An Antidote Against Popery
The source for this document is https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/B09202.0001.001
Project Note
This is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND. This license allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
The source of this document is the Early English Books Online (EEBO-TCP) website. Those books were transcribed in a character for character manner and can be very cumbersome to read since there was no standard spelling during that time. Many spelling variations such as "unlesse", "vnlesse", and "vnles" regularly appear.
This project was conceived to clean up those books as much as possible and make them more accessible to the interested reader, leading to the creation of a massive list of variant spellings and their corrections. This was used to clean up the text, but is of course only as complete as the list itself. Because of the nature of the original transcription, some words have missing characters or places where the original language (e.g., Greek) was not transcribed. This effort does not change that. Be aware that the original transcription can also be faulty and in some cases entire sentences may be missing.
Although this is no substitute for a properly compared, proofed, and scholarly edition, I believe that the result is a document which is far more accessible, particularly for searching for terms using standard spelling. The document has been cleaned and presented in what I hope is a pleasing and useful format for the vast majority of Christian brothers and sisters who just want access to read these spiritually nourishing works.
However, a word of warning: The Puritans were a very diverse group of people and their age was characterized with godliness, but also much upheaval, disputation and strife. They disagreed on many doctrines and some of these works contain less orthodox or Scriptural views than others. The reader is strongly advised to read with discernment, particularly if it is unknown whether author is trustworthy.
This project took a huge amount of time and skill to bring to fruition. I would particularly like to thank David Jonescue for the initial list of Puritans he found on EEBO and the concept behind this project as well as the continuous, unceasing efforts toward seeing this complete. Without his labor, this would not be available. Alex Sarrouf was invaluable in providing the initial list of over 7,000 spelling variations he had identified and corrected, as well as continuing to review more than 16,000 additions to that list for any typos.
Logan West
(with David Jonescue and Alex Sarrouf)
www.puritansearch.org
AN ANTIDOTE Agaynst Popery: Most necessary for all in this Back-slyding Age.
Wherein
1. The Truth is confirmed, by Authority of Scripture, Witnessing of Antiquity, and confession of the Popish party.
2. Popish Scriptural Arguments are answered, by the Exposition both of Fathers, and of their own Doctors.
By WILLIAM GUILD, D. D. Preacher of God's Word.
Job. 6.25. How forcible are right Words?
ABERDENE, Printed by James Brown, 1656.
To the Right Honorable, and Religious LORD. DAVID, Earl of WEIMES, Lord ELCHO, &c. AND To His Noble & Religious Lady D. MARGARET LESLIE, Countess of VEIMES, &c.
IF ever any times, these now require, that as the Apostle willeth us, We earnestly contend for that Faith, which was once delivered to the saints; considering both the subtlety and sedulitie of the Enemies of the Truth, whose subtlety & working in a Mystery, as it should make all men the more wary; so their sedulitie in seduction (like that of the Pharisees of old) should make all the LORD'S Servants on the Watchtowre more watchful and diligent. That while as the envyous man is so bussie to sow Tares in their Masters Field, and draw men frō the Truth, they be not found slack and sleeping in sowing good seed, and keeping men with the Truth.
This the Glory of GOD requireth at our hands, whereof we should be zealous, This the command of CHRIST enjoineth, whose Sheep we we ought to feed and guard them from disguysed Wolves who come to devour the Flock, This the danger of our Church in these sad times craveth and calleth for. With this also doth our calling and conscience burdē us, if ever we look for the approbation of good & faithful servants. And to do this, the pity that we ought to have on many poor souls, should stimulat us, who like these who followed Absalom in the simplicity of their hearts, are slielie seduced, craftily captivated, & cruelly soul-murdered, by these devouring Wolves, in sheep's clothing; of whom the Apostle fore-warned Act. 20.29. Who with the Pharisees of old, pretend Moses Chair, and the infallibility of their Church, being in the mean while, not Apostolic, but Apostatick, not Pastors, but Impostors, not Leaders, but Misleaders, not Priests of Bethel, but of Babel, and like that Beast in the Revelation, though horned like the LANB, yet speaking like the Dragon. And as it was said to Peter by the High-Priests Mayde, Their speech bewrayeth them, that though they pretend to be for Christ, yet they serve Antichrist.
Of such, for GOD'S people to be aware, it is not only our part to fore-warn, as Paul did the elders of Ephesus, or to stand armed ourselves, with the builders of the Walls of Jerusalem, but also for convincing of error, & defense of the Truth, to arm & furnish others out of the Lord's Armorie of holy Scripture, whereby they may be both guarded from error, & their feet guyded in the paths of Truth.
For which end these pains that I have taken, Right Honorable, I have Dedicate to your Honors: whom in like love of the Truth and encouragement both of God's Servants, and others that are Religious in the bounds where ye live, as ye are exemplar, So I beseech God you may continue to be Patrons and Paterns of piety, Which doubtless shall tend in end to the procuring in Mercy of God's blessing both on you & yours here, and to your Eternal happienesse here-after; Which shall be the hear • i •… wish of
Your Honors humbl •… Servant in Christ WILLIAM GUILD
The Table of the first part of this TREATISE.
- CHAP. I. OF Scripture, and the Canon thereof. PAG. 1.
- CHAP. II. Of the perfectiō of Scripture, against unwritten traditions. PAG. 11.
- CHAP. III. Of the playnnes of Scripture in all things needful to Salvation; and therefore that people should not be debarred from reading the same. PAG. 22.
- CHAP. IV. Of the perpetual visibility of the true Church. PAG. 32.
- CHAP. V. Of the Churches infal •… bilitie, and how it •… death at last into Popes infallibility, w •… pretendeth that he •… head thereof. 〈…〉
- CHAP. VI. Of the Popes supre •… cie.
- CHAP. VII. Of Prayers & publi •… worship, whether 〈…〉 same should be i •… known tongue.
- CHAP. VIII. Of the invocation •… Saynts & Angels. PAG. 7 •…
- CHAP. IX. Of the representing G •… by an Image, and t •… worshipping of such 〈…〉
- CHAP. X. Of the adoration of Relics. PAG. 9 •…
- CHAP. XI. Of free-will in our Vo •… cation. PAG. 10 •…
- CHAP. XII. Of our Justification. PAG. 1 •…
- CHAP. XIII. Of Sanctification, a •… man's ability to kee •… GOD'S Law. PAG. 140.
- CHAP. XIV. Of Glorification, & whether our good works do merit the same. PAG. 148.
- CHAP. XV. Of Purgatory. PAG. 161.
- CHAP. XVI. Of the Sacraments, and first of the absolute necessity of Baptism. PAG. 175.
- CHAP. XVII. Of Transubstantiation in the LORD'S Supper, PAG. 183.
- CHAP. XVIII. Of half Communion, or with-holding the Cup from the people. PAG. 208.
- CHAP. XIX. Of the Sacrifice of the MASSE. PAG. 215.
An Antidote Against Popery.
CHAPTER I. OF SCRIPTVRE.
SECT. I. Of the Canon thereof.
•… he state of the Contraversie.
COncerning the Canon of Scripture, there is no question between the Romanists and us, of the •… ookes of the New Testament, but •… lie of the Old: to wit, Whether those Books which are placed af •… the Prophet Malachi, common called APOCRYPHA, be Canoni •… Scripture: that is, (as the word i •… porteth) be of that Divine Auth •… ritie, as to be the Rule of our Fay •… and practice; which the Council Trent affirmeth, accursing th •… who will not receive them as •… creed and Canonical; and which deny to be such, because of th •… reasons following.
1. Authority of Scripture •…
1. LUKE XXIV. 27. And •… ginning at Moses, and the Prophets, he expounded 〈…〉 them in all the Scriptures, things concerning himself.
Whence it followeth, If ou •… •… viour comprehendeth all the S •… tures of the Olde Testament in •… ses and the Prophets, of whom M •… chi was the last: that then all ot •… which were written after, (as Apocrypha Books were) are no •… nonick Scripture. But (as we see by Saynct LUKE) our Savior comprehendeth all the Scriptures of •… he Olde Testament in Moses and •… he Prophets, of whom Malachi was •… he last, as witnesseth Theodoret, and •… heir own Genebrard: therefore all •… uch as were written after, (as the Apocrypha Books were) are no Ca •… onicke Scripture, For thus saith •… heodoret, Malachi as the last Pro •… het after all others, left the Divine Oracles in writ. So that from Mala •… hi to John the Baptist (saith Gene •… ard ) no Prophet arose.
2. ACTS XXVI. 22. Having •… herefore obtained help of GOD, 〈…〉 continue unto this day, witnessing •… oth to small & great, saying none •… there things, (or, as the Rhemists •… ranslate, nothing beside) than those •… hich the Prophets and Moses did •… ay should come.
Whence it followeth again; •… eeing Saynct Paul comprehendeth 〈…〉 like manner all the Scriptures of •… he Olde Testament in the writs of 〈1 page duplicate〉 〈1 page duplicate〉 Moses and the Prophets only, leadging no other things for conf •… mation of his doctrine; that the •… fore any other writs which we neither Moses nor the Prophets, (su •… as the Apocrypha Books be) are Canonicke Scripture.
3. ROM. 3.2. Unto th •… (to wit, the Jews) were commit •… the Oracles of GOD (or, as 〈…〉 Rhemistes translate, the words GOD ) that is, as Ferus a Roman and all others with him, expou •… the Canonicke Scriptures of Olde Testament.
But to subsume: Those Boo •… which are called Apocrypha, w •… not committed unto them as Oracles of GOD, nor acknowl •… ged, read, or expounded by th •… (as Bellarmine confesseth:) th •… fore it followeth, that they are Canonicke Scripture. Wheref •… (saith Augustine ) those thi •… are not sp • ken with such firmn •… or authority, which are not w •… ten in the Canon of the Jews.
Where it is to be noted, that •… ache of the Jews, not as they are at •… is day, but as they were then, •… hen they ONLY were the Church •… f GOD under the Olde Testa •… ent: and therefore, whose testi •… onie of the Canonicke Books of •… e Olde Testament, was then of •… ore credit, than any other Church •… ow can be in the contrary: in re •… ect that the Jewish Synagogue (as •… yeth Cordubensis, a minorit Friar) •… d then the infallible authority of •… ecerning between Divine inspy •… d Scriptures which they recea •… ed, and others which then they •… ejected.
4. 2. TIM. 3.16. All •… cripture is given by Divine in •… iration.
Whence it followeth, That what 〈…〉 not given by Divine inspiration, •… s not Canonicke Scripture. But •… ich are the Apocrypha Books: •… herefore, they are no Canonicke •… cripture.
Now, that such are the Apocrypha •… ookes, is proven, 1. out of themselves; because the author of t •… Books of Maccabees acknowle •… geth that they are only the abridg •… meant of an human Story, done b •… great pains; and wherein he excuseth himself, That if he hat •… done slenderlie, it is all that h •… could attain unto: which is n •… the style of Canonicke Scripture •… Wherefore, saith Saynct Jerome the Church receiveth not th •… Books of the Maccabees as Can •… nick Scripture. Which thing all •… Pope Gregory, in his Moralls, clea •… lie acknowledgeth.
Next: This is a sure testimoni •… (saith Bellarmine ) that the Boo •… of holy Scripture are Divine; b •… cause of the wonderful and Divi •… agreement of the Writers; as if the •… had been all written with one Pe •… and by one Writer. Whence it fo •… loweth, that such Books, whic •… have not this Divine agreemen •… but disagree from other Canonic Scripture, (as the Apocrypha do are not Divine or Canonic themselves; which is proven by two o •… them, in place of all the rest: t •… wit, 1. the Book of Tobit, chap. 5. •… ers. 12. where the good Angel is •… rought in uttering a lie: which is only proper, by Canonicke Scrip •… ure, to Satan, (who is a liar from •… he beginning) and to evil Angels, •… nd saying, that he was of a human kindred, and carnal procrea •… ion; whose nature is only to be created Spirits, appointed for ministration.
Next: by conferring Apocrypha Esther, with Canonicke Esther, in these few places following, videlicet, in Apocrypha Esther, 12.5. it is said, that Mordecai for detecting the Treason against the King, by the two Eunuchs, at that time, he got a Reward: and in the Canonicke Esther, 6.3. it is said the contrary; that at that time he got no Rewarde. Agayne, in Apocrypha Esther, 15.10. it is said, When Esther came before the King, he looked on her fiercelie: and in Canonicke Esther, 5.2. it is said the contrary; that he looked on her favourablie. Lykewyse, in the Apocrypha Esther, 12.6. it is said, that Haman hated Mordecai, because o •… the two Eunuchs, whose Treaso •… he detected: and in Canonicke Esther, 3.5. it is said, that this he •… did because he would not bow hi •… knee to Haman. And last, in Apocrypha Esther, 16.10. Haman i •… called a Macedonian: and in Canonicke Esther, 3.1. he is declared that he was an Agagite. Next they disagree amongst themselves, which Canonicke Scripture doeth not, as Bellarmine 's former testimony witnesseth: For 1. Macab. 6. it is said, that Antiochus died at home in his bed at Babylon: and 2. Macab. 9.28. it is said, that he died in a strange country, amongst the mountains. And that this was one and the same man, Bellarmine witnesseth.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
ATHANASIVS in his SYNOPSIS, declareth, That according to the number of the Hebrew Alphabet, there are only xxij Books of Canonicke Scripture, in the Olde Testament; which he setteth down, •… s we have them And unto these saith he) let no man add. And little after; Besides these, there •… re o • her Books, (saith he) •… hich we put not in the Canon. •… nd thereafter numbereth out the •… ookes of Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, •… sther, Judith, Tobias, &c. The like •… hereof doeth Hilary, Ruffinus, •… amascene, and others.
But in place of all, Saynct Jerome •… stifieth, in his time, what was the •… ynde of the whole Church, say •… g, The Church indeed readeth •… ese Books, but receiveth them •… ot amongst Canonical Scriptures. •… o that according to Cardinal Pe •… n 's words, this Testimony is a •… fficient evidence of the Faith of •… e whole Church then in this •… oynt. For when the Fathers speak •… ot as private Doctors, (saith he) •… ut as witnesses of those things •… hich the Church did and believed 〈…〉 their time; affirming, that such a •… ing was the Faith or practice of •… e whole Church; then their te •… imonie is sufficient to declare the unanime consent of the wh •… CHURCH.
3. Confession of party
LYRA, after the enumeratio •… the Books of Canonicke Sc •… ture; Whatsoever is beside t •… Books of the Olde Testament Saynct Jerome speaketh, (saith the same is to be placed amo •… the Apocrypha, which are the Bo •… that are not in the Canon: w •… the Church notwithstanding •… mitteth, as good and profitable, not as Canonical.
So likewise saith the Gl •… upon the Decretals; The Wisdo •… of Solomon, the Book of Jesus son of Sirah, which is called •… clesiasticus, and the Books of Iu •… Tobias, and the Maccabees, are co •… ted Apocrypha, and not read ge •… rallie.
And if anywhere thou fin •… the Apocryphal Books count •… mongst those that are Canonic •… either in holy Councils, or •… cient Doctors, (saith Card •… Cajetant ) let it not trouble thee, •… ho art a Novice: for all such spea •… es are to be reduced to Saynct •… rome 's manner of speech, or emen •… tion. They are not, therefore, •… anonicke: that is, a Rule to con •… me matters of Faith. But they •… ay be called Canonicke, (saith •… ee) that is, Regular unto edifica •… on: to wit, being received, and •… thorised to this ende only. Ther •… re also saith Driedo, Professor at •… ovane. Cyprian, Ambrose, and o •… er Fathers cited some sentences •… ut of Baruch, and the third and •… urth Books of Esdras, not as out •… f Canonical Books; but as out of •… ookes containing some Godly •… octrines, &c.
SECT. II. Of the perfection of Scripture, against unwritten Traditions.
The state of the Question.
THE question herein between the Romanists and us, is not of Traditions serving for explicati •… of Scripture, nor of Historical, ne •… there Ritual, which concern E •… clesiasticall Order and Policy; b •… only of Doctrinal, added to Scri •… ture, for making up a perfect Ru •… both of Faith & Manners. Wher •… anent the Romanists affirm, in th •… Council of Trent, that this D •… ctrine of Truth pertaining bo •… to Faith and Manners, is partly o •… lie contained in the Scriptures, a •… partly in unwritten Tradition which the Church receiveth wi •… alike reverence, and pious affectio •… as the Scripture it self, (say they and who so doeth otherwise, is a cursed by them, Yea, the Scri •… ture (saith their Charroneus ) is t •… least part of revealed Truth; a •… the far greater part of the Gosp •… hath come unto us by Traditio •… (saith their Bishop Hosius. )
On the contrary, (reverenci •… the plenitude and perfection Scripture) we affirm, That the •… is no Doctrine pertaining to Fay •… and Manners, necessary to be b •… lieved unto Salvation, which is n •… in holy Scripture, either materially •… ontayned therein, or which may •… early be deduced out of it, or •… se evidently proven by the same, 〈…〉 these subsequent Testimonies •… rue to confirm.
1. Authority of Scripture.
2. TIM. 3.15. From a child [ 1] •… hou hast known the Scriptures, •… hich are able to make thee •… yse unto Salvation. Therefore •… so, ACT. 20.32. they are called •… he word of grace, which is able to •… uild us up, and give us an inhe •… itance amongst the Sayncts.
Whence it followeth: If the •… criptures be able to make us wise •… nto Salvation, and to give us an •… nheritance amongst the Saints, •… hich is all we can seek; therefore •… hey contain the whole Doctrine, •… hich is necessary to that ende. Wherefore Saynct Paul, to bring •… is hearers to Salvation, professeth, •… hat he taught them no other thing, •… han was contained in Scripture; which therefore he calleth The •… hole Council of GOD. As also Saynct Augustine telleth us, tha •… the writers of Scripture choose •… therefore those things which wer •… thought sufficient for the Salvatio •… of Believers, (saith he) both fo •… Faith and Manners. And so saith Cyril, joining this, That shining so by a right Faith, and Vertuou •… actions, (saith he) we may come to the Kingdom of Heaven.
[ 2] 2. TIM. 3.16. All Scripture is given by Divine inspiration, and is profitable for doctrine, reproof, correction, and instruction in righteousness: that the man of GOD (that is, chiefly, the Minister of GOD'S word, 1. TIM. 6.11.) may be perfect, thoroughly furnished (or, as the Rhemists translate, instructed) unto every good work.
Whence it followeth: If the Scripture serve sufficiently to make him perfect, thoroughly furnished unto every good work, who is the Minister of the Word, and to whom it belongeth to declare the whole Council of GOD; that then it containeth all perfect furniture of instruction tending to that ende. For that is perfect, (saith Aquinas ) where there is no defect at all to be supplied.
But all or complete Scripture, serveth to do this, (as the TEXT telleth us) therefore it is perfect it self; having all perfect furniture in it tending to that ende. Wherefore, saith Cardinal Cajetan on this place, after that he expoundeth [all Scripture] to comprehend both Olde and Newe Testament; Behold whither the utility of Scripture tendeth; even to the perfecting of the man of GOD: that is, of him who fully giveth himself to GOD: yea, to such a perfection, (I say) that he may be perfect unto every good work, both in the intellectual, and operative part, (saith he.) As also, (saith Estius ) though every part of Scripture is not profitable to all these uses; yet in the whole Scripture all these four vtilities are to be found.
[ .3] GAL. 1.8. Tho we, or an Angel from Heaven, preach unto you beside that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Which words Augustine (and with him Basel ) thus expoundeth: If an Angel from Heaven preach unto you anything, beside that which is in the Scriptures, of the Law and Gospel, which ye have received, (saith he) let him be accursed.
Next, (saith Theophilact, and with him Chrysostom; ) Neither saith the Apostle, If they teach things contrary or repugnant: but, If they teach never so small a point, beside that which we have taught: that is, add never so little more than that, let him be accursed.
The same also saith Cardinal Cajetan on this place, with Aquinas, and others: Wherefore the very RHEMISTS have translated, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , beside that; and not, contrary to that which is written.
Whence it followeth: If nothing •… ust be preached to GOD'S peo •… le, though it were by an Angel from •… even, but that only which is con •… yned in Scripture, under pain of •… cursing: That therefore the Scri •… tures contain in them all Do •… rines of Faith, needful to be •… own, or necessary to salvation. •… nd whosoever addeth thereunto 〈…〉 written doctrinal Traditions, or •… acheth the same, they fall under •… e accursing of the Apostle.
EPHES. 4.20. And are [ 4] •… uilt upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets, JESUS •… HRIST Himself being the •… iefe corner stone. Which place •… quinas, Caejetane, and others, thus •… e expound: that is, upon the do •… rine of the Prophets, and Apo •… es: and to show that this do •… rine is only contained in Scrip •… re: therefore saint Ambrose, and •… ith him Lombard, thus do ex •… ayne it, saying; That is, upon the •… lde and the New Testament.
Whence it followeth: If the doctrine 〈1 page duplicate〉 〈1 page duplicate〉 of the Prophets and Aposles contained in the Scriptures o •… the Olde and New Testament, be the only foundation where vpo •… the Church is built; therefore it i •… not built partly upon vnwritte •… Traditions: upon which whosoever buildeth his faith in any po it of doctrine, he buildeth like th •… foolish builder, upon a sandy an •… unsure foundation.
GAL. 3.15. Tho it be but [ 5] man's testament, yet if it be confirmed, no man disanulleth, n •… addeth thereto: or, as the Rh •… mists translate, further disposeth.
Whence it followeth: If a man testament containeth perfectly h •… will, and therefore being confi •… med, that no man addeth theret •… then much more is the LORD •… Testament perfect, confirmed by h •… Blood: and therefore much le •… should any man be bold to ad •… thereunto.
[ 6] ACT. 17.11. And the B •… reans searched the Scriptures da •… lie, whether those things were so, (as Paul taught) therefore many believed.
Whence is is evident, that it was not upon any warrand of unwritten Traditions; but upon the warrand only of Scripture, that they grounded their faith: Therefore, saith Theophylact, and with him Oecumenius, Hence it is, that they were the more confirmed in the Faith, that they searched the Scriptures, and found whatsoever belonged to the LORD'S conversing in the flesh, to agree with the Oracles of the ancient Prophets. Whereas on the contrary, it is a manifest falling from the Faith, and an argument of arrogancy, (saith saint Basel ) either to reject any point of those things which are written, or to bring in any of those things which are not written.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
THE holy and divine inspyred Scriptures, (saith Athanasius ) are sufficient for the full instruction of All Truth. And in what only t •… Truth must be acknowledged (saith Gregory Nyssen ) where •… is seen the seal of Scriptural T •… stimonie. And again; Therefo •… the only Canon of Scripture is su •… ficient for all doctrines of Faith (saith Vincentius Lyrinensis ) So th •… take from Heretics, wherein the agree with Heathens, that by Scripture only they may debate the questions, (saith Tertullian ) an •… they cannot stand. This being sure tenet to be held concernin •… all Doctrines wanting Scriptura warrand, which Gregory Nyssen setteth down, saying of such; For a •… much as this is upholden with n •… testimony of Scripture, as false we reject it. Seeing the very lea •… point that concerneth the holy an •… divine mysteries of Faith, (saith saint Cyril ) must not be taugh •… without holy Scripture.
3. Confession of party.
ALL Doctrines of Faith & Manners, (saith Bellarmine ) which are simply necessary for all men, •… re playnelie set down in Scrip •… ure. Therefore, (saith Aquinas ) •… othing should be taught, which •… s not contained in the Gospels & Epistles, and in the holy Scriptures. And it is but a Staff of Reedes, whatsoever as a tradition is taught without the warrand of the word of GOD, (saith their own Fe •… us. ) For the word of GOD is that only, whereupon we can safelie lean: and they are but wicked deceavers, who in place of GOD'S Word, propound their own dreams. For the Scriptures themselves are able sufficiently, to instruct a man to salvation, (saith Claudius Espenseus a Doctor of Sorbon ) and to make him learned therein. So also Aquinas, and Anselmu • : yea, (say the very Rhemists of late) by the uniform consent of all learned Divines, the holy Bible, or written Word of GOD, containeth expresslie or implied all things that man is to believe, to observe, and to avoid, for the obtaining of eternal salvation.
SECT. 3. Of the perspecuity of Scripture in all things needful to Salvation; and therefor •… that people should read th •… same.
The state of the Question.
THE Question between the R •… manists and us herein, is no •… Whether some things or places i •… Scripture, be obscure, (as sayn •… Peter saith) which we grant: b •… whether the same be so obscu •… throughout, that people can n •… understand therein, or know suc •… things as belong to Faith & Ma •… ners, and consequently, to salvation, and that for the obscurity an •… danger of reading the same, th •… people should be altogether d •… barred there from. Which we deny, because of these Reaso •… following.
PSAL. 119.105.130. Th •… [ 1] Word is a lamp to my feet, and light unto my paths: yea, the very entrance of thy Word giveth light, and understanding to the simple.
Upon which words saith Augustine, What is this woe • d which is called such a Light, that it is a Lamp also? except we understand the Word which was revealed to the Prophets, and preached by the Apostles, and which the interlinearie gloss calleth, therefore, the whole Sacred Scriptures: which for this cause is called a Lamp, and a Light, (saith Genebrard on this place) because it directeth us to GOD in those things which we should do, believe, hope for, & love, &c. For it is the Rule of our Faith and life, (saith he) showing us the way, in the darkness of this world, unto eternal life.
Whence it will follow: If it be a Lamp to direct, and show us the way in darkness, that it is not dark and obscure it self: for this is the nature of a Lamp, to be light it self, which is opposite to darkness; and to show light others, that they walk not, 〈…〉 stumble in darkness. Therefo •… (PSAL. 19.8.) it is said, to enlig •… ten the eyes; and (PSAL. 119.13 •… to give understanding to the ve •… simple.
[ 2] 2. TIM. 3.15. From a chy •… thou hast known the Scriptures
Upon which Text, (saith Est •… Professor in Duay ) Moreover, t •… place teacheth. That very child •… should not be debarred from r •… ding of holy Scripture. And the •… after he saith of Timothy, in •… spect that he was instructed by 〈…〉 Mother, and Grand-mother, who faith was commended in the f •… Chapter; It is collected, (say •… he) that neither women are to forbidden the reading of holy Sc •… pture. Therefore saith holy •… natius; Fathers, bring up your ch •… dren in Discipline, and knowled •… of the LORD, and teach them t •… holy Scriptures. So also say •… Theophylact, upon Ephes. 6.4.
Whence it doeth follow: If chi •… dren may attain to the knowledge •… f GOD in Scripture, and should •… ade the same; then much more •… ay their Parentes, who should •… struct them, whether they be •… en or women: And therefore, •… hat They are not so obscure, nor •… angerous, that Laickes should •… ee debarred from the reading •… ereof.
JOHN 5.39. Search the Scrip •… res, [ 3] for in them ye think ye •… aue eternal life, and they are •… ey which testify of Mee, (saith •… ur Savior.)
Wherevpon saith saint Cyril, •… his he did cry alowde unto the •… wish people to do. So also Chrystome; Our LORD exhorted the •… wes, to search the Scriptures, saith he:) and much more •… old He induce us to the sear •… ing thereof. Therefore, saith •… rigen; Would to GOD we all •… d that which is written, saying, •… earch the Scriptures. Fo •• ra the •… oing hereof, and meditating •… erein, the blessed man is described in the first Psalm. And this were the Bereans common •… by the Apostle, ACTS 17.11. A •… why then should Christians no •… be condemned for doing of 〈…〉 same?
[ 4] EPHES. 6.17. Take the sw •… of the Spirit, which is the W •… of GOD.
That is, (saith Haymo, ancient Father, and with him Ca •… sian ) Take the doctrine and in •… ction of the holy Scriptures, w •… by, as by a sword, we may p •… flight all the machinations of Devil, &c. saith he.
Note then, that all Chris •… whatsoever, (because all are •… tuall Warriours) are bidden themselves with the Scripture that who forbiddeth them th •… and reading thereof, they them naked before their spiri •… enemy.
COLOSS. 3.16. Let [ 5] Word dwell in you richlie, ( •… the Rhemists translate, abounda •… in all wisdom, teaching and a •… nishing one another. And be ye •… illed with knowledge, (saith the Apostle, COL. 1.9.)
Upon which place, therefore, say • h Chrysostom ) hearken unto •… ee so many of you as have wives •… nd children, howe even here the •… postle commandeth you to read •… e Scripture; and that, not slight •… e, or p • rfunctoriouslie; but with •… reat ca • e, or diligence. And there •… fter subjoineth; I beseech you •… hat are La • ckes, that ye get you •… bless, the Medicine of the Soul. •… nd if you cannot get more, get •… e New Testament.
This dwelling also of the word •… boundantlie, which the Apostle •… ill have to be in people. is, That •… ey may have (saith Lombard ) •… e vndestanding of the whole Scri •… tures. Which is far from Po •… ish ignorance, and their forbid •… ing of the people to read the •… Vord at all: as who would for •… id children to look into their fa •… er's Testament.
2. COR. 1.13. For we write [ 6] none other thing unto you, tha •… what you read, &c. And agay •… EPHES. 3.4. Whereby, w •… ye read, ye may vndersta •… my knowledge in the mysteri •… CHRIST.
Where we may see, that it 〈…〉 the practice of the primitive C •… stians, to read the Scriptures 〈…〉 the writings of the holy Apo •… and that this was the fruit w •… they reaped thereby: to wit •… understanding of the mysteri •… CHRIST; made known fir •… to the Apostles, and by their •… tings made known unto oath •…
2. Witnessing of Antiquit •…
WHAT seemeth amb • gu •… and obscurelie to be sp •… in some places of holy Scrip •… may be explained, ( saith B •… by other places which are p •… cuous and clear. Also, in 〈…〉 places which are clearly set d •… in Scripture, ( saith Augustine those things are to be fo •… •… hich contain both Faith and •… anners. And therefore, concerning the •… ading of the same, he thus speaketh •… to the people: Neither let it suf •… e you, that ye hear the holy •… riptures read in the Church, •… ayeth he: ) but also in your own •… ouses, either read them your •… lues, or desire others to read •… em unto you: and hear ye them •… ladlie.
Neither say thou, (saith Theo •… ylact, and before him Chrysostom) •… at it is the part only of religious •… ersons, to read the Scriptures: •… or it is the part of every Chri •… ian so to do; and especially their •… art who are occupied in wordly •… usinesses. Whereof S. Chrysostom •… endereth this reason: Because they •… ho are occupied about wordly •… usinesse, receive wound upon •… ound daily, ( saith he: ) and •… herefore have need of this divine •… edicine, to cure them. And there •… ore, he is so earnest with the people to •… eade the Scriptures, that he saith: •… ever exhort you, and shall not •… easse to exhort you, That not only you take heed to those thin •… which ye hear in this place: 〈…〉 also when you are at home, t •… ye busy yourselves with the c •… tinuall reading of the Scriptu •… For (saith he) is it not an abs •… thing, and preposterous, that wh •… we are receiving monies, w •… will not trust others, but num •… and count them our selves: but 〈…〉 weyghtier matters, simply to f •… low the opinion of others: chie •… lie seeing we have the moste j •… Ballance and Rule of Scriptu •… Therefore, I beseech, and intre •… you all, (speaking to his hearers) th •… ye leave what s • emeth right to th •… or that man: and that, of all the •… things, ye inquire of Scripture.
3. Confession of party.
ALL Doctrines of Faith & Ma •… ners, which are simply nece •… sarie for all men, are plainly 〈…〉 down in Scripture, (saith Bell •… mine.) As also, (saith Pepinus, 〈…〉 Dominion) the Scripture it se •… alone, doeth teach perfectly a •… playnl • e, whatsoever is to be belie •… d as Articles of Faith, and what to be done as Divine Preceptes, •… c. And therefore it is manifest by •… e Apostles doctrine, (COL. 3.16.) •… d by the practice of the Church. •… ayeth their Bistop Espenseus ) that of •… de the public use of Scripture 〈…〉 as permitted to people. Where •… e, besi • e Theodoret his testimony, •… at in his time the Scriptures were •… r that ende translated into all Lan •… ages, the very Rhemistes do wit •… sse, That altho the Bible, in the •… ulgar, is not generally permitted; •… et Saynct Chrysostom translated the •… SALMES, and some other partes of •… cripture, for the Armenians, when •… ee was there in banishment. The •… elavonians and Goths also, (say they) •… ad the Bible in their Languages. 〈…〉 was translated likewise in Italian, •… y an Arch-Bishop of Genua: and we •… a • some parts thereof in English trans •… ated by Venerable Beda, as Malmes •… urie witnesseth (say they) The neglect •… f the reading whereof, their own Cor •… elius Mus, Bishop of Bitonto, so much •… egrated, that he said; Alas, for grief! that the holy Scriptu •… hitherto, have been so neglec •… to the great hurt of all, &c.
CHAPTER II. OF THE CHURCH.
SECT. I. Of the perpetual visibili •… of the true CHURCH: OR, to take away all ambigu •… tie in words; Of the constant apparency a •… conspicuousnesse thereof.
The state of the Question.
THE Question is not of t •… perpetuity and continuance •… the visible Church, simply and a •… solutelie considered in the nature •… it, as it is the visible Church; but the continuance of it, considered the perfection of the health thereof, as being fully orthodox in pr •… fessing the Truth in all points of Doctrine. For we acknowledge the •… ontinuance of the Church in the •… irst sense, and the perpetuity of the •… isibilitie thereof: which is all that •… he Arguments adduced by the •… oman • stes do prove. But we flat •… e deny the perpetual continuance •… hereof in the other sense: to wit, that the visible Church doeth ever •… ublicklie before the world pro •… esse the Truth in all points: and, •… hat there is ever a society of men •… rofessing so, like a Kingdom, or •… epublicke, conspicuous to the eyes •… f all men. Which thing our Adver •… ries are never able to prove. But, •… n the contrary, we have moste •… rong and evident warrands in the Word, That the health and puri •… e of the Church, is subject to all •… eration, as the estate of the Jewish Church was of old, and is clear •… ay these places following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
〈…〉 . KING. 19.10. And Elijah [ 1] said, I have been very 〈1 page duplicate〉 〈1 page duplicate〉 zealous for the LORD of host for the children of Israel ha •… forsaken thy Covenant, throw •… down thine Altars, and slay •… thy Prophets; and I only a •… left; and they seek my life.
I ask, then, Where was a vi •… ble company of true worship •… in public at this time in Israe •… And that the like estate of true P •… fessoures was at one time both Israel and Judah, is evident out 2. CHRON. 15.8. and 1. KING. 〈…〉 9. The whole Kingdom of Iu •… being idolatrous in Abijam 's lat •… reign. And, at the same ty •… whole Israel being idolatrous •… der Jeroboam.
Agayne, 2. CHRON. 28.24. i •… recorded, howe at once both Iu •… was altogether idolatrous vn •… King Ahaz, and the LORD'S t •… worship utterly abrogated; and the same time Israel was so vn •… their kings, Pekah and Hoshea.
Of which time, it is said, T •… Israel having all • ogether made •… fection to idolatry, there was none •… eft but the Tribe of Judah only, •… nd Judah also kept not the Com •… andementes of the LORD their •… OD, but walked also in the sta •… utes of Israel which they made: •… nd so the LORD rejected all the •… eede of Israel, complaing on •… hem by His Prophet Ezekiel, That •… hose two sisters, in their spiritual •… horedomes, had both taken one •… way.
Note then: When both this peo •… le (which only were then coun •… ed GOD'S Church) made defe •… tion with their kings in common, •… o the public practice of idolatry •… nelie, and abrogated the true wor •… hip of the true GOD utterly, where was then the face of a visible Church of true Professors, having a public worship? Or were •… hey not a few only, professing in secret, and lurking under persecution? Of whom • , therefore, the LORD speaketh to ELIAS, I have left me 7000 in Israel, who have not bowed their knees to Baa • l: and saying to Jerusalem; I will lea • e in the 〈1 page duplicate〉 〈1 page duplicate〉 midst of thee an afflicted and poor •… ple, that shall trust in the Name o •… LORD.
Whence I infer, What b •… to the Church of GOD in this 〈…〉 at one time, may befall to the s •… at another. But this befell to •… Church of GOD at one time, 〈…〉 the true Prefessoures therein w •… not conspicuouslie known, •… lurked Therefore this may befa •… another.
