PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Acts and Monuments Volume 2 Part 2

John Foxe (1516-1587) · 794,303 words · 3530 min

Large work readerShowing section 3 of 20. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 3/20

Loe Syr▪ how I run at riot beyond measure. When I began, I was minded to have written but half a dosen lines: but thus I forget myself ever when I write to a trusty friend, which will take in worth my folly, and keep it from mine enemy. &c.

As for Doctor Wilson, I wotte not what I should say: but I pray God endue him with charity. Neither he, nor none of his countrymen did ever love me since I did inuey against their factions, and partialitye in Cambridge. Before that, who was more favored of him then I? That is the byle that may not be touched. &c.

A certain friend shown me, that Doctor Wilson is gone now into his country about Beuerley in Holdernes, and from thence he will go a progress through Yorkshire, Lancashyre, Cheshyre, and so from thence to Bristow. What he intendeth by this progress God knoweth, and not I. If he come to Bristow I shall here tell. &c.

As for Hubberdin (no doubt) he is a man of no great learning, nor yet of stable wit. He is here seruus hominum: for he will preach whatsoever the Bishops will bid him preach. Verily in my mind they are more to be blamed then he. He doeth magnify the Pope more then enough. As for our Savior Christ and Christian kings are little beholding to him. No doubt he did miss the cushion in many things. Howbeit they that did send him (men think) will defend him: I pray GOD amend him, and them both. They would fain make matter against me, entendyng so either to deliver him by me, or else to rid us both together, and so they would think him well bestowed. &c.

As touching Doctor Powell, howe highly he took upon him in Bristow; and how little he regarded the sword which representeth the kings person, many can tell you. I think there is never an Earl in this Realm that knoweth his obedience by Christ's commandment to his Prince, & wotteth what the sword doth signify, that would have taken upon him so stoutly. Howbeit Mayster Major, as he is a profound wise man, did twicke him pretily: it were to long to write all. Our pilgrimages are not a little beholding to him. For to occasion the people to them, he alleged this text.

Omnis qui relinquit patrem, domos, vxorem. i. Whosoever leaveth father, house, wife. &c. By that you may perceive his hot zeal and crooked judgment. &c. Because I am so belied, I could wish that it would please the kings grace to command me to preach before his highness a whole year together every Sunday, that he himself might perceive how they bely me, saying, that I have neither learning, nor utterance worthy thereunto. &c. I pray you pardon me, I cannot make an end.

*A brief digression touching the railing of Hubberdin against M. Latimer.

FOrasmuch as mention hath been made in this letter of Hubberdin, an old Divine of Oxford, a right painted Pharisey, and a great strayer abroad in all quarters of the realm to deface and impeach the springing of God's holy Gospel, something would be added more touching that man, whose doings and pageantes if they might be described at large, it were as good as any Enterlude for the Reader to behold. Who in all his life and in all his actions (in one word to describe him) seemeth nothing elles but a right Image or counterfayt, setting out unto us in lively colors the pattern of perfect hypocrisye. But because the man is now gone, to spare therefore the dead (although he little deserved to be spared, which never spared to work what vilany he could against the true servants of the Lord) this shall be enough for example sake, for all Christian men necessarily to observe, howe the said Hubberdin after his long railing in all places against Luther, Melangthon, Zwingli, John Frith, Tindale, Latimer, and all other like Professors, after his hypocritical opē alms given out of other men's purses, his long prayers, pretensed devotions, devout fastinges, his wolwarde going, and other his prodigious demeanor, riding in his long Gowne down to the Horse heels like a Pharisey, or rather like a slouen, dyrted up to the Horse belly, after his forged Tales and Fables, Dialogues, dreams, dauncinges, hoppinges and leapinges, with other like histrionical toys and gestures used in the Pulpit, and all against heretics: at last riding by a Church side where the youth of the Parishe were dancing in the Churchyarde, sodeinely this Silenus lighting from his horse, by occasion of their dancing came into the Church, and there causing the bell to tolle in the people, thought instead of a fit of mirth, to give them a Sermon of dancing. In the which Sermon after he had patched up certain common texts out of Scriptures, and then coming to the Doctors, first to Augustine, then to Ambrose, so to Jerome, and Gregory, Chrysostom, and other Doctors, had made them everyone (after his Dialogue manner) by name to answer to his call, and to sing after his tune for the probation of the sacrament of the altar against John Frith, Zwingli, Oecolampadius, Luther, Tyndale, Latimer, and other Heretics (as he called them) at last to show a perfect Hermonye of all these Doctors together, as he had made thē before to sing after his tune, so now to make them dance also after his Pype, first he calleth out Christ and his Apostles, then the Doctors and ancient Seniours of the Church, as in a round ring all to dance together: with Pype up Hubberdin. Now dance Christ, now dance Peter, Paul, now dance Agustine, Ambrose, Jerome, and thus old Hubberdin as he was dancing with his Doctors lustely in the Pulpit, against the Heretics, howe he stamped and took on I cannot tell, but crashe quoth the Pulpit, down cometh the dauncer, and there lay Hubberdyn not dancing, but sprawling in the midst of his audience: where altogether he brake not his neck, yet he so brake his leg the same time and bruised his old boanes, that he never came in Pulpit more, and died not long after the same. Whereupon when the Church Wardens were called and charged for the Pulpit being no stronger, they made answer again, excusing themselves that they had made their Pulpit for preaching, and not for dancing. &c. But to spend no more paper about this idle matter, now to our purpose again.

Amongest many other impugners and Aduersaryes, whereof there was no small sort which did infest this good man in Sermons: some also there were, which attempted the pen against him. In the number of whom was one Doctor Sherwoode, whom upon the same occasion of preaching of the Virgin Mary (or as they thought, against the Virgin) did invade him with his pen, writing against him in Latin, whose long Epistle, with M. Latimers answer also in Latin to the same, hereunder followeth.

Epistola Gulielmi Sherwodi aduersus Dominum Latymerum expostulatoria.

Gulielmus Sherwodus praesbyter, D. Latymero Kyngtoniae, Rectori, gratiam & pacem à Deo patre nostro & domino Jesus Christo.

NIhil moleste feres sat scio, vir egregie, ab homine Christiano christiane admoneri, quae res vna (est Deus testis) nos hoc tempore animauit liberius tecum per literas (quando corā fandi copia negatur) confabulari supernonnullis, quae parum christiane in concione illa tua (sit modo concio & non verius multo Satyra quaedam insana dicenda) Magnesfeldiae effudisse mihi videbare. Ac primum quidem prouerbio illo de fure & pastore (quanquam prouerbij vocem parabolae vice mihi vsurpasse videtur Euangelista) carpsit, vt recte & vere aiebas, Christus Scribarum & pharisaeorum (vtpote deus, eo{que} 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) vesaniam obduratam{que} incredulitatem, sed clam, sed tecte, sed in genere. Non aiebat, scribae & pharisaei ad vnum fures sunt & latrones. Sed quid? Amen dico vobis qui non intrat per ostium in stabulum ouium, sed ascendit aliunde, ill fur est & latro. Tu contra homo patentium intuitor non mentium rimator. Episcopy omnes, papae omnes, Rectores ecclesiarum omnes (te vno paucis{que} alijs, quos nescio tuae fa inae hominibus, id enim sensisse videris, exceptis) vicarij omnes fures sunt, & latrones, quibus furibus, quibus latronibus suffocandis ne Angliae totius quidem canapū sufficere predicabas, aut verius dementabas, hyperbole forsan, vt semper vsus, sed temeraria, sed audaci supra modum, sed truci, sed impia. Non est mi frater, non est sic temere, si diuo credimus Paulo, ante tempus iudicandum, quod veniat Dominus qui & illuminabit abscondita tenebrarum, & manifestabit consilia cordium, Christus quo{que} ipse, iudex viuorum & mortuorum, à deo patre constitutus temerariam eiusmodi proximi condemnationem apud Matthaeum, Christiano homini mihi sustulisse videtur, quum inquit: Nolite condemnare, ne condemnemini, nec tanti flagitij subticens poenam. Quo enim (inquit) iudicio iudicatis eo iudicabitur de vobis, & qua mensura metimini, ea metientur vobis & alij. Volo hominum vitia taxari, volo sua scelera populo praedicari, annunciari, reuelari, & si fieri possit, ob oculos poni, no debacchari in homines, eosque absentes, non poni lucem tenebras, & tenebras lucem, nō dici bonum malum, & malum bonum, dulce amarum, & amarum dulce. Quod si fit, verendum ne dum alius alium mordemus & deuoramus, vicissim alius ab alio consumemur. An ista partius, imo modestius viris obijcienda, ipse videto. Nouimus, & qui te transuersa tuentibus hirquis, & quo: sed faciles nymphae risere sacello. Heu, heu, Latimere, quae te dementia caepit, vt mentireris, dixissem praedicares plures longe in Christi ecclesia fures esse, quam pastores, plures haedos quam oues? Non sic Cyprianus ill, non sic. Sed quid? Est, inquit, Deus verax, omnis autem homo mendax Stat confessorum, hoc est (vt ipse intelligit) pie Christianorum, pars major & melior in fidei suae robore, & in legis ac disciplina dominicae veritate, nec ab ecclesiae pace descedunt, qui se in ecclesia gratiam consequutos de Dei dignatione meminerunt. Atque hoc ipse ampliorem consequuntur fidei suae laudem, quod ab eorum perfidia segregati, qui iuncti confessionis consortio fuerint, à contagionis crimine recesserunt. Vero illuminati euangelij lumine, pura & candida domini luce radiati, tam sunt in conseruanda Christi pace laudabiles, quam fuerunt in Diaboli congressione victores. Quae sanctissimi hominis sanctissima verba, ausim, te etiam reclamante de ea ipsa, quae nunc ecclesia, praedicare, vereque affirmare, quam vbi ex confessoribus Christi filij Dei viui depinxisses, statim vbi esset gentium te nescire praedicabas. Dicebas enim, Quisquis cum Petro Christum Dei viuentis filium fatetur, Petrus est, & de ecclesia, seu, vti ipse interpretabaris, congregatione, (subdola nimirum vsus art, ac caeco potius praestigio) ac si hoc loci magis nihil ad Petrum, Christi in terris summum vicarium attineret, quam ex Christianis alium quemlibet. Esto, simus nos, vt Origenis vtar verbis, aliquo modo Petrus, si dixerimus quod dixit Petrus. Tu es Christus, filius Dei viui, non carne & sanguine nobis reuelante, sed patre qui est in coelis mentem nostram illuminante, non alio dicendi genere dicemus haec nobis Petri competere verba, quam ipsi Petro? Absit procul, absit. Nam secundum Christi nomen omnes qui sunt illius, Christi dicuntur, dicente propheta: Vt saluos faciat Christos suos. Item, Nolite tangere Christos meos, & tum alio longe modo hic, alio illi vnctionis vocabulo insigniuntur. Sanius certe Roterodamus cuius imitatorem, & sequacem strenuum in nonnullis video. Is (tu es Petrus & mox quae sequuntur) in primis in Romanū Pontificem, vt in christianae fidei principē competere ait, omnium semoto dubio, Annotatione in 16. Math caput: quanquam plus aequo Origenianae sententiae inniti ibidem mihi videtur. Quod si dixerimus te author aequaliter, & indiscriminatim haec de Petro, & omnibus christianis intelligi, incidemus in illam Lutheranam sententiam. Omnes Christianos esse sacerdotes, & Ordinatum nullam potestatē accipere, quam antea non habebat, sed deputari tantum ad licite vtendum potestate, prius habita: quae sententia iam olim est ab ecclesia damnata.

Ad haec aiebas Christum, quum minima vocaret praecepta, Scribarum & pharisaeorum allusisse impietate, qui vt sua eueherent, & amplificarent, minima dicebant diuina. Multum hic discors es ab Origin, scripturarū interpret, saneque vigilantissimo, qui Homilia in Matthaeum quinta adeo non negat reuera quaedam Dei praecepta dici, & esse minima, vt ex solutione, & observation eorum minimum & magnum dici in regno coelorum nihil obscure praedicet. Simul pugnat quod tum Christus ipse seorsum à plebe & populo cum pauculis discipulis, suae celestis, tum solis doctrinae capacibus in monte versabatur, nihil interim cum Scribis, nihil cum Pharisees tractans, vt diuina illa cōcione sua prorsus indignis.

Subiunxisti christiane parum vt mihi videbatur, hominem christianum carnis acquiescentem desiderijs, non magis christianum esse, quam sit Iudeus, quam sit Turcus. Hoc mihi non christianum, sed Oecolampadianum

*Desunt nonnulla, quae coniecturis forsan vtcunque suppleri possunt ex sequente Latimeri responsione.

Sit opus, quàm ad beneficam Petri confessionem germanis fructibus referendam. Quid tu hic tibi velis nescio. Si est aliquis Petri primatus, is certe Catholico cuilibet pro viribus defendendus est. Est aliquis Petri primatus: alioqui Christi verbum inefficax est, (tibi dabo claues regni coelorum. &c.) Si nihil est opus vt defensetur Petri primatus, nihil est opus vt defensetur veritas. Et ob veritatem ad necem vsque mortali cuilibet certandū. Non puto quenquam germanis fructibus refer posse beneficam Petri confessionem, negando Petri primatum benefica Petri confessio, an non est Iesum esse Christum filium Dei viuentis? Dei filius est veritas. At non Christus, si nullus est Petri primatus. Hic foede lapsus mihi videre. Nihil enim alienum esse puto à benefica Christi confession, si quis pro viri i sedem tueatur, & defenset apostolicam.

Apertissimum mendacium esse clamitas, Christum cum pauculis discipulis in monte seorsum a turba versa ū fuisse. Apertissime tum mecum mentitus est Origen's, scripturarum interpres vigilantissimus, qui Homilia in Matthaeum 5. inquit: Descendēte Jesus de monte, sequutae sunt eum turbaemultae, Docente vero domino in monte, discipuli erant cum ipso, quibus datum erat coelestis doctrinae nosce secreta, per quae salutis scientia brutorum corda salirent, coecorumque oculis per mundanae delectationis tenebras caligantibus, lucem patifacerēt veritatis. Vnde & dominus ad eos: Vos estis (inquit) sal terrae, vos estis & lumina mundi. Nunc vero descendente eo de monte, tubae secutae sunt eum. In montem scilicet ascendere nequaquam poterant, quia quos delictorum sarcinae deprimunt, ad mysteriorum sublimia, nisi abiecto onere scandere minime valent. Audis nostram, non tuam ab Origen probari sententiam.

Notas praeterea, quos nescio, tibi tum notissimos, alij nulli pseudopraedicatores, qui populo suadent christiano sat esse, si credit quemadmodum credit ecclesia, & nescire interim quid, aut quomodo credat, ita miserum vulgus ab ampliore dei agnitione querenda dehortando. Iniqua, & praeceps satis censura in verbi Dei ministros. Tales siqui sunt, debemus Lutheranae & haereticorum ecclesiae: in nostra esse nequeunt, quum pollicitus sit spōsus ad consummationem vsque seculi se non deserturum sponsam suam ecclesiam. Quae dicis reliqua, quum sint mera conuitia, transeo.

Quod satis declarat, quod postremo pene dicis argute philosophatum me de iustificatione fidei, interim mea nihil conuellens. An hoc est argute philosophari de iustificatione fidei, dicere fidem iustificare, sed non solam, imo & opera suam habere iustitiam, sed in fide, sed in charitate? Hoc ego arguebam quod opera diceres non iustificare. Si hoc est philosophari, ego sum philosophatus, & non ego tantum, sed & Jacobus apostolus. Fides est, fateor, vt recte dixit Augustinus Fundamentum▪ & radix iustae vitae, qua consequimur bonorum operum voluntatem, ac ita iustitiam. Tantum ne putet quis iusticiam sola animi existimatione finiri omni bono & pio excluso opere. Caetera, quum nō agnoscis ego sepelio. Vnum id adijciens, si been feceris, been recipies: sin autem male, ecce in foribus aderit peccatum tuum. Alias nacto otio abundantius. Interim vale. Derhamia.

Salutem plurimam.

NON EQVIDEM sum ego vel adeo ferox, quod sciam, vir item exemie, vt ab homine Christiano christiane admoneri moleste feram, vel adeo in sensatus, & à communi sensu alienus (ni fallor) vt me prius suggillatum fuisse abs te & inter pocula, neque semel suggillatum quam admonitum, imo nec admonitum tandem sed acerrime potius redargutum, sed conuitijs & mandatijs male habitum potius, sed calumnijs inique affectum potius, sed falso condemnatum potius, constanter probem. Quod si tuis hisce literis pro illarum iure & mei animi ductu ego iam responderem. Sed cohibeo me, ne dum conor tuo morbo mederi, bilem tibi move am homini vel citra stimulum (vt prç se ferunt literae) plus{quam} oportet bilioso. Imo det vtrique Deus, quod ipse vtrique norit commode fore, & mihi videlicet vel in medijs calumnijs patientiam christiano homine dignam, & tibi iuditiū aliquando tam rectum {quam} nunc habes zelum tu opte marte been feruidum. Conducibilius, opinor, fuerit sic orare, {quam} eiusmodi criminationi apologiam parare, quum & ego iam negotiosior sum pro concione mihi perendie dicenda, {quam} vt commode possim respondere: & mendatiora sint tua omnia, quam vt iure debeam ea confutare. Sed vt paucis tamen multis, si fieri possit, satisfaciam, primū operepraetium fuerit in mediū statuere, & quid ego dixi, & quid tu ex dictis collegisti. Collegisti quidem multa, veluti sanguinem e silice colligendo ex cussurus. Sed sic est affect{us} vti video, erga me tuus, quem ob rabiem eiusdem aegre nosti dissimulare. Esto dixerim ego omnes papas, omnes episcopos, vicarios rectores que omnes, per ostium non intrantes, sed ascēdentes aliunde fures & latrones esse. Dum sic dixi, ex introitu & ascensu, non ex personis & titulos cum Christo sum rem metit{us}. Hinc tu tua minerua colligis omnes papas, omnes episcopos, vicarios rectoresque omnes, simpliciter fures esse, saltem sic me dixisse. Num iusta hic (mi frater) collectio? An non just in te quadret illud Pauli ad Romanos? sic aiunt nos dicere, sic male loquuntur de nobis, sed quorum damnatio iusta est (inquit:) & tamen iustius videri possunt ex Paulo collegisse aduersarij, quam tu ex me. I am si idem dei verbum nunc quod prius, neque minus deo gratum acceptumque, quisquis interim minister verbi fuerit nonne & eadem damnatio calumniatores ministri nunc manet quae olim? Longe interest dicas omnes per ostium non intrantes fures esse, & omnes simpliciter fures esse. Sed vnde (quaeso) dum ego dico omnes per ostium non intrantes fures esse videor tibi dicere omnes simpliciter fures esse? nisi forte plaerique omnes videntur tibi aliunde ascendere, & non per ostium intrare? Quod si senseris, at nolito dicere, si sapis (sapis autem plurimum) quod sentis▪ Cum quanto enim id dixeris tuo periculo, ipsi videris. Et nisi id senseris, cur per Deum immortalem ego non possum dicere omnes esse fures, qui per ostium non intrantes ascendunt aliunde, quibuscunque interim titulis splendescant, nisi videar tibi dicere statim omnes ad vnum fures esse: & tum quae te potius caepit dementia, dum sic colligis, vt plures fures {quam} pastores colligendo esse feceris. Nam velis nolis verum est quod ego dixi nempe quotquot per ostium non intrant, sed aliunde ascendunt fures & latrones esse, seu papae seu episcopi fuerint. Quare dum sic in ipso exorbitas limine, quorsum attinet, reliqua examinare? Sed age, hoc tibi arridet plurimum, quod Pharisaei sunt tam tecte à Christo repraehensi, & non palam, quomodo tum non displicebit e regione tibi acerbissima illa, simul & apertissima criminatio, in os & coram turba illis obiecta, (Vae vobis Scribae & Pharisaei hypocritae) vbi nominati taxantur? Sed Christus, inquis, deus erat peruicatiam cordis conspicatus. Tu vero homo, patentium intuitor, no mentium rimator. Sum sane homo (vti dicis) id quod citra tuam operā iam olim habeo exploratum: homo (inquam) sum, non labem in alieno cord delitescentem, sed vitam omnibus patentem & expositam intuitus, adeoq́ue ex fructibus cognoscens, quos Christus admonuit ex fructibus cognoscendos, ipsum quorundam viuendi genus libenter damnans denique, quod in sacris literis sacrisque interpretibus damnatum toties comperio, nihil id quidem moratus, quaecunque ipsum amplectuntur personae: quod dum ego facio, neque cordium latebras vlterius penetro, nonne immerito abs te reprehendor? qui non homo mecum sed plusquam homo es, dum mei animi emphasim melius nostri per arrogantiam, quam egomet noui, vtpote qui non sat habes quae dico nouisse, sed quae sentio nondum dicta noueris abditissima cordis mei penitissime rimatus, ne non cite in teipsum competeret, quod in me torquere molitus es: nimirum noli ante tempus iudicare, noli condemnare, vt discas quam oportet mendacem non esse immemorem, ne proprio forsan gladio iuguletur, & in foueam incidat ipse, quam struxerat alteri. Nam dum ego pronuncio fures esse, quotquot per ostium non intrantes ascendunt aliunde, tibi non verba solum audienti sed & corculum meum contemplāti omnes ad vnum fures esse pronuntio, excepto meipso videlicet & alijs meae farinae hominibus, nescio, (inquis) quos. Sed quis illam fecit exceptionem, nisi tu qui cognoscens occulta cordium, sic inquis, sensisse Videris? Sed tibi sic sensisse videor, cui & dixisse videor quod (vt liquidissime constat) neutiquam dixi. Sed tibi peculiare est alios à cordis intuitu prohibere, vt vpse intuearis solus, quicquid est in cord, acie vidilicet tam perspicaci, vt videas in cord, quod in cord nondum est natum: id quod ibi facis quo{que}, dum quod ego de ecclesia recte dixi, tu tuo more calumniaris inique, quasi ego, quod ad vsum clauium attinet, aequassem omnes cum Petro, cum ne vnum quidem verbum de clauium potestate sit dictum. Imo ne cogitatum quidem, ne{que} Petri primatui derogatum, vt cuius nulla sit facta mentio. Sed tu pro tuo candore sic colligis, dum ego nil aliud {quam} admonui auditors ecclesiam Christi super petram non super arenam fundatam, ne mortua fide plus satis haereant tum perituri & portis inferorum foedissime cessuri, sed fidem opetibus ostendant, tum demum vitam aeternam habituri. Quid ego minus quam omnes christianos, vt ego sum, sacerdotes dixerim esse? Sed ocul tissimi sunt inuidi ad colligendum quod venantur. Nonne hic optimo iure cogor nonnihil christianae charitatis in tuo pectore desiderare? qui dum nescis confutare quod dico, miris modis mihi impingis quod possis cōfutare. Tu vero optime nosti quid sentit Lutherus de Ecclesia. Et ego non grauabor subscribere, quid sentit post multos alios Lyranus super .xvi. Mathaei. Ex quo patet inquit, quod Ecclesia non consistit in hominibus, ration potestatis vel dignitatis ecclesiae, seu secularis, quia multi principes & summi pontifices, inquit, inuenti sunt apostatasse à fide, propter quod ecclesia consistit, inquit, in illis personis, in quibus est notitia vera & confessio fidei & veritatis. Hic consensit & cum Hieronymo Chrisostomus Sic enim dicunt: (nescio an applaudant tibi quod dicunt, quippe qui in illis te prodis esse:) Qui promptiores sunt ad primatum Petri defensandum, etiam cum nihil sit opus, quam ad beatificam Petri confessionem germanis fructibus referandam. Sed tu mittis me ad Augustinum, been liberalis consultor. Ego optem te eundem legere si libeat in epist. Ioannis tractatu tertio. Videris enim in Augustinianis operibus non adeo exercitatus, cum de fidei iustificatione tam argute philosopharis. Quocirca cuperem te in collectaneis Bedae exertitationem fore, cum tua ipsius collectanea Augustinum non spirent, vt iam non pluribus neque illius, neque aliorum authorum locis querendis te grauem, Sed illud non omittam tamen, etsi alio etiam me euocent negotia, non allusisse videlicet Christum pharisaeorum impietati, cum praecepta vocaret minima. Sic enim tu audes dicere, quia aliam in Origin interpretationem legisti. Pulchre admodum obiectum quasi vnus & idem scripturae locus non sit ab alijs aliter fere expositus: Origines de illusione nō meminit, igitur nemo, qualis consecutio? Sed nihil, inquis, ibi Christo cum Pharisaeis: & id quoque non minus pulchre abs te dictum, quasi non statim post subderet Christus de Scribis & Pharisaeis mentionem, populum ab illorum iustitia humanis. i. suis ipsorum traditionibus stabilita reuocans. Nisi abundauerit iustitia vestra inquiens plus {quam} scribarum. &c. At versabitur tum, inquis, Christus cum pauculis discipulis seorsum à turba: imo hoc apertissimum mendatium est id quod verba Mathaei caput 7. claudentia luce clarius commonstrant, vt tolerabiliora sint mihi de me mendatia tua, qui audes de ipso Christo & eius sermon mentiri. Et factum est, inquit, vt cū finijsset Jesus sermons hos, obstupuerunt super doctrina eius. Ecce autem, si Christus seorsim à turba sit locutus, quomodo obstupuerunt super doctrina, quam per te non audierunt? Sed lucas Euangelista, sieve de eodem, sieve de consimili Christi sermon locutus, testator turbam audijsse, capite. 7. Cum consummasset Jesus sermons hos (inquit) audienti populo, En quo prolabitur praeceps iuditium tuum inuidia male deformatum? Scilicet tu ipse hîc non toto erras coelo? dignius videlicet qui aliorū errores expisceris & notes, & ad pallinodiam reuoces: Tu tuo sensui hic non fidis? Medice cura te ipsum, & disce quid sit illud: Hypocrita, cur vides festucam. &c. Disce ex suis trabibus alienis festucis parcere. Ego nihil dixi, testor Deum, non mentior, quod vel Oecolampadio, vel Luthero, vel Melanthoni acceptum refer debeam: & tamen tu, quae est tua charitas, non vereris id meo assuere capiti. Ego si feci istud, decidam merito ab inimicis meis inanis. Sed nescis tu quidem opinor cuius spiritus sis, dum mauis ministrumverbi impudentissimis mendatijs lacessere, quam testimoniū veritati perhibire, quod quantūsit piaculū in cōspectu dei, tu abs{que} doctore non ignoras, in cumulum damnationis tuae nisi resipiscas. I am vero num ego vitupero, vt quis credat quemadmodum ecclesia credit? Non sane vitupero, nisi quod maleuo lentia erga me tua tam surdas reddidit aures tuas, vt ne audiens quidem audias quae dicuntur. Sed hoc vitupero, vt quis cui christianorum suadeat, quemadmodum suadere solent pseudopraedicatores non pauci, sat per omnia esse, credere quemadmodum ecclesia credit, & nescire interim quid aut quomodo credit ecclesia, & sic miserum populum ab ampliori dei agnitione quaerēda dehortari? Quod postremo mihi obtrudis, mendatium est & illud, plus quam dici possit inhumanum, ne{que} eo mea verba sensu accipis, sensu quo sint à me dicta, ideoque Hieronimo super 26. Mathaei teste falsus testis coram deo futurus. Lege locum, & relinque falsum testimonium. Ego dico Christianum, i. baptismo in Christianorum numerum receptum, si professioni non respondeat, sed carnis desiderijs sese dedat, non magis christianum esse quod ad consecutionem aeternae vitae spectat, quae promittitur Christianis quam Iudaeum aut Turcam: in quam huius conditionem in illo die deteriorem fore, si verum tibi dixit: melius esse viam veritatis non agnoscere, quam post agnitam. &c. Et quibus dicit Christus nunquam noui vos? Nonne his qui per nomen eius prophetantes, virtutes praestiterintit, nonne negabit Christus nos, illum praenegantes coram hominibus? Non statuemur inter oues Christi a dextris, si non vitam Christo dignam retulerimus professi Christum, sed professionem mala vita contaminantes. Sunt verius pseudichristiani quam Christiani habēdi: & ab Augustino & Christo vocantur Antichristi, Non nego quin obliga io manet, sed in maiorem damnationem manet si nō satisfacit obligationi, Officiū concionatoris est hortari auditors vt sic sint christiani, vt compatientes hic cum Christo, cum Christo conregnent in coelo, vt aliter christianum esse non sit illis christianum esse. Sic scripturae, sic interpretes scripturae loquuntur verbis haeretica tibi videatur loquutio, sed auarus, fornicator, homicida, inquis, catholicus est & Christi seruus: tamen sic animi gratia tecū ludā. Fornicator per te est Christi seru{us}. sed idēest pecti & diaboli seruus: ergo idem potest duobus dominis seruire {quod} Christum latuit, Et si fides mortua efficit catholicum, & daemones pertinēt ad ecclesiam catholicam, vtpote qui iuxta Iacobum credunt & contremiscunt. Fornicator (inquis) fidit Christo: spes non pudefacit. qui fidit Christo non peribit, sed habebit vitam aeternam. Ne{que} me latet ad Galathas scripsisse Paulum fide aber rantes ecclesiam tamen vocasse: sic idem ad Corinthios scribens eos in eodem capite nunc carnales appellate, nunc Dei templum Corinthios nimirum intelligens, sed alios at{que} alios? Neque enim templum dei erant qui carnales erant: quanquam nec me latet ecclesiam i. multitudinem profitentium Christum, partim ex bonis, partim ex malis conflatam esse, nempe rete euangelicum ex omni genere congregrari. Quid hoc aduersum ea quae ego dixi qui conabor omnes bonos non malos efficere, & ideo laborabā vt auditors mei non putarent magnum esse si in malis ecclesiastici inuenirentur: sed non visum est tibi piam praedicationem pie interpretari, dum existimas ad pietatem pertinere, si pie dicta impie reuocarentur. Si colloquia tua non sunt quam scripta clementiora, neque neutra ego optem mihi contingere. sed omnis amarulentia, tumor, ira vociferatio, maledicentia tollatur à te cum omni malitia: & tamen neque colloquijs neque scriptis me grauabis. Tu non optares (opinor) tales auditors, qualem te praestiteris. Sed deus te reddat benigniorem, vel à meis concionibus quàm longissime ableget. Vale.

