Commentary on Romans
2. Oecumenius will have this sentence to be referred to the former, that we should be so far from rendering evil for evil, as contrariwise we should procure things honest: but so the Apostles meaning should be too much restrained, which is more general.
3. This precept is not to be understood only of things honest and lawful, that we must •• ke heed that we commit not any dishonest thing: but in things otherwise lawful and indifferent, we must take heed of giving offense, Martyr.
4. Origen here moveth this doubt, that this should seem to be contrary to that sailing of the Apostle, If I should please men, I should not be the servant of Christ, Gal. 1. he answereth, that the Apostle saith not here, that we may please men: but let us do things honest before them, sieve placeant, sieve non placeant, whether they please or not: to the same purpose P. Martyr: the Apostle saith not, seek to please men, but procure things honest, &c. for as we must approve our conscience before God, so also, bona fama non negligenda est, a good fame and name is not to be neglected.
5. Gorran here well observeth sour sorts of men; some procure things honest only before men, as hypocrites; some only before God, as they which are simple, and not yet perfect; some neither before God, nor man, as notorious offenders, and licentious persons; some before both, as they which have integrity of conscience before God, and of life before men.
27. Quest. How we should have peace with all men.
1. Tolet taketh this to be another reason of the former precept, why we should not render evil for evil, both because we must procure things honest; and, we must maintain peace: Gorran thus divideth these precepts; three things the Apostle admonisheth to be done concerning our enemies: first to do them good, to bless them, v. 14. then to do them no hurt, to recompense none evil for evil, v. 17. then, if they do us wrong, to bear it, and not to break peace: but the Apostles sentence is more general, to have peace with all men, as well enemies as others. 2. Erasmus would have this clause, if it may be, to be joined with the former sentence, procure things honest before all men, if it may be. But Beza well obserneth, that that precept is without limitation, or condition: we must simply procure things honest: but peace only, if it may be. 3. Origen maketh both these exceptions, if it may be, and as much as in you lieth, to have one and the same meaning: as much as in you lieth, that is, quod proposito vestro, & fidei vestrae convenit, as it may stand with your profession and faith: for to have society with the evil, agreeth not with your faith. 4. Gorran, following the interlinearie gloss, thus expoundeth these words, that which in you lieth, that is, in pote • are vestra est, it is in your power to have peace with all men: and so he thinketh three things to be here noted; the difficulty, if it may be ; the possibility, that which in you is ; and the generality, with all men: but neither is it true, that it is in our power to have peace with all men, for it is God that maketh one to be like minded to another, Rom. 15.5. and these two are contrary the one to the other, if it may be, and yet, it is in your power. 5. Wherefore these two exceptions, are thus better distinguished; if it may be: for in some cases, we must have no peace at all with men, but reprove them; as quando de pietate sermo est, when the question is of piety and religion: Origen toucheth another case, that we must not societatem habere cum malis, have any society with the evil: when we see either the truth betrayed and oppugned by heretics, or infidels, or God offended by men's evil life, we should not under pretense of violating peace, be silent in such occasions. Now, where he saith, that which in you lieth, that is added, because some are so contentious, that they will have no peace: but yet we must do our endeavor, that there be no fault in us: quae tui sunt officij praesta, do that which is thy part to do, si ill pacem non servaverit, &c. tu voluntate sis amicus, if he will not have peace with thee, yet be thou friendly and peaceable in thine own disposition: Chrysost. Origen addeth this may be done, cum crimina oderi ••• • omines amant, when they love the men, yet hare their vices, &c. peace is not broken •• them in reproving their vices, for therein they show, that they notwithstanding love the men themselves.
28. Quest. How we should not avenge our selves, but leave it unto God.
v. 19. Auenge not yourselves, &c. The vulgar Latin readeth, defendentes, defending: but the Greek word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which is better translated, vindicantes, avenging, as Chrysostom's interpreter; or vlciscentes, taking revenge, as Origen's interpreter: Pererius taketh upon him here to justify the vulgar Latin, and showeth out of Nonius Marcellus, and Gellius, how the word defendere, to defend, was in time past used, for vlcisci, to revenge, as we are said ho • os defendere, to defend, that is, to keep off our enemies: But howsoever this may be admitted, that some kind of defense is joined with revenge; yet can he not show, these 2. words to be of the same sense: I prefer Tolets judgment, defensio aliquādo iusta est, defense is sometime just, but all revenge is very unjust: and therefore he thinketh, it should be interpreted, revenge: Haymo taketh the word defend, in the proper sense, showing, that Christians being railed upon, should not defend themselves, but by silence, as Christ did before Pila ••• wherefor if this interpretation should be admitted, it would be thought a thing unlawful, for any Christian to defend himself: neither doth the Latin interpreter keep the property of the word, who else-where translateth another Greek word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , defense, 2. Tim. 4.16.
2. Ambrose thinketh, that not only private persons are here concluded, but the public Magistrate also, si plus exigat, &c. if he take greater punishment of the offender, then the cause requireth: but the magistrate revengeth not himself but others. Now here men are forbidden only to avenge themselves: and yet in this case even the magistrate avengeth himself, when under color of his office, he in respect of some particular wrong, proceedeth more rigorously against an offender. 3. But the Apostle taketh not away here all liberty to use defense by the authority of the Magistrate: for both S. Paul himself appealed unto Caesar, and the Magistrate is appointed of God for our wealth: yet we must not go unto the Magistrate, animo vlciscendi, with a mind to seek revenge. For these causes a Christian may safely crave the aid of the Magistrate: 1. to discharge his duty in defending those frō wrong, which are under his care and charge. 2. to seek the amendment of the offender, and wrongdoer, by moderate correction. 3. to take away such evil examples and scandals among Christians, Martyr: but one must not use the benefit of the law, to seek his own revenge; as S. Paul, when 40. Jews conspired against him, sought the Magistrates help for his defense and deliverance, not for their punishment, Gualt. so that nihilo plus excusationis habet, &c. he hath no better excuse, that seeketh to the Magistrate, with a malevolent mind, then if he sought to be revenged by himself, Calv. 4. The Apostle doth not only stay our hands & tongue here from revenge, sed, ne cor huiusmodi cupiditate teneatur, but he forbiddeth, least the heart should be tempted, with any such desire, Calv. 5. But whereas our Savior proceedeth yet further, and saith, Matth. 5.39. Resist not evil, but whosoever shall smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also: this must not be understood according to the strict letter: as Augustine well interpreteth, that this precept is not always to be observed, quantum ad executionem, in respect of the execution in fact, sed quantum ad praeparationem animi, but in the preparation of the mind, that we should always be armed with patience to suffer wrong: for neither did our Savior, when he was smitten on the cheek turn the other, but mildly reproved him that did the violence: to this purpose Aug. epist. ad Marc. This then is to be done, when it may either profit our brother, or maketh more for the glory of God, and not otherwise, Martyr.
Beloved • The Apostle useth this friendly compellation: 1. because these things, which now he speaketh of, were duriora, somewhat harsh and unpleasing; therefore he thus insinuateth himself, the better to persuade, Martyr: blanda appellatione manum inijcit, vt nos retineat, &c. he doth stay us as with his hand, by this friendly word: for otherwise men are impatient in their affections, Calv. 2. And least they might think, that he in thus reading, did not counsel them for their profit, he calleth them, beloved, Mart. 3. And though the world hate such as were patient in suffering wrong, yet they were beloved of God; and so also beloved of the Apostle, Tolet. 4. And in thus saluting them, as beloved brethren, he putteth them in mind of brotherly love, which is much hindered by seeking of revenge.
Give place unto wrath. 1. some understand this of our own wrath, to give way unto it, not to suffer it to break forth, sed apud nos ipsos concoquamus, but to digest and allay it in our selves, Gualt. so also Vatablus, compescite eam, stay your anger: but this phrase is used in a contrary sense, Eph. 4.27. neither give place unto the devil: to give place unto wrath, were to give way unto it, not to resist it. 2. others refer it to the anger and wrath of the adversary, that doth wrong: and so they give two expositions, give place, that is, permittite vobis nocere, suffer them willingly to do you wrong and hurt: or, fugite a loco ad locum, flee from place to place, and so give way unto them, Haymo: and Basil also hath both these expositions, regul. brev. resp. 244. Origen understanding it also of the wrath of him, that doth the wrong, giveth another sense, that if he that hath received the wrong, avenge not himself, quasi effuso, & àrgesto furore, &c. he having digested, and allaied his fury, waxeth milder. 3. But the better interpretation is, by wrath, to understand the divine revenge or punishment: permit Deo, vt adversarium tuum in ius vocet, suffer God to deal with thine adversary, Chrysost. so also Origen understandeth vindictam divinam, the divine revenge, and that wrath, quam sibi the saurizat malis actibus, which he doth treasure unto himself, by his own lewd acts: this sense followeth Calv. Mart. Osiander. Par. Perer. & it is confirmed by the sentence following, cited out of Moses, vengeance is mine, I will repay: the meaning is then, that we should commend our cause unto God, and he will in due time take revenge.
4. Vengeance is mine, &c. 1. Concerning the reading of the words. 1. the vulgar Latin putteth the word in the accusative, vindictam, revenge: which reading Pererius defendeth to be ancient, and to have been used both by Tertull. l. 2. cont. Marc. and Hill. in Psal. 118. yet he confesseth, quod lectio sit rectior, &c. that it is the better reading in the nominative. And so it is in the Greek, and so readeth Hier. epist. ad Ruffia. mihi vindicta, to me revenge, that is, belongeth. 2. now whereas in the original, Deut. 32.35. whence this testimony is cited, there is the conjunction, and, which is here omitted by the Apostle: and there a verbal word is put, recompense is mine, which here the Apostle expresseth by the verb, I will repay: herein he partly followeth the Septuagint, who do interpret it so, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , I will repay: and partly he expresseth the sense, not tying himself to the words: neither doth the omitting of the conjunction anything alter the sense. 2. The Apostle here secretly meeteth with an objection: for whereas he forbiddeth all revenge, it might be said, what then, shall injuries never be requited: yes, saith the Apostle, God in his good time shall take revenge, Tol. neither must the Apostle be so understood, as though we should votis expetere, by our vows and desire entreat God to be revenged of our enemies: but the Apostle here showeth, that we must not revenge our selves, for this were to take God's office upon us: we must therefore pray first, that God would convert our enemies, but if they continue in their wickedness, then we leave them to God's justice, Calv. and when the righteous seeth his desire upon his enemies, non tam delectatur poena, quam dei iustitia, he is not so much delighted in his punishment, as in the justice of God, gloss. ordinar. 3. Now then we must leave all revenge unto God: 1. because he is the judge of all the earth, and it belongeth unto him to punish, Gualt. 2. he taketh revenge citra vllam perturbationē, without any passion, or perturbation, which man cannot do, Gryneus. 3. and it is God only, cui propria est generalis omnium delictorū vindictà, to whom is proper the general revenge of all wrongs; which man cannot do, Tolet. 4. acerbius vindicabit Deus, God will more sharply and severely take revenge then any man can do: whereas if a man revenge his own cause, he must not expect the divine revenge also, Theophyl.
29. Quest. Of doing good unto our enemies.
v. 20. If thine enemy hunger, &c. 1. This precept is fitly joined unto the former, of not avenging our selves: for not only he which rendereth evil for evil, revengeth himself, but he also, which withdraweth his helping hand: and by feeding, and giving drink, we understand, omnia humanitatis officia, all the offices of humanity: as where the Scripture saith, God suffereth the rain to fall, and the Sun to shine upon the wicked, all other temporal gifts are understood: and P. Martyr here observeth out of the civil law, that if victus testamento legatus sit, if maintenance of food be given unto any by will, it includeth apparel, habitation, lodging, medicine for sickness. 2. Further, whereas we are commanded to feed him, this must be understood of the time of necessity: we are not required to bid him home to our houses, Tolet: we must succurrere necessitati, non indulgere voluptati, succor his necessitate, not pamper his pleasure, Cajetan: and we must then relieve him, when fittest occasion is offered to us to take revenge: this precept hath not place, when our enemy is in prosperity and of power: for then men use to faune upon their enemies, that they may do them no harm: but then there is use of this precept, when our enemy is in necessity, and hath need of our help: and then must we afford our help willingly and liberally: for so the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , signifieth not simply to feed, but to do it liberally and plentifully, Tolet. 3. This is the most perfect work of charity, which is here prescribed; and so most hard to flesh and blood: which made Julian to deride and scoff the Christians, as fools and idiots, because he favored not those things, which were of the spirit of God. August. lib. de serm. Dom. c. 33. setteth down diverse degrees of duties to be practiced toward our enemies: 1. one is not to butt, unless one be first provoked, but then he careth not if he do greater hurt, then he received. 2. another degree is velle tantum laedere, to do no more hurt, then was done. 3. a higher degree is, velle minus laedere, to do less hurt, then was received. 4. but yet he goeth further, qui nihil vult laedere, which will do no hurt at all, though he have received much. 5. he is yet more perfect, who being wronged, yet is ready vt amplius laedatur, to bear it, if he be more wronged and hurt. 6. but the perfectest point of all is, quando laesus laedenti benefacit, when he who is hurt, doth good unto him, that hurt him. These three last duties are touched by the Apostle here; not to revenge, to give place unto wrath, to be prepared with patience to bear still, & to feed our enemy being hungry.
30. Quest. What it is to heap coals of fire upon the head of the enemy.
1. Chrysostom understandeth it of the punishment of our enemy, nihil adeo incundum est, atque de inimico sumptum videre supplicium, nothing is so pleasant, as to see punishment taken of our enemy: But this is against the rule of charity, which S. Paul so much urgeth here, for any to take delight in the punishment of his enemy.
2. Origen interpreteth it commissi poenitudinem, qua eum conscientia torquet, the repentance of the fact committed, whereby as with a fire the conscience tormenteth the enemy: so Augustine by coals of fire, understandeth vrentes poenitentiae gemitus, the burning gripes of repentance, whereby the enemy abateth his pride and malice, seeing how the evil which he offered, is recompensed with good: lib. 3. de doctr. Christ. c. 16. so Jerome epist. ad Hedib. qu. 1. and Eucherius, understand this place, that beneficijs cor inimici emollitur, the heart of the enemy is mollified by these benefits: this sense followeth Gwalther: and Osiander, that the enemy shall be pricked in conscience, and descend into himself, and never be at rest till he be reconciled: so also Piscator understandeth, confusionem conscientiae, the confusion of conscience, which causeth the enemy to leave off from his malice.
3. Haymo giveth this sense, ardorem charitatis paries super caput, thou shall kindle upon him servant and burning charity: so also Lyranus, occasiones accendendi ignis dilectionis, &c. thou shalt give him occasion to kindle the fire of love. This sense followeth Martyr, adijciet stimulum, &c. thou shalt so prick his conscience, that he shall be stirred up to love thee: so Gorran, Hugo, Emmanuel Sa, Vatablus, Pererius.
4. Some put both these last senses together; as M. Calvin, animus frangetur in vtram{que} partem, &c. aut beneficiis emollietur, &c. the mind of the enemy shall both ways be qualified, either it shall be mollified with the benefits; or if he continue still in his malice, vretur testimonio conscientiae, he shall be set on fire, with the testimony of his conscience: so also Olevian, Pareus: and Tolet saith, these benefits bestowed upon the enemy are called burning coals, propter vehementiam doloris, &c. & propter ardorem charitatis, &c. for the vehemency of grief which he conceiveth, and the fervency of charity whereby he is inflamed: to the like purpose also Erasmus in his annotations.
5. But that other interpretation seemeth more agreeable, to understand the heaping of these coals of fire, of the heaping up of God's judgments, and the kindling of the divine wrath against such: as Theophylact, arbiter ero inimici tui vindex, &c. wilt thou be revenged of thine enemy, confer some benefit upon him, and so I will take more severe revenge for thy wrong, &c. and Origen also toucheth this sense, poenas eorum in diē iudicit cumulamus, we do heap up their punishment against the day of judgment: of this sense these reasons are given. Theophylact confirmeth it by the words before-going, give place unto wrath, that is, divinae irae concedendum, we must give way unto the divine wrath: and so here the Apostle showeth, how the divine wrath shall take revenge of such malicious and perverse adversaries: M. Beza referreth us to that place in the Prov. 25.22. from whence this testimony is cited; where Solomon by burning coals, understandeth iram Dei alicuius capiti impendentē, the wrath of God hanging over ones head: so also Junius in his annotations here in the Syrian translation, and Rollocus following him: for thus the words stand there, Thou shalt lay coals upon his head, and the Lord shall recompense thee: that is, God shall punish thine enemy, and reward thee. Faius addeth a third reason; because it is usual in the Scripture, by coals of fire, to understand some divine plague, & judgment: as Ps. 18.13.120.4.
But it is thus objected against this exposition: Haymo saith, if one should do well unto his enemy with that mind, to prepare for him greater punishment in hell, non hoc iam est charitatis, this should be no charity in him: so also P. Martyr, we must seek nothing else but their salvation: we must not do good to an enemy with any such intent, to increase their punishment: likewise Pererius hath the same objection, est contra charitatem, &c. it is against charity to do well unto our enemies, with that intent, vt gravius in malum incidant, that they fall into a greater mischief.
Answ. In these words, thou shalt heap coals, &c. the event of the thing only is shown, not the intent and purpose of the doer: like as in the former verse he biddeth them not to avenge themselves, but to give way unto the wrath and justice of God: not that we must in forbearing our own revenge, pray unto God with a revengeful mind, for that were also a breach of charity: but that we should so leave our cause unto God, as a just judge, who at due time will take revenge, if there be no amendment in our enemy.
6. Wherefore the last exposition is most agreeable, by heaping of burning coals, to understand the increasing of their punishment; but yet a secret condition must be implied, that if they be not won by our charity, then burning coals are heaped to their punishment. This conditional sense followeth Gryneus ; thine enemy by thy beneficence, is either become better, or so will he love thee again, or he is made worse, and then he hurteth himself, iram Dei in se concitando, by stirring up the anger of God against him: these burning coals then are the wrath of God, which is the more kindled against such unthankful persons, that are not won by the kindness and beneficence of those, which have recompensed them good for evil.
31. Quest. Of these words, v. 21. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with goodness.
1. The Apostle concludeth this place concerning patience in not revenging our selves of our enemies, with this excellent sentence: which containeth a dehortation from impatience, be not overcome of evil: and an exhortation to patience, but overcome evil with goodness: and so as Origen observeth, contraria contrarijs perimuntur, one contrary destroyeth another, as everything is increased by the like: as fire waxeth greater, if fire be added to it, and the darkness of the night is increased by a cloudy sky: so evil is augmented, when evil is added to it; as if evil be recompensed with evil: he is overcome of evil, qui malis provocatus reddit malum, which being provoked by evil, rendereth evil again: but he overcometh evil with goodness, that having received evil, restituit bona, doth restore good things, Origen.
2. Erasmus noteth, that here good and evil, are not referred unto the good or evil man; but thereby are understood, wrong, and beneficence, or patience: this is true: but yet he that is impatient, and is overcome of evil, thereby also becometh evil; as Haymo noteth, similis efficeris, thou art made like unto him that did the wrong, by not suffering of wrong: as it is said, Prov. 26.4. Answer not a fool in his foolishness, least thou also be like him.