MATTH. 26.31. Then say JESUS unto them, All ye s •… be offended because of me 〈…〉 night: For it is written, I 〈…〉 smyte the Sheepheard, and 〈…〉 Sheep of the flock shall be s •… tered abroad.
This dispersion, or scatte •… abroad, Lyra and Arboreus de •… reth to be the D • sciples flee from their Master, thorough gr •… nesse of fear; which made s •… also, (as Peter ) to deny Him. 〈…〉 ask, then: When this was fulfill •… where was the visible true Chur •… or multitude, professing CHRI •… JESUS? seeing that sundry Ro •… •… stes of great Note, as Durand, A •… xander Halensis, and Turrecrema •… , with others, affirm, That at •… e time of CHRIST'S Passion, •… e Profession or Faith of CHRIST •… mayned only in the Virgin MA •… IE; and in her person only did •… e Church (as it were) at that •… me consist. [ 3]
REVEL. 12.14. And to the Woman were given two wings of 〈…〉 great Eagle, that she might fly •… nto the Wilderness, unto her •… lace; where she is nowrished for 〈…〉 time, and times, and half a •… yme, from the face of the Serpent.
This Woman, the Rhemistes and Romanists (as Lyra, Carthusian, and others, beside the Ancien • es) expound to be the true CHURCH of CHRIST; forced to flee, and •… u • ke, from the tyranny and persecution of Antichrist: where she may either not be inquired after, (saith the Jesuit Ribera ) or else not found out, and yet, where she shall be fed with the Word GOD by her holy Bishops, 〈…〉 Preachers of the Truth, (sa •… he) who shall • ee w • th her, 〈…〉 lurk also in secret, in which ty •… of persecution, (saith the Ie •… also Pererius ) the Chu • ches wor •… shall be only private, and 〈…〉 in secret. And the external sta •… the Roman Church, (say the •… mists ) and public intercour •… the Faythfull, with the same, •… cease, and their communion •… only in heart with it, and the p •… ctise thereof in secret, as it i •… places where open intercours •… forbidden.
By all whose speeches we may •… such an invisibilitie of the Chu •… granted by the Romanists, as 〈…〉 do affirm: and though they say, t •… their Church is never thus to 〈…〉 obscured, but in the reign of A •… christ; yet thereby they grant, 〈…〉 much as we affirm; to wit, T •… the Church sometimes may 〈…〉 hid, and invisible: and then 〈…〉 apply, That all that time of 〈…〉 true Churches invisibilitie he •… tofore, was the time of Antichrist 's •… ne; who is already come • ▪ and 〈…〉 as they dream • with the Jews •… erning their Messias ) as yet on •… o come.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
•… Ometymes the Church is not •… apparent, (saith Augustine) •… en wicked Persecutors above •… assure rage against her. And come •… ing her to Corn under the ground, 〈…〉 saith; Sometymes she suffe •… h storms for a season; so that in •… me places she is nowayes known, •… t lurketh: but yet she is infal •… lie known to GOD, and shall •… owe even to the Harvest. Yea, •… metymes, (saith he) like the •… oone, she may be so hid and •… scured, that the members there •… shall not know one another.
In like manner: The Church, saith Ambrose ) looking forth like •… he Moon, hath often times her •… ayninges, or eclipses. And she •… ath her own times, (to wit, of •… ersecution and peace.) For as the Moon, she seemeth indeed so •… times, not to be at all; and yet hath not perished: for she may 〈…〉 be eclipsed, or over-shado •… but she cannot perish.
Which made holy Athanasia •… complain, saying; What Chu •… now freely doeth worship? see •… if it be Godly, it is exposed dangers: and if in any place th •… be the Go • lie and zealous serva •… of CHRIST, like that great P •… phet Elias, they are h • d in den •… and caves of the earth, &c.
3. Confession of party.
THE Church sometimes is 〈…〉 tossed, (saith Gregory of V •… lence) with the wave, of Error •… Schisms, and Persecutions, that •… such as are unskillful, and do n •… discreetlie enough weygh the c •… cumstances of times, & matters, s •… shall be very hard to be know •… Which then specially fell out, wh •… time the falsehood of the Arri •… bare rule almost over all the wor •… Therefore we deny not, but th •… it will be harder to discern the •… urch at some times, than at •… er some. Yet this we avowe, •… at it always might be discer •… , by such as could wisely •… eme of things.
The Jesuit also Viegas, writing on •… xii of the Revelation, saith, That •… the Woman flying to the Will •… nesse, is signified, That so great •… ll be the Persecution of Anti •… st, against the Christian Church, •… t she shall, for fleeing of esche •… ng the same, depart into solitary •… ces; that so she may lurk, and •… de her self, the whole time of 〈…〉 reign of Antichrist. And the •… emistes themselves tell us, That du •… g that time, the external state of •… e Roman Church it self, and •… e public intercourse of the •… ythfull with it, is like (say they) •… cease; and the communion of •… hristians with the same, shall on •… be in heart, and their worship 〈…〉 private.
SECT. II. Of the Churches infalli •… litie; and howe it endet •… last in the Pope 's infallib •… tie; who pretendeth, tha •… is head thereof.
The state of the Question
WHat is truly to be held 〈…〉 the Churches infallibiliti •… general, their own Cardinal •… recremata, as one for all, declar •… saying, What we say, to wit, 〈…〉 the Church in Faith and Manners, 〈…〉 not err, is so to be taken, that G •… doeth so assist her, even to the cons •… mation of the World, that there 〈…〉 ever some, albeit not all, who have 〈…〉 faith which worketh by charity. 〈…〉 ordinarily, the Romanists, w •… they speak of the infallibility •… the Church in foundamentall •… ctrines, by [the Church] they •… derstand not the universal Chu •… of CHRIST, but the Roman or •… stern part thereof: which their o •… Bis •… op of Bit • nto in a public Ora •… at the Council of Trent, ac •… wledged to be but a Daughter •… e Eastern and Greek Church: •… so but a part of the Catholic, 〈…〉 which to call Universal and Ro •… e, implieth a contradiction.
•… xt, they distinguish this their Ro •… e Church, to which they ascrybe •… llibilitie only, into the essential •… rch, which is the whole num •… of Believers; the representative, •… ch is the Bishops and others •… eaned into a general Coun •… and the virtual, which is the •… e himself.
•… nd this infallibility which they •… ne at first so much to attribute to 〈…〉 Church, they neither grant to the •… ntiall nor representiue Church, 〈…〉 to the Pope only: therefore •… armine telleth us, (and with 〈…〉 Suarez, Valentia and others) •… t this infallibility is not in a •… ncell, (saith he) but only •… he Pope. So that albeit they •… ache of the Church, as though it •… re of the whole Catholic •… urch of CHRIST, yet from the Catholic in common, they c •… to the Roman Church in par •… lar, and from the Roman Ch •… to the B • shop of Rome only that in ende, the whole contra •… sie endeth in the prerogatiu •… one man only.
And this infallibility they n •… to be in his person only, as •… cessour to Peter, altho they can •… there prove this by Scripture, •… any institution of CHRIST, (as •… larmine granteth) to w t, that 〈…〉 the Bishop of Rome was or is P •… successor in Rome at all, let •… that he succeedeth in particula •… his infallibility, which was o •… proper and personal to Peter h •… self as an Apostle and Pen-ma •… holy Scripture, and to all ot •… only, that were Apostles 〈…〉 him. They stryving so much 〈…〉 this infallibility of the Bishop •… Rome, for this ende, that he 〈…〉 be acknowledged the only 〈…〉 supreme Judge in contravers •… and so, that they may secure the •… selves in their bad cause agay •… all opponents, he being b •… judge and party, fo • so saith Bel •… mine. If we can demonstrate •… ayeth he) that h • judgem nt of •… e Pope is cert • yne and infallible, •… en it will also be seen, that the •… ope is lyk • wise the supreme •… dge of the Chu • ch: as if it might •… ee said of the Pope, that which •… e Father from Heaven spak • of •… is Son only, hunc audit, •… ear him.
Now, because Bellarmine, to prove •… he Popes infallibility, taketh his •… rgument from the infallibility of •… h • high Priest amongst the Jews, 〈…〉 which we have answered in the •… wne place hereafter) • herefore •… giving, and not granting, that the Pope were the Christian high Priest (which he is not) and had the •… yke prerogative as the Iewi •• had, yet we will show by the ensewing argument take • n from the Jewish high Priest, that the • ope who pretends to be Christian h gh Priest, hath no infallibility at all.
1. Authority of Scripture •…
[ 1] EXOD. 32.5. And wh •… Aaron saw the Calf, he 〈…〉 an Alter before it, and A •… made proclamation, and said •… morrow is a Feast to the L •…
Upon which Text (saith •… dinall Cajetan) Aaron not be •… wi ling to lose the high Pr •… hood, he buildeth an Altar b •… the C • lfe, not tarrying till 〈…〉 were desired so to do, but pr •… lie how soon he saw the C •… he first of all built an Altar to •… fer up sacrific • unto it, and ca •… proclaim, saying, To morrow 〈…〉 Feast to the LORD, which Blasp •… mie, of Aaron's cannot admit 〈…〉 excuse, but rath • r accusation, set •… he was more mad than any, 〈…〉 respect that he attributed that in •… fable and incommunicable Nam •… JEHOVAH, unto an Idole, no 〈…〉 inst • gating him thereto: and wh •… was worst of all, doing this (say •… he) by public proclamati •… Wherevpon most justly thereafter •… se • accused him, saying, What •… h this people done to thee, that thou •… ldest have brought upon them this •… at sin? Whence it app • areth •… yeth Cajetan ) that Moses knew •… ll enough t •••• Aaron was the ve •… cause o • suc • dolatrie, as this •… s.
Where we s e, tha • all • ho Aaron •… as the fi • st legal high Pri • st, he •… as so far from having infall • bi •… ie, that he was guilty of Idola •… e, and Blasphemy himself, and •… as the very cause of the Idolatry •… mmitted by others, by bringing •… t great sin vpō the people cō •… itted to his charge. And therefore •… om no infalli •• litie of the Jewish •… gh Priest, can Romanists a • gue (as •… ey do) to the infallibility of the •… ope, as the Christian high Priest.
2. KINGS 16.11. And [ 2] Urijah the Priest built an Altar, •… ccording to all that King Ahaz had sent from Damascus, so Uri •… ah the Priest made it, against King Ahaz came from Damas •… us, &c.
Upon which place Lyra say •… this high Priest, notwithstandi •… his l • call in personal successio •… that office, he was jam cor •… tus Idololatria, and having • e •… ved the Lord's Altar out of its p •… he erected another for Idola •… & as it is said verse 16, did all w •… soever that wicked and idolat •… King Ahaz had commanded hi •…
[ 3] MATTH. 26.65. Then 〈…〉 high Priest rent his clothes, •… ing, He hath spoken blaspheme •…
Remarke then here, tha •… high P • jest sitting in Cathe •… pronounceth judiciallie, tha • w •… CHRIST most truly had sp ke •… HIS D ••• ie, to be plain blas •… mie, & so most grossly erred i •… main doctrine of Ve • ity: Whe • •… (saith Arboreus a Parisian Doct •… that having heard CHRIST'S •… swear, th • high Priest turn d n •… and his furious madness made 〈…〉 to rent his clo • thes, and to say, 〈…〉 CHRIST had blasphemed, 〈…〉 partly by Scriptures, and p •… by Miracles done by His o •… power, did prove Himself to be 〈…〉 Son of GOD.
Whence it followeth, (as hath •… ene said) that seeing the Jewish •… gh-Priests so grosslie erred, •… th in deed and doctrine, or •… t and faith, (as we say) there •… e from the Infallibilitie of the •… ish High Priest, ex pacto, (as •… y allege, MALACH. 2.7.) no •… lid argument can be brought to •… one the Pope's infallibility, as •… e Christian High Priest, ex aquo, 〈…〉 they pretend.
And as for their distinction, that •… e may err personallie, but 〈…〉 judiciallie, the same hath no •… iditie: For suppose that some •… ynt of Faith, wherein the Pope •… sonallie erreth, were by him at •… e Churches entreaty, to be de •… mined judiciallie, I ask, whe •… er his definitive sentence would •… e according to his own private •… dgement, or according to the •… ueth? If the first, then he •… old err judiciallie. If the •… st, I ask, by what means is he •… rought to pronounce that judiciallie to be truth, which p •… so •• lli • 〈◊〉 thin •• h to be erro •… If 〈…〉 they do th •• 〈…〉 th • insti •… of th • 〈…〉 then this we •… to make he 〈…〉 to be t •… author of a li • : so m ••• iri, is c •… tra mentem ire; which • s a mo •… impious absurdity. And if it b •… replied, Th • t when • t comme •… to such a pinch. GOD then woe •… derfullie, and suddenlie, illumin •… teth the Pope's vnderstandin •… that he seeth his error, a •… changeth his mind, and so pr •… nounceth that which is truth •… deed; it will follow, That t •… Pope being an Heretic, oug •… not to be deposed by the Churc •… as is evident by the judgeme •… and practice of the eyght Cou •… cell, that the same ought to b •… done: as also by the Decrees 〈…〉 their Canon Law. For it is co •… trarie to charity and lenity, 〈…〉 depose him for Heresy, who 〈…〉 so easy a way may be reclaym •… to the truth. Neither was it •… good course, to confute Heresy •… 〈…〉 convocating such General •… ouncels, to the great pains, •… re travels, and great expenses, 〈…〉 so many Bishops, when the •… e sentence of decision might •… ue been had easier from the in •… libilitie of one sitting in his •… air.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
THE Sixt General Council, hol •… den at Constantinople, AN •… 685, consisting of 289 Bishops, •… demned Pope Honorius, according •… his public person, for an Here •… ke. As also the seventh General •… uncell, holden at Nice, ANNO 〈…〉 , accursed him as a Monothelite; 〈…〉 may be seen in the Acts of those •… uncels at large, and is witnessed by •… sellus, Beda, and Anastasius.
3. Confession of party.
FIrst in the general: It is evident, 〈…〉 (saith Lyra) that the Chur •… hes stability consisteth not in •… en, either in regard of their Ecclesiastical or secular power an •… 〈◊〉 seeing mani • Princes an •… 〈…〉 , as well as other infe •… 〈…〉 found to hau •… 〈…〉 from the Fayt •… 〈…〉 : For it is 〈◊〉 •… fest, 〈…〉 Castro 〈…〉 Pope Liber • 〈…〉 of one mind w •• 〈…〉 Platina ) and so ma •• 〈…〉 by them, (saith •• rre • re ••• •… and over-come whole with 〈…〉 Arian H ••• si • , as Jerome testifiet •… (saith Cusanus.) In like mann •… that Anastasius the second wa •… Nostorian, Alfonsus in the f • re-c •… place witnesseth; as also Platina •… his life; who therefore was p •… gued by GOD, by a sudden g •… shing out of his bowels on 〈…〉 stool. In like manner, as Maldon •… the Jesuit, and many others testifi •… Innocent the first held, that th • . E •… charist was necessary to Infant •… unto their salvation, as well •… Baptism. Which error infec •… the whole Roman Church vn •… him. For this error (saith M •… donate) bare sway in the Chu •… •… or the space of 600 years. Of the •… ore-named Honorius also who was a •… onothelite, saith their own Ca •… us: Howsoever other Popes •… ight be excused from Heresy, •… et I see not how Honorius (saith •… ne) can be fred from this guilt, whom Psellus, Tharasius, Epipha •… ius, Beda, Adrian, and Agatho, •… both Popes) and the seventh general Council, hath branded •… ith the note of Heresy. Celesti •… us also erred, (saith Alfonsus) in •… he matter of Matrimony. Ney •… her was this error of Celestinus •… uch as ought to be imputed on •… ie to negligence. So that we can •… ay, that he erred only as a pri •… ate person, and not as Pope, •… saith he ) because this definition of Celestinus was to be had in the •… old Decretals, which I myself both saw and read, (saith Alfonsus fore-said.) And to say, that when the Pope erreth obstinatelie •… in the Faith, that then he ceaseth to be Pope, and so the Pope cannot be an Heretic, It is, (saith he) in a serious matt •… but to jest, or mock.
SECT. III. Of the Pope's Supremacy.
The state of the Question.
THE Question is not of t •… Primacie of Order, whi •… Peter had amongst the Apostles, 〈…〉 also the Bishop of Rome had 〈…〉 old amongst the four Patriarc •… of the Christian Church, whi •… we oppose not; but only of S •… premacie of Power and Iurisd •… ction, which the Romanists a •… leadge Peter alone had overall t •… rest of the Apostles, and who •… Church of CHRIST: and cons •… quentlie which (they say) the Bi •… shop of Rome only, as Peter 's Su •… cessour, hath, and justly doet •… claim to have, over the oath •… Apostles Successoures, and who •… Church in like manner, as sol •… Monarch, Universal Bishop, Head •… Husband, and Foundation of th •… Church, (as Bellarmine callet •… him) from whom all Ecclesiastical power to others is only deryved, and to whom to be subject, is to every Christian of the necessity of Salvation.
First then, we deny that ever Peter had any such Supremacy. And though it were, Bellarmine granteth, that by no Scripture it can be proven, that the Bishop of Rome is the Successor of Peter in particular at all: let be then in this pretended Prerogatiue.
Our Arguments are these following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
ACTS 8.14. Now when the Apostles that were at [ 1] Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the Word of GOD, they sent unto them Peter and John.
Whence we infer only, That they who sent him, were equal with him; and, that he had no supreme dominion over them. For albeeit that Mission import •… not ever a subjection, or impar •… of him who is sent, and of his s •… der, (as in the sending of 〈…〉 Son, and holy Ghost) yet it •… cludeth ever a domination, 〈…〉 majoritie in him who is sent, o •… them who send him. Theref •… Peter here pleadeth no exem •… tion from going, in regard of •… supremacy over the rest, as 〈…〉 Pope would do in the like ca •… and count it too bold saucines •… if any presumed to send him •… like manner, to confirm nev •… converts in any forraygne Con •… trey.
GALAT. 2.11. But wh •… [ 2] Peter was come to Antioch, 〈…〉 with-stood him to the face, (or 〈…〉 the face, as the Rhemists translat •… because he was to be blamed.
Upon which words, saith th •… ordinary Gloss, and Lombard, M •… ster of Sentences, he resisted hi •… as his equal; which he would n •… ver have been bold to do, e •… cept that he had known, that h •… was no ways inferior, to wit, in •… risdiction, or power, as Cyprian •… itnesseth, altho in primacy of •… lace, as Junior, or the last called •… postle. The like to do to the •… ope, no mortal man may do, •… y their Canon Law, altho he •… ade innumerable people to Hell •… ith himself; because he it judge •… f all men, but to be judged of •… one, (saith the Canon Law.)
2. COR. 11.5. For I sup •… ose, [ 3] I was not a whit behind the •… erie chiefest Apostles. (Or, in •… othing inferior, as S. Jerome showeth.) Which the Rhemists trans •… ate fraudulentlie, I have done no •… hing less.
Upon which words, S. Chryso •… tome telleth us, that it was in par •… icular with Peter, that he made •… his comparison, denying any •… nferioritie to him, in power •… nd calling. Therefore, S. IEROME on GALAT 2. bringeth in S. Paul, comparing himself in this sort with S. Peter; I •… am nothing inferieur to him; for we are established in the Ministry 〈…〉 one, and the same GOD, (say •… he.) Which the Jesuit Iusti •… also, in his Paraphrase, maket •… be the self same meaning.
So that first, then, if moe t •… one were chief, then one was 〈…〉 the sole and only chiefest ab •… all the rest. And next: If P •… was in nothing inferior to Pe •… then Peter had no supremacy •… power above Paul, nor ani •… the rest.
[ 4] EPHES. 5.23. For the h •… band is the head of the wife, e •… as CHRIST is the head of 〈…〉 Church: and He is the Savio •… of the body.
Note, then, that as an husba •… will be only Head, and ha •… no Substitute in his place, to b •… with his wife under him; no mo •… will CHRIST (who is a jealo •… GOD) have any other Head •… Husband over His Church, vn •… Himself, but Himself. Whe •… fore also, (saith Augustine ) if th •… man be the head of the Churc •… •… y whose taking of flesh upon •… m. He was made the Word, •… nd did dwell amongst us; then it •… olloweth. That all the rest of the •… aynctes, (none excepted) are but •… nelie Members, by whom the Church is perfected, and accom •… lished. Which thing moved Gre •… orie to call that Title, [The head •… f the Church] a moste bold and •… mbitious Title for any Church •… an to assume; saying unto Eulo •… ius Bishop of Alexandria, concer •… ing John Patriarch of Constanti •… ople, who would have usurped •… he same: By the pride of this am •… itious Title, (saith he) he is •… old, to subject unto himself, all •… he members, who coheare to one •… nlie Head, to wit, CHRIST Himself.
EPHES. 1.22. And gave him [ 5] •… o be Head over all things to the Church, which is his body.
And again, EPHES. 4.4.5. There is one body, — and one Lord, &c.
Remarke, then, that the Scr •… ture borroweth this sim •… from an human body; therefo •… in explication thereof, we m •… adheare thereunto. First, therfo •… it will follow, That if any oth •… beside CHRIST may be call •… the head of the Church, the •… should have two heads at on •… and so should be a body mo •… monstrous. Next: If any m •… be called the head of this bod •… then the Church may be cal •… the body of such an head; whi •… were moste absurd, and blasph •… mous. Last, in respect similitu •… carry reciprocation, then it woe •… follow, if the Church in this, b •… like an human body, then an h •… mane body in this, may be lie •… the Church; and so should ad •… two heads, one principal and pe •… petuall, and another subalter •… and temporary; which were mo •… absurd: as one kingdom to a •… mit two kings, and one ho •… two masters; where as t •… very prime Apostles were one •… Stewardes in CHRIST'S House; 〈…〉 so they call themselves.
1. COR. 1.12. Everie one of [ 6] •… u saith, I am of Paul, and I 〈…〉 Apollo, and I of Cephas, and of CHRIST. Is CHRIST •… yded? was Paul crucified for •… u? or were ye baptized in •… e name of Paul?
Upon which words saith •… ope Gregory to John Patriarch of •… ierusalem, who would be called •… ead of the Church: Surelie the •… postle Paul, when he heard that •… me said, I am Paul 's, and I •… pollo 's, and I of Cephas, most ve •… ementlie abhorring this renting •… f our LORD'S Body, by which His Members did, in a manner, •… ouple themselves to other heads, •… ryed out, saying, Was Paul cru •… fied for you? or were ye bap •… ized in Paul 's name? If there •… ore he eschewed, that the mem •… ers of the LORD'S Body 〈…〉 saith he) should particularly •… ee subjected unto certain other •… eads beside CHRIST, altho they were Apostles, what wilt thou 〈…〉 able to answer at the strayt try •… of the last judgment, to CHRI •… the Head of His Universal Chur •… who preassest, by the Title of V •… versall Bishop, to subject all th •… His Members unto thee?
Note, then, that this Supre •… cie was long ago opposed by 〈…〉 primative Bishops of Rome, a •… even by this Text: and neyt •… Cephas, nor any Apostle, claim •… any such thing, as to be head •… the Church: which none can b •… but He that was crucified for H •… Church; and so is the Savior His Body: and in whose NAM •… the Members thereof are bap •… zed.
[ 7] JOHN. 3.29. He that ha •… the Bryde, is the Brydegroom •… and therefore I have espous •… you to one husband, that I m •… present you as a chaste Virgin •… CHRIST, saith the Apost •… 2. COR. 11.2.
Note, then, that he can n •… be called the Churches Bryd •… groome, or husband, but he that •… weth Her, and hath right to Her •… y His Blood; which is CHRIST •… nlie. And therefore, being a •… haste Virgin to one, she hath •… ot moe husbands. Wherefore, •… saith BERNARD to POPE •… VGENIVS) call not His beloved •… pouse, thine, but His: thou chal •… anging nothing as proper to thee •… ver Her. Therefore also saith •… heir own Ferus, of the Baptist: •… therwyse, how ingrate should John •… aue been to such a Benefactour, •… s to usurp Her as his, who was •… spoused to another? Even the •… oules of the Faythfull.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
THE rest of the Apostles, were the self same that Peter was; •… endued (saith Cyprian ) with •… like fellowship, both of Honor •… nd Power. And it is Satanical •… ride, (saith Gregory ) by an ar •… ogant Title of HEAD, so to sub •… ect all CHRIST'S Members to •… ne man; which coheareth to one only H ••• , CHRIST I •… SVS only
3. Confess • ion of party.
WEE know (saith Car •… nall Cusan ) that PET •… received no more power fr •… CHRIST, than he o •… APOSTLES; and CHRIS •… would not have the rest of t •… APOSTLES subject to PET •… but to be all alike BRETHRE •… (saith Cardinal Cajetan. ) N •… there was the Bishop of Rome •… pointed by GOD to be abo •… other Bishops. And this was T •… tullian 's opinion, (saith Bea •… Rhenanus. )
CHAPTER III. Of the Churches worshi •…
SECT. I. That Prayers, and all public •… worship, should be in a •… known tongue.
The state of the Question.
WEE contravert not, in what Language one may pray to •… OD in private, so that they •… derstand the same, and, as the •… postle saith, that they pray in •… e Spirit, and with vnderstan •… ng: but the question is, Whe •… er Prayers, or any other parte 〈…〉 GOD'S public Worship, •… herein one or moe speaketh be •… re the people, should be in a •… guage unknown to the peo •… e, as the Council of Trent ap •… ynteth. And if the people them •… ues should be taught to recite 〈…〉 their devotions, the PATER •… OSTER, CREED, and such •… ke, in the Latin tongue, where •… they have no understanding, •… his we altogether deny, be •… use of these SCRIPTURES •… llowing.
1. Authority of Scripture.
PSAL. 47.7. GOD is King [ 1] of all the earth: Sing praises 〈…〉 Him with understanding.
Upon which words, accordi •… to the vulgar translation, whi •… hath, SING WYSELIE, t •… interlinearie hath, SING WI •… VNDERSTANDING. For accordi •… to Augustine 's words, (saith 〈…〉 ordinary Gloss) no man do •… that wisely, which he vnderst •… death not. Therefore, (saith Co •… thusian ) some sing and also pra •… vnwyselie; of whom the LOR •… by the Prophet saith. This peo •… draweth near unto me with th •… lips, but their heart is far fr •… me. And such praising or pray •… is unfruitful, according to that 〈…〉 the Apostle, If I should pray w •… my tongue only, my mind is with •… fruit. Therefore he subjoynet •… I will pray in the Spirit, and I w •… pray with understanding also: I w •… sing in the Spirit, and I will sing w •… understanding also. Which, ho •… wholesome and fruitful a thing •… is, (saith Carthusian ) the Apostle manifesteth, subjoining, In t •… Church I had rather speak five words with understanding, than ten thousand in an unknown tongue. Else, for a reasonable service, (which is required ROM. 12) an unreasonable service should be offered up: and for the Calves of the lips, the lips of Calves, as it were.
Wherefore also Cardinal Contarenus affirmeth, That the simple people praying in an unknown tongue, wanteth that fruit, (saith he) which they would reap, if they understood those Prayers which they utter: for so they would in a special manner bend their soul and mind to GOD, that they might obtain from Him, that which with their mouths they specially desire; and would be more edified by the Godly understanding of those Prayers which they utter.
1. COR. 14.15. What is it, [ 2] then? I will pray with the Spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the Spirit, and I will sing with understanding also.
VERS. 16. Else, when th •… shalt bless with the Spirit, ho •… shall he that occupyeth the ro •… of the unlearned, (or vulgar, 〈…〉 the Rhemists translate) say Am •… at thy giving of thanks, see •… he understandeth not what t •… sayst?
VERS. 18. I thank GO •… I speak moe tongues than all: yet in the Church I had there speak five words with •… derstanding, that by my voy •… might teach others also, th •… ten thousand words in 〈…〉 unknown tongue.
Out of all which, I reason th •…
The worship of GOD sho •… be performed the best way, a •… most fittest to edification. But t •… best and sittest way, is, that t •… same should be performed it known tongue: therefore in known tongue should the woe •… ship of GOD be performed, •… hither it beeexhortation, prayer, •… r thanksgiving, all which the •… postle enumerateth.
Upon which Text, therefore, saith Sc • ulius ) the Apostle would •… there speak a few words, clear 〈…〉 right understanding, than in •… 〈…〉 words, that were ob •… 〈…〉 unknown, and edify 〈…〉 th • hearer: because a few 〈…〉 ••• ith profit, are better nor 〈…〉 •• ch profit not.
So ••• ewyse, (saith Haymo ) Els • how shall the hearer answer by the confirmatorie word which •… s called AMEN, seeing he understandeth only his own language, but understandeth not that unknown tongue whereby thou speakest?
In like manner, (saith their own Lyra ) the Apostle here showeth, in public prayer, if the people understand the Prayer or blessing of the Priest, the better they are brought to GOD, & answer the more devotelie, AMEN. Else, the simple people wanting understanding, pro •… little, or nothing. For whi •… cause, (saith he) the Blessing and all other common Service 〈…〉 the primitive Church, was pe •… formed in the vulgar tongue. Ye •… (say the Rhemistes themselves 〈…〉 when a man prayeth in a stran •… tongue, which himself vnde •… standeth not, it is not so fruitf •… for instruction to him, as if h •… knew particularly what h •… prayed.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
IF ye meet together ( say •… Ambrose ) for the edifying 〈…〉 the Church, then those thing •… should be spoken, which th •… hearers may understand: for wh •… profiteth it that one should speak •… with a tongue which himself on •… lie understandeth, and he wh •… heareth profiteth not thereby The same doth Chrysostom affirm •… and beside the fore-named Fathers, Sedulius and Haymo, on the plac •… foresaid.
3. Confession of party.
•… VT of this doctrine of Paul's, (saith Cajatane) it is colle •… ed, That it is better for the edi •… ing of the Church, that pub •… cke prayers which are said in •… e people's hearing, be said in v •• gar tongue, known to the •… ople and Clergy, rather than 〈…〉 Latin. Whence it was, (saith •… assander) that the canon • call •… rayers, and specially the words 〈…〉 consecration of the Body and •… lood of our LORD, the An •… ents did so read it, that all the •… eople might understand, and say •… hereto, AMEN. Yea, their late •… stius, Professor in Duay, gran •… eth, that in it self it is good that all •… vine service be performed in the •… ngue which people understand: for •… is tendeth greatly to their edi •… ying, saith he ) as this place •… roveth well. Therefore said •… ope John the eyght, in his Epistle •… o the Prince of Moravia; It is not •… gaynst sound Faith or Doctrine, whether to celebrate the Mass, 〈…〉 to read the Gospel, or the s •… creed Lessons of the Olde and Ne •… Testament, being well translate •… or to sing the other Divyne Se •… vice: because He that made thr •… principal Languages, the H •… BREW, GREEKE, and LATIN •… made also all others, to His ow •… Praise and Glory.
SECT. 2. Of the invocation of Saynct and Angels.
The state of the Question.
THE Question is not, wheth •… Say • ctes departed, out their abundant charity, do g •… nerallie pray for us, and t •… whole Church militant; for t •… we oppose not: but whether w •… should pray to them, as the Cou •… cell of Trent appointeth. A •… not only to intercede for us, th •… we may get grace from GOD •… or mercy; but also joineth the •… with GOD; and seeking fro •… them Blessinges, and help, as the Rhemistes profess (on REV. 1.4) •… hey do, from the Virgin MARIE, and the Sayncts. Which to be lawful, we altogether de •… ye; having clearly for us these reasons following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
PSAL. 65.2. O Thou that hearest Prayer, unto thee [ 1] shall all flesh come: that is, All sorts of persons, (saith Augustine ) rich and poor, great and small, Jew and Gentile.
Where •• mark, that He to whom we must come by prayer, must have that property, that He heareth prayer: And therefore, because the LORD only hath this property, for this cause, according to the PSALMIST, all flesh should come to Him only.
Wherefore, (saith Bellarmine, concerning vocal prayers) to know the prayers, which at one and the s • me time are made in most distant and diverse places, is required true Ubiquitie: Which we believe not to agree (saith he) to the spirits either of Men or Angels. And concerning those that are mental, he saith in that same place; Neither Angels, not blessed Souls, altho they were present, can by their nature know our prayers, (saith he) when we pray only in thought, seeing it is GOD only, who knoweth, and is the searcher of the heart.
And as for that imagination of theirs, of the Saints, or Angels, their beholding of all things in the essence of the holy Trinity, we may justly say, That this Mathematical Glass, which some of the doting School-men set in Heaven, for soothing their superstition, hath been long ago, in respect of the brittleness of it, beaten all in pieces. For I ask of them; Whether this Glass doeth represent all things to the Sayncts, and Angels, or such things only, that are the Prayers of men on earth? If all, then their knowledge should be as infinite as GOD'S is, and nothing, no, not the day and hour of Judgment, should escape their knowledge, For MATTH. 18 10. it is said, that the Angels always behold the Face of the Father which is in Heaven; and yet they know not when the Day of Judgment shall be, MARKE 13.32. If only the Prayers of men on earth, then this were as much, as first they came only to the knowledge of GOD, and then GOD did reveal them to such or such a Saynct, that is invocated; and then these again did reveal them back to GOD: which is moste ridiculous. Besides; Who ever revealed unto them, or gave them such assurance, That there is such a revelation in Heaven? And if they have no Word of GOD for it, but their own dreams, with alike facility it is rejected, as it is assumed. For Scotus upon Lomb. in 4. dist. 45. q. 4. saith, That no such revelation followeth upon Beatitude necessarily, (as also doeth Biell in can. Missae, lect. 31.) But Bellarmine goeth farther, and praesupposeth, that if the Sayncts should have need thus of a new revelation, the Church would not so boldly say unto all the Sayncts, PRAY FOR VS; but would sometimes entreat GOD, That He would reveal our Prayers unto them. Bell. de Eccles. triumph. lib. 1. cap. 20.
[ 2] ROM. 10.14. Howe shall they call upon Him, in whom they have not believed?
But to assume; we must only believe in God: therefore, only in call upon GOD. Now, that we must only believe in GOD, beside Scripture cited on the margents, Antiquity telleth us, Gregory Nazianzen saying, That this is proper only to GOD. And Cyprian, (or, as others will have it, Ruffinus, upon the first Article of the CREED) saying, By this syllabe of praeposition, IN, the Creator is distinguished from the creatures. So that when saith is expressed in the DEITIE, it is said, I believe in God the Father, and in JESUS CHRIST His Son, and in the holy Ghost: But when speech is of the creatures, or of mysteries, the praeposition IN is not added: as, we say not, I believe in the holy Church; but, I believe the holy Church. So also saith Aquinas, By this where he saith; Believe also in me, our Savior testifieth, that He is true GOD. For altho we may believe a man, who is a creature, yet we ought to believe in none, but in GOD only. Therefore also saith Lombard, It is another thing to believe in GOD, another thing to believe Him, and another thing to believe that He is. For the Devils believed Him, but not in Him: and we believe Paul and Peter, but not in Paul, nor in Peter, (saith he.) Wherefore, we conclude, If we may no ways believe in Paul, nor in Peter, who are Saints departed; then, by this place of Scripture, we may no ways incall upon them. For no man incalleth up •… any, (saith Cornelius à Lapide the Jesuit ) in whom he do •… not believe, and from whom h •… hopeth not for help and relief •… their hands.
[ 3] PSAL. 50.15. Call vpo •… Mee in the day of trouble: will deliver thee, and thou sh •… glorify Mee.
Loe here GOD'S own 〈…〉 rection, to call upon Him onel •… with His gracious Promise of D •… liverance, for our encowrageme •… and that to Him only belong •… the Religious Worship bo • h Prayer and Praise, whereby H •… is glorified by us. Whereas o •… the contrary, GALAT. 4.8. t •… Apostle rebuketh them who d •… service to them, which by natu •… were not GOD'S: and therefo •… useth the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ? Of which sort of service in Re •… gious Worship, none can de •… Prayer to be.
[ 4] LUKE 11.2. And he say •… to them, When ye pray, say, Our Father, which art in Heaven.
