History of the First Ten Persecutions
Moreover, Councils are abused, when as their authority is impared not with solid reasons, taken out of the Scrip •… ures of GOD, but rather with the railing speeches of contentious men▪ like as a number of Heretics called Acephali, with tumultuarie murmuring and crying out against the Council of Chalcedon, dispersed themselves here and there, and left not off their ungodly courses, until a new Heresy of the Monothelites, an ungracious bud of the rotten and cutted-down stock of the Heresy of Eutyches did arise. But no man aught to contend against Councils, with pride of a contentious mind, but rather with humility of a modest mind search out, whether their Ordinances be agreeable to the book of GOD, or not.
Finally, Councils are abused, when they who are assembled together are transported with incertainetie of doubtful opinions, so that albeit they be met together, to settle others in the certainty of the true Faith, yet they themselves are so wavering minded, that they can never be at rest. Like as the Arians, not content with the sum of Faith set down at Nice, assembled themselves many times, & set down 9. diverse forms of Faith, as Socrates recordeth: yet could they never agree upon one certain form of Faith, which they would not alter. Likew •… se in the affairs of Discipline, so great discrepance of opinion was found, that neither Council agreede with Council, nor Bishop with Bishop, nor yet Bishops with Councils.
The Council of Ancyra thought expedient for order taking with those who had sacrificed unto Idols in time of persecution, that unto Bishops should be adjoined Chorepiscopi, that is, Country Bishops, or Landward Bishops, to whom they gave not power to ordain Elders and Deacons, but only Readers, and Subdeacons. Damasus Bishop of Rome could not agree to this subordinate order of Bishops called Chorepiscopi. The Councils of Neocaesarea & Antiochia, liked of this form of gouernament. Other Councils in not making mention of this name declared their misliking: so that this abuse likewise of diversity of opinions (frequently altered) both in Doctrine and Discipline, impaired much the authority of Councils.
Before I declare who hath power to conuocate General & National Councils, something is to be premitted concerning the assemblies upon the LORD'S holy Sabbaths. These assemblies of all other were counted moste holy: in so much, that when the Princes of the people of Israel were to conueene with Moses, to consult concerning matters of civil gouernament, they were warned so to do by the blowing of one of the silver trumpets only: but when both the silver trumpets did blow, then the people were warned to conueene at the door of the Tabernacle, for the exercise of divine service, which as it was of all Conuentions most holy, so in like manner it was foresignisied in most solemn manner. These holy meetings were warranded by the LORDES express commandment, Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy, &c. And in the New Testament, Christians having received power to meet together in CHRISTES Name, with promise that CHRIST would be amongst them, they convened secretly, to the hearing of the word, and ministration of the Sacraments, albeit they were most straitly inhibited so to do, by the Edicts of persecuting Tyrantes: and these who were comprehended and put to death for their conuentions & profession, they died Holy Martyrs, how soever the Pagans did put them to death as traitors, because they disobeyed the Emperors commandment, both in their conuentions and profession. Yet this ground being once laid, that they died Holy Martyrs, it will follow that Christians have power to conucene, to hear the word preached (especially upon the LORDES day) albeit all the Princes of the world would forbid them to meet. And this liberty granted by CHRIST, and sealed up by the blood of innumerable martyrs, Confirmed also by the laws of Christian Princes, ever since the reign of Constantine, it will continue unto the blessed appearance of the LORD JESUS, to judge the world, albeit all the enemies of the Gospel of CHRIST should grind their teeth, and fret against this liberty.
These fore-said weekly conuentions are necessary at all times, and in all ages, even albeit there were no H •… retique nor Scismatique in the world, to divert people from the truth of GOD, because even the best of us all is but like unto a barren husbandry, that hath need continually to be dressed, and labored, and watered with the streams of the rivers of the Sanctuary of our GOD, lest we wither in the barrenness of a corrupt nature. But Councils General or National are not necessary at all times, but only when the peace of the Church is troubled with Heresy and Schism, or an universal over-spreading scab of corrupt manners: and at such times it is meet that Pastors acquaint the supreme Magistrate with the danger, who hath not need at all times to conuocate a Council, except the malady that he would rem •… die be unsupportable. After this wise form of dealing did Constantine send Osius Bishop of Corduba to Egypt, to see if by his travels the Heresy and Schism springing up in Alexandria, could be timeously suppressed: but when the good Emperor saw that this Gangrene daily increased, then there was no remedy, but to gather a General Council for suppressing of Heresy, and for keeping of intestine peace into the Church of CHRIST.
Now to prove that National and General Councils ought to be gathered by Monarchs and Princes: In the old Testament the great Conuentions at Carmell, Silo, and Mizpah, were assembled by Princes: and the assembly convened at Mizpah by Samuel, he gathered it, as a civil Governor of the land, and not in so far as he was a Prophet, for as yet Saul was not allowed by the people to be king. The Conuention appointed at Gilgal, was with the express consent and allowance of King Saul, who was also personally present at that Assemblie. In the New Testament the assembly of the Apostles at Jerusalem, albeit it was gathered without the knowledge and allowance of the Emperor Cluadius, in whose time it was assembled: Yet the Apostles had such extraordinary warrandes of the Spirit, such extraordinary gifts, and their painful travels fell in such an extraordinary time, when there was no Christian Magistrate favoring the Gospel, that he who furnished unto them courage to preach without liberty granted unto them by Princes, furnished also courage and grace unto them to meet at Jerusalem, for the well of the Church, without the fore-knowledge and allowance of the Emperor Claudius. But things done extraordinarily, lean unto their own extraordinary warrandes, and are no impediment to us to proceed, and to speak of things that are ordinary.
And it is to be noted, that even during the time of the 10. Persecutions, Christians neglected not to seek the support of Emperors against Heretics, whē it could be obtained, as clearly appeareth by the ninth Persecuting Emperor Aurelian, who with his civil authority assisted the Synod of Antiochia, against Samosatenus, as hath been declared in the third CENTURIE, and the Church had craved the support of the Emperors authority to that effect.
From the days of the Emperor Constanti •… e, until the year of our LORD 1215. the Emperors were in use to conuocate Councils. But Innocentius the third, to whose tuterie Frederick the seconde was recommended, by his father Henry the sixth, more like to the successor of Judas, then the successor of Peter, made Otto Duke of Saxon Emperor in prejudice of Frederick, until the spirit of dissention fell betwixt Otto and Pope Innocentius the third. Then was Otto excommunicated, and the Empire was given to Frederick the seconde, to whom it rightly belonged. Notwithstanding Pope Innocentius took upon him boldness to conuocate the General Council of Lateran wherein Popish Transubstantiation did get allowance) the like whereof no Pope preceeding his time ever persumed to do.
Now I demand of these, who defend the Popish Religion, and herewithal continually brag of Antiquity, whether or no this be an ancient custom, that the Bishops of Rome should conuocate General Councils? The History is so evident and clear, that he who is not altogether effronted, will grant, that it was not an ancient custom, that the Bishop of Rome should conuocate General Councils, and no Pope did it before Innocentius the third. Gratianus according to his foolish and flattering form of writing, bringeth in the testimony of Julius the first, affirming that no Council is or shall be firm and sure without the allowance of the chair of Rome. What shall we then say of the Council of H •… erusalem, holden by the Apostles before there was any Bishop of Rome to give allowance unto it? Notwithstanding, even Pope Julius himself, when he writeth to the Bishops gathered in the Council of Antiochia, he blameth them with many faults, yet he chargeth them not with this, that they had assembled themselves together without license obtained from him, but rather for this, that they had not required him, or his messengers, to be present at their assembly, Whereby it is evident, that it was not an ancient custom, that the Bishop of Rome should conuocate all General and National Councils.
With the like arrogancy the Bishops of Rome took upon themselves to be Moderators of Councils, from thee year of our LORD 1215. until our days. And this is another novelty, which the Roman Bishop could not bring in, until he had trodden the Emperors authority under foot. In the Council of Nice Eustatius Bishop of Antiochia was Moderator. In the second General Council holden at Constantinople, Gregorius Bishop of the great Town at that time was President. In the third Coun. convened at Ephesus, Cyrillus bishop of Alexandria was Moderator. In the fourth convened at Chalcedon in Bithinia, Lucentius, Pascasianus, and Boniface, messengers sent from Leo Bishop of Rome, had the presidencie. This is the first time whereinto the B. of Rome, either in his own person, or by his Agent, moderated any General Council: And at this time who can say that the Counc. of Chalcedon was assembled by the commandment of Leo B. of Rome? When as in the very frontespice of the Council it is written, Ex Decreto piissimorum & fidelissimorum Imperatorum Valentiniani & Martiani, &c. Moreover it is evident by reading the Epistles of Leo, that he intraited for this favor at the Emperors hand, that the General Council might have been convened in Italy, which he needed not to have done if by his own authority he had power to conuocate General Councils. It is well observed by that worthy and learned writer of France, Philip Morney that Baronius for excessive desire he hath to prove that Leo had power to assemble General Councils, he changeth the Orthographie of the Latin language, and instead of Consilium Synodi Generalis indiximus, he citeth Concisilium Synodi Generalis injuximus. It is true, that Leo B. of Rome gave advice and counsel both to Theodosius, and to Martianus, to gather a General Council, but he had no power to appoint & command that it should be kept. But this power belonged to the Emperor. Baronius will not prove his purpose so easily, as by stealing in the letter C, in place of the letter S. The fi •… t General Council was assembled in Constantinople, by the commandment of the Emperor Justinian, and not by the commandment of Vigilius B. of Rome, neither was Vigilius Moderator in this Council, but Eutychius B. of Constantinople governed the Assemblie.
The sixth General Council was assembled by the commandment of the Emperor Constantine Pogonatus, and was perfected by the commandment of Iustinianus the second his son. Sergius Bishop of Rome, did not appoint this Council to be keeped, neither would he give allowance to the determinations of this Council, because in it the constitutions of the Roman Church concerning prohibition of Marriage, were disallowed: Notwithstanding his Agent, who was present in Constantinople, and compeared in his name, gave consent, and subscribed the Acts of the sixth General Council, but stolide (saith Platina) that is, foolishly, writing with flattering style pleasant things to the Bishops of Rome.
For d •… cision of the question concerning worshipping of Images 3. great Councils were gathered, one by Constantine Copronymus, at Constantinople: another by the Empresse Irene, at Nice: the third by the Emperor Carolus Magnus, at Francf •… ra: which of them soever shall be found the seuenrh General Council, always none of these three was gathered by the commandment of the Bishop of Rome, neither was he Moderator in any of them.
The eight General Council was assembled by the commandment of Basilius Emperor of Constantinople: but the Ambassadors of the Bishop of Rome, Hadrian the seconde, had the gouernament of the assembly: and they began early to manifest the portraict of their tyrannous gouernament. No man was admitted to give vote in the General Council, save he only, who would cons •… nt and subscribe to the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome. Adoration of Images did get full allowance in this Council: and this was a fore-running messenger of the tyranny that followed hereafter, from the 1215. year of our LORD, until our time. Now the Bishop of Rome conuocateth General Councils, governeth them by himself, or his substitute, and maketh ordinances flatly repugnant to the written word of GOD. No cause is so impious and ungodly, that ever wanted an advocate: but this I repeat again, that he is very impudent, who dare affirm, that the Bishop of Rome of old time did conuocate General Councils, and was Moderator in them.
By conference with persons of the Roman Religion, I understand, that they will not give full credit to any Assemblie, but to such a one, as is lawfully conuocated, holden, and lawfully ended. They count it lawfully conuocated, when the Bishop of ROME by his Edict hath gathered it: lawfully holden, when the Bishop of ROME, or else his substitute, is Moderator of the Assemblie: and lawfully ended, when he, who is Moderator, continueth in his office until the ende of the assembly. Such deep instructions Papists of our Nation have received from their teachers: and alas, an ignorant person is soon shooueled out of the way, but cursed be he, that make •… h the blind to go out of the way: and all the people shall say, So be it. Are not these Doctors of lies ashamed, at sometimes to commend the first four General Councils, with excessive praises, and again to give such instructions to their disciples, as shall make the fi •… st four General Councils to be of no account, because none of them was conuocated by the Edict of the Bishop of ROME, but by the commandment of the Emperors, CONSTANTINE, THEODOSIUS, VALENTINIAN, and MARTIANUS. Moreover, in none of these four was the Bishop of ROME, or yet his substitute, Moderator, except only in the Council of CHALCEDON. Who can give credit to such teachers, who in one word build, and in another word destroy that same thing which they have built. The Apostle PAUL saith 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : that is, For if I build again the things that I have destroyed, I make myself a trespasser. And when they have found out new distinctions, by these distinctions, the contradiction of their late Councils are the more inexcusable. The Council of BASIL, g •… thered by EUGENIUS the fourth, ANNO 1431. wherein it is decearned, that the B. of ROME shall be subject to the General Council, as a child to his mother, And the Council of FLORENCE, gathered by the self same Bis. ANNO 1439. wherein the contrary is decearned, yet were both these Coun. according to their own description lawfully conuocated, holden, & ended: and yet are they flat contrary one to another, in a fundamental point of Popish faith, for it leaneth not vpō scripture only, but also upon the authority of General Councils, and of the B. of ROME.
Before I speak of the last head, it is to be considered, that in gathering of Councils diverse respects have been had, sometimes to the people, sometimes to the Pastors, and at sometimes also regard hath been had to good men, who have been unjustly accused. Regarde was had to the people, when Councils were convened in those self same places whereinto the pestilent venom of Heretical doctrine was chiefly overspread: For Novatus was damned at Rome, Samosatenus at Amiochia, Artemon in Bostra of Arabia, Eustatius in Gangra of Paphlagonia, and Arius at the first in a particular Synod holden at Alexandria. In a •… l these Councils regard was had to the people, that heresy might die as the grass-hoppers die, to wit, in the fields whereinto they have been bread, and be buried as the frogs of Egypt were buried, to wit, in the river from whence they came when they over-covered the lande. At other times great regard was had to Pastors, especially in assembling General Councils, that the place of meeting might be commodious, whereinto the Preachers of Asia, Europe, and Libya, either by sea or lande might moste conveniently resort: and without all question this was the cause wherefore all the General Councils preceeding the woeful Council of Lateran were assembled, either in Bithynia, Ionia, or Thracia, places whereinto Europe and Asia doeth moste nearly confine, and the Nauigation is moste easy to the Bishops of Egypt, Pentapolis, Libya, and Mauritania. Some times a regard was had to innocent men, that they might resort to such places whereinto their cause might have been tried, without partiality, as Serdica a town of Illyrium was appointed for the trial of Paulus, Athanasius, Marcellus, and Asclepas: For it is no reason, that honest men should be journeyed to places whereinto the force of armor is more to be feared, then the force of their aduersari •… s arguments.
The last head had been unnecessary to be entreated, if that the ambition of the Bishops of the Roman Church had not compelled men to seek out this question to the very ground: for who can doubt but Bishops, Elders, Deacons, and wise and learned men, having commission from their own Churches, should be present at Councils, and vote according to the word of GOD, in such things as shall happen to be proponed in the Council. Nevertheless the ambition of Bishops, fearing lest by plurality of votes matters should frame otherwise then liked themselves best, they began to make distinction betwixt consultatiue and definitive votes, minding thereby to appropriate unto themselves only definitive votes, and the rest of the Council, albeit Elders, Deacons, Doctors, and learned men, furnished with commission, their vote should only be consultatiue, and should not be numbered amongst the votes whereupon the definitive sentence should arise. This question was reasoned in the General Council of Basil, •… ssembled ANNO 1431. And recourse was had to Scripture, as the true ground whereby controverted questions should be decided, and there it was found in the definitive sentence of the Council of Jerusalem, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , &c. that is, For it seemed good to the Holy GHOST, and to us. Now this demonstrative word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 sendeth us to the preface and superscription prefixed to the Epistle, wherein it is written, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : that is, The Apostles, and the Elders, and the Brethren, unto the Brethren, who are of the Gentiles in Antiochia, and in Syria, and Silicia, send grecting. In these words it is manifest, that the Elders and Brethren, who came to HIERUSALEM, furnished with commission, gave such votes, whereupon the definitive sentence of the Council did arise.
