PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Works

John Lightfoot (1602-1675) · 3,989,977 words · 17733 min

Large work readerShowing section 62 of 144. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 62/144
or that they should bind them upon their hands. And accordingly the place where they wore these two parchments was, the one upon their foreheads downwards, towards between their eyebrows, and the other upon their left arm: whereupon Tanchuma hath taken occasion to expound God's swearing by his strong arm, of his swearing by the Phylacteries.

I doubt whether all the Nation used these Phylacteries indifferently, or only those who were called, The Scholars of the wise, who pretended more knowledge, devotion, and study of the Law than the common people: It is recorded by the Jewish writers, that the Sadducees though they could not away with the Pharisees traditions, yet that they used Phylacteries as well as they, but only that they differed from them in opinion, about the place where they should wear them: but whether Husbandmen, Tradesmen, and the rest of the common people wore them, as well as Scholars, and the learned of the Nation; this one passage of Maymony amongst other arguments, may give some occasion to suspect: He speaking of those things, for which a man might be allowed, to pass by a Synagogue whilst they were at prayers there and not come in; among other things he saith thus, Were his Phylacteries seen upon him, then that was a sign that he neglected not the Law, and so though he had occasion to pass the Synagogue at that time, yet his Phylacteries appearing, spake for him, that it was not for want of devotion, that he passed the Synagogue, but was called away by some business or occasion.

Howsoever the common people did not wear these Phylactery parchments, as the learned did, yet both learned and unlearned were bound alike to the rehearsing or saying over the Phylactery sentences contained in them morning and evening every day. Yea workmen that were on the top of a tree, or on the top of a piece of timber, (rearing or repairing a house) they were bound to this rehersal there, when the time of the day for it was come.

This rehearsal is commonly called by the Hebrews 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Keriath Shema, the saying over of Shema, because one of the Sections began with Shema Israel, Hear O Israel, &c. Deut. 6. 4. which though it were not the first of the four, as they stand written in the book of the Law, nor the first written in their parchments which they wore, yet was it ever the first in their rehearsal; and the reason is given, because it containeth the first and the foundation of all other duties, and that is, to love the Lord.

The time of their Keriath Shema, or rehearsal of their Phylactery sentences in the morning, is thus determined in their Traditions. At what time of day do they say over their Phylacteries in the morning? Namely, from such time as a man can see to distinguish between blew and white: Rabbi Eliezer saith, between blew and green, even until sun rising, Rab. Joshua saith, until the third hour. And at what time do they say them over at Evening? Namely, from the time that the Priests go in to eat their offerings until the end of the first watch, &c.

Now besides this daily rehearsal of these sentences morning and evening, to which they were all bound by their traditions, they also held it a great piece of piety to say them over at the hour of death: so it is related of one of the ten Martyrs of the Kingdom, (for so let me Translate 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) that as he was saying over his Phylacteries, he was slain and cast unto the dogs. And to speak from more later times, Joseph the Priest in his various History of the Turks, Jews, and Christians (a book very rare to be had) describing a massacre raised by the red Cross Soldiers that went under Godfrey of Bulloine, and the rest to the holy war, against the Jews in Germany: he recordeth it several times over, that when such and such murdered Jews were ready to expire, yea even children in their mothers arms, they said their Keriath Shema, or their Phylactery sentences over, and with those in their mouths they gave up the Ghost.




SECT. V. The burning of Incense, and the rest of their Prayers.

COncerning the time of the burning of Incense, they have this Tradition 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That the Incense of the morning was offered between the sprinkling of the blood, and the laying of the pieces upon the Altar: and of the Evening, between the laying on of the pieces on the Altar, and the drink offering. Now for this employment of offering the Incense, they go to lotting again, to be resolved who should do it; and so there was another lot likewise cast, to determine who should bring the pieces from the rise of the Altar and lay them on.

He that was allotted to burn the Incense, took a silver dish in which there was a Censer full of Frankincense; another took another dish and went to the top of the Altar, and thence took some burning coals and came down. These two must go into the Temple; now as they go, there was a great vessel or instrument, or what shall I call it? (they call it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Migrephah ) which being rung or struck upon, made an exceeding great sound; and so great, that they set it out by this hyperbole 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 One man could not hear another in Jerusalem, when the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Migrephah sounded: It was as a Bell that they rung to give notice of what was now in hand. And the ringing of it, as saith the Treatise Tamid, served for these three purposes. 1. Any Priest that heard the sound of it, knew that his brethren were now ready to go in and worship, and he made haste and came. 2. Any Levite that heard it, knew that his brethren the Levites were going in to sing, and he made haste and came. And 3. the head or chief of the Station hearing the sound of it, brought up those that had been unclean and had not yet their atonement made, into the gate of Nicanor to have them there atoned for.

The two men then, that are going into the Temple to burn Incense, ring upon this Migrephah as they go by it, (for it lay between the Altar and the porch) to give notice to all who were to attend, that now the service was in beginning, and to chime them in. As they go up the steps, they two that had been in before, to cleanse the Incense Altar, and to dress the Lamps, go up before them: He that had cleansed the Altar goeth in, and taketh up his dish Teni, and worshippeth, and cometh out. He that had dressed the five Lamps before, dresseth now the other two, and taketh up his dish Coz, and worshippeth, and cometh out. He that went in with the Censer of coals after a little office done towards the disposing of the Incense, leaves the other there, and he also comes out.

Now he that is left there alone for the burning of the Incense, he offers not to kindle it, till the president from without with a loud voice give him notice when he shall begin: yea though it were the High▪priest himself that offereth the Incense, yet he begins not to do it, till the President have called to him, Sir offer: and as soon as he hath given the signal to the Incense offerer that he shall begin and offer, all the company in the Court withdraws downward from the Temple, and fall to other of their Prayers.




SECT. VI. The rest of their Prayers.

BEsides the Prayers and Rehearsal of the Decalogue and of their Phylacteries mentioned before, they had three or four Prayers more which they used at the morning Service, and they were these; The first they called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Emeth and Jatsib, because it began with those two words, and it referred to their Phylacteries, and it was of this form. Truth and stability, and firm and sure, and upright and faithful, and beloved and lovely and delightful, and fair and terrible and glorious, and ordered and acceptable and good and beautiful is this word for us forever and ever. The truth of the everlasting God our King, the Rock of Jacob, the shield of our salvation forever and ever. He is sure and his Name sure, and his Throne settled, and his Kingdom and Truth established for evermore, &c.

The second is called by the Talmud Text 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Avodah, but by Maymony 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Retseh, yet they both agree in one as to the prayer itself, only the one names it after the first word in it, and the other after one of the chiefest words in it. The tenor of it was thus, Be pleased O Lord our God with thy people Israel, and with their prayer, and restore the service to the Oracle of thy house, and accept the burnt offering of Israel and their prayer in love, with well pleasedness; and let the service of Israel thy people, be continually well pleasing to thee. And they conclude thus, We praise thee who art the Lord our God, and the God of our Fathers, the God of all flesh, our Creator, and the maker of all the Creation, blessing and praise be to thy great and holy Name, because thou hast preserved and kept us; so preserve and keep us, and bring back our captivity to the Courts of thy holiness, &c.

A third prayer ran thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Appoint peace, goodness, and blessing, grace, mercy, and compassion for us, and for all Israel thy people: bless us O our Father, even all of us as one man, with the light of thy countenance, for in the light of thy countenance thou O Lord our God hast given us the Law of life, and loving mercy and righteousness and blessing and compassion and life and peace, let it please thee to bless thy people Israel at all times. In the book of life, with blessing and peace, and sustentation let us be remembered and written before thee, we and all thy people the house of Israel, &c.

And a fourth prayer was used on the Sabbath as a blessing, by the Course that went out, for a farewell, upon the Course that came in, in these words, He that caused his name to dwell in this house, cause to dwell among you love, and brotherhood, and peace, and friendship. Compare 2 Cor. 13. 11.

Now whereas there is some seeming doubtfulness among the Talmudical writers, about the time of these prayers, they leaving it somewhat uncertain whether they were uttered immediately before the offering of the Incense, or in the very time of its offering, the Evangelist Luke hath determined the question, and resolved us, that the multitude was praying at the very time of the Incense, Luke 1. 10. and even the Gloss upon the Talmud itself, doth tell us, that these prayers were the people's prayers, the last only excepted.

When those prayers were done, he whose lot it was to bring up and lay the pieces of the Sacrifice upon the Altar, did that business in that manner as hath been mentioned before, namely, first flinging them into the fire, and then taking them up again, and laying them in order.

After which things performed, the Priests, especially those that had been in the holy place, (with the holy vessels in their hands that they had used) standing upon the stairs that went up into the porch, lifted up their hands and blessed the people. Compare Luke 1. 22.

Not to insist upon the large disputes and discourses that are among the Jews about their lifting up their hands, the blessing they pronounced was that in Numb. 6. 24, 25, 26. The Lord bless thee and keep thee, the Lord make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee; the Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace. And the manner was thus, they lift up their hands above their heads, with their fingers spread, and one of them saith over this blessing word by word, and they say after him, and they make it all one blessing (but in the Synagogues they made it three) and when they have ended it, the people answered, Blessed be the Lord God, the God of Israel, from everlasting to everlasting.

After this blessing the meat offering was offered, and after that the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meat offering of the High-priest, and last of all the drink offering; and then began the song and music, of which we have spoken before; and upon every stop of the song, the trumpets sounded and the people worshipped; and having done so at the last close they departed.

Thus was the ordinary and common service of the Temple Morning and Evening, save that at the Evening service there was some small difference from this Rubric, which was not very material: as that then they cast not lots for their several employments, but those that the lot had assigned them in the Morning, they retained in the Afternoon: only about the matter of burning the Incense they cast lots anew amongst those of the house of the Father that served that day, that had never burnt Incense in their lives: but if all of them had at one time or other been upon that employment, then he that had had it by lot at the Morning Service, did also perform it at the Evening: likewise at the Evening Sacrifice the burning of Incense was a little later than at the Morning, as was touched before; for it was between the laying on of the pieces of the beast upon the Altar, and the offering of the drink offering: so that then the burning of Incense and the public Prayers fell in just with the time of the Minchah or meat offering. The Priests also lifted not up their hands in blessing the people at the Evening Service on some days, as they did in the Morning, and the reason why they did not, is given, and the matter discussed in the beginning of the fourth chapter of the Treatise Taanith, but it may seem more tedious to the Reader than either useful or delightsome to insist upon it.




CHAP. X. The manner of their worshipping at the Temple.

THE holiness of the place, and the equity of that Law, Ye shall reverence my Sanctuary, did justly challenge all solemn and holy behavior of them that came to worship there: for which, as the Law had prohibited all uncleanness from that place, so did the great Masters of Traditions prohibit other things which the Law had not named, in which provision they did, as they did generally in all other things, they strained at a Gnat and swallowed a Camel: not sticking to make and permit the house of Prayer to be a house of Merchandise, and a den of Thieves, and yet strict in prohibiting what was of far less faultiness and scandal. According to which their punctual preciseness in lesser matters.

I. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 No man might go into the mountain of the house with his staff. It being reputed as a thing unfit, to bring in weapons of striking into that place of peace, or to use that place as a journey, which was to be a rest, or to lean upon any staff there, but only on God. From this custom it was that our Savior drove not out the buyers and sellers out of the Temple with a staff, but with a whip of cords, no staff being permitted to be brought in thither. And here it was a strange contradiction in Religion, that they might bring cattle to market into the Mountain of the house, but they might not drive them in thither with a staff. Yet did the man of the Mountain of the house walk up and down the Mountain with his staff, and use it to strike too, for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as Maimonides tells us, he cudgelled or punched with his staff, those Levites that lay sleeping upon the guards.

II. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Nor might any man enter in thither with his shoes on his feet. This prohibition they took from those words of God to Moses and Joshua, Put off thy shoes from thy feet, &c. Exod. 3. Josh. 5. Under which prohibition and practice was couched that doctrine, which the Targum uttereth on these words in Eccles. 5. Take heed to thy feet when thou enterest into the house of God. Thou son of man take heed to thy feet when thou enterest into the sanctuary of the Lord to pray, that thou go not in thither full of thy sins unrepented of, &c. And be not as fools, which offer sacrifices for their sins, and yet turn not from their evil works.

They might go into the Mountain of the house in their sandals though they might not in their shoes, but the Levites might not go into their desks to sing, nor their Priests into the Court to serve, no not so much as in their sandals, but bare footed.

III. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Nor might any man enter into the mountain of the house with his scrip or bag purse about him. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is taken by some to signify a little upper garment that they wore, which in Greek (from which language they conceive this word is taken) is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Joh. 21. 7. but I have ventured to render it a scrip or bag purse, for the clearer sense of the prohibition that we are about, upon some grounds and reasons which I shall give, when I have named one or two of their prohibitions more.

IV. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Nor might he come in with the dust upon his feet, but he must wash or wipe them, and look to his feet when he entered into the house of God. How under this might be couched the doctrine of shaking off all worldly thoughts and affections when they were to go about the service of God, is ready for everyone to observe, and needeth no intimation.

V. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Nor with money tied to him in his purse. The words of our Savior to his Disciples when he was sending them to preach, are so parallel to these prohibitions, that it is more than probability that he speaketh in allusion to these things. Provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses, nor scrip for your journey, neither shoes nor staves, Matth. 10. 9, 10. And therefore I have the rather translated 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a scrip, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a purse, because those two words in our Savior's speech do not only fitly translate these two, but that they seem to do so purposely. And for the rendering of the former word so, there is this double warrant: 1. Because the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which the Syriac hath used to render the Greek word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 by in the place cited, is sometimes used by the Talmud in conjuction with the same words that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is used with here; as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 with his staff and his scrip, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 bis staff, his shoes, and his scrip: and 2. from the signification that Rabbi Nathan giveth of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in these words, It was a kind of vesture which was a little upper garment in which were many places sewed, in which they put anything they met with, that they had occasion to use: So that this was a kind of an apron with divers purses, or pockets made in it, in which they put their necessaries, as we do in our pockets; which apron they could readily put on or off, wear or lay aside as they saw occasion. And as in such an apron they had their pockets, so in the scarf or girdle wherewithal they girded their under coats, they had their purses, Matth. 10. 9. Their girdles ordinarily were of linen, which the word before us 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meaneth, (and it was extraordinary in Elias and John the Baptist to go in leathern girdles) and in these their girdles they had a way to keep the money that they carried about with them when they travelled or went upon their occasions, but into the Mountain of the house they might bring no money in it. And thus might they not come thither, with anything of worldly notion or incumbrance about them, but must lay aside for their time of being there, (as a lecture of devotion retired from worldly thoughts or employments) their money, their worldly implements and utensils, and whatsoever in their common employments and occasions they used, and used to carry with them: Sure then (it will be thought, that) the poor Creeple that lay at the Beautiful gate begging, Act. 3. had but a very poor and comfortless trade of it, to beg there where no money was, or might be stirring: and when Peter and John say to him, silver and gold have I none; it may seem that that was the tune of all that came by him: But money was brought into the Temple in abundance, though they brought it not in their purses, for they gave money to the Priests, who helped them to offerings for their money, and they gave money to the Treasury for the poor, but they brought their money in their hands. And it may be that phrase so ordinary in the Hebrew did allude to this custom, He shall bring an offering as his hand shall find.

VI. Being come into the Mountain of the House, he must be careful of these four things. 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He may in no wise spit there: but if he be necessitated to spit, he must do it in some corner of his garment: Yet did they not stick to spit in the face of him that was greater than the Temple, Mat. 26. 67. There was a street in Jerusalem which was called the Upper Street, and in this Street spittle was unclean, and so it was in no street of Jerusalem besides.

2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He may not use any irreverent gesture, especially not before the Gate of Nicanor, for that was just before the face of the Temple: and this irreverence forbidden was, that they might not laugh, scoff, nor talk idly, much less do anything of a higher irreverence.

3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He may not make the Mountain of the House a thoroughfare: no more might they do one of their Synagogues: As if he had occasion to go from one side of the City to another about his occasions, he might not go through the Mountain of the Temple, though that were the nearer way, but he must go about: for thither he might not come 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , but only upon occasion of Religion.

4. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He that went into the Court must go leisurely and gravely into the place where he was to stand, and there he must demean himself as in the presence of the Lord God, in all reverence and fear.

VII. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Being now come in, to pray and to attend the service in the Court, 1. He must stand, and neither sit, nor lean, nor lie: for besides that caution which we shall observe by and by, that none might sit in the Court, it was not only their custom, but they held it their duty to pray standing wheresoever they prayed: Our Savior saith, they loved to pray standing in the Synagogues, and in the corners of the streets, Mat. 6. Their own traditions do bear witness to these words, both as to the posture, and to the place. There are eight things (saith Maymony in the place cited above in the Margin) that he that prayeth must take notice of to do them: namely, to stand, to set his face toward the Temple, to compose his body, to compose his clothes, to fit his place, to order his voice, to bow and to worship: He is not to pray but standing (unless sick or weak) and if he be in a ship or a cart, if he can let him stand. And in the eleventh Chapter of the same Book, he speaks of praying in the streets at their Fasts, and some other days when the Synagogues would not hold them. 2. As for the composure of their bodies in prayer, the rule that their tradition gives, is this, He is to stand, with his feet one even by another, and must cast his eyes downward, and his heart upward, and he must lay his hands upon his breast, the right hand upon the left, and he must stand as a Servant before his Master, with all reverence and fear. Their looking down in prayer, they took from those places in Scripture that speak of being ashamed to look up towards Heaven, and of being unable to look up because of sin, and to this posture of looking down, and laying his hands upon his heart, that demeanour of the Publican in the Parable seemeth parallel. He would not so much as lift up his eyes towards Heaven, but smote upon his breast, Luke 18. 13. And even the Priests when they pronounced the blessing upon the People, neither looked up towards Heaven, nor level upon the People, but down upon the ground, and the People might not look upon them.

VIII. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Were they never so weary with standing, or had they stood never so long, yet might they not sit down in the Court, either People or Priests: For this is a most known and received Maxim amongst the most Jewish Writers, That no man whosoever might sit in the Court, but only the Kings of the House of David. Though Kimchi allege some, that excepted the Kings from this privilege, and allowed it only to the High-priest. Midras Tillin doth wittily apply this sitting of the King alone, and all the rest standing, to the posture of the Congregation in Heaven, where the great King sits, and all the company there, standeth attending on him: But some other of the Jews do as unwittily apply it, when they make this to be one of Jeroboams greatest fears for the Peoples withdrawing from him, and personate him speaking thus. It is certain that there is no sitting in the Court, but only for the Kings of the House of David: therefore as soon as they shall see Rehoboam sitting, and me standing, they will conclude, that if I were a King, I should sit down, &c, From this received tradition, of not sitting in the Court, the great Sanhedrin, who sat in the room Gazith, which was in the South Wall of the Court, would not presume to sit in that side of the building that stood in the Court, but they sat in the other side that stood in the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 chel. In its due place we have at large described the situation of that building, and their sitting there.

