed being there said of him, as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 he was killed here (see Note on Mat. 23. g.) That Antipas was a contemporary of the Apostles, and when he died, was extreme old, will hereafter appear out of the Menologie, and therefore at what time soever this Vision were written, 'tis certain there was such a man as Antipas, and no doubt a Christian, if not Bishop of Pergamos then; And so 'tis less strange that he should be here mentioned by name, then that Cyrus should, before he was born; and no more strange then for any other living person to have his Martyrdom particularly foretold. As for the sense of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 was killed, which may be thought to conclude him already killed, sure that is of little weight, it being very ordinary for prophecies to be delivered in words which signify the time past. All this may serve for a competent satifaction to the grand difficulty. And howsoever in a matter of some uncertainty we may possibly mistake in the particularity of time, wherein the Visions were received, yet that they belong (much of them) to the business of the destruction of the Jews, there will be little question, when the particulars come to be viewed.

This being thus far evident, it follows to be observed, that the destruction of Jerusalem under Titus was but one part of this coming of Christ, I mean of the judgments upon the Jews. Many other bloody acts there were of this Tragedy still behind when that was over. Not to mention Domitian 's edict of killing all David 's kin, ( Eusebius l. 3. c. 19.) The first I shall insist upon is that under Trajan, till whose reign S. John himself lived (saith Eusebius l. 3. c. 23. out of Irenaeus l. 2. c. 39. and l. 3. c. 3. and out of Clemens Alexandrinus ) though not to this part of it. In this Emperors time it went very heavily with the Jews, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith he, their calamities came tumbiling in upon them, one of the] back of another; For both in Alexandria, and the other parts of Egypt, and even in Cyrene, many Jews behaving themselves seditiously, and at last breaking out into open wars and horrid cruelties, described by Dion and Spartianus, as well as Eusebius, and once having worsted the Grecians, they of Egypt, and they of Cyrene joining together under the conduct of Lucuas, and overrunning all Egypt, the issue of it was, that Trajan sent Marcius Turbo with an army by sea and land, horse and foot, who in a long continued warred killed great multitudes of them; and lest they in Mesopotamia should, or suspecting that they had already joined with them, the Emperor sent to Quintus Lucius Aemilius, that he should destory them all utterly out of that province; and for his care in obeying that command, he was, saith Eusebius, constitued 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Ruler of Judea under the Emperor. These passages we find in Eusebius l. 4. c. 2. and, saith he, all the Greek writers of the Heathens, who set down the stories of those times, have the same verbatim; and so indeed they have. See Dio, as also Spartianus. And the number of the slain Jews in that calamity is reckoned to be no less then two hundred thousand in that reign of Trajan 's: this, if there had been none before, and if there were no more behind, might well be styled a coming of Christ in the clouds against his crucifiers, a lamentable judgment on all the tribes of that land, and so might own the expressions in that seventh verse, and some part of the after Visions.

But beside this, yet farther, within few years more, in the time of Adrian, Trajan 's immediate successor, (who began his reign An. Dom. 118.) there befell more sad destructions upon the Jews, and particularly upon Jerusalem itself, occasioned by the rising of Barchocheba, who being but a villain, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , one that lived by robbing and killing, took upon him to come as a Messiah, as a light from heaven to the Jews, and therefore styled himself Son of a star. And with those that he thus raised, a great war there was waged by the Romans in the eighteenth year of Adrian, at the town Bethek, not far from Jerusalem; and the issue was, that the Jews were under a most miserable siege, and Rufus governor of Judea, on occasion of this rising, without any mercy destroyed all he could come to, men, women and children, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , saith Eusebius l. 4. c. 6. whole myriads together; and, to conclude, there came out an Edict of Adrian 's, after the death of the ring-leader, interdicting all Jews, and forbidding them to return to their city Jerusalem again, or so much as to look toward it: to which end the foundations of the Temple were ploughed up by Rufus, (and so Christ 's prophecy not till now exactly fulfilled, of not one stone upon another ) the city inhabited by the Romans, new built, and named Aelia, from Aelius Adrianus, and (they say) the statue of a Swine set over the gate of it, reproach the Jews, and banish their very eyes from it. And this was another passage which might well be referred to in that place, as matter of mournful spectacle to all the Tribes of Judea, and as mournfully represented in some of the Visions. To which must be farther added, that the unbelieving Jews are not the only men to whom the destruction here revealed in these Visions did belong, but as notably also, and well nigh as soon, the erroneous vile Christians of those times (which were many of them Jews also, and (those that were not) Judaizers, or compliers with the Jews) viz. the Gnostics, so oft spoken of in S. Paul's Epistles, and by S. Peter, and S. James, S. Jude, and S John also, with intimation of their approaching destruction, which here is visible in the Vision of, and the causes of the several destructions that lighted on the seven Churches of Asia, (if not wholly yet) at least on the Gnostics and other heretics among them; of whom saith Eusebius, after the enumerating of their heresies, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they vanished to nothing in a moment, and this saith he, in Trajan 's time, l. 3. c. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . And then in the second place, the other enemies of Christ, partakers in the crucifying of him, and afterward eminent persecutors of Christians, those of heathen Rome, as will appear in the exposition of the Visions. And then thirdly, as in a parenthesis, Gog and Mogog, c. 20. 8. which after the peaceable flourishing of Christianity for a thousand years, should waste the Church again, the Turks in the East, &c. And then all the enemies of God, at the fatal last day of doom, c. 20. 11.