But seeing that the Bishops of the Roman Church have presumed to set themselves so far forward, as if they should be the only actors and do •… rs of matters entreated in Councils, it were not amiss, if reason can afford so much, even to set them a soote abacke. Now therefore I affirm, that when any Council, either General or National is convened, whereinto the question concerning the supremacy of the B. of Rome is disputed, In such a Council (I say) no Popish B. should have vote, neither definitive nor consultatiue, because he cometh not to the Counc. as a free man, to vote according to the light of his conscience, but he cometh as a bond-slave to the Bish. of Rome, anticipated and preoccupied in the very time of his admission to his Bishopric, and bound by an oath to defend the supremacy of the Pope, together with the ordinances of the late General Councils. What to do hath such a bond-slave to vote in a free Council? except he be first loosed from the bands of his oath, moste unrighteously conceived and ma •… e: so that it is not possible for them to vote as free men in any Council, until that oath (made to the Anti-christ, and not to CHRIST) be abjured, abrenounced, and utterly undone.
Now to conclude, It were a wise course in all things that we presume to do, at least to set such a patron before our eyes, which without all contradiction is perfect: and let us endeavor to approach so near as possible is, to the similitude of that patron, to the ende that our doings be not altogether evil and reproueable. And if the men of our age would set before their eyes the perfect patron of the Holy and Blessed Council of HIERUSALEM, no doubt but the people of GOD should receive greater comfort of their meetings, then hitherto they have received: But let the LORD work this in his own time, To whom be praise forever,
A TREATISE, Of the Monasticke life.
T HE original of the Monasticke life is referred by some men to Helias, by others to John Baptist: some refer it to those who were in company with the Apostles, and had all things common: Others refer it to the Essenes, a sect of the Jews, of whose customs Josephus accurately writeth. And indeed the similitude of the manners of the Monks and the Essenes converted to Christian Religion, agreeth in many points: for they had all things common, they labored with their hands, & were men accustomed with long abstinence from meat and drink. Eusebius reserreth the beginning of the Monasticke form of living, to the auditors of the Evangelist Mark in Alexandria: for a number of them inclined their minds to the contemplation of divine mysteries, and separated themselves from the company of the multitude who dwelt in towns, and they had their habitation in the wilderness, about the lake Maria, or Maris. This place was called the Wilderness of Nitria. Eusebius confirmeth this opinion by the testimony of Philo. Finally, some refer it to the time of the ten Persecutions, at what time many fled to the Mountains, to the Wilderness, and to solitary places, wherein they contracted such a custom and habit of solitary living, that even in time of peace, and when Persecutions were ended, they continued still living in the Wilderness.
Whatsoever was the original of the Monasticke life, it is certain, there was a greater show then substance of Religion in it: for bodily exercises they profit little, & the not sparing the body, is counted by the Apostle 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, a voluntary Religion, which men have invented to themselves, and GOD hath not commanded it. True it is, that men do well if they subdue their bodies, as Paul did, to bring it in subjection, lest by any means, when he had preached to others, he himself should be reproved. And as true it is on the other part, that incase men repose upon these outward exercises, as things in themselves meritorious, and refer them not unto the right ende, as Paul did: yea, and if they join not with abstinence from meat, an abstinence also from sin, the LORD regardeth not the outward affliction of the body, as the Prophet Isai clearly declareth in these words, •… s it such a fasting that I have chosen, that a man should afflict his soul for a day, and to bow down his head, as a bulrush, and to lie down in sack-cloth and asshes? Wilt thou call this a fasting, or an acceptable day to the LORD?
In the very original ground of the Monasticke life, I see this infirmity, That men imagined by changing of place to be free of the snares of the Devil: But it is otherwise, Adam was tempted in Paradise, & CHRIST was tempted in the Wilderness, and Satan is ready to spread his net both in the prison and in the palace, and by changing of place we cannot be free from his malice. In the Epistle written by Basilius Magnus to Gregorius, this is illustrate by the fit similitude of a man who saileth in a ship, and findeth himself to be sick, and secretly in his own mind blameth the greatness of the vessel whereinto he saileth: but when he steppeth down into the little bote, that accompanieth the ship, his sickness continueth, and is not abated, whereby he is compelled to come to a consideration of the right cause of his sickness, that it is neither the great vessel, nor the little vessel, that is the cause of his grievance, but rather the corrupt humors that lurk within his own body. Even so the permutation of place will not make us free of the temptations of the Devil, as some men imagined. And like as the consolations of GOD are not tied to any certain place, for Moses in Arabia, and upon Mount Horeb was delited with the sight of GOD, and in Pisga, with the long expected sight of the promised land: and the Apostle John in the Isle of Patmos saw many comfortable reuclations: even so the perilous snares of Satan are spread out everywhere, no less then the consolations of GOD are.
The Monks of old were not all of one rank, for some of them were called Coenohitae, or Conventuales. Others were called Anchoritae. The conuentuall Monks, albeit they were separated from the fellowship of the common people, yet they had a fellowship amongst themselves, and some of them dwelt in the Wilderness: such as the Conuentuall Monks of Egypt dwelt in the Wilderness of Nitria and Schethis: but the Conuentuall Monks of Syria, Persia, Armenia, and other places, not so near approaching to the Equinoctial line as those of Egypt were, they dwelt in Towns and Villages, because the inclemencie of alterable weather permitted them not to dwell in the Wilderness, as the Monks of Egypt did. Notwithstanding, some of the Conuentuall Monks of that part of Syria which is called Interamnis, or Mesopotamia, as it were striving against nature, over-went the Monks of Egypt, in that which the Apostle calleth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, a not sparing of the body: for the Monks of Egypt dwelt in little Cottages, and ate some quantity of bread, after long abstinence: but the Monks fore-said had their remaining upon the Mountains, and were covered with no roof of any shop or lodge defending them against the injury of the weather, except only with the roof of Heaven: and they ate no bread, but only refreshed their hungry bodies with the roots of herbs, which they houcked out of the ground: and for this kind of pasturing the people called them Greges. Of this rank of conuentual monks about Nisibis & Mount Sigeron were the monks following, famous and much renowned, to wit, Batthaeus, Eusebius, Barges, Abbos, and Lazarus (who afterward was ordained a Bishop) and Abdaleos, Zenon, and Hetrodorus an old man, of whom Sozomen in the place above specified maketh particular mention. To all these Conuentuall Monks, wheresoever they dwelt, this was common, that they were divided into Conuentes, and every Conuent was governed by one Governor, whom they reverenced, as children reverence their father.
The Anachorites were Monks who dwelt in the Wildernes severally, & by themselves, not deliting in fellowship, as the Conuentual monks did. Ruffin. maketh the more reverend record of the Anachorites, or Eremites of Egypt, because he visited them, & had the honor to be blessed by imposition of their hands, such as two Eremites bearing the name of Macarius, Isidorus, Pambus, Moses, Benjamin, Scyron, Helias, Paulus in Apeliote, Paulus in Focis, Poemen, & Joseph in Pispiri, of whom there are large treatises in the Ecclesi •… sticall History. Some of the Anachorites were so rude and i •… mane, that they bowed their faces to the ground, and ate 〈◊〉 and herbs, as beasts do: and if they had seen another m •… n, they fled from him, & hid themselves, as if they had no b •… ne procreated of the race of mankind. The brethrē of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , of whom Plutarch writeth, are to be set by, as unworthy of any further remembrance: And the common people justly called them Armenta, that is, Cattle. There was yet another rank of Eremites called Circulatores, who after long abstinence from all kind of delicate pleasures, they left the wild •… rnesse, and came to towns, sat in tabernes, resorted to stoue-ho •… ses, and yet were not entangled with any kind of desire of earthly pleasures, as dead men to the world: but when occasion of prayer was offered unto them, the •… ldest and weakest of them did pluck up his heart, and with vigore and courage did perform that Holy s •… ruice. Euagrius commending these Circulatores, with exces •… iue praises, borroweth a similitude from Plato whereby he would declare, that as a man who hath unclothed himself of his upper garments, and in ende hath cast off his shirt also, this man is naked indeed: even so these Circulatores, after they had forsaken all carnal delites, in ende they forsook also 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, vain glory, which is like unto the shirt of a man, and the last of all garments casten off. The similitude is very good, if it had been rightly applied, but I cannot see howe it can be rightly applied to these Circulatores, who needed not to have come to towns, as to stages and theaters, to make ostentation of their abstinence, if they had not been covetous of vain glory.
The orders of Monks that sprang up after the three hundredth year of our LORD, were like unto roots planted in an Orchard, which spread out in many branches, such as the Basilidians, Ambr •… sians, the Augustine Monks, Hieronymian •… , Gr •… gorians, and Benedictines. But the Augustine's and Benedictines were beyond the rest. The order called Grandimontenses, the Orders of Premonstratenses, in the low countries of Germany, near to Le •… dium, of Guilelmitae in Aquitania, Milites D. Jacobi, and Calatrinenses in Spain: All these followed the rules of the Augustine Monks. But the Orders of the Cluniacenses in France, of the shadowed valley, who dwelt in Italy, and upon the Apenneine of Cistertienses in Burgundy, of Bernard •… ines, Coelestines, of Iustinians, of Mount Olive •… , of Humiliati, and diverse others: all these were branches of the order of S. Benedict. And this diversity of names was imposed to Monks living under the rules of Augustine and Benedict, partly to declare the places wherein, and partly the persons by whom the dissolute conversation of the Monks of these two orders was reduced to the strict abstinence of their first institution. Many other Orders I have of purpose over-passed with silence, because the number is exceeding great only of the Charterous Monks, of the Franciscans and Dominicans, and of the unhappy order of the Layolites and a few more we shall speak hereafter, GOD willing.
Now to keep some order in this Treatise, I shall fi •… st declare (GOD willing) the means whereby the Monasticke form of living was increased, magnified and admired, even beyond all measure. Secondly, of the degrees of the decay of their fame, which ensued soon after the excessive commendation of that state. And thirdly, the vild and unsufferable abuses of the Mon •… stick life of late days, whereby Monks are become a heavy and loath some burden, over-charging the world, and like unto the offensive Locusts, who even when they have flown away they leave behind them such detriment and loss to parts whereinto they have been, that of a long time they cannot be forgotten again. First, the Monastries of old were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or places of honesty, whereinto all lasciviousness, wantonness, and riot was abhorred, as it was wont to be detested i •… Selga, a town of Pisidia, in so far that the Apostle Paul himself abhorreth not from the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , whereby he betokeneth wantonness. Likewise they were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for their solitary living, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , for their meditation and continual holy exercises. In these places men were well brought up, and were furnished with knowledge, & were meet to stop the mouths of Heretics, who in the fourth CENTURIE did abound. In these places were continual exercises of Prayer, Reading, Meditation, and abstinence from all kind of delicate pleasures. And men brought up in Monasteries were meet to undertake the weighty charge of Pastors and Bishops. Epiphanius from his youth was brought up in the Monastries both of Palestine and Egypt. And Nazianzenus drew with him Basilius Magnus to the Wilderness, where they laid aside all the books of Gracian Philosophers, and searched out the mysteries of the Kingdom of GOD, out of the books of Holy Scripture, and very diligently read the books of ancient Fathers, who before their time had written Commentaries upon divine Scripture: so were they both well prepared for great emploimentes, by thirteen years continual exercise of reading in the Wilderness. Barses, Eulogius, Lazarus, Leo, and Prapidius of Monks in Syria and Persia, were made Bishops. And this was the first honor of Monastries, that in them, as it were in Colleges of Learning, men were well exercised, and prepared for the Pastoral office.
Secondly, the great gifts of GOD that appeared in some of them, who professed the Monasticke life, brought this kind of living in wonderful great admiration amongst the people, especially the gift of working of miraculous works. In this point like as I am not altogether incredulous, to doubt of every miracle which GOD wrought by the hands of Monks, so likewise will I not be so childish credulous, as to believe everything that Ecclesiastical Writers do record of them, as namely, the thirty years silence of THEONAS, conjoined with a Prophetical gift. GOD suffered not ZACHARIAS the father of JOHN BAPTIST (albeit justly punished with dumnesse for his incrudelitie) to be so long silent, seeing the talentes of GOD are given to be occupied, and not to be hidden in the ground.
The miracle of Apelles an Egyptian Monk, who brunt the Devil in the face with an hot iron, who appeared unto him in the similitude of a beautiful woman, and tempted him to ungodly lust: is it not a childish fable, and repugnant also to Scripture, wherein the weapons are described wherewith we should fight against spiritual wickedness, and all are pieces of spiritual armor only?
The miraculous transporting of Ammus over a broocke, to the ende he should not draw off his own hose, and see his own naked legs, is not agreeable to the ende that GOD hath in working of miracles: namely, to confirm the weakness of Faith, but not to foster vain conceits in men's hearts. Was it a fault of CHRISTES Disciples to see their own naked legs, when our LORD JESUS washed them?
The superstition of the Monk Dorotheus, hating sleep as he hated the Devil, when as our Master JESUS CHRIST abhorred not from refreshing his own body with natural rest. The multiplied number of prayers which PAULUS in Pherma as a daily task offered to GOD, numbering his prayers by the like number of three hundredth stones put in his bosom, and after every prayer casting out a stone, until his bosom was emptied of all the three hundredth little stones laid up in his bosom. This devotion is much praised by Sozomenus, and out of question it is the first ground of Popish beads. The vow of P •… , when he went to the Wilderness of Egypt, that he should never see any of his own kindred in the face again, and his endeavor to perform his vow by closing his eyes, and permitting his sister to satisfy her mind, which longed for a sight of him, but he would not once open his eye liddes to see his sister, lest he should break his vow by so doing. All these things and many more are recorded by Ecclesiastical Writers, and that not without a Note of high commendation: So that the report of their Miracles, of their extraordinary abstinence from lawful refreshments, of their long continuance in prayer, brought the people to a wonderful admiration of the Monasticke life.
The third mean whereby the fame & renown of monks was mightily augmented, was their good carriage in their conversation, for a long time: They were temperate, chaste, obedient to their superiors, full of charity, given to Prayer, Reading, Meditation, and hearing of godly Exhortations: With manual labors also they gained food and raiment to themselves, and that which superabounded, was bestowed to the support of the poor their policy was commendable: the conuent was divided by tens, & every ten Monks had a Decanus to attend upon them, so called because he attended upon the company of ten Monks: from them he received the work they had wrought with their hands, & sold it in the towns of Egypt, & bought food & raimēt to the Monks, and the rest was bestowed on the poor, so that sometimes Ships were hired to transport to Christian people (whom they heard of to be indigent) support from the Monks of Nuria and Schethis. Moreover, the glorious name given of old to Hethnicke Philosophers, now was transferred to the Monks: for the Emperor Valens had flame all the Philosophers in the East for their curiosity, in seeking out by the tripode of Apollo the name of him who should succeed to the Emperor Valens: so that both the common people and Ecclesiastical Writers, conferred the glorious name of Philosophers unto the Monks only.
