PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Exposition of Hebrews 6-10

John Owen (1616-1683) · 598,197 words · 2659 min

Large work readerShowing section 6 of 20. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 6/20
Expounds this Title, ver. 22. The most High God, Possessor of Heaven and Earth, which he gives as a Reason why he would not take ought of the King of Sodom, seeing he was the Servant of that God who disposed of all things in Heaven and Earth, and so had no need of Supplies from him: His God could make him Rich without the help of the King of Sodom. Wherefore God under this Consideration of the most High God was the principal Object of the Faith of Believers in those Days. For whereas they were few in Number, and all the Inhabitants of the Earth being greedily set upon getting Possessions and Inheritances for themselves, they Believed in God as he who was able to Protect them, and provide for them, according unto the Tenor of the Name whereby he afterwards Revealed himself unto Abraham, namely, of El Shaddai, or God Almighty. And this also was the principal part of their Profession, that they Served the most High God alone, in opposition unto all the false and Dunghill Deities of the Earth.

The Socinians in all their Disputes against the Deity of Christ do always make Use of this Name, and continually repeat it; Christ, they say, is not the most High God; a God they will allow him to be, but not the most High God. But whereas this Name is used in Distinction only from all false gods, if their Christ be a God but not on any Account the most High God, he is a false god, and as such to be rejected. See Jer. 10. 11. And from this Name or Title of God as it is Descriptive of his Majesty and Authority, we may observe,

1. To keep up and preserve a due Reverence of God in our Minds and Words, we should think of, and Use those Holy Titles which are given unto him, and whereby he is described in the Scripture. This was the constant manner of the Holy Men of Old, and which God himself in sundry places directs unto. Thus Abraham immediately makes Use of this Name, Gen. 14. 22. I have lift up my Hand unto Jehovah the most High God, the Possessor of Heaven and Earth. So are we taught to fear that Dreadful and Glorious Name, The Lord thy God, Deut. 28. 58. See Isa. 30. 15. Chap. 57. 15. And there is nothing that Argues a greater contempt of God among Men, than the common slight irreverend mention of his Name, whose highest degree is that horrible Profanation of Swearing and Cursing by it, with wicked and Diabolical Spirits. Let us not therefore think of God, nor mention him, but as the most High and Holy one that Inhabiteth Eternity. Not that on all Occasions of mentioning him we should constantly make Use of these Glorious Titles, the Scripture Warranting us to speak both to him and of him, without their Addition unto his Name; but that we should do so as Occasion doth require, and always Sanctify him in our Hearts and Words, as he unto whom they do belong.

2. It is good at all times to fix our Faith on that in God, which is meet to encourage our Obedience and dependence upon him in our present Circumstances. The Believers in those Days did in a very particular manner confess themselves to be Strangers and Pilgrims in the Earth, Heb. 11. 13. The Church was not as yet fixed unto any certain place, and they being Separated from the Apostate World, not mixing with it, nor incorporating in any Society, went up and down from one place to another: In this Condition, having no Inheritance nor abiding place, but exposed unto manifold Dangers, they eyed God in an especial manner as the most High God; as he that was over all, and had the Disposal of all things in his own Sovereign Power. And that variety of Titles which in the Scripture are given unto God, with the Descriptions that are made of him, are all suited unto this end, that in the variety of Occasions and Trials that may befall us in this World, we may still have something peculiarly suited unto the Encouragement of our Faith and dependence on God.

3. In particular it is a matter of inestimable Satisfaction that he whom we Serve is the most High God, the Sovereign Possessor of Heaven and Earth. It is in sense, the same with that Name which God gave himself when he entered into Covenant with Abraham, encouraging thereby unto an adherence to him in Faith and Obedience, Gen. 17. 1. I am God Almighty. And it were easy to Demonstrate what Relief in all Troubles, Dangers, Persecutions, Distresses inward and outward, in Life and Death, we may thence receive. As this Name is Distinctive we may observe, That,

4. Public Profession in all Ages is to be suited and pointed against the Opposition that is made unto the Truth, or Apostasy from it. The World being now generally fallen into Idolatry and the Worship of new Earthly gods, Believers made this the principal part of their Profession, that they Served the most High God, which ought to be observed on all alike Occasions.

V. The Apostle Describes this Melchizedek from that Action of his with its Circumstances, which gave occasion unto the whole Account of him. Who met Abraham returning from the Slaughter of the Kings. On this Occasion only is he introduced in the Scripture-story, as a new Person never heard of before, nor ever afterwards to be made mention of, as unto any of his own Concerns. Abraham did not only overthrow the whole Army of the Kings, and Recovered the Spoyls, but he slew the Kings themselves, as is expressly affirmed, Gen. 14. 17. Hence is he here said, to return from the Slaughter of the Kings; for as he includeth in it the Destruction of their Host, so it was that which signalized his Victory. And the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 afterwards mentioned were the Opima Spolia taken from the Kings themselves. As Abraham thus returned with Honor and Glory, made very great in the Eyes of the Nations round about, as he staid in the Kings Dale to deliver unto the King of Sodom his Goods and People with a Royal Munificence becoming a Servant of the most High God, who had a better Portion than could be found amongst the Spoyls, Melchizedek knowing the state of things, and the Promise made to Abraham, comes out unto him for the Ends mentioned.

But it may be inquired whether this were a just Occasion for the Introduction of this King of Peace, Priest of the High God, and Type of Christ, to Bless him who returned from War with the Spoyls of a bloody Victory. Answ. (1.) The Apostasy and Rebellion of the whole World against God have made it necessary that Spiritual Victory be the Foundation of all the actings of Christ, in the setting up of his Kingdom. The first Promise of him was, that he should break the Serpents Head, wound the Head over the large Earth, Psal. 110. 6. This was to be Effected by a Glorious Conquest and Victory, which is everywhere so described in the Scripture. See Col. 2. 15. And because outward Force and Opposition is always used by the World in the Defense of the Interest of Satan, He will also sometimes apply the outward Sword for the Destruction of his stubborn Adversaries, Isa. 63. 1, 2, 3. Rev. 19. This therefore was no unmeet Season for the Introduction of him, who made so Solemn a Representation of him. (2.) Abraham himself was in this Victory herein also a Type of Christ, not absolutely of his Person as was Melchizedek, but of his Power and Presence in his Church. Melchizedek, I say, Represented Christ in his Person and his Offices. Abraham Represented his Presence in the Church, or the Church, as his Body. I will neither approve of nor reject that Conjecture of some, that these four Kings were Types of the four great Monarchs of the World which the Church of God was to conflict withal, and at length to prevail against; as Dan. 7. 18. ver. 27. And indeed many things in their Names and Titles, do notably countenance that Conjecture. But it is certain in general that they were great Oppressors of the World roving up and down for Dominion and Spoyl. Wherefore Abraham 's Conquest of them, was not only a Pledge of the final Success of the Church in the World, but also a Representation of the Usefulness of the Church unto the World, whenever its Pride and Blindness will admit of its help and kindness, Micah 5. 7. The Church is indeed the only means of conveying Blessings unto the World, as the Oppression thereof will prove its Ruin.

3. The Land of Canaan was now given unto Abraham and his Seed for a Possession, to be the Seat of the Church and God's Worship among them. The Nations now Inhabiting of it, were devoted unto Destruction in an appointed Season. And he was not to allow these Foreign Kings to set up any Dominion therein. And God gave him this Victory as a Pledge of his future Possession.

4. Abraham was obliged in Justice and Affection, both, to Rescue his Brother Lot, whom they were carrying away Captive. And this is expressed as the next cause of his Engagement against them; ver. 14. On all Accounts therefore this War was just, and the Victory of God. And because there was a Representation therein of the Victory and Success of Christ in his Church, it was a Season most eminently proper for the Introduction of Melchizedek, blessing him in the exercise of Sacerdotal Power.

5. This Congress of Melchizedek and Abraham, after Abraham had gotten the Victory over all his Adversaries, was a Type and Representation of the Glorious Congress and Meeting of Christ and the Church at the last day, when the whole Church shall have finished its warfare, and be Victorious over the World, Sin, the Law, Death and Hell. Then will the Lord Christ bring out the Stores of Heaven for their Eternal Refreshment, and give them in the fullness of the Blessing, and all things shall issue in the Glory of the most High God. All the Promises are unto him that overcometh. And we we may observe, That,

1. All the Commotions and Concussions that are among the Nations of the World, do lie in or shall be brought into a subserviency unto the Interest of Christ and his Church. I intend those places where either the Seat of the Church is, or is to be. A great War and Tumult there was between these Eastern Kings and those of Canaan, and many Nations were smitten and destroyed in the Expedition, Gen. 14. 5, 6, 7. And what is the final Issue whereinto all these things do come? Why, two things fell out hereon that neither side of the Combatants either looked for, or had any Interest in. (1.) The Victory of Abraham or the Church over them all. (2.) A Glorious Type and Representation of Christ brought forth visibly acting in his Church. Yea I may add, that in Abraham 's Glorious Victory, and Royal Munificence on the one hand, and in the Sacerdotal Blessing of Melchizedek on the other, there was such a Representation of Christ in his Principal Offices as Priest and King, as had never been made in the World before. This Issue did God direct that War and Tumult unto. It will be no otherwise with all those Confusions and Disorders that the world is filled withal at this day, though we can see nothing of the ways and means of their tendency unto such an end.

2. There have been and are to be such Seasons wherein God will dispose of Nations and their Interest according as the Condition of the Church doth require; as he did here with all these Nations, Isa. 43. 3, 4. Chap. 60. 6, 7.

3. The Blessing of God may be expected on a Just and Lawful War. This War and Victory of Abraham, which he received the Blessing upon, is Celebrated, Isa. 41. 2, 3. And our Apostle mentions that Circumstance of the Slaughter of the Kings as that which was a Token of God's kindness unto Abraham, and of his own Greatness. And where these things occur, (1.) A Lawful necessary immediate Cause of War, as Abraham had for the Rescue of Lot. (2.) A Lawful Call unto the War, as Abraham had being a Sovereign Prince and raising his Army of his own People merely, and that to the securing of the Possessions of a Country granted unto him by God himself; and (3.) A Subserviency unto the Glory of Christ and the Good of the Church, the Presence of God in it, and the Blessing of God upon it, may be justly expected.

VI. Melchizedek is farther Described by two Acts of his Sacerdotal Power, or Office which he exercised on this occasion of meeting Abraham. (1.) He Blessed him, and then (2.) He received Tithes of him.

He met Abraham and Blessed him. This Solemn Benediction is fully expressed, Gen. 14. 19, 20. And he Blessed him and said, Blessed be Abraham of the most High God Possessor of Heaven and Earth; and Blessed be the most High God who hath delivered thine Enemies into thy hand. There are two parts of this Blessing; (1.) That which hath Abraham for its Object, a Blessing of Prayer. (2.) That which hath God for its Object, a Blessing of Praise. Our Apostle seems to take Notice only of the first, or that part of the Blessing whereof Abraham was the immediate Object. But the Truth is, the other part whereby he Blessed God, being on the Account of Abraham and as it were in his Name, it belongs also to the Blessing wherewith he was Blessed.

As to this Blessing we may consider, (1.) The Nature. (2.) The Form of it. As to the Nature of it, Blessings in general are the means of Communicating Good Things, according unto the Power and Interest in them of them that Bless, Gen. 33. 11. So also are Curses of Evil. Hence it is God alone that absolutely can either Bless or Curse, for he only hath Sovereign Power of all Good and Evil. He doth therefore so express his Blessing; In Blessing I will Bless thee, Gen. 22. 17. Do it assuredly and effectually as having all the Subject-matter of Blessings in my hand. And therefore he says to Abraham, I will Bless them that Bless thee, and Curse them that Curse thee, Gen. 12. 3. Because he is over them and all their Blessings and Curses. Balak therefore was not a little mistaken when he tells Balaam, I know that he whom thou Blessest is Blessed, and he whom thou Cursest is Cursed, Numb. 22. 6. For however he might Divine concerning them that should be so, absolutely he could neither Bless nor Curse. Wherefore I say all Blessings are Instituted means of the conveyance and Communication of Good unto others, according unto the Power and Interest of them that Bless, in that Good. This being amongst Men by God's Concession and Institution various, there are also various sorts of Blessings, which may be reduced unto two Heads. (1.) Such as are Authoritative. (2.) Such as are Charitative or merely Euctical. The latter fort of Blessing is removed from our Consideration in this place. For our Apostle treats only of such Blessings as evidently and unavoidably prove him that Blesseth to be Superior unto him that is Blessed, ver. 7. But this is not so in this latter sort of Blessings, which consist only in Prayer for a Blessing on them. For so Equals may Bless one another; yea Inferiors may bless Superiors, Children may bless Parents, Servants Masters, Subjects their Rulers, Psal. 20. 1, 2, 3, 4.

Authoritative Benediction among Men is twofold. (1.) Paternal. (2.) Sacerdotal, or with Respect unto any other Office in the Church.

Paternal Benedictions were of old of two sorts. (1.) Such as were of Common Right. (2.) Such as had an especial Prophetical Warranty. For the first; Parents have an especial Right by virtue of Divine Institution Authoritatively to bless their Children, in as much as he hath given unto them an especial Interest in the Matter of the Blessing, and Power for the Communication of it. And this Blessing consists in two things. (1.) A Solemn Declaration unto God of their Acceptance and Approbation of that Duty and Obedience which the Children perform unto them, by the Law of Nature and God's appointment. This brings ordinarily the Children so Blessed under the Promise of the fifth Commandment. So are the words of the Command, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that they may prolong thy Days. They shall have Power to communicate this good unto thee by their Blessing, in their Solemn Declaration of their Acceptance and Approbation of thy Obedience. And if this were more considered and more observed by Parents and Children, it would be much to their Advantage. And indeed the state of those Children is unhappy, whose Parents cannot sincerely avow an Approbation of their Duty, which intercepts the benefit of their Blessings. (2.) Parents bless Children by endeavoring to enstate them in their own Covenant-Interest. God having promised to be a God unto Believers and their Seed in and by them, they do three ways bless them with the good things thereof. (1.) By communicating unto them the Privilege of the initial Seal of the Covenant, as a Sign, Token and Pledge of their being blessed of the Lord. (2.) By pleading the Promise of the Covenant in their behalf. (3.) By careful Instructing of them in the Mercies and Duties of the Covenant. Wherefore although this Power of blessing be founded in the Law of Nature, and in all Nations something hath been observed that looks towards it, yet it is by Faith alone and in an Interest in the Covenant, that any Parents are able to Bless their Children in a due manner. For a blessing is a communication of Good according to his Interest in it that blesseth, which we have none in any that is really so, but by virtue thereof. And whereas these things are a Solemn appointment of God, it is certainly a disadvantage that a Foppish Ceremony is in common practice substituted in the room of them.

Secondly, There was of old a Paternal Benediction that had its Rise in an especial Warranty, and was accompanied with a Spirit of Prophecy. This consisted in a certain Praediction and Declaration of future Events, whereby those so Blessed were Infallibly and Indispensibly stated in a Right unto them. So Noah blessed Shem and Japheth; Isaac blessed Jacob, Jacob all his Sons. Herein God gave unto some Parents the Honor of a Power to bequeath unto their Posterity, those Good things which he Graciously intended to bestow on them. This kind of blessing is now absolutely ceased, for it wholly respected the coming of Christ in the Flesh with those other things which conduced thereunto.

It were well if instead of all these several ways of Blessing, many Parents did not Curse their Children. Some upon their provocations have desperately and Profanely imprecated Curses upon them; and we have known Instances wherein God hath eminently revenged their Impiety by his Judgments inflicted on Parents and Children both. Some entail a Curse upon them, by Oppressions and Falsehood, in getting their Estates, or in a Flagitious course of Life, which God will Revenge to the third Generation. But most do Curse them with the Cursed Example of their Conversation, initiating them almost from the Cradle in a course of Sin and Wickedness.

It is true, many of those Parents who do use conscientiously the ways appointed of God whereby they may Bless their Children, do ofttimes not see the effect of their Endeavors. They Bless them, but they are not Blessed. But (1.) They have Peace and Comfort in the Discharge of their Duty (2.) Their Blessing may have Success and oftentimes hath, when they are gone out of the World, yea, in their Children's Children for many Generations. (3.) If all fail, they shall be Witnesses for God at the last day against their own profligate Posterity. But I return.

Sacerdotal Blessings were Authoritative also; and that on a double Ground. (1.) Of Common Right and Equity. (2.) Of Especial Institution. (1.) There was a common Right and Equity that he who was called to be a Priest should bless the People Authoritatively. For as he was appointed to Act for Men with God, so it is reasonable, that he should pronounce Blessings unto them in the Name of God; that as he Ministerially carried their Gifts, Offerings, and Services unto God, so in like manner he should return his Acceptance and blessing unto them. Whereas therefore this Right and Duty belonged unto the Office of the Priest, two things ensue thereon. (1.) That this Blessing was an Act of Authority, for every Act of Office is so. (2.) That he who thus blesseth another is greater than he who is blessed by him, as our Apostle disputes, and we shall see afterwards. And we may take Notice in our passage, That whatever be the Interest, Duty and Office of any to act in the Name of others towards God, in any Sacred Administrations, the same proportionably is their Interest, Power and Duty to act towards them in the Name of God in the Blessing of them. And therefore Ministers may Authoritatively bless their Congregations. It is true, they can do it only Declaratively, but withal they do it Authoritatively, because they do it by Virtue of the Authority committed unto them for that purpose. Wherefore the Ministerial Blessing is somewhat more than Euctical or a mere Prayer. Neither is it merely Doctrinal and Declaratory, but that which is built on a particular especial warranty proceeding from the Nature of the Ministerial Office. But whereas it hath respect in all things unto other Ministerial Administrations, it is not to be used but with reference unto them, and that by them, by whom at that season they are Administred.