Spiritum Veritatis.

FLAMMIS, fumo{que} quam lection, aut oculis digniores multo perlegimus tuas literas, quibus tua ipsius scelera in nos torquere subdole, & astute admodum moliris Et quo firmius ista tua statuas, veterē inter pocula me tui suggillatorem facis. Quod quam vere (vt omnia) dicas, iam vide. Narrauit nobis praesentib{us} iamolim Marchfeldiae vnus & item alter, qui tuae interfuerant concioni, te palam summa{que} vt prae te ferebas, cum authoritate dixisse, indignos esse miseros homunculos, qui angelica salutatione salutent deiparam virginem ni velint ipsam rursum vt p r •• t Christum. Ego haec dixi, parum Christiane & religiose abs te dicta, cauendumque diligenter pijs quibusque christianis, ne huiusmodi fidem habeant concionatoribus. An hoc est te uggillate an magis & tibi & illis pie, & religiose consulere? Nihil ego tibi & tu mihi, necdum viso, bilis impingo, sed summa raraque te esse modestia, & tolerantia hominem (vt videri vis) gaudeo, sed & gaudebo nec retorqueo in te conuitia, & probra, quibus tuae scatent literae. At istud non video quomodo dicas (imo nec admonitum tandem, sed acerime potius redargutum, sed conuitijs & mendatijs male habitum potius, sed calumnijs inique affectum potius, sed falso condemnatum potius) Redargui fate or, at ea redargutio quam admonitio, aliud nihil. Conuitium nullum, mendatium nullum, calumnia nulla, quod sciam, in meis conspicitur literis, nisi mentitus est Paulus, Nisi calūniatus est Paulus, Nisi cōuiciatus est Paulus quum diceret quosdam se dixisse, faciend mala vt venirent bona. Nos calidi adhuc tuo spiritu, tua tibi tetulimus verba, id quod norūt probe omnes, qui te illic vna audiere. Vtinam tu nil tale effudisses, ego tum certe nihil tibi tale asscripsissem. Absit à me vt ego (quod dicere videris, vllo te animi odio, vllo te impio mentis affectu persequar. Didici ex Christo diligere etiam inimicos: tantum abest vt hominem fratrem, eiusdemque domini conseruum odio habeam Sed plus quam hostilia, plus quam cruenta tua verba nequicquā me mouent. Tantum quam possum paucissimis tuis respondebo post hac te tuo relicturus iudici.

Primum quod dicis (Esto dixerim ego, omnes papas, omnes episcopos, vicarios, rectoresque omnes per ostium non intrantes sed ascendentes aliunde fures esse & latrones, dum sic dixi, ex assensu non ex personis & titulis cum Christo sum rem metitus.) Si id dixisses, nihil nobis tecum ea de re negotij fuisset. Sed (quod tu mea minerua collegisse dicis) dicebas, Papae videlicet omnes, episcopi omnes, vicarij omnes, rectores omnes fures sint, & latrones, nulla, quam audiui neque ascensus, neque descensus, neque per hostium, neque per fenestram mentione facta. Nec ego adeo surdis eram auribus, vt si quid tale suo loco dixisses, continuo non excepsissem. Eum quem nunc adfers sensum catholicum veneror, & exosculor: priorem reijcio & detestor. Sacra scripturae authoritas principi populi tui non maledicis) non sinit me vt sentiam, vt tu mihi ascribere videris, plaerosque omnes aliunde ascendere. Quis sum ego vt iudicem alienum seruum (Vnusquisque enim propriam sarcinam baiulabit. Non ego, sed nec alius quisquam vetuit vnquā quo minus diceres omnes esse fures qui per hostium non intrantes ascendunt aliunde, quibuscunque interim titulis splendescant. sed qui per hostium non intrantes, ascendunt aliunde, iam primum audio quod si prius (vt iam dixi) adiecisses, verbum nullum. Quod dicis, quae me dementia coepe rit sic, collegisse, vt plures fures quam postores, plures hoedos quam oues esse in ecclesia dixisti. Quod quam dixeris, vt prius dixi, vere, ipse videto. I am prioribus literis saniorem fuisse diui Cypriani Martyris de ecclesia censuram docuimus. Frustra dicis apertam illam & in os obiectam criminationem, vae vobis Scribae & Pharisaei,, hypocritae, mihi e regione displicituram, quum adeo, vt dicis arrideat tecta & parabolica illa, Qui non intrat per hostium in stabulum ouium &c. Non potest profecto mihi vnquam displicere aliquod sacrum Christi factum. Praesētes repraehendebat ipse impios, Scribas & Pharisaeos iuxta id: Annuncia populo meo scelera sua non aliena: absentes tu papas & episcopos, qui talia fecerant vae futurum praedixit: tu vocabula, quo nescio afflatu, tantum respiciebas. Nullius ego hominis animum iudico vnquam, sed nec iudicabo, tantum abest vt animi tui emphasin mihi arrogauerim vnquā. Desine mihi obijcere talia. Quod audiuimus loquimur, quod vidimus testamur. Si sane, & recte ad quem libet Christianum interpretatus es id Matthaei. Tu es Petrus, aequaliter, vt dicis, de ecclesia, nihil omnino de vi clauium locutus, gaudeo. Mihi certe non arridet. Nec dixi te dixisse omnes Christianos, vt tu es, sacerdotes esse, sed illjusmodi nudam & confusam interpretationem non parum fouere & nutrire huiusmodi assertionem Lutheranam, id quod credo, ipse vides. Me illorum adijces numero, qui promptiores sunt ad primatum Petri defensandum etiam, vt ais, quum nihil * sed haereticum dictum videtur. Christianus enim conditionem significat non actionem sine actu, Signa latet quippiam. &c.

Besides these latin letters above expressed other letters also he wrote in English as well to others, as namely Syr Edward Baynton Knight, which letters because they do contain much fruitful matter worthy to be read and known, I thought here presently to insert, which albeit may seem somewhat prolixe in reading: yet the fruit thereof I trust shall recompense the length of them.

The copy of a letter sent by master Latimer, person of Westekington, in the county of Weltes. to Syr Edward Baynton Knight. Salutem in Christo.

RIght worshipful Syr, I recommend me unto youre maystership, with hearty thanks for your so friendly, so charitable, and so mindful remembrance of me so poor a wretch. Whereas of late I received your letters by M. Bonnam, perceiving therein both who be grieved w t me, wherefor, & what behooveth me to do, in case I must needs come up, which your goodness towards me w t all other such like to recompense, where as I myself am not able, I shall not cease to pray my Lord God, which both is able and also doth in deed reward all them that favor the favorers of his truth for his sake, for the truth is a common thing, pertaining to every man, for the which every man shall answer another day. And I desire favor neither of your maystership, neither of any man else, but in truth, and for the truth, I take God to witness which knoweth all. In very deed master Chancellor did show me that my Lord bishop of London had sent letters to him for me: and I made answer that he was mine Ordinary, and that both he might & should reform me as far as I needed reformation, as well and as soon as my Lord of London. And I would be very loath (now this deep winter) being so weak and so feeble (not only exercised with my disease in my head and side, but also with new, both the colike and the stone) to take such a journey: and though he might so do, yet he needed not, for he was not bound so to do: notwithstanding I said, if he to do my Lord of London pleasure to my great displeasure, would needs command me to go, I would obey his commandment: yea, though it should be never so great a greuance and painful to me: with the which answer he was content, saying he would certify my Lord of London thereof, trusting his Lordship to be content with the same: but as yet I hear nothing from him. M. Chancellor also said that my Lord of Londō maketh as though he wer greatly displeased with me, for y t I did contēpne his authority, at my last being in London. Forsooth I preached in Abbe-church, not certain then (as I remember) whether in his Dioces or no, intending nothing less then to contemn his authority, and this I did not of mine own suinge, or by mine own procuration, but at the request of honest merchaunt men (as they seemed to me) whose names I do not know, for they were not of mine acquaintance before: & I am glad thereof for their sakes, least if I knew thē I should be compelled to utter them so, and their godly desire to hear godly preaching should return to their trouble: for they required me very instantly, and to say y e truth even importunately. Whether they were of that parish or no, I was not certain: But they shown not only themselves but also many other to be very desirous to hear me, pretending, great hunger, and thyrst of the word of God & ghostly doctrine. And upon consideration, and to avoid all inconveniences, I put them of, and refused them twice or thrice, till at the last they brought me word that the Parson and Curate were not only content, but also desired me, notwithstanding that they certified him both of my name plainly, and also that I had not the bish. seal to show for me, but only a license of y e University, which Curate did receive me, welcommed me, and when I should go into the pulpite gave me the common benediction: so that I had not ben, alonely uncharitable, but also churlishly uncharitable if I would have said nay. Now all this supposed to be truth (as it is) I marvel greatly howe my Lord of London can allege any contempt, of him in me.

First, he did never inhibit me in my life, and if he did inhibit his Curate to receive me, what pertaineth that to me, which neither did know thereof, nor yet made any suit to the curate deceitfully, nor it did not appear to me very likely that the Curate would so little have regarded my Lord's inhibitiō, which he mayntayneth so vigilantly, not knowing my Lord's mind before. Therefore I coniected with myself that either the Curate was of such acquaintance with my Lord, that he might admit whom he would, or else (and rather) that it was a trayne and a trap laid before me, to the intent that my Lord himself, or other pertaining to him was appointed to have been there, and to have taken me if they could in my sermon, which conjecture both occasioned me somewhat to suspect those men which desired me, though they speak never so fair and friendly, and also rather to go. For I preach nothing, but if it might be so, I would my Lord him self might hear me every sermon I preach. So certain I am that it is truth, that I take in hand to preach. If I had w t power of my friends (the Curate gaynesaying and withstanding) presumed to have gone into the pulpitte, there had been something wherefore to pretend a contempt. I preached in Kent also, at the instaunt request of a Curate: yet here I not that his Ordinary layeth any contempt to my charge, or yet doth trouble the curate. I marvel not a little, how my Lord Bysh. of London, having so broad, wyde, and large Dioces committed unto his cure, and so peopled as it is, can have leisure for preaching and teaching the word of God, oportune importune, tempestiue, intempestiue, priuatim, publice to his own flock, i stando, arguendo, exhortando, monendo, c m omni lenitate & doctrina, have leisure (I say) either to trouble me, or to trouble him self w t me, so poor a wretch, a stranger to him & nothing pertaining to his cure, but as every man pertaineth to every man's cure, so intermixing & interm •• ling himself with another man's cure, as though he had nothing to do in his own. If I would do as some men seyn my Lord doth, gather up my oil, as we call it, warely and narrowly, and yet neither preach for it in mine own cure, nor yet other where, peradventure he would nothing deny me. In very deed I did monish Judges and Ordynaryes to use charitable equity in their judgments towards such as been accused, namely of such accusers, which been as like to hear and bewray, as other been to say amiss, and to take men's words in the meaning thereof, and not to wrast them in another sense, then they were spoken in: for all such accusers and witnesses be false before God, as saint Jerome saith upon the xxvi. chapiter of Matthew. Nor yet I do not accompt those Judges well advised, which wittingly will give sentence after such witnesses, much less those which procure such witnesses against any man: nor I think not judges now a days so deeply confirmed in grace or so impeccable, but that it may behoove and become preachers to admonish thē to do well as well as other kinds of men, both great and small. And this I did, occasioned of the epistle which I declared. Rom. vi. wherein is this sentence, non istes sub lege, sed sub gratia, ye christen men y t believe in Christ, are not under the law. What a saying is this (quod I) if it be not rightly understand, that is as saint Paul did understand it? for the words sound as though he would go about to occasion Christian men to break law, seeing they be not under the law: and what tht pseudapostles, adversaries to saint Paul would so have taken them, and accused saint Paul of the same to my Lord of London? if my said Lord would have heard saint Paul declare his own mind, of his own words, then he should have escaped, and the false Apostles put to rebuke: if he would have rigorouslye followed vtennque allegata & probata, and have given sētense after relation of the accusers, then good S. Paul must have borne a fagot at Paul's cross, my Lord of London being his judge. Oh, it had ben a goodly sight to have seen saint Paul with a fagot on his back, evē at paules cross, my Lord of London Bishop of the same, sitting under the cross. Nay verily I dare say, my Lord should sooner have burned him, for saint Paul did not mean that christen men might break law, and do whatsoever they would, because they were not under the law: but he did mean that Christian men might keep the law & fulfill the law, if they would, because they were not under the law, but under Christ, by whom they were divided from the tyranny of the law, and above the law, that is to say, able to fulfill the law to the pleasure of him that made the law, which they could never do of their own strength, and without Christ: so that to be under the law, after Saynct Paul's meaning, is to be weak to satisfy the law: and what could saint Paul do withal, though his adversaries would not so take it? But my Lord would say peradventure that men will not take the preachers words otherwise then they mean therein, bona verba, as though S. Paul's words were not otherwise taken, as it appeareth in the third chapiter to the Romans, where he saith, quod iniustitia nostra dei iustitiam commendat, that is to say, our unrighteousness commondeth and maketh more excellent the righteousness of God, which soundeth to many as though they should be evil, that good should come of it, and by unrighteousness, to make the righteousness of God more excellent. So saint Paul was reported to mean: yet he did mean nothing so, but shown the inestimable wisdom of God, which can use our naughtiness to the manifestation of his unspeakable goodness: not that we should do noughtily to that end and purpose. Now my Lord will not think (I dare say) that S. Paul was to blame that he spake no more circumspectly, more warely, or more plainly, to avoid evil offense of the people: but rather he will blame the people, for that they took no better heed, and attendaunce to Paul's speaking, to the understanding of the same: yea, he will rather pity the people, which had been so long nozeled in the doctrine of the Pharisees, and wallowed so long in darkness of man's traditions, superstitions, and trade of living, that they were unapt ts receive the bright lightness of the truth, and wholesome doctrine of God, uttered by Saint Paul. Nor I think not that my Lord will require more circumspection, or more convenience to avoid offense of errors in me, then was in saint Paul when he did not escape maleuolous corrections, & sclaunderous reports of them that were of perverse judgments, which reported him to say, whatsoever he appeared to thē to say, or what so ever seemed to them to follow of his saying: but what followeth sic aiunt nos dicere, sic male loquuntur de nobis so they report us to say, saith saint Paul. So they speak evil of us: sed quorum damnatio iusta est, but such, whose damnation is just saith he: and I think the damnation of all such that evil reporten preachers now a days, likewise just: for it is untruth now and then. Yea Christ himself was misreported, & falsely accused, both as touching his words and also as concerning the meaning of his words. First he said: destruite, that is to say, destroy you: they made it possum destruere, that is to say, I can destroy: he said templum hoc, this temple, they added manu factum, that is to say made with hand, to bring it to a contrary sense. So they both inverted his words, and also added unto his words, to alter his sentence: for he did mean of the temple of his body, and they wrast it to Solomon's temple. Now I report me whether it be a just fame raised up, and dispersed after this manner. Nay verily, for there be three manner of persons which can make no credible information. First, adversaries, enemies: Second, ignorant & without judgment: Thirdly, susurrones, that is to say, whisperers, and blowers in men's ears, which will spew out in hudder mudder, more then they dare avow openly. The first will not, the second cannot, the third dare not: therefore relation of such is not credible, and therefore can make no fame lawful, nor occasion any indifferent Judge to make process against any man, nor it maketh no little matter what they be themselves that report of any man, neither well or evil, for it is a great commendation to be evil spoken of, of them that be naughty themselves, and to be commended of the same, is many times no little reproach. God send us once all grace to wish one to another, and to speak well one upon another. Me semes it were comely, for my Lord (if it were comely for me to say so) to be a preacher himself, having so great a cure as he hath, then to be a disquieter and a troubler of Preachers, and to preach nothing at all himself. If it would please his Lordship to take so great labor and pain at any time, as to come preach in my little Byshoppricke at Westkington, whether I were present or absent myself, I would thank his Lordship heartily, and think myself greatly bounden to him, that he of his charitable goodness would go so far to help to discharge me in my cure or else I were more •• natural then a beast unreasonable nor yet I would dispute, contend or demand by what authority or where he had authority so to do, as long as his predicatiō were fruitful, & to y e edification of my parishioners. As for my lord may do as it pleaseth his lordship I pray God he do always as well as I would wish him ever to do: but I am sure S. Paul y e true minister of god, & faithful dispensour of God's miste & ries, right exemplar of all true and very bishops, saith in the first chapter to the Philippians, that in his time some preached Christ for envy of him, thinking thereby so to grieve him withal, and as it were to obscure him, and to bring his authority into contempt, some of good will and love, thinking thereby to comfort him: notwithstanding (saith he) by all manner of ways, and after all fashions, whether it be of occasion or of truth, as ye would say for truths sake so that Christ be preached and shown, I joy and will joy, so much he regarded more the glory of Christ, and promotion of Christ's doctrine, to the edificatiō of christē souls then the maintenance of his own authority, reputation and dignity, considering right well, as he said, that what authority so ever he had, it was to edification and not to destruction. Now I think it were no reproach to my lord but very commendable, rather to joy with saint Paul, & be glad that Christ be preached quouismodo, yea though it were for em y, that is to say in disdain, despite and contempt of his Lordship (Which thing no man well advised will enterprise or attempt) then when the preaching cannot be reproved justly, to demand of the preacher austerely as the Pharisees did of Christ, qua authoritate haec facis, aut quis dedit tibi istam autoritatem? as my authority is good enough, and as good as my Lord can give me any, yet I would be glad to have his also, if it would please his Lordship to be so good Lord unto me. For the university of Cambridge hath authority Apostolic, to admit. 12. yearly, of the which I am one, and the kings highness. God save his grace, did decree that all admitted of Universities, should preach throughout all his realm as long as they preached well, without distreine of any mā, my Lord of Canterbury, my Lord of Duresme, with such other not a few standing by, and hearing the decree nothing again saying it, but consenting to the same. Now to contemn my Lord of London's authority were no little fault in me: so no less fault might appear in my Lord of London to contemn the kings authority and decree, yea so Godlye, so fruitful, so commendable a decree pertaining both to the edification of christen souls, and also to the regard and defense of the popish grace and authority Apostolic. To have a book of the kings not inhibited, is to obey the king, and to inhibit a preacher of the king admitted, is it not to disobey the king? is it not one king that doth inhibit and admit, and hath he not as great authorititie to admit as to inhibit? He that resisteth the power, whether admitting, or inhibiting, doth he not resist the ordinance of God? we low subjects are bound to obey powers, and their ordinances: and are not the highest subjects also, who ought to give us ensample of such obedience? As for my preaching it self, I trust in God my Lord of London cannot rightfully belacke it, nor justly reprove it, if it be taken with the circumstance thereof, and as I spake it, or else it is not my preaching, but his that falsely reporteth it, as the Poet Martial said to one that depraved his book: quem recitas meus est, o Fidentiue, libellus: sed male cum recitas, incipitesse tuus. But now I hear say that my Lord of London is informed, and upon the said information hath informed the king, that I go about to defend Bilney, and his cause, against his ordinaryes and judges, which I ensure you is not so: for I had nothing to do with Bilney, nor yet with his Judges, except his Judges did him wrong: for I did nothing else but monishe all Judges indifferently to do right, nor I am not altogether so foolish as to defend the thing which I knew not. It might have become a preacher to say as I said, though Bilney had never been born I have known Bilney a great while, I think much better then ever did my Lord of London: for I have been his ghostly father many a time: and to tell you the truth, what I have thought always in him, I have known hitherto few such so prompt, and ready to do every man good, after his power, both friends and foe, noisome wittingly to no man, and toward his enemy so charitable: so seeking to reconcile them, as he did, I have known yet not many, and to be short in a sum a very simple good soul, nothing fit nor meet for this wretched world, whose blind fashion and miserable state (yea far from Christ's doctrine) he could as evil bear, and would sorrow, lament and bewail it as much as any man that ever I knew: as for his singular learning, as well in holy scripture, as in all other good letters, I will not speak of it. Notwythstanding if he either now of late, or at any time attempted anything contrary to the obedience which a Christian man doth owe, either to his prince or to his bishop, I neither do nor will allow and approve that, neither in him nor yet in any other man: we be all men, and ready to fall: wherefor he that standeth, let him beware he fall not. Now he ordered or misordered himself in iudgemeēt, I cannot tell, nor I will not meddle withal: God knoweth, whose judgments I will not judge. But I cannot but wonder, if a man living so mercifully, so charitablye, so patiently, so continently, so studiously, and virtuously, and killyng his old Adam, that is to say, mortify his evil affections, & blind motions of his heart, so diligently should die an evil death, there is no more but let him y standeth beware that he fall not: for if such as he shall die evil, what shall become of me such a wretch as I am? but let this go, a little to the purpose, and come to the point we must rest upon. Either my Lord of London will judge my outward man only, as it is said, Omnes vident quae foris sunt, or else he will be my God, & judge mine inward man, as it said Deus autem intuetur cor: if he will have to do only with mine outward man, and meddle with mine outward conversation, how that I have ordered myself toward my christen brethren the kings liege people, I trust I shall please and content both my Lord God, and also my Lord of London: for I have preached and teached but according to holy scripture, holy fathers, and ancient interpretours of the same, with the which I think, my Lord of London will be pacified: for I have done nothing else in my preaching, but with all diligence moved my auditors to faith and charity to do their duty, and that that is necessary to be done. As for things of private devotion, mean things, and voluntary things, I have reproved the abuse, the superstition of them, without condemnation of the things themselves, as it becometh Preachers to do, which thing if my Lord of London will do himself (as I would to God he would do) he should be reported (no doubt) to condemn the use of such things, of covetous men which chaue damage, and find less in their boxes by condemnation of the abuse, which abuse they said rather should continue still, then your profit should not continue, (so thorny be their hearts:) if my Lord will needs cost and invade my inward man, will I nill I, an break violently into my heart, I fear me I shall either displease my Lord of London, which I would be very loath, or else my Lord GOD, which I will be more loath: not for any infidelity, but for ignorance, for I believe as a christen man ought to believe: but peradventure my Lord knoweth and will know many things certaynely, which (perchance) I am ignorant in, with the which ignorance though my Lord of London may if he will, 〈◊〉 discontent, yet I trust my Lord God will pardon it as long as I hurt no man withal, and say to him with diligent study, and daily prayer paratum cor meum Deus, paratum cor meum, so studying, preaching, and tarrying the pleasure and leisure of God. And in the mean season. Acts. viii. as Apollo did, when he knew nothing of Christ, but Baptismum Johannes, teach and preach mine even christen that, and no farther then I know to be true. There be three Creedes, one in my mass, another in my mattyns, the third common to them that neither saith mass nor mattyns, nor yet knoweth what they say when they say the Creed: and I believe all three with all y t God hath left in holy writ, for me and all other to believe: yet I am ignorant in things which I trust hereafter to know, 〈◊〉 I do now know things, in which I have been ignorau t at heretofore: ever learn and ever to be learned, to profit w t learning, with ignorance not to noy. I have thought in times past, that the Pope Christ's Uicar, had been Lord of all the world as Christ is, so that if he should have depryued the king of his Crown, or you of y e Lordshyp of Bromeham, it had been enough: for he could do no wrong. Now I might be hired to think otherwise: not withstanding I have both seen and heard scripture drawn to that purpose, I have thought in times past, that the Popes dispensations of pluralities of benefices, and absence from the same, had discharged consciences before God: forasmuch as I had heard ecce vobiscum sum, & qui vos a dit, me audit, bended to coroborate the same. Now I might be easily entreated to think otherwise &c.