The Monks being thus advanced by the wind of populare applause, & mounted up upon the benches of high estimation, their number also was daily augmented: so that in the Wilderness of Nitria were found fifty several companies of Monks, and in every company three thousand and above, who were all subject to one Governor, as many sons to one Father, These companies make out the number of an hundredth and fifty thousand Monks, all dwelling in one Wilderness of Nitria, over and beside other Egyptian Monks, who had their remaining in the Wilderness of Schethis, where the Conuents of Monks subject to one common Father, consisted of the number of five hundredth Monks. And like as in the Country of Arabia foelix at the noon-tide of the day innumerable flying Serpentes are found bizzing about the Aromaticke trees, not in respect of a delight they have in the sap of those trees, but in respect of the delight they have in the warmenesse of an hot day •… even so the applause of the people encouraged many to embrace the Monasticke life, rather then a deli •… e in the st •… ickt abstinence of a solitary life.
Finally, ancient Fathers commended the Monasticke life ou •… of all me •… sure, Augustine calleth •… , Excellens fast g •… m sanct •… , that is, the exc •… lent eminency of 〈◊〉 : And Basilius. Magnus was earnest in building Monasteries in Pontus, and sedulous in writing books called Ascetica, containing Precepts of c •… elie and mannerly living, to be practiced by Monks: le •… om inverted the ancient order, and of a presbyter became a Monk, in a Monastery built at Bethlehem, when as before the Monasticke life had been a preparation to the Minis •… rie: Yea, and the Monasticke life was so highly praised and admired, through the great commendations, that learned Fathers gave unto it, that in ende it was a proverb in the mouths of the people, Malus Monachus, bonus Clericus, that is, an evil Monk, a good Clergy man, where in the worst of the Coruent of Monks was equalled to the best of the Ministry. Augustine was offended at this proverb: notwithstanding it was the Fathers themselves, such as Augustine, Epiphanius, Basilius, Ambrose, and Jerome, who rooted this opinion in the people's hearts, that Monachatus was excellens fastigium sanctitatis, as hath been declared.
Now if comparison should be made betwixt the Monks of the Conuent, and the principal members of the Clergy, what shall we say of Epiphanius Bishop of Cyprus, Basilius B. of Cesarea in Cappadocia, Nazianzenus Bishop of Constantinople, Dioscorus Bishop of Hermopol •… , Acholius Bishop of Thessalonica, and innumerable more of the like rank, who of Monks became Bisshops? Were they more perfect when they lurcked in the Wilderness, and cared for their own souls only, or when they were made Bishops, and cared for the souls of many people, bought with the precious ransom of the blood of CHRIST; Dare any man say, that by undertaking the office of a Bishop they abased themselves, & stepped down to a lower degree of perfection, then the former, which they had during their remaining in the Wilderness? Hath the proverb Ab Equis ad Asinos, that is, from Horses to Asses, any place in this exchange of their estate? Yea, what shall we say of Narcissus Bishop of Jerusalem, who left his Pastoral office, and fled to the Wilderness and in his old age returned again to Jerusalem? Doeth any 〈◊〉 . 〈◊〉 Writer count his going to the Wilde •… nesse a mounting to a degree of further •… fection? and not rather a piece of i •… becillitic and weakness in him, who could not patiently endure when •… alse testimony was borne against him?
Concerning the place of Scripture, wherein it is said, If •… hou would be perfect, go, and sell all thou ha •… , and give it unto the poor, and th •… shalt have treasure in Heaven: This was spoken to a rich man, and to an Hypocrite puffed up with a conceit of his own rightecus •… es, and for discovery of his hypocrisy a particular commandment is given to him only, and not generally appertaining to all Christians: Like as another commandment was given to ABRAHAM, in particular, and not generally appertaining to all men, to offer up his son ISAAC a sacrifice to GOD: And CHRIST in that place, is not describing the perfection of a man, but he is discovering the false conceit of an Hypocrites heart, glorying in the perfect righteousness of the Law. CHRIST will let the world see, that for all his bragging, yet he loved his riches better then he loved GOD, and consequently he knew not so much as the General sum of the Law, which warneth men to love GOD above all things.
In the next head the decay of the fame and glory of the Monasticke life is to be declared, which ensued soon after the excessive commondation of it, & that through manifold defections both in doctrine and manners, that fell out amongst Monks: First they became both inuentors and propagators of Heresies: Aud •… i, otherwise called Anthropomorp •… itae, who supposed GOD to be fashioned according to the similitude of a man, with head, arms, legs, feet, and other members, proportionallie agreeing to the similitude of a man's body. These Heretics (I say) first sprang up in the Wilderness of Nitria. Eustachius Bishop of Sebastia in Armenia, albeit he was not a Monk, yet he was an admirer of the Monasticke life, and afterward was condemned as an obstinate Heretic, in the Council of Ancyra. Marathonius, who had been a Thesaurer in the days of the Emperor Constantius, and furnished money to the Emperors Soldiers, in ende became rich, & by advise of Eustachius Bishop of Sebastia in Armenia, he built a Monastrie in Constantinople, where he propagated the Heresy of Macedonius, which had been quenched in Constantinople if Maratbonius under pretence of Religion had not propagated it. Moreover the Heresy of Messaliani and Euchytae, did so over-spread in Monastries, that Letoi •… s Bishop of Meletina found no better mean to suppress this Heresy, then by driving the Monks out of their Cloisters, and setting the Monastries on fire. Likewise Amphiloc •… ius Bishop of Iconium in Lycaonia, and Flavianus Bishop of Antiochia, with great fightings and wressing hardly could get these Heretics in their bounds discovered and subdued. And Eutyches, whose error like a Canker-worm so long time molested the Church of GOD, was he not an Abbot in Constantinople •… Poly •… also a ridiculous Monk, obstinately defended the Heresy of the Monoth •… tes in the fixed General Council, and offered to confirm that doctrine with a miraculous work: but with shame and confusion he succumbed, and was curs •… d by the Council. Moreover Monks were the chief defenders of the adoration of Images. And in the second Council of Nue worshipping of Images is proved by a confabulation betwixt the Devil & a Monk, and by another foolish dialogue betwixt a Monk & his Abbot. This was the first great dash that the Monastic •… e life got, that many of them were found rather propagators of Heresy, then defenders of the truth.
Corruption of manners amongst the Monks, began at disobedience to their superiors. Of old the Conuent was very obedient to their Governor (who some time was called Prepositus, afterward Archimandrita, and last Abbas) and the Governor was obedient to the Bishop, and the Bishop to the Emperor and his Deputies. Nevertheless under the reign of the Emperor A •… cadius, the Monks of Egypt went forth out of their Monastries, and came to Alexandria, of purpose to slay their Bishop Theophilus •… which thing also they had performed, if so be that by subtlety of flattring words he had not mitigated their anger, as is a •… eadie declared. In like manner the Monks of Nitria, to the number of 500. came out of the wilderness to Alexandria not against their B. Cyrillus, but against Orestes the deputy of the Emper. Theodosius, whom they both outbraided and wounded: And the Monk Ammonius, who wounded the deputy, was deservedly punished to the death for his seditious attempt: yet was he commended by Cyrillus, and counted a martyr, but with the great disliking of good Christians, who hated seditious enterprises against lawful Magistrates. Also the seditious Monks of CONSTANTINOPLE, whose insolency John Chrysostom 〈◊〉 to correct, they slandered him as a senere angri •… , fi •… ce, and proud man, and opened the first door to his trouble: so that his hateful enemies both in Court and Church, were encouraged by their means to procure his deposition, banishment, and death. Likewise, the Monks of Nova Laura in HIERUSALEM, who for Heretical opinions were driven out of their Monastries by their own Bishop Eustochius, they became very seditious, and stirred up horrible contention, betwixt Theodorus Ascidas Bishop of Cesarea in Cappadocia, and Eustochius Bishop of HIERUSALEM. No contention ha •… been more pernicious in the Church of CHRIST, then this (Th •… odorus being in great favor with the Emperor Iusti •… an) if the fifth General Council had not staide all the attempts of Theodorus, by comdemning the Heretical opinions of Origin, which both the monks of Nova Laura, and Theodorus As •… das did maintain. Finally, the monks became so contentious & seditious, that not only they contended against their superiors, but also they contended amongst themselves with unsupportable hatred, and even in the wilderness of •… tria, where their great fame and commendation did spring up, in that same place the fame and beauty of the Monasticke life did fade and wither.
Beside Heresy and contention, other corruptions of manners stained and defaced the glory of the Monasticke life: namely, an inclination to idleness, abstinence from manual labors, & heaping up of riches, which they gathered of the sweat of other men's labors. And this appeareth clearly by the writings of Augustine, who not only testifieth, that the monks of his days so did, but also they defended, that it was lawful to them to be idle, because CHRIST Saieth in the Gospel, 〈◊〉 , the fowls of Heaven, for they sow not, neither reap, neither carry into the barns, yet your Heavenly Father feedeth them: Are ye not much better then they? Against whose idlen •… sse Augustine most sharply enueieth, saying, that by the example of the fowls of Heaven they could learn idlen •… sse, but they would not imitate the fowls of Heaven in carrying nothing into the barns, but they would lay up in barns and provision houses those riches which other men with painful travels gained and brought unto them. And he is so stomached against them, that he saith, Quis fer at homines contumaces, ut gemina illeccbra corrumpantur, & dissolutalicētia vacationis, & falsonomine sanctitatis? that is, who can suffer contumacious men, entangled with double corruption, both with the dissolute liberty of vacance fromlabour, & with the false conceit also of holiness?
From the six hundredth year of our LORD, until our days, Monastries began again to be in great account in the sight of the world not for the exercises of reading, praying, meditation, laborious working in a lawful calling, and charity, which were the ornaments of the monks of old, but for the splendor of costly buildings, like unto the Palaces of Princes, magnificent Churches, plurality of Relics, great revenues daily increased by the liberality of Princes: and this new beauty was like unto the fairding of an old woman, when natural beauty is spen •… , then must she be decked with pictured colors, invented by the art of man: and this kind of beauty rauisheth the senses of such as are simple and ignorant. And it is a wonderful thing to consider how the hearts of men were transported with this new show of holiness: in so far, that some Kings thought it to be an holier thing to enter into a Monastrie, than to sit in their Royal Thrones, and to gonerne in Justice and Righteousness the affairs of their Kingdom. Bamba •… King of Goths (which nation reigned in Spain) resigned the title of his Royal authouritie to Euringus, and entered into a Mon •… erie. S •… bbus King of the Oriental Saxons, left his Kingdom, and entered into a Monastery: & to the end that it might seem that GOD gave allowance unto this superstition, false miracles were invented to grace this fact of sebbus: for the tomb whereinto his body was laid, being •… n length an hand br •… shorter then his corpse, was miraculously enlarged, and lengthened to the just proportion of his dead body: so that in the seventh CENTURIE, and about the days of Pope Vitalia •… s, it was a proverb in the mouths of the people, that three adm rabble thing s feil out in their age: First, innumerable Abbaci •… s were built: Secondly, the heads of King were shaven, and they entered into Monastries: Thirdly, that whoredom wa •… canonized, that is, notable •… arlots were counted Saints. So with the increasing number of Monast •… ies, superstition, false miracles, and a lewd conversation in like manner daily increased In the eight CENTURIE Rachis King of Lom-bardis entered into the Abbacie called Cassinerse in Italy, and his brother Aistulphus governed the affairs of the Kingdom, in the days of Pope Zachari •… , Caralomannus the elder brother of Pipinus King of France, was first in the Monastery built upon the Mount Sarapte, afterward in the Monastery called Cassin •… nse (whether voluntarily or against his will I dispute not) and he ended his life in the Monastery of Vienne in France, being transported thither against his heart by the violence of his brother Pipinus. In the ninth and tenth CENTURIES, the Bilshops of Rome finding, that their estate was mightily advanced by Abbacies and Nunneries, they also on the other part endeavored to advance the Monasticke life, in so far that Kings & Princes were allured to profef •… themselves to be of the order of Monks, with dispensation not the less to them from the Bishop of Rome (under whose souereignity all high powers began to stoop) to govern their own Kingdoms, providing always, that with liberal gifts they had enriched the chair of Rome: So it came to pass, that the world saw a rare and vnquoth spectacle, to wit, Kingly Monks, and Monks Kings.
Yea, and Kings were so bewitched with seducing speeches, that they who would not abase their Royal estate with participation of Monkish orders, yet they thought it was so holy and meritorious a turn to build Monasteries, that by so doing, they might merit forgiveness of heinous sins, As Edgarus king of England, a man contaminated with many vild spots of sin, such as adultery, murder, tyranny, and an a •… tender upon three notable harlots: yet because he was accustomed every year to build an Abbacy, this holy fact abolished the remembrance of all his faults, and made him worthy af •… er his death to have his name, tog •… there with the name of W •… frida an holy Nun (and yet the Kings whore) & the name of her daughter Ed •… ha, whom she did bear to the King, All their names (I say) were counted worthy to be enrolled in the Catalogue of Saints, Caziminus King of Poll, being driven from his Kingdom, entered into a Monastery of France, in the days of Benedict the ninth: and the Polo •… ian Ambassadors, who came to France, to entrait their king to return again to his Kingdom, & w •… re fore grieved at his negative an were: Yet by the means of Pope Benedict the ninth (at whose hands all things might have be •… ne obtained for money) they obtained their King again, with liberty to him to marry, and to procreate children. If Monasticke vows be lawful, the loosing of the bands of Monasticke vows for money was not lawful. This Bened •… ctus the ninth is he of whom Platina writeth, that after his death his effigie appeared unto a c •… rtaine man, horrible and monstrous, more like the similitu •… e of a Beast, then of a man, which betokened the beastly conversation of this unhappy Pope in his lifetime. The examples of late days, that are recent in all men's memory, of Lord's, Earls, Dukes, Ladies, yea, and of the Emperor Charles the fifth in his old days, who entered into Monastries and Nunneries, whether to lead, or to conclude their lifetime, I pass over with silence. This was the glory of Monks, since the six hundredth year of our LORD until our days, that Kings, Monarchs, Popes, and mighty men in the world magnified their estate by repairing old Monasteries, building new Abbacies, and bestowing great revenues and rents upon them: and sometimes, as said is, entering themselves into Monastries, either to lead, or to ende their lives.
Monasteries also of late days became places of imprisonment, especially of Noble persons, dejected from their anteriour dignities: so that Pope Christophorus himself in the days of the Emperor LODOVICUS the third, being dejected from his Papal dignity, was thrust into a Monastery: Unicum 〈◊〉 refugium, as saith Platina, that is, the only refuge of men who were in calamity. Constantine the son of the Emperor Leo, thrust his brethren into a Monastery, rendri g •… unto them a just recompense of the like inhumanity that they had practiced against their own father. Likewise Monastries became places whereinto men entered, to sorrow for by-past offenses, imagining that by the strict observation of the rules of the Monasticke life, they might obtain forgiveness of sins at the hands of GOD. Paulus Cyprius Bishop of CONSTANTINOPLE before the seconde Council of NICE, entered into a Monastery, and lamented for that he had consented to the abolishing of Images, in the Council assembled by CONSTANTINUS COPRONYMUS.
This PAULUS CYPRIUS was a man of a base, timorous, and feeble spirit, who never knew what the Godly sorrow, described by the Apostle PAULE, did mean, which causeth repentance to salvation, not to be repented, for he had great need to have repented: this his repentance and his sorrow was not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , whereof Paul speaketh, 2. Corint. 7.