Secondly, There was an especial Institution of a Sacerdotal Benediction under the Old Testament, Recorded, Numb. 6. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, speak unto Aaron and his Sons, saying, On this wise shall ye Bless the Children of Israel, saying; The Lord Bless thee and keep thee, the Lord make his Face to shine upon thee, and be Gracious unto thee, the Lord lift up the light of his Countenance upon thee and give thee Peace; and they shall put my Name on the Children of Israel, and I will Bless them. Their putting the Name of God upon the People, was their praying for and pronouncing Blessings on them in his Name, by virtue of this Institution. For it is an Institution whereby the Name of God is put on anything or Person. Hereon God would effectually bless them. This especial Institution I acknowledge was after the Days of Melchizedek, and the cessation of his Office as to actual Administration. But it is apparent, and may be proved, that many if not the most of those Sacred Institutions, which were given in one System unto Moses, were singly and gradually given out by Inspiration and Prophecy unto the Church before the giving of the Law; only at Sinai their Number was increased, and the Severity of their Sanction heightened. Thus this Sacerdotal Benediction was but a Transcript from, and expressive of that Power and Form of Blessing, which Melchizedek as a Priest enjoyed and used before. And from what hath been spoken we may gather the Nature of this Blessing of Melchizedek wherewith he Blessed Abraham. For, (1.) It had the Nature of a Blessing in general, whereby any one Man may bless another, in that it was Euctical and Eucharistical, It included both Prayer for him, and Thanksgiving on his Account unto God. And (2.) It was Authoritative and Sacerdotal; He was the Priest of the High God, and he blessed Abraham, that is, by virtue of his Office. For so the Nature of the Office requireth, and so God had in particular appointed, that the Priests should bless in his Name. (3.) It was Prophetical, proceeding from an immediate Inspiration, whereby he declares the confirmation of the great Blessing Promised unto Abraham; Blessed be Abraham. And we may see,

1. That he who hath received the greatest Mercies and Privileges in this World, may yet need their Ministerial confirmation. Abraham had before received the Blessing from the Mouth of God himself. And yet it was no doubt a great confirmation of his Faith to be now blessed again in the Name of God by Melchizedek. And indeed such is the estate of all the Faithful the Children of Abraham in this World, that what through the weakness of their Faith, what through the greatness of their Temptations and Trials, they stand in need of all Ministerial Renovations of the Pledges of God's good will towards them. We are apt to think that if God should speak once unto us as he did to Abraham, and assure us of the Blessing, we should never need farther confirmation whilst we live. But the Truth is, he doth so speak unto all that believe in the Word, and yet we find, how much we want the Ministerial Renovation of it unto us. Bless God for the Ministry, for the Word and Sacraments; Ordinarily our Faith would not be kept up without them.

2. In the Blessing of Abraham by Melchizedek all Believers are Virtually Blessed by Jesus Christ. Melchizedek was a Type of Christ and represented him in what he was and did, as our Apostle declares. And Abraham in all these things bare the Person of, or Represented all his Posterity according to the Faith. Therefore doth our Apostle in the foregoing Chapter Entitle all Believers, unto the Promises made unto him, and the Inheritance of them. There is therefore more than a bare story in this matter. A blessing is in it conveyed unto all Believers in the way of an Ordinance forever.

3. It is God's Institution that makes all our Administrations Effectual. So did Sacerdotal Benedictions become Authoritative and Efficacious. Innumerable ways and means of blessing things and persons have been found out in the Papacy. They will bless Bells, Steeples, and Churches, Church-yards, Utensils, Fonts, Candles, Salt; and Children by Confirmation. There is in Truth in them all a want of that wisdom, Gravity and Reverence which ought to accompany Men in all Religious Services; but that which renders them all Useless and casts them out of the Verge of Religion, is that they want a Divine Institution.

The Second Sacerdotal Act, or Exercise of Priestly Power ascribed unto Melchizedek is that he received Tithes of all. To whom Abraham also gave the Tenth of all. As Abraham gave them in a way of Duty, so he received them in a way of Office. So the Apostle expresseth it, ver. 6. He received Tithes of Abraham, or Tithed him. And the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of all, is limited unto the Spoyls which he took of the Enemies, ver. 4. To whom Abraham gave the Tenth of the Spoyls. This in the Original History is so expressed as to leave it doubtful both to whom the Tenths were given, and of what they were, Gen. 14. 20. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And he gave him the Tenth of all. The words immediately preceding are the words of Melchizedek, and the Story concerneth him; so that if the Relative included in 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —he gave, do answer unto the next Antecedent, Melchizedek gave the Tenth of all unto Abraham. Nor doth it appear what the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or, all was that is intended; whether his own whole Estate, or all the Tithable things which he had then with him. But all this Ambiguity is removed by our Apostle according to the mind of the Holy Ghost, and withal declared how great a Mystery depended on the right understanding of those words. It was Abraham that gave the Tenth of all to Melchizedek, whereby he acknowledged him to be the Priest of the High God, and the Type of the Son of God as Incarnate, every way Superior unto him, who but newly received the Promises. And that the Tenth which he gave was only of the Spoyls that he took from the Enemies, as a Token and Pledge in particular that the Victory and Success which he had against the Kings was from God.

This receiving of Tithes by Melchizedek was a Sacerdotal Act. For, (1.) The Tenth thus given was firstly given unto God; and he who received them received them as God's Officer in his Name. Where there was none in Office so to receive them, they were immediately to be Offered unto God in Sacrifice accordunto their Capacity. So Jacob vowed the Tenth unto God, Gen. 28. 22. which he was himself to Offer, there being no other Priest to receive it at his hand, and no doubt but he did it accordingly, when God minded him to pay his Vow at Bethel, Gen. 35. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. And (2.) The things that were fit of this sort, were actually to be Offered in Sacrifice unto God. This Saul knew, when he made that his pretence of sparing and bringing away the fat Cattle of the Amalekites, 1 Sam. 15. 15. And I no way doubt but that these Tenths that Abraham gave, at least such of them as were meet for that Service, although it be not expressed, were Offered in Sacrifice unto God by Melchizedek. For whereas he was a King he stood in no need of any Contribution from Abraham; nor was it Honorable to receive anything in way of Compensation for his Munificence in bringing forth Bread and Wine, which was to Sell his Kindness and spoil his Bounty, nor would Abraham have deprived the King of Sodom and others of any of their Goods, to give them unto another. Wherefore he received them as a Priest to Offer what was meet in Sacrifice to God, whereon no doubt according to the Customs of those times, there was a Feast wherein they eat Bread together and were mutually Refreshed. (3.) This Matter was afterwards precisely determined in the Law, wherein all Tithes were appropriated unto the Priest. I Observe these things, only to show that the Apostle had just Ground to infer from hence the Sacerdotal Power of Melchizedek and his Preeminence in that Office above Abraham. For everything in the Scripture is Significant and hath its especial Design, the whole being inlay'd with Truth by Infinite Wisdom, whether we apprehend it or no. Without this Light given by the Holy Spirit himself, how should we have conceived, that this giving the Tenth of the Spoils to Melchizedek was designed to prove his Greatness and Dignity above Abraham and all the Levitical Priests on that Account, as the Great Type and Representative of Jesus Christ. And indeed all the Mysteries of Sacred Truth which are contained in the Old Testament, are seen clearly only in the Light of the New; and the Doctrine of the Gospel is the only Rule and Measure of the Interpretation of the writings of the Old Testament. Wherefore although the writings of both are equally the Word of God, yet the Revelation made immediately by Jesus Christ, is that which ought to be our Guide in the whole. And they do but deceive themselves and others who in the Interpretation of Mystical Passages and Prophecies of the Old Testament, do neglect the Accomplishment of them and Light given unto them in the New, taking up with Jewish Traditions, or vain Conjectures of their own, such as the late writings of some highly pretending unto Learning are stuffed withal. And we may see from hence, (1.) How necessary it is for us according to the Command of our Savior to Search the Scriptures, John 5. 39. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to make a Scrupulous Enquiry, a diligent Investigation, to find out things hidden, or parcels of Gold Oar. So are we directed to Seek for Wisdom as Silver, and to search for her as for hid Treasures, Prov. 2. 4. There are Precious Useful Significant Truths in the Scripture, so disposed of, so laid up, as that if we accomplish not a diligent search we shall never set eye on them. The common course of Reading the Scripture, nor the common help of Expositors, who for the most part go in the same track, and scarce venture one step beyond those that are gone before them, will not suffice, if we intend a Discovery of these hid Treasures. This diligent search was attended unto by the Prophets themselves under the Old Testament with respect unto their own Prophecies, which they received by Inspiration, 1 Pet. 1. 10, 11. God gave out those deep and Sacred Truths by them which they comprehended not, but made Diligent Enquiry into the mind of the Holy Ghost in the words which themselves had spoken. What belongs unto this diligent search shall be elsewhere declared. (2.) That the clear Revelations of the New Testament ought to be our Principal Rule in the Interpretation of difficult Passages in the Old. What our Apostles in these cases had by immediate Inspiration and Direction, that we must look for, from what is Recorded in their Writings, which is sufficient for us, and will not fail us.

There is great Enquiry usually made on this place, whether Tithes be due by the Light of Nature, or at least by such a Moral positive Command of God, as should be perpetually Obligatory unto all Worshippers unto the end of the World. This many contend for, and the principal Reasons which they plead from the Scripture are these. (1.) That Tithes were paid before the Law as well as under the Law; and what was so observed in the Worship of God, Namely, that being in Usage before the Law and confirmed by the Law, is Originally of the Law of Nature, and could have no other Fountain. (2.) Our Lord Jesus Christ himself speaking of Tithing Mint and Cumin, approveth of it, affirming that those things ought not to be omitted though the most Inferior Instance that could be given of the Duty. (3.) He seems in like manner to have respect thereunto, when he commands to give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's, which were the Tithes, the Law concerning them being thereby confirmed, which proves it not to be Ceremonial. And this some Men judge to be a certain Argument, of that which is Moral and unalterable, namely, the appointed Usage of it, before the Law, under the Law, and under the Gospel after the Expiration of the Law of Ceremonies, or the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances. And it seems so to be, if there be the same Reason of the Law or Command in all these Seasons, for otherwise it is not so. For instance it is supposed that the eating of Blood was forbidden before the Law, and assuredly it was so under the Law, and is so in the New Testament, Acts 15. which yet proves it not to be Morally Evil and perpetually forbidden. For it is not so upon the same Grounds and Reasons. For in that place of Gen. 9. 4. But Flesh with the Life thereof, that is, the Blood thereof shall ye not eat: Blood is not absolutely forbidden, but in some cases and with respect unto a certain End. It was not to be eaten whilst it was yet hot and warm in the Flesh, which Prohibition God gave to prevent that Savage Custom which yet afterwards got ground among Mankind, of eating Flesh like Ravenous Beasts whilst the Blood was yet warm in it. Under the Law it was forbidden, because God had taken it to be the Principal part of Sacrifices, and far the most Significant, Lev. 17. 5, 6, 11, 14. And in the 15th. of the Acts it is only occasionally forbid for a Season to avoid Scandal and Offence. So that if it should be supposed that the matter of the Prohibition before the Law, under the Law, and in that Synod at Jerusalem were the same, yet the Reasons of it being various, it doth not prove a Morality in the Law, or such as should be everlastingly Obligatory. But where not only the Subject-matter, but the Formal Reason of the Command is the same, there it is of Natural Equity, and unalterable; and so it is said to be in the case of Tithes.

I shall not enter into any long Digression about this controverted Subject. It is such as wherein the various Interests of Men have engaged their utmost diligence on the one hand and on the other. But this I am sure enough of, that unless they were paid by them that give them with more Conscience and regard unto Duty than generally they seem to be, not one in a thousand having respect in the payment of them, to anything but the Civil Law of the Land; and unless they turned unto a better Account with them by whom they are received, than generally they do, it is to no great purpose to dispute upon what Grounds, or by what Right they are due unto any. And without sollicitousness concerning Offence, I shall take leave to say, that it is no safe Plea for many to insist on, that Tithes are due and Divine, as they speak, that is, by a binding Law of God now under the Gospel. For be the Law and Institution what it will, nothing is more certain than that there is nothing due under the Gospel by virtue of God's Command or Institution with respect unto his Worship unto any who do not wholly give up themselves unto the Ministry and Labor in the Word and Doctrine, unless they be such as are disenabled by Age and Infirmities, who are not to be forsaken all the days of their lives. For Men to live in Pleasure and Idleness, according to the Pomp, Vanities and Grandeur of the World, neither rising early, nor going to bed late, nor spending their time or strength in the Service of the Church, according to the Duties required of all the Ministers thereof in the Gospel, to sing unto themselves that Tithes are due to them by the Appointment and Law of God, is a fond Imagination, a Dream that will fill them with Perplexity when they shall awake. But as unto the Question in hand, I shall briefly give my thoughts about it in the ensuing Observations and Propositions.

1. By Tithes is understood either the express Law of Tithing, or paying the Tenth of all our Substance and of the whole Increase of the Earth; or only the dedicating of a certain Portion of what we have unto the Uses of the Worship and Service of God. If this latter be intended, it is with me past all Doubt and Question, that a bountiful part of our Enjoyments is to be separated unto the Use and Service of the Worship of God, particularly unto the comfortable and honorable Supportment of them that Labor in the Ministry. And it is no small part of that Confusion which we suffer under, that Christians being in all places compelled to pay the Tenth by Civil Laws unto some or other whether they will or no, are either discouraged, or disenabled, or think themselves discharged from doing that which God certainly requireth at their hands in a way of Duty. However this will be no Excuse for any, for generally they have yet left unto them that whereby they may discharge their Duty in an acceptable manner. And I cannot but wonder how some Men can satisfy their Consciences in this Matter, in such Circumstances as I shall not now name.

2. If the strict Legal course of Tithing be intended, it cannot be proved from this Text, nor from any other Instance before the Law. For Abraham gave only the Tenth of the Spoils which were not Tithable by Law. For if the places taken or destroyed in War, were Anathematized, as Jericho was and also Amalek, no Portion was to be reserved under a pretence of Sacrifice or any other Sacred Use, as Saul found to his Cost. And if they were not Anathematized, all the Spoils were left entirely unto the People that went to War, without any Sacred Decimation. So the Reubenites and the Gadites at their Return over Jordan into their own Land carried all their Rich Spoils and Cattle with them, no Tithe being mentioned, Josh. 22. 8. Although there is no Question but many of them Offered their Free-will Offerings at the Tabernacle. And when God would have a Sacred Portion out of the Spoils, as he would have in the Wilderness, out of those that were taken from the Midianites, to manifest that they fell not under the Law of Tithes, he took not the Tenth part, but one Portion of 500 from the Soldiers, and one of 50 from the People, Numb. 31. 28, 29, 30. Wherefore the giving of the Tenth of the Spoils, was not from the Obligation of any Law, but was an Act of Free-will and Choice in the Offerer. But yet there was so great an Equity herein also, Namely, that God should have an acknowledgment in the Fruits of those Successes which he gave in War, that out of the Spoils of his and his Peoples Enemies David made his Provision for the Building of the Temple. And the Captains of the Host that went against Midian, after a Tribute was raised for the Lord out of the Spoyls according unto the Proportions mentioned, when they found the Goodness of God in the Preservation of their Soldiers, whereof there was not one lost, they made a new voluntary Oblation unto God out of their Spoils, Numb. 31. 48, 49, 50. And as for the Instance of Jacob, who Vowed unto God the Tenth of all, it is so far from proving that the Tenth was due by virtue of any Law, that it proves the contrary. For had it been so, it could not have been the matter of an Extraordinary Vow, whereby he could express his Obedience unto God.

3. The precise Law of Tithing is not confirmed in the Gospel. For that saying of our Savior's approving the Tithing of Mint and Cumin, evidently respects that Legal Institution which was then in force, and could not be violated without sin. And by his Approbation of that Law, and of the Duty in observance of it, he did no more confirm it, or ascribe an Obligatory Power unto it under the Gospel, than he did so unto all other those Ceremonial Institutions which both he himself observed as a Man made under the Law, and enjoined others so to do. They all continued in full force unto the Time of Reformation, which gave them their Bounds and Limits, Heb. 9. 10. and ended with his Resurrection. His other saying, of giving unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's, respects our whole Moral Obedience unto God, and not this or that particular Institution. The meaning of it is, that we are to pay or perform unto God all whatever he requireth of us in a way of Obedience, but what that is in particular, is not here determined. And other mention of Tithes in the Gospel there is none.

4. Whereas by the Light of Nature, all Rules of Reason, and positive Institutions, a Portion of what God is pleased to give unto every Man is to be returned unto him in the way of his Worship and Service, wherein it may be used according unto his Appointment; And whereas before the giving of the Law sundry Holy Men fixed on the Tenth part, as that which was meetest to be so Dedicated unto God, and that as is probable not without some especial Conduct of the Holy Spirit, if not upon express Revelations; and whereas this was afterwards expressly confirmed under the Law by positive Institution, the Equity whereof is urged in the Gospel; it is the best direction that can be given unto any what proportion of their Estate should be set apart unto this Purpose. Herein, I confess, so many Circumstances are in particular cases to be considered, as that it is impossible any one certain Rule should be prescribed unto all Persons. But whereas withal there is no need in the least to furnish Men with Pleas and Excuses for the non-performance of their Duty, at least as unto the necessary degrees of it, that I shall not suggest anything unto them, which may be used to that purpose. I shall therefore leave this Rule in its full Latitude, as the best Direction of Practice in this Matter.