I have thought in times past y t the P. could have spoiled purgatory at his pleasure w t a word of his mouth: now learning might persuade me otherwise, or else I would marvel why he would suffer so much money to be bestowed that way, which so needful is to be bestowed otherwise, and to deprive us of so many patrons in heavē as he might deliver out of purgatory. &c. I have thought in times past, that and if I had been a Friar and in a cowle, I could not have been dāpned, nor afeard of death and by occasion of the same I have been minded many times to have been a Friar, namely whē I was sore sick and diseased. Now I abhor my superstitious foolishenes. &c. I have thought in times past, that diverse Images of saints could have holpen me, and done me much good, and delivered me of my diseases: now I know that one can help, as much as another. And it pitieth mine heart that my Lord and such as my Lord is, can suffer the people to be so craftily deceived, it were to long to tell you what blindness I have been in, and howe long it were or I could forsake such folly, it was so corporate in me: but by continual prayer continual study of scripture, & oft cōmuning w t men of more right judgment, God hath delivered me &c. Yea, mē thinketh y t my lord himself hath thought in times past that by God's law a man might marry his brothers wife, which now both dare think and say contrary: and yet this his boldness might have chanced in Pope Julius days, to stand him either in a fire, or else in a fagot. Which thing deeply considered, and pondered of my Lord, might something stir him to charitable equity and to be something remissable toward men, which labor to do good as their power serveth with knowledge, and doth hurt to no man with their ignorauncye, for there is no greater distance, then between God's law and not gods law: nor it is not so, or so, because any man thinketh it so, or so: but because it is so or so in deed, therefore we must think it so, or so when God shall give us knowledge thereof, for if it be in deed either so or not: it is so or not so, though all the world had thought otherwise these thousand years &c. And finally as ye say, the matter is weightye and ought substantially to be looked upon, even as weighty as my life is worth: but howe to look substantially upon it, otherwise know not I, then to pray my Lord God day and night, that as he hath bolded me to preach his truth, so he will strengthen me to suffer for it, to the edification of them which have taken by the working of him, fruit thereby, and even so I desire you, and all other that favor me for his sake, likewise to pray: for it is not I, (without his mighty helping hand) that can abide that brute, but I have trust that God will help me in time of need, which if I had not, the Ocean sea, I think should have divided my Lord of London and me by this day. For it is a rare thing for a Preacher to have favor at his hand which is no preacher him self, and yet ought to be: I pray God that both he and I may both discharge our selves, he in his great cure, and I in my little, to God's pleasure and safety of our souls. Amen. I pray you pardon me that I write no more dystinctly, more truly: for my head is so out of frame, that it should be to painful for me to write it again, and if I be not prevented, shortly I intend to make merry with my Parishioners this Christmas, for all the sorrow, least perchance I never return to them again: and I have heard say, that a Do is as good in wyn er, as a Buck in summer.

*A letter of Syr Edward Baynton Knight, answering to the letter of M. Latimer sent to him before.

MAyster Latimer, after hartye recommendations, I have communicated the effect of youre letters to diverse of my friends, such as for Christian charity (as they say) rather desire in you a reformation, either in youre opinion) if it swerve frō the truth) or at the least in your manner and behavior, in as much as it giveth occasion of slander and trouble in let of your good purposes, then any other inconvenience to youre person or good name. And for as much as your said letter misliked them in some parte, and that I have such confidence in your Christian breste, as in my judgment ye will conformably and gladly, both hear that may be reformed in you, and also (as it is worthy) so knowledge and confess the same: I have therefore desired them to take the pain to note their minds in this letter which I send to you, as agregate of their sayings, & sent from me your assured friend and favorer, in that that is the very truth of God's word, wherein nevertheless, as I trust ye yourself will temper your own judgment, and in a sobernes affirm no truth of yourself, which should devide the unity of the Congregation in Christ, and the received truth agreed upon by holy fathers of the Church, consonaunt to the scripture of GOD, even so whatsoever ye will do therein (as I think ye will not otherwise then ye should do) I being unlearned, and not of the knowledge to give sentence in this altera ion and contention, must rather of good congruence show myself in that you disagree with thē, readier to follow their doctrine in truth, then yours, unless it may please almighty God to inspire and confirm the hearts of such people to testify the same in some honest number as ought to induce me to give credence unto them.

Only God knoweth the certain truth, which is communicate unto us, as our capacity may comprehend it by faith, but that it is per speculum in enigmate. And there have been qui zelum Dei habuerunt, sed non secundum scientiam. Among which I repute not you, but to this purpose I write it, that to cal this or that truth it requireth a deep and profound knowledge, considering that to me unlearned, that I take for truth may be otherwise, not having sensus exercitatos, as saint Paul saith, ad discernendum bonum & malum, and it is shown me, that an opinion or manner of teaching, which causeth dissension in a Christian congregation, is not of God, by the doctrine of S. John in his Epistle, where he saith: Omnis qui confitetur Christū in carne. &c. ex Deo est. And like as y e word of God hath always caused dissension among men unchristened, whereupon hath ensued and followed Martyrdom to the preacher, so in Christ's congregation among them that profess Christ's name, In vno Domino, vno Baptismate & vna fide, they that preach and stir rather contention, then charity, though they can defend their saying, yet their teaching is not to be taken as of God, in that it breaketh the chain of Christian charity, and maketh division in the people, congregate and called by GOD into an unity of faith and Baptism. But for this point I would pray to God, that not only in the truth may be agreement, but also such sobernes and uniform behavior used in teaching and preaching, as men may wholly express (as they may) the charity of God tendyng only to the union in love of us all, to the profit and salvation of our souls.

The answer of M. Latimer to the letter of Syr Edward Baynton above prefixed.

RIght worshipful sir, and my singular good master, salutem in Christ Jesus, with due commendation and also thanks for your great goodness towards me &c. And whereas you have communicate my last letters to certain of your friends, which rather desire this or that in me &c. what I think therein I will not now say, not for that there could be any peril or danger in the said letters (well taken) as far as I can judge, but for that they were rashly and vndeuisedly scribled, as ye might well know both by my excuse, and by themselves also, though none excuse had been made. And besides that, ye know right well, that whereas the Be gathereth honey, even there the spinner gathereth venom, not for any diversity of the flower, but for divers natures in them that sucketh the flower: As in times past, and in the beginning, the very truth: and one thing in it self was to some, offense, to some foolishness, to other otherwise disposed, the wisdom of God. Such diversity was in the redress of hearers thereof.

But this notwithstanding, there is no more but either my writing is good, or bad, if it be good, the communicatynge thereof to your friends cannot be hurtful to me? if it be otherwise, why should you not communicate it to them, which both could and would instruct you in the truth, and reform my error. Let this pass, I will not contend: had I wyst cometh ever out of season. Truly I were not well advised if I would not either be glad of your instruction, or yet refuse mine own reformation, but yet it is good for a man to look or he leapeth, and God forbid that ye should be addict and sworn to me so wretched a fool, that you should not rather follow the doctrine of your friends in truth, so great learned men as they appear to be then the opinions of me, having never so christen a breast.

Wherefore do as you will: for as I would not if I could so I cannot if I would, be noisome unto you, but yet I say I would my letters had been unwritten, if for none other cause, at least way, in as much as they cause me to more writing, an occupation nothing meet for my mad head: and as touching points which in my foresaid letters mislike your friends, I have now little leisure to make an answer thereto for the great business that I have in my little cure, I know not what other men have in their great cure seeing that I am alone without any Prieste to serve my cure without my scholar too read unto me, without any book necessary to be looked upon, without learned men to come and counsel withal All which things other have at hand abundantly, but something must be done, how soever it be. I pray you take it in good worth, as long as I temper mine own judgment, affirming nothing with prejudice of better. First ye mislike, that I say I am sure that I preach the truth, saying in reproof of the same, that god knoweth certain truth. In deed alonely God knoweth all certain truth, and alonely God knoweth it as of himself, and none knoweth certain truth but God, and those which be taught of God, as saith S. Paul: Deus enim illis patesecit: And Christ himself: erunt omnes docti a Deo: And your friends deny not but that certain truth is communicate to us, as our capacity may comprehend it by faith, which if it be truth as it is, then there ought no more to be required of any man, but according to his capacity: now certain it is that every man hath not like capacity. &c.

But as to my presumption and arrogancye: either I am certain or uncertain that it is truth that I preach, If it be truth, why may not I say so, to courage my hearers to receive the same more ardently, and ensue it more studiously? If I be uncertain, why dare I be so bold to preach it? And if your friends in whom ye trust so greatly, be preachers themselves, after their sermon I pray you ask them whether they be certain and sure that they taught you the truth or no, and send me word what they say, that I may learn to speak after them. If they say they be sure, ye know what followeth: If they say they be unsure, whē shall you be sure that hath so doubtful teachers and unsure? And you yourselves, whether are you certain or uncertain, that Christ is your savior, and so forth of other articles that ye be bounden to believe, or whether be ye sure or unsure, that civil ordinances be the good works of God, and that you do God service in doing of them, if ye do them for good intent: if ye be uncertain, take heed he be your sure friend that heareth you say so, and then, with what conscience do you doubt: Cum quicquid non est ex fide, peccatum sit? But contrary say you, alonely God knoweth certain truth, and ye have it but per speculum in enigmate: and there have been, qui zelum Dei habuerunt, sed non secundum scientiam: and to call this or that truth, it requireth a deep knowledge, considering that to you unlearned, that you take for truth may be otherwise, not having sensus exercitatos (as Paul saith) ad discernendum bonum & malum, as ye reason against me, and so you do best to know surely nothing for truth at all, but to wander meekly hither and thither, omni vento doctrinae. &c. Our knowledge here, you say, is but per speculum in enigmate? What then? Ergo it is not certain and sure?

I deny your argument by your leave: yea if it be by faith, as ye say, it is much sure, quia certitudo fidei est maxima certitudo as Duns and other school Doctors say: that there is a great discrepaunce between certain knowledge, and clear knowledge: for that may be of things absent that appear not, this requireth the presence of the object, I mean of the thing known so that I certainly and surely know the thing which I perfectly believe, though I do not clearly and evidently know it. I know your school subtleties, as well as you, which 〈◊〉 as though enigmaticall knowledge, that is to say, dark and obscure knowledge might not be certain and sure knowledge because it is not clear, manifest and evident knowledge: and yet there hath been (they say) qui zelum Dei habuerunt, sed non secundum scientiam, which have had a zeal, but not after knowledge. Truth it is, there hath been such, and yet be to many to the great hinderance of Christ's glory, which nothing doth more obscure, then an hot zeal accompanied with great authority without right judgment. There have been also, Qui scientiam habuerunt absque zelo Dei, qui viuitatem Dei in iniustitia detinentes plagis vapulabunt multis, dum voluntatem Domini cognoscentes, nihil minus quàm, faciunt, I mean not among Turks and Saracens that be unchristened, but of them that be christined▪ and there have been also that have lost scientiam Dei, id est, spiritualem diuini verbi sensum, quam prius habuerunt. i. The spiritual knowledge of God's word which they had before, because they have not ensued after it, nor promoted the same, but rather with their mother wits have impugned the wisdom of the father, and hindered the knowledge thereof, which therefore hath been taken away from them, vt iustificetur Christus in sermonibus suis, & vincat cum iudicatur, threatening Math. 13. Ei vero, qui non habet, etiam quod habet, id est, quod videtur habere, auferetur ab eo, cum abuti habito, vel non been vti, sit non habere, nec non sit verum illud quoq́ue, non habitaturam, videlicet sapientiam in corpore peccatis subdito, qui adhuc & si carnaliter sapiant plus satis, at stat, sententia, nem •• e carnalem & Philosophicam scripturarum intelligentiam, non esse sapientiam Dei, quae à sapientibus absconditur, paruulis reuelatur. And if to call this or that truth, requireth a deep and profound knowledge, then either every man hath a deep and profound knowledge, or else no man can call this or that truth: & it behooveth every Preacher to have so deep and profound knowledge, that he may call this or that truth, which this or that he taketh in hand to preach for the truth, and yet he may be ignorant and uncertain in many things, both this and that, as Apollo was: but which things, whether this or that, he will not attempt to preach for the truth. And as for myself, I trust in God, I may have sensus exercitatos well enough ad discernendum bonum & malum. Sensus exercised to discern good and evil in those things which without deep and profound knowledge in many things I preach not, yea there be many things in scripture in which I cannot certaynely discern bonum & malum, I mean verum & falsum, not with all the exercise that I have in scripture, nor yet with help of all interpreters that I have, to content myself and other in all scrupulosity, that may arise: but in such I am wont to wade no farther into the stream, then that I may either go over, or else return back again, having ever respect, not to the ostentation of my little wit, but to the edification of them that hear me, as far forth as I can, neither passing mine own nor yet their capacity.

And such manner of arguments might well serve the Devil contra pusillanimes, to occasion them to wander and waver in the faith, and to be uncertain in things in which they ought to be certain: or else it may appear to make and serve against such preachers which will define great subtleties & high matters in the Pulpit, which no man can be certain and sure of by God's word to be truth, ne sensus quidem habens ad discernendum bonum & malum exercitatissimos: as whether, if Adam had not sinned we should have had Stockefishe out of Iseland: howe many Larkes for a penny if every Star in the element were a flickering Hobby: how many years a man shall lie in Purgatory for one sin if he buy not plenty of the oil that runneth over our lamps to slake the sin withal, and so forget hell which cannot be slaked, to provide for Purgatory.

Such argumentation (I say) might appear to make well against such Preachers, not against me, which simply and plainly utter true faith and fruits of the same, which be the good works of God, quae preparauit deus vt in eis ambularemus. i. which he hath prepared for us to walk in, every man to do the thing that pertaineth to his office and duty in his degree and calling, as the word of God appointeth, which thing a man may do with soberness, having sensus ad discernendum bonum & malum, vel mediocriter exercitatos. For it is but foolish humilitye, willingly to continue always infantulus in Christo & in infirmitate. i. an infant still in Christ, and in infirmity: in reproof of which it was said 〈◊〉 estis opus habentes lacte non solido cibo. For S. Paul saith not: Estote humiles, vt non capiatis. For though he would not that we should think arrogantly of our self, and above that that it becometh us to think of our self, but so to think of our self, vt simus sobrij ac modesti, yet he biddeth us so to think of our self, vt cuiq́ue Deus partitus est mensuram fidei. i. as God hath distributed to everyone the measure of faith. For he that may not with meekness think in himself what God hath done for him, and of himself as God hath done for him, how shall he, or when shall he give due thanks to God for his gifts? And if your friends will not allow the same, I pray you inquire of them whether they may cum sobrietate & modestia be sure they preach to you the truth, and whether we may, cum sobrietate & modestia follow S. Paul's bidding, where he saith unto us all: Nolite fieri pueri sensibus, sed malitia infantes estote. i. Be not children in understanding, but in maliciousness be infantes. God give us all grace to keep the mean, & to think of our self neither to high nor to low, but so that we may restore unto him, qui peraegre profectus est, his gifts again cum vsura, that is to say, with good use of the same, so that aedificemus inuicem with the same, ad gloriam Dei. Amen.

For my life I trust in god that I neither have, neither (by gods grace) shall I, neither in soberness, nor yet in drunkenness affirm any truth of myself, therewith intending to divide that unity of the Congregation of Christ, and the received truth agreed upon by the holy Fathers of the Church consonant to the Scripture of God, though it be shown you never so often, that an opinion or manner of teaching, which causeth dissention in a Christian Congregation, is not of God, by the doctrine of Saint John in his Epistle where he saith: Omnis qui confitetur Iesum Christum in carne, ex Deo est. i. Everyone that confesseth Christ in the flesh, is of God. First not everything whereupon followeth dissention, causeth dissention, as I would they that shown you that, would also show you, whether this opinion, that a man may not mary his brothers wife, be of God or of men, if it be of men, then as Gamaliell said, dissoluetur: if it be of God, as I think it is, and perchance your friends also, quis potest dissoluere nisi qui videbitur Deo repugnare? i. Who can dissolve it but shall seme to repugn against God▪ And yet there be many not heathennes, but in Christendom, that dissenteth from the same, which could bear full evil to hear said unto them: vos ex patre diabolo estis. So that such an opinion might seme to some to make a dissētion in a Christian Congregation, saving that they may say perchance with more liberty then other, that an occasion is sometime taken and not given, which with their favor I might abuse for my defense, saving that, non omnibus licet in hac temporum iniquitate.

The Galatians having for preachers and teachers the false Apostles, by whose teaching they were degenerate frō the sweet liberty of the Gospel into the sour bond of ceremonies, thoght themselves peradventure a Christian Congregation when Saint Paul did write his Epistle unto them, and were in a quiet trade under the dominion of maysterly Curates, so that the false Apostles might have objected to S. Paul that this Apostleshippe was not of God, for as much as there was dissention in a Christian Congregation by occasion thereof, while some would renew their opinions by occasion of the Epistle some would opinari, as they were wont to do, and follow their great Lord's and masters the false Apostles, which were not heathen and unchristened, but Christened, and hie Prelates of the professors of Christ. For your friends I know right well what Erasmus hath said in an Epistle set before the Paraphrases of the first Epistle to the Corinthians, which Erasmus hath caused no small dissension with his pen in a Christian Congregation, in as much as many have dissented frō him, not alonely in Cloisters, (men more then christened men) of high perfection, but also at Paul's Cross, and S. Mary Spitle: besides many that with no small zeal have written against him, but not without answer.

And I would fain learn of your friends, whether that S. Jerome's writing were of God, which caused dissension in a Christian Congregation, as it appeareth by his own words in the prologue before the Canonical Epistles, which be these: Et tu virgo Christi Eustochium, dum à me impensius Scripturae viritatē inquiris, meam quodam modo senectutem inuidorum dentibus vel morsibus corrodendam apponis, qui me falsarium corruptoremque Scripturarum pronunciant: sed ego in tali opere nec illorum inuidentiam pertimesco, nec Scripturae veritatem poscentibus denegabo. I pray you what were they that called S Jerome falsarium and corrupter of Scripture, and for envy would have bitten him with their teeth? vnchristen, or christen? what had the vnchristen to do with christen doctrine? They were worshipful fathers of a Christian Congregation, men of much more hotter stomachs then right iudgemen e, of a greater authority then good charity: but Saint Jerome would not cease to do good for the evil, speaking of them that were naught, giving in that an ensample to us of the same: and if this dissension were in Saint Jerome's time, what may be in our time? de malo in peius scilicet.

And I pray you what meaneth your friends by a Christian Congregation? All those (trow ye) that have been christened? But many of those been in worse condition and shall have greater damnation, then many unchristened. For it is not enough to a Christian Congregation that is of God, to have been Christened: but it is to be considered what we promise when we be christened, to renounce Satan, his works, his pomps: Which thing if we busy not our self to do, let us not crake that we profess Christ's name in a Christian Congregation, in vno baptismo. i. in one baptism.

And where they add in vno Domino. i. in one Lord, I read in Math. 17. non omnis qui dicit Domine, Domine. &c. . Not everyone that saith Lord, Lord. &c. And in Luke the Lord himself complaineth and rebuketh such professors and confessors, saying to them: Cur dicitis domine, domine, & non facitis quae dico? i. Why call you me Lord, Lord, and do not that I bid you? even as though it were enough to a Christian man, or to a Christian Congregation to say every day, Domine Dominus noster, and to salute Christ with a double Domine. But I would your friends would take the pains to read over Chrysostom super Mathaeum, hom. 49. cap. 24. to learn to know a Christian Congregation, if it will please them to learn at him. And where they add, in vna fide. i. in one faith, S. James saith boldly: ostende mihi fidem ex operibus. i. show me thy faith by thy works. And S. Jerome: Si tamen credimus, inquit, opere veritatem ostēdimus. And Scripture saith, qui credit Deo, attendit mandatis: And the devils believe to their little comfort, I pray God to save you and your friends from that believing Congregation, and from that faithful company.

Therefore all this toucheth not them that be unchristened, but them that be christened and answer not unto their Christendom. For Saint Jerome showeth how true Preachers should order themselves, when evil Priests and false Preachers and populus ab his deceptus. i. The people be by them deceived, should be angry with them for preaching the truth. Tom. 5. in Hieremiam Capi. 26. exhorting them to suffer death for the same of the evil priests and false Preachers and the people deceived of thē, which evil Priests and false Preachers with the people deceived, be Christened as well as other: and I fear me that Saynct Jerome might appear to some Christian Cōgregation, as they will be called, to write seditiously, to devide the unity of a great honest number, confessing Christ in vno baptismate, vno Domino, vna fide, saying: populus qui ante sub magistris consopitus erat, ibit ad montes, non illos quidem qui vel leuiter tacti fumigant, sed montes veteris & noui testamenti, Prophetas, Apostolos, & Euangelistas, & cum eiusmodi montium lection versatus, si non inuenerit doctores (messis enim multa operarij autem pauci) tunc & populi studium comprobabitur, quo fugerit and montes, & magistrorum desidia coa guetur. To. 6. in Naū. cap. 30.

I do marvel why our Christian Congregation be so greatly grieved that lay people would read scripture, seeing that Saynct Jerome alloweth and approveth the same, which compareth not here the unchristened to the christened, but the lay people christened to their Curates christened, under the which they have been rocked and locked a sleep in a subtle trade a great while full soundly, though now of late they have been waked, but to their pain, at the least way, to the pain of them that have weakened them with the word of God: and it is properly said of S. Jerome to call them Maysters and not servants, meaning that servants teacheth not their own doctrine, but the doctrine of their Mayster Christ, to his glory. Maysters teacheth not Christ's doctrine, but their own, to their own glory: which Maysterly Curates cannot be quiet till they have brought the people a sleep again: but Christ the very true Mayster saith: vigilate, & orate, ne intretis in tentationem. Non cogitations meae cogitations vestrae, neque viae meae viae vestrae, dicit dominus: & there have been, qui cogitauerunt concilia, quae non potuerunt stabilire. i. which have gone about counsels, which they could not establish. I pray God give our people grace so to wake, vt studium illorum comprobetur, and our masters so to sleep, vt non desidia illorum coarguatur. For who s so blind that he seeth not howe far our Christian Congregation doth gaynesay S. Jerome, and speaketh after another fashion. God amend that is amiss: for we be something wide, ywis.