This bastard glory above specified, whereof Monks rejoiced, when the fir •… t ornaments were lost, did rather belong to the Conuentuall Monks, than to the Anachorites. We read not of Kings, who delited to exchange their Kingdoms with the solitary living by themselves apart in the Wilderness, except Suatacopius King of Moravia, who being overcome in battle by the Emperor Arnulphus, he went to the Wilderness, wherein he continued until the day of his death, eating herbs, and drinking water with greater contentment of mind then he lived before in the pleasures of his Kingdom. As concerning •… saphat King of India, of whom Damascene writeth, that he forsook his Kingdom, and went to the Wilderness, and exercised himself continually in reading and praying, for the space of five and thirty years, it is but a fabulous narration, and the writer of it cannot cite so much as one approved Author for confirmation of his alleged History: But the purpose of Damascene is to confirm a lying narration with lying miracles, wrought at the sepulchers of Ios •… phat, some time King of India, and Barlaam an Eremite, whose bones he allegeth were transported by King Baracbias out of the Wilderness, into the Country of India: but I leave Damascene lying, and I proceed.
Under the shadow and color of all this counterfeit glory above mentioned, from the six hundredth year of our LORD, until our own time, horrible abominations hath been hatched, so far surpassing the defections preceeding the six and seventh hundredth year of our LORD as the darkness of the winter night goeth beyond the darkness of the summer night. Beside the doctrine of Images, where of Monks were the principal authors: yea, and Paulus Cyprius, before he could procure the gathering of the second Council of Nice entered into a Monastrie, as it were into the shop and office house of Satan, and with his vntimous sorrowing moved the Empresse Jrene to gather the Council fore-said. But beside this (I say) Monks were the first forgers of the doctrine of Transubstantiation: for Damascene expre •… ely writeth, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : that is, the very Bread and Wine are changed into the Body and Blood of the LORD. And again he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : that is, the Bread and the Wine are not a figure of the Body and Blood of CHRIST, but the very Dei-fied Body of our LORD. This error was received, dispersed, and propagated, the more willingly in Monastries, because it was forged by the brain of a Monk. Likewise the doctrine of the merit of men's works, cuen such works as are superstitious, and not commanded in the Law of GOD: This doctrine (I say) as a banner displaide against the merits of the sufferings of CHRIST, it was chiefly spread out in Monastries, wherein the grand our of great and legible letters made their opinion known to the world, ORDO SERVAT US DUCIT AD VIT AM, that is, The keeping of order (to wit, Monasticke rules) leadeth to life. Other points of erroneous & corrapt doctrine, where of they are not the first inuenters, they are the principal propagators of them: as namely, prayer for the dead, and the opinion of purgatory: these errors invented of old, had died out long ago as the fires of Aetna and Vesuvius have done, if that the fables of Monks (daily renewed) had not been like unto fuel, entertaining the flame of foolish opinions.
The vile and unchaste conversation of the Monks, from the six hundredth year of our LORD, until our time, he who undertaketh to describe it, undertaketh an •… nnecessarie work, as they did who of old commended H •… rcules, whom no man did 〈◊〉 : even so they, who presume to describe the unchastity of Monastries and Nunneries, they spend time in vain to prou •… that thin •… , which no man can deny: yea, and their own speeches cont •… ine a confession o •… the Guiltines, of unchaste living. When any of their number is d •… prehended in whoredo •… e and adu •… rie, they do not aggre g •… th •… fault as a shame and dishonou •… done unto their holy Order. but rather extenu •… e the horror of sin, saving, it is better to be a secrete whore-monger, than an open Heretic. The commendation that the Poet Nigellus giveth to the Nuns of the Gilbertine order, in our neighbor Country, is but slender: namely this, that when they were aged they left off bearing of children. This Order began in ENGLAND, ANNO 1140.
The Monks and Nuns of our own Country, where they were best known, they were worst liked: and •… hey might have suffered a trial of any persons, except of neighbors, and such as knew them well. In other Countries, albeit the turpitude of an unchaste life was covered with less transparent veils, always GOD is like unto himself, and he hateth the workers of iniquity. Let S. Adonei a Monk of Row •… m be an examplarie type of the manners of many others, when he fell over the bridge in the night time, and drowned in the water of Seane, the good and evil Angels strove for his soul, because it was to be doubted, whether his foot-steps led to the Church, or to his harlot: And in ende the decision of this controversy, was referred to RICHARD Duke of Normandy. It appeareth by this fable, invented by Normand Monks, that their purpose was not only to excuse the villainy of Adonei, and to count him a Saint, but also to encourage themselves to lasciviousness, because the good Angels would strive for the soul of a villane, who was cled with an holy Monkish habit, and at last the decision of the controversy must be referred to some mortal man: not unlike unto Paris, who was more fauourabiie inclined to Venus, then he was either to I •… no, or Minerva.
Now it is time to speak of the multiplied number of the orders of Monks, not to make a perfect reher •… all of them, but to let the Reader understand, that the woride groaned under the charge of an importable burden, which neither were they willing to shake off, nor able to bear it. Ouer and beside the multiplied number of the branches of the Augustine and Benedictine Orders, above specified, other Orders also sprang up, such as the order of the Charterus Monks, where of Br •… a man bo ne i •… Colne was the author, ANNO 1080. It is rumored that a certain man in Paris died, who was renowned for the honesty of an unreprovable life: notwithstanding after his death, in audience of the people, who were assembled to perform the last funeral duty to him, he sat up in the bire, and uttered terrible words, that he was accused, and in the righteous judgment of GOD condemned. Bruno was present, and heard these tragical words, and said unto the people, If so be that this man be condemned, it is not possible that any man can be saved, except he renounce the world: And so being accompanied with a few followers, he went into a Wilderness, ne •… re to Gratianopolis, and was the author of a new Order of the Charterus Monks, whose continual abstinence from flesh, unmannerly silence, and purging with fire the footsteps of women, was in their opinion a renouncing of the world. If this be true, the people of Ethiopia called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , have renounced the world, and are nearer to the Kingdom of GOD, then the Charterus Monks.
By the like Diabolical invention the Order of Catherina de Senis was found out, ANNO 1455. The marks of CHRIST'S sufferings, the spousing Ring she received from CHRIST, with four precious Pearls of inestimable value, the emptying her body of her own heart, to the ende the heart of CHRIST might be thrust in place of it, What are all these forgeries, but as the filthy exhalation of a stirred mire of uncleanness? yet are these fables published to the world, in that book laden with lies, called Chronica Chronicorum: yea, and this woman was canonized by Pope Pius the seconde, ANNO 1470. And the Order of S. Catherene was received amongst other holy orders. Hospitalarii, Templarii, Teutonici gladiatores, are reckoned amongst orders of Monks, yet was their employment more in descending Christians from the injury of Infidels, then in reading, praying, or any other spirituail exercises. What became of these Templarii, after they were dispersed throughout EUROPE, and whether they were justly or unjustly cut off all at one time, by the ordinance of Clemens the fifth, in the Council of Vienne, I omit to speak: but whether they had been guilty or innocent, it was but small clemency in Pope Clem. to give out a sentence of death against so many, before they were warned, heard, and sufficiently convicted of faults laid unto their charge.
The Orders of Carmel •… es, who dwelt upon Mount Carmell, where Helias prayed, and of Camaldinenses, Ioannites, the Order of white Monks, of the holy Trinity, of S. Clara, of Penitentiers and scourgers of themselves, of Cross-bearers, and Starrebearers, of Minimes, and of Bonehomes, of Penitent sisters, of Saccit, of Bethlehemites, of the servants of Marie, of Georgians, and many more. This multiplication of Orders declareth, that there was greater care amongst late Monks, to find out some dissimilitude of habit and ceremonies amongst themselves, then to conform themselves to the similitude of CHRIST.
The Orders of the Franciscans and Dominicans, overspread the world, about the 1200. year of our LORD: Their number in short time was mightily increased: so that the Francis •… ans rejoiced, that there were found of their Order in diverse Nations two thousand, one hundredth, fourscore and six Monasteries. And the Dominicans numbered four thousand, one hundredth and forty six Monasteries in EUROPE, all professing their Order, as Creccelius, sometime an Augustine Monk, reckoneth. These were like unto the Frogs of EGYPT, whose number made them to be fearful: And like unto the Grass-hopp •… rs of EGYPT, which ate the residue that remained, and escaped from the Hail, These were like unto Mothes in a garment, like Myce in a barn, like Caterpillars amongst corn, and roust in metals, so offensive unto the world, that the people groaned for the oppression of begging Friers, The Dominicans followed the rules of the Augustine Monks: & this is the cause wherefore Crecc •… lius, of whom we spake before, reckoneth not the Dominicans as one of the principal stocks and roots, from which other Orders as branches did proceed. Both these Orders of Franciscans and Dominicans, had their allowance and confirmation from Innocentius the third, who dreamed that the Church of Lateran was bowing and inclining to fall, and that saint Francis and saint Dominic set to their shoulders, to uphold the decaying Church of Lateran. What wonder is it, that these Orders teach a doctrine of lies & dreams, whose confirmation could not be obtained, until Pope Innocentius the third dreamed that these two did uphold the Church of Lateran. In the Sermones of the begging Friers saint Francis is extolled with excessive praises, as if by long fasting, earnest prayers, and deep meditations, he had been counted worthy to see Celestial visions, and to be marked in hands, feet, and side, with the marks of the sufferings of CHRIST. Notwithstanding of all these Hyperbolicke praises, in the very beginning of his devotion, he began at theft, and stole money from his father, and gave it to a Priest, to help the reparation of the Church of saint Damian. And for this cause his father took him, and did beat him with many stripes. In so far, that they who do plead saint Francis cause, deny not, that he took away his fathers money, neither do they deny, that for this cause he was chastised by his father, but they call the foresaid chastilement persecution.
The Monks and Friers of the Order of Saint DOMINICKE do attribute unto him, both in his life-time and after his death, the working of so many and so great miracles, as if it were their purpose not only to prefer him unto saint FRANCIS, but also to equali him to CHRIST, and to his Apostles. Notwithstanding his greatest devotion was in beating himself thrice •… uerie night with an iron chain, partly for his own sins, partly for the sins of other men who were alive, and partly for the sins of those who were in purgatory. This fact (I say) was as foolish and derogatory to the honor due to CHRIST, and to the merits of his sufferings, as anything that was done by that notable fool saint FRANCIS.
The latest Orders, such as the Iacobines and Capuscings, are but branches of the Francis •… ane and Dominicane Orders, and are famous, as Erostratus was, rather for evil, then for good. The lapuscings are fine Trumpetters, to proclaim war-fare against the City of GOD: And the Iacobines are soldiers of Satan, to put hand to work, and to fight against the Heaven, in not sparing the Anointed of GOD, and him who was anointed with that Celestial oil that came from above, as they themselves and others of their Religion do affirm.
Concerning the Jesuits, who may more properly be called Layolites then Jesuits, because they walk rather in the foot-steps of Layola, the author of their sect, then in the footsteps of JESUS, who never taught any man to follow the way of Cain, as they do: But Layola was a soldier, and delited in shedding of blood. Of them (I say) I am in doubt whether to call them an Order or not: for the old Aenigma is revived in them, Vir, non vir, percussit, non percussit, lapide, non lapide, avem, non avem, super arbore, non arbore. Even so the Layolites may be called an order, and not an ordere, because they will not be bound unto a certain habit, as a distinguishing note, separating them from other Orders, lest by their habit they should be discovered, and made known to Princes, against whose estate they traffic with most treasonable attempts: neither will they contain themselves within their own bounds, as if they would counterfeit the Apostles, but with a preposterous counterfeiting called by the Gracians 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . The Apostles were the Ambassadors of CHRIST, the Jesuits are the ambassadors of the antichrist, the Apostles endeavored to set up the Throne of CHRIST, by preaching the death of CHRIST, the Jesuits endeavor to repair the loss of the antichrist, with the slaughter of Christian Princes. O generation of Vipers the brood already conceived in their venomous breasts, will be their destruction, as it is the destruction of the feminine Vipers: but I leave a description of their bloody attempts to others, who have better knowledge of the profundities of Satan, more clearly manifested in them then it was of old in the ten persecuting Emperors.
To all these fore-mentioned Orders, one thing is common, that they are all obliged & bound by vows of chastity, poverty & obedience, everyone to the attēdance of his own order: the Layolites have added the vow of temperancie, without which custody it is hard to keep chastity: the vow of chastity is good, providing that Matrimonial chastity be included under the generality of the word Chastity, seeing that Marriage is honorable among all, and the bed undefiled. But the vow of Virginall chastity, is the sacrifice of fools, as if a man would vow to be a Preacher, before he were persuaded that GOD had vouchsafed upon him the gift of preaching: Even so it is a foolish thing to any man to bind himself by a solemn vow to Virginall chastity, before he be fully persuaded, that GOD hath vouchsafed upon him that rare gift.
Under pretence of the vow of poverty, a number of Monks, especially Abbots, Channons, and Capitulare Monks, as it were Bishops chief Counsellers, have heaped up infinite riches, and in pomp, wealth, civil preeminence and splendor of worldly magnificence have over-went Earls, Lord's, and Barons, in many Countries: and in the mean time they were but a nest of idle bellies, keeping for a fashion seven Canonical hours, which they spent in reading & singing (oftener by their substitutes, then by themselves) as if they had been ca •… led Canonici, for keeping Canonical hours, and not for st •… dying holy Canonicke Scripture, to the ende they might be able to interpret it to the utility of others.
Concerning the vow of obedience kept in all Orders, but more strictly amongst the Layolites, then all the rest, The commandment of GOD should have been observed, whereinto the authority of the father must be regarded, in such sort, that if he ratify not the vow of his young daughter, remaining as yet in his house, then her vow is undone, and cannot stand: Even so the vows that mortal men do make in earth, if they be not ratified by the allowance of our Heavenly Father, they are undone, and cannot consist and stand. Notwithstanding the commanders amongst the Layolites, will try the obedience of their disciples in maters dishonest, vncomly, ungodly, and devilish such as to walter themselves into a filthy mire, if so it please the commander to enjoine & to violate the commandment of the Phis •… ion, in rubbing that thing outwardly upon the body which the Physician commanded to be eaten by the diseased person, and in drinking that liquor of oil wherewith the Physician appointed the body to be anointed. Also in commanding •… heir disciples to kill Christian Princes. Hath GOD kept silence in his blessed word, and by his taciturnitie given a secrete allowance to such ungodly commandments? Read the Scriptures of GOD, whereinto he forbiddeth to touch the Anointed of the LORD: but they have touched the Anointed of the LORD, even betwixt the Porch and the Altar, not ashamed to defile their holy sacrament of auricular confession, with treasonable consultations against the Anointed of the LORD.
To conclude, The Orders of Monks from appearance of commendable beginninges, have degenerated so far, that they who seemed to be Stars fixed in Heaven, and shining with the splendor of Celestial light, in end they are become busy-bodies, practicers of treasons, under color of late invented sacraments, whom the LORD in his own time with the tempest of his wrath will scatter as dust, and no man shall be able to gather them again.
CENTURY V.
CHAP I OF EMPEROVRS.
Arcadius, and Honorius.
T HE good Emperor Theodosius left behind him two sons, Arcadius to govern the East parts, and Honorius the West. Arcadius reigned 14. years: He was a meek and godly Emperor, but not courageous as his father had been. His simplicity was abused by Eudoxia his wife, Ruffinus his chief Counselor, and Gania his chief Captain. Eudoxia was offended at the freedom that Chrysostom used in reproving of sin: And by the means of Theophilus B. of Alexandria procured his deposition. Theophilus had gathered a Synod at the oak of Chalcedon: because Chrysostom being warned, refused to compear, they convict him of contumacy, and deposed him: after deposition followed banishment, from which the affectioned minds of the people toward their Pastor constrained the Emperor to reduce him again: yet Eudoxia continued in her malice, and procured by the means of Theophilus, his second deposition and banishment, with commandment to journey his weak body with excessive travails from place to place until he concluded his life.