That this was the summary matter of these ensuing Visions, the most serious pondering of every part soon made unquestionable to me. And of it the Reader may here beforehand receive this short scheme, viz. that, after the Preface, in the first Chapter, to v. 10. and the Visions about the seven Churches of Asia, each of them set down distinctly, c. 2, and 3. this book contains, First, the proceedings of God with the Jews, from the fourth to the twelfth chapter: Secondly, the infancy and growth of the Church of Christ in order to the heathen world, till it came through great oppositions to get possession of the Roman Empire, partly by destroying, partly by converting the heathen and villanous, impure Idol-worshippers, from the twelfth to the twentieth chapter: Thirdly, the peaceable, flourishing state of the Church for a thousand years, (and after that the breaking out of the Turk, and harassing the Eastern Churches, briefly touched, together with their destruction, and the end of the world) most rhetorically described from chap. 20 th to the 6 th verse of chap. 22. and from thence to the end of the Book a formal conclusion of the whole matter. All which it somewhat proportionable to that which old Tobit prophetically spoke of the times that were to follow him, c. 14. 5. which he divided into three distinct spaces; First, the re-building of the Temple, which was now long past, and this Book hath nothing to do with that: Secondly, the consummations of the seasons of the age, that is, the destruction of the Jewish state, which is the first main period here. This is not so clearly set down in out ordinary English version as in the Greek it is: for that reads not as the English doth, until the time of that age be fulfilled, confining the continuance of the second Temple to the time of that age; but, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , till the seasons of the age be fulfilled, a phrase near of kin to those many which are used in the New Testament, for the destruction of this people, the latter days, or seasons, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the consummation, or conclusion, of the age, Mat. 24. 3. But in the Hebrew copy set out, and rendered by Paulus Fagius, (which appears to be translated skillfully by some Jew out of the Original Chaldee ) there is a very considerable addition to this purpose, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , And again they shall go into a long and captivity, noting the greatness and duration of this beyond all the former. That these words in that Hebrew copy are the true reading, appears by the subsequent mention of a return, which cannot be sense, without this precedent mention of a captivity. And that it belongs to that destruction of them by the Romans, appears by another passage, added also in that Hebrew copy, and directly parallel to Mat. 24. 31. For as there after the destruction of Jerusalem, v. 29. is mention of the Angels sent to gather the elect Jews from the four winds, (parallel to the vision of the sealing, Rev. 7.) so it follows in Tobit, but God, holy and blessed, shall remember them, and gather them from the four corners of the world. After which follows thirdly, the state of Christianity, the glorious building of Jerusalem, and the house of God, foretold by the prophets, (and that building set down, c. 13. 16, 17. with Sapphires, Emrods, precious stones, pure gold, Beryl, Carbuncle, stones of Ophir, in the same manner as 'tis described in these Visions, c. 21. 18, 19.) and that to continue for ever or, as the Hebrew reads, forever and ever; and as a prime branch of that period the converting of the nations, and burying their idols, (which is here the second main period) v. 6, 7. This parallel prediction in Tobit may be of some force to authorise the interpretation of these Visions; in all which, as there may be several particular passages either so obscure (from the nature of prophetic style) as not to be easily explicated, or so copious, (and capable of more then one explication) as to render it uncertain which should be prefer'd (in which respect I hope, and expect that much more light may be added to it by more strict survaies, and comparing the expressions in this Book with the like phrases or passages in the Prophets of the Old Testament) so for the general matter of these Visions, I suppose, upon pondering the whole, there will be little doubt but these are the true lineament of it.