IX. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 They might not pray with their heads uncovered: And the wisemen and their scholars (saith my Author) never prayed but being veiled. So Rabbi Nathan relating a story of Nicodemus, how he prayed, and begged for rain in a great exigent, and mentioning his twice going in to pray upon that occasion, he doth particularly express this circumstance 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That he put on his veil, and went in, and prayed. And the Jews compare the appearing of the Lord upon Mount Sinai in a cloud, to the Angelus Ecclesiae, or Minister of the Congregation, having on his Vail. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . The Priests wore their Caps or Bonnets constantly all the time they were about the service, and yet it seems they did not account that covering of their heads sufficient when they went to pray, but they put on some other covering also. This Custom and Practice of theirs the Apostle taketh to task, 1 Cor. 11. 4.

X. Their bodily gesture in bowing before the Lord, was either 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 bending of the knees, or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 bowing of the head: or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 falling prostrate upon the ground. Now this last is most spoken of, and yet according to its strict propriety it was least in use: they used indeed sometime to fall down upon the floor in prostration, but ordinarily this was changed among them from a flat falling upon the ground, to a very low bending of the body towards it: for they had this position, That prostration was not fit for every man, but only for such as knew themselves righteous men, like Joshua.

XI. Having performed the service, and being to go away, they might not turn their backs upon the Altar, therefore they went backward till they were out of the Court: and when they came into the mountain of the House, they might not go out at the same Gate, at which they came in, about which matter we have discoursed elsewhere.




CHAP. XI. Of the appearance of the People at the three Festivals.

THE great Sanhedrin was as an Almanac to all the Nation to give them notice of the New Moons, by which they might fix their monthly Feasts, and know when to celebrate their Solemnities. Now although the Sanhedrin had the skill to know the night when the New Moon should appear (for from its appearing they began the Month) yet they did not determine of the thing, till they had the testimony of two men, which gave in evidence that they had seen the New Moon: And hereupon it was, that very many couples repaired to Jerusalem for this purpose, who having seen the first New Moon, set away thither to give testimony of it, and there were entertained in a place of the City called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Beth Jaazek, a Court walled in with stone, and examined about the business and feasted, that men might be encouraged to come to witness upon so needful an occasion: it is besides our present purpose to inquire curiously after the quality of the persons whose testimony was to be accepted, or how, or how far they came, or why they should come, when the Persons of the great Council might see the Moon themselves, and how they of the Sanhedrin that saw the Moon, did witness among themselves about it, and therefore we will let these disquisitions alone, and content ourselves with observing this, that as the Court held itself bound to fix and give notice of the New Moons, so they held themselves bound to determine upon this matter by the mouth of two Witnesses, as they did also in other Judicial matters.

The two first witnesses that came, if their testimony were current did serve the turn, and they looked no further (yet had they something to say to all the couples that come, because they would encourage the work:) or if those two did not serve the turn, when any other two did, then they took course that all the Country might know of the day with what speed might be.

For that purpose their course at the first was this: At night (after they had concluded by day, by such witness, that the New Moon was seen the Night before) they caused one to go to Mount Olivet, with a bundle of most combustible wood, and other stuff, and there he set it on fire, and waved it up and down, and this way, and that way, and never left, till he saw another do so upon another hill, and so another on a third: and those that took at him, they waved their blazes up and down, till they were answered with the like from another Hill, and so the intelligence was quickly dispersed through the whole land: Nay, saith the Talmud, it went from Mount Olivet to Sartaba, from Sartaba to Gryphena, from Gryphena to Hhevaron, from Hhevaron to Beth Baltin: and he that stood there never left waving his blaze, till he saw all the place of the Captivity full of the like.

The Country thus seeing these flames and blazes, knew that the New Moon had appeared the night before, and that the Sanhedrin had concluded the day past, for the first day of the Month, and so they knew how to count forward: But it seems experience taught them in time; that by such kind of intelligence, they might be, and sometimes were deceived 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 by the Santaritans or profane persons, or some of their enemies, that made such flamings for the very nonce, that they might deceive them: Therefore they fell to a second way of dispersing their intelligence, and that was by sending Messengers up and down the Country for this purpose: What a toil would a good Almanac have saved, nay an indifferent one would have given as much, or more certainty about this matter, than this way did, or could do, because of the slipperiness of it in several particulars.

These Messengers were sent abroad upon this errand only seven months in the Year: As,

  • 1. In the Month Nisan, that the People might know the right day of the Passover.
  • 2. In the month Ijar, because of the second Passover, or the Passover in the second month.
  • 3. In the month Ab, because of the Fast, on the ninth day.
  • 4. In the month Elul, because of the beginning of the year, the next month after: for Elul was most ordinarily mensis vacuus, or a month of nine and twenty days only, and so they knowing the first day of Elul, they might observe the thirtieth day, for the first of Tisri, or the beginning of the year: And if on the thirtieth day they found not either by the sight of the Moon, or by some intelligence from the Sanhedrin, that that proved the first day of the month; they kept the next after also for it, that they might make sure.
  • 5. In Tisri, because of the day of Expiation, and feast of Tabernacles.
  • 6. In Cisleu, because of the Feast of Dedication.
  • 7. In Adar, because of the Feast of Purim.

The knowledge of the certain day of the three Festivals, Passover, Pentecost and Tabernacles, being thus imparted to all the Country, they were by the Law to resort to Jerusalem, at the times appointed, and to keep the Feast, and to rejoice there. Their appearance there was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Raaiah, and their festivating and rejoicing, was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 chagigah. Their appearance was made in the Court of the Temple, the first holiday in the festival Week, and they were to bring their sacrifice for their appearance, and peace offerings for the Hagigah, or for the solemnity of the Festivity, and their peace offerings for their rejoicing, and these were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Peace offerings of joy.

There were some that were acquitted and excused from this appearance; as Menservants that were not made free, the deaf, dumb, silly, lame, unclean, uncircumcised, those that were very old, the sick, tender and unable to travel afoot, and infants till they were able to walk up to the Mountain of the House, holding their Fathers by the hand.

And as miraculous providence did preserve their Families in the Country, when they were gone up to these solemnities (and had left at home none but Women, Children, and some Men-servants, which were not free,) so it was little less than a Miracle, that all these vast multitudes of People, should find provision and accommodation for them, when they came to Jerusalem. And this the Talmudicks do justly take notice of as a special wonder, and remarkable work of God, of which they have this observation.

Ten wonders, say they, were shown to our Fathers at the Sanctuary. No Woman ever proved abortive by the smell of the flesh of the Sacrifices. And no man ever stumbled in Jerusalem: Neither did any man ever fall in Jerusalem. Nor was there ever abortion in Jerusalem: Nor did any man ever say to his fellow, I have not found a fire where to roast my Paschal in Jerusalem: Nor did any man ever say to his fellow, I have not found a Bed in Jerusalem to lie in: Nor did ever any man say to his fellow, My lodging is too strait in Jerusalem, &c.




CHAP. XII. Of the manner of the celebration of their Passover.

THE great and mysterious Sacrament of the Passover, is so copiously related, and the History of it given, in Exod. 12. that it is needless to speak anything of it, as to its story: But the celebration of the Passover in after times, especially in the times of our Savior, when traditions were come to their height, did so far differ in various circumstances from that, that was ordained in Egypt, and had so various Rites put upon it by their Traditions above that, that the discovery of the manner of it in those times, deserveth some copious discourse and scrutiny from their own Traditions and Antiquities, that put those circumstances upon it. It will therefore not be amiss to trace these particulars step by step, out of such Writing and Writers, as speak purposely and largely of this matter; and that the rather, because the New Testament in several places and passages doth refer to some of the circumstances which we call additional.

First therefore we will begin with the difference which the Jewish Doctors hold out, between the Passover in Egypt, and the Passover in succeeding ages, which Tosaphta on the Treatise Pessachin holdeth out thus.

The Passover in Egypt, the taking of it up, was on the tenth day, and the killing of it was on the fourteenth, and they were not guilty for it of cutting off. The Passover in succeeding generations they are liable concerning it to cutting off.

Of the Passover in Egypt it is said, Let him and his neighbor next to him take a Lamb, but it is not so said of the Passover in succeeding generations: But I say, saith R. Simeon, it is so said of the Passover in future times: And that because a man should not leave his neighbor whose house is near unto him, to keep his Passover with his companion; for it is said, Better is a neighbor that is near, than a Brother that is far off.

The Passover in Egypt was not charged with sprinkling the blood and fat upon the Altar; but it is otherwise with the Passover in after times.

Of the Passover in Egypt it is said, Ye shall put of the blood upon the two posts, and the upper door post: but it is not so with the Passovers afterward.

At the Passover in Egypt it is said, None of you shall go out of the door of his house till morning: but it was not so in after generations.

The Passover in Egypt was slain by everyone in his own house, but the Passovers afterward, all Israel slew them in one place.

Where they eat the Passover in Egypt, there also they were to lodge: but in after times, they might eat it in one place, and lodge in another.

Yet was the Passover in Egypt, and succeeding Passovers all one: whosoever had servants that were not circumcised, and maidens that were not baptized, they restrained them from eating the Passover. But I say, saith Rabbi Eliezer the son of Jacob, the Scripture speaks only of the Passover in Egypt.

In these things the Passover in Egypt, and in succeeding times was alike.

The Passover in Egypt was in three Houses, so also was it with future Passovers.

The Passover in Egypt was of the flock, a male without blemish, of the first year: After Passovers were so likewise.

Of the Passover in Egypt it is said, ye shall not leave ought thereof till morning: the like was it also with after Passovers.

Rabbi Josi the Galilean saith, I say that leaven in Egypt was forbidden but for one day.

The Passover in Egypt required a song: so did the Passovers in after times require a song.

Thus is the Jewish differencing and parallelling the first Passover, and those succeeding: in which passage before we leave it, these things are observable:

  • 1. That whereas it is said, that as to the Passover in Egypt, there was no liableness to cutting off, it is spoken in comparing the relation of the institution of the first Passover in Egypt, Exod. 12. with the renewing of the command of the Passover in the Wilderness, Numb. 9. For when God first ordains the Passover, there is cutting off mentioned indeed in some reference to it; for it is said that whosoever eateth leavened bread from the first day to the seventh day, shall be cut off, Exod. 12. 15. but it is not expressly said, he that keeps not the Passover shall be cut off, but when God comes to renew the Command and to give the Law for it, for after times, he then saith expressly, that the man that is clean and is not in a journey, and forbeareth to keep the Passover, that soul shall be cut off, &c. Numb. 9. 13.
  • 2. Whereas it is said that the Passover in Egypt was in three houses, and so also the Passover in after times; it is not to be understood as if the Paschal Lamb might be so divided as that part of him might be eaten in one house, and part of him in another, for that was expressly against the Command, Ye shall bring nothing of him forth out of the house, Exod. 12. 46. but it meaneth that several families might join together in one society to the eating of one Lamb; and so it was in Egypt, and so also was it in after times.

The first command toward this solemnity was, the taking up of the Lamb on the tenth day, and so keeping him up till the fourteenth, Exod. 12. 3, 6. Which whether it were a perpetual command, or only for that Passover in Egypt is disputed: Ibn Ezra saith it is a matter of doubtfulness; but Rabbi Solomon plainly determines that it was a command of practice only confined to that one time in Egypt; which though it may be true in some circumstances, yet may it be questioned whether it held universally true or no. It is not to be doubted but everyone in after times took up their own Lambs, as they did in Egypt, but it is somewhat doubtful whether they did it in the same manner. It is exceeding probable, that as the Priests took up the Lambs for the daily sacrifice four days before they were to be offered, as we have observed elsewhere; so also that they provided Lambs for the People at the Passover, taking them up in the Market four days before, and picking and culling out those that were fit, and agreeable to the command. For whereas the Law was so punctual that they should be without blemish, and their Traditions had summed up so large a sum of blemishes, as that they reckon seventy three, it could not be, but the Law and their Traditions which they prized above the Law, should be endlessly broken, if everyone took up his Lamb in the Market at Jerusalem at adventure. The Priests had brought a Market of Sheep and Oxen against such times as these into the Temple, (for had it not been their doing, they must not have come there) where they having beforehand picked out in the Market, such Lambs and Bullocks as were fit for Sacrifice or Passover, they sold them in the Temple at a dearer rate, and so served the Peoples turn and their own profit, for which amongst other of their Hucksteries our Savior saith, they had made the house of prayer a den of thieves. Thus he that would, might bring up his Lamb with him, and he that did not might buy a Lamb at Jerusalem when he came there; and whether of these our Savior did at his last Passover, the Gospel is silent; it is most probable he did the latter; See Luke 22. 8. John 13. 29.

It is the opinion of some of the Jewish Nation, that those that took up the Lamb on the tenth day, and kept him till the fourteenth, did tie him all that while at one of their beds feet, that he might be in their eye to view him oft whether he were right and lawful, and to mind them of what they were to go about; but howsoever it was in this, or the other particulars that have been mentioned, it must not be omitted to observe how the Lamb of God, the true Paschal, by whose blood is everlasting deliverance, did answer this figure of the Lambs being taken up on the tenth day, when on that very day he rode upon an Ass into Jerusalem, and offered himself to be taken up for that Sacrifice, which within six days after, he was made for sin and offered up. See John 12. 1. 12.

SECT. I. Their searching out for Leaven.

THE next care they were to have in reference to the Passover, was to refrain from the eating and use of Leaven at Passover time, and that at the time when the Passover was slain it should not be found within their houses. The Law in this point was exceeding strict. In the first month on the fourteenth day of the month at Even, ye shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the Month at Even. Seven days there shall be no leaven found in your houses, for whosoever eateth that which is leavened, even that soul shall be cut off from the Congregation of Israel, whether he be a stranger or born in the land, Exod. 12. 18, 19. & 13. 7. and so in Lev. 23. 6. Numb. 28. 17.

Now what analogy there was between this Law and their redeeming out of Egypt, and what relation the one could have to the other, Abarbinel disputing, concludeth thus, that it lay in this, because it signified unto them the hastiness of their coming out of Egypt, insomuch that they had not time to leaven their bread, as Exod. 12. 39. and he addeth withal, that in those hot Countries, bread will not keep above a day, unless it be leavened: so that the command of unleavened bread might read unto them in that respect a Lecture of dependence upon Providence, when they were enjoined to forsake the common and known way of preserving their bread, and to betake themselves to a way extraordinary and unsafe, but only that they had the Command of God, and his Injunction for that way, and they must learn to live by the word of God.

The Jews to meet with this Command that was so exceeding strict, and to make sure to provide for its observance soon enough, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Did on the fourteenth day while yet there was some light; make search for leaven by the light of a Candle. Thus is the Tradition, in which by the light of the fourteenth day their Glossaries tell us that we must understand the thirteenth day at even, when it began to be duskish and candle-lighting. The rubrick of the Passover in the Hebrew and Spanish tongues renders it in Hebrew Letters, but in the Spanish Language thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 En entrada di quatorze del mez de Nisan, At the entrance of the fourteenth day of the Month Nisan, they searched for leaven in all the places where they were wont to use leaven, (in Barns, Stables, and such out houses they needed not to search) even in holes and crannies, and that not by light of Sun and Moon, or Torch, but by the light of a wax candle, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 i. e. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 con candela di cera. And the reason why they used a Candle rather than any other light, was because it is the fittest for searching holes and corners, and because the Scripture speaketh of searching Jerusalem with Candles.

After the evening of the fourteenth day was come in, (which was after Sun setting) they might not go about any work (no not to the study of the Law) till they had gone about this search; therefore there was not so much as Divinity Lectures that evening▪ lest they should hinder that work.

Before he began to search he said this short ejaculation, Blessed be thou O Lord our God, the King everlasting, who hath sanctified us by his commandments, and hath enjoined us the putting away of leaven. And he might not speak a word betwixt this praying and searching, but must fall to work, and what leaven he found he must put it in some box, or hang it up in such a place as that no Mouse might come at it. And he was to give it up for nul in these words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . All the leaven that is within my Possession, which I have seen, or which I have not seen, be it null, be it as the dust of the earth.

SECT. II. The passages of the forenoon of the Passover day.

WHen the Passover day itself was now come (which the New Testament commonly called the first day of unleavened bread, from their custom newly mentioned, but the Jewish Writers do ordinarily call it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Passover eve ) some part of the People made it a Holiday by ceasing from bodily labor all the day long, and others made it but half holiday, by leaving work at noon; the Talmud relates that in Galilee they left work all the day long from morning till night, but in Judea that they wrought till noon, and then gave over: which may seem somewhat strange that those further off were so observant of the Passover, and those nearer hand were so much less; but the reason is this, because in Galilee those that were at home on that day, had nothing else to do towards the Passover, but only to meditate upon it, and rest from labor in honor of it; but those in Judea, it may be they travelled all forenoon to get up to Jerusalem, or had some work to do towards the forwarding of the Passover, or to dispatch, that they might follow their Passover work the better.

It is in dispute in the place cited immediately before, concerning resting from labor on this day that we have in hand, and it proves a controversy between the schools of Shammai and Hillel, whether they should not also rest from labor the night before: but at last the determination comes so low, as that it gives liberty to works that were begun on the thirteenth day to be finished on the fourteenth; nay yet lower, that where the custom was to leave off work for all day, there they should leave work; and where it was the Custom to work till Noon, there they should do according to the Custom.

But whatsoever they did in this case, cease from their labor in the forenoon, or cease not, one work they must not fail to do, and that was to cast out and put away leaven out of their houses, this day (as they had searched for it the night before) and that it might not be seen nor found amongst them. The Law indeed concerning this work, doth pitch upon the fifteenth day for the doing of it, as if it were soon enough to do it on the fourteenth day at Even, Exod. 12. 18, 19. but the Jews do not impertinently observe that the expelling of leaven was by the Law to be before the time wherein the eating of it was forbidden: For whereas it is said, on the first day you shall put leaven out of your houses, their tradition taught them, that by the first is meant the fourteenth day: And a proof for this there is from what is written in the Law. Thou shalt not kill the blood of my sacrifice with leaven, that is, Thou shalt not kill the Passover, whilst leaven is yet remaining; non the killing of the Passover was on the fourteenth day in the afternoon.

