PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
Scottish Presbyterian

Commentary on Revelation

James Durham (1622-1658) · 686,604 words · 3052 min

Large work readerShowing section 5 of 18. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 5/18
: this is almost the same with the former, and looketh to the terms which God proposed to them when He took them to be a Church, and what was their purpose when they submitted thereunto. As if the Lord had said, did I propose to you only to take on a name without reality? or did ye engage only to be professors in show, and not to be thoroughly sincere? See then how this condition of yours answereth my proposal, and your engagement. The third word is, and hold fast : which is not to be understood, as if he were well pleased with their present condition, as in the Epistles to Thyatira and Philadelphia : because here He giveth them many directions and burdens (to say so) besides this, which He doth not in the other two Epistles: But it doth imply these two, 1. A necessity of holding fast the little thing that was, left they should run to the extremity of declining ere long. 2. It respecteth what they had received and heard: and so, the meaning is, that they would grip faster to hold that than formerly they had done. Under these directions we may gather what hath been their guiltiness, and the steps by which they have come to such an hieght in this hypocrisy and declining. The last word is, Repent : which is a general cure for all evils, and is of special use for the preventing, and removing of such inward evils, as, declining from any good condition, security, presumption, and hypocrisy, as we may see through all these Epistles. For readily it cannot be evil with the spiritual frame of a Christian when Repentance is in exercise, and it cannot be well when it is otherwise. But of this we shall say no more now.

The third thing in the Body of this Epistle, to wit, the way how the Lord presseth these exhortations in this verse, is by subjoining a sharp threatening, If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shall not know : this threatening is general; but it is the more comprehensive and sharp, If we consider these two, 1. That when He saith, He will come, &c. He doth not signify any particular stroke He will bring on them, whereby they may gather, that there is no particular threatening; but it may be comprehended under this general: and so it may be, I will come unto thee and remove thy Candlestick, or fight against thee with the sword of my mouth, or call thee and thy people some extraordinary way to a reckoning, and such like. The sin of hypocrisy, especially in a Minister, is a most dreadful sin, and they who are guilty thereof, are in a most dreadful condition: for, their doom is bl •• k, and God may fill therein all the threatenings that are in this Book, as it is in Deut. 29.20. and Rev. 22.18. And they themselves cannot tell how many evils they are liable unto at Christ's coming upon them. 2. If we consider, that this coming of Christ's, is no friendly coming to them; but as the coming of an enemy upon them, and that in some terrible manner, suddenly and inexpectedly surprising them. And so it presseth them to the present exercise of Repentance, because the coming of the Lord would be dreadful unto them in that condition; and yet it was hard to know how suddenly they might be surprised by the same.

The fourth thing in the Body of the Epistle, is, the consolation laid-down in reference to the handful that had some life: for, if they were but as two or three on the tops of the uttermost branches, the Lord will not neglect them. This consolation, verse. 4. hath three parts. 1. The persons are described to whom it is sent. 2. The consolation is laid down in promise. 3. The reason is given, why the Lord putteth this difference betwixt them and others. The persons are several ways described, 1. They are said to be some names : this is according to the Scripture phrase, to show their eminency and excellency beyond others, who by their integrity had, as it were, procured themselves a name in Christ's account: so this phrase is understood, Act. 1.15. to wit, not only it signifieth some persons simply, but some persons that are eminent. 2. They are even in Sardis : and this commends their honesty, that had keeped somewhat lively, even where Minister and People were dead. 3. They are a few names: which showeth, that in comparison with the multitude of this Church, there were but few sincere Believers, at least in a lively condition, although outward things looked exceeding fair, which also heightens their commendation. 4. In the description it is said, thou hast, relating to the Angel which saith, that a lifeless Minister may have some lively persons under his charge▪ and yet he is little to be thanked for it. We conceive, that this doth not only respect the title which he hath to all that are members; but it seemeth to relate to a peculiar interest in these few beside others; and so they might be said to be his, as being begotten by his Ministry: in which respect, he could not be said to have these who had no sincerity at all. 5. They are described by this, That they have not defiled their garments : which relateth not only to purity in outward practice; (for it is like that was not so rare a thing in Sardis ) but especially it relateth to their inward liveliness and freedom from these evils, especially of security, formality, declining, hypocrisy, and such like, that were common in the place. And thus, to keep the garments, is often taken universally, as respecting man's inward condition, as well as that that is outward, and particularly, chap. 16. verse. 15.

The consolation itself, is in this promise, they shall walk with me in white : which hath a twofold consolation in it, 1. That they shall walk with Christ, and so enjoy his company and be made happy objectively by the possessing of His presence. 2. That in the enjoying of Christ's company, they shall be clothed with white: which we take to hold forth the inconceivable Glory which shall be put upon the souls, and even the bodies also of Believers, when they shall be raised in Glory and bear the Image of the heavenly, &c. 1 Cor. 15. and shall be conformed to Christ's glorious Body, Philip. 3.21. and shall shine as the Son in the firmament, Matth. 13. It's called white, 1. because then there shall be no spot amongst all the Congregation of the firstborn. 2. When Christ is on his conquest, chap. 19 he appeareth in white: and in this place, it is to show forth the Believers absolute victory over all difficulties and enemies. 3. When Christ was transfigured, His garments did shine, so saith he here, that the Believer, who keepeth himself pure, shall walk in Christ's livery, and, as it were, He shall give them new clothes like unto His own; Thus shall they be subjectively happy.

The reason subjoined, is in these words, for they are worthy : we may take up worthiness under several considerations, as, first, when there is supposed to be in proper justice a condignity between the deserving of the person, and the thing that is bestowed upon him▪ as when a workman is said to be worthy of his wages, speaking as mongst men: in this respect, Scotus, and many of the Schoolmen that follow him, deny that men can merit anything before God: because there is such a distance between God and creatures, that no creature can make God his debtor, without respect to His own free engagement and promise: and also, because there is no due proportionablnesse between the great happiness of Eternal life, and what men can do to procure the same. This Doctrine is much opposed by the generality of the Schoolmen, and later Jesuits, as having these absurdities with it, 1. That it destroyeth all proper merit. 2. That it saith there is no condignity in good works themselves, without respect to God's promise, whereas they say, such and such works had been condignly meritorious, although there had never been such a promise. 3. They say, it is all one with the Heretics opinion, and such like: of which, possibly, we may say a word some-otherwhere (if the Lord will) Yet, this first acception of worthiness or merit, cannot be admitted here: because, 1. it contrairs the end of Christ's giving this promise, which is to express the freeness of His Grace in taking notice of such, and bestowing such an excellent privilege on them beyond their deserving. 2. It is contrary to what is implied in the promise: for, if they had absolute perfection for the time, so as to merit to be thus de •• t with, Then it would suppose that they did already walk in white, and were simply free of all blots; whereas Christ doth difference their future happy condition from what they had for the time in this respect, that although then they wanted not their own infirmities, albeit they were sincere, and free of the faults that others were lying under; yet wanted they not all spots: but at that time, when this promise should be fulfilled, these spots should be wiped away, and they should walk fully in white. Secondly, Worth, or merit, is sometimes taken as it respecteth God's gracious acceptation of a sinner through Christ Jesus: and thus a believing sinner may be said to be worthy, and to have heaven bestowed upon him in God's righteousness and faithfulness. 1. Because in Christ he is accepted as worthy: and so they may be said to be worthy in Him, as they are just and righteous in Him, that is, through the imputation of Christ's worth and righteousness unto them: for, though it be said here, that they are worthy ; yet it is not said that they are worthy in themselves. 2. In this respect, Believers may be said to be worthy; because God hath freely condescended to promise such things unto them: and therefore (to speak so) according to the terms of the Law of Grace, they may expect and claim the performance of such promises from the righteous Judge, who cannot in His justice but perform what He hath promised, as if there were a ty of strict justice by merit put upon Him. And this agreeth with the Apostles reasoning, 2 Tim. 4.7, 8. In the third place, often this word which is rendered worthy here, is to be understood of a meetness and sutablnesse which is in such a thing, without respect to any merit or proper justice: thus it is rendered, Mat. 3.8. Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance. The word rendered meet there, is the same that is rendered worthy here, and importeth only that there ought to be a sutablnesse in their fruits to true Repentance. This will agree well to this place, as the scope cleareth; The Lord saith, they kept themselves clean, when others were defiled: therefore they shall walk with me in white, when others shall be polluted: and the reason is subjoined, it is suitable and meet it should be so, that these that difference themselves in keeping clean from the sins of others, should be by me brought to a condition where they shall have eternal and absolute whiteness. And at the first view, it is clear, that the promise is conceived in these terms, so as it may carry in it a sutablnesse to their present honest condition. And the Lord often useth this expression, both in His promises and threatenings, when He intendeth not to show what is due in strict justice; but only, that there is and will be a suit, ablnesse and poportionablnesse between men's carriage and His deal ng with them, as we will after find, chap. 16. verse. 15, 16. And this we rest in, as the meaning of the place, and as most clear from the scope thereof.

The Conclusion followeth: Wherein, 1. there are some encouragements given to the overcomer, verse. 5. and then the common advertisement, verse. 6. which is in all the other Epistles. There are three promises made to the overcomer. The first is, the same shall be clothed in white raiment : which is, upon the matter, that same which was promised to these few sincere Members that were in Sardis. And is here proposed, to show, that not only these in Sardis, but all that shall faithfully wrestle and overcome, shall be made partakers of that excellent privilege formerly mentioned: And yet I suppose none can say that all that shall be clothed in white, and admitted to heaven, are in strict and proper Justice worthy of the same; yet, upon the former Popish principles, this will follow, if so be the proper worthiness of these in Sardis, had been the thing that procured this privilege unto them, to wit, to walk in white.

The second promise, is, And I will not blot out his name out of the book of life. The Book of Life is frequently mentioned in this Prophecy: and (God-willing) we may take occasion to speak somewhat of it, chap. 20. Only now we say, there are four Books figuratively attributed to God (to mention no more:) for, God hath neither need nor use of Books; but after the manner of men for helping us to take up His mind, He thus expresseth Himself. First, There is a Book that is more general, and comprehendeth His decrees: which in His ordinary providence He executeth in the World from time to time. In this respect, all His works are said to be known to Him from the beginning, as if He had had a particular roll of them all: and it is with respect to this, that David ( Psal. 139. verse. 16.) saith, Thine eyes did see my substance yet being imperfect, and in thy Book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them. A second Book, is, of God's Omniscience: which taketh in all things past, present, and to come, as if He had keeped a Diarie of every event, and had written up ev •• y word and action of men. In reference to this, the Books are said to be opened in the day of Judgment, Rev. 20.12. A third Book, is of God's special care of His Church: whereby, as it were, He hath set forth Himself to have a peculiar care and oversight of her, and what concerneth her. This is mentioned, Chap. 5. verse. 1, &c. A fourth Book, is called the Book of Life: which relateth only to the names of such as our Lord hath ordained to Glory, and doth import that they are as definitely and distinctly determined and known by Him, as if they were by name and surname particularly recorded in a Book. It is this Book, that is here called the book of life : Because, 1. The end thereof is to ordain so many to Life. And, 2. because there is a immutable connection betwixt being written in this Book of Life, and obtaining eternal life: and so, being the first and sure door that maketh entrance unto life possible and feasable, and gives the right to, and is the foundation of all that followeth; therefore deservedly it getteth this name to be called the book of life.

It rests then to consider, what it is not to blot out his name out of the book of life : It is not to be understood as if there were a scraping out, and putting in into that Book, posterior to God's eternal and immutable decree: because, First, in that respect, it could not be called the Book of Life: for so, many might die who once were in it. Secondly, It is contrary also expressly to the end and use thereof in the day of Judgment, where ( Chap. 20.12.) express mention is made of the opening of this Book, for this end, that whoever were found from the beginning written therein, might be keeped from the lake that burneth with fire and brimston, as is said in the 15. verse of that Chapter. And if the connection of being written in this Book, and the obtaining of life, were not peremptory, there could be no such reason of openning this Book in the day of Judgment. Thirdly, What ever this be, it is something to be performed after this life: and seeing it cannot be imagined that one can die with his name in this Book, and afterward have it blotted out: Therefore such a gloss cannot be put upon this place. And who would have further confirmation of this, may have it in the Learned Gomarus his digression on this very Text. The words then are to be understood thus, as importing more than they express, to wit, that in the day of Judgment Christ will own the overcomer, and present him before God, as one that was enrolled in the Book of Life, and given to Him in the bargain of Redemption, for this very end, that He might raise him up in the last day, and give unto him eternal life, as it is, John. 6.39, 40.

That this is the meaning, will appear by considering the third promise, But I will confess his name before my Father, and before his Angels : which doth expressly hold forth what we assert of Christ solemn, and honorable owning of them as His and given to Him in the great Day, when all the holy Angels shall be present. We shall say nothing of the other part of the Conclusion, which is so often, but never needlessly repeated. Now, we may take some few Observations from the several parts of the Epistle, besides these that are already hinted.

Observe, 1. To have a name without reality, is an exceeding great evil; yet an evil incident both to Ministers and People. 2. These that have had once something, may through unwatchfulnesse be brought to a very low posture, as it were, to be ready instantly to expire. 3. Folks may have some extraordinary motions at sometimes, and yet afterwards fall from these, and forget them, as if they had never had such purposes and resolutions. 4. There may be some honest, where there is much deadness, even in the public Ordinances; and God may keep some lively, even in such a place as Sardis, when the generality are dead, and this tendeth exceedingly to their commendation. 5▪ A Church may have a great name for many professors, and yet the number of the truly sincere may be very few. 6. God inesse is of great value where ever it is, if it were amongst never so few: it is like, Religion in power was not much thought of in Sardis ; yet what advantage will these few have, beyond others that were of the greatest name, when Christ shall come to Judgment? it will never be well understood what advantage there is in true Holiness beyond profanity and hypocrisy, till by Christ's second coming this be manifested.

Beside these Observations and what hath been said, there are yet some few Questions tending to the further clearing of this Epistle; as First, If an unfound hypocritical man may be a sent Minister of Christ? Secondly, If such a man may have gifts in exercise; or, if even a Believer may have gifts in exercise when his grace is in no good condition? Thirdly, If such a Minister may have fruits? Fourthly, If usually such a Minister with his gifts hath many, or rather but few fruits? And lastly, if by his deadness the Ordinances be so polluted to others as they cannot without sin partake of the same with him? To which, we shall answer shortly in order, by laying down some Doctrines from the Text.

And to the first we say, that men that are unsound as to heart▪honesty, may be de facto Ministers in the Church of Christ, and, while continuing such, ought to be so accounted: What this Angel was simply in respect of his state, we shall not determine; yet this is certain that although he had a name to be living, he was dead ; and his works were not perfect before God, what ever they were before men. And comparing this with the condition of the Angel of Laodicea following, we conceive there is ground to say, that men that are for their own case unsound, may yet be Ministers in Christ's House; and are to be esteemed such, while they continue in that room, s ing our Lord Jesus doth so here. And this is not to plead for profane Ministers, as if by this they themselves might have peace in their discharge of Ministerial duties: or, as if others, whose place giveth them a hand in the admitting unto, or keeping in the Ministry, such as are, or may be discovered legally to be so, might from this have any defense; there will no such thing follow hence: But it is to plead for the Ordinance of the Lord Jesus Christ, that ought not to suffer derogation in whatsoever hands it be. Hence doth the Lord ( Matth. 23.3, &c. ) recommend to His Hearers to give due ministerial respect to the Scribes and Pharisees, even when He is to discover their rottenness, that thereby the people's derogating from the Lord's Word in their mouth, while they sat in Moses Chair and spake truth might be prevented. Our Lord's calling of Judas to be an Apostle doth evince this (for He knew what simply was necessary to a Minister) who, no question, in his Preaching, was to be accounted an Ambassador of Christ with the rest: the reason is, because it is not Grace that entitleth one to that Charge, but Christ his Call and Commission: and seeing it is certain that these may be separated, a Call from Grace, as Grace from a Call: It will follow therefore, that according to His Sovereignty He may make use of whom He will, who as He hath not chosen Holy sinless Angels, but sinful earthen Vessels, to commit that treasure of the Gospel unto, that it might be known that the excellency of the power, is not of men, but of Go ; so may He make use of sinful men, even more sinful than others, that it may be known that the edification of souls doth not necessarily depend on the holiness of the Instrument, as Act. 3.12. Therefore we will find, that many who have been untender, have had hand at this work, as Matth. 7.23. Many shall say we have prophesi d in thy name, &c. and Philip. 1.15. Some preach Christ out of envy, and saith Paul ( Chap. 2.21.) almost of all, they seek their own things. This ought to make both Ministers and People to tremble, and to strive to be in at the strait gate of Holiness, seeing no place nor station, nor shining gift can change our nature, and exempt from the sentence of Christ's curse in the last day: which use is made of it, Matth. 7.22, 23.

In Answer to the second Question▪ We may see, that Gifts may be in exercise, where there is little or none of inward Grace, or a great decay thereof. This Angel hath a name and is thought of, even while dead: this may be in unregenerate men, as in the former instances; and also may be in good men respectively. It is like, Job's friends, for as excellently as they spoke, yet had much defect as to the inward life. And Solomon remarketh of himself ( Ecles, 2.) that his wisdom remained with him, even when his heart was bent upon vanity: Gifts are deceitful and deceiving both to men themselves and to others: Grace is another thing, and although sometimes God will strike the Idol-shepherd in his right eye, and make even his Gifts to wither, thereby to show the necessity of nearness with Him; yet sometimes will He continue the exercise of them, that thereby His sovereignty may appear, and that men may not lay too much weight on a common Gift, and also that the edification of others may be furthered.

To the third, we say, That a man whose particular condition is not approvable before God, may not only have gifts, and be called to be a Minister; but also he may have fruits, and some success in his Ministry: this Angel hath a few names, even in Sar is : and, no question, Judas in his Ministry wanted not fruit, seeing one report is made of all indifferently, Mark 6.30. And the Preaching of Christ by the Inviers ( Philip. 1.4.) seemeth to have had success: otherwise, their Preaching had been no great ground of rejoicing to Paul. This also is to show the Lord's sovereignty, who will make use of whom He will in His Work: and although saving Grace do not always accompany common gifts of the Spirit; yet are they given to profit withal, 1 Corinth. 12.7. And seeing they do not always nor often profit these to whom they are given, and yet are not simply unprofitable when they are some way improven, They must therefore profit others for whom they are given.

To the fourth, we say, That although such a Minister may not be altogether always without fruit; yet often great Gifts with an unsound frame of heart have but little fruit and few converts: he hath here names, but a few names, though he himself had a great name: and certainly in part it is imputed to his unsoundness, whose works were not perfect before God; so that although men could not censure him; yet before God he was not kindly and natively driving the design of that people's edification, whereof this, of having a few names, is a consequent, as the real honesty, though with a little measure of Gifts, of the Angel of Philadelphia, did not want its own influence up •• the success of his Min strie: This therefore showeth the danger of an unsound lifeless Ministri , that often the fruits are exceeding few, where there are any at all. Hence these Scribes and Pharisees are, in Christ's account, as to fruit and to saving of souls, Matth. 9. as almost none at all, although he gave not people way at their own hand to cast at them. And considering, that turning of men from their evil way, and standing in God's counsel, Ier. 23. verse. 22. and walking with God in equity, and turning many from their iniquity, Mal. 2. verse. 6. go together. It is no marvel that the e who are negligent in the one, be also less blessed with the other. These, we conceive, God hath wisely linked together, that the more a man have of Him, the more fruit his Commission in his mouth sh uld have. And although this be not peremptory in all cases, especially in the comparative degree amongst honest men; Yet, 1. this connection is more suitable in itself, verse. 12. that one who tenderly and singly aimeth at fruit, should attain more than one who indeed intendeth but the feeding of himself. 2. The one hath a promise and may claim it, 1 Tim. 4.16. the other is judicially smitten in this: for, as fruits are in part some reward of Grace to a faithful Minister; so fruitlesnesse is a just stroke upon the other. 3. There is a connection also in respect of means: tenderness in a Minister disposeth to faithfulness, sympathy, &c. and the want of it, unfitteth a Minister to conceive experimentally of many things; and so he is indisposed to speak them seasonably: and it marreth that holy boldness, which immediate eyeing of God giveth; and by it, a Minister is incapacitated to deal in secret with God for the people and is apt to lay stumbling▪ blocks before them: and so, partly by wanting what he should have, and partly by being prone to foster their security, or rifle their wounds untenderly, or stumble them by his carriage, he, in these and many other respects, looketh as one not suited and fitted in an ordinary, at least a kindly, way, for the begetting of many: so that whatever in some extraordinary cases the Lord may do; yet this is most usual: which should make people desire lively Ministers, and pray that they may be kept so; and also should make Ministers conscionably see to their own particular conditions, and that in reference to their Ministry, least by their declining in their own Spiritual estate, and their neglecting thereof, they have no less influence on the fruitlessenesse of their Ministry, than by the direct neglecting of proper ministerial duties.

From this also we may gather, in answer to the last Question, That no personal corruption in joint worshippers▪ doth pollute any of the Lord's Ordinances to another; or, on that account, necessitate a separation from them: for, if the corruption of any had such influence, then it were especially the corruption of Ministers; and if the corruption of Ministers did so, then it were not to be thought that the Lord would have such; even after their discovery, to be acknowledged still to be Ministers, which yet here and in the former instances is clear. The Word and Sacraments administered by such, if rightly received and improven, are owned by Him as His Word and Sacraments, as well as when administered by the most Holy, as from the considering of the forementioned instances may appear.

There are yet two particular Questions, which possibly may be desiderated by some, to which we shall speak a word before we leave this Epistle. The first is, by what symptoms a Minister may discern his own deadness while things seem to go well with him in public? or, what may give him occasion to suspect himself to be under such a charge, as is given against this Angel here? The second is, What may be the means of a Ministers preventing of such a condition, or, of recovering himself therefrom when fallen into it?