3. So this is an excellent persuasion to recompense evil with good, because thereby we obtain the victory; as Chrysostom here noteth, inimicum tuum interroga, &c. ask thine enemy, when he is most grieved, when thou railest being railed upon, or when thou laughest the railer to scorn, he will answer thee the last, &c. and so Ambrose saith, lib. 1. de offic. c. 36. vindicare se non esse actum fortitudinis, sed abiectionis & timiditatis, that for a man to revenge himself, is no act of fortitude, but of cowardliness and timiditie: it is a noble thing to overcome, but more noble to overcome evil, but most noble of all to overcome evil with good, Gorran.
4. And as he overcometh, that rendereth good for evil, so he is overcome, which recompenceth evil for evil: he only doth not bring evil upon himself, but a greater evil, then his enemy offered him: for that was but malum poena, the evil of punishment, as it is called: but he by his impatience and revenge, sibi infert malum culpa, doth bring on him evil, that is sin, Tolet: and so he is overcome of a threefold evil, of the evil which his enemy put upon him, of the evil of his own passion and corrupt affection; and Haymo addeth the third, à diabolo, he is overcome of the devil.
5. Lyranus here observeth, that always it is not good to sustain wrongs, as when thereby datur andacia malefici malis, the evil take greater encouragement, and boldness to do evil: and to this purpose he allegeth Gregory in his moralls, Quidam cum temporalia inobis bona subtrahant, sunt tolerandi, &c. some are to be tolerated, when they take from us our temporals, some are to be stayed in charity, not so much, that they rob us not of ours, quam ne non sita rapientes, seipsos pendant, &c. as, lest in taking that which is not theirs, they destroy themselves, &c. But then we are to show our patience, when by defending our selves, some great evil is like against the honor of God.
6. P. Martyr also here moveth this doubt; whereas we are here bid to overcome evil with goodness; that is, to give our enemy meat and drink in his need: what shall become of excommunicate persons, with whom we are charged not to eat, 1. Cor. 5.11. and such as are enemies to the truth, whom we are not to bid, God speed, 2. epist. I am. The answer is, that we must not do any of these things, comitatis aut familiaritatis causa, for familiarity or acquaintance sake, but only to minister to their necessity; ne desimus officio charitatis, that we be not behind in the duty of charity.
4. Places of Doctrine.
1. Doctr. To ascribe all unto God's mercy and grace doth not hinder exhortations.
v. 1. I beseech you by the mercies of God, &c. Though S. Paul ascribe our salvation to God's mercy, as he said before, c. 9. It is not in him that willeth, nor in him that runneth, but in God that showeth mercy: yet the Apostle notwithstanding ceaseth not to exhort: and the reason is, because our salvation is not wrought without means, as preaching, admonition, exhortation, and such like: and therefore these means may be used, and yet the foundation of God's mercy in saving us, shall remain unshaken, Martyr: M. Calvin saith further, nullis praeceptis pia men's sic ad obsequium Dei formatur, &c. a devout mind is not by any precepts so much framed to the obedience of God, as by a serious meditation of his mercy; as the Apostle saith, Tit. 2.11. The grace of God, &c. teacheth us to deny ungodliness.
2. Doctr. Of the threefold will of God.
v. 2. What is the good will of God, acceptable and perfect. Paulus Burgens. addit. 2, hath this distinction of the will of God, which is taken here for voluntas signi, his signified or revealed will, that is the will of God for the thing willed: which is prohibitionis, praecepti, consilij, in forbidding, commanding, or counseling: as if a man abstain from evil which is forbidden, therein he doth well: but if he do also the thing commanded, now he doth also that which is pleasing unto God: if further he proceed unto the counsels, then he is perfect: as our Savior said, Matth. 19.21. to the young man, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell all thou hast, &c. This distinction may be admitted with this caution; if counsels be understood of things indifferent, as for a man wholly to leave the world, and to give all or half to the poor, as Zacchaeus did, and such like, not to merit thereby, but to show our obedience and thankfulness to God: in such there must be needs acknowledged, a greater degree of perfection.
3. Doctr. Against curious questionists.
v. 3. The Apostle forbiddeth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to understand above or beyond that which is meet to be understood: which may be urged against curious and unnecessary questions of matters concerning religion: such it seemeth the Church was much troubled with in S. Paul's time, in so much that in six several places in his two Epistles to Timothy, he giveth him charge touching such contentious questions, and vain disputations, 1. Ep. 1.4. c. 4.7. c. 6.5.20. 2. Ep. 1.16.23. where he styleth such needless questions, with the term of old wives fables, vain disputations, profane babblings, foolish and unlearned questions. Much like was that curious and needless endeavor of the school-Divines in reducing all Divinity to intricate questions, and idle and vain speculations: wherein I condemn not their commendable pains, in the debating of doubtful points fit to be discussed, but in finding out new tricks and devises, and excogitating distinctions to obscure and corrupt the truth.
4. Doctr. That no man must forsake his Ecclesiastical function, nor aspire above his reach.
Pet. Martyr applieth the former text against those, which in times past did refuse, or forsake the Ecclesiastical functions, to the which, they were called, who under pretense that they had not gifts sufficient, but indeed either for fear of the troubles incident to those places, or for love of their own ease, or pleasure, did draw their necks out of the collar: these he saith, non sapere vt oportet, they did not understand as they ought. But in these days there is another extreme, which is admitted, when men do presume ambitiously unto places above their reach, and for the which they are in respect of gifts unmeet: neither do these sapere vt oportet: they are not wise unto sobtietie, neither do keep themselves within their line and compass.
5. Doctr. That the holy Ghost is God.
v. 3. As God hath dealt to every man, &c. That which here is ascribed unto God is elsewhere said to be the work of the spirit, 1. Cor. 12.11. All these things worketh the self same spirit, distributing to everyone as he will: seeing then it is God that distributeth these several gifts and graces, and it is the Spirit that so distributeth them, it doth necessarily follow, that the Spirit is God.
6. Doctr. The Scriptures are the rule of faith, from the which we must not swerve.
v. 6. Prophesy according to the analogy, or proportion of faith, &c. This proportion or rule of faith, is to be taken only from the Scriptures; as our Savior biddeth us search the Scriptures, John. 5.39: to them, as the line of truth, must we have recourse, in all our teaching and preaching, not one jot to decline the same: as the Prophet Isai saith, c. 8.20. to the law, to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, there is no truth in them: so Jerome saith, quod non discendit de monte Scripturarum eadem facilitate contemnitur qua approbatur, that which floweth not down from the mountain of the Scriptures, is as easily refused as approved, &c. in c. 23. Matth.
Doct. 7. That Christian religion expelleth not human affections, but only directeth them.
v. 9. Hate that which is evil, &c. A Christian may retain hatred, but it must be exercised against that which is evil: it is not then as the Stoics were of opinion, that in a wise man there are no passions or affections: there are without question, but tempered, and qualified by grace: that like as in an harp, when time and tune is applied, to the instrument consisting of wood, or some such like thing, and strings, there is made pleasant harmony: so human affections ruled by grace do make a sweet consent.
Doct. 8. Of the order and degrees in the Church and commonwealth.
v. 10. In giving honor go one before another: Among Christians then, there are which must give honor, and some are to be honored: Christ will have order kept in his Church, God is not the author of confusion, 1. Cor. 14.33. the inferiors must yield honor to the superiors: the scholars to the teachers, the people to their pastor, they which are ruled to their governors: this maketh against the Anabaptistical confusion, which taketh away the civil superiority of one above another.
Doct. 9. That the Church of God shall never want enemies to persecute it.
v. 14. Bless them which persecute you, &c. Then the godly shall never want persecutors to exercise their patience: there are two things which the world hateth, unity and piety, and all persecutions in the world, are either for the truth or godliness sake: wherefore seeing such is the lot of the Church of God in this world, they must arm themselves with patience, as the Apostle saith, Heb. 10.36. You had need of patience, that after you have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise.
Doct. 10. How, and wherein we should love our enemies.
v. 19. Auenge not yourselves, &c. We must thus be affected toward our enemies. 1. in loving them as Christ loved us, when yet we were enemies, Rom. 5.10. 2. in procuring their conversion, as Ananias did Saul's, Act. 9. 3. in praying for them, as Stephen did for the Jews. 4. in taking heed of giving them offense: for which cause Jacob went away from Esau, Gen. 27. 5. in bearing their wrongs, as the Apostles did, Act. 5. 6. in molifying them with gentle words, as Abigail did David, 1. Sam. 25. 7. in ministering necessary things unto them, as Elisha did to the army of the Syrians, 1. King. 6. 8. in showing compassion in their miseries, as David mourned for Saul. 9. in receiving them to mercy, when they return to grace, as Joseph did his brethren.
5. Places of controversy.
Controv. 1. Concerning the power of free-will.
1. Wherea • 〈◊〉 Apostle in this 12. chapter beginneth to give precepts of righteousness, and to exhort 〈◊〉 holiness: hence the enemies to the garce of God take occasion to establish their opinion concerning free-will: that a man assisted by God's grace, is able to perform all these precepts: Stapletons reasons are these, Antid. p. 777.
1. The precepts of the moral law, are agreeable to the law of nature, and to the law of nations, therefore they have not such difficulty, but that they may be kept.
2. All things are possible to the grace of God: which grace of God is had and obtained by prayer.
3. God commandeth in vain, if his precepts cannot be performed: so also Erasmus, praecepta frigent, si nihil tribuitur voluntari, the precepts are cold, if nothng be yielded to the will of man, &c.
4. Either God is unjust, in commanding that which cannot be performed, or imprudent in requiring such obedience, which he thought might be performed and cannot.
5. And men herein have an excuse of their disobedience, because it is not in their power to do that which they are bidden.
Contra. 1. The perfect obedience, which the law requireth, far exceedeth that righteousness, which the Law of nature, and of nations exacteth: for that only requireth an external discipline: but the moral law prescribeth a perfect conformity of the creature with the Creator.
2. To the grace of God given in perfection nothing is hard and impossible: but so is it not given to any in this life, but in a certain measure and degree: the regenerate by grace are made able in some measure to keep God's commandments, but not perfectly.
3. Neither are the precepts of God in vain, though men are unable to keep them: for there are diverse other ends: as the unregenerate are either thereby stirred up and called, or are made inexcusable: the regenerate by such precepts are raised up from negligence, and slouthfulnesse, have a rule given them to follow, and do see their own weakness, and are encouraged and provoked to go on still unto perfection, to attain as near it, as they can.
4. God is neither unjust in so commanding: for the creature is bound to yield perfect obedience to the Creator, and the creature both once had received strength in the creation, which through willful transgression was lost, and now a way is shown by restauration in Christ, how the will of God may be fulfilled: neither is God imprudent, for he is not deceived in those ends, which he propoundeth to himself in giving such precepts unto men.
5. Man can have no excuse for his disobedience, seeing once he had received strength to perform the Creators will, which was lost by man's willing transgression: and because he seeketh not to have his disobedience satisfied by the perfect obedience of Christ, and so he contemneth grace offered.
2. Now touching the doctrine of truth, concerning freewill: this we affirm, that man by nature hath no power or activity at all unto that which is good, but is altogether a servant to sin, and that without grace in Christ, no man can choose and follow that which is good: this is evident by these texts of Scripture, Genes. 6.5. all the imaginations of the thoughts of man's heart are only evil continually: if all are evil, and only, and continually, what place or time is left here to that which is good in man's corrupt heart: Math. 7.18. a corrupt tree cannot bring forth good fruit: it is against the nature of things, for evil to bring forth good, or good evil: everything bringeth forth by nature, that which is like unto it: Rom. 6.20. Ye were servants of sin: Eph. 2.5. we were dead by our sins: servants are not freemen, neither can the dead do any work of the living: no more can a man by nature do anything, that is good, 1. Cor. 2.14. the natural man perceiveth not the things of the spirit of God: if he perceive not, nor know them, he cannot choose to do them: for there is nothing in the election of the will, which is not first in the conception of the understanding.
But it will be objected. 1. Then is not the will of man free, if it have not power indifferently to good or evil.
Answ. The will of man is free from coaction and compulsion, but not from necessity: for the determination of the will to one thing, taketh not away the liberty and freedom thereof: for the will of God by the perfection of nature, is inclined only to that which is good, in the Angels by the perfection of grace: and to evil the will is only inclined by the perverseness of the will, either simply and unchangeably, as in reprobate Angels and men, or for a time, and in some sort, though not simply, as in the unregenerate: yet in all these the will worketh freely without any forcing.
2. Object. Though a man without grace can do no good thing, yet his will assisted by grace is enabled to every good thing.
Answ. 1. That good thing which is wrought in the regenerate by the grace of Christ, proceedeth not at all from their own freewill: grace worketh, the will is wrought upon: for Christ saith, without me ye can do nothing, John. 15.5. 2. this grace worketh not perfectly in any in this life, but is begun only here: for the Apostle saith, if we say we have no sin we deceive our selves, and the truth is not in us, 1. John. 1.8. See further hereof, Synops. Centur. 4. err. 42. to err. 45.
Controv. 2. Whether the Mass be a sacrifice properly so called.
The Romanists would prove it out of this place v. 1. because the Apostle exhorteth to give up our bodies a living 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , sacrifice. 1. hence they reason thus: Christians have a sacrifice properly so called, which is the oblation of some external and sensible thing unto God by the lawful Minister: but there is no such external sacrifice to be found among Christian, saving the Mass: it remaineth then that the Mass is that external sacrifice.
2. Every Priest must have a sacrifice to offer, but there is no other sacrifice offered up by the Priests of the new testament, but the Mass: Ergo: to this purpose Bellarm. lib. 1. de Miss. cap. 2. & 15.
Contra. 1. Christians need not any external sacrifice to offer unto God, such as were the legal sacrifices of beasts: but they have a true sacrifice, (though not to offer up daily themselves) which was once killed and sacrificed upon the cross: which now is not daily to be offered up: but the memory of that sacrifice is to be revived by the celebration of the Sacrament: as our Savior saith, this do in remembrance of me. And beside, this sacrifice once offered for all, there are other sacrifices, not properly so called, but metaphorically, such are the spiritual sacrifices of Christians, as is their mortification, mentioned by the Apole here, v. 1. such are the sacrifices of praise, Heb. 13.15. the sacrifice of alms, Philip. 4.17. and S. Paul calleth martyrdom, a sacrifice of faith, Philip. 2.17. other external sacrifice there is none necessary for Christians to offer.
2. Every sacrificing Priesthood must have somewhat indeed to offer, but the ministry of the Gospel is no such sacrificing Priesthood: that is a function of the Popes devising, one of Antichrists creatures, to have power to make and offer up Christ's body: the sacrificing Priesthood of the new Testament, is appropriated and determined to, and in the person of Christ, neither doth pass unto any other: Priests to offer up spiritual sacrifices all Christians are made in Christ, Revel. 1.6. and Ministers especially, who are by calling to offer up the prayers of the congregation unto God, and to declare his will again unto them.
3. But touching the Mass, it is no sacrifice at all: the Eucharist is a Sacrament, therefore no sacrifice: for a Sacrament is a representation of a thing absent, a sacrifice is an oblation of a thing present: the one is given from God to us, the other offered by us unto God. 2. Christ did not sacrifice himself in his last supper, but upon the cross: therefore neither is Christ now sacrificed in the Eucharist. 3. where a sacrifice is, there is a change and alteration of the thing sacrificed: but in the Eucharist, the bread and wine remain visibly and sensibly unchanged: therefore no sacrifice.
Controv. 3. Of the difference between 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , worship, and service, whether they signify two kinds of religious worships, the one peculiar to God, the other to the creatures.
This is generally affirmed by the Romanists, that these two words do signify two kinds of religious worships, the first proper unto God, the other communicated to the creatures: their arguments are these.
1. The Scripture so useth these words, giving 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , worship unto God, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , service unto the creatures.
2. For otherwise there should want a proper and peculiar name for the worship due only unto God: for service is due to man, piety to parents; and other such terms of reverence are imparted to the creatures: only 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , worship, is left to signify that peculiar kind of service which is due unto God, or else none.
3. Worship is due unto ones person, in respect of the excellency thereof: now there are three kinds of excellenc • e, divine, human, and the middle between both, which is of the Angels and Saints, and • o accordingly, there must be three kinds of worship, divine, peculiar to God, civil or human, due unto men, and a middle kind of worship, due unto Saints: to this purpose, Thomas, 2. quest. 103. art. 3.
Contra. 1. It is untrue, that the Scripture so distinguisheth these two words, making the one peculiar to God, the other to the creatures: for both 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , service, is used to express the divine worship: as Deut. 13.4. Iud. 2.7. 1. Sam. 7.3. c. 12.11. and in diverse o ••• ••• aces of the Old Testament, likewise in the new, Matt. 6.24. Luk. 6.23. and we shall ••• de the divine worship to be oftener signified, by this word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , service, then 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , worship: for as Pareus hath diligently observed, the first is found at the least 39. times in the old and new testament ascribed unto God, the other about 30. times. And as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , service, is given unto God, so 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , worship or service, is given to the creatures: for 10. times in the Old Testament, as Pareus hath summed the places, it is said, thou shalt not do in the Sabbath, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , any servile work: as Levite. 23.7.8.21. Numb. 28.18. the other places may be supplied out of Pareus. And whereas Bellarmine objecteth, that in the new Testament, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , is only used for the divine worship: that is not so, for once in the new testament, is it taken for the worship of the creatures, Rom. 1.25. Neither do these two words signify two kinds of religious worships, the one due only to God, the other communicable to the creature: for, as the worship of idols under the term of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , is forbidden 34. times in the old testament, and once in the new, as learned Pareus hath collected: so is it forbidden under the other term 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , 23. times in the old testament: See Pareus further, dub. 3. so that both these when they are used for any religious worship, are not communicable to any creatures, but only peculiar to God: as Augustine confesseth, qu. 34. in Exod. duliam deberi Deo tanquam Domino, latreiam tanquam Deo, that service, is due unto God, as our Lord and Master, and worship, as our God.
2. If the Greek tongue should want a peculiar word to express the divine worship, it were no more innonvenient, then that both in the Hebrew and Latin tongue, the same defect is found: and yet there is a special word, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , God's worship, which is used in Scripture, to signify the divine worship due unto God only, John. 9.31. 1. Timoth. 2.10.
3. Indeed civil worship is to be given according to the difference of degrees, and excellency of the persons: but religious worship is to be given only as the Lord hath appointed it: and yet there are more distinctions of excellency then these three: for even among the Angels, there are diverse degrees, as of Arkeangels, Thrones, Dominions: and so by this rule, there should be not only three, but many kinds of worship.
4. Now touching the thing it self, this we affirm, that there are only two kind of worships, a religious, which sometime is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , worship, sometime 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , service, and this is peculiat only unto God: there is beside a civil adoration and service, which may be given to the creatures: some of our reasons are these.
1. Samuel saith unto the people, 1. Sam. 7.3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , serve him only: where 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , religious service, is commanded due only to God: so that here they can have no evasion, by that distinction of these two words, worship and service.