On this fourteenth day therefore, for a good part of the forenoon, they might eat leaven or leavened bread, and might give it to any Bird or Beast, or might sell it to a stranger, but the fixing of the certain time is not without some debate. Rabbi Mei saith, they may eat it all the fifth hour, and were to burn it at the beginning of the sixth. Rabbi Judah saith, they may eat it all the fourth hour, and they were to suspend all the fifth, and at the sixth hour they were to burn it. Which dispute Maimonides fifteth into this resolution, It was lawful to eat leaven on the fourteenth day till the end of the fourth hour, but they might not eat it the fifth hour, yet they might use it; but he that eateth it the sixth hour, was beaten with the Rebels beating, and he that eat it from the beginning of the seventh, was to be whipt.

Twelve a clock or thereabouts, therefore being come, it had been a strange sight to have seen everyone of them either siring, or drowning, or scattering their leaven into the wind (for any of these ways served for the expelling of it, and this command and practice reached over all the Country) and you might have seen them do it with this Valediction. All the leaven that is within my possession, which I have seen, or which I have not seen, which I have cast out, or which I have not cast out, be it null, be it as the dust of the earth.

SECT. III. The time of killing the Passover.

ABout the day of celebrating the Passover, there needeth no discourse to fix it, it is so plainly pointed out to be the fourteenth day of the first Month that nothing can be plainer, therefore when we speak of the time of killing the Passover we speak not of the day of the month, which is so well known, but of the time of the day which is not so clearly pointed out.

The Tosaphta indeed upon the Treatise Pesachin, relateth that the Cuthaeans sometimes kept their Passover a day before the Israelites did, and sometimes a day after, (where the word Cuthaeans might breed some dispute, for in the Talmudicks language, it means sometimes Samaritans and sometimes Christians, but we shall not insist upon it.) And there have been some Christians that have held, that Christ and his Disciples kept their last Passover one day before the Jews kept theirs, conceiting this from that which is spoken in John. 18. 28. where it is related that when Christ was brought into Pilate 's Judgment Hall (which was when he had eaten the Passover, as all the other Evangelists declare abundantly) the Jews durst not go into Pilate's Hall, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover. To which mistake I shall only give some words of Maymony at this present for answer, for the ground of the mistake we shall have occasion to look after in the ensuing discourse. It is an affirmative command (saith he) to kill the Passover on the fourteenth day of the Month Nisan in the afternoon, and they kill it not but only of Lambs or Kids, a male of the first year, and both men and women are alike liable to this command; and he that breaks this command presumptuously, and passeth the fourteenth day and offereth not, if he be not unclean or in a long journey, he is guilty of being cut off; but if he transgress the command ignorantly, he is quit. They kill not the Passover but in the Court even as the rest of the holy offerings, yea even in those times, when high places were permitted, they offered not the Passover in a private high place, but in the public, (that is, the Temple) and he that offered it in a private high place was to be whipt. From which words, it being observed what penalty lay upon him that passed the fourteenth day, and what the there was to slay the Paschal Lamb in the Court, it will appear extreme absurd to imagine that any Israelite should keep his Passover before the fixed day. What the Cuthaeans or Samaritans might do at their Mount Gerizim, it is no matter, but for any Jews to celebrate the Passover at Jerusalem, (for nowhere else it might be done) before the proper and fixed time, could not have been without evident danger to them that did it; it being so diametrically contrary both to the Law and to their Traditions, and yet we find not Christ was ever touched with the least accusation about his Passover as if he kept it on the wrong day.

But to let this pass, which indeed is too plain to be disputed (for the Evangelist most plainly tells us that on the day of unleavened bread when the Passover must be killed, Jesus sent Peter and John to prepare his Passover, Luke 22. 7, 8.) and now to come to look after the time of the day when the Passover was killed, we must take these two maxims with us. 1. That the Passover was not lawful if it were killed before noon; and the reason of this is easy to give, namely because the Law doth expressly appoint, that they should kill it between the two evenings, Exod. 12. 6. And 2. that the daily evening Sacrifice was to be killed before they began to kill the Passover; and the reason of this is also readily to be given, namely, because an extraordinary service must not prevent one ordinary and constant. After they had burnt the incense of the evening sacrifice, and after they had dressed the Lamps, then they began to kill the Passover, and so continued till the end of the day. The times they divided thus, they slew the daily Sacrifice at the eighth hour and an half, and they offered it up at the ninth hour and an half: but on the Eve of the Passover, they slew it at the seventh hour and an half, and offered it up at the eighth hour and an half, whether the day were a common day or the Sabbath: and if the Eve of the Passover fell on the Eve of the Sabbath, the daily Sacrifice was killed at the sixth hour and half an hour past, and offered it up at the seventh hour and half an hour past, and the Passover after it.

It was the command both for the Passover and for the daily Evening Sacrifice, that they should be slain and offered 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 between the two Evenings, Exod. 12. 6. & 29. 39. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 A very hard expression (saith Ibn Ezra ) and he gives as very hard an interpretation of it; for he judgeth the two Evenings to be these, the one when the Sun sets and goes out of sight, and the other when the day closes in and all the light is clean gone, which he saith is ordinarily about an hour and three quarters after Sun setting; and so he will have the daily Sacrifice to be offered up at this time, and though all the Passovers could not be killed in this space, yet he conceiveth that it is commanded they should be killed between the two Evenings, because most of them were slain in this space, though all could not. I shall not insist to show the improbability of this Tenet, he himself that holds it, is in a manner glad at last to betake himself to the general and common received Opinion, which was, that the two Evenings were these, the first from that time of the day that the Sun began to decline from his vertical or noon-tide point toward the West, and the other from his going down and out of sight. And according to this construction did they go in killing and offering up their Evening Sacrifice, taking up an hour for that business just in the middle of the afternoon (counting at Aequinox time) namely, from half an hour past two, to half an hour past three, and so there were two hours and an half from the Suns beginning to decline, to the time they killed, and two hours and an half from the time they offered it up, till the Sun went down.

Now occasional Sacrifices did sometimes cause an alteration of the time of the daily, for that being to be ever offered the first, as being the fixed and appointed service of the day, that the others might have room to be offered up in due time, that removed out of its place, to somewhat earlier in the day, sometimes an hour, and sometimes two, as in the Traditions alleged, and especially this was for the sake of the Passover, when Lambs were exceeding many: The common time therefore to begin to kill the Passover was, from about half an hour past two a clock, and little more, and so continued all afternoon: and if the Passover lighted on the Eve of the Sabbath, (that is, on the day preceeding the Sabbath) they began an hour sooner, that they might the better dispatch their business by the time that the Sabbath began.

SECT. IV. The Paschal Societies.

BEfore the Paschal Lamb was slain, they first agreed and concluded upon the Company that should eat him: for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , They might not slay the Passover but for persons numbered before, or a number agreed on before for his eating. And this caution was not unwarrantably taken up, from that command in Exod. 12. 4. Every man according to his eating: ye shall make your count for the Lamb: So that while the Lamb was yet alive, it was to be crtainly concluded, who, and how many would join together for his eating, and he might not be slain but for societies so agreed and numbered. If any of the society, after the number was agreed on, saw occasion to withdraw from that company, and to go to another, he must do it before the Lamb was slain, for after he might not. These societies were called everyone of them 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and the number of the persons in them was not certain, but sometime more, sometime less, according to their proportionableness of eating, because of the command, Everyone according to his eating: were there among the company those that were sickly and aged, and little eaters, then they might take the more into the company, but if they were healthy and lively, and like to eat more freely, then was the number less: He that was to eat the least, was to eat as much of him, as came to the quantity of an olive, and if he could not eat so much, they counted not him in the number: And they might number so many in a society, as if there were the quantity of an olive for everyone to eat, it was enough.

1. Although Women were not directly bound to appear three times year before the Lord, as the males were, yet were they bound to some particular services that attended the three appearances, and so that brought them in: but especially to the Passover, for to the observation of that they were obliged by those express words of the Commandment, The whole assembly of the Congregation of Israel shall kill it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And men and women were bound to this command alike: Now in forming up these societies that were severally to eat the Lambs, they suffered not any companies to consist of servants and women only, nor of servants and children only, lest there should be some lightness among them, and not that gravity that became so great a solemnity: nor to consist of old or sickly persons only, lest they should leave any of them, and so transgress the command, Ye shall leave nothing of him till the morning: Nor to consist of Proselytes only, or of children only, because they were unlikely to speak of those memorable things that were to be spoken of at the Passover. But a society might be only of women, or only of servants, but ordinarily they were of whole families, one or more united, Husbands, Wives, Children, Servants, all together. Our Savior's society was himself and the twelve, Mat. 26. 20. Luk. 22. 14.

SECT. V. The killing of the Passover.

THE Passovers were slain in three companies : 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And the ground of this practice and tradition they make to be those words of the institution, The whole assembly of the Congregation of Israel shall kill it: where because, there are three words, Assembly, Congregation, and Israel, applied to the killing of the Passover, they divided the killing of it into three companies according to that number.

There were not to be less than thirty men in every company: yet found they out a shift to make fifty men (if there were no more) to make thirty men three times over, for the three companies; and their way was this. Thirty of the fifty went into the Court, (for there only might the Passover be killed) and when they had killed their Lambs, ten of them went out, and ten of those, that stood without, came in and killed theirs, and then ten others went out, and the other ten that stood without came in and killed theirs, and so there were thirty in the Court continually, while the Lambs were killing.

But this was only a provision for a pinch; namely, if such an exigent should occur, as that there should be but fifty Lambs presented, or at least but fifty persons present, (for ordinarily everyone of the numbered Paschal societies that have been spoken of, sent their Lamb by one of their company only, and under fifty there was no Passover killing) but commonly everyone of these three companies we are speaking of, were as many as ever the Court could hold.

The first company came in, till the Court was filled, and then the doors were locked, and they fell to killing the Lambs, and while they were about this work, the Levites sang, and the trumpets sounded: It is a tradition, saith the Jerusalem Talmud, The daily sacrifice which hath a drink offering, they blew the trumpets at the time of the drink offering: but at the Passover which hath no drink offering, they blew the trumpets at the killing of it. Which the Gloss upon the Babylon Talmud doth utter more punctually, At the killing of the Passover there were seven and twenty soundings with the trumpets: for the Passover was killed in three companies one after another, &c.

Now the song that was sung at this time while they were killing the Passovers, was called the Hallel 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 so saith the same Gloss in the same place. Every company said over the Hallel three times: for their Paschals were many, and they were bound to the saying over of the Hallel at the slaying of them. And Maymony more largely. All the time that they were killing and offering the Levites said over the Hallel: if they had finished the Hallel, and the company had not yet done, they said it over again: And if they had finished saying it over again, and the company had not yet done neither, they set to it a third time. And both these speak this, from the Mishneh in the treatise Pesachin where it is said, They said over the Hallel, and when they had finished they said it over a second time, and when they had done that, they said it over a third time.

The Jews do make exceeding frequent mention in their writings of the Hallel or the Hymn; (for so we may translate it from Matth. 26. 30.) And they distinguish it into the common or lesser Hallel, and the greater: The lesser Hallel they also call the Egyptian Hallel, because it was sung more especially in remembrance of their delivery out of Egypt: and it was the 113, & 114, & 115, & 116, & 117, & 118, Psalms. Concerning the choice and use of which it may not be amiss to take up two or three of their traditions.

1. The Jerusalem Talmud in the Treatise Pesachin hath this relation. R. Jacob Bar Aha in the name of Rabbi Jasa saith, Strength was given to Moses his voice, and his voice went through all Egypt forty days journey: And what said he? One company from such a place to such a place, and another company from such a place, to such a place. And wonder not at it: for if of dust whose nature is not to go, it be said, it shall become dust through all the land of Egypt, (Exod. 9. 9.) much more might a voice go abroad, whose nature is to go. Rabbi Levi said, As strength was given to Moses his voice, so strength was given to Pharaohs voice; and his voice went throughout all Egypt forty days journey. And what said he? Arise, get ye out from among my people: For, as for the time past ye have been the servants of Pharaoh, but from henceforth ye must be the servants of the Lord. From that hour they said, Praise ye the Lord, praise him ye servants of the Lord, Psalm 113. and now no more the servants of Pharaoh.

2. Maymony in his Treatise of Megillah, and Chanuchah, or of the Feast of Purim and of Dedication, saith The custom of saying over the Hallel in the days of the former wisemen, was thus, The chief among them that was to read the Hallel after he had said a prayer, began thus, Hallelujah; and all the people answered Hallelujah. He goes on and says, Praise ye the servants of the Lord; and all the people answered Hallelujah. He proceeds and says, Praise the Name of the Lord; and all the people answered Hallelujah. He says further, Blessed be the Name of the Lord from this time forth, even for evermore; and all the people answered Hallelujah. And so at every passage, till they answered Hallelujah, an hundred and three and twenty times over, and of that number were the years of Aaron.

Now when he that read it, came to the beginning of any Psalm, as when he read, When Israel came out of Egypt, the people repeated and said, When Israel came out of Egypt; but when he said, And the House of Jacob from a strange people, then the people answered Hallelujah: and so forward, till he came to, I love the Lord because he hath heard my voice, and there the people repeated, I love the Lord because he hath heard my voice, And so when he said, Praise the Lord all ye Nations, they repeated, Praise the Lord all ye Nations: And when he came to, Save now Lord I beseech thee, the people repeated, Save now Lord I beseech thee; though it were not the beginning of a Psalm: And when he said, I beseech thee now send prosperity, they rehearsed and said, I beseech thee now send prosperity. And when he said, Blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord, all the people answered, Blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord.

3. This saying over of the Hallel, is acknowledged by the Jews to be an Institution of the Scribes; and the reason of the picking out of these Psalms for that purpose, was because of their beginning or ending with Hallelujah; and partly because they contain, not only so high and eminent memorials of God's goodness and deliverance unto Israel; as is intimated by that passage alleged in the Jerusalemy; From that time they said, Praise ye the Lord, ye servants of the Lord, and no more of Pharaoh; but also several other things of high and important matter and consideration; for the Hallel, say they, recordeth five things: the coming out of Egypt, the dividing of the Sea, the giving of the Law, the Resurrection of the dead, and the lot of Messias.

4. This Hallel was said over eighteen days in the year and one night; namely, at the killing of the Passover, at the Feast of Pentecost, on the eight days of the Feast of Tabernacles, and on the eight days of the Feast of Dedication, and on the Passover night. With the manner of its saying over, the people still answering Hallelujah: compare the redoubled Hallelujahs, in Rev. 19. 1, 3, 4. 6.

Besides this Hallel, which they called the Egyptian Hallel, there is frequent mention of the great Hallel 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as the Treatise Taanith telleth a story that they appointed a Fast at Led (or Lyddo, Act. 9. 35. and this Fast was for rain, which they wanted exceedingly) And rain came down for them before midday. Rabbi Tarphon saith to them, Go eat, and drink, and keep holiday: They went and eat, and drank, and kept holiday, and came at Even, and said over the great Hallel: and we shall observe anon, that at the eating of the Passover, as they used constantly to say over the Hallel commonly so called, so did they sometimes add the great Hallel to it; and when we come to speak of the time when this was rehearsed, we will then observe what this great Hallel was.

So that (now to return where we were again) the first company being come into the Court, and having filled it, and the doors locked upon them, and they falling to kill the Passovers, this Hallel or these Psalms were begun to be sung, the people answering as hath been related. And when they had sung them over once, and the work not yet done, they set to them again, and a third time, and by that time they had gone over the third time, the work was commonly done, and they began not again. And therefore those words which are very usual with those Jews which treat upon this subject, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are to be construed, that when they had sung it over a second time, they began a third, although they went not through a third time in all their days: for before they had gone through, the work was done, and then they had done also.

The first company being thus dispatched, went out of the Court with their slain and flayed Passovers (how they flayed them, was observed erewhile) and they stood in the mountain of the House: And now there comes in the second company, as many as the Court would hold, and while they are killing, sprinkling the blood, and burning the fat, the Hallel is begun again, and sung even as it was before, and when that company had done they went out, and the third came in, and they did as the others before, till all was finished.

They did not only slay the Passovers whilst they stood thus in the Court, but the blood was also sprinkled by the Priests, they standing in rows from the slaughter place to the Altar, conveying the blood from hand to hand, and so they crowded not, nor troubled not one another, which they would have done had they run singly from every slain Lamb to bring the blood to the Altar. The blood brought thither in such handing rows was poured at the foundation of the Altar. The owners flayed their Lambs, the most of them hanging him upon a staff on their shoulders, and he hanging between them, and they helping one another: They took out his entrails, cleansed away his ordure, separated his inwards, put them in a dish, salted them, and laid them on the fire on the Altar: and when the three companies were so dispatched, the Priests (as there was no small need) did wash the Court.

If the Passover killing did fall upon the Sabbath, yet did they not abate of any of this work, no not of washing the Court; for they had a traditional warrant which bare them out 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which was, that there was no prohibition concerning resting in the Sanctuary: and that which was prohibited elsewhere, and obliged others, about resting from work upon the Sabbath, did not oblige the Priests at the Temple: and to this our Savior speaketh, Matth. 12. 5. On the Sabbath days the Priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless. Now although they killed, and flayed, and opened the Passovers on the Sabbath, yet did they not carry them home to their lodgings at Jerusalem till the Sabbath was out: But when the first company had dispatched in the Court, they went and stood in the mountain of the House, and the second being dispatched, went and stood in the chel, and the third continued in the Court till the Sabbath ended: and when it was done, they went away with their Lambs to their several companies. And the reason of this was, because the killing and offering of the Passover was by the express commandment of the Law, bound to its time, which they might not transgress, but must do it, though it were on the Sabbath, but the taking of the Lamb home, was not so bound but that it might very well be delayed till the Sabbath was ended.




SECT. I. Their searching out for Leaven.

THE next care they were to have in reference to the Passover, was to refrain from the eating and use of Leaven at Passover time, and that at the time when the Passover was slain it should not be found within their houses. The Law in this point was exceeding strict. In the first month on the fourteenth day of the month at Even, ye shall eat unleavened bread, until the one and twentieth day of the Month at Even. Seven days there shall be no leaven found in your houses, for whosoever eateth that which is leavened, even that soul shall be cut off from the Congregation of Israel, whether he be a stranger or born in the land, Exod. 12. 18, 19. & 13. 7. and so in Lev. 23. 6. Numb. 28. 17.

Now what analogy there was between this Law and their redeeming out of Egypt, and what relation the one could have to the other, Abarbinel disputing, concludeth thus, that it lay in this, because it signified unto them the hastiness of their coming out of Egypt, insomuch that they had not time to leaven their bread, as Exod. 12. 39. and he addeth withal, that in those hot Countries, bread will not keep above a day, unless it be leavened: so that the command of unleavened bread might read unto them in that respect a Lecture of dependence upon Providence, when they were enjoined to forsake the common and known way of preserving their bread, and to betake themselves to a way extraordinary and unsafe, but only that they had the Command of God, and his Injunction for that way, and they must learn to live by the word of God.