But now your friends have learned of S. John, that omnis qui confitetur Iesum Christum in carne, ex Deo est. i. Everyone that confesseth Jesus Christ in flesh, is of God. And I have learned of Saint Paul, that there have been, not among the heathē, but among the Christian, qui ore confitentur, factis autem negant i. which confess Christ with their mouth, and deny him with their acts: So that Saint Paul should appear to expound S. John saving that I will not affirm anything as of myself, but leave it to your friends to show your vtrum qui factis negant Christum & vita, sint ex deo necne per solam oris confessionem: for your friends knoweth well enough by the same. Saint John, qui ex Deo est, non peccat: and there both have been and be now too many, qui ore tenus confitentur Christum venisse in carne, which will not effectually hear the word of God by consenting to the same, notwithstanding that S. John saith, qui ex deo est, verbū Dei audit, vos non auditis quia ex deo nō estis: & many shall hear nunquam noui vos. i. I never knew you, which shall not alonelye be christened, but also shall prophetare, and do puissaunt things in nomine Christi: and Saint Paul said there should come Lupi graves qui non percerent gregi. i. ravening Wolves which will not spare the flock, meaning it of them that should confite i Christum in carne in their lips, and yet usurp by succession the office, which Christ calleth speudoprophetas. i. false prophets, & biddeth us beware of them, saying they shall come in vestimentis ouium, id est, in sheep's clothing, and yet they may wear both satten, silk, and velvet, called afterwards serui ne quam, nō pascentes sed percutientes conseruos, edentes & bibentes cum ebrijs, habituri tandem portionem cum hypocritis. They are called serui, servants I trow, quod ore confitentur Christum in carne: nequam vero, quia factis negant eundem, non dantes cibum in tempore, dominum exercentes in gregem: And yet your friends reason as though there could none barcke and bite at true Preachers, but they that be unchristened, notwithstanding that S. Agustine upon the same Epistle of John calleth such confessors of Christ, qui ore confitentur, & factis negant, Antichristos: a strange n me for a Christian Congregation: and though S. Augusten could defend his saying, yet his saying might appear not to be of God, to some men's judgment, in that it breaketh the chain of Christ's charity, so to cause men to hate Antichristianismum, Antichrists, according to the doctrine of S. Paul: sitis odio persequentes quod malum est. i. Hate that is evil: and so making division, not between christened and unchristened, but between Christians and Antichristians, when neither pen nor tongue can devide the Antichristians from their blind folly. And I would you would cause your friends to read over S. Agustine, upon the Epistle of S. John, and tell you the meaning thereof, if they think it expedient for you to know it, as I remember it is tractatu. 3. but I am not sure nor certain of that, because I did not see it since I was at Cambridge: and here have I not S. Austin's works to look for it: but well I wot, that there he teacheth us to know the Christians frō the Antichristians, which both be christened, and both confess Iesum esse Christum, if they be asked the question: and yet the one part denieth it in very deed: but to know whether, non linguam sed facta attendamus, & viuendi genus, nū studeamus officia vocationis praestare an non studeamus, immo persuasi forte sumus non necesse esse vt praestemus, sed omnia in primitiuam ecclesiam & tempora praeterita. &c. quasi nobis sat sit dominari, & secula ibus negotijs nos totos voluere, ac voluptatibus & pompae inhiare: and yet we will appear, vel soli ex Deo esse: sed longe aliter Christum confitentur, qui confitēdo ex Deo esse comprobantur.

And yet as long as they minister the word of God or his Sacraments or anything that God hath ordained to the salvation of mankind, wherewith GOD hath promised to be present, to work with the ministration of the same to the end of the world, they be to be heard, to be obeyed, to be honored for God's ordinance sake, which is effectual and fruitful, whatsoever the minister be, though he be a Devil, and neither Church, nor member of the same, as Origen saith, and Chrysostom, so that it is not all one to honor them, and trust in them, Saint Jerome saith: but there is required a judgment, to discern when they minister God's word and ordinance of the same, and their own, least peradventure we take chalk for cheese, which will edge our teethe, and hinder digestion. For as it is commonly said, the blind eateth many a fly, as they did which were persuaded à principibus sacerdotum vt peterent Barrabam, Iesum autem crucifige ent. i. Of the high Priests, to ask Barabbas and to crucify Jesus: and ye know that to follow blind guides is to come into the pit with the same. And will you know, saith Saint Augustine, how apertly they resist Christ, when men begin to blame them for they misliuing, and intolerable secularity, & negligence? they dare not for shame blaspheme Christ himself, but they will blaspheme the ministers and preachers of whom they be blamed.

Therefore, whereas ye will pray for agreement both in the truth, and in uttering of the truth, when shall that be as longe as we will not hear the truth▪ but disquiet with crafty conveyance the Preachers of the truth, because they reprove our euilnesse with the truth, And to say truth better it were to have a deformity in preaching, so that some would preach the truth of God, and that which is to be preached, without cauponation and adulteration of the word (as Lyranus saith in his time few did, what they do now a days I report me to them that can judge) then to have such an uniformity, that the seely people should be thereby occasioned to continue still in their lamentably ignorance, corrupt judgment, superstition and Idolatry, and esteem things as they do all, preposterously, doing that, that they need not for to do, leaving undone that they ought to do, for lack or want of knowing what is to be done, and so show their love to God, not as God biddeth (which saith: Si diligitis me, praecepta mea seruate. And again: Qui habet praecepta mea & facit ea, hic est qui diligit me) but as they bid qui quaerunt quae sua sunt, non quae Jesus Christi. i. Which seek their own things: not Christ's as though to tythe mynt were more, then judgment, faith, and mercy.

And what is to live in state of Curates, but that he taught which said: Petre amas me? pasce, pasce, pasce: Peter lovest thou feed, feed, feed: which is now set aside, as though to love were to do nothing else, but to wear ringes: miters, and rochets. &c. And when they err in right living, how can the people but err in loving, and all of the new fashion, to his dishonor that suffered his passion, and taught the true kind of loving, which is now turned into piping, playing, and curious singing, which will not be reformed (I trow) nisi per manū Dei validam. And I have both S. Agustine, and S. Thomas, with diverse other, that lex is taken, not alonely for Ceremonies, but also for Mo als, where it is said: N estis sub lege: though your friends reprove the same. But they can make no division in a Christian congregation. And whereas both you and they would have a sobernes in our preaching, I pray god send it unto us, whatsoever ye mean by it. For I see well, whosoever will be happy, and busy with vae vobis, he shall shortly after come coram nobis.

And where your friends think that I made a lie, when I said that I have thought in times past that the Pope had been Lord of the world, though your friends be much better learned then I, yet am I sure that they know not what either I think, or have thought, better then I, iuxta illud▪ nemo nouit quae sunt hominis. &c. as though better men then I have not thought so, as Boniface (as I remember) Octauus, the great learned man John of the burnt Tower: presbiter Cardinalis in his book where he proveth the Pope to be above the counsel General and Special, where he saith that the Pope is Rex egum, & Dominus dominantium. i. The King of Kings and Lord of Lord's, and that he is verus Dominus totius orbis, iure, licet non facto. i. the true Lord of the whole world by good right, albeit in fact he be not so: and that Constantine did but restore his own unto him, when he gave unto him Rome, so that in propria venit, as S. John saith Christ did, & sui eum non receperunt: and yet I hear not that any of our Christian congregation hath reclamed against him, until now of late, dissention began. Who be your friends I cannot tell: but I would you would desire them to be my good masters, and if they will do me no good, at the least way do me no harm: and though they can do you no more good then I, yet I am sure I would be as loath to hurt you as they, either with mine opinions, manner of preaching or writing.

And as for the Popes high dominion over all, there is one Raphaell Maruphus in London, an Italian, and in times past a Marchaunt of dispensations, which I suppose would die in the quarrel, as God's true Knight, and true Martyr. As touching Purgatory, and worshipping of Saints, I shown to you my mind before my Ordinary: and yet I marvelled something, that after private communication had with him, ye would (as it were) adjure me to open my mind before him, not giving me warning before, saving I cannot interpret evil your doings towards me: & yet neither mine Ordinary, nor you disallowed the thing that I said, and I looked not to escape better then Doctor Crome: ut whē I have opened my mind never so much, yet I shall be reported to deny my preaching, of them that have belied my preaching, as he was. Sed opus est magna patientia ad sustinendas calumnias malignantis Ecclesiae.

Syr, I have had more business in my little cure since I spake with you, what with sick folks, and what with matrimonies, thē I have had since I came to it, or then I would have thought a man should have in a great cure. I wonder how men can go quietly to bed which have great cures and many, and yet peradventure are in none of them all. But I pray you tell none of your friends that I said so foolishly, least I make a dissention in a Christian Congregation, and devide a sweet and a restfull union, or tot quot, with haec requies mea in seculum seculi. Syr I had made an end of this scribbling, and was beginning o write it again more truly and more distinctly, and to correct it, but there came a man of my Lord of Farleys, with a Citation to appear before my Lord of London in haste, to be punished for such excesses as I committed at my last being there, so that I could not perform my purpose: I doubt whether ye can read it, as it is. If ye can, well be it: if not, I pray you send it me again, and that you so do, whether you can read it or not. Jesus mercy, what Worlde is this, that I shall be put to so great labor and pains, besides great costs, above my power for preaching of a poor simple Sermon? But I trow, our Savior Christ said true: Oportet pati, & sic intrare: tam periculosum est in Christo pie viuere velle: yea in a Christian Congregation. God make us all Christian, after the right fashion. Amen.

Here followeth another letter of M. Latimer written to K. Henry the 8. upon this occasion. Ye heard before of two sundry Proclamations set out by the Bishops in the time of K. Henry, the one in the year 1531. and the other set out an. 1546. In the which proclamations b ing authorised by the kings name, were inhibited all english books either containing or tending to any matter of the scripture. Where also we have expre ed at large the whole Catalogue of all their errors & heresies, which the said Bishops falsely have excerpted, and maliciously imputed to Godlye writers, with their places and quotations, above assigned in the page aforesaid. Now M. Latimer growing in some favor with the king, and seeing the great decay of Christ's religion by reason of these Proclamations, and touched therefore with the zeal of conscience, directeth unto K. Henry this letter hereunder ensuing, thereby entēding by all means possible to persuade the kings mind to set opē again the freedom of God's holy word amongst his subjects. The copy and tenor of his letter here followeth.

The Letter of Mayster Latimer written to King Henry, for the restoring again the free liberty of reading the holy Scriptures.

To the most mighty Prince King of England Henry the eight, Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father by our Lord Jesus Christ.

THe holy Doctor Saint Augustine in an Epistle which he wrote to Casulanus saith that he which for fear of any power hideth the truth, provoketh the wrath of God to come upon him: for he feareth men more then God. And according to the same, the holy man Saint John Chrysostom saith: that he is not alonely a traitor to the truth, which openlie for truth teacheth a lie, but he also which doth not freely pronounce and show the truth that he knoweth. These sentences (moste redoubted Kyng) when I read now of late, and marked them earnestly in the inward partes of mine heart, they made me sore afraid, troubled and vexed me grievously in my conscience, and at the last drove me to this strayt, that either I must show forth such things as I have read and learned in Scripture, or elles to be of the sort that provoke the wrath of GOD upon them, and be traitors unto the truth: the which thing rather then it should happen, I had rather suffer extreme punishment.

For what other thing is it to be a Traytour unto the truth, then to be a Traytour and a Judas unto Christ, which is the very truth and cause of all truth? the which saith that whosoever denieth him here before men, he will deny him before his father in heaven. The which denying ought more to be feared and dread, then the loss of all temporal goods, honor, promotion, fame, prison, slander, hurtes, banishmentes, and all manner of torments, and crueltyes, yea, and death it self, be it never so shameful and painful. But alas, how little do mē regard those sharp sayings of these two holy men? and how little do they fear the terrible judgment of almighty God? and specially they which boast themselves to be guides and capitaynes unto other, and challenging unto themselves the knowledge of holy Scripture, yet will neither show the truth themselves (as they be bound) neither suffer them that would: So that unto thē may be said that which our savior Christ said to y e Pharisees, Math. 23. Woe be unto you Scribes and Pharisees, which shut up the kingdom of heaven before men, and neither will you enter in yourselves, neither suffer them that would, to enter in. And they will as much as in them lieth, debar, not only the word of God, which David calleth a light to direct and show every man how to order his affections and lusts, according to the Commaundementes of God: but also by their subtle wiliness they instruct, move, and provoke, in a manner, all Kings in Christendom to aid, succor, and help them in this their mischief: and especially in this your Realm, they have sore blinded your Liege people and Subiectes with their Laws, Customs, Ceremonyes, and Banbery Glofes, and punished them with Cursynges, Excommunications, and other corruptions (corrections I would say) and now, at the last when they see that they cannot prevail against the open truth (which the more is persecuted, the more it increaseth by their tyranny) they have made it Treason to your noble Grace to have the Scripture in English.

Here I beseech your Grace to pardon me a while and patiently to hear me a word or two: yea and though it be so that as concerning your high Majesty and regal power, whereunto almighty God hath called your Grace, there is as great difference between you and me, as between God and man. For you be here to me and to all your subjects, in God's stead, to defend, aid, and succor us in our right, and so I should tremble and quake to speak to your grace. But again, as concerning that you be a mortal man, in danger of sin, having in you the corrupt nature of Adam, in the which all we be both conceived and borne, so have you no less need of the merits of Christ's passion for your salvation, then I and other of your subjects have, which be all members of the mystical body of christ. And though you be an higher member, yet you must not disdain the lesser. For as Saint Paul saith: those members that be taken most vilest and had in least reputation, be as necessary as the other, for the preservation and keeping of the body. This, most gracious king, when I considered, and also your favorable and gentle nature, I was bold to write this rude, homely, and simple letter unto your grace, trusting that you will accept my true and faithful mind even as it is.

First and before all things I will exhort your grace to mark the life and process of our Savior Christ and his Apostles in preaching and setting forth of the Gospel, and to note also the words of our Mayster Christ, which he had to his Disciples when he sent them forth to preach his Gospel, and to these have ever in your mind the golden rule of our master Christ: The tree is known by the fruit. For by the diligent marking of these, your grace shall clearly know and perceive who be the true followers of Christ and teachers of his Gospel, and who be not. And concerning the first, all Scripture showeth playnelye that our savior Jesus Christ's life was very poor.

Begin at his birth, and I beseech you, whoever heard of a poorer or so poor as he was? It were to long to write how poor Joseph and the blessed Virgin Mary took their journey from Nazareth toward Bethlehem, in the cold and frosty winter, having nobody to wait upon them, but he both Mayster and man, and she both Mistress and maid▪ How vilely thinks your grace, they were entreated in the Inns and lodgings by the way? and in how vile and abject place was this poor maid, the mother of our Savior Jesus Christ, brought to bed in, without company, light or any other thing necessary for a woman in that plighte? Was not here a poor beginning, as concerning the world? Yes truly. And according to this beginning was the process and end of his life in this world, and yet he might by his godly power have had all the goods and treasures of this world at his pleasure, when and where he would.

But this he did to show us that his followers and Uicars should not regard nor set by the riches and treasures of this world, but after the saying of David we ought to take them, which saith thus: If riches, promotions, and dignity happen to a man, let him not set his affiaunce, pleasure, trust, & heart upon them. So that it is not against the poverty in spirit which Christ praiseth in the Gospel of Saint Matthew, chapter 5. to be rich, to be in dignity, and in honor, so that their hearts be not fixed and set vpō them so much, that they neither care for GOD nor good man. But they be enemies to this poverty in spirit, have they never so little, that have greedy and desirous minds to the goods of this world, only because they would live after their own pleasure and lusts. And they also be privy enemies (and so much the worse) which have professed (as they say) willful poverty, and will not be called worldly men. And they have Lord's Lands, and kings riches, yea rather then they would lose one jot of that which they have, they will set debate between king and king, Realm and Realm, yea between the king and his Subiectes, and cause rebellion against the Temporal power, to the which our Savior Christ himself obeyed and paid tribute, as the Gospel declareth: unto whom the holy Apostle S. Paul teacheth every Christian man to obey. Yea and beside all this, they will curse and ban, as much as in them lieth, even into the deep pit of hell, all that gain say their appetite, whereby they think their goods, promotions, or dignities should decay.

Your grace may see what means and craft the Spiritualty (as they will be called) imagine to break and withstand the Acts which were made in your graces last Parliament against their superfluities. Wherefore they that thus do, your Grace may know them not to be true followers of Christ. And although I named the spiritualty to be corrupt with this unthrifty ambition: yet I mean not all to be faulty therein, for there be some good of them. Neither will I that your Grace should take away the goods due to the Church, but take away such evil persons from the goods, and set better in their stead.

I name nor appoint no person nor persons, but remit your Grace to the rule of our Savior Christ, as in Matthew the seventh Chapiter: By their fruits ye shall know them. As touching the words that our Savior Christ spake to his Disciples when he sent them to preach his Gospel, they be readde in Matthew the fiftenth Chapiter, where he showeth, that here they shall be hated and despised of all men worldly, and brought before the Kings and Rulers, and that all evil should be said by them, for their preaching sake, but he exhorteth them to take patiently such persecution by his own example, saying: It becometh not the servant to be above the Mayster. And seeing they called me Belz bub, what marvel is it, if they call you Deuillishe persons and heretics? Read the fourtenth Chapiter of Saint Matthews Gospel, & there your Grace shall see that he promised to the true Preachers no worldly promotions or dignity, but persecution and all kinds of punishment, and that they should be betrayed even by their own brethren and children. In John also he saith: In the world ye shall have oppression, and the world shall hate you: but in me you you shall have peace. And in the 10. Chapiter of S. Matthews Gospel saith our Savior Christ also: Loe I send you forth as sheep among Wolves. So that the true Preachers go like sheep harmless, and be persecuted, and yet they revenge not their wrong, but remit all to God: so far it is of that they will persecute any other but with the word of God only, which is their weapon. And so this is the most evident tokē that our savior Jesus Christ would that his Gospel and the Preachers of it should be known by, and that it should be despised among those worldly wise men, and that they should repute it but foolishness and deceivable doctrine, and the true Preachers should be persecuted and hated, and driven from town to town, yea and at the last lose both goods and life.

And yet they that did this persecution, should think that they did well, and a great pleasure to God. And the Apostles remembering this lesson of our Sauioure Christ, were content to suffer such persecutions, as you may read in the Acts of the Apostles and the Epistles. But we never read that they ever persecuted any man. The holy apostle S. Paul saith, that every man that will live godly in christ Jesus, should suffer persecution. And also he saith further in the Epistle written to the Philippians in the first chapter: that it is not only given you to believe in the Lord, but also to suffer persecution for his sake.

Wherefore, take this for a sure conclusion, that there, where the word of God is truly preached, there is persecution, as well of the hearers as of the teachers: and where as is quietness and rest in worldly pleasure, there is not the truth. For the world loveth all that are of the world, & hateth all things that is contrary to it. And to be short, S. Paul calleth the Gospel the word of the cross, the word of punishment. And the holy Scripture doth promise nothing to the favorers and followers of it in this world, but trouble, vexation, and persecution, which these worldly men cannot suffer, nor away withal.

Therefore, pleaseth it your good Grace, to return to this golden rule of our Mayster & Savior Jesus Christ, which is this: by their fruits ye shall know them. For where you set persecution, there is the Gospel, and there is the truth: and they that do persecute, be void and without all truth: not caring for the clear light, which as our Savior Jesus Christ saith in the third Chapter of Saint John's Gospel) is come into the world, and which shall utter and show forth every man's works. And they, whose works be naught, dare not come to this light, but go about to stop it and hinder it, letting as much as they may, that the holy scripture should not be read in our mother tongue, saying that it would cause heresy and insurrection, and so they persuade, at the least way they would fain persuade your Grace to keep it back. But here mark their shameless boldness, which be not ashamed, contrary to Christ's doctrine, to gather figs of Thorns, and grapes of bushes, and to cal light darkness, and darkness light, sweet sower, and sower sweet, good evil, and evil good, and to say that that, which teacheth all obedience, should cause dissension and strife, but such is their belly wisdom: therewith they judge and measure everything, to hold and keep still this wicked Mammon, the goods of this world, which is their GOD, and hath so blinded the eyes of their hearts, that they can not see the clear light of the Sacred Scripture, though they bable never so much of it.

But as concerning this matter, other men have shown your Grace their minds, howe necessary it is to have the Scripture in English. The which thing also your Grace hath promised by your last Proclamation: the which promise I pray God that your gracious highness may shortly perform, even today before tomorrow. Nor let not the wickedness of these worldly men deceive you from your Godly purpose and promise. Remember the subtle worldly wise Counselors of Hammon the son of Naas, king of the Ammonites, which, when David had sent his Seruauntes to comfort the young King for the death of his Father, by crafty imaginations counseled Hammon, not alonely not to receive them gentlye, but to entreat them moste shamefully and cruelly saying: that they came not to comfort him, but to espy and search his lande so that afterward they bringing David word how everything stood David might come and conquer it. And so they caused the young king to sheare their heads, and cut their coats by the points, and sent thē away like fools: whom he ought rather to have made much of, and to have entreated them gently, and have given them great thanks and rewards. O wretched Counselors. But see what followed of this carnal and worldly wisdom. Truly nothing but destruction of all the whole Realm, and also of all them which took their partes.

Therefore good king, seeing that the right David, that is to say, our Savior Christ hath sent his Seruauntes, that is to say, true preachers, and his own word also to comfort our weak and sick souls, let not these worldly men make your Grace believe that they will cause insurrections and heresies, and such mischiefs as they imagine of their own mad brains, least that he be avenged upon you and your Realm, as was David upon the Ammonites, and as he hath ever been avenged upon them which have obstinately withstand and gainsayd his word. But peradventure they will lay this against me, and say that experience doth show, how that such men as call them selves followers of the Gospel, regardeth not your Graces commandment, neither set by your Proclamation, and that was well proved by these persons which of late were punished in London for keeping of such books as your grace had prohibited by proclamation: and so like as they regarded not this, so they will not regard or esteem other your Graces laws, statutes and ordinances. But this is but a crafty persuasion. For your grace knoweth that there is no man living, specially that loveth worldly promotion, that is so foolish to set forth, promote, or enhaunce his enemy, whereby he should be let of his worldly pleasures and fleshly desires: but rather he will seek all the ways possible that he can, utterly to confoūd, destroy and put him out of the way. And so as concerning your last proclamation, prohibiting such books, the very true cause of it, and chief Counselors (as men say, and of likelihood it should be) were they whose evil living and cloaked hypocrisy these books uttered and disclosed. And howbeit that there were 3. or 4. that would have had the Scripture to go forth in English, yet it happened there, as it is evermore seen, that the most parte overcometh the better, and so it might be that these men did not take this proclamation as yours, but as theirs set forth in your name, as they have done many times moe, which hath put this your Realm in great hinderance and trouble, and brought it to great penury, and more would have done if God had not mercifully provided to bring your Grace to knowledge of the falsehood and privy treason, which their head and Captayne was about: and be you sure not without adherents, if the matter be duly searched. For what marvel is it, that they being so nigh of your Council, and so familiar with your Lord's, should provoke both your Grace and them to prohibit these books, which before by their own authority have forbidden the New Testament, under pain of everlasting damnation: for such is their manner, to send a thousand men to hell, ere they send one to God, and yet the New Testament (and so I think by y e other) was me kely offered to every man that would and could, to amend it, if there were any fault.

Moreover, I will ask them the causes of all insurrections, which hath been in this Realm heretofore. And whence is it that there be so many Extortioners, bribers, murderers, and thieves which daily do not break only your graces laws, ordinances, and statutes, but also the laws and commandments of almighty God? I think they will not say these books, but rather their Pardons which causeth many a man to sin in trust of them. For as for those malefactors which I now rehearsed, you shall not find one amongst a hundredth, but that he will cry out both of these books, and also of them that have them, yea & will be glad to spend the good which he hath wrongfullye gotten, upon Fagots to burn both the books and them that have them.

And as touching these men that were latelye punished for these books, there is no man (I hear say) that can lay any word or deed against them that should sound to the breaking of any of your graces laws (this only except) if it be yours, and not rather theirs. And be it so that there be some that have these books, that be evil, unruly, and self willed persons, not regarding God's laws nor mans, yet these books be not the cause thereof, no more then was the bodily presence of Christ and his words the cause that Judas fell, but their own froward mind and carnal wit, which should be amended by the virtuous example of living of their Curates, & by the true expositiō of the scripture. If the lay people had such Curates that would thus do their office, these books nor the Devil himself could not hurt them, nor make them to go out of frame, so that the lack of good Curates is the destruction and cause of all mischief. Neither do I write these things because that I will either excuse these men lately punished or to affirm all to be true writ̄ in these books, which I have not all read, but to show that there cannot such inconvenience follow of them, and specially of the scripture as they would make men believe should follow.