Reffinus stirred up Alaricus King of the Goths to fight against Arcadius, secretly presuming to the kingdom, but his tree sonable enterprises being espied, he was slain, & his head and right hand were hung up upon the port of Constantinople.
Gama of a simple soldier was made general commander of Arcadius his army: he waxed insolent and proud, affected the Kingdom, being in blood a stranger, of the Nation of the Goths, in religion an Arian. He craved a petition of the Emperor, that he might have one of the Churches of Constantinople whereinto he might serve GOD according to his own form: but this petition by the prudent advise of Chrysostom given to the Emperor, was rejected, and the pride of Gaina for a time was something abated.
Honorius reigned in the West, a'l the days of his brother Arcadius, and 15. year after his death. The whole time of his government was very troublesome. Gildo his lieuetenant in Afric usurped the dominion of Afric, and Maseelzer his brother, who at the first detested treasonable enterprises in his brother, yet afterward followed his brothers footsteps, and received the just deserved reward of his inconstancy, for he was slain by his own soldiers. In like manner Stilico the Emperors father in law (for Honorius married his daughter) and the Emperors chief Counselor, presumed to draw the Kingdom to Eucherius his son, and stirred up the Uandales, Burgundians, Almans, and diuerso others to invade the Kingdom of France, to the end that Honorius being overcharged with the multitude of unsupportable businesses, might permit Stilics to set forward to the designs of his own heart. About this time Rhadagisus a S •… ythian accompanied with an army of two hundredth thousand Goths, came to Italy. And the help of Valdinus and Sarus captains of the Huns and Goths being obtained, Rhadagisus was suddenly surprised, himself was taken & strangled, many were slain, the most part were sold, whereupon followed incredible cheapness of servants, so that flocks of servants were sold for one piece of gold in Italy.
The next great trouble came by Alaricus King of the Western Goths, who invaded Italy, and camped about Ravenna, with whom Honorius entered into a capitulation, and promised to him and his retinue a dwelling place in France. The Goths matched toward their appointed dwelling place: But Stilico the Emperors father in law followed after them, and set upon them at unawares, when they suspected none evil, and slew a great number of them. By this the Emperor clearly perceived the treason of Stilico, and caused him and his son to be slain, but to his own great hurt, he appointed no general cōmander of the army in his place. Alaricus and his army were enraged, partly by their loss, and partly by remembrance of the covenant made with them, and incontinent violated: Therefore they turned back again, & invaded Italy with all their might, and besieged Rome two years, and took it in the year of our LORD 410, or as some reckone 412. In the mids of burning, slaying, robbing & militare outrage, some favor was shown by the express commandment of Alaricus to such as fled to Christian Churches for safety of their lives. Alaricus led his army from Rome, and was purposed to sails to Afric, there to settle his abode, but being driven back with tempestuous winds, he wintred in Consentia where he ended his life. Alaricus in his lifetime had given in marriage Placidia the sister of Honorius to Ataulphus his nearest kinsman, and Ataulphus after the death of Alaricus reigned over the Goths. The Goths under the conduct of Ataulphus retarned back again to Rome. Placidia through her intercession purchased great well to the town of Rome: the Goths abstained from burning, and shedding of blood, and addressed themselves toward France and Spain.
Theodosius 2. and Valentinian 3.
AFter Arcadius reigned his son Theodosius the second 42. years. His uncle Honorius governed in the West: After whose death the whole government pertained to Yheodosius, who associated unto himself Valentinian the third, the son of Placidia his fathers sister. Theodosius in godliness was like unto his grandfather, in collecting a great labrarie of good books, nothing inferior to Ptolemaus Philadelphus. In collecting in one short sum the laws of kings & princes: he tread a path whereinto Justinian walked, following Theodosius example, and benefited all men desirous of learning. His house was like unto a sanctuary for exercises of reading of holy Scripture, and devote prayers. He was of a meek and tractable nature almost beyond measure: his facility in subscribing vnread letters was corrected by the prudent advise of his sister Pulcheria. In these two Emperors time the estate was mightily crossed and troubled by strangers. By the procurement of Boniface deputy of Afric, the Vandals under the conduct of Gensericus their King came into Afric, took the town of Carthage, & other principal towns and settled their abode in that country. Valentinian 3. Emperor of the West was compelled to bind up a covenant with the Vandals, and to assign unto them a limited bounds in Afric for their dwelling place.
The Vandals were partly Pagans and partly Arians, whereby it came to pass that the true Church in Afric was persecuted with no less inhumanity, and barbarous cruelty by Gensericus King of the Vandals, than it was in the days of the Emperor Dioclesiane. Attila King of the Huns encumbered the Roman empire with greater troubles. Theodosius Emperor of the East bought peace with payment of a yearly tribute of gold to Attila. Valentinian the third by the means of Aëtius his chief Counselor allured Theodoricus King of the Western Goths to take his part. The parties fought in the fields called Catalaunici a great fight, whereinto a hundredth and fourscore thousand men were slain. And Theodoricus King of the Goths in this battle lost his life. Attila was compelled to flee. Thrasimundus the son of Theodoricus was very willing to pursue Attila, for desire he had to revenge his fathers slaughter, but he was stayed by Aëtius. This counsel seems to be the occasion of his death: for Valentinian commanded to cut off Aëtius. Attila finding that the Roman army was destitute of the conduct of so wise a governor, as Aëtius was, he took courage again, and in great rage set himself against Italy, took the towns of Aquileia, Ticinum and Millane, sacked and ruined them, and set himself directly against Rome, of intention to have used the like cruelty also against it. But Leo bishop of Rome went forth, and with gentle words so mitigated his mind, that he left sieging of the town of Rome. Soone after this Attila died, the terror of the world, and the whip wherewith GOD scourged many nations.
Valentinian the third, after he had reigned in whole 30. years, was cut off for the slaughter of Aetius. Maximus usurped the Kingdom, and violently took unto himself Endoxia the relict of Valentinian: but she was relieved again by Gensericus King of Vandals, who led an army to Rome, and spoiled the town, relieved Eudoxia, and carried her and her daughters to Afric, and gave Honoricus his son in marriage unto her eldest daughter. Maximus was cut in pieces by the people, and his body was cast into Tiber. From this time forth the Empire utterly decayed in the West, until the days of Carolus Magnus, so that Auitus, Richimex, Maioranus, Severus, Anthemius, Olybrius, Glycerius, Nepos, Orestes, and his son Augustulus, they continued so short time, and governed so vnprosperously, that their names may be left out of the rolle of Emperors.
Now to return again to Theodosius Emperor in the East, a King beloved of GOD, in so much that by prayer he obtained of GOD a wonderful deliverance to Ardaburius captain of his army. When his uncle had ended his life, Ardaburius was sent against a tyrant John, who did usurp the Kingdom in the West. The ship whereinto Ardaburius sailed by tempest of weather was driven to Rauenna, where the tyrant John took him prisoner. Aspar the captains son, being conducted by an Angel of GOD (as Socrates writtteth) entered into Rauenna, by the passage of the loch, which was never found dried up before that time: the ports of the town were patent, so that Aspar and his army entered into the town, slew the tyrant John, and relieved Ardaburius his father. This miraculous deliverance is thought to be the fruit of the effectual prayers of the godly Emperor. His death was procured by a fall from his horse, after which he was diseased, and died: an Emperor worthy of everlasting remembrance.
Martianus.
MARTIANVS by the means of Pulcheria the sister of Theodosius was advanced to the Kingdom, with whom Valentinian the third, of whom I have already spoken, reigned 4. years. Martianus, albeit he obtained the government in a time most troublesome, when the Goths, Vandals, Huns, and Herulis had disquieted the estate of the Roman empire out of measure, yet by the providence of GOD the short time of his government was peaceable, for he reigned not fully 7. year, and he left behind him great grief in the hearts of the people, because a government so good and godly endured so short time. Anent the council of Chalcedon assembled by him, it is to be referred unto the own place.
Leo.
AFTER Martianus succeeded Leo, and governed 17. years. He was godly and peaceable, not unlike to Martianus his predecessor. He interponed his authority to suppress those who proudly despised the council of Chalcedon, and obstinately maintained the heresy of Eutyches. Notwithstanding the madness and rage of Eutychian heretics began in his time, immediately after the report of the death of Martianus. Procerius B. of Alexandria was cruelly slain by them in the Church, harled through the streets, and with beastly cruelty they chewed the entrails of his body, having before ordained Timothy to be their bishop. The Emperor banished Timothy being first foreseen, that not only Leo bishop of Rome, but also all other bishops of chief account, damned the ordination of Timothy. The terrible earthquake which destroyed a part of Antiochia, and the more terrible fire which wasted a great part of Constantinople, were fore-running tokens of the great desolation that should ensue by the detestable heresy of Eutyches.
Zeno.
THE Emperor Leo left his Kingdom to his nephew the son of Zeno called Leo, but he fell sick and died, when he had scarce reigned 1. year. So his father Zeno had the emperiall soueraignitie 17 years: he was of a bad religion, dissolute in manners, intemperate, effeminate, and hated of all men. Therefore Basiliscus conspired against him, and Zeno fled. Basiliscus was a persecutor of the true faith, damned by his encyclicke letters the Council of Chalcedon: restored Eutychian bishops to their places again: such as Timothy Arideus to Alexandria, Petrus Cnapheus to Antiochia, Paulus to Ephesus: five hundredth preachers were found, who subscribed Basiliscus letters, and cursed the council of Chalcedon. So great a plague it is, either to have ignorant Pastors, who know not the truth of GOD, or cowardly teachers, who will suffer no rebuke for the known truth of GOD. Zeno returned to his Kingdom again within 2 years: he banished Basiliscus to Cappadocia, where he was slain with his wife and children. He abolished the encyclicke letters of Basiliscus, and ejected Petrus Cnapheus out of Antiochia, and Paulus out of Ephesus. Timothy of Alexandria was old, infirm, and near to the last period of his life, else also he had been ejected out of Alexandria: for Zeno, not for love of the true faith, but for hatred of the name of Basiliscus endeavored to undo all that he had done.
Under the reign of Zeno came Odoacer assisted with people of Pannonia called Rugi, Turcilingi, and Heruli, and invaded Italy, and slew Orestes at Papia, and compelled his son Augustulus, to denude himself of emperiall honors: so that the Roman empire, as it began in the person of Augustus Caesar, so likewise it ended in the person of Augustulus the son of Orestes. Odoacer would not usurp the glorious title of an Emperor, but called himself King of Italy, and reigned 14, years. Zeno on the other part stirred up Theodoricus King of Goths to expel Odoacer out of Italy. Theodoricus encountered with him diverse times, and prevailed. In end he besieged him in Ravenna, until a covenant of peace was bound up betwixt them, but it lasted short time: for Theodoricus under pretence of friendship, called Odoacer & his sons to a banket, & caused them cruelly to be slain. Afterward he reigned himself alone in Italic 33, years. he reedified the towns in Italy which by violence of wars had been wasted & made desolate, & was well beloved of the people: & albeit in religion he was an Arian, yet he abstained from persecution of those who professed the true faith.
The Eutychian persecution is already begun, but the Arian persecution is not as yet ended. Hunnericus son of Gensericus King of Vandals, was an Arian persecutor so unmerciful, that in Afric where his dominion was, he had neither compassion on sex or age: he banished at one time five thousand professors of the true faith. And such as were infirm and weak, & could neither travel by foot nor horse, he commanded cords to be knit to their legs, and to traile them through the rough places of the wilderness, and by such merciless dealing, the death of many innocent people was procured: but the LORD suffered not this cruelty to be unpunished: for the LORD plagued the Vandals with famine, and pest, and Hunnericus was so long tormented with venomous biles, that in end he was consumed with vermin, and in great misery ended his most wretched life.
In this Century studying to brevity, I have overpassed some remarkable things, such as the deceitful practices of the wise men of Persia, to divert the affection of their King Isdige •… des from the love he carried to Maruthas bishop in Mesopotamia, and Ambassador of Theodosius 2. This history is set down at length by Socrates. In like manner the calamity of the Jews who dwelt in the Islle of Candie, and were piteously abused by a deceiving fellow, who called himself Moses, and promised to lead them through the Mediterran sea, to their own lande, as Moses led the people of Israel through the read sea: this calamity read in the 7. book of the ecclesiastical history of Socrates. chap. 38. The Jews were commanded to cast themselves into the sea, & to swim unto a rock: but they were drowned in the sea. & dashed upon the hard rock, and by the means of Christian fishers some few escaped. This history is referred unto the 434. year of our LORD: so that it sell forth under the reign of Theodosius 2. The miraculous conucrsion of the Burgundians to the faith of CHRIST about the same time I have of purpose overpassed, willing to be short, & to give a view of the history to those who are desirous to read
CHAP. II. Of Pastors and Doctors.
Patriarchs of Rome.
A FTER Siricius succeeded Anastatius, and governed the Church of Rome 3. years. About the year of our LORD 401. he entered into his office, under the reign of Honorius. He made a constitution, that men should not sit, but stand when the gospel was read. After him succeeded Innocentius, and continued in his office 15. years: he was an aduersare to the Novatians, and Pelagians, and was friendly to John Chrysostom, whose deposition Eudoxia the Emperors wife had procured. Innocentius sent to Honorius, and Arcadius 5. Bishops, and two Presbyters, to procure the appointment of a general council, whereinto the cause of Chrysostom might be examined: for he counted the gathering of an aecumenicke Council the only remedy whereby the vehement tempest of so great commotions as followed the deposition and banishment of Chrysostom, could be settled: but the aduersares of Chrysostom procured the messengers of Innocentius to be ignominiously entreated, & sent back again. Here let the judicious Reader mark that the power of conuocating general Councils appertained to the Emperor, and not unto the bishop of Rome. In this man's time (according to mine opinion) the Roman Church began to swell in pride, and to usurp jurisdiction over other Churches, having no better ground than a personal and temporal act of the Council of Serdica.
Zosimus the successor of Innocentius continued not above the space of a year and 5. months in office, or 2. years, as Socrates writeth. To him Platina ascribeth this constitution, that no servant should be assumed into the clergy, but he lamenteth, that not only servants, but also the sons of strange women, and flagitious persons, were admitted to spiritual offices to the great detriment of the Church. He sent Faustinus a B. to the Council of Carthage, with 2. presbyters of the Roman Church to crave that no matter of moment and importance should be done without advise of the Roman Bishop. He pretended an act of the Council of Nice alloting this great dignity to the Roman chair: but after diligent search of the principal registers no such act was found. I expected that Onuphrius now should have compeared, & in so main a point said something to the cause, which with tooth & nail he defendeth, but in his annotations I see nothing except a diversity of counting of years, for in his reakoning Zosimus continued 3. years, 4. months.
To Zosimus succeeded Boniface 1. and governed 3. years. At his election there was a schisine in Rome. Some elected Boniface, others Eulalius to be their bishop. The Emperor Honorius banished them both from Rome, but after 7. months Boniface was restored, and was B. of Rome: at this time they were bishops of Rome, to whom the Emperor gave allowance, but they were not Emperors, to whom the B. of Rome gave allowance.