The Jews to meet with this Command that was so exceeding strict, and to make sure to provide for its observance soon enough, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Did on the fourteenth day while yet there was some light; make search for leaven by the light of a Candle. Thus is the Tradition, in which by the light of the fourteenth day their Glossaries tell us that we must understand the thirteenth day at even, when it began to be duskish and candle-lighting. The rubrick of the Passover in the Hebrew and Spanish tongues renders it in Hebrew Letters, but in the Spanish Language thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 En entrada di quatorze del mez de Nisan, At the entrance of the fourteenth day of the Month Nisan, they searched for leaven in all the places where they were wont to use leaven, (in Barns, Stables, and such out houses they needed not to search) even in holes and crannies, and that not by light of Sun and Moon, or Torch, but by the light of a wax candle, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 i. e. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 con candela di cera. And the reason why they used a Candle rather than any other light, was because it is the fittest for searching holes and corners, and because the Scripture speaketh of searching Jerusalem with Candles.

After the evening of the fourteenth day was come in, (which was after Sun setting) they might not go about any work (no not to the study of the Law) till they had gone about this search; therefore there was not so much as Divinity Lectures that evening▪ lest they should hinder that work.

Before he began to search he said this short ejaculation, Blessed be thou O Lord our God, the King everlasting, who hath sanctified us by his commandments, and hath enjoined us the putting away of leaven. And he might not speak a word betwixt this praying and searching, but must fall to work, and what leaven he found he must put it in some box, or hang it up in such a place as that no Mouse might come at it. And he was to give it up for nul in these words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . All the leaven that is within my Possession, which I have seen, or which I have not seen, be it null, be it as the dust of the earth.




SECT. II. The passages of the forenoon of the Passover day.

WHen the Passover day itself was now come (which the New Testament commonly called the first day of unleavened bread, from their custom newly mentioned, but the Jewish Writers do ordinarily call it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Passover eve ) some part of the People made it a Holiday by ceasing from bodily labor all the day long, and others made it but half holiday, by leaving work at noon; the Talmud relates that in Galilee they left work all the day long from morning till night, but in Judea that they wrought till noon, and then gave over: which may seem somewhat strange that those further off were so observant of the Passover, and those nearer hand were so much less; but the reason is this, because in Galilee those that were at home on that day, had nothing else to do towards the Passover, but only to meditate upon it, and rest from labor in honor of it; but those in Judea, it may be they travelled all forenoon to get up to Jerusalem, or had some work to do towards the forwarding of the Passover, or to dispatch, that they might follow their Passover work the better.

It is in dispute in the place cited immediately before, concerning resting from labor on this day that we have in hand, and it proves a controversy between the schools of Shammai and Hillel, whether they should not also rest from labor the night before: but at last the determination comes so low, as that it gives liberty to works that were begun on the thirteenth day to be finished on the fourteenth; nay yet lower, that where the custom was to leave off work for all day, there they should leave work; and where it was the Custom to work till Noon, there they should do according to the Custom.

But whatsoever they did in this case, cease from their labor in the forenoon, or cease not, one work they must not fail to do, and that was to cast out and put away leaven out of their houses, this day (as they had searched for it the night before) and that it might not be seen nor found amongst them. The Law indeed concerning this work, doth pitch upon the fifteenth day for the doing of it, as if it were soon enough to do it on the fourteenth day at Even, Exod. 12. 18, 19. but the Jews do not impertinently observe that the expelling of leaven was by the Law to be before the time wherein the eating of it was forbidden: For whereas it is said, on the first day you shall put leaven out of your houses, their tradition taught them, that by the first is meant the fourteenth day: And a proof for this there is from what is written in the Law. Thou shalt not kill the blood of my sacrifice with leaven, that is, Thou shalt not kill the Passover, whilst leaven is yet remaining; non the killing of the Passover was on the fourteenth day in the afternoon.

On this fourteenth day therefore, for a good part of the forenoon, they might eat leaven or leavened bread, and might give it to any Bird or Beast, or might sell it to a stranger, but the fixing of the certain time is not without some debate. Rabbi Mei saith, they may eat it all the fifth hour, and were to burn it at the beginning of the sixth. Rabbi Judah saith, they may eat it all the fourth hour, and they were to suspend all the fifth, and at the sixth hour they were to burn it. Which dispute Maimonides fifteth into this resolution, It was lawful to eat leaven on the fourteenth day till the end of the fourth hour, but they might not eat it the fifth hour, yet they might use it; but he that eateth it the sixth hour, was beaten with the Rebels beating, and he that eat it from the beginning of the seventh, was to be whipt.

Twelve a clock or thereabouts, therefore being come, it had been a strange sight to have seen everyone of them either siring, or drowning, or scattering their leaven into the wind (for any of these ways served for the expelling of it, and this command and practice reached over all the Country) and you might have seen them do it with this Valediction. All the leaven that is within my possession, which I have seen, or which I have not seen, which I have cast out, or which I have not cast out, be it null, be it as the dust of the earth.




SECT. III. The time of killing the Passover.

ABout the day of celebrating the Passover, there needeth no discourse to fix it, it is so plainly pointed out to be the fourteenth day of the first Month that nothing can be plainer, therefore when we speak of the time of killing the Passover we speak not of the day of the month, which is so well known, but of the time of the day which is not so clearly pointed out.

The Tosaphta indeed upon the Treatise Pesachin, relateth that the Cuthaeans sometimes kept their Passover a day before the Israelites did, and sometimes a day after, (where the word Cuthaeans might breed some dispute, for in the Talmudicks language, it means sometimes Samaritans and sometimes Christians, but we shall not insist upon it.) And there have been some Christians that have held, that Christ and his Disciples kept their last Passover one day before the Jews kept theirs, conceiting this from that which is spoken in John. 18. 28. where it is related that when Christ was brought into Pilate 's Judgment Hall (which was when he had eaten the Passover, as all the other Evangelists declare abundantly) the Jews durst not go into Pilate's Hall, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover. To which mistake I shall only give some words of Maymony at this present for answer, for the ground of the mistake we shall have occasion to look after in the ensuing discourse. It is an affirmative command (saith he) to kill the Passover on the fourteenth day of the Month Nisan in the afternoon, and they kill it not but only of Lambs or Kids, a male of the first year, and both men and women are alike liable to this command; and he that breaks this command presumptuously, and passeth the fourteenth day and offereth not, if he be not unclean or in a long journey, he is guilty of being cut off; but if he transgress the command ignorantly, he is quit. They kill not the Passover but in the Court even as the rest of the holy offerings, yea even in those times, when high places were permitted, they offered not the Passover in a private high place, but in the public, (that is, the Temple) and he that offered it in a private high place was to be whipt. From which words, it being observed what penalty lay upon him that passed the fourteenth day, and what the there was to slay the Paschal Lamb in the Court, it will appear extreme absurd to imagine that any Israelite should keep his Passover before the fixed day. What the Cuthaeans or Samaritans might do at their Mount Gerizim, it is no matter, but for any Jews to celebrate the Passover at Jerusalem, (for nowhere else it might be done) before the proper and fixed time, could not have been without evident danger to them that did it; it being so diametrically contrary both to the Law and to their Traditions, and yet we find not Christ was ever touched with the least accusation about his Passover as if he kept it on the wrong day.

But to let this pass, which indeed is too plain to be disputed (for the Evangelist most plainly tells us that on the day of unleavened bread when the Passover must be killed, Jesus sent Peter and John to prepare his Passover, Luke 22. 7, 8.) and now to come to look after the time of the day when the Passover was killed, we must take these two maxims with us. 1. That the Passover was not lawful if it were killed before noon; and the reason of this is easy to give, namely because the Law doth expressly appoint, that they should kill it between the two evenings, Exod. 12. 6. And 2. that the daily evening Sacrifice was to be killed before they began to kill the Passover; and the reason of this is also readily to be given, namely, because an extraordinary service must not prevent one ordinary and constant. After they had burnt the incense of the evening sacrifice, and after they had dressed the Lamps, then they began to kill the Passover, and so continued till the end of the day. The times they divided thus, they slew the daily Sacrifice at the eighth hour and an half, and they offered it up at the ninth hour and an half: but on the Eve of the Passover, they slew it at the seventh hour and an half, and offered it up at the eighth hour and an half, whether the day were a common day or the Sabbath: and if the Eve of the Passover fell on the Eve of the Sabbath, the daily Sacrifice was killed at the sixth hour and half an hour past, and offered it up at the seventh hour and half an hour past, and the Passover after it.

It was the command both for the Passover and for the daily Evening Sacrifice, that they should be slain and offered 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 between the two Evenings, Exod. 12. 6. & 29. 39. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 A very hard expression (saith Ibn Ezra ) and he gives as very hard an interpretation of it; for he judgeth the two Evenings to be these, the one when the Sun sets and goes out of sight, and the other when the day closes in and all the light is clean gone, which he saith is ordinarily about an hour and three quarters after Sun setting; and so he will have the daily Sacrifice to be offered up at this time, and though all the Passovers could not be killed in this space, yet he conceiveth that it is commanded they should be killed between the two Evenings, because most of them were slain in this space, though all could not. I shall not insist to show the improbability of this Tenet, he himself that holds it, is in a manner glad at last to betake himself to the general and common received Opinion, which was, that the two Evenings were these, the first from that time of the day that the Sun began to decline from his vertical or noon-tide point toward the West, and the other from his going down and out of sight. And according to this construction did they go in killing and offering up their Evening Sacrifice, taking up an hour for that business just in the middle of the afternoon (counting at Aequinox time) namely, from half an hour past two, to half an hour past three, and so there were two hours and an half from the Suns beginning to decline, to the time they killed, and two hours and an half from the time they offered it up, till the Sun went down.

Now occasional Sacrifices did sometimes cause an alteration of the time of the daily, for that being to be ever offered the first, as being the fixed and appointed service of the day, that the others might have room to be offered up in due time, that removed out of its place, to somewhat earlier in the day, sometimes an hour, and sometimes two, as in the Traditions alleged, and especially this was for the sake of the Passover, when Lambs were exceeding many: The common time therefore to begin to kill the Passover was, from about half an hour past two a clock, and little more, and so continued all afternoon: and if the Passover lighted on the Eve of the Sabbath, (that is, on the day preceeding the Sabbath) they began an hour sooner, that they might the better dispatch their business by the time that the Sabbath began.




SECT. IV. The Paschal Societies.

BEfore the Paschal Lamb was slain, they first agreed and concluded upon the Company that should eat him: for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , They might not slay the Passover but for persons numbered before, or a number agreed on before for his eating. And this caution was not unwarrantably taken up, from that command in Exod. 12. 4. Every man according to his eating: ye shall make your count for the Lamb: So that while the Lamb was yet alive, it was to be crtainly concluded, who, and how many would join together for his eating, and he might not be slain but for societies so agreed and numbered. If any of the society, after the number was agreed on, saw occasion to withdraw from that company, and to go to another, he must do it before the Lamb was slain, for after he might not. These societies were called everyone of them 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and the number of the persons in them was not certain, but sometime more, sometime less, according to their proportionableness of eating, because of the command, Everyone according to his eating: were there among the company those that were sickly and aged, and little eaters, then they might take the more into the company, but if they were healthy and lively, and like to eat more freely, then was the number less: He that was to eat the least, was to eat as much of him, as came to the quantity of an olive, and if he could not eat so much, they counted not him in the number: And they might number so many in a society, as if there were the quantity of an olive for everyone to eat, it was enough.

1. Although Women were not directly bound to appear three times year before the Lord, as the males were, yet were they bound to some particular services that attended the three appearances, and so that brought them in: but especially to the Passover, for to the observation of that they were obliged by those express words of the Commandment, The whole assembly of the Congregation of Israel shall kill it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And men and women were bound to this command alike: Now in forming up these societies that were severally to eat the Lambs, they suffered not any companies to consist of servants and women only, nor of servants and children only, lest there should be some lightness among them, and not that gravity that became so great a solemnity: nor to consist of old or sickly persons only, lest they should leave any of them, and so transgress the command, Ye shall leave nothing of him till the morning: Nor to consist of Proselytes only, or of children only, because they were unlikely to speak of those memorable things that were to be spoken of at the Passover. But a society might be only of women, or only of servants, but ordinarily they were of whole families, one or more united, Husbands, Wives, Children, Servants, all together. Our Savior's society was himself and the twelve, Mat. 26. 20. Luk. 22. 14.




SECT. V. The killing of the Passover.

THE Passovers were slain in three companies : 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And the ground of this practice and tradition they make to be those words of the institution, The whole assembly of the Congregation of Israel shall kill it: where because, there are three words, Assembly, Congregation, and Israel, applied to the killing of the Passover, they divided the killing of it into three companies according to that number.

There were not to be less than thirty men in every company: yet found they out a shift to make fifty men (if there were no more) to make thirty men three times over, for the three companies; and their way was this. Thirty of the fifty went into the Court, (for there only might the Passover be killed) and when they had killed their Lambs, ten of them went out, and ten of those, that stood without, came in and killed theirs, and then ten others went out, and the other ten that stood without came in and killed theirs, and so there were thirty in the Court continually, while the Lambs were killing.

But this was only a provision for a pinch; namely, if such an exigent should occur, as that there should be but fifty Lambs presented, or at least but fifty persons present, (for ordinarily everyone of the numbered Paschal societies that have been spoken of, sent their Lamb by one of their company only, and under fifty there was no Passover killing) but commonly everyone of these three companies we are speaking of, were as many as ever the Court could hold.

The first company came in, till the Court was filled, and then the doors were locked, and they fell to killing the Lambs, and while they were about this work, the Levites sang, and the trumpets sounded: It is a tradition, saith the Jerusalem Talmud, The daily sacrifice which hath a drink offering, they blew the trumpets at the time of the drink offering: but at the Passover which hath no drink offering, they blew the trumpets at the killing of it. Which the Gloss upon the Babylon Talmud doth utter more punctually, At the killing of the Passover there were seven and twenty soundings with the trumpets: for the Passover was killed in three companies one after another, &c.

Now the song that was sung at this time while they were killing the Passovers, was called the Hallel 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 so saith the same Gloss in the same place. Every company said over the Hallel three times: for their Paschals were many, and they were bound to the saying over of the Hallel at the slaying of them. And Maymony more largely. All the time that they were killing and offering the Levites said over the Hallel: if they had finished the Hallel, and the company had not yet done, they said it over again: And if they had finished saying it over again, and the company had not yet done neither, they set to it a third time. And both these speak this, from the Mishneh in the treatise Pesachin where it is said, They said over the Hallel, and when they had finished they said it over a second time, and when they had done that, they said it over a third time.

The Jews do make exceeding frequent mention in their writings of the Hallel or the Hymn; (for so we may translate it from Matth. 26. 30.) And they distinguish it into the common or lesser Hallel, and the greater: The lesser Hallel they also call the Egyptian Hallel, because it was sung more especially in remembrance of their delivery out of Egypt: and it was the 113, & 114, & 115, & 116, & 117, & 118, Psalms. Concerning the choice and use of which it may not be amiss to take up two or three of their traditions.

1. The Jerusalem Talmud in the Treatise Pesachin hath this relation. R. Jacob Bar Aha in the name of Rabbi Jasa saith, Strength was given to Moses his voice, and his voice went through all Egypt forty days journey: And what said he? One company from such a place to such a place, and another company from such a place, to such a place. And wonder not at it: for if of dust whose nature is not to go, it be said, it shall become dust through all the land of Egypt, (Exod. 9. 9.) much more might a voice go abroad, whose nature is to go. Rabbi Levi said, As strength was given to Moses his voice, so strength was given to Pharaohs voice; and his voice went throughout all Egypt forty days journey. And what said he? Arise, get ye out from among my people: For, as for the time past ye have been the servants of Pharaoh, but from henceforth ye must be the servants of the Lord. From that hour they said, Praise ye the Lord, praise him ye servants of the Lord, Psalm 113. and now no more the servants of Pharaoh.

2. Maymony in his Treatise of Megillah, and Chanuchah, or of the Feast of Purim and of Dedication, saith The custom of saying over the Hallel in the days of the former wisemen, was thus, The chief among them that was to read the Hallel after he had said a prayer, began thus, Hallelujah; and all the people answered Hallelujah. He goes on and says, Praise ye the servants of the Lord; and all the people answered Hallelujah. He proceeds and says, Praise the Name of the Lord; and all the people answered Hallelujah. He says further, Blessed be the Name of the Lord from this time forth, even for evermore; and all the people answered Hallelujah. And so at every passage, till they answered Hallelujah, an hundred and three and twenty times over, and of that number were the years of Aaron.

Now when he that read it, came to the beginning of any Psalm, as when he read, When Israel came out of Egypt, the people repeated and said, When Israel came out of Egypt; but when he said, And the House of Jacob from a strange people, then the people answered Hallelujah: and so forward, till he came to, I love the Lord because he hath heard my voice, and there the people repeated, I love the Lord because he hath heard my voice, And so when he said, Praise the Lord all ye Nations, they repeated, Praise the Lord all ye Nations: And when he came to, Save now Lord I beseech thee, the people repeated, Save now Lord I beseech thee; though it were not the beginning of a Psalm: And when he said, I beseech thee now send prosperity, they rehearsed and said, I beseech thee now send prosperity. And when he said, Blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord, all the people answered, Blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord.

3. This saying over of the Hallel, is acknowledged by the Jews to be an Institution of the Scribes; and the reason of the picking out of these Psalms for that purpose, was because of their beginning or ending with Hallelujah; and partly because they contain, not only so high and eminent memorials of God's goodness and deliverance unto Israel; as is intimated by that passage alleged in the Jerusalemy; From that time they said, Praise ye the Lord, ye servants of the Lord, and no more of Pharaoh; but also several other things of high and important matter and consideration; for the Hallel, say they, recordeth five things: the coming out of Egypt, the dividing of the Sea, the giving of the Law, the Resurrection of the dead, and the lot of Messias.

4. This Hallel was said over eighteen days in the year and one night; namely, at the killing of the Passover, at the Feast of Pentecost, on the eight days of the Feast of Tabernacles, and on the eight days of the Feast of Dedication, and on the Passover night. With the manner of its saying over, the people still answering Hallelujah: compare the redoubled Hallelujahs, in Rev. 19. 1, 3, 4. 6.