And it hath been matter of much satisfaction to me, that what hath upon sincere desire of finding out the truth, and making my addresses to God for his particular directions in this work of difficulty (without any other light to go before me) appeared to me to be the meaning of this prophecy, hath, for the main of it, in the same manner represented itself to several persons of great pretty and learning (as since I have discerned,) none taking it from the other, but all from the same light shining in the prophecy itself. Among which number I now also find the most learned Hugo Grotius, in those posthumous notes of his on the Apocalypse, lately published.

And this is all that seemed useful to be here premised concerning the interpretation of this Book.




THE [note a] REVELATION OF John [note b] the Divine.

[ a] THE title of this Book as it is ordinarily set, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Revelation of John the Divine, hath in it some seeming difference from the first words of the Book, which were written by S. John himself, (Whereas that other (as the rest of the titles of the Books of the New Testament) was by the Church of the first ages affixed unto it,) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Revelation of Jesus Christ. And this difference is to be reconciled, not by making one of them to refer to the person that received, the other to him that gave the Revelation; for as John received it from Christ, so Christ also received it from his Father, and therefore 'tis here added v. 1. which God gave him: but it must be by distinguishing of the time and manner of these revealings. God formerly revealed these future events to Christ the Son of man, as the Mediator by him now designed to convey all knowledge and grave to us; and this he did when Christ entered on his Prophetick office (long before the time here specified from whence it was that Christ, whilst on earth, forethold (in the parable of the King and the Husbandmen, Luk 20. 16. and Mat. 24. and sparsim at other times) many of the particulars represented in this prophecy, especially that of the destruction of the unbelieving Jews. And in this respect this whole Book is entitled the Revelation of Jesus Christ, that is, that prophecy which Jessus Christ received from his Father, as the vision of Isaiah, &c. is the Prophecy which Isaiah received from God, or, that God gave to Isaiah. But then as Christ thought fit to give a representation of this to his beloved disciple, John, and so John received it, as a prophecy, to deliver to others, so 'tis fitly styled (here in the titile) the Revelation of John, who received it (in visions, or ecstacy, v. 10.) by the Angel from Christ, as Christ received it from his Father. For this is the meaning of the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Revelation, a word ordinarily used in Daniel, to signify any knowledge extraordinarily communicated any by God. Thus is the word used 2 Cor. 12. 1. where he puts together visions and revelations of the Lord (and perhaps expresses it, v. 2. by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a man in Christ, as here ver. 10. by being in the Spirit snatched into the third Heaven, ) so again ver. 7. abundance of Revelations. So. Gal. 2 2. I went up by Revelation, that is, by impulsion of the Spirit of God, and Ephes. 3. 3. by Revelation (that is, by Christ 's speaking to him from heaven, and other the like vision, which, it appears, he had, 2 Cor. 12. 7.) God made known to me the mystery. In other places the word is used in a greater latitude, for and exposition or interpritation of any sacred figure, &c. however come by though not by immediate inspiration from God, the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 among the Hebrews, expounding of difficulties (see Note on 1 Cor. 14▪ b.) and yed more widely 1 Pet. 1. 7. for Christ 's revealing himself in judgment on his adversaries, and rescuing the faithful. But here it is according to strict idiom to more then vision or prophecy, and so the title of Enoch s book, citied Jude 15. was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Revelation of Enoch, but in S. Jude 's style ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) the prophecy of Enoch. And if in this notion of the word (which is peculiarly that which here and c. 1. 