2. All worship of Angels is forbidden: Coloss. 2.17. the word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which is not by our adversaries own confession, a worship peculiar unto God: so Revel. 22. the Angel forbiddeth John to worship him, because he was his fellow servant: where S. John's error was not, as Bellarmine suggesteth, because he gave that kind of religious worship, unto an angel, which is proper to God only; but because he did worship him simply, for he doth not restrain him from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the divine worship, but from all 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , all adoration, and humble prostrating of himself.
3. All idololatricall worship is forbidden, but all religious adoration given unto the creatures is such as tendeth to idolatry, because it ascribeth unto the creature that which is peculiar to the Creator, as to know the heart, to be present everywhere, to have power to help, and such like: for they which pray unto Angels and Saints, and prostrate them before their images, have this opinion of them, that they are present to hear, and help them, which only God can do: Ergo, such religious adoration is idolatrous: See further of this question, Synops.
Controv. 4. Of the comparison between virginity and marriage.
The Rhemists in their annotation, 1. Cor. 7.31. do extol virginity in such sort, that they do much disgrace marriage: for these are their words, virginity hath a grateful purity and sanctity of body and soul, which marriage hath not, &c. and for this cause they say that Priests are forbidden marriage, That they may be clean and pure from all fleshly acts of copulation, &c.
But this were to make marriage unclean, whereas it is not the matrimonial act, but the lascivious and wanton mind, which abuseth marriage, that bringeth uncleanness with it: Origen is more equal, who upon these words, v. 1. give up your bodies a living sacrifice •••• lie, &c. thus writeth, quoniam videmus nonnullos sanctorum, aliquas etiam Apostol •• 〈◊〉 buisse coniugium, &c. because we see that certain of the Saints, and some of the Apostles were married: we cannot understand the Apostle here to mean virgintie only, &c. but that they which are in coniugijs positi, &c. placed in marriage, and by consent for a time do give themselves to prayer, corpora sua exhibere posse hostiam viuentem, &c. may exhibit their bodies a living sacrifice; if in other things sancte agant & just, &c. they deal holily and justly, &c. and concerning virgins he further saith, that if they be polluted with pride, or covetousness, or such like, they are not to be thought, ex sola virginitate corporis, &c. by the only virginity of their bodies to offer up a living sacrifice unto God, &c. Thus then there may be both purity and sanctity in marriage, and as the Apostle saith, an undefiled bed, Heb. 13.4. which the Rhemists deny: and there may be pollution and uncleanness in virginity: See further, Synops. Papis. Centur. 3. er. 97.
Controv. 5. The mind it self, and not the sensual part only hath need of renovation.
v. 2. Be changed by the renewing of your mind: this is against the position of the Philosophers: as Aristotle affirmeth, Ethic. 1.13. that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , reason always persuadeth and moveth unto the best things: the Romanists do jump with them herein; who think the sensual part of the mind only to be corrupted.
But 1. the Apostle here showeth that the very mind, and spiritual part of the soul hath need of renovation. 2. indeed in civil things and moral duties, the reason may be a guide, but in divine and supernatural, it is blind and erroneous. 3. and if it be here objected, that the Philosophers, as Socrates, Plato, did many excellent things by the light of reason: I answer, that yet in those things they failed of the true ende: for they respected not the honor and glory of God, but sought perfection by their own endeavor: and herein they shown the error and corruption of their mind. 4. yea the reason is so far off, from being a perfect guide, that even in the regenerate, it hath need still to be renewed, as in the Romans here, to whom S. Paul writeth: how much more in the unregenerate.
Controv. 6. Of the perfection of the Scriptures against traditions.
v. 2. To prove what the will of God is, acceptable, and perfect: this perfect will of God, is nowhere else revealed but in the scriptures: if they contain a perfect revelation of the will of God, then there need no other additaments; what use then of human traditions, such as many the Church of Rome is pestered with, which have no warrant out of the Scripture: which being able to make the man of God perfect to every good work, 2. Tim. 3.17. all other helps and supplies, are superstitious and superfluous: See further hereof, Synops. Centur. 1. err. 11.13.
Controv. 7. Against freewill.
v. 2. And be not fashioned, &c. Tolet hence collecteth, because the vulgar Latin thus readeth, nolite configurari, &c. have you no will to be conformed, &c. that it is positum in arbitrio hominis, placed in the will of man, whether thus to be fashioned, or not: whereas there is no such word in the original, for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , signifieth be not fashioned, not be ye not willing to be fashioned: and beside the very next words, be ye changed by the renewing of your mind, do confute this opinion, and evidently show, that a man hath no freewill of himself unto that which is good: Indeed the Scriptures do use exhortations to the regenerate, to show, that it must be the work of the spirit, to stir them up to do those things whereunto they are exhorted: See further Synops. Papis. Centur. 4. err. 46.
Controv. 8. Against the arrogancy of the Pope.
v. 3. According as God hath dealt to every man, &c. Then every man hath his certime measure and stint of gifts: one hath not received all: as the Apostle saith, 1. Cor. 7.7. Every man hath his proper gift of God, &c. Then that man of pride here showeth himself in his colors, who arrogateth to himself authority over the whole Church: and boasteth to have all knowledge locked up in his breast: wherein he showeth not himself to be a servant of Christ's: for all his servants have received a portion and measure of gifts; one alone hath not all, Pareus.
Controv. 9. Against the superstitious orders of the Popish Clergy.
v. 7. Or he that teacheth, on teaching, &c. Pet. Martyr and Gwalther upon this place do show, what was the oeconomie, ecclesiastical policy and discipline of the Primitive Church: how first they had praesides doctrinae, the presidents of doctrine, then they had assistants, the Seniors and Elders, qui disciplinam publicam conservabant, which did preserve the public discipline: the next were the deacons, which dispensed the treasure of the Church, unto whom were joined, such as attended the sick: as in this place, the Apostle setteth down five offices of the Church, pastors and teachers, that attended the spiritual edifying of the Church: then distributors, rulers, shewers of mercy, whose care was for the external discipline: but now ne nominā quidem extant, &c. not so much as the names remain of these functions, Martyr: or as Gwalther, praeter inauia nomina, &c. beside vain names and titles, nothing is left in the Popish Church: but they substituted other orders, as Acoluthists, exorcistes, doorekeepers, candlebearers, and such like: See more hereof, Synops. Centur. 1. err. 69.
Controv. 10. The Pope not the head of the Church.
v. 5. We are one body in Christ: Beside that in this place the Church is said to be the body of Christ, and so he consequently the head thereof: as S. Paul calleth directly, Ephes. 1.22. Coloss. 1.18. and so this being a title peculiar to Christ, to be head of the Church, no mortal man can arrogate it to himself: it may be thus further shown. 1. the Apostles did not take upon them to be heads of the Church: for S. Paul both here, and 1. Cor. 12. doth reckon himself in the number of the members. 2. the Church hath not two heads, Christ is one, the Pope cannot be another. 3. the head giveth direction and influence to the body, none of these offices can the Pope do unto the Church. 4. the Church is not the spouse or body of the Pope, therefore he is not the head thereof. 5. from Peter to Clemens 8. 200. Popes have died, but the head of the Church dieth not, for then the Church should die with it, 6. from Euaristus to Pius 5. the Papal sea was vacant at times, 38. years, 8. months, and 29. days, as Mercator casteth it in his cronologie, then so long was the Church without an head, if the Pope were the head. 7. there have been at one time 2. and sometime three Popes, then should the Church have had so many heads, ex Pareo.
Controv. 11. That to love our enemies is a precept, and commanded, not counseled as indifferent.
v. 14. Bless them which persecute you, &c. The Romanists do hold, that a man is not bound extra casum necessitatis, but in case of necessity to succor his enemy, and to apply any particular prayer unto him, but only in general: in case of necessity to do it, it is a precept, but otherwise, and in other cases it is a counsel only: to this purpose Thomas 22. qu. 25. whom Pererius followeth, 2. dispute. numer. 8. Tolet addeth further, for a man to be ready in mind, not only not to revenge himself, but to suffer more wrong, as to hold his other cheek when he is smitten upon the one, is a precept, but in fact to do it, is but a counsel only, annot. 30. in fine: and a precept and counsel (they say) do thus differ: the first belongeth to all Christians, and to leave it undone is sin, the other is only for such as are perfect, which though to leave undone be no sin, yet to do it, is of great merit.
Cont. 1. S. Paul's precept is here general, to bless our persecutors, there is no case or time excepted: Christian charity must not be restrained nor limited: who then seeth not, but that this minsing and cutting of the Apostolical precept, is against the rule of charity. 2. to be always ready in mind, and in fact when occasion requireth to keep patience toward our enemy, is a precept and commanded: but according to the strict letter, to turn the cheek to the enemy, when one is stricken, is neither precept nor counsel: for our Blessed Savior being smitten on the one cheek did not turn the other, who was most perfect in all his actions. 3. a difference between precepts and counsels we grant, in respect of the matter and subject: the one is of things necessary, the other of matters in their own nature indifferent: such as that is, 1. Cor. 7.15. of bestowing ones virgins, but otherwise they are both general and not to be omitted, and neither are meritorious: See further Synops. Centur. 2. err. 84.
6. Moral observations.
Observ. 1. Of the necessity of good works and a godly life.
v. 1. I beseech you brethren, &c. S. Paul having hitherto in this epistle laid down th • doctrine of justification, and of other principal points of Christian religion, now beginneth to exhort unto holiness, and to the showing forth of the fruits of our regeneration: as here in this place he entreateth them to give up themselves and their bodies to the service of God: for this is the end of our redemption and deliverance to serve the Lord, Luk. 1.74. A. Fulvius, when he had taken away his son from following Cataline, he killed him, saying, non Catalina te genui sed patriae, I did not beget thee for Cataline, but for the country: but it may be better said of us, that God hath not created us to serve the Devil, the world, or the flesh, but to serve him: When Phillip King of Macedon, being somewhat pleasant, did dance and leap among the poor captives, insulting over them, and upbraiding their misery, Demades said unto him in this manner, cum fortuna tibi Agamemnonis personam imposuerit, uonne te pudet Thersitem agere, seeing fortune hath put upon thee the person of Agamemnon (that is of a King) art not thou ashamed to play Thersites (who was a base, contemptible, and odious, railing companion:) so when God hath called us to this high dignity to be called his sons, and hath made us heirs of his kingdom, yea Kings in Christ, it is a shame for us, to abase our selves to the vile condition of being servants unto sin.
Observ. 2. We must not conform our selves to the fashion of this world
v. 2. And be ye not fashioned, &c. Chrysostom observeth well, that the figure and fashion of this world is but a transitory thing: it is tanquam persona scenica non consistens rerum substantia, as a person counterfetted upon the stage, not a thing of any substance: and therefore it were a vain thing to conform our selves to it: therefore the Apostle saith, We should use this world as if we used it not, for the fashion of this world goeth away, 1. Cor. 7.31.
Observ. 3. Against curiosity.
v. 3. That no man understand above that, which is meet, &c. This maketh against those which are curious searchers and priers into God's secrets, neglecting those things, which are for their necessary knowledge and use: Sirach giveth good counsel, Ecclesiastic. 3.22. Seek not out the things that are too hard for thee, &c. but what God hath commanded, think upon that with reverence, &c. Augustine saith well, melius est dubitare de occultis, quam litigare de incertis, &c. it is better to doubt of hid matters, then to contend about uncertain. The Philosopher was worthily reproved of his maid, who while he was vewing the stars fell into a pit, that was before him: such are they, which seek after things to high above their reach, and let go things more profitable.
Observ. 4. Against pride and vain glory.
v. 3. That everyone understand according to sobriety. Chrysostom hath here an excellent moral against arrogancy, when men do attribute more to themselves then there is cause, and are puffed up with pride. 1. he compareth the arrogant man to a very fool: for their speeches are alike vain, and foolish: the proud man saith, I will set my throne above the stars, Isaiah. 14. I have gathered all the earth as one doth gather eggs, Isai. 10.1 • . what could a very idiot and fool say more: saving that herein they differe, that fools are pitied, because they are such by nature, not by their own fault, but a proud man none hath pity of: periter desipiunt cum illis, veniam tamen vt illi, non merentur, they are unwise like the other, but they deserve not pardon, as the other.
2. He that exceedeth the measure of prudence, and is pust up in pride becometh foolish: he is timorous, and rash, and subject to all infirmities whatsoever: as Nabal of a proud man, became foolish, and afterward so faint hearted, and timorous, that through fear he died: for like as corpus intemperatum factum quibusvis est passionibus obnoxium, a body being intemperate, and having lost the complexion, is subject to every passion; so the mind having lost humility and prudence, is apt to every infirmity: and like as the eye being blind, maketh all the members blind, so is it with arrogancy, that blindeth the mind.
3. An arrogant man maketh himself a monster: forsan tibi pennas innascioptares, it may be thou wouldest wish thou hadst feathers and wings: for a proud man omnino volare conatur, endeavoreth as it were to fly in his mind, and so becometh a very monster, a man with wings.
4. In the last passage, he compareth a proud man not to ashes or dust, or dirt, for they are to good; but they seem to me stupae accensae similes, to be like unto tow set on fire: which is soon kindled, and soon extinct, and it leaveth nothing behind it: so is the mind of an arrogant man quickly inflamed, and as soon quenched, and come to nothing: more casual then a spiders web, and more light and vain then smoke.
5. Observ. Of hospitality.
v. 13. Giving yourselves to hospitality. Chrysostom here hath another worthy treatise concerning hospitality, against those which only do not give, but afflict and grieve the poor, with reviling words. 1. he speaketh against their curiosity, which sift and examine the poor narrowly, before they will give him anything: if Abraham had done so, he had missed of entertaining the Angels, & so if thou curiosa scruteris pauperem, do curiously sift a poor man, thou mayest sometime let slip a man approved of God: but what if he be a lewd man of life, doth not God suffer the sun to shine upon such, and dost not thou think him worthy of a morsel of bread: it is extreme insolency, pro vno pane totam hominis miseri vitam curious inquirere, for a piece of bread to sift the whole life of a poor miserable man: but what if he be thine enemy, yet remember, quod famulus illius es, qui percutientem se curavit, &c. that thou art his servant, which cured him, that smote him: yea Christ, os illud, quod mortem operatum erat, exosculatus est, kissed that mouth, which wrought his death.
2. In the next passage Chrysostom showeth how monstrous a thing it is, not only to withdraw benevolence from the poor, but to persecute them with evil language. 1. thou addest affliction to affliction, velut tempestatem tempestati, as one tempest to another: and him that fleeth unto the haven, thou dost drive back upon the rocks. 2. quomodo peccatorum tuorum veniam petis, qui eum convitiaris, qui tibi nihil peccavit, &c. how canst thou ask pardon of thy sins, who railest on him, that hath not sinned against thee? 3. thou art herein more cruel then the saluage beast: for they only ravin, when their hunger compelleth them, tu nemine cogente fratrem tuum devoras, mordes, laceras, thou, no man compelling thee, dost devour thy brother, bite him, tear him, &c. 4. how dost thou think to receive the holy oblation, qui linguam humano sanguine rubefecisti, which hast died thy tongue red with man's blood. 5. they which feed not the poor are condemned, Go ye cursed into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: and what punishment, thinkest thou, shall they have, qui non solum non pasceunt, sed & convitiantur, &c. which do not only not feed, but rail also and revile, &c.
6. Observ. That no man should stand upon his own wit, but use the counsel and advice of others.
v. 16. Be not wise in yourselves: because everyone seeth not all, and the most prudent may be sometime deceived, it is very expedient, that we should give ear unto the counsel of others: we see that Rebeccahs advise unto Jacob, corrected the oversight of Isaac, who partially would have given the blessing unto Esau, refusing Jacob: Moses that wise lawgiver hearkened to the counsel of Hobab his father in law: and Naaman refused not the counsel of his poor servant, who advised him to do as the Prophet had prescribed.
7. Observ. How to overcome our enemies with patience and lenity.
v. 20. Thou shalt heap coals of fire, &c. that is, either thou shalt win him with thy benefits, as some interpret it, or, heap up a greater judgment against him: And true it is, that oftentimes the malice of the enemy, which is by violence and resisting more inflamed, is by lenity asswaged: as Saul's fury toward David, was for the time much abated, when David spared him in the cave, having cut off the lap of his garment, and another time when he took from him his spear, and pot of water, 1. Sam. 24.26. In foreign stories, even among the heathen, memorable mention is made of Phocion that noble Athenian, who being unworthily condemned to die, when he was about to drink the deadly cup, being asked of his friends, what message he would send to his son; answered, mando ei hoc, vt oblrviscatur potus huius, this I command him, that he forget this drink, which the Athenians have appointed for me. Aelian. lib. 12.
The like Valerius Maximus lib. 4. c. 2. writeth of Cicero, who defended Gabinius in open judgment, who in his Consulship had expelled him the city: likewise twice he pleaded for Vatinius, that shown himself a professed enemy always to Cicero. Not unlike unto these is the example of Balduinus king of Jerusalem, who having put the Arabian Saracens to flight, and taken great spoils, in his return found upon the way a woman ready to travel of child, wife unto a chief Prince of the Arabians, whom he had left behind, being pursued, whom he covered with his own mantle, and appointed a woman to attend upon her, and left with her two milch camels: This his kindness was not lost: for afterward he being besieged by the Arabians, and put to a great straight, was delivered by the means of that Captain, whose wife he had succoured in her extremity.
CHAP. XIII.
1. The text with the diverse readings.
1. Let every soul be subject to the higher (or supereminent ) powers: for there is no power but of God: and the powers that be, are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore setteth himself against the power, ( resisteth, B.G.L. but there is another word for that afterward ) resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist, shall receive to themselves condemnation. ( judgment, V. )
3 For rulers B. ( magistrates, G. Be. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) are not to be feared ( are not a fear, Gr. ) for good works, but for evil: wilt thou then not fear ( be without fear, G. ) the power? do well, so shalt thou have praise of the same.
4 For he is the minister of God for thy good: ( wealth, B.G. ) but if thou do evil, fear: for he beareth not the sword in vain: ( without cause, L. for naught, G. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) for he is the minister of God, and revenger for wrath ( to take vengeance, G. ) on him, that doth evil.
5 Wherefore it is necessary to be subject, not because of wrath only, but also for conscience sake.
6 For, for this cause pay ye also tribute: for they are God's ministers, bending themselves ( serving, L.B. applying themselves, G. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , with force and strength applying: see. c. 12.12.) to the same purpose.
6 Give unto all men their duty: tribute, to whom ye owe tribute; custom, to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor, to whom honor.
8 Owe nothing to any man, but to love one another: for he that loveth another ( his neighbor, L.S. ) hath fulfilled the Law.
9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet: and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended ( capitulated, Gr. not restoared, L. fulfilled, S. ) in this saying, namely B.Be. (in this, Gr.) Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself.
10 Charity doth not evil to the neighbor: therefore is charity the fulfilling of the Law.
11 And that considering ( knowing, Gr. ) the season, that it is now time ( the hour, Gr. ) that we should be raised ( awake, B. ) from sleeepe: for now is salvation nearer us (better, then our salvation is nearer, L.B.G. ) then when we believed.