Remarke, then, that our Savior directeth us, to pray to Him only, who is Creator, and of the Divine Nature: and not to pray to any Saynct, or Angel, who are of a created nature. Therefore, under the name of FATHER, their own Maldonado, the Jesuit, will have the whole Divine Nature comprehended, as it comprehendeth Father, Son, and holy Ghost; saying, I approve rather the opinion of others, who will have the whole Trinity here to be called FATHER, than theirs, who take the word personallie. And he proveth it to be so; Because the whole Trinity is our Father, in regard of creation, preservation, redemption, and regeneration, &c. Yea, Prayer is such a principal parte of Divine Service, incommunicable to any other, that it is usually put for the whole, as Ier. 10.25. Joel 2. 32. Act. 9.14. 1. Cor. 1.2. A •… the public place of GOD 〈…〉 Worship hath from thence its 〈…〉 nomination, of The House 〈…〉 Prayer, ISAI. 56.7. MATT •… 21.13.
[ 5] ROM. 8.5. But ye have •… ceaved the Spirit of Adoption •… whereby we cry, ABBA, F •… THER.
So likewise GAL. 4.6. A •… because ye are sons, GO •… hath sent forth the Spirit of H •… Son into your hearts, cryin •… ABBA, FATHER.
Whence we infer, as Aug •… stine showeth, That as the Spir •… of Faith teacheth us, rightly t •… believe; So the Spirit of Praye •… teacheth us rightly howe to pray •… But so it is, that the Spirit o •… Prayer, called here The Spirit of Adoption, teacheth us to pray to GOD only, as our Father: and so, to come to Him not as subjects by Courteours to a King; but immediately, as children to a loving father: Because (saith Estius ) this is the privilege of the sons of GOD, to call GOD their Father, both by CHRIST'S example, the natural Son of GOD, who in the Gospel either teaching or praying, called GOD His Father, as likewise by His precept who teached us to pray thus, Our Father, &c.
Therefore, for Prayer to GOD only, we see, that we have the direction of the whole Trinity, GOD the Father teaching us so to do, PSAL. 50; GOD the Son, LUKE 11; and GOD the holy Ghost, ROM. 8; beside the example of CHRIST, and all the Sayncts before us.
To which doctrine and practice, how far that of Popery is contrary, is more now than evident, and wherein they are come to such a hight of impiety, as the Jesuit Mendoza hath of late set forth this as a Problem. Whether it is more profitable to us to invovate the Name of JESUS, or the name of Marie? to which he answereth, thus, Now (saith he) witho •… any ambiguity, more plainly 〈…〉 decyde the whole matter, thus; 〈…〉 I say, Let it be so, that the favo •… and authority which CHRIS •… hath with GOD, be greater tha •… the Virgins; yet notwithstandin •… the blessed Virgin is more easil •… moved with our prayers, some •… times, nor Christ is: and there •… fore the patrocinie of the mothe •… is more present, or ready, some •… times, unto us, th • n the patro •… nigh of the Son. And this op •… nion hath both authority, reason, and experience for it (saith he •… Wherefore also in the fourth Problem of that same book, he •… affirmeth, That the Virgin Mari •… is to be worshipped with tha •… highest degree or worship whic •… they call LATRIA, in respect o •… the dignity of her motherhood, which belongeth to the order o •… hypostatical Union: be reason of which union, (saith he) th •… worship of LATRIA is due to CHRIST'S • umanitie; and therefore to all other things which belong to that order of union.
As for the invocation of Angels, though the preceeding arguments do sufficiently militate against any such, yet beside them, we join this which concerneth the same in particular.
COLOS. 2.18. Let no man beguyle you of your reward (or seduce you, as the Rhemistes [ 6] translate) in a voluntary humility, and worshipping of Angels.
Upon which words S. Chrysostom commenting, he showeth what this worshipping was, to wit, the making of them intercessors between GOD and them, counting it too proud a boldness, immediately to go to God, or to Christ to intercede for them, and therefore they prayed unto the Angels, that they would mediate at GOD'S hand for them. Which the Council of Laodicea condemned as Idolatry, & therefore saith Theodoret. The council which conveaned at Laodicea, which is the Metropolitan city of Phrygia, did prohibit by a Law, that they should not PRAY to Angels, (Loe there the worship in particular) So that it is an ydl •… subterfuge for Romanists, to say that divyne adoration, or one so •… was only prohibit, seeing th •… Text is general, inhibiting all woe •… ship, & consequently invocation •… Which invocation also of Angel •… Irenaeus in like manner did teac •… to be far from the practice o •… the true Church of CHRIST in his days. And Augustine showeth that they who thus did worship Angels, were accounted Heretics, and therefrae called Angelici.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
HAue Christ alone before your eyes, and His Father, in your prayers, being enlightened by the Spirit (saith Ignatius. ) Also all prayers and supplications, and intercessions, and thanksgivinges, are to be sent up to GOD the LORD of all, (saith Origen ) by the high Priest who is above all Angels, being the living Word, and GOD. And as for the Churches practice, the names of the Saints are in th • ir own o • dour rehearsed amongst us, (saith Augustine ) but they are not invocated by us.
3. Confession of party.
NOthing of this was delyvered or taught (saith Eckius ) in the Scriptures of the Olde Testament, and in the New Testament also, the Apostles nor Evangelists, neither by word nor writ, (that is, Scripture nor Tradition) left any such thing behind them, that the Sayncts should be prayed unto. And it is to be confessed, (saith Cassander ) that many & great errors through the pretext of the intercession and merits of Sayncts, have invaded the minds and manners of the vulgar, whereunto also the inconsiderat writings and sayings of learned men have given occasion, and fostered their erour. For first, wicked men continuing in their wickedness h •… believed that by the only int •… cession and patrocinie of Saynct •… they should get pardon and gr •… from GOD at hand, which p •… nicious opinion also so far 〈…〉 might be, hath been confirm •… by counterfeit miracles
Another error is, that m •… who are not wicked or otherw •… good, have made choice v •… themselves of certain Sayncts 〈…〉 their Patrons and Defenders, a •… have placed more confidence 〈…〉 their merits and intercession th •… in Christ's merit, and so, havi •… obscured that office of Christ's o •… lie advocation, they have in pla •… thereof substitute the Sayncts, a •… in special the Virgin Mary's a • vocation.
Yea, there hath not wanted f • mous men (meaning BIEL an • others) who affi • me, that i •… the Virgin Marie that is accomplished which Ahasuerus promised to Esther, to give her the half of hi • Kingdom, and that even so of the Kingdom of GOD (which consisteth of justice and mercy) the LORD hath given to Marie mercy, retaining justice to Himself, whence are these Titles given to her, Queen of Heaven, and Queen and Mother of mercy.
What shall I say, when thorough the whole Psalter, every-where the Name of the LORD is found changed into the name of our Lady, yea, it is come to that hight, that even CHRIST now raygning in Heaven is made subject to His Mother, whence in the Churches this is sung to her, saying, Command our Redeemer.
Thirdly, some are seen to attribute to the merits of Saints, the very power of Sanctification and Redemption, which is only proper to Christ God and Man, and of whose fullness we all have received, (all this saith Cassander )
SECT. 3. Of the worshipping of Images.
The state of the Question.
WEE acknowledge the civi •… use of Images, as freely a •… the Church of Rome; to wit, th •… use that is made of them in th •… common societies of men, out o •… the appointed places of GOD'S solemn worsh • p, for ornament and historical use. But to represent GOD by any Image, we count it unlawful; and to worship the Images of CHRIST, or o •… Saints, with any religious adoration, as the Council of Tren •… decreeth them to be, and to be kissed, and fallen down before, we oppose, as most gross Idolatry: Especiallie, seeing all the School-men, allmoste, (saith their own Bishop Peresius ) do teach, That the Images are to be worshipped, with that self same worship, as those whom they represent. And, that the Images of CHRIST, and the Saints, are to be worshipped properly, (saith Bellarmine ) that is, as they are considered in themselves; so that the worship stayeth it self in the Image: For if the Image (saith he) were not to be worshipped but improperlie, to wit, because before it, or in it, or by it, that which it representeth is adored, then surly it might be simply denied, that Images should be worshipped at all. And as for such subtle distinctions, whereby they would palliate their Idolatry, they are such, (as Bellarmine himself saith of such) which neither themselves understand who have broached them, and far less the unlearned people.
So that it is more than ma •… fest, (saith their own Cassan •… than can be expressed by wor •… that the worship of Images, 〈…〉 come to that hight of adorati •… that the very Pagans themsel •… have given to their Idols. N •… there is their excuse of any woe •… (saith he) which some use 〈…〉 pretend, That they give this w •… ship not to the Images, but 〈…〉 them whom they represent: 〈…〉 this color the Pagans also 〈…〉 for their Idolatry, as we see 〈…〉 Arnobius, (saith he) Yea, p •… ple are so affected to them, (s •… eth their own Biell ) that t •… think some divine grace, or •… linesse, doeth reside in them, 〈…〉 which they are able to work •… racles, and give cures: and 〈…〉 that cause they worship them, 〈…〉 go in pilgrimage to them.
Our Arguments, then, f •… against the representation of G •… by any image; and next, aga •… adoration of any Image, 〈…〉 these.
1. Authority of Scripture.
ISAI. 40.18. To whom [ 1] will ye liken GOD? Or what likeness will ye compare unto Him?
Wherevpon saith Jerome, To whom will ye liken GOD? Or what image will ye make to Him, who is a Spirit, in all, and everywhere? &c. Lykewyse, saith Perusin (an Augustine Eremite, and Professor of divinity) By these words is refuted and rejected the rashness of men; yea, their madness and ignorance, (saith he) who dare be bold to represent GOD by any image, or resemble Him by any similitude: seeing the Majesty and Essence of GOD is invisible, and incomprehensible.
Upon which words of the Prophet, in like manner, saith Pintus, a Portiugall Frier; Seeing GOD is a Spirit, who filleth all places, how can ye resemble Him by any graven Image? Or what lykenesse can ye make v •… Him?
[ 2] ROM. 1.23. And th •… changed the glory of the inc •… ruptible GOD, into the sim •… tude of a corruptible man.
Upon which words saith O •… gen; It is not to be passed 〈…〉 that this speech of the Apostle •… not only condemneth them w •… worship Idols, but also, t •… these are to be accounted in l •… manner amongst Anthropom •… phit heretics; who in t •… Church call that bodily image 〈…〉 a man which they set up there, 〈…〉 image of GOD. Therefore a •… Augustine giveth this reason, w •… it is not lawful for any Christ •… to make any such image of GO •… lest we fall into that same sac •… ledge, (saith he) whereby 〈…〉 Apostle maketh them execrab •… who change the glory of the i •… corruptible GOD, into the si •… tude of a corruptible man.
Yea, it is extreme fury and i •… piety, (saith Damascene, to 〈…〉 present GOD by any figure: •… nd Nicephorus and Euthymius set •… his down as the Heresy of the •… lde Armenians, saying: Neither •… bhorre they to make the Image •… f the blessed Trinity, (saith •… ee) which is only uncreated, •… nfinite, indefinite, and altogether •… nknowne.
In the Church of Rome also Gregory the second, (Anno 726) •… ryting to Leo Isaurus, testifieth, •… hat then they painted not, nor •… epresented GOD the Father, by •… nigh image; because he cannot •… ee seen.
Upon which words Baronius •… ath noted in the margent, that it was thereafter, that the custom grew to paint GOD the Father. Therefore, their own Vasques •… nd Catharinus declare also, that •… he representing GOD by any •… mage, is expresslie against the second Precept. As also (as witnesseth Bellarmine) Abulensis, Durand, and their Bishop Peresius, teach plainly, that the image of GOD is nowayes lawful to be made. Yea, himself saith, That it is not so surly to be believed by the Church, that the Image of GOD, or of the Trinity, may be as lawfully made as the Image of CHRIST, and of the Sayncts. And without good instruction of the Prelates and preachoures, l •… confess, (saith he) that such pictures without danger can no •… be set before unlearned people.
[ 3] EXOD. 20.5. Thou shalt not bow down to them, nor worship them. And again,
LEVIT. 26.1. Neither shall ye set up any image of stone in your land, to bow down to it: For I am the LORD.
Wherevpon saith the ordinary Gloss; This Divine Speach cutteth off both these; to wit. That neither in affection thou worship such, neither give any show of adoration to them. Therefore also saith Theodoret, The LORD here showeth, that both are impious, saying, Thou shalt not bow down before them, nor worship them. For which cause also Gerson (Chancellor of the University of Paris ) declareth, That all worship of Images, even •… he bowing before them, is vn •… awful. Therefore said Origen of the Church in his time, We worship no Images. And after •… he Council of Frankford, (held Anno 800) for opposing the wor •… hip of Images, decreed by the seconde of Nice, in that Book which was purposely written for confutation thereof, it is said, The Catholic Church profess •… eth, that mortal men are to worship GOD not by Images, but •… y CHRIST the LORD.
This Thunder-clap from Hea •… en, of the second Precept of GOD'S Law, the Romanists •… erceaving to threaten sore that gross Idolatry which they day •… ie commit, thought fit (with Pha •… ao, working wisely) to conceal the knowledge thereof from the common people, by razing those words out of the Decalogue that goeth abroad for common use: And so to incur that guilt, Deut. 12.32. and curse Rev. 22.19.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
NO Image of GOD is to be worshipped, (saith Augustine) but that which is the same that Himself is; to wit, CHRIST, who is consubstantial with the Father, and the engraven Character of His person. In like manner saith Gregory to Serenus Bish •… of Marsils; The dispersed sons o •… the Church, are to be called together, and it is to be show •… unto them, by the testimonies o •… holy Scripture, That it is n •… lawful to worship anything tha •… is made with hands; because it i •… wr • tten, Thou shalt worsh • p th •… LORD thy GOD, and Him only shalt thou serve. And there after he saith; Wherefore, es •… ch • w by all means the adoratio •… of Images.
3. Confession of party.
AS for the worship of Images, (saith Polydor Virgil ) not only those that are not of our Religion, but, as S. IEROME testifieth, all the ancient Fathers, almost, condemned the same, for fear of Idolatry. And the LORD inhibited not only any Image to be worshipped, (saith ABVLENSIS) but also that Himself should be worshipped by any Image.
Where also it is to be noted, That their word Veneration, which they use, sign • fieth Adoration, and is one there • with, as is evident BELLARMINE, and as THARASIVS woe • des, Bishop of CONSTANTINOPLE, in the second Council of NICE, show, saying, All who profess the Vene • ation of Images, and d • nye Adorat • on, are blamed, or disproved, as Hypoc • ites.
SECT. 4. Of the Adoration of Relics.
The state of the Question.
THe Question is not, Whethe •… the true relics of Saints that is, their dead bodies, o •… any member thereof, should be honored; which we grant, (against Vigilantius ) yielding to the •… that due honor which was eithe •… given to CHRIST'S own body, by Joseph of Arimathea, or 〈…〉 His first Martyr S. STEVEN, b •… the Disciples; to wit, decent an •… houourable Burial: But we d •… nye, that any such religious woe •… ship should be given unto the •… as the Council of Trent decreeth, Sess. 9. sub Pio 4. and as 〈…〉 usual amongst the Papists; to wi •… insh • yning and placing of the •… bones on Altars, for religiou •… worship; going in pilgrimage 〈…〉 them, carrying them abouut i •… Processions, to be kissed, kneeled unto, and adored; swearing by them, (as is approven by the Catechism of Trent ) and so Deifying them indeed. And, which is worst of all, praying unto such things, as never had life, hearing, or holiness; as to the point of the spear that pierced CHRIST His side, saying;
1. Authority of Scripture.
[ 1] DEVT. 34.6. And h •… buried him (to wit, M •… SES) in a valley in the land Moab, over against Be •… Peor: but no man knoweth of 〈…〉 sepulcher unto this day.
Loe here the greatest hon •… that the LORD thought fit 〈…〉 be given to the body of His d •… rest and faithful servant Mo •… to wit, BVRIALL, which the LO •… would have, for the place there to be unknown, as saith Chrysostom, that all occasion Idolatry might be cut off: 〈…〉 as Lyra saith, which was d •… by GOD, lest the people 〈…〉 worshipped him, whose mor •… tie as it showed him, not to 〈…〉 God, so if it had been lawful 〈…〉 laudable to have adored his •… liques, as the dear servant of GOD, the LORD had not withdrawn and obscured so this his body from His own people.
2. KING. 23.17.18. Then he said, (to wit, IOSIAH) What title is that which I see? And the men of the City told [ 2] him, It is the Sepulcher of the man of GOD, which came from Judah, and proclaimed these things that thou hast done against the Altar of Bethel. And he said, Let him alone, let no man move his bones.
Behold here again the honor that this Godly King IOSIAH giveth to the bones or relics of the true Prophet of GOD; to wit, no exhumation, nor any adoration; but only that he will not have his Sepulcher touched, nor his bones moved out of their place.
2. KING. 13.21. And it [ 3] came to pass, as they were b •… rying a man, that behold, th •… spied a band of men, and th •… cast the man into the Sepulch •… of Elisha: and when the man w •… let down, and touched the bon •… of Elisha, he revived, and stoo •… up upon his feet:
Remarke here, likewise, th •… greatest honor that was done t •… the Prophet ELISHA his body, wa •… Burial. And that though at the touc •… of his bones, for authorizing th •… truth of his prophesies, a miracle was wrought, by the powe •… of GOD, (for which cause it 〈…〉 said in ECCLESIASTICV •… 48.14. that the body of ELISEV •… did prophesy in the grave) yet h •… bones are not said therefore 〈…〉 have been taken up, inshryned nor worshipped.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
WEE have no such custom (say • h Cyril) to adore Martyrs; yea, not only do we nowyse worship the relics of Martyrs, (saith S. Jerome ) but we will not worship the Sun, nor Moon, nor Angels, nor Arch-Angels, nor Seraphims, nor no name that is named in this world, nor that which is to come; lest we should serve the creature, rather than the Creator.
In like manner, Athanasius, in the life of holy Antony, telleth us, that he oftentimes desired the Bishops, to instruct the people, that the Egyptian custom was not good, to keep the bodies of the Saints above the earth; wherein (said he) the bodies of the Patriarchs and Prophets are kept unto this day. Yea, the very body of our LORD was laid in a Grave, and covered with a stone rolled thereto, till He should rise again the third day. By which words (saith Athanasius, or the Author of his life) he showeth, that he sinned, who after their death did not bury the bodies of those, how holy soever: for what is of greater account, or more holy, than o •… LORD'S Body, (saith he •… Wherefore, many there-after •… when they heard this, they bury •… their dead, and gave GOD •… thanks, that they were so well •… instructed, (saith the foresay •… Author.)
3. Confession of party.
IT is certain, (saith Cassander) that in these last times too much hath been ascrybed to the relics of Saints; so that even by good men, endued with a pious zeal, their whole religion, as it were, hath been thought to be placed in getting such Relics, decoring them with Golde, and precious stones, and in building moste statelie Temples to their memories. As also that a false confidence hath been placed by wicked men, in the foolish and superfluous worship of Relics: Wherefore, in the Council of Cabilon they are rebuked, who under pretext of Devotion, went in Pilgrimage to Rome, or Turaine; thinking by the frequenting of those places, (to wit, where many Relics were) that they were purged from their sins.
To this were added other evils, (saith he) that thorough avaryce, and for entysing simple people, false Relics have been obtruded, and feygned miracles alleged to be wrought, whereby the superstition of people hath been nowrished: and sometimes thorough the deceat and illusion of the Devil, abusing men's superstition, by Dreams, and Visions, new Relics have been revealed: and by the same operation of Satan, miracles have seemed to be wrought. Wherefore he concludeth, That it were more wisely & better, that men did abstain from all ostentation of Relics, and that p • ople were exhorted, (saith he) to honor the true Relics of Saints; that is, to imitate their holy ex • mples, which are extant, and may be seen • either in Scripture, or were done by th •… Apostles, or are recorded o •… them.
CHAPTER IV. Of Free-will in our Vocation.
The state of the Question.
THE Question is not, Whether Man after the Fall, hat •… the essence and faculty of the wi •… still remaining, and free of coaction, (which Augustine proveth against Celestius ) nor of the free use thereof, which he hath i • things civil, and others depending only on the power of Nature: But, Whether by natura in the state of corruption, it is so free, that it may be called indifferent, either to good or evil? And, Whether in the first act o • conversion, the will hath such a power of it self, naturally, to will and concur with GOD, that it needeth not a full change, and total reparation; but only (as the Papists hold) some help only; leaving it in indifferency of turning it self either way; and that it needeth an excitation only to answer GOD when He calleth, to accept of Salvation when He offereth, and to cooperate at first with Him, when he converteth? Therefore, saith the Council of Trent, Sess. 6. Can. 4 If any man say, that our Free-will being moved and excited by GOD, doeth not coopeperate, by assenting to GOD, who excyteth and calleth us; and, that it disposeth not, and prepareth it self for the grace of justification, nyether can dissent if it will, but is miere passive therein, let him be accursed.
Whereas we hold in the contrary, That it hath no power naturally to will that which is morallie good, tending to Salvation; and, that grace coming to an unregenerate man in the first act of his conversion, is not a co-working grace with his will, (as it is after) but a sole-working grace upon his will; not only helping and excyting it already willing but changing and reforming it; and of nilling (as Augustine speaketh) making it willing: not by any Manichean coaction, but by a gracious and powerful inflexion; that so all the glory of the work may redound to Him alone, to whom all glory belongeth, and who is both the Author and sinisher of our Faith.
1. Authority of Scripture for us.
2. COR. 3.5. Not that we [ 1] are sufficient of our selves to think anything as of our selves; but our sufficiency is of GOD.
Upon which words saith Haymo, here the Apostle destroyeth all confidence in Free-will. And there-after he setteth down this to be the Apostle's meaning, That not only ar • w e unable (saith he) to do a • e thing without the mercy of GOD, and His preventing and following grace, but • lso to think: for the grace of GOD preventeth us, that we may will; and it followeth us, that we may perform: Therefore did the PSALMIST say, Thy mercy shall prevent me, and thy mercy also shall follow me. For if we cannot so much as think, howe can we be able to perform?
Lykewyse, (saith Estius on these words) the Fathers of the Council of Orange did use this same Testimony of the Apostle, (saith he) where-by they decreed, That he was deceived with an heretical spirit, who will say, That a man, by the power of nature, can think, as becometh him, any good that belongeth unto eternal life; or that h e can choose the same, or consent unto the saving Preaching o • the Gospel, without the illumination and inspiration of the holy Ghost.
More-over, (saith he) the Greek Commentators, as Chrysostom, Theophylact, and Oecumenius, explicating the Apostle's meaning, speak after this manner; That there is not something on our part, and something on GOD'S part; but that plainly there is nothing on our part; no, not the least thing; but all is to be ascrybed unto GOD. Therefore said our Savior, Without Mee you can do nothing; to wit, which is truly good, and acceptable to GOD.
PHIL. 2.13. For it is [ 2] GOD who worketh in you, both to will, and to do, of His good pleasure.
According to which words, (saith Augustine ) the LORD preventeth him who is unwilling, to make him willing; and He followeth him who is made willing, that he will not in vain. And in like manner, saith Bernard; The faculty of the will, maketh us to will; but Grace maketh us to will that which is good. And a little after, Let no man, therefore (saith he) think that it is called Free-will, because of any indifferent power, or faculty it hath between good and evil; seeing by it self it can fall, but cannot rise, but by the Spirit of GOD: Immittendo bonam cogitationem qua praevenit, & immutando malam voluntatem (saith he) quae sibi per consensum jungit. Therefore, we must beware (saith he) lest when we feel these things invisiblie to be wrought in us, that either we attribute the same to our will, which is infirm, or to any necessity in GOD; which is not, but to Grace Onlie, whereof He is full.
In like manner saith Lombard upon these words; We then do will, but GOD worketh this will in us: we also work, but GOD worketh this working in us. It is expedient, then, that we both believe and profess so, (saith he) because it is both pious and true; that so our Confession may be humble, and all may be ascrybed to GOD.
[ 3] EPHES. 2.5. Even when we were dead in sins, he hath quickened us together with CHRIST.
Remarke, then, that as the whole power of quickening the dead, and raising him from death, is from GOD only, and no part thereof from the dead who is raised; even so the whole power and efficacy of our first resurrection and conversion, is from CHRIST only, who is the Way, Veritie, and Lyfe; and no part thereof is from natural free-will. Therefore, saith Bernard, neither couldst thou create thyself, when thou wast not, nor justify • hy self, being a sinner: neither being dead, ca • st thou r • yse thyself from the dead.
[ 4] 1. COR. 4.7. Who hath made thee to diffe • from another? (or, discerneth thee, say the Rhemistes) and what hast thou, which thou hast not received?
Upon which words, (saith Estius ) rightly therefore doeth Augustine use and inculcate this sentence of Paul, against the Polagians; that so he might teach, That all the good whereby one doeth differ from another, or excel his neighbor, is given from GOD: and therefore, that neither grace is given according to men's merits, neither that any are predistinate unto life for foreseen works; but that as well Predestination, as Grace, which is the effect of Predestination, is altogether and mierelie of free mercy, as Augustine writeth. And in like manner by these words they are condemned, who say, that equal help of grace being given or offered, oftymes it falleth out, that this man doeth embrace the same, and that man not; or that this man doeth so, more or less: so that the differing of the one from the other, is of man's free-will, and not by the grace of God. Which thing we doubt not, (saith he) is altogether against the Apostles doctrine.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
IT is sure (saith Augustine ) that we will freely when we will, but he maketh us to will that which is good, of whom it is said, it is GOD who worketh in us both the will and the deed. And again, To will that which is good, he worketh it in us without us, (saith he) but when we will, and will so that we perform, then he cooperateth with us: so that without him, either working in us to will, or cooperating with us when we will, we are altogether unable for any work of piety. In like manner, (saith Bernard) Free-will maketh us willing indeed, but Grace only maketh us to will that which is good. To will, proceedeth from our selves, or nature; but to will that which is good, proceedeth from Grace, let no man then, (saith he) think that therefore it is called Free-will which we have, because it hath an equal power, or inclination, as well to good, as to evil, seeing it could fall by it self, but cannot rise, but by the holy Ghost. And thereafter he asketh, What, then, is this all that our Free-will doeth, that it consenteth? It is, (saith he) but not that this consent is from it self, seeing we are not able to think anything (which is less than consent) of our selves, as of our selves: For they are not my words, but the Apostles, that all that which can be good, that is, to think, and to will, and to perform, he attributeth all unto GOD, and nowyse to his own free-will. Therefore we must beware (saith he) when we find that these things invisiblie are wrought in us, and with us, that either we attribute the same to our Free-will, which is unable, or to any necessity in GOD, which is none, but to Grace only, whereof He is full.
And if we will hear a whole Council: If any will contend, (saith the Council of Orange) that GOD expecteth our will to be purged from our sins, and doeth not confess that this willingness to be purged, is not wrought in us by the infusion and operation of the holy Spirit, he resisteth the holy Spirit, speaking by Solomon, saying, The will is prepared of the LORD. As also the Apostle most wholesomelie declaring, that it is the LORD that worketh in us both the will and the deed.
3. Confession of party.
THE Scripture therefore (saith Bellarmine) both by words & similitudes everywhere crieth, That a sinner cannot in any sort dispose himself to receive grace • and again, The conversion of a man to GOD, (saith he) as any other good action, as it is an action, it is from free-will only, not secluding GOD'S general aid, (to wit, in whom we move) but as it is a good action, it proceedeth only from Grace. And surly the Orthodox Fathers (saith their Cassander) have ever contended against the Pelagians and Manichees, That the righteousness whereby we are justified before God, is not to be attributed to the power of free-will vitiate by sin, but to the singular grace of GOD, whereby no new will is created; but being unwilling, it is made willing; being depraved, is corrected; and of evil, turned to good; and by an inward motion, is so drawn, that of nilling, it is made willing, that willingly it may yield to GOD'S calling. Yea, h • w much most part of the School-men have attributed to devyne grace herein, in place of all, BONAVENTVRE doeth witness; For this is the duty of godly minds, (saith he) to attribute nothing to themselves, but all to the grace of GOD. Whence it is, that how much one ascrybeth to the grace of God, he departeth not from piety; altho ascrybing much to the grace of GOD, he should with-draw some from the power of nature, or free-will: but when anything is with-drawn from the grace of GOD, and ascrybed to nature, which belongeth to grace, there the danger is (saith he.)
And this is proven, because the beginning of our justification is from preventing grace, (saith Josephus Angles) & from the calling of GOD, who saith JOHN 15. Ye have not chosen me; and from Predestination, which is also the only work of GOD, ROM. 9. Who saith, It is neither in him that willeth, nor him that runneth, but in God that showeth mercy. The same doth Andreas Vega acknowledge, and Aquinas, with others.
CHAPTER V. Of Justification.
The state of the Question.
FOR clearing the state of this Contraversie, it is to be considered, that this word [IVSTIFIE] in Scripture, is sometime taken largelie, and then (as our learned Divynes confess) it comprehendeth both Absolutiō from sin, and Sanctification by grace, as two conjunct benefits given unto us through Christ: so that in this sense being justified, as the Apostle speaketh ROM. 8.30. and TIT. 3.7. we are not only reconciled, but renewed: and so we willingly yield, that this our justification standeth not only in the imputation of CHRIST'S righteousness, and remission of sin, but likewise in the infusion of inherent righteousness, which thing made the Fathers frequentlie take the word [IVSTIFIE] a • all one with [SANCTIFIE.]
But the question being what the word [IVSTIFIE] taken more stricklie, signifieth in those places wherein the doctrine of a sinners absolution before GOD, and acceptation unto eternal life particularly is handled by the Apostle in his Epistles, specially to the ROMANS and GALATIANS; where by the confession of Romanists themselves, it is taken (as Cardinal Tolet witnesseth) for absolving, as a judicial term, and opposit to condemning. In which sense we call Justification, a gracious action of GOD'S, as the Judge whereby remitting all the sins of the Elect, and accepting the righteousness of their Head, His own Son, he pronounceth those who believe in Him, righteous, and heirs of eternal life, to the Praise of the Glory of His grace, altho of themselves they were guilty of condemnation.
Of which justification, the principal efficient, is GOD; the impulsive cause, is His gracious mercy; the meritorious cause, is CHRIST'S death only; the persons justified, are only the Elect, who believe in CHRIST; the formal cause, consisteth in the remission of sin; and imputation of CHRIST'S righteousness, the instrumental; whereby it is offered to us, is the Word and Sacraments; and that whereby we receive it, is Faith; and the final cause of all, is the Praise of the Glory of His Grace, and our Peace with GOD in CHRIST.
In this action, then, we enquyre, How, or wherewith, we may compear before the Tribunal of GOD'S exact justice, without fear of condemnation? And having that whereby we may answer all accusations against us, which thing we say we cannot do, except that as CHRIST in our persons, and for us, was condemned, and crucified; so that we in Him be justified, and absolved and as our sins imputed to Him brought Him to death: so His righteousness ONLIE imputed to us▪ bringeth us to life, being (as Bellarmine speaketh) given to us; s •… that we may offer up the same to GOD the Father for our sins because He hath taken the burden upon Him, to satisfy for us (saith he) and to reconcile v •… to GOD His Father.
The Romanists, on the contrary, in their Council of Trent affirm, That the immediate an •… proper cause of our justification, whereby we are translated from being children of wrath, and enter into friendship with GOD, i •… infused righteousness, only inherent in man himself; which the •… affirm to be absolute, and perfect, and therefore call it tha •… white & unspotted Robe, wherewith we must present our selve •… before the Tribunal of GOD, 〈◊〉 attain unto eternal life. Therefore, saith Andradius, expoundin •… that Canon of the Council, because he cannot be said to be just, who is altogether defiled with sin, therefore the LORD infuseth in him Charity, by whose power and force, (saith he) all his sins are washen away, extinguished, and expelled. And so, they esteem that GOD is not reconciled with Man, but by the expelling of sin, thorough infused righteousness, (as Bellarmine saith) even as darkness is by light. And therefore, they call that Righteousness, Gratia gratum faciens; or, That grace which procureth acceptation. And whosoever will say, That that grace whereby we are justified, is the only favor of GOD, let him be accursed, (saith the Council of Trent, )
Wherefore, he who will have the pardon of his sins, according to the mind of that Council, must interpone between him, and GOD'S wrath: not CHRIST'S satisfaction immediately, and only, as Scripture teacheth; but his own inherent righteousness: an •… then he may believe, that he is reconciled, and accepted, when by this righteousness first had, hi •… sins are expelled.
And what they would seem herein to ascrybe to CHRIST'S merit, it is not, That for it only and immediately, the LORD doeth reconcile with us, and accept us in favor, unto eterna •… life: but that for it, there is infused in us, that new quality of i •… herent righteousness, whereby we are justified. Which is a much to say, as that we are just •… fied, not for CHRIST'S, but fo •… our own righteousness. So th •… CHRIST'S righteousness, an •… satisfaction, is only the meritorious cause, where frae we ha •… in our selves something inheren •… which we may oppose to GOD' •… justice, & rely upon, thereby immediately, and formerly, to b •… justified. Yea, some of them d •… so far derogate from the righteousness of CHRIST, in th •… matter of IVSTIFICATION, that they are bold to affirm, That our inherent righteousness, doeth make us acceptable to GOD, without any relation to CHRIST'S merit: and, that it hath not any force of conciliating GOD'S favor unto us, from the blood and merits of CHRIST, but only from its own intrinsicall perfection.
Besides which first Justification, they make also a second, which is an increase of the first, and which, they say, is required by good works; which promeriteth a farther righteousness, than that which is infused • n the first. The works of which second Justification, so promerited by the works of the first, do merit again (say they) everlasting life. So that they will have CHRIST's righteousness only in the first Justification, to merit their inherent righteousness; and thereafter themselves to merit, both the increase of farther righteousness here; and that righteousness again, to merit unto themselves eternal life hereafter. Contrarie to which their error in the matter of Justification, these Scriptures militate.
1. Authority of Scripture.
[ .1] ROM. 3.24. Being justified freely by His grace, through the redemption that is in JESUS CHRIST.
Upon which words saith Cardinal Cajetan, it is clearly here explained, That the righteousness of GOD, which justifieth a sinner, is not of works, but of the miere favor of GOD, whereby (saith Ferus ) he carrieth good-will towards us for CHRIST'S sake: Favor enim DEI primum est quo salvamur. For the favor of GOD, is the first thing whereby we are saved, (saith he) Therefore also saith Estius, That which followeth. (BY HIS GRACE) is exegeticallie added. As if he would say, FREELIE; that is, BY HIS GRACE. For the meaning is, that sinners are justified without any merit of their own, by the only free favor or good-will of GOD, (saith he) And yet who-so-ever will say, That that grace where-by we are justified, is the only favor of GOD, let him be accursed (saith the Council of Trent.
2. COR. 5.21. For He [ 2] hath made Him to be sin for us; who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of GOD in Him. (so also PHILIP. 3.9.) But He was made sin for us by imputation, ISAI 53.6. Therefore so are we made righteous.
Wherevpon saith Augustine, He then was made sin, that we might be made righteousness: not ours, but of GOD; not in us inherent, but in Himself, even as He did show Himself in the similitude of sinful flesh, wherei • He was crucified, to be sin▪ not His own, but ours; not it Himself, but which was in us Therefore also saith Theophylact This thing doeth the righteousness of GOD design, whe •… freely any is made righteous, and when in him no spot at all i •… found: (which no man dare say o •… his own inherent righteousness, And therefore, (saith Theophylact ) the Apostle saith not, That we might be made righteous, but the righteousness of GOD signifying the huge greatness o •… His favor.
Wherefore also, (saith Cardinal Cajetan ) the righteousness of GOD in CHRIST, is CHRIST'S merit, sufficient to satisfy for us, and to justify us, which is called, [of GOD, because it is His, who is GOD personallie, and because it is before GOD'S Tribunal true righteousness; to put difference thereby between it and our righteousness, which before GOD'S Tribunal is as a menstruous clothe. Therefore when CHRIST'S merit is communicated to us, then we are made the Righteousness of GOD in CHRIST; because we are made righteous, not by our own righteousness, but by the righteousness of GOD in CHRIST communicated to us: for we are justified before GOD, by his merit and satisfaction.