Besides this Hallel, which they called the Egyptian Hallel, there is frequent mention of the great Hallel 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as the Treatise Taanith telleth a story that they appointed a Fast at Led (or Lyddo, Act. 9. 35. and this Fast was for rain, which they wanted exceedingly) And rain came down for them before midday. Rabbi Tarphon saith to them, Go eat, and drink, and keep holiday: They went and eat, and drank, and kept holiday, and came at Even, and said over the great Hallel: and we shall observe anon, that at the eating of the Passover, as they used constantly to say over the Hallel commonly so called, so did they sometimes add the great Hallel to it; and when we come to speak of the time when this was rehearsed, we will then observe what this great Hallel was.

So that (now to return where we were again) the first company being come into the Court, and having filled it, and the doors locked upon them, and they falling to kill the Passovers, this Hallel or these Psalms were begun to be sung, the people answering as hath been related. And when they had sung them over once, and the work not yet done, they set to them again, and a third time, and by that time they had gone over the third time, the work was commonly done, and they began not again. And therefore those words which are very usual with those Jews which treat upon this subject, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are to be construed, that when they had sung it over a second time, they began a third, although they went not through a third time in all their days: for before they had gone through, the work was done, and then they had done also.

The first company being thus dispatched, went out of the Court with their slain and flayed Passovers (how they flayed them, was observed erewhile) and they stood in the mountain of the House: And now there comes in the second company, as many as the Court would hold, and while they are killing, sprinkling the blood, and burning the fat, the Hallel is begun again, and sung even as it was before, and when that company had done they went out, and the third came in, and they did as the others before, till all was finished.

They did not only slay the Passovers whilst they stood thus in the Court, but the blood was also sprinkled by the Priests, they standing in rows from the slaughter place to the Altar, conveying the blood from hand to hand, and so they crowded not, nor troubled not one another, which they would have done had they run singly from every slain Lamb to bring the blood to the Altar. The blood brought thither in such handing rows was poured at the foundation of the Altar. The owners flayed their Lambs, the most of them hanging him upon a staff on their shoulders, and he hanging between them, and they helping one another: They took out his entrails, cleansed away his ordure, separated his inwards, put them in a dish, salted them, and laid them on the fire on the Altar: and when the three companies were so dispatched, the Priests (as there was no small need) did wash the Court.

If the Passover killing did fall upon the Sabbath, yet did they not abate of any of this work, no not of washing the Court; for they had a traditional warrant which bare them out 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which was, that there was no prohibition concerning resting in the Sanctuary: and that which was prohibited elsewhere, and obliged others, about resting from work upon the Sabbath, did not oblige the Priests at the Temple: and to this our Savior speaketh, Matth. 12. 5. On the Sabbath days the Priests in the Temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless. Now although they killed, and flayed, and opened the Passovers on the Sabbath, yet did they not carry them home to their lodgings at Jerusalem till the Sabbath was out: But when the first company had dispatched in the Court, they went and stood in the mountain of the House, and the second being dispatched, went and stood in the chel, and the third continued in the Court till the Sabbath ended: and when it was done, they went away with their Lambs to their several companies. And the reason of this was, because the killing and offering of the Passover was by the express commandment of the Law, bound to its time, which they might not transgress, but must do it, though it were on the Sabbath, but the taking of the Lamb home, was not so bound but that it might very well be delayed till the Sabbath was ended.




CHAP. XIII. Their manner of eating the Passover.

IT is indeed beyond our line and compass to follow the people with their slain Paschals from the Temple to their own homes, to see what they do with them there, for the virge of the Temple confineth our discourse: yet because the eating of these Lambs was so high and holy a rite, and since the story of our Savior's last Passover hath turned the eyes of all men to look at the custom and demeanour used in this solemnity, the Reader I doubt not will be facile to excuse such a digression, as shall relate the particulars of this great business, which were many, and which we will take up one by one.

1. To omit their curiosities in roasting the Paschal Lamb, (which they commonly did upon a spit or staff of Pomegranate tree, running him in with it at the mouth and out behind) the first observable circumstance towards the eating of him, we may take up in this tradition.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 On the evening oft he Passover a man may not eat, from near the Minchah, till it be dark. In which they inform us of two things, first, that they went not about the Passover meal till it was night; and the reason of this custom is apparently grounded in the Law, because that commanded, they shall eat the flesh in that night, Exod. 12. And accordingly are these words of the Evangelists in the relation of our Savior's Passover to be understood, when the Even was come, he sat down with the twelve. Secondly, That they fasted some space before. Near the time of the Minchah ( say the Glossaries upon that Tradition) meaneth, a little before the Evening sacrifice; and from that time they might eat nothing, that they might eat the unleavened bread which was commanded, with appetite, for the honor of the command.

II. They eat not the Passover but sitting, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 No not the poorest in Israel might eat it till he was set down. R. Simeon (in the Jerusalem Gemara) in the name of R. Joshua the son of Levi saith, that olive-quantity that sufficeth to discharge a man that he hath eaten the Passover, he must eat it sitting down, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and so it is said Jesus sat down with the twelve. Now this sitting at their Passover eating, was not after the manner of our sitting at the Table, nor after the manner of their ordinary sitting at other times, but a special posture by itself. And so they themselves used to observe and to speak of it as they sat. How different (said they) is this night from all other nights, for all other nights we eat 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 either sitting or leaning, but this night we all sit leaning: where the two words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 & 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which both signify sitting at meat, are used with so much diversity, as that they are opposed one to another. And they are set in the like opposition in the Treatise Beracoth in this passage 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Did they sit down to meat? Everyone gave thanks for himself, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Did they sit leaning? Then one gave thanks for them all. Rabbi Nathan conceives that the difference between the two words consisteth in one of these two things; that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meaneth that they sat close round about their meat, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 importeth as if everyone of them had sitten single. Or this other interpretation, saith he, may be given that they sat down for some other business, (and not purposely to eat) and meat was set before them, then everyone gave thanks for himself. But 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 means that they sat down purposely to eat and not for other business, and then one gave thanks for them all. But it appeareth by Maymony, and by other Talmudists, that the difference lay in the manner of sitting, and not in the occasion of sitting down. His words are these, The kind of sitting called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Hosebbah, is not required of a woman; but if she be a woman of fashion then it is required of her. And this kind of sitting is required of a Son (at the Passover) before his Father, and of a Servant before his Master; but a Scholar before his Teacher must not thus sit down unless his Teacher give him leave: And leaning upon the right side is not this posture, nor leaning on the neck, nor on the face. But it was leaning on the left side, as he intimateth in another place, when he saith he must drink off his cups of wine leaning upon his left side. And the Talmudic Gloss defines that kind of leaning, briefly thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 It was upon the bed and upon the Table.

Their sitting at meat was commonly upon beds or couches made for that purpose, with the Table before them: Now at other meals they either sat as we do with their bodies erect, or when they would enlarge themselves to more freedom of feasting and refreshing, they sat upon the beds and leaned upon the Table on their left elbow, and this or the other posture they used indifferently at other times as they were disposed. But on the Passover hight they thought they were obliged to use this leaning posture, and you may take their reason for it in some of their own words. They used this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 leaning posture as free men do, in memorial of their freedom. And R. Levi said, because it is the manner of servants to eat standing, therefore now they eat 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 sitting and leaning to show that they were got out of servitude into freedom. And again, In every generation a man is bound to behave himself at the Passover, as if he himself had been delivered out of the bondage of Egypt, &c. Therefore at meat that night a man is bound to eat, and to drink, and to sit in a posture of freedom.

Upon this principle and conceit of freedom, they used this manner of discumbency at their meat frequently at other times, but indispensably this night, so far different from the posture enjoined and practiced at the first Passover in Egypt, when they eat it with their loins girded, their shoes on their feet, their staves in their hands, and in haste, Exod: 12. 11. And as the thought of their freedom disposed them to this leaning, reposed, secure composure of their elbow upon the Table, and their head leaning on the hand, so to emblem out the matter the more highly, they laid their legs under them, sitting upon them, and their feet lying out behind, as Luke 7. 38. removing and acquitting their legs and feet as far as possible from the least show of standing to attend, or readiness to go upon any ones employment, which might carry the least color of servitude, or contrariety to their freedom with it. Now according to this manner of sitting and leaning, are we to construe that passage of the Evangelist, about the beloved Disciple's leaning in the bosom of Jesus, Joh. 13. 23. and on the breast of Jesus, Joh. 13. 28. & 21. 20. for so the words are clearly differenced, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , & 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . which some translations not having observed, or at least not expressed, they have intricated the reader in such gross conceptions about this matter [ quasi in ipsius sinu contra omne decorum sterteret, ut ab imperitis pingi accubitus ill consuevit ] as that some have thought and some have pictured John reposing himself, or lolling on the breast of Jesus, contrary to all reason and decency. Whereas the manner of their sitting together was only thus; Jesus leaning upon the Table on his left elbow, and so turning his face and breast away from the Table on one side; John sat in the same posture next before him, with his back towards Jesus breast or bosom; not so near as that Johns back and Jesus breast did join together and touch one another; but at such a distance as that there was space for Jesus to use his right hand upon the Table to reach his meat at his pleasure, and so for all the rest as they sat in the like manner. For it is but a strange fancy that some have satisfied themselves withal about this matter, conceiving either that they lay along upon the beds before the Table one tumbling upon the breast or before the breast of another; or if they sat leaning on the Table, that they sat so close, as that ones back joined to another's bosom, which did utterly deprive them of the use of their hands to feed themselves. But their sitting was so, as that indeed they sat the back of one to the breast of another, but with such distance between, that the right hand of everyone of them had liberty to come and go betwixt himself and his fellow to reach his meat as he had occasion. In such a manner and distance did the beloved Disciple lean before our Savior, and yet is said very properly to lean in his bosom, because he leaned before his breast, so as that whensoever Christ put up his arm he was in a manner within his embrace. But when Peter beckned to him to inquire who it was that should be the Traitour, then 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 he leaned back so far, as that his back or shoulders rested upon Jesus breast, and he lay in a sitting posture to whisper with him.

III. They being thus set, the first thing towards this Passover supper that they went about, was, that everyone drank off a cup of Wine. So do their own Directories and Rituals about this matter inform us. The order of the performing of the things commanded for the fifteenth night ( saith Maymony) was thus, they first mingled a cup for everyone of them, and one gave thanks and they drank it off. And herein he doth follow the Talmud Text, which in the Treatise of the Passover in the place cited in the Margin before, relateth the very same thing in the very same order.

Among the several viands, or victuals, or concomitants, or what you will call them, which accompanied the Paschal Lamb at its eating, of which we shall speak in their course, there were two which they held to be most eminent, and most honorable; and those were Bread and Wine: And amongst other expressions of respect and honor that they shown to these, this was not a small one, that howsoever they disposed of their posture of sitting all the rest of the meal, they might not fail to betake themselves to the leaning composure (already described, the emblem of their liberty) when they eat their unleavened Bread and drank their Wine. And so my Author last cited holdeth out in this Tradition 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 When is it necessary that they use the leaning posture? Even at that time that they are eating an Olivequantity of unleavened Bread and drinking their four cups of Wine; and as for the time of eating or drinking of anything else all the meal, if they sat leaning it was the more commendable, but if they did not it was not so very material. Which matter the Gemarists and Glossaries do clear and distinguish upon, thus; The unleavened bread requires the leaning posture, but the bitter herbs require it not: Of the wine it is said that it doth require the leaning posture, and it is said that it doth not require it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 For they say of it, that the two former cups require this leaning composure, but the two latter require it not.

The eating of unleavened bread at this time, they were enjoined by a special and express command, Exod. 12. 18. but as for the use of Wine, they took it upon this general ground, because a man must cheer up his wife and children to make them rejoice at the Festival. And what do they cheer them up withal? With Wine. And they were so punctual and exact in this matter that the poorest man in Israel was bound to drink off four cups of Wine this night, yea though he lived of the alms basket. And if he had no other way to compass so much Wine, or if the Almoners gave him not enough for four cups, he must sell or pawn his coat, or hire out himself for four cups of Wine. The Gemarists do debate the matter, why four cups of Wine rather than any other number, and the result is held out by the Jerusalem Talmud to this purpose; Whence is the ground for four cups? Rabbi Jochanan in the name of Rabbi Benaiah saith, in parallel to the four words that are used about Israel's redemption, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 bringing out, delivering, redeeming, and taking. R. Joshua the son of Levi saith, in parallel to the four cups of Pharaoh, in these Texts, Pharaohs cup was in my hand, and I squeezed them into Pharaohs cup. And I gave the cup into Pharaohs hand, and thou shalt give Pharaohs cup into his hand. R. Levi saith, in parallel to the four Monarchies, Dan. 7. And our Rabbins say, in parallel to the four cups of vengeance that the holy blessed God will make the Nations of the World drink off, (for which there are these four Texts) Thus saith the Lord God of Israel to me, take the Wine cup of this fury at mine hand, Jer. 25. 15. Babel is a golden cup in the hand of the Lord, Jer. 51. 7. For in the hand of the Lord there is a cup, Psal. 75. 8. And this is the portion of their cup, Psal. 11. 6. And answerably the Lord will make Israel drink four cups of consolation (in these four Texts) The Lord is the portion of my cup, Psal. 16. 5. My cup runeth over, Psal. 23. 5. I will take the cup of salvation, Psal. 116. 13. which was two.

In these four cups of Wine that they were to drink, they were curious about the measure and about the mixture, the proportion of Wine in every cup might not be less than 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the fourth part of a quarter of an hin, besides what water was mingled with it, for if they did not drink it so mingled, they held they missed of the right performance of that service, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 These four cups, saith the Author cited in the margin, must needs be mingled. And the Talmudic Rubric for this night service, whensoever it speaketh of any of these cups of Wine brought to him that officiated in the Haggadah, it useth this expression 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 They mingled it for him. And it is received among them as a current Maxim, what was delivered by Rabh in the Gemara, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That whosoever drank these four cups of pure Wine, he indeed had done his duty about drinking Wine, but he had not done his duty about setting forth their freedom: for this mingling of their Wine, was not so much in reference to sobriety, as it was to make the Wine the more delightsome. And that is the reason that Maymony giveth when he saith the Wine must needs be mingled, namely, that the drinking of it may be the more delightsome, and all according to the quality of the Wine, and the mind of the drinker. Therefore they accounted it somewhat towards the expression of their freedom which they so much affected to express at this time, to drink their Wine mingled, which heightened the drinking of it to the more delight.

The first cup of these four being brought to them as they were now set, one of the Company, (the Master of the family, if there were but one family in the society: or if there were more, some sit man chosen out for that purpose, whom they called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the rehearser of the office of the Passover ) gave thanks over the Wine, and then they drank it off. The thanksgiving was in reference to the Wine, and in reference to the Day. The Schools of Hillel and Shammai differ about the precedency of these two, or whether of them should first take place; but whether soever went first, (for it is not worth labor to trace the dispute) the tenor of his thanksgiving was to this purpose; over the Wine he said Blessed be thou O Lord who hast created the fruit of the Vine: and as concerning the day he used such words as these, Blessed be thou for this good day, and for this holy convocation, which thou hast given us for joy and rejoicing: Blessed be thou O Lord, who hast sanctified Israel and the times.

IV. Then did they everyone of them wash their hands: over which action, the Officiator (for so let us call him) uttered this ejaculation, Blessed be thou O Lord our God who hath sanctified us with his commandments, and hath commanded us concerning the washing of our hands. They used on this night to wash their hands twice, whereas at other Suppers they washed but once, and this different and extraordinary so doing, it was their course to take notice of, and to speak of as they were at supper, using this passage amongst others that they uttered at that time, How different is this night from all other nights! for all other nights we wash but once, but this night we wash twice. They use the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to express the washing of their hands by, which betokeneth dipping, for in that way they washed them at this time. The Treatise Jadajim and the Tosaphta there do intimate unto us that they had a twofold way of washing their hands; Netilah and Tebhilah, either by pouring water upon them, or by putting them into the water; and they difference these two washings by these circumstances (besides the different application of the water) that he that put his hands into the water needed not to dry them, but he that poured water on them needed: He that had water poured on them, must lift up his hands, yet so as the water might not run above his wrist, nor return upon his hands for making them unclean (but there drop off; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Mark 7. 3.) But he that puts his hands into water needed not to lift them up, &c. He that puts his hands into the water is said to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 dip his hands, and he that had water poured upon them was said to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to wash his hands, and yet both of these kinds of washing were indifferently called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Netilath Jadajim, washing of the hands.

V. They having washed, the table was then furnished with what provision they held requisite for that supper, and that was of several sorts: For besides the Passover Lamb, and unleavened Bread, and bitter Herbs, for the use of which they had an express command, they had at the least two dishes besides, and sometimes three, which they had taken up the use of, upon tradition. Let us view all their dishes particularly.

1. There were two or three cakes of unleavened bread (for the number is under some dispute,) and the eating of this bread, they held so undispensable a command that infants and sick persons were to be brought to it: and if they were not able to eat it dry, they had it sopt and macerated in some liquid thing, that so they might eat of it at least to the quantity of an Olive. And as for persons of health and strength, they were to eat very little meat of all day, that they might eat unleavened bread with hungering and appetite at night: and many of them would fast all day for that purpose. Especially they might not eat unleavened bread of all day, because there should be a distinct appetitive eating of it at the Passover, and he that eat any unleavened Bread that day before that time he was beaten with the Rebels stripes.

2. The herbs they used were five kinds 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Lettuce, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Endive, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Succory, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Beets, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Horehound, or some such herbs as these, some of them sallet herbs, and some bitter, and these either green or dried, but neither boiled nor pickled. And the general and the proper reason that is given for the use of this rite of eating bitter herbs is, that they might hereby remember the bitter affliction that they underwent in Egypt. But the fancy of a Spanish Jew cited by Ibn Ezra, is somewhat singular in this point, which let me produce in his words.

One of the wise men of Spain (saith he) saith, it is well known that moisture is predominant in the land of Egypt, because of the waters of the river, and because they have no rains there, therefore the air is continually moist. Hereupon it was their custom at all their Tables to eat divers kinds of bitter herbs and mustard. And though an Egyptian had but one bit of meat, yet had he ever bitter herbs at his Table to dip his meat in, which was a help for their air. But we will adhere to the judgment of our ancients of blessed memory, which have expounded to us that the bitter herbs were a memorial of that passage, They made their lives bitter, Exod. 1.

3. The body of the Paschal Lamb was also set upon the Table, roasted whole and so brought up, the Legs and Inwards, as Heart, Liver, &c. held by some to have been put and roasted within him, but by others to have been fastened by some means upon his body, and so roasted on the outside of him: Now besides these three dishes, of Bread, Flesh, and Sallet, so positively appointed by the Law.