12 The night is past on, ( passed before, L. praecessit, but it is better interpreted processit, is past on, Be. ) and the day is approached: ( is atiband, G. is come nigh, B. ) let us therefore cast away the works of darkness, and put on the armor of light, ( the habit which beseemeth the light, Be. ad. )
13 So that we walk honestly, as in the day, not in rioting, Be. ( or gluttony, G. in music, S. ) or drunkenness, neither in chambering, and wantonness, nor in strife, and envying:
14 But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and take no care ( make no persuasion, Gr. B. ) for the flesh, to fulfill the lusts thereof.
2. The Argument, method, and parts.
IN this Chapter from the general exhortation to the offices of charity, the Apostle cometh unto particular duties, as unto the Magistrate, and then falleth again into the commendation of love, dehorting from gross vices, and corruptions of life: so then of this chapter there are three parts, 1. the first of duty to be exhibited to the magistrate, to v. 8. 2. of love in general, v. 8, 9, 10. 3. the exhortation is extended from v. 11. to the ende.
1. In the first the proposition is expressed, v. 1. every soul must be subject to the magistrate: which is confirmed by diverse reasons: 1. from the author or efficient cause, which is God, amplified by the contrary, that may which resist magistrates, resist against the ordinance of God. 2. from the effects, the punishment of those which disobey, v. 2. 3. from the double ende of magistracy or government, the praise of well-doers, v. 3. and the punishment of them that do evil, v. 4. 4. from the inconvenience that ensueth, he that disobeieth, violateth a good conscience: therefore for conscience sake we must be subject, v. 5. 5. from a part to the whole: they pay tribute, therefore they must yield obedience also in other things, v. 6. 6. ab aequo, from the equity of it: we must pay unto all, that which is due, but subjection is due unto the magistrate, as he proveth by diverse particulars, v. 7. Ergo.
2. In the second part the Apostle exhorteth unto mutual love. 1. from the rule of equity, it is a common debt, which one oweth unto another. 2. from the effects, it is the fulfilling of the law, v. 8. which he proveth, 1. by a particular induction, v. 9. 2. by removing of the contrary effects: love doth none evil unto our neighbor, therefore it is the fulfilling of the law.
3. Then the Apostle concludeth with a general dehortation from certain vices: which is joined with an exhortation to the contrary virtues. And the same is either general urged by two arguments: 1. one taken from the state of the regenerate, salvation is nearer now, then before, v. 11. 2. the other from the circumstance of time, which is propounded figuratively; the night is past, and the day is come, v. 12. Then the particular exhortation followeth, v. 13. with a dehortation from the contrary vices: and so he concludeth again generally concerning both, v. 14.
3. The questions and doubts discussed.
1. Quest. Of the occasion, which moved the Apostle in this chapter to entreat of the duty of subjects to the Magistrate.
1. Chrysostom. thinketh, that the Apostle having treated in the former chapter of patience, and not rendering evil for evil, doth very oppotunely now move obedience unto the Magistrate; multo enim magis illis, qui benefaciunt, &c. for much more ought we to obey them, which deserve well of us; if we should not be avenged of them, which do evil.
2. Beside he giveth another reason, that whereas the Christians had in those days many troubles, temptations, and trials, it was needless, van as tentationes superaddere, to add vain idle temptations and occasions of trouble, namely, in resisting the Magistrates.
3. Calvin thinketh, that this precept was added especially, because of the Jews, to whom it seemed a very unmeet thing, that progenies Abraha in servitute maneret, that the progeny of Abraham should remain in servitude under heathen governors: the same reason is touched by Peter Martyr.
4. Pareus addeth, that S. Paul's doctrine concerning Christian liberty, as he said before, c. 6. we are not under the law, but under grace, might have been misconstrued, as though Christians should not be subject to civil laws: & therefore he seasonably urgeth civil obedience.
5. Add hereunto, that the Christians were defamed, as enemies unto the policy of Commonwealths, and civil Magistracy: which false surmise was the cause of the persecuting of Christians, as Clemens Alexandrin. lib. 4. stromat. therefore the Apostle to give satisfaction to the Gentiles, thus exhorteth: this moved Justinus Martyr, in his 2. apology unto Antonius the Emperor, to clear the Christians by many arguments of this surmised imputation: Tolet.
6. And further, whereas the Apostle before had taught, that Christians should not avenge themselves: some might have gathered thereupon, that it were not lawful to use the defense of the Magistrate against wrongs: nay that it was not lawful for the Magistrate to take revenge of evil doers, therefore the Apostle very fitly falleth into this discourse: Gwalther.
7. And lastly, because the Magistrates were then infidels, least that the faithful might take themselves free from the command of Infidels, as subjects from their Magistrates, servants from their Masters, the Apostle doth interlace this treatise, Calvin, Gwalther: for these and such like reasons doth the Apostle so inculcate this doctrine of civil obedience, as in this place, and 1. Tim. 12. Tit. 3.1. and S. Peter agreeth, 1. Pet. 2.13.14.
Quest. 2. How every soul should be subject to the higher powers.
1. Every soul. 1. The soul is put, a part for the whole, by the figure synecdoche, according to the phrase of Scripture: as Haymo giveth instance of that place Gen. 46. how Jacob went down to Egypt with 70. souls: and Act. 27. there were 275. souls with Paul in the ship: as sometime the flesh, the other part of man is taken for the whole: as all flesh shall see the salvation of the Lord. 2. But Origen's conceit is here somewhat curious, as Martyr and Erasmus note, that it is not said, every spirit, but every soul, for the spiritual man, which hath renounced the world, hath nothing wherein to be subject to the superior powers: as the Apostle said, gold & silver have we none: he that hath none of these, nō habet vnde subiaceat potestat ib. hath nothing wherein to be subject to the powers, &c. But even the Apostles thenselves were obedient unto them. 3. he saith, every soul, quia debet esse voluntaria subiectio, because this subjection must be voluntary, not only in body, but in soul, Gorran. 4. and further by this is signified, that all mortal men, none excepted, should be so subject; and therefore he saith, every soul. 5. Caietane yet noteth further, that not only our bodies, and our substance, but even our souls should be subject unto the secular powers, in ijs quae possunt legitime imperare, in those things, wherein they may lawfully command.
Be subject. The word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which signifieth to be subordinate: where 1. is insinuated the order of government, which whosoever resisteth, bringeth in disorder and confusion. 2. and Chrysostom noteth, that he saith not, be obedient, but be subject ; which is a general word, comprehending all other duties and services. 3. but this must be limited unto those things, which are lawfully commanded: for otherwise, if they shall require anything against the glory of God, and our conscience, we must follow the example of the Apostles, Act. 4. to obey God, rather then man, Gualt. so Haymo well observeth, that as man consisteth of body and soul, so he must inviolably in his soul, servare fidem Deo, keep his faith unto God, and in his body serve the powers.
To the superior or chief powers. 1. The vulgar Latin readeth, sublimiaribus, higher powers: which Erasmus and Beza think not to be so fit, because the word in the original is not in the imperatiue: and this would give occasion to some to think, that obedience should be given only to the chief magistrate. But they are called high in respect of the people, over whom they are set, not compared among themselves: for not only the King as the chief, but other inferior officers and ministers are to be obeyed; as S. Peter showeth, 1. epist. 2.3.14. 2. Caietane observeth, that this word high, or excelling, is added to exclude tyrants, who are not excelling Lord's, and so he taketh the Apostle to speak de legitimis potestatb. of lawful powers: but I prefer the ordinary gloss, which understandeth the Apostle of secular powers, sive bonis, sive malis, whether good, or evil: and Peter Martyr observeth well, that here we must not inquire, quo iure, quave iniuria, by what right or wrong, these powers obtained their authority: for the Romans by force, not by right, were at this time Lord's of the world: but the Magistrates for the present are to be obeyed. 3. Chrysostom also noteth well, that the Apostle speaketh not of the person of the governors, sed de ipsa re, but of the thing it self, of their authority, and power: that howsoever they are unworthy of their authority, which abuse it, yet the power, which they have, is to be obeyed. 4. Lyranus, and Haymo before him, think this place to be understood of spiritual governors, and Prelates, as well as secular and civil: but Chrysostom, and Basil. lib. de constitut. Monach. c. 23. do better interpret this place of civil governors: and Basils reason is, because the Apostle afterward maketh mention of tribute, which is due only to the secular power: And therefore Calvin justly taketh exception to the Romanists, which out of this place would conclude, that obedience is to be given also to the Prelates of the Church. Pererius here, dispute. 1. numer. 3. opposeth Basil unto Calvin, who should think, that obedience to Prelates may be concluded out of this place: but Basil in the place before alleged, directly showeth, that the Apostle speaketh de potestatibus mundi, of the worldly, not of spiritual powers: only he reasoneth from hence, from the less to the greater; that if such obedience be to be given to temporal governors, quanto magis, &c. how much more to spiritual; and then for proof hereof, he allegeth that place, Heb. 13.17. Obey those which have the oversight of you.
3. Quest. How the powers that be are said to be of God.
1. God in the beginning gave a threefold power unto man: first over himself: God gave unto man freewill, whereby he should govern all his actions: then he gave him power over the other creatures: and thirdly, he gave unto man power over man, first in families, as unto the father over his children, to the master over his servants, to the husband over his wife: then in the politic regiment, of what kind soever it be, whether Monarchical, of one, Aristocratical, of many, and those the best, or Democratical, which is the popular state: all these had their beginning from God, some mediately, some immediately. Pareus.
But it will be asked, how and when this order of government, was first instituted of God: the answer is, that God imprinted in man by nature, this original light, to see the necessity of government, without the which there would be no order: as we see, that the unreasonable creatures, as the silly bees have their governor, the cranes also, and sheep: Chrysostom addeth further, marvel not, that God hath appointed rule and government among men, cum istud in corpore fecerit, seeing he hath done the like in the body: for some parts are made to direct and guide the rest: this natural instinct of government the Lord estsoone confirmed by precept; as Gen. 9.6. Whosoever sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: which is not understood of everyone, for God is not the author of confusion, but of the Magistrate, by whom the murder should be punished, Martyr.
3. Tolet here hath a very good distinction, between potestas, vsus potestatis, assumptio in potestatem, the power, the use of the power, and the assuming of the power: for the power may be of God, when the abuse of the power cometh of the devil, and of man's own corruption: as Saul had his kingly power from God, but he abused it unto cruelty: and the assuming of that power, and the entering into it, is often unlawful; as Abimelech by cruelty aspired the government, Judge. 9.
4. Beside, the same author observeth well a difference between the Civil and Ecclesiastical regiment: for the first is so from God, that yet the institution thereof may be devised by man; as a king may in his kingdom according to the necessity of the state, erect new officers and ministers, and therefore it is called, the ordinance of man, 1. Pet. 2.13. but the spiritual power is immediately instituted of God, and therefore the Apostle saith, Eph. 4.11. He gave some to be Apostles, some Prophets, some Evangelists, &c. Thus far Tolet goeth well: but this that is well said, he corrupteth with a dram of his Popish dregs; that Christ gave this power to make Bishops, and other Ecclesiastical ministers to Peter, which power in successores eius amanavit, &c. did issue forth to all his posterity: and so, saith he, all Ecclesiastical power did not immediately come from Christ, but only prima potestas, the first power, out of the which the rest do slow; but so is it not in the secular state.
Contra. 1. As though the other Apostles did not as well constitute Bishops, Elders, and other officers, as well as Peter: the Deacons, Act. 7. were chosen by the common consent of the Apostles: and Paul and Barnabas ordained Elders in every Church, Act. 14.23. 2. it will be hard for him to prove the Pope to be Peters successor, and to succeed in his Apostolical power. 3. If the original Ecclesiastical power only were immediately from Christ, so is it in the secular also: for that originally hath God's immediate warrant, that there should be rulers, and governors over the people: and so there should be no difference at all in this behalf. 4. Wherefore we acknowledge this a true difference between the Civil and Ecclesiastical state propounded by Tolet, but again rejected, and disavowed by him; that every Ecclesiastical office and ministry was immediately instituted by Christ, and his Apostles, though now mediately by the Church, men are assumed to these offices; but in the Civil government, the institution only in general is from God, many particular offices have been invented by men.
4. Quest. Whether every superior power be of God.
That every Magistracy and government is not of God, it may be thus objected.
1. The Lord saith by his Prophet Hoshea, 8.4. they have set up Princes, but not by me: they have made Princes, and I knew it not.
2. A tyrannical government is not of God, but many governments in the world are tyrannical, as of the Turks and Mohammedans.
3. Magistrates are created, and appointed by men, and S. Peter calleth them human ordinances, 1. Pet. 2.13. therefore they are not all of God.
4. Satan is called the prince of the world, John. 14.30. yea the god of the world, 2. Cor. 4.4. and he taketh upon him to distribute the kingdoms of the world, Matth. 4.9. therefore they are not of God.
5. And if every power were of God, then the supreme authority, which the Pope challengeth over the universal Church, should be of God.
Ans. First in general this distinction is to be premised, which may serve to dissolve every particular objection: we must make a difference between the power in it self considered, and the way of attaining unto that power, and the use or manner of execution: the first is always of God, but not the second, and the third, for when any by bribery, cruelty, or any other corrupt means, attaineth unto any Magistracy, or if he abuse his power to the maintenance of superstition, and to oppress the people of God, in neither of these respects, is it said to be of God. Origen doth thus illustrate this, by the similitude of the parts of the body, as the sight and hearing, are natural faculties given us of God, and yet men may abuse them ad impia & iniqua ministeria, to wicked and ungodly services: Chrysostom showeth this difference by the example of marriage: carnal copulation lawfully used in marriage is of God, yet there may be an unlawful cohabitation and copulation with women, which is not of God: so in the Magistracy, we must distinguish between the institution and the abuse thereof, the first is of God, so is not the other: now for a further answer in particuliar we say,
1. To the first place objected out of Hoshea, diverse answears are made. 1. Jerome thinketh that the Prophet speaketh of Saul, who was chosen error populi, non voluntate Domini, by the error of the people, not by the will of God: but it is evident, that the Prophet in that place toucheth the preposterous setting up of Jeroboam and his idolatry, as v. 5. Thy calf O Samaria did cast thee off. 2. Wherefore the better answer is, that concerning the thing it self, the renting of the kingdom from Solomon, and giving of ten tribes to Jeroboam, was the Lord's own act, as the Prophet Ahiah saith, 1. King. 11.31. but in respect of the circumstances, as the rebellion of the people against their lawful king, and their falling away from his obedience, without consulting with God, so was it not the Lord's act, Pareus. 3. Pet. Martyr saith further, that he is said to have reigned but not by God, in respect of the manner of his government, quia se non accomodavit ad scriptam & patefactam Dei voluntatem, because he applied not himself to the written and revealed will of God. 3. Faius putteth both these answears together, that Jeroboam and such other governors, are said to reign, but not by God, because they invade the kingdom, praeter ordinem, &c. beside or contrary to the order instituted of God, & sibi non Deo regnant, they reign for themselves, not unto the honor and glory of God: yet the power it self which they have is of God: to this purpose Gregory writeth well, as he is alleged in the ordinary gloss, tumoris elatio, non ordo potestatis in crimine est, potentiam Deus distribuit, elationem potentiae malitia nostrae mentis invenit, the swelling pride, not the orderly power is to be blamed, God giveth the power, but the proud usage of the power, the malice of man's mind hath found out, &c.
2. Tyrannicall government, as it is tyrannical is not of God, for that is the fault and corruption of the governor: but the power it self of governing is notwithstanding of God: riches gotten by usury, extortion, and other evil means, cease not to be the gifts of God, and good in themselves, though they are not good to them, which get them evil: so we must here discern between the right which God hath in such things, which always remaineth in God, and his judgments, whereby he so distributeth such things, as the corruption of man often concurreth in them, and the unjust usage or usurpation, or acquisition, whereby such things, though good in themselves, yet are not good unto such usurpers.
3. The second clauses exclude not the first: though diverse forms of gouernements are found out by men, the first institution notwithstanding was from God: as the fruits of the earth are brought forth by the industry and labor of man, yet cease they not to be God's gifts: so Ecclesiastical functions, as of Apostles, Prophets, were at the first immediately appointed by God: yet now also Pastors are of God, though called mediately by men. And S. Peter calleth the Magistracy an human ordinance, both subiective, because man is the subject thereof, by whom it is executed, and obiective, because human affairs are the object thereof, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in respect of the ende, because it is for man's good: yet the original institution is of God.
4. Satan is called the Prince of the world, not simply as though he did what he would, but because he is God's minister in the world, and used for the punishment of worldly men, and hath so much power over men, as is granted unto him: and he is called the God of the world; because he is so reputed of worldly men: and Satan therein lied, in saying that the kingdoms of the world were his to bestow.
5. The episcopal authority of the Bishop of Rome, so he were a right Bishop, we deny not to be of God: but his challenge of universal dominion, is not potestas, sed potestatis vl ••• , a power, but an abuse or disease of the power, which he hath not by God's ordinance, but by his own ambition, the devils instigation, and God's sufferance and connivence, Pareus.
Quest. 5. How far evil governors have their power from God, whether by his permission and sufferance only.
1. Pererius here taking occasion to slander the Protestants, that they should hold, that Deus est vere author & effector quorumlibet peccatorum, God is the very author and effector of any sins whatsoever; findeth great fault with Bucer for thus writing, that whosoever hath any power whether he use it well or evil, or come unto it by right or wrong, that it is undoubtedly true, eam potestatem à Deo accepisse, that he received that power from God, &c. whereupon he inferreth, that he which by manifect tyranny invaded the government, Dei fuerit consilio & voluntate assumptus, was by the counsel and will of God assumed and taken unto that government: and further he falleth into a great admiration, that they which deny obedience to Christ's Vicar, yet do persuade obedience to be given to every Tyrant: to this purpose Pererius, numer. 6. And consequently the opinion of the Romanists is, that evil governors do rise up in the world, permittente Deo, God only so permitting, Tolet annotat. 3.
Contra. 1. It is a mere slander, that Protestants lay any such imputation upon God, as to make him the author of evil: nay the Romanists are rather guilty hereof, that affirm God to be a permitter and sufferer of evil: for he which suffereth evil to be done, which he can hinder, must be accessory unto it: we say then, that God is neither an actor nor a permitter of evil, as it is evil: his permission we grant, but such as is joined with his will, for that which God would not have done in the world, cannot be done: but for the more full explanation of this point, I refer the Reader to the 64. question upon the 1. chapt. of this Epistle.
2. But that evil governors do not rule only by God's permission is evident out of Scripture, as it is here alleged by the ordinar. gloss: as Job. 34.30. qui facit regnare hypocritam, &c. which causeth an hypocrite to reign for the sins of the people, &c. as the vulgar Latin readeth: and Hosh. 13.11. I gave a king in mine anger, &c. and hereupon the gloss inferreth, datur improbis nocendi potestas, power to hurt is given to the wicked, that the patience of good men might be proved, &c. and further it is added, per potestatem diabolo datam, & Job probatus est, vt iustus appareret, & Petrus tentatus est, ne de se presumeret, & Paulus colophizatus, ne se extolleret, & Judas damnatus vt se suspenderet: by power given unto the Devil, both Job was proved, to appear just, and Peter tempted, that he should not presume of himself, and Paul buffeted, least he should extol himself, and Judas damned, to hang himself, &c. here their own gloss is against them, which maketh God a giver of that power, which wicked governors abuse, This is then our assertion, that evil governors rule not by God's permission only: for in the Scripture God is said to have raised and stirred up the Assyrians and Babylonians: But therein God's providence is seen, and such evil governors are not sent without God's secret will and ordinance, for the punishment of men's sins: as Pet. Martyr, Deus arcana & efficaci voluntate voluit eos imperare, God by his hid and the same effectual will would have them to rule: though then they do not either attain unto the place of government, by lawful means, and according to the rules of God's revealed will, neither do rule after the same, yet by his secret will and providence they are appointed thereunto for the execution of God's judgments, which are most just.