1. belongs to it) M r brightman entitled his comment on this book Apocalypsim 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Rlevelation of the Revelation (as it seems he did by applying the words of Scripture, The Lord hath spoken who can but prophesy? to his own performances in that Comment, adding that God not only speak of old by dreams and visions, but daily now, whensoever he enlightens the minds of his servants to the fetching out any hidden truth of his word: and that when God doth thus communicate with any, he understandeth a necessary imposed on him to makee it known to others, and that the danger is not sh wn to him for his own private sake ) I cannot but affirm that be hath grossly mistaken his business and endeavored to impose false prophecies upon his Reader. For though by the help and grace of God, sought only by prayer, and by the use of means instrumental to that end, & subordinate to that grace (such are comparing Scripture with Scripture, and Prophetick expressions with the Prophetick style, and Symbols with Symbols, and the observation of the use of words and phrases in the sacred dialect) it be possible to attain to the expounding or revealing some secret senses of Scriptures, which without the uses of these means will not be attainable; yet may not the interpretations of any mere man (which hath not the gift if prophecy) pretend to be the word of God. And whosoever shall profess thus to reveal the Revelation, by God speaking to him, and doth not evidence his calling and mission prophetic, especially if he pretend to have learned from the Revelation things so distant from what there we read, as are Germany, and France, and Britanny, of this last Century, from the Churches of Sardis, Philadelphia, and Laodic a, in Asia, then in being when S. John by Christ 's appointment wrote this prophecy to them must needs be looked on as a false seer or false prophet. And this is done by Master Brightman in express words, saying, that he had learned out of the Apocaelyesp that a most heavy trial was now suddenly to invade the Christian world (as if what was said to be sudden near 1000 years since, were sufficiently fulfilled by being near at hand forty four years ago) that the Churches of Britian, Germany, and France, were most favourably admonished of this tempest by Epistles written to them by name; that he by divine impulsion, or direction, (or what else divinitus can signify) found these very Epistles, which signify this thing, and from the inscriptions of them understood to whom they were sent, and durst not but dispatch them to them, left either by intercepting or concealing them he should be condemned of wrong offered to the divine Majestly. And that those Epistles do not foretell this by any doubtful conjecture, but teach in clear words what he thus thinks fit to affix on them. The least that can be said of this is, that 'tis the adding to the prophecies of thus book, c. 22. 18. the odtruding his own fancies for Divine revelations. And if the ad calamities which have befallen this British Church since the writing of this New Apocalypse of his, be conceived to conclude 〈◊〉 a true Prophet, in his presaging against the Angel of that Church, it will be as reasonable to ascribe divinity to the heathen Auguries and Oracles also, as oft as any part of the event followed any one of them: whereas indeed of any contingent future event there being only two things possible, either that it will, or that it will not come to pass, and prescutions; and schisms, and commotions, and seditions, and changes of Government being so frequent, that whatsoever Church or Kingdom hath long withstood such onsets, may at last by some advantage industriously sought, and maliciously laid hold on, not improbably sink and fall under, them, whatsoever is or can be foretold in this kind with any common prudence, will not be improbable to fall out (in some part) within forty of fifty space. Nay whatever 'tis, some advantage it will have toward the completion by having been foretold: As when by the flying of the birds (so casual & unsignificant a thing as that) the Roman Augurs promised the soldiers a victory on that side, the courage thus infused into them by believing that prediction, did oft contribute very much to the obtaining the victory; the same may in some measure be said in this particular. But much more considerable is the influence and consequence of that doctrine which is so frequently inculcated by the Expositors of this Book, That the people are they that must pull dowm Antichrist, whilst Kings espouse his cause: then which nothing can be more effectual and direct toward the raising and somenting of commotions, to which the prosperity of them is as probably consequent, as victory to the number and courage of an Army; and so though the prescience of God (which is not his decree) and the predictions of true Prophets, which are but rays of that prescience, have no proper immediate influence on the effect, noting of causality in them, yet these vain delusions of those false Prophets may have had much of (improperly so called, yet) real efficiency, and if so designed by them, of guilt in them. All which proves the wickedness and dangerousness of such designs, but gives no Authority to the interpretations.