5. On these Suppositions it is that the Apostle treating of this Matter makes no Use of the Right or Law of Tithing, though directly unto his purpose, if it had not been abrogated. For intending to prove that the Ministers of the Gospel ought to be Liberally supported in their works with the Earthly things of them unto whom they do Administer the things of God, he Argueth from the Light of Nature, the general Equity of other Cases, the Analogy of Legal Institutions, the Rules of Justice with the especial Institution of Christ in the Gospel, but makes no mention of the Natural or Legal Right of Tithing, 1 Cor. 9. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15. And farther I shall not at present divert on this Subject. And we may Observe, That

Whatsoever we receive signally from God in a way of Mercy, we ought to return a Portion of it unto him in a way of Duty. That this was the Practice of the Saints of old, might easily be proved by an Induction of Instances, from this Act of Abraham, (yea, from the Sacrifice of Abel) down to the Vow of Jacob, the Dedications of David, Solomon, and others in their respective places and Generations. The light of Nature also counted it as a Duty among all the Civilized Heathens. The Offerings and Sacred Dedications of Nations and Private Families, are Famous on this Account. And it was laid as a lasting blemish on good Hezekiah that he returned not unto the Lord according to the Mercy which he had received.

And we may do well to consider, (1.) That no Man hath any great or signal Success in any Affair or Occasion, more than others, or more than at other time, but there will be in his Mind an ascription of it unto one cause or another. This the Nature of things makes Necessary, nor can it be avoided, Hab. 1. 11. (2.) That whatever a Man doth secretly ascribe such Successes unto, That he makes in some sense his God. They Sacrifice unto their Net, and burn Incense unto their Drag, because by them their Portion is fat, and their Meat plenteous, Hab. 1. 16. They ascribed their Successes unto their own strength, endeavors and means that they used. Hereby they Deified themselves as far as in them lay; and therefore these thoughts are called Sacrificing and Burning Incense which were Expressions of Religious Worship. And it is no better with us when in our Successes in our Trades and Affairs we secretly applaud our own Endeavors, and the Means we have used as the only causes of them. (3.) It is a great sign that a Man hath not engaged God in the getting of anything, when he will not entitle him unto any Portion of what is gotten. There are two Evils common in the World in this case. Some will make no Acknowledgment unto God in the especial Consecration of any part of their Substance unto him, where it is Lawfully gotten. And some will make great Dedications of what hath been gotten by Robbery, Spoils, Oppression and Violence. Many Public Works of Munificence and Charity as they are called, have had no other Original. This is but an Endeavor to entitle God unto injustice, and draw him to a Copartnership with them, by giving him a share in the Advantage. God hateth Robbery for Burnt-Offerings, Isa. 61. 8. and he smites his hand at Men's dishonest Gain, Ezek. 22. 13. He will have nothing to do with such things, nor accept of any Portion of them or from them, however he may over-power things in his Providence unto his Glory. Both these ways are full of Evil, though the latter be the worst. (4.) No Man hath any Ground to Reckon that he can settle what he hath unto himself or his, where this Chief Rent unto God is left unpaid. He will at one time or other make a Re-entry upon the whole, take the Forfeiture of it, and turn the ungrateful Tenant out of Possession. And among other things this makes so many Estates Industriously gotten so speedily molder away as we see they do in the World. (5.) God hath always his Receivers ready to accept of what is tendered, namely, his Poor, and those that Attend the Ministry of his House.

VI. The Apostle pursues his Design and Argument from the Name and Title of the Person spoken of with their Interpretation. First, being by Interpretation King of Rightcousness, and after that also King of Salem, that is, King of Peace. And we shall consider herein,

  • 1. The Names themselves with their Interpretation.
  • 2. The Grounds or Reasons of the Apostle's Arguing from this Interpretation of Names.
  • 3. What is intended in them, or what he would have us Learn from them.
  • 4. Their Order which he particularly Observes.

First,

1. He respecteth his Proper Name, that is, Melchizedek. For the Fancy of some that Sedec was a place or City where first he Reigned, as he did afterwards at Salem, is very fond. For then he must be utterly without a Name belonging unto his Person, which the Apostle doth not observe, as he would have done one way or other, had any such unusual thing offered itself unto him. Besides had it been so, he would not have been called Melchizedek, but said to be Melch Sedec, as he is said to be Melec Salem. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 -. is a King, and by the Interposition of Yod to smooth the Composition, the former Saegol is turned into Patha, and the latter into Schevah, whence Melchi ariseth. Some would have this Yod to be a Pronoun Affix, and then the meaning of the word is my King; and on this Supposition, taking 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Sedek for Saddik; they would render it, my Righteous King. But there is nothing more Ordinary in the Composition of Names than the Interposition of Yod paragoricum, to soften the Sound and Pronunciation of them. So is it in Adonisedek, Adonibezek, Abimelech, Achitob, Abishua, Abishag, Abishalom, and sundry others. Wherefore Malchi is nothing but the Name Melek a King, a little varied to fit it unto the Composition intended. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is Righteousness. And so the whole Name is properly Interpreted and rendered by our Apostle 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a King of Righteousness.

2. His Title is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the King of Salem, of which place we have spoken before. This is by Interpretation saith our Apostle, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the King of Peace. Some think that herein occurs a greater Difficulty, than did in the Interpretation of his Name. For 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Salem, say they, doth not signify Peace, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Shalom. Salem is only as much as Pacificus, Peaceable, not Pax, or Peace itself. But yet neither ought this to give us any trouble. For Instances may be given in this Language wherein the same word is used sometimes Substantively, sometimes Adjectively; as for Instance 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are. And upon the matter the signification is the same. Rex pacificus and Rex pacis do both denote him that is the Maker and Author of Peace. So God on that Account is called the God of Peace, Rom. 15. 13. Chap. 16. 20. 1 Thes. 5. 23. 2 Thes. 3. 16. Heb. 13. 20. Wherefore as we ought to acquiesce in the Authority of the Apostle who knew better than us all, the signification of these Names, so that he gives, is proper according unto our best conception of these things.

Secondly, It may be inquired what Ground the Apostle had to Argue from the Signification of these Names, which seems to be but a Curious and infirm kind of Argumentation. And we find by Experience, that whilst some have followed and imitated as they suppose this Example, they have fallen into woeful Mistakes.

Answ. 1. The Apostle takes it for granted in general that everything in the story of Melchizedek was Mystical and Figurative. This he did on good Grounds, because the only Reason of its Introduction was to give a Representation of the Person and Priesthood of Christ.

2. It was usual under the Old Testament to have Names given unto Children by a Spirit of Prophecy, as to Noah, Peleg, and others, yea, it may be most of the Patriarchs. It was so also to have Men's Names changed upon some great and Solemn Occasions, as Abram was called Abraham, Sarai, Sarah, Jacob was called Israel, and Solomon, Jedediah. And whereas this was sometimes done by Divine Authority, as in the Instances mentioned, whence it was highly significant; so the People in imitation thereof, did often give other Names to themselves, or others, on some Occasion wherewith they were affected. Hence it is that we find the same Persons so frequently called by divers Names, which gives no little Difficulty in Genealogies. But where this was done by Divine Warranty, it was Doctrinal and Prophetically instructive. So was it in that great Name given unto our Lord Jesus Christ himself, namely, Immanuel, which the Evangelist remembers and gives us the Interpretation thereof, Mat. 1. 23. Now whether this Name was given to Melchizedek from his Nativity by a Spirit of Prophecy, as is most probable, or whether his Name were changed by God himself when he was Publicly called unto his Office is uncertain, and no way needful to be inquired into. But certain it is, that this Name was given him by Divine Direction, and that for the very End for which it is here used and applied by our Apostle. And no Countenance can hence be taken unto their Curiosity who seek for Mysteries out of Names and their Numbers, which for ought they know had a Casual Imposition, or that which respected some particular Occasion, whereof they are utterly Ignorant.

3. As for the Name of the place where he Reigned, or Salem, it was also given unto it on the same Ground to be praesignificative of the work that was to be Effected by him, whom he Typed out. Most probably at that time, God first gave that Name unto that place; for that it was not the Salem by Sychem we have before declared. And I am persuaded that God himself by some Providence of his, or other intimation of his mind, gave that Name of Peace first unto that City, because there he designed not only to Rest in his Typical Worship for a season, but also in the fullness of Time there to accomplish the great work of Peace-making between himself and Mankind. Hence it was afterwards by the same Guidance called Jerusalem or a Vision of Peace, because of the many Visions and Prophecies concerning the Spiritual and Eternal Peace which was to be wrought and Published in that place; as also from all those Holy Institutions of his Worship which there represented the means whereby that Peace was to be wrought, namely, the Sacrifice of Christ himself, the only real and proper Priest of the Church. Wherefore our Apostle doth justly Argue from the signification of those Names which were given both to the Person and place by Divine Authority and Guidance, that they might teach and fore-signify the things whereunto by him they are applied.

Thirdly, The Interpretation of the Names being proper, and the Argument from thence in this case Useful, as to the Signification of them, it must be inquired how this Man was King of Righteousness and Peace. Most suppose that no more is intended but that he was a Righteous and Peaceable King, one that Ruled Righteously, and Lived Peaceably. And it is true that absolutely in himself and as unto his own Personal Qualifications he was so and no more, nor could be more. But these Names have Respect to his Relative state, and were given him as a Type of Christ. He was a King of Righteousness and Peace, as he was without Father and without Mother, that is, to Represent Christ in his Office. Really he was a Righteous and Peaceable King; Typically he was the King of Righteousness and Peace. Now the King of Righteousness is he who is the Author, Cause, and Dispenser of Righteousness unto others. As God is said to be the Lord our Righteousness. And so is the King of Peace also; in which sense God is called the God of Peace. Thus was it with Melchizedek as he was the Representative of Jesus Christ.

4. The last thing that the Apostle Observes from these Names and Titles in their Order, wherein it is Natural that the Name of a Man should precede the Title of his Rule. First, King of Righteousness, and afterwards King of Peace. Righteousness must go first, and then Peace will follow after. So it is Promised of Christ and his Kingdom, that in his days the Righteous shall flourish and abundance of Peace, so long as the Moon endureth, Psal. 72. 7. First they are made Righteous, and then they have Peace. And Isa. 32. 17. The work of Righteousness shall be Peace, and the effect of Righteousness Quietness and Peace forever. This is the Order of these things. There is no Peace but what proceedeth from and is the Effect of Righteousness. So these things with respect unto Christ are declared by the Psalmist, Psal. 85. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. What we are taught hence is,

1. That the Lord Jesus Christ is the only King of Righteousness and Peace unto the Church. See Isa. 32. 1, 21. Chap. 9. 6. He is not only a Righteous and Peaceable King as were his Types Melchizedek and Solomon, but he is the Author, Cause, Procurer and Dispenser of Righteousness and Peace to the Church. So is it declared, Jer. 23. 5, 6. Behold the Days come saith the Lord that I will raise unto David a Righteous Branch, and a King shall Reign and Prosper, and shall Execute Judgment and Justice in the Earth. In his Days Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely, and this is his Name whereby he shall be called, The Lord our Righteousness. He is Righteous and Reigneth Righteously, but this is not all, he is the Lord our Righteousness.

VII. The Apostle proceeds yet unto other Instances in the Description of Melchizedek wherein he was made like unto the Son of God, ver. 3. Without Father, without Mother, without Descent, having neither beginning of Days nor end of Life. The things here asserted being at the first view strange and uncouth would administer occasion unto large Discourses, and accordingly have been the Subject of many Enquiries and Conjectures. But it is no way unto the Edification of those who are Sober and Godly, to engage into any long Disputes about those things, wherein all Learned sober Expositors are come to an Issue and Agreement, as they are in general in this matter. For it is granted that Melchizedek was a Man, really and truly so, and therefore of Necessity must have all these things; for the Nature of Man after him who was first Created, who yet also had beginning of Life and end of Days, doth not exist without them. Wherefore these things are not denied of him absolutely, but in some sense, and with respect unto some especial end. Now this is with respect unto his Office, therein or as he bare that Office, he was without Father, without Mother, &c. And how doth this appear that so it was with him? It doth so because none of them is Recorded or mentioned in the Scripture, which yet diligently Recordeth them concerning other Persons; and in particular those who could not find and prove their Genealogies were by no means to be admitted unto the Priesthood, Ezra 2. 61, 62, 63. And we may therefore by this Rule inquire into the particulars.

1. It is said of him in the first place, that he was without Father, without Mother, whereon part of the latter clause, namely, without beginning of Days, doth depend. But how could a Mortal Man come into the World without Father or Mother? Man that is Born of a Woman is the Description of every Man; what therefore can be intended? The next word declares, he was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , without Descent say we. But 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is a Generation, a Descent, a Pedigree, not absolutely, but Rehearsed, Described, Recorded. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is he whose Stock and Descent is entered upon Record. And so on the contrary, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is not he who hath no Descent, no Genealogy, but he whose Descent and Pedigree is nowhere Entered, Recorded, Reckoned up. Thus the Apostle himself plainly expresseth this word, ver. 6. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , whose Descent is not counted, that is, reckoned up in Record. Thus was Melchizedek without Father and Mother, in that the Spirit of God who so strictly and exactly Recorded the Genealogies of other Patriarchs and Types of Christ, and that for no less an end than to manifest the Truth and Faithfulness of God in his Promises, speaks nothing unto this purpose concerning him. He is introduced as it were one falling from Heaven, appearing on a sudden, Reigning in Salem, and Officiating the Office of the Priesthood unto the High God.

2. On the same Account is he said to be without beginning of Days or end of Life. For as he was a Mortal Man he had both. He was assuredly Born, and did no less certainly die, than other Men. But neither of these are Recorded concerning him. We have no more to do with him, to learn from him, nor are concerned in him, but only as he is Described in the Scripture, and there is no mention therein of the Beginning of his Days, or the end of his Life. Whatever therefore he might have in himself, he had none to us. Consider all the other Patriarchs mentioned in the Writings of Moses, and you shall find their Descent Recorded, who was their Father, and so upwards unto the first man; and not only so, but the time of their Birth and Death, the Beginning of their Days, and the End of their Lives is exactly Recorded. For it is constantly said of them, such an one Lived so long, and begat such a Son, which fixed the time of Birth. Then of him so begotten it is said he lived so many Years, which determines the end of his Days. These things are expressly Recorded. But concerning Melchizedek none of these things are spoken. No mention is made of Father or Mother, no Genealogy is Recorded of what Stock or Progeny he was, nor is there any Account of his Birth or Death. So that all these things are wanting unto him in this Historical Narration wherein our Faith and Knowledge is alone concerned. Some few things may yet farther be inquired into for the clearing of the sense of these words.

(1.) Whereas the Observation of the Apostle is built upon the silence of Moses in the History, which was sufficient for him, whatever was the Cause and Reason of that silence, we may inquire whence it was? Whence it was, I say, that Moses should introduce so great and excellent a Person as Melchizedek without any mention of his Race or Stock, of his Parents or Progenitors, of his Rise or Fall, contrary unto his own Custom in other cases, and contrary unto all Rules of Useful History. For to introduce so great a Person, in any Story, and on so great an Occasion, without giving any Account of him, or of any of his Circumstances whereby his concernment in the Matter related might be known, is utterly contrary unto all Rules of Serious History.

Answ. 1. Some of the Jews absurdly imagine that it was because his Parents were not only Obscure, but that he was Born of Fornication, and so he had no Right of Genealogy. But this is both a foolish and wicked Imagination. For it is not to be supposed God would have Advanced a Person known to be of such an Extract and Original, into the Honor of the Priesthood, and that of the most Excellent kind that ever was under the Old Testament. For being low and mean in the World it is neither Disadvantage nor Disparagement. The best of Men were so, and all the chief Patriarchs were but Shepherds. But Bastardy is a Mark of Infamy in the World, and God would not raise such an one to Administer peculiarly unto him, and that as a Type of his own Son, who was to be Incarnate.

2. Some say that there is no singular thing herein, but that it is done according to the Custom of Scripture, which relates only the Genealogies of the Patriarchs, who were of that Linage from whence Christ did come. But when it makes mention of any others, though they be never so eminent, it reckoneth not up their Genealogy. Thus it dealeth with Jethro the Father-in-law of Moses, and with Job, so great and Holy a Person, concerning whom it says no more, but that there was a Man in the Land of Uz Named Job. And some things may be allowed herein. But the Instances are no way parallel. For Jethro, he was a stranger unto the Church, and there is a full Account concerning him, so far as it is either Necessary or Useful, that we should in point of story know anything of him. And the story of Job, is a separate story wherein himself only and Family was concerned; and we have therein his Country, the Number and Names of his Children, with the Years of his Life, and time of his Death. But as we have none of these things in the Account of Melchizedek, so he is introduced as one in whom the Church of God was Publicly concerned. Wherefore,

3. The true Cause of the Omission of all these things, was the same with that of the Institution of his Priesthood, and the Introduction of his Person in the Story. And this was that he might be the more express and signal Representative of the Lord Christ in his Priesthood. For to this End it was not only needful that he should be declared to be a Priest, as the Messiah was to be, but also in that Declaration all those Circumstances were to be observed, wherein the Nature of the Priesthood of Christ might be any way praefigured. After this the Church being reduced into a standing Order for Succession, it was obliged necessarily for many Generations unto a Priesthood which depended solely on their Genealogy and Pedigree both by Father and Mother, Ezra 10. 18, 19. Nehem. 7. 63, 64, 65. Wherefore whereas the Priesthood of our Lord Christ was to depend on no such Descent (for it is evident that our Lord sprang of Judah, whereof Moses spake nothing of the Priesthood) it was necessary that it should be Originally represented, by one who had no Genealogy, seeing that as unto his Office he himself was to have none. And therefore when the Church of Israel was in the highest enjoyment of the Levitical Priesthood, whose Office depended wholly on their Genealogy, yea, so far as on a supposition of a defect or Change thereof, not only the Priesthood itself, but all the Sacred Worship also which it was designed to officiate must utterly cease; yet the Holy Ghost then thought meet to mind them, that a Priest was to come without respect unto any such Descent or Genealogy, in that he was to be after the Order of Melchizedek who had none, Psal. 110. 4. This is the true and only Reason why in the story of Melchizedek as the Priest of the High God, there is no mention made of Father, Mother, Genealogy, Beginning of Life or end of Days.