3. Neither is a Tyrant to be obeyed, if he command anything contrary to the word of God: such are the laws of the Pope, which maintain superstition and idolatry: and though a Tyrant in his proper place of government is to be obeyed, it followeth not, the Pope should: for the one (though a tyrant) beareth sway in temporal things, wherein the conscience is not touched, and in his proper seignorie, which he is advaunced unto: but the Pope doth tyrannize in spiritual things and over the conscience, and out of his own precinct and jurisdiction: so that he commandeth as a Lord out of his own territory, where no obedience is due: As for his supposed vicardome, it is but an idle fancy and Popish dream.
Quest. 6. Why the Apostle saith again, The powers that be, are ordained of God.
1. The vulgar Latin readeth, The things which are, are ordained of God, and so Anselm, and the interlinear. gloss. wherein a double error is committed, for the word powers, which is in the original, is omitted, and the word ordinata, ordained, is put in the neuter, which in the Greek is in the feminine, answering unto powers: and beside, as Tolet well observeth, annot. 4. these words would beget an erroneous sense: for all things that are, are not ordained of God, as war, sickness, poverty: for then it were not lawful to prevent any of these: for God's ordinance must not be resisted.
2. Origen omitteth this clause altogether: and Erasmus coniectureth, that this clause might be inserted by some interpreter, by way of explanation: but seeing Chrysostom hath it, and the Syrian interpreter, with other ancient copies, this conceit cannot be admitted.
3. Neither yet is it a repetition of the same thing, which the Apostle set down before, every power is of God, to show God to be author and founder of these powers, as Oecum. for there had been here no great need or use of such repetition.
4. Haymo thinketh, that the Apostle in the second place understandeth iura potestatum, the rights belonging to these powers: that not only the power it self, but the right of governing is of God; but these two cannot well be distinguished, the power and the right of the power: Beza thinketh that in the first place, the Apostle in general shown the dignity of the magistracy, in the second, the distribution of the same dignity: because there are diverse degrees of magistracy, to show, ipsis •• fimis ordinibus, &c. that we are to yield obedience to the lowest orders of government: but this was comprehended in the former sentence, Every power is of God, that is, whether superior or inferior, none are excluded.
5. Some do infer, because the Apostle saith, They are ordained, &c. that there is an order and certain degrees in government, some are superior to others: Boniface 8. in the extravagant vnam sanctam: but it is evident by the words following, where the power is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the ordinance of God, that this ordaining hath reference unto God's institution, not to the distinction and order of degrees in the powers: But whereas Boniface in that place, upon this supposed ground buildeth the preeminence of the Ecclesiastical power above the Civil, and so would make the Pope the Lord peramount above all, the vanity of this conceit shall be examined among the controversies following.
6. Theodoret by ordaining understandeth the divine providence: the ordinar. gloss interpreteth, rationabiliter disposita, reasonably disposed: but more is signified then so: for there are many things disposed of in the world by God's providence, which yet it is lawful to resist, as Tolet noteth annot. 4.
7. Wherefore the emphasis or force of this sentence, lieth in the word ordained, which amplifieth that which the Apostle said before: that these powers are not simply of God, as other things, but specially ordained, that is, by special precept from God: there are other things of God, as famine, war, sickness, poverty, but not ordained by precept and commandment: Thus Tolet, likewise Faius: that by ordaining, is understood, praeceptum esse à Deo, that it is commanded of God, that obedience should be yielded to magistrates: so also before them both Hyperius: and three ways may these powers be said to be ordained or ordered: first in respect of God, because thy are by him instituted and appointed: secondly in regard of themselves, the Lord hath set them certain limits and bounds, whereby they should be ordered: thirdly in respect of those which are to be ordered: God would have order among men, some to rule, some to obey: like as in a campe there are some leaders and captains, others are appointed to follow, and to be ranged in their ranks, as the soldiers, Pareus.
Quest. 7. Of not resisting the power.
1. He that resisteth, the word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which properly signifieth disordered, or counter-ordered, ordered against: which showeth that all rebellion is a disorder, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a very confusion, Pareus.
2. Diuerse ways is the power resisted, either aperta vi, by open violence and rebellion: or fraud, by deceit and craft, when the power is deceived and misinformed, which is an ordinary thing in Princes Courts, Martyr: Tolet addeth a third, qui praecepta negligit, &c. he that neglecteth the precepts of the Prince, and withholdeth duties, as to pay tribute, and such like, therein showeth himself contrary to God's ordinance.
3. Chrysostom observeth the phrase, that the Apostle saith, not he which obeyeth the Magistrate, therein submitteth himself to God's ordinance, but by the contrary, he that resisteth the power, resisteth God's ordinance, to show, that non gratiam sed debitum illis obediendo praestemus, &c. that we do not show them a pleasure in obeying, but pay our debt: and further he inferreth, that no man should think subiectionem turpem, that this subjection is vile, seeing God hath appointed it.
4. Origen here also noteth, that we must not understand such powers as persecute the faith: for in such a case it is better to obey God then man: and the reason is, as Tolet observeth, quia nemo debet potestati obedire contra Deum, no man must obey the power against God, of whom the power is.
5. Gorran maketh this objection: that if it be not lawful to resist any power which is of God, then not the power of Satan: he answereth that it doth not follow, because that is, potestas permissionis, non commissionis, a power of permission not of commission: or rather it is not so much a power which the devil exerciseth, as an abuse of power, and therefore we are to resist him: And so concerning such powers, which command or allure to anything which is evil, Augustine's rule must be followed, contemn potestatem timendo maiorem potestatem, contemn the power, by fearing a greater power.
6. Pet. Martyr well observeth here, that although it be not lawful to resist the powers, by rising up, or practicing against them, yet one may make an escape by fleeing away from the force of the magistrate: as David was let down at a window out of his own house by his wife, and so escaped Saul's hands; and so was Paul at Damascus, let down in a basket by a window, as 2. Cor. 11. but the case is otherwise, when one is apprehended, and committed to prison, for then he thinketh it not lawful for a man though unjustly imprisoned, to break prison; because it is against the law, & audaciam idem faciendi, &c. and it would minister boldness to malefactors to commit the like: add hereunto, that thereby another man's life is endaungered, as the keeper upon the escape of his prisoners is like to be punished: and further it were a betraying of their cause, to make a privy escape: this made S. Paul, that though his bonds were loosed, and the prison doors opened, yet he would not flee away: nay he refused to be sent away privily, when the governors sent unto them to depart, Act. 16. yet every escape of the innocent out of prison is not to be condemned, if it be not procured by some sinister practice by themselves, as by fraud or violence, but by some other means, as the voluntary connivence or negligence of the keeper, or some other way as it were made by God: for so we read, that Peter escaped out of prison, the doors being opened by the Angel before him, Act. 12. but this is not rashly to be done for the aforesaid reasons, but upon good warrant, when God shall as it were make a way for a man to set him free.
Quest. 8. What kind of judgment they procure to themselves, which resist the magistrate.
1. Whereas the Greek word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , signifieth both condemnation, as Beza, damnation, as the vulgar Latin: judgment, as the Syrian interpreter: punishment, as Piscator: some take this to be understood not of eternal punishment, but of the temporal inflicted by the Magistrate: when as the powers being offended, do either punish rebels with death, or cast them into prison, Haymo: so also Vatablus. 2. Lyranus contrariwise interpreteth it, de aeterna morte, of everlasting death, not excluding also temporal punishment: so also Martyr. 3. Some understand poenam, punishment generally, without limitation, Olevian, Piscator, Junius annot. 4. Some will have the punishment in this life understood, whether inflicted by the Magistrate, or by God himself, who will take revenge for the transgression of his own ordinance, as is evident in the fearful punishment of rebellious Cote, Dathan, and Abiram, Numb. 16. Pareus, Gwalther: and so before them Chrysostom and Theophylact, cum à Deo, tum ab hominibus poenas daturum, he shall endure punishment both from God and men. 5. But all these are better joined together; that such as resist the Magistrate are punished by the public laws, and God often taketh revenge also; beside they make themselves guilty of everlasting damnation, which is due unto the transgression of God's commandment, and the violating of his ordinance, Faius. 6. Tolet hath here this conceit by himself, it is said, they shall receive judgment, because being not restrained by the Magistrate, whom they stand not in awe of, they cast themselves into those sins, for the which damnationem incurrunt, they incur damnation: but here the Apostle speaketh of that punishment which is due for the resisting of God's ordinance. 7. Pareus here observeth well these two things, that the purposes and endeavors of such are frustrate, and beside they show their madness and foolishness, in being accessory to their own punishment: for it is an unwise part for one to procure his own hurt.
Quest. 9. How the Prince is not to be feared for good works, but for evil.
1. Concerning the words in the original they stand thus, Princes are not a fear of good works, and so the vulgar Latin: that is, for good works, as the Syrian interpreter putteth it in the dative, bonis operibus, to good works: so also Tertullian readeth in scorpian: and Beza followeth this sense, and the meaning is, that they are not a terror, or to be feared, ration boni operis, by reason of the good work, Lyranus. or his qui sunt boni operis, to them which are of good works, Gorran: so before him Chrysostom, been agentibus, to those which do well: good works are here to be understood, not as Divines take them, for moral works, but for civil works agreeable to the public laws, which are either against the divine law, whereof the Magistrate ought to have special care, or against the positive constitution, Pareus.
2. Touching the occasion of these words: Tolet will have them to depend of the former sentence, and to show the cause, why they which resist the powers, do receive judgment to themselves, because they contemn the Magistrate, who is ordained to restrain evil works: and so they without restraint fall into evil, and so incur punishment: but the better coherence is, to make this another argument, to move obedience to the higher powers from the utility thereof, as Chrysostom ; or à duplici sine, from the twofold ende of magistracy, which is for the punishment of the evil, and praise of the good.
3. They which do good works, must fear the Magistrate still, but timore reverentiae, non seruili, &c. with a reverent, not a servile fear, as the malefactors do, which having a guilty conscience, are afraid of punishment, to be inflicted by the Magistrate, Gorran.
Quest. 10. What it is to have praise of the power, v. 3.
1. Whereas often it falleth out, that the Magistrate doth punish the good, and encourage the wicked, how then is this true, which the Apostle saith, do well and thou shalt have the praise of the same: the answer is, that first we must distinguish between the power it self and authority, which is ordained of God, to these ends, for the reward of the good, and punishment of the evil, and the abuse of this power: secondly, although governors abusing their power, do offend in some particulars, yet in general more good cometh by their government, then hurt: as under cruel Nero, there was some execution of justice, for Paul was preserved by the Roman captain from the conspiracy of the Jews, and appealed unto Caesar, which was then Nero, and his appeal was received.
2. It will be objected, that even under good Princes, where there is punishment for offenders, yet the righteous receive not their reward. 1. Origen thus understandeth these words, thou shalt have praise of the same, &c. that is, in the day of judgment, ex istis legibus landem habebis apud Deum, by these laws thou shalt have praise with God for keeping them, &c. but the Apostle speaketh not of having praise by the laws, but of the power, that is, the Magistrate. 2. Augustine thinketh it is one thing to be praised of the power, that is, to be commended and rewarded by it, another laudem habere ex illa, to have praise of it, that is, exhibit se laude dignum, he showeth himself worthy of praise, whether he be actually praised or not of the power: Tolet alloweth this sense, though he take the distinction between these phrases to be somewhat curious: so also Haymo: but the Apostle speaketh not simply of having praise and commendation, but of having it from the Prince. 3. the ordinar. gloss thus: thou shalt have praise of the power, si iusta est ipso laudante, if it be just it will praise thee, si iniusta, occasionem prebente, if unjust, it will give thee occasion of praise: so also Gorran, it shall praise thee, either causaliter, by being the cause of thy praise, or occasionaliter, by being the occasion, &c. causa erit maigris coronae, it shall be the cause of thy greater crown, gloss. interlin. laudaberis apud Deum, thou shalt be praised with God, Haymo: but the Apostle speaketh of receiving praise from the power: as Chrysostom and Theophylact well observe, erit laudum tuarum praeco futurus, he shall be a setter forth of thy praise. 4. Bucer thinketh that the Apostle alludeth unto the custom of the Grecians and Romans, among whom they which had done any notable exploit, were praised publicly, or privately: but S. Paul speaketh in general of the office of all Magistrates whatsoever. 5. Pet. Martyr thinketh, that it is no small part of praise, absolvi in iudicio, to be absolved in judgment: as it was no small praise to Cato, being so often accused still to be freed and absolved: it is also a great praise for a man to be so innocent, that nothing can be objected against him in judgment: as Fimbria being asked, what he could object unto Scevola so innocent, and harmless a man, answered, quia telum toto suo corpore non receperit, because he received not his weapon whole into his body: but it is one thing to receive praise and reward, another to be freed only from punishment. 6. Wherefore I take this to be the better answer, that first the Apostle speaketh here, of the power it self, and of the true ende, wherefore it was ordained, and not of the personal faults in those, that abuse this power: for if the good be not rewarded, as well as the evil punished, it is the fault of the governors: add hereunto, because it is not possible for a Prince to reward all good subjects, that by praise we must understand, omnia commoda & privilegi\%a, &c. all the privileges and commodities, which are by the laws offered to good subjects: Pareus: they are praised, that is, counted worthy, qui participent omnibus ijs bonis, &c. to be made partakers of all those benefits and commodities, for the which commonwealths came first together, Bullinger: as good subjects enjoy liberty, possession of their lands, and goods, defense from wrong, and such like, and as occasion may serve, may receive also praise and encouragement from the Magistrate.
Quest. 10. How the Magistrate is said to be God's minister for our wealth or good.
1. Some understand this only of the power to punish, loco Dei vindicate, he taketh revenge in God's place, gloss. interlin. Lyranus. 2. Haymo giveth these two senses: he is God's minister to defend thee from wrong: or for thy good, that thou do no evil: but this expresseth but one part of this ministering power. 3. therefore Chrysostom better, voluntati Dei cooperatur, &c. he worketh according to God's will in punishing of the evil, and in rewarding the good, and therefore he is called his minister: so also Theophylact, voluntati Dei obsequitur, he obeyeth the will of God, as in commanding chastity, in forbidding avarice and theft: like as the Lord is, so must the minister be: but God loveth the just and punisheth the wicked, therefore so should the magistrate do, that is God's minister. 3. and generally they are God's ministers, 1. because they are ordained of God. 2. they are as gods in earth, in respect of their preeminence and authority over others. 3. in regard of their office, because they do execute justice in the earth, in awarding rewards to the righteous, and punishments to the wicked. 4. whereas the Prince is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the minister of God, which name and title also agreeth to the spiritual pastors, who are the ministers of God, yet they are ministers in a diverse kind: both agree in their institution, which is from God, and in the general ende, which is to seek the good of God's people, yet they differ both in the object: for the pastors charge, is only about spiritual things, the Prince is occupied also in caring for temporal: as also in the means: for the Prince by his sword and coactiue power procureth the good of his subjects: but the pastor seeketh it by the preaching of the word, the administration of the Sacraments and discipline, and other spiritual means.
For thy good. ] That which the Apostle called before, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , praise, now he nameth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , good: which is either natural, moral, civil, or spiritual good; the Magistrate procureth all these: the natural good, as in preserving the lives and bodies of his subjects: the moral good, in commanding virtue, and punishing vice; the civil, in maintaining their goods and possessions; their spiritual good, in setting forth and defending the true religion, Pareus.
11. Quest. How the Magistrate is said, not to bear the sword for naught, v. 4.
1. Lyranus doth indifferently understand this of the material sword which the civil power hath, or of the Ecclesiastical: but the whole course of the Apostles speech showeth, that he speaketh of the Civil power, to whom tribute, and such other customs belong.
2. By the sword, he understandeth the power of exercising and drawing forth the sword against offenders: and he alludeth to the custom of Princes, which have the sword carried before them, and other ensigns of their authority.
3. There are three uses of the civil sword, the one is ad vindictam, to be revenged of the evil: ad protectionem bonorum, for the protection of the good: and, ad executionem iustitiae, for the execution of justice.
4. He beareth not the sword, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in vain: that is, temere, rashly, Beza: because he hath his authority from God, nor, sine causa, the vulgar Latin, without some certain cause or ende, namely, the punishment of the evil.
5. And so he is called a revenger unto wrath. 1. which some understand of the divine wrath, which is executed by the Magistrate: or to show the wrath of God in time to come, Gorrh. Hug. 2. rather by wrath we understand the punishment it self inflicted, which is an effect of wrath, Pareus, Tolet, Sa.
Quest. 12. Of the right use of the sword, both in time of peace and war.
1. Concerning the use of the sword in time of peace, three things are requisite, 1. that there should be good laws enacted, and established. 2. that there should be upright judgment according to those laws. 3. that of such judgments once given, there should be just execution.
1. In the making of laws, three things must concur, the matter of the law, the end and scope, and the extent. 1. for the matter, it must be agreeable to the law of nature, and to the will of God: Princes must not make laws according to their own mind, but such as may be consonant to the pure and perfect will of God: hereupon it was, that the law-makers among the Gentiles would always ascribe the invention of their laws to someone of the gods, to win more credit unto them: Zoroastres who gave laws to the Bactrianes and Persians, did make Oromazen, whom they held to be a god, the author of his laws: Trismegistus among the Egyptians, Mercurius: Minos among the Cretensians: Jupiter Carundas among the Carthaginians made Saturnus his author: Lycurgus among the Lacedemonians, Apollo: Solon & Draco among the Athenians, Minerva: Xamolpis among the Scythians, Vesta: Numa among the Romans, the gods Egeria: and Mahomet commended his Alcaron to the Arabians, under the name of Gabriel the Arkeangel: But these were their fabulous conceits: we have indeed the book of God, a perfect rule and line of all just laws: secondly, the end and scope of laws must be to suppress vice and maintain virtue: the lawmaker must intend the public good, and not his private gain: thirdly, for the extent of these laws, they must include all: some must not be bound unto the laws, and others free: and therefore it is dangerous to give privileges and immunities to some persons, by virtue whereof they may without check and controlment transgress the laws: Papintanus is worthy of honorable memory, who choose rather to die, then to excuse the parricide of Antonius Bassianus the Emperor.