And though it be so that your Grace may by other books, and namely by the Scripture it self know & perceive the hypocrite Wolves clad in sheep's clothing, yet I think myself bound in conscience to utter unto your grace such things as God put in mind to write. And this I do (God so judge me) not for hate of any person or persons living, nor for that that I think the word of GOD should go forth without persecution, if your Grace had commanded that every man within your Realm should have it in his mothers tongue. For the Gospel must needs have persecution unto the time that it be preached throughout all the world, which is the last sign y t Christ shown to his Disciples that should come before the day of judgment: so that if your grace had once commanded that the scripture should be put forth, the devil would set forth some wyle or other to persecute the truth. But my purpose is, for the love that I have to God principally, & the glory of his name, which is only known by his word, and for the true allegiaunce that I owe unto your Grace, and not to hide in the ground of my heart the talent given me of God, but to chaffer it forth to other, that it may increase to the pleasure of God, to exhort your grace to avoid and beware of these mischievous flatterers and their abhominable ways and counsels.

And take heed whose counsels your grace doth take in this matter: for there be some that for fear of losing of their worldly worship and honor, will not leave their opinion, which rashly, and that to please men withal by whom they had great promotion, they took upon them to defend by writing, so that now they think that all their felicity which they put in this life, should be mard, and their wisdom not so greatly regarded, if that which they have so slanderously oppressed, should be now put forth and allowed. But alas, let these men remember S. Paul, how fervent he was against the truth (and that of a good zeal) before he was called: he thought no shame to suffer punishment & great persecutions for that which he before despised & called heresy. And I am sure that their living is not more perfect then S. Paul's was, as concerning the outward works of the law, before he was converted.

Also the king and Prophet David was not ashamed to forsake his good intent in building of the Temple, after that the Prophet Nathan had shown him that it was not the pleasure of god that he should build any house for him: and notwithstanding that Nathan had before allowed & praised the purpose of David, yet he was not ashamed to revoke and eat his words again when he knew that they were not according to God's will and pleasure.

Wherefore they be sore drowned in worldly wisdom that think it against their worship to knowledge their ignorance: whom I pray to God that your grace may es ye, and take heed of their worldly wisdom, which is foolishness before God, that you may do that that God commandeth, and not that seemeth good in your own sight without the word of God, that your grace may be found acceptable in his sight and one of the menbers of his church and according to the office that he hath called your Grace unto, you may be found a faithful minister of his gifts, and not a defender of his faith, for he will not have it defended by man or man's power, but by his words only, by the which he hath evermore defended it, and that by a way far above man's power or reason, as all the stories of the Bible maketh mention.

Wherefore gracious king remember yourself, have pity upon your soul, and think that the day is even at hand when you shall give accounts of your office and of the blood that hath been shed with your sword. In the which day that your grace may stand steadfastly and be not ashamed, but to be clear and ready in your reckoning & to have (as they say) your Quites est, sealed with the blood of our Savior Christ which only serveth at that day, is my daily prayer to him that suffered death for our sins, which also prayeth to his father for grace for us continually. To whom be all honor and praise forever. Amē. The spirit of God preserve your Grace. Anno Domini 1530. 1. die Decembris.

In this Letter of Mayster Latimer to the king above prefixed, many things we have to consider: First his good conscience to God, his good will to the king, the duty of a right Pastor unto truth, his tender care to the common wealth, and especially to the Church of Christ. Further we have to consider the abuse of Princes courts, how kings many times be abused with flatterers and wicked coūsellers about them, and especially we may note the subtle practices of prelates, in abusing the name and authority of kings to set forth their own malignaunt proceedings. We may see moreover, and rather marvel at in the said letter, the great boldness and divine stoutness in this man, who as yet being no Bishop, so freely and plainly without all fear of death aduentring his own life to discharge his conscience, durst so boldly, to so mighty a Prince, in such a dangerous case against the kings law and proc amation set out, in such a terrible time, take upon him to write, and to admonish that, which no coūseller durst once speak unto him, in defense of Christ's Gospel. Whose example if the Bishops and Prelates of this Realm, for their partes likewise in like cases of necessity would follow (as in deed they should) so many things peradventure would not be so out of frame as they be, and all for lack that the officers of God's word do not their duty.

Finally, this moreover in the said letter is to be noted, how blessedly almighty God wrought with his faithful servant, whose bold adventure, and wholesome counsel, though it did not preuayl through the iniquity of the time: yet notwithstanding GOD so wrought with his servant in doing his duty, that no danger, nor yet displeasure rose to him thereby, but rather thanks and good will of the Prince: for not long after the same he was advanced by the king to the Bishopric of Worcester, as is above declared.

Seeing M. Latimer was so bold and plain with the king (as is afore specified) no great marvel if he did use like freedom and playnes toward other meaner persons in admonishing them of their misorder, especially if any such occasion were given, where truth and equity required his defense against injury and oppression. For example whereof we have another Letter of his, written to a certain Justice of peace in Warwickshyre, who as he is long since departed, so he shall be here unnamed. The letter although it may seme somewhat long and tedious: yet I thought here not to overpass the same for diverse & sundry respects: first that the virtue and faithful conscience of this good Pastor may appear more at large: also for that all other Bishops and pastors by this example may learn with like zeal and stomach to discharge their duty and conscience in reforming things amiss and in pouderyng with the salt of God's word the sores of the people. Which thing if every Bishop for his part within his Dioces had done in king Edward's days, in redressing such corruption of that time with like diligence as this man did, verily I suppose that the persecution of queen Mary had not so plagued the Realm as it did: but where as never man almost liveth in due order, and yet never a Bishoppe will stir to seek redress, what can become of the Realm? Item, another respect is because of the Justices and all other placed in room and office, which may take heed hereby, not to abuse their authority to tread down truth and bear down poor men with open wrong through extortion or partiality: and finally that all injurious oppressors whatsoever, by the said letter may take some fruit of wholesome admonition. What the argument and occasion was of this letter, I shown before. The tenor and purporte thereof, as it was written to the Gentleman, is this as followeth.

A fruitful letter of M. Latimer, written to a certain Gentleman.

RIght worshipful, salutem in Domino. And now Syr I understand, that you be in great admirations at me, and take very greeuouslye my manner of writing to you, adding thereunto that you will not bear it at my hand, no not and I were the best Bishop in England. &c.

Ah Syr? I see well I may say as the common saying is: Well have I fished and caught a Frog: brought little to pass with much ado. You will not bear it with me, you say. Why syr, what will ye do with me? You will not fight with me, I trow. It may seem unseemly for a Justice of peace to be a breaker of peace. I am glad the dotyng time of my foolish youth is gone and paste? What will you then do with me, in that you say you will not bear it at my hand? What hath my hand offended you? Perchaunce you will conuent me before some Judge, and call me into some court. Deus been vertat. Equidem non recuso iudicium vllum, Accusemus inuicem, vt emendemus alius alium in nomine Domini. Fiat iustitia in iudicio. And then and there, do best have best, for club half penny. Or peradventure ye will set pen to paper, and all to rattle me in a letter, wherein confuting me you will defend yourself and your brother against me. Now that would I see, quoth long Roben, vt dicitur vulgariter. Non potero sane non vehementer probare eiusmodi industriam: For so should both your integrityes and innocencyes best appear, if you be able to defend both your own procedinges, & your brothers doings in this matter to be upright. Et ego tum iustis rationibus victus, libenter cedam, culpam humiliter confessurus. But I think it will not be. But now first of all let me know what it is that ye will not bear at my hand? What have I done with my hand? What hath my hand trespassed you? Forsoothe, that can I tell, no man better: For I have charitably monished you in a secret letter, of your slipper dealing, and such like misbehavior. O quam grave piaculum? i. What a sore matter is this? And will ye not bear so much with me? Will ye not take such a show of my good will towards you, and toward the saving of your soul at my hand? Oh Lord God, who would have thought that Mayster N. had been so impudent, that he would not bear a godly monition for the wealth of his soul? I have in use to commit such trespasses many times in a year with your betters by two ot three degrees, both Lord's and Ladies, of the best in the Realm, and yet hitherto I have not heard that any of them have said in their displeasure, that they will not bear it at my hand. Are you yet to be taught, what is the office, liberty, & privilege of a Preacher? What is it else, but even arguere mundum de peccato, without respect of persons, quod quidem ipsum est ipsius spiritus sancti peculiare in ecclesia munus & officium, sed non nisi per Praedicatores legitimos exequendum. You could but ill bear (belike) to hear your fault openly reproved in the Pulpit, which cannot bear the same in a secret sealed up letter, written both friendly, charitably, and truly, nisi forte acriter reprehendere peccata, sit iam omni charitate, amicitia, veritate carere. But Mayster N. if you will give me leave to be plain with you, I fear me you be so plunged in worldly purchasinges, and so drowned in the manifold dregs of this deceiveable world, that I ween you have forgotten your Catechism. Read therefore again the opening of the first commandment, and then tell me whether you of me, or I of you have just cause to complain. &c.

Item Syr, you said further that I am wonderfully abused by my neighbor. &c. How so, good Mayster N? Wherein? Or how will you prove it to be true, and when? So you said that he had abused you, and given you wrong information, but the contrary is found true by good testimony of Mayster Chamber, which heard as well as you, what my neighbor said, and hath testified the same, both to you, and against you, full like himself. Master N. to forge and feine (which argueth an ill cause) that is one thing: but to prove what a man doth say, that is another thing. As though you were privileged to outface poor men & bear them in hand what you list, as may seem to make some maintenance for your naughty cause. Trust me Mayster N. I was but a very little acquainted with my neighbor when this matter begā: but now I have found him so conformable to honesty, upright in his dealings, and so true in his talk, that I esteem him better, then I do some other whom I have perceived and found other ways. For I will flatter no man, nor yet claw his back in his folly, but esteem all men as I find them, allowing what is good, and disalowing what is bad, In omnibus hominibus sieve amicis sieve inimicis, iuxta praeceptum Paulinum, à filijs huius seculi in precio non habitum: Sitis odio, inquit, prosequentes quod malum est, adhaerentes autem ei quod bonum est: Neque bonum malum, nec malum bonum in gratiam hominum affirmemus vnquam, id quod filij huius seculi vulgo faciunt, vt est videre vbique. And now what manner of man do you make me Mayster N. when you note me to be so much abused by so ignorant a man, so simple, so plain, and so far without all wrinkles? Have I lived so long in this tottering world, and have I been so many ways turmoiled and tossed up and down, and so much, as it were seasoned with the powder of so many experiences to and fro, to be now so far bewitched and alienated from my wyttes, as though I could not discern cheese from chalk, truth from falsehood, but that every seely soul, and base witted man might easily abuse me to what enterprise he listed at his pleasure? Well, I say not nay, but I may be abused. But why do you not tell we howe your brother abused me, promising before me and many moe, that he would stand to your awardship, and now doth deny it? Why do you not tell me, how those two false faythlesse wretches abused me, promising also to abide your awarde, and doth it not? Yea, why do you not tell me, how you yourself have abused me, promising me to redress the injury and wrong that your brother hath done to my neighbor, and have not fulfilled your promise? These notable abuses be nothing with you, but only you must needs burden me with my neighbors abusing me, which is none at all, as farreforth as ever I could perceive, so GOD help me in my need. For if he had abused me as you and other have done, I should be soon at a point with him, for anything further doing for him. &c.

Item Syr, you said further, that I shall never be able to prove that either your brother, or the two tenauntes agreed to stand to your award. &c. No Syr? Mayster N. you say belike as you would have it to be, or as your brother with his adherents have persuaded you to think it to be, so inducing you to do their request to your own shame and rebuke, if you persevere in the same, beside the peril of your soul, for consenting at least wa , to the mainteinance by falsehood of your brothers iniquity. For in that you would your awardship should take none effect, you show yourself nothing inclinable to the redress of your brothers vnright dealing with an honest poor man, which hath been ready at your request to do you pleasure with his things, or else he had never come into this wrangle for his own goods with your brother.

Ah Mayster N. what manner of man do you show yourself to be? or what manner of conscience do you show yourself to have? For first, as touching your brother, you know right well, that Sir Thomas Cokin with a Letter of his own hand writing, hath witnessed unto your brothers agreement, which letter he sent to me unsealed, and I shown the same to my neighbor and other mo ere I sealed it, and perchance have a copy of the same yet to show. With what conscience then can you say that I shall never be able to prove it? Shall not three men upon their oaths make a sufficient proof trow you? vel ipso dicente Domino: in ore duorum vel trium. &c. Yea, you think it true I dare say, in your conscience, if you have any conscience, though I were in my grave, and so unable to prove anything. And as for the two tenauntes, they be as they be, and I trust to see them handled according as they be: for there be three men yet alive that dare swear upon a book, that they both did agree. But what should we look for at such men's hands, when you yourself play the part you do? Verum viuit adhuc Deus, qui videt omnia & iudicat just. &c.

Item Syr, you said yet further, that the Justices of peace in the country think you very unnatural, in taking part with me before your brother. &c. Ah Mayster N. what a sentence is this to come out of your mouth? For partaking is one thing? and ministering of justice is another thing: and a worthy minister of justice will be no Partaker, but one indifferent between party and partye. And did I require you to take my parte, I pray you? No, I required you to minister justice between your brother and mine neighbor without any partaking with either other. But what manner of Justices be they I pray you, which would so fain have you to take parte naturally with your Brother, when you ought and should reform and amende your brother? as you yourself know, no man better. What? Justices? no Iuggelers you might more worthily call such as they be, then Justices. Be they those Justices which call you unnatural, for that you will not take your brothers part against all right & conscience, whom you had picked out & appointed to have the final hearing and determining of my neighbors cause after your substantial and fine award making? Verily I think no less. Forsooth he is much beholding to you, & I also for his sake. Is that the wholesome counsel that you have to give your poor neighbors in their need? In deed you show yourself a worthy Iuggler: Oh, I would have said a Iusticier, among other of your iuggling and partaking Justices. Deum bonum, what is this world? Mary Syr my neighbor had sponne a fair thread, if your partaking Justices through your good counsel had had his matter in ordering and finishing. I pray God save me and all my friends, with all God's flock, from the whole fellowship of your so natural and partaking Justices. Amen.

Lord God, who would have thought that there had been so many partaking Justices, that is to say, unjust Justices in Warwickshire, if Master N. himself one of the same order (but altogether out of order) and therefore knoweth it best, had not told us the tale? but these call you (you say) very unnatural. &c. And why not rather (I pray you) to much natural? For we read de natura duplici, integra & corrupta. Illa erat iusticiae plena: haec nisi reparata semper manet iniusta, iniusticiae fructus alios post alios paritura: so that he that will not help his brother having a just cause in his need, may be justly called unnatural, as not doing iuxta instinctu naturae, sieve integre, sieve reparate. i. According to the instinct of nature either as it was at the beginning, or as it was restored. But he that will take his brothers parte against right, as to ratify his brothers wrong deceiving, he is too much natural, tanquam sequens ingenium sieve inclinationem naturae corruptae, contra voluntatem Dei. i. As one following the disposition and inclination of corrupt nature against the will of God: and so to be natural may seem to be cater cosin or cosin germane with, to be diabolical.

I fear me we have to many Justices that be to much natural to their own perishment both body and soul. For worthy Justices, having ever the fear and dread of God before their eyes (quales sunt pauciores apud nos, quàm vellem) will have no respect at all in their judgments and proceedings, ad propinquitatem sanguinis, but altogether ad dignitatem & aequitatem causae, vt quod iustum est semper iudicent intuitu Dei, non quod iniustum est intuitu hominum: of which number I pray God make you one. Amen. Iustus est (saith John) qui facit iusticiam. At, qui facit peccatum (id quod facit, quisquis injust facit in gratiam & fauorem vllius hominis) ex diabolo est. i. He is just that doth justice. But he that sinneth (as they all do which do unjustly for favor and pleasure of men) is of the devil (saith he) which once all our pataking and unnatural iustices be with all their partiality and naturalitie. Quare dignum & iustum est, that as many as be such Justices, just priuentur munere, & amplius quoque plectantur pro sui quisque facinoris quantitate, vt vel sic tandem abscindantur, tanquam nati in incommodum reipub. nostrae, qui nos conturbant cum adiuuare debeant, Amen.

Quare seponite iustitiam, & sequimini naturam, as your naturals and diabolicales would have you to do, that is, even as just as Germans lips, which came not together by nine mile, Vt Vulgo dicunt &c.

Item Sir, finally and last of all you added these words following? Well (quod you) let master Latimer take heed howe he meddleth with my brother, for he is like to find as crabbed and as froward a piece of him, as ever he found in his life. &c. Ah sir? and is your brother such a one as you speak of in deed? merciful GOD, what a commendation is this for one brother to give another? Est ne eiusmodi gloriatio tua mi amice? And were it not possible, trow you to make him better? It is written: Vexatio dat intellectum. And again, Bonum mihi Domine quod humiliasti me. At least way I may pray to God for him as David did for such like, ad hunc modum: Chamo & freno maxillas eorum constringe qui non approximant at te. In the mean season I would I had never known neither of you both: for so should I have been without this inward sorrow of my heart, to see such untowardness of you both to godliness: for I cannot be but heavy hearted, to see such men so wickedly minded. Well, let us ponder a little better your words, where you say, I shall find him as crabbed and as froward a piece &c. Mark well your own words. For by the tenor of the same it plainly appeareth, that you confess your brothers cause wherein he so stiffly standeth, to be unjust and very naught. For he that standeth so stiffly in a good quarrel and a just cause, as many good men have done, is called a fast man, a constant a trustye man. But he that is so obstable and intractable in wickedness and wrong doing, is commonly called a crabbed and froward piece, as you name your brother to be.

Wherefore knowing so well youre brothers cause to be so naughty, why have you not endeavored youre self, as a worthy Justice, to reform him accordingly, as I required you, and you promised me to do, now almost twelve months ago, if not altogether? Summa Summarum, Master N. if you will not come of shortly, and apply yourself thereunto more effectually hereafter then you have done heretofore, be you well assured thereof, I shall detecte you to all the friends that I have in England, both hye and low, as well his crabbednes and frowardness, as your colorable supportation of the same, that I trust I shall be able thereby, either to bring you both to some goodness, or at least way, I shall so warn my friends and all honest hearts to beware of your ilnes, that they shall take either no hurt at all, or at least way, least harm by you through mine aduertisemente, in that, knowing you perfectly, they may the better avoid and shun youre company. You shall not stay me master N. no though you would give me all the lands and goods you have as riche as you are noted to be. Ego nolo tam iustam causam derelinquere, ego nolo peccatis alienis in hac parte communicare. For whether it be per detestabilem, superbiam, whether per abominabilem auaritiam, or by both two linked to gether, it is no small iniquity to keep any one poor mā so long frō his right and duty so stiff neckedly and obstinately, or whether ye will crabbedly and frowardly. And what is it then any manner of ways to consent to the same? You know I trow, Mayster N. furtum quid sit: nempe quouismodo auferre vel retinere alienam em inuito Domino, vt quidam definiunt. Si fur sit qui sic palam facit, quis erit qui facientem probat, tutatur, propugnat, vel quibuscunque ambagibus suffulcit? id est. What theft is, that is, to take or deteyne by any manner of way, another man's good against his will that is the owner, as some define it. If he be a thief that so doth openly, what shall he be that approveth him which is the doer, defendeth, mayntayneth, and supporteth him by any manner of color? Consider with yourself good master N quid sit opprimere & fraudare in negotio fratrem, and what followeth thereof. It is truly said, non tollitur peccatum, nisi restituatur obl tum. No restitution, no salvation▪ which is as well to be understand, de rebus per frauds, technas, & dolos, as de rebus per manifestum furtum & latrocinium partis. Wherefore let not your brother master N. by cavillation continue in the Devils possession. I will do the best I can, and wrestle with the Devil omnib{us} viribus, to deliver you both frō him. I will leave no one stone vnmoued, to have both you and your brother saved. There is neither Archbishop nor Byshoppe, nor yet any learned man either in Universities or elsewhere, that I am acquainted withal that shall not write unto you, and in their writing by their learning confute you. There is no Godly man of Law in this realm that I am acquainted withal, but they shall write unto you, and confute you by the law. There is neither Lord nor Lady, nor yet any noble personage in this Realm, that I am acquainted withal, but they shall write unto you, and Godlye threaten you with their authority.

I will do all this: yea, and kneel upon both my knees before the kings majesty, and all his honorable Counsaile, with most humble petition for youre reformation, rather then the Devil shall possess you still, to you inall damnation. So that I do not despair, but verily trust, one way or other, to pluck both you, and also your crabbed brother, as crabbed as you say he is, out of the Deuilles claws, maugre the Deuilles heart.

These premisses well considered, look upon it, good master N. that we have no farther ado: God's plague is presentlye upon us: therefore let us now diligently look about us, and in no wise defend, but willingly reknowledge, and amend whatsoever hath been amiss. These were the capital points of youre talk (as I was informed) after you had perused that my nipping and unpleasant letter: and I thought good to make you some answer to them, if perchance I might so move you, the rather to call yourself to some better remembrance, and so more earnestly apply yourself, to accomplish and perform what you have begun and promised to do, namely the thing it self being of such sort, as apparently tendeth both to your worship, and also to God's high pleasure.

Thus loe with a mad head, but yet a good will, after longe scribbling, I wotte not well what (but I know you can read it, and comprehend it well enough) I bid you most heartily to fare in the Lord, with good health, and long life to God's pleasure, Amen. From Baxsterley the xv of July.

During the time that the said M. Latimer was prisoner in Oxford, we read not of much that he did write, besides his conference with Doctor Ridley, and his protestation at the time of his disputation. Otherwise of letters, we find very few or none, that he did write to his friends abroad, save only these few lines, which he wrote to one maistres Wilkinson of Londō, a godly matron, and an exile afterward for the Gospels sake. Who so long as she remained in England, was a singular patronesse to the good saints of God, and learned Bishops, as to master Hooper, to the Bishop of Hereford, to Mayster Coverdale, M. Latimer, Doctor Cramner with many other. The copy and effect of which his letter to Maystres Wilkinson here followeth.

A letter sent to maystres Wilkinson of London widow, from master Hugh Latimer out of Bocardo in Oxford.

IF the gift of a pot of a cold water, shall not be in oblivion with God, how can God forget your manifold & bountiful gifts, when he shall say to you: I was in prison and you visited me. God grant us all to do and suffer while we be here, as may be to his will and pleasure. Amen.

Yours in Bocardo Hugh Latimer.

Touching the memorable acts and doings of this worthy man, among many other this is not to be neglected, what a bold enterprise he attempted, in sending to king Henry a present, the manner whereof is this. There was then, and yet remaineth still, an old custom received from the old Romans, that upon Newyeares day being the first day of January, every Bishoppe with some handsome Newyeares gift, should gratify the king: and so they did, some with gold, some with silver, some with a purse full of money, and someone thing, some another: but master Latimer being bishop of Worcester then, among the rest presented a New Testament, for his Newyeares gift: with a napkyn having this posy about it: Fornicatores & adulteros iudicabit Dominus.

And thus hast thou gentle reader, the whole life, both of master Ridley, & of master Latimer, two worthy doers in the church of Christ, severally and by themselves set forth, and described with all their doings, writings, disputations, sufferings, their painful trauayles, faithful preachings, studyous service in Christ's Church, their patiente imprisonmente, and constant fortitude in that which they had taught, with all other their proceedings from time to time, since their first springinge years, to this present time and Moneth of Queen Mary, being the Moneth of October. Anno. 1555. In the which Moneth they were both brought forth together, to their final examination and execution. Wherefore, as we have heretofore declared, both their lives seuerallye, and distinctlye one from the other, so now jointly to couple them both together, as they were together both joined in one society of cause and Martyrdom, we will by the grace of Christ prosecute the rest that remaineth, concerning their latter examination, disgrading, and constant suffering, with the order and manner, also of the Commissioners, which were Mayster White Bishop of Lincoln, Mayster Brookes Bishop of Gloucester, with others: and what were their words, their objections, their Orations there used, and what again were the answers of these men to the same as in the process here followeth to be seen.

The order and manner of the examination of Doctor Ridley, and master Latimer, had the xxx. day of September. 1555.

FIrst, after the appearing of Thomas Cranmer Archbyshop of Canterbury, before the Popes Delegate, and the Queens Commissioners in S. Mary's Church at Oxford, about the xii. day of September, whereof more shall be said (by the Lord's grace) when we come to the death of the said Archbyshoppe: shortly after upon the 28. day of the said month of September, was sent down to Oxford another Commission from Cardinal Poole Legate a latere, to John White, Byshoppe of Lincoln, to Doctor Brokes Bishop of Gloucester, and to Doctor Holiman, Byshoppe of Bristow. The contents and virtue of which Commission was, that the said John of Lincoln, James of Gloucester, and John of Bristow, they or two of them, should have full power and authority, to ascite, examine, and judge master Hugh Latimer and M. Doctor Ridley, pretensed Bishops of Worcester, and London, for divers and sundry erroneous opinyons, which the said Hugh Latimer, and Nicholas Ridley, did hold and maintain in open disputations had in Oxford, in the Monethes of Maye, June, and July, in the year of our Lord 1554. as longe before in the time of perdition and sithen. The which opynions if the named persons would now recant, giving and yealdyng themselves to the determination of the universal and Catholic Church, planted by Peter in the blessed Sea of Rome, that then the deputed Judges, by the said authority of their Commission, should have power to receive the said penitente persons, and forthwith minister to them, the reconciliation of the holy Father the Pope, but if the said Hugh Latimer, and Nicholas Ridley would stoughtly and stubbornly defend, and maintain these their erroneous and assertions, that then the said Lord's by their Commission, should proceed in form of Judgment, according to the law of Heretics that is degradyng them from their promotion, and dignity of bishops, priests, & all other Ecclesiastical orders, should pronounce them as Heretics, and therefore clean to cut them off from the Church, and so to yealde them to receive punishments, due to all such heresy and schism.