And we may herein consider the Sovereign wisdom of the Holy Ghost in bringing forth Truth unto Light according as the state and condition of the Church doth require. And first he proposeth only a naked Story of a Person that was a Type of Christ, and that obscurely and sparingly. Something the Men of the Age wherein he lived might learn by his Ministrations, but not much. For that which was principally Instructive in him for the Use of the Church was not of Force until all his Circumstances were forgotten; and the Church was now to be Instructed, not so much by what he was, as what was Recorded of him, wherein the Scripture superseded all Tradition that might be of him in the World. Yea, the contrivance of any Tradition concerning his Parents, Birth and Death had been contrary to the mind of God, and what Instruction he intended the Church by him. Afterwards when it may be, all thoughts of any Use or Design of this Story in Moses was lost, and the Church was fully satisfied in a Priesthood quite of another Nature, the Holy Ghost in one word of Prophecy Instructs the Church, not only that the thing spoken concerning Melchizedek were not so Recorded for his sake, or on his own account, but with respect unto another Priest which was afterwards to arise, by him Represented; which gave a new Consideration, Sence and Design to the whole Story; but moreover gives it to know that the Priesthood which it then enjoyed was not alwas to continue, but that another of another Nature was to be introduced, as was signified long before the Institution of that Priesthood which they enjoyed, Psal. 110. 4. And as this was sufficient for the Use and Edification of the Church in those days, yet it was left greatly in the dark as to the full Design and meaning of these things. And therefore it is evident that at the Coming of our Savior, and the accomplishment of this Type, the Church of the Jews had utterly lost all knowledge and Understanding of the Mystery of it, and the Promise renewed in the Psalm. For they thought it strange that there should be a Priest that had no Genealogy, no Solemn Consecration nor Investiture, with his Office. Wherefore our Apostle entering upon the unfolding of this Mystery doth not only Preface it with an Assertion of its Difficulty, or how hard it was to be understood aright, but also by a long previous Discourse variously prepareth their minds unto a most diligent attention. And the Reason of it was not only because they had utterly lost the Understanding that was given in these things formerly, but also because the true Understanding of them would put an end at that time unto that Priesthood and Worship which they had adhered unto. Wherefore until this time the Church was not able to bear the true Understanding of this Mystery, and now they could no longer be without it. Hence is it here so fully and particularly declared by our Apostle. And we may Observe,

1. That the Church never did in any Age, nor ever shall want that Instruction by Divine Revelation which is needful unto its Edification in Faith and Obedience. This it had in all Ages according unto that gradual progression which God gave unto Light and Truth in the Explication of the great Mystery of his Grace, which was hid in him from the Foundation of the World. An Instance hereof we have in the things which concern this Melchizedek, as we have observed. The Church had never need to look after the Traditions of their Fathers, or to betake themselves unto their own Inventions, their Instruction by Revelation was always sufficient for the State and Condition wherein they were. Much more therefore is it so now, when the Sum and Perfection of all Divine Revelations is given in unto us by Jesus Christ.

2. It is a great Honor to Serve in the Church by doing or suffering for the Use and Service of future Generations. This was the Honor of Melchizedek, that he was employed in a Service, the true Use and Advantage whereof was not given in unto the Church, until many Generations after. And I add Suffering unto Doing, because it is well known what Glories have sprang up in future Ages, upon the past Sufferings of others.

3. The Scripture is so absolutely the Rule, Measure, and Boundary of our Faith and Knowledge in Spiritual things, as that what it conceals is Instructive, as well as what it expresseth. This the Apostle Manifests in many of his Observations concerning Melchizedek, and his Inferences from thence. But I have (as I remember) Discoursed somewhat hereof before.

Secondly, Our next Enquiry is, Wherein Melchizedek was Typical of Christ, or what of all this belongeth unto the following Assertion that he was made like unto the Son of God; that is, so described as that he might have a great Resemblance of him.

Answ. It is generally thought that he was so in the whole, and in every particular mentioned distinctly. Thus he is said to be without Father, and without Mother, (no mention is made of them) because the Lord Christ was in some sense so also. He was without Father on Earth as to his Human Nature, with respect whereunto God says that he will create a New thing in the Earth, That a Woman should compass a Man, Jer. 31. 22. or Conceive a Man without Natural Generation. And he was without Mother as to his Person or Divine Nature, being the only begotten of the Father, by an Eternal Generation of his own Person. But yet it must not be denied but that on the other side, he had both Father and Mother. A Father as to his Divine, and a Mother as to his Human Nature. But as to his whole Person he was without Father and Mother. Again, Whereas he is said to be without Genealogy, it is of somewhat a difficult application; for the Genealogy of Christ was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Roll of his Pedigree, is declared by two of the Evangelists, the one driving of it up to Abraham, the other unto Adam, as it was necessary, to manifest the Truth of his Human Nature and the Faithfulness of God in the accomplishment of his Promises. It may be (therefore) respect is had unto those words of the Prophet, Isa. 53. 8. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —Who shall declare his Generation; there was somewhat in his Age and Generation, by Reason of his Divine praeexistence unto all, that was ineffable.

Again, He is said to be without Beginning of Days and end of Life. And this also is spoken by our Apostle with respect unto the Narration of Moses wherein mention is made neither of the one, nor of the other. And it belongs unto his Conformity unto the Son of God, or that wherein he Represented him; for as unto his Divine Person, the Lord Christ had neither the one nor the other, as the Apostle proves, Chap. 1. 10, 11, 12. from Psal. 102. 25, 26, 27. But on the other side, as to his Human Nature he had both, he had both beginning of Days and End of Life, both which are upon Solemn Record. Wherefore it should seem that if there be a likeness in these things on the one account, there is none on the other, and so no Advantage in the Comparison.

Considering these Difficulties in the Application of these particulars, some do judge that these Instances do not belong unto the Analogy and Resemblance between Christ and Melchizedek, but are introduced only in Order unto what ensues, namely, He abides a Priest forever, wherein alone the similitude between him and Christ doth consist. And so they say we find things quoted in the Scripture at large, when only some one passage in it, may be used directly unto the business in hand. But although this will be difficultly proved, namely, that any Testimony is cited in the Scripture, whereof any principal part of it belongs not unto the Matter designed to be confirmed, yet it may be granted that it is so sometimes, when the sense of the whole Context is to be taken in. But there was no Reason on this Ground, that the Apostle should make so many Observations on what was not spoken at all, which in an Ordinary way ought to have been mentioned, if the whole of what he so Observed, was not at all to his Purpose.

Wherefore it must be granted, as that which the plain Design of the Apostle exacteth of us, that Melchizedek even in these things, that in the Story he was without Father, without Mother, without Genealogy, having neither beginning of Days nor End of Life, was a Type and Representative of Christ. But it is not of the Person of Christ absolutely, nor of either of his Natures distinctly that our Apostle treateth, but merely with respect unto his Office of Priesthood. And herein all the things mentioned do concur in him, and make a lively Representation of him. It was utterly a new Doctrine unto the Hebrews that the Lord Christ was a Priest, the only High Priest of the Church, so as that all other Priesthood must cease. And their chief Objection against it was, that it was contrary unto the Law, and inconsistent with it. And this because he was not of the Line of the Priests, neither as to Father or Mother, or Genealogy, nor had any to Succeed him. But in this Type of his the Apostle proves that all this was to be so. For (1.) In this respect he had neither Father nor Mother from whom he might derive any Right or Title unto his Office. And this was forever sufficient to exclude him from any Interest in the Priesthood as it was Established by Law. (2.) He had no Genealogy upon the Priestly Line. And that which is Recorded of him on other accounts, is so far from having respect unto his Right unto the Priesthood of the Law, that it directly proves and demonstrates that he had none. For his Genealogy is evidently of the Tribe of Judah, which was excluded Legally from that Office, as we have besides the Institution an Instance in King Uzziah, 2 Chron. 26. 16, 17, 18. from Exod. 30. 7. Numb. 18. 7. Hence our Apostle concludes, That had he been on the Earth, that is, under the Order of the Law, he could not have been a Priest, there being others who by virtue of their Descent had alone the Right thereunto, Heb. 8. 3, 4. Wherefore God in these things Instructed the Church, that he would erect a Priesthood which should no way depend on Natural Generation, Descent, or Genealogy; whence it inevitably follows that the state of the Priesthood under the Law was to cease, and to give place unto another, which our Apostle principally designs to prove. (3.) In this respect also the Lord Christ was without Beginning of Days and End of Life. For although in his Human Nature he was both Born, and Died, yet he had a Priesthood which had no such Beginning of Days, as that it should be traduced from any other to him, nor shall ever cease or be delivered over from him unto any other, but abides unto the consummation of all things.

In these things was Melchizedek made like unto Christ, whom the Apostle here calls the Son of God; made like unto the Son of God. I have formerly observed in this Epistle, that the Apostle makes mention of the Lord Christ under various Appellations, on various Occasions; so that in one place or another he makes Use of all the Names whereby he is signified in the Scripture. Here he calls him the Son of God, and that, (1.) To intimate that although Melchizedek were an Excellent Person, yet was he infinitely beneath him whom he Represented, even the Son of God. He was not the Son of God, but he had the Honor in so many things to be made like unto him. (2.) To declare how all these things which were any way Represented in Melchizedek or couched in the Story, or left unto Enquiry by the veil of silence drawn over them, could be fulfilled in our High Priest. And it was from hence, namely, that he was the Son of God. By virtue hereof was he capable of an always-living, abiding, uninterrupted Priesthood, although as to his Human Nature he once died in the Discharge of that Office.

This Description being given of the Person treated of, which makes up the Subject of the Proposition, it is affirmed concerning him that he abideth a Priest forever. For anything we find in the Story of his Death, or the Resignation of his Office, or the Succession of any one unto him therein, he abideth a Priest forever. Some I find have been venturing at some obscure Conjectures of the perpetuity of the Priesthood of Melchizedek in Heaven. But I cannot perceive that they well understood themselves what they intended. Nor did they consider that the real continuance of the Priesthood forever in the Person of Melchizedek, is as inconsistent with the Priesthood of Christ, as the continuance of the same Office in the Line of Aaron. But things are so related concerning him in the Scripture, as that there is no mention of the ending of the Priesthood of his Order, nor of his own Personal Administration of his Office by Death or otherwise. Hence is he said to abide a Priest forever. This was that which our Apostle principally designed to confirm from hence, namely, that there was in the Scripture before the Institution of the Aaronical Priesthood a Representation of an Eternal, unchangeable Priesthood to be introduced in the Church, which he demonstrates to be that of Jesus Christ.

It may not be amiss in the close of this Exposition of these Verses summarily to represent the several particulars wherein the Apostle would have us to observe the likeness between Melchizedek and Christ, or rather the especial Excellencies and Properties of Christ that were Represented in the Account given of the Name, Reign, Person and Office of Melchizedek. As,

1. He was said to be, and he really was, and he only, first the King of Righteousness, and then the King of Peace; seeing he alone brought in Everlasting Righteousness and made Peace with God for Sinners. And in his Kingdom alone are these things to be found.

2. He was really and truly the Priest of the High God, and properly he was so alone. He offered that Sacrifice, and made that Atonement which was signified by all the Sacrifices Offered by Holy Men from the Foundation of the World.

3. He Blesseth all the Faithful, as Abraham the Father of the Faithful was Blessed by Melchizedek. In him were they to be Blessed, by him are they Blessed, through him delivered from the Curse and all the Fruits of it, nor are they Partakers of any Blessing but from him.

4. He receiveth all the Homage of his People, all their grateful Acknowledgments of the Love and Favor of God in the Conquest of their Spiritual Adversaries, and Deliverance from them, as Melchizedek received the Tenth of the Spoils from Abraham.

5. He was really without Progenitors or Predecessors unto his Office, nor would I exclude that Mystical sense from the intention of the place, that he was without Father as to his Human Nature, and without Mother as to his Divine.

6. He was a Priest without Genealogy, or Derivation of his Pedigree from the Loins of Aaron, or any other that ever was a Priest in the World, and moreover Mysteriously was of a Generation which none can declare.

7. He had in his Divine Person, as the High Priest of the Church, neither Beginning of Days nor End of Life, as no such thing is reported of Melchizedek. For the Death which he underwent in the Discharge of his Office, being not the death of his whole Person, but of his Human Nature only, no Interruption of his endless Office did ensue thereon. For although the Person of the Son of God died, whence God is said to Redeem his Church with his own Blood, Acts 20. 28. yet he died not in his whole Person. But as the Son of man was in Heaven whilst he was speaking on the Earth, John 3. 13. namely, he was so in his Divine Nature; so whilst he was dead in the Earth in his Human Nature, the same Person was alive in his Divine. Absolutely therefore, nor in respect of his Office, he had neither Beginning of Days nor end of Life.

8. He was really the Son of God, as Melchizedek in many Circumstances was made like to the Son of God.

9. He alone abideth a Priest forever; whereof we must particularly treat afterwards.

The Doctrinal Observations that may be taken from these Verses, are,

1. When any were of Old designed to be Types of Christ, there was a Necessity that things more Excellent and Glorious should be spoken or intimated of them, than did properly belong unto them. So many things are here observed of Melchizedek, which were not properly and literally fulfilled in him. And so there are likewise of David and Solomon in sundry places. And the Reason is, because the things so spoken were never intended of them absolutely, but as they were designed to Represent the Lord Christ, unto whom alone they did truly belong. And in the Exposition of such Typical Prophecies, the utmost Diligence is to be used in distinguishing aright what is absolutely spoken of the Type only, and what is spoken of it merely as Representing Christ himself.

2. All that might be spoken so as to have any probable Application in any sense unto Things and Persons Typically, coming short of what was to be fulfilled in Christ, the Holy Ghost in his Infinite Wisdom supplied that defect by Ordering the Account which he gives of them so, as more might be apprehended and learned from them than could be expressed. And where the Glory of his Person as vested with his Office could not be Represented by positive Applications, it is done by a Mystical Silence, as in this Story of Melchizedek. And the most Eminent and Glorious things assigned unto Types as such, have a more Glorious signification in Christ than they have in them. See to this purpose our Exposition on Chap. 1. ver. 5.

3. That Christ abiding a Priest forever hath no more a Vicar or Successor or Substitute in his Office, or any deriving a real Priesthood from him, than had Melchizedek, whereof we shall speak afterwards.

4. The whole Mystery of Divine Wisdom effecting all inconceivable Perfections centred in the Person of Christ, to make him a meet, Glorious, and most Excellent Priest unto God in the behalf of the Church. This it is the principal Design of the whole Gospel to demonstrate, namely, to declare that all the Treasures of Divine Wisdom and Knowledge are hid in Jesus Christ, Col. 2. 3. The Constitution of his Person, was the greatest Mystery that ever Infinite Wisdom effected, 1 Tim. 3. 16. And thereby did God Gloriously Represent himself and all his Infinite Perfections unto us, Heb. 1. 3. Col. 1. 14, 15. 2 Cor. 4. 6. Had he not the Divine Nature, he could not have been the Express Image of God in himself. And had he not been Man, he could not have Represented him unto us. Nor can anything be more Mysteriously Glorious, than the Furniture of his Person as Mediator, with all fullness of Power, Wisdom and Grace for the accomplishment of his Work, John 1. 16. Col. 1. 18, 19. Chap. 2. 9. Phil. 2. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. The work that he wrought in Offering himself a Sacrifice and making atonement for sin, hath the highest inconceivable Impression of Divine Wisdom upon it, John 3. 16. Acts 20. 28. Rev. 5. 8. Eph. 5. 2. And so also hath the Grace that is from thence administered by him and from him unto Jews and Gentiles, Eph. 3. 8, 9, 10, 11. And Instances of the like kind may be multiplied. And we may consider thence first, into what Condition of sin and misery we were fallen by our Apostasy from God, whence nothing would or could recover us but this Blessed work of the whole Mystery of Divine Wisdom. And then the unspeakable Riches and Excellencies of that Wisdom, Love, and Grace which provided this way for our Recovery.

VER. 4, 5, 6.