To the first, we say, that even when things go well in public before others, a Ministers works may yet be liable to this charge of not being perfect before God: and, we conceive, upon search within, and reflection upon himself, may be discerned by these or such like symptoms, 1. When there is a decay or lifelesnesse in his own particular condition, that is, when there is no exercise of Repentance in himself as a Christian, nor freshness and tenderness in communion with God in secret prayer and other Christian duties: if in such a case he should preach as an Angel, yet cannt that be said to be perfect before God. 2. In such a frame, a Minister ordinarily is not kindly affected with the discharge of ministerial duties, nor with sympathy towards the People; but he goeth lightly under the burden of these, almost indifferent what come of the fruit, if fairly and without any palpable discovery of his infirmity such duties be put by. 3. Upon this it followeth, that if there be acceptation of the thing amongst the people, there is but too much quietness in the Minister, without reflecting upon his own indisposition and unsoundness, and without being taken up with the desire of fruitfulness among the people. This is suspicious-like, when a Minister so acteth in ministerial duties, as if there were no more called-for, than the throughing of what is public before m n. 4. S mething of this may be gathered from the scope and strain of his Doctrine, that is, if there be any secret aiming to commend himself by such Doctrine, or, if of its own nature it seem to tend more to that, than to edify and feed the souls of Hearers. 5. If his own gift and present acceptation among the people be well satisfying to him, so as he be under little fear of sitting up, and if he be unfrequent and cold in adresses to God for liveliness and success: these and such like things look not well. 6. Somewhat may be perceived by Ministers inclination to converse with unserious untender men though they be civil; and to keep up general discourses and questions with them, rather than to converse with such as are tender, and love to have their exercises and practical cases for the matter of their discourse: it cannot be well when it is so. 7. It is not right with a Minister, however it be in the exercise of his gift, when he is not walking under the impression of sinful defects, and unsinglenesse and want of zeal as to his end and manner of carrying on the most commendable-like duties: for as it is no good token in a private Christian to be without the impression of his own corruptions and sinful infirmities; so it cannot be right with a Minister when his ministerial defects are not sensible to him: and when there is not an actual exercise with the selfishness, carnalness, vanity, &c. that are in him, it's too like these have too much sway with them.

Now, to the second, to wit, What a Minister ought to do in such a case for recovering of himself? Answ. The reading of this Epistle seriously will indeed satisfy this: which we may draw out in these directions, 1. It's necessary that a Minister observe his own condition, and take notice of the sinfulness and hazard thereof: this is implied in the word remember, verse. 3. and indeed who cometh to ponder and consider rightly their own condition, are in a fair way of recovery. 2. There will be a putting of everything right that belongeth to a Christian: oftentimes decaying in Christianity, bringeth on this deadness in the Minister: and therefore there can be no better mean of recovery than once to put the soul in a right posture in this respect. 3. It will further this much, that he begin with the serious exercise of Repentance of what is past, and that as to the defects that cleave to him both as a Christian and as a Minister: this maketh the beginning of a recovery to be solid. Therefore it is commanded, verse. 3. 4. There would be special care had in the doing of ministerial duties, that not only they be done, but that they be done in a right manner: that so everything be done as in the sight of God, with an eye to this, that it may be found perfect before him. This is in the word be watchful, and implied under this Angels charge of not having his works perfect before God. 5. There would be zeal and carefulness in the begetting and keeping of life and liveliness among the people, as in himself: and for that cause, a doing of everything with respect to that end. This was the Angels fault in his deadness, to wit, the neglecting of this, and it is commanded to him, to strengthen what was ready to die, as a thing befitting his recovery. This is in a condescending way to seek to feed the people with what is profitable, though thereby a Minister should seem to some to lose of his name and reputation. 6. There is need in all things to be denied, and to exercise faith in Him that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven Stars also, without which there is no attaining to liveliness: and for this end doth the Lord so describe Himself in the Inscription of this Epistle. Much dependence on Him, walking with Him, standing in His counsel, &c. and that in the meanest particular steps of any ministerial duty, as not daring to undertake anything without Him, and so an acknowledging of Him in His grace, as to the fruit of everything, This is a very fountain of the life of a Minister

LECTURE II.


Vers. 7.

And unto the Angel of the Church in Philadelphia, write, These things saith he that is holy, he that is true, he that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth, and shutteth, and no man openeth;


8.

I know thy works: behold, I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it: for thou hast a little strength, and hast kept my word, and hast not denied my name.


9.

Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan (which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie) behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.


10.

Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.


11.

Behold, I come quickly, hold that fast which thou hast, that no man take thy crown.


12.

Him that overcometh, will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is the new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.


13.

He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches.

THis sixth Epistle, directed to Philadelphia, hath the same Division with the rest, to wit, the Inscription, verse. 7. the Body of the Epistle, verse. 8, 9, 10, 11. and the Conclusion, verse. 13.

In the Inscription, the Lord, the directer of this Epistle, doth set forth Himself in these three, 1. He that is holy. 2. He that is true : these are two essential Attributes of the God-head, and show that our Lord Jesus is God. And He taketh these stiles to Himself in this place, that, 1. He may show unto this honest Church, that their honesty could not but be approven of Him, who was holiness itself. And, 2. to strengthen their Faith in the expectation of the performance of His promises, however they looked improbable-like, because He who made them is true, and truth itself. The third Title, is, He that hath the key of David, he that openeth, and no man shutteth; and shutteth, and no man openeth : This respecteth His Office, and holdeth Him forth as the great Steward of the House of God, who is entrusted with the management of what concerneth the same, and is invested with Power and Authority suitable thereunto. It alludeth to Isa. 22.20, 21, 22, &c. where the Lord, speaking of His preferring Eliakim unto the government of Jerusalem and Judah, doth express it thus, And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder: So, He shall open, and none shall shut, and He shall shut, and none shall open. Now this, as attributed here to Christ, is not to be understood principally of His essential and absolute Dominion as God: for, that cannot be called the key of the house of David ; but it's to be understood of His Mediatorie Kingdom, whereby He, as Mediator, is invested with Power and Authority for ordering the affairs of the house of God. And as it standeth in this verse, it doth hold forth, 1. That Christ Jesus, as Mediator, hath a peculiar oversight and Government of the Church. 2. That in this Dominion of Christ's, is fulfilled the promise of perpetuating the power of the house of David : therefore it's called the key of the house of David, which is committed to Him. 3. Here is held forth the Sovereignty and absoluteness of Christ's Dominion: therefore He shutteth, and no man openeth; and openeth, and no man shutteth : there is no marring of any of His orders: for, He having obtained this Name above every Name by God's exalting of Him thereunto, Philip. 2.9. there can be no imaginable competition with Him in the exercise of this Power. 4. This being compared with the former two titles, doth show that He who is entrusted with the supreme Government of the Church, is God: He, is holy and true, and therefore can do no wrong to any, nor fail in the performance of what He promiseth: which is of great consolation to His People. This, lastly, is here mentioned, to encourage and strengthen this honest weak Angel and Church against the many difficulties which they had to wrestle with, as we will find in the Body of the Epistle.

This Angel and Church, it's like have been before others, far from that estimation that Sardis was in: for, they have but a little strength, and many enemies; yet were they much more honest and commendable before God, and fruitful under the Ordinances they had: therefore the Lord indites a most comfortable Epistle unto them.

In the Body of the Epistle, we have these three things, 1. Their present condition, is in several respects described. 2. Their commendation is laid down. 3. Some excellent encouragements and directions are given them for the time to come. These three being interwoven, we must open them as they lie.

Beside this general, I know thy works : which, though common to all the rest of the Epistles in some respect, yet may be taken here as holding forth His particular approbation of this Church, because there is nothing quarrelled in her. This will not indeed prove that she was altogether free; but that, being honest and free of gross faults, the Lord doth not rigidly reckon with her. Besides this, I say, in the 8. verse. this Churches good condition is set forth in these four, 1. Behold I have set before thee an open door, and no man can shut it : this is the fountain of all that is commendable in her, and from which it doth flow, to wit, Christ's conferring such a mercy upon her: and this is a main encouragement premitted for the strengthening of the honest Angel of this Church. For understanding of it, we must consider, 1. What is meant by an open door. 2. What by Christ's setting of it before the Angel, so as no man can shut it. By an open door usually is understood in the Scripture the Lord's making way for profitable preaching of the Gospel, which standeth not mainly in having access and liberty, without any external restraint, to preach the Gospel; but especially it stands in God's giving inward liberty to the Preacher, and in His countenancing of the Word, and making it effectual and successful upon the hearts of Hearers. This is called, Colos. 4.3. A door of utterance, when a Minister is not straitened in preaching the Gospel, but, as it were, the door is casten open to him. And, 2 Cor. 2, 12. When I came to Troas to preach Christ's Gospel, and a door was opened unto me of the Lord : which is some special signification of God's sending him and removing of difficulties out of the way, and making his Ministry succesefull there, And, 1 Cor. 16.9. it is said, a great door and effectual is opened unto me, and there are many adversaries, So, that there may be an effectual door opened, even where there is much opposition. In sum, it imports these two or three, 1. That there is a straitnednesse in Ministers who cannot bring forth the Gospel as it ought to be brought forth, and will when the Lord sendeth forth the Spirit and enlargeth a man with boldness to speak the same: in this respect, a door of utterance is opened unto him, as in that place, Col. 4.3. is clear. 2. That there is a further let beside this, to wit, when the ears and hearts of Hearers are so locked up that the Word hath no entrance, but is repelled. The Lord openeth this door, when by the work of His Spirit upon hearts, as upon the heart of Lydia, He doth make the Word to be received and admitted: in which respect, (2 Thess. 3.1.) Paul desireth them to pray that the Word may have free course, that is, that there be no shut doors to mar the progress of the same. Both these are understood here, to wit, liberty for the Minister to speak, and that with countenance and success among the People. We conceive also that this phrase of an open door, doth take in a concurring of God's providence, for the keeping of the Word ministered, and Ordinances in such a place in both the respects that are mentioned, notwithstanding of the numerousnesse and maliciousness of opposers: and this agreeth well with that word, in this verse, and no man shall shut it. And this may be a third thing imported in this expression, though it be not of the same kind with the former two every way.

By Christ's setting open of this door before the Angel, so that none can shut it, is holden forth, 1. Christ's supreamacie and sovereignty in giving Gifts to men, liberty and inward freedom to improve them, and also a blessing upon them in making of them succesefull. It is not Gifts, by which a man will be able to Preach, if the Lord'give not a door of utterance; yea, even the great Apostle Paul hath need of this, Col. 4.3. nor is it the having of utterance that will obtain fruits among the people, if the Lord do not open an effectual door, and give the Word free course among them. Hence it is, that sometimes where there is most utterance given, there may be less success than where there are fewer Gifts: because he, whose privilege it is to set open doors, doth open more fully the door of utterance to the one, and the effectual door to the other, and doth not open both equally to all. 2. This importeth the necessity and inevitablenesse of success: when Christ thus openeth the door, Success cannot but follow: and no man, or devil can shut out or impede the same, when He pleaseth to countenance His Ministers, and to commend the Word to the hearts of hearers. Now, it may appear what the meaning of this part of the verse is, which relateth especially to the Angel, to wit, I have called thee to this Ministry, and have given thee some measure of utterance, though thou hast not much ability, and especially, I have ordered matters so as the Word from thee shall have free course and success. And, rage who will, this shall not be obstructed. By which also we may see why the Lord took the Title to Himself, that doth immediately go before this.

The second thing in the verse, is, for thou hast a little strength : by little strength here, is not to be understood weakness in Grace; (for, that is eminently commended) nor yet little countenance in the discharge of Ministerial duties, But it looketh to his parts and abilities, which, its like, were not many and great in comparison of what others had, that is, it may be he was not able to speak of, nor search into so many profound mysteries, and follow doubtful disputations, as others were in capacity to do. This is not mentioned here as any ground of opprobrie to him, nor yet as any ground of commendation, being considered simply and in itself; but it is mentioned for these two reasons, which being put together, will clear the scope. 1. It is given as a ground of Christ's opening the door before him, and as an evidence that what success he had, was to be attributed to His countenancing of him, because thou thyself hast but a little strength. And this showeth, that as oftentimes Christ is most tender to the weak Believers; so also to the weak Ministers, that are yet sent by Him, and honest in the discharge of their Commission. 2. It is mentioned here to heighten the commendation that followeth, to wit, that though thou hast a little strength, yet thou hast kept my Word. It is the joining of these two together, that showeth wherefore this is here taken notice of.

The third and fourth expressions, which most expressly hold forth the commendation, are, Thou hast kept my Word, and hast not denied my Name : by keeping of the Word here, is not only understood the keeping of purity in Doctrine; but especially these two, 1. A keeping it in practice, by being conform thereto in their walk. 2. An avowed Preaching of the Truth by the Minister, and his adhering to and owning of the same in his station, notwithstanding of all the reproaches which he met with: for the scope, relating especially to the Minister, his keeping of the Word must imply also something peculiar to him, which is commonly expressed in the Old Testament by this Word of keeping the Lord's charge. The last word, thou hast not denied my Name, is to the same purpose; but doth import more than is asserted, to wit, that notwithstanding of the many trials thou hast met with, yet thou not only hast not faintly denied my name; but hast openly and confidently avowed and confessed the same. And these two, being compared with a little strength which this Angel had, do make the evidences and commendation of his honesty the more wonderful. In the 9, and 10. verses, the Lord g veth two special encouragements unto them, having also some testimony of their by-gone integrity included in them. It is like this honest Church, hath been under a twofold persecution, (as we have seen in some of the former Epistles) 1. From the corrupt and unbelieving, Jews, who, having Synagogues in many places, did prove great persecutors and reproachers of the Name of Christ, and His Worshippers: This the Lord doth encourage them against, in the 9. verse. 2. From heathens: in reference to which, He comforteth them, verse. 10.

The Consolation, which is laid down, verse. 9. doth express these three,

1. There is a description of these corrupt Jews, they are said to be of the synagogue of Satan, who say they are Jews and are not, but do lie, that is, they indeed call themselves Jews, and children of Abraham, and God's Covenanted people, &c. but they do lie, it is not so, for now they being broken off by their unbelief, are truly of the synagogue of Satan, and followers of him, as we expounded it, chap. 2. verse. 9.

2. There is the promise which the Lord maketh to this Church, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee. In sum, it is this, these corrupt Jews do now calumniate thee, as if thou wert not of my Church nor beloved by me; but, faith be, by my inward Power I will so move and incline them, as they shall willingly come and worship before thy feet, and know indeed that I have loved thee.

The words of the promise may be two ways understood, and we conceive that both come well in here, 1. They may be understood of sincere conversion; and so the meaning is, I will convert many of these blasphemers, and, as an evidence thereof, make them come and worship before thy feet, that is, really Worship God in the Assemblie with thee, like that word, Isa. 60.14. The sons also of them that afflicted thee, shall come bending unto thee, and they that despise thee, shall bow themselves down at the soles of thy feet; and they shall call thee, the city of the Lord, the holy one of Israel. And in this expression, the Prophets scope, is, to foretell the conversion of the Gentiles in the days of the Gospel. The word in the first language, is, I will give them, &c. which doth express more significantly both the nature of this work as to the Angel; (it is a very excellent and singular gift to him to have blasphemers made converts) and also it showeth the 〈◊〉 hereof, it being a Gift of Christ's Grace. This we conceive is to be taken as a part of the meaning: And is clear, 1. from the scope, which is to show the fruit of Christ's keeping the door open before this Minister for his encouragement, to wit, His making the Word powerful for the captivating of gainsayers unto the obedience of Christ. 2. The word added, and they shall know that I have loved thee, seemeth to import something of a kindly principle acting them in this.

Again, 2. The words may be understood as holding forth a feigned submission of many unto the Ordinances of Christ; who from Christ's clear owning of His Church shall be made, being as it were astonished, to acknowledge the same, and to say, doubtless God is among such a people of a truth, as it is, 1 Corinth. 14.25. And this being a promise made to the Church, as a piece of her splendor and happiness, that her enemies shall lie, or give feigned obedience unto her, Deut. 33. 29. and a thing also that doth tend to the evidencing of the Lord's respect to His Church, we take it in under this promise likewise. So the meaning will be, I will give some of these Jews as real converts unto thee, and others of them shall be so far convinced of My respect to thee, as shall make them counterfit in their profession, and give thee some reverence also: for, if there were not some converts, the promise would not be so great as it is; yet, it cannot be expected that this reality should be universal amongst these corrupt Jews. And according to the former exposition, these words which follow, and to know that I have loved thee, are two way also to be understood, to wit, either of such a Spiritual discerning of the saving effects of God's love to such a people, which begetteth a charitable persuasion in them of the sincerity of such and such persons; or, it is to be understood of some common and general conviction, flowing from some outward evidences of God's favor, which often is in many hypocrites.

The third thing in the verse, is, the Lord's making this promise so observable, both by doubling and repeating the same; and also by prefixing a behold at every time thereunto: which showeth, 1. That the thing is most rare which is here promised, o wit, to have blasphemers made converts. 2. That it is a most excellent favor to a Minister or Church when such a mercy is bestowed. And, 3. that although it be difficult-like; yet in this case it is sure, seeing for the confirmation of the saith of this Church the Lord hath repeated the same.

The encouragement in reference to the other persecution followeth, verse. 10. Wherein, 1. there is a common trial foretold. 2. There is a promise made to them in reference to the same. And, 3. some ground, as it were a reason of this promise, is premitted, verse.. 10.

The trial which is foretold, is everal ways set forth. 1. It is called a ventation. It is usual in Scripture to style affliction by the name of entation, as I m. 1.2. Count it all joy when ye fall in divers entations; and so also, verse. 11. The reason is, because such afflictions want never many circumstances waiting upon them, which do indeed make them to be temptations: and so there men are tried by them, or, through their own corruption, snared upon such occasions. 2. It is an hour of temptation: to signify both the definitnesse and shortness thereof: which doth carry an encouragement in the bosom of it. 3. It is a trial which shall come upon all the world : By world here, is not to be understood the Heathen world, as contradistinct from the Church, for, that world is not the object of such trials; but is instrumental therein: it is then the Church spread up and down throughout the world, They shall be tried. And usually it was so, when persecution was moved by the Heathen Emperors, it spread through all the corners of the world, where any part of the Church was. 4. The end thereof, is, to try them that dwell upon the earth, that is, the Saints that live upon the earth; and so earth here, is not contradistinguished from the Church simply; but thereby the Church militant is contradistinguished from the Church-triumphant. For, the privilege of Philadelphia is not, that she shall be kept from ills that are common to the men of the world; but this, that when the Church should be under persecution generally, the Lord should secretly and tenderly preserve her from the weight of that trial, that others were to meet with: which is the second thing to be considered in the verse.

The promise, in reference to this trial, which is made to Philadelphia, is in these words, I will also keep thee from the hour of temptation, &c. It may two ways be understood, 1. As being a promise to keep her from any prejudice by that trial, though she might meet with the same: this is indeed truth; but cannot be said to be a peculiar privilege to Philadelphia : for, all the Lord's people might plead and expect that, and yet some peculiar thing seemeth to be holden out as to Philadelphia in this promise. Therefore, 2. we understand it thus, when others shall be under persecution, thou shalt either be altogether free from that particular trial, which is to come; or, at least in a great measure shall be kept from the extremities that others t ereby shall be put unto. And in this respect, the promise beareth something peculiar to Philadelphia : and therefore cannot be made use of by others as a ground to expect freedom from temporal crosses, except there be the like warrand to apply the same.

The last thing in the verse, (though it be first in order) is the ground to which the Lord doth knit this promise, Because thou hast kept the word of my patience, I also will keep thee, &c. The word of Christ's patience, is the Gospel: called so, 1. because usually the cross followeth it, and the Professors thereof have need of patience. 2. Because it is the great School-master that teatheth the exercise of patience: for which reasons, it's also called the Kingdom and Patience of Jesus Christ, chap. . verse. 9. Their keeping of this word of His patience, doth import their owning of, and adhering to, this Gospel with much patience under many crosses and much persecution and so this connection doth not imply any merit in them procuring this peculiar privilege; but doth express Christ's tenderness, and, to say so, His condescending equity in His proceeding, who, seeing this Church had a little strength, and yet had born out more steadfastly and patiently under many former trials, than others who might be of greater abilities; Therefore, out of His tenderness, He now promiseth to keep them free in a peculiar manner from a coming storm.

The last thing in the Body of the Epistle, is the advertisement, verse. 11. which hath these three, 1. An assertion of Christ's coming, and that quickly, Behold I come quickly: which showeth, that though he seem now to be absent, and to delay His coming; yet it will be found otherwise. It is said to be quickly, 1. Because it is not long in comparison with Eternity. 2. Because it will be sudden to enemies. 3. It will be seasonable to friends. It will not be one hour behind the due time: and therefore may be said to be quickly. 4. He is for the present hasting, and, to say so, making dispatch of what is to precede His coming; and so may be said to be coming quickly. This is here mentioned as a ground of encouragement to the Angel to continue steadfast upon the one side, and as a watchword to scare them from declining on the other, seeing Christ was to come to Judgment, and that shortly. The second word, is, a direction, hold that fast which thou hast : which is in sum, ye are in a good condition now, be diligent to retain the same, as the like expression was expounded, Chap. 2.25. The third thing, is, a warning added to this direction, hold fast, &c. that no man take thy Crown : in sum it is this, thou art now in a royal condition, thy honesty is thy Crown before Me and others, and it hath a promise of a Crown after this: therefore be diligent and steadfast, lest by your declining ye be prejudged of your Crown. It alludeth to running amongst men, where they that sit up in the way, though having for a time run well, yet obtain not the Crown, because some other outstrips them, and obtaineth the same: here the scope only, is, to show that these who sit up in the practice of Christianity, shall as surely be deprived of the Crown of Glory; and it is here added, to show how the Lord addeth spurs to His most faithful servants for preventing of their falling.