Wherefore, the last of September, the said two persons Nicholas Ridley, and Hugh Latimer, were ascited to appear before the said Lord's, in the divinity school at Oxford, at viii. of the clock. At what time thither repaired the Lord's, placyng themselves in high seat, made for public lectures and disputations, according to the usage of that school, being then fair set, and trymmed with clothe of Tissue, and cushynges of Ueluet: and after the said Lord's were placed and set, the said Latimer & Ridley were sent for, and first appeared master Doctor Ridley, and anon master Latimer. But because it seemed good severally to examine them, M. Latimer was kept back, until Doctor Ridley was thoroughly examined. Therefore soon after the coming of Doctor Ridley into the school: the Commission was published by an appointed Notary, and openly read. But Doctor Ridley standing bare headed, humbly expectinge the cause of that his appearance, eftsoons as he had heard the Cardinal named, and the Popes holiness, put on his cap. Wherefore after the commission was published, in form and sense above specified, the Bishop of Lincoln spake in sense following.

Lincoln.

M. Ridley, although neither I, neither my Lord's here, in respect of our own persons, do look for cap or knee, yet because we bear & represent, such persons as we do, that is my Lord Cardinals grace, Legate a latere to the popes holiness, as well in that he is of a noble parentage, and therewith master Ridley moved his cap with lowly obeysaunce descending from y e regal blood, as in that he is a man worthy to be reverenced with all humility, for his great knowledge and learning, noble virtues, and godly life, and especially in that he is here in England deputye to the popes holiness, it should have becomed you at his name, to have discovered your head. Wherefore except you will of youre own self, take the pains to put your hand to your head, and at the nomination, as well of the said Cardinal, as of y e Popes holiness uncover the same, least that this your contumacy exhibited how before us, should be prejudicial to the said mo •• e reverend persons (which thing we may in no case suffer) you shall cause us to take the pain, to cause some man to pluck off youre cap from you. To whom master Ridley making his petition for lycence, answered.

Ridley.

As touching that you said (my Lord) that you of your own persons desire no cap nor knee, but only require the same, in consideration that you represent the Cardinals graces person, I do you to wit, and thereupon make my protestation, that I did put on my cap at the naming of the Cardinals grace, neither for any contumacye that I bear towards your own persons, neither for any derogation of honor toward the Lord Cardinals grace. For I know him to be a man worthy of all humility, reverence, and honor, in that he came of the most regal blood, & in that he is a man endued with manifold graces of learning and virtue, and as touching these virtues and points, I with all humility (therewith he put of his cap, and bowed his knee) and obeisance that I may, will reverence, and honor his grace: but in that he is Legate to the Bishop of Rome (and therewith put on his cap) whose usurped supremacy, and abused authority, I utterly refuse and renounce, I may in no wise give any obeysaunce, or honor unto him, least that my so doing and behavior, might be prejudicial to mine oath, & derogation to the verity of God's word, and therefore that I might not only by confession, profess the veritye in not reverencing the renounced authority, contrary to God's word, but also in gesture, in behauioure, and all my doings express the same, I have put on my cap, and for this consideration only, and not for any contumacye to your Lorshipp, neither contempt of this worshipful audience, neither derogation of any honor due to the Cardinal his grace, both for his noble parentage, and also his excellent qualities, I have kept on my cap.

Lincoln.

M. Ridley, you excuse yourself of that, with the which we pressed you not, in that you proteste you keep on your cap, neither for any contumacy towards us (which look for no such honor of you) neither for any contempt of this audience: which although justly they may (yet as I suppose) in this case do not require any such obeysaunce of you: neither in derogation of any honor but to my Lord Cardinals grace, for his regal descent (at which word M. Ridley moved his cap) & excellent qualities: for although in all the premisses honor be due, yet in these respects, we require none of you, but only in that my Lord Cardinals grace is here in England, deputy of the Popes holiness (at which word the Lord's and others put of their caps, and master Ridley put on his) and therefore we say unto you the second time, that except you take the pains yourself, to put your hand to your head, and put of your cap, you shall put us to the pain, to cause some man to take it from you, except you allege some infirmity and sickness, or other more reasonable cause, upon the consideration whereof, we may do as 〈◊〉 think good.

Ridley.

The premisses I said only for this end, that it might as well appear to your Lordships, as to this worshipful audience, why and for what consideration, I used such kind of behavior, in not humbling myself to youre Lordships with cap and knee: and as for my sickness, I thank my Lord GOD, that I am as well at ase, as I was this long season: and therefore I do not pretend that which is not, but only this, that it might appear by this my behavior, that I acknowledge in no point that usurped supremacy of Rome and therefore contemn and utterly despise, all authority coming from him. In taking of my cap, do as it shall please your Lordships, and I shall be content.

Then the Bishop of Lincoln, after the third admonion, commanded one of the Bedles (that is an officer of y e university) to pluck his cap from his head. M. Ridley bowing his head to the Officer, gently permitted him to take away his cap.

After this, the Bishop of Lincoln in a long Oration exhorted M. Ridley, to recant and submit himself to the universal faith of Christ, in this manner.

Lincol.

M. Ridley, I am sure you have sufficiently ondered with yourself, the effect of this our commission with good advisement, considering both points thereof, how that authority is given to us, if you shall receive the true doctrine of the Church, which first was founded by Peter at Rome immediately after the death of Christ, and from him by lineal succession hath been brought to this our time, if you will be content to renounce your former errors, recant your heretical and seditious opinions, content to yield yourself to the undoubted faith, & truth of the Gospel, received and always taught of the catholic, and Apostolic Church, the which the king and Queen, all the Nobles of this Realm, and commons of y e same, all Christian people have & do confess, you only standing alone by yourself. You understand and perceive, I am sure, that authority is given us to receive you, to reconcile you, and upon due penance to adjoin and associate you again into the number of the Catholics and Christ's Church, from the which you have so long straied, without the which no man can be saved, the which thing I and my Lord's here, yea and all, as well Nobles and commons of this realm most heartily desire, and I for my part (wherewith he put of his cap) most earnestly exhort you to do.

Remember master Ridley, it is no strange country whether I exhort you to return. You were once one of us you have taken degrees in the school. You were made Prieste, and became a Preacher, setting forth the same doctrine, which we do now. You were made Byshoppe according to our laws: and to be short, it is not so longe agone, sithe you separated yourself from us, and in the time of Heresye, became a setter forth of that Deuillishe and seditious doctrine, which in these la ter days was preached amongst us. For at what time the new doctrine of only faith began to spring the counsel willing to win my Lord Chancellor sent you to him▪ (I then being in my Lord's house unknown as I suppose to you) and after you had talked w t my Lord secretly, and were departed immediately my Lord declared certain points of your talk, & means of your persuasion, and amongst other this was one, that you should say, tush my Lord this matter of justification is but a trifle, let us not stick to condescende herein to them: but for God's love my Lord, stand stoutly in the verity of the Sacrament: for I see they will assault that also. If this be true (as my Lord is a man credible enough in such a matter) hereby it is declared of what mind you were then, as touching the truth of the moste blessed sacrament.

Also in a sermon of yours at Paul's Cross, you as effectually and as Catholickely spake of that blessed sacrament, as any mā might have done, whereby it appeareth that it is no strange thing, nor unknown place whereunto I exhort you. I wish you to return thither from whence you came: That is, together with us to acknowledge the truth, to acknowledge y e church of God, wherein no man may err, to acknowledge the supremacye, of our moste reverend father in God the Popes holiness (which as I said) lineally taketh his dissent from Peter, upon whom Christ promised before his death to build his church the which supremacy or prerogative, the moste ancient fathers in all ages, in all times did acknowledge: and here he brought a place or two out of the Doctors, but especially stayed upon a saying of Saint Augustine, which writeth in this manner: Totus orbis christianus intransmarinis, & longe remotis terris Romanae Ecclesiae subiectus est. That is: All the Christian countries beyond the sea, are subject to the Church of Rome. Here you see M. Ridley, that all Christendom is subject to the church of Rome. What should stay you therefore to confess the same with saint Agustine, and the other Fathers.

Then M. Ridley desired his patience, to suffer him to speak somewhat of the premisses, least the multitude of things might confound his memory, and having grant thereunto, said in this manner:

Ridley.

My Lord, I most heartily thank your Lordshyp, as well for your gentleness, as also for youre sobrietye in talk, and for your good and favorable zeal in this learned exhortation, in the which I have marked especially three points, which you used to persuade me to leave my doctrine, and Religiō which, which I perfectly know & am thoroughly persuaded to be grounded not upon man's imagination and decrees, but upon the infallible truth of Christ's Gospel, and not to look back, and to return to the Romish sea, contrary to mine oath, contrary to the prerogative and crown of this Realm, and especially which moveth me most) contrary to the expressed word of God.

The first point is this, that the sea of Rome taking his beginning from Peter, upon whom you say Christ hath built his Church, hath in all ages lineally from Bishop to Bishop been brought to this time.

Secondly, that even the holy Fathers from time to time, have in their writings confessed the same.

Thirdly, that in that I was once of the same opinion and together with you I did acknowledge the same.

First, as touching the saying of Christ, from whence your Lordship gathereth the foundation of the Church upon Peter, truly the place is not so to be understand as you take it, as the circumstance of the place will declare. For after that Christ had asked his Discyples whom men judged him to be, and they had answered, that some had said he was a Prophet, some Helias, someone thing, some another, then he said, whom say ye that I am? Thē Peter said: I say that thou art Christ the son of God. To whom Christ answered: I say Tu es Petrus, & super hanc Petram aedificabo Ecclesiam meam. i. Thou art Peter, and upon this stone I will build my Church: that is to say, upon this stone not meaning Peter himself, as though he would have constitute a mortal man, so frail and brickle a foundation of his stable and infallible Church: But upon this Rock stone, that is this confession of thine, that I am the son of GOD, I will build my Church. For this is the foundation and beginning of all Christianity, with word, heart and mind, to confess that Christ is the son of God. Whosoever believeth not this, Christ is not in him: and he cannot have the mark of Christ printed in his forehead, which confesseth not that Christ is the son of God.

Therefore Christ said unto Peter, that upon this rock that is upon this his confession, that he was Christ the son of God, he would build his Church, to declare that without this faith, no man can come to Christ: so that this belief, that Christ is the son of God, is y e foundation of our christianity, and the foundation of y e church. Here you see upon what foundation Christ's Church is built, not upon the frailty of man, but upon the stable and infallible word of God.

Now as touching the lineal descent of the Bishops in the Sea of Rome true it is that y e Patriarchs of Rome in the Apostles time, and long after was a great maintayner, and a setter forth of Christ's glory, in the which above all other countries and regyons there especially was preached the true Gospel, the sacraments wer most duly ministered, and as before Christ's coming, it was a City so valiant in prowess, and marshall affairs, that all the world was in a manner subject to it, and after Christ's passion, and diverse of the Apostles there suffered persecution for the Gospelles sake: so after that the Emperors, their hearts being illuminated, received the gospel, and became Christians, the Gospel there, as well for the great power and dominion, as for the fame of y e place flourished most, whereby the Bishops of y e place wer had in more reverence and honor, most esteemed in all counsayles and assemblies, not because they acknowledged them to be their head, but because the place was moste reverenced and spoken of, for the great power and strength of the same. As now here in England, the Bishop of Lincoln in Sessions and sittinges, hath the preeminence of the other Bishops, not that he is the head and ruler of them: but for the dignity of the Byshoppricke (and therewith the people smiled.) Wherefore the Doctors in their writings, have spoken moste reverently of this Sea of Rome and in their writings preferred it: and this is the prerogative, which your Lordship did rehearse, the ancient Doctors to give to the sea of Rome.

Semblably, I cannot nor dare not but commend, reverence, and honor the sea of Rome, as longe as it continued in the promotion, and setting forth of God's glory and in due preaching of the Gospel, as it did many years after Christ. But after that the Bishops of that Sea, seeking their own pride, and not God's honor, began to set them selves above kings and Emperors, challenging to them the title of God's Uicares, the Domynion and Supremacye over all the world, I cannot but with saint Gregory a Byshoppe of Rome also, confess that the Byshoppe of that place is the very true Antichrist, whereof saint John speaketh by the name of the whore of Babylon, and say with the said saint Gregory: he that maketh himself a Bishop over all the world, is worse then Antichrist.

Now, where as you say that saint Augustine should seem, not only to give such a prerogative, but also a supremacye to the sea of Rome, in that he saith, all y e chrystian world is subject to the Church of Rome, and there, fore should give to that Sea a certain kind of subjection: I am sure that your Lordship knoweth that in saint Augustine's time, there were four Patriarckes, of Alexandria, Constantinople, Antioch and Rome, which Patriarckes had under them certain Countries, as in England the Archbyshop of Canterbury hath under him diverse Byshoprickes in England and Wales, to whom he may be said to be their Patriarcke. Also youre Lordship knoweth right well, that at what time saint Augustine wrote this book, he was then Bishop in Africa. Farther you are not ignorant, that between Europe and Africa lieth the sea called Mare mediterraneum, so that all the countries in Europe to him which is in Africa, may be called transmarine, countries beyond the sea. Here of S. Agustine saith: Totus orbis Christianus in transmarinis & longe remotis terris ecclesiae Romanae subiectus est. That is all the Chrystian Countries beyond the seas and far Regions, are subject to the sea of Rome. If I should say all Countries beyond the sea, I do except England, which to me now being in England, is not beyond the sea. In this sense saint Augustine saith, all the Countries beyond the sea are subject to the sea of Rome, declaring thereby that Rome was one of the seas of the four Patriarckes, and under it Europe, by what subjection I pray you? only for a preeminence, as we here in England say, that all the Byshoprickes in England, are subject to the archbishopricke of Canterbury and York.

For this preeminence also the other Doctors (as you recited) say, that Rome is the mother of Churches, as the Bishopric of Lincoln, is mother to the Bishopric of Oxford, because the Bishopric of Oxford came from the Byshopricke of Lincoln, and they were both once one, and so is the Archbyshopricke of Canterbury, mother to the other Byshopricks, which are in her province. In like sort the Archbishopric of York, is mother to the Northbishoprickes: and yet no mā will say, that Lincoln, Caunterburye, or York, is supreme head to other Byshoprickes: neither then ought we to confess the sea of Rome to be supreme head, because y e Doctors in their writings, confess the sea of Rome to be mother of Churches.

Now where you say, I was once of the same Religion, which you are of, the truth is, I cannot but confess the same. Yet so was saint Paul a persecutoure of Christ. But in that you say, that I was one of you not long agone, in that I doing my message to my Lord of Winchester, should desire him to stand stoughte▪ in that gross opinion of the Supper of the Lord, in very deed I was sent (as your Lordship said) from the Counsayle, to my Lord of Winchester, to exhort him to receive also the true confession of Justification, and because he was very refractorious, I said to him, why my Lord, what make you so great a matter herein? You see many Anabaptists rise against the sacrament of the alter: I pray you my Lord be diligent in confounding them, for at that time my Lord of Winchester and I had to do, with two Anabaptists of Kente. In this sense I willed my Lord to be stiff in the defense of the sacrament, against the detestable errors of Anabaptists, and not in the confirmation of that gross and carnal opinion now maintained.

In like sort, as touching the sermon, which I made at Paul's Cross, you shall understand that there were at Paul's, and divers other places, fixed railing bills against the sacrament, termynge it Jack of the box, the sacrament of the halter, round Robin, with like unseemly terms: for the which causes I to rebuke the irreverent behavior of certain evil disposed persons, preached as reverently of that matter as I might, declaring what estimation and reverence, ought to be given to it, what danger ensued the mishandling thereof, affirming in that sacrament to be truly and verily the body and blood of Christ, effectuously by grace and spirit: which words the unlearned understanding not, supposed that I had meant of the gross and carnal being, which the Romish decrees set forth, that a body having life and motion, should be in deed under the shapes of bread and wyne.

With that the Bishoppe of Lincoln, somewhat interrupting him, said.

Lincol.

Well M. Ridley, thus you wrest places to your own pleasure: for where as saint Agustine saith that the whole Christian world, is subject to the sea of Rome without any limittation, and useth these words: In transmarinis, & longe remotis terris, only to express the latytude of the dominion of the Sea of Rome, willing thereby to declare that all the world, yea countries far distaunt from Rome, yet nevertheless are subject to that Sea, yet you would wrast it, and leave it only to Europe. I am sure ye will▪ not deny, but that totus mundus is more then Europe.

Ridley.

In deed my Lord, if saint Agustine had said simpliciter totus mundus, & not added in transmarinis it had been without limitation: but in that he said totus mundus in transmarinis partibus, all the Countries beyond the seas he himself doth limitte the universal proposition, declaring how far he meant by totus mundus.

The Bishop not staying for this answer, did proceed, saying.

Lincoln.

Well, if I would stay upon this place, I could bring many moe places of the Fathers, for the confirmation thereof, but we have certain instructions, according to the which we must proceed, and came not hither to dispute the mater with you, but only to take youre answers to certain Artycles, and used this in the way of exhortation: in the which you interrupted me, wherefore I will return thither again.

Ye must consider that the Church of Christ lieth not hidden, but is a Citty in the mountayn, and a candle on the Candlestick. Ponder with yourself, that the Church of Christ is catholica, catholic which is deducted of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, per omnia : so that Christ's Church is vniuersallye spreadde throughout the world not contained in the allegation of places, not comprehended in the circuit of England, not contained in the compass of Germany and Saxony, as youre Church is.

Wherefore master Ridley, for God's love be ye not singular: acknowledge with all the realm the truth, it shall not be (as you allege prejudicial to the crown, for the king and Queen their majesties have renounced that usurped power taken of their predecessors, and justly have renounced it. For I am sure you know that there are two powers, the one declared by the sword, the other by the Keys. The sword is given to kings, and rulers of coūtries: the Keys were delivered by Christ to Peter, and of him left to all the successoures. As touching our goods, possessions, and lives, we with you acknowledge us Subiectes, to the king and Queen, who hath the temporal sword: but as concerning matters of Religion, as touching God's quarrel and his word, we acknowledge another head: and as the king and y e Queen their highness do in all worldly affairs, justly challenge the prerogative and primacy, so in spiritual and Ecclesiastical matters they acknowledge themselves not to be heads and rulers, but members of Christ's body. Why therefore should ye stick at that matter, the which their majesties have forsaken and yielded?

Wherefore master Ridley, you shall not only not do injury to the Crown, and be prejudicial to their majesties honor, in acknowledgyng with all Christendom the Popes holiness to be supreme head of Christ's Church here militaunt in earth, but do a thing most delectable in their sight, and most desired of their highness. Thus if you will do, revoking together all youre errors, acknowledging with the residue of the realm, the common and the public fault, you shall do that all men most heartily desire: you shall bring quyetnesse to your conscience, and health to your soul: then shall we with great joy, by the authority committed to us from the Cardinals grace, receive you into y e church again, acknowledgyng you to be no longer a rotten, but a lively member of the same, but if you shall still be singular, if you shall still and obstinately persevere in your errors, stubbernely maintaining your former heresies, then we must against our will, according to our commission, separate you from us, and cut you of from the church least the rottenness of one part in process of time, putrefy and corrupt the whole body, then must we confess and publish you to be none of ours: thē must we yield you up to the temporal judges, of whom except it otherwise please the king and Queens highness, you must receive punishment by the laws of this Realm, due for heretics.

Wherefore master Ridley, consider your state, remember your former degrees, spare your body, especially consider your soul, which Christ so dearly bought with his precious blood, do not you rashly cast away that which was precious in God's sight, enforce not us to do all that we may do, which is only to publish you to be none of us, to cut you of from the Church for we do not, nor cannot condemn you to die (as most untruly hath been reported of us) but that is the temporal Judges office, we only declare you to be none of the Church, and then must you, according to the tenor of them, and pleasure of the Rulers, abide their determination, so that we, after that we have given you up to the temporal Rulers, have no further to do with you. But I trust Mayster Ridley, we shall not have occasion to do that we may. I trust you will suffer us to rest in that point of our commission, which we most hartilye desire, that is, upon recantation and repentance to receive you, to reconcile you, and again to adjoin you to the unity of the Church.

Then M. Ridley with often interruption, at length spake.

Ridley.

My Lord I acknowledge an unspotted church of christ, in the which no man can err, without the which no man can be saved, the which is spread throughout all the world, that is the congregation of the faithful: neither do I alligate or bind the same to any one place, as you said, but confess the same to be spreadde throughout all the world: and whereas Christ's Sacraments are duly ministered, his Gospel truly preached and followed, there doth Christ's Church shine as a City upon an hill, and as a Candle in the Candlestick: but rather it is such as you, that would have the Church of Christ bound to a place, which appoint the same to Rome that there and nowhere else is the foundation of Christ's church. But I am fully persuaded that Christ's church is everywhere founded, in every place where his Gospel is truly received, effectually followed. And in that y e church of God is in doubt, I use here in the wise counsel of Vyncentinus Lyranensis, whō I am sure you will allow, who giving precepts howe the catholic church may be in all schisms and heresies known, writeth in this manner? When (saith he) one parte is corrupted with heresies, then prefer the whole world before that one part: but if the greatest parte be infected, then prefer antyquitie.

In like sort now, when I perceive the greatest parte of Christianity to be infected with the poison of the sea of Rome, I repair to y e usage of the primitive church, which I find clean contrary to the Popes decrees, as in that the Priest receiveth alone, that it is made unlawful to to the Laitye to receive in both kinds, and such like: Wherefore it requireth, that I prefer the antiquity of the primative church, before the novelty of the Romish church.

Lincol.

Mayster Ridley these faults which you charge the Sea of Rome withal, are in deed no faults. For first it was never forbid the Laity, but that they might if they demanded, receive under both kinds. You know also, that Christ after his resurrection, at what time he went with his Apostles to Galilee opened him self by breaking of bread. You know that saint Paul after his longe sailing towards Rome brake bread, and that the Apostles came together in breaking of bread which declareth that it is not unlawful to minister the Sacrament under the form of bread only: and yet the church had just occasion to decree, that the laytye should receive in one kind only, thereby to take away an opinion of the unlearned, that Christ was not wholly both flesh and blood under the form of bread. Therefore to take away their opinion, and to establish better the people's faith, the holy Ghost in the church thought good to decree, that the Laity would receive only in one kind: and it is no news for the Church upon just consideration, to alter rites and ceremonies. For you read in the Acts of the Apostles, that saint Paul writing to certain of the Gentiles, which had received the Gospel biddeth them to abstain a suffogato & sanguine, from things stifled, and from blood, so that this seemeth to be an express commandment: yet who will say but that it is lawful to eat bloudings? how is it lawful but by their permission of the Church?

Ridley.

My Lord, such things as saint Paul enjoined to the Gentiles for a sufferance, by a little and little to win the Jews to Christ, were only commandments of time, and respected not the successors: but Christ's commandment: do this (that is, that which he did in remembrance, which was not to minister in one kind only) was not a commandment for a time, but to persevere to the worlds end.

But the Bishop of Lincoln not attending to this answer, without any stay proceeded in his Oration.

So that the Church seemeth to have authority by the holy Ghost, whom Christ said he would send after his ascension, which should teache the Apostles all truth, to have power and jurisdiction to alter such points of the Scripture, ever reserving the foundation: but we came not, as I said before, in this sort to reason the matter with you, but have certain instructions ministered unto us, according to the tenor of the which we must proceed, proposing certain articles, unto the which we require your answer directly, either affirmatively, either negatively to every of them, either denying them, either granting them without farther disputations or reasoning,: for we have already stretched our instructions, in that we suffered you to debate and reason the matter, in such sort as we have done: the which articles you shall hear now, and tomorrow at eyght of the clock in saint Mary's Church we will require and take youre answers: and then according to the same proceed: & if you require a copy of them, you shall have it, pen, ink and paper, also all such books as you shall demand, if they be to be gotten in the University.

The Articles.

IN dei nomine, Amen. Nos Johannes Lincoln. Jacobus Glocest. & Johannes Bristol. Episcopy▪ per reuerendis. dominum Reginaldum miseratione diuina S. Mariae in Cosmedin. &c.

1 We do object to the Nic. Ridley, and to thee Hughe Latimer, jointly and severally, first that thou Nicholas Ridley in this high University of Oxford. Anno. 1554. in the months of April, May, June, Iulye, or in someone or moe of thē, hast affirmed, and openly defended & maintained, and in many other times and places besides, that the true and natural body of Christ, after the consecration of the priest, is not really present in the sacrament of the altar.

2. Item, that in the year and months aforesaid, thou hast publicly affirmed and defended, that in the Sacrament of the altar, remaineth still the substance of bread and wine.

3. Item, that in the said year and months, thou hast openly affirmed, and obstinately maintained, that in the Mass is no propiciatory Sacrifice for the quick and the dead.

4. Item, that in the year, place, and months aforesaid, these thy foresaid assertions solemnly have been condemned, by the scholastical censure of this school, as heretical, and contrary to the Catholic faith, by y e worshipful M. Doctor Weston Prolocutour then of the convocation house, as also by other learned men, of both the Universities.

5. Item, that all and singular the premisses be true, notorious, famous, and openly known by public fame, as well to them near hand, as also to them in distaunt places far of.

Examination upon the said Articles.