THE Proceed of these Verses is unto the Application of what was before Discoursed. For having proved that Christ the promised Messiah was to be a Priest after the Order of Melchizedek from Psal. 110. and given a Description both of the Person and Office of this Melchizedek from the Historical Narration of them as laid down by Moses, he makes Application of the whole unto his present purpose. And from the consideration of sundry particulars in his Description, confirms in general the Argument which he had in hand. For that which principally he designeth to prove is, that a more Excellent Priesthood than that of Aaron being introduced according to the Purpose and Promise of God, it followed necessarily, that that Priesthood with all the Worship, Rites and Ceremonies which belonged unto it, was to cease and be taken out of the way. For as this new Promised Priesthood was inconsistent with it, and could not be Established without the Abolition of it, so it brought a far greater Benefit and Spiritual Advantage unto the Church than it before enjoyed. And we are not to wonder that the Apostle insists so much hereon, and that with all sorts of Arguments, especially such as the Old Testament furnished him withal. For this was the Hinge on which the Eternal Salvation or Destruction of that whole Church and People at that time, did turn. For if they would not forgo their Old Priesthood and Worship, their Ruin was unavoidable. Christ would either be rejected by them, or be of no profit unto them. Accordingly things fell out with the most of them, they clave absolutely unto their Old Institutions, and rejecting the Lord Christ, perished in their unbelief. Others contended for the Continuance of their Priesthood and Worship, for which they supposed they had Invincible Reasons, although they admitted the Profession of Christ and the Gospel therewithal. But our Apostle knowing how inconsistent these things were, and how the retaining of that Perswasion, would keep them off at present from believing the Necessity, Usefulness, Glory and Advantages of the Priesthood of Christ, and the Spiritual Worship of the Gospel, as also dispose them unto Apostasy for the future, laboreth by all means to eradicate this pernicious Fundamental Error out of their minds. Unto this End doth he so diligently insist on all the Instances, and particulars of them, whereby God of Old did intimate unto their Fore-fathers the Introduction of this Alteration, with the Advantage of the Church thereby. And I mention these things, that we may see the Reason the Apostle did so Scrupulously as it were to insist on all the ensuing particulars, which otherwise we may not so easily discern the necessity of; and withal to show, (1.) How hard it is to dispossess the minds of men of inveterate Perswasions in Religion. (2.) The great Care and Diligence they ought to Use and Exercise who have the Care of the Souls of Men committed unto them, when they discern them in apparent danger of Ruin.

That the Old Priesthood was to be removed, and the New one mentioned to be introduced. He proves in the first place, by the Greatness of the Person who was first chosen of God to praefigure and Represent the Lord Christ in his Office of Priesthood. For if he were so Excellent in his Person and Office, as deservedly to be preferred above Aaron and all his Successors, then he who was praefigured and represented by him, must be so also; yea, be so much more as that which is Typed out and Signified, is, and always must be more Excellent than the Type and Sign, which are of no Use but with respect thereunto.

In these Verses he choseth out his first Instance in what he had observed before out of the Narrative of Moses concerning the Greatness and Excellency of Melchizedek, in that he received Tithes of Abraham. His Design is to prove him more Excellent and Great than all the Levitical Priests. But herein he takes a step backward, and begins with Abraham himself, from whom both People and Priests confessedly derived all their Privileges. And he produceth his Instance in the case of Tithes, whereon as it is known the whole Levitical Priesthood did depend. And this the Apostle knew full well, that if once he proved him Greater than Abraham, he should not need with that People to prove him above any of his Posterity, but they would immediately give over the Contest. So in their Exceptions unto our Savior 's Testimony concerning himself they acknowledge they could proceed no higher; Art thou, say they, Greater than our Father Abraham? whom makest thou thyself to be? John 8. 53. But yet our Apostle not content herewith, to obviate all Pretences, proves distinctly afterwards that the whole Order of the Levitical Priests were inferior unto him.

VER. 4, 5, 6.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; Considerate, Spectate, Syr. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —Videte; Vul. Lat. intuemini. Consider, Behold, Contemplate; serious Consideration with Diligent Intuition is intended. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; quantus hic; sit, vul. fuerit, is supplied by others; as by us, how great this Man was. Syr. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —quam magnus hic. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . Decimas spoliorum, decimas de spoliis hostium; de spoliis, vul. Lat. Decimas de praecipuis, of the chiefest things. The Syr. makes a distinction. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —Tithes and First-fruits. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; Cujus Generatio non annumeratur in eis; Whose Generation is not numbered in them; very obscurely. Cujus genus non recensetur ex illis, non refertur ad illos. Whose Stock, Race, Pedigree is not reckoned from them, referred unto them; the Syriac 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 who is not written in their Genealogies, which is the sense of the word; for respect is had unto the Genealogies that were written and upon Record.

VER. 4.

Consider then how great this man was, unto whom even the Patriarch Abraham gave the Tenth of the Spoils.

The Duty of the Hebrews upon the Proposition of the state of Melchizedek before insisted on, is here pressed on them. And the words contain both a Respect unto the preceding Discourse, a Duty prescribed, the Object of that Duty, and the Reason of a Qualification therein expressed, amplified by the Title, State and Condition of one Person concerned.

1. The Note of Respect unto the preceding Discourse is in the Particle 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which we render now, consider now, then, or therefore; but do you consider. The things before laid down are as of Importance in themselves, so of your especial concernment.

2. The Especial Duty which he prescribes unto them with Respect unto the things proposed by him concerning the Excellency of Melchizedek and his Office, is that they would consider it.

He doth four times in this Epistle call the Hebrews unto this especial Duty of an Inteuse Consideration of the things proposed unto them, as we have translated his words, and that not unduly, Chap. 3. 1. Chap. 10. 24. Chap. 12. 3. and in this place, Chap. 3. 1. Chap. 10. 24. we have the same word in the Original, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , whose Importance hath been declared on Chap. 3. 1. Chap. 12. 2. the word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which signifies to call things unto a due Reckoning and Account, so as to conform our minds unto them, which is our great Duty with respect unto the patient Sufferings of Christ there intended. The word here used signifies diligently to behold, contemplate on, or to look into the things proposed unto us. He had before warned them that what he had to Discourse on this Subject was difficult and hard to be understood, but withal such was its Use and Excellency that neither would he refrain from declaring of them, nor ought they to spare any pains in a diligent Enquiry into them. Having therefore laid down the matter of Fact, and stated the whole Subject which he designed to treat upon, he adds their Duty with respect thereunto. And this in the first place is that they would heedfully and diligently look into them.

1. It will be fruitless and to no Advantage to propose or declare the most Important Truths of the Gospel, if those unto whom they are proposed do not diligently inquire into them. And here those unto whom the Dispensation of the Gospel is committed, are pressed with no small difficulty, as our Apostle professeth that he was in this very case. For whereas it is incumbent on them in that Declaration of the whole Counsel of God which is enjoined them, to insist upon sundry things that are Deep, Mysterious, and hard to be understood, when their Hearers for want of a good Foundation of Knowledge in the Principles of Religion, or through carelessness in attending unto what is delivered, do not come unto a due perception and understanding of them, it is very grievous to see their own Labors and others Profit disappointed. Wherefore if Men think they have nothing to do, but as it were to give the hearing unto such as endeavor to carry them to perfection, they will lose all the advantage of their Ministry. This Duty therefore is here prescribed by the Apostle with respect unto this Truth, to obviate this slothful frame. And we may on this Occasion briefly name the things that are required thereunto. As, (1.) Sense of a concernment in them. Unless this be well fixed on the mind, Men will never diligently attend unto them, nor duly consider them. If upon the proposal of Sacred Truths that appear hard to be understood, they begin to think that this belongs not unto them, it is for others who are more exercised than they, it is not likely they should ever endeavor to apprehend them aright. And this very frame keeps many in a low form of knowledge all their days; possibly also this Neglect is increased in many, by the spreading of a late foolish apprehension, that we are upon the matter to look after nothing but the Doctrines and Precepts of Morality that are in the Scripture; but as for the more Spiritual Mysteries of Grace we are not concerned in them. Where this Principle is once imbibed, Men will rest and satisfy themselves in the most profound Ignorance; and not only so, but despise all such as endeavor to be wiser than themselves. But, (2.) Unto a due Apprehension of these things there is not only required a sense of our concernment, but also a Delight in them. If the Light be not Pleasant unto us, as well as Useful, we shall not value it nor seek after it. When such Mysterious Truths as that here insisted on by our Apostle, are proposed unto Men, if they have no Delight in such things, they will never be at the Cost and pains of enquiring into them with necessary Diligence. Curiosity indeed, or an humor to pry into things we have not seen, and which we cannot see in a due manner because not revealed, is everywhere condemned by our Apostle, who warns us all to be wise unto Sobriety, and not above what is written. But there is a secret delight and complacency of mind in every beam of Spiritual Light shining in its proper Divine Revelation, when the Soul is disposed aright unto the reception of it. Without this in some measure we shall not follow on to know, nor thrive in knowledge. (3.) Study, Meditation and Prayer, with the diligent Use of all other means appointed for the search and Investigation of the Truth, do close this Duty. Without these things in Hearers, Ministers lose all their Labor in the Declaration of the most important Mysteries of the Gospel. This the Apostle as to the present case designs to obviate in the frequent prescription of this Duty.

That which the Apostle proposeth in the first place and in general as the Object of this Enquiry and consideration, is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Quantus iste erat; the word respects Greatness and Excellency in any kind. Nunc quantus Achilles, Quantus erat Julius Caesar, and the like. And this Greatness of Melchizedek respected neither the endowments of his Person, nor the largeness of his Dominion, nor his Riches or Wealth, in which sense some are said to be Great in the Scripture, as Job, Barzillai, and others; but it regards alone his Dignity with respect unto his Office, and his Nearness unto God on that account. That which these Hebrews insisted on as their Chief and Fundamental Privilege in Judaism, and which they were most unwilling to forgo, was the Greatness of their Predecessors, with their nearness unto God in Favor and Office. In the first way as to Divine Love and Favor, they Gloried in Abraham, and opposed the Privilege of being his Children on all Occasions unto the Person and Doctrine of Christ, John 8. 33, 53. And in the latter they thought Aaron and his Successors to be preferred above all the World. And whilst they were under the Power and Influence of these Apprehensions, the Gospel could not but be ungrateful unto them, as depriving them of their Privileges, and rendering their Condition worse than it was before. To undeceive them in this matter, and to demonstrate how unspeakably all those in whom they trusted, came short of the true High Priest of the Church, he calls them to consider the Greatness of him, whose only eminence consisted in being a Type or Representative of him. Wherefore the Greatness of Melchizedek here proposed unto earnest Consideration, is that which he had in Representing Jesus Christ, and his nearness unto God on that Account. And it were well that we were all really convinced, that all true Greatness consists in the Favor of God, and our nearness unto him, on the Account of our Relation unto Jesus Christ. We neither deny nor undervalue any Mans Wealth or Power hereby. Let those who are Rich and Wealthy in the World be accounted and called Great, as the Scripture sometimes calls them so. And let those who are High in Power and Authority be so esteemed, we would derogate nothing from them which is their due: But yet the Greatness of them all is but particular, with respect unto some certain things, and therefore fading and perishing. But this Greatness and Honor of the Favor of God, and nearness unto him, on the account of Relation unto Jesus Christ, is general, abiding, yea, eternal.

The Proof of the Apostle's Assertion, included in that Interrogation, How Great this Man was, follows in an Instance of what he had before observed and proposed unto them; Unto whom even the Patriarch Abraham gave the Tenth of the Spoils. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; the Tenth part. The Conjunction 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is Emphatical; and although in the Original it is joined with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , yet in Construction it is to be understood with Abraham; not, unto whom Abraham gave even the Tenth; but unto whom even Abraham gave the Tenth, as it is in our Translation.

The Proof of the Greatness of Melchizedek from hence consists in three things. (1.) In the Nomination of the Person that was Subject unto him, or Abraham. (2.) In the Qualification of his Person, He was the Patriarch. (3.) In what he did, He gave him the Tenth part of the Spoils.

As to the Person himself he was the Stock and Root of the whole People, their Common Father in whom they were first separated from other Nations to be a People of themselves. And herein they had a singular Reverence for him, as generally all Nations have for the first Founders of their Political State, who among the Idolatrous Heathens were commonly Deified, and made the Objects of their Religious Adoration. But moreover it was he who first received the Promise and the Covenant with the Token of it, and by whom alone they put in their Claim unto all the Privileges and Advantages which they Gloried in above all Nations in the World. This Abraham therefore they esteemed next unto God himself. And their Fosterity do now place him in Heaven above the Angels, hardly allowing that the Messiah himself should be exalted above him, and tell a Foolish story how he took it ill, that the Messiah should be on the Right Hand, and he on the Left Hand of God. But it is sufficiently evident from the Gospel, how much in those days they boasted of him, and trusted in him. Hence it is that our Apostle expresseth it so emphatically, even Abraham.

The Qualification of his Person, and his Title thereon is added in like manner: He was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . A Patriarch is a Father, that is, a Prince or Ruler of a Family. A Ruling Father; and these Patriarchs were of three sorts among the Jews. Of the first sort was he alone who was the first separated Progenitor of the whole Nation. He was their 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —the first Father of all that great Family. Secondly, there were such as Succeeded him, from whom the whole Nation in like manner Descended, as Isaac and Jacob, who were Heirs with him of the same Promise, Heb. 11. 4. Thirdly, Such as were the first Heads of their Twelve Tribes into which the Nation was divided, that is, the Twelve Sons of Jacob, are called Patriarchs, Acts 7. 8, 9. Others that followed them, as David, who is also called a Patriarch, Acts 2. 29. were termed so, in allusion unto them, and being signally the Progenitors of a most Eminent Family among them. Now it is evident that the first of these on all accounts is the Principal, and hath the Preeminence over all the rest. And this was Abraham alone. Wherefore if any one were greater than Abraham, and that in his own time, it must be acknowledged it was upon the account of some Privilege that was above all that ever that whole Nation as Descendents from Abraham were made partakers of. But that this was so the Apostle proves by the Instance ensuing, namely, that he gave to Melchizedek, &c.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 he gave them; yet not arbitrarily, but in the way of a Necessary Duty, not as an Honorary respect, but as a Religious Office. And he gave thus 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Tithe-portion, delivering it up unto his Use and Disposal as the Priest of the most High God. And this Tenth was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as the Apostle Interprets the passage in Moses, of the Spoils of War. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is acervus, an heap of Corn or any Useful things; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is the top of the Heap, the best of it, from whence the First-fruits were taken for Sacred Services. And because it was the Custom of all Nations afterwards to dedicate or devote some Portion of what they got in War unto Religious Services, the word itself came to signify the Spoils of War. At first it was the portion that was taken out of the whole, and afterwards the whole itself was signified by it. Now although Abraham had reserved nothing unto himself of what belonged unto the King of Sodom and his Companions, yet the Army and King which he had newly slain and destroyed having smitten sundry other Nations, Gen. 14. 5, 6, 7. and dealt with them as they did with Sodom and the other Towns, took all their Goods and Provision, ver. 11. being now in their return home and laden with Prey, it fell all into the hand of the Conqueror; The Tenth part of the Spoils in every kind, might probably be a very great Offering both for Sacrifice and Sacred Dedication in the place where Melchizedek Ministred in his Office. What farther concerns the Greatness of this Man, the Apostle farther declares in the ensuing Verses, where it will fall under Consideration. From this one Instance of Abraham 's paying Tithes unto him, it is in a great measure already evinced.

But how came Melchizedek to be thus Great? Is it because he was Originally in himself, more Wise and Honorable than any of the Sons of Men? We Read no such thing concerning him, which the Apostle declares to be the Rule and Measure of all our Conceptions in this matter. Is it that he attained this Dignity and Greatness, by his own Industry and Endeavors? as the Prophet says of some, that their Judgment and their Dignity proceeds from themselves, Hab. 1. 7. Neither do we find anything of that Nature ascribed unto him. The sole Reason and Cause hereof, is, that God raised him up and disposed of him into that Condition of his own good pleasure. And we may see in him, that

The Sovereign Will, Pleasure, and Grace of God is that alone which puts a difference among Men, especially in the Church. He makes Men Great or Small, High or Low, Eminent or Obscure, as it seemeth Good unto him. He raiseth up the Poor from the Dust, and lifteth up the Beggar from the Dunghill, to set them among Princes, and to make them Inherit the Throne of Glory, for the Pillars of the Earth are the Lord's, and he hath set the World upon them, 1 Sam. 2. 8. which is plentifully elsewhere Testified unto. Whence was it that the Twelve Poor Fishermen were made Apostles to sit on Twelve Thrones Judging the Tribes of Israel, and becoming Princes in all Nations? Who made the most Glorious Apostle of the first and fiercest Persecutor? Was it not he who hath Mercy on whom he will have Mercy, and is Gracious unto whom he will be Gracious? And it is laid down as an Universal Rule, That no Man hath anything in this kind but what he hath freely Received, nor doth any Man make himself to differ from others, 1 Cor. 4. 7. For, (1.) God lays the Foundation of all Spiritual Differences among Men, in his Sovereign Decree of Eternal Election, Rom. 9. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Ephes. 1. 4. And among them that are Chosen he calleth them when and how he pleaseth, both unto Grace and Employment or Work. And (2.) As to Grace, Gifts, and Spiritual Endowments, the Holy Spirit divideth unto every Man as he will, 1 Cor. 12. 11. Let everyone then be contented with his Lot and Condition, everyone endeavor to fill up the place and state wherein he is fixed, and as he is called to abide with God. Let God be owned in all his Gifts and Graces, and our Souls be Humbled in what we come short of others; and the Sovereignty of Grace admired in all the different effects of it which we behold.