The first part of the Conclusion, (for we shall say nothing of the second) is, verse. 12. comprehending five privileges to the overcomer. The first is, I will make him a pillar in the Temple of my God : by the Temple of my God, must be here understood Heaven, and so, to be made a pillar, is to be fixed there in Heaven, as a Trophy of the Victory of Jesus Christ, and as singularly and eminently fitted for, furnished with, and fixed in the glory that is there. For, 1. The properties that follow, will show that this can only be understood of Heaven. 2. Thus also it can only agree with all the other promises that are made to the overcomer, which principally relate to Heaven. 3. There is no other thing that can be expected by every overcomer but Heaven.

The second thing, is, he shall go no more out : the access that Believers have to God's company and Temple here hath interruptions; and the Believer is again soon down from any mount where Christ may be transfigured before him: but (faith the Lord) when I shall make him a pillar in the Temple of my God, and settle him in Heaven, there shall no more be any interruption of communion, either by God's hiding of Himself upon the one side, or from the Believers whoring from Him upon the other; but he shall be by the powerful grace of God established there, and shall go no more out. And this is added as a special consolation to the Believer that is weary of his own gading and whoring from God; that there is a time coming when that shall be broken off, and he shall go no more out.

The third step, is, and I will write upon him the name of my God : pillars that were erected as monuments of honor, were honorable according to the name or inscription that was written upon them: Now, there can be none more honorable than to have the Name of God written upon them, and to be devoted to Him. We concieve also, it implieth a sharing and partaking of the glory of God in some measure, as a poor creature is able to partake of the same.

The fourth thing, is, and the name of the city of my God, which is New Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God. We must understand, 1. What is meaned by this New Jerusalem, before it can be understood what it is to bear its Name. By the New Ieru alem and city of my God, we understand one of two, either, 1. Heaven, which in the seat of the Church Triumphant, called here the New Jerusalem, because it so far doth exceed the splendor and beauty of the Church, or Jerusalem, here upon earth: and it is said to come down from Heaven, because by the preaching of the Gospel the Kingdom of God is brought near, even to the door. Or, 2. The congregation of the first-born that are already perfected in Heaven, called the New Jerusalem, because though they be of that same Church of Christ, yet are they in respect of their glorious qualifications and perfections, as it were, a new Church. And thus it is said to come down from Heaven, not so much to signify any local mutation, as to show where it is for the time: and that their original, as such, is from God. Both these turn to one, and show that by this promise is understood, that the overcomer shall be admitted as a free Burgess and Citizen to glory amongst the rest of the Congregation of the first-born. And thus to have the name thereof written upon the overcomer, is to have Him, as it were, declared a free Burgess and Citizen of that glorious Incorporation. That it is thus to be understood of Heaven, and not of any state of the Church upon earth, the reasons before mentioned do evince. Beside, it is a promise that is to be performed to every overcomer, and that after his full Victory here; and so consequently after his death: and therefore can be understood of no other thing but Heaven.

The last thing, is, and I will write upon him my new name : the Mediators new name, is, the exaltation which He hath received after His Resurrection and complete Victory, as is clear, Philip. 2.9. The writing of this upon the overcomer, is, the making of Him a joint sharer of that His Glory; and so to sit upon one Throne with Himself, and eat and drink at one Table with Him, and to behold His Glory, as Himself doth pray, John. 17.22, 23, 24. the due and proportionable difference being always kept betwixt the head and members. Now, put these together, and so the overcomer shall be glorious in himself: For, so, 1. He shall be a pillar. 2. He shall partake of the glory of God, and have His Name upon him. 3. He shall partake of the glory of Heaven and the Saints that are there already. 4. He shall partake of the Mediators Glory and bear His new Name: and what more can be imagined? Thus the Lord shall be admired in all that believe, 2. Thess. 1.10. in that day when every Believer shall be as a Trophy erected to the glory of the grace of God, and for a memorial of the love that our blessed Lord Jesus had unto, and of the Victory He obtained for elect sinners by His redeeming of them.

It rests now that we observe some things further from this Epistle beside what is already hinted: wherein it is not our purpose to insist.

Observe, 1. There is difference betwixt gifts requisite to the being of a Minister, and success by the exercise of these in the Ministry. There is here a little strength, that respecteth the first; and an open door, which respecteth the second: and these two are distinguished one from another. And thus we will find throughout Paul's Epistles, that difference is made betwixt his liberty to Preach upon the one side, and God's opening an effectual door to him upon the other. 2. We see that Christ is the giver of both, to wit, of gift to Ministers, and of success among the People. 3. We see that he distributeth not to all alike; but an open door is set before some, more than before others, and when not at all before others, as by comparing this and other Epistles together is clear.

It may be asked here, 1. What way a Minister may know if an effectual door be opened to him amongst the People, seeing Paul sometimes afferteth the same? 2. How: Minister, having such an opportunity, ought to carry in the improving thereof?

To the first we say, that this cannot be discerned alanerly from a man's gift: for, it may be shut where great gifts are, as we will see hereafter. Beside, it is like Paul had not always this door open to him, at least it was more in one place than another. Nor is it merely to be gathered from a man's freedom from external crosses in a place, nor yet from the great following he may have: for, there may be many adversaries where this effectual door is opened, 1 Cor. 16.4. and there may be no such thing, where there is great peace and applause. Yet, we conceive by these and such like characters, this may be somewhat discernible, 1. When a Minister getteth the door of utterance upon the one side opened to him, and there is an opening of ears among the People to welcome the same upon the other: which is not to be understood of carnal itching after, or being tickled with a gift; but of love to edification, and simplicity and diligence amongst them: which showeth that such a man and his gift is commended to them; and so that they are in the greater capacity to get good of him. 2. Where this is, it hath real changes following, and much solid work: for, by it people are not made light, and notional, but are made humble, serious, tender, fruitful, &c. 3. Where such a door is opened, the devil often rageth, and setteth himself to oppose, traduce, or some way to blast the Ministry of such a person more than of many others. This poor Angel hath much affliction, when the Ministers in Sardis and La dicta are free. And so when an effectual door is opened to Paul at Ephesu , this is added, that there are many adversaries, 1 Cor. 16. Yet, even under such afflictions there are many trysts of providence to be marked in the Lord's way, for countenancing 〈◊〉 Ministry, and many evidences of respect to the same from such as are tender. 4. It is a good token of an open door, when some way observably the Lord defeateth the devil and pr fanity in a place, and is making him fall like lightning from heaven by the Preaching of the Word. 5. The experimental proof that is most sure, is an actual gaining of ground upon the kingdom of the devil, and a bringing off of prisoners unto Jesus Christ: which is the proof given here, where God promiseth new converts; and is ever supposed by Paul, when he mentioneth this door.

Now to the second, to wit, how a Minister ought to use such an opportunity? We say, 1. it is to be improven with all diligence in his duty, as a man that is to reap corn that is already ripe. 2. It is to be made use of with all humility and self-denial, left by being tikled therewith he prejudge the Master of His Glory, and so procure straitening to himself. 3. It would be with much fear and watchfulness: with fear, lest he himself miscarry; or any soul miscarry in the birth, because of his unskilfulness: with watchfulness, lest the devil saw cares while he is sleeping; and the conception prove false without reality as to many hearers. This is Paul's word, 1 Corinth. 2.3. I was amongst you in much weakness, and in much fear and trembling, which showeth the kindly impression which he had, both of his own and the people's infirmities. 4. It would be improven zealously, that is, so as the Authority of Christ may appear upon His Ordinances both to adversaries and friends. 5. It would be made use of (to say so) solidly, by making the foundation sure, by proposing solid food to souls, as the substantial Gospel-truths, and the uncontroverted duties of holiness: for, there is hazard too soon to bring such a people to the new wine of the most sublime things in Doctrine, or the most extraordinary practices of grown Christians: and it is better that they be fed upon milk, and what is healthful and nourishing, than that to please their appetites, they be diverted with useless Questions. 6. There would be much dependence upon God in such a case: for He is the Master, and hath appointed a great Steward over the house who hath the keys laid upon His shoulder: and the Minister in such a case, would know that he hath no Tack or Lease of such a condition, but is at the Masters pleasure: and therefore he would be acknowledged in every step of the Work as it is done, or in doing. Lastly, The great shot of all Preaching would be driven constantly, both in public and private, to wit, the edification and salvation of the people, and the forming of Christ in them by travelling, as it were, in birth for that effect. Obs. 4. Somtimes there may be greater success unto mean Gifts, by Christ's countenancing the same, than where Gifts are in themselves more eminent and shining: the reason is, because, for the attaining of success, it is not only necessary to have the exercise of a Gift; but also to have a door opened to them by Christ: and these two are sometimes separated, as was formerly said. And by so doing, the Lord would teach Ministers, to know their own insufficiency for any such thing; and also necessitate both Ministers and People to the acknowledgement of Him. There is a notable instance of the Power of mean Gifts beyond greater abilities in the History of the Council of Nice, wherein a subtle Philosopher who had long keeped the Assembly jangling with disputes, at last by a man of small parts (in respect of others who had been disputing) was convinced by the simple propounding of the Truth of the Gospel, which he closed thus, this is the Truth of God, Philosopher, believeth thou this? Who answered, he did. Then said the honest confessor (for so is he styled by the Author) If so, then follow me, and be baptized: unto which the Philosopher yielded, as if he had never learned to gain-say; expressing these words to the hearers, and especially to some other Philosophers that were with him, so long as I was dealt with by words, I did repel words with words, but when power proceeded with words out of the mouth of him that spoke, I was not able, said he, to resist that : and thereupon instantly went out to be baptized. At first all the Doctors were affrighted that the Truth should have suffered; and therefore hardly gave way to him to speak; yet did that simplicity prevail by God's blessing to the conviction and conversion of the Philosopher, when all these Scholastic debates did not. This is recorded by Russinus in the third Chapter of his book, which is the first added by him to Eusebius his Ecclesiastic History. Obs. 5. That some men of mean and small Gifts or Parts, and who are not able to do much by writing or disputing against subtle adversaries; do yet often prove more steadfast adherers to Truth in times of pesecution, than others who in the former respects have gone far beyond them, and have been of greater esteem as friends to Truth, both with themselves and others. This Angels strength was not much; but his steadfastness and patience under affliction was great. Worthy Perkins, on the place, giveth a memorable instance of this in the time of the persecution under Queen Marie of England, to wit, that there was an honest man of mean Parts and no great esteem, near to Cambridge, who did seal the Truth with his blood, when all the great Scholars and Doctors of that University did miserably and shamefully make defection from the same. Obs. 6. That oftentimes an honest Minister with mean Gifts, hath more countenance and success in his Ministry than where greater Gifts without honesty are, as by comparing this Angel with the Angels of Sardis and Laodicea in this same Chapter is clear. For (to say no more) he hath this advantage, that his works may be found perfect before God, wherein the others cannot but be defective. Obs. 7. That a little measure of Gifts, being honestly and faithfully improven, have their commendation from Jesus Christ, as if they were of the highest measure and degree: because it is not Gifts that commendeth a Minister to Christ, but faithfulness in improving the measure which he hath: and so if two talents be faithfully improven, it will be said, well done to that servant, and he will be called faithful, even as well as he, who had five, or even ten talents, bestowed upon him. And if this were well considered, Ministers might be less anxious for the measure of their Gifts, and more provoked to be serious and faithful in their improving of the same. Obs. 8. That it is a special mercy, even to be keeped from the common trials that others meet with: there is much mercy in God's people's being keeped free from ills, that other ways they might be over-mastered with: and it is not by chance or fortune, that the lot of one Church or Person is more easy than the lot of others; but this cometh from the Lord's over-ruling Providence, keeping them from that hour of temptation, which in His wisdom is ordered for others; who is therefore humbly and thankfully to be acknowledged in the same. Obs. 9. That steadfastness in honesty and faithful adherence to Christ and His Truth, do never of themselves involve a people in trials and afflictions; but, in God's good providence, do often prevent the same: therefore this honest and zealous Church, is kept from a coming storm, which was to try all the world beside. Obs. 10. That it is not impossible to God to make open blasphemers real converts, and that sometimes He hath actually done and doth the same. Obs. 11. That when He doth this, it is one of the rarest Gifts that can be bestowed upon a Church, and one of the greatest confirmations that an honest Minister can meet with in his Ministry; and, in the usual dispensation of God's Providence, doth attend a Ministers honest, zealous and faithful discharge of his duty in simplicity. Therefore both Ministers and People would not only be animated and encouraged to pray for the same; but also to love and follow honest simplicity and faithfulness, as the most suitable and probable way for attaining the same. Obs. 12. That as usually true conversion to God and sincere love to the Saints go together, so also is it found in experience that the more bitterness hath been against the Ordinances, Saints or Servants of our Lord Jesus, There will be, if conversion be true, the more full and manifest testimonies of respect shown to them, even often beyond what are shown from these that have been formerly sincere. Obs. 13. That profane men before their conversion, do not look upon honest simple and Godly followers of God, as so beloved of Him as indeed they are. Obs. 14. It is a good token when men are brought in sincerity, to acknowledge, that it is neither the great men, nor the wise and learned men of the world that are beloved of God; but only the Godly, and all such, whatever their place or parts be. Obs. 15. The right impression of Godliness in a Person or Church, is not to conceive such and such to be more deserving than others; but to be more beloved of God: which is the great fountain of all the rest.

Concerning Ministerial qualifications.

IF we will compare the Angels of these three Churches in this Chapter together, we will find great difference: these of Sardis and Laodicea, it is like, had many gifts, which made the first get a name from others, and the last to esteem of himself; yet hath none of them a great commendation for grace, but the contrary; He of Sardis had a name, but was dead, and his works (what ever they appeared to men) were not perfect before God: what he of Laodicea was, that Epistle also will clear. And for fruit, the Angel of Sardis hath little, but a few names ; and it is like he of Laodicea had less or none at all. The Angel of Philadelphia again, is in all these three contrary: he hath few parts, but a little strength ; yet hath a good testimony of honesty and success. Whence may we not only gather, 1. That there are different measures of gifts amongst Ministers. And, 2. That some are more honest than others And, 3. That the most honest have often the meanest gifts in appearance; and who have greatest gifts, often are least conscionable in the improving of them. And, 4. That a sincere honest Minister may have very mean gifts, either considered in themselves, or as being compared with others; and yet may be more faithful in improving of them, be more accepted of by Jesus Christ with his small measure, and have moe fruits and greater success, than others of more shining gifts without tenderness in their walk: But we may also have occasion to inquire, what qualifications are requisite in a Minister of the Gospel? and particularly, if Learning be any way useful to a Minister? or, if it be not rather hurtful, seeing weak Philadelphia is so commanded, when others are reproved? or, if grace ought to be reckoned amongst ministerial qualifications? There are here extrems, some giving too much to Learning, and too little to Grace, and others doing the contrary. These are not then to be looked on as inconsistent; but as agreeing well together: for, it is not the Angel of Sardis his reproof, that he had a name or gifts; but that he was unanswerable to them: nor is it Philadelphia's commendation, that he had a little strength; but that he improved well that little which he had: otherwise, one talent may be hid and abused as well as five. To speak a word therefore to the thing, we conceive that these three are necessary for the complete qualifying of a Minister, or, of one of the Ministry, to wit, 1. Gifts. 2. Learning. 3. Grace. The second helpeth to manage the first; the third sanctifieth both, and maketh them lavell at the right end and mark. Yet take these advertisements, 1. That there are degrees in all these, and that we intend not to stint to any rigid measure or degree in any of them. 2. That although they be necessary; yet not equallynor after the same manner, the first two being necessary to the esse, or being of ministerial qualifications; the last belonging to the beue esse, or to the well and integral being thereof, as will afterward appear.

By gifts, we understand a fitness given of God, whereby one is capacitated for such a Calling: and although by improving, it may increase; yet we conceive that it is in itself no acquired thing simply, but is like a Stock or a Talent that is given to Trade with in such a Station: and therefore by no pains, skill, or art, can be attained, where it is not given. Hence it is peculiarly called a gift; and of Christ's giving, Ephes. 4.12. 1 Cor. 12. and 14. 1 Tim. 4.14. and 2 Tim. 1.6. The Apostle comprehendeth it in that word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , apt to Teach, 1 Tim. 3. And we may take it up in these three, 1. A capacity to discern and conceive of the things of God with some distinctness: if this be not, there can be no progress to any other step; and this may be called the gift of knowledge (as there is a word of knowledge which doth suppose this gift, 1 Cor. 12.) whereby one is able to take up the truths of the Gospel, which everyone is not: this is prayed for to Timothy, 2 Tim. 2.7. not as to a Christian simply, but as to a Minister. 2. It taketh in a fitness to express and bring forth, for the edification of others, what they have conceived themselves: I called by the Apostle utterance, Col. 4.3,4. and he that hath it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . And it may be called the word of wisdom or knowledge, whereby one is sitted profitably to speak to others: without which, no knowledge is sufficient. 3. There is also comprehended in this gift, an energy, or efficacy, which bringeth out things in another manner, and with another stamp than the Rhetoric and eloquence of men can do. Hence the Word and Power in the Preaching of the Gospel are distinguished, 1 Corinth. 4.19. I will know, not their word, but their power, (what the two great Divines Calvin, and Martyr say on the place, is excellent to this purpose) and this, we conceive, is the main differencing thing of ministerial gift, the former two being common to men of all professions in some respect, but this is not. Hence many men may have much knowledge, and be able by great eloquence to express it, and yet be far from that power and life which a native ministerial gift hath with it, as the corrupt Teachers at Corinth, who abounded in human eloquence, were: which (as holy and Learned Mr. Boyd of Trochrege saith) is to be tried, not ex done, or, by the gift only; but, ex doni efficaciâ, or, by the efficacy of that gift in the impression of it upon consciences. And, although this may be best known to a spiritual ear, which can try and discern gifts, as the palate meats; yet is the thing clear in Scripture, and often (as it is more and less) will be acknowledged by natural Hearers; such as not a few of Christ's, and John the Baptist's Hearers were, who yet notwithstanding discovered this power and efficacy in their preaching, which they did not in the preaching of the Scribs and Pharisees, Mat. 7.29. that is, when a preaching for matter and manner of expressing exquisite, yet will less affect, and have less weight, than some few words spoken thus in simplicity by another. This efficacy consisteth not in natural servour and outcrying: there may be much of that, and little of this, and contrarily: nor consisteth it in any mere exercise of art, in disposing of the matter spoken, or choosing of taking expressions. These things, it is true, when not affected, may have their own use; but other ways such affectation of words, may well draw men to admire the carrier, or love their gift; but doth not engage to esteem of Him that sendeth, and chiefly to commend the matter that is spoken, to the conscience; which is the native rule by which a true gift is discerned and squared. And we may consider it mainly in these, 1. In its simple plainness, or plain simplicity, whereby the Truths of God are proposed like themselves, having nothing mixed in to divert the hearer from them; but they made as naked as can be to them, for their understanding of them: this simplicity is often spoken of by the Paul, and is opposed to human eloquence, as in the Epistles to the Corinthians. 2. It consisteth in evidence and demonstration, a gift whereby one is fitted convincingly to propose or press such a thing, not so much doctrinally in drawing conclusions from premisses, as by leaving the impression of such a thing upon the conscience, that it is bound with it: this is called the evidence and demonstration of the Spirit and Power, 1 Corinth. 2.4. 3. There is a power and efficacy which accompanieth this, as to its effects: this maketh threatenings so weighty, that Paul will make Felix to tremble; and it maketh promises sweet and persuasive, so that Agrippa will almost be persuaded to be a Christian: this will make (even the idiot or stranger (1 Corinth. 14.) to say, Doubtless God is there. And that is more than an ordinary discourse, even of such a subject, thus to commend the Word and ourselves to men's consciences in the fight of God; when by his assistance, He maketh the Gospel to triumph in every place, and to be a sweet savor to Him in all, 2 Corinth. 2.14. 4. This ministerial gift taketh in a seasonable way of speaking as to the time, occasion, hearers, &c. Thus it is a gift of right dividing the Word of Truth, 2 Tim. 2.15. so as neither to strengthen the wicked, nor to faint and make sad the righteous; but to lay battery at the proud imaginations of natural men, for taking in of these strong holds, and to pour oil in the wounds of exercised sinners, and that so, as the one, may not by the Preachers fault, partake of the allowance, or be wounded with the stroke that is designed for the other: this is indeed true learning, to be able to condescend and make plain a word in season to the weary, Isa. 50.4. and such a one, is a work-man that needeth not to be ashamed. 5. There is in this gift a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or holy boldness and freedom, whereby in an Authoritative way the Lord's Word is spoken as it ought to be spoken, such as is observed to be in the chief Pastor his Preaching, Matth. 7.29. it is called ( Col. 4.3. and 4.) a door of utterance, and a speaking as it ought to be spoken ; or, as it is, 1 Pet. 4.11. as the oracles of God : so that in less or more, this gift ought to have a stamp of the Majesty of God on it, as His Word hath in itself. And this rebuking with Authority, that none despise this Ministry, is both often mentioned in Paul's practice, and recommended by him to others, in the persons of Timothy and Titus : and it is like, something of all hath been in this Angel of Philadelphia. And this power is not anything physically and inseparably united to the man, or to his Preaching, but is in him a fitness and dexrerity given of God, which He accompanieth with a singular impression by His Spirit ordinarily on the hearts and consciences of hearers, thereby discovering it to be of Him.