3. ROM. 3.28. Therefore we conclude, that a man is justified by faith, without the works of the Law.
Where, first, by the law Augustine showeth the moral law to be understood, where-of the Apostle saith after, I had not known sin, but by the law. And so likewise doeth Aquinas on this place, Next, he intendeth not, (saith Cajetan ) to exclude the works of the law from execution, or performance of them, but from justification; that is, (saith he) from the power of justifying a man absolutely: which is as much to say, from any virtue of procuring remission of sins: for of such a justification is the Apostles speech here, (saith Cajetan ) Wherefore also saith Augustine of such works, Sequuntur justificatum, non praecedunt justificandum: that is, They follow in the person that is justified, but they go not before to procure him to be justified. Whence we see, that works which follow after faith, do no more justify, than works which go before faith, by this reason. These works which follow justification, cannot be the cause of justification, (as leaves and fruit make not the tree • ) but the works of faith follow justification: therefore they cannot be the cause of Justification.
[ 4] PHILIP. 3.9. And may be found in Him, not having my own righteousness which is of the Law, but that which is through the faith of CHRIST, the righteousness which is of GOD by faith.
Where the Apostle speaketh in this Chapter of a threefold righteousness: the first is that in Judaism, according to which he saith, verse 6, that he was blameless. The second is that wherein the regenerate exercise themselves, by obedience to God's Law: and this he calleth his own righteousness, because inherent in him; and where-of he speaketh in the present time, I account all less and dung, verse 8. As of the first he spake in the preterit, because before his conversion, verse 7. And the third righteousness, is that which he calleth Through the faith of CHRIST: quyting so his own inherent and present righteousness that on this last imputed to him by GOD, and applied by faith, he may only rely.
GAL. 3.11. But that no [ 5] man is justified by the Law in the fight of GOD, is evident: for the just shall live by faith. See also 1. COR. 4.4.
Wherevpon, (saith Aquinas ) it is to be said, that here the Apostle speaketh of all works, as well Moral as Ceremonial: For works are not the cause why any man is justified before GOD, but they are rather executions, and manifestations of his justification, (saith he.) Now, such works as are manifestations, that one is justified by Faith, are surly the works of Faith: therefore, even such works are excluded, by the Apostle, from being the cause of the justification of any before GOD, contrary to the Council of Trent.
ROM. 4.3. For what saith [ 6] the Scripture? Abraham believed GOD, and it was reputed unto him for righteousness.
Upon which words, saith Cajetan ) altho then a man should never so much exercise himself, as is said, in good works, Moral or Ceremonial, (and none can be good, but those that are of faith:) yet he can never by these attain to the remission of sins, (saith he.) And therefore it is subjoined, Abraham believed, and it was reputed unto him for righteousness. Where-upon also saith Aquinas, It is to be considered, that this righteousness written of by the Apostle, and reputed by GOD to be so, Abraham expressed not in any outward work, but in the inward faith of his heart, which GOD only beholdeth.
ROM. 5.19. For as by one [ 7] man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one, many shall be made righteous. But by one man's disobedience many were made sinners by imputation as Bellarmine granteth, l. 5. de amissa gra. c. 17. Therefore by imputation many are made righteous thorough the obedience of one in like-manner.
Where-upon saith Cajetan, He not only setteth down the sort of Adam's sin, but also explayneth, the manner how that sin is imputed to others: and thereafter, by saying, we are made sinners, he manifesteth, that without our own works we are made so by the disobedience of Adam; and so, that many are made righteous in like-manner by the obedience of CHRIST, without their own works, as appeareth in Baptism, (saith he.)
Whence we reason thus: in this Text there is mention of the disobedience of one Adam, which was common to many; and so common, that there-by many were made sinners. So likewise there is mention of the obedience of One, to wit, CHRIST, which was common in like-manner to many, and so common, that thereby many are made righteous. But this disobedience of Adam was in him personallie, and inherent: and yet (saith Bellarmine ) it is communicated to us by generation, after that manner whereby that can be communicated which is transient; to wit, by imputation. (All these are Bellarmine's words.) Therefore, (ex antithesi) it will follow, that this obedience of CHRIST'S, which was in him personallie and inherent, is communicated like-wise to us by that conjunction which we have with CHRIST through regeneration, after that manner also where-by that can be communicated which is transient, to wit, by imputation.
LUKE 18.14. I tell you, [ 8] that this man went down to his house justified, rather than the other: for he that exalteth himself, shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself, shall be exalted.
But he that exalteth himself, is he who like the Pharisee relieth on his own inherent righteousness, to be justified thereby before GOD, (as the Romanists do) and the humbling of ones self, like the Publican, is he who humbly acknowledging his own unrighteousness, relieth only on GOD'S mercy for pardon, as the Orthodox Christians are taught. Therefore the one, according to CHRIST'S words, may expect with the Pharisee abasing, and rejection, and the other with the Publican, exaltation to GOD'S favor, and to go home justified.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
THis is my good, (saith Ambrose ) that we are not justified by works: therefore I have not where-of to glory in my works; and therefore I will glory in CHRIST. I will not glory, then, that I am righteous, but that I am redeemed: not that I want sin, but that my sins are forgiven me: not that I have been profitable to any, or any to me; but that I have an Advocate for me, at the hands of the Father, who is CHRIST, and that his blood is shed for me. And in like manner, (saith Bernard ) for this cause did He command His Precepts to be observed diligently; that seeing our imperfection and deficiency, and that we cannot fulfill what we ought, we may flee unto His Mercy, and say, Because thy mercy is better than life. And seeing we cannot appear before Him in the Garment of Innocence, and Righteousness, let us appear in the garment of confession, to wit, To be justified with the poor Publican.
In like-manner, he was made sin (saith Ans • lme ) that we might be made righteousness: not ours, but GOD'S; neither in us, but in Him; even as he was made sin, not his own, but ours; neither in Himself, but which was in us, therefore (saith Bernard ) CHRIST'S righteousness is imputed unto us.
3. Confession of party.
VAsques the Jesuit reckoneth a number of their learned Doctors, who (he saith) differ in this point only in words from us, but agree in deed, as Vilhelmus Parisiensis, Scotus, Occam, Gregory, Ariminensis, Biel, Antididagma Coloniense, Johannes Bunderius, Alfonsus de Castro, and Andreas Vega. So likewise Albertus Pighius, as witnesseth Bellarmine, yea, Bellarmine himself saith of us; and of our doctrine. For if they would only have (saith he) that CHRIST'S merits are imputed unto us, because they are given unto us, and we may offer them up to GOD the Father for our sins, because CHRIST hath taken upon Him the burden to satisfy for us, and to reconcile us to God the Father; then their opiniō or doctrine were right, (say • h he) and this is our very doctrine which he hath rehearsed: so that our very adversary pleadeth here for us.
I esteem, then, (saith their Cardinal Contarenus, ) that it is altogether Piouslie and Christianlie said that we ought to rely, rely, (I say) as upon a most firm prope, which shall surly uphold us; to wit, on CHRIST'S Righteousness, which is gifted to us; and not upon our own holiness, or any grace that is inherent in us. For as the divynes of Colen affirm, (saith Vega ) it is only by the imputation of CHRIST'S Righteousness, in so far as faith apprehendeth mercy and the Righteousness of CHRIST, for His merit, that we are justified before GOD.
CHAPTER VI. Of Sanctification, and man's ability to keep the Law.
The state of the Question.
HAVING considered the way, howe a man is made just, when he is first reconciled to GOD, which our Adversaries call His first justification, now we are to consider man, as he is allreadie justified, and to enquyre, what he is able to perform in this estate of grace wherein he is allreadie translated? Our Adversaries maintain two things anent man's ability n this estate, which we flatlie deny. The one is; That he is able, perfectly, to fulfill the Law of GOD, in all the Preceptes thereof, and duties required by every Precept. The other is grounded upon this, to wit, That he is able to merit eternal life; and so to challenge it by right, That GOD should be unjust, if He denied to reward him with the same. To come, then, to the first point, Of man's ability to keep GOD'S Law.
UNDERSTANDING by Keeping of the Law, that sincere measure of obedience to every Precept thereof, which GOD now requireth under the Gospel; and which the Godly, according to that measure of grace which they get, and the condition of this life, (only still tending to perfection) performeth, and is graciously by GOD, in CHRIST, accepted. In this sense we deny not, but the Godly may keep GOD'S Law; and ought more and more, with the Apostle, strive to perfection, and to obey the same.
But that any man on earth can so keep the same, and give such perfect obedience thereunto, as may endure the strict trial of of GOD'S judgment; yea, do more than the Law requireth; and so super-errogat (as the Rhemistes teach; ) this we affirm to be proud Pelagianism, and a most lurd Heresy, against which the Authority of Scripture doeth most clearly militate.
1. Authority of Scripture.
[ .1] 1. KING. 8.46. There is no man that sinneth not.
Which thing to deny, (saith Ambrose ) is sacrilege: and it is above the nature of man, (saith Nazianzen ) not to sin: and the property of GOD alone.
[ 2] PROV. 24.16. For a just man falleth seven times.
Therefore, saith DAVID, a man according to GOD'S heart, Enter not into judgment with thy servant: for in thy sight shall no man living be justified. And again; Who can understand his errors? Cleanse thou me from secret faults. Wherefore also saith Gregory Nyssen. The Scripture telleth us, that none can be found amongst men, who can live but one day, without spot. And if thou canst show me but one man, who hath fulfilled the Commandementes, (saith Jerome to the Pelagiane ) then thou mayest show me a man, that needeth not the Mercy of GOD.
1. JOHN. 1.8. If we say, then, that we have no sin, we [ 3] deceive our selves, and the truth is not in us.
Where-upon Augustine showeth us, that the Apostle, who said before, that he who is borne of GOD, sinneth not; yet here-in also he speaketh right. For altho (saith he) in so far as we are borne of GOD, we sin not: yet that also is in everyone of us, that we are borne of Adam; and there-fore, sin daily. And if JOHN number him-self, and the other Apostles, amongst sinners, (saith Father FERVS on this place) who of us dare be so bold, to pronounce him-self to be righteous, and without sin?
[ 4] JAMES 3.2. For in many things we offend all.
Of which place, saith Gregory, Who is able in this life after he hath gotten faith, to live without sin? seeing John saith, If we say that we have no sin, we deceive our selves, and the truth is not in us. To whose words, (saith he) S. James agreeing, saith, In many things we offend all. And lest that it should be said that he spake of lesser, or venial sins, (as they call them) he saith, By-past sins are remitted, when faith is obtained: and yet after faith, while as we decline to the committing of sins, how can we presume of righteousness, or have hope in our selves of eternal life?
ROM. 7.23. I see another [ 5] law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin.
Wherefore (saith Jerome ) if a man can be without sin, which is evident that the Apostles could not, then that man may be above the Apostles, to pass by the Patriarchs and Prophets, whose righteousness in the Law was nowyse perfect.
LUKE 11.4. And forgive [ 6] us our sins.
Upon which words (saith Tertullian ) the LORD knew that himself only was without sin, therefore he taught us to seek the forgiveness of our sins. As also (saith Cyprian ) lest any man should please himself as he were Innocent, while as no man is innocent; and by ex • olling himself, should perish the more; he is therefore taught, that he daily sinneth, while a he is commanded daily to pray for the pardon of his sins.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
NO man can be without sin, (saith Lactantius ) so long as he is clothed with flesh, whose infirmity three manner of ways is subject to the dominion of sin, in deeds, words, and thoughts, Therefore saith S. Jerome, (after adduction of sundry proofs ) All these examples I have run over, to show that the Law was never yet fulfilled by any (saith he.)
3. Confession of party.
IT is impossible, (saith Aquinas ) to fulfill the law, &c. and never any could keep the Law as it is commanded. And if we will hear a Pope, Hadrianus a Trajecto, he saith, All our righteousness is like a menstruous clothe, as Isai speaketh; cap. 64. for continually upon the clothe of our good life, which we weave with the works of righteousness, we drop the corrupt worsome of many crimes, or grievous offenses. Lykewyse Carthusian asking how Hezekiah, Jeremiah, and Ester, &c. alleged their righteousness before GOD? he answereth, that they said not this simply, that they were righteous, but after an human measure, knowing (saith he) that all their righteousness before GOD, was but like a menstruous clothe. Therefore it is said, Enter not into judgment with thy servant, for in thy sight no living man can be justified.
CHAPTER VII. Of glorification: and whether our good works do merit the same.
The state of the Question.
THat good works are necessary to the obtaining of eternal life, and that according to them in measure, but not for their condignity and merit, eternal life is bestowed on the godly, we constantly affirm. Therefore herein only standeth the question, not of their necessity, or whether good works have a reward abiding them, (which Scripture affirmeth, PSALM 19.11. PROV. 11.18. and none can deny) but whence they have the same; that is, whether from Justice, for the condignity of the work meriting, (as the Papists affirm) or from Mercy, according to GOD'S free promise graciously obliedging, as James 2.5. and as a just GOD in keeping his promise, and mercifullie performing the same. As may be seen to be the only truth, by these scriptures following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
PSAL. 62.12. Also unto [ 1] thee, O LORD, belongeth mercy, for thou rendrest to every man according to his works.
Remarke, then, that this retribution floweth from GOD'S mercy, and not man's merit, and is rendered according to his works, and not for his works. Wherevpon Pope Gregory moveth this question, saying. If that happiness of the Sayncts be Mercy, and not acquired by merits, where is that which is written, And thou wilt render to everyone according to his works. If then it be rendered according to works, how shall it be esteemed mercy? But it is another thing, (saith he, by way of answer) to render according to works, and another thing to render for the woe • kes themselves: for in that it is said, according to their works, the quality of the works is understood, that whose works are seen to be good, their retribution shall be in glory. For unto that blessed life, wherein men live with God, and enjoye from God, no labor can be equalled, and no works can be compared.
[ 2] ROM. 6.23. For the wages of sin, is death; but the gift of GOD, is eternal life, thorough JESUS CHRIST our LORD. So EPHES. 2.8.9.
Upon which words, (saith Augustine ) when he might have said, and rightly said, The wages of righteousness, is eternal life; yet he would rather say, The free gift of GOD, is life eternal: that hereby we may understand, that it is not for our merits, but according to His own mercy, that GOD bringeth us unto eternal life. So likewise saith Chrysostom, The LORD showing that they got it not as a debt, (saith he) or a due retribution, and remuneration, for their labors; but that all came of mere grace freely. And therefore the very Rhemistes translate the word here used, [GRACE] or that which cometh of mere favor only.
In like-manner saith Cardinal Cajetan, He saith not, The wages of righteousness, is life eternal; but the gift of GOD, is life eternal: that we may understand, that it is not for our merits, but of the free gift of GOD, that in ende we attain unto life eternal. Therefore he subjoineth, (saith he) In Christ Jesus our Lord. Loe here the merit, loe here the righteousness, the wages whereof, is eternal life. But unto us it is a gift, for Christ Jesus sake. The very same saith Cardinal Cusanus on this place, as also their master of Sentences, Lombard, saying, that the Apostle spake so, that we may understand (saith he) that GOD bringeth us to eternal life, for His own mercies sake, and not for our merits. Closse contrary unto which doctrine of the Apostles, and these fornamed expositions is that which Maldonado affirmeth, saying, that as properly and truly we merit reward, when by grace we do well, as we merit punishment when without grace we do evil.
ROM. 8.18. For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time, are not worthy (or condign as the Rhemistes translate) to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.
Upon which words (saith Haymo ) if any man could fulfill all the Precepts of the Olde and New Testament, and suffer all sort of torments (which he rehearseth) many ages of time, he would no wise be worthy of that glory to come, which the elect shall receive: For to that blessed life (saith Gregory ) which we live with GOD, and have from GOD, no labor can be equal, nor no works compared: chiefly seeing the Apostle saith, that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy of that glory to come, to be revealed in us. For the suffering is but small (saith Theodoret ) but the gain which is hoped for is great: And therefore he called these things that are looked for, not a Reward, but Glory, and which is no ways merited de condigno (saith the Cardinal Cajetan )
Wherevpon also saith Bernard, concerning life eternal, We know, that the sufferings of this time, are not worthy to be compared with the future glory; no, not, if one did sustain them all: for the merits of men are not such, that for them eternal life should be due of right; or GOD should do any injury, if he did not give it.
[ 4] 2. TIM. 1.16.18. The LORD give mercy unto the house of Onesiphorus, for he refreshed me, & was not ashamed of my chain. The LORD grant unto him that he may find mercy of the Lord in that day: that is, in the day of Death, and Judgment, (saith Carthusian. )
Where-upon (saith Theophylact, ) Take heed, that here he saith not, The LORD give unto him any other thing, but mercy. And again, if Onesiphorus, (saith he) who for the Name of CHRIST did cast himself in so many perils, was saved by Mercy; how much gather should we expect so to be saved? Therefore also saith the Prophet, Sow to yourselves in righteousness, and reap in mercy. So likewise, Blessed are the merciful, (saith our Savior) for they shall receive mercy. And in like-manner (saith the Apostle) Not by the works of righteousness, which we have done, but according to His mercy He hath saved us. If then our salvation be from mercy, it followeth, therefore, that it is not from merits.
ROM. 8.17. And if we be children, then we are heirs. [ 5] Children by Adoption. ROM. 8.15. And heirs of that kingdom which he hath promised to them that love Him. IAM. 2.5.
Upon which words (saith the Jesuit Salmeron, ) Remarke, that this speech is of Children by Adoption, because amongst men this inference faylleth not; for, for this ende are such adopted, that they may succeed to his goods who adopteth them, (saith he.) And in like-manner (saith the Jesuit Justinian, (Very fitly doeth he use the word of heirship, alluding, to wit, to the right of adoption. For, (saith Cajetan ) for this ende any one is adopted to be a son, that consequently he may be heir. If therefore our adoption is from no merits, and that our inheriting is from adoption, therefore it will follow by good consequence, that our inheriting is from no merit.
[ 6] EPHES. 2.10. For we are His workmanship, created in CHRIST JESUS, unto good works, which GOD hath before ordained, that we should walk in them.
Remarke, then, as walking in a way to a place, maketh us not to have right to that place; so walking in the way of good works to heaven, maketh us not to have right to heaven, as the meritorious cause of obtaining the same, but only CHRIST'S purchase, and his gracious promise. Therefore said Bernard of them, that they were the way to the Kingdom, but not the cause of our reygning in that Kingdom. So that it is a brutish thing, when we are at the ende of our journey, to count our steps to that Kingdom, so many merits deserving the same; or that GOD thereby oweth to us, to whom we more than owe our own selves.
LUKE 17.10, So likewise [ 7] ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.
Which speech (as Vasques showeth) is both a speech of humility and verity, and as Maldona • also, and Alfonsus à Castro, on this place declare. Whence it is, that Jerome inferreth, If he be unprofitable who hath done all, what is to be said of him, who could not fulfill all? Hence, therefore, we reason thus. Whosoever meriteth at GOD'S hands, he is a profitable servant: but none, even who doeth all that is commanded him, is a profitable servant: therefore none can merit at GOD'S hands. The Major is undeniable; the Minor is Christ's own words; which he backeth with a reason, because all are debt-bound. Where-upon saith Chrysostom, in doing all whatsoever we can do, we but pay our debt when we have done the same. And therefore rightly also saith Maldonado, What we owe, is not so laudable when we perform the same, as it is vituperable if we perform not the same. And which we see in the punishment of that servant with many strypes, who knew the will of his master, and did it not. Therefore from these words doeth Marcus H • remita draw this conclusion; The Kingdom of Heaven, then, (saith he) is not the hire of works, but the free grace of the LORD, prepared for his faithful servants: De iis qui putant se operibus justificari. So LUKE 12, 32. where are three Arguments: 1. A Kingdom given: 2. This a gift of GOD'S good pleasure, not addebted: and 3. Given unto us, as an inheritance from a father. Therefore saith the Text, It is your Fathers pleasure to give to you a Kingdom.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
ETernall rest, (saith Basel ) abideth them who in this life have lawfully striven: not for the merits of their works, but out of the free favor of that most bountiful GOD, wherein they have trusted. Lykewyse (saith Augustine ) thy sins are thine, but merit is GOD'S; punishment is due to thee; and when reward cometh, He shall crown His gifts, not thy merits. Last of all, (saith Bernard ) Thou canst not merit eternal life, by no works of thine, but He freely likewise bestoweth that on thee: — nor should God do any wrong, if He gave not the same unto thee. Closse contrary unto the Rhemistes their words on HEB. 6.10.
3. Confession of party.
WIth full consent do the whole Fathers deliver (saith Cassander ) that the hope of pardon, and of life eternal, is ONLIE to be placed in the mercy of GOD, and merit of CHRIST only: neither are our works what-so-ever they be, of that worth, (saith Ferus, and with him à Castro ) that they deserve duelie and condignlie any such reward. Therefore Bellarmine was forced to conclude all his dispute for merits, thus; that for the vncertayntie of our own righteousness, (saith he) and the danger of vain glory, it is most safe to put our whole confidence in the only mercy and bounty of God. And he is to be accounted the sounder Divyne, the more faithful Catholic, and most agreeable to holy Scripture, (saith their Waldensis ) who simply denieth all merit, and with the Apostle & holy Scriptures acknowledgeth, that simply no man meriteth the Kingdom of Heaven, but that he getteth it only of God's miere favor and good will of the Giver.
CHAPTER VIII. Of Purgatory.
The state of the Question.
WEE deny not that the godly many ways, and oftymes suffer here, and have by the Hand of their wise and merciful Father, castigatorie and emendatorie punishments inflicted upon them in this life, which may justly be called Medicinal benefits, fardering their mortification, and tending to their good, as DAVID professeth: and the Apostle teacheth, that they may be made partakers of the LORD'S holiness. But we deny, that these are expiations, or that they suffer any punishment for their sins at all after this life; especially of such a satisfactory quality, as the Council of Trent mentioneth, and as the Romanists have forged, in the fire of Purgatory, which they define to be a hellish prison, wherein the souls of the godly are purged after this life, which were not fully purged here, by enduring a temporal punishment for their mortal sins there, and satisfying for their venial. And wherein they are so peremptory, that they affirm, that whosoever believeth not this fire to be, their souls in Hells fire shall be tormented forever. Notwithstanding that this mean of purging of souls, or their going to any such place after death, is flat against Scripture.
1. Authority of Scripture.
1. JOHN 1.7. And the blood [ 1] of JESUS CHRIST His Son, purgeth us from all sin.
That is (say the Rhemistes themselves) from Original & Actual, Veniall and Mortall, from the fault and pain due for the same. In like-manner, (saith Lombard ) CHRIST by His death, and by that one true Sacrifice of His, hath abolished WHAT-SO-EVER faults we had, whereby we were holden by Satan to undergo punishment. And more particularly (saith Bellarmine, ) The sufferings of CHRIST are able to expiate all sin, original & actual, mortal and venial, and all punishment, eternal and temporal: and all this by it self alone. All which these sufferings do not only perform, when in Baptism we are first reconciled with GOD, but also thereafter (as the Rhemistes on this same place confess) when we repent of our sins committed after our first reconciliation, notwithstanding of these calamimities that have come upon the godly thereafter, as upon DAVID, and others: For Infants after Baptism, are subject to the like temporal calamities. As sicknesses & death it self, as well as those who actually sin after Baptism, and are of riper age: so that, if such common calamities, or chastisements should argue no plenary pardon of sins committed after reconciliation in those who are of age, then should it argue the like also in Infants, and so there should no plenary pardon be of all: which were to derogate greatly from the virtue of the sufferings of CHRIST, and from the LORD'S mercy in like-manner, and so to make the Father of mercies in mercifulness far inferior to man, and that he requireth of us, in free and in full pardoning, a far greater perfection of mercy than he hath in himself.
The sufferings of CHRIST then being of an infinite value (saith Durand and Mairones cited by Bellarmine ) to join therefore, the satisfactions of the sufferings of the godly thereto, is altogether superfluous, for as where there is grace, there is pardon, so where there is pardon (saith Chrysostom ) there is no punishment at all, to wit, satisfactory.
PSAL. 73.24. Thou wilt [ 2] guide me with thy counsel, and afterward receive me up into Glory.
Remarke, then, that after the finishing of this life, wherein the godly are guyded by the council of GOD, and His Grace; immediately followeth the receiving up of their souls to Glory. Therefore (saith Augustine ) O happy Soul, who HOW SOONE it is loosed from the body, being set at liberty, PRESENTLIE goeth to Heaven, and is secure at rest.
In like-manner saith Prosper of the godly, that having ended their painful pilgrimage, presently thence-forth they reign happy (saith he) in their native country.
2. COR. 5.1. For we know, [ 3] that if our earthly house of this tabernacle be dissolved, we have a building of GOD, a house not made with hands, eternal in the Heavens.
Upon which words saith Anselm, We know that PRESENTLIE we have from GOD a building, that is, a blessed Mansion place.
Yea, in like-manner, (saith Bellarmine himself) The Apostle's reasoning is most excellent, to wit, this, if this mortal life perish, (saith he) we have presently another far better in the Heavens.
REVEL. 14.13. Blessed are the dead which die in the LORD, [ 4] from hence-forth now, saith the Spirit: for they rest from their labors, and their works follow them.
Upon which words, (saith the Jesuit Ribera ) It is almost the common exposition of all, which Andreas Caesariensis followeth, that these words are spoken of all the godly, (and not only of Martyrs ) therefore Beda saith, I thank thee, O IESV, who makest them blessed in Heaven, (not in Purgatory ) who die in thee on earth: how much more these, who lay down their happy souls both in Thy faith, and for Thy faith? And this exposition Ribera proveth to be true, by sundry like speeches of Scripture, and by the custom of the Church which in her public offices for the dead understandeth the same so; and therefore he calleth it, the most fit and convenient meaning, because it comprehendeth them that die for the LORD, (as Martyrs ) and extendeth it self also unto all others the godly who-so-ever. Thus also doeth Primasuis, Aretas Caesariensis, Bernard, Haymo, and the Jesuit Lorinus, expone these words.
Next, (à modo) or from hence forth Ribera exponeth, from the very time of their death, as Ambrose, Haymo, and Beda, expone (saith he) who therefore brings that of the PSALMIST, when He hath given unto His well-beloved their sleep, behold, the inheritance of the LORD.
COL. 1.20. Having made [ 5] peace through the blood of His Grosse by Him, to reconcile all things unto Himself, whether they be things in Earth, or in Heaven.
Whence we see, that the Apostle distinguisheth the Church, which is reconciled to GOD by CHRIST, into that which is on Earth, and that which is in Heaven: but of any part there-of in Hell, he speaketh not at all. There-fore, that reconciliation which was made by CHRIST'S Blood, belongeth not to any who are there, either in Limbus, or Purgatory.
Agayne, 2. COR. 4.18. These things that are seen, are Temporal; and these things which are not seen, are Aeternall. Whence it followeth, that there is no invisible place after this life, which is not eternal, and consequently, there is no Purgatory.
In like manner (saith Andreas Casariensis, and with him Aretus ) Their very departure out of the body, is this resting from their labors: and therefore, from hence-forth, that is, from the very time of their death is signified, saith Richardus de sancto Victor.
Wherefore, (saith Cyprian ) O what dignity and security is it, in a moment to close thy eyes, whereby men in the world are seen, and to open them instantlie, that GOD and CHRIST may be seen • O what great happiness is it, to be speedily pulled from the earth, that thou mayest Presentlie be placed in Heaven! Last of all, to rest from their labors, is, (as Beda calleth it) to be blessed in Heaven: and not as the Rhemists expone it, To be discharged of the troubles of this life. For this were a miserable Rest, to be fred of such, and yet to be tormented with hellish pains after this life.
[ 6] 2. COR. 5.8. We are confident, I say, and willing, rather to be absent from the body, and to be present with the Lord. So also PHILIP. 1.23. I desire to be dissolved, and to be with CHRIST.
Whence we reason thus, They who are with the LORD, or with CHRIST, are in no place of torment, (for to be with CHRIST, is to be in Paradise, as he said to the Thief.) But the godly Souls presently after their being absent from the body, which is by death and dissolution, are present with the LORD, or with CHRIST, as the Apostle's words import, and the Rhemists confess. Therefore they are in no place of Torment.
Therefore doeth Tertullian add the particle of time, saying, I desire, saith the Apostle) jam recipi, even now, to be received, and to be with CHRIST.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
THE Church then, (saith Augustine ) doeth know two sorts of lives, which are from GOD preached and • ecommended to her, where-of one is by faith, the other by fight: the one in the time of her Pilgrimage, the other in the time of her Mansion: the one in labor, the other in rest: the one in the way, the other in her native country. But no mention of any third sort of life, of such who are neither in bless, nor rest, nor in their country: even as the Apostle distinguisheth the Church, either being on earth, or in Heaven. And as the primitive Church (by Bellarmine's witnessing) defended themselves against the Donatists, that they made not two Churches, one upon earth, and another in Heaven; but distinguished the two times or estates of the Church; the one Militant, and the other Triumphant: no word b •• ng then of the Popish • ripartition, o • a third, in Purgatory.
And most excellently saith Justin Martyr. Thus after the departure of the soul from the body, presently is made a distinction between the good and the evil; for they are carried to the places whereof they are worthy: the souls of the godly by the Angels being carried to Paradise, where the company and sight of Angels, and Arch-angels is, as also the sight of CHRIST our Savior, according to these words, While we are absent from the body, we are present with the LORD. But the souls of the wicked are carried to Hell, (saith he.) Neither hath the Scripture taught us, (saith Ephrem ) that there are three places.
3. Confession of party.
WEE are certain, (saith Aquina • ) if our earthly house wherein we dwell here, that is, our body be dissolved, and turn to corruption by death, we have Presentlie, not in hope, but in real possession, a better house, not made with hands, that is, heavenly glory, whereof our Savior said, In my Fathers house, are many mansions.
Bellarmine also, after the reciting of this Testimony of Dionysius Areopagita, which saith thus, The sayncts in their death, know surly, that wholly they shall attain to rest, and a full conformity with CHRIST, how-soon they come to the ende of this present life. He willeth us, to remark this, saying, Note, that Dionysius saith, that the souls of the godly presently after death, attain to immortal bless.
CHAPTER IX. Of the Sacraments.
SECT. 1. Of the absolute necessity of the Baptism of Infants.
The state of the Question.
WEE hold, that Baptism is necessary to Salvation, by a conditional necessity, to wit, if it may be had, or ration praecepti. The contempt whereof is damnable, as also that it is the only ordinary mean given by GOD to his Church, for bringing of Infants to the participation both of Grace and Glory. But that it is simply necessary by such an absolute necessity, ration medii, that except this mean of salvation be used, there is no possibility of salvation to poor Infances, who are children of the faithful, this we deny, and reject as a cruel & uncharitable point of doctrine, (altho the Council of Trent accurse them who so think) & we affi • me it to be altogether contrary to these Scriptures following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
[ 1] GEN. 17.7. And I will establish my Covenant between me and thee, and thy seed after thee in their generations, for an everlasting Covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee. So likewise, ACTS 2.39. For to you is the promise, (saith the Apostle) and to your children, and to all that are afar off, whom-so-ever the LORD our GOD shall call.
Remarke, then, that not only are the Parents within the Covenant of Grace, but their children also, and their seed after them, And even as the female was comprehended under the male, (because incapable of Circumcision) and so saved amongst the Jews; so are Infants dying in the mothers womb, or in the birth, without Baptism, comp • ehended under their believing P ••• nts, and within the Covenant of Grace; and consequently are saved, as belonging to election. Therefore saith Augustine, It is collected, that invisible sanctification hath been present to some, and profited them to salvation, without the visible Sacraments.
IOSHVA 5.5. Now all the [ 2] people that came out, were circumcised: but all the people that were borne in the Wilderness, by the way as they came out of Egypt, them they circumcised not.
Whence we infer, That as the children who died those forty years in the Wilderness, were not condemned, for not being circumcised under the Law, notwithstanding of that peremptory commination, which saith, and the uncircumcised man-child, whose flesh of his fore-skin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people: Even so, neither are the children of Christians condemned, for not being baptized under the Gospel, when that Sacrament cannot possibly or convenientlie be had: it being not the want, but contempt of Baptism that is judged damnable. Therefore said Ambrose concerning the Emperor Valentinian, who died unbaptized, I lost him whom I was to regenerate by Baptism; but he hath not lost that grace which he desired there-by.
[ 3] IEREM. 1.5. Before thou camest out of the womb, I sanctified thee. And again, ROM. 9.11. For the children not being yet borne, (saith the Apostle) neither having done either good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth, it was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger: as it is written, Jacob have I hated, and Esau have I loved.
Wherevpon (saith Cornelius Mus, Bishop of Ritonto, ) by a special privilege of divyne grace by Christ, even infances in the womb may attain to salvation, as is manifest in the example of Jeremiah, and John the baptist. (And there-after,) For it is evident, saith he, and with him Bellarmine ) that the divyne grace of Christ, is not tied to Sacraments. Therefore (saith Bernard ) what reason or nature teacheth, that none of those who die, whose body outwardly is not sprinkled with the element of water, can obtain internal and eternal salvation? and therefore he thereafter affirmeth, that in case contempt be not the cause, that then the Parents faith is not only profitable, but sufficient also for the child. For if the root be holy, (saith the Apostle) so also are the branches.
[ 4] 1. COR. 7.14. For the vnbelieving husband, is sanctified by the wife, and the vnbelieving wife, is sanctified by the husband; else were your children unclean, but now they are holy.
Note, then, if the children of one only believing parent be esteemed holy, and in the Covenant, how much more then should the Children of Parents, both believing be esteemed holy, and so charitablie judged of, (if they die without Baptism) to be eternally saved? Therefore in that book which was written by Augustine, of the Baptism of Infantes, that examples have gone before of Infants to make, whom Christians (saith he) the Christian will even of one parent had prevailed, the Apostle did signify.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
HOw forcible that is the which the Apostle saith, even without the visible Sacrament of baptism, (saith Augustine ) with the heart we believe unto righteousness, and with the mouth we confess to Salvation, is declared in that Thief on the Cross. But then it was invisiblie fulfilled, when not the contempt of Religion, but the point of necessity, did exclude the mystery of Baptism. Wherefore (saith Bernard ) CHRIST when he said. He who believeth, and is baptized, shall be saved warilie, and well, he saith not, But he that is not baptized, shall be condemned.
3. Confession of party.
LOmbard speaking of the sense of these words, John 3. Except man be borne of new, &c. and understanding them of Baptism: but this is to be understood (saith he) of them who may, and yet despise to be baptized: otherwise, (saith he) GOD hath not tied his power to Sacraments; for tha • some hath gotten invisible sanctification, without the visible Sacrament, this Augustine clearly teacheth. So likewise saith Cardinal Cajetant, in the case of necessity unto the salvation of children, the Parents desire of Baptism is sufficient. Yea, GERSON, before the whole Council of Constance, delyvered this doctrine, saying, It is evident, that GOD hath not tied His mercy of salvation, to the common laws of Christian doctrine, nor yet unto Sacraments; but without any prejudice thereof, he can sanctify children unborn in the very womb, by the baptism of his grace, and power of the holy Ghost. And therefore he saith that all Parents should pray for this grace to their Infants, in case that they happen to die before their birth.
SECT. 2. Of Transubstantiation in the LORD'S Supper.
The state of the Question.
THat in the LORD'S Supper, the very Body and Blood of Christ is truly, really, and effectually present, as food to the souls of all true believers, and that the same is truly participated unto salvation, by all worthy Receavers, we constantly affirm: but after consecration to affirm, that the sacramental Elements are not only changed in use and quality, but also that the very substance of bread and wine is converted, and changed into the very substance of CHRIST'S Body & Blood, their accidents of shape, color, and quantity only remaining, as the Council of Tr • n • decreeth under a curse; and that under these accidents, the Body and Blood of Christ hath such a local existence, that it may be handled by the Priest, and in the participation there-of, eaten by all the communicant • what-so-ever, yea, by very Dogs and Myce, as the cantells of their Mass beareth, and as one of themselves testify, that this is the common doctrine of School-men. This (I say) we oppose, as a most gross and erroneous doctrine, destroying both the nature and partes of a Sacrament, as also the verity of Christ's human nature, and furnishing matter likewise of most gross Idolatry, & most impious Blasphemy. The places of Scripture which militate in the contrary, are these.