Having said thus much in general of Master Brightman's Apocalypse, I shall not think it amiss to give the Reader some view or taste of his way of interpreting, and the grounds where with he contents himself. And it shall be by mentioning his explications of the prophecies of the seven Churches, which are it themselves the most clear and intelligible of any part of the whole book, (as belonging peculiarly and by name to the chief Episopal Sees of Asia, sufficiently known to all, and, in respect of the matter and expressions used in them, more perspicuous then almost any part of the prophecies of Isaiah, but much more then those of Ezekiel and Daniel ) but by him detorted and wrested from their native itelligible sense to far distant purposes. This view I shall not choose to give here out of its place, but leave the Reader to make it up, by putting together these few notes on the three ensuing Chapters, ch. 1. g. ch. 2. b. d. g. ch. 3. a.

[ b] That the title of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Divine is here given to the writer of these Visions, and not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Apostle, is not from any imagination of those that affixed it, that the Apostle John was not writer of them, but because that title of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 was by the Ancients, Origen especially, bestowed on this Apostle, in respect of the divinity and sublimity of his manner of writing, observable in his Gospel, and particularly becausee he began it with setting down the divinity of Christ (whereas others begin with his birth, or humanity) the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Word was God. This title had by the Platonists been given to Orpheus, in relation to the book concerning the God's written by him, and so to Linus and Musaeus also; those three ordinarily known by the name of Thrologi poetae.

CHAP. I.

1. THE Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things that must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his Angel unto his servant John:]

[Paraphrase] 1. The prophecy, or vision, of Revelation of Jesus Christ, which (as to our great Prophet and Intercessor, or Mediator between God and us) was put into his hands by his Father, that he might, as he pleased, make known to his Apostles some things that should suddenly come to Passe (many of them in the age wherein they lived, as his dealing with his crucifiers, and their persecutors, the Jews) and (as some of them he made known to them all together, whilst he was alive, as then near at hand, Mar. 24. 34. Luk. 21. Mar. 13. so) now he hath thought fit to send a Symbolical representation of the same, and all the rest, the whole matter of this prophecy, by an Angel to John his most beloved disciple;

2. Who bare record of the word of God, of [note a] the testimony of Jesus Christ, and of all things that he saw.]

[Paraphrase] 2. That John that had preached or given in his testimony concerning the word of God, the doctrine and deeds and sufferings and resurrection of Christ (whereby he testified his to be the doctrine and will of his Father) and some particulars which he peculiarly saw, (see Joh. 19. note d. and 1 Joh. 1. 1.) not taken notice of by others.

3. Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are wirtten therein: for the time is at hand.]

[Paraphrase] 3. In this Revelation other prophecies there are, and predictions of things future (after this of the Jews destruction) and therein, mixed, the admirable ways of God's providence in permitting and punishing his enemies, exercising and rewarding the patience of his servants, the constant Christians. And so the prophecies here set down of the destructions of the enemies of Christ, are matter of comfort to all them are now under persecution, and are such as concern everyone that now lives to read and observe, and to perform whar herein he is admonished to perform. For the time is close at hand, wherein one after another, all those prophecies, tending all to set from God's wonderful providence in punishing his enemies and protecting his servant, shall be successively fulfilled.

4. John to the seven Churches in [note b] Asia: Grace be unto you and peace from him which is, and which was, and which is to come, and from [note c] the seven spirits which are before his throne.] 〈1 page duplicate〉 〈1 page duplicate〉

[Paraphrase] 4. These Revelations which I John thus received, I send in an Epistle to the seven Churchess of Asia, which I salute myself, and am commanded to send them greeting from the eternal God, whose name is Jehovah, which signifies, He that is, and was, and shall be, and from the Angels which attend and wait upon God eh. 4. 5. and are, as in the Sanhedrim, the officers waiting on the head of the Sanhedrim, to go on all their messages, or, as in the Church, the Deacons, to attend the commands of the Governor of the Church, and to perform them (see Mat. 18. note a.)

5. And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first-begotten of the dead, and the Prince of the Kings of the earth: unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,]

[Paraphrase] 5. And from Jesus Christ, him that testified and made known, being here on earth, the will of his Father with all fidelity, (see note a. and ch. 3. c.) and that being crucified rose from the dead (and so as our first-fruits, 1 Cor. 15. 20. ascertained our resurrection, wherein we his brethren shall be like him our elder brother) and hath all power given unto him in heaven and in earth, is superior to all the Princes of this world, (Dan. 4. 17.) whose power or persecutions ye may fear: to him that hath made use of that power to express the reality of his love to us, in purging us from our sins, obtaining justifica ion and sanctification for us, by the satisfaction wrought by the shedding of his blood, and all the merits of his death (and the power of his resurrection, and the blessed consequents of it, the sending of his Spirit, and his own Intercession at the right hand of his Father) all consequents of that blood-shedding of his, upon which God so highly exalted him above all, Philip. 2. 9.