For the second, to wit learning, what to say of it will be harder to decide, seeing it hath many several acceptions, as, 1. It may be taken for acquaintance with Scripture, and with divine and heavenly things in it, or, for acquaintance with human literature, as knowledge of tongues, arts, sciences, &c. 2. We may consider learning, either materially in itself, as it is a fitness which a man hath to reason for a Truth against an Error, to draw conclusions from premisses, to open hard places, or reconcile seeming contradicting places, and to answer objections, &c. or we may consider it in the manner how men come by this faculty, or acquire this fitness to understand tongues, to investigate and search into difficulties, &c. and thereby come to be enabled to improve the gift given, and to stir it up: which is either by an extraordinary illumination, as the Apostles had it, and Prophets of old, without any mediate pains or means; or by an ordinary and mediate way of reading, studying, and learning of these by mediate helps, which may conduce for that end. Now, in answer we say,

1. That learning considered materially, or in itself, as it implieth acquaintance with the things of God, That is simply necessary. This all the Apostles had, to wit, ability to reason against gainsayers, to open the mysteries of the Gospel, &c. This is required in all Ministers, 1 Tim. 3.2. and Titus 1.9. that he be apt to teach : and it •• useful in reference to the truths he hath to propound; whereof somthings are hard a d not easily understood, which the unlearned and ignorant, are ready to pervert to their own destruction, 2 Pet. 3. 16. A Minister then had need to be thus learned, lest he speak, not knowing whereof he affirmeth, 1 Tim. .7. and (being unable to hold fast the form of found words which himself hath learned, 2 Tim. 1.13.) he be turned aside to foolish unlearned questions, chap. 2.23. It is also needful for his opening of Scripture, for his dealing with adversaries; and that both to exhort and covince gain-sayers, Tit. 1.9,11. whose mouths are to be stopped by him, as, in many of the Epistles, we see Paul did; and that in a learned and methodick way of dispute: and this did Stephen, Acts 6. and it is frequent in that story. Yea, there is even a learning required in reference unto the weary, unto whom words and expressions by a singular dexterity are to be wailed, Isa. 50.4.

2. For the manner of acquiring this learning and ability, we think it not simply necessary to ty it to the ordinary mediate ways: for, God often did communicate it immediately; and if He had thought good, could have continued it in His Church in that manner.

Yet, 3. Seeing the Lord now giveth not this acquaintance with Divine Truths, and ability to reason, &c. immediately; the way of studying, by reading, and being brought up by others in the knowledge of these, is now, upon this supposition, simply necessary also: for, if it be necessary to know the mystery of the Gospel, and men by an immediate way do not attain it, then it is necessary to follow the way, whereby it is attainable. That it is not now immediately communicated, we suppose is clear in experience: men cannot now speak with a strange tongue; yea, not read their own tongue without teaching and learning: and can it be supposed that they shall be fit for prophesy, which is the greater gift? Beside, the Lord hath not left us His Word to lie by us, but that we should read it, as the command is expressed, 1 Tim. 4.13, &c. Give thyself to reading : yea, He hath so veiled many parts of His Word purposely, that the reader should be provoked to search into it, as is several times insinuated in this same prophesy: and seeing there is a communication of gifts, and what is made known to one, may and should (in a right manner) be made known to others, and that by write as well as by word: what reason can there be, that a Believer or Minister now may not, and should not improve the knowledge that others before him had, or now at a distance from him have, in the mystery of God, as well as by conference, he may make use of one that is alive, and present? And what other way in there than by reading to attain that? This cannot be denied to a private Christian, much less to a Minister: and the many sad fruits of ignorance, error and confusion, which flow from the neglect of study, show the necessity of this. Neither is it for naught that parents are commanded to bring up their children in the knowledge and admonition of the Lord, which in Timothy's education, is commended: which could not be, if this way of acquiring knowledge were unlawful. And it is also confirmed by that property (given by the Lord Himself) of the Scribe, who is taught unto the Kingdom of God, Matth. 13.52. that he bringeth out of his treasure things new and old : whereby it appeareth not only that he hath a treasure or stock laid up, but that he hath in it, what is old, as having been of long time useful to the Church, and what is new, and added thereunto by his own painfulness.

4. For the knowledge of human learning, and the studying thereof, such as tongues, sciences, history, &c. although we conceive them not essential, and simply necessary for the being of every Minister, so as none could be a Minister without them; yet we conceive them useful exceedingly to all, and necessary for the Church, being used in a right subordination to the great end of edification. For although the Lord gave gifts of many tongues; yet are the Scriptures in two original languages only: and is it not necessary to be acquainted with these? Yet hath the Lord made use of no extraordinary gift of tongues to translate them into several languages; but of men who by His blessing in the way of study had acquired skill in these languages; which saith, that such a study is necessary to the Church: and indeed if that had been unlawful, many nations of the Gentiles had never had the Word, and so never had been Churches, had not this been: th •• therefore which is such a mean for the propagating of the Gospel, and so blessed of God, cannot be displeasing to Him, who could have appointed otherwise, and not left this necessity on us, if He had thought meet. Beside, the right using of all sciences (even these which men by their corruption do most abuse) contribute exceedingly to advance edification: not by furnishing new weapons (the Scripture is the only Sword;) but by enabling men to manage the old. These are to men, like skill to one that hath strength, to teach him how to handle his arms for his safety; like Physic to the body, to make all the members act to their several uses; and like the pulling out of something in the ear or eye, which marreth the hearing or seeing: So learning, is but the fitting of the natural faculties of the soul, of reason, and even of the gift formerly mentioned, to act neatly, and to be forth-coming accordingly, and subserviently to the orders and dictates of a sanctified judgment: whereas other ways a natural and habitual indisposition doth in much incapacitate men for the exercising even of that which they have. Neither can this be thought strange, seeing men are not born skillful in any common occupation, till it be taught them: it is no marvel therefore that they be undextrous as to the main things. And the writings of Heathens have been made use of for good ends by Paul, as his citing of them upon several occasions cleareth, and can the reading thereof hurt us? It is a good similitude which Basil useth ( Orat. ad adolese. ) that as Dyers when they are to dy purple, do first put some common color on the clothe to make it receive the purple the better; so, human learning, is useful for fitting one for the more profitable study of Divinity. Only we say, This learning would be well regulated, so as to be made use of only for edification, men not flying to that as if the principles of Heathen Philosophers were more sure and strong than plain Scriptures, or as if, loathing the Scripture phrases and arguments, we would confirm Truths from more learned mediums out of these: much less would we reconcile their principles and the Scriptures by ascribing such a meaning to the Scripture, as must be consistent with them, as loather to brangle them in their Authority than the Scriptures of God; nor yet by using their phrases to derogate from Scripture-plainness or simplicity, (as often the miserably blind Schoolmen do) which is an high fault. It is abused also when a Minister thinketh himself something because of it, and despiseth these who are inferior to him therein, or, when he accounteth that in himself, or in others, sufficient for qualification, or, when he useth it for ostentation or getting of a name amongst hearers; that is a poor learning, which maketh the message less intelligible, and less useful; and that is truly a learned Pastor, who can make Spiritual mysterious Truths most plain and palpable to the simplest hearer, as Luther once said, that he is the ablest Preacher who pueriliter, trivialiter, populariter, & simplicissime docet. Melc. Adam. in vit. Lutheri. Learning serveth to enable one in searching for Truth, to conceive what is solid or insolide, and to express it plainly; whereas that, is a great abuse of learning used by the Schoolmen (follow them in it who will) to make the plainest Scripture, or practical thing obscure with many doubts, questions, diverse senses, objections, and many frothy unedifying notions, which have never profited them that have been occupied therein, and is contrary to the true end of learning, which ought to be edification. And often the most learned Preacher, in this sense, hath the most ignorant People. He is not the most learned and skillful Lawyer, School-master, &c. who knoweth most speculatively, but he who can reduce it best to practice, as the nature of his Calling doth require; So is it truly in the learning of a Minister, he who can inform, convince, or edify others with most dexterity, is the most learned Minister, though, it may be, the les e knowing man.

3. We said also, that Grace was necessary, and that he that thus carrieth the Lord's message now should be holy, as they were, who of old carried His vessels we do not rigidely call for this as for the former two, so as if no man could be a Minister without saving Grace, and unless he be truly regenerated: what was said in the former Epistle, doth guard against this; yet we may assert, that it is necessary by necessity of precept: for, holiness is a qualification in that same roll with ability to convince gain-sayers, Tit. 1.8, 9. And also by way of mids, it is useful and necessary in many respects, 1. For himself: he cannot have confidence of his Calling, or of his being approven of God in it, without this: though he may be called; yet he cannot act as called of God, and so must be much incapacitated in that respect. 2. For the work: which is of that nature that it requireth communion with God and a standing in His counsel, Ier. 23.18, 22. otherwise, it may be accounted a stealing of his word without acknowledging of himself, verse. 30. And though these be necessary in any Calling, yet the nature of this showeth them to be in a singular way necessary in it. 3. There cannot be that boldness in the message, especially where difficulties occur, without it. 4. For application of Truths, and speaking especially to the weary, This is necessary; that they may more natively take up the cases of others, apply the remedy to them, and sympathize with them, by making forth-coming the consolation to others, wherewith they have been comforted themselves, 2 Corinth. 1.9. which is a main way whereby God fitteth His Ministers experimentally; and even the Head, in some respect, was thus qualified. From this, Luther said, that these three, tentatio, meditatio and oratio, were requisite in a Minister: and they who want this holiness, are certainly exceeding defective. Further, in respect of his having fruits, it is most necessary, these being often blessed of the Lord with many, and others with all their learning, but with few, as in these two Churches appeareth, beside a Ministers Prayers having influence on the hearers profiting, as well as his Preaching; and he being to Pray for them, and to account their thriving to be an answer of his Praying, as well as the fruit of his Preaching, as in Paul's practice is manifest: what can the unrenewed Minister do here? Can he lie between the Porch and the Altar? can he strive without ceasing in Prayer to God for them? and therefore must he be much incapacitated to be profitable in this respect? Yea, for the credit of the Ministry, it is requisite that he be of good report, even to these without, otherwise his word will not have much weight: and what will gain such a good report without holiness? Hypocrisy often is not much convincing, neither is it continuing, whereas holiness even in a common servant will adorn the Gospel, much more in a Minister, who is a city set on an hill, and cannot be hid.

Again, we say, That this qualification of holiness should be greatly respected both in a people's calling, or choosing of a Minister, and in a Presbyteries ordaining of one for a People; so that if they should respect all other qualifications, and yet never inquire for this, they are exceeding faulty: and although holiness be not simply necessary to a Minister, as if without it he were not to be accounted so, when lawfully admitted, as is said; yet we conceive that neither a People, nor a Presbytery should pass over that qualification in their choice or Admission, so as to make no enquiry for it, or not to respect it, where, it may be, there is nothing to sway any to that opinion of the man in well grounded charity, but somewhat more to the contrary: for, the people are not left to call whom they will; if it were a Deacon, he is to be a man full of the holy Ghost, Act. 6. And this place being the first clear evidence of a people's interest in their calling of a Minister, this rule for their proceeding must be of force also. Again, it being such a great Trust, as to be entrusted with the Oracles of God, and with the souls of People, can he be thought fit to endeavor the saving of the souls of others, who yet maketh no conscience in taking heed to his own? This is the Apostles reasoning, 1 Tim. 3.2, 3, 4, 5. If a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the Church of God ? which is proposed by way of Question, to show the unanswerablnesse of that reasoning, by which He presseth the observing of the former qualifications. And certainly these two, are not without weighty reasons put together, Act. 20.28. and 1 Tim. 4.16. Take heed to thyself, and to the Flock and Doctrine, But to show this, that who careth not for the one, will never natively and naturally care for the other. Especially, that word, which followeth being considered, So shalt thou save thyself and those that hear thee, intimating, that carelesenesse in his own walk, may not only mar his own salvation, but also the salvation of his Hearers, seeing these two ordinarily are carried-on jointly, as in this Epistle: And, can people dispence with this, to have only a form of Ordinances, not caring whether their Ministers have fruit amongst them or not? or that the profit be to many or few? and yet there cannot much be expected (what ever God may sovereignly do) from a man that standeth not in God's counsel, Ier. 23.22. and therefore turneth not many from their iniquity: neither can any expect that the Lord will approve that he should be made a steward in His house, and an under-father to His Children, who yet upon no charitable ground can be accounted a child himself, and what confidence can there be, that a man not esteemed gracious, shall either Christianly carry in the outward form of Religion, or yet keep soundness in the Faith? and will they not be accessory to these evils, who have hazarded so much on them, who are not worthy of any such Trust?

The considering of this, as it relateth to a Presbyteries duty, will confirm it further. We say, they ought not (whoever call, or whatever ones parts be) to proceed to admit men to the Ministry, without respect to this qualification of holiness: my meaning is no , that search in extraordinary ways should be made for knowing of men's conversion, or, that infallibility should be expected in this, or, that any particular evidences in such a measure or degree should be pitched on, without which nothing is to be satisfying, (for there are degrees, as was said) but because, even Scholars are naturally sinful, and gifts do not mortify corruption, nor edify, but as they are well improven; and seeing often by men's profanity, good gifts do much hurt in the Church; and seeing there can be no ground to expect the right improvement of gifts by one not supposed to be gracious, Therefore trial would be, 1. To clear that he be not profane, and that nothing can be charged on him. And, 2. That there are some things making him look holy-like, and giving ground, in a discerning charity, to esteem so of him, that what ever afterward he prove, they may have peace in what they have done. And lastly, that some fit time and way be taken purposely for trying of this. This is clear, 1. From the many directions that are given to Ministers concerning this one thing, in the Epistles of Paul to Timothy and Titus, where they are expressly limited in their proceeding to this, that he be holy, 1 Tim. 3.2, &c. and Tit. 1.8. And this holiness is not only described negatively, that he be blameless, not given to wine, &c. verse. 6. and 7. but positively, that he have a good name, be sober, just, holy : which showeth, that it consisteth not merely in negatives. 2. It is evident that it is to be tried: because even a Deacon also is to be proved, 1 Tim. 3.10. (which also supponeth, that a Minister is much more to be proved) and then let him use the office, if he be found (that is, after trial) to be blameless: and so there is a proof to be had of this qualification, as of others. 3. It appeareth by his excluding of a Novice from this charge, verse. 6. (that is, one lately brought in to the faith) as not being yet able to bear it, or as not being well known what he might prove: and there being to us a proportionablnesse, and likeness in some respect, betwixt the Novice then, (they being all accounted Believers) and one that seemeth now to profess more seriously than the generality of others, it saith, he would be of a standing profession that should be admitted to this Charge. And, 4. That which is, Chap. 5.22. Lay hands suddenly on no man, &c. doth confirm this also; and that is, not only lest he be not of parts, but lest he through untendernesse abuse his parts, and thou become guilty, as the reason subjoined, cleareth. And (to meet that objection which one might have, to wit, It is not rashly done; for, nothing can be laid to his charge) Paul saith some men's sins are at the first obvious; but some (saith he) will follow after: and therefore will take time before they be discovered. Therefore there is need of wariness and trial to bring them out, as Reverend Mr. Dickson expoundeth the place. And can this be so to be slighted in Ministers proceeding, which Paul so frequently presseth, not only to observe when it is palpable, but to search for it, where it is not so obvious? And if it be so requisite even for a Deacon, what will it be for a Minister, whose Station leadeth him more immediately to the things of greatest concernment? And as the Apostles appointed, so practiced they, Act. 6. Seek ye out men full of the holy Ghost, them we will ordain, intimating, concerning others, that they would not ordain them, So is the qualification proposed for the Apostle, Act. 1. although Judas in God's sovereign wisdom had been employed; yet there is another rule given them to walk by, than he taketh to himself; they must take one of these who had given best proof of their integrity, verse. 23. And through all the Epistles, when Paul is recommending Ministers, there is ever some evidence of their sanctification given: whereby he would let us know, what weight is truly in that qualification for commending of men for the Ministry; and what sort of men others should recommend after him. And there are also many reasons which may be gathered from what is said, to make Ministers very careful in this, That holiness be well looked unto in Instruments, as they would expect an open door to be set to them by the Lord, as he doth here.

If any should say, 1. That this looketh like the way of rigid trying of Church-members, and seemeth to favor that conceit. Answ. 1. I am not speaking of the manner of proceeding, but of the thing, what ever way any Judicatory or persons in Christian prudence shall take to satisfy themselves in the particular, That I conceive can be regulated by no certain directions: for, that will be fit in one case, which will not be in another, &c. 2. Although there be a proving and trying here called-for; yet it will not hold as necessary to all members: because there is not the like ground; nay, nor such precepts nor practices for trial of members, as there i in this: and were it so clear for members, I suppose it were hard to shift it. Yea, 3. This doth overturn that rigidity and scrupulosity concerning Church-members, it is so far from strengthening of it: for, if there be somewhat singular required of a Minister, and if one that is already a Church-member be yet to be proved, if probably he be holy ere he be a Minister (so that one may be a Church-member for his holiness, and yet unfit, in respect of his being defective in this qualification, to be a Minister; yea, a Deacon) Then is there not such rigid and accurate search to be made for positive evidences in every Church-member: for then, there could be no addition to it, or further length to go: But from this, it is clear that something is required in the trial of an Intrant to the Ministry, more than of one to be admitted into the Church: for one may be warrantably admitted to the Church, who yet may be unfit in this respect to be a Minister: therefore the extending of this conclusion to all the members indifferently, is unwarrantable: for, this new trying of them, supposeth the former not to be so exact, and yet all this probation is to be of such as are within.

If any should further object, That this layeth on that which is impossible. Answ. There is no such thing intended. But, 1. it is more than is needful to every Church-member. 2. It is somewhat that needeth proof and trial, and is not to be taken on trust: but the manner of trial we leave. 3. It is somewhat that may warrand the conscience, not to determine infallibly concerning such a persons state; but concerning a man's own act in a deliberate well grounded concurring in his ordination; So that there be no ground for a challenge afterward, being put to say, it was sudden, and so to charge himself as accessory unto, and guilty of, his sins also, if afterward he miscarry: which is intended by that precept, 1 Tim. 5.22, &c.

If it be objected further, Then there would be few Ministers entered, and many Congregations would be desolate. That great Pattern and Patron of Learning and Piety, Trochrege, when he moveth this objection to himself (which showeth that it hath been ordinary in all times so to dispute against this duty) Answereth, that it is not so much to be respected, quot, or, how many be in the Ministry, as quales & qui, that is, who, or of what qualifications they be. Therefore (saith he) it had been the advantage of the Ministry that they had been ever fewer, rather than that many who are in that station should have been admited to it: for (saith he) some became not only useless themselves, but do incapacitate others, and make the Ministry despicable before all by their carriage. And indeed it is often found so, that many Congregations had been better still to have waited for what providence might have ordered for them, than to have been planted as they were. Many excellent things hath he to this purpose, pag. 1187, &c. particularly, pag. 1107, &c.

We are persuaded, that whatever profane men think of holiness, that yet the people who desire to have their souls saved, will be loath to have a blind Guide, who, by falling into the ditch, may hazard others, or, one that may heal their wound slightly; or at best, point out the way to them, but in little join with them in it. And especially, that Ministers of the Gospel, who know what esteem Christ hath of souls, and what difficulty it is for themselves to walk singly in this Ministry, even though they mind their own salvation; and what native and natural sympathy is called-for betwixt a Minister and His Flock; and who are well acquainted with the devices of the devil, who aimeth to make havoc of souls by an ungodly, as well as by an erroneous Ministry; and also are laying to heart and seriously minding their reckoning to Jesus Christ at His appearing, for the souls of such Congregations, as they have had access to provide with Ministers, whether his Sheep were committed to a friend, or an enemy, to one that loved him, and so would feed the Lambs; or one that loved and sought his own things, (as all men in nature do) and so would feed himself. We are persuaded (we say) that such will tremble to be accessory to such heinous effronting of Jesus Christ, or such cruel betraying of poor souls in committing them to an ignorant, or unfaithful Guide, who may fall in the ditch with them. And seeing this is of main concernment to the advancement of Christ's Gospel, and the edification of people's souls, to have Ministers according to the Lord's heart, and not men's, to feed the people; and a special promise subjoined to His marrying of a Land, Ier. 3.14. and an evidence of His dwelling with a people, Let all such therefore, whether People or Ministers, who have a hand in this, be obtested in the fear of the Lord, and by the coming and appearance of our Lord Jesus, the great Shepherd of His sheep, that they be wary and circumspect in this most concerning-business, as they would not in that day be guilty of the blood of many souls, that unholy Ministers cannot but be guilty of; and as they would not be accounted partakers with them in all their sins. And, no question, this command amongst others, is implied in that charge to Timothy, 1 Tim. 6.13.14.21. And it is very observable, that in these Epistles, while he giveth directions to Timothy, and Titus in the name of all Ministers, which are to be obeyed to the end of the world, he so often chargeth, more than in other Epistles, That these commands should be done without partiality; which certainly showeth, that Ministers must especially reckon for their observing thereof. Yea, that charge, is particularly given in reference to this duty, 1 Tim. 5.21. and 22. I charge thee, &c. Do nothing by partiality : withal subjoining, Lay hands suddenly on no man : which (as Calvin observeth) is upon this ground given, because men often are ready to be partial in admissions, Therefore, saith the Apostle, whatever others do, do not thou partake of that sin with them. And though that Reverend forecited Author Mr. Boyd, be every way most moderate; yet, pag. 1108. doth he censure the preposterous moderation of some good men, who are too charitable in the matter of admission of men to the Ministry; and directly asserteth, that in trial of Spirits for such an end, not only the Doctrine, sed & animorum motus, consilia, conatus, are also to be proven. And if nothing satisfying appear which may hold forth God's call, although it were for many years, it is to be forborne. Nec enim tam refert quot sint hoc Ministeri fungentes, quam qui sint, & quant â cum cur â delecti at que probati; praestatque plurimi abdicatis, vel unum aliquem admitti, qui sit unu ex mille, &c. quam plurimis indifferenter admissis, ex mille vix unum, qualem cupias invenire. And thereafter, citeth our Lord's practice, Luk. 9.57. who though most tender of the Churches edification, and in a time when the Harvest was very great, and the Laborers but few, yet doth reject two, who seemingly offered themselves with affection to the work, and presseth one, not so seemingly forward as the other two. In all which, and in much more to this purpose he doth excellently enlarge himself as in a thing of most grave concernment to the Churches edification. His famous Master also, Divine Mr. Rollock, doth most pathetically press this; and particularly in his Lectures upon the Lord's last Sermon and solemn Prayer, John. 17. Lect. 23. Although this be true, and will not, we hope, by any be called in question; yet there are two things which possibly to some may need more particularly to be spoken to; seeing it is easy to run in extrems. The first is, What length may be attained, or is to be aimed at in this trial of a Ministers Sanctification, by virtue of that precept, Lay hands suddenly on no man ? Secondly, How it may be made to appear, that seeing so much is attainable in this case, that as much as is not to be sought after in the trial of private members? We shall therefore, before we leave this, speak a word to these.