4. They used to eat some other meat before they began to eat of the Paschal. And the reason of this was, because they would eat of that to satiety. For it was held a choice command that a man should eat the flesh of the Passover with an eating to satiety; therefore if he had offered his fourteenth days peace offerings, then he eat of them first, and afterward he eat of the flesh of the Passover that he might satiate himself with it. Yet if he eat no more than what amounted to the quantity of an Olive, he discharged the obligation of his duty. These fourteenth days peace offerings were so called, to distinguish them from the peace offerings of his Hagigah and rejoicing at the feast: for those were offerings to which he was obliged of duty, and were to be offered after the eating of the Passover most ordinarily; but these were some thanks offerings, or vows, or free will offerings, which being reserved to be offered at their coming up to the Festival, they commonly did so offer them as that when the Altar and Priests had had their parts, they had the other ready for this occasion, to begin the meal on the Passover night. And so here was one dish more than we find appointed for this time by the Law. Now the Talmudicks speak of two more, which if they were used in the time when the Temple stood, may well be supposed to have been to supply the want of peace offerings in such companies as had not offered any, nor had any ready for this occasion. And they call them 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the two boiled meats. The Mishuch in that Chapter of Pesachin that hath been cited so oft, delivering the Rubric of the Passover, saith, they set before him unleavened Bread, and bitter Herbs, and charoseth, and the two boiled meats, making no difference of time between these and the other particulars named with them, which undoubtedly were in those times of which we speak. The Gemara thereupon hath these words. It is a command to set before him unleavened Bread, and the bitter Herbs, and the two boiled meats. And those two boiled meats, what are they? Rab. Hona saith, Broth and Rice. Hezekiah saith, Fish and Eggs. Rab. Joseph saith, two sorts of flesh were required, one in the memorial of the Passover, and the other in memorial of the Hagigah. And with this last doth Maymony concur, for he useth the very same words, but he useth also the term 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 At this time they set upon the Table two sorts of flesh, &c. as making it questionable whether this custom were in use when the Temple stood, or taken up afterward. I shall not be solicitous to dispute the case; it seemeth for ought I yet see in the Talmuds, or their Schoolmen, that it was in the Temple times, and that the Author cited doth not (by the Phrase he hath used) so much intimate that the custom was taken up after the Temple was fallen, as he doth, that after the Temple was fallen they were glad to take up with these two dishes only. For whilst that stood, peace offerings were in use, and served for that occasion on the Passover night, and these two boiled meats were only in request where no peace offerings were to be had, which was but rare; but after the Temple fell there were no peace offerings to be had at all, and so they were constrained to take up only with these two dishes. Let the Reader scan his meaning from his own words. They set before him (the Officiator) bitter Herbs and unleavened Bread, and Charoseth, and the body of the Lamb, and the flesh of the fourteenth days Hagigah. But at this time they set upon the Table two sorts of flesh, one in memorial of the Passover and the other in memorial of the Hagigah. And whether way soever he turneth the scales it is not much material.

5. They had also a dish of thick sauce which they called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Charoseth, made of sweet and bitter things grown and pounded and mingled together, as Dates, Figs, Raisins, Vinegar, &c. And this was a memorial to them of the clay in which their Fathers labored in the Land of Egypt. They used Charoseth (saith the Talmud) although it were not commanded. Rabbi Eliezer from Rabbi Zadok saith, it is a command. A command! for what? Rabbi Johanan saith, it is a memorial of the clay, therefore they make it of all kinds of sweet and bitter things, with vinegar, like clay in which there is a mixture of everything. The dish in which our Savior dipped the sop which he gave to Judas is held by exceeding many to have been this dish of the thick sauce Charoseth; which might be very well believed, if it might be believed that that supper was the Passover supper, which hath been much asserted, but never yet proved.

VI. The Table thus furnished, the Officiator takes some of the sallet of the Herbs and after he hath blessed God for the creating the fruit of the ground, he dips it in something (but whether in the thick sauce Charoseth, or in Wine, or in Vinegar, is disputed, and so we will leave it in dispute) and he eateth the quantity of an Olive at the least of them, and so do all the rest of the company the like. Now this dipping and eating of Herbs was not under the notion of eating bitter Herbs, which the Law enjoined, but is was some other of the Herbs, as Lettuce, Endive, or the like, and it was for this and merely, that the children might begin to wonder at this strange beginning of a meal, and might be incited to inquire about the matter. And to put them on to this the more, the company had no sooner eaten of this bit of the sallet, but presently the dishes were all removed from before the Officiator, and a second Cup of Wine was filled and brought unto him. And here the Children began to inquire about the matter; and if he had no Children, the Wife inquired; and if there was no Wife, the company inquired one of another. And if none inquired, yet he unasked began thus, How different is this night from all other nights! For on all other nights we eat leavened or unleavened bread indifferently, but on this night unleavened bread only. On all other nights we eat any herbs whatsoever, but this night bitter herbs: On all other nights we eat flesh either roasted, or stewed, or boiled, but on this night we eat flesh only roasted. On all other nights we wash but once, but on this night we wash twice. On all other nights we eat either sitting or leaning indifferently, on this night we all sit leaning. And according to the capacity of the Child, he would address his speech to him; if he were very young and slender of understanding, he would tell him, Child, we were all servants, like this maid-servant, or this man-servant that waiteth; and as on this night the Lord redeemed us, and brought us into liberty. But to the Children of capacity, and to the rest of the company, he would tell particularly of the Wonders done in Egypt, and of the manner of their deliverance, and of God's various goodness towards them: and as the Talmud briefly relates it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He began with their disgrace, and ended with their glory; and expounded from that Text, A Syrian ready to perish was my Father, even through out to the end of the Section: which as the Glossaries give the sense, meaneth thus; that he began his discourse with the Idolatry of Terah, and their fathers beyond the flood, and he led on the story to their bondage in Egypt, and the wonders done for their deliverance, and the Lord's giving them his Law, and making them his People; and particularly he took up that Text in Deut. 26. 5, 6, &c. and enlarged himself upon it, and the more the more commendably.

Then are the Dishes that were taken away from before him, set before him again, and then he saith This is the Passover which we eat, because that the Lord passed over the houses of our Fathers in Egypt. And holding up the bitter herbs in his hand, he saith, These are the bitter herbs that we eat in remembrance that the Egyptians made the lives of our fathers bitter in Egypt. And holding up the unleavened bread likewise in his hand, he saith, This is the unleavened bread, which we eat, because the dough of our fathers had not time to be leavened, before the Lord revealed himself, and redeemed them out of hand. Therefore are we bound to give thanks, to praise, to laud, to glorify, to extol, to honor, to praise, to magnify him that hath done for our fathers, and for us, all these wonders, who hath brought us from bondage to freedom, from sorrow to rejoicing, from mourning to a good day, from darkness to a great light, from affliction to redemption; therefore must we say before him Hallelujah, praise ye the Lord, praise ye servants of the Lord, praise the name of the Lord, &c. And so he said over the hundred and thirteenth, and the hundred and fourteenth Psalms, and concludeth with this prayer, Blessed be thou O Lord our God, King everlasting, who hath redeemed us, and redeemed our Fathers out of Egypt, and brought us to this night to eat unleavened bread and bitter herbs. And then he and all the company with him drank off the second cup of Wine.

VII. And now he washeth his hands again, using the same ejaculation or short prayer that he had done at washing before: And then taking the two cakes of unleavened bread, he breaketh one of them in two, and layeth the broken upon the whole, and giveth thanks to God, who bringeth bread out of the earth. Not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 first giving thanks, and then breaking (as was the order of our Savior, Mat. 26. 26. Mark 14. 22. Luke 22. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 24. for that action of Christ was farther in the supper than we are yet come) but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 he first brake and then gave thanks; and the Jews do make a business of the method. For he might not give thanks by their Tradition, either over both or either of the Cakes whilst they were whole, but over it when it was broken: And they give this reason, because it was the bread of poverty and affliction, and the poor have not whole Cakes to give thanks over, but are glad to do it over bits and pieces. Hence the phrase and practice of breaking of bread seemeth to have its original.

I shall 〈…〉 follow the Dispute that is taken up by the Hebrew Writers, about the number of these Cakes, whether they were two or three, for some assert the one number, and some the other; and I believe both the Opinions are true applied to different and several times; for before the fall of the Temple, or in those times to which our discourse pointeth, there were but two used, as may be collected by the best records of those times, but in after times they used three, either in reference to the threefold division of the Nation into Priests, Levites and People; or parallel to the three cakes that a delivered captive was to offer for his deliverance, for Israel was delivered out of slavery at a Passover. It is more of import to look a little after that which they called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Aphicomen; about which one would think they had two positions, one contrary to another. The Mishueh of the Talmud hath this Tradition 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 they dismiss not the company after the Passoever with an Aphicomen. And yet this is a current saying amongst them 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He breaketh one of the cakes in two pieces, and leaveth one half for the Aphicomen. Now the seeming difference of these two positions is reconciled by referring them to several times as the number of the cakes was before. The word Aphicomen in their sense, doth mean the last dishes they used at meals, namely of Nuts, Apples, or Sweet-meats, wherewithal they closed up their meals when they saw good; but such a closure they might not make at the Passover supper, and the reason was, because they would eat some of the Paschal Lamb last, and close up the meal with that as the chiefest dish. Last of all (saith Maymony) he eateth of the flesh of the Paschal at the least the quantity of an Olive, and he is to taste no other meat after it at all. But now he eateth to the quantity of an Olive of unleavened bread, and tasteth nothing at all after that; that is, while the Temple stood, and they had a Paschal Lamb to eat, that was ever the last meat they ate, but in after times when they used no Lamb, they closed the meal with unleavened bread instead of it, and after that might eat nothing. And so the same Author relateth again, when he saith, It is from the words of the Scribes that they ate nothing after the unleavened-bread, nor cracknels, nor nuts, or the like, but if he eat unleavened bread, and eat other meats after, or fruits, he must return and eat unleavened bread last, to the quantity of an Olive, and so he concludes.

Now when they ate unleavened bread for a closure of all, in this manner the cake that was broken in two that we are speaking of, was half of it after the breaking of it given to someone in the company to reserve for the Aphicomen, or for the last bit 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and he laid it under his Napkin: but the other half, and (if that were not enough) the other cake also, and if they reserved not an Aphicomen, the two parts of the broken cake they used thus: The Officiator took a bit, and wrapped it together with the bitter herbs, and dipped them into the thick sauce, and gave thanks and said, Blessed be thou O Lord our God, King everlasting, who hath sanctified us by his commandments, and commanded us concerning the eating of unleavened bread, and so he eats, and the rest do likewise. There is some question moved amongst their Traditionaries, whether the bread and the herbs were to be eaten apart or wrapped together, and they speak of a difference betwixt Hillel and his fellows about this matter, but the determination is so indifferent, that if he eat them apart, he gave thanks for them apart, and if together, the thanksgiving specified was sufficient.

VIII. Then fell they to the eating of the flesh that was before them, having hitherto eaten nothing but bread and herbs: and first he gave thanks, Blessed be thou O Lord our God, King everlasting, who hath sanctified us by his command, and commanded us concerning the eating of the Sacrifice; and so they fell to, and ate of the fourteenth days Hagigah, or those peace offerings that they had offered on that day; and of these they made the most of the meal. And then giving thanks again, Blessed be thou O Lord our God; King everlasting, who hath sanctified us by his command, and commanded us concerning the eating of the Passover, they eat of the flesh of the Lamb, everyone at the least the quantity of an Olive; which when they had done, he washeth his hands again (now after meat) and saith Grace after meat (for so let me express it) over the third cup and so they drink it off. And here comes in the mention of the first action of Christ at his last Passover: Matthew and Mark indeed record his words as they were eating, One of you shall betray me, &c. Even one of the twelve that dippeth with me in the dish, &c. Mat. 26. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. and Mark 14. 18, 19, 20, 21. (This was most probably at the time when they dipped the unleavened bread and bitter herbs in the thick sauce charoseth ) and Luke relateth also those words, With desire I have desired to eat this Passover with you, &c. Luke 22. 15, 16. But the first special action that is specified is, that he took the cup and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it amongst yourselves, Luke 22. 17. This was the the third cup at the supper, for there is but one more mentioned after it in that story.

The Traditions of the Jews express the passage at this time of the meal thus: 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And after (he hath eaten the flesh of the Paschal Lamb) he washeth his hands and blesseth the blessing of the meat (or saith grace after meat) over the third cup and drinks it off: or briefly thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 They mingle him the third cup, and he giveth thanks over it.

Now this cup was called by them the cup of blessing, as appeareth by these and such like expressions that we meet withal in their Traditionaries: Many of our Schoolmen 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 think, that everyone of these four cups required blessing or thanksgiving over it; but some again of the Schoolmen think that they were not bound to thanksgiving, but only over the first cup, and over the cup of blessing: thus the Marginal Gloss upon Maymony in the Tract we have so much occasion to use in this Paschal Ritual, on chap. 8. in the beginning; and towards the latter end of the same chapter he produceth some words of one of their Schools, which helps to tell which of the four cups this cup of blessing was: The Words are these, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 It is forbidden to eat anything after the unleavened bread, (viz. when no Lamb was eaten) but not to drink anything beside the Cup of blessing, and cup of Hallel: which words he clears somewhat more by these words a little after 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He drinketh two cups after the unleavened bread, the cup of blessing after meat, and the cup of the Hallel, and a third cup if he will, of the great Hallel. And so Rabbi Alphesi speaks of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 divers singular excellencies in the cup of blessing: And Rabbi Mordecai 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of the cup of blessing having its measure.

Now the reason why the third cup beareth this name of the cup of blessing above all the rest, is partly because the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the blessing, or grace after meat was said over it, as terminating the Meal; and chiefly to distinguish it from the first cup, for over that and this especially was blessing or thanksgiving uttered. It is a great Dispute among the Talmudical Schoolmen, whether there was thanksgiving used over all the four cups alike, and the debate ends most to this vote, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He gave thanks most especially over the first cup, and over the cup of blessing (which otherwise is sometime expressed 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) over the first cup, and over the third. The Gemara in the Chapter oft cited hath this Parable. What is written; and the Child grew and was weaned: the holy blessed God will make a feast for the righteous in the day that his mercy shall be shown to the seed of Isaac. After they had eaten and drunk, they gave Abraham our father the cup of blessing to bless; he said, I cannot bless it, because Ishmael came from me: He gave it Isaac to bless, he said, I cannot, because Esau came from me: He said to Jacob, take it and bless it, he said, I cannot, because I married two sisters, which the Law forbids: He said to Moses, take it, and bless it, he said, I cannot, because I was not counted worthy to go into the Land of Israel, neither alive nor dead. He said to Joshua, take it and bless it, he said, I cannot, because I have no son: He saith to David, take it and bless it, he said to them, I will bless it, and it is fit for me to bless it; as it is said, I will take the cup of Salvation, I will call upon the Lord.

The Apostle useth this term the cup of blessing, concerning the Sacramental Cup in the Lord's Supper, 1 Cor. 10. 16. in which he doth not only allude to their custom and expression that we have now in speech, but by this, and by what he speaketh in the next Chapter following, it seemeth that the Judaizing Christians in the Church of Corinth did very much imitate this Paschal Custom at the receiving of the Sacrament, as that they had a supper before, and so much Wine stirring before, as that some were drunk, 1 Cor. 11. 21, 22. And that for conclusion of the Meal, they had the Bread and Wine of the Lord's Supper, as they at the Passover had the unleavened bread, and the Cup of Blessing.

And as the Apostle in this Phrase alludeth to their expression and custom, so doth our Savior also speak suitably to their practice when he taking this third cup, or the cup of blessing, bids them divide it among themselves. For the four cups that were used at the Passover supper, were enjoined to Men, Women and Children, all alike. Our Rabbins deliver it for a Tradition, say the Gemarists, that these four cups ought to have in them a fourth part of a hin, all alike for Men, Women and Children. And because we are fallen upon mention of their being drunk at their Supper, before the Sacrament in the Church of Corinth, let us take notice of a Talmudic passage or two, that may give some light about such a matter, though it seems in pretence to be of a contrary tune. They have a Tradition that runneth thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 If any will drink between these cups he may, so that he drink not between the third cup and the fourth. The Jerusalem Gemara debating the case why between the first and second cup, or between the second and third, but not between the third and fourth; it resolves it thus, that this was to prevent their being drunk; but they raise hereupon again, a very just objection, what prevention could be in this? And they give this poor answer to it, Because Wine at Meat maketh not a man drunk, but Wine after Meat doth. If Religion did not prevail with them to withhold them from trial of the truth of this Aphorism, more than the virtue of the Aphorism would prevail to keep them from drunkenness; I doubt not but there were drunken heads to be found at their Paschal Cups, as well as at the Sacramental Suppers in the Church of Corinth. And the Caution which the Tradition giveth a little after those words alleged but now, doth make the matter somewhat suspicious, when they provide thus: Doth any one sleep at the Passover meal and wake again? he may not eat again after he is awaked. Do more of the company sleep? they may eat again when they awake; do they all sleep? they may not eat. Rabbi Jose saith, if they nod or slumber only, they may eat upon their waking, but if they have been sound asleep, they may not.

IX. And now we are come to the fourth cup, which was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the cup of the Hallel: 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for he finished the Hallel at it, and at it he said the blessing of the Song. He had begun the Hallel over the second cup, for he concluded the Haggadah or showing forth of their deliverance, (as 1 Cor. 11. 26.) with the rehearsal of the hundred and thirteenth, and hundred and fourteenth Psalms. And now he begins with the hundred and fifteenth and rehearseth that, and the hundred and sixteenth, and hundred and seventeenth, and hundred and eighteenth, for these six Psalms were the Hallel, as was observed even now.

Now the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Blessing of the Song was a Prayer or Blessing that they uttered after the Hallel or the Hymn was finished about which there is some dispute between R. Judah and R. Johanan in the Gemara what it should be: the one naming one Prayer, and the other another: but the Scholiasts thereupon do conclude that the difference between them, is not so much about the Prayers themselves, as about the order of them, or which was uttered first, and they determine these two, to be they, and that they were uttered in this order:

O Lord our God, let all thy works praise thee, and thy Saints and the righteous ones that do thy will, and thy People the house of Israel, all of them with shouting. Let them praise, and bless, and magnify, and glorify, and sing cut the name of thy glory with honor and renown, for remembrance of thy Kingdom; for it is good to praise thee, and it is lovely to sing unto thy name. For ever and ever thou art God. Blessed be thou O Lord the King, who art to be lauded with praises, Amen.

And he concludeth thus: Let the soul of all living bless thy name, O Lord our God, and the spirit of all flesh glorify and exalt thy memorial forever, O our King. For, forever thou art God, and besides thee we have no King, Redeemer, or Savior, &c.