1. Authority of Scripture.
MATTH. 26.26. And as [ 1] they were eating, JESUS took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to his Disciples.
Note, then, that what our Savior brake, and gave to his Disciples, is declared to be that same which he took and blessed, or did consecrate, as the word (it) so often repeated, importeth. But our Savior took bread, (saith the Text) and blessed or consecrated it. Therefore seeing the same word (it) is still retained, after blessing or consecration, it followeth, that it was bread in substance which He brake, and gave unto his Disciples after consecration. So that we see, our Savior's consecration changed not the substance of the bread into any other, but only sanctified the same, to a Sacred and Sacramental use.
Now, that the consecration of the bread and wine, was by our Savior's blessing, (and not by these words, hoc est corpus meum, ) and used in like-manner by the Apostles after him, we see, first, by S. Paul's words, saying, The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the Blood of CHRIST? Where-upon saith Aquinas, (which we bless,) that is, which we who are Priests do consecrate. And therefore in like manner saith the Canon Law, Not every bread, but that which receiveth the blessing of Christ, becometh the body of Christ. Wherefore also doeth Justin Martyr tell us, that by Prayer and Thanks-giving the Elements are consecrated, (saith he) and the bread after invocation of the holy Ghost, is no more common bread, (saith Cyril of IERVSALEM.) The like style doeth Theodoret give to consecration, which Augustine calleth Mystical Prayer; and Cyril of Alexandria, Mystical Benediction. Where-of again, saith the Canon Law, Before the Benediction it is called that speee, (to wit, bread) but after Benediction the Body of Christ (remark) is signified there-by, (saith their Decretal. ) And again, We cal that the body & blood of Christ, (saith another Canon) which being taken of the fruits of the earth, & consecrated by mystical prayer, we receive unto salvation of our souls, in remembrance of the Lord's suffering. The particular form of which prayer, our Savior left to the liberty of his Church. Therefore we see that consecration was by Christ's blessing, and words of prayer uttered to GOD, and not by concionall, or such words as the Romish Priest's, now in an unknown tongue whisper to the bread. Yea, Bellarmine himself is forced, by the evidence of Truth, to grant, that any change that was made of the bread from common bread, was by CHRIST'S blessing: For, (saith he) He gave not common bread as He took it, but bread which He had blessed; and by blessing, changed it. All which we grant, to wit, from common, to Sacrementall bread. But yet still after blessing, that it remained in substance bread, and that our Savior brake bread, and gave bread to His Disciples, is evident out of the Text, (as is shown) saying, He took bread, and blessed it, and brake it, and gave it to His Disciples. Where the word (it) thryse repeated, can have relation to nothing else, but to the first words, to wit, He took bread. And therefore to clear this the more, the Apostle telleth us, that it is not only bread which is broken, and given after blessing or consecration, but also which is eaten by the faithful, saying, not only, The bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of CHRIST? but also, As oft as ye shall eat of this bread, &c, (saith he) ye shall declare the LORD'S death till He come.
1. COR. 11.24. This is [ 2] my body, which is broken for you.
The exposition of which words, (this is My Body) if we will hear the same out of their Canon Law, and gloss upon the Decretal therein, it is this; That this bread, suo modo vocatur corpus Christi, that is, after the own manner thereof it is called the Body of CHRIST; seeing (saith the Canon) it is truly, but the Sacrament of CHRIST'S Body. And upon which Canon saith the glossator, That heavenly bread, that is, the heavenly Sacrament, which truly representeth Christ's flesh, is called Christ's Body; but improperlie, (saith he) wherefore it is said, that after the own manner thereof it is so called, but not in the truth of the thing it self, but by mystical significatiō: so that the meaning is, it is called the Body of CHRIST, that is, (saith he) it signifieth or representeth the same.
Besides the Popes Decretals, if we will hear the Fathers, their exposition no less over-throw Transubstantiation, for first, Augustine giveth us a general rule for understanding such speeches, saying, The thing which signifieth, useth to be called by the name of that which it signifieth. Next more particularly Theodoret shortly telleth us, saying, that our Savior honored the visible signs with the name of His Body and Blood; not changing their nature, (saith he) but adding grace to nature. And he made no difficulty (saith Augustine ) to say, This is My Body, when he gave the sign of His body. Which Tertullian also against Marcion, calleth the the figure of His body, and Eusebius, the symbol of the same. And there-fore not the same it self by transubstantiation.
But to come to the next words, (which is broken for you.) From whence we reason thus. The bread is the body of Christ, after that manner that the body of Christ was then broken, when He gave the Sacrament. But His body then was broken sacramentallie only, or by representation, and not really or by passion; for then He had suffered twice, (contrary to HEB. 9.27.) Therefore the bread is not the body of Christ really, but sacramentallie, even as in Sacraments, signs get the names of things signified by them; as Circumcision is called the Covenant; the Lamb, the Passover; and the Cup in this Sacrament, is called The New Testament. Where-fore saith there Canon Law, by this fraction what other thing is represented, but the immolation of the Lord's body upon the cross? And again, (saith the gloss) His death is represented, while as the bread is broken. Wherefore also saith Bernard, Even as he seemeth in a sort to suffer, while as in the Sacrament, (to wit, by His fraction) His death is commemorated by us: so in a sort He seemeth to be borne yearlie, while as His birth is represented unto us. The fractiō then of Christ's body in the Sacramētal action there-of, is no otherwise, than as the birth of Christ's body is on the feastivall commemoration there-of, to wit, neither of them real or properly, but by representation or recordation, and improperlie.
1. COR. 11.24. Do this [ 3] in remembrance of Mee.
Whence we reason. What Christ left to His Church in remembrance of His body, and of His suffering there-in, (signified by breaking) the same is not the body of Christ it self which did suffer; for these two are diverse. But this Sacrament of His body, He left to His Church, in remembrance of His body, and of his suffering therein, (as saith the Text:) therefore this Sacrament of His body, is not the body of Christ it self which did suffer. Hence therefore it is, that Ambrose, Chrysostom, and with them Eusebius, calleth the Sacrament, a Rememberance of Christ's death, and of that sacrifice which He once offered upon the Cross. And Augustine showeth, that to eat His flesh, and drink His blood, is sweetlie and profitably to have in remembrance, that His flesh was crucified, and wounded for our sakes.
Aquinas also (and with him Lombard ) showeth this to be the reason why this SACRAMENT may also be called a Sacrifice; Because (saith he) the celebration of this Sacrament, is a certain Image of the Passion of CHRIST. Now, we know, that the Image of a man, made to represent him, and be in remembrance of him, is not a man himself. Therefore also saith their Canon Law. Because we are delyvered by the death of Christ, being myndfull of this thing, in eating, and drinking, we represent that flesh and blood which was offered for us.
[ 4] LUKE 22.20. This Cup is the New Testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
Note here, first, that, as S. MARKE relateth, these words of the Cup, were uttered by our Savior to His Disciples after they all had drunk thereof: and, therefore, if they were the words of Consecration, then the wine had been consecrated: and consequently, (as they say) changed into His Blood, in the Disciples bellies, and not in the Cup at all.
Next; it is to be remarked, that those who deny any figure in Christ's speech of the Bread, yet in this place of the Cup, they grant figures freely; to wit, 1. that by the Cup, is meaned, that which is in the Cup: which they must say after consecration, is either Wine in substance, or else Christ's Blood. If they say, Wine, then we agree: if they say Christ's Blood properly, how shall Christ's Blood be the New Testament, which is the Gospel preached long before, and must be diverse from the Testator? If they say, that it is so called, because it is the Seal thereof, then here a new figure again: besides, that seals should be visible, which the Blood is not. As also, the sense of these words, This Cup of the New Testament in my Blood, should be this, This Blood is the seal of the New Testament in my Blood: which were just, a non sense. And in like-manner, if they admit, that the Cup is the New Testament, because it is the Seal there-of, why admit they not likewise, that the Bread is the Body of Christ, because it is the Seal there-of, as Sacraments are called, Signs and Seals, ROM. 4.11?
In like-manner, that which is added, (which is shed for you) overthroweth Transubstantiation. For this shedding of Christ's Blood when He gave the Sacrament, must be understood either really and properly, or else Sacramentallie and improperlie. But the first it could not be; for then it should have been shed and issue out of His veins at the Table, before it was shed thereafter, and on the Cross: and so He should have suffered oftener than once, contrary to Scripture before cited. As also their Mass should not be an unbloody Sacrifice. Therefore it followeth, that this shedding was only Sacramental, and by representation, whereunto agreeth the Gloss upon their Canon Law, saying, CHRIST'S Blood is shed; that is, the shedding thereof is signified or represented: and if it be shed only Sacramentallie, or by representation, then it is Christ's Blood only, so in like-manner; and consequently, not really and properly, by Transubstantiation.
MATTH. 26.29. I will [ 5] not drink hence-forth of this fruit of the Vine. SO MARKE 14.25.
Which words Pope Innocent himself declareth were spoken by Christ, of the Cup, in the Sacrament. Luke indeed he testifieth, that Christ spake the same of the Paschal Cup: but he denieth not that which the two former Evangel • sts affirm, that he spake the same in like-manner of the mystical Cup: and therefore we conclude, that (without any inversion of order by the two Evangelists) our Savior spake the same of both Cups: as if he would have said, I will not hereafter celebrate with you neither any Passover, nor mystical Supper. And so the Evangelists agree well amongst themselves. And herein we have with us, Origen, Cyprian, Chrysostom, and Beda; and of themselves, Jansen, and others.
Note, then, that both after consecration & drinking thereof, our Savior calleth it Wine in substance, or the fruit of the vine: and therefore not transubstantiate in blood. Wherefore saith Cyprian, It was wine which he called His blood. So also saith Chrysostom, speaking against some who used to give water, When our Savior celebrated this Mystery, He gave Wine to His Disciples, (saith he) having called it the Fruit of the Vine; which produceth not water. So that we see that it was Wine after consecration, which He called His Blood: and it was Wine also which He gave to His Disciples to drink. Therefore, saith Theodoret, (and with him Bertram ) the mystical signs they depart not after consecration from their own nature: for they remain in their former substance, form, & figure, & may be seen & touched, evē as they were before.
And to say that Christ's Blood is called the fruit of the Vine, because it was once so, (to wit, before consecration) we are to understand, (beside what is spoken) that in Sacramental speeches, signs receive the names of things signified, but not things signified the names of the signs.
1. COR. 10.16. The bread [ 6] which we break, is it not the communion of the body of CHRIST? that is, a mean (as saith Aquinas ) to make us one with Christ: because the receiving of this Sacrament (saith Lyra, ) incorporateth the receaver in Christ.
Note, then, that the Apostle calleth it bread, which is broken, which breaking seeing in their Mass it is after consecration, it followeth that it is bread after consecration.
Here our Adversaries are miserably perplexed, to tell what is broken: for if they grant the Apostles words to be true, that it is bread, then they yield to us. Therefore, lest they should do so, Pope Nicolas, with his Council at Rome, determined, that it was Christ's real body, which sensibly, and in the truth of the thing it self was broken by the Priest's hands, and chewed with the teeth of the faithful: as is to be seen in the Popes Decretal, and prescryved manner of Berengaries Recantation, But the Romanists since, considering the many inconvenients and absurdities that follow here-on, have thought this too gross, and Capernaitish, and therefore they say now, that the body of Christ, under the accidents of bread, is whole in the Host, and in every part thereof, and (according to the Gloss upon the Pop's Decretal) that the accidents are only broken, and give the crack. Whence it followeth, that they must admit a strange figure, and put upon Christ's words, and the Apostles, a strange interpretation: to wit, that Christ's words are to be thus exponed, This is my body, which is broken for you: that is, This is not My body which is broken, but the accidents of bread, without the substance thereof, as the color, shape, and taste of bread, while as no bread is their present at all. And that the Apostles words likewise are thus to be exponed, The bread which we break, that is, We break no bread at all in substance, but only imaginary accidents, without any subject: and so the Gloss to belie the TEXT.
[ 7] 1. COR. 11.26. As oft as ye shall eat of this Bread, and drink of this Cup, ye shall declare (or as the Rhemists translate) show the Lord's death till His coming.
Note here again, that, that which is eaten, is called bread, Now, eating is after consecration: therefore it is bread after consecration; and consequently, nowyse transubstantiate. Wherefore saith Pope Gelasius, The Sacraments which we receive of the body and blood of Christ, indeed are a divyne thing, by means where-of we are made partakers of the divyne nature: and yet the substance of bread and wine (saith he) doeth not cease to be. And where they say, it is called bread, because it is so in show only, then the next words do convince thē; for they must grant, that the Cup also is only so in show, the Apostles speech being alike of both. And whereas others say, that it is so called, because it was once bread before consecration, and therefore is denominate from what it was; as man is called Dust; and Eve, bone of Adam's bone: this is true indeed in changes where the same substance remaineth, and entereth in the composition of a thing, as Dust doeth in man's body, and Adam's rib did in Evahs: the like where-of they dare not say of bread, that it entereth so into the composition of Christ's body, and yet remaineth still in the substance there-of.
Agayne, out of the last words we reason thus: As the memorial or declaring of His death and passion till he come, is not His passion it self; so the memorial of His body till he come, is not His body it self present. But the Sacrament is the memorial of His death and body crucified, till He come in it glorified: therefore is not the same present in substance.
[ 8] JOHN 17.11. And now I am no more in the Worlde. Which Cardinal Tolet, granteth to be meant of his bodily presence after His ascension, according to ACT. 3.21.
Where-upon Augustine taketh occasion to inquire, saying; How, then, shall I receive him who is absent? how? shall I stretch out my hand to Heaven, where He sitteth, to lay hold on Him? Where-unto he answereth, Send thy faith thither, and thou hast laid hold on Him.
Vigilius also (a Martyr, and Bishop of Trent, disputing against the heretic Eutyches, who would have confounded Christ's two natures, saith. If the word and the flesh have but one nature, how cometh it to pass, that the Word being in all places, the flesh also is not in all places? For when it was on earth, it was not in Heaven: and now when it is in Heaven: (saith he) it is not here on earth.
To this the Romanists answer, That he meaneth visibly. And so not only will they have an universal proposition, to lose its vniversalitie, but also when the Fathers expone Scripture, they again will expone the Fathers, & have them to mean what they list. But if Vigilius had meant only visibly, he had never overthrown the Eutychian Heretic, who granted, that Christ's flesh was no more visible on earth. But Vigilius, to defend the truth of the human nature of Christ, affirmeth, That as Christ's flesh being on earth, was not in Heaven; to wit, visibly nor invisiblie; So His flesh being now in Heaven, is not on earth; to wit, in like-manner visibly nor invisiblie: else there should be no force in his reasoning against the perverse Eutychian. Others, to instance that visibly after His ascension, he was seen on earth, allege, ACT. 23.11. Where it is said, that in the night time the LORD stood by Paul, and comforted him. But their own Carthusian, and the Jesuit Lorinus, both show on that place, that this was only in a vision, such as was that of the man of Macedonia, ACT. 16.9.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
THE bread which is from the earth, (saith Irenaeus ) receiving the invocation of GOD, (as Fenerdantius translateth) is not anymore common bread, but the Eucharist, (or Sacrament of Christ's body) consisting of two things, an earthly and an Heavenlie: so that the mystical signs depart not from their own nature, (saith Theodoret ) but they remain in their former substance, form, and figure; and may be seen and touched, as they were before. So likewise Ephrem, Patriarch of Antioch, telleth us, that, that which is received by the faithful, changeth not (saith he) its sensible substance, and yet remaineth inseparable from intelligible grace: and so Baptism being wholly made spiritual, and remaining one, doeth both retain the property of his sensible substance of water, and yet losseth not that which it is made.
3. Confession of party.
THE bread, then, is called The body of CHRIST, but after a sort, seeing it is truly but the Sacrament of Christ's body, (saith the Popes Decretal. ) Where-upon also saith the Marginall Gloss. The heavenly Sacrament then which truly representeth Christ's flesh, is called CHRIST'S Body, but improperlie. Yea, Bellarmine hims • lfe granteth, that it is probable, that there is no express place of Scripture, that evidently can enforce Transubstantiation to be admitted, for that it is proven by these words, This is my body, he saith the most learned and sharpest witted School-men, (as Scotus was) have thought the clean contrary.
SECT. 3. Of with-holding the Cup from the people, or half Communion.
The state of the Question.
HEERE-IN it being a matter of fact and transgression, and no ambiguity to be cleared by stating the Question, The Confession of our Adversaries, in that Canon of the Council of Constance, held in Anno 1416, is sufficient for detecting what injury is openly done and avowedlie both to GOD and His people, in violating His institution, and with-holding from thē the comfort of the Cup. For (saith the Pope and his Council) albeit Christ instituted this venerable Sacrament, in both kinds of bread and wine, and gave it to his Disciples; and altho like-wise in the primitive Church, the same was received by the faithful under both kinds; yet notwithstanding this custom, for the eschewing of some perils and scandals, is for certain reasons brought in, that it shall be here after taken by the Priests under both kinds, but by the laickes under one kind only. So that this militateth, we see by their own confession, both against Scripture in the institutiō, and practice of the primitive Church, which was conform thereunto, (putting so asunder what GOD hath conjoined:) which for farther evidence thereof, we clear by these places following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
[ 1] MATTH. 26.27. And taking the Cup, He gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of this.
Where it is to be noted, that whereas our Savior saith only of the bread, Take ye, eat ye; when He speaketh of the Cup, as it were to prevent this error, He saith more expressly, Drink ye all of this: that so, none should be excepted. Therefore saith Ruardus Tapperus, Dean of Lovan, It were more convenient, that the Communion were ministered in both kinds; for that were more agreeable to the institution (saith he) and fullness thereof, as also to the example of Christ and the Fathers of the primitive Church. As also (saith Tiletanus, ) According to Christ's institution the communicating in both kinds is common as well to laickes, as to Priests.
1. COR. 10.16. The Cup [ 2] of blessing, which we bless, is it not the Cōmunion of the Blood of CHRIST?
Whence we reason: To whom the Communion of the Blood of Christ, or benefit of Remission of sins belongeth, to them also doeth the Cup of Blessing belong. But to all the faithful doeth the communion of the blood of Christ, or benefit of Remission of sins belong: there-fore also to them doeth the Cup of Blessing belong.
And who-so-ever depryveth the people of the Cup, they depryue them of the comfortable pleadge of the Remission of their sins, and of that full refection of their souls signified there-by, and wherein the very essence of the Sacrament consisteth. Therefore their own Cassander telleth us, that Christ's Disciples at that last Supper, did represent the persons of all faithful communicants. So that to with-hold the Cup from them, is as if the same had been withholden from the Disciples; whereof in the contrary our Savior said, according to the place alleged, Drink ye all of this.
1. COR. 11.28. Let a [ 3] man examine himself, and so let him eat of that Bread, and drink of that Cup.
Which words of the Apostle cutteth off all evasions: For as the commandment which is general, and to each one to examine himself, is given to all the faithful; so the commandment to eat of the Bread, and drink of the Cup, is general, and given to all the faithful: therefore also we see, that in the two preceeding verses, and in the subsequent, both eating of the bread, and drinking of the Cup, are ever joined, and enjoined to all. Wherefore Pope Gelasius saith, that the di • yding of one and the same Sacrament, cannot be done without great sacrilege.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
ONE Cup is distributed amongst all, (saith Ignatius ) and to everyone that is present, the Deacons distribute wine and water, (saith Justin Martyr. ) Which words over-throw like-wise Transubstantiation: And unto all men what-so-ever, is one Body and one Cup presented, (saith holy Chrysostom. )
3. Confession of party.
WEE are instructed by the Writtes of many holy Fathers, (saith Alphonsus de Castro ) that of old the Eucharist was given unto Laickes under both kinds. And more particularly, (saith Cassander ) It is evident that the Universal Church to this day, and the Occidentall or Roman, a thousand years and moe after Christ, in the solemn and ordinary administration of this Sacrament, did exhibit to all the members of Christ's Church, both the sorts, to wit, bread and wine: For, whole Christ is not contained under one kind (saith Alensis ) Sacramentallie; but His flesh only under the Element of bread, and His blood under the Element of wine. And he who receiveth only the Hoste, (saith Durand ) receiveth not the full Sacrament. Wherefore (saith Aquinas ) this is the more conveniēt form of celebrating this Sacrament, that by themselves the body of Christ be given to the faithful for meat, and His Blood apart for drink.
CHAPTER X. Of the Sacrifice of the Mass.
The state of the Question.
FIRST: As for the new Titles which the Romanists give unto the SACRAMENT, calling it a SACRIFICE, and the MASSE, we should not insist much in Logomachies, if by Sacrifice they understood it only to be, (as Venerable Antiquity acknowledgeth it) Commemoratiue, Representatiue, and Eucharisticall. Neither should we be contentious for the name of MASSE, (seeing that this is not the custom of the Church of GOD) if that word imported no more than their own Pope and Doctors (cited in the margin) acknowledge that it did of old: to wit, a Mission or Dimission of such after Divine Service, as were not prepared, or fit as yet for the participation of the mystery of the holy Eucharist; the Deacon crying to such, Ite, Missa est.
Yet here-anent in the general, with Bellarmine him-self we must affirm, that the liberty of using new words in the Church, (saith he) is a most dangerous thing; seeing piece and piece, by new words, new things them-selves do arise, when it is lawful for everyone to invent new names in matters that are Divine. Wherefore, (saith he) S. PAVLL did forbid profane Noveltie of words. And holy AUGUSTINE saith also, that Philosophers, indeed, use a liberty of new words, nor fear they not-with-standing of the offense of religious ears, when the same is done for the understanding of difficill things. But it is only lawful for us, (saith he) to speak according to a certain Rule, (to wit, Scripture) lest the liberty of words beget a wicked error, concerning those things which are signified thereby.
Therefore it is, that for the name, we choose rather to speak with Scripture, by calling that holy Sacrament, The LORD'S SUPPER, or The Communion, than to use any such name of a later stamp, three hundredth threescore & ten years after CHRIST, which the most ancient Fathers, as Origen, Epiphanius, Justin Martyr, and Jerome, (as witnesseth Bellarmine ) never used, and where-of as yet there is no mention in the Greek Church, (saith he:) So that as Jerome speaketh to Pammachius, so in the same words concerning this name of MASSE, we may say to any, Why after four hundredth years wouldest thou teach us now, that which hitherto was not known?
The main Controversy, then, standeth here-in, that they will have the Mass to signify, and the celebration thereof, to be really and properly, an external, essential, and truly propiatorie Sacrifice, for the quick and the dead, (as the Council of Trent decreeth to be believed, under pain of a Curse, Sess. 6. sub Pio 4. Cap. 1. Can. 1. & 2.) Where-in, externallie, by the hands of the Priest, and corporallie, the very body and blood of CHRIST, locallie there being on the Altar, is offered up to the Father, for the persons foresaid, and worshipped by the people, as CHRIST'S true body, with Divine Adoration. This we abhor, as a Lurd Error, and moste Idolatrous Practice, against the clear evidence of these SCRIPTURES following.
1. Authority of Scripture.
HEBR. 7.24. But this [ 1] Man, because He continueth forever, hath an unchangeable (or, as the RHEMISTS translate, an everlasting) Priesthood.
Where-upon (saith Aquinas ) There-fore, CHRIST ONLIE is our true Priest: and all others, they are but the Ministers of CHRIST, (saith he) as they are called 1. COR. 4.1. HAYMO like-wise, an ancient Father, gathereth another inference from hence, saying, Seeing JESUS is only immortal, He hath an eternal Priesthoode: neither can He have any to succeed to Him.
According to Aquinas, then, CHRIST being our only Priest under the Gospel, none other should be called so; but, according to the Scripture which he citeth, Ministers of CHRIST JESUS.
According also to HAYM • , CHRIST being immortal • imselfe, there are none under the Gospel as Priests, who can succeed to Him. Succ • ssion being only because of death, as testifieth the Apostle. Vers 25.
There-fore, to make any Priests by special Office, under the New Testament, to offer up any corporal sacrifice, is to make CHRIST'S Priesthood changeable, or separable from His own person; which is against the nature of His Priesthood, that cannot pass from one to another, (for so importeth the word) because of His own aeternitie. And to make such a plurality of Priests in CHRIST'S Priesthood, as Substitutes, or in any respect partakers of that Office with Him, is to praesuppose, that CHRIST was not able to do that Office alone; and, that He needeth others, to succeed Him: which argued imperfection in the Priesthood of Levi, and is contrary to this Text that saith, Because He continueth forever, He hath an unchangeable Priesthood, which cannot pass from one to another.
HEBR. 7.17. For He testifieth, [ 2] Thou art a Priest forever, after the Order of Melchizedek.
In which words, the Apostle having entered into a particular comparison, between the Levitical Priesthood, and CHRIST'S, to show the imperfection of the one, in respect of the other, he proveth the Excellencie of CHRIST'S Priesthoode, above the other, by the aeternitie thereof, in His own person, and the dignity of the Order, being a Priest after the Order of Melchizedek to whom none succeeded in that Office after him: and so none were to succeed to CHRIST.
So that CHRIST being a Priest after the Order of Melchizedek, the Apostle placeth in these two, to wit, Unity and Aeternitie: 1. Because Christ as only Priest under the Gospel, hath offered up Himself as a propitiatory Sacrifice on the Cross for us; to whom if any should succeed (though subordinate) in the offering up of such a Sacrifice properly, then Unity (according to the Apostle) were not a property of CHRIST'S Priesthood after the Order of Melchizedek.
Next, CHRIST'S Priesthood is eternal, both in respect of His intercession, Vers. 25. and of His sacrificing: not according to the act there-of, which was transient; but of the virtue and efficacy there-of, to save; which is eternal, and permanent. And so no iteration can be of that propitiatory sacrificing in the Mass after Him, without a direct impugning of CHRIST'S eternal Priesthoode.
HEBR. 7.27. Who needeth [ 3] not daily, as those high-Priests, to offer up Sacrifice, (which the RHEMISTS call HOSTES) &c. for this He did once, when He offered up Him-self.
Where-upon HAYMO concludeth, That this offering once, sufficeth therefore forever for propitiation, or taking away the sins of all the faithful, (saith he.)
Next; In that He did offer up Sacrifice but once; to wit, when He offered up Him-self upon the Cross; it is evident, that He offered up no propitiatory Sacrifice of Him-self a before in the last Supper. And, consequently, if the Mass-Priest do but what CHRIST did in the last Supper, it will follow, that he offereth up no propitiatory Sacrifice. Therefore, (saith Suarez the Jesuit ) there is no express mention in the History of the Gospel, of a Sacrifice, or Oblation, as also the fact of CHRIST, which is declared, might have been done by Him without any Sacrifice: to wit, the consecrating the Bread and Wine, and giving the same to His Disciples, without any intention of sacrificing, (saith he.)
And, in the same place, he reporteth, that the B • shop of Bitonto, and others also, at the Council of Trent, did defend, and maintain, that CHRIST, in that night of celebrating His last Supper, offered up no Sacrifice at all, For if He had offered up an • e propitiatory Sacrifice then, whereby the sins of the world had been expiated, then in His last Supper He behooved to have died: (For the Apostle ever joineth these together.) And so He had not needed to have died anymore.
Thirdly: The Sacrifice of the Evangelical Priest, who is CHRIST only, is said here, to be Him-self, who was holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the Heavens: Therefore in this point of offering Him-self, and in those excellent personal properties fore-named, seeing none can succeed; therefore neither can they in His Priesthoode any way.
HEBR. 10.14. For by one [ 4] Offering He hath perfected forever them who are sanctified.
Where-upon (saith Aquinas ) seeing, then, it is not to be reiterated, howe do we daily offer? I answer, (saith he) This is not another, but a commemoration of that which CHRIST offered, as He said, MATTH. 26. Do this in remembrance of Mee. Wherefore, if it be but a COMMEMORATION of CHRIST'S propitiatory Sacrifice, or Offering, then it is not that Offering it self. For the remembering of an action long since done, is not the action it self, or doing there-of. And we all grant, that the Sacrament may be called a Sacrifice commemoratiue: for there-by it will clearly follow, that it is not, then, properly propitiatory.
Agayne: If that one and once offering of CHRIST availeth forever, to the remission of sin, and perfecting, or perfectly saving of them who are sanctified; then it followeth necessarllie, that there is no more offering for sin: and, consequently, no more need of Sacrifices propitiatory.
[ 5] HEBR. 9.25. Nor yet was it necessary, that He should offer up Him-self often, &c. for then must He often have suffered.
Remarke, then, that it is all one in Scripture, CHRIST to be offered, and CHRIST to have suffered, His Passion and Death being inseparable from His Sacrifice: And, therefore, to offer CHRIST daily, is all one, as CHRIST to die, and to suffer daily: which seeing He doeth not, being now immortal, therefore He is not daily offered: and consequently, in the Mass, there is no propitiatory Sacrifice of Him really performed.
Next: The offering of CHRIST, is the personal action of CHRIST Him-self only, (as this place showeth:) there-fore none can, nor may offer Him really, by sacrificing, but Him-self. For the Priest must be either better, or at least as good, as the sacrifice. But none can be as good as CHRIST, let be better: therefore none can offer CHRIST in a proper propitiatory Sacrifice.
More-over: To imagine an offering of CHRIST often, is both to give the Lie to this TEXT, and to make CHRIST'S offering, by the repetition of it, imperfect, as was the Levitical: For if one offering of CHRIST be sufficient, then oftener offering is superfluous. And if often offering be needful, then that once offering was not sufficient; and, consequently, imperfect: which were blasphemous to affirm. Wherefore, if any pretend to offer CHRIST often, he hath no warrand from CHRIST; but, so far as in him lieth, maketh CHRIST'S Offering imperfect, and usurpeth a Priesthood, whereunto GOD never called him.
[ 6] HEBR. 9.22. Without shedding of blood, there is no remission.
Where-by was praefigured, that the remission of sins, behooved to be (saith AQVINAS) by the blood of CHRIST. If, therefore, without the shedding of blood, there be no remission, then it will follow, that where there is no shedding of blood, there is no remission. But so it is, That in the Mass, there is no shedding of blood, (for they call it, there-fore, an unbloody sacrifice:) there-fore, in the Mass, there is no remission. Wherefore, an unbloody propitiatory sacrifice for sin, is a vain imagination, which the Apostle acknowledgeth not; else were his words here altogether untrue; which is blasphemous to affirm. Either, there-fore, must such as pretend to offer CHRIST, for obtaining the remission of sin, grant, That they shed the Bloode of CHRIST daily, as those who crucified Him: or else, that by their offering, no remission of sin is procured: And so, their Sacrifice in the Mass, is no ways properly Propitiatorie.
[ 7] HEBR. 10.18. Now, where remission of sin is, there is no more offering for sin.
To subsume, then; But remission of sin, is allreadie purchased, under the Gospel, by that true and only propitiatory sacrifice of CHRIST upon the Cross: There-fore, for the purchasing there-of, there is not under the Gospel anymore propitiatory sacrifices to be offered up.
Where also remark, that he saith not, No sacrifice anymore is to be offered up for sin; but, No offering, bloody or unbloody. That Church, there-fore, which praetendeth to offer up any propitiatory offering for the sins of the quick or the dead, under the Gospel, professeth, in-deed, that there is no remission of sins to be had in her: Because, where there is remission of sin, there is no more offering for sin, saith the Apostle expresslie.
2. Witnessing of Antiquity.
CHRYSOSTOME, speaking of that Propitiatorie Sacrifice upon the Cross, he saith thus of the SACRAMENT; The Symbol and sign, where-of is this Sacrifice, (saith he.) And again; We offer up (saith he) that same Sacrifice which CHRIST offered. Or rather, (by correcting his speech) We celebrate or act the remembrance of that Sacrifice of His. So likewise saith EVSEBIVS, that after CHRIST had offered up that admirable and excellent Sacrifice to His Father, for the salvation of all, He instituted, (saith he) that we should offer up the remembrance of that benefit, in place of a sacrifice to GOD.
We see, then, that these two call it a sacrifice commemoratiue. Now followeth S. AMBROSE, calling it both Commemoratiue and Representatiue, saying; Because we are delivered by CHRIST'S death, as myndfull there-of, in eating and drinking, we represent that Body and Blood, which was sacrificed for us.
3. Confession of party.
THAT which is offered up, and consecrated, by the Priest, is called a Sacrifice and Offering, ( saith LOMBARD) because it is the Rememberance and Representation of that true Sacrifice, and holy Immolation, which was made vpō the Altar of the Cross, AQVINAS also giveth this to be the reason, why it is called a Sacrifice: Both because the celebration of this Sacrament, (saith he) is an Image and representation of the Passion of CHRIST; as also, because by this Sacrament, we are made part-takers of the 〈◊〉 of the LORD'S Passion. Where-fore also saith the Gloss upon the Pope's Decretal; where it is said, that in this mystery, CHRIST dieth, and His fl • sh suffereth: that is, (saith the Gloss) His Death, and Suffering, is there represented.
The Contents Of the second part of this Treatise.
-
CHAPTER I.
- OF Scripture, wherein Whether the Books [ 1] commonly called Apocrypha, are Canonicke Scripture. PAG. 1.
- Whether all doctrines for [ 2] faith and manners, are contained therein, without unwritten traditions. PAG. 3.
- Of the obscurity of Scripture, [ 3] and if people therefore, should be debarred from reading the same. PAG. 12.
-
CHAPT. II.
-
Of the Church, wherein
- [ 1] Of the perpetual and conspicuous visibility thereof. PAG. 20.
- [ 2] Of the infallibility thereof, which endeth into the Popes infallibility. PAG. 26.
- [ 3] Of the Popes supremacy, as the head thereof. PAG. 34.
-
CHAPT. III.
-
Of Religious worship, wherein
- [ 1] Of the invocation of Saints. PAG. 40.
- [ 2] Of prayer to Angels. PAG. 48.
- [ 3] Of representing GOD by an Image. PAG. 52.
- Of the worship of Images. [ 4] PAG. 53.
- Of the adoration of Relics. [ 5] PAG. 58.
-
CHAPT. IV.
- Of free-will in our vocation. PAG. 67.
-
CHAPT. V.
- Of Justification, the true and proper cause thereof. PAG. 76.
-
CHAPT. VI.
- Of Sanctification, and ability of keeping GOD'S Law. PAG. 83.
-
CHAPT. VII.
- Of Glorification, and whether good works can merit the same. PAG. 92.
-
CHAPT. VIII.
- Of Purgatory. PAG. 107.
-
CHAPT. IX.
-
Of the SACRAMENTES, wherein
- [ 1] Of the absolute necessity of Baptism. PAG. 125.
- [ 2] Of TRANSSVBSTANTIATION. PAG. 128.
- [ 3] Of half Communion. PAG. 132.
- [ 4] Of the Sacrifice of the MASSE. PAG. 136.
-
CHAPT. X.
-
Of the five bastard Sacraments, to wit,
- [ 1] Confirmation. PAG. 147.
- [ 2] MARRIAGE. PAG. 150.
- [ 3] Penance, and auricular Confession. PAG. 153 and 156.
- Holy Ordours. PAG. 161. [ 4]
- Extreame unction. PAG. 163. [ 5]
ERROUR'S Arraignment.
CHAPTER I. Of Scripture.
SECT. I. Whether those Books, which are called Apocrypha, be Canonik Scripture; as the Romanists affirm; pretending for thē these places following.
THE Apostles, PETER and JAMES, cite in their EPISTLES, (in the places mentioned in the margin) the Book of ECCLESIASTICVS, CHAP. 14.17: where it is said, All flesh waxeth old, as a garment: E • go, ECCLESIASTICVS, which is cited by them, is Canonicke Scripture. This reason is used by Sixtus Senensis.
Answer. The words used by both these Apostles, are, All flesh is grass; or, as the flower of the grass; and are borrowed out of ISAI, 40.6. where the Prophet saith, All flesh is grass, and the glory there-of, as the flower of the field. And this both the Jesuits, LORINVS and SALMERON, on the first of PETER, testify. And therefore also the Rhemistes have quoted ISAI on the margin of 1. PETER 1.24.
ROM. 11.34. The Apostle [ 2] (say they) borroweth those words which he hath in that place out of the Book of WISDOME, 9.13. where it is said, For what man is he that can know the counsel of GOD? or who can think what the will of GOD is? ERGO, The Book of WISDOME, from whence they have borrowed, is Canonicke Scripture.