ALl these articles I thought good here to place together, that as often as hereafter rehearsal shall be of any of them, y e reader may have recourse hither, and peruse the same, and not to trouble the story with several repeticions thereof.

Lincoln.

After these Articles were read, the Bishops took counsel togethers. At the last the Bishop of Lincoln said: these are the very same Articles which you in open disputation here in the University did mayntayn and defend. What say you unto the first? I pray you answer affirmatively, or negatively.

Ridley.

Why my Lord, I supposed your gentleness, had been such, that you would have given me space until tomorrow, that upon good advisement, I might bring a determinate answer.

Lincoln.

Yea M. Ridley, I mean not that youre answers now shall be prejudicial to your answers tomorrow. I will take your answers at this time, and yet notwithstanding it shall be lawful to you to add, diminish, alter, and change of these answers tomorrow what you will.

Ridley.

In deed, in like manner at our last disputations I had many things promised, and few performed. It was said that after disputations, I should have a copy thereof, and license to change mine answers, as I should think good, It was meet also that I should have seen what was writ̄ by the Notaries at that time. So your Lordship pretended great gentleness in giving me a time, but this gentleness is the same, that Christ had of the high priests: for you, as youre Lordship saith, have no power to condemn me, neither at any time to put a man to death, so in like sort the high Priests said, that it was not lawful for them to put any man to death. but committed Christ to Pilate, neither would suffer him to absolve Christ, although he sought all the means therefore that he might. Then spake Doctor Weston, one of the audience.

West.

What? do you make the king Pilate?

Rid.

No master Doctor, I do but compare youre deeds with Caiaphas his deeds and the high Priests, which would condemn no man to death, as ye will not, and yet would not suffer Pilate to absolve and deliver Christ.

Lincol.

M. Ridley, we mind not but that you shall enjoy the benefit of answering tomorrow, and will take your answers now as now, tomorrow you shall change take out, add, and alter what you will. In the mean season we require you to answer directly to every Article, either affirmatively, or negatively.

Ridley.

Seyng you appoint me a time to answer tomorrow, and yet will take mine answers out of hand, first I require the Notaryes, to take and write my protestation, that in no point I acknowledge your authority, or admit you to be my Judges, in that point you are authorised from the Pope. Therefore whatsoever I shall say or do, I protest, I neither say it, neither do it willingly, thereby to admit the authority of the Pope: & if your Lordship will give me leave, I will show the causes, which moveth me thereunto.

Lincol.

No M. Ridley, we have instructions to the contrary. We may not suffer you.

Ridley.

I will be short: I pray youre Lordships suffer me to speak in few words.

Linc.

No M. Ridley, we may not abuse the hearers ears.

Rid.

Why my Lord, suffer me to speak three words.

Linc.

Well M. Ridley, tomorrow you shall speak 40. The time is far paste: therefore we require your answer determinately. What say you to the first article? and thereupon rehearsed the same.

Rid.

My protestation always saved, that by this mine answer I do not condescend, to your authority, in that you are Legate to the Pope, I answer thus: In a sense the first article is true, and in a sense it is false: for if you take really for vere, for spiritually by grace and efficacye, then is it true that the natural body and blood of Christ is in the sacrament vere & realiter, in deed and really: but if you take these terms so grossly, that you would conclude thereby a natural body having motion, to be contained under the forms of bread and wine vere & realiter, then really is not the body and blood of Christ in the Sacrament, no more then the holy Ghost is in the element of water in our Baptism. Because this answer was not understood, the Notaries wist not how to note it: wherefor the Bishop of Lincoln willed him to answer either affirmatively, or negatively, either to grant the Article, or to deny it.

Rid.

My Lord, you know that where any aequiuocation (which is a word having two significations) is, except distinction be given, no direct answer can be made: for it is one of Aristotle's fallacies, containing two questions under one, the which cannot be satisfied with one answer. For both you and I agree herein, that in the sacrament is the very true and natural body and blood of Christ, even that which was borne of the Virgin Mary, which ascended into heaven, which sitteth on the right hand of God the Father, which shall come frō thence to judge the quick and the dead, only we differ in modo : in the way and manner of being: we confess all one thing to be in the sacrament, and dissent in the manner of being there. I being fully by God's word thereunto persuaded, confess Christ's natural body to be in the sacrament in deed by spirit and grace, because that whosoever receiveth worthily that bread and wine, receiveth effectuously Christ's body and drinketh his blood, that is, he is, made effectually partaker of his Passion: and you make a grosser kind of being, enclosing a natuall, a lively and moving body under the shape or form of bread and wyne.

Now, this difference considered, to the question thus I answer: that in the sacrament of the altar is the natural body and blood of Christ vere & realiter, in deed and really, if you take these terms in deed and really for spiritually by grace and efficacy: for so every worthy receyuer receiveth the very true body of Christ: but if you mean really and in deed, so that thereby you would include a lively and a mouable body under the forms of bread and wyne, then in that sense is not Christ's body in the sacrament really and in deed.

This answer taken and penned of the Notaryes, y e Boshop of Lincoln proposed the second question or Article. To whom he answered.

Rid.

Always my protestation reserved, I answer thus: that in the sacrament is a certain change in the r y e Bread which was before was common bread, is now made a lively representation of Christ's Bodye, and not only a figure, but effectuously representeth his body, that even as the mortal body was nourished by that visible bread, so is the internal soul fed with the heavenly food of Christ's body, which the eyes of faith seethe, as the bodily eyes seeth only bread. Such a sacramental mutation I grant to be in the bread and wyne, which truly is no small change, but such a change as no mo tall man can make but only that omnipotency of Christ's word.

Then the Byshoppe of Lincoln willed him to answer directly, either affirmatively or negatively, without further declaration of the matter. Then he answered:

Rid.

That notwithstanding this sacramental mutation of the which he spake, and all the Doctors confessed the true substance and nature of bread and wine remaineth, with the which the body is in like sort nourished as the soul by grace and spirit with the body of Christ. Even so in Baptism the body is washed with the visible water, and the soul is cleansed from all filth by the invisible holy Ghost, and yet the water ceaseth not to be water but keepeth the nature of water still: In like sort in the sacrament of the Lord's supper the bread ceaseth not to be bread,

Then the Notaryes penned, that he answered affirmatively to the second article. The Bishop of Lincoln declared a difference between the sacrament of the altar and Baptism, because that Christ said not by the water this is the holy Ghost, as he did by the bread: this is my body.

Then master Ridley recited saint Agustine, which conferred both the sacraments the one with the other: but the Byshoppe of Lincoln notwithstanding thereupon recited the third article, and required a direct answer. To whom Ridley said.

Rid.

Christ as saint Paul writeth, made one perfect sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, neither can any man reiterate that sacrifice of his, and yet is the Communion an acceptable sacrifice to God of praise and thanksgeuing: but to say that thereby sins are taken away (which wholly and perfectly was done by Christ's passion, of the which the Communion is only a memory) that is a great derogation of the merits of Christ's passion: for the sacrament was instituted that we receiving it, and thereby recognising and remembering his Passion, should be partakers of the merits of the same. For otherwise doth this sacrament take upon it the office of Christ's Passion, whereby it might follow that Christ died in vain.

The Notaryes penned this his answer to be affirmatively. Then said the Bishop of Lincoln:

Lin.

In deed as you allege out of Sayncte Paul, Christ made one perfect oblation for all the whole world, that is, that bloody sacrifice upon the cross: yet nevertheless he hath left this sacrifice, but not bloody, in the remembrance of that, by the which sins are forgiven: the which is no derogation of Christ's Passion.

Then recited the Bishop of Lincoln the fourth article. To the which M. Ridley answered:

Rid.

That in some part the fourth was true, & in some parte false, true in y t those his assertions were condemned as heresies, although unjustly: false in that it was said they were condemned scientia scholastica, in that the disputations were in such sort ordered, that it was far from any school act.

This answer penned of the Notaryes, the Bishop of Lincoln rehearsed the fifth Article. To the which he answered:

Rid.

That the premisses were in such sort true, as in these his answers he had declared. Whether that all men spake evil of them he knew not, in that he came not so much abroad to hear what every man reported.

This answer also written of the Notaryes, the bishop of Lincoln said:

Lin.

To morrow at eyght of the clock you shall appear before us in S. Mary's Church, and then because we cannot well agree upon your answer to the first article (for it was long before he was understood) if it will please you to write youre answer, you shall have pen, ink, and paper, & books such as you shall require: but if you write anything saving your answers to these Articles, we will not receive it: so he charging the Major with him, declaring also to the Major that he should suffer him to have pen and ink dimissed M. Ridley, and sent for Master Latimer, who being brought to the Divinity Schole, there tarried till they called for him.

Master Latimer appeareth before the Commissioners.

NOw after M. Ridley was committed to the Major, then the Bishop of Lincoln commanded the Bailyffes to bring in the other prisoner, who eftsoons as he was placed, said to the Lord's.

Lati.

My Lord's, if I appear again, I pray you not to send for me until you be ready. For I am an old man, and it is great hurt to mine old age to tarry so long gazyng upon the cold walls. Then the Bishop of Lincoln said:

Linc.

M. Latimer, I am sory you are brought so soon, although it is the Bailyffes fault, and not mine: but it shall be amended.

Then Master Latimer bowed his knee down to the ground, holding his Hat in his hand, having a kerchefe on his hed, and upon it a night cap or two, and a great cap (such as Towns men use, with two broad flaps to butten under the chin) wearyng an old thread bare Bristow fryse gown gyrded to his body with a penny leather gyrdell, at the which hanged by a long string of leather his Testament, and his spectacles without case, depending about his neck upon his breast. After this the Bishop of Lincoln began on this manner:

Linc.

M. Latimer, you shall understand that I and my Lord's here have a Commission from my Lord Cardinal Poles Grace Legate a latere, to this Realm of England, from our moste reverent father in God the Popes holiness, to examyne you upon certain opinions and assertions of yours, which you as well here openly in disputations in the year of our Lord. 1554. as at sundry and diverse other times did affirm, maintain, and obstinately defend. In the which Commission be especially two points: the one which we must desire you is, that if you shall now recant, revoke, and disannul these your errors, and together with all this Realm, yea all the world confess the truth, we upon due repentance of your part should receive you, reconcile you, acknowledge you no longer a strayed sheep, but adjoin you again to the unity of Christ's Church, from the which you in the time of schism fell: So that it is no new place to the which I exhort you: I desire you but to return thither from whence you went.

Consider M. Latimer, that without the unity of the Church is no salvation, and in the Church can be no errors. Therefore what should stay you to confess that which all the Realm confesseth to forsake that which the Kyng and Queen their Majesty's have renounced and all the Realm recanted: it was a common error, and it is now of all confessed: it shall be no more shame to you, then it was to us all. Consider M. Latimer, that within these .xx. years this Realm also with all the world confesseth one Church, acknowledged in Christ's Church an head, and by what means and for what occasion it cut of itself from the rest of Christianity, it renounced that which in all times and ages was confessed, it is well known, and might be now declared upon what good foundation the sea of Rome was forsaken, save that we must spare them that are dead, to whom the rehearsal would be opprobrious: it is no usurped power as it hath been termed, but founded upon Peter by Christ, a lure foundation, a perfect builder, as by diverse places as well of the ancient fathers as the express word of God, may be proved.

With that M. Latimer, which before leaned his head to his hand, began somewhat to remove his cap and kerchef from his ears.

The Byshoppe proceeded saying: for Christ spake expressly to Peter saying, pasce oues meas, & rege oues meas, the which word doth not only declare a certain rulyng of Christ's flock, but includeth also a certain preeminence and government, and therefore is the king called Rex à regendo: so that in saying rege, Christ declared a power which he gave to Peter, which jurisdiction and power Peter by hand delivered to Clement, and so in all ages hath it remained in the sea of Rome. This if you shall confess with us, & acknowledge with all the realm your errors and false assertions, then shall you do that which we most desire, then shall we rest upon the first part of our Commission, then shall we receive you, acknowledge you one of the Church, and according to the authority given unto us, minister unto you upon due repentance, the benefit of absolution, to the which the Kyng and Queen their Majesty's were not ashamed to submit them selves, although they of them selves were unspotted, and therefore needed no reconciliation, yet lest the putrification and rottenness of all the body might be noisome, and do damage to the head also, they (as I said) most humbly submitted them selves to my Lord Cardinal his grace, by him, as Legate to the Popes holiness, to be partakers of the reconciliation: but if you shall stubbornly persevere in your blindness, if you will not acknowledge your errors, if you as you stand now alone, will be singular in your opinions, if by schism and heresy you will still divide yourself from our Church, then must we proceed to the seconde part of the Commission, which we would be loath to do, that is, not to condemn you, for that we cannot do (that the temporal sword of the Realm, and not we will do) but to separate you from us, acknowledge you to be none of us, to renounce you as no member of the Church, to declare that you are filius perditionis, a lost child, and as you are a rotten member of the Church, so to cut you of from the Church, and so to commit you to the temporal Judges, permittyng them to proceed against you, according to the tenor of their laws.

Therefore M. Latimer, for God's love consider your estate, remember you are a learned man, you have taken degrees in the Schole, borne the office of a Bishop, remember you are an old man, spare your body, accelerate not your death, & especially remember your souls health, quiet of your conscience, consider that if you should die in this state, you shall be a stinkyng sacrifice to God: for it is the cause that maketh the Martyr, and not the death: consider that if you die in this state, you die without grace, for without the Church can be no salvation. Let not vain glory have the upper hand, humiliate yourself, captivate your understanding, subdue your reason, submit yourself to the determination of the Church, do not force us to do all that we may do, let us rest in that parte which we most heartily desire, and I, for my part, (then the Bishop put of his cap) again with all my heart exhort you.

After the Bishop had somewhat paused, then M. Latimer lift up his head (for before he leaned on his elbowe) and asked whether his Lordshyp had said: and the Bishop answered yea.

Lati.

Then will your Lordship give me leave to speak a word o two?

Linc

Yea M. Latimer, so that you use a modest kind of talk, without raising or taunts.

Lati.

I beseech your Lordshyp, license me to sit down.

Linc.

At your pleasure M. Latimer, take as much ease as you will.

Lati.

Your Lordshyppe gentlye exhorted me in many words, to come to the unity of the Church. I confess (my Lord) a Catholic Church, spread throughout all the world, in the which no man may err, without the which unity of the Church no man can be saved: but I know perfectly by God's word that this Church is in all the world, and hath not his foundation in Rome only, as you say, and me thought your Lordshyp brought a place out of the Scriptures to confirm the same, that there was a jurisdiction given to Peter, in that Christ bad him regere, govern his people. In deed my Lord, saint Peter did well and truly his office, in that he was bid regere: but since the Bishops of Rome have taken a new kind of regere. In deed they ought to regere, but how my Lord? not as they will them selves: but this regere must be hedged in, and digged in. They must regere, but secundum verbum dei: they must rule, but according to the word of God.

But the Bishops of Rome have turned regere secundum verbum dei, into regere secundum voluntatem suam: they have turned the rule according to the word of GOD into the rule according to their own pleasures, and as it pleaseth them best: as there is a book set forth which hath diverse points in it, and amongst other, this point is one, which your Lordshyppe went about to prove by this word regere, and the argument which he bringeth forth for the proof of that matter, is taken out of Deuteronomy, where it is said: if there riseth any controversy among the people, the Priests Leuitici generis, of the order of Leviticus shall decide the matter secundum legem dei, according to the law of GOD: so it must be taken. This book perceyuing this authority to be given to the Priests of the old law, taketh occasion to prove the same to be given to the Bishops and other the Clergy of the new law: but in prouyng this matter, where as it was said there, as the Priests of the order of Leviticus should determine the matter according to God's law (that according to God's law) is left out, and only is recited: as the Priests of the order of Leviticus shall decide the matter, so it ought to be taken of the people: a large authority I ensure you. What gelding of Scripture is this? what clippyng of God's coin? With the which terms the audience smiled. This is much like the regere which your Lordshyp talked of. Nay, nay my Lord's, we may not give such authority to the Clergy, to rule all things as they will. Let them keep them selves within their commission. Now I trust my Lord▪ I do not rail yet?

Linc.

No M. Latimer, your talk is more like taunts then railing: but in that I have not red the book which you blame so much, nor know not of any such, I can say nothing therein.

Lati.

Yes my Lord, the book is open to be red, and is entitled to one which is Bishop of Gloucester, whom I never knew, neither did at any time see him to my knowledge. With that the people laughed, because the Bishop of Gloucester sat there in commission.

Then the Bishop of Gloucester stood up, and said it was his book.

Lati.

Was it yours my Lord? In deed I knew not your Lordshyp, neither ever did see you before, neither yet see you now, through the brightness of the Sun shining betwixt you and me. Then the audience laughed again: and Master Latimer spake unto them saying: Why my masters, this is no laughyng matter, I answer upon life and death. Vae vobis qui redetis nunc, quoniam flebitis.

The Byshoppe of Lincoln commanded silence, and then said:

Linc.

M. Latimer, if you had kept yourself within your bounds, if you had not used such scoffs and taunts, this had not been done.

After this the Bishop of Gloucester said in excusing of his book.

Gloc.

M. Latimer, hereby every man may see what learning you have.

Then M. Latimer interrupted him saying:

Lati.

Lo, you look for learning at my hands, which have gone so longe to the school of oblivion, making the bare walls my Librarie, keeping me so long in prison without book or pen and ink: and now you let me lose to come and answer to Articles. You deal with me as though two were appointed to fight for life and death, and over night the one through friends and favor is cheryshed, & hath good counsel given him howe to encounter with his enemy. The other for envy or lack of friends, all the whole night is set in the stocks. In the morning when they shall meet, the one is in strength and lusty: the other is stark of his limbs, and almost dead for feebleness. Thynke you that to run through this man with a spear is not a goodly victory?

But the Byshoppe of Gloucester interruptyng his answer proceeded, saying:

Glo.

I went not about to recite any places of Scripture in that place of my book: for then if I had not recited it faithfully, you might have had just occasion of reprehention: but I only in that place formed an argument á major , in this sense: that if in the old law the Priests had power to decide matters of controversies, much more then ought the authority to be given to the clergy in the new law: and I pray you in this point what availeth the rehearsal, secundum legem dei.

Lati.

Yes my Lord, very much. For I acknowledge authority to be given to the spiritualty to decide matter of Religion, and, as my Lord said even now, to regere: but they must do it secundum verbum dei, and not secundum voluntatem suam, according to the word and law of God, and not after their own will, after their own imaginations and fantasies.

The Bishop of Gloucester would have spoken more, saving that the Bishop of Lincoln said, that they came not to dispute with M. Latimer, but to take his determinate answers to their Articles, and so began to propose the same Articles which were proposed to M. Ridley. But M. Latimer interrupted him, speaking to the bishop of Gloucester: well my Lord, I could wish more faithful dealing with God's word, and not to leave out a part, and snatche a part here and another there, but to rehearse the whole faithfully.

But the Byshoppe of Lincoln not attendyng to this saying of Master Latimer, proceeded in rehearsing the Articles in form and sense as I declared before in the examination of the Articles proposed to Master Ridley, and required Master Latimers answer the first. Then Master Latimer making his protestation, that notwithstanding these his answers it should not be taken that thereby he would acknowledge any authority of the Byshoppe of Rome, saying that he was the Kyng and Queen their Majesty's subject and not the Popes, neither could serve two masters at one time, except he should first renounce one of them: required the Notaries so to take his protestation, that whatsoever he should say or do, it should not be taken as though he did thereby agree to any authority that came from the Bishop of Rome.

Linc.

The Bishop of Lincoln said, that his protestation should be so taken: but he required him to answer briefly affirmatively, or negatively to the first Article, and so recited the same again: and Master Latimer answered as followeth.

Lati.

I do not deny (my Lord) that in the Sacrament by spirit and grace is the very body and blood of Christ, because that every man by receiving bodylye that bread and wine, spiritually receiveth the body and blood of Christ, and is made partaker thereby of the merits of Christ's Passion: but I deny that the body and blood of Christ is in such sort in the Sacrament as you would have it.

Linc.

Then Master Latimer, you answer affirmatively.

Lati.

Yea, if you mean of that gross and carnal being, which you do take.

The Notaries took his aunsweares to be affirmatively.

Linc.

What say you Master Latimer to the seconde Article? and recited the same.

Lati.

There is, my Lord, a change in the bread and wine, and such a change as no power, but the omnipotency of GOD can make, in that that which before was bread, should now have that dignity to exhibit Christ's body, & yet the bread is still bread, and the wine still wine: for the change is not in the nature, but in the dignity, because now that which was common bread hath the dignity to exhibit Christ's body, for where as it was common bread, it is now no more common bread, neither ought it it to be so taken, but as holy bread sanctified by God's word.

With that the Bishop of Lincoln smyled, saying:

Linc.

Lo Master Latimer, see what steadfastness is in your doctrine: That which you abhorred and despised moste, you now most establyshe: for where as you moste railed at holy bread, you now make your communion holy bread.

Lati.

Tush, a rushe for holy bread. I say the bread in the communion is an holy bread in deed.

But the Byshoppe of Lincoln interrupted him and said.

Linc.

O, you make a difference between holy bread, and holy bread (with that the audience laughed.) Well master Latimer, is not this your answer, that the sustaunce of bread and wine remaineth after the words of consecration?

Lati.

Yes verily, it must needs be so, for Christ him self calleth it bread, Saint Paul calleth it bread, the Doctors confesseth the same, the nature of a Sacrament confirmeth the same, and I call it holy bread, not in that I make no difference betwixt your holy bread & this, but for the holy office which it beareth, that is, to be a figure of Christ's body, and not only a bare figure, but effectually to represent the same.

So the Notaries penned his answer to be affirmatively.

Linc.

What say you to the third question? and recited the same.

Lati.

No, no my Lord, Christ made one perfect Sacrifice for all the whole world, neither can any man offer him again, neither can the Priest offer up Christ again for the sins of man, which he took away by offering him self once for all (as Saint Paul saith) upon the cross, neither is there any propitiation for our sins, saving his cross only.

So the Notaries penned his answer to this Article also to be affirmatively.

Linc.

What say you to the fourth Master Latimer? and recited it. After the recital whereof, when Master Latimer answered not, the Bishop asked him whether he heard him or no?

Lati.

Yes, but I do not understand what you mean thereby.

Linc.

Mary only this, that these your assertions were condemned by M. Doctor Weston as heresies: is it not so M. Latimer?

Lati.

Yes, I think they were condemned. But how unjustly, he that shall be judge of all knoweth.

So the Notaries took his answer, to this Article also to be affirmatively.

Linc.

What say you M. Latimer to the v. Article? and recited it.

Lati.

I know not what you mean by these terms. I am no Lawyer: I would you would propose the matter plainly.

Linc.

In that we proceed according to the law, we must use their terms also. The meaning only is this, that these your assertions are notorious, evil spoken of, and yet common and recent in the mouths of the people.

Lati.

I cannot tell howe much nor what men talk of them. I come not so much among them, in that I have been secluded a long time. What men report of them I know not, nor care not.

This answer taken, the Bishop of Lincoln said:

Linc.

M. Latimer, we mean not that these your answers shall be prejudicial to you. To morrow you shall appear before us again, and then it shall be lawful for you to alter and change what you will. We give you respite till tomorrow, trustyng that after you have pondered well all things against tomorrow, you will not be ashamed to confess the truth.

Lati.

Now my Lord I pray you give me license in three words to declare the causes why I have refused the authority of the Pope.

Linc.

Nay M. Latimer, tomorrow you shall have lycence to speak xl. words.

Lati.

Nay my Lord's, I beseech you to do with me now as it shall please your Lordships: I pray you let not me be troubled tomorrow again.

Linc.

Yes M. Latimer, you must needs appear again tomorrow.

Lati.

Truly my Lord, as for my part I require no respite, for I am at a point: you shall give me respite in vain: Therefore I pray you let not me trouble you tomorrow.

Linc

Yes, for we trust God will work with you against tomorrow. There is no remedy, you must needs appear again tomorrow at eight of the clock in saint Mary's Church. And forthwith the Bishop charged the Major with M. Latimer, & dismissed him, and then brake up their Session for that day, about one of the clock at after noon.

Here followeth the second Session.

THE next day following (which was the first day of October) somewhat after eyght of the clock, the said Lord's repaired to S. Mary's Church, and after they were set in a high throne well trimmed with clothe of tissewe and silk, then appeared M. Ridley, who was set at a framed table a good space from the Bishops feet, which table had a silk clothe cast over it, the which place was compassed about with framed seats in quadrate form, partly for Gentlemen which repaired thither (for this was the Session day also of Gaile delivery) & heads of the University to sit, and partly to keep of the preasse of the audience: for the whole body as well of the University as of the town, came thither to see the end of these two persons. After M. Ridleyes appearance, and the silence of the audience, the Bishoppe of Lincoln spake in manner following.

Linc.

M. Ridley, yesterday when that we challenged you for not vncoueryng your head, you excused yourself of that whereof no man accused you, in saying you did not put on your cap for any obstinacy toward us, which as touching our own persons desired no such obedience of you, but only in respect of them whose persons we bear: neither (you said) for any contempt that you bear to this worshipful audience, which although justly may, yet in this case require no such humility of you: neither for any derogation of honor to my Lord Cardinals grace, in that he descended from the regal blood, in that he is a man most noble, both for his excellent qualities & singular learning: for as touching those pointes, you said you with all humility would honor, reverence, and worship his grace: but in that he is Legate to the most reverent father in God the Popes holiness (with that the Bishop with all then present put of their cappes, but M. Ridley moved not his) you said you ne could ne would by any means be induced to give him honor: but for as much as this is the point as we told you yesterday, why we require honor and reverence of you, we tell you now as we did then, except you take the pains to move your bonet, we will take the pains to cause your bonet to be taken from you, except you pretend sickness, as yesterday you did not.