After Boniface, Coelestinus governed the Church of Rome, 8, years, 10. months, 17. days. He was an aduersare to the Novatians, Pelagians, and to Nestorius & his adherents. Socrates taketh him up right, that he was bitter against the Novatians, for desire of preeminence. In Constantinople they who professed the true faith, had liberty to conueene, albeit in matters of discipline their opinion was not sound: but Coelestinus silenced Rusticola the bishop of the Novatians for desire to have all bishops stouping under his soueraignitie. Mark the words of Socrates in the Latin translation bearing these words: Romano Episcopatu iam olim perinde at que Alexandrino ultra sacerdotii limites ad externum dominatum progresso: that is, the bishopric of Rome, even of old, having stepped beyond the limites of priest-hood to an external domination, as the bishopric of Alexandria had done before. Pelagius had propagated his heresy in the Isle of Britain. But Coelestinus hindered the propagation of a wicked heresy, by sending Germanus to the Brittones, and Palladius to the Scots. Coelestinus more impudently than his predecessors, Innocentius, Zosimus, and Boniface, urged a submission of the Churches of Carthage unto the Roman chair, and that they should accept in favor Appiarius whom they had excommunicated for his appellation from his own bishop to the bishop of Rome: but the fathers of the 6. Council of Carthage would neither absolve Appiarius before his repentance were known, neither would they stoup under the jurisdiction of the Roman Church.
To Coelestinus succeeded Sixtus 3, & continued in office 8 years, 19. days. He was accused of the crime of Adulterieby Bassus: but Sixtus was found innocent, & Bassus was found a calumniator & a false accuser: therefore he was banished by the Emperor Valentinian 3. & his goods were appointed to go to the use of the Church. Bassus after his banishment desired to be received again in favor with Sixtus, but his petitiō was rejected as if he had sinned against the holy Ghost. Notwithstanding the flatterers of the chair of Rome writeth that Sixtus buried Bassus his accuser with his own hands, which seemeth to be repugnant to his unmerciful form of dealing in his life-time.
After Sixtus Leo a deacon in Rome, & absent out of the town, was chosen to be bishop of Rome, & ruled 21. years, 1. month, 13. days: he stirred up the Emp. Theodosius 2. to appoint a Council for suppressing the error of Eutyches, whereinto it was rather confirmed than suppressed by the craft of Dioscorus B. of Alexandria, whereof I shall speak hereafter, GOD willing, & how Eutyches was condemned in the Council of Chalcedon under the reign of Martianus. His wisdom & eloquence in mitigating the fury of Attila hath been handled in the preceeding history. Amongst his constitutions none is more louable then his constitution against ambitious men, who presumeth continually to high places. He ordained that they should be deprived both of the higher, and the lower place: of the lower place for their pride, because they had proudly despised it: of the higher, because they had auaritiously suited it. In discipline nothing is better than to bear down those place-mongers, whereby it cometh to pass, that prerogative of place is preferred to prerogative of gift, Followed Hilarius & continued 7. year, 3. months, 10. days. To whom succeeded Simplicius, & continued 15. years 1, month. 7. days. Felix 3. was the successor of Simplicius, and continued 8. years, 11. months, 17. days. He governed the Church of Rome in the time of the Emperor Zeno, and in the time, when Odoacer and Theodoricus contended for the superiority of Italy: he was nothing inferior to his antecessors in zeal to advance the supremacy of the Roman chair: for he excommunicated Acatius B. of Constantinople, because he craved not his advise in receiving Petrus Moggus in favor, like as he had craved his advise at the first when he excommunicated him. This Petrus Moggus was an Eutychian heretic, and was justly excommunicated by Acatius, who used the advise of Felix B. of Rome, in excommunicating him. But when Petrus Moggus testified his repentance by his supplicant bill, containing the recantation of his error, Acatius absolved him. This grieved the proud stomach of Felix, because his advise was not craved in all things. Therefore he excommunicated Acatius, as said is. Acatius little regarding the pride of the Roman bishop, gave to Felix an hard meeting: for he both excommunicated Felix, and razed his name out of the rolle of Bishops. Ambition was the first great cancker-worm that consumed and defaced the beauty of the Church of Rome.
Gelasius the successor of Felix, an African borne, ruled 4. years, 8. months, 17. days. The estate of Italy was so troubled by the incursions of barbarous people, that the manners of the people were altogether dissolute (for he ministered in the last years of Theodoricus King of Italy) therefore he endeavored to establish discipline in the Church: he claimed superiority over all Churches more manifestly than any of his predecessors had done, for he affirmed that the Church of Rome should judge all Churches, and should be judged by no Church, and that the right of Apellation to the bishop of Rome from all partes in the world, was not a supposititious act of the Nicene Council, as the 6. Council of Carthage had determined, but that it was autentique, and a Right given by them in deed to the Roman Church: neither would he be reconciled with the Oriental bishops in any cace, except they would first allow the excommunication of Acatius, and raze his name out of the rolle of Bishops Platina writeth that he did excommunicate the Emperor Anastatius a favorer of the Eutychian heresy, but this example once begun, was practiced in most prodigal manner by the bishops of Rome against Emperors, who maintained no heresy.
Patriarchs of Constantinople.
JOHN CHRYSOSTOME succeeded to Nectarius in the days of Arcadius, and Honorius: he had been an helper to Flavianus B. of Antiochia, from whence he was transported by the authority of the Emperor Arcadius, and ordained bishop of Constantinople, sore against the hearts of the people of Antiochia. In Oratrie he had profited in the school of Libanius, in Philosophy in the school of Andragathius beyond his fellows. His liberty in reproving of sin both in Court and Clergy, procured against him the hatred of Eudoxia the Emprice, and the hatred of the Clergy, who could not suffer their corrupt manners to be reformed. Theophilus B. of Alexandria was opposed to Chrysostom from the very first time of his ordination: for he endeavored to have Isidorus a Monk brought up in the wilderness of Schethis, & afterward a Presbyter in Alexandria to be seated in Constantinople: but when his plotted course failed, he became an enemy to Chrysostom, and gladly embraced all occasions, whereby he might procure his deposition: how he was unjustly deposed, banished, and journeyed to death by the malice of Eudoxia, and Theophilus it hath been sufficiently declared in the preceeding history. Other things (Godwilling) shall be handled in the description of the life of Theophilus. Chrysostom governed the Church of Constantinople 7. years.
After Chrysostom, Arsatius the brother of Nectarius an aged man (for he was fourscore year old) ministered in Constantinople scarce 2. years.
Atticus the successor of Arsatius ministered 21. years, He was admitted to this office in time of the minority of Theodosius 2. at what time Antbemius his counselor (a man in wisdom inferior to none who lived in his time) governed the affairs of the Kingdom. Atticus was not unlearned, he was godly and prudent: he insert the name of Chrysostom into the rolle of Bishops, and in the public Liturgy made an honorable commemoration of his name, & persuaded Cyrillus B. of Alexandria to do the like. Socrates affirmeth that GOD by his ministry wrought miraculous works, and that a lewe sick of the palsy was baptized by him in the Name of JESUS, and immediately after Baptism was healed from his disease. In staying the progress of superstition, whereinto people, even at this time were inclined, he kythed himself prudent: for some of the people of Constantinople resorted to the sepulcher of Sabbatius to pray, & to do some worship to the defunct: but Atticus caused his body in the night season to be raised, & to be buried in another place unknown to the foresaid superstitious people, & so they left off their resorting to the sepulcher of Sabbatius.
Sisinnius after Atticus ministered 2. years. Nestorius followed him in office, but his name is to be read in the catalogue of heretics. Next to Nestorius was Maximianus, who continued not above 2. years, and 5. months. To whom succeeded Proclus, and continued 12 years.
Flauianus after Proclus ministered in the days of Theodosius the second, a faithful man in his calling, but scarcely did he complete 2. years in his ministry. He deposed and excommunicated Eutyches an Abbot in Constantinople, the author of a pernicious heresy. He was cruelly tramped under foot in the second Council of Ephesus called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, a council of brigandrie, Dioscorus B. of Alexandria, in that Council favored the opinion of Eutyches, and by tumultuare dealing, so oppressed Flavianus, that he procured his death, They who attribute too much to the authority of Councils, let them fasten their eyes upon this Council, and learn, that pos •… lie Councils may err, and that Patriarchs, such as Dioscorus was, may err even in matters of faith.
To Flauianus succeeded Anatolius, and governed 8. years. And after him Gennadius 13. years. Acatius the successor of Gennadius ministered 17. years under the Emperor Zeno. He gave a good proof of his constancy in the true faith, at that time when Basiliscus (who drave Zeno from his Kingdom) condemned the Council of Chalcedon, and compelled bishops to subscribe to the error of Eutyches. The great dissention that fell out betwixt him and the Roman bishops, for Petrus Moggus B. of Alexandria, and Petrus Cnapheus B. of Antiochia, it was not for communicating with them before they renounced their error, as some learned men do affirm, but for plain emulatiō, such as was of old betwixt Pompeius & Caesar, the one could not abide a companion, the other could not abide a superior. The Roman Church manifestly cōtended for superiority: the Church of Constantinople on the other part perceiving what advantage the Roman bishops took of this, that their counsel was craved, they left off the doing of it. And this moved the proud stomach of Gelasius (after the death of Acatius) to brast out in these arrogant words, that the Church of Rome had power to judge of all other Churches, but no Church had power to judge of the Church of Rome, yea, and Platina a late writer groundeth the supremacy of the bishop of Rome upon this, that Acatius B. of Constantinople wrote unto him, to damn the heretical opinion of Petrus Moggus B. of Alexandria: albeit the faith of PETER was grounded upon a sure rock, yet the supremacy of the Roman bishops is grounded only upon such sandy ground, as Platina and other flatterers of the Roman chair do cast out in their writings.
After Acatius succeeded Phrauitas. otherwise called Flauitas & continued scarce 4. month: some think that GOD in wrath shortened his days, because that by unlawful means he attained to that dignity to be B. of Constantinople. The Synodicke letter of Petrus Moggus B. of Alexandria written to Flauitas, and pondered by his successor Euphemius, wherein Petrus Moggus accurseth the Council of Chalcedon, it will clearly prove inconstancy in Petrus Moggus, but not a fault in Acatius: for many are like unto dogs, who return unto their vomit again, & this blame must rest in the bosom of fickle & unconstant men, & not in the bosom of honest men who are deceived by them.
Euphemius succeeded to Flauitas, & ministered under the reign of Zeno and Anastatius, & would not complete the ceremonies of the inauguratiōn of Anastatius until the time that by his oath and hand writ, he promised to be a desender of the true faith & of the acts of the Council of Chalcedon. This hand-writ Anastatius craved to be delivered back again to him, which when he could not obtain, Euphemius was compelled to fly for safety of his life. When he pondered the Synodicke letter of Petrus Moggus, he abhorred his name, & inserted again the name of Felix B. of Rome into the catalogue of bishops, which was razed & cancelled by Acatius one of his predecessors.
Patriarchs of Alexandria.
THEOPHILVS ministered in Alexandria in the dayess of Theodosius, and of his sons Arcadius and Honorius, a man both reproouable in his life, and inconstant in his faith. He sent Isidorus a Monk to Rome, there to lurk secretly, and to expect the event of the battle that was to be foughten betwixt Theodosius and Maximus, and to congratulate the victor. When he returned from Rome he endeavored to promote him to the bishopric of Constantinople: but John Chrysostom was preferred to him. After this, he cannot keep friendship with Isidorus, whom he intended once to have preferred, but upon a light occasion cast him off, and excommunicated him, because Isidorus would not deliver to him the money left in testementall legacy to be distributed to the poor. This money which Theoplnlus sister had left to the use foresaid, Theophilus craved that it might be put in his hands, to be employed to building and repairing of Churches: but Isidorus answered, that the money put in his custody should be bestowed according to the will of the defunct. And that it was a work more acceptable to GOD to support the poor, who were the living temples of GOD, then to build old and ruinous walls. Therefore Theophilus hated, and excommunicated Isidorus: for this cause Isidorus left Alexandria, and addressed himself to the wilderness of Schethis, where he complained to Ammonius, Dioscorus, Eusebius, and Enthymius called Longifratres of the injury that Theophilus had done unto him, who entreated Theophilus to receive Isidorus in favor again, and to admit him to his communion: but Theophilus gave unto them an evil reward for their travails, for he hated them, and finding that there was diverse opinions amongst the Monks of Nitria and Schethis, he put fuel to the fire, to the ende that diversity of affection might be added to diversity of Opinion: a man in all his courses malicious and deceatfull. Longi fratres fled to Constantinople to complain to the Emperor Arcadius of the malitiousnes of Theophilus, and they were humanely and courteously received by Chrysostom, but not admitted to the participation of the holy mysteries, until their cause had been first judged. To the rest of the Monks who dwelt in Nitria & Schethis the malice of Theophilus was not unknown. And 500. of them (especially such as were Anthropomorphite) came from the wilderness of N •… ia, of intention to have slain Theophilus, but he met them, & with gentle and flattering words lenified their anger, for he said unto them: Brethren, I see your faces as the face of GOD. They took his words in this sense, as if he had said, that GOD was fashioned according to the liken •… sse of a man's body. Therefore they desir •… d him to abjure the doctrine of Origen, which thing he willingly did, for he hated the books of Origen: and so he escaped the danger. The next pract •… se of his malice was against John Chrysostom B. of Constantinople, whom he hated, because he had received & courteously entreated Isidorus, & Longi fratres, who came to Constantinople, of intention to accus •… him. In this matter he dealt deceitfully like unto a crastie fox lying in wait, until he found occasion to set on. First, he reconciled himself to Epiphanius bishop of Salamin in Cyprus, and moou •… d him to gather a Council in Cyprus for damning the books of Origen, and to w •… ite to John Chrys •… stome, that he should do the like in his bou •… ds: but Chrysostom took little regard of the Council of Epiphanius, other things were more necessary than to trouble the memorial of a man that was dead long ago. Theophilus was glad to have this vantage, that Epiphanius a man of g •… eat account was on his side, and so soon as he found that Eudoxia the Emperor A •… cadius wife with courteours and some of the Clergy were incensed against Chrysostom, he was in readiness as a firebrand of Satan to execute all evil turns. So the man of GOD (as hath been declared) was deposed, banished, and unjustly put to death by Eudoxia and Theophtlus two chief procurers of it.
•… yrillus the nephew of Theophtlus of his brothers side, succeeded to Theophtlus, and ministered 32. years: a man learned, zealou •… an lactiue: his ministration was under the reigns of Theodo •… s 2, & Ualentinian 3. He was an aduerfare to here •… ques, in his days, especially to Nestorius B. of Constantinople. who denied the personal union of the divine and human Nature in CHRIST, whose opinion as heretical, was damned in the Council of Ephesas. Cyrillus carried some greater pomp & majesty than became the preachers of the humility of CHRIST'S cross. For he revenged the injury that the Louis had done unto Christians in the night time, by setting upon their Synagogues, slaying a great number of them, banishing others, & distributing their substance as a prey to the multitude that followed him. The Jews had dwelt in Alexandria from the days of Alexander the great to that time, but now by fury of Cyrillus they were vtte •… lie undone and scattered. Orestes the deputy of Theodosius 2. was in the town, to whom Cy •… illus would not complain of the injury done by the Jews against Christians, but at his own hand usurping the office of the civil Magistate he set upon the Jews, slew, scattered & spoiled them, as hath been above mentioned. This was the ground of unsupportable discord betwixt Orestes and Cyrillus, in so much, that 500. Monks of Nitria came out of the wilderness to Alexandria,, to support Cyrillus their bishop: One of them called Ammonius wounded the governor Orestes, and when he was taken & punished unto the death, Cyrillus called him a Martyr, buried him in the Church, changed his name, and called him 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, admirable. The Roman bishops claimed to a superiority over their brethrene, but Cyrillus B. of Alexandria plainly pretended to a superiority over civil Magistrates. This moved Socrates writing of Coeles •… inus 1, to say, that the bishops of Rome and Alexandria had stepped beyond the limites of priesthood, to the affectation of an external domination. The bishops of Rome kept their own pride, and borrowed from Alexandria a proud usurpation of domination over civil Magistrates: but the wise providence and provident wisdom of our GOD would have the mouths of the bishops of Rome opned to condemn that civil domination which their successors afterward most proudly usurped. Mark what Gelasius writeth, that before the coming of CHRIST some persons, such as Melchizedek, were both Kings and Priests. This (saith he) Satan imitating in his members would have Pagan Emperors to be called Pontisicesmaximi, & Imperatores: but when he came who was indeed both King & Priest, (to wit) CHRIST, neither did the King take upon him the priestly dignity, neither the priest the kingly authority.