Answer. Thomas Aquinas, Cardinal Cajetan, and Dominicus à Soto, all three famous Romanists, writing on that place to the ROMANES, do all in one voice agree, That the words which the Apostle borroweth, are out of ISAI. In like manner, Chap. 40. verse 13. where the words of ISAI come nearer the Apostle's words, than those of the Book of WISDOME; and the sense is the same.
SECT. II. Whether all doctrines of faith are contained in Scripture, without unwritten Traditions? which the Romanists deny, using these Arguments.
[ 1] JOHN 16.12. I have yet many things to say unto you, (saith CHRIST) but now ye cannot bear them. These (say they) were higher mysteries, which He would only entrust to them there-after, by verbal tradition.
Answer. S. Augustine saith, That it is presumption, to determine what those things were. And Cyril telleth us clearly, That they were not mysteries, or doctrines, of Faith; but relations of things to come, such as S. John got in Patmos, and are written. Therefore, (saith he) CHRIST seeing His Disciples desirous to know things to come, reproveth them not; but promiseth, That they should get knowledge thereof, in a fitter time.
Augustine also showeth, that this same Text was abused of old by those Heretics, who for maintaining their Erroures, pretended unwritten tradition, saying, Those seek to color their devyces, by the pretext of this GOSPELL, I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them.
JOHN 21.25. If all were [ 2] written which JESUS did, the world could not contain the Books there-of. Here, (say they) beside Scripture, we see many things that are known only by unwritten tradition.
Answer. S. Cyril (and with him Augustine ) showeth, That the Evangelist speaketh only of CHRIST'S miraculous actions, and not of doctrines of Faith, (whereof only is the question:) And herein he witnesseth clearly, with us, the perfection of Scripture, saying, All which our LORD did, are not written, indeed; but what the Wryters thought sufficient (saith he) both for Faith and Manners.
[ 3] 1. COR. 2.6. We speak wisdom amongst those who are perfect, (saith S. PAVLL:) That is, Some mysteries of Faith, (say they) which are meet only to be taught the more learned, by verbal tradition.
Answer. S. Chrysostom saith, (and with him Ambrose and Jerome ) that by the speaking of Wisdom, is meant generally the preaching of the Gospel; and that by the perfect, not a few more learned, but all believers are understood, who aim and tend to perfection. And if we will hear two famous late Romanists, Estius (public Professor of Divinity, and Chancellar of DOWAY) he saith, and with him a Jesuit, Cornelius à Lapide, That by Wisdom, is understood, the high mysteries of Religion, that are contained in PAVLL 's Epistles; (and consequently, are written:) and that by Perfect, those are meant, who are able for stronger meat, opposed to others that are Babes in CHRIST, and have yet need of Milk, according to Hebr. 5.12.
Irenaeus likewise testifieth, That this Text was wrested so of old, by some Heretics, who taught, (saith he) that the Truth could not be found out of the Scripture, by those to whom Tradition was unknown; for as much as it was not delivered by writing, but by word of mouth: for which cause S. PAVLL saith, We speak wisdom amongst them who are perfect.
1. TIM. 6.20. O Timothy, [ 4] keep that which is committed to thy trust. Which (say they) were unwritten traditions.
Answer. Vincentius Lyrinensis expoundeth this, to be the whole talent of the Orthodox Faith, (or, as S. Jerome and Primasius call it, The preaching and revealing of the whole counsel of God) Unto the instruction whereof, he affirmeth clearly, That the Canon of Scripture, is perfectly sufficient.
Lykewyse, (saith the Jesuit à Lapide ) it is certain, that by this Depositum, (generally) sound doctrine is understood. Therefore the Apostle inculcateth, (saith he) That he avoid new and false [ 6] doctrines, and defend the ancient true Faith: or, (as Estius saith) that he admit no new Articles of faith, but those which CHRIST delivered to His Apostles. Now, all such which were necessary for all men, (saith Bellarmine ) were written; and, consequently, by the former Text, unwritten traditions are not understood.
Tertullian also showeth, That this Text was wrested of old, by Heretics, for defense of unwritten traditions, saying, The Heretics confess, indeed, that the Apostles were ignorant of nothing, and differed not amongst themselves in preaching. But they say, (saith Tertullian ) that they revealed not all things unto all men: but some they delivered openly, and to all; and some things secretly, and to a few. For thus saith S. PAVLL to TIMOTHY, O Timothy, keep that which is concredited to thy trust.
2. THESS. 2.15. Stand [ 5] fast, therefore, Brethren, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or by our Epistle. Ergo, Beside Scripture, (say they) we see unwritten traditions.
Answer. Nicephorus and Theodoret, show, That the Apostle speaketh not of diverse doctrines, some written, and some not at all: but of the same doctrines diverslie delivered; to wit, by word, he being present with them; and the same by Epistle, he being absent from them: or first spoken, and then written: but not some written, and some to remain only and ever, as unwritten Traditions. Therefore, saith Nicephorus, Those things which being present, he only taught by word; being absent, he delivered unto them by Epistle, eadem, the same things; recalling them so by an abridgement, to their memories.
So likewise saith Theodoret, in the person of the Apostle, speaking thus, Ye have for a rule of your faith, (saith he) our Sermones, which both we preached to you by word, and wrote the SAME to you in our Epistles.
In like manner, (saith Aquinas, writing on PAVLL's words to the PHILIPPIANS,) To write those same things unto you in my absence, which before I spake unto you being present, is not grievous unto me: For words soon pass away, but writing doeth abide.
Or suppose that some doctrines had been taught to this people of Thessalonica, by word, which had not been written unto them by Epistle, it followeth not, that they were not written to others, or else-where in Scripture. Yea, in the contrary, Bellarmine proveth, that that which was preached by word to this people, was written else-where in Scripture: because he saith plainly, That all things were written by the Apostles, which they publicklie preached to any people, or was necessary to salvation.
1. COR. 11.34. The rest [ 6] I will dispose when I come, (saith S. PAVLL.) Which he was to do by word only, or unwritten tradition, (say they.)
Answer. He speaketh not of doctrines of Faith, (whereof only is the question) but as Chrysostom, Oecumenius, and Haymo, do testify, such things as belong only to external order in the Sacrament.
This also doeth Lombard, Cajetan, and Aquinas, witness.
As also, (saith their late Estius, and with him à Lapide ) by THE REST, he understandeth those things which belong to a worthy, honest, and orderlie celebration of those mysteries. And again else-where; He speaketh of those things, (saith he) which belong to external worship, and are ceremonies.
SECT. 3. Whether Scripture be obscure? And that therefore people should be debarred from reading the same? Which the Romanists would prove, by these places following.
PSAL. CXIX. 18. and 34. [ 1] Open mine eyes (saith DAVID) that I may see the wonders of thy Law: and give me understanding, that I may search thy Law. If, then, the Scripture was so obscure to such a one as David, (say they) howe much more is it so to others?
ANSWERE. Non legis ista criminatio, (saith Chrysostom ) that is not the fault of the Law it self, that David saw not the wonders thereof. And therefore Jerome notably showeth, That he humbly confesseth, his own natural blindness, to be the cause; whereas the Law it self was a Lamp, and a Lantern, enlightening the eyes, and making wise the simple.
Neither ceaseth he, therefore, to search GOD'S Law, because he wanteth understanding: but rather because he was to read and search it, therefore he desireth understanding. And so this Text maketh rather for reading of the Scripture, than any ways against it.
[ 2] ACTS 8.30.31. Understandest thou these things which thou readest? (saith PHILIP to the Eunuch.) who said, How can I, without a guide?
Answer. This maketh no ways against us; the question being not, Whether some places of Scripture be obscure, needing interpretation? But, Whether people should not, therefore, read the same at all? Whereas the laudable practice of this Eunuch, not being rebuked for reading, but getting thereby the place expounded unto him, giveth evidence in the contrary, That it was lawful, and he got good by reading. Whence their own Carthusiane collecteth, saying, Great was the care of this heathen man; and his diligence, (saith he) condemneth our negligence, of learning holy Scripture.
Wherefore also S. Chrysostom, exhorting the people, to read the holy Scriptures, giveth them this direction, saying, That which is easy to be understood, get it by heart; and those things that are obscure, read them over often. And if by doing so, thou canst not find out the meaning, then go to him that is thy Teacher, (saith he.)
2. PET. 3.16. In which, [ 3] (to wit, PAVLL's Epistles) are some things hard to be understood.
Answer. This no ways militateth against us, who grant, with the Apostle, that some things are obscure: but he saith not, that all places are so, and, therefore, not to be read by people; Paul 's own direction, to such as he wrote, and his ende of writing, being in the contrary.
Therefore, Augustine saith well, That GOD hath so graciously and wholsomlie tempered the Scripture, that by the plain places He might satisfy our hunger; and by the obscure places, wype away our loathsomeness. And in those places, (saith he) which are clearly set down in Scripture, all those things are set down, which concern both Faith and Manners. Which thing Chrysostom like-wise affirmeth: and with him, a famous Pope, Gregory the first.
Next: PETER speaketh here of the mysteries, or things themselves, whereof S. PAVLL writeth: but not of his manner of writing; which both Lorinus the Jesuit, and Estius, acknowledge, writing on this place.
4. REV. 5.1. And I saw in the right hand of him that sat on the Throne, a Book written within, and on the back-side sealed with seven seals. Which (say they) was to signify the obscurity of Scripture.
Answer. Beda, Ambrose, and Haymo, with other Fathers, who comment on this place, expound this Book, to be the obscure prophesies in the Olde Testament of the Messias to come; and the opening thereof by the Lamb, to be their fulfilling, and clearing, by the coming of CHRIST.
But the Jesuit Ribera showeth, That thereby is meant, the prophesy of those things which shall fall forth in the last times; according as Andrew, Arch-Bishop of Cesarea, expoundeth: and by most pithy reasons he proveth, That by this Book, the Scripture cannot be meant; whereof this is one: That John saw this Book then sealed, even when this Revelation was made unto him: before which time, many of the Apostles were dead. If by this Book, then, the Scripture were understood; then it would follow, (saith he) that the very Apostles, upon whom the holy Ghost descended, in their time understood not the Scripture: but that it was sealed to PETER & PAUL, and the rest who died before this Revelation was made unto Saynct JOHN.
[ 5] JOHN 7.49. But as for this people, they know not the Law. Loe here, (say they) an evidence, that the people in Christ's days read not the Scripture.
Answer. Their own Cardinal TOLET showeth, That this was the pride of those Pharisees, being blind guydes them-selves, (as our Savior called them) and yet imputing ignorance of the Law, and of the true meaning thereof, to the people who believed; while as they did know the Law, and Word of GOD, better than themselves, who believed not.
Also the Jesuit Maldonado showeth, That as Rupertus holdeth, according to DEVT. 27.26. not to know the Law, is as much as not to obscrue the Law. And therefore, that the Pharisees did not maliciouslie so much impute ignorance of the Law, to such as believed in CHRIST, as impiety, to make them there-by more odious.
CHAPTER II. Of the Church.
SECT. I. Of the conspicuous visibility of the CHURCH, in the true Professoures there-in, at all times, and to all persons; as the Romanists hold, pretending these Arguments.
[ 1] MATTH. 5.14. A City that is set on an hill, cannot be hid. That is, (say they) the true Church, shall ever be conspicuous.
Answer. Chrysostom and Theophylact, on this place, show, That our Savior speaketh not of the Churches visibility; but of Pastoures their duty there-in: to wit, That being set in eminent Places, as Lights on Candle-sticks, or a City on an hill, therefore, they should shine in the sight of all, both in sincere Doctrine, and an holy life.
This also doeth their own Lyra, Ferus, and Carthusian, declare. And their late Jesuit Maldonado, telleth us, That by these three similitudes of Salt, Light, and of a City, our Savior would declare one, and the same thing: to wit, Howe far beyond other common Christians, His Apostles, and their Successoures, should eminentlie shine, both in life and doctrine.
PSAL. 19.4. He placed [ 2] His Tabernacle, in the Sun. That is, (say they) He hath appointed His Church, where-in He abideth, to be ever gloriouslie, and conspicuouslie visible, as the Sun.
Answer. The words are, (as their own Arias Montanus, and Paguin, set down,) In them hath He set a Tabernacle for the Sun. That is, In the Heavens, as the Text showeth, and as S. Jerome and Theodoret truly expound.
Thus also saith their own Lyra, In the Hebrew, (saith he) and in S. Jerome 's Translation, which is according to the Hebrew, it is said, In them He set a Tabernacle for the Sun. That is, He hath set a seat for the Sun, in the midst of the Planets. So that this place showeth, where the Sun is set in Heaven; but not howe the Church is visible ever on earth.
The Rhemistes also expound this place thus; By the Sun, a most excellent, and super-elementarie creature, the Prophet descrybeth CHRIST; making His course thorough the world, illuminating, comforting, and strengthening the Church His Tabernacle, wherein He perpetuallie dwelleth.
[ 3] ISAI. 2.1. In the latter days, the Mountayne of the House of the LORD shall be prepared in the top of the Mountaynes: And it shall be lifted up above the little hills: And all Nations shall flowe unto it. Whence, therefore, it followeth, (say they) that it must be conspicuouslie ever visible.
Answer. All that here-by is meant, Procopius showeth to be this; to wit, That in the latter days, the Christian Church shall be firmlie built, upon the foundations (saith he) of the Prophets, and Apostles, as on the tops of mountains; and shall be of greater excellency, above the Church of the Jews, as CHRIST in glory is above Moses; and of greater and more ample extent, in like manner, because of the conversion of the Gentiles, by the preaching of the Apostles, at that time, according to CHRIST'S Commission, saying unto them, Go teach all nations.
Their own Lyra, Pintus, and Perusin, commenting on this place, jump with Procopius, and declare, That this prophesy was fulfilled in the Apostles times, as said is: but never a one of them affirmeth, That this Text proveth a conspicuous constant visibility of the true Church, of Orthodox Professoures, at all times, and to all; which the very Rhemistes themselves grant, is not ever to be expected. And, consequently, the former Texts do not prove the same.
MATTH. 18.17. If thy [ 4] Brother offend against thee, tell the Church. Therefore, (say they) the Church must be ever visible.
Answer. Origen, Chrysostom • , and Hilary, commenting on this place, show, That by the Church, not the Universal, but a particular Church, or Congregation, or those who are set over the same, is meant. Whence also it will only follow, That such a Church is visible, to her own members: but not so to her raging foes, in time of persecution. As the Rhemistes tell us, That in the time of Antichrist, the faithful then who lurk, shall, notwithstanding, amongst themselves, have their communion in secret: whereby they may do, as this Text directeth.
MATTH. 16.18. Upon [ 5] this rock I will build my Church; and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it. To wit, (say they) to make it to be invisible.
Answer. Chrysostom, (and with him Origen ) showeth, That this not prevailing, is only, That CHRIST'S Church shall never decline from the Truth, nor forsake the same, notwithstanding of the furious assaults of raging Persecution, stirred up against Her: which maketh Her sound members, some times, so to lurk, as S. Jerome telleth us, that the little Boat of the true Church, seemeth, as it were, sunk out of sight.
Lykewyse, the Promise is, (saith their own Carthusian ) that the Elect, of whom chiefly the Church consisteth, shall not possibly be drawn from the Faith: or, as Lyra saith, subverted there from.
SECT. II. Of the Churches infallibility, which endeth into the infallibility of the Pope, as hath been shown in the stating of the Question: and which they labor to establish, by these places following.
[ 1] DEVTER. 17.9.12. There (say they) in doubtsome matters, men are directed to the high Priest, and his Council: and whosoever hearkeneth not to him, shall die. Therefore, this praesupposeth, that his judgment was infallible: and therefore, so is the Pope's, being the high Priest under the GOSPELL.
Answer. This place speaketh of the Priests and Levites, and not of the high Priest, with whom the Civil Judge is joined, (as their own Lyra, and the Text, showeth) whose determination is not in matters of Faith, but of Fact: to wit, Of strife between man and man. Whereas though it were of Faith, yet (saith their own Lyra ) note, that it is not said unto thee, that thou shalt obey them, except they teach thee according to the Law. And whereby is evident, (saith he) if they decree that which is false, or declyne manifestly from the Law of GOD, that they are not to be heard. Which thing was needless to have been said, either by the Text, or Lyra, if they had had absolute infallibility.
Cyprian also applieth this, against all such as are disobedient to any Bishop, or Priest, directing them according to the word: to whom, notwithstanding, the Romanists grant not infallibility.
Neither would it follow, though the high Priest under the Law had been infallible, (as the examples of Aaron and Uriah prove the contrary) that therefore the Pope is so, because he is the high Priest under the Gospel: because this is to take for granted, that which is denied.
[ 2] LUKE 22.32. Simon, I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not. Which prayer, (say they) was for PETER, and all his Successoures, that they should not err.
Answer. Beda and Bonaventure show, That CHRIST spake here of PETER only personally, as His designation by name importeth, Simon, Simon: to wit, though he erred in denying CHRIST, and so foulie fell; yet, that he might not finally fall away, as Judas did, therefore also saith Theophylact, I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not. That is, Altho for a short while thou be shaken, yet that the hid seed of faith within thee may remain. But that CHRIST in this Prayer, prayed not likewise for PETER's pretended Successoures, Bishops of Rome, their own Lyra, with diverse others, declareth, saying, that the Churches stability consisteth not in men neither in regard of their Ecclesiastic or secular power & dignity; seeing many Princes, and Popes too, (saith he) as well as other inferioures, have been found to have made Apostasy from the Faith.
Neither is there any doubt, (saith their Carthusian ) but that He prayed for all other His Apostles, having said, Satan hath desired to winnow you. But why there-after He said this to PETER particularly, I have prayed for thee, CHRYSOSTOME giveth the reason; That it was to fore-tell him, that he was more grievouslie to fall, than all the rest.
[ 3] MATTH. 16.18. Thou art Peter, and upon this Rock I will build my Church. That is, (say they) upon PETER, and his Successoures, who shall be immovable in the Faith.
Answer. Their own Cardinal Petrus de Aliaco, showeth the contrary, saying, Who is that would build the firmness, or stability of the Church, upon PETER's infirmity? Of whose infirmity, ask the Mayde (saith he) that kept the door, and she will tell thee, Where-fore, saith their own Ferus, It is moste evident, that CHRIST did not build His Church upon PETER, or any other man who-so-ever. For there is no man who-so-ever, so firm, or constant, (saith he) who may not be moved, or shaken; which thing in PETER we manifestly see. See then in Rivet, p. 303. Quid Petra.
Lyke-wise Ambrose and Origen do show, That this which was spoken to PETER, was like-wise spoken to all the other Apostles: and there-fore would infer alike infallibility of all their Successoures.
Their own Cardinal Cusanus also saith, There is nothing said to PETER, which was not said unto all the rest. For, as it was said unto PETER, What-soever thou shalt bind on earth, &c. was it not said unto all the rest, (saith he) What-so-ever ye shall bind? And, altho it was said to Peter, Thou art Peter, and upon this Rock I will build my Church; yet by the Rock, (saith he) we understand CHRIST Him-self, whom he confessed. And if PETER were to be understood by this Rock, as a ground-stone of the Church, according to Saint Jerome, Are not (saith he) the other Apostles ground-stones of the Church in like manner? Of whom it is spoken in the penult of the REVELATION, where by the twelve stones of the foundation of that City HIERVSALEM, which is the holy Church, no man doubteth, (saith he) but the Apostles ought to be understood.
[ 4] JOHN 11.51. And this he spake, not of him-self, but being high Priest that year. Therefore, (say they) as prophetical infallibility was in Caiaphas, as the high Priest under the Law; So is the privilege of INFALLIBILITIE tied to the Pope, as high Priest under the Gospel.
Answer. First, this is to take that as granted, which we still deny. Next, Chrysostom and Ambrose, on these same words, show, That the high Priest's intention was wicked, and his sentence according there-unto, moste erroneous. There-fore, saith their own Cardinal Tolet, Remarke, that Caiaphas sentence, in that sense as he conceived it, (saith he) was moste wicked, and did proceed (saith Cyril ) from him-self, and not from the holy Ghost. But in so far, as the virtue of CHRIST'S death was declared there-by, this the LORD would have to be uttered by his mouth, in regard of the quality, and authority, of the person; as whose speeches were of moste special remark, and weight amongst the people; and not because INFALLIBILITIE was tied to his Chair: the contrary where-of kythed, when judiciallie sitting in CATHEDRA, he pronounced CHRIST'S Profession of His own DEITIE, to be open blasphemy.
[ 5] As for that of our Savior's, MATTH. 28.20. Loe, I am with you always, even unto the ende of the world; which they would have to be tied to the Pope only, with his Council, for establishing their INFALLIBILITIE.
Cardinal Turrecremata declareth, That this is so to be taken, (saith he) that GOD doeth so assist His Church to the ende of the world, that there shall be ever some, altho not all, who have true faith, (saith he) working by charity. And so that this promise is not tied to any one person, or particular Church.
SECT. III. Of the Pope's Supremacy over the CHURCH, as head there-of: Which the Romanists would establish, by these TEXTS following.
JOHN 21.17. JESUS [ 1] saith unto him, Feede My Sheep. That is, (say they) be thou only governor over the whole Church.
Answer. Augustine testifieth, saying, When it was said to PETER, it was said to all the Apostles, Lovest thou Mee? then feed My Sheep. So saith S. Ambrose: and more expresslie saith S. Cyprian, That there-fore the rest of the Apostles were the self-same that PETER was, endued with a-like Fellowship, (saith he) both of Honor, and Power.
Which thing also their own Ferus doeth clearly homologate; as like-wise their famous Cardinal Cusanus, saying, If it was spoken to PETER, Feed My Sheep, yet it is manifest, (saith he) that this feeding, was but by the Word, and his holy example: and that according to S. Augustine, in his Commentary upon these words, the same was commanded there like-wise unto all others, in saying, Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel unto every creature. So that nothing is spoken to PETER, (saith he) which importeth any other power. And, there-fore, we conclude rightly, (saith the Cardinal) That all the Apostles were equal in power with PETER.
[ 2] MATTH. 16.19. And I will give unto thee the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven.
Aunswere. Besides Scripture, which showeth unto us, That the power signified by those keys, was given unto all the rest of the Apostles, the Fathers also clearly witness the same: There-fore, saith Jerome, (and with him Origen, Theophylact, Augustine, and Beda ) The whole Disciples received the Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven: and, what was said to PETER, was common to all the rest.
And in like manner, their own Cardinal Cusanus, (and with him Ferus, and others) We know, that PETER received no more power from CHRIST, (saith he) than the other Apostles: For there was nothing spoken to PETER, which was not spoken to the rest. For, as it was said to PETER, (saith he) What-so-ever thou shalt bind on earth; was not the same said also to others, Whatso-ever ye shall bind? Yea, not only was this said to all the Apostles; but (as Theophylact saith) to all their Successoures. Whence it should follow, That as many Bishops and Pastors were in the Church, so many Monarchs and Lord's should be over the same; and Stewardes, or Porters, who have the Keys, should be Masters in the Families wherein they are.
[ 3] LUKE 22.32. When thou art converted, strengthen thy Brethren. Loe here, (say they) a power given to PETER, over all his Brethren.
Aunswere. Besides Scriptural speeches, which prove. That this importeth no Monarchicke Supremacy, Beda giveth this exposition, as if CHRIST had said, Remember, by the example of thy repentance, (saith he) to raise up, and comfort any Brethren that are weak; lest they, perhaps, should despare of pardon. So like-wise saith Theophylact; Being converted, that is, repenting, and pouring out tears, and rising from thy Fall, be thou an example to others, (saith he) that they repent like-wise, and despare not.
And so like-wise doeth their own Lyra, Stella, and Maldonado, expound: collecting from this place, no Papal or Monarchicke Supremacy.
LUKE 22.26. He that is [ 4] greatest amongst you, let him be as the younger, &c. Where we see, (say they) That amongst the Apostles, one was greatest; and this, doubtless, was PETER.
Answer. MATTHEW showeth, That it was not, that one was greatest indeed: but that amongst them some would be greatest. And therefore saith Ambrose, Unto all the Apostles, is given one plat-form of interdiction, (saith he) that none of them should vaunt of Preeminence. Lykewyse, their own Lyra, Carthusian, and Stella, show, That here the Apostles were taxed by CHRIST, of Ambition; for the contention of some, for a Preeminence above the rest, which was equally inhibited unto all.
CHAPT. III. Of Religious Worship.
SECT. I. Of the invocation of Sayncts; which the Romanists would defend, by these places following.
[ 1] GENES. 48.16. Let my name be in-called upon them, and the name of my fathers. Hence (say they) we see an invocation, not only of GOD, but of Saints departed.
Answer. This Text proveth no such thing: For it saith not, Let my name be in-called upon by them: but, be named upon them. That is, Let them from hence-forth be called and accounted as my sons: Even as it is clear by a-like form of speech, ISAI. 4.1. and ANOS 9.12. Where-upon saith Ribera, The Name of GOD is named upon any people, when they are called GOD'S peculiar people. And there-fore Fonseca, Pintus, and other Popish Interpreters, agree, That this is a phrase peculiar to the Hebrews, to say, That the name of any man is named upon another, for to be named after such a one; as is clear, (say they) out of ISAI. 4. and DAN. 9. The Rhemistes also so translate this place, be my name called upon them: and affirm only, That this importeth, That they were made participant amongst the Trybes, of the Blessinges of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; for whose sake the LORD would bless them.
Which sort of speech Jacob used here, (saith LYRA) because they were to be called, the adoptive sons of Jacob, and heads of two Trybes. Therefore saith Vatablus, This is the meaning, Let them here-after be called my sons, and the sons of Abraham and Isaac. And by which words, (saith their own Ferus ) he meaneth none other thing, than that they should be called his sons, even as his other sons were called: For, by this speech, he adopted them to be so. So saith Emmanuell Sa, Let my name be named upon them: that is, Let them be called my sons, and of Abraham and Isaac. And so saith Mariana, in the same words.
[ 2] JOB 5.1. Call now, if any will answer thee: and turn thee to some of the Saints. Which Text, (say the Rhemistes ) showeth the common faith and practice, of invocating Sayncts, in that time.
Answer. The words, (as their own Arias Montanus translateth) contain not a direction, but a question, saying, To whom of the Saints wilt thou turn? The meaning where-of, their own LYRA expoundeth to be this, That Eliphaz telleth Job, that seeing GOD answereth him not in his affliction, to whom other can he have recourse? For thou shalt not have the Saints (saith he) to be thine Helpers, seeing He answereth not. And so this Text is rather against any such invocation, than with it.
Cardinal Cajetan also affirmeth, That here by Eliphaz would show to Job, that his innocence, which he maintained so, was so bad a cause, as he would get none to defend the like: no, not the holiest, who would plead such innocence as he did. Or, as Ferus and Mercerus say, who would approve his speeches.
More-over: It is a wonder, that they would bring any such place, to prove invocation of Saints under the Olde Testament: seeing Eckius, and other Romanists, give this as the reason, why any such was not; Because the Patriarchs, and Saints, then, were in LIMBVS PATRVM, and heard not the Prayers of the living: according to that of ISAI. 63.16. Abraham did not know us, &c.
3. ROM. 15.30. S. PAUL prayeth the ROMANS, to pray to GOD for him: Therefore, (say they) if we may pray the living; why not much more the Saints departed, to pray for us, seeing their charity is greater?
Answer. Saynct PAVLL did pray them; that is, Christianlie desire them: but did not pray to them; that is, religiouslie worship them. So that the one is a lawful action, warranded by the Word; the other, as S. Augustine saith, is a Religious Adoration, done by Religions Rites; illicite, and contrary to the Word, to be given to any creature.
Lyke-wise, INVOCATION, (as the Papists acknowledge) is an acknowledging of a Superioritie, in those whom they in-call. But I hope they will not say, That the Romans, whom PAVLL requested, had any Superioritie over him, being an Apostle. Nor yet, That altho our SAVIOR besought the Samaritan Woman, to give Him a draught of Water, that there-fore He invocated her.
Nor will it follow, Because we put up our Requestes to men, for any good we stand in need of, who are alive, and have mutual commerce with us, hearing us, and knowing our necessities; That there-fore we may religiouslie invocate them, when they are dead. When that commerce ceaseth, they hear us not, nor know our particular condition.
Besides: They make the Sayncts in Heaven, not only joint-Petitioners with us, (as those on earth) but joint-Advocates with CHRIST, to plead, by their merits, for us. There-fore, saith LOMBARD, setting down their Doctrine, We pray to the Saints, to intercede for us: that is, (saith he) that their merits may help us. Whereas S. Ambrose, and with him Augustine, do teach, That this is so proper to CHRIST, as nothing is more proper.
4. 2. PET. 1.15. And I will do my diligence, you to have often, after my decease also, that you may keep a memory of these things. Signifying, (say the Rhemistes ) that his care over them should not cease by death: meaning, of his Intercession for them.
Answer. 1. The Text is corrupted, which saith, I will endeavor, that you may be able after my deceasse, to have these things always in remembrance: to wit, as verse 13. by his frequent stirring them up, and exhortation, so long as he was alive. 2. Yeelding to their translation, yet the same, as also their exposition, should prove only PETER'S care over them, and intercession for them; which is nothing to this question, of our praying to Saints; and not of their Intercession for us. And 3. AQVINAS giveth this as the true meaning, saying in the person of the Apostle, Because I am shortly to depart, I will endeavor: to wit, so long as I am alive, by admonishing you, not only once, but often times, and diligently, That ye may have these things in remembrance. So also doeth Cardinal HVGO, CAIETANE, CARTHVSIAN, and their late ESTIVS, expound: where also he noteth the Verbe 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , doeth not agree to the Saints in Bliss.
SECT. II. Of the invocation of Angels: which the Romanists would establish as lawful, by these Scriptures following.
GENES. 48.16. The Angel [ 1] which delivered me from all evil, bless the Children.
Aunswere. This ANGELL was JESUS CHRIST, the Great ANGELL of the COVENANT: for so saith S. Cyril; First, he prayed to GOD, to bless the Children; and with GOD, he prayeth also the Angel that delivered him from all evil. So that by GOD, he understandeth the Father; and by the Angel, he understandeth the WORD of the Father, (saith he:) For he was not ignorant, that His Name was The Angel of the Great Council.
Lyke-wise, saith Athanasius, (and with him Procopius ) It is clear, that the Patriarch Jacob coupled none other in his Prayers with GOD, but His WORD; which he, there-fore, calleth the ANGELL; Because (saith he) He only revealeth His Father's will.
REVEL. 1.4. Grace be [ 2] unto you, and peace, from Him which is, and which was, & which is to come, and from the seven spirits which are before the Throne, &c. That is, (say they) From the seven Angels, where-of mention is made TOBIT 12. Whence it is clear, (say they) That the Apostle pray • th not only to GOD, as the Author for Grace and Peace; but also to the Angels, as the Instruments thereof, as Viega speaketh.
Answer. The Jesuit Ribera acknowledgeth, That by the seven spirits here, the Fathers, and others, understand the holy Ghost; who from His manifold Graces, is called SEAVEN here, and Rev. 5.6. So doeth Primasius, (saith he) Ambrose, Beda, Ansbertus, Rupertus, Haymo, (to whom he might have joined Augustine ) and Thomas, on this place. As also Victorinus Martyr, Joachim Abbas, and Anselmus. And this, not without good reason: For, 1. Grace and Peace is never sought in Scripture, or wished, but from GOD alone. 2. It followeth presently, [and from JESUS CHRIST.] Now, it were absurd, to place CHRIST in such a Prayer after Angels; altho as man, and so inferior, He be placed after the holy Ghost.
[ 3] REVEL. 8.3. And another Angel came, and stood at the Altar, having a golden Censer: and there was given unto him much Incense, that he should offer it, with the Prayers of all Saints. Here, then, (say they) the Prayers of the Saints directed to an Angel, to offer them up for them.
Aunswere. Ambrose expoundeth this Angel, to be CHRIST, who is said to come, (saith he) because by the Mystery of His Incarnation He appeared to the world: and He is said to receive and offer up the Prayers of the Sayncts as Incense (saith Beda, ) because by Him the prayers of all, with a sweet smell come before GOD.
Their own Lyra, (and with him Carthusian ) expone in lykemanner, this Angel, to be Christ; the much Incense, to be acceptable prayers to GOD, which He should offer up; that is, present them unto His Father (saith he.) And which exposition Carthusian affirmeth to be the common exposition of all Catholic Doctors.
SECT. III. Of representing GOD the Father by an Image: the lawfulness where-of the Romanists would defend, by these places following.
[ 1] 2. KINGS 22.19. I saw the LORD sitting on a Throne, (saith MICHEAS) and His garments were white as Snow, and his hair white as Wooll, (saith DANIELL. 7.9) There-fore as He was seen, so He may be painted (say they.)
Answer. It followeth not: for before that time He appeared to Moses in the form of fire: and yet their own Richeom granteth, that to paint him so, would seem to favor the Pagans, who worshipped the fire: And even so say we, that this paynting of Him like an old man, may seem as well to favor the Anthropomorphits. Therefore Augustine giveth this reason, why it is not lawful for any Christian to make any such Image, left we fall into that same Sacrilege, (saith he) whereby the Apostle maketh them execrable, who turn the glory of the incorruptible GOD, into the similitude of a corruptible man.
SECT. IV. Of the worship of Images: which the Romanists would prove to be lawful, by these places following.
PSAL. 99.5. Adore ye [ 1] His foot-stool: for it is holy. Here (say they) the Ark is commanded to be adored, for its holiness, and reference it had to GOD: therefore, much more ought Images, for a clearer resemblance, and relation of the persons whom they represent.
Answer. The words are, Worship ye at His foot-stool, for He is holy, for so the Septuagint, Pagnin, Vatablus, and the Chaldee paraphrase, which Jansen followeth, and Lorinus the Jesuit: or, as Lyra saith, ante scabellum pedum ejus: that is, Before His foot-stool.
Next, Bellarmine himself saith of the reason which is adduced, I confess (saith he) that it is not ill translated so, as the Septuagint, and S. IEROME have translated it, (For He is holy) taking so the reason of the worship, from the holiness of the person worshipped, and not of the place at, or before which they were to worship: or suppone it be taken from the place (For it is holy,) it will infer only, that GOD is He only who is to be worshipped, in or at those places, which are consecrated to His worship; as He speaketh in like-manner of the Temple, verse 9. and as He is worshipped by us, in a solemn and public manner in our Christian Church • s. Therefore their own Genebrard saith, that the PSALMIST here alludeth to the manner of homage, or reverence done to King's, while they sit on their Thrones, by falling down, or kneeling at their foot-stool.
Next, though the translation were admitted, which saith, Adore ye His foot-stool, for it is holy; if we hearken to the exposition of Fathers, and of their own doctors likewise, Augustine will tell us, that by His foot-stool, the human nature of CHRIST is understood, who took upon Him (saith he) Earth of our Earth, and Flesh of our Flesh: which being united unto His Deity, is in the unity of His person to be adored. And this exposition doth Lyra, Carthusian, and Lombard, (all Romanists ) follow, and the Rhemistes themselves in their Notes on this PSALM.
[ 2] PHILIP. 2.10. GOD hath given Him a Name, which is above every name: that at the Name of JESUS, every knee should bow. Loe here then, (say they) the Name of JESUS, when it is pronounced, ordained to be worshipped, for the relation thereof to His person; much more then His Image.
Answer. By bowing the knee to the Name of JESUS by all sorts, is meant, the universal subjection of all creatures to himself who is so named. Therefore, besides OEcumenius, and Theophylact, who so expone this Text, with dyverse others Ancients, as Sedulius, and Haymo, their own Aquinas saith, That signum pro re signata ponitur: that is, The name for himself who is so named. As also saith their late Estius, the name is put for the person named, and bowing the knee, signifieth by a figure of Metonomie, subjection, or humiliation: therefore the meaning is, (saith he) that all who are in any place, knowing that Man who is called JESUS, to be the Son of GOD, and GOD Himself truly, they shall submit themselves to Him, as GOD and LORD of all.
HEB. 11.21. He (to [ 3] wit, Jacob) adored the top of his Rod. Whence observe, (say the Rhemistes ) that adoration (as the Scripture useth this word) may be done to creatures.