2. As good laws must first be made, so judgment must be exercised according to those laws: that the just case may be discerned from the false, and good men from the evil: Antishenes was wont to say that those commonwealths were declining, wherein boni à malis nihil differunt, good men did nothing differ from evil: Now in the process of judgment these rules must be observed. 1. that the Judge be willing to admit all complaints, and to take knowledge of all causes, and aggrevances: this was the fault of Saul's government, that the oppressed could not have justice, which made many that were aggreved to flock and have recourse unto David: Absalom did not more insinuate himself into the hearts of the people, then in showing his affability in hearing the griues, and complaints of them: In foreign histories, Philip King of Macedon was killed by Pausanias, because he rejected his suite to have justice against Attalus that had wronged him, and after laughed him to scorn: and Demetrius of Macedon did much alienate the hearts of his people, because he neglected their complaints, and would cast their bills of supplication from the bridge of Axium into the river: secondly, after diligent inquisition of the cause, there must be just judgment given, without partiallitie, fear, favor, or any other sinister affection: see Levite. 19.15. among the Thebanes a Judge was pictured blindfold, and without hands, to signify that he neither should be lead by partial affection in judgment, or corrupted with bribes: and the Athenians had a law, that causes should be handled 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , without proems and prefaces to stir up affection.
3. After judgment must follow execution: for otherwise the laws are in vain and judgment according to the laws, if they be not put into execution: where these two things must be observed. 1. that the execution be not too remiss: for it is profitable often for the offender himself to be punished, thereby to be brought unto repentance: who otherwise might continue in his sin; as the thief converted upon the cross was prepared by that ignominious punishment unto repentance: and it is good for the example and admonition of others, that punishment be inflicted upon the offenders. 2. yet the punishment must not be hastened too much, or be too severely adjudged, but with such moderation as that the party which suffereth be not in hazard of loosing both soul and body.
2. Concerning the use of the sword in warring, and waging of battle: 1. it is out of doubt, that it is lawful for the Magistrate to take in hand just and lawful war; for Abraham recovered Lot by force, from them which had taken him captive: the Centurions faith is commended in the Gospel by our Savior: and if it be the Magistrates office and part, to defend every particular person from wrong, much more the whole people. 2. but war must be enterprised not rashly, or suddenly, but with deliberation, and not without weighty and urgent cause. 1. as when either the Magistrate is bound by some league to help his confederates, as Joshua did the Gibeonites, 2. or when the enemies offer to invade the country, they must by the Magistrates force be kept off, as David often encountered the Philistines that assaulted Israel. 3. and in the quarrel of religion and defense of the truth, the Magistrate may fall to battle: as the other ten tribes had thought to have warred against Reuben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh, for setting up an altar, fearing that they had declined from the true worship of God, Josh. 22.
Quest. 13. How it is said, it is necessary to be subject, for conscience sake.
v. 5. Therefore it is necessary ye should be subject. 1. first some read, be ye subject unto the necessity, diuinae dispositionis, of the divine ordinance, and so put necessity in the dative, Gorran. 2. the vulgar Latin, which many follow, put necessity in the ablative, necessitate subditi estote, be subject of necessity: but both these readings are diverse from the original: where the word is not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , be ye subject, in the imperatiue, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to be subject, in the infinitiue, as both Beza, and Erasmus well observe: so then the best reading is, it is necessary to be subject. 3. which neither must be understood of a compelling necessity, as the interlin. gloss. quasi ex necessitate, as of necessity: because he cannot excutere iugum Principis, shake off the yoke of the Prince: nor yet as Augustine, is it referred to the necessity of this life: because we must necessarily use temporal things, as long as we are in this world, which it is in the Magistrates power to deprive us of: but we understand rather obligationem praecepti, the bond of the precept, which is of necessity to be kept: so that it is not a free thing, whether men will be subject or no, but it is necessary, both in respect of the wrath and revenge of the power, and for conscience sake toward God: so in effect here are three reasons couched together, why we should be subject to the Magistrate in respect of God, it is his ordinance, of the Magistrate, because of wrath and punishment, of our selves, that we wound not our conscience: the first is honestum, honest, the second, vtile, profitable, the third, delectabile, pleasant and delightful.
But also for conscience. 1. Ambrose referreth this conscience, to the fear of punishment in the world to come: that men should not obey only for fear of present punishment, but because of the judgment to come. 2. Chrysostom applieth this to the conscience of the great benefits, which we receive by the Magistrate, that he which is disobedient offendeth against his conscience in being unthankfull. 3. Lyranus understandeth it of the particular conscience, which every man ought to have, debitum reddere, to render that which he oweth to another. 4. Tolet interpreteth it of the conscience of other sins, which they that are lawless and disobedient are apt to fall unto. 5. Hugo of the conscience quae naturaliter dictat, &c. which naturally suggesteth unto a man, that the superior is to be obeyed. 6. Erasmus of an others conscience, which is offended by the evil example of the disobedience. 7. but here the conscience of the divine precept must be understood, which to obey bringeth peace of conscience, but to resist God's ordinance, is a deadly sin, saucians conscientiam, wounding the conscience, Pareus: so Haymo, propter conscientiam mentis, for the conscience of the mind, which we must keep and preserve pure.
Quest. 14. Why tribute is to be paid, verse. 6.
For this cause: that is, as a testimony of your subjection you pay tribute: some refer these words to the former sentence, v. 4. be is the Minister of God, praepositi sunt à Deo, they are set over others by God, and therefore they must pay tribute, Haymo: some thus expound for this, because they are profitable for you, Hugo: but these words rather depend of the next before, because of conscience: for the paying of tribute is a testimony of their subjection, that they in their conscience acknowledge it to be due.
Pay ye tribute. 1. he saith, praestatis, non datis, you pay, not you give, to show that it is not given, but they repay it again, in their care which they undertake for the common-wealth, gloss. or. 2. the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , tribute, is derived of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to bear or bring in, quia infertur à subditis, because it is brought by the subjects into the kings treasure, Pareus: or it signifieth properly portage money, which was paid for such commodities, as were brought in: and so by one kind all the rest are understood, as there be diverse other customs: as pedagia, which was paid for the passage on foot toward the mending of the high ways: & guidogia, guide money for those that travailed, and such like, Faius. 3. and the Apostle maketh express mention of the paying of tribute, taking it as a thing yielded and acknowledged of all, because it was objected against the Christians, that they under pretence of religion would free themselves from tribute, as Justinus showeth, apolog. 2. ad Anton.
For they are God's Ministers. 1. Two reasons are given of the lawfulness of paying tribute, both because it was a sign of their subjection, and as a recompense to the magistrate, for his great pains undertaken in the defense and government of the commonwealth. 2. the word here used is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , ministers, as the Magistrate before is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a minister, which words are not only used of sacred offices, as we see, but of civil: and therefore that it a false observation of the massing Papists, Act. 13. v. 4. where by the use of the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to minister, they would prove, that the Apostles said Mass.
Applying themselves to the same ende, &c. 1. the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , signifieth more then to serve, as the vulgar Latin readeth, it betokeneth to continue, watch, to take pains in any business, as c. 12.12. continuing or laboring, persevering, watching in prayer. 2. some refer these words to them that pay tribute, that they serve to this ende, Gorran: but it is evident that the Apostle speaketh of the Magistrates: that they watch over the people for this, not to receive tribute, as some interpret, but it is referred to the whole duty of the Magistrate rehearsed before, that he beareth not the sword for naught, that he is for the terror of the evil, and praise of well doers.
Quest. 15. Of the diverse kinds of tribute, and to whom they are due.
v. 7. Render therefore to all men, &c. 1. Chrysostom here observeth well, that the Apostle saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , render, not give, nihil enim gratuite dat, qui hoc fecerit, for he doth not give anything freely, that doth this: for it is our duty to yield obedience in all these things here specified to the Magistrate.
2. But Origen hath here a strange allegory: by the powers, he understandeth the ministering spirits, and by the tribute, vectigalia negatiationis in carne, the payments due for our trading in the flesh to the spirits exacting it of us by diverse temptations: but this dangerous kind of allegorizing perverteth the sense of the Scripture, & giveth occasion of many errors.
3. Gorran calleth the first two, custom and tribute, delictum temporale, the temporal debt which is due unto superiors, the other he nameth debitū spiritual, the spiritual debt, which is either inward, fear, or outward, honor: As though all outward honor and service were spiritual: the Apostle speaketh only of civil honor, which is to be yielded to the Magistrate, not of spiritual and religious honor, which is only due to God.
4. The Apostle here nameth two kinds of payments, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , tribute, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which is interpreted, custom. 1. Some do thus distinguish them, tribute is that which solvitur domi, is paid at home: vectigal, custom, that which is carried to the Lord's house, gloss. ordin. Lyranus taketh tribute for that which was paid generally by a country or city in sign of their subjection: custom that which is exacted of particular persons, as for traffike, merchandise: Martyr, Pareus, take the first called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for the tribute paid out of men's grounds or substance: and the custom due for commodities carried forth or brought in: Beza taketh the first for capitatio, poll money, when men are taxed either by the poll, or accordding to their wealth: so the Syrian interpreter, calleth it argentum capitationis, head silver, and the latter for tribute due out of their grounds, or for Merchandise, and such like: but the latter, rather called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , seemeth to be the poll money, which was paid viritim, man by man, as appeareth Matth. 17.25. it is called tribute, or census poll money: and the other 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , was such tribute, as was due for commodities brought in, as the etymon of the word showeth: and the Latin word vectigal, is so called also à vehendo, of carrying: when the fruits of their grounds were brought into the city. And so with us there are two kind of payments, subsidies and tenths, which are laid upon men according to their ability and substance, and then the impost and custom which is due for merchandise, in the exporting of wares, or bringing in of foreign commodities: but for the most part, these two words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , are confounded, and are indifferently taken for any kind of tribute or payment made to the governors: yet to speak distinctly, there are two kinds of tribute, which is either laid upon the persons, which is properly called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , poll money: or upon their substance, either mooueable, as their goods, such as is merchandise, or immooueable as their lands; and this is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , tribute, impost, Faius.
5. Here the Apostle nameth four kind of duties, which are to be performed to the Magistrates and their officers: as impost and custom to the customers, tribute and subsidies to the collectors and threasurers, fear to the kings officers and ministers, and honor to the person of the Magistrate himself.
6. Chrysostom and Theophylact here move this doubt, how the Apostle enjoineth the subject to fear the Magistrate: and before he freeth good subjects from it, and would have them only to fear, that do evil; he answereth by a distinction of fear: that fear which is ex mala conscientia, of an evil conscience, good subjects are free from: but yet they have a kind of fear, which is nothing else but a reverence of the Magistrate: Pet. Martyr addeth, that though a good man feareth not the power for anything, that is done and past, yet he may fear, ne quid in posterum committat, that he commit nothing in time to come: as Ambrose hath the like distinction of fear, aliud est timere quia peccasti, aliud timere ne pecces, ibi formido est de supplicio, hic sollicitudo de praemio, it is one thing to fear because thou hast sinned, another to fear least thou sin: there is fearfulness of the punishment, here carefulness of the reward.
7. Honor also is to be yielded to the Magistrate, which is nothing else but an external signification of our inward reverent opinion, which we have of one for his excellency and greatness: wherein these three things are considered, the inward reverence, the outward gesture, the object, the excellency of the person: between honor and glory this is the difference: honor is given propter officij dignitatem, for the dignity of the place and office, glory propter virtutem, because of his virtue: to a good magistrate both are due, to an evil honor is to be shown for his place, though he deserve no glory, for any virtue and a private person may be worthy of glory for his virtue, though not of honor, which is the Magistrates due.
Quest. 16. The several duties summed together which are due to the Magistrate.
Gorran reduceth them to these seven. 1. we owe unto the Magistrate subjection, 1. Pet. 2.13. submit yourselves. 2. honor, 1. Pet. 2.17. fear God, honor the King. 3. fear, Prov. 24.21. Fear God, and the King. 4. fidelity as in Ittai, that said to David, 2. Sam. 15.21. In what place my Lord the King shall be, whether in death or life, even there will thy servant be. 5. obedience, as the people said to Joshua, 1.17. as we obeyed Moses in all things, so will we obey thee. 6. paying of tribute, Matth. 22.21. Give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's. 7. prayer, 1. Tim. 2.2. The Apostle willeth supplications to be made for Kings.
Pareus observeth that five things belong to the honoring of our superiors. 1. reverence, because of the divine ordinance. 2. love, because of their labor and care in watching over us. 3. thankfulness for the benefits which we enjoy under them. 4. obedience in all lawful things. 5. equity and charity, in covering and extenuating the faults and infirmity s in governors.
Quest 17. How far the Magistrate is to be obeyed, and wherein not to be obeyed.
It may seem, that in no wise it is lawful, to resist the Magistrate, but that obedience must be absolutely yielded unto him, upon these reasons.
1. The ordinance of God is not to be resisted: evil Magistrates are the ordinance of God therefore even the evil must be obeyed and not resisted.
2. S. Peter biddeth servants to obey their Masters, not only the good and courteous, but even the froward. 1. Pet. 2.8. so likewise subjects must obey their Magistrates.
3. It is not lawful to recompense evil for evil, Rom. 12.17. therefore the subject being oppressed is not to resist.
4. It is not lawful for a private person to use the sword, for it is said only of the Magistrate, he beareth not the sword in vain, but to resist the Magistrate is to take the sword: Er.
Ans. 1. True it is, that the ordinance of God is not to be resisted, so it be not against God: for like as the inferior Magistrate, to whom the Prince committeth the sword is not to use it against his Prince: so neither is the Prince to be obeyed, using his authority against God, in commāding impious and dishonest things: we must give unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things which are God's, we may not give unto the Prince the things which are God's, that is, the conscience. And in this case the Apostles give us a rule, to obey God rather then man, Act. 4.19. when obedience then is denied in unjust & unlawful things, not the authority which is God's ordinance, but the abuse of the authority is gainsaid.
2. True it is that both evil Masters, and evil Magistrates are to be obeyed, but with this limitation, that nothing be enjoined against the conscience: and so much is implied by the words following, v. 19. This is thank worthy, if a man for conscience toward God endure grief suffering wrongfully: so that when anything is commanded against the conscience; a man is to suffer rather: an so the power is obeyed, not in doing, but in suffering.
3. To disobey unlawful commandments, is no requital of evil for evil, nor yet for a man to use lawful defense: but if the subject should bear arms against his Prince, and seek to assault his body or life, which is unlawful, that were indeed to recompense evil for evil.
4. There are three degrees of not obeying an evil Magistrate, in not doing that which is commanded, and here the subject useth not the sword at all, he only refuseth to do anything against his conscience: in using his lawful defense, against wrongs offered, tending to apparent impiety: here he taketh the sword no otherwise, then as the laws arm a private man to defend himself in case of necessity against a thief and robber: the third is in assaulting the Prince by force: which is a taking of the sword, and most unlawful.
Now on the other side, certain cases shall be propounded, wherein obedience is to be denied to unjust Magistrates, and some kind of resistance to be used: And here a distinction is to be made of subjects: some are either public persons, and the same either Ecclesiastical, as the Pastors and ministers of the Church: or civil, as inferior Magistrates, or more private persons: according to this division, we are to see, how far each of these may proceed in denying their obedience to the Magistrate commanding unjust things.
1. Concerning the Pastors of the Church, these propositions may be set down, 1. that they are not to attempt anything at all by the sword, and outward violence against the Magistrate: for it is forbidden, that a Bishop should be a striker, 1. Tim. 3.3. Ambrose saith, coactus repugnare non noui, potero flere, potero gemere, aduersus arma, milites, lachrymae me • erma sunt, being urged, I know not how to resist, I can mourn, I can weep: against armed soldiers my weapons are tears, orat. in Auxent, and in another place, epist. 33. nogamus Auguste, non pugnamus, we entreat O Sovereign, we fight not.
2. It is the duty of Pastors to admonish the Magistrates by the word of God, arguendo eorum notoriam impietatem, & ad officium iuxta verbum Dei & leges faciendum cohortando, by reproving their notorious impiety, and by exhorting them to do their duty according to the word of God, and the laws; this proposition which Pareus setteth down may safely be received, and assented unto, as agreeable to the word of God: for so Elias reproved Ahab to his face, and John the Baptist, Herod, telling him of his incest with his brothers wife. Thus excellently Ambrose writeth hereof to Theodosius, who had caused some thousands of people to be put to the sword unjustly, an pudet te imperator facere, quod Propheta David, &c. peccavi Domine, &c. noli ergo impatienter ferre imperator, si tibi dicatur, (tu fecisti istud.) quod Davidi dictum est à Propheta, &c. art thou ashamed O Emperor, to do that which the Prophet David did (I have sinned Lord) do not then take it impatiently O Emperor, if it be said unto thee, as Nathan said to David, thou hast done this: epist. 28. ad Theodos.
3. It is lawful for the Pastors of the Church to refuse to communicate holy things unto impious and cruel Magistrates, which will not be admonished nor reclaimed from their sins: as in such a case they are not to be admitted unto the Sacraments, neither is the Pastor bound to be a minister of holy things unto them: this is warranted by the Scripture, Matth. 7.6. Give not that which is holy unto dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine: 1. Tim. 5.22. Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partakers of other men's sins, keep thyself pure, but he which admitteth any notorious sinner to the communion, is partaker of his sins.
Ambrose also to this effect saith to Theodosius, offerre non audeo sacrificium, si volueris assistere, I dare not offer the (spiritual) sacrifice, if thou be present, epist. 28. he refused to communicate with the Emperor being guilty of blood.
5. Pareus goeth yet a step further, that the Bishops and Pastors may resist unjust Magistrates, not only by admonishing, reproving, and exhorting them: but also contumaces de consensu Ecclesiae etiam Satanae tradendo, donec rescipiscant, in delivering them up also unto Satan, with the consent of the Church, such as are obstinate, till they repent: for this his assertion he allegeth these reasons. S. Paul saith, 1. Tim. 5.20. Them that sin rebuke openly, that the rest may fear. 2. Because the Pastors watch over men's souls, and must give account for them, if any perish by their default. 3. Ambrose resisted Theodos. by the word.
But none of these reasons do prove, that Princes are to be excommunicate, but only that they must be reproved, and shown their faults, which yet must be done with reverent respect, not in such sort, as they should by taunting speech, or malepart reprehensions be disgraced before their subjects: Ambrose as is shown before, only withdrew his hand from ministering holy things to the Emperor being guilty of innocent blood, neither by his peremptory sentence did he cast him out of the Church, but persuaded him to repentance for his sin, and to forbear.
Indeed the practice of the Roman Church is such, to make no great matter of excommunicating Emperors and Kings, and to absolve the subjects from their obedience: wherein the Pope evidently transgresseth in these three points, in exercising jurisdiction, where he hath nothing to do, and in arrogating to himself the sole authority of dispensing the keys of the Church, and in denying ordinary duties and obedience to an excommunicate Prince.
And as touching the excommunicating of Magistrates by the censure of the Church, I take it not to be so convenient to be done, neither have we any direct precept or president in the Scripture to warrant it: But the contrary rather.
1. If the ecclesiastical sword might be drawn forth against the Magistrates, then the Civil also, and the Prince might as well be proceeded against in Civil courts, to be sentenced for his offense, as in ecclesiastical: for otherwise there should be less power in the Ciuile, then in the Ecclesiastical state: but this were a very proposterous course, to appoint superior judges to the Prince in his own kingdom.