Rid.

I pretend now none other cause, then I did yesterday, that is, only that hereby it may appear that not only in word and confession, but also by all my gesture and behavior, in no point I agree or admit any authority or power that shall come from the Pope, and nor for any pride of mind (as GOD is my judge) neither for contempt of your Lordshyps, or of this worshipful audience, neither for derogation of honor due to my Lord Cardinals grace as concerning those points which your Lordshyp spake of, that is, his noble Parentage and singular graces in Learnyng. And as for taking my cap away, your Lordshyp may do as it shall please you: it shall not offend me, but I shall be content with your ordinance in that behalf.

Linc.

For as much as you do answer now as you did yesterday, we must do also as we did then, and forthwith one of the Bedles very hastily snatched his cap from his head.

After this the Bishop of Lincoln began the examination in sense following.

Linc.

Master Ridley, yesterday we took your answer to certain Articles, which we then proposed unto you: but because we could not be thoroughly satisfied with your answer then to the first Article, neither could the Notaries take any determinate answer of you, we (you requiring the same) granted you lycence to bring your answer in writing, and thereupon commanded the Major that you should have pen, paper, and ink, yea any books also that you would require, if they were to be gotten: we licenced you then also to alter your former aunsweares this day at your pleasure: Therefore we are come now hither to see whether you are in the same mind now that you were in yesterdaye, (which we would not wish) or contrary, contented to revoke all your former assertions, and in all points content to submit yourself to the determination of the universal Church, and I for my part moste earnestly exhort you (and therewith he put of his cap) not because my conscience pricketh me as you said yesterday, but because I see you a rotten member and in the way of perdition.

Yesterday I brought forth amongst other S. Agustine, to prove that authority hath always been given to the sea of Rome, and you wrested the words far contrary to S. Augustine's meaning, in that you would have totus mundus to be applied only to Europe, which is but the third part of all the world, where as in deed the process of S. Augustine's words will not admit that your interpretation. For he saith not totus mundus Christianus in transmarinis. &c. but first, totus mundus Christianus Romanae Ecclesiae subiectus est: All the Christian world is subject to the Church of Rome, and afterward addeth in transmarinis partibus, beyond the Sea, but only to augement the dominion of the sea of Rome.

Rid.

But M. Ridley still persevered in his former answer, saying: I am sure my Lord you have some skill in Cosmography, in the which you shall understand that there is a sea called Mare mediterraneum, cast between Europe and Africa, in the which he meant Europe beyond the Sea, even as I should say the whole world beyond the Sea, exceptyng England in the which I stand: and here many words were spent upon the interpretation of the same place of S. Agustine.

Lin.

After long disceptation, the Byshoppe of Lincoln said, that the meaning of S. Augustine might be known by the consent of other the Doctors, and rehearsed diverse.

Rid.

But M. Ridley required the rehearsal of the places, and to read the very words of the Doctors, saying, that perhaps those which the Bishop rehearsed, being proponed in other terms in the Doctors, would admit a contrary meaning and interpretation: but in that book out of the which the Bishop rehearsed them, was none of the Doctors, but only the sentences drawn out of y e Doctors of some studious man: he could not recite the very words of the Doctors.

Linc.

Then after he came to Cyrillus, which (as he said) made against M. Ridley in the Sacrament, even by Philippe Melancthon his own alleging in his common places, and forthwith called for Melancthon, but in vain, because all such books were burned a little before, wherefore he passed it over.

Cyrillus also in another place pro ing to the Jews that Christ was come, useth this reason, Altars are erected in Christ's name in Britain and in far countries: Ergo, Christ is come. But we may use the contrary, of that reason: Altars are plucked down in Britain: Ergo, Christ is not come. A good Argument á contrarijs: I will stand to it in the Schools by and by with any man. Ye see what a good argument this your docrine maketh for the Jews, to prove that Christ is not come.

D. Ridley smilyng, answered: your Lordshyp is not ignorant that this word Altare in the Scripture signifieth as well the Altar whereupon the Jews were wont to make their burt Sacrifices, as the table of the Lord's Supper. Cyrillus meaneth there by this word Altare, not that the Iewysh Altar, but the Table of the Lord, and by that saying (Altars are erected in Christ's name, Ergo Christ is come) he meaneth that the Communion is ministered in his remembrance, Ergo Christ is come: for the strength of his argument is, because the remembrance of a thing cannot be, except the thing it self be past: then could not all Countries celebrate the Communion in the remembrance of Christ's passion, except Christ had been come and suffered. As for the taking down of the Alters, it was done upon just considerations, for that they seemed to come to nigh to y e Jews usage. Neither was the supper of the Lord at any time more better ministered, more duly received, then in these latter days when all things were brought to the rites and usage of the primative Church.

Linc.

A godly receiving I promise you, to set an Oyster table in steed of an Altar, and to come from Puddynges at Westminster, to receive: and yet when your table was constituted, you could never be content, in placing the same now East, now North, now one way, now another, until it pleased GOD of his goodness to place it clean out of the Church.

Rid.

Your Lordshyppes irreverent terms do not eleuate the thing. Perhaps some men came more deuoutely from Puddynges then other men now do from other things.

Lin.

As for that, M. Ridley, you ought to be judge of no man: but by this your reasoning you cause us to stretch and enlarge our instructions. We came not to reason, but to take your determinate answers to our Articles: and eftsoons he red the first Article in manner above specified.

Now M. Ridley, What say you to the first Article? if you have brought your answer in writing, we will receive it: but if you have written any other matter, we will not receive it.

Rid.

Then M. Ridley took a sheet of paper out of his bosom, and began to read that which he had written: but the B. of Lincoln commanded the Bedle to take it from him. But he desired license to read it, saying that it was nothing but his answers, but the Bishop would in no wise suffer him.

Rid.

Why my Lord, will you require my answer, and not suffer me to publysh it? I beseech you my Lord, let the audience bear witness in this matter. Your Lordships may handle it at your pleasures: therefore let the audience be witness to your doings.

Linc.

Well M. Ridley, we will first see what you have written, & then if we shall think it good to be red, you shall have it published: but except you will deliver it first, we will take none at all of you.

With that M. Ridley seeing no remedy, delivered it to an Officer, which immediately delivered it to the Bishop of Lincoln, who after he had secretly communicated it to the other two Bishops, declared the sense, but would not read it as it was written, saying, that it contained words of blasphemy: therefore he would not fill the ears of the audience therewithal and so abuse their patience: notwithstanding M. Ridley desired very instantly to have it published, saying, that except a line or two, there was nothing contained but the ancient Doctors sayings for the confirmation of his assertions.

After the said Bishops had secretly vewed the whole, then the Bishop of Lincoln said: In the first part master Ridley, is nothing contained but your protestation, that you would not have these your answers so to be taken, as though you seemed thereby to consent to the authority or jurisdiction of the Popes holiness.

Rid.

No my Lord, I pray you read it out that the audience may hear it: but the Byshoppe of Lincoln would in no wise, because (he said) there were contained words of blasphemy.

Then the Bishop of Lincoln recited the first Article, and required master Ridleis answer to it. Then M. Ridley said, that his answer was there in writing, and desired that it might be published: but the Byshoppe would not read the whole, but here and there a piece of it. So the Notaries took his answer, that he referred him to his answer in writing exhibited now, and also before at the time of disputation, M. Doctor Weston being prolocutor.

In likewise the Bishop of Lincoln recited the second Article, and required an answer, and M. Ridley referred him to his answer in writing, exhybited now, and also before at the time of disputation: and like answers were taken to all the residue of the Articles.

These answers in manner rehearsed, taken, and penned of the Notaries, the Bishop of Gloucester began an exhortation to move M. Ridley to turn.

Glo.

If you would once empty your stomach, captivate your senses, subdue your reason, and to gether with us consider what a feeble ground of your religion you have, I do not doubt but you might easily be perduced to acknowledge one Church with us, to confess one faith with us, and to believe one religion with us. For what a weak and feeble stay in religion is this I pray you? Latimer leaneth to Cranmer, Cranmer to Ridley, & Ridley to the singularity of his own wit: so that if you overthrow the singularity of Ridleyes wit, then must needs the Religion of Cranmer and Latimer fall also. You remember well M. Ridley, that the Prophet speaketh most truly, saying: vae, vae, woe, woe be to them which are singular and wise in their own conceytes.

But you will say, here it is true that the Prophet saith: but how know you that I am wise in mine own conceit? Yes Master Ridley, you refuse the determination of the Catholic Church: you must needs be singular and wise in your own conceit, for you bring Scripture for the probation of your assertions, and we also bring Scriptures: you understand them in one sense, and we in another. Howe will ye know the truth herein? If you stand to your own interpretation, then you are singular in your own conceit: but if you say you will follow the minds of the Doctors and ancient Fathers, semblably you understand them in one meaning, and we take them in another: howe will ye know the truth herein? If you stand to your own judgment, then are you singular in your own conceit, then can you not avoid the vae and woe which the Prophet speaketh of.

Wherefore, if you have no stay but the Catholic church in matters of controversy, except you will rest upon the singularity and wisdom of your own brain, if the Prophet most truly saith, vae, vae, woe, woe be to them that are wise in their own conceit: then for God's love M. Ridley stand not singular, be not you wise in your own conceit, please not yourself overmuch. Howe were the Arians, the Manicheis, the Futichiās, with other diverse Heretics which have been in the Church, how I pray you were they suppressed and convinced? by reasoning in disputations? No truly, the Arians had mo places of Scriptures for the confirmation of their heresy, then the Catholics for the defense of the truth. Howe then were they convinced? only by the termination of the Church. And in deed except we do constitute the Church our foundation, stay, and judge, we can have no ende of controversies, no ende of disputations. For in that we all bring Scriptures and Doctors for the probation of our assertions, who should be Judge of this our controversy? If we our selves, then be we singular and wise in our own conceits, then cannot we avoid the woe that the Prophet speaketh of.

It remaineth therefore that we submit our selves to the determination and arbitrement of the Church, with whom God promised to remain to the worlds ende, to whom he promised to send the holy Ghost which should teache it the truth. Wherefore M. Ridley, if you will avoid the woe that the prophet speaketh of, be not you wise in your judgment: if you will not be wise and singular in your own judgment, captivate your own understanding, subdue your reason, and submit yourself to the determination of the Church.

This is briefly the sum of the Oration of the Bishop of Gloucester, by the which he endeavored in many mo words, amplyfiyng and enlargyng the matter eloquently with sundry points of Rethoricke, to move affections, to persuade Master Ridley to recant and forsake his Religion.

To whom M. Ridley answered in few words, that he said most truly with the Prophet, woe be to him which is wise in his owe conceit, but that he acknowledged no such singularity in him, ne knew any cause why he should attribute so much to him self. And where as he said Master Cranmer leaned to him, that was moste untrue, in that he was but a young Scholar in comparison of Master Cranmer: for at what time he was a young Scholar, then Master Cranmer a Doctor, so that he con essed that M. Cranmer might have ben his Scholemaister these many years. It seemed that he would have spoken more, but the Bishop of Gloucester interrupted him, saying.

Glo.

Why M. Ridley, it is your own confession, for M. Latimer at the time of his disputations confessed his learning to lie in M. Cranmer's books, and M. Cranmer also said, that it was your doing.

Linc.

Likewyse the Byshoppe of Lincoln with many words and gentle holding his Cap in hand, desired him to turn. But M. Ridley made an absolute answer, that he was fully persuaded, the Religion which he defended to be grounded upon God's word, and therefore without great offense towards God, great peril and damage of his soul, he could not forsake his Master and Lord God, but desired the Bishop to perform his grant in that his Lordshyp said the day before, that he should have license to show his cause why he could not with a salfe conscience admit the authority of the Pope: but the Bishop of Lincoln said, that where as then he had demanded license to speak three words, he was contented then that he should speak .xl. and that grant he would perform.

Then stepped forth D. Weston, which sat by and said, why my Lord, he hath spoken four hundred already.

M. Ridley confessed he had, but they were not of his prescribed number, neither of that matter. The Bishop of Lincoln bad him take his license: but he should speak but .xl. and he would tell them upon his fingers, and eftsoons M. Ridley began to speak: but before he had ended half a sentence, the Doctors sitting by cried and said, that his number was out, and with that he was put to silence.

After this the Bishop of Lincoln which sat in the middes, began to speak as followeth.

Linc.

Now I perceive M. Ridley, you will not permit ne suffer us to stay in that point of our Commission which we most desired: for I ensure you, there is never a word in our Commission more true then, dolentes & gementes. For in deed I for my part, I take God to witness, am sory for you. Whereunto M. Ridley answered:

Rid.

I believe it well my Lord, for as much as one day it will be burdenous to your soul.

Linc.

Nay not so M. Ridley, but because I am sory to see such stubborness in you, that by no means you may be persuaded to acknowledge your errors, and receive the truth: but seeing it is so, because you will not suffer us to persist in the first, we must of necessity proceed to the other part of our Commission. Therefore I pray you hearken what I shall say, and forthwith did read the sentence of condemnation, which was written in a long process: the tenor of which because it is sufficiently already expressed before, we thought meet in this place to omit, forasmuch as they are rather words of course, then things devised upon deliberation. Howbeit in deed the effect was, that for as much as the said Nic. Ridley did affirm▪ maintain, and stubbornly defend certain opions, assertions, and heresies, contrary to the word of God, and the received faith of the Church, as in denying the true and natural body of Christ, and his natural blood to be the Sacrament of the Altar: Secondarily in affermyng the substance of bread and wine to remain after the words of the Consecration: Thirdly in denying the Mass to be a lively Sacrifice of the Church for the quick and the dead, and by no means would be perduced and brought from these his heresies, they therefore the said John of Lincoln, James of Gloucester, John of Bristow, did judge and condemn the said Nic. Ridley, as an Heretic, and so adjudged him presently both by word and also in deed to be degraduated from the degree of a Byshoppe, from Pristhoode and all Ecclesiastical order: declaring moreover the said Nic. Ridley to be no member of the Church, and therefore committed him to the secular powers, of them to receive due punishment according to the tenor of the temporalll laws: and further excommunicatyng him by the great excommunication.

The last appearance and examination of M Latimer before the Commissioners.

THis sentence being published by the Bishop of Lincoln, M. Ridley was committed as a prisoner to the Major, and immediately M. Latimer was sent for: but in the mean season the Carpet or cloth which lay upon the table whereat M. Ridley stood, was removed, because (as men reported) M. Latimer had never the degree o a Doctor as M. Ridley had. But eftsones as M. Latimer appeared as he did the day before, perceiving no cloth upon the table, laid his hat, which was an old felt under his elbows, and immediately spake to the Commissioners, saying:

Lati

My Lord's, I beseech your Lordships to set a better order here at your entrance: for I am an old man and have a very evil back, so that the press of the multitude doth me much harm.

Linc.

I am sory M. Latimer for your hurt. At your departure we will see to better order.

With that M. Latimer thanked his Lordshyp, making a very low courtesy. After this the Bishop of Lincoln began on this manner.

Linc.

M. Latimer, although yesterday after we had taken your answers to those Articles which we proposed, might have justly proceeded to judgment against you, especially in that you required the same, yet we having a good hope of your returning, desiring not your destruction, but rather that you would recant, revoke your errors, and turn to the Catholic Church, deferred farther process till this day, and now according to the appointment, we have called you here before us, to hear whether you are content to revoke your heretical assertions, and submit yourself to the determination of the Church, as we most heartily desire, and I for my part, as I did yesterday, most earnestly do exhort you, either to know whether you persevere still the man that you were, for the which we would be sory.

It seemed that the Bishop would have farther proceeded, saving that M. Latimer interrupted him, saying:

Lati.

Your Lordship often doth repeat the Catholic Church, as though I should deny the same. No my Lord, I confess there is a Cotholicke Church, to the determination of the which I will stand, but not the Church which you call Catholic, which sooner might be termed diabolike. And where as you join together the Romish and Catholic Church, stay there I pray you. For it is an there thing to say Romish Church, and another thing to say Catholic Church: I must use here in this mine answer the counsel of Cyprianus, who at what time he was ascited before certain Bishops that gave him leave to take deliberation and counsel to try and examine his opinion, he answered them thus: in stickyng and perseueryng in the truth, there must no counsel, nor delibera, tion be taken. And again being demanded of them sitting in judgment, which was most like to be of y Church of Christ, either he which was persecuted, either they which did persecute: Christ, said he, hath foreshowed, that he that doth follow him, must take up his cross and follow him. Christ gave knowledge that the disciples should have persecution and trouble. Howe think you then my Lord's, is it like y t the sea of Rome, which hath been a continual persecutor, is rather the Church, or that swal flock which hath continually ben persecuted of it even to death? Also the flock of Christ hath ben but few in comparison to the residue, and ever in subjection: which he proved, beginning at No s time even to the Apostles.

Linc.

Your cause and S. Cyprians is not one, but clean contrary, for he suffered persecution for Christ's sake and the Gospel: but you are in trouble for your errors and false assertions, contrary to the word of God, and the received truth of the Church.

Lati.

M. Latimer interruptyng him, said: yes verily, my cause is as good as S. Cyprians: for his was for the word of God and so is mine.

But Lincoln goeth forth in his talk.

Also at the beginning and foundation of the Church, it could not be but that the Apostles should suffer great persecution. Further, before Christ's coming, continually there were very few which truly served God: but after his coming began the time of grace, then began the Church to increase, and was continually augmented until that it came unto this perfection, and now hath justly that jurisdiction which the unchristian Princes before by tyranny did resist: there is a diverse consideration of the estate of the Church now in the time of grace, and before Christ's coming. But Master Latimer, although we had instructions given us determinately to take your answer to such Articles as we should propose, without any reasoning or disputations, yet we hopyng by talk somewhat to prevail with you, appointed you to appear before us yesterday in the Divinity Schole, a place for disputations. And whereas then notwithstanding you had license to say your mind, and were answered to every matter, yet you could not be brought from your errors. We thynkyng that from that time ye would with good advisement consider your state, gave you respite from that time yesterday when we dimissed you, until this time, and now have called you again here in this place, by your answers to learn whether you are the same man you were then or no? Therefore we will propose unto you the same articles which we did then, and require of you a determinate answer, without farther reasoning, and eftsones recited the first article.

Lati.

Always my protestation saved, that by these mine answers it should not be thought that I did condescend and agree to your Lordship’s authority in that you are legased by authority of the Pope, so that thereby I might seem to consent to his jurisdiction, to the first article I answer now as I did yesterday, that in the Sacrament the worthy receyuer receiveth the very body of Christ, and drinketh his blood by spirit and grace. But after that corporal being which the Romish Church prescribeth, Christ's body & blood is not in the Sacrament under the forms of bread and wine.

The Notaries toke his answer to be affirmatively. For the seconde article, he referred himself to his answers made before.

Linc.

After this the Bishop of Lincoln recited the third article, and required a determinate answer.

Lat.

Christ made one oblation and sacrifice for the sins of the whole world, and that a perfect sacrifice, neither needeth there to be any other, neither can there be any other propitiatory sacrifice.

The Notaries took his answer to be affirmatively.

In like manner did he answer to the other articles, not varying from his answers made the day before.

After his answers were penned of the Notaries, and the Bishop of Lincoln had exhorted him in like sort to recant as he did M. Ridley, and revoke his errors and false assertions, and M. Latimer had answered that he ne could, ne would deny his master Christ and his verity, the Bishop of Lincoln desired M. Latimer to hearken to him, and then master Latimer harkening for some new matter and other talk, the Bishop of Lincoln red his condemnation, after the publication of the which, the said three Bishops brake up their Sessions, and dimissed the audience.

But M. Latimer required the Bishop to perform his promise, in saying the day before, that he should have license briefly to declare the causes why he refused the Popes authority.

Lincol.

But the Bishop said, that now he could not hear him, neither ought to talk with him.

Then M. Latimer asked him whether it were not lawful for him to appeal from this his judgment. And the Bishop asked him again, to whom he would appeal. To the next general Counsel, quoth M. Latimer, which shall be truly called is God's name. With that appellation the Bishop was content: but he said it would be a long season before such a convocation as he meant would be called.

Then the Bishop committed M. Latimer to the Major, saying: now he is your prisoner master Major. Because the press of people was not yet diminished, ech man looking for farther process, the Bishop of Lincoln commanded avoidance, and willed M. Latimer to tarry till the press were diminished lest he should take hurt at his egression, as he did at his entrance. And so continued Bishop Ridley, and M. Latimer in durance till the .16. day of the said month of October.

A communication between D. Brokes, and D. Ridley, in M. Irysh his house, the xv. day of October, at which time he was degraded.

IN the mean season upon the 15. day in the morning, and the same year above said, the Bishop of Gloucester Doct. Brokes, and the Uicechauncelour of Oxford Doct. Marshall, with diverse other of the chief and heads of the same University, and many other moe accompanying with them, came unto M. Irish his house then Major of Oxford, where D. Ridley, late Bishop of London was close prisoner. And when the Bishop of Gloucester came into the chamber where the said D, Ridley did lie, he told him for what purpose their coming was unto him, saying: that yet once again the Queens Majesty did offer unto him by them, her gracious mercy, if that he would receive the same, and come home again to the faith which he was Baptized in, & revoke his erroneous doctrine that he of late had taught abroad to the destructiō of many. And further said, that if he would not recant, and become one of the Catholic Church with them, then they must needs (against their willes) proceed according to the law, which they would be very loath to do, if they might otherwise. But (saith he) we have been often tim s with you, and have requested that you would recant this your fantastical & devilish opinion, where hitherto you have not, although you might in so doing win many, and do much good. Therefore good M. Ridley, consider with yourself the danger that shall ensue both of body and soul, if that you shall so willfully cast yourself away in refusing mercy offered unto you at this time.

My Lord, quoth D. Ridley, you know my mind fully herein: and as for the doctrine which I have taught, my conscience assureth me that it was sound, & according to God's word (to his glory be it spoken) the which doctrine the Lord God being my helper, I will maintain so long as my tongue shall wag, and breath is within my body, and in confirmation thereof, seal the same with my blood.

Brok.

Well, you were best, M. Ridley, not to do so, but to become one of the Church with us. For you know this well enough, that whosoever is out of the Catholic church, cannot be saved: therefore I say once again, that whiles you have time and mercy offered you, receive it, and confess with us the Popes holiness to be be the chief head of the same Church.

Rid.

I marueyle that you will trouble me with any such vain and foolysh talk. You know my mind concerning the usurped authority of the Romish Antichrist. As I confessed openly in the Schools, so do I now, that both by my behavior and talk I do no obedience at all unto the Bishop of Rome, nor to his usurped authority, and that for diverse good and godly considerations. And here Doct. Ridley would have reasoned with the said Brokes Bishop of Gloucester, of the Bishop of Rome's authorities, but could not be suffered, and yet he spake so earnestly against the Pope therein, that the Bishop told him, if he would not hold his peace, he should be compelled against his will. And seeing saith he, that you will not receive the Queens mercy now offered unto you, but stubburnly refuse the same, we must, against our wills, proceed according to our Commission to disgradyng, taking from you the dignity of Priesthode. For we take you for no Bishop, and therefore we will the sooner have done with you: so, committing you to the secular power, you know what doth follow.

Rid.

Do with me as it shall please God to suffer you, I am well content to abide the same with all my heart.

Brok.

Put of your cap M. Ridley, and put upon you this surples.

Rid.

Not I truly.

Brok.

But you must.

Rid.

I will not.

Brok.

You must: therefore make no more a do, but put this surples upon you.

Rid.

Truly if it come upon me, it shall be against my will.

Brok.

Will you not do it upon you?

Rid.

No, that I will not.

Brok.

It shall be put upon you by one or other.

Rid.

Do therein as it shall please you. I am well contented with that, and more then that: the servant is not above his Master. If they dealt so cruelly with our Savior Christ, as the Scripture maketh mention, and he suffered the same patienly, howe much more doth it become us his servants? and in saying of these words they put upon the said Doctor Ridley the surples, with all the trinkettes appertaynyg to the Mass, and as they were putting on the same, Doctor Ridley did vehemently inuey against the Romish Byshyp and all that foolysh apparel, calling him Antichrist, and the apparel foolysh and abominable, yea to fond for a Uice in a play, in so much that Brokes was exceeding angry with him, and bad him hold his peace. For he did but rail. Doct. Ridley answered again, and said: so long as his tongue and breath would suffer him, he would speak against their abominable doings, what so ever happened unto him for so doing.

Brok.

Well, you were best to hold your peace, lest your mouth be stopped. At which words one Edridge, the reader then of the Greek Lecture standing by, said to Doct. Brokes: Syr, the law is he should be gagged, therefore let him be gagged. At which words Doct. Ridley looking earnestly upon him that so said, wagged his head at him, and made no answer again, but with a sigh said: Oh well, well, well.

So they proceeded in their doings: yet nevertheless D. Ridley was ever talking things not pleasant to their ears, although one or other bad him hold his peace, least he should be caused against his will.