Secondly, Whereas even Abraham himself gave the Tenth of all to Melchizedek, we may Observe, that

The Highest Privilege exempts not any from the Obligation unto and Performance of the meanest Duty. Notwithstanding all these Advantages and Privileges which Abraham was possessed of, on the account whereof he was Mighty in his own Days & almost Adored by his Posterity, yet when the meanest Duty was presented unto him, he readily complied with it. Nor ought it to be otherwise with any. For, (1.) Privilege is less than Duty. A Man may have the Greatest Privileges and yet be rejected, but the least sincere Duty shall not be unrewarded. For Duty indeed is our chiefest Honor and Advantage. And for Men to pretend to such Advancements in the Church of God, as that they should be exempted thereby from the Ordinary Labor of the Ministry, is horrid Pride and Ingratitude. But when Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Privileges are pretended to countenance Men in a Life or Course of Idleness, Sloth, Pleasure, Sensuality, or Worldliness in any kind, it is a Crime that it may be we as yet want a Name to express. Wherefore, (2.) Whatever is pretended, that is no Privilege, which either exempts a Man, or hinders him in and unto the performance of any Duty whatever. It is such a Privilege as being well improved will send Men to Hell. It will prove no otherwise let the pretence be what it will. For, (3.) There are indeed but two Ends of any Privileges whereof in this World we may be made Partakers; whereof the first is to enable us unto Duty, and the other is to encourage us thereunto. Hereunto we may add, that when any are highly exalted in Privileges, that they have an Advantage thereby to give an eminent Example unto others in the Performance of their Duties, when these Ends are not pursued, all Privileges, Promotions, Dignities, Exaltations, are snares and tend unto the Ruin of Men's Souls. There are things still of this Nature both as unto whole Churches and as unto particular Persons. Some Churches are like Capernaum as to the outward means of Grace, as it were lifted up to Heaven; Let them take heed of Capernaum 's Judgment in being brought down as low as Hell for their Abuse of them, or Negligence in their Improvement. Some Persons have Eminent Endowments, and if they are not Eminent in Service, they will prove their disadvantage. Yea, the Highest Privileges should make Men ready to condescend unto the meanest Duties. This is that which our Lord Jesus Christ so signally Instructed his Disciples in, when he himself washed their Feet, and taught them the same Duty towards the meanest of his Disciples, John 13. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17.

3. Opportunities for Duty which render it beautiful, ought diligently to be embraced. So did Abraham as unto this Duty upon his meeting of Melchizedek. Hence the Performance of this Duty became so Renowned, and was of the Use whereunto it is here applied by our Apostle. It is Season that gives everything its Beauty. And Omission of Seasons or Tergiversations under them, are Evidences of an Heart much under the power of Corrupt Lusts or Unbelief.

4. When the Instituted Use of Consecrated things ceaseth, the things themselves cease to be Sacred, or of Esteem. For what became of all these Dedicated things after the death of Melchizedek? They were no more Sacred, the Actual Administration of his Typical Priesthood ceasing. Of what Use was the Brazen Serpent after it was taken from the Pole whereon it was lifted up by God's appointment; or of what Use would the lifting of it up be, when it was not under an express Command? We know it proved a Snare, a means of Idolatry, and that was all. God's Institution is the Foundation and Warranty of all Consecration. All the Men in the world cannot really Consecrate or Dedicate anything, but by virtue of Divine Appointment. And this Appointment of God respected always a limited Use, beyond which nothing was Sacred. And everything kept beyond its Appointment is like Manna so kept, it breeds Worms and stinketh. These things are manifest from the consideration of all things that God ever accepted or dedicated in the Church. But Ignorance of them is that which hath filled the world with horrid Superstition. How many things have we had made Sacred which never had warranty from any Institution of God? Monasteries, Abbeys, Persons and Lands, Altars, Bells, Utensils, with other things of the like Nature very many, which whatever Use they are of, yet all the Men in the world cannot make them Sacred. And the extending of the Sacredness of Dedicated things beyond their Use, hath had no less pernicious Event. Hence was the Useless Reservation of the Consecrated Bread after the Sacrament, and afterwards the Idolatrous Worship of it. But these things are here occasionally only mentioned. The Apostle adds in the Confirmation of his Argument,

VER. 5.

And verily they that are the Sons of Levi, who receive the Office of the Priesthood, have a Commandment to take Tithes of the People according to the Law, that is of their Brethren though they come out of the Loins of Abraham.

There is in these words an Illustration and Confirmation of the present Argument, proving the Preference of Melchizedek above Abraham, from his giving the Tithe or Tenth of all unto him, and consequently receiving the Blessing from him. And this is taken from what was determined in the Law and acknowledged among the Hebrews, with which kind of Arguments the Apostle doth principally press them in the whole Epistle, as we have shown on many Occasions. Now this is, that the Priests who received Tithes by the Law were Superior in Dignity and Honor unto the People from whom they did receive them. And this was only declared in the Law, for the Foundation of it was in the Light of Nature, as the Apostle expressly intimates in the Instance of Benediction afterwards.

There are considerable in the words, (1.) The Introduction of this new confirmation of his fore-going Argument. (2.) A Description of the Persons in whom he Instanceth. (3.) The Action ascribed unto them with its Limitation. And (4.) The Qualification of the Persons to whom their Power was exercised.

The Introduction of his Reasoning herein is in these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . The Connection in the Conjunction is plain; yet not a Reason is given of what was spoken before, but a Continuation of the same Argument with farther Proof is intended. And he adds the Note of Observation, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , verily; as if he had said, as to this matter of Tithing and what may thence justly be inferred as to Dignity and Preeminence, you may consider how it was under the Law, and there, what I propose unto you, you will find directly Confirmed. It is a great advantage to press them with whom we have to do from their own Principles.

The Description of the Persons in whom he Instanceth is in those words, The Sons of Levi who receive the Office of the Priesthood. It was the Priests directly whom he intended, or the Sons of Aaron; and he might have so expressed it, the Priests according to the Law. But he varieth his expression for sundry Reasons that appear in the Context.

1. Because all the Levites did receive Tithes by the Law, yea, Tithes in the first place was paid unto them in common. But because their Dignity among the People was less conspicuous than that of the Priests; and the design of the Apostle is not merely to argue from the giving of Tithes unto any, but the giving of them unto them as Priests, as Abraham gave Tithes of all to Melchizedek as Priest of the High God, he thus expresseth it, The Sons of Levi, who receive the Office of the Priesthood. For though all the Sons of Levi received Tithes, yet all of them did not receive the Priesthood, with which sort of Persons alone he was concerned.

2. He doth thus express it to introduce the mention of Levi, whom he was afterwards to mention on the same Occasion, and to lay the weight of him and the whole Tribe under the same Argument.

3. He minds them by the way of another Dignity of the Priesthood, in that not all the Posterity of Abraham, no, nor yet of Levi were partakers thereof, but it was a Privilege granted only to one part of them, even the Family of Aaron. And these are the Persons in whom he makes his Instance. Thus God distributes Dignity and Preeminence in the Church as he pleaseth. Not all the posterity of Abraham but only those of Levi were set apart to receive Tithes, and not all the posterity of Levi but only the Family of Aaron did receive the Priesthood. And this Order of his Sovereign pleasure God required of them all to submit unto and acquiesce in, Numb. 16. 9, 10. And it is a dangerous thing out of Envy, pride, or Emulation to transgress the Bounds of Dignity and Office that God hath prescribed, as we may see in that Instance of Korah. For every Man to be contented with his Station which God hath fixed him unto by Rule and providence, is his Safety and Honor. What God calleth and disposeth Men unto, therein are they to abide, and that are they to attend. It was new to the people to set the whole Tribe of Levi taken into a peculiar Sacred Condition, to attend forever on the worship of God, yet therein they acquiesced. But when the Priests were taken out of the Levites and exalted above them, some of them murmured at it, and stirred up the Congregation against Aaron, as though he took too much upon him, and deprived the Congregation of their Liberty, which yet was all Holy. The end of this Sedition was known, notwithstanding the specious pretence of it.

Thirdly, What is ascribed unto these Persons ensues in the words, have a Commandment to take Tithes of the People according to the Law. They had a Command to take Tithes, and they were to do it according to the Law; the one was their Warranty, and the other their Rule, for so are the Commandment and the Law here to be distinguished. (1.) They had a Commandment to take Tithes, that is, there was a Command or Institution enabling them so to do. For the Command in the first place respected the People, making it their Duty to pay all their Tithes unto the Levites. God did first take the Tithe to be his peculiar Portion, and thereby alienated it from the People that they had no Propriety in it. And the Tithe of the Land, saith he, is the Lord's, Lev. 27. 30. Hence those that withheld their Tithes are said to rob God, Mal. 3. 8. And wherever it can be manifested that God hath by an Institution of his own, taken the whole Tithe of any place into his own possession, there for any to detain them for their own Use, it is Sacrilege, and not else. But God having thus in the Land of Canaan taken them into his own Propriety, he Commanded the People to pay them to the Priests. This Command given unto the People to pay them, was a Command to the Priests to receive them. For what Men have a Right to do in the Church by God's Institution, that they have a Command to do. The Right of the Priests unto Tithing was such, as that it was not at all their Liberty to forgo it at their pleasure, yea, it was their sin so to have done. The Command which Obliged others to pay them, Obliged them to receive them. And they who on slight pretences do forgo what is due to them with respect unto their Office, will on as slight when Occasion serves neglect what is due from them on the same account. And this fell out frequently with the Priests of old, they neglected their Wages that they might have Countenance in the Neglect of their Work. And we may hence observe, That

Rule, Institution, and Command, without regard unto unrequired Humility, or Pleas of greater Zeal and Self-denial, unless in evident and cogent Circumstances, are the best Preservatives of Order and Duty in the Church. They are so in every kind, especially in the disposal of Earthly things, such as the Maintenance of the Officers of the Church doth consist in. Neither the Peoples pretence of Poverty, nor the Ministers pretence of Humility will regulate this Matter as it ought to be. But as it is the Peoples Duty to provide for them, wherein they exercise Grace and Odience towards Jesus Christ, so it is the Ministers Duty cheerfully to Receive what is their Due by the appointment of Christ, for they have a Command so to do. But whereas they are not many who are apt to Transgress on this hand, we shall not need farther to press this Consideration. But add,

2. As it is the Duty of those who are employed in Sacred Ministrations to receive what the Lord Christ hath appointed for their Supportment, and in the way of his Appointment, so it is likewise without Trouble, Solicitousness or Complaint to acquiesce therein. So was it with the Priests of old, they were to receive their portion, and to acquiesce in their portion; the Neglect of which Duty was the sin of the Sons of Eli. We take it for granted that the way of Maintenance is changed as to the Ministers of Holy things under the Old and New Testament. That the Law of Maintenance is taken away is the highest folly to imagine, it being so expressly asserted by our Savior himself and his Apostles, Luke 10. 7. 1 Cor. 9. But here it is thought lies the disadvantage; that whereas the Priests under the Old Testament had a certain portion which was Legally due unto them, and they might demand it as their own, it is now referred unto the voluntary Contribution of them that have the Benefit and Advantage of their Labor. Now whereas they oftentimes, yea, for the most part are negligent in their Duty, and through love of the present World, very scanty and backward in their Contributions, Ministers cannot be Supported in their Work in any measure proportionable unto what the Priests were of old. Besides it should seem unworthy a Minister of the Gospel who ought to be had in Esteem, and is declared by the Apostle to be worthy of double Honor, to depend on the Wills and as it were Charity of the people, many of them it may be poor and low themselves. And these things have taken such Impressions on the Minds of the most of them that are called Ministers, as that with the help of the Secular powers they have wisely provided a new way and Law of Legal Tithing for their Subsistence, with a notable over-plus of other good Ecclesiastical Lands and Revenues, which practice I shall neither Justify nor Condemn, let the Effects of it and the Day declare it. Only I say that the Institution of Christ before mentioned, stands in no need of this Invention or Supply to Safe-guard it from these Objections. For,

1. The Change made in the way of Maintenance pretended so disadvantageous unto Ministers of the Gospel, is no other but a part of that Universal Alteration, wherein Carnal things are turned into those that are more Spiritual, which was made by the bringing in of the Kingdom of Christ. And if Ministers may complain that they have by the Gospel lost the former Allottment of Sacred Officers in Tithes, the People may as well complain that they have no Inheritances in the Land of Canaan. But he is unworthy the Name of a Minister of the Gospel, who is not satisfied with what our Lord hath Ordained in every kind. And as for those who indeed think better of what was of Use in Judaism or Heathenism, than what is warranted by the Gospel, I shall not debate the matter with them. Wherefore as yet I Judge, that the taking of the Maintenance of Sacred Ministers from the Law of a Carnal Commandment, enforcing of it, charging it on the Grace and Duty of the Church, is a perfective Alteration, becoming the Spirituality and Glory of the Kingdom of Christ. For,

2. This way is the most Honorable way, and that which casts the greatest Respect upon them. Even the Princes and Rulers of the World have their Revenue and Supportment from the Substance of the People. Now I would only ask, whether it would not be more Honorable that the People should willingly and of their own accord bring in their Contribution, than merely pay it under the Compulsion of a Law. For in this latter way, no Man knoweth whether they have the least true Honor for their Ruler or Regard unto his Office. But if it might be done in the former, all the World must take Notice what Reverence, Regard, and Honor they have for the Person and Dignity of their Prince. It is true generally the Men of the World are such lovers of themselves, and so little concerned in Public Good, that if they were left absolutely at Liberty in this matter, their Governors might be defrauded of their Right, and the Ends of Government be disappointed. Wherefore in all Countries, Provision is made by Law, for the payment of that Tribute which yet without Law was due, But whether it be meet to bring this Order into the Church or no, I much Question. If it be so, possibly it may secure the Revenue of Ministers, but it will not increase their Honor. For however men may please themselves with outward appearances of things, true Honor consists in that Respect and Reverence which others pay them in their Minds and Hearts. Now when this is such, and that on the account of Duty, that men will freely Contribute unto their Supportment, I know no more Honorable Subsistence in the World. What will some say, to depend on the Wills and Love of the People there is nothing more base and unworthy? Yea, but what if all the Honor that Jesus Christ himself hath, or accepts from his People, proceeds from their Wills and Affections? Mahomet indeed who knew well enough that neither Honor, Respect, nor Obedience were due unto him, and that he could no way Recompence what should be done towards him in that kind, provided that men should be brought in Subjection unto his Name, by Fire and Sword. But our Lord Jesus Christ despiseth all Honor, all Obedience and Respect that is not Voluntary and free, and which doth not proceed from the Wills of Men. And shall his Servants in the work of the Gospel suppose themselves debased, to receive Respect and Honor from the same Principle? Well therefore because our Apostle tells us that our Lord hath Ordained that those who Preach the Gospel shall live on the Gospel, and all Obedience unto his Ordinances and Institutions must be Voluntary, if Ministers are ashamed and esteem it unworthy of them to receive what is so Contributed in a way of Voluntary Obedience, let them try if they can prevail with themselves to receive it so for him, and in his Name, who is not ashamed to receive it, no, if it be only a Cup of cold Water, so it comes from a free and willing Mind, when he despiseth the Revenue of the whole world upon Compulsion. If they will not do so, their best way is to leave his Service and take up with that which is more Honorable. For my part I do judge that the way of Maintenance of Ministers, by Voluntary Benevolence in a way of Duty and Obedience unto Christ, though it be not likely the most Plentiful, is yet the most Honorable of all others. And of this judgment I shall be, until I am convinced of two things. (1.) That true Honor doth not consist in the Respect and Regard of the Minds of Men unto the real Worth and Usefulness of those who are Honoured but in outward Ceremonies and forced works of Regard. (2.) That it is not the Duty which every Church owes to Jesus Christ, to maintain those who labor in the Word and Doctrine, according to their Ability; or that it is any Gospel-Duty which is influenced by Force or Compulsion.

Thirdly, It must be acknowledged that this way of Voluntary Contribution is not like to afford matter for that Grandeur and Secular Greatness, those ample Revenues, those Provisions for Ease, Wealth and Worldly Honor, which some think necessary in this case. But yet however it must be granted, that all those large Possessions and Dominions which some now enjoy under the Name of Church-Revenues, were Originally Voluntary Grants and Contributions. For it will not be said that the Clergy got them by Force of Arms, or Fraud, nor were they their Patrimonial Inheritance. But yet I fear, there were some undue Artifices used to induce men unto such Donations and Ecclesiastical Endowments, and somewhat more of Merit fixed thereon than Truth will allow, besides a Compensation therein for what might be undergone in Purgatory when men were gone out of the world. However the thing itself in its whole kind, that men out of their Substance and Revenue should design a Portion unto the Service of the Church, is not to be condemned. But it proved Mischievous and Fatal, when those who received what was so given, being immeasurably Covetous and Worldly, fixed no Bounds unto the Charity or Superstition of men in this kind, until they had over-run the World with their Gains. And not only so, but whereas there was no pretence of Use of such great Revenues in any way pretended to be of Divine Appointment, they were forced to invent and find out ways innumerable, in Abbeys, Monasteries, Cloisters, to be Repositories of their overflowing Treasure and Revenues. But when God had appointed to Build his Tabernacle of the Free-will Offerings of the People, a Type of the Gospel-Church, when there was Provision enough of Materials brought in, the Liberality of the People was restrained by Proclamation, and some perhaps grieved that their Offerings were not received, Exod. 36, 5, 6. Want of this care to put a stop unto the Devotions of Men in these Donations according unto a just measure of the Churches Necessary Use, the Bounds whereof were broken up and left invisible by the Pride, Ambition, Covetousness, and Craft of the Clergy, the whole World run into Superstition and Confusion. At present I grant that the way which the Gospel appoints is not likely to make Provision for Pomp, Grandeur, Wealth, Revenues, and Inheritances unto them that rely upon it. Nor do I think that if the present Establishment of a Superfluous Revenue unto the Clergy were removed, that the World itself would in haste run into the same state again. Wherefore those who judge these things Necessary and desirable, must be permitted as far as I know, to betake themselves unto the Advantage the world will afford; it is acknowledged that the Gospel hath made no Provision of them.

4. It is indeed supposed unto the Disadvantage of this way, that by means thereof Ministers do become obnoxious unto the, People do depend upon them, and so cannot deal so uprightly and sincerely with their Consciences as they ought to do, left they incur their Displeasure, wherein they are too much concerned. It were easy to manifest with how many more and greater Inconveniencies the other way is attended, were we now comparing of them. And in Truth it is a vain thing to look for or expect any such Order and Disposal of these things, as should administer no Occasion for the Wisdom and Graces of them concerned, nor would such a way be at all Useful. I say therefore, that God hath Established mutual Duty to be the Rule and Measure of all things between Ministers and People. Hereunto it is their wisdom and Grace to attend, leaving the Success unto God. And a Minister may easily conclude that seeing his whole Supportment in Earthly things with respect unto his Ministry, depends on the Command of God on the Account of the Discharge of his Duty, if he have respect thereunto in his work, or so far as it is Lawful for him to have, that the more sincere and upright he is therein, the more assured will his Supportment be. And he who is enabled to give up himself unto the work of the Ministry in a due manner, considering the Nature of that work, and what he shall assuredly meet withal in its Discharge, is not in much danger of being greatly moved with this pitiful consideration of displeasing this or that man in the Discharge of his Duty.