2. David when he had committed these two great sins of murder and adultery, confessed and said, tibi soli peccavi, against thee only have I sinned: the reason whereof Ambrose yielded: quia rex erat, nullis ipse legibus tenebatur, because he was a King, and was bound to no laws, apolog. David, c. 10. and Jerome also saith, rex enim erat, alium non timebat, he was a King, and feared no other, ad Eustoch: It seemeth then that David was free both from Ciuil and Ecclesiastical censure: whereupon Ambrose inferreth generally of all Kings: neque enim vllis ad paenam vocantur legibus toti imperij potestate, that they cannot be drawn to punishment by any (human) laws, being privileged by their imperial powers.
3. Saint Paul willeth prayers to be made for Kings, 1. Tim. 2.2. we must bless them, not curse them, but to give them over to Satan, is to curse them; Saint Paul when he had called Ananias painted wall, being admonished that he was the high Priest, excused himself by his ignorance, alleging that text Exod. 22.28. Thou shalt not speak evil of the ruler of thy people: so far off was Saint Paul from excommunicating him, and giving him over unto Satan, as he did Elymas the Sorcerer whom he called the child of the Devil, Act. 13.10. I hold it then the safer way, that the sentence of excommunication go not forth upon any occasion against the supreme Magistrate, (howsoever the inferior may be censured) it is sufficient, that the Minister discharge his duty, in reproving and exhorting, and in not consenting to any sin in the Magistrate; as Ambrose said to the Emperor, malo mihi honorum esse tecum, quam malorum consortium, I had rather be partaker with thee in good things, then in evil, &c. He speaketh of his silence and connivence in the Emperors sin, as the words following show, ideo clementia tuae displicere debet sacerdotis silentium, therefore the silence of the Priest (or Pastor) ought to dislike your clemency.
4. But because, the Papal sea taketh upon it to excommunicate Kings, wherein I would have a perpetual difference between their synagogue, and the reformed Churches; this shall be our last proposition here of this matter: that an excommunicate Prince is notwithstanding to be obeyed by his subjects, neither is it lawful for them by that color to withdraw their obedience.
1. The divine ordinance is to be obeyed in all lawful things, but all higher powers are God's ordinance, even when they stand excommunicate, they cease not not to be Magistrates: for seeing they are ordained of God, by no human constitution can they be vnordained: but the Ecclesiastical censure of excommunicating kings, is only an human ordinance, not commanded nor warranted by the word: Ergo:
2. An excommunicate person is in the same degree with an heathen and Publican, Mat. 18.17. but an heathen Magistrate is to be obeyed, for such were the governors in S. Paul's time, to whom he willeth subjection to be given, Rom. 13.1.
3. Christian religion overthroweth not the policy of Commonwealths, neither is God the author of confusion: but if Princes excommunicate should be disobeyed, great disorder and confusion should follow in the commonwealth: for the canons forbid, palam vel secrete loqui, to speak openly or secretly with excommunicate persons, part. 2. c. 11. qu. 3. c. 1. or to go unto the house of one that is excommunicate, ib id. c. 26. or to receive any that is excommunicate into their house, c. 29. and they are decreed not to be homicides, qui contra excommunicatos armantur, which take arms against excommunicate persons, caus. 23. qu. 5. c. 27. and an excommunicate person non audiendus in iudicio, must not be heard in judgment, decret. Gregor. lib. 1. tit. 29. c. 21. Now who seeth not, what confusion would be brought upon the commonwealth, if the subjects might neither speak and confer with the king, nor resort unto him, and that they might take arms against him standing excommunicate.
4. No Ecclesiastical law can dispense and take away the civil and natural law: as, for the son to do his duty to his father, the wife to her husband, the servant to his Master, though they stand excommunicate: yea the Popish decrees allow all these to do their service even unto excommunicate persons: as thus stand the words of the canon: anathematis vinculo has subtrahimus, videlicet vxores, liberos, seruos, ancellas, &c. we do release from the bond of excommunication, wives, children, servants, maids, &c. which did attend upon excommunicate persons, part. 2. c. 11. qu. 3. c. 103. If these domestical inferiors may perform their duties to persons excommunicate, how much more lawful is it for subjects to do the like to their Princes, because the necessity of the state, so much the more requireth it.
5. The Popes censure of excommunication is unjust and unlawful, and therefore void by their own laws, as part. 2. c. 11. quest. 3. it is decreed iniustam damnationem irritam, that an unjust damnation is of no force, c. 1.46. non est petenda solutio, vbi inique fertur sententia, absolution is not to be craved, where the sentence is unjustly laid, &c. to this purpose is the decree of Gelasius B. of Rome there expressed.
Now the Popes excommunicating is unlawful for diverse reasons. 1. because he is an incompetent judge, he excommunicateth Princes, who are not of his jurisdiction: and the law is, cui denegatur executio, denegatur & sententiae pronuntiatio, to whom the execution of the sentence is denied, the pronouncing of the sentence is, &c. Cod. lib. 3. tit. 26. leg. 3. but the Pope out of his precinct and jurisdiction, hath no power to execute his sentence, Ergo, the denouncing thereof belongeth not unto him.
2. Their own canons hold, that qui inimici sunt, iudices esse non possunt, they which are enemies can be no judges: Caus. 3. qu. 5. c. 15. but the Pope is a professed enemy to kings whom he excommunicateth.
3. They are not held to be excommunicate, which are excommunicate by heretics, c. 24. qu. 1. c. 36. but the Pope holdeth many heretical points of doctrine, for proof hereof, see Synops. Papis. throughout.
4. It is not lawful for any to excommunicate in their own cause: See the decree of Gregor. c. 23. qu. 4. c. 27. but this doth the Pope.
5. Their law is: that no man should be excommunicate antequam causa probetur, before the cause be proved, c. 2. qu. 1. c. 11. but how can the causes of Princes he proved before an incompetent judge, where no man appeareth to answer for them.
6. An excommunicate person cannot excommunicate, c. 24. qu. 11.4. but the Pope standeth excommunicate himself according to that decree of the Toletane council, 12. c. 1. non erat ab anathematis sententia alienus, aut à divina animadversionis vltione securus, quisquis contra salutem principis deinceps, aut crexerit vocem, aut commouerit caedem, aue quamcun{que} quaesierit laedendi vltionem, he shall not be free from the sentence of excommunication, or secure from the revenge of the divine animadversion, whosoever hereafter, doth either lift up his voice against the safety of the Prince, or plotte to murder him, or seek to be revenged by procuring any hurt unto him, &c. the like decree see Toletan. 4.74. Toletan. 5.4. Toletan. 7.1. Now then because it is apparently known, that the Pope practiseth against the safety and state of Princes (not of his faction,) he standeth excommunicate, and so his excommunication is of no value.
6. If Kings ought not at all to be excommunicate, de iure, by the right of their imperial authority, then de facto, if they chance in fact to be excommunicate, obedience notwithstanding is to be yielded unto them: but the first is true, as is partly shown before: and further appeareth by the reasons sometime used by the College or Church, Leodievs. against the excommunication of Paschalis the 2. in this manner; si quis vetus & novum Testamentum, gestaque revoluerit, &c. If any man turn over the old and New Testament, and the things done therein, he shall evidently find, quod aut minime aut difficile possunt Reges & Imperatores excommunicari, that Kings and Emperors either not at all, or very hardly are to be excommunicate, they may be admonished, rebuked by discrete men: because those whom Christ the King of kings, hath appointed in his place in earth, damnandos & salvandos suo iudicio reliquit, &c. he hath reserved to be condemned or saved to his own judgment, &c. here are two reasons of this assertion, the one taken from the authority of the old and New Testament, wherein no such president is to be found, the other from the eminency of the Princely estate, which Christ hath reserved to his own judgment: An other reason, which they urge, is this Paulus pro malis regibus orari vult, &c. Paul will have evil Kings prayed for, that we may lead a quiet life: esset apostolorum imitari Apostolum, it were Apostolic to imitate the Apostle, &c. Kings must then be prayed for, and blessed, they must not be anathematized and accursed.
How far the Civil state may proceed in resisting a Tyrant.
Here Pareus hath this position: that the inferior Magistrates being subjects, may defend themselves, the Commonwealth, and the Church, and the true saith, even by force of arms against a Tyrant, so these conditions be observed. 1. When either the Prince degenerateth to a Tyrant, and maketh havoc of all, offering notorious wrongs against all law and equity to his subjects, and forceth them to Idolatry and false religion. 2. if that without such defense, they cannot be safe, their lives, bodies, and consciences. 3. that under pretence of such defense, they seek not their own revenge, with other respects unto themselves: 4. that all things be done with moderation, not to the vndoeing of the state, but the preservation of it: his reasons are these.
1. From the institution of God, and the end of the ordinance of Magistracy which is, to be avenged of evil doers, and for the praise of the good: they do not bear the sword for naught: the inferior Magistrates then having the sword, may exercise their power, in restraining the tyranny of superior governors: and for this cause inferior Magistrates are joined with the superior, not only as helpers, but to moderate their licentious and outrageous government: and therefore where they bridle the insolency of Tyrants, vtuntur gladio per legitimam vocationem diuinitus sibi tradito, they use the sword delivered unto them from God by a lawful vocation.
2. Like as a furious and mad man may be removed from the government, as Nebuchadnezzar was cast forth by public authority. Dan. 4.31. so a Tyrant also who differeth not from a mad and furious man.
3. They which have power to constitute the Magistrate, as where they enter by election of the Senate, consent of the people, or by other electors appointed, have power also to restrain their immoderate government.
4. This is confirmed by many commendable examples, out of sacred and foreign stories: the people resisted Saul, that he should not put Jonathan his son to death, 1. Sam. 14.45. the Israelites in the time of the Judges, often were delivered by their Judges whom God raised up, from their oppressors: Athalias was removed from her tyrannical government, 2. kin. 11. the Maccabees defended thenselves and their country against the rage and fury of the Syrian Kings: the Romans expelled their vicious Kings: so did they depose their cruel Emperors, as Nero, Maximinus: Traianus is commended for that saying, when he gave the sword unto a chief officer: hoc pro me vtere, si iusta imperavero, contra me, si iniusta, &c. use that for me: if I command just things, and against me, if unjust: The Prince Electors removed Wencelaus, a man given to idleness and luxurious life from the Empire, in his stead appointing Rupertus the County of Palatine, one of the Electors: to this purpose Pareus.
But here certain differences are to be observed: for where either there is an extraordinary calling, as in the time of the Judges, or where the kingdom is usurped without any right, as by Athaliah, or where the land is oppressed by foreign invaders, as in the time of the Maccabees: or where the government is altogether Electiue, as the Empire of Germany, in all these cases there is less question of resistance to be made by the general consent of the states; And yet where none of these concur, God forbid, that the Commonwealth and Church should be left without remedy, the former conditions observed, when either havoc is made of the Commonwelth, or of the Church and religion.
How far private men may be warranted, in denying obedience unto Tyrants.
Here Pareus hath two propositions. 1. That it is not lawful for a private man without a lawful calling, to take arms either before the danger to invade a tyrant, or to defend thenselves in the time of danger, or to revenge himself after danger, if he may be defended by an ordinary power, &c. for unlawfully to resist the power is to resist God's ordinance, and one ought rather to die, then to sin: and here that saying of the Lacedemonians taketh place, si duriora morte imperetis, potius moriemur, if ye command things more heavy then death, we will choose rather to die.
2. His other position is, That it is lawful for subjects, being mere private men, if a Tyrant as a thief, and violater of chastity, do offer them violence, and they neither can implore the ordinary power, nor by any other means escape the danger, to defend themselves and theirs for the present against a Tyrant, as against a private person, that maketh an assault: for if it should not be lawful to make such resistance in case of necessity, there should be no remedy left against the furious outrage of Tyrants, which would tend to the utter dissolution of human society: and beside against whom defense by the Magistrate is lawful, in case of necessity where that cannot be had, a private defense is allowed: for then leges armant privatos, the laws do arm private men, but it is lawful for the inferior Magistrates to defend the private subjects, in cases before limited, against the fury and outrage of Tyrants: Ergo &c. to this purpose Pareus.
But this last position of his must receive some further qualification: for if a private man might lawfully defend himself, when any notorious wrong is offered to him by a Tyrant, men in this case should be judges of their own wrongs, and as their judgment is partial in their own case, so they would take great liberty to defend themselves: wherefore these conditions must further be here observed.
1. It must be considered, whether in these wrongs that are offered, the Tyrant do transgress his own laws: if he do, then he is held to be but as privatus grassator, a private assaulter, otherwise if the laws bear him out in these wrongs, they are rather to suffer and endure, then use any resistance: as the band of Christian soldiers, which were put to the sword for their Christian faith, at the commandment of the cruel Emperor Maximianus resisted not, but yielded themselves: Otto Phrinsigens. lib. 2. c. 45▪ because then the laws of the Empire were for the maintenance of Idolatry: and a whole City of Phrygia professing Christianity was destroyed and burnt with fire using no resistance, Euseb. lib. 8. c. 11.
2. The subject must wisely discern, whether he be forced to be an agent, or patient in these wrongs: he is rather to die, then to be compelled to consent to any evil: as a woman attempted by a Tyrant to adultery, should resist rather unto death, then prostitute her body: but if they be patients only, and are not forced to do anything, or consent against their conscience the case is otherwise.
3. It must be also weighed, wherein this wrong is offered, if it be only in the goods and substance of the subject, no resistance is to be made: for the goods of the subject are more lyeable to the command of the Magistrate, then anything beside, so Naboth refused to yield his inheritance and patrimony unto Ahab, but without any resistance: but if a man's life be assaulted, or the chastity of his wife, or the liberty and safety of his children, against all color of law, nature teacheth a man here to use defense.
4. Further the cause must be considered, for the which the subject is assaulted, if it be a civil matter, resistance may more safely be used: but if it be the cause of religion, therein they should rather show their patience in suffering: as we read in the persecutions of the primitive Church of 20. thousand Martyrs, that were burnt together in a Temple, without any resistance at all, who for their number might have sustained the brunt of the adversaries: but they willingly yielded themselves to the fire.
5. Likewise this discreet consideration must be used, whether there be not hope to escape the danger without resistance, or whether by resisting, a way may be opened of deliverance, or whether by their escaping, many of their brethren shall not be brought into greater danger: for where any of these things do happen, it is not safe to resist.
6. They must in such extremities so defend themselves, as that they use no assault upon the person of their Prince, to put his life in danger: for therein they manifestly transgress the public laws: it is one thing to use a necessary defense, another to make an assault: David though he stood upon his own guard, and had a great band of men attending upon him, yet when Saul twice fell into his hands, he spared to lay any violent hands upon him; with these restraintes and limitations, some defense may be granted even unto private subjects against Tyrants, otherwise it is dangerous, both in respect of their conscience, in resisting the power, and for the evil example whereby other seditious persons may be encourraged. Thus much of this question, how far resistance may be made against the civil power: how far also and in what manner the Tyrannie of the Pope the Antichrist may be resisted, see among the Controversies. contr. 3.
Quest. 18. How we should not owe anything to any man, but to love one another.
1. Touching the occasion of these words; Augustine thinketh that the duties before membratim fusa, nunc ipso circuitu clauduntur, delivered by partes, now are shut up together, de doctrine. Christian. 4. c. 20. Lyranus also thinketh, that here inferiors are taught, that they owe charity to their superiors: so also Mr. Calvin thinketh this precept of the Apostle, to be a confirmation of his former doctrine of obedience to Magistrates, because violat charitatem, &c. he doth violate charity, who denieth obedience. 2. Beza thinketh that the Apostle remooueth the impediment of obedience; because the want of charity is cause of quarrels and suits; whereupon the Magistrate is constrained by his authority to force men to render unto everyone their own; and so by this means, magistratus nomen invidio sum sit, it cometh to pass, that the name of the Magistrate is odious and envied. 3. Erasmus collecteth out of Ambrose, but not rightly, as Beza here noteth, that hitherto the Apostle shown what duty was to be yielded to the heathen Magistrates, but now he teacheth the duty, which must be rendered to Christian Magistrates. 4. But the truth is, the Apostle from special duties belonging to superiors, ascendeth higher to treat of the general duty of love, which is common to all.
2. Owe nothing: there are two kinds of debts, there is a Civil debt, and a Natural debt: the civil is either common to all, as the paying of tribute, yielding of obedience must be performed by everyone to the superiors: or concerneth only some particular persons, which are indebted by promise and contract, or some other bond unto others: there is also a natural debt, either peculiar and proper to some, as of the children to the parents, of scholars to their Masters, wives to their husbands, or common to all, as is mutual love here by the Apostle commended.
3. There are three kind of ways, whereby one may be a debtor to another, either when he payeth nothing of his debt, as if he owe an hundred shillings, and pay none at all: or if he pay but part and not all, as but ten, and if he pay the whole debt due at one time, but not at another: as if he should pay every day a shilling, till the whole debt be paid, and he hold the payment one day or two, but fail in the rest: the debt of charity, is not of either of the first kinds, but of the third: a man showeth charity once or twice, he is bound to show it still: Tolet.
4. The debt of charity different from other debts in these three points: 1. as Chrysostom saith, it is such a debt, vt semper reddatur & semper debeatur, that it both is always paid, and yet is always owing: not like unto other debts, which being paid, cease to be due: and so both redditur cum impenditur, it is restored, when it is paid, & debetur, cum reddita fuerit, and it is owing, when it is rendered, because it must be shown at all times. 2. nec cum redditur, omittitur, charity is not lost from him, that showeth it: as money which is paid goeth from him that payeth it. 3. may charity, reddendo multiplicatur, is multiplied by the paying of it, cum redditur ab homine, crescit in homine, when it is rendered by a man, it increaseth in man: gloss. ordinar. ex Augustine: so some things, when they are communicated to many, minuuntur, non augentur, are diminished, not increased, as money, and all terren things: some things are neither increased nor diminished, when they are communicated, as the light, and the sound of a voice • some things, non minuuntur, sed augentur, are not diminished, but increased, as charity, and all spiritual things, Gorran.
5. Origen's conceit is here very strange, who by debt understandeth sin, vult ergo omne debitum peccati solvi, he would therefore every debt of sin to be paid, and not to remain with us. But the Apostle speaketh not of any such spiritual debt, whereby we stand indebted to God, neither is it in our power to pay that debt, but of outward debts and duties unto men.
19. Quest. How he that loveth his brother fulfilleth the law.
1. He which loveth his brother doth not in every particular, and in act, keep every part in the law: for one may love his brother, though in that instant he do not perform all the acts of charity, as in feeding him, if he be hungry, and such like: but yet he fulfilleth all these duties, virtute & potestate, in possibility, and having an aptness and power thereunto: both because charity is the cause and beginning of all the duties, which as it moveth him to one duty, so it will stir him up to the rest, as also it is the ende and scope of the law, which is to maintain charity, and it is modus, the manner, how the law should be observed: for whatsoever external duty one doth, if it be not in love, it is nothing, as S. Paul showeth, 2. Cor. 13.2, 3.