And here ordinarily the meal was quite ended, and they ate nor drank no more that night. (compare Mat. 26. 29.) Yet they have a Tradition that if they were minded, they might drink off a fifth Cup of Wine, upon this condition, that they should say over the great Hallel over it. But what was the great Hallel? Rabbi Judah saith from O give thanks, to By the Rivers of Babylon, that is, the hundred fix and thirtieth Psalm.

Rabbi Johanan saith, from A Song of degrees, to By the Rivers of Babylon; that is, from Psal. 120. to Psal. 137. Rabbi Ahabar Jacob saith, from For the Lord hath chosen Jacob to himself, Psal. 135. ver. 4. to By the Rivers of Babylon, Psal. 137. 1. Thus they debate it in the Gemara, in the Treatise Pesachin; and in the Treatise Erachin they seem yet to go further, and to add the hundred and fifth Psalm to this Hallel; and so they make it of a doubtful measure (as is observed well by the learned Buxtorsius ) sometimes larger, sometimes less, according as they saw good.

And now to take up the whole Rubric of this Sacramental Supper in a short sum, they sat them down in a leaning posture, began with a Cup of Wine, over which they hallowed the day; washed their hands; the table is furnished, they first eat some Sallet, have a second Cup of Wine filled, over which is the rehearsal of the Haggadah, and of Psal. 113, 114. and then the Wine drunk off. They wash their hands again, unleavened bread is broken and blessed, and some of it eaten with bitter herbs dipt in the thick sauce; then eat they the flesh of the peace offerings, and then the flesh of the Lamb; after which they wash; have a third cup of Wine filled, or the cup of blessing, over which they first say grace after meat, and then give thanks for the Wine, and so drink it off. And lastly, they have a fourth Cup of Wine filled, over which they say the Hallel out, and a prayer or two after it, and so they have done.

Thus was the Rubric and Ritual of this great solemn Supper, with which the Reader comparing the action of our Savior at his last Passover, he will easily perceive, that the mention of the first thing he did, is coincident with the third cup, or the cup of blessing, which he biddeth them to divide among themselves; And then he taketh some of the unleavened bread again, and blesseth, and breaketh, and giveth to be eaten for his body, from henceforth, in that sense that the flesh of the Paschal Lamb which they had newly eaten had been his body hitherto: And that which was commonly called the cup of the Hallel, he taketh and ordaineth for the Cup of the New Testament in his Blood, and after it they sung the Hymn or the Hallel out, and so he went out into the Mount of Olives.




CHAP. XIV.

SECT. I. Of the Solemnity and Rites of the first day in the Passover Week of the Hagigah, and Peace Offering of rejoicing.

THE next day after the Passover was eaten was holy, and no servile work to be done in it, but it was accounted and kept as a Sabbath, and so it is called, Lev. 23. 6, 7, 15. On this day all the Males were to appear in the Court of the Temple, and to bring with them a burnt offering for their appearance, and a double peace offering, one for the solemnity, and another for the joy of the times The offering for their appearance was called Corban Raajah, and they conclude it due from these words, None of you shall appear before me empty, Exod. 23. 15. Yet if any one failed of bringing such a gift, his shame and his conscience go with it, but there was no penalty upon him, because though he had broken a Negative Precept, yet there was no work nor action done by him in it.

The peace offerings for the solemnity of the time were called the Hagigah, and they were to be of some Beast, Bullock or Sheep. Hereupon in 2 Chron. 30. 24. & 35. 7. 8. there is mention of Bullocks and Oxen for the Passover; and in Deut. 16. 2. there is speech of sacrificing the Passover of the herd; which cannot be understood of the Passover that was to be eaten on the fourteenth day at Even, for that was punctually, and determinately appointed to be of Lambs or Kids, Exod. 12. 5. but it is to be construed of these peace offerings which were for the solemnity of the time. And this is that which the Evangelist John calleth the Passover, when he saith, The Jews went not into Pilate's judgment Hall, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover, Joh. 18. 28. For they had eaten the Paschal Lamb the night before.

They held themselves obliged by the Law, as to appear at the three solemn festivals, and to pay their offerings and their services then due, so to make merry and to rejoice, and cheer up one another, because it is said, Thou shalt rejoice before the Lord, Deut. 16. 11, 14, &c. And hereupon they took up the use of Wine at the Passover Supper, as was observed before; and hereupon they took up other peace offerings besides the Hagigah at the Passover solemnity, and called them 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The peace offerings of rejoicing And by the offering of these two sorts of peace offerings, it is like they thought themselves the better discharged though they brought not the offering of their appearance; for if they brought these, they might the better think they appeared not empty. And so Levi Gershom construeth that passage concerning Elkanah, that he went up yearly from his City to Shiloh, to sacrifice to the Lord, in application to these sorts of peace offerings, rather than any other offering, for it meaneth (saith he) that he sacrificed his peace offerings of rejoicing, and his peace offerings for the Hagigah.

The time for the offering of these they accounted the first day of the Festival to be most proper, and they strove to dispatch upon it that they might return home the sooner, but if these Sacrifices were offered in any day of the Festival, it served the turn.

On this first day of the Feast, when these great matters were to be in hand, namely their appearing in the Court and offering these their Sacrifices of solemnity and rejoicing at the last Passover of our Savior, they shown themselves otherwise employed, for on this day they crucified the Lord of Life.

In reference to whose judging, condemning, and executing, though it be somewhat beside the bent of the present discourse, let the Reader scan two or three of their Traditions.

  • 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 They might begin no judgments in the night, nor received they any witness in the night, but the judgments were to be in the day only: yet were they in the examination and judgment of our Savior all night long.
  • 2. The judging of a false Prophet was only to be by the great Sanhedrin of seventy and one: Under this notion they blasphemously accused and arraigned our Savior, Joh. 18. 19. Luke 23. 2. and unto this, those words of his refer, Luke 13. 33. It cannot be that a Prophet perish out of Jerusalem.
  • 3. They put not an Elder that transgresseth against the determination of the great Sanhedrin to death, neither at the Sanhedrin that was in his own City, nor at the Sanhedrin that was at Jabneh, but they bring him up to the great Sanhedrin at Jerusalem, and keep him till a solemn festival, and execute him at the Feast; according to what is said, That all the People may hear and fear, &c.

SECT. II. The second day in the Passover Week. The gathering and offering of the first fruits Omer.

THE first and last days of the solemn festival Weeks were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Holy days, or good days; and the observation of them differed little in strictness from the observation of the Sabbath. See Lev. 23. 7, 8, &c. Now the days between them were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Moed Katon, or the lesser solemnity; in which, although there were not the like strictness of observance that there was of the Holy days, yet was there a distinction made betwixt them and other ordinary times: and divers things were prohibited, especially by their Traditions, to be done in them, which were permitted to be done on other days. And as for the service and employment in the Temple, there was commonly more work and sacrificing on these days than on other ordinary days, because the peace offerings due or reserved to that time, could not all be dispatched on the other days, but did take up much of these days, and did find the Priests more than ordinary attendance and employment about the Altar.

On this day that we have in hand, namely, the second day of the Passover week, whatsoever else of extraordinary offering was on it, there never failed to be the offering and waving of the first fruit sheaf before the Lord: The Law for this is given in Lev. 23. 10, 11. When ye be come into the Land which I give unto you, you shall reap the Harvest thereof, then ye shall bring a sheaf of the first fruits of your Harvest unto the Priest; and he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord, to be accepted for you: the morrow after the Sabbath the Priest shall wave it: Where by the word Sabbath is to be understood, not the Sabbath day in the proper sense, but the first day in the Passover Week, of which we have spoken, which was so solemn an holy day: And so the Chaldee Paraphrast, and several other Jews do well interpret it.

The Rites about gathering and offering this first fruits sheaf are largely described by Tosaphta ad Menachoth to be after this manner : Rabbi Ishmael saith, The Omer or first fruits sheaf, if it came on the Sabbath day, (properly so called, as it did that very day that our Savior rested in the grave) it came in three Seahs, but if on another day it came in five: but the wisemen say, whether Sabbath or other day all was one, it came in three Seahs: Abba Saul said, On the Sabbath it was reaped by one man, and with one sickle, and in one Basket: but on another day it was reaped by three men, and in three baskets, and with three sickles: But the wise men said, Sabbath or other day it was all one, it was by three men, and in three baskets, and with three sickles: The first fruits sheaf came out of the vale of the ashes by the brook Kidron, &c. The day of waving it lighting on the Sabbath, the Sabbath was dispensed with for the reaping of it: And how was it done? Those that the Sanhedrin sent about it, went out, at the Evening of the holy day, (the first day of the Passover Week) they took baskets and sickles, &c. They went out on the holy day when it began to be dark, and a great company went out with them: when it was now dark one said to them, On this Sabbath, on this Sabbath, on this Sabbath; In this Basket, in this Basket, in this Basket; R. Eliezer the son of Zadok saith, With this Sickle, with this Sickle, with this Sickle, every particular three times over. And they answer him, well, well, well, I will reap, and he bids them reap. And why do they thus? Because of the Baithusaeans (the Sadducees) who said that the reaping of the first fruit sheaf is not on the end of the holy day. They reap it and put it into the basket, and bring it into the Court: and pass it through the fire; that they might answer the command about parched corn. The words of Rabbi Meir, But the wise men say, That is not to be meant so, but there was a hollow vessel full of holes, so that the fire might go quite through it in the Court, and the wind blew on it, (in which they put the Corn suddenly to dry it that it might grind) and they put it on a Mill to get out a tenth deal, &c. One takes the tenth deal and puts its oil and frankincense on it, and mingles them, and waves it, and takes out a handful and puts it on the Altar, and the rest is for the Priest to eat. As soon as the Omer is offered, they go out and find Jerusalem streets full of Meal and parched Corn: which was not according to the mind of the wise men. The words of R. Meir: But the wise men say; that it was according to the mind of the wise men, for as soon as the Omer was offered, new Corn was permitted.

SECT. IV. The Feast of Pentecost, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

FRom this day and occasion, namely from the offering of the first fruits Omer they began to count the Weeks to Pentecost, even seven Weeks forward. This day was the first of the number, and the next day after the expiring of seven Weeks, being the fiftiethday from hence, was Pentecost day, as is imported in the very word. It was dated from the offering of the first Corn, because that Solemnity and this Festival had some relation one to another: The presenting of the first sheaf, was an introduction to Harvest, and the Feast of Pentecost was a return or offering of their Harvest; by that they had liberty to begin to put the sickle into the Corn and to reap, and at this they offered an offering of their Corn now reaped and inned. Therefore this Solemnity is sometimes called in Scripture the Feast of Harvest, Exod. 23. 16. and sometimes the Feast of weeks, Deut. 16. 10. because of the reckoning of the seven Weeks from that day to it, and sometimes Pentecost, Act. 2. 1. because it was the fiftieth day from that: and so the Jews themselves call it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the fiftieth day, or Pentecost.

But the Jews in their Writings do most commonly call this Feast by the name 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Atsereth, and so do the Chaldee Paraephrasts use it in Numb. 28. 26. although Abarbonel doth observe that this Feast alone, of all the three, is not called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Atsereth in the Scripture. The word doth properly signify a resraining or a shutting up, and from that signification it is taken to signify a solemn holy day, or assembling, as being interdicted and restrained from work, 2 King 10. 20. Joel 1. 4. Amos 5. 21, &c. But whether this Feast were so called by them in so singular a manner, because that was the time of the restraining of rains, it being the very middle of Harvest, or because the offering of their first fruits was restrained till this time, or because the festival joy of Harvest was yet restrained, and not as yet full, or for what cause else, I shall not be much solicitous to determine; but certainly some of the Rabbins give such intimation as might seem to give some strength to the supposal upon one of the two latter. For Maymony relateth that they brought not any first fruits before 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Pentecost, because it is said, the Feast of Harvest, the first fruits of thy labors: And if they brought any, they received them not from them, but laid them by till Pentecost. And Baal Hatturim hath this saying, There is no rejoicing spoken of at the Passover, because the fruits were yet in the field: But at 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Pentecost, when Corn is now reaped, and Wine is now in the Grapes, there is one rejoicing spoken of, Deut. 16. 11. But at the Feast of Tabernacles, when all is inned, then rejoicing is twice mentioned, Deut. 16. 14, 15.

The solemnity of this day and feast was: 1. That all the Males were to appear at it, as at the Passover and Feast of Tabernacles. 2. They were to offer two cakes back'd with leaven, of the Corn of the Harvest now reaped, or of new Corn: and if it be questioned why with leaven now, seeing there was so express commands against leaven at the Passover, some of the Jews do give this pertinent reason: because these loaves or cakes were an offering in behalf of the bread which they were ordinarily to eat, (for these were first fruits of their Wheat) but their bread at the Passover was commemorative of their hasty departing out of Egypt, when they could not stay to have their bread leavened: Their Passover bread was for a memorial, their Pentecost cakes were not. At Passover they could only say, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Here is unleavened bread 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . But at Pentecost, Here is unleavened bread (for the meat offering) and leavened too (for the two cakes) as the Gentarists descant upon this matter. These cakes were made square, each cake seven hand-breadth long, four broad, and four high.

3. With these cakes were also offered seven Lambs, and one Bullock, and two Rams for a burnt offering, a Kid for a sin offering, and two Lambs for a peace offering. And these two Lambs were the only peace offerings that the Congregation offered: and these peace offerings only were reckoned in the rank of the most holy offerings.

Now these Lambs being Peace offerings, were to be waved up and down with the two cakes, for so is the command express, Lev. 23. 20. and the manner of that action was thus: The Priest first waved the Lambs up and down whilst they were yet alive, and then slew them: and having flayed them, he took out the breast and shoulder of either of them, and laid them close besides the two cakes, and putting his hand under them he waved them all together, upwards and downwards, and this way and that way, and all towards the East; and afterwards burnt their inwards, and the Priest ate the rest of the flesh. And as for the Cakes the High Priest took the one, and the other was divided among all the Courses who were then present.

It was not so much the solemnity or multitude of the Sacrifices of this day that challenged the appearance of all the People in the whole Land, though the offerings were many and solemn, but it was the Memorial which the Feast carried with it, namely of the Law, being given to Israel, at that time of the year from Mount Sinai.

On this day was the Hallel sung, as was intimated before, and on this day was the great gift of tongues visibly bestowed upon the Disciples.




SECT. I. Of the Solemnity and Rites of the first day in the Passover Week of the Hagigah, and Peace Offering of rejoicing.

THE next day after the Passover was eaten was holy, and no servile work to be done in it, but it was accounted and kept as a Sabbath, and so it is called, Lev. 23. 6, 7, 15. On this day all the Males were to appear in the Court of the Temple, and to bring with them a burnt offering for their appearance, and a double peace offering, one for the solemnity, and another for the joy of the times The offering for their appearance was called Corban Raajah, and they conclude it due from these words, None of you shall appear before me empty, Exod. 23. 15. Yet if any one failed of bringing such a gift, his shame and his conscience go with it, but there was no penalty upon him, because though he had broken a Negative Precept, yet there was no work nor action done by him in it.

The peace offerings for the solemnity of the time were called the Hagigah, and they were to be of some Beast, Bullock or Sheep. Hereupon in 2 Chron. 30. 24. & 35. 7. 8. there is mention of Bullocks and Oxen for the Passover; and in Deut. 16. 2. there is speech of sacrificing the Passover of the herd; which cannot be understood of the Passover that was to be eaten on the fourteenth day at Even, for that was punctually, and determinately appointed to be of Lambs or Kids, Exod. 12. 5. but it is to be construed of these peace offerings which were for the solemnity of the time. And this is that which the Evangelist John calleth the Passover, when he saith, The Jews went not into Pilate's judgment Hall, lest they should be defiled, but that they might eat the Passover, Joh. 18. 28. For they had eaten the Paschal Lamb the night before.

They held themselves obliged by the Law, as to appear at the three solemn festivals, and to pay their offerings and their services then due, so to make merry and to rejoice, and cheer up one another, because it is said, Thou shalt rejoice before the Lord, Deut. 16. 11, 14, &c. And hereupon they took up the use of Wine at the Passover Supper, as was observed before; and hereupon they took up other peace offerings besides the Hagigah at the Passover solemnity, and called them 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The peace offerings of rejoicing And by the offering of these two sorts of peace offerings, it is like they thought themselves the better discharged though they brought not the offering of their appearance; for if they brought these, they might the better think they appeared not empty. And so Levi Gershom construeth that passage concerning Elkanah, that he went up yearly from his City to Shiloh, to sacrifice to the Lord, in application to these sorts of peace offerings, rather than any other offering, for it meaneth (saith he) that he sacrificed his peace offerings of rejoicing, and his peace offerings for the Hagigah.

The time for the offering of these they accounted the first day of the Festival to be most proper, and they strove to dispatch upon it that they might return home the sooner, but if these Sacrifices were offered in any day of the Festival, it served the turn.

On this first day of the Feast, when these great matters were to be in hand, namely their appearing in the Court and offering these their Sacrifices of solemnity and rejoicing at the last Passover of our Savior, they shown themselves otherwise employed, for on this day they crucified the Lord of Life.

In reference to whose judging, condemning, and executing, though it be somewhat beside the bent of the present discourse, let the Reader scan two or three of their Traditions.

  • 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 They might begin no judgments in the night, nor received they any witness in the night, but the judgments were to be in the day only: yet were they in the examination and judgment of our Savior all night long.
  • 2. The judging of a false Prophet was only to be by the great Sanhedrin of seventy and one: Under this notion they blasphemously accused and arraigned our Savior, Joh. 18. 19. Luke 23. 2. and unto this, those words of his refer, Luke 13. 33. It cannot be that a Prophet perish out of Jerusalem.
  • 3. They put not an Elder that transgresseth against the determination of the great Sanhedrin to death, neither at the Sanhedrin that was in his own City, nor at the Sanhedrin that was at Jabneh, but they bring him up to the great Sanhedrin at Jerusalem, and keep him till a solemn festival, and execute him at the Feast; according to what is said, That all the People may hear and fear, &c.



SECT. II. The second day in the Passover Week. The gathering and offering of the first fruits Omer.

THE first and last days of the solemn festival Weeks were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Holy days, or good days; and the observation of them differed little in strictness from the observation of the Sabbath. See Lev. 23. 7, 8, &c. Now the days between them were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Moed Katon, or the lesser solemnity; in which, although there were not the like strictness of observance that there was of the Holy days, yet was there a distinction made betwixt them and other ordinary times: and divers things were prohibited, especially by their Traditions, to be done in them, which were permitted to be done on other days. And as for the service and employment in the Temple, there was commonly more work and sacrificing on these days than on other ordinary days, because the peace offerings due or reserved to that time, could not all be dispatched on the other days, but did take up much of these days, and did find the Priests more than ordinary attendance and employment about the Altar.

