History of the First Ten Persecutions
Such is the corruption of man's nature, that in nothing can we keep the golden mediocrity commanded by God. Sometimes we hate and persecute God's servants, at other times we give unto them the honor that is due to God alone. And in this great confusion and disorder howe can order be kept? yea these idolaters themselves, who at sometimes honor the saints with excessive and vncompetent honor, they keep not one and the self-same order. Sometime they begin at excessive honor, and they end at excessive contempt, as the men of Listra, first, they called PAUL & BARNABAS gods, and afterward they stoned PAUL as an evil doer, Act. 14. At other times they begin at excessive contempt, and they mount up to excessive honor as the people of the Isle of Malta first counted PAUL to be a murderer, after to be a god, Act. 28. Many other examples may be given, specially in the person of MOSES under the Law, and of the Apostles under the Gospel. The carnal Jews that came out of Egypt murmured many times against MOSES, but their more carnal and unhappy posterity preferred MOSES to Christ, John, 9. ver. 29. saying, We know that God spake to Moses, but this man know we not from whence he is. This is the malice of Satan changing our prison, but not suffering us to be set at liberty. For when a man is incarcerate in any upper house, and then his prison is changed, and he is prisoned in the lower prison, where there is less liberty of air, and great stink & filth, the estate of this man is not better but worse by his change: even so when men have misregarded in most contemptible manner the servants of God, this is a snare of the devil, but when they give unto them the honor that is due to God, this is a greater snare, for they who called PAUL a mutherer (who was indeed the prisoner of Christ) at that time they lied, yet they attributed nothing to PAUL but that sin whereunto by nature he was inclined, and also practiced before his conversion, Act. 9. but when they called him a god, they attributed unto him that honor that was not competent to a mortal man, Act. 28.
Albeit we be not able to comprehend the deep and subtle slights of Satan yet in the first entry we may grope some deceitfulness in Satan's dealing, because he dealeth one way with Gentiles and Pagans who knew not God, and another way with Jews and Christians who had some knowledge of the true God. He stirreth up the Gentiles forthwith to call men God's, by whose hands the Lord wrought a miraculous work, Act. 14. and Act. 28. but he dealeth otherwise with the Jews who had some knowledge of God, not incontinent to equal MOSES to God, but to prefer him unto other teachers, and to Jesus whom they denied to be God. In like manner he moved the Jews to deck and beautify the sepulchers of the Prophets, Mat. 23, which seemed to be no fault, but Satan was craftily under color of honoring the servants of God, leading them to persecute the master himself, even Christ Jesus the great prince of all Pastors. And therefore Christians should beware of the slights of the devil, because upon very small and not disalowable beginnings (as would appear he laboreth to lead them in end to horrible idolatry.
Again Satan is so crafty and deceitful that he will build upon another man's foundation. It was not Satan but the Lord himself that would have the funerals of his Saints reverently handled. God said unto JACOB that JOSEPH should close his eyes, and that the Lord himself would reduce him back again to Canaan, that is. the Lord would attend upon his funeral in his back coming again, Gen. 46. ver. 4. yet that crafty adversary Satan building as it were upon the Lord's own ground under pretence of honor to be done to the bodies of the Saints, as the temples whereinto the holy Ghost dwelt, he hath brought men so far forward, that they have opened the graves of the Saints, raised their bones, carried them in procession, and made their prayers before them with hope to be the better heard of God, because they bow themselves before the relics of Saints,
Also Satan's craft appeareth in this, that as the Philistines did not send SAMPSON immediately to grind in their mill until they had first pulled out his eyes, Judge. 16 21. even so Satan moved not men to bow their knees and to say their prayers before dead men's bones at the first instance, until he had of along time blind-folded their eyes with a misty cloud of ignorance, so that all things were welcome that pleased their blind guides to thrust into their hands. And so we shall see (Godwilling) that in the first 300. years after the ascension of our Lord there was no adoratiō of relics. Now let the history speak for itself. In the old Testament we read that some men's bones were raised out of their graves to dishonor thē, as the bones of the priests of Bethel, which were burned upon the altar of Bethel by IOSIAH, 2. Reg. cap. 23. 16. but in that same chapter it is expressly noted, that the bones of the true Prophet who came from Judah and foretold all these things, ibid. ver. 17. these bones, I say, were not raised to honor them as the bones of the idolatrous priests were raised out of their graves to dishonor them. The body of MOSES buried in the plain of Moab, Deut 34. ver. 6. whose sepulcher was unknown to man, but known to Satan, yet he who knew it had not liberty to open it, & to discover the relics of his body, left it should have been an occasion of idolatry, because MICHAEL the Archangel of God strove against him in this point, epist. •… ud. ver. 9. The grave of the Prophet ELIZEVS was opened not of purpose to raise his bones, and to honor them, but upon a great suddentie to cast in another dead man: and albeit the Lord wrought a great miracle by touching of ELIZEVS bones, 2. Reg. 13. ver. 21. yet no man was so foolish as to raise them out of the grave, or to carry them into the Temple to be adored and worshipped. The bones of JOSEPH that were in a chest, and transported out of Egypt by MOSES, Exod. 13 ver 19. yet in the wilderness were not worshipped, no not by these carnal Jews, who worshipped the golden calf. And so the history of the Old Testament may be laid aside as an holy history furnishing no fuel to hold in this fire of Popish superstition anent adorations of dead men's bones.