5. It is farther pleaded, That these things were tolerable at the first entrance and Beginnings of Christianity, when the Zeal, Love, and Liberality of its Professors did sufficiently stir them up unto an abundant Discharge of their Duty; but now the whole Body of them is degenerate from their pristine Faith and Love, Coldness and Indifferency in the things of their Eternal concernment, with Love of Self and this present evil World, do so prevail in them all, as that if things were left unto their Wills and sense of Duty, there would quickly be an end of all Ministry for want of Maintenance. This is of all others the most cogent Argument in this case, and that which prevails with many good and sober men, utterly to decry the way of Ministers Maintenance by a Voluntary Contribution. I shall briefly give my thoughts concerning it, and so return from this Digression. And I say, (1.) I do not condemn any Provision that is made by Good, Wholsom, and Righteous Laws among men for this end and purpose, provided it be such as is accommodate unto the furtherance of the Work itself. Such Provision as in its own Nature is a Snare and Temptation, inclining men unto Pride, Ambition, Luxury, distance from, and elation above the meanest of the Sheep or Lambs of Christ, or as it were requiring a Worldly Grandeur and Secular Pomp in their course of Life, must plead for itself, as it is able. But such as may comfortably Support, Encourage, and help men in this work and discharge of their Duty, being made without the Wrong of others, is doubtless to be approved. Yea, if in this Degeneracy of Christianity under which we Suffer, any shall out of Love and Obedience unto the Gospel, set apart any portion of their Estates, and settle it unto the Service of the Church in the Maintenance of the Ministry, it is a Good Work, which if done in Faith, will be accepted. (2.) Let those who are true Disciples indeed know, that it is greatly incumbent on them to roll away that Reproach which is cast upon the Institutions of Christ by the miscarriages of the Generality of Christians. He hath Ordained that those who Preach the Gospel shall Live on the Gospel. And the way whereby he hath prescribed this to be effected is, that those who are his Disciples should in Obedience unto his Commands supply them with Temporals by whom Spirituals are dispensed unto them. If this be not done, a Reproach is cast upon his Institutions as insufficient unto the End for which they were designed. It is therefore incumbent on all who have any true Zeal for the Glory and Honor of Christ, to manifest their Exemplary Obedience and Fruitfulness in this matter; whereby it may appear that it is not any defect in the Appointments of Christ, but the stubborn Disobedience and Unbelief of Men, that is the cause of any Disorder. (3.) Seeing there is such a Degeneracy among Christians, as that they will not be wrought upon unto a Voluntary Discharge of their Duty in this matter, it may be inquired what hath been the Cause or at least the principal Occasion thereof. Now if this should be found and appear to be, the Coldness, Remisseness, Neglect, Ignorance, Sloth, Ambition, and Worldliness of those who have been their Guides and Leaders, their Officers and Ministers in most Ages, it will evince how little Reason some have to complain that the People are backward and Negligent in the discharge of their Duty. And if it be true, as indeed it is, that the Care of Religion that it be preserved, thrive and flourish, not only in themselves but in the whole Church be committed unto those Persons, there can be no such Apostasy as is complained of among the People, but that the Guilt of it will be at their Doors. And if it be so, it is to be inquired whether it be the Duty of Ministers absolutely to comply with them in their Degeneration, and suffer them to Live in the neglect of their Duty in this matter, only providing for themselves some other way; or whether they ought not rather by all ways and means to endeavor their Recovery into their pristine Condition. If it be said, that whatever men pretend, yet it is a thing impossible to work the People unto a due Discharge of their Duty in this matter; I grant it is, whilst that is only or principally intended. But if men would not consider themselves or their Interest in the first place, but really endeavor their Recovery unto Faith, Love, Obedience, and Holiness, and that by their own Example as well as Teaching, it may well be hoped that this Duty would revive again in the Company of others; for it is certain it will never stand alone by itself. But we must proceed with our Apostle.

Secondly, These Sons of Levi who obtained the Priesthood received Tithes according to the Law; That is, as the matter or manner of Tithing was determined by the Law. For by Tithes I understand that whole Portion which by God's Order and Command belonged unto the Priests; and this in all the concerns of it was determined by the Law. What, when, how, of whom, all was expressly established by Law. So they received Tithes according to the Law, in the Order, Way, and Manner therein determined. For it is God's Law and Appointment that gives Boundaries and Measures unto all Duties. What is done according unto them is straight, right, and acceptable; whatever is otherwise, however it may please our own Wisdom or Reason, is crooked, froward, perverse and rejected of God.

But there is an Objection that this Assertion of the Apostle seems liable unto, which we must take Notice of in our passage. For whereas he affirms that the Levites who received the Office of the Priesthood took Tithes of their Brethren, it is evident from the first Grant and Institution of Tithing, that the Levites who were not Priests, were the first who immediately received them of the People. See Numb. 18. 21, 22, 23, 24.

Answ. 1. By Tithes the whole Consecrated portion according unto the Law is intended, as we said before. Hereof the Portion allotted unto the Priests out of various Offerings or Sacrifices was no small part, wherein the Levites had no Interest, but they belonged and were delivered immediately unto the Priests. (2.) The Levites themselves were given unto the Priests for their Service in and about Holy things, Numb. 3. 9. Whatever afterwards was given unto the Levites, it was so with reference unto the Supportment of the Priesthood in due Order. The Tithes therefore that were paid to the Levites were in the Original Grant of all to the Priests. (3.) The Priests Tithed the whole People in that Tenth of all which they received of the Levites; and that being given unto them, what remained in the possession of the Levites themselves, became as all other clean things, to be used promiscuously, Num. 18. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32.

Fourthly, The Privilege of the Priests in taking the Tenth of all is amplified by the consideration of the Persons of whom they took them: Now these were not Strangers or Foreigners, but their own Brethren. And these also were so their Brethren as that they had a right unto, and were partakers of the same Original Privilege with themselves, which did not exempt them from the Duty of paying Tithes of all unto them, took Tithes of their Brethren, though they came out of the Loins of Abraham. Abraham first received the Promises, and was an equal common Spring of Privileges to his whole Posterity. The Priests were not more Children of Abraham than the People were. The whole People therefore being so, and thereby equally interested in all the Privileges of Abraham or the Church of Believers, it is manifest how great the Honor and preeminence of the Priests were in that they took Tithes of them all. And this the Apostle declares to strengthen his Argument for the Greatness and Excellency of Melchizedek in that he received Tithes of Abraham himself. And we may learn, (1.) That it is God's Prerogative to give Dignity and Preeminence in the Church among them which are otherwise equal, which is to be acquiesced in. Our common Vocation by the word, states us all equally in the same Privilege, as all the Children of Abraham were in that respect in the same Condition. But in this common state, God makes by his Prerogative a three-fold difference among Believers; as to Grace, as to Gifts, as to Office. For, (1.) Although all true Believers have the same Grace in the kind thereof, yet some much excel others in the degrees and exercise of it. As one Star differeth from another, that is, excelleth another in Glory, so here one Saint excelleth another in Grace. This both the Examples of the Scripture, and the Experience of all Ages of the Church doth testify. And this dependeth on the Sovereign Pleasure of God. As he is Gracious unto whom he will be Gracious, so when, and how, and in what measure he pleaseth. Some shall have Grace sooner than others, and some that which is more eminent than others have. Only he that hath least, shall have no lack, as to making of him meet for the Inheritance of the Saints in Light; and he that hath most, hath no more than he shall find need of and exercise for. But so it is, some God will have as Pillars in his House, and some are but as bruised Reeds. And every ones Duty it is for himself, in his place and Condition, to comply with the will of God herein. First, Let not the weak, the feeble of the Flock, those who either really are so, or in their own apprehensions, complain or faint. For (1.) There is no Man in the world that hath so little Grace, who hath any, but he hath more than he ever deserved; as none hath so much, as that any Dram of it is of his own earning. And as he who hath nothing but what he hath freely received, hath nothing to boast of; so he who hath that which he never deserved, hath no Reason to complain. (2.) It is the Pleasure of God it should be so. If it be his will to keep us Spiritually Poor, so we are thereby kept Humble, we shall be no losers. I say not this, as though any one who hath but a little Grace, or apprehends himself to have so, should on the Pretence that such is the will of God concerning him and his Condition, neglect the most earnest Endeavor after more, which would be a shrewd Evidence that he hath none at all; but that those who in a diligent Use of means for Growth and Improvement, cannot yet arrive unto such an Increase, such an addition of one Grace unto another, as their profiting may be manifest, which falls out on several Occasions, may find Relief in the Sovereign pleasure of God to keep them in their low Condition. (3.) They may do well to consider, that indeed there is a great deal of Glory in the least of true Grace. Though there be not so much as in more Grace, yet there is more than in all things under the Sun besides. No Man hath so little Grace, who hath any, as that he is ever able to set a sufficient price upon it, or to be thankful enough for it. (4.) There is indeed so much spoken in the Scripture concerning the Love, Care, Compassion, and Tenderness of our Lord Jesus Christ, towards the Weak, the Sick, the Diseased of his Flock, that on some Accounts the state of those Humble Souls who have yet received but little Grace seems to be most safe and desirable, Isa. 40. 11. Let not such therefore complain, it is God alone who is the Author of this difference between them and others. And on the same Grounds, (Secondly) Those who are strong, who have much Grace, ought not, (1.) To boast, or be lifted up. For as we observed before, they have nothing but what they have freely received. Yea, it is very suspicious that what any one boasteth of, is not Grace. For it is the Nature of all true Grace to exclude all boasting. He that by comparing himself with others, finds any other Issue in his thoughts, but either to admire Sovereign Grace, or to judge himself beneath them, is in an ill Condition, or at least in an ill frame. (2.) Nor to trust unto what they have received. There is none hath so much Grace, as not every moment to need Supplies with more. And he who like Peter trusteth unto that wherein he is above others, will one way or other be brought down beneath them all. (3.) Let such be greatly Fruitful, or this appearance of much Grace will issue in much darkness.

Secondly, God dealeth thus with Men as to Spiritual Gifts. Among those who are called, the Spirit divideth unto everyone even as he will. Unto one he giveth five Talents, unto another two, and to a third but one. And this diversity depending merely on God's Sovereignty is visible in all Churches. And as this tends in itself unto their Beauty and Edification, so there may be an abuse of it unto their disadvantage. For besides those disorders which the Apostle declares to have ensued, particularly in the Church of Corinth upon the undue Use and Exercise of Spiritual Gifts, there are sundry Evils which may befall particular Persons by reason of them, if their Original and End be not duly attended unto. For, (1.) Those who have received these Spiritual Gifts in any Eminent manner, may be apt to be lifted up with good Conceits of themselves, and even to despise their Brethren who come behind them therein. This Evil was openly prevalent in the Church of Corinth. (2.) Among those who have received them in some Equality, or would be thought so to have done, Emulations and perhaps Strifes thereon, are apt to ensue. One cannot well bear that the Gift of another should find more Acceptance, or be better Esteemed than his own. And another may be apt to extend himself beyond his due line and measure, because of them. And (3.) Those who have received them in the lowest degree, may be apt to despond, and refuse to Trade with what they have, because their Stock is Inferior unto their Neighbors. But what is all this to us? May not God do what he will with his own? If God will have some of the Sons of Abraham to pay Tithes, and some to receive them, is there any Ground of Complaint? Unto him that hath the most Eminent Gifts, God hath given of his own, and not of ours; he hath taken nothing from us to endue him withal, but supplied him out of his own stores. Whoever therefore is unduly Exalted with them, or Envies because of them, he despiseth the Prerogative of God, and contends with him that is Mighty.

3. God distinguisheth Persons with Respect unto Office. He makes, and so accounts whom he will Faithful, and puts them into Ministry. This of Old Korah repined against. And there are not a few who free themselves from Envy at the Ministry by endeavoring to bring it down into contempt. But the Office is Honorable, and so are they by whom it is discharged in a due manner; and it is the Prerogative of God to call whom he pleaseth thereunto. And there is no greater Usurpation thereon, than the Constitution of Ministers by the Laws, Rules, and Authority of Men. For any to set up such in Office, as he hath not Gifted for it, nor called unto it, is to sit in the Temple of God, and to show themselves to be God. We may also hence observe, That,

No Privilege can exempt Persons from Subjection unto any of God's Institutions. Though they were of the Loins of Abraham. Yet,

VER. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

IN the five following Verses the Apostle pursues and Concludes that part of his Argument from the Consideration of Melchizedek, which concerned the Greatness and Glory of him who was Represented by him, and his Preeminence above the Levitical Priests. For if Melchizedek who was but a Type of him, was in his own Person in so many Instances more Excellent than they; how much more must he be esteemed to be above them, who was Represented by him. For he whom another is appointed to represent, must be more Glorious than he by whom he is represented. This part of his Argument the Apostle concludes in these Verses, and thence proceeds unto another great Inference and Deduction from what he had taught concerning this Melchizedek. And this was that which struck unto the heart of that Controversy which he had in hand, namely, that the Levitical Priesthood must necessarily cease upon the Introduction of that better Priesthood which was fore-signified by that of Melchizedek. And these things, whatsoever sense we now have of them, were those on which the Salvation or Damnation of these Hebrews did absolutely depend. For unless they were prevailed on to forgo that Priesthood which was now abolished, and to betake themselves alone unto that more Excellent which was then Introduced, they must unavoidably perish; as accordingly on this very account it fell out with the Generality of that People, their Posterity persisting in the same Unbelief unto this day. And that which God made the Crisis of the Life and Death of that Church and People, ought to be diligently weighed and considered by us. It may be some find not themselves much concerned in this Laborious accurate Dispute of the Apostle, wherein so much occurrs about Pedigrees, Priests, and Tithes, which they think belongs not unto them. But let them remember, that in that great Day of taking down the whole Fabric of Mosaical Worship, and the Abolition of the Covenant of Sinai, the Life and Death of that Ancient Church, the Posterity of Abraham the Friend of God, to whom unto this Season an inclosure was made of all Spiritual Privileges, (Rom. 9. 4.) depended upon their receiving or rejecting of the Truth here contended for. And God in like manner doth often-times single out especial Truths for the Trial of the Faith and Obedience of the Church in especial Seasons. And when he doth so, there is ever after an especial Veneration due unto them. But to return.

Upon the Supposition that the Levitical Priests did receive Tithes, as well as Melchizedek, wherein they were equal; and that they received Tithes of their Brethren the Posterity of Abraham, which was their especial Prerogative and Dignity; he yet proveth by four Arguments that the Greatness he had assigned unto Melchizedek and his Preeminence above them, was no more than was due unto him. And the first of these is taken from the Consideration of his Person of whom he received Tithes, ver. 6. The Second from the Action of Benediction which accompanied his receiving of Tithes, ver. 7. The Third from the Condition and state of his own Person compared with all those who received Tithes according to the Law, ver. 8. And the Fourth from that which determines the whole Question, namely, that Levi himself, and so consequently all the whole Race of Priests that sprang from his Loins, did thus pay Tithes unto him.

VER. 6, 7.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

The Ethiopic Translation omits those words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . He takes up the Name Abraham in the fore-going Verse, who came forth out of the Loins of Abraham; and adds unto them what follows in this, who received the Promise; possibly deceived by a maimed transcript of the Original.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . Syr. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —He who is not written in their Genealogies; properly enough; for the Apostle speaks of the Genealogies that were Written and on Record in the Book of Genesis, wherein there is none of Melchizedek. And it is the Writing by Divine Inspiration that his Argument is founded on. Answ. Genealogisatus, Genealogised. Is cujus genus non recensetur ex illis; Whose Stock is not reckoned from them; or as Beza, Ad illos non refertur. Vul. Lat. Cujus Generatio non annumeratur in eis; That is as the Rhemists, He whose Generation is not Numbred among them. Nor whose Descent is not counted from them; putting Pedigree in the Margin. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , is, is cujus ortus, generatio, nativitas recensetur; whose Original, Nativity, Stock, Race, is reckoned up or Recorded.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , from them, from among them; Vul. Lat. in eis, for, inter eos, among them, whose Generation is not Numbred among them. The meaning is, he was not of their Stock or Race; he sprang not of them, nor arose from among them.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , decimas tulit, sumpsit, exegit, accepit, decimavit; 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , is decimo, or decimam partem excerpo; to take out the Tenth part, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; Plut. in Camillo; ex spoliis hostium decimas excerpere, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 with an Accusative case as here, is to receive Tithes of any; and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the same construction, is of the same signification, ver. 5. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . But absolutely it signifies to pay Tithes, or to give Tithes, not to receive them, Luke 18. 12. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , I Tithe all that I possess; that is, give Tithe out of it.

VER. 6.

But he whose Descent is not reckoned from them, received Tithes from Abraham, and Blessed him that had the Promises.