On this day that we have in hand, namely, the second day of the Passover week, whatsoever else of extraordinary offering was on it, there never failed to be the offering and waving of the first fruit sheaf before the Lord: The Law for this is given in Lev. 23. 10, 11. When ye be come into the Land which I give unto you, you shall reap the Harvest thereof, then ye shall bring a sheaf of the first fruits of your Harvest unto the Priest; and he shall wave the sheaf before the Lord, to be accepted for you: the morrow after the Sabbath the Priest shall wave it: Where by the word Sabbath is to be understood, not the Sabbath day in the proper sense, but the first day in the Passover Week, of which we have spoken, which was so solemn an holy day: And so the Chaldee Paraphrast, and several other Jews do well interpret it.

The Rites about gathering and offering this first fruits sheaf are largely described by Tosaphta ad Menachoth to be after this manner : Rabbi Ishmael saith, The Omer or first fruits sheaf, if it came on the Sabbath day, (properly so called, as it did that very day that our Savior rested in the grave) it came in three Seahs, but if on another day it came in five: but the wisemen say, whether Sabbath or other day all was one, it came in three Seahs: Abba Saul said, On the Sabbath it was reaped by one man, and with one sickle, and in one Basket: but on another day it was reaped by three men, and in three baskets, and with three sickles: But the wise men said, Sabbath or other day it was all one, it was by three men, and in three baskets, and with three sickles: The first fruits sheaf came out of the vale of the ashes by the brook Kidron, &c. The day of waving it lighting on the Sabbath, the Sabbath was dispensed with for the reaping of it: And how was it done? Those that the Sanhedrin sent about it, went out, at the Evening of the holy day, (the first day of the Passover Week) they took baskets and sickles, &c. They went out on the holy day when it began to be dark, and a great company went out with them: when it was now dark one said to them, On this Sabbath, on this Sabbath, on this Sabbath; In this Basket, in this Basket, in this Basket; R. Eliezer the son of Zadok saith, With this Sickle, with this Sickle, with this Sickle, every particular three times over. And they answer him, well, well, well, I will reap, and he bids them reap. And why do they thus? Because of the Baithusaeans (the Sadducees) who said that the reaping of the first fruit sheaf is not on the end of the holy day. They reap it and put it into the basket, and bring it into the Court: and pass it through the fire; that they might answer the command about parched corn. The words of Rabbi Meir, But the wise men say, That is not to be meant so, but there was a hollow vessel full of holes, so that the fire might go quite through it in the Court, and the wind blew on it, (in which they put the Corn suddenly to dry it that it might grind) and they put it on a Mill to get out a tenth deal, &c. One takes the tenth deal and puts its oil and frankincense on it, and mingles them, and waves it, and takes out a handful and puts it on the Altar, and the rest is for the Priest to eat. As soon as the Omer is offered, they go out and find Jerusalem streets full of Meal and parched Corn: which was not according to the mind of the wise men. The words of R. Meir: But the wise men say; that it was according to the mind of the wise men, for as soon as the Omer was offered, new Corn was permitted.




SECT. IV. The Feast of Pentecost, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

FRom this day and occasion, namely from the offering of the first fruits Omer they began to count the Weeks to Pentecost, even seven Weeks forward. This day was the first of the number, and the next day after the expiring of seven Weeks, being the fiftiethday from hence, was Pentecost day, as is imported in the very word. It was dated from the offering of the first Corn, because that Solemnity and this Festival had some relation one to another: The presenting of the first sheaf, was an introduction to Harvest, and the Feast of Pentecost was a return or offering of their Harvest; by that they had liberty to begin to put the sickle into the Corn and to reap, and at this they offered an offering of their Corn now reaped and inned. Therefore this Solemnity is sometimes called in Scripture the Feast of Harvest, Exod. 23. 16. and sometimes the Feast of weeks, Deut. 16. 10. because of the reckoning of the seven Weeks from that day to it, and sometimes Pentecost, Act. 2. 1. because it was the fiftieth day from that: and so the Jews themselves call it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the fiftieth day, or Pentecost.

But the Jews in their Writings do most commonly call this Feast by the name 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Atsereth, and so do the Chaldee Paraephrasts use it in Numb. 28. 26. although Abarbonel doth observe that this Feast alone, of all the three, is not called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Atsereth in the Scripture. The word doth properly signify a resraining or a shutting up, and from that signification it is taken to signify a solemn holy day, or assembling, as being interdicted and restrained from work, 2 King 10. 20. Joel 1. 4. Amos 5. 21, &c. But whether this Feast were so called by them in so singular a manner, because that was the time of the restraining of rains, it being the very middle of Harvest, or because the offering of their first fruits was restrained till this time, or because the festival joy of Harvest was yet restrained, and not as yet full, or for what cause else, I shall not be much solicitous to determine; but certainly some of the Rabbins give such intimation as might seem to give some strength to the supposal upon one of the two latter. For Maymony relateth that they brought not any first fruits before 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Pentecost, because it is said, the Feast of Harvest, the first fruits of thy labors: And if they brought any, they received them not from them, but laid them by till Pentecost. And Baal Hatturim hath this saying, There is no rejoicing spoken of at the Passover, because the fruits were yet in the field: But at 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Pentecost, when Corn is now reaped, and Wine is now in the Grapes, there is one rejoicing spoken of, Deut. 16. 11. But at the Feast of Tabernacles, when all is inned, then rejoicing is twice mentioned, Deut. 16. 14, 15.

The solemnity of this day and feast was: 1. That all the Males were to appear at it, as at the Passover and Feast of Tabernacles. 2. They were to offer two cakes back'd with leaven, of the Corn of the Harvest now reaped, or of new Corn: and if it be questioned why with leaven now, seeing there was so express commands against leaven at the Passover, some of the Jews do give this pertinent reason: because these loaves or cakes were an offering in behalf of the bread which they were ordinarily to eat, (for these were first fruits of their Wheat) but their bread at the Passover was commemorative of their hasty departing out of Egypt, when they could not stay to have their bread leavened: Their Passover bread was for a memorial, their Pentecost cakes were not. At Passover they could only say, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Here is unleavened bread 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . But at Pentecost, Here is unleavened bread (for the meat offering) and leavened too (for the two cakes) as the Gentarists descant upon this matter. These cakes were made square, each cake seven hand-breadth long, four broad, and four high.

3. With these cakes were also offered seven Lambs, and one Bullock, and two Rams for a burnt offering, a Kid for a sin offering, and two Lambs for a peace offering. And these two Lambs were the only peace offerings that the Congregation offered: and these peace offerings only were reckoned in the rank of the most holy offerings.

Now these Lambs being Peace offerings, were to be waved up and down with the two cakes, for so is the command express, Lev. 23. 20. and the manner of that action was thus: The Priest first waved the Lambs up and down whilst they were yet alive, and then slew them: and having flayed them, he took out the breast and shoulder of either of them, and laid them close besides the two cakes, and putting his hand under them he waved them all together, upwards and downwards, and this way and that way, and all towards the East; and afterwards burnt their inwards, and the Priest ate the rest of the flesh. And as for the Cakes the High Priest took the one, and the other was divided among all the Courses who were then present.

It was not so much the solemnity or multitude of the Sacrifices of this day that challenged the appearance of all the People in the whole Land, though the offerings were many and solemn, but it was the Memorial which the Feast carried with it, namely of the Law, being given to Israel, at that time of the year from Mount Sinai.

On this day was the Hallel sung, as was intimated before, and on this day was the great gift of tongues visibly bestowed upon the Disciples.




CHAP. XV. Of the Service on the day of Expiation.

THE institution of this solemn day, of which there is a large mention, Lev. 16. was first occasioned from this, that Moses on that very day, after three several forty days Fasts came down from the Mount, having obtained Israel's full peace with God and reconciliation, and brought now with him the renwed Tables, and a full commission to build the Tabernacle, and to set up the solemn Worship in the midst of them.

Seven days before the day of Expiation, they put the High Priest apart from his own House into the Chamber 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Parhedrin: lest his Wife proving to be in her separation should bring upon him an uncleanness of seven days, and so prevent him of being fit for that days service.

They also appointed another Priest as his substitute, to perform the service of that day, if it should fall out, that any uncleanness did befall him that he could not officiate, that so the service should not fall to the ground.

Every day of these seven they caused him to sprinkle the blood of the daily Sacrifice, to burn the parts of it, to offer the Incense, and dress the Lambs, that he might be the better inured to those services on that day when it came.

On the third day, and on the seventh, they besprinkled him with the ashes of the red Cow, for fear he might have been defiled by the dead, and not aware of it.

They delivered to him some of the Elders of the Sanhedrin, who read before him the rubrick and order of that days service, and they said unto him, Sir High Priest, read thou thyself, it may be thou hast forgotten, or it may be thou hast not learned.

On the Eve of the day of Expiation, that is, on the day before in the morning they brought him to the East-gate of the Courts, and there they made Bullocks, and Rams, and Lambs to pass before him, that still he be the better acquainted with everything that he had to do.

Afterward the Elders of the Sanhedrin delivered him over to the Elders of the Priesthood; who brought him into the Chamber of Abhtenes, that there he might learn to hand the incense: And there they gave him this Oath: Sir High Priest we are the Messengers of the Sanhedrin, and thou art our Messenger and the Sanhedrins, we adjure thee by him that hath caused his name to dwell in this House, that thou alter not anything of what we have spoken to thee: and so they part weeping.

Now the reason of this solemn adjuration was because of the Sadducees, who had vented a Doctrine, and some of them had ventured a practice contrary to the Tradition of the Elders, namely, to kindle the Incense, and to make it smoke without the Vail, and to bring it smoking within: They swore him, saith the Jerusalem Talmud, because of the Baithusaeaus, who said, Let him kindle the Incense without, and then bring it in: And there was one that did so, and when he came out, one said to his Father: Ye have been searching all your days, yet did ye never the thing to purpose till his man came and did it, he answered him: although we have been searching all our days, yet have we done according to the will of the Wise Men. And I shall much wonder if this man that hath done so live long after. And they say he died shortly: namely within three days.

The Even being come, they suffered him to eat but sparingly, because fullness would make him drowsy: for sleep he might not, for fear of Nocturnal Pollution, but all the night, he, if he were learned, read and expounded the Scripture to them that were with him, if he were not learned, some other did, especially out of Job, Ezra, Daniel and Chronicles, places that might most affect and prepare him for the service.

The day being come, (which was so strict a Fasting day, as that to eat anything, or to do any work on it, fell under the penalty of being cut off ) the High Priest is now to prepare himself for the business. And first he puts off his ordinary wearing Clothes, bathes himself in water his bathing this day was on the roof of the room of Happarbah, a fine Sheet hanging betwixt him and the sight of the People) wipes himself dry with a Towel, and puts on the rich Garments of the High-Priesthood, washeth his Hands and Feet, killeth the daily Sacrifice, burns the pieces, offers the Incense, dresseth the Lamps, and doth all the service belonging to the ordinary daily service: And so he doth by the Bullock, and seven Lambs of the extraordinary Sacrifice: And when he had done with these, he washed his hands and his feet again.

Then put he off his rich Robes again, and bathed himself, and put on the white Linnen Garments, appointed Levite. 16. 4. and performed the peculiar services of that day, as first he goeth to his own Bullock, Levite. 16. 6. (which stood between the Temple and the Altar) laid his two hands upon his head, and made this confession: Ah Lord, I have sinned, done perversely and transgressed before thee, I and mine house, I beseech thee O Lord, expiate the sins, perversities and transgressions, whereby I have sinned, done perversely and transgressed, I and mine house, as it is written in the Law of Moses thy servant, saying, for on this day he will expiate for you to purge you from all your sins before the Lord that ye may be clean.

Then went he to cast the Lots upon the two Goats, on the North-East part of the Court below the Altar: The two lots were ordinarily of Gold, pieces just of one and the same bigness, on the one of them was written, for the Lord, and on the other for Azazel: these were put into a Box into which the Priest could put both his hands: this Box was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The two Goats were set before him; one before the right hand and the other at the left; and on his right hand stood the Sagan, and on his left hand stood chief of his Fathers house: He put his hand in the box and took out the lots: and opening his hands, if the lot for the Scape-goat came in his right hand the Sagan said to him, Sir, lift up your right hand, and so the right hand Goat was the Scape-goat: And if that lot came in his left hand, the chief of his Fathers house said to him, Sir, lift up your hand, and then that was the Scape-Goat that was on the left hand: And he tied a Scarlet list upon that Goats head, and set him there from whence he was to be sent away, and the other Goat he sent where he must be killed.

This Scarlet list is called commonly by the Rabbins 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Lingula coccinea, the Scarlet tongue, because it was broad and fashioned like a tongue. And they expected that when it was tied upon the Scape-Goats head, it should turn white. And so they say it did, in the time of Simeon the just, and that the lot for the Scape-Goat came still up in his right hand: and this they ground upon Isaiah 1. 18.

Having thus set the two Goats ready against their time comes, he returned again to his own Bullock where he left him standing, and lays his hand upon his head a second time, and makes a second confession, in the very same words that he had done the former, save that when he had said, wherein I have sinned, done perversely, and transgressed before thee, I and my fathers house, he added, and the sons of Aaron thy holy people, as it is written in the Law of Moses, &c.

Then killed he the Bullock, took the blood and gave it one to stir that it should not congeal: He himself took a Censer full of Coals from the Altar, and set them down upon a Bench in the Court: and from a Vessel brought him, he took his hands full of Incense and put it into a Dish: The Censer of Coals he took in his right hand (because it was hot and heavy, otherwise he should have carried it in his left) and the Dish of Incense in his left hand, and so he went into the Holy of Holies, and came up to the Ark, and there he sets his Coals down, empties the Incense into his hands again, and so lay it on the coals, and stays till all the room be full of smoke, and then comes backward out from within the veil, having his face still toward the Ark: Being come out he made this short Prayer, O Lord God let it be thy good pleasure, that this year may have seasonable rains, (if it have been droughty:) And let not thy Scepter depart from Judah, and let not thy people Israel want sustenance, and let not the prayer of wicked transgressors come before thee: and so he came out.

Then took he the blood of the Bullock which had been stirred about all this while, for congealing; and brought it within the most holy place, and sprinkled of it eight times, once upward and seven times downward between the bars of the Ark, and having so done he came out thence, set the rest of the blood in the bason in the Holy place and came forth.

Then slew he the Goat, took the blood of it into the most holy place, and sprinkled it there eight times, as the other; came forth and set it down in the holy place, took up the Bullocks blood and sprinkled it eight times before the veil, and so he did by the Goats blood; then mingled he them together and sprinkled therewith the golden Altar going round about it: He began first with the North-east corner, so to the North-west, and to the South-west and ended at the South-east; then sprinkled he the body of the Altar itself seven times, and so came out; and poured the remainder of the blood at the foot of the burnt offering Altar on the West-side.

And now he goes about to send the Scape-goat away; he first laid his hands upon his head and made this confession, Ah Lord, thy people the house of Israel have sinned and done perversely, and transgressed before thee, I beseech thee now O Lord expiate the sins, perversities, and transgressions, which the house of Israel thy people have sinned, done perversely, and transgressed before thee; as it is written in the Law of Moses thy servant, For this day he will expiate for you, to purge you from all your sins that you may be clean before Jehovah. As soon as the Priests and people that were in the Court heard him utter the name Jehovah, they bowed, worshipped, and said, Blessed be the Name of his glorious Kingdom forever and ever. And then they sent the Goat a going.

There was from Jerusalem about some twelve easy miles off, a very steep and high promont, which they express by the name 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Tsock, (some take this to be the proper name of that Hill, some for the common name of any high rock whatsoever.) Between Jerusalem and this hill there were ten Booths set up at an equal distance one from another, namely, about a mile asunder, and the nearest about a mile from Jerusalem. Having delivered the Goat to him that was to bring him into the Wilderness, they accompanied him to the first Booth, and from thence there were some ready there to accompany him to the next, and some at that to go with him to the third, and thus through all: and at every Booth they asked the man that led him whether he would eat or drink.

From the last Booth they went not quite through with him to the high Rock, but stood at distance to see what he did. When he came there, he took the crimson list from between the Goats horns and pulled it in two pieces; the one half of it he tied upon the rock, and the other half upon his horns again. Then took he the Goat and pushed him backward from off the rock, and by the time he came to the bottom he was dashed all in pieces. And so the man returns to the next Booth, and there stays till it be dark.

In the mean time the High-priest after the sending away of the Goat, had returned to the service again, and cut in pieces the Bullock and Goat that he had slain, and whose blood he had brought within the veil, and laid their inwards upon the Altar to be burnt, but their pieces he delivered to some, to be carried forth without Jerusalem, there to be burnt, Levite. 16. 27.

At last they say to the High-priest, Sir, by this time the Goat is gotten into the Wilderness. And then he went into the Court of the women, and there in a Pulpit read a Section or two in the Law, as namely, all Levite. 16. and Chap. 23. verse. 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32.

Now if it be questioned how they could guess the very time when the Goat arrived in the Wilderness, there are three several ways of this conjecture held out by them, and they are these, 1. The Mishueh of the Talmud saith, there were several high piles or pillars of stone set up in the way thither, and men stood upon them with linen clothes in their hands, and when the Goat was got into the Wilderness, he that stood on the pillar there, waved his Napkin up and down, and the next took at him and did the like, and the next at him, and so they conveyed the intelligence into the City in a trice. 2. Rab. Ishmael saith, a crimson list was tied on the Temple door, and as soon as ever the Goat arrived in the Wilderness, it grew white.

And that passage in the Gemara of the Babylon Talmud is remarkable (whether it speak of this list, or of that betwixt the Goats horns it is not much material, they were both of the same nature, and reference) when it saith That all the forty years before the destruction of Jerusalem the red list did never turn white: for whereas this change of it was a sign of the remission of their sins, as they themselves construe it from Isaiah 1. 18. they had now so died themselves with the blood of Christ, slain just forty years before the destruction of the City, that we may well take their own evidence and testimony for their guilt, and unpardonableness for that fact. R. Judah saith, it was three miles to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Beth Haduda, which was the edge of the Wilderness that way that the Goat went, and for the measuring out of the space of time that the man might be going thither with the Goat, some men walked out a miles space from the City, and walked back that mile again without any stay, and when they were come back, they stayed so much time as one might walk another mile, and then concluded that by that time the man with the Goat was come into the Wilderness.

The High-priest having read his Lessons in the Law, and prayed eight several Prayers after, he washes his Hands and Feet, puts off his linen clothes, baths himself, puts on his rich garments, washes his Hands and Feet again; offereth a Ram for himself and another for the people, and seven Lambs for the additional offering of the day. And then he offered the daily Evening Sacrifice.