Answer. First, they deceatfullie corrupt the Text, leaving out ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) or upon the top of his Rod, and so are bold to take from the words of the Book of GOD, contrary to Revel. 22, 19.
Next, Augustine thus exponeth it, (as the Rhemistes grant) with whom they might have joined, Jerome, Theophylact, and Beda, that Jacob leaning upon his Staff for weakness, adored GOD. Therefore also (saith Aquinas; and with him Lombard, Arboreus, Carthusian, and others) he worshipped not the Rod it self; nor yet Joseph, as some hath thought wrōgfullie, but GOD Himself (saith he) leaning upon the top of his Rodde,
SECT. V. Of the Adoration of Relics, which the Romanists would establish, by these Texts following.
[ 1] EXOD. 13.19. And Moses took the bones of Joseph with him. Here (say they) Relics were carried about with GOD'S People; which, no doubt, they worshipped.
Answer. This was only for inhumation and burying of them in Shechem, as they had promised to JOSEPH, and as we see performed, IOSHVA 24.32. but not for adoration: which is as gross Idolatry done against GOD, as exhumation of the bones of Martyrs, or Godly men, is an injury done against them. Therefore, while IOSIAS took the bones of the false Prophets out of their graves, he said of the true Prophets grave, Let no man move his bones.
Yea, close contrary to the adoration of Relics, Chrysostom giveth this as one of the reasons, why Joseph appointed his body to be carried from Egypt, lest the Idolatrous Egyptians (saith he) being myndfull of the benefits they had gotten by him, had made the body of righteous Joseph, to be an occasion of impious adoration: even as for the same cause the body of Moses was buried by the LORD, where never man yet knew.
[ 2] 2. KINGS 13.21. When the man was let down, and touched the bones of Elisha, he revived. Here (say they) a miracle wrought by a Sayncts Relics; therefore justly may they be worshipped.
Answer. A miracle indeed was wrought at the touch of Elisha's bones; but not by them, but by the LORD, for confirmation, that Elisha was a true Prophet, (as we see the like professed by Peter, ACTS 3.12.) notwithstanding of which miracle, in respect that those bones were not raised, inshryned, nor adored, this maketh rather against the adoration of such Relics. For not only do we nowyse worship the relics of Martyrs, (saith S. Jerome, and with him S. Cyril. of the practice of the Church in their times) but we will no • worship the Sun, nor Moon, nor Angels, nor Arch-angels, nor Seraphims, nor no name that is named in this world, nor that which is to come; lest we should serve the creature, rather than the Creator.
ISAI 11.10. To Him shall the Gentiles seek, and His [ 3] grave shall be glorious. Here we see (say they) that the holy grave shall be counted glorious; and therefore worthy to be worshipped.
Answer. The Text is, (And His rest shall be glorious) as both the Septuagint translateth, Paguin interpreteth, the Hebrew word beareth, and S. Jerome approveth, this being the meaning, that (as is said HEB. 12.2.) after His enduring the cross and shame on Earth, He should rest in Glory forever in Heaven, being set down at the right hand of the Throne of GOD, where-of also the Rhemistes give this as the meaning, That CHRIST after His death, which was ignominious to the world, should be gloriouslie buried by very honorable persons, Joseph and Nicodemus, with abundance of most p • ecious Spyces, wrapped in fi • e Linnen, and laid in a new Monunment. And though it were His grave it self that were here called Glorious, yet it followeth no more that it should be adored, than the Sun and Moon, which are glorious like-wise.
An Appendix, concerning the inferior sort of worship, which the Romonistes say they only give to Sayncts, Angels, Images, and Relics fore-said, which they call Dulia, or Service.
THE Romanists, to cloak their gross Idolatry in worshipping of creatures, they tell us, that there are three degrees of religious worship: the first, highest. and due only to GOD, wh • ch they call Latria, or divyne Worship: another lower, and due only to the Virgin MARIE, which they call Hyperdulia: and a third lowest of all, which they give to Sayncts, Relics, and such like, which they call Dulia, or Service. Therefore, to enervate, and over-throw this their groundless distinction, devysed only to delude the simple, we are to consider, that the word Dulia, or Service, is only two ways taken in holy Scripture; to wit, either for that which is civil or human, and due unto men; or which is religious, & divyne, proper only to GOD. In the first signification it is said of Jacob and Esau, The elder shall serve the younger. And all Christians are willed by the Apostle, in love to serve one another. In the second sign • fication it is said, Thou shalt fear the LORD, and serve Him only. And again, Prepare your hearts unto the LORD, (saith Samuel to the people) and serve H • m only. So in the New Testament, Religious service is made proper to GOD only. Therefore saith the Apostle, Serving the LORD with all humility. ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) And ag • yne, telling the Gallatians of their former misery, he saith, Ye served them who by nature were not God's. ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) Which according to the Papist's distinction, he could not have reprehended. Wherevnto also consenteth Antiquity: there-fore saith Augustine, Let Religious Service tie you to the Omnipotent GOD only: and as for the Sayncts, we honor them with love, (saith he) but not with Religious Service. The reason whereof S. Ambrose doeth render, saying, For he who serveth so, he doeth adore, which is unlawful (saith he) to be done to any mere creature.
Which thing made their own Bishop Peresius to say, I know not if this duty of worship to Sayncts ought properly to be called Dulia, (saith he) seeing that veneration which is commonly due unto Sayncts, is not given to them in token of Service: for we are all the servants of GOD, though far inferior in merits and holiness, which the very Angel (saith he) did signify, before whom the Apostle S. John fell down, saying, See thou do it not, for I am thy fellow-servant. So that if it be once Religious Worship at all, it is of that highest excellency, which is due only to the excellency of the highest, who is a jealous GOD, and hath said, My glory I will give to no other. Therefore saith their own Jesuit Vasques, If it be once an act of Religion, it may be called Latria, (saith he) for Latria and Religio, are the same thing. And so we see how their evasion of an inferior sort of Religious Worship given to creatures, and called Dulia, like Dagon before the Ark, falleth to the ground. Again, as Dulia, so like-wise Latria, is sometime attributted unto man, and signifieth civil Service, as well as some-times it is attributted to GOD, and signifieth Religious: therefore LEVIT. 23.7. the servile work that is forbidden on the Sabbath, is called, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . And again, in Deuteronomy, the LORD threateneth His people, if they would not serve Him in joyfulness, and abundance of all things, they should serve their enemies in hunger and thirst, and in want of all things: where the word in the original is one, and by the Septuagint is translated, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , wherefrae cometh their Latria, which we see signifieth not ever a supreme worship due only to GOD.
CHAPT. IV. Of FREE-WILL, Which the Romanists would establish, by these places following.
GENES. 4.7. If thou do [ 1] well, thou shalt be accepted: and if thou do not well, sin lieth at the door, and unto thee the appetite (or concupiscence) there-of shall be subject, and thou shalt rule over it. That is, (say they) If thou wilt, thou mayst resist the concupiscence of sin, thorough the power of Free-will: so that this Text (say the Rhemistes ) showeth Free-will in man, also after his fall.
Answer. First, if thou do well, or not well, showeth not what was in the power of Cain's will, as equally indifferent to good or ill a-like, but what should be the consequence of doing well or evil; to wit, acceptation or rejection. For as saith Augustine, Mans free-will being now captivated, is able unto nothing, but to sin; but unto righteousness it is altogether unable, except it be made free, and aided by GOD.
Next, the words following, (Also his desire shall be to thee, and thou shalt rule over him,) are understood of Abel, and not of Sin. Therefore saith Chrysostom, See the mercy of the Lord, how He preasseth to mitigate his fury and madness, &c. by subjecting his brother to him, and nowyse impairing his power over him. So likewise doeth Procopius and Gennadius expone, as also their own Ferus telleth, that sundry others do so in like-manner, from whence also he raiseth this observation, That piety overthroweth not superiority of the power of others. Where also note a shameless lie made by the Rhemistes in their Notes on this Text: to wit, That in our last English Translation, the place is translated thus, Unto thee shall be the desire thereof, and thou shalt have rule of it.
DEVT. 30.19. I call [ 2] Heaven and Earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: there-fore choose life, that thou and thy seed may live. Here (say they) life and death put in man's choice, which were in vain, if he had not free-will to do either.
Answer. The option of either indeed is set before man, but the choosing of life which is commanded, is shown else-where in Scripture, whence man hath the same; to wit, from no natural ability of free-will, but from grace only. These three things being ever to be considered in man's free-will. 1. The liberty or indifferency it had to good or evil at first in man's first creation. 2. The pravitie thereof, now after the fall, arysing from our corruption: and 3. The inclyning thereof to good, or the performance of spiritual duties appertaining to Salvatiō, this being only by GOD'S grace, and from regeneration. Therefore saith Augustine, We live more safe, to ascrybe the whole to Him, and not to give part to Him, and part to our selves. Which Bernard showeth to have been Paul's practice, saying. The Apostle ascrybeth all to GOD, and no ways ought to his own free-will.
And how much most part of the School-men have attributed to divyne grace, herein (saith their own Cassander ) in place of all, Bonaventure doth witness: For this is the duty of godly minds (saith he) to attribute nothing to themselves, but all to the grace of GOD.
To the same purpose they produce a like seeming place out of ECCLESIASTICVS, 15.15.16. [ 3] where it is said, If thou wilt, thou shalt observe the Commaundementes, and testify thy good-will: He hath set Water and Fire before thee, stretch forth thy hand unto which thou wilt, &c.
Answer. (As saith Rupertus speaking of this same Book, and with him Jerome, pref. in lib. Salom. ) This Scripture is not Canonicke, therefore, neither is this sentence taken out of the same of Canonicke Authority; so that, this which is brought out of the same, more easily is to be contemned, nor acknowledged, (saith he.)
Next: This Text maketh no ways for the indifferency of man's will, by nature, to good, as well as to evil, in the state of corruption: For the Text saith, If thou wilt, thou shalt observe the Commaundementes: And I hope no Romanist, (except he were worse than a Pelagiane ) dare be so bold, as to say, that this can be done only by the ability of Nature: Therefore he speaketh of Man, as he was first created, as is mentionate Verse 14. and Bellarmine acknowledgeth, Lib. 4. de Libr. Arb. Cap. 7. §. postremo. On which words, Jansen also commenting, saith, That Man had a fuller power unto good before his fall, than after. But yet, that the Scripture speaketh often times of his will, as if it were in the power thereof, to will and do good; both because it looketh to that power of the will which it had from GOD in the creation, dissembling that which is done since by sin; as also, because by his creation, as yet, he hath power to will and do good, but not by himself: that is, by that power which he hath now, as he had then.
ROM. 9.16. It is neither in [ 4] him that willeth, nor in him that runneth; but in GOD, that showeth mercy. Here we see, (say they) that a willing is attributed to Man; and an endeavor unto which being joined, GOD'S mercy, by exciting Grace, a man's conversion is wrought.
Aunswere. The Apostle speaketh not of the will of man by nature, but as it is renewed by grace, and maketh a man to run (with DAVID) in the way of GOD'S obedience: both which the Apostle ascrybeth to mere mercy; and so this Text maketh close against them. This is AUGUSTINE'S exposition; from whom (saith Estius) Nazianzen, Chrysostom, and Jerome, dissent not: who having disputed out of this Text, against the natural power of man's will, to that which is truly good, concludeth thus; It resteth, then, (saith he) that it be understood rightly to be spoken, It is neither in him that willeth, nor in him that runneth, but in GOD, that showeth mercy; that all be ascrybed to GOD, who prepareth the will of man to be good, and helpeth it, being prepared: For we read both this in holy Scripture, His mercy shall prevent me: and His mercy also spall follow me. HEE preventeth one, being unwilling, and maketh him willing: and He followeth him who is willing, that he will not in vain.
Moste excellently also doeth Aquinas, commenting on this place, show this to be the true meaning thereof; as likewise Lyra, who citeth the foresaid words of Augustine. And their late Estiu • in like manner, setteth down this to be the Apostle's meaning: as if he would say, No man hath either power to will, or work, of himself; but he receiveth all from GOD, mercifullie preventing him by His Grace. And this containeth (saith he) moste fully Catholic Veritie.
LUKE 10.30. At last they [ 5] bring an Argument, from the parable of him who came down from Jerusalem to Jericho, and was wounded by the Robbers, and left half dead. Which man, (say they) representeth fallen Man-kind; in whom there is some life left, and a desire to be cured: and this is by his Free-will.
Aunswere. First, Bellarmine himself granteth, That from a mystical sense, a solid argument can never be taken, for probation of doctrines of Faith. Next: This is flat contrary to the mind or scope of our Savior, which was to show only by this parable, who was the true Neyghbour, as Cajetan, Stella, Maldonado, and others, declare. And last: This contradicteth the Apostle foulie, who showeth us, That Man, by nature, is altogether, (and not allmoste) dead in his sins.
CHAPT. V. Of Justification, And the immediate proper and formal cause thereof; which the Romanists affirm to be inherent righteousness, in man himself only: adducing for them these places following.
ROM. 5.19. As by the disobedience of one, many [ 1] were made sinners; so by the obedience of one, many are made righteous. But by the disobedience of one, (to wit, Adam ) many are made sinners by an inherent sinfulness, (say they) and not by sin imputed unto them . Therefore, many are made righteous, or justified, by an inherent righteousness in themselves, and not by the righteousness of another imputed unto them. And which inherent righteousness, is absolute, and perfect, (saith Bellarmine. )
Aunswere. We grant, That as by the disobedience of Adam, many were made sinners, by an inherent sinfulness; that even so, by the obedience of CHRIST, and merit thereof, many are made righteous, by an inherent righteousness in themselves. But this we affirm to be in sanctification: But deny, that it is that righteousness, where-by we are justified before GOD, and is the cause of our absolution, and acceptation to favor.
Next: Where they say, That by Adam, many were made sinners, not by any sin of his imputed unto them, Bellarmine granteth the contrary, saying; For unto all, who are borne in him, the sin of Adam is imputed; because all being in his loins, in him, and by him, did sin, when he himself sinned. And, therefore, it will follow, That even so in our justification, before GOD, by Christ, by virtue of that union we have with Him, His Righteousness is imputed unto us in like manner, and is the cause of our absolution, and acceptation unto life. Therefore, saith Bernard. The satisfaction of one, is imputed unto all; and why may not righteousness be from another, as well as guiltiness was from another? Yea, farther, saith Justin Martyr, What other thing could cover our sins, but the righteousness of CHRIST? And in whom can we who are wicked, be justified, but in the only Son of GOD? Yea, saith their own Bellarmine, CHRIST'S righteousness is imputed unto us: that is, It is given unto us; so that we may offer the same unto GOD, for our sins; because CHRIST hath taken the burden upon him, to satisfy for our sins, and to reconcile us unto GOD His Father, (saith he.)
ROM. 3.24. Being justified [ 2] freely by his grace: That is, By inherent righteousness in our selves.
Answer. BY GRACE, inherent righteousness in man, is not meant; but that free favor and compassion which is in GOD Himself, as the word GRACE is taken, ROM. 4.4. and HEBR. 4.16. and as RICHARDVS OR MEDIA VILLA testifieth, That the Auncientes in this place, do understand the same. Therefore also saith their own Ferus, (and with him Pererius ) This GRACE, is that good will of GOD towards us, for CHRIST'S sake: which is His Favor, (saith he) where by we are saved. So that the meaning is, (saith Estius ) That sinners are justified without any merit of their own works, even by the only free favor of GOD. Which GRACE also Aquinas calleth, His Eternal Dilection. The Apostle also clearly distinguishing between these two, ROM. 5.15, calleth GOD'S free Favor, GRACE; and what floweth there from, the GIFT which is by Grace; whether it be of remission in justification, or our renewing in sanctification.
[ 3] 1. COR. 6.11. But ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified. Here, then, (say they) we see that justification includeth both washing and sanctifying, which is by inherent righteousness.
Aunswere. Taking the word IVSTIFIE, in the large signification thereof, as is said in the state of the Question, we yield, that both these Benefits are comprehended therein. But Bellarmine teacheth us, That the Fathers understand this place properly of the Sacrament of Baptism, (which the word of WASHING doeth import.) Wherein the Apostle teacheth, That by the invocation of the NAME of CHRIST, and operation of the Holy GHOST, we are therein purged, and sanctified, (saith he.) And, therefore, rightly doeth the Apostle, after the general word of Washing, denotating Baptism, particularize and join both these Benefits of Justification and Sanctification, conferred therein: but confoundeth not the one, with the other; nor maketh he Sanctification, or inherent righteousness in us, the cause of our purging, or of our justification before GOD.
[ 4] JAMES 2.24. Ye see, then, howe by works a man is justified, and not by faith only. Now, works, (say they) proceed from an inherent righteousness, in man him self.
Aunswere. First: Bellarmine, and many other Romanists, whom Suarez mentioneth, affirm, That this Text speaketh no ways of man's first justification before GOD'S Tribunal, unto absolution; and whereof is the Question: and so it maketh no ways for the purpose.
Next: Beside OEcumenius, Theodoret, and Beda, on this place, their own Aquinas, showeth the true meaning thereof: who objecting to this place, that to the ROMANS, (ROM. 3.20.) he reconcileth them thus; I answer, (saith he) That, to justify, may be taken two ways; either for the execution, or the manifestation of our justification. And this way, indeed, a man is justified by works: that is, He is declared and shown to be just: Or, it is taken for the infused habit of righteousness: and this way no man is justified by works, (saith he.)
Lyke-wise, (saith Doctor Paes, a Portugal Friar) the meaning of these words, That ABRAHAM was justified by works, may be this, (saith he) that is, That he was declared just, as Theodoret expoundeth, and which I most approve.
CHAPT. VI. Of SANCTIFICATION, And of our ability to keep GOD'S Law: which the Romanists would prove, by these Texts following.
[ 1] LUKE 1.6. And Zechariah and Elizabeth were both righteous before GOD, walking in all the Commandementes, and Ordinances of the LORD, without blame.
Aunswere. This was the old Pelagian Objection, which they called The impenetrable Buckler, as witnesseth S. Jerome, and whereunto he replieth thus; First, they are called Righteous, as many others are called Righteous in holy Scripture, (saith he) as Job, Jehoshaphat, and Josiah: not that they wanted all fault; but they are commended, because that for the most part, they were virtuous. For Zacharias himself was punished with dumbness, (saith he) and Job, by his own speech, was rebuked, and Jehoshaphat and Josiah, are reported to have done things, which g • eatlie displ • ased the LORD: where-of the one gave help to the wicked, and was rebuked by the Prophet; and the other, against the LORD'S Commandment, by the mouth of Jeremiah, went out against Necho, King of Egypt, and was killed.
Next, where it is said, that Zechariah and Elizabeth walked in all the Commandementes of the LORD, without blame; that is, without such gross wickedness, which the Grecians call 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , (saith he) but without Sin, which they call 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , I deny that any man can be: for that is competent only to GOD, (saith he) and which in this life is spoken only of the only Son of GOD (saith Augustine. ) It is so far from truth, then, (saith the same Father) that because of these words, we should believe that Zechariah and Elizabeth had perfect • igh • eousnesse, without any sin, that we think, that the Apostle himself was not perfect, according to the perfection of that Rule.
Their own Carthusian also, and with him their late Stella, expoundeth this place, That these were righteous; that is, (saith he) according to that measure which is agreeable to human condition, here. But that this their righteousness, had no mixture of sin, there is none so righteous in this mortal flesh (saith he.)
[ 2] MATTH. 5.48. Be ye perfect, as my Father in Heaven is perfect. To the performance whereof, we see some of the Saints have attained, (say they) as Paul witnesseth, PHILIP. 3.15.
Answer. To this old Pelagian, and n • w • opish Argument, S. Jerome • nswereth, thus; That in the Scriptures there are two sortes of perfection mentioned: the first, absolute, or complete, (or, as we say, actu, & gradu; ) the second, which agreeth (saith he) with our fragility here, according to that of the PSALM; There is no flesh that shall be justified in Thy sight: (which is in Voluntate & conatu, ) as he showeth at large. And this is it (saith he) whereof the Scripture here speaketh.
In like-manner, (saith Augustine ) this is not to be understood, that any man can therefore be without sin; but he may be called perfect, not because he hath no farther to attain unto, but because for the most part he hath attained, or greatly profited; therefore he is thought worthy so to be called,
Lyke-wise, (saith the Jesuit Maldonado ) CHRIST propoundeth unto us here a ma • ke to aim at, to • he which He knoweth that we cannot attain, that we may endevoure to come as near as we may: and (as saith their Carthusian ), as the exigence and possibility of this frail life admitteth.
MATTH. 11.30. My [ 3] yoke is easy, and My burden light.
Answer. S. IEROME answereth thus to this old Pelagian Objection; It is certain, (saith he) that the Preceptes of the Gospel are light, in comparison of the Jewish Superstition: but that they are called light, because they may be easily fulfilled, behold the Apostle, and all the faithful, (saith he) profess the contrary, that they cannot perform that which they would.
Chrysostom also, and their own Arboreus showeth, that this is in comparison of sin, which depresseth the soul, why they are called a light yoke; because these Precepts call us to an obedience, which is true freedom, in respect of the former heavy servitude; and is supported by powerful grace, with sweet promises, and a glorious expectation.
Carthusian like-wise telleth us, that they are so of their own nature; and therefore (saith Lyra ) if any man say that they are grievous, let him blame his own infirmity, or corruption.
MATTH. 22.37. We [ 4] are commanded to love GOD, and our Neyghbour: which we may and must do, by His grace, if we be His. Now, he that loveth GOD, keepeth His Commandments, (saith our SAVIOUR) and he that loveth his Neyghbour, fulfilleth the Law (saith the Apostle.)
ANSWERE. He that loveth GOD, keepeth His Commaundementes, we grant; and he that loveth his Neyghbour, fulfilleth the Law, after that manner, as the fore-named Jerome and Augustine show, and according to that measure (as their own fore-cited Carthusian and Stella express,) to wit, which is agreeable to human condition here, and which GOD in CHRIST mercifullie accepteth of His own children: otherwise, a man is not able fully to keep that Commandments, (saith Lombard ) in this mortal life, but in part: not in whole, because we love but in part, as we know but in part: and our perfection is only in the life to come. And then he objecteth, saying, But why is a Perfection then commanded unto us here, seeing no man hath it in this life? To which he answereth, saying, Because we cannot run a right, if we know not to what Butte we should run. And (as Bernard saith) that seeing our imperfection, and that we cannot fulfill what we ought, we may flee unto mercy,
1. JOHN 3.9. Who-so-ever is borne of GOD, committeth [ 5] not Sin. Therefore such a one may keep GOD'S Law, seeing the committing of sin, is the only transgressing of the Law,
Answer. AUGUSTINE answereth hereunto, saying, It is one thing, not to commit sin, and another thing, not to have sin: for he is said, not to commit sin, (saith he) in whom sin reigneth not. He committeth not sin, then; that is, he obeyeth not rhe concupiscence there-of.
Bernard also saith, He sinneth not; that is, (saith he) he persevereth not in sin, because that Heavenlie Birth, which cannot fail, conserveth him so, that he cannot perish.
Cardinal Cajetan also saith, That this signifieth to us, that a member of CHRIST, as one is a member of CHRIST, sinneth not: or as Bellarmine saith, As he is a child of GOD, and is partly spirit, he sinneth not: but in respect he is partly flesh also, and the son of Adam, because of his infirmity, as yet not wholly abrogated, he sometimes falleth. And so like-wise saith SALMERON also on this Text.
CHAPT. VII. Of Glorification, And whether good works do merit the same, as the Romanists affirm, adducing for them these places following.
MATTH. 5.12. Rejoice [ 1] and be glad, for great is your reward in Heaven.
Answer. We deny not, but that to GOD'S servants, who either suffer for righteousness, (whereof our SAVIOR speaketh) or do good works, a reward is promised: but the question is, from whence they have this reward? to wit, whether from GOD'S justice due unto them for the condignity of their works or sufferings, as the Romanists hold, and which this Text never will prove? or from His own mercy, as a recompense freely bestowed out of His gracious bounty only, as the Scripture clearly doeth everywhere proclaim? Which recompense in holy writ is therefore called a reward, with this adjection, of inheritance, to show that It cometh to us rather, as from a merciful Father, who freely hath adopted us thereto, than from an addebted Master, from whom we may justly crane the same, as the merit of our Service. And this distinction of a reward by Grace, and of debt, the Apostle clearly setteth down, ROM. 4.4,
Therefore, saith Augustine, What meaneth this then, that our reward is called GRACE? But if it be GRACE, it is freely given, and what is freely given, is without deserving.
In like-manner, (saith their own Ferus, ) if at any time thou hear that a Reward is promised, know, that it not due unto thee for any other cause, than the promise of GOD, He hath freely promised, and freely giveth it: Therefore, if thou wouldest keep the love and favor of GOD, (saith he) make no mention at all of any merits of thine: for indeed far more justly than PAVLL to PHILEMON, verso 19. may the LORD say to any of us, Thou • owest thyself to me.
ROM. 2.6. Who shall render [ 2] to everyone according to his works. Here (say they) the reward hath relation to the works: theerfore they merit.
Answer. I will only satisfy them with the clear words of one of their greatest Popes, Gregory the Great, who saith, If this felicity of the Saints, be Mercy, and not acquired by merits, where is that which is written, Who shall render to everyone according to his works? If it be rendered then according to works, how shall it be esteemed Mercy? But (saith he) it is one thing to render according to ones works, and another thing to render for the works themselves: for in that it is said, according to his works, the quality of the works is understood, that whose works are seen to be good, his reward shall be also Glorious: (as whose works are evil, his reward shall be contrary.) But as to that eternal Lyfe which we have of GOD, and with GOD, no labor can be equalled, (saith he) no works can be compared.
Therefore, (saith their late Ferus, ) look that here thou lift not up thy crest, and extol thy works more than thou ought, and begin to tell of thy Merits, (as Hypocrites do) as if they would make GOD a debtor to thee for thy works, seeing it is certain that our works are defective, both in number, weight, and measure; and if they were weighed in the LORD'S Ballance, would be found too light. All therefore that this word (ACCORDING,) doeth import in relation to good works, is, that their doing is a requisite cond • tion, without any sort of meriting, in which sense Bellarmine himself clearly acknowledgeth, that the word (ACCORDING) may be taken, Libr. 1. de justif. Cap. 21. §. Si loquitur.
2. THESS. 1.5. That ye [ 3] may be counted worthy of the Kingdom of GOD. There is (say they) express mention of the merit of condignity, as also Revel, 3.4.
Answer. First, (saith Cardinal Cajetan ) the Apostle saith not, That ye may be worthy, (for the sufferings of this time, are not worthy of that Kingdom) but that ye may be esteemed, or accounted, worthy. Therefore saith Augustine, What-so-ever GOD hath promised. He hath promised to them that were unworthy, that it might not be promised as wages for works; but being GRACE, it might according to its name, be graciously and freely given or bestowed.
Next, They ought to distinguish between the worthiness of the person, where-of both the places speak, and between the dignity of the works, whereof there is no mention, and is our only Question▪ Now the dignity of the persons, proceedeth not from the dignity of their works, but from GOD'S mere favor, where-by He hath graciouslic, without any merit of theirs, accepted th • m in CHRIST, as sons, as we see, JOHN 12. And this distinction Bellarmine himself setteth down, Libr. 5. de justif. Cap. 17. §. respondent.
[ 4] MATTH. 20.8. Call the laborers, and give them their hire. Here (say they) eternal life is called AN HYRE, which is due to the worker, for the works sake.
Aunswere. First, Parabolicall Argumemtes conclude nothing in doctrines of faith, as hath been formerly acknowledged by our Adversaries themselves. For so saith Fenerdantius, In Parables the rule of Truth is not to be found, but in plain Scriptures. In Iren. Libr. 2. Cap. 46.
Next, Cardinal Cajetan showeth, that CHRIST'S scope is only to show, that GOD calleth some at the last hour; that none may despare of a sinners conversion, so long as this life endureth, and the means of grace: and this which is promised by GOD, as a just hire, is above the condignity of our works, (saith he:) for the very sufferings of this time, are not worthy of that Glory to come. Yea, the felicity of the Saints, (saith Gregory ) is mere mercy, and not acquired by merits.
2. TIM. 4.8. Hencefoorth [ 5] is laid up for me a crown of Righteousness, which the LORD the just judge shall give me at that day. Here (say they) a crown to be given for Righteousness, by GOD, as a just Judge, rewarding PAUL'S merits.
Aunswere. We grant, that in respect GOD hath tied Himself by His Promise, to reward the godly life of His own Chosen with Glory, that in this sense, it proveth in a sort to be an Act of Justice, and therefore the Apostle attributeth it to Justice, though originallie it come from mere mercy: even as in forgiving our sins, (which in it self all men know to be an Act of Mercy,) he is said to be faithful and just; to wit, in regard of the faithful performance of His gracious promise, made to all true penitents so to do. Therefore (saith Sedulius, ) it is called the justice of GOD, which is seen to be Mercy, because it hath its Original from His Promise: and when this promise of GOD is performed, it is called IVSTICE. So likewise (saith Bernard ) there is a crown of Righteousness which PAUL'L expected; but of the Righteousness of GOD, not his own. For it is just, that GOD should pay that which He oweth; and he oweth what he promised, (saith he.) And thus did all the Auncients with a full consent teach) (saith their own Cassander ) that the hope both of pardon, and of eternal life, was only to be placed in the only mercy of GOD, and merit of CHRIST.
MATTH. 25.34. Come [ 6] ye blessed of My Father, for when I was hungry ye gave me meat, &c. Here (say they) the word (for) showeth that their works was the cause that merited their Salvation, as the works of the wicked are the cause that meriteth their damnation.
Answer. First, the word (for) signifieth not ever the cause of a thing, but the evidence there-of, as where it is said in the evening, To morrow it will be fair Weather, for the Sky is red, MATTH. 16.2. The redness of the Skye, being an evidence that it will be so, but not the cause of being so: but suppone, that it import a Casualitie, yet the same is Moral only and Instrumental, being the means appointed by GOD, whereunto of His free mercy in CHRIST, He hath promised a reward: but from a word of Casualitie in the general, to infer a meritorious Casualitie and Efficiencie in particular, the Argument holdeth not.
[ 7] 2. COR. 4.17. Our light afflictions, which are for a moment, causeth our works to us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of Glory. Here (say they) the Sayncts sufferings are expresslie called causes of their glory.
Answer. To this the solution of the former ARGUMENT giveth satisfaction, as also the inequality of these afflictions, compared with the far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory, agreeing with that ROM. 8.18. overthroweth clearly the merit of condignity.
Both with the wicked, then, and the Godly, He is to deal, according to the quality of their works, good or evil; but not with His own Elect, for the merit of their works, as with the wicked: Therefore He is brought in, saying to the godly, Inherite the kingdom prepared for you, before the foundation of the World: verse 24: And therefore not obtained by the merit of their works. Whereby we may see the dissimilitude, between the works of the godly and the wicked: that the one (as Bernard saith) is the way to Glory, not the cause of it: but the other, (to wit, the works of the wicked) are both the way to punishment, and the meritorious cause of it. Neither is this vnaccustomeable in Scripture, to oppose or compare things in some respects, which holdeth not in all, as the wicked are rewarded according to their works which they do of themselves: and yet no Romanist will say, that even so the godly are rewarded, according to their works, which they in like manner do of themselves, but which flow from grace: and one evil work is sufficient to condemn, but not so is one good work sufficient to save.
[ 8] Last of all, they say, that CHRIST hath merited this to us, that we our selves might merit eternal life, and that our works are meritorious, in so far as they are dipped, or died in His blood, wherefrae they receive that efficacy of meriting, and so our meriting doeth nowayes derogate from CHRIST.
Aunswere. This is to make CHRIST, the general and remote cause only, but our selves and out works to be the nearer cause, which properly and immediately produceth the effect of our salvation. Whereas to merit the same, is a personal action of the Son of GOD, our head only, and incommunicable to His members: in respect that the nature of meriting, consisteth in the infinite virtue of the person who doeth merit, and which must be correspondent to that infinite weight of glory which is merited. There-fore seeing no simple creature can be capable of that infinite virtue, it followeth, that CHRIST only is the sole, immediate and near cause of meriting glory unto us, who fully hath satisfied, and merited unto us, what-so-ever is necessary unto our Salvation.
Whence like-wise it should follow, (according to Romish doctrine) that our salvation ought rather to be ascrybed to us & our merits, than to CHRIST'S: because the effect is ascrybed to the nearest and immediate cause, rather than to the general and remote: which absurd were impious.
Lyke-wise the Apostle should have said in vain, If righteousness were by the Law, then CHRIST died in vain: because according to the doctrine of Romanists, it might be answered, that CHRIST died for this very ende, that righteousness might be by the Law: that is, that by our works, we may merit eternal life; and which virtue of meriting, He hath acquired unto us by His death: but indeed the Apostles were ignorant, of any such fruit of CHRIST death at all, and therefore did teach, that CHRIST'S blood doeth wash us from our sins, and make our garments white which are dipped therein: but never that our works were dipped therein, to take on such a color as merit.
CHAPT. VIII. Of Purgatory, Which the Romanists seek to establish, by these Arguments following.
PSAL. 66.12. We went [ 1] thorough fire and water. Whereby is meant (say they) suffering in Purgatory.
Answer. First, Bellarmine himself granteth, that all such places which for this purpose are adduced out of the Olde Testament, probablie only or conjecturallie infer, but doeth not necessarily or demonstratiuelie enforce any such thing, firmlie to be believed.
Next, beside this general ANSWERE to all, particularly to answer to this place, which if it were literallie taken, would infer not only a fire, but a watery Purgatory: as the Heathen Poët saith, eluitur scelus, aut exuritur igne. AUGUSTINE telleth us, (and with him Hilary ) that here-by are meant the troubles and trials, where-with this life abound (saith he,) and therefore the living speak here of their experience of them, which in like-manner they could not do of the fire of Purgatory.
Their own Jansen also, Emmanuell Sa, and late Estius, expone this Text, like-wise of the tribulations of this life, and the Rhemistes expone this of temptations, saying, through GOD'S assistance, His Servauntes pass through and over-come all temptations.
ISAI 4.4. When the [ 2] LORD shall have washed away the filth of the daughters of Zion, and shall have purged the blood of IERVSALEM from the midst there-of, by the spirit of judgment and burning: That is, (say they) by the fire of Purgatory.
Answer. S. Jerome (and with him Cardinal Tolet ) expone this spirit of burning, to be the same which the Baptist called, the baptizing with fire: Now what is there-by meant, let Maldonado first declare, who saith, there is no doubt, but by fire the holy Ghost is meant: for the conjunction (and) in this place is not conjunctiue, (saith he) but explicatorie. After the like-manner doeth Estius expone, and Jansen proveth the same strongly, in his Concordance of the Gospel.
[ 3] MALACHI 3.2. But who may abide the day of His coming? And who shall stand up when He appeareth? For He is like a refiners fire, and Fullers sope: and He shall sit as a refiner of Silver, and purify the sons of LEVI. Which purifying (say they) is in the fire of Purgatory.
Answer. RVFFINVS (and with him Theodoret ) telleth us, that this is meant of CHRIST'S second coming to Judgment, saying, This was fore-told by the Prophets: therefore saith Malachi, Behold, the Almighty cometh, and who may abide the day of His coming? &c.
Lykewyse saith their late Estius, (and with him Cardinal Tolet, ) This is to be meant of that general conflagration, at the general day of Judgment, whereof MALACHI speaketh: and of this purging by fire, at the day of that great Judgment, do these Fathers understand that place, (saith he) to wit, Jerome, in his Commentary, Ambrose, on PSAL. 36. Augustine de civit. Dei, Lib. 20. Cap. 25. and Origen, hom. 6. on EXODVS.
ZECHARIAH 9.11. By the [ 4] blood of thy Covenant, I have sent out thy prisoners out of the pit, where-in is no water. That is, (say they) out of Purgatory.
Answer. Here-of no better exposition can be, than this, (saith Augustine ) that there-by is understood, the dry and barren deepness of man's misery, where the waters of Righteousness abound not, but where there is the puddle of Iniquity.