2. But here a question is moved by Chrysostom, how the Apostle reduceth all the law unto this one precept of loving our neighbor, when our Savior Christ in the Gospel speaketh of two great precepts, the love of God, and of our neighbor. 1. some think that the Apostle meaneth the fulfilling of the precepts of the second table, and so M. Calvin hath one answer, the Apostle in totam legem non respexit, hath not respect to the whole law, but only to the duties toward our neighbors. 2. Origen by this neighbor, understandeth Christ: hunc proximum si diligamus, &c. if we love this neighbor, we fulfill all the law: but this seemeth too curious. 3. but the better answer is, that the one includeth the other, as S. John saith, How can one, that loveth not his brother, whom he seeth, love God, whom he hath not seen, 1. John. 4.20. so Chrysostom allegeth those words of our Savior, Peter lovest thou me, feed my sheep, &c. the love of God is seen then in the love of our brother: neque Deus sine proximo, neque proximus sine Deo diligi potest, neither is God loved without our brother, nor our brother without God. Haymo.
3. Now the Apostle rehearseth not all the commandments, but only of the second table, because he treateth of those duties, which are to be performed unto men: and by the keeping of the second table it is better discerned who observe the law, then out of the first: and he omitteth the first precept of the second table, because he intended not to rehearse them all, but supplieth them in those general words, if there be any other commandment: neither doth he observe the same order, for he setteth the seventh precept before the sixth, because he purposed not to set down the precepts, neither all, nor in their order, but only to give an instance in some of them.
20. Quest. How a man is to love his neighbor as himself.
1. Chrysostom thus expoundeth, non solum dilectionem requirit, sed etiam vehementem, he doth not only require love, but a vehement and earnest love: that is, a man should love his neighbor, without dissimulation, earnestly, heartily, as he loveth himself.
2. And it comprehendeth more beside. 1. no man hateth his own flesh, no more ought be to hate his neighbor. 2. when anything happeneth unto our selves that is evil and grievous, we are sorry, and troubled, so should we be affected toward our brethren in their griefs. 3. in our own faults we are favorable, making the best of everything, so we should not be rigidi, austere, and too censorious in sifting the infirmities of our brethren. 4. in loving of our selves, nunquam defatigamur, we are never wearied, so we should hold out still to love our brethren. 5. we wish all good things to our selves, so should we do to our neighbors.
3. But this must be understood of the natural self-love, which every man beareth toward himself, not of that vicious love, whereby men thorough the corruption of their nature, and evil custom, are affected to their own vices: so a man must not love himself unto that which is evil, for he that sinneth hateth his own soul: and therefore neither must one love his neighbor, as he corruptly loveth himself: but either, quia iustus, aut vt sit iustus, a man loveth himself, either because he is just, or that he may be just, and so must he love his neighbor: gloss. ordinar.
4. Theophylact here observeth, that the Gospel requireth a more perfect love then the Law doth, namely, that one should lay down his life for his brethren: but the Law biddeth us only to love another as our selves: but the charity which the law requireth comprehendeth this also: for then a man loveth another as himself, when he is ready to do that to another, which he would have done for himself, Math. 7.12. Now one would desire to be redeemed by an others life, rather then his soul should perish: so let him be affected to another: A man is not bound to give his bodily life to redeem an others, for then he should love him better then himself: but to give his bodily to deliver an others soul from perishing, is but to love him, as himself; for so he would wish his friend to do for him.
5. But this rule taketh not away all inequality, difference, and degrees of love: for though everyone is to be loved as our selves, yet one is to be loved before another: our parents, children, and wives, are first to be respected in the duties of charity, then strangers: for S. Paul's rule is, that men must first show godliness toward their own house, 1. Tim. 5.4. the quality of our love is here signified: that it should be simple, sincere, unfeigned, not the quantity, or the degree of our love: all are to be loved as our selves, that is, constantly, unfeignedly, heartily, and yet one may be preferred before another in our love.
Quest. 21. Who is understood by our neighbor.
1. Origen expoundeth this neighbor to be Christ, hinc ergo proximum si diligamus, if then we love this neighbor, we shall fulfill the whole law: and that Christ is our neighbor he proveth by that parable of the Samaritan, Luk. 10. who took the man which was wounded by theiues, and laid him upon his beast, and brought him to the inne, and gave two pence to the host to see unto him: so Christ, he took us up being wounded of our sins, and stripped and left naked by Satan, iumento corporis sui supposuit, and laid us upon his body to be borne, and brought us ad stabulum Ecclesiae, to the stable or fold of his Church, and left the two pence of the old and new Testament, for the expenses of our cure, and healing. And he proceedeth further and showeth how he which loveth Christ keepeth all the commandments: for he whose delight is in Christ, will not commit adultery, nor follow any other carnal pleasure, because his delight is in Christ: neither will be steal from another, who is willing to leave all he hath for Christ, &c. But Origen's interpretation is too curious: howsoever in that parable Christ may be understood by that good Samaritan, though every point of the parable cannot fitly be allegorized, yet it is evident, that the Apostle here by neighbor understandeth, our brother, for he speaketh of loving one another.
2. Hugo Cardinal out of Augustine here moveth a question, whether under this name of neighbor, the Angels are comprehended; and he bringeth two solutions, one is that the Angels are excluded, because the commandment speaketh of those, qui diligendi sunt ex charitate, which are to be loved in charity: but our charity is not extended unto the Angels: the other solution is, that seeing by neighbor everyone is understood, vel cui praebexdum est officium miserecordiae, vel à quo, either to whom or from whom mercy and compassion is shown, then Angels may be well said to be our neighbors, by whom we receive so great benefits: but the better answer is, that our love toward those blessed spirits, is not comprehended in the duties of the second table, the subject whereof is our brother, whom we daily see, 1. John. 4.20. neither can any one of the precepts, thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, be referred to the Angels in any sense: but like as man is not commanded to love himself, which that nature teacheth him: for it followeth necessarily if a man love his neighbor as himself, he must needs love himself first: so the love of the holy angels, the ministers of God doth necessarily follow upon our loving of God, which though it be not commanded in the first table, yet it followeth necessarily upon it.
3. Wherefore by our neighbor we understand not, those which are so in habitation, or with whom we have affinity, or from whom we have received any benefit, sed omnium hominum intelligi opertet, we must understand every man in general, quia nemo est quo cum sit operandum malum, because we ought not to work evil with any, or to offer wrong unto any: gloss. ordinar. sufficiat nobis quod homo sit, &c. let it suffice us that he is a man, and of one and the same nature, who standeth in need of our help: and there is none that liveth that may not stand in need of an others help, as Xerxes that great King and commander of Persia, that brought so many hundred thousand men in Grecia, was same to escape in a fishers boat.
Quest. 22. How salvation is said to be nearer, then when we believed.
1. Lyranus referreth this time of belief, to the Old Testament, when the fathers believed only in Christ to come, but they saw nothing performed: so also Erasmus, Tolet: but Beza refuseth this, because S. Paul speaketh specially to the converted Gentiles among the Romans, and not to the Jews only, who lived under the Old Testament.
2. Some give this sense, salvation is nearer then when we believed, that is, then a man would believe: there was such an open door of salvation made, as one would hardly believe it, Hugo: but the words, we, when we believed: not any other believed of us.
3. An other hath this gloss, it is nearer, that is, magis debita per bona opera, more due unto us by good works, then when we believed, having yet no good works, Gorran: but a lively faith is never without works.
4. Chrysostom understandeth it of the ende of the world, when the salvation promised shall be accomplished: tempore peocedente futura secula proprius accedunt, for as time weareth, so the world to come draweth nearer.
5. But the Apostle rather confert incrementa cum initijs fidei, compareth the increasing of faith with the beginning: and this is another argument, which he useth to stir us up to newness of life: as before he moved by the opportunity of time, that now we should awake from sin, as one when the day is come riseth up unto his work, so here he persuadeth ab vtili, from that which is profitable: iam proprius acessimus ad metam, we are now come nearer the mark, then when we began to believe, and therefore it behooveth us to be the more earnest: like as they which are set to run a race, the nearer they come to the mark, the faster they run least any should outstrippe them: this difference is made between a natural and violent motion, this is more speedy in the beginning and it slacketh toward the ende, but the natural is slow in the beginning, and more quick and speedy toward the ende: so the faithful that are truly called, will still increase more and more.
Origen toucheth both these last expositions: there is, adventus lucis generalis, & specialis, a general coming and approaching of this light, which shall be at the coming of Christ, and this every day groweth nearer: and there is a particular coming of this light to everyone: si Christus in cord est, diem nobis facit, if Christ be in our heart, he bringeth day and light with him.
Quest. 23. How the night is said to be past, the day at hand: of the literal sense.
1. The night is past or well spent. The word is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which properly signifieth praecedo, provehor, to go forward, to proceed: and so read Chrysostom, Theodoret: the vulgar Latin readeth praecessit, is gone before: so Cyprian in the same sense, transivit, is passed: and Jerome in c. 26. Matth. praeterijt, is gone over: but the other is the better reading, both because of the proper signification of the word, and for that it followeth, the day is at hand, but if the night were all past, and not rather spent, and some part thereof behind, the day should not be at hand only, but it should be present: this Metaphor the Apostle useth, because there remaineth with us some ignorance and darkness still, even after our calling, and we have not in this life a perfect knowledge of Christ, neither is it full day with us, till the next life.
2. By the works of darkness are understood the works of sin, both because they proceed from darkness and ignorance of God, and they which follow them delight in darkness, and hate the light, as also the ende of such works is everlasting darkness, and to be deprived forever of the light of God's kingdom.
3. We must cast them away. Which signifieth, 1. that we should not defer our repentance from dead works, like as he which awaketh when it is day doth hastily put from him his night garments. 2. as we must speedily put them off, so cum detestatione, we must do it with a kind of hatred and detestation, as a man casteth from him with disdain that which he abhorreth. 3. and we must procul abijcere, cast them far away from us, never to entertain them again.
4. We are bid to put on: which metaphor noteth three things. 1. diligence, like as he which putteth on his garments or armor, doth not only clothe or arm one part of his body, but everyone: so it is not enough to follow one or two good works, but we must give our selves to every good work, as we clothe every part of our body. 2. we must do it with delight, like as there is comeliness in clothing the body wherein we delight. 3. herein is expressed conscience, that having put on these garments, or armor, we should not suddenly put them off, as it is said, in the Cantic. 4.3. I have put off my coat, how shall I put it on: so after we have put on our coat, so we should not put it off.
5. The armor of light. 1. They are called armor in these two respects, because they are defensiva, both defensive, we thereby resist the temptations of Satan, having the breastplate of righteousness: and they are offensiva, offensive, whereby we drive away also the tempter from us; such is the sword of the spirit, whereby we quench all the fiery darts of Satan. 2. they are called armor rather then garments, for we are not thereby covered in God's sight, as justified by our own righteousness, yet we are thereby defended from Satan's assaults.
6. They are called the armor of light: because they proceed from the knowledge of God, the true light of the soul: and they do shine and give light before men, who seeing them do glorify God, Par. and they defend us against the works of darkness, illuminate the soul, and bring us ad lucem aeternam, to everlasting light, Lyranus.
Quest. 24. What time is understood by the day and night.
1. Chrysostom by the night seemeth to understand the time of this life, and by the day, the resurrection, prope est resurrectio, the resurrection is at hand: but, as Tolet well observeth, that the day cannot be understood here of the day of judgment: (as beside Chrysostom, other of the Fathers interpret this place, as Athanas. 44. ad Antioch. qu. 90. August. epist. 80. ad Isich. ) for then the Apostles exhortation would be of small force, who moveth to cast off the works of darkness in respect of the time, because the day was come: but if the day were not yet come, then the ground of this exhortation faileth.
2. Anselm by the day, understandeth the time after this life, which is so much the nearer as death approacheth: so also the ordin. gloss. but when death cometh it is no time to work: here the Apostle exhorteth to walk honestly which is in the day: therefore this day must be in this life present.
3. Some do expound this night to be the time before the coming of Christ, and the day the time of preaching the Gospel, when Christ the Sun of righteousness did shine unto the world: so Lyranus, the night is past, obscuritas figurarum legis, the darkness of the figures of the law: likewise Erasmus, under the law, vmbra fuit magis quàm res, there was a shadow rather then the thing: Osiander also understandeth that time, quando nondum fuit exhibitus Christus, when Christ was not yet exhibited to the world: so also Faius: But as Beza noteth, the Apostle in this sense should have had reference only to the Jews, whereas he writeth to the believing Gentiles among the Romans, which were not acquainted with the figures of the law.
4. Wherefore with Pet. Martyr, Pareus, Beza, by night, rather we understand, tempus ignorantiae & caecitatis, the time of blindness and ignorance, which goeth before regeneration: for till they were called to the knowledge of Christ, they were in darkness, as the Apostle saith, Ephes. 5.8. Ye were sometime darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord, walk as children of light: this day light as Martyr observeth, if it be compared with our darkness & ignorance in times past, it may be called the day, but in respect of the life to come, it is but as the twilight, or break of the day, Martyr: so whereas the Apostle saith not, the night is past, but processit, it is well nigh spent, thereby he signifieth the imperfection of the state present, because yet there remaineth some darkness even in the regenerate: like as whē we see noctem properae ad diluculum, the night hasten to the dawning: and the swallows begin to chatter, we one call up another and say it is day: Chrysostom, and Theophylact, yet maketh the matter more plain: as allowing 12. hours to the night, and ten of them be spent, we say the night is wearing away, and it is toward day, &c. so the gross darkness is past when the light of faith and knowledge riseth up in us: but yet it is but as the dawning of the day in this life: Thus Origen followeth this sense, as is alleged before, si Christus in cord sit, &c. if Christ be in our hearts, he maketh it day.
Quest. 25. How we should walk honestly.
v. 13. So that we walk honestly. 1. Chrysost. observeth well, whom Theophyl. followeth, that whereas the Romans were much affected with the opinion of glory, he persuadeth them, decoro & honesto, by that which was comely and honest. 2. and further he saith, that we walk, not walk ye, putting himself in the number, that he might exhort thē without envy. 3. that which he saith here in one word, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , honestly, he elsewhere Tit. 2.12. thus distinguisheth to these three, to live soberly, righteously, and godly. 4. and he addeth, as in the day: like as a man will be ashamed to go naked or clad with tottered and ragged garments in the day: so this time of the light of faith requireth us to walk honestly.
Not in riot and drunkenness. 1. Some by these two understand, by the first excess in meat, by the other excess in drink, Gorran: but Origen better distinguisheth them, by the first understanding, in honesta & luxuriosa convivia, dishonest and riotous feasts, by the other drunkenness, which is a companion of such feasts: such excessive feasts were used among the Egyptians, where the manner was to have a dead man's scull brought in, in the middes of their feasts, that they being put in mind of mortality, might more freely spend the short time which they had in following of their pleasure. 2. Chrysostom here noteth also, bibere non prohibit, sed praeter mensuram bibere, he forbiddeth not to drink, but to drink beside measure.
Chambering and wantonness. 1. Gorran, and so Hugo, by the first understandeth the sin of sloth, by the other fornication and uncleanness. 2. But Origen taketh these to be cubilia impuditiae, the chambers of wantonness: and thinketh here some reference to be made to the dens of beasts, because these filthy sins are more agreeable to beasts, then men. 3. Chrysostom noteth that the Apostle forbiddeth not all kind of bedding, and chambering, for the marriage bed is undefiled, Heb. 13.4. non mulieribus commisceri, sed scortari, he forbiddeth not to company with women, but to follow whoredom.
Not in strife and envying. 1. As before he touched the sins of the flesh, so now he forbiddeth the vices of the mind, contention, emulation, Origen. 2. these are joined to the other, as being the perpetual companions of banqueting and drunkenness: as the wise man showeth, that to such is woe, sorrow, and strife, that follow wine, Prov. 23.29. 3. these two are the fruits and effects of drunkenness, concupiscence and wrath, so that the Apostle taketh away the very occasions of these evil affections, Chrys. for excess in meat and drink is the cause of wantonness, and of the sin of uncleanness, and of strife and contention. 4. Haymo thinketh that by strife, is here understood the contention about questions of faith: rather such brawls and contentions are here restrained, which follow upon excessive rioting and drunkenness.
Quest. 28. How we must put on Christ.
1. The Apostle altereth his phrase of speech: for whereas before he spake of the armor of light, now he useth another metaphor of putting on a garment: for our good works, though they may defend, and arm us against the assaults of Satan, yet it is the righteousness only of Christ, that covereth us as a garment in the sight of God, Par.
2. How Christ is put on, it is diversely scanned. 1. Some make four ways of the putting on of Christ, as the glass receiveth the image by impression, so some put on Christ for a time, but it passeth away as an image in a glass: as the wool receiveth the die or color per assumptionem, by assuming the same: as the example is as it were put on, per imitationem, by imitation: and the iron taketh the fire per penetrationem, by penetration: but all these do only show the putting on of Christ unto sanctification, whereas he is put on also unto justification. 2. some then make two puttings on of Christ, the one is by faith in Christ, whereby we are justified: like as Adam was clothed with skins of slain beasts, to signify our spiritual clothing by the death of Christ: this sense followeth Pet. Martyr, Pareus: the other by imitating of Christ in holiness: as Origen saith, that he which putteth on all virtues putteth on Christ, qui haec omnia habet, habet Christum, he that hath all these things hath Christ: but Chrysostom saith better, he that hath put on Christ, omnem virtutem habet, hath every virtue indeed: of the works of sanctification, Beza understandeth this putting on of Christ, and Osiander. likewise Tolet referreth it to the imitation of Christ's virtues: but the better sense is, to join them both together: it signifieth more then imitation only, as Chri •• tum fide apprehendere, to apprehend Christ by faith, and then by his spirit to be made fit & • ot unto every good work, Ca • . for the word putting on, signifieth not only partem aliquā • rgumenti, some part only of the covering, but the apparelling of the whole man, both inward and outward, Faius.
3. But seeing the Apostle saith, that Christ is put on by baptism, & S. Paul here speaketh • o them which were baptized, how then doth he bid them now put on Christ: the answer 〈◊〉 that as August. saith, some do put on Christ ad sacramenti perceptionem, to the receiving of the sacrament only; some us{que} ad vitae sanctificationem, unto the sanctification of life, the Apostle speaketh here of the latter: for so Christ not once only in baptism but all our life long is to be put on.
4. Gorran is here somewhat curious in distinguishing these three, put on the Lord, which signifieth power, Jesus, clemency, Christ, wisdom: the first is seen in subduing sin with power, the second, clementer indulgendo, in gently pardoning the penitent, the third, prudenter instruendo, in prudently instructing the ignorant: But this I omit as too curious.
5. Chrysostom taketh here occasion to show, how Christ is all things unto us: as here he is our vesture and apparel: he is our way and life, our food, our foundation, our spouse, our master, our friend, our brother, our advocate, our habitatiō, as he saith, he dwelleth in me, and I in him: yea he is our suppliant, we pray you in Christ's stead, be reconciled unto God, 1. Cor. 5.20.
Quest. 27. How the flesh is to be cared for.
v. 14. Take no care for the flesh, to fulfill the lusts thereof. 1. I will omit here to note the elegancies which Erasmus observeth in the Apostles phrase, and style, how in the original the Apostles words do fall well to the ear in the orderly compounding, and one part doth answer another, his sentences are full of Metaphors, and there is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the like ending of the words in the sound and pronouncing. 2. But I prefer Chrysostom's note, that as the Apostle before did not forbid simply to drink, but to be drunken, nor to marry, but to commit fornication, so here he simply restraineth not all care for the flesh,