A Description there is in these words of Melchizedek, by a Negation of a certain Respect Useful to be Observed unto the Design of the Apostle; and then an Assertion upon a supposition thereof. (1.) He was a Person whose Descent, Pedigre, Nativity, Traduction of Stock and Linage, was not reckoned from among them. He had before observed absolutely, that he was not at all Genealogized, ver. 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , without Descent. And how this was necessary to shadow out the Eternity of the Priesthood of Christ, we have declared. For if he had any Genealogy, or had stood in need thereof, it had been to show from whom he derived his Priesthood, and unto whom it was transmitted; whereas he had no such Circumstances, nor was to have, as to the End of his Call and Office. Hence it follows in particular, that he could not derive his Descent from Levi; Morally he could not, because so he had none at all; and Naturally he could not, for in his Days Levi was only yet in the Loins of Abraham; so that in no respect he could descend from him. But the Apostle hath a peculiar Intention in this Verse. For whereas he designed to prove the Greatness of Melchizedek from his receiving Tithes, he intends here to declare, on what Right and Title he did so: For there were but two ways whereby any one did or might take Tithes of any. (1.) By virtue of the Law, or Institution of God in the Law. This way none could do so, but he who Legally derived his Descent from Levi. (2.) By virtue of some especial Grant or Personal Privilege, either before or above the Law. Whereas therefore Melchizedek as is here declared, had no Interest in the former, it must be with respect unto the latter that he had this Right, which Argues his Dignity. So God may and doth sometimes communicate of his Favor and Privileges thereby, by especial exemption, and not by an Ordinary Rule or Constitution. I do not at all know, nor can it be proved, that God is now by his Word or Law or Constitution, Obliged to give no Ministry unto the Church, but by virtue of an Orderly outward Call according to the Rule. It is true, we are obliged to keep ourselves unto the Rule and Law in the Call of Ministers so far as we are able; but whether God hath bound himself unto that Order, I very much Question. Yea, when there is any great and Signal Work to be done in the Church, it may be such as the Church cannot or will not call any unto, even such a Reformation of Persons as may prove a dissolution of its Constitution, if God raise, Gift and Providentially call any unto that work, assisting them in it, I should not doubt of the Lawfulness of their Ministry, as granted unto them by especial Privilege, though not Communicated by external Rule and Order. It is good ordinarily to be Genealogised into the Ministry by established Rule; but God can by virtue of his own Sovereignty grant this Privilege unto whom he pleaseth. And let not any imagine that such a Supposition must needs immediately open a Door unto Confusion; for there are invariable Rules to try Men and their Ministry at all times whether they are sent of God or no. The Doctrine which they teach, the Ends which they promote, the Lives which they lead, the Circumstances of the seasons wherein they appear, will sufficiently manifest whence such Teachers are.

2. Having thus described Melchizedek, and manifested on what Account the things mentioned were ascribed or did belong unto him, he mentions the things themselves, which were two. (1.) That he received Tithes of Abraham. (2.) That he Blessed him. In both which he demonstrates his Greatness and Dignity. (1.) By the Consideration of the Person of whom he received Tithes, it was Abraham himself. (2.) By an especial Circumstance of Abraham; it was he who received the Promises, from whence the whole Church of Israel claimed their Privileges.

(1.) He received Tithes of Abraham. The Levitical Priests received Tithes of those who came out of the Loins of Abraham, which was an Evidence of their Dignity by God's Appointment. But he received them of Abraham himself, which Evidently declares his Superiority above them, as also herein above Abraham himself. And the Apostle by insisting on these things so particularly, shows, (1.) How difficult a matter it is to dispossess the minds of Men of those things which they have long trusted unto and boasted of. It is plain from the Gospel throughout, that all the Jews looked on this as their great Privilege and Advantage, that they were the Posterity of Abraham, whom they conceived on all accounts the greatest and most Honorable Person that ever was in the World. Now although there was much herein, yet when they began to abuse it, and trust unto it, it was Necessary that their Confidence should be abated and taken down. But so difficult a matter was this to effect, as that the Apostle applies every Argument unto it, that hath a real force and evidence in it, especially such things as they had not before considered, as it is plain they were utterly Ignorant in the Instructive part of this story of Melchizedek. And we see in like manner, when Men are possessed with an inveterate conceit of their being the Church, and having all the Privileges of it enclosed unto them, although they have long since forfeited openly all Right thereunto, how difficult a thing it is to dispossess their minds of that pleasing presumption. (2.) That every Particle of Divine Truth is Instructive and Argumentative when it is rightly used and improved. Hence the Apostle presseth all the Circumstances of this Story, from everyone of them, giving light and evidence unto the great Truth which he sought to Confirm.

2. That it might yet farther appear how great Melchizedek was, who received Tithes of Abraham, he declares who Abraham was in an instance of his great and especial Privilege. It was he who received the Promises. This he singles out as the greatest Privilege and Honor of Abraham, as it was indeed the Foundation of all the other Mercies which he enjoyed, or Advantages that he was entrusted withal. The Nature of this Promise, with the Solemn manner of its giving unto Abraham, and the Benefits included in it, he had at large declared, Chap. 6. ver. 13, 14, 15, 16. Hereby Abraham became the Father of the Faithful, the Heir of the World, and the Friend of God; so that it exceedingly Illustrates the Greatness of Melchizedek, in that this Abraham paid Tithes unto him.

The Medium of the Argument in this instance is liable only unto one Exception; namely, That Abraham was not the first that received the Promises, so that although he were not, yet there might be others greater than Melchizedek, who never made any acknowledgment of his Preeminence. For the Promise was given unto Adam himself immediately after the Fall, as also unto Noah in the Covenant made with him, and to others also who before Abraham died in the Faith. Answ. It is true, they had the Promise and the Benefit of it; but yet so as in sundry things Abraham was preferred above them all. For, (1.) He had the Promise more plainly and clearly given unto him, than any of his Predecessors in the Faith. Hence he was the first of whom it is said, that He saw the Day of Christ and Rejoiced, as having a clearer view of his Coming and of Salvation by him, than any that went before him. (2.) The Promise was confirmed unto him by an Oath, which it had not been unto any before. (3.) The Promised Seed was in it peculiarly confined unto his Family or Posterity; See Heb. 2. 17. (4.) His receiving of the Promise was that which was the Foundation of the Church in his Posterity which he had peculiarly, to deal withal. He had therefore the Preeminence above all others in this matter of receiving the Promises.

But it may yet be said, that Abraham had not received the Promises then when he was Blessed of Melchizedek, so that it was no Argument of his Preeminence at that time. But (1.) He had before received the same Promise for the Substance of it, which was afterwards more Solemnly confirmed unto him, on the trial of his Faith in Offering his only Son, Gen. 12. 2, 3. Chap. 13. 15, 16. (2.) He was then actually instated in a Right unto all that farther Confirmation of the Promises which he received on various Occasions, and what followed added not unto the Dignity of his Person, but served only unto the Confirmation of his Faith. So Melchizedek Blessed him who had the Promises. And we may Observe,

1. We can be made partakers of no such Grace, Mercy, or Privilege in this World, but that God can when he pleaseth make an addition thereunto. He who had received the Promises was afterwards Blessed. We depend upon an infinite Fountain of Grace and Mercy, from whence it is made out unto us by various degrees according to the good pleasure of God. Neither will he give unto us, nor are we capable to receive in this world, the whole of what he hath provided for us, in the enjoyment whereof our final Blessedness doth consist. Wherefore as it is required of us to be thankful for what we have, or to walk worthy of the Grace we have received: Yet we may live in constant expectation of more from him, and it is the great Comfort and Relief of our Souls that we may so do.

2. It is the Blessing of Christ, Typed in and by Melchizedek, that makes Promises and Mercies effectual unto us. He is himself the great Subject of the Promises, and the whole Blessing of them cometh forth from him alone. All besides him, all without him, is of, or under the Curse. In him, from him, and by him only, are all Blessings to be obtained.

3. Free and Sovereign Grace is the only Foundation of all Privileges. All that is spoken of the Dignity of Abraham is resolved into this, That he received the Promises.

VER. 7.

But what if Abraham was thus Blessed by Melchizedek, doth this prove that he was less than he by whom he was Blessed? It doth so, saith the Apostle, and that by virtue of an unquestionable general Rule.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

The words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , less and greater, are in the Neuter Gender, and so rendered in most Translations; illud quod minus est, à majore; only the Syriac reduceth them to the Masculine, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He who is the less, is Blessed of him who is greater, or more Excellent than him, which is the sense of the words.

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Erasm. Porro nemo negat; absque ulla, omni contradictione; and without all Contradiction.

And without all Contradiction the Less is Blessed of the Greater.

The words prevent an Objection, which is supposed, not expressed. And therefore are they continued with those fore-going by the Conjunction 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as carrying on what was before asserted by a farther Illustration and Confirmation of it. And there is in them, (1.) The Manner of the Assertion; and, (2.) The Proposition itself.

(1.) The Manner of it is in these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; without, beyond, above, all reasonable Contradiction. A Truth this is that cannot, that will not be gain-said, which none will deny or oppose; as that which is evident in the Light of Nature, and which the Order of the things spoken of, doth require. All Truths, especially Divine Truths, are such as ought not to be Contradicted, and which no Contradiction can evert or change their Natures, that they should not so be. But against some of them, not for want of Truth, but either from want of Evidence in themselves or for want of light in them unto whom they are proposed, Contradictions may arise, and they may be called into Dispute or Question. Thus it hath fallen out with all Truths which we receive by mere Supernatural Revelation. The Darkness of the minds of Men, unable clearly to discern them, and perfectly to comprehend them, will raise Disputes about them, and Objections against them. But some Truths there are, which have such an Evidence in themselves, and such a Suitableness unto the Principles of Reason and Light Natural, that no color of Opposition can be made unto them. And if any out of brutish Affections or Prejudices do force an Opposition unto them, they are to be neglected and not Contended withal. Wherefore that which is here intimated is, That there are some Principles of Truth that are so Secured in their own Evidence and Light, as that being unquestionable in themselves, they may be used and improved as concessions, whereon other less evident Truths may be Confirmed and Established. The due consideration hereof is of great Use in the Method of Teaching, or in the Vindication of any unquestioned Truths from Opposition. In all Teaching, especially in Matters that are Controverted, it is of great Advantage to fix some unquestionable Principles, whence those which are less evident, or are more opposed may be deduced; or be otherwise influenced and confirmed. Neglect hereof, makes popular Discourses weak in their Application, and those wherein Men contend for the Truth, infirm in their Conclusions. This Course therefore the Apostle here useth, and resolveth his present Argument into such an unquestionable Principle, as Reason and common Sence must admit of.

2. The Proposition thus Modified, is, That the Less is Blessed of the Greater; that is, wherein one is orderly Blessed by another; he that is Blessed is therein less than, or beneath in Dignity, unto him by whom he is Blessed, as it is expressed in the Syriac Translation. Expositors generally on this place distinguish the several sorts of Benedictions that are in Use and warrantable among Men, that so they may fix on that concerning which the Rule here mentioned by the Apostle, will hold unquestionably. But as unto the especial design of the Apostle this Labor may be spared: For he treats only of Sacerdotal Benedictions, and with Respect to them, the Rule is not only certainly true, but openly evident. But to Illustrate the whole, and to show how far the Rule mentioned may be extended, we may reduce all sorts of Blessings unto four Heads.

(1.) There is Benedictio Potestativa; that is, such a Blessing as consists in an actual Efficacious Collation on, or Communication of the matter of the Blessing unto the Person Blessed. Thus God alone can Bless absolutely. He is the only Fountain of all Goodness, Spiritual, Temporal, Eternal, and so of the whole entire matter of Blessing, containing it all eminently and virtually in himself. And he alone can efficiently communicate it unto, or collate it on any others, which he doth as seemeth Good unto him, according to the Counsel of his own will. All will grant, that with Respect hereunto, the Apostle's Maxim is unquestionable, God is greater than Man. Yea, this kind of Blessing ariseth from, or dependeth solely on that Infinite Distance that is between the Being or Nature of God, and the Being of all Creatures. This is God's Blessing, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 —an Addition of Good as the Jews call it; a real communication of Grace, Mercy, Privileges, or whatever the matter of the Blessing be.

2. There is Benedictio Authoritativa. This is when Men in the Name, that is, by the Appointment and Warranty, of God, do declare any to be Blessed, pronouncing the Blessings unto them, whereof they shall be made Partakers. And this kind of Blessings was of Old, of two sorts. First, Extraordinary by virtue of especial immediate Inspiration, or a Spirit of Prophecy: Secondly, Ordinary by virtue of Office and Institution. In the first way Jacob Blessed his Sons, which he calls a Declaration of what should befall them in the last days, Gen. 49. 1. And such were all the Solemn Patriarchal Benedictions; as that of Isaac, when he had Infallible direction, as to the Blessing, but not in his own mind as to the Person to be Blessed, Gen. 27. 27, 28, 29. So Moses Blessed the Children of Israel in their respective Tribes, Deut. 33. 1. In the latter, the Priests by virtue of God's Ordinance were to Bless the People with this Authoritative Blessing. And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, speak unto Aaron and his Sons, saying, On this wise shall ye Bless the Children of Israel saying unto them; The Lord Bless thee and keep thee, the Lord make his Face shine upon thee, and be Gracious unto thee; the Lord lift up the light of his Countenance upon thee, and give thee Peace; and they shall put my Name on the Children of Israel, and I will Bless them, Numb. 6. The whole Nature of this kind of Blessing is here exemplified. It is founded in God's Express Institution and Command. And the Nature of it consists in putting the Name of God upon the People; that is, declaring Blessings unto them in the Name of God, praying Blessings for them on his Command. Wherefore the word Bless is used in a twofold sense in this Institution; ver. 23. Ye shall Bless the Children of Israel is spoken of the Priests; ver. 27. I will Bless them is spoken of God. The Blessing is the same, declared by the Priests, effected by God: They blessed declaratively, He efficiently. And the blessing of Melchizedek in this place seems to have a mixture in it of both these. For as it is plain that he blessed Abraham by virtue of his Sacerdotal Office, which our Apostle principally considereth; so I make no Question but he was peculiarly acted by immediate inspiration from God in what he did. And in this sort of Blessing the Apostolical Maxim maintains its Evidence in the Light of Nature.

3. There is Benedictio Charitativa: This is, when one is said to bless another, by praying for a Blessing on him, or using the means whereby he may obtain a Blessing. This may be done by Superiors, Equals, Inferiors, any or all Persons mutually towards one another, See 1 Kings 8. 14, 55, 56. 2 Chron 6. 3. Prov. 30. 11. This kind of Blessing, it being only improperly so, wherein the Act or Duty is demonstrated by its Object, doth not belong unto this Rule of the Apostle.

4. There is Benedictio Reverentialis; Hereof God is the Object. So Men are said often to Bless God, and to Bless his Holy Name, which is mentioned in the Scripture as a signal Duty of all that Fear and Love the Lord. Now this Blessing of God is a Declaration of his praises with an Holy Reverential Thankful admiration of his Excellencies. But this belongs not at all unto the design of the Apostle, nor is regulated by this general Maxim, but is a particular Instance of the direct contrary, wherein without Controversy the Greater is Blessed of the Less. It is the second sort of Blessings that is alone here intended; and that is mentioned as an Evident Demonstration of the Dignity of Melchizedek, and his Preeminence above Abraham.

It is a great Mercy and Privilege when God will make Use of any in the Blessing of others with Spiritual Mercies. It is God alone who Originally and Efficiently can do so, who can actually and infallibly Collate a Blessing on any one. Therefore is he said to Bless us with all Spiritual Blessings in Heavenly things, Ephes. 1. 3. There is no one Blessing but he is the sole Author and worker of it. But yet also he maketh Use of others, severally, in various degrees of Usefulness, for their Communication. And this he doth, both to fill up that Order of all things in dependence on himself, wherein he will be glorified; and also to make some Partakers in his especial Grace and Favor by using them in the Collation of Good things, yea, the best things on others. For what greater Privilege can any one be made Partaker of, than to be an Instrument in the Hand of God, in the Communication of his Grace and Goodness? And a Privilege it is whose Exercise and Improvement must be accounted for. I speak not therefore of them whose Benedictions are Euctical and Charitative only, in their mutual Prayers; but of such as are in some sense Authoritative. Now a Man Blesseth by the way of Authority when he doth it as an especial Ordinance, as he is called and appointed of God thereunto. Peculiar Institution gives peculiar Authority. So Parents Bless their Children and Household, and Ministers the Church. Parents Bless their Children in the Name of the Lord, several ways. (1.) By Instruction; the Discharge whereof was the Glory and Honor of Abraham in the sight of God himself, Gen. 18. 17, 18, 19. For whereas the Knowledge and Fear of God, is the greatest Blessing that any one in this World can be made Partaker of, he hath Ordained that Parents shall be Instrumental in the communication of them unto their Children, suitably unto that general Law of Nature, whereby they are Obliged in all things to seek their good. This being the End of the Instruction which God hath appointed them to attend unto, they do therein Bless them in the Name of the Lord. And if Parents did truly consider, how they stand in the stead of God in this matter, how what they do is peculiarly in his Name and by his Authority, they would (it may be) be more Diligent and Conscientious in the Discharge of their Duty, than they are. And if Children could but understand that Parental Instruction is an Instituted means of God's Blessing them with the principal Blessing, & that whereon all others, as unto them, do much depend, whereunto the Fifth Commandment is Express, they would with more Diligence and Reverence apply themselves unto the reception of it, than is usual among them. (2.) They do it by their Example. The Conversation and Holy walking of Parents is God's Ordinance whereby he Blesseth their Children. This is the Second way of Instruction, without which the former will be insufficient, yea, insignificant. Let Parents take what pains they please in the Teaching and Instructing of their Families, unless their Personal walk be Holy, and their Lives Fruitful, they will do more for their Destruction than their Edification. The least Disorder of Life persisted in, is of more prevalency to turn aside Children from the ways of God, from the liking and practice of them, than a multitude of Instructions are to persuade their Embracement. For besides that we are all Naturally more prone to Evil than Good, and a far less occasion or means