To the first we say, 1. That by virtue of that precept, there is no infalliblity to be expected nor pretended unto: because there is no such thing possible: nor doth the Lord in His Word give such symptoms and evidences as may found such a judgment or decision of another persons gracious estate: nor is this to be inquired for, as if the validity of a persons ordination did depend upon the same: for, ordination may be valid, where no Sanctification is, as was formerly said; But it is such a trial and probation as is opposite to rashness and hastiness, and may give ground of quietness unto these that go about this work, even though the person should not be found afterward answerable. Because the ground of their peace, is not the reality or truth of the thing; but it is (to say so) the reality of such and such evidences, which after trial are found indeed to be so, although possibly they be not sincere.

2. We say, That negative evidences, or negative knowledge, that is, that we ourselves know no evil of the person, and such like, will not be sufficient to exoner us in proceeding to ordination, according to this precept: for, that may be, where a man is not known at all. Beside that will not give ground to make him be accounted of good report, holy, faithful, &c. which are the qualifications required in him to whom the word of truth is to be committed. Also the Scripture holdeth forth such qualifications as are positive, to be inquired-for in this case: which were useless, if negatives were sufficient. And certainly there is a negative holiness at least required in a private member; yet it is clear that more is to be inquired for in an Officer; yea, even a Deacon is not to be admitted without special qualifications, which are not requisite in ordinary members. Amongst other words, Ambrose saith on this place, non enim sufficit si sine crimine sit, quia merita ejus debent praeire bonorum operum ut dignus si ad ordinationem.

3. We say then, That something positive is attainable, and is to be inquired for: which though it be not infallibly convincing of the persons state; yet may be sufficient, to quiet the mind against the challenges of rash and sudden proceeding in that matter. Which, in the general, may be drawn to these three, 1. That there be a search in the external positives that are given in the Word; the knowledge whereof may be attained by search. 2. There may be some observation of a man's way, and tract of carriage, from which some discovery may be made of a man's equablnesse, singlnesse and spirituality in such duties. 3. There may be some discovery attained of a man's universality in these duties so qualified, by considering his carriage in reference to divers cases and conditions and divers persons, both such as are more tender, and others. That these are attainable cannot be denied, at least so far as is necessary for the scope foresaid. And certainly, that precept must be understood to require proof and trial in this, so far as is possibly attainable (other ways a man cannot be thought to be sufficiently exonered in his duty) as the reason subjoined confirmeth: especially in such cases where neither the good works, nor the evil of some men, are open before hand. And these being attainable, as is said, It will follow then that they are to be inquired into. Judicious and Learned Mr. Wood in his Peece against Mr. Lockier, doth assert, That there are some more eminent outward works and actings in Religion, and Piety, by which, men (so far as is competent to men to judge) may be warrantably judged positively gracious, pag. 142. and showeth how this is to be attained, pag. 152, 153. in these words, There is requisite some seemingnesse of Spiritual sincerity in a man's profession, id est, that he doth it from a Spiritual principle, upon Spiritual motives, and for a Spiritual end: but a mere, sober, not mocking, serious profession without more, is not a positive appearance of Spiritual supernatural sincerity. Which showeth, that such a thing is possible; and experience also doth confirm this.

4. We say, That in this precept it is implied, that these positive evidences are not soon to be trusted; but that men are seriously, and diligently to inquire in the reality of them, for the quieting of themselves rationally in concluding that he is so and so qualified. And this we conceive is the great scope of that precept: for the general, that a Minister should be eminently qualified even in reference to Godliness, I suppose will not be denied by any: The miscarriage is ordinarily in the application, and that is not purposedly to admit an unholy man to be a Minister, but to account a man holy without ground, and thereupon suddenly to proceed. The Apostles scope therefore is principally to guard against this, that such thoughts of a persons fitness be not suddenly and without trial admitted and entertained. And we suppose, that although particular evidences be not insisted on; yet trial in the general, seriously and with circumspectnesse gone-about, will do much to quiet the mind in reference to its own act. And this is so understood by Chrysostom, Theophilact, and others, as importing a command to try, and try again.

If it were more particularly inquired, What these positive evidences are, which may be warrantably looked-for in one that is to be admitted to the Ministry? Answ. Although by proportion what may evidence one man to be gracious unto another (so far as is requisite for one man to judge of another) That will hold here; and though there be some generals laid down, which include many particulars as to be holy, full of the holy Ghost, Acts 6. such as have given good proof of their faithfulness and constancy in Religion, Acts 1. verse. 21, 22. and such like; Yet beside these, the Scripture hath pitched upon some particular characters for the discovery of this.

First, He is to be a man that ruleth well his own house, 1 Tim. 3. verse. 4, 5. which doth imply a man's faithfulness and profitablnesse, as a Christian, in whatsoever private station he hath been in formerly; so it is to be looked, how he hath done the duty of a son to parents, of a student in his studies, of a private Christian in his private walk with others, or how he hath behaved himself in families, or in other places wherein he hath had more near access to be edifying, and such like. This one character putteth to take trial, 1. of a man's zeal and sincerity in studying edification according to his place. 2. Of his prudence in managing and ordering what he may meet with. And, 3. of his Authority, how probably he may be able to keep people in a kindly subjection to Christ's Ordinances, as the particular observing of that place will bear forth: which speaketh not only of his fitness to teach; but also to govern in the house of God. And it would seem that though always the Church is not to be restrained from calling one that is young, and without a family; yet by a man's living sometime after his going through private studies, before his coming to the Ministry, or having a family to govern, there might be much more access confidently to discern a Called-minister in respect of this qualification: for, as the Apostle reasoneth, 1 Tim. 3.5. If a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the Church of God?

Secondly, He is to be tried according to these marks wherewith a Christian may be tried, such as to be vigilant, to be sober, (which looketh to sobriety in his whole carriage) not only to be blameless, but to be of good behavior, given to hospitality, not greedy or covetous, patient, &c. 1 Tim. 3.3. Titus 1.7, 8. In which qualifications, not only is to be tried what are men's practices; but what are their distempers, or infirmities; what are their natural inclinations, and dispositions, and such like: and if these be froward, except by the evidences of the opposite Graces, there be hope that they shall be subdued, there can be no confidence to proceed. For, a Minister should be meek, gentle, no brawler, &c.

Thirdly, He is one that must have a good report from them that are without, 1 Tim. 3.7. which importeth a shining eminency in his conversation, so as to be convincing even to wicked men: from whom seriousness and sincerity will get a testimony, when lightness and lukewarmness will be abhorred even by them.

Fourthly, He is to be a lover of good men, Titus 1.8. It is a mark of a Believer to love the Children of God; and here it is made a character whereby one, that is to be called to the Ministry, ought to be tried: and it is such a love to them as is demonstrable and evidenced to others, by their conversing with them, estimation of them, and that in opposition to others, whom in that respect they love not, though possibly their natural ties to such may be moe. This character, doth first suppone a capacity in them to discern good men beside others. And, secondly, a principle within, making them to love and esteem of such: which, where they are in reality, are both commendable in themselves, and cannot but be some way discernible to others; and therefore may be the more warrantably observed and laid weight upon, and when they are wanting, proceeding may, yea, should be at the greater stand and non-entry.

A fifth evidence is, That he be no Novice, 1 Tim. 3.6. which holdeth out that he ought to be of some settled standing in the profession of Godliness; at least, there would be ground to think him so: which cannot well be, if the man have been but as others in his education, and possibly come by reason of the thoughts of a Ministry to have some fairer outward carriage than others; when yet, as to the practice of Religion, he may be but a mere Novice, and so give no ground to found a rational charity for expecting any thriving of the work of Grace in his heart, or of the work of the Ministry in his hands.

When these external evidences are found, Then Ministers ought to reflect upon all to see if anything can be gathered concerning the sincerity of their end, spiritualness of their walk, and such like, as by the words of these two eminent Divines formerly cited doth appear. And because this cannot be discerned by one act or two; or, in a month or two: therefore it is necessary to take time, and to consider the equablnesse of such a man's way for satisfying of themselves concerning him. And though it is not like that each Minister can come to a well grounded knowledge in reference to the Admission of everyone, by his own particular acquaintance; yet in such a case, it is to be supplied by the testimony of such, who being able to discern, and thoroughly satisfied themselves upon solid grounds, dare confidently give testimony of the good behavior and Christian carriage of such a person, according to the former characters: and such testimony, when given, ought to have weight. Therefore we see that in Scripture, the faithful Servants of God used to commend such, as were of their acquaintance, to others: and such recommendations wanted never weight. Only concerning this, we say, That seeing recommendations and testimonies may have much influence upon the good or ill of the Church. This would not be overly gone about; but these caveats would be observed, 1. That when men testify positively such and such qualifications to be in any, they would have ground of satisfaction in their own consciences that such things are true, and consistent in their knowledge. 2. As this testimony would be on knowledge; so the matter testified, would be weighty, and such as being true evidenceth some good beginning, or appearance of the work of Grace. There are many testimonies given thorough Paul's Epistles to several persons; but we will still find them have these two, 1. The thing testified, is something that doth indeed commend them as Christians; as having love to God, and to the edification of souls, and such like. 2. It's upon knowledge; yea oftentimes from such evidences as were discernible even to others, such as suffering for Christ, distributing to the Saints, painfulness and diligence in what they have been employed about, and such like. On the other side, there is also need of taking heed what testimonies be received. And, 1. That the testimony be full, bearing out these characters sufficiently in the bosom thereof: otherwise▪ it can be no proof of them, whoever be the testifier, and, it may be, it were not impertinent to do it in the Apostles words. 2. Respect is to be had to these who give the testimony. And, 3. To the ground upon which they give it, to wit, if it be of their own certain knowledge that they do testify such things; or, only upon the report of others, and such like considerations. Wherein faithful Presbyteries will employ their zeal and prudence for the satisfying of themselves; and so there is the less need to insist particularly in them.

Now, as to the second, if any should ask, what reason there can be more to inquire thus in reference to Ministers, than in reference to members? and if the one will not follow upon the grounds that are laid down for inferring the other? We answer, It is enough to say that this enquiry in reference to Ministers is commanded, and the other not. Neither will any objector, I suppose, be able to give such precepts for the trial of Church-members, as have been laid down for this trial in reference to Ministers. It is observable which that great vindicater of this truth, concerning the admission of Church-members without such exact trial, doth answer to this objection; I mean Learned Mr. Wood, in his Examination and Confutation of Mr. Lockyers Little-stone, pag. 80.81. Mr. Lockyer had made the same objection, which he answereth thus,

All that Mr. Lockyer here bringeth in concerning admitting persons into Offices in the Church, is idly and impertinently alleged to the point in hand: we acknowledge that none ought to be put in such Offices, but such as give evidences of all manner of Godly conversation; we have an express and full rule for this, 1 Tim. 3. And hands ought not to be laid upon any man, without a foregoing trial and proof of these things. But where will ye show us in all the Scripture from the one end to the other such a rule requiring such qualifications in persons, and such a trial of them before, and in relation to their admission into the fellowship of the visible Church; and to be under Pastoral care and the Ministry of the Word? If he could show us this, either in precept or approved practice, we should soon yield and be at an end of this controversy; But this he cannot, nor ever will be able to show; and therefore the reasoning from the care and accuracy to be used in trying persons, who are already in the Church, in relation to admitting them to places of Office, unto admission of persons into the Society of the visible Church, is unreasonable.
Thus far he convincingly to the point in hand. It is observable also, that these amongst the Ancients, who have said and done most against the Novatians and Donatists, have been yet most pressing and peremptory in this, to wit, that none with any blemish should minister in the holy things, as in the writings of Cyprian and Augustine is clear. This is enough to remove any such Objection: Yet for further satisfaction, we say, That there want not palpable reasons for this difference, as,

1. When a member is admitted, he is received to be trained up in Christ's House or School; and therefore if he profess himself docile, and subject himself to Ordinances, it cannot be expected that he will be, or can be accurate before he have learned: for, it is within the Church that properly Christianity is taught. It is not so in the admitting of one to be a Minister: for, he is to be entered to be a Teacher, Therefore more must be required of him: and he is supposed to have been a Scholar in Christ's School, and under His Ordinances for some considerable time; and therefore more may justly be expected and sought-for from him.

2. When a Professor seriously desireth entry to the Church or Baptism, he doth it by pleading a title or right thereto according to Christ's warrand: wherein a Church judicatorie is obliged in justice to decide, and that legally according to his title and right: and if he be found to have such a right, they cannot upon any consideration justly refuse him: But in trying of a man for the Ministry, there is no such title and right which can be pleaded: For, 1. This is no man's particular privilege, which he, as a Saint, or Professor, may claim by virtue of the Covenant, or Christ's institution, as he may do the Sacraments; for, many have right to these that have none to this. 2. A particular person may be keeped from the Ministry and not be wronged, even although he be honest; because in admitting thereto, Church-officers are to walk according to the general ground of the edification of the Church: and therefore when it is not for the edification of the Body, a man may be forborne (to speak so) and not admitted to such and such a particular charge, at least, without the wronging of any just title of his: which cannot be in Baptism, if the man be qualified accordingly as is called-for in such a case. For in deciding anent the admission of a particular member, the Question runneth, If he have what giveth title to Membership; But in deciding concerning a man's admission to a particular Ministry, beside any qualifications of his as a Church-member, it is to be considered, if it be expedient for, and edifying to, the Church, that such a man be admitted to be a guide. And therefore there is more of Christian prudence and deliberation required in the deciding of this, than in the other, where mere right hath place.

Lastly, This difference may be observed, That in deciding the first, to wit, the man's right, Church officers must decide according to what judicially is made out; for, a person that giveth in his title, looking like a serious Professor, he cannot be refused, although men have only a negative knowledge of his sincerity: yet this cannot be admitted in a Minister, where want of clearness, and positive satisfaction is enough to keep a man from positive deciding for the admission of a Minister. All which may be thus illustrated: suppose some in an Incorporation or City, should claim to be Burgesses thereof by virtue of their sufficient title and right thereto; in this case the Judges were to decide strictly according to Law, as they found these titles to be made out, or not: and it were injustice to refuse them that privilege, if they were found to have right to the same: but, if an Incorporation or City were to choose out of all the Burgesses, some to Govern, to be Thesaurer, or the like; the case would be quite different: for, so men were not here to decide what were any man's particular right, but what were good and expedient for the whole Body; and so many might be past without any prejudice to them; which could not be in the first. In this last election also, men walk not so much by what is judicially made out of the fitness of any person, but as they are satisfied anent their qualifications and fitness, by their knowledge of them, and acquaintance with them in the private course of their carriage: Both which will well agree to the case of the admission of Ministers, as it differeth from the admission of Members.

LECTURE III.


Vers. 14.

And unto the Angel of the Church of the Laodiceans, write, These things saith the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of the creation of God,


15.

I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.


16.

So then because thou art luke-warm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of my mouth.


17.

Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing: and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked.


18.

I counsel thee to buy of me gold tried in the fire, that thou mayest be rich; and white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear, and anoint thine eyes with eye-salve, that thou mayest see.


19.

As many as I love, I rebuke and chasten, be Zealous therefore and repent.


20.

Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.


21.

To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.


22.

He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches.

THis is the last of the seven Epistles, and is directed to the Angel of the Church of the Laodiceans. It containeth the discovery of an exceeding desperate condition, and a most sharp threatening for the same: yet, which is wonderful, it hath a most excellent advice and counsel unto this luke-warm Church.

The Division is common with that of the rest of the Epistles. The Inscription is, verse. 14. The Body of the Epistle, is from that unto the 21. The Conclusion is, verse. 21, 22.

In the Inscription, verse. 14. the Lord taketh these two Titles to Himself, 1. Thus saith the Amen, which is expounded by the next words, the faithful and true witness, that is, He who being Truth itself and cannot lie, as He cannot be mistaken in taking up the condition of any, although never so secret; it is he that directeth this Epistle. Amen, being an Hebrew word, is frequently used even in the New Testament, as a sign, or evidence of the confirmation of somewhat that hath been spoken; or as a testimony of the sincerity of the speaker in wishing seriously something which he hath been praying for: therefore often it is used in the close of Prayer; and is here applied to Christ, to show that in Him there is not Yea and Nay, but Yea and Amen, as the word is 2 Cor. 1.19, 20. The second Title, is, the beginning of the Creation of God : the word rendered beginning here, is not to be taken passively, as if it were to be understood thus, the first thing that was created: for, the Greek word will not admit that; but it is to be taken actively, that is, thus saith He who gave a being and beginning to all things that were created: in which respect, it is said, John. 1.3. All things that were made, were made by Him. He taketh the first style in this place, because He was to discover a hidden hypocrisy, and to bear sharp testimony against this Church: therefore at the entry He removeth all prejudice that might be against His Testimony. He taketh the second Title, to be a ground of Faith to them, for expecting a recovery from their deadness upon the terms offered by Him, seeing He is omnipotent, and can give a being to things that have none.

In the Body of the Epistle, we have these four, 1. Their case is proposed, and aggravated, verse. 15. 2. They are threatened, verse. 16. and the reason thereof is given, verse. 17. 3. The cure is proposed, and commended by way of counsel, verse. 18. And lastly, The improving thereof, and the practice of some other things needful to their case, are pressed, verse. 19, 20.

Their case is in short, Thou art neither cold nor hot, but, as it is, verse. 16. Thou art luke-warm. By cold here, is understood the want of all form and profession; and so, a being in their natural and heathenish condition without any change: This is clear from the scope. By hot, is understood not only to have profession, but to have power, warmness and life therewith, and so to have the change through. The condition of this Church, was neither altogether without a profession, nor yet having power with a profession; But having renounced gross Idolatry and profanity, and having been kept free from corruptions in Doctrine, she satisfied herself in that formal profession, without singleness and zeal in the performance of these duties which she went about: therefore they are called luke-warm, as if some way the cold had been put off them; and yet not being thoroughly warm and hot, they continued to be luke-warm, which, making water most loathsome to the stomach, it is here alluded unto, to show how loathsome this indifferency in the practice of Religion was to our Lord Jesus. That this is their very condition, is clear from the scope, and from the amplification following, where it appeareth they had some form, and therefore thought well of themselves; and yet were indeed miserable and wretched under the same. Also, the Lord's provoking them to be zealous, verse. 19. showeth, that their fault did consist mainly in what was opposite to this. And so their condition will be like Israel's in the days of Elias, 1 King. 18.21. as halting between two opinions, that is, neither altogether forsaking Religion, nor yet seriously following the same; or, r as it is said of Ephraim, Hos. 7.8 he was as a cake unturned, that is, having the one side somewhat hot and baken, but the other cold and raw. Only this is the difference, that indifferency of theirs was in respect of Doctrine, this, is mainly in respect of practice.

The Lord aggregeth the hatefulness of this condition in the words following, I would thou wert cold or hot, that is, although y think yourselves much better than others, because of your formal profession; yet such hypocrisy, is more hateful to me than the want of the form of Religion altogether. So this, I would thou wert hot or cold, is not to be understood of Christ's will, as prescribing to them a duty: for so, it cannot be thought that he commandeth them to be cold; nor doth it imply any will or desire to be in Him of such things simply; (for it cannot be thought that He is so indifferent concerning these extrems) but it is to be understood as His expressing of His loathing of their condition, after the manner of men: and doth hold out this, that He doth esteem such a hypocritical profession to be indeed more dishonorable to Him, than if profession had never been taken on. That this is the meaning thereof, appeareth by these considerations. 1. That Christ here is following a similitude usual among men, to show the abominablnesse of the thing in itself, and it is not rigidly to be pressed in every part of the similitude in reference to Him beyond the scope. 2. Because he putteth cold and hot in the same balance together: so that whatever difference other ways be in His estimation of being hot, beyond that of being cold ; yet in this place they are made equal, and nothing is asserted concerning the one, but is also asserted concerning the other: which doth clearly show, that the Lord's expression is to be understood after the manner of men, (as was said) that is, as men use to express their hating of anything, by this, I wish it were, or had been any otherway: that same is the Lord's intent here. I cannot therefore but somewhat wonder, that a Learned man ( Johannes Dallaeus in his Apology, &c. ) doth draw this place of the Lord's wishing that Laodicea were hot, to confirm that assertion of the Lord's having a will and desire of the salvation of all men, besides His signifying of what is acceptable to Him as considered in itself, by His Word.