In the New Testament like as the doctrine of resurrection was clearly preached and believed amongst all Christian people: so likewise a great care was had that the bodies of the Saints should be honourably buried as bodies appointed to an happy resurrection. This persuasion grounded in the hearts of Christians made them to count death a sleep, the grave a bed, & resurrection a wakening of men out of their sleep, John. 11. Act. 7. Now this sleep differeth from other sleeps in this, that when a servant conveyeth his masters son to bed to sleep and rest, pos •… bly this same servant will waken him again in the morning that he may rise and walk: but when we are conveyed to the grave by the Lord's servants, these servants will not get that honor to raise us up again out of our bed, but let us sleep on still until it shall please our Lord and master Christ Jesus to come again, and raise us up out of our bed and sleep. But foolish servants to be troubling the graves of the Saints and digging out their bones which they cannot cloth with flesh, sinews and skin, neither can they breath a spirit in them, it is both foolish, superfluous, and vntimous diligence, whereof no example is to be found in the New Testament.
In the ecclesiastical history it is to be noted that the fathers who lived nearest unto the days of the Apostles were also freest of this superstition of worshipping of bones and other relics. In the fourth persecution POLYCARPVS Bishop of Smyrna was martyred (as hath been declared) at what time great care was taken both by Jews and Pagans that the dead body of POLYCARPVS should not come into the hands of Christians: and to this purpose it was burned with fire. The Christians who waited on diligently to honor that blessed body, which had patiently suffered rebuke for the cause of Christ, in end they got his bones, which albeit they counted to be more precious then gold and silver, yet they worshipped them not, as EVSEBIVS clearly declareth, lib. 4. eccles. hist. cap. 16. but they buried them honourablie into a convenient place. Moreover that day whereinto he was burnt for the Name of Christ, was called by the fathers natalis, or natalitium POLYCARPI, that is, the birth-day of POLYCARPVS, because by his death he made it manifest that he was the true child of GOD, begotten and borne of the incorruptible seed of the Word. And in that place where his bones were buried, and upon the very day of his martyrdom, Christians convened to glorify God for the constant suffering of the Martyr & to exhort others with constant perseverance to be ready to do the like, Euseb. ibid.
These things no man can justly vituperat in the ancient Church, because their purpose was to glorify GOD by means not unlawful, and to f •… ster in the hearts of the people, the assurance of the resurrection of the dead, by honorable burial of such as died for Christ, And so much the more they were moved so to do, because the persecuting Pagans hindered the Christians from burying their dead, to the end they might quench the hope of the resurrection in their hearts, as Euseb. lib. 5. cap. 1. clearly declareth speaking of the Martyrs in France, who suffered death in the fourth persecution under ANTONINVS VERVS, whose bodies were left unburied for a ti •… e, and afterward were burnt with fire, and resolved into ashes, and the ashes were cast into the river of Rhodanus, ne ullam amplius resurrectionis spem habeant, that is, to the end they should have no more hope of the resurrection. And doubtless there is no Christian heart that lived in these days, but behooved to increase their cair in burying the bodies of the Saints, because in want of burial the Pagans would have quenched the hope of refurrectiō.
The custom of transporting the bones of the holy men of God from one place to another more honorable place (as seemed to the transporters) it was not so ancient as it can be proved by examples for the space of three hundredth years after the ascension of our Lord, yet these bones were transported after a manner, as the bones of JOSEPH from Egypt to Canaan, to be buried in a more honorable place. Joshua. 24. verse. 22. without any kind of adoration, as the bones of BABYLAS B. of Antiochia, in the days of IVLIAN the apostat. Theodoret. lib. 3. cap 3. 10. The bones of PAUL B. of Constantinople, were transported and buried in the Church of Constantinople, that was built by his persecutor MACEDONIVS. Sozom. lib. 7. cap. 10. This was done in the days of THEODOSIVS the Emperor, and the words are to be marked. transtulis corpus ejus & in Ecclesia condidit quam MACEDONIVS persecutor ejus adificaverat, that is to say, he transferred his body, and buried it into the Church which his persecutor MACEDONIVS had built. In the days of the Emperor ARCADIVS the relics of SAMUEL were brought to Constantinople. Theodor. lector collect. lib. 2. & in the days of THEODOSIVS 2. his son, the bones of CHRYSOSTOM were transported to Constantinople. Al this time, bones & other relics were trāsported & buried, but not set up upon altars nor worshipped.
If it be objected that IEROME disputing against VIGILANTIVS defendeth the custom of women, who in the very day time went to the graves of the martyrs with lighted torches of wax to honor them by so doing. To this I answer that the words of IEROME make little against our opinion. First, because his words import that the bones of the saints were lying in their graves Secondly, the women who lighted these wax torches IEROM granteth that they had a zeal to God, but not according to knowledge. Thirdly IEROM in cōpating these lighted torches to the precious ointment poured out by MARIE upon Christ's head, John. 12. whereof Christ had no need, and no more have the martyrs need of wax torches to be lighted at the places of their sepulchers, with IEROMS favor (for honor of his learning) his comparisons are not good: for MARIES fact was done in zeal mixed with knowledge, & hath an approbation in Christ's own mouth: but the sact of those women was done in zeal without knowledge, and hath but a slender approbation in IEROMS own mouth Hieron contra Vigilant..
Again if it be objected that miracles were wrought at the graves of the Martyrs, as namely in Milan, where AUGUSTINE was present, at the sepulchers of PROTASIVS and GERVASIVS a blind man was restored to his sight, and AUGUSTINE himself beareth witness of this miracle, because he saw it done with his own eyes. August lib. confess. 9. cap. 7 To this I answer that God wrought a miracle at the sepulcher of this holy Martyr PROTASIVS to confirm that true faith for which he suffered martyrdom. Like as God wrought a greater miracle at the sepulcher of ELISEVS in restoring a dead man to life again. 2. Reg 13. to confirm the doctrine of ELISEVS that it was of God. But the