6. And hath made us [note d] Kings and Priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.]

[Paraphrase] 6. And all this that he might purchase to himself a Church of obedient servants (and accordingly he hath now set us apart as consecrated persons (such as Kings and Priests were of old) to perform daily service unto him, and delivered us from our persecutors that we may do so:) To this Savior and Redeemer of ours be ascribed, as to our eternal God, all glory and dominion forever and ever, Amen. (Which acknowledgment of that disciple of his, attributing the same to Christ which Christ teaches us to attribute to our Father in heaven, Mat. 6. and which belongs only to God, is a sure testimony that Christ is God: see note on Rom. 9. c.

7. Behold, he [note e] cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him: even so, Amen.

[Paraphrase] 7. Behold, this is his season wherein he cometh to protect his servants and to inflict vengeance on his enemies, (see note on Mat. 24. b.) as discernibly as when by the appearance of Angels in white clouds, or with thunder and lightning, &c. he exhibits himself (see Dan. 7. 13.) and all men shall discern his particular hand in these judgments, and all that had to do in the crucifying of him, and all the nation of the Jews, whether at Jerusalem, or wheresoever scattered (see the Premonition, and Mat. 24. b.) shall discern that these judgments are inflicted on them for their crucifying of Christ, and persecuting Christians, and shall see what cause they have to lament for their cruel usage of them, which now lights so heavy upon themselves.

8. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.]

[Paraphrase] 8. The first and last letter of the Greek Alphabet is a description of me, saith Christ, who am before and after all things (and so he whose kingdom hath no beginning nor end) and am able to secure all faithful servants of mine, and to subdue and destroy mine enemies, and now mean to evidence some of my royal power in punishing my enemies, or ill subjects.

9. I John, who also am your brother and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the Isle that is called Patmos for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.]

[Paraphrase] 9. I John, who write this Epistle to you, and who with other the faithful Christian Jews have suffered persecution, and do still hold out constant and patient, through the power of Jesus Christ (who now reigns, though once he suffered) not permitting any temptation to shake my faith, or drive me from the profession of Christianity, was in the Isle of Patmos, banished thither for preaching and promulgating the doctrine and faith of Jesus Christ. (See v. 2. note a.)

10. I was in the spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet,]

[Paraphrase] 10. And being there excluded from the society of men, I was vouchafed by God to receive Revelations from him; and accordingly I fell into an ecstasy or transportation, on the day of Christ's resurrection, the first day of the week, either the annual, or the weekly festivity, set apart to commemorate his resurrection, and as upon a festivity, I heared the sound of a trumpet, Psal. 47. 5. or a voice as loud as the sound of the trumpet, and that voice behind me, Is. 30. 21. calling to me unexpectedly.

11. Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last; and, what thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven Churches which are in Asia, unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamos, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea.]

[Paraphrase] 11. And that which was said, was, that he that sp ke to me was the eternal God, and that I was commanded by him to write down what was or should be (at this or at any other time) shown me, and to send all together in an Epistle to the seven Churches of Christ in Asia, of which Ephesus was the chief Metropolis: which accordingly now I do.

12. And I turned to see the voice that spake with me: and being turned I saw seven golden Candlesticks,]

[Paraphrase] 12. And hearing the voice behind me, I turned to see who it was, from whence this voice came to me. And upon this occasion of turning, there appeared unto me in the vision the representation (in Symbols or visible Hieroglyphics) of what that voice v. 11. said unto me: To signify the seven Churches, appeared seven golden Candlesticks.

13. And in the midst of the seven Candlesticks one like unto the Son of man, clothed with a garment down to the foot, and girt about the paps with a golden girdle.]