If it be asked how hypocrisy or lukewarmness may be said to be more dishonorable to the Name of God, than the want of a profession altogether? It may be answered in these three respects, 1. Where no profession is at all, the Name of Christ is not so concerned, as where it is: and therefore by any miscarriage of such, it is not so reflected upon, and made obnoxious to reproach, as it is in respect of these who have some way given up their names to Religion. It is on this account that in Ezek. 20.39. the Lord doth discharge the people of Israel to pollute His holy Name with their gifts, and biddeth them, go serve ye everyone his Idols, &c. which is not to give them allowance to run to Idolatry; but it is to show them, that if they would not wholly cleave to Him, His Name would be less polluted and dishonored by their direct betaking of themselves to Idolatry, than it was by mixing His Worship, and the worship of Idols together. 2. The nature of the sin itself, hath also some aggravations in it, which maketh it exceedingly loathsome to Jesus Christ, and dishonorable to Him beyond the condition of such as have no profession at all: for, such a person indeed is really cold, and without any Religion, as others are; And hath these two things beside, 1. He is a counterfitter of Religion, and that before God: therefore, Act. 5.3, &c. such are said to tempt God, and lie to the holy Ghost; because they presumptuously intrude themselves in a profession, as if they were something, being yet indeed nothing; and so tempteth the Majesty of God singularly to take notice of them, and discover them, or other ways some way to lie under the imputation either of no discerning, or of approving such unsoundness, as if it were Religion. Secondly, Ordinarily such, though they be poor, yet are they proud, presumptuous and haughty, in respect of their form; for, they say they are rich and increased with goods, &c. verse. 17. which no person without all form can be so readily tempted unto: Now the Lord abhorreth this empty pride above anything. A third respect in which hypocrisy is hateful beyond the want of all form, is, that it maketh such a persons conviction, conversion and salvation more difficult than if they had had no profession at all: for if so, it might have been more easy to have convinced them of their emptiness, and to have brought them to Christ, than in the case of their formality and pride. And thus not only is the case of hypocrisy more dangerous to themselves, but it is more dishonorable to God, because it some way frustrateth the end of His Ordinances amongst such. And therefore the Lord usually doth prefer the Publican's and Harlots in this respect, to the Scribes and Pharisees: because such were more easily convinced, and brought to some fruitfulness under the Ordinances, than Scribes and Pharisees were, who rejected the counsel of God against themselves. Thus ( Matth. 21.31, 32.) Publican's and Harlots are said to go unto the Kingdom of Heaven before the Scribes and Pharisees, because they believed John's Preaching, which the other did not.

The second thing in the Body of the Epistle, is, the Lord's threatening of them for this ill, by an expression suitable to the ill, verse. 16. So then, because thou art lukewarm, neither cold nor hot, I will spew thee out of my mouth : which is in sum this, seeing then thou art in a luke-warm temper, which usually men's stomachs can more hardly keep than what is cold, or what is hot, but must spew out the same as a thing loathsome unto them; so will I in some singular and extraordinary manner evidence my loathing of this thy luke-warm hypocritical temper. And this expression, to spew out, &c. seemeth to import these three, 1. That it shall be such a judgment as will be an evidence of the Lord's loathing of them, and giving up with them without respect to their form. 2. It implieth a making of them loathsome before others, as vomit useth to be: and so it is the Lord's taking-by the veil of their hypocrisy, and making them to fall from that respect and estimation amongst others, which possibly they hunted-after in this their external profession. 3. It may imply the Lord's giving them up to break out into gross external ills, whereby they might be emptied of that vain ground of boasting which they had in their former formality. And this being a common plague that follows proud hypocrisy, and a thing that discovereth the rottenness and loathsomeness of such, it may well be understood here, seeing the scope is to threaten them with making them appear to be loathsome, although they did endeavor by all means to cover the same.

The reason of this severity, is added, verse. 17. and it is in sum this, I will take such course as may discover thy loathsomeness, because thou art not only miserable and poor, but art conceity and proud, as if all were well, and knoweth not thy own rottenness and unsoundness, therefore (saith he) I will thus discover it.

In this verse. we may consider, 1. What was indeed the case of this Church. 2. What they themselves did esteem, and give it out to be. 3. With what confidence and upon what ground they did this. And lastly, the connection betwixt this and the former threatening.

Their true state, is set forth in five words, in the close of the verse: The first is, Thou art wretched : which is a comprehensive word, and doth ordinarily set forth the bodily defects and personal unsoundness and loathsomeness of one in respect of grievous diseases, and such like: this here is to be applied to their spiritual condition, which in these respects is no less wretched, disjointed, loathsome, &c. than the bodily condition of any can be. The second word, is, miserable : which looketh to a concurrence of external things beside the former wretchedness, as want of means of supply, want of fitness to do for themselves, and want of any solid way of provision made for them by others, and such like: Thus ( Ezek. 16.) the wretched child, is described, not only as loathsome, with the navil not cut, without washing with water to be suppled, &c. but none eye did pity it, to do any of these unto it, &c. so here, thou art miserable, that is, not only wretched in thyself; but in a disconsolate condition in respect of what thou may expect from others in this case. The third word, is, poor, that is, thou thinks thou hast many good works and much grace; but it is quite contrary; really thou hast nothing. The fourth is, thou art blind: that is an aggravation to all, that though thou be in this miserable condition, thou art senseless and ignorant thereof, and neither knoweth thy danger, nor how to rid thyself out of the same. The fifth word, is, and naked, that is, without anything to hide or cover this miserablnesse and filthiness before the justice of God. It is not desperate when folks are poor and miserable in themselves, if they have on Christ's righteousness to cover the same: but, faith the Lord to this Church, thou art in thyself miserable, and also without this cover, so that thou art lying as casten forth in the open fields, and obnoxious to the justice of God: This holdeth forth a very sad and a very dangerous condition. Yet, in the second place, we will find their thoughts of it to be far other ways: which the Lord setteth down in three words, 1. Thou sayest I am rich, that is, abounding in grace and good works, and having a righteousness sufficient enough. 2. I am increased with goods : which is still to be understood of their esteem of their own spiritual furnitour, which they think sufficient, not only to make them rich, but also to make them abound: and this, to be increased with goods, doth imply, both their esteeming of themselves to have much, and also to be upon the growing hand: which is a most dangerous condition, when a hypocrite doth not only falsely esteem himself to have grace when he hath none, but doth flatter himself as if he were thriving and growing in the same. The third word; is, and have need of nothing : this is indeed a comprehensive commendation of a condition, if there were ground for it: but where this entereth in a person abounding in corruption, it is the very height of self-delusion and presumptuous hypocrisy, to wit, that a person should think himself free of hazard, well stored with graces, and a great length therein, &c. but especially (as in this place) that he should think himself fully clear, and sure of his peace with God, and interest in the Covenant; so that in these respects there is need of nothing. This we conceive is here intended, and doth indeed look very like the language of stout self-confident ignorant hypocrites.

It may be wondered how and with what confidence they could entertain such thoughts. This is the third thing proposed, to be cleared in the words, and may be gathered from two expressions, 1. Thou sayest I am rich, &c. which words do not so much express the language of their mouths, as the inward language and confidence of the heart, and do import, not only their thinking of such a thing to be true, but their persuasion thereof, and confidence therein, even to a kind of audacity and impudency, so as nothing can put them from it, and is like these words, Ier. 2.23. How canst thou say I am not polluted, &c. and verse. 35. yet thou sayest, because I am innocent, &c. which places hold forth the impudency of formal hypocrites that will stick to their own justification, even contrary to the clearest applications of the Word of God against them: and therefore, Luk. 13.26, &c. some are brought-in pleading, as it were, with Christ in the day of Judgment their own Justification, and, though their will be no such pleading in that day, yet it showeth that many hypocrites may live and die, without being brangled in this their vain confidence, until Christ's final sentence do it, which is the scope of that place. The second word, is, and knoweth not that thou art wretched, &c. Some might think how could such poor persons boast so of their riches? this word showeth that they were not gross dissemblers speaking what they thought not; but that really they knew no better, and so they are (to say so) native, subtle hypocrites, as subtle hypocrisy is distinct from gross dissembling. Which doth show, 1. That hypocrites may really be blind and ignorant of their own unsoundness, and indeed think it otherwise than it is. 2. That this their ignorance doth not excuse them and extenuate their guilt; but on the contrary, it is both a sin in itself, and an aggravation of other sins to them; and for that end, it is made use of here.

The last thing in the verse. is, the connection of this with the former threatening in the word, because ; and is to this purpose, the reason of my so loathing thee, is not because simply thou art poor, miserable, and naked, &c. but because thou being such, art conceity of thy counterfeit profession, and unhumble under, and ignorant of, thy spiritual ills: therefore, I will spew thee out of my mouth, &c. otherwise poverty and grace can agree well; but blind, proud, reigning hypocrisy, and grace, can never be consisting together in one person.

From which words, these observations are clear, 1. That many may be in a very miserable spiritual condition under some seeming form and profession. 2. That yet such who are poor and rotten, and withal, have some profession, are oftentimes exceeding vain, proud and carnally confident in respect of the same. It is a wonder that a person, or Church, in such a condition, should yet esteem itself so as this doth: but this presumption and vain confidence, is not the least part of the subtlety of the sin of hypocrisy, and of the deceit of natural hearts. 3. It appeareth here, that many may absolve themselves with great confidence, and as having many seeming good grounds for their doing so, who yet may not be absolved by the Lord. 4. There is no condition more dangerous to a person, and loathsome to Christ, than to be poor and proud, or corrupt and rotten, and yet withal to be conceity and confident. 5. This universal confidence and satisfaction with ones own condition, is oftentimes (if not ever) a companion or fruit of the most desperate hypocrisy: because sincerity being imperfect as to its degrees, and so ever walking within fight of many wants, is still laboring under the sense thereof; and so in a dissatisfaction with its own condition in one respect or other. 6. We may see also, that it is a main part of a Ministers duty to rip up the secret and hidden hypocrisy of hearts, and to beat down the proud presumption of secure hypocrites, as well as to reprove the gross out-breakings of profane persons. 7. In application, Ministers would commend the Word to consciences, and therefore would seek to convince the Hearers of their heart-language, who oftentimes think more proudly and grossly of themselves and of their own condition, and even of Religion itself, than they dare outwardly profess.

The third thing in the Body of the Epistle, is, the cure which the Lord proposeth for such a case, verse. 18. There is a wonderful depth of iniquity and hypocrisy in their case; but here there is a far more wonderful depth and mystery of free grace and infinite love in the proposed cure. It is proprosed by way of offer under the expressions that belong to bargaining. And indeed here is an excellent market or fair, wherein we may consider these five.

First, There is the wares proposed, which indeed are the cure of the former case; and they are contained in three words, 1. It is gold tried in the fire. 2. White raiment. 3. Eye-salve. All which are very suitable to their wretched, poor and blind condition: under which expressions is understood, Christ Jesus Himself, and His benefits, who only can work the effects ascribed to these upon sinners, and make such a change upon their Spiritual condition: for He it is, that is made to us of God, Wisdom, Righteousness, Sanctification, and Redemption, 1 Cor. 1.30. And considering the strain of the Gospel where these properties are only attributed to Christ, together with the scope of this place, there can be no doubt of this.

Secondly, We may consider here the parties that are bargainers: upon the one side, the offerer is the Prince of the Kings of the earth, the beginning of the Creation of God, our blessed Lord Jesus, who maketh offer of Himself to sinners, and saith, Behold Me, Behold Me, unto these who were not called by His Name; on the other side, these to whom the offer is made, or who are to be the buyers, they are wretched, poor, miserable &c. This looketh disproportionable-like at first; yet it suiteth well with the bargain of Grace, where the Lord's Merchant is, every man that hath no money, Isa. 55.1. providing he be thoroughly sensible of the same.

Thirdly, We have the commendation of these wares, especially in reference to the parties that they are proposed to; As, 1. the excellency of the things themselves, the god is tried, the raiment is white, &c. There is nothing in our Lord Jesus but is exceeding excellent. 2. The wares are exceeding useful and profitabe, it is gold that maketh rich. The person that hath Christ, wanteth not Righteousness to pay his debt; and there is no other thing to make a person rich. 3. This raiment covereth nakedness : sin is not taken notice of where Christ is put on by Faith: For, His blood cleanseth from all sin, whereas there are many naked, loathsome souls under gorgeous robes. 4. The wares are most suitable to the party to whom they are proposed; they are poor, Christ maketh rich; they are naked, He covers; they are blind, He enlighteneth them, and openeth their eyes; there are no such suitable wares for a sinner as Christ, and whatever account self-righteous men have of Him, yet they who think themselves sinners, should by all means endeavor to purchase Him. 5. Wares are commended in this, they are necessary especially to such a party: there is no other way to be rich, but by having Christ; no otherway to be covered, or clothed before God, but by His righteousness; or, to see, or be in capacity to walk rightly in Spiritual things, except He prove the leader.

The fourth thing in this market or bargain, will yet commend this more; and it is this, to wit, the terms upon which these wares are proposed, implied in these words, buy of Me : which is not to be understood, as if there were some equivalent price required, or to be given for Christ: for, that is contrary to the scope of this place. And, considering the excellency of these wares, and the poverty of these that are called to be the Merchants, what can be expected of them in recompense for such an excellent bargain? The terms then must be Grace, as the same market is proclaimed, Isai. 55.1, 2, 3. He, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money: come ye, buy and eat, yea, come, buy wine and milk without money, and without price, &c. And verse. 3. the wares to be bought are the same, to wit, the sure mercies of David, that is, Christ Jesus, (as being compared with Act. 13.34. is clear) whom the Lord promiseth there to give, because there is no other way possible for the attaining of Him. This is expressed under the similitude of buying, to show, that as there is in covenanting with God two parties to be considered (as in all bargaining) and some excellent wares which the one must have from the other; so there must be a mutual consent and engaging for the clofing of this bargain, as there useth to be in bargains amongst men, though the difference be still in this, that here all the terms are of Grace. But, God willing, we shall consider the nature of this bargain peculiarly by itself.

The fifth thing in this bargain is the manner of Christ's proposing the same, I counsel 〈◊〉 , &c. which is not so proposed, as if it were left, indifferent to them to hearken or not. But it is thus expressed, for these reasons, 1. That thereby he may bear out his affection, who, as a friend, condescendeth to give them counsel in things that are of most concernment for their own good. 2. This also showeth the necessity and advantage of following this advice, because they are counseled to it by Him that is the Counselor, Isa. 9.6. and the Fathers substantial Wisdom. It must therefore be folly to reject His advice. 3. It is thus expressed, to gain their consent the more willingly to the same: therefore in the Gospel He doth beseech and entreat, &c. that thereby hearts may be induced to submit cheerfully to Him.

This verse contains a sum of the Gospel, and is a treasure of many Gospel-truths, as, 1. That there is no condition so desperate, but there is a fullness and efficacy in our Lord Jesus to cure the same: He is gold, white raiment, eye-salve, &c. and (the meaning of these expressions being obvious) we conceive there is no need to insist upon them. 2. This Doctrine is clear, That upon condition of believing and fleeing to Christ, the most loathsome, luke-warm, desperate hypocrite may have mercy: otherways such a counsel had not been given to Laodicea. 3. As there is a fullness in Christ; so there is a freeness in Grace to make that fullness forthcoming to sinners that will follow Christ's advice: and there is no sinner that heareth this Gospel, but may think himself sufficiently warranted to close this bargain with Christ, if heartily he submit to the terms thereof. But of these no more for the time.

The fourth thing in the Body of the Epistle, is, our Lord's pressing of this His counsel: which is done two ways, verse. 19, 20. as many as I love, I rebuke and chasten, (saith he) be zealous therefore and repent. The first part of the verse hath the Argument in it, The second part, is, a conclusion drawn from it. The Argument is, whom I love, I rebuke and chasten, that is, it is not my way to reprove with words or chasten with rods these whom I carry no respect unto; but I use this way to them whom I love, as I love my visible Church, which is confirmed from Prov. 3.12. and therefore seeing I take this way with you, and do not give up with you, my counsel ought to be the better received: where it would be observed, that it is still the same persons whom at first He chargeth. The conclusion drawn from this, hath two parts: The first is, be zealous, that is, mind to exercise Religion more seriously, in opposition to their former formality and lukewarmness; and that in the performing of the duties thereof, zeal to the glory of God, may be lively and predominant. This we conceive doth not press new duties; but a more spiritual end, motive, manner and edge in the doing of them: for, many duties may be done without zeal to God, though where this is not, they are never acceptable. The second part of the direction, is, and repent : which calleth them kindly to be affected with their hypocritical condition: And these two are inferred by the word, Therefore, from the former ground that expresseth God's love to them.

The second way he presseth it, verse. 20. is, by a most instant and importunate pursuing of His offer, with a protestation of His being there, and of His making the same. This is done four ways, First, by showing His work and posture, I stand at the door and knock. Hearts naturally are as Castles shut and guarded by the devil against Christ: when H cometh with His Ordinances, He doth thereby, as it were, lay a siege at them, and by His Word knock at the doors thereof to gain their consent; and the more pungently He presseth by His Ordinances, He is said to knock the more: and in this respect, Song. 5.2. His voice is said to knock at the Believers door in their sleepy condition. Here these two things are imported, 1. Christ's continuing to deal with His Church, and to wait upon her in His Ordinances, notwithstanding of her many former refusals. Thus, He is said to stand at the door : whereby is holden forth their ingratitude to Him, in keeping of Him out, and His patience that still waiteth on. 2. In this, by the other word, is imported His growing more instant in His dealing with them: therefore He is said to knock. And indeed if the former sharp threatening and charge, and the sweet and free offer be considered, it may well be said that now His knocks are doubled.

The second way He presseth in this verse, is, by making His offer particular, as it were, bringing it to every man's door, if any man hear my voice, and open the door, &c. Wherein, 1. He expresseth what He would have. 2. From whom. What He would have, is in two expressions, the one is, if any man hear my voice, that is, its hearkening to His voice which He requireth, as Psal. 95.7. for the want of which He complaineth, Psal. 81.13. And in these expressions often the terms of the Covenant of Grace are expressed, as, Isai. 55.2, 3. and is, upon the matter, that same with buying formerly mentioned, as in that place of Isaiah is clear. And it setteth forth Faiths consenting to hear and hearken to, and accept of God's offer of Grace in the Covenant; as, refusing to hear, holdeth forth men's rejecting of the same. The other word, is, and open the door : it is the same thing for substance with the former. Thus also Faiths closing with the Covenant of Grace, is often expressed, as, Psal. 81.10. Act. 16.14. because by Faith, the heart that was formerly shut against Christ, is made open to Him, and He hath way made for Him to enter into the same, as is clear from, Song. 5.2. Psal. 24.7.9. and Act. 16.14. where the Lord's opening the heart of Lydia, is expressly expounded to be her giving heed to these things, which Paul spoke, that is, her receiving of the same by Faith. This then is the duty called-for, and the terms upon which the offer is made, to wit, Faiths yielding to receive and admit Christ, for the end for which He is proposed. Secondly, The person called to this, is expressed thus, if any man, &c. which putteth it so to every hearer, as if it went round to every particular person, if thou, and thou, or thou, &c. and this manner of expression doth obviate any objection which might rise, such as, what if the most part reject? be it so, saith He, if any man open, it shall be well with him: or, if it should be objected, I am a sinner, miserable, a hypocrite of long standing that hath often rejected the Gospel, &c. This, if any man will open, &c. answereth all these at once: because where the Lord saith any man, without exception, who is he that can limit the same, where a person of whatsoever condition or qualification is found, that will accept of the offer according to the terms proposed? and so this any, is a particular application of the former advice; yet, such a particular application, as reacheth everyone of whatsoever condition they be.

The third way how it is pressed here, is, by subjoining a most comfortable promise unto any man so understood, as it is said, to wit, if any man will open, I will come in to him ; that showeth an union which shall be betwixt Christ and him: I will sup with him ; this showeth a friendly familiar way of communion that Christ shall entertain with him, as it is, Song. 5.1. I am come into my Garden, I have eaten my honey with my honey comb, I have gathered my myrhe, &c. Christ is a most heartsome guest where He is entertained. It is added, and he shall sup with me : this is the fruit and effect of the former two; and expresseth the sweet satisfaction that the sinner who openeth to Christ shall have by union and commuinon with Him, as in that same place of the Song. 5.1. when He cometh to feed Himself upon His own spices, His own myrhe, and His own wine, and what He brings with Him, then hath He a large allowance to His friends, as in the next words, eat, O friends, drink, yea, drink abundantly, O beloved. O so satisfying a life as it is to have Christ dwelling in the heart, and thus to be feasted with the comforts of His presence which are better than life▪ and what more can there be requisite to press the making of Christ welcome by sinners, than such a promise, or rather, three promises put in one?

The fourth thing that presseth this offer in this verse, is, the behold, which is deservedly premitted to all. And in this place (beside the usual weight it hath in other cases) it is Christ, making this offer of His observable to them, so that afterward they shall not get it shifted, but this shall be as an Instrument taken upon His making the offer, to stand in futuram rei memoriam : and so is like that, be it known unto you, men, and brethren, &c. whereby Paul closeth His Sermon, Act. 13.38. and thus, as it were, he driveth the nail to the head before he leave it, testifying that if this good bargain come not to a close, the blame shall be upon their side. And so we may see how weightily the Lord Preacheth in these Epistles to the Churches.

The conclusion of the Epistle followeth, in the last two verses, having two parts, as all the rest have. The first is a promise made to the overcomer, with an excellent qualification of the same, verse. 21. The promise, is, To him that overcometh, will I grant to sit upon my Throne : it is in substance the same with many promises formerly mentioned, to wit, a promise to make him partaker of Christ's Glory: it is not only to bring him to Glory, but to make him a sharer of that Glory which Christ the Head possesseth; that so he may reign with him and partake of the fruits of His Dominion and Conquest. The qualification or amplification of this promise, is, even as I overcame, and am set down upon my fathers throne : which doth import these three, 1. The greatness of this glory, which they are to partake of: Christ is set upon the Fathers Throne, and they are to be admitted to Christ's Throne, and so consequently to partake both of the Glory of the Father, and of the Son according to their capacity. 2. It is set forth in the surnesse thereof: it is sure to the overcomer, even as that exaltation is sure to Christ. 3. It setteth forth the method of it: so that as Christ did first suffer and overcome, and did then come to Glory; so these that are to be set down upon His Throne must come in the same method, by wrestling, and overcoming to obtain the same.