Dioscorus, who succeeded to Cyrillus, his name is to be read in the catalogue of heretics, but Proterius was the true successor, in regard he kept the faith, but he was cruelly flaine by the favorers of Dioscorus, immediately after the death of the Empetour Martianus.
Timothy Salophaciolus ministered in Alexandria 23 years, 6, months, in the days of Zeno & Basihscus, Albeit Basihscus advanced another Timothy, furnamed Aelurus to be B. of Alexandria, yet when Zeno was restored to his soueraignitie again Salophaciolus received his place again.
After Timothy Salophaciolus followed Johannes Tabennesiota whom the Emp. Zeno justly hated for his perjury: for he came ambassador to the Emperor & craved, that when their B. was dead, the Church of Alexandria might have liberty to choose their own bishop: the Emp. suspected that he was ambitiously suiting the place to himself, & therefore did bind him with an oath, that when the place should happen to vaike, he should make no moyen to possess himself into that room: but he did the contrary & accepted the place: therefore the Emp. Zen •… banished him: he fled to Felix B. of Rome, who being misinformed by Johannes Tabennesiota made him to think, that he was persecuted for the true faith, as Athanasius was, who fled to Julius bishop of Rome: but the Emperors letter assured him of the contrary, that he was banished for perjury. Petrus Moggus who followed, is to be reckoned in another catalogue.
Patriarchs of Antiochia.
To Flavianus in Antiochia succeeded Porphyrius, whose ordination was more secret than becomes the ordination of bishops to be, in absence of the people, when they were deliting themselves with the sight of stage plays in Daphue. He consented to the deposition of John Chrysostom. No Man whom I have read, maketh reverent record of him, except Theodoretus, who possibly doth not examine him narrowly, but for the dignity of his place letteth him pass with a note of commendation.
After Porphyrius succeeded Alexander, a man much commended by Theod. for eloquence, but more for peace: for he was not only an instrument to quiet the estate of his own Church of Antiochia, but also to quiet the estate of other Churches, and he was the fi •… st who inserted the name of John Chrysostom into the catalogue of holy bishops, and pe •… swaded others to do the same. Theodotus was his successor 4. years, of whom little is written.
To Theodotus succeeded Johannes Gram •… aticus & ministered 18. year. In his time the Council of Ephesus was assembled by Theodosius 2. and Valentinian 3. In it there was a pitiful distraction betwixt John B of Antiochia and Cyrillus B. of Alexandria for a light c •… se. Not because John B. of Antiochia favored the her •… sie of N •… storius: but in r •… spect he thought Cyrillus too hasty in giving out a definitiu. sentence before the full number of his brethren were assembled together. This dissention was afterward reconcil •… d, and Johannes sent to Cyrillus Paulus Emisenus, and craved his f •… iendship, and was reconciled with him.
Domnus the successor of I •… annes was an unconstant man. He consented to the deposition of Eutyches. and afterward in the Council called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 he consented to th •… reposition of Euty •… hes. He received a just recompense of his inconstancy: for the second Council of Ephesus deposed him, and ordained Maximus B. of Antiochia
Maximns was admitted B. of Antiochia by the second Council of Ephesus. H •… e was present at the Council of Chalcedon, whereinto albeit the second Council of Ephesus was damned as heretical, and all the acts of it were abrogated, yet they gave allowance to the deposition of Domnus. and to the admission of Maximus, which thing came to pass by this occasion, Leo B, of Rome had received Maximus to his communion before the Council of Chalcedon (albeit he had received ordination from an heretical Council) and the ambassadors of Leo were pr •… sidents in the Council of Chalcedon: therefore they overpassed lightly, and with allowance any fact that was done by the B. of Rome. But all the world was set in business, when Acatius received in favor Petrus Moggus, because it was done without foreknowledge of the Bishop of Rome.
To Maximus succeeded Martyrius, who being absent at Constantmople for necessar affairs of his own Church, Petrus Gnapheus stale away the hearts of the people from him, so that at his returning he was compelled to leave Antiochia, with this goodnight, I forsake a disobedient Clergy, arebellious people, and a defiled Church, reserving unto myself the dignity of Priesthood.
Petrus Gnapheus for his deserts is worthy to be reakoned in the rolle of heretics. First, he supplanted Martyrius by vnhon •… st means in the days of the Emperor Leo. Secondly he ordained a clause to be added to that part of the Liturgy, which is called trisagios, sanctus Deus, sanctus fortis, sanctus immortalis. To this (I say) he added, qui crucifi •… us est pro nobis, which form of speaking (albeit 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 may tolerate it to be spoken) was said by him in an heretical sense, as if the divinity had suffered pain. Thirdly he attributed divine honors unto the Virgin MARIE, and ordained that her name should be in called upon in the public prayers' of the Church. He was banished by the Emperor Leo, and restored by Basiliscus: he damned the Council of Chaloedon, and was banished the second time by the Emperor Zeno, and excommunicate by F •… lix B. of Rome, & Acatius B. of Constantinople. Stephanus succeeded in his room, and was incontinent made out of the way by the faction of Gnapheus. Calandion succeeded to Stephanus, and he likewise was banished by the Emperor Zeno. In end Petrus Gnapheus subscribed the henoticke letters of Zeno (these were letters containing a sum of the true faith, an approbation of godly Councils, and a protestation of unity with godly Bishops) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Greek language signifieth vnitiue or coniunctiue, and henoticke letters were letters to procure peace and union in the Church. By these means Gnapheus obtained his place again, and is reakoned in the Catalogue of Bishops only for the subscription of the Emperors henoticke letters.
Patriarchs of Jerusalem.
To Cyrillus succeeded Johannes Nepos. After him Polythronius ministered in Jerusalem. He was oft accused, and oftentimes absolved. His chief accusation was this, that he counted hims •… lfe the supreme bishop of all bishops. Sixtus 3. B. of Rome was serious in this turn, because he thought that the apple of his eye was touched when supremacy was spoken of. Therefore he sent 8. ambassadors to Jerusalem: a Conncill of 70. bishops was gathered, & Polyth •… onius was found innocent. Notwithstanding he was convict of some other faults, nam •… lie that he refused to consecrate a Church until 10. pounds of gold were paid unto him: for this cause he was ordained to dwell without the town, a Vicar to supply his room, and a portion to be allotted to him for his sustentation. This portion appointed for his sustentation, when he saw the people of Jerusalem pinched with famine, he sold it, and supported their necessity, and was for his loving affection to his flock, restored to his office again.
To him succeeded Iuvenalis, whose inconstancy GOD iusily punished. He was present at the first Council of Ephesus, & consented to the excommunication of Nestorius. He was present likewise at the second Council of Ephesus, and consented to the restitution of Eutyches. He was deposed in the Council of Chalcedon, & received in favor again after humble confession of his fault. This is that famous author, whom the Roman Church citeth for the fable of the Assumption of the Virgin MARIE. When he returned to Jerusalem, a number of turbulent Monks arose up against him, and desired him to accurse the Council of Chalcedon, which when he refused to do, they chose another bishop called Theodosius: but the Emperor Martianus commandment was strait to fetch Theodosius alive unto him: therefore he fled, and Juvenalis returned again unto his place. The names of Anastatius and Martyrius who followed Iuvenalis, for their assenting to Basiliscus, and to Petrus Gnapheus are not worthy to be insert in this catalogue.
Of other Pastors and Doctors.
THeodoritus was B. of Cyrus a town in Syria, whose builder seems to have been Cyrus King of Persia, a man of excellent learning, lived under the Emperors, Theodosius 2. Valentinian 3. and Martianus. He had the oversight of eighty parishes lying within his ample diocie. He is bold to affirm in a cerraine Epistle written to Leo bishop of Rome, that by his travails a thousand souls within his bounds were reclaimed from the heresy of Marcion. He fell into many lamentable troubles. The ground of all was the extraordinare love he carried toward his own Patriarch John B. of Antiochia. For like as he accompanied him to the Council of Ephesus, so likewise he concurred with him in the deposition of Cyrillus B. of Alexandria, and Memnon B. of Ephesus: but the Council gathered at Ephesus took trial in the cause of Cyrillus and Memnon, and absolved them, and damned John B. of Antiochia, & his complices, Theodoritus was one of the number. The second trouble followed upon the neck of the first: for by instigation of his patriarch John he wrote against the 12 heads or 12. theses of Cyrillus written against Nestorius, wherein he mistaketh the doctrine of Cyrillus, as if he had fallen into the error of Apollinaris: but after that Cyrillus wrote a declaration of his own meaning, it was found that both Cyrillus and Theodoritus professed one faith, and they were reconciled. Nevertheless Theodoritus was damned in the second Council of Ephesus for writing against Cyrillus, neither being cited, accused nor convict of any fault. Theodoritus complained to Leo B. of Rome, of the outrage of Dioscorus bishop of Alexandria, who had damned him in a Council before he was heard. Leo absolved him, and the Council of Chalcedon, after he had pronounced Anathema against the errors of Nestorius and Eutyches, they in like manner absolved him. And finally after his death in the 5, general Council, his writings against the 12. heads of Cyrillus were damned. All these troubles proceeded from one and the selfsame ground, to wit, upon the extraordinary love he carried toward his patriarch John. This one thing laid aside, he was nothing inferior to the most wise, accurate, and learned writers of the ancient time. In the first of his learned dialogues called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , he proveth that the Word became flesh without changing of the divine Nature into the human Nature, or the human Nature into the divine. Even as in the Sacrament of the Supper of the LORD the bread becomes the body of the LORD, not by changing the substance of it, but by assuming by grace another use than it had, the very symbol obtaineth the name of the thing represented by the symbol. When Papists do read the dialogues of Theodoritus, let them leave off to brag of the antiquity of the doctrine of Transubstantiation, and take them to the Monk Damascene the first author of their 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : he continued at least 30 years in his ministry, and ended his life as is supponed, under the reign of Leo the first.
Augustine in his young years was infected with the error of the Manicheans. His mother Monica watered her face many times with tears, in her prayers begging at GOD his conuersione to the truth. GOD heard her prayers: he was sent to Milan to be a teacher of Rhetoric, by the preaching of Ambrose B. of Milan, and the devote behavior of the people in singing Psalms to the praise of GOD, the like whereof Augustine had never seen in any place before: for men in earth praising GOD with ardent affection seemed to represent the Angels of heaven, who incessantly praise GOD with vnsp •… akable delight, Also with the reading of the life of Antonius the heremite, he was wonderfully moved, & beg •… n to dislike his former conuersatiō, which he had spent in worldly ple •… sures, and went unto a quiet garden, accompanied with Alipius: with many tears he bewa •… led the insolency of his bypast conversation, wishing the time to be now come, whereinto without farther delay his soul should be watered with the dew of the converting grace of GOD. And as he was pouring out the grief of his wounded heart to GOD with a flood of tears, he heard a voice saying unto him tolle & lege, and again, tolle & lege, that is to say, take up and read, take up and read. At the first heating, he took it to have been the voice of boys or maids speaking in their play such words one to another: but when he looked about, and could see nobody, he knew it to be a celestial admonition warning him to take up the book of holy Scriptu •… e (which he had in the garden with him) and read. Now the first place that fe •… l in his hands after the opening of the book was this: Not in gluttony, nor drunckennes, nor in chambering, nor wantonness, nor in strife or envying: but put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and take no thought of the flesh, to fulfill the l •… stes thereof. At the reading whereof he was so fully resolved to forsake the vanities of the world, & to become a Christian that immediately thereafter he was baptized by Ambrose B. of Milan, with his compenion Alipius, and his son Adeodatus. After this he returned to Afric, and was coadiutor to Valerius B of Hippe, as Chrys •… stome was to Flauianus in Antiochia: and •… fter them also with extraordinary gifts of knowledge: but the writers of this time, especially Evagrius who concludeth his history with the death of Maurice, bringeth in many famous men in this Century, gifted with power to work miraculous works, But when I consider the ende of these miraculous works, they are brought in, either to confirm the sanctimony of the monasticke life, the adoration of the Grosse, or some other gross superstition. Zosymas a Monk is commended by him for his prophetical foreknowledge of the ruin of Antiochia, and for the miracle of the Lion, who slew the Ass that carried his victualing to Cesarea, and likewise the Lion by his mandate was compelled to bear that same burden which the Ass had borne to the ports of Cesarea. No man is so senseless, or ignorant, but may perceive that this lying miracle is brought in, to the confirmation of the excellency of the monastick life The miracle of Thomas B of Apamea, tendeth to the adoration of the tree of the Cross. The miracle of the fire that came out of Barsaunphius shop at Gaza, & consumed the most part of them who were in company with Eustochius B of Jerusalem, is a notable lie, and tendeth only to confirm superstitition. The miracle of the Image of the virgins MARIE, detesting Anatolius an hypocrite, an Idolater, and a sorcerer, and yet insinuating himself in familiar acquaintance with Gregorius B. of Antiochia in the days of the Emperor Tiberius, any man may perceive that this miracle is forged, not so much for detestation of hypocrisy, Idolatry, and sorcery, as for worshipping the Image of the Virgin with a devote mind. The miracle of Simeones who in his youth miraculously tamed a Pard, and fastened his girdle about the neck thereof, and brought it like a catte into the Monastery and afterward lived upon the tops of pillars, and mountains, sed with branches of trees 68. years: this fable whereunto it tendeth all men do see. And finally the golden Cross sent by Cosroes to Sergiopolis tendeth not only to the invocation of Saints, but also to put our trust and confidence in them, as the last words of the Epistle of Cosroes, and his wife Sira, clearly proporteth. No we let the judicious Reader pardon me in pre •… ermitting many things written by others, lest I should weary them by filling their ears with fables and lies
CHAP. III. Of Heresies.
IN this and the next Century, I find that the error of Eutyches is like unto a root of bitterness, which budding out with new branches, not seen before, but fostered with the venomous sap of the old root that seemed to be abolished, did mightily perturb the Church. The error of the Monothelites was but a branch of the error of Eutyches, but this belongeth to the seventh Century. In this Century a great number of people, especially of Monks, favoring the heresy of Eutyches spake against the Council of Chalcedone, these were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , because they had no principal head upon whom they depended and they were ante •… iour to Anthimus, or Anthimius B. of Constantinople, and to Theodosius B. of Alexandria, and Severus B. of Antiochia: therefore they were not called Anthimians, Theodosians, or Severues, but indeed they might have been called Eutychians: always the vulgare name given unto them was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .
Another branch, which sprang up from the root of Eutyches heresy was the error of those who supponed that the flesh of CHRIST was void of all kind of human infirmity, expressly contradicting holy Scriptures, which attributeth to the body of CHRIST hunger and weariness, and other infirmities, which he voluntarily accepted for our sakes. And where it is said, that the LORD JESUS did eat and drink. To this they answered, that he seemed to eat and drink as he did after his •… esurrection, but he had no necessity of eating and drinking, but the verity of his death stoppeth the mouths of these heretics: for CHRIST was content to taste of all our infirmities, death it self not except, that we might know he will be a merciful high Priest, because he hath tasted of our infirmities, and can have compassion of those who are in trouble. In this opinion was the Emperor Justinian in his old days, whose vices did almost equal his virtues, especially in comporting so much with Theodora the Empresse, to the great advancement of the error of Eutyches, and hindrance of the Gospel.
In this Century the defenders of the books of Origenc, such as Theodorus Ascidas B. of Cesarea Cappadocia, and the Monks of Nova Laura, whom Eustochius B. of Jerusalem ejected out of their monasteries were counted heretics, as will be declared hereafter (Godwilling in the head of Councils.
Finally, there were some heretics, who durst derogate perfection of knowledge to the Son of GOD in his divine Nature: these were called Agnoitae, whom I leave as buried in the dust, and according to their name, never worthy to have been known in the world.
CHAP. IIII. Of Councils.
THE schism that fell out in the election of Symmachus was the cause of the gathering of the Council of Rauenna. Laurentius was his competitour. In this Council it was found that Symmachus was first ordained, and that the most part both of Clergy and people adher •… d to him: therefore he was declared to be bishop of Rome and Lanrentius was ordained bishop of Nuceria.
The multiplied number of Councils in Symmachus time, all convened by the authority of Theodoricus King of Goths, who reigned in Italy. All this number of Councils (I say) was assembled for matters of little importance, except the fourth and fifth Council, whereinto a lible of accusations was given in against Symmachus, but he compeared not before the Council to answer, yet was he absolved by the most part of the Council (being his own favorers) chiefly for this reason, because they thought that the high Pricst should be judged by no man, but his doings should be examined only before the Trihunall of GOD. Mark how this matter goeth: the bishops of Rome are lying under the feet of the Goths, neither have they liberty to assemble themselves together, except that license be sought, and obtained from Theodori •… us King of Goths. Not withstanding supremacy that great Idole, whereat they aimed continually, runneth so high in their heads, that the flatterers of the bishop of Rome would absolve him, as a man whose actions came not under the iudicature of mortal men. His accusers protested in write, that if the successors of PETER should b •… e judged by no man, then with the •… est of the priui'edges of their chair, they had also a p •… iuiledge to sin, and to do what they pleased.
The Councils of Spain called Ilerdensc, and Val •… ntinum, assembled in Valentia are very obscure Councils. In the one •… ight bishops were present: in the other six bishops. Many new and superstitious Canons were made in these assemblies, and farther I see nothing. In the first called Ilerdense a prohibition of marriage in time of Lent, and three weeks before the sestiuitie of John the Bap •… st, and betwixt the days of the Advent of our LORD, and the days called Epiphania. In the other Councillit was appointed, that in the ordinary service the Gospel should be read after the Epistle. partly in respect that all the people of GOD have entresse to hear the wholesome precepts of their Savior, and partly, in respect that by such hearing, some were found to be converted to the faith, where of it may be perceived, that the Gospel was read unto the people into a know •… e and intelligible language, else it could not work faith in the hearts of the hearers.
In the twentieth year of the reign of the Emperor Anaslatius a national Council was assembled at Sidon of eighty bishops, by the procurement of Xen •… as B. of Hierapolis, for undoing the Council of Chalcedone. The Emperor had all eadie banished Euphemius, and Macedonius bishops of Constantinople, Yet he found that Flavianus B. of Antiochia, and Helias bishop of Jerusalem altogether disliked and reproved his proceedings, neither could they admit the law of oblinion, called in the Greek language 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which the Emperor would have brought in, to pacify controversies in the Church, as civil controversies, at sometimes have been pacifi •… d: for this cause the Emperor Aanastatius set himself directly against the truth of GOD, and gathered this Council, to undo the authority of the Council of Chalcedone. Flavianus, & Helias would not be present at this ungodly Council, whereinto they damned the Council of Chalcedone, yet they abstained from damning Flavianus, and Helias, for a time. Nevertheless by continual accusations of these two bishops, as if they had been mockers of all the Emperors doings, they procured their banishment, as hath been declared in the preceeding history.
In the 22. year of the reign of Anasta •… us, and under the reign of Clodoueus King of France, convened 32. bishops in the town of Aur •… lia, of purpose to settle some order in Ecclesiastical discipline, which through injury of time, and irruption of barbarous people into the country of France, had been brought to great dissolution and misorder. The Canons of this Council are coincident for the most part, with the Canons of all other Councils.
The two former Councils assembled in Spain, namely Ilerdense, and Valentinum, were under the reign of Theodoricus. Now these two Gerundense and Casaraugustanum are ce •… ebrated under the same King, to wit, Theodo •… us of the nation of the Goths reigning in Spain. In Gerunda seven bishops convened, made Ecclesiastical constitutrons, chiefly anent Baptism, that Catechumen should be baptized on Pas •… he day, and at Pentecoste, when most s •… lemne conuentions of people were gathered. They who were under inf •… mitie and sickness, might be baptized at any time, and the infant, which was likely to die, mightlee baptized that same day where into it was borne. In Caesaraugusta elenen bishops seem to have been convened. They forbid fasting upon the LORD'S day, for supersution, or for respect of times, or for persuasion. It would appear that this Council had a desire to abolish the rites and customs of the Matichean heretics, who were accust •… med to fast upon the Lord's day.
In the days of Hormisda by the mandate of Theodoricus King of Goths reigning in Italy, a Council was assembled at Rome upon this occasion. It was thought meet by the Emperor Anastatius, Theodoricus King of Italy and many others, that a Council should be convened at Heraclea for deciding controversies in religion. Many bishops resorted to Heraclea above the number of 200, but Anastatius suffered no Council to be holden, thereby incurring the great blame of inconstancy, and carelessness in seeking out the truth: for this cause Theodoricus willed Hormisda bishop of Rome to gather a Council at Rome, whereinto the error of Eutyches is damned of new again, and ambassad ours are ordained to be sent to Anastatius the Emperor, and to the bishop of Constantinople, to divert them, if possible were from the error of Eutyches, but howe in humanely the ambassadors were entreated, it hath been declared in the description of the life of Hormisda.
Under the reign of the Emperor Justinus a Synod was gathered in Constantinople by Johannes Cappadox. Many grievous accusations were given in against Severus B. of Antiochia, such as sacrilegious spoiling of Temples, under pretence of eschewing causes of Idolatry, he took away the golden doves that hung above the fontes, and the altars, and h •… e uttered many blasphemous speeches against the Council of Chalcedone. Johannes Cappadox, albeit he was of a bad religion himself, yet the authority of the Emperor, and consent of the Council procured that Severus should be damned of heresy, whom the Emperor also banished, and (as some affirm) punished him also by commanding that his blasphemous tongue should be cut out. In like manner the Monks of Apamea in a Council convened in Syriasecunda accused Severus of bloody cruelty, & oppression, in besieging of Monastries slaying the Monks, & spoiling their goods. The like accusation was given in against Peter B. of Apamea, which accusations being sufficiently proved by vnsuspect witnesses this Council damned Severus, & Petrus B. of Apamea.
In the fifth year of King Abnaricus was the second Council of Toledo convened, partly for renewing the ancient constitutions of the Church, and partly for making new constitutions belonging to Ecclesiastical discipline. It was ordained that children whom their parents had dedicated to the Church, they should not be admitted to the office of a Subdeacon, until they were 18. years of age, neither to the office of Deacon, before they were 25. years old, and at the beginning of their admission to the office of a Subdeacon, namely when t •… ey •… re full 18. years old (and not before that time) they should be presented before the Clergy, and people to make an open declaration, whether they were of purpose to lead a continent life, or to marie, and these who protested they had not the gift of continency, are tolerated by the first Canon of the second Council of Toledo to marry.
In the year of our LORD 551, and in the 24. year of the reign of the Emperor Justinian, was a general Council assembled at Constantinople. The principal causes of this meeting are expressly set down by Evagrius lib. 4. cap. 38. First in re •… pect of the controversy betwixt Eustochius B. of Jerusalem, and Theodorus Ascidas B. of Cesarea Cappadocia. Eustochius cast out the Monks of Nova Laura, who obstinately defended the errors of Origen. Theodorus Ascidas assisted them, and said, that Eustochius B. of Jerusalem had dealt cruelly, and inhumanely with his brethren, to pacify this controversy was this Council convened: Also great disputation was in the Church anent the books of Origen, of Theodorus B. of Mopsuesta, and some writings of Theodoritus B. of Cyrus, and Ibas B. of Edessa: this was the second cause of this great conuention to put an ende unto these contentious disputations. At this time MENAS was bishop of Constantinople, but he ended his life in the very time of the general Council. The first question moved in the Council was this: Whether or no men who were dead, and had ended their course, might lawfully be cursed and excommunicated. To this EVTYCHIVS (a man before this time of no great account) answered: That 〈◊〉 as IOSIAS not only punished Idolatrous Priests who were alive, but also opened the graves of them who were dead, to dishonor them after their death, who had dishonored GOD in their lifetime: even so the memorials of men might be accursed after their death, who had harmed Christ's Church in their lifetime. This was thought by the Fathers of the Council to be pertinently spoken, & when his answer came to the ears of the Emperor Justinian, he appointed that he should be or deined bishop of Constantinople, for Menas died suddenly in time of the Council. Vigilius B. of Rome was in Constantinople in time of this Council, but would not be present at the Council, lest the dignity of the Roman chair should be impaired, if the Patriarch of Constantinople had been equalled with him in honor, for Eutychius after Menas, was moderator of the Council. The general conuention took thi •… effect, That the writings of Theodorus B. of Mopsuesta were utterly condemned, and the replies of Theodoretus to the 12. heads of Cyrilus, together with the letter of Ibas written to Maris a Persian were damned. Finally the errors of Origen were damned, and Theodorus Ascidas, together with the Monks of Nova Laura, who defended the errors of Origen, all were excommunicated, and the 4. preceeding general Councils were confirmed with full allowance. The Council of Mopsuesta immediately following, tended only to this, to know when the name of Theodorus sometime B. of Mopsuesta a town of Silicia, was razed out of the rolle called sacra dipiycha. And the ancients both of Clergy & people, assured the Emperor Justinian that the name of Theodorus was razed out of the rolle of holy bishops before their time.
Under the reign of Childebertus King of France, were frequent meetings of Bishops in Aurelia a town of France commonly called Orleans. Many superstitious constitutions were hatched amongst them, especially anent prohibition of marriage, for this doctrine of Devils had now gotten great upper hand in the West. The verse of Homer may be written in the frontispice of these Councils 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : that is, It is a shame to tarie long, and to return empty. If they met so oft, some fruits worthy of their meeting should have been brought out to the world, but it is a wearisome thing to travel a long time in the wilderness of Arabia, albeit in it there be large fields, yet it is a barren ground, and the pain of wearisome traveling is not recompensed with the delight of any refreshment that can be had there. This I write, not to hinder any man from the reading of these Councils also: for some good things are to be found in them, but to wish that the short time we have to live in this world should not be unfruitfully spent.
In the second Council simony is damned, & the receiving of money for admitting a man to a spiritual office is utterly detested.
In the third Council perjury is abhorred in a man having a spiritual calling, but softly punished by 2. years excluding of him from the communion.
In the fourth Council, it is ordained that in the offering of the holy Calais, nothing shall be presented, except wine only, unmixed with water, because it is a sacrilegious thing to transgress the holy mandate and institution of our Savior CHRIST.
In the fifth Council it is condescended, that no man shall be ordained bishop, without consent of King, Clergy and people, according to the ancient constitutions of the Church, and that no spiritual office shall be bought by money.
The heap of constitutions anent the keeping of Pasche day and Lent, anent the prohibition of marriage betwixt Christians and unconverted Jews, anent servants not to be admitted to Ecclesiastical orders, anent assemblies to be at the least yearly conuocated by bishops, anent Ecclesiastical rents not to be dilapidated. The nature of a short Compend cannot permit me to insist in such things.
Under the reign of Theodobertus King of France, the Fathers who were present at the Council, of Aurelia, convened also in the Council of 〈◊〉 & ordained that no man should presume to the office of a bishop by the favor of m •… n 〈◊〉 , but by the merits of an honest and 〈◊〉 .
That the dead body of a bishop in time of 〈◊◊〉 not be covered with the pall, otherwise called Opertor •… 〈◊〉 corporis which covered the Altar, lest the honor done to the body, should be a polluting of the Altar with many other constitutions, which of purpose I overpass with silence
Under the reign of Aribertus King of France, a Council was assembled at Tours. In this Council it was ordained, that the Clergy & people in every Congregatiō should provide support for their own poor, & not permit them to wander to uncouth places: for indeed this custom of wandering hath brought in Atheism amongst the poor, when they leave their own Congregation, they leauealso their own Pastor, who attended upon their conversation, and they fall into the snare of the devil.
It was also statute and ordained, that a bishop should count his wife as his sister, and that he should no manner of way company with her, and for this cause he should have Presbyters, & Deacons so familiarly conversant with him, that they might bear testimony of his honest behavior, to wit, that he never companied with his wife. The Romanists who count the prohibition of marriage to be the soul of their religion, could not overpass this Canon without a censure Now let us hear what Censura saith. Intellige hunc Canonem uixta usum Orientalis ecclesia, in qua co •… iugatus promovebatur adsacerdotium: that is, Understand this Canon according to the custom of the Oriental Church, wherein a married man was promoted to the Priesthood: well excused. The bishops of Rowen, Burgess, Tours, &c. are convened in the town of Tours, to prescribe rules to the Oriental Church, or at least rules unto their own bishops to live after the form of the Oriental Church, which never came in their mind to do, as may evidently be known by the sixth general Council,
Moreover, it was statute, and ordained, that no Priest, or Monk should receive in bed with him another Priest or Monk, to the ende they might be so vnreproouable, that they would abstain from all appearance of evil.
In this Council was set down very strict prohibitions, that no man should oppress the Church, and convert unto his own use anything duly belonging to them, lest he incurrethemalediction of Judas who was a thief, and kept the bag and converted to his own use a part of that money which belonged to the poor.
In the Council holden at Paris, order was taken concerning admitting of bishops to their offices that no man should be admitted bishop, without the full consent of Clergy and people, and that no man should presume by favor of Princes only, without the consents foresaid, to become bishop in any place.
Recaredus King of Spain, and of the descent of the Goths, who were miserably insected with the Arian heresy, assen bled 2 Council of 62. bishops at Toledo, where he renounced the Ar •… heresy, and embraced the true faith, and the whole nation of the West Goths in Spain did the like, about the yeeee of our LORD 585.
Under the reign of Maurice a Council was assembled at Constantinople, for trying of the cause of Gregorius B of Antiochia, whom Asterius Deputy in the East had accused of incest: but Gregorius was declared to be innocent, & his accuser was scourged with rods, and was banished. In this Council the name of Ecumenic bishop was attributed to John Patriarch of Constantinople.
The first Council of Matiscon was assembled about the time of Pelagius 2, as the second Tome of Councils recordeth. In it commandment was given, that no man of the Clergy should cite another man having a spiritual office before a seculare judge.
And that a bishop or Presbyter should not entangle himself with carnal lust, after he is promoted to so high dignity, but the woman who before was his wife, now let her be his sister, and let the husband be changed into a brother. Mark how subtly Satan under pretence of loathing matrimonial chastity, is bringing in, all kind of uncleanness into the Church.