[Paraphrase] 13. To signify Christ, that eternal God that spake to me, and said, I am Alpha and Omega, there appeared an Angel in the midst of the Candlesticks (like him described Dan. 10. 5.) in a very solemn manner, habited like the high priest, Levite. 6. 12. and 16. 4. (to signify Christ our merciful high priest, who hath compassion on our infirmities, and intercedes and prays for us, to be represented by this Angel) in an upper garment, long, such as he used to wear (see note on Mat. 5. 6.) and girt with a girdle, (as he was too) and that of gold, (as Rev. 15. 6.) after the manner of the high Priest, the curious girdle of whose Ephod was of gold, blue, purple, scarlet, and fine twined linen, Exod. 39. 5. and by that intermixture of gold, discriminated from the girdles of ordinary priests (see note on Luk. 12. b.) and this belt or girdle girt about the paps.

14, 15. His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire;

[Paraphrase] 14. And his appearance from head to foot was like a flaming fire, nothing his coming to do vengeance, to consume with the brightness of his presence, 2 Thess. 2. 8. And his voice was like the sound of a great many waters met together, or of a multitude, Dan. 10. 6. making a huge terrible roaring noise.

15. And his feet like unto [note f] fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.]

16. And he had in his right hand seven stars: and out of his mouth went a sharp two-edged sword, and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength.]

[Paraphrase] 16. And he held seven stars in his right hand (signifying his approbation and care of the seven singular Governors which were placed in those seven Churches, represented by the Candlesticks:) and there came out of his mouth, instead of a tongue or words, a sword of such a kind as betokened sudden destructions, and the same was signified by his looks, which was the resemblance of the sun when it shineth in its greatest brightness.

17. And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead: and he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last:]

[Paraphrase] 17. And when I saw Christ thus represented, the terr blenesse of the vision and Christ's appearance in it was such, that it put me into a fainting fit (see Dan. 10. 8.) but he held me up, and encouraged me not to fear, but to trust in him, as the eternal God, who would certainly do me no hurt, how terrible soever he proved to his enemies, putting me in mind who he was, the God of heaven, though vilified and crucified upon the earth, (which crucifying of him, and proceeding in like manner with his servants, is the thing that becomes now to punish, and therefore there would be no matter of fear, (but much rather of comfort and joy) to any faithful Christian.)

18. I am he that liveth and was dead; and behold I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and death.]

[Paraphrase] 18. Even that Christ which lived here on earth, and was put to death (and so knows how to have compassion on all faithful Christians that suffer in like manner, Heb. 2. 17.) and rose again to life, and now lives never to die again, and hath all power over that invisible state and continuance in death, and over death itself (see note on Mat. 11. 1.) being able to fetch any man out of that condition, and restore him to life again, and so fit to relieve and reward any that suffers, though it be death itself, for his sake. To which purpose, saith he, for the evidencing the truth of what now I say, that is, of my faithful care of all those that continue constant to me (whilst I destroy the obdurate)

19. Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter;]

[Paraphrase] 19. Do thou write the visions which thou hast formerly seen, a representation both of the things which are now a doing, and of others which shall soon follow after them.

20. The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden Candlesticks. The seven stars are the [note h] Angels of the seven Churches; and the seven Candlesticks which thou sawest are the seven Churches.]

[Paraphrase] 20. And for that which thou now seest, which thou art to write also, (as I bad thee, v. 11.) the meaning of it is, that it representeth to thee the seven Churches, to which thou must communicate these visions in an Epistle, and the seven Governors of them; The seven stars which were shown thee in the vision, signify so many Governors of those so many Churches, v. 11. and the Candlesticks signify the Churches themselves.

Annotations on Chap. I.

[ a] V. 2. The testimony of Jesus ] The testimony of Jesus is the Gospel, as it was preached and testified by him, the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , most creditable authentic witness, ver. 5. and accordingly 'tis called I 1 Cor. 1. 6. the testimony of Christ, and 2 Tim. 1. 8. the testimony of our Lord, and the testimony of God, 1 Cor. 2. 1. For as there is the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 record or testimony that God test fied of his Son, Joh. 8. 18. both the voice from heaven▪ and the miracles which he did, &c. and as the Apostles office (and the Baptists, Joh. 5. 30.) was peculiarly, that they should testify of Jesus, Joh. 19. 35. and 21. 24.