Theodoret like-wise, (and with him the interlinare Gloss,) exponeth this to be the deep pit of man's misery, wherein all mankind lay as prisoners, as the Prophet speaketh, till Christ redeemed them therefrae, saying, When men were bound in this pit, our LORD JESUS CHRIST loosed them, and brought them forth, when by His precious Blood He delyvered them, (saith he) and gave them the new Covenant. Agayne the Romanists confess, that the Prophet speaketh here of a place where there is no comfort, but in Purgatory there is incredible comfort (saith Bellarmine, ) therefore of Purgatory, the Prophet speaketh not here. The Rhemistes also say on this place, that S. Jerome, S. Cyril, and other Fathers, understand this lake to be Limbus patrum, which is now emptied long ago, and wherein there was no torment of fire at all.
Other places, as 2 MACHAB. 12. and TOBIT 4. because they are Apocrypha, nor make they any mention of Purgatory. Therefore (as Cardinal Cajetan granteth out of S. Jerome, ) they are not a rule to confirm matters of faith.
Places out of the New Testament, adduced for Purgatory, are these.
MATTH. 12.32. He [ 1] who shall speak against the holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, nor in the world to come. Where we see (say they) that some sins are forgiven in the world to come after this life, which must be only in Purgatory.
Answer. First, Bellarmine, (and with him the Jesuit Salmeron ) granteth, that this doeth nowayes follow, according to the rules of reasoning, if the sin against the holy Ghost be not remitted, neither in this Worlde, nor that which is to come. ERGO, Some other sins are remitted in the World to come. We grant that this followeth not (saith he) according to the rules of reasoning,
Next, Mark is a clear interpreter of Matthew's words, (as witnesseth their Valentia ) but so it is, that Mark expresseth the meaning of Matthew's words to be this, That the sin against the holy Ghost, shall never be forgiven at all. To which exposition two Romanists, Carthusian and Arboreus, both of them do subscrybe.
Last, because in Purgatory there is no remission of sin, proceeding from Mercy, but punition for sin, proceeding from justice; and that these two are opposite, as we see EXOD. 20.5. visiting sins, and showing mercy are: therefore justly we may retort this place against them, and prove thereby, that there is no Purgatory.
In Purgatory there is a punition for sins. But where a punition of sins is after this life, there is not a remission for sins, (for these two are opposite:) therefore in Purgatory there is no remission.
MATTH. 5.26. Verilie, [ 2] thou shalt not come forth thence, till thou pay the uttermost farthing. That is, out of Purgatory, (say they) till thou hast satisfied for thy least or venial sins, and suffered temporal punishment for others.
Answer. Their own Jansen declareth, (and with him Chrysostom, Theophylact, Ferus, and Emmanuell Sa, ) that this place is literallie to be understood, CHRIST therein only persuading to concord. And therefore out of this place, there is none (saith he) that can rightly urge the proving of Purgatories wherefore also (saith Stapleton ) there are few now that so expone the same.
But giving it were allegoricallie to be exponed, yet it nowayes maketh for Purgatory: for Augustine exponeth this prison to be the Hell of the damned, (as Bellarmine showeth) the payment eternal punishment, and donec, or till, to signify that he shall never come forth who entereth in that prison. Therefore also (saith Theophylact, ) If we must abide so long in that prison, till we pay the uttermost farthing, that will never be.
Therefore also saith their own Carthusian, (and with him Lyra, Stella, Maldenat, and • ansenius ) till thou pay, &c. that is, thou shalt never be redeemed, for in Hell (saith he) there is no satisfaction.
[ 3] 1. COR. 3.15. If any man's work burn, he shall suffer loss, but he himselft shall be saved: yet so, as by fire. Whereby (say they) Purgatory is meant.
Answer. Some thinketh (saith their late Estius ) that the Apostle taketh not the word (fire) throughout the whole Text, in one signification, — but this appeareth not without cause to be absurd, that the Apostle in one Text of so few words, so diverslie should take the word (fire) neither can any man easily persuade himself, (saith he) that in the third place, the fire of purging of souls is meant: if in the first and second places, another fire be understood.
It must be then the fire of that general and last conflagration, that is here spoken of, (saith Estius ) as the instrument of that Judgment, as Basel, Hilary, Ambrose, (and many moe whom he there rehearseth) doeth understand.
And (he shall be saved, yet as by fire) that is, as is spoken, 1. PET. 4.18. the righteous shall scarce be saved, (saith Estius ) Even as a Merchand in a Sea tempest, escapeth himself hardly, ane with the loss of his goods.
And if it be asked, when he shall be so saved? I answer, (saith Estius ) that this shall be in the day of the LORD: that is, of the last general Judgment, whereof mention is made, c. 5.5.
And thereafter having proponed this Question. How Purgatory of souls then after this life, can be proven by this place, he answereth, saying. If the fire shall prove or try every man's work, and that this trial or examination, is to be only in the day of the LORD, or at the general judgment; and that unto that day, this which is said, (and he himself shall be saved, yet as by fire,) is to be referred, not only doeth it appear (saith he) that the Purgatory of souls, presently af • er the dea • h of the body, is not established by this place of the Apostle: but on the • ont • ari • by this place it is quite overth • own, seeing all is referred to the last Judgment.
1. COR. 15.29. What [ 4] shall they do who are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not? Where by bapt • zing is meant, afflicting of themselves, by Prayer and Fasting for the dead, (say they) that th • y may be delyvered out of Purgatory.
Answer. First, this cannot be applied (saith Estius ) to voluntary afflictions, as Prayers, Alms, and Fasting, undertaken for the help of the dead: which if Paul had understood, he had not said, who are baptized, as it were by others, but who baptizeth themselu • s for the dead, as according to Scripture they are said to afflict themselves, who undergo voluntary Fastinges, and the like, LEVIT. 23. and 16.
The exposition, then, which their own Estius saith, is worthily to be preferred before all others, and which Epiphanius received from them who was before him as approved; is this, (saith he) to wit, that these are said to be baptized for the dead, who having no hope of longer life here, (but esteemed as dead men) did crave and receive baptism, really hereby declaring, that they were baptized for the dead, that is, for this ende, that Baptism might be profitable unto them at that time, when they departed this life; and were to enter into the estate of mankind after death: as if the Apostle had said, if there be no resurrection of the body at all, what fruit can they reap who are Baptized, being now about to die? and for this cause professeth they are baptized, in respect of that future estate that is after this life; and this sense is most clear and simple (saith Estius, ) and most fit to prove what the Apostle intendeth; which other Learned Men also, most gladly approve.
The Jesuit also, à Lapide, after the rehearsal of five other Expositions, he counteth this only the best, which Chrysostom giveth, (saith he) to wit, as if Paul would say, wherefore do all the faithful receive Baptism, for the hope of the resurrection from the dead, or in respect of the estate of the dead, that in that estate after death, it may be well with them, if the dead rise not? for certainly they should do this in vain otherwise, which is not credible. And this Exposition (saith à Lapide, ) of all others seemeth to be most simple and plain.
MATTH. 5.22. But I say unto [ 5] you, who-so-ever is angry with his brother without a cause, is in danger of judgment, and who-so-ever shall say to his brother, Racha, shall be in danger of the Council: but who-so-ever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of Hells fire. Here (say they) are three sortes of sins, and three sortes of punishments, whereof the last only, for greatest offenses, is Hell fire, but a lesser punishment for lesser sins, and this is in Purgatory.
Answer. First, there are not set down here, three sortes of sins and of punishments, but three degrees of one, and the self same sin; to wit, Murder, and three degrees of one, and the self same sort of punishment, to wit, Eternal, our SAVIOR'S scope being (as their own Aquinas showeth) because they did not understand Murder to be committed, but when a man was killed: there-fore our LORD (saith he,) did manifest that all sinful motion against a man's brother to hurt him, was to be also esteemed, a kind of Murder.
Lykewyse that this punishment, whereof our SAVIOR speaketh, is not a temporal punishment in Purgatory, for the first two degrees of sin that are mentioned, and an eternal in Hells fire, for the last only, we have first the Text it self to convince them, which saith, VERSE 21. Who-so-ever shall kill, shall be guilty of judgment: which word is used also in the very next VERSE, where it is said, Who-so-ever is angry at his brother without a cause, shall be guilty of judgment. Therefore if by judgment, (as the Jesuit Salmeron showeth) eternal punishment for the Act of Homicide, be understood in the first place, then by judgment in like manner, eternal punishment for unjust anger, which is the murder of the heart, must be understood in the second place, and which being an inward motion only, unbroken out as yet in word nor deed, could not be taken hold on, by any human Iudicatorie.
Next, the evidence of the Text, Antiquity concurreth, therefore (saith Isidorus Pelusicta ) He will not only have us to abstain from Slaughter, but also from Anger: and unto those who will not obey. He hath threatened unquenchable fire.
In like-manner, (saith their own Maldonado ) all these three degrees of punishment, signifieth that the punishment of Hell fire, is appointed for every mortal sin: there-fore it is like (saith their own Barr • sdas ) that CHRIST speaketh here of anger, as a mortal sin, which the punishment thereof proveth.
CHAPT. IX. Of the Sacraments,
SECT. I. Of their number, and absolute necessity of Baptism.
HEERE-IN (saith their own Cassander ) there is no contraversie that there are but two special Sacraments of our salvation, wherein our salvation principally consisteth, and is comprehended, as speaketh Robertus Tuitiensis, and Hugo de Sancto Victore, to wit, BAPTISME, and the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of CHRIST: therefore seeing they acknowledge these two only, as Sacraments properly so called and necessary, let us first come to their Arguments, where-by they would establish an absolute necessity of Baptism.
[ 1] JOHN 3.5. Except a man be borne a new of water, and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of GOD. That is, (say they) except he be Baptized.
Aunswere. Their own Ferus, exponeth this water not to be that Elementarie water used in Baptism, but Metaphoricalli: thereby to be understood, the purging virtue (saith he) and efficacy of the spirit of regeneration: which Augustine therefore calleth, the invisible water of the Spirit, even as it is said elsewhere, He shall baptize you with the holy Ghost, and with fire.
But understanding it of Baptism literallie, (as they would have it) it is to be meant (saith Lombard ) of these who may, but contemneth to be baptized. And this is to be understood (saith Carthusian, ) if the occasion serve to receive the Sacrament of Baptism; otherewyse, the Baptism of the Spirit sufficeth: else the believing Thief on the Grosse, should be excluded out of Paradise, and many in the Primitive Church called Catechumen, who died in the saith before they were baptized; yea, some who suffered Martyrdom, should be excluded like-wise.
Wherefore, (worthily saith Bernard ) that CHRIST when he said, He who believeth, and is baptized, shall be saved; warilie and watchfullie, he saith not, but he that is not baptized, shall be condemned: but only, he that believeth not, shall be condemned.
Therefore their own Cassander also concludeth, saying, That it is both agreeable to the judgment of the primitive Church, and to holy Scriptures, that Infantes dying without Baptism, may be and are saved: for if they cannot get Baptism (saith he) being prevented by death, as the faith of the Church, and of these who offer them to Baptism is reputed, as their own faith; so the will and desire of the Church, and specially of the Parentes, to have had them baptized, is accepted for Baptism, by that merciful Father who accepteth the will for the deed, and tieth none to what is impossible, or His own grace simply to the external Sacrament.
SECT. II. Of Transubstantiation, which the Romanists would establish, by these places following.
MATTH. 26.27. Take [ 1] ye, eat ye, this is my Body. Here (say they) a clear Text for Transubstantiation.
Aunswere. Cardinal Cajetan affirmeth, (as witnesseth Suarez ) that these words of CHRIST, are not able of themselves to prove Transubstantiation: but that they may be taken in a Metaphoricall sense, as is evident (saith he) in that example, And the Rock was CHRIST.
Yea, how CHRIST'S body is in the Sacrament, whether by Transubstantiation, or without any such conversion, (saith their own Biell ) is not found expressed in the Canon of the BIBLE, which made their own Bishop of Rochester, also ingeniouslie to acknowledge, that it could not be proved by any Scripture at all.
More-over (saith Cardinal de Aliaco ) that manner which supposeth the substance of Bread, to remain still is possible, neither (saith he) is it contrary to reason, nor to the Authority of the BIBLE, yea, more, it is more easy and reasonable to understand.
Cardinal Bellarmine like-wise, who bringeth this as the only Text, thereby to prove Transubstantiation, yet by the force of Truth is made to say, It is not altogether improbable, that there is no express place of Scripture, which without the Churches determination, can evidently enforce a man to admit of Transubstantiation, as Scotus affirmed: for albeit the Scriptures seem to us, (saith he) that they may compel any, but a refractary man, to believe the same: yet it may be justly doubted, whether the Text be clear enough to enforce it, seeing the most sharp witted and Learned Men, such as Scotus was, have thought the contrary (saith he.)
Having now heard themselves, if we hearken next to the true exposition of the Auncients, which they give thereon, Augustine telleth us, that the LORD doubted not to say, This is my body, when He gave the Sign of His body (saith he.) Tertullian also saith, This is my body, that is, the FIGVRE of my body. Eusebius in like-manner saith, That CHRIST ordained His Disciples to use bread, for the Symbole of His body (saith he.)
Theodoret like-wise affirmeth, That our SAVIOR honored the visible signs, with the name of His Body and Blood, not changing their nature (saith he,) but adding Grace to Nature.
Where-fore also saith their Gloss upon the Canon Law, The heavenly Sacrament which truly representeth CHRIST'S flesh, is called the Body of CHRIST, but improperlie.
SECT. III. Of half Communion, or With-holding the Cup from the people: which the Romanists would out-face as lawful, by these places following.
[ 1] LUKE 24.30. And it came to pass, as He sat at meat with them, He took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. Here then (say they) Communicating under one kind, warranded by the example of CHRIST.
Answer. Pope Gregory on this place (and with him Eusebius, Emissenus, and Beda, ) showeth, that this was for ordinary refection. Lyke-wise (saith their own Carthusian, and with him Lyra) He took bread, and blessed it, but did not convert it into His body, as He did at His last Supper, but only as His custom was to bless meat.
Wherefore saith their own Jansen, There are some who from hence would take an Argument, to prove, that it is lawful under one kind, to give or receive the Sacrament of the Eucharist: which opinion is neither certain, nor hath likely-hood of truth (saith he.)
ACTS 2.4. (and 20.7.) [ 2] And they continued steadfastly in the Apostles doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread and Prayers. Here (say they) Communicating under one kind, practiced by the holy Apostles.
Answer. We grant, that in both these places of the Acts, by breaking of bread, the celebration of the Sacrament is to be understood; but denieth that therefore it was given under one kind only: because S. LUKE in both places by a figure called Synecdoche, from one part comprehendeth the whole. And this to be an usual form of speech used by the Apostle, in the matter of the Sacrament, we may see clearly, 1. COR. 12.13. where it is said, We have been all made to drink into one spirit, the Apostle there reasoning from the Sacraments, and intending by the use of them to prove, that we ought to have a holy unity amongst our selves, as members of one mystical body; (as both Cajetan and Salmeron declareth) because by one spirit, we are all baptized in one body (saith he.) And speaking likewise of the Sacrament of the Eucharist, he saith, and have been all made to drink into one spirit by one spece, Synecdochicallie, meaning the full participation of the Sacrament, both by eating and drinking; else it should follow, that by saying, we all are made to drink, that the Cup should be given to all, and the bread may be withholden.
Now that the full participation of the LORD'S Supper, under both speces, signified by this drinking into one spirit: Theophylact first declareth, saying, It appeareth that the Apostle speaketh of the LORD'S Table; and when he saith, we all drink of one spirit, he did give us to understand both, to wit, the Blood and the Flesh (saith he.)
Lyke-wise (saith the Jesuit Justinian on this place) as in the preceeding Chapter, by one kind of food, he did signify both: even so here by one spece, to wit, of drink, he would signify the whole Sacrament.
SECT. IV. Of the Sacrifice of the MASSE, that it is properly propitiatory: which the Romanists strive to prove, by these places following.
[ 1] GENESIS 14.18. And Melchizedek King of Salem, offered up Bread and Wine, for he was the Priest of the most high GOD. Of whose order (say they) CHRIST being, He did at His last Supper offer up Himself, under the accidents of Bread and Wine, and so do all Priests under the Gospel the same, as a Sacrifice properly propitiatory.
Aunswere. First, the Text is, He brought forth Bread and Wine, and he was the Priest of the most high GOD. Therefore their own vulgar Translation hath proference, not ofference. With which agreeth, both their own Pagnin, and Vatablus. And as for that which is subjoined, as the reason of his oblation, or right he had to do so, (For he was the Priest of the most high GOD,) in the Hebrew there is no such thing, as witnesseth Cardinal Cajetan, and which error also Bellarmine granteth, saying, that in the Hebrew it is not (for he was,) but (and he was the Priest of the most high GOD,) by a copulative particle, after which is immediately subjoined, his Priestlie action in these words, and he blessed him.
Next, from the translation and clearing the words, to come to the exposition, and the ende of his bringing forth Bread and Wine, Josephus telleth us clearly, That it was in Hospitalitie to Abraham and his followers, who would not have them want anything for their refreshment (saith he.) Clemens Alexandrinus also saith, That Melchizedek for refection, gave bread and wine to Abraham: and Ambrose who useth the word, Obtulit, saith. That this offering or presenting up of Bread and Wine, it was to Abraham himself. Therefore (saith Cardinal Cajetan, and with him Andradius ) there is nothing here written of any Sacrifice or Oblation (saith he, ) but that he caused bring forth Bread and Wine, as Josephus reporteth, for the refreshment of the Victors: and thereafter when he cometh to these words, and he blessed him, Ecce actio socerdotalis, behold here (saith he) is his Priestlie action, according to NVMB. 6.23. Which therefore the Apostle remembereth, HEB. 7.1. and proveth him thereby to have been greater nor Abraham, and consequently his Priesthood to be more excellent than the Priesthood of LEVI, by these two reasons, 1. because he tithed LEVI himself, who was then in the loins of Abraham. And next, whereas LEVI as the greater blessed the people who were the branches, he blessed both Abraham the stock, and LEVI also the branch that was then in his loins, and who afterwards both tythed and blessed others, and so he was greatest of all, and his Priesthood above LEVI'S.
Last, giving that Melchizedek had offered up to GOD Bread and Wine, it had been Euchrasticke for the victory, (as Augustine showeth) and not propitiatory: neither did CHRIST offer up Bread and Wine at His last Supper, nor will the MASSE Priests grant, that they offer up Bread and Wine in their daily Mass: therefore his sacrifice and theirs cannot be one, nor the one warranded by the other: which also may serve shortly to answer all Bellarmine's Arguments, taken from the Types of the Paschal Lamb, and other legal Sacrifices, which were figures of that true Sacrifice of CHRIST Himself offered on the Cross.
[ 2] ISAI 66.21. And I will take them for Priests and Levites, saith the LORD. Here (say they) Priests are foretold under the Gospel, which importeth a daily Sacrifice: and this is the Mass.
Answer. They should have added also Levites, (as is in the Text) and so established the Levitical order. But to show the true cause, wherefore by allusion to the sacred order of the legal ministry then in use, who served at the Altar, the Ministers of the Gospel are under alike styles fore-prophesied: it is, as their own Pintus showeth, for bringing men to CHRIST, which is by the preaching of the Gospel. Therefore saith the Apostle, That I should be the Minister of JESUS CHRIST to the Gentiles, ministering the Gospel of GOD, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable: upon which place therefore saith Chrysostom, (and with him S. Jerome & Haymo ) This is my Priest-hood (saith he,) to preach the Gospel, and this sacrifice do I offer up.
In respect also of the Celebration of the Sacraments, wherein they act the memorial of Christ's Passion, consecrate the Elements, offer by solemn PRAYERS, CHRIST'S sufferings and merits, to the Father for his people, whom at last they bless; no marvel that Analogicallie and by allusion foresaid, they be spoken of under the styles of Priests & Levites.
[ 3] DANIELL 11.31. And He shall take away the daily Sacrifice. That is, (say they) Antichrist, when he cometh, shall abolish the Mass.
Aunswere. ORIGEN showeth, that by the daily Sacrafice, that of the Jews was signified, and that this prophesy was fulfilled before CHRIST'S Birth, by Antiochus Epiphanes, and more fully thereafter, when the Temple was quite destroyed by Titus, the son of Vespasian: which thing also their own Lyra testifieth.
[ 4] MALACHI 1.11. From the rising of the Sun, to the going down of the same, my Name is great among the Gentiles, and in every place Incense shall be offered to my Name, and a pure offering or sacrifice. Which (say they) is the sacrifice of the Mass.
Answer. IRENEVS showeth, that hereby the spiritual Sacrifice of Prayer and Thanks-giving is meant, and therefore our Altar is in the Heaven's (saith he,) whither our Prayers and Sacrifices are directed thither. And thus likewise doeth Tertullian and Theodoret expone.
In like-manner also their own Lyra, (and with him Hugo Cardinalis ) expone this place of spiritual Sacrifices foresaid, showing that the LORD would here-by give the Jewish Priests to know, that spiritual Sacrifices were to succeed to theirs which were carnal, and in particular devote Prayer, is this clean Sacrifice (saith he,) or we our selves according to ROM. 12.1. (saith Eusebius ) a contrite heart also, and the Sacrifice of praise.
LUKE 22.19. Do this in [ 5] remembrance of Mee. That is, (say they) sacrifice my Body and Blood, under the accidents of Bread and Wine in the Mass.
Aunswere. Their own Jansen affirmeth, that out of these words, it cannot be sufficiently proven (saith he,) that this action is a Sacrifice: the reason whereof Beda giveth, in respect that the Apostle exponeth them thus, saying, As oft as ye shall eat of this Bread, and drink of this Cup, ye shall declare the LORD'S death till He come. Whence it will follow, if these words, do this, (which according to the Apostles exposition, extend themselves to all Communicantes,) did import sacrificing of CHRIST, then all these who communicate should be Mass Priests.
But giving, that they extended only to the Apostles, and their successoures in the Church, and that the meaning were, offer up Sacrifice, yet the Fathers, and their own Doctors tell us what Sacrifice this is. Chrysostom calling it the remembrance of that Sacrifice which CHRIST offered on the Cross, Eusebius, the memorial of that great Sacrifice, and S. Ambrose, with Cyprian and others, the remembrance of the LORD'S death.
Thus also saith their own Lombard, That which is offered and consecrated, is called a Sacrifice and Oblation, because it is a remembrance of that true Sacrifice, and holy Oblation, upon the Altar of the Cross.
In like-manner, (saith Aquinas ) for a twofold respect, is the Celebration of the Sacrament, called an Immolation of CHRIST. First, as Augustine saith to Simplicius, because Images, are called by the name of those things whereof they are Images; but so it is (saith he,) that the Celebration of this Sacrament is an Image, representing the Passion of CHRIST, which was His true Immolation: — and next, in regard of the effect of the Passion of CHRIST, to wit, because by this Sacrament (saith he,) we are made partakers of the fruit of the LORD'S Passion.
[ 6] HEB. 13.10. We have an Altar, where-of they have no right to eat, who serve the Tabernacle. Here then, (say they) an Altar under the Gospel, which importeth a Sacrifice to be offered thereon, and which is the Sacrifice of the Mass.
Answer. Their own Aquinas showeth, that this Altar is either CHRIST'S Cross or suffering, of the fruit whereof none are partakers (saith he,) who adheare to the Levitical Priesthood: or else, CHRIST Himself, in whom and by whom, we offer up our prayers, and which is that golden Altar (saith he) spoken of, REVEL. 8. Which exposition of Aquinas, their late Estius declareth to be most true, and agreeable to the Text. Therefore Bellarmine dismissed this place, as unable to militate for him, saying, There are not Catholics wanting, who by this Altar understand the Cross, or else CHRIST Himself, there-fore I urge not this place.
CHAPT. X. Of the five bastard SACRAMENTS.
SECT. I. Of the Sacrament of Confirmation: which the Romanists labor to confirm, by these places following.
[ 1] MATTH. 19.15. And He laid His hands on them, (to wit, the children that were brought unto Him.) Here then (say they,) CHRIST first of all confirmed little Children.
Aunswere. BELLARMINE granteth, That all Sacraments of the Gospel, properly so called, must have these three things: 1. a material and visible sign or Element, 2. a directiue word or institution, by CHRIST Himself, and 3. a promise of saving, or justifying grace, annexed to the right vsers there-of: and therefore they must be common to all. But so it is, that both Alexander of Hales, and their own Bonaventure, affirmeth, that Confirmation was not instituted by CHRIST, (as Biell witnesseth of them) but long afterward by the Church.
Lyke-wise their own Suarez testifieth, that this imposition of our SAVIOR'S hands, was not Sacramental. For it is most true (saith he,) that our Lord here, by this imposition of hands, did never confer this Sacrament, nor before His Ascension, was it ever ministered by any.
ACTS 8.17. Then they [ 2] laid their hands upon them, and they received the holy Ghost. Here like-wise (say they) the Apostles ministered Confirmation.
Answer. This imposition of the Apostles hands, was not a Sacrament: for that which they received thereby, on whom they laid hands, was not ordinary saving grace, which is the effect of a Sacrament, but the extraordinary gift of miracles: as witnesseth Chrysostom, and O Ecumenius plainly, as also their own Lyra, and Bernardus Felicianus.
And as for simple laying on of hands only, whereof is mention here, Suarez saith, it is to be affirmed, that the simple laying on of hands, was not truly the Sacrament of Confirmation, which we have now (saith he,) because in the sinsible rite thereof, it is very far different; and except Chrism be applied to the fore-head, (saith Bellarmine, ) we affirm that it is no Sacrament.
SECT. II. Of MARRIAGE, which the Romanists would prove to be a Sacrament, by these places following.
[ 1] EPHES. 5.32. This is a great Sacrament. Speaking (say they) of Marriage.
Answer. Thou hast not out of this place (prudent Reader) (saith Cardinal Cajetan, ) that Marriage is called by S. PAVLL a Sacrament: for he saith not this is a great Sacrament; but, This is a great Mystery. Where-fore also their late Estius declareth, that it is not proven out of this place, that Marriage is a Sacrament. Yea, it seemeth not to be plain out of Scripture at all, (saith Catharinus ) that Matrimony is a Sacrament, as others are: Nay, it is nowayes a Sacrament, properly of the Newe Testament at all, (saith Durand, as he is cited by their own Cassander: ) one reason whereof, their own Lombard giveth to be this, Because it conferreth not saving or justifying grace: which if it did, they were injurious to their Clergy, who deprive them thereof.
1. TIM. 2.15. Not-withstanding, [ 2] she shall be saved by Chylde-bearing: to wit, the Wyfe. Therefore, (say they) seeing here we see saving grace conferred by Marriage, Marriage is a Sacrament.
Aunswere. This is ascrybed to Chylde-bearing in Marriage, and not to Marriage it self: for there are sundry Marriages, where there is no Chylde-bearing at all; and others, where it is long delayed, as Sarah's and Elizabeth's. Next: It is said in the TEXT, If they continue in Faith, and Charity, and Holiness, with Sobriety. And there are none, (I hope) who will deny, but if those who live in a single life, contine in these Graces, they shall be no less saved.
To understand, then, the meaning of this place rightly, we have the same phrase, ACT. 14.22. where it is said, that by many afflictions, we must enter into the Kingdom of GOD: and yet Afflictions them-selves confer not Grace, or are there-fore Sacraments. But, as by Afflictions, even so by Chylde-birth in pain, (as one sort there-of) if Wyues have these saving Graces here spoken of, they shall be saved, and enter into the Kingdom of GOD. Their bearing of Children also being the Function of that Sexe, and estate of life, where-unto they are called; where-in, (saith their Bishop Espenceus ) if they walk sincerely, we deject not so far that Sexe, but that they shall be also Parttakers of Salvation.
SECT. III. Of the Sacrament of Penance: which the Romanists labor to establish, by these places following.
MATTH. 4.17. Do Penance, [ 1] (saith our SAVIOUR.)
Answer. First, this no more proveth Penance to be a Sacrament, (though the word were rightly translated, which is, repent, ) than all other Preceptes of GOD'S Word are Sacraments, as where he saith, Watch and Pray; or where the Prophet saith, Repent, and turn you from all your Transgressions.
Next, this was before Baptism, (as the Rhemistes on this place acknowledge,) and the Council of Trent declareth, that after CHRIST'S coming, Penance before Baptism was no Sacrament at all: and therefore ACT. 2.38. no such Sacrament is spoken of.
Lyke-wise this was before CHRIST'S Resurrection, and therefore no Sacrament at all; for we teach, (saith Bellarmine, ) that the Sacrament of Penance, was instituted only after Christ's Resurrection.
JOHN 20.22. When He [ 2] had said this, He breathed on them, and said unto them, Receaue the holy Ghost: and whose sins ye shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins ye shall retain, shall be retained. Here (saith both the Council of Trent, and the Rhemistes, ) the Sacrament of Penance was instituted.
Answer. Here is no institution of a Sacrament: because, 1. there is no Elementarie sign, whereunto the word of institution should be ever joined, according to Augustine's rule, accedat verbum ad Elementum, & fit Sacramentum: and which sign should resemble the saving grace which is signified thereby, as in Baptism, and the LORD'S Supper: for, saith the same Augustine, If they have not the resemblance of these things whereof they are Sacraments, they were no Sacraments at all.
In these words, then, our Savior reneweth only to his Apostles their Commission which He had given before, which their own Aquinas showeth, saying, That here is 1. an injunction of their office to preach, 2. the fitting of them thereto, by giving them the holy Ghost, and 3. this is the effect of their preaching, unto the Remission of sins, &c. In like-manner saith Barradius, (and with him Ferus, ) in this place He instituteth them Apostles, that is (saith he,) He sendeth them to preach the Remission of Sins.
SECT. IV. Of auricular Confession: which the Romanists would prove, by these places following.
[ 1] MATTH. 3.6. And they were baptized of him in Jordan, confessing their sins; even as it is likewise said, ACT. 19.18. And many who believed, came, and confessed their deeds.
Answer. Of both these places saith Cajetan, As they went unto the Baptism of JOHN confessing their sins, so are they now said to confess their deeds: but without all doubt (saith he) this was publickelie and generally, for none of them was sacramental confession, but a profession of repentance, for their by-gone life.
And for the first place, Bellarmine saith, We have no example of sacramental Penance, (where-of confession is a part,) either in the actions of the baptist, nor before CHRIST'S Resurrection.
JAMES 5.16. Confess [ 2] your sins one to another.
Answer. There is no speech here of sacramental confession, (saith Cardinal Cajetan ) as is evident out of that which the Apostle saith, Confess one to another: where-as sacramental confession (saith he,) is not one to another, but to the Priest only. The very same also doeth their Carthusianus show: as also (saith Scotus ) by saying, Confess one to another, he saith not that this confession should be to the Priest, more than to another man. For which cause the Rhemistes themselves on this Text are forced to confess, that it is nowayes certain here, that the Apostle speaketh of Sacramental confession.
Wherefore, seeing there is no warrand for the same in Scripture, it was not without cause, that their own Scotus said, and with him Petrus Oxoniensis, and Bishop Rhenanu • , (as witnesseth Bellarmine ) It appeareth that this confession (saith he,) is not jure divine, or by any warrand of Apostolical Scripture.
It is to be noted always, that we oppose not a Christian voluntary confession, whereby a man, being touched in conscience, may at any fit time, privatelie resort to his Pastor, or any discrete Minister of the Word, and for his spiritual ease, comfort, and cure, confess such sins as disquieteth him, or that he findeth himself given unto; that so he may receive Pastoral instruction, comfort, and counsel, for the obtaining of mercy, farthering his mortification, and health of his soul. This sort of confession, (I say,) with Calvin and others, we greatly approve, both as lawful and expedient; and wish, that men were more sensible, than they are of sin; and this recourse to the Physicians of the soul, were more customeable in practice.
But that which we justly impugn, is the imposing upon all men indifferently, the yoke of such a Sacramental confession to the Priest, as must be of all sins, and their circumstances; which they make to be of such an absolute, necessity by divine precept, that without the same be done, no pardon is to be expected at GOD'S hand: and that he who dieth vnconfessed to man, dieth bound in his sins before GOD. So that the manner, obligation, and sacramental necessity of this their confession, hath made it a Racke to the conscience, and a political Pike-lock to know all secrets: which moved their own Cassander to say, I believe there would be little contraversie in this (saith he,) if this wholesome Medicine of confession, were not infected and defiled, by skillesse and importune Physicians, with many unprofitable Questions, whereby they ensnare, and as it were with torments, rack the conscience (saith he,) which they ought rather to comfort.
SECT. V. Of the Sacrament of holy Orders: which the Romanists would establish, by these places following.
1. TIM. 4.14. Neglect [ 1] not the grace that is in thee, which is given thee by prophesy, with imposition of hands. Here (say they) a visible sign, with the effect of invisible grace, in giving of orders, therefore it is a Sacrament.
Aunswere. First, the sign (if it were sacramental) should be an Elementarie sign, (as is said) resembling the grace signified thereby, and instituted by CHRIST Himself to that ende, else altho it hath been used by CHRIST Himself, yet it is no sacramental sign at all, as we see, MATTH. 19.15. imposition of CHRIST'S hands upon little Children, and of His Disciples upon the sick, MARKE 16.18. and thereafter, His own breathing upon them, whereby they received the holy Ghost, John 20.22. and yet no man will say, that this imposition of hands upon the sick, or insufflation of our SAVIOR'S, was a Sacrament at all.
Next, from the sign, to come to the grace signified, and conferred, it is not sacramental grace: for (as witnesseth Bellarmine ) that is saving and justifying, common to all the Elect: but this which is here spoken of, is a proper gift of teaching, given to Pastors in the Church, and sometimes given in an eminent degree or measure, to such as are wicked in life; and so it is, gratia gratis data, but not justifying grace, which is, gratia gratum facient, (as they speak in the Schools.) Therefore S. Chrysostom telleth us, and with him Theophylact, that thereby his gift of teaching is only understood, Sedulius, the exercise of his Talent; Anselmus, and Cajetan, his Episcopal Function; and the late Jesuits, Salmeron and Justinian, the power which he had to teach.
SECT. VI. Of the Sacrament of extreme unction, which the Romanists would prove, by these Texts following.
MARKE 6.13. And [ 1] they anointed many that were sick with Oil, and healed them.
Answer. We need no more 〈1 page duplicate〉 〈1 page duplicate〉 for a full reply, but Bellarmine and Suarez, their Arguments whereby they prove, That the Sacrament of extreme unction, is nowayes spoken of here, but the gift only of miraculous healing: For 1. this unction was for the body, whereas Sacraments are chiefly for the good of the Soul. 2. The Apostles were not Priests as yet, till they were made such at the last Supper, as the Council of Trent teacheth, and therefore no fit Ministers then of this Sacrament: 3. (saith Bellarmine ) they anointed all sick persons whosoever, whereas this Sacrament is only conferred (saith he,) upon those who are bedfast, and in the danger of life; and 4. they anointed those who were not baptized, whereas this Sacrament (saith he,) should neither be given, nor is available to those who are not first baptized.
JAMES 5.14. If any man [ 2] be sick amongst you, let him bring the Priests of the Church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with Oil, in the Name of the LORD: and the prayer of the faithful shall save the sick, and the LORD shall raise him up.
Answer. Cardinal Cajetan on this place, saith. Neither by words, nor by effect, do these words of S. James speak of sacramental or extreme unction (saith he,) but rather of that unction which CHRIST appointed in the Gospel, by His Disciples to be used towards those who were sick: for the Text saith not, Is any man sick amongst you to death, but simple, is any man sick. And he calleth the effect of this unction, the healing of the sick. And besides this, S. James biddeth Sende for many Elders or Priests, to one sick person, that they may pray over him, and anoint him: which (saith he) is altogether contrary to the rite or custom of extreme unction.
More-over, Beda, Theophylact, (to whom we join Euthymias, and Victor Antiochenus, as also Thomas Waldensis, and Alfonsus à Castro, (as witnesseth Bellarmine ) with Lyra and Carthusian, ) all these do hold, that it is one and the self same unction, that is spoken of both by S. MARKE, and S. JAMES here: But so it is, that both Bellarmine and Suarez, the one a Cardinal, the other a Jesuit, proveth, that there is no sacramental unction spoken of by S. MARKE: therefore it will follow, that neither is there any such spoken of by S. JAMES,