The other thing of the conclusion, is the common advertisement, now, the seventh time repeated, verse. 22. Yet is it never idly done: Which showeth, 1. what all men's duty is, to wit, it is their part that live in any place at any time, to receive the Word of God with as great reverence, as others who lived in some other place, and at some other time: therefore this advertisement is given equally to all the Churches, and to all Hearers. It is men's duty to receive with reverence every word of God, of whatsoever kind it be: therefore it is subjoined to all the several messages. 2. It showeth men's sinful stubborness that are not easily brought to give obedience to this principal duty.

It is meet now that we take notice of some difficulties that may arise from the words. And here it may be inquired, what is to be thought of this Church? or, what judgment may be given of the same? Answ. Although it is hard to determine peremptorily concerning the state; yet it appeareth that the condition of this Church, is the very worst of any that hath been written to: For, 1. there is nothing in her commendable, (at least commended) as was in Ephesus, Pergamos, and other Churches. 2. There is no person excepted from the charge of lukewarmness and hypocrisy, as was done in the Epistle to Sardis, verse. 4. But the strain of the Epistle runeth to charge them, and to charge them all with a most grievous charge. And seeing our Lord doth take this title to Himself in this very Epistle, to be the faithful and true witness, it is not like that He would have altogether past over their honesty, or such as were sincere amongst them, without commending the same, if there had been any such to be commended. For, our Lord kept that way in all the former Epistles; and had there been any sincere persons in this Church, it had been no less to their commendation, and to the commendation of His Grace, to have commended the same: yet we think that the Lord is in trysting-terms with them, and therefore might possibly have some to call effectually from amongst them, which maketh Him thus, out of love to continue and knock : yet we cannot see any ground to conclude that there was any sincerity, or sincere person amongst them for the time. Upon which, several Questions may arise, as,

1. It may be asked, If there can be any particular Church, without some sincere persons in the same, seeing it is compared to a floor where both Wheat and Chaff are? Ans. If we consider the visible Church as Catholic and Universal; so, indeed she can neither be without hypocrites, nor without true Converts, as may be gathered from these similitudes whereby she is holden forth in Scripture: but if we consider the particular Societies or Congregations that meet together at Ordinances for Worship, we suppose that it cannot be so peremptorily determined in reference to each of these, as if there had never been a particular Church without hypocrites on the one hand, or sincere persons on the other: for, there is no such promise that can be extended to every particular Congregation; but these promises must be applied to the Catholic Church: in which only, faith cannot fail. Again, these properties and descriptions of the visible Church, do not agree to every particular Congregation, but to the Church-universal, which is called the Kingdom of Heaven, and likened to such and such similitudes. Beside, if we consider experience, it will be hard to say that never any company of hypocrites did combine together of themselves, or by providence were casten to meet at the same Ordinances in way of a particular Congregation. There can be little said of this Church of Laodicea to vindicate her from this. On the other side, it were hard to say that never any, though the most choice number, should meet together in a Church-way, and be without hypocrites: This indeed I grant is much more difficult, and cannot but be much more rare than the other; (which I suppose is but too frequent) yet considering what may be said for these hundred and twenty who did meet and continue together, Act. 1.15. we suppose it is hard simply to deny the same. From which, it will follow that the visible Church must be principally considered in the New Testament as Catholic, seeing these many properties and descriptions can only be applicable to it as such, and are not so to be applied to particular Congregations.

2. It may be inquired, that seeing this Church is holden forth as hypocritical, what may be the characters of a hypocrite, as they are here drawn by the Lord? Answ. There are two sorts of hypocrites: one is more gross, and do indeed know that they are but dissembling: these are not properly hypocrites, but dissemblers. A second sort, is, more subtle, that is, when not only they make others to esteem of them, as if they were sincere; but when they come indeed to have such an estimation of themselves. These are properly hypocrites, and such as are described here, verse. 17. Now, from this Epistle, such a description may be gathered, 1. A subtle hypocrite, is one that hath some large profession, and fruitfulness as to many external duties: in this respect, he is not cold, as wanting all form; but it may be he aboundeth in that. 2. Though he hath much form; yet hath he no power nor reality at all: other ways he could not be denominat a hypocrite, though he might be said to have much hypocrisy in him: and in this respect, the hypocrite is not hot, even as he is not cold. 3. He is one that notwithstanding of this his want of sincerity, is yet still insensible of his poverty, wretchedness and misery, &c. Thus, verse. 17. he knoweth not that he is poor, miserable, blind, &c. and this is a main piece of the subtlety of hypocrisy, whereby not only others, but even the person himself is deceived, in respect of his own state and condition. 4. As he is insensible of his poverty, so is he highly puffed up with the estimation of what he appeareth to himself to have: and thus his security, is perfect peace; his presumption, is strong faith and confidence; his praying, and common liberty in the same, are most lively parts of communion with God in His account: and thus he saith, he is rich, verse. 17. and really thinketh so. 5. He is a man that doth continue and grow in this self-opinion: for, being unacquainted with through convictions, and with any apprehension of declining, or falling from the good which he had, he doth apprehend himself to be upon the growing hand, and so to him still, his faith, grace, and state of friendship with God, &c. do become the more unquestionable to him, and he supposeth himself to be, in all these respects, upon the thriving hand: therefore it is said, that he thinketh himself to be increased with goods, &c. 6. He is one that is exceedingly well content and satisfied with his own condition; and so, in his own estimation, there is none more honest and sincere, none that loveth God more singly, or is more beloved of Him; and, in a word, none with whom he would exchange his condition. This is a man that hath need of nothing in his own account; but is as if all were well already. 7. Under all this he is a man that hath never been at the market of free Grace, nor hath bought, or put on the white raiment, &c. therefore still all the wares are his own; his righteousness is of his own spinning; his peace standeth on his own bottom; and Christ hath never been fled unto, or accepted of for righteousness by him: therefore is there still need of making offer of, and pressing, the market of Grace unto and upon him. 8. Notwithstanding of this, he is as confident as if all were well: and he is in an incapacity (except the Lord do it in an extraordinary way) to be convinced either that he wanteth sincerity in the strain of his walk, or that he hath not received Christ or made use of His righteousness: and though he may take with many particular challenges; yet he is guarded, as it were, against these two. Therefore it is said, there must be eye-salve bestowed upon him, to discover his nakedness to him. And this is even the height of all, when self-conceitedness and vain confidence so possess the heart, as to make all convictions to be rejected, and to keep the foul sleeping securely without suspecting its own naughtiness.

3. If it be asked, how a person that is so unsound cometh to have such thoughts of himself, or such confidence of his own condition? We may Answer, Upon these confiderations, 1. Men naturally are lovers of themselves, and admirers of what is in themselves. Hence it is, that men are so easily induced to overvalue their own natural and moral parts, and, upon the same account, these things that look more Spiritual-like. 2. Men naturally cannot discern the things of God, for they are Spiritually discerned: it is no wonder therefore that they take that which glittereth to be gold, especially this being added to the former consideration. 3. He hath all the concurrence the devil can give him to cause him entertain such thoughts: and therefore often such a man is kept from gross temptations, and foul out-breakings, which many sincere persons are tortoured with: by which the devil aimeth to keep all in quiet, as the scope of the parable runneth, Matth. 12.29. If we consider his practice, it needeth not seem strange that he be thus deluded: for, he doth not search himself; he doth not make hypocrisy his burden, or use these means whereby the sincere-hearted are helped to a discovery of their own naughtiness: and therefore, what wonder is it that such be strangers to this? 5. When they go on smothering convictions, neglecting duties, and such like, there is something that cometh judicially from God to give them up to that delusion, so as to trust the language of their own hearts concerning their own state, beyond the most clear convincing reproofs that may come from the Word of the Lord: and this is to be found, ( Isa. 44.20.) in a very irrational like thing, as the worshipping of stocks and stones; yet such a person, being turned aside by a deceived heart, cannot deliver his own soul, nor say, is there not a lie in my right hand? 6. There are some concurring things which may also have influence upon this, as suppose men be so esteemed of by others who are esteemed gracious, especially if upon some fits of convictions, or common exercises, they have been inconsiderately cried-up by Ministers, as exercised Christians, when as yet the exercise hath not taken root, not hath it been adverted possibly, how it came to a close: by such and such like means, often may a Novice, or one who is not a Christian thoroughly, come to be puffed up and fall in the condemnation of the devil, by this or some other way. And, no question, these foolish Virgins were not a little confirmed in their vain confidence and presumption, from this, that they had the company and countenance of the wise Virgins, which, it may be, many others had not, Mat. 25.

4. If it be asked, If a hypocrite can discern his own rottenness and hypocrisy, or fear and suspect the same? Answ. 1. A hypocrite may come a great length as to this, at some particular times and occasions, especially when some sudden fears seem to surprise, or when some particular challenge and the fear of wrath is born in upon him; yet in so far as he hath these, and entertaineth them, he cannot be called a hypocrite; but in so far as he beareth down and passeth over the same. For, there is a real ground of suspicion and fear within him, &c. and therefore to be affected therewith, is not properly hypocrisy, except the same be hypocritically used, that is, that it be keeped from making discernible to him the rottenness of his state, but on the contrary, he becometh the more vain because of such flashes, and seeming exercises, when yet they have never been suffered to come the length of any real sincerity. 2. We suppose, that the continuance of such suspicions, challenges and fears, is inconsistent with the state of hypocrisy, of which we are speaking, because security and presumption (to say so) are essentials to such a hypocrite: and we conceive that the continuance of such challenges, fears, &c. in any degree, cannot be consistent with such an absolute security and confidence, as was formerly spoken to. Yet no such fear or exercise, &c. will be a proof of sincerity, except they be rightly improven for the discovering of a persons self-inability, and for the putting of them to the market of free Grace, by which only such fears can be rightly removed. 3. Where these fits of fears and suspicion are in hypocrites, they proceed rather from some apprehension or sense of wrath (as in these who dispare concerning their Salvation) then from any seen or felt grossness of the corruption that is in themselves; or from any dissatisfaction with their own faith, or sincerity upon the distinct discovery of their own rottenness and hypocrisy in itself: and therefore such fears follow not upon their searching of themselves, nor result from the discovery of their own naughtiness, nor are willingly entertained by them: but, on the contrary, it is some apprehension of wrath that wakeneth them; and what apprehensions they have of their unsoundness, are but impressed upon this occasion; whereas the Believer, first, seeth and feeleth the body of death within him, and then hath the apprehensions of wrath flowing from that. 4. In their doubtings and suspicions, they are most sensibly touched with respect to the end and event, that is, they doubt whether they may attain heaven, or miss it: and possibly because of their unbelief, they may draw such sentences sometime against themselves; yet are they not usually brought to sentence themselves in respect of their own state, and to judge themselves as lost and graceless: for, eye-salve, to discover our nakedness, is a gift of Christ's giving, and goeth alongst in one bargain with gold, white raiment, &c. Therefore it cannot be thought that any hypocrite can have this kindly discovery of their own nakedness, and natural loathsomeness in respect of the root thereof, though they may have many particular fruits discovered to them. 5. If a hypocrite come under any fit of terror or conviction thus to sentence himself: yet, even then, it is not simple dissatisfaction with his own sinfulness, which maketh him do the same; but some apprehended terror of God upon him: and therefore when that is removed, his sentence past upon himself is retreated. And so in such a case, a hypocrite's sentencing of himself, is but his expressing what he apprehendeth to be God's sentence upon him, or, it is his foretelling of what he thinks coming: and this supponeth still God's sentence to be past in his apprehension, which maketh them not so much pass their own sentence upon the account of their own deservings, as to express with regrate what he hath passed already: which by no means they would do, if they could eschew it: whereas a sincere person doth arraign and judge himself, from the sense of his own guilt, accounting it just that God should do so also, although they do not look upon his deed as the ground of theirs, (as in the former case) but on their own guiltiness without respect thereto.

5. It may be asked, how a Minister may discern a luke-warm temper among the people over whom he hath charge? Answ. Although peremptory decision of such a persons state, who hath a form of Religion, be a thing that Ministers, nor others, are not to take on them; Yet (considering that such a case is often most frequent, and that it is of most weighty concernment for a Minister to discern the same; also, that where it is common, it is ordinarily one way or other so far discernible as is fit, to a searching discerning eye) We may offer from these words such characters thereof, as may help a Minister in applying of himself suitably, at least, to their present frame. 1. Such a luke-warm temper hath much more light than life, and much more delight in speculative knowledge, and in such preachings as bring some new thing to that, than they have in what really feedeth the soul, and tendeth to search the conscience or awaken any spiritual exercise therein. 2. Such a people have ordinarily a heal and unbroken condition; without fears, exercises, or doubts; and so accordingly there will be little of such subjects the matter of discourse betwixt them and the Minister: yea, if such a thing be moved, either they will suffer it to die out, as a thing which they are not acquainted with, or delighted in; or, so entertain it with some such general expressions as rather show their desire not to be thought ignorant, than any way to express their sense of the same. 3. Much of their discourse of Religion will readily be to their own commendation, even when they seem with the pharisee, ( Luk. 18.) to thank God they are not as other men : and so still there is some expression of their satisfaction with their own condition that's discernible in the whole strain of their discourse and way, what ever acknowledgements may be intermixed. 4. It is discernible by pride, self-esteem, vain confidence, &c. that do accompany such, which for a continuance of time together can hardly be hid to a searching Minister: for, this doth not only kyth negatively in their want of spiritual exercises, and such like; but it will even often kyth positively, by their censuring of others when they fall; by their asserting their own sincerity, and the clearness and confidence that they have of their own good condition, and by their looking upon all things which may touch at their sore, as not belonging to them, and as if they were above and without the reach of all such grounds of doubting. 5. Such love rather to have the esteem and familiar acquaintance of their Minister, than to have profit by his Ministry: hence they will be short in no civil courtesy; will be desirous of having the Minister frequently with them, and that he may love them, and readily complain if he humor them not in that; yet he may be many nights in their company and find it hard to edify much; or discover any great greediness in them to take the Word off his hand. We see the Pharisees invited Christ to their houses, thinking it a part of their esteem, and name, to be familiar with such a person; yet it is not recorded of any of them that they intended their own edification, or made use of such opportunities for that end, as Marie did, Luk. 10.42. 6. Men in such a frame, as they are professed enemines to profanitie; so are they secret whisperers against true tenderness, and tender persons; they wonder what spiritual exercises are; and why folks will not believe, and so quiet all their doubts; they are ready to count diligence and seriousness beyond their own pitch, to be but fancy and conceits, as we see in some Pharisees, condemning poor women that were mourning at Christ's feet; and upon occasions they cannot well hide the same, especially, when any faults break out in such, as once seemed to be more tender, then they bless themselves in their own form of Religion, and insult upon these; whereas these that are truly spiritual, are commanded to restore (and will readily endeavor it such as fall with the spirit of meekness, Gal. 6.1. 7. Somewhat is discernible by a people's conversing with others: for, such readily love to converse with these that do admire them, and make no doubt of their piety and sincerity: and so Ministers and People both, that speak most smoothly to them, without riping up anything of their wounds, are most beloved by them, and spoken of with the greatest commendations, even in their absence. 8. Some-thing also may be gathered from this, if the Congregation be esteemed to be generally religious, and if their manner of carriage under it be still the same, and hath been so for a long time together, without any observable change, and such like. When these things concur, it may justly be suspected if such a work be real that's so universal and easily constant. By these and such like, an observing and discerning Minister may, at least, come so far in the knowledge of such a case, as may warrand him to apply himself to deal with them suitably to the same.

6. If it should be asked, How it is that a Minister ought to deal with people in such a frame? This will be indeed more difficult to answer, and will be the matter of many serious thoughts to a faithful Minister, lest he run, and labor in vain among such a people. For there is no people with greater difficulty gained by the Gospel; and there is not ordinarily any case that doth destroy so many souls in the visible Church, as this doth: and therefore there is not more zeal and prudence required in reference to any sort of persons, than in reference to such. For helping to answer this, we may offer these things from the way which our Lord useth in this Epistle, 1. A Minister that hath to do with such a people, would endeavor to have a ministerial esteem amongst them, that is, that, upon the one side, he may have a testimony in their consciences, that he loveth them, and wisheth the good of their souls, as a faithful Minister should do: other ways, if there should be any other jar, all his reproofs and threatenings will be accounted to flow from that, and so be rejected. Again, on the other side, when (I say) this respect ought to be ministerial, it is to seclude a carnal, trivial respect and affection, that doth proceed from too great familiarity with such persons, than which there is nothing more dangerous both to Ministers and People: for, where it is, he is accounted a companion, and, plainness from him, hath no weight with it: for they cannot think that he would converse with them so familiarly, if he had indeed such thoughts of their condition, as faithfulness will put a Minister to express in such a case: and, as such persons usually seek to gain such affection and familiarity from their Minister, as a special mean to keep him in esteeming so of them, as they do of themselves; So Ministers would beware of giving them such a stumbling; but to endeavor such an esteem amongst them, as is, for the works sake, 1 Thess. 5.12. 2. A Minister in such a case would not hold upon general Doctrines, nor the reproving of gross scandals only; but he would set himself in application to insist upon hypocrisy and lukewarmness, and so to describe it, to show the rifenesse of it, to set forth the loathsomeness and the hazard that cometh to souls by it, and that in a searching, grave and weighty manner, that he may be seen to be affected therewith himself, as the Lord doth in this place. 3. This would be done pungently and purposely, as if a Minister were building forts to besiege a City, or taking a strong hold by the Gospel: and therefore one battery would be made to follow upon the back of another, if so be such stout pillars of presumption may be battered down: and for that end, the Word would be sharpened and edged, that it may prove a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart, and lay open, not only what is the man's practice without, but what is the heart-language within; what are his thoughts of himself; what are the grounds upon which he buildeth them; what are the answers whereby he shifteth challenges; what are the deceits wherewith he beguileth himself in all these, and such like: which is the Lord's practice here, thou sayest, &c. 4. A Minister would threaten such indefinitely, as here, and, when he hath described them with their characters and symptoms, thunder out the Lord's wrath and curse even against hypocrisy, lukewarmness, self-conceitedness, want of humility, such as have not fled to Christ, are not born again, and such like; that they may know such spiritual ills are loathsome to God. 5. It is fit in such a case to rid marches between Nature and Grace accurately and distinctly; and to give such symptoms of the one, and marks of the other, as may clearly from Scripture et bounds between hypocrisy and sincerity; between duties done in the right manner, and such as are but in show; so as consciences may be bound with it, that these things are the Truths of God. 6. There would be •• ll a plain opening-up of the way of Justification through Faith in Christ, which is the sure ground of all peace: and there would be a clearing of the terms of the Covenant of Grace, and of the Doctrine of Regeneration; and withal, a most serious pressing of them to make the right choice, and to accept of the best bargain. Lastly, This application would be carried-on with more than ordinary ve emencie in the manner, weightiness in the expression, convincingnesse in the Arguments and Motives, &c. beside secret wrestling with God for them: therefore the Lord here obtesteth, and protesteth in the pressing of this: this also would not be done for some little space of time; but would be continued, and insisted in: therefore the Lord knocketh, and He standeth and knocketh : which giveth a pattern of what Ministers ought to do in such a case. And indeed there is no greater need of anything, than by weighty powerful Preaching, and convincing Application, to beat and knock at hearts with the Word, as with a hammer: because, there is no condition more rife, and more dangerous in the Church of God, than the same of which we have spoken.

Concerning the identity of Angel, Bishop, and Presbyter.

IT may possibly seem strange to some, that in the Exposition of all these Epistles, we have still applied what is spoken to, or of, the Angels, as being spoken to, or of, ordinary Ministers: whereas to some, it appeareth, that these Angels were some singular and eminent persons, having Jurisdiction and Authority over other Ministers, such as usually is given to Bishops and Prelates as contradistinct from the other: and that therefore this Exposition and Application, which all alongst, doth confound Bishops and Ministers, as if there were no distinction amongst them, is not to be admitted.

To say something to this now, upon the close of all the Epistles: We do indeed acknowledge that this Exposition doth confound the same, and will admit of no distinction amongst them, as amongst Officers of the Church of a higher and lower place. And although we hinted somewhat of the reasons of this, Chap. 1. verse. 20. Yet we shall attest any serious Reader (who will ponder and weigh the series of these Epistles, and the application of them) if he can judge it possible to expound, and apply these Epistles in any useful and practical manner, and not be necessitate to understand what is spoken of, or to these Angels, as being spoken of, and to, the Ministers of these Churches. And, having now gone through the same, we profess ourselves to be more confirmed in the Exposition of this title Angel, which was formerly given. And if it were not so, we truly would not know how to expound these Epistles, or to apply the same to one, such as this Bishop, contradistinguished from Ministers or Presbyters, is supposed to be. And although we purpose not to disgresse in this; yet that it be not looked upon as any unreasonable thing thus to confound Bishops and Ministers, and to take them for one and the same Officer, we shall propose these four considerations,

The first is, That we are sure this is agreeable to Scripture: and if in Scripture they be thus confounded, it must certainly be safest to speak with it. Now that the Scripture doth so, may appear from these Scriptures, which even many of the Ancients have made use of for this end. The first is, Act. 20. where ( verse. 17.) Paul doth call the Elders of Ephesus ; and when he hath continued for a time to speak unto them ( verse. 28.) he doth give them this style of Bishops (for what is translated Overseers, is in the Original, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) In which place they are most evidently spoken of as one, both in respect of name, and in respect of Office.

The second place, is, Philip. 1.1. where Paul directeth his Epistle, beside the Saints, to the Bishops and Deacons, without mentioning of any Minister or Presbyter. The reason why they are called Bishops, in the plural number, is, not because there were plurality of Lord-Bishops, as distinct from Ministers in one City; but it is, because by Bishops, is understood the plurality of Ministers that were therein. And Chrysostom upon the words observeth, That in the Scripture, distinction is not made betwixt these titles; but the same that is a Minister, is also a Bishop.

The third place, is, Tit. 1. by comparing, verse. 5. with verse. 7. where in the one, these words are, for this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou should ordain Elders (or Ministers) in every City. and in the 7. verse. after he hath given some directions concerning their qualification, he doth subjoin this as a reason enforcing the observation of the same, for a Bishop must be blameless, &c. and if both were not one, there could be no force in his so reasoning. The word also rendered Bishop, is that same which was in the former places.

The fourth place is, 1 Pet. 5.1.2. where Peter, exhorting the Ministers, or preaching Elders, to watch carefully over the Flock and to feed the same, expresseth the nature of their Office to consist in this, in having, or taking, the oversight of the flock : which, in the Original, is the same word, that must be applied to Bishops, and might be rendered thus, feed the flock that is among you, overseeing the same as Bishops, not by constraint but willingly : for the word is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . And there were no reason for him to require Ministers to play the Bishops (to speak so) by watching so over the Flocks as belong to them, if Bishops and Ministers in the language of the Holy Ghost were not one and the same. Neither will that exception which Bellarmine hath ( de Clericis, lib. 1. cap. 15.) and sundry other Papists with him, to wit, that at that time these titles were not distinguished in the Church, but used in common, as they prove out of many of the Ancients But, on the contrary, this doth confirm our assertion: For, 1. If they were not distinguished then, who can afterward distinguish them? 2. Can there be so universal and frequent mentioning of them as one, except they be really and wholly so? 3. It appeareth by these Scriptures, where not only the titles are confounded as belonging to the same Officers, but the offices themselves are confounded, both in respect of the qualifications of the persons, and in respect of ordaining and installing of them in these offices, and also in respect of the duties that are required of both. It is worth the observing which the Jesuit Lorinus hath to this purpose, Act. 20.17. who, after the rejecting of many answers, is brought to acquiesce in this as truth, that these names were common in the Apostles days, who did use the title of Bishop, and Presbyter indifferently: and that therefore these who are Presbyters in the one verse, are styled Bishops in the other: he doth also afterward subjoin this similitude to illustrate the same; As (saith he) in the Primitive time the title Papa, or Pope, was indifferently given to all eminent Bishops; but afterwards was restricted to the Bishop of Rome, for distinguishing him from others; so (saith he) the title Bishop, which was at first common to all Ministers, was at last appropriated to some few; who, for distinguishing them from others, were thus styled, for setting forth their Authority and Jurisdiction above them. This indeed seemeth to be the ruth, and showeth clearly that Bishops and Popes (in the sense that some do plead for) have the same original, and are grown up by the same means, to be distinguished from others as being above them, to wit, by men's pride and human constitutions.

I know that even by some of the Fathers these two places, to wit, Ephes. 4.11, 12. and, 1 Tim. 3.2. with 8. are adduced for the same end: because, in the first place, the Apostle reckoneth out both extraordinary and ordinary Preaching-officers, without making any mention of Bishops: which could not be, if they were not the same with Pastors that are named, as Ambrose on the place asserteth. And although it seemeth that in some things he mis-representeth the Primitive order of the Church; yet is he forced to add, ideo non per omnia convenient scripta Apostoli ordinationi quae nunc in Ecclesia est: quia haec inter ipsa primordia scripta sunt. And though that last reason hath no weight in it to infer any change upon the Church now, in respect of its Office-bearers, from what it was then in the Apostles days, and ordained to be by them; yet this is clear, that he granteth a clear difference between the state of the Church in these days, wherein this distinction of Bishops from Pastors was come to some height, from what it was in the time of the Apostles, which certainly must be the most pure times of the Church. In the other place, to wit, 1 Tim. 3.1, &c. The Apostle proposeth certain rules for the trying and ordaining of one to be a Bishop, and after, in verse. 8. he doth immediately pass to the office of a Deacon, without mentioning of a Presbyter or Minister: which showeth, that in speaking of Bishops, he did understand Presbyters, and did acknowledge no distinct Teaching-officer between them and Deacons. And indeed the rules and qualifications are the same which he maketh common to Bishops and Presbyters, Titus 1. Chrysostom moveth the same Question on the words, verse. 8. Homilia 11. to wit, Why doth Paul pass immediately from Bishops to Deacons, ommitting Presbyters? because (saith he) between a Bishop and a Presbyter there is almost no difference: for, the care of the Church is committed to Presbyters: and what he spoke of Bishops, doth agree to Presbyters. Only he subjoineth, in the matter of Ordination, doth the Bishop differ from the Minister? And this difference is not to be understood to be such as was in the Apostles days: for, the former Scriptures will confute that. Therefore even this same Father with others, do assert that then Presbyters did ordain Bishops, as in the instance of Timothy, 1 Tim. 4. they assayed to make out; But it is a difference that was brought in afterward in the Church, and was in exercise for that time, though without any warrand from the Word. And if these Scriptural grounds hold, as by what is said, they necessarily and clearly must, it mattereth the less what may be said from other grounds. And so we leave this first consideration.

Our second consideration, is, That this confounding both of the titles and offices of Bishop and Presbyter, will be found agreeable to the most pure Primitive times. It is true, within some few ages, difference was made between Bishops and Presbyters in the Church; yet was never that distinction counted by them to be jure divino, or by the Law of God; but as a thing belonging to order in the Church, and brought in by custom: which was, that he who was of greatest age and respect, and did preside in the meetings, was particularly called Bishop, which afterward was established by some Councils. If we might take the testimony of some Papists here, they will confirm this; Michael Medina (as he is cited by Bellarmine, lib. 1. de Clericis, cap. 15.) doth affirm, that not only Jerome was of that mind with Arius ; (whose opinion was, that the Bishop and the Presbyter were equal and the same) but also, that Ambrosius, Augustinus, Sedulius, Primasius, Chrysostomus, Theoderetus, Oecumenius, and Theophilactus were of that same mind. Atque ita (inquit Medina) isti viri, alioqui sanctissimi, & Sanctarum Scripturarum consultissimi: quorum tamen sententiam prius in Aerio, deinde in Waldensibus, postremo in Ioanne Wicclifo, damnavit Eclesia, &c. Note here, that this hath been always accounted the common judgment of the Waldenses and of Wicklife, with his followers, whose judgment certainly is of great weight, seeing they were eminent witnesses against the Beast, whereof more may be spoken, Chap. 11. and he doth at large make out the Agreement of these Fathers with Arius in this point, to wit, that by Divine right there is no difference between Bishop and Presbyter. This testimony will be more clear, if we consider many of these testimonies themselves, as they are set down by Sixtus Senensis, Bibliothecae sancta, lib. 6. annotatione, 319, & 324. where he hath the words of many of these Authors, as agreeing with Jerome, whose testimony is most largely set down, and beside what was already cited from Ambrose, these words are added out of his Comments on 1 Tim. cap. 4. Episcopy & Presbyteri una est ordinatio: (uterque enim Sacerdos est) sed Episcopus primus est, ut omnis Episcopus Presbyter sit, non tamen omnis Presbyter Episcopus. Ille enim Episcop s est, qui inter Presbyteros primus est. which is not to show any superiority of degree, but an orderly precedency which he that was the chief Presbyter had amongst others. He is also cited upon Philip. 1.1. where he bringeth-in, Acts 20.17. and 28. to confirm this, that Presbyters and Bishops were the same.

Beside these, we may add two more particular testimonies, The first is of Jerome, first, in his Epistle to Euagrius, where at large he asserteth and proveth this Truth: and when he proponeth the Question, Would ye have Authority? he goeth through these Scriptures, Philip. 1. Acts 20. Tit. 1. 1 Tim. 4. 1 Pet. 5. and from these places doth confirm, not only the titles to be common; but that the Presbyters were by office Bishops: and for that cause he cites the Greek word, to wit, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which in that place of Peter is applied to Presbyters, to show the identity of the one office with the other: Yea, he addeth many other places, as the 2. and 3. Epistles of John, and 1 Tim. 3. where (saith he) de ordination Episcopy & Diaconi dicitur; de Presbiteris, omnino reticetur: quia in Episcopo & Presbyter continetur. If it be asked, How this distinction did enter? He answers in that Epistle, quod autem postea, &c. that is, that when afterward one came to be elected and preferred to the rest, it was done for the remedy of Schism. And it is observable, that this remedy is said by him to be after John's writing of his Epistles, during which time, there was no such difference. And he illustrateth it thus, as if the Deacons should peculiarly choose one from among themselves, whom they knew to be industrious and give him the title of Arch-deacon, for helping them in the managing of what belongs to their office orderly: thus e. Which clearly showeth what kind of precedency this is which he attributeth to the Bishop, even such as he would allow to a Deacon, that for some special end is advanced to some peculiar care by others. Again, he doth purposely handle this same thing in his Commentars on Titus 1. where without any prejudice by the heat of dispute, having compared verse. 5. with verse. 7. he addeth, idem est ergo Presbyter qui Episcopus: & antequam diaboli instinctu studi in religione fierent, & diceretur in populis, ego sum Pauli, ego Apollo, ego autem Cephae, omnium Presbyterorum consilio Ecclesia gubernabantur. Postquam vero unusquisque eos quos baptizavera suos putabat esse, non Christi, in toto orbe decretum est, ut unus de Presbyteris electus superponeretur cateris; ad qu m omnis Ecclesiae cura pertineret; & Schismatum semina tollerentur. And lest this assertion of his should be thought to be without warrant, he addeth putat aliquis, &c. doth any think that this is not the mind of the Scripture, but our own? to wit, that a Bishop and Presbyter are one and the same, and that the one word, to wit, Bishop, denoteth the office; and the other, to wit, Presbyter, the age? for then they used to be well stricken in years; and Presbyter signifieth Elder. And he doth subjoin, in this place, the Scriptures formerly mentioned for confirming the same: which he doth not only cite; but solidly reasoneth the Conclusion from them, and having cited Acts 20. he hath these words, observe here diligently, how calling the Presbyters of one City, to wit, Ephesus, he doth afterward style them Bishops. And also maketh use of that, Heb. 13.17. where submission and subjection is required to all that watch over souls, and, saith he, ibi aequaliter inter plures Ecclesiae cura dividitur. And lest it should be thought that he esteemed this difference, which afterward followed between Bishop and Presbyter, to be of Divine institution (though in part he did then acknowledge some difference, de facto ) he doth close with this, sicuti ergo Presbyteri sciunt se ex Ecclesiae consuetudine ei qui sib prepositus fuerit, esse subjectos: ita Episcopy noverint se magis consuetudine, quam dispositionis dominicae veritate, Presbyteris esse majores, that is, as Presbyters know themselves to be by the custom of the Church, subject to him that is set over them; so Bishops would know that they are above Presbyters, rather by custom, than by any verity of Divine disposition or appointment: and when he cometh again to the Text, he useth this transition, videamus igitur qualis Presbyter, five Episcopus, ordinandus sit.

From which testimonies, these things are clear, 1. That there was no difference betwixt the names and offices of Bishops and Presbyters in the days of the Apostles, 2 That the difference was not begun by any Apostolic constitution; but upon Church-custom, the decrees of Counsels, and such other grounds. 3. That although he acknowledgeth some difference for the time, as that Bishops were to ordain, from which Presbyters were restricted; yet that is clearly asserted by him not to flow from any Divine constitution, (for there can be none imagined after the Apostles days) but from some human or Church constitution, as by the former warning both to Bishops and Presbyters wherewith he closeth, is clear.

This testimony is so clear that it doth put many of the Popish adversaries to a stand. Alfonsus Castrensis (as he is cited by Bellarmine, and Sixtus Senensis, in the places formerly mentioned) doth not stand to aver, that in this Jerome did err. And Bellarmine when he hath given one answer, to wit, that Jerome intended the change betwixt Bishops and Presbyters to have begun upon the occasion of the first Schism at Corinth, because of his alluding to these words, I am of Paul, I am of Ap llo, &c. and finding him afterward to maintain the same Doctrine from the Epistles of Paul to the Philippians, and Titus, and also from the Epistles of Peter and John, which were written long after the said Schism; to weaken his testimony, he saith, observandum est sanctum Hieronim m in illa sua se tentia non adeo constantem vid ri, &c. whereas he is most constant, seeing by mentioning these words, he doth not pitch on that particular Schism at Corinth ; but, in allusion thereto, doth express the Schisms that followed thereafter. And we suppose there can be no •• f inging of these so direct and express testimonies: yet we may observe what estimation these men have really of the most eminent Fathers (whom they so much other ways cry up) when they differ from them.

This testimony upon Titus, is the more observable, because, as both Sixtus Seuensis hath it, and Bellarmine doth acknowledge, Sedulius, Scotus, and Anselmus Cantuariensis Episcopus do expound these words of Paul to Titus in the same very words that are used by Jerome. And so the former testimony is not to be accounted the testimony of one, but the testimony of three, beside others, who in other words incline to Jerome's mind.

The second testimony is of that famous Father Augustine, who in his 19. Epistle (which is the last of his Epistles direct to Jerome, and is also in that order among Jerome 's Epistles) when he is pressing Jerome. who was but a Presbyter to use freedom with him who was a Bishop, and to correct him wherein he was wrong, he doth urge it thus, q a qu m enim secundum honorum v cabula, quae j m Ecclesia usu ob •• nuit, Episcopa us Presbyter •• jor sit.

In which words it is indeed asserted, that a Bishop was more than a Presbyter, at that time, yet the rise of that is shown to be from the use or custom which had now obtained in the Church. Neither can that exception of Bellarmine and some others be of force, to wit, that Augustine doth compare, not the use of the Christian Church in that time with what was formerly, but the use of these words in the Christian Church with what was before Christ: and so the use of the Church, and Divine institution, according to this meaning, will be one: This (I say) doth most grossly contradict that Fathers intent: for, 1. His scope is to show that though he was called a Bishop, and Jerome but a Presbyter, that yet indeed there was no difference, but only such as use and custom had brought in into the Church, whereas if we expound custom or use other ways, Augustine would seem rather to assert and aggrege the distance that was between him and Jerome, than any way to diminish the same. When yet his scope is clear to lessen that distance of superiority that seemed to be between him and him because of these titles. 2. The very expression will bear the same, quae jam Ecclesiae usus obtinuit, &c. which necessarily importeth, that sometimes such difference was not in custom in the Church: and where will it be found in Augustine that he compareth any custom of the Church after Christ with what was before, as different customs of different times of the same Church? for to him, and almost all the Fathers, usus, or consuetudo Ecclesiae, is ever taken, when given, as a ground of any practice, as contradistinguished from Divine institution, as in the last cited words of Jerome is clear. Also, it may have its own weight, that he is now writing to Jerome whose judgment in these things was not unknown to him: he must therefore be supposed to use the same, as it was understood by him.

Also in that book, which is entitled, Liber quaestionum Veteris & Novi Testamenti among August. his Works, Quaest. 101. when he hath proven from 1 Tim. 3. the Bishop and Presbyter to be one, quid est enim Episcopus nisi primus Presbyter ? and after he marketh, that although the Bishops used to style Presbyters, Compresbyteri ; yet, saith he, they never say to the Deacons Condiaconi. And whoever be the Author, it showeth that in the Primitive times this title Bishop, was rather given as a note of respect to some eminent Ministers, than as that which did constitute a different Office or Officer especially jur divino. And that there was another kind of identity between Ministers and Bishops then any of them and Deacons, though Ministers virtually comprehend that office also.

It is like it may be objected, that all antiquity did condemn Arius, whose opinion is said to be this, that he took away all distinction betwixt Bishop and Presbyter? Answ. It is the judgment of Learned Rivet in his Catholicus orthodoxus, in his reply to the same charge given by Ballius, tractatu secundo Quaest. 22. That Arius was condemned by them, not simply as maintaining anything contrary to truth, in this, but as imprudently in practice brangling the order then established amongst them, to the hazard of their union. And there are two clear proofs of this, 1. Because where the same tenets were maintained, as in Jerome, and others; yet where these persons continued in the unity of the Church, they were never branded with any name of Heresy for the same. 2. Because even Augustine, who reckons up this Heresy of Arius, doth yet acknowledge this difference to be by no Divine constitution, as we have formerly seen. And who will consider the rolls of Heresies, set down by these Fathers, will find that oftentimes such are reckoned among Heretics, who much rather ought to be accounted Schismatics. It is observable also, that even adversaries grant that none of these Fathers do condemn him for denying that distinction to be jure divino, (for which see Estius, lib. 4. pag. 35.) but for denying it simply, And so now we leave our second consideration.

The third consideration, is, that there is some footsteps of this identity of Bishop and Presbyter in the most corrupt Writtings of the most impure School-men: which may appear in these three, 1. In that, generally, Episcopacy is holden to be no distinct order from Presbytery ; and that Presbytery, or Priesthood (as they speak) is the highest order in all their Hierarchy. And this is current as the doctrine of Lombardus the Master of Sentences, Hugo, Aquinas, Thomas Waldensis, and generally of all the Thomists at least. And though they seem to make Bishops to be of a more eminent degree; yet by Estius, and some others alleged by him, this is not thought sufficient to distinguish one office from another. And indeed considering their Doctrine in all the other branches, or orders of their Hierarchy, it will well follow, that these two, being the same order, cannot be admitted to be distinct Officers, seeing in no other order such a distinction is admitted.

2. We may gather it from their acknowledging of this to have been a truth in the Primitive times. Thus Lombardus, the great Master of Sentences, lib. 4. distinct. 24. when he giveth the reason why only two orders, to wit, Presbyteratus, and Diaconatus, are mentioned by way of excellency in the Canons, and are called, Ordines Sacri : he subjoineth this as the reason, quia hos so os primitiva Ecclesia legitur habuisse, & de his solis pr ceptum Apostoli habemus ; and doth for this end cite, 1 Tim. 3. and Act. 6. Again, that great School-man Cajetan, on Titus 1.5. and 7. hath these words, ubi adverte eundem gradum, idemque officium, significari à Paulo nomine Presbyteri, & nomine Episcopy Nam praemisit, idcirco reliqui te in Creta ut constituas Presbyteros: & modo probando regulam, dicit, oportet enim Episcopum, &c. By which words, the identity of these two offices is most clearly asserted, and confirmed: and this also will be found to be the mind of many moe.

If it be asked, how then these more eminent degrees of Bishop, Arch-bishop, Patriarch, &c. did enter into the Church; and, how these differences have arisen? Answ. The same Lombardus in that same place, de quadripartito ordine Episcoporum, doth omit his former alleging of the custom of the Old Testament, and other things which he abused, and out of Isidorus layeth it down thus, borum autem discretio à Gentilibus intro-ducta videtur; qui suos flamines, alios simpliciter flamines, alios archi-flamines, alios pr to-flamines apellabant. Sacerdotes enim Gentilium, flamines dicebantur, &c. Which is in sum, this difference seemeth to be brought in from the Gentiles who used so to style their Priests, as to call some Priests simply, others Arch-priests, others again first-Priests, &c. and considering that the root of the Roman Hierarchy, to wit, Papacy, and the ordering thereof, did arise from the superstitious Christians their imitating of the heathenish Pontifex maximus (whereof we may see somewhat, cap. 13. lect. 4.) it is no wonder that these inferior pillars be of the same kind. And if there were any show from the Word for such differences, it would seem that this great Master had not gone to the Gentiles to be beholden to them for the same. Also Estius when he is to prove the superiority of Bishops, he hath these words, quod autem jure divino sint Episcopy Presbyteris superiores, et si non ita clarum est e sacris literis, aliunde tamen abunde probari potest, &c. in lib. 4. senten. distinct. 24. and so he citeth Popes constitutions, Canons of Councils, &c.

In the third place, this will appear from the considering of the answers that generally are given by them to these places of Scripture alleged, whereby it is concluded that a Bishop and Presbyter are the same; which are generally one of these two, 1. Some say, that though the office in the Primitive times was distinct; yet the titles of Presbyter and Bishop, were common. But we have found already this to be a miserable shift: because, 1. This identity of the names so circumstantiated, proveth the identity of the offices as was said; 2. Because these places do not only apply the titles indifferently; but do indifferently apply the duties, qualifications, and every other thing that belongeth to such officers, and offices; and there is nothing spoken of the one in Scripture, but it is also spoken of the other, neither anything required as a qualification in, or duty from the one, but is also done in reference to the other, and that expressly. A second answer, is that of Scotus, and some others who follow him, in lib. 4. sententiarum, distinct. 24. quaestione unica ; where he endeavoreth thus to remove that Objection, because (saith he) at first Believers were few, and so few Ministers were needful, and it was not necessary that there should be Officers instituted in every degree; but (saith he) when the Believers did multiply, then it was necessary. Where there is a double fault, 1. That contrary to the Scripture it is asserted that then the Church was not numerous, when as yet very soon the Apostles were necessitated to choose Deacons for their help. 2. That it supponeth, that when the Church is less numerous, there may not only be fewer Officers, but that she may want some wholly of such and such a degree. Add, that it supponeth de facto, that the Church in the Apostles days was not so completely constitute in respect of the kind of Officers as afterward: which is altogether inconsistent with that perfect plat-form of the Church in the Primitive Apostolic times. And when such answers are made by the learnedest of that party to such Arguments, what is it, but indeed the granting, upon the matter, that there was no such distinction, or distinct offices of Bishop and Presbyter in the Primitive times in use and practice in the Church?

Our fourth and last consideration, is, That this confounding of Angel and Minister in this place, is necessary from the consideration of the scope and other circumstances of the Text, whatever might be said from other places. For, 1. we cannot see how other ways these Epistles can be profitably expounded and applied with relation to the state of these particular Churches, except this be, as was hinted at the entry of this Question. 2. It is certain that our Lord's purpose, is, to point out the condition of the ordinary Ministers of the Churches as well as of the people, or of any supposed particular Bishop. And if this be the Lord's scope, then they must be comprehended under this Title Angel, to whom the Epistles are directed: and if so, then what is spoken of the Angel, must be applied to them indifferently, seeing the Lord maketh no difference: therefore, either we must altogether leave out Ministers from being considered in these Epistles, or we must thus apply to them what is spoken to, and of, the Angels. 3. What is spoken here to, or of the Angels, will agree to what in other Scriptures is spoken to, and of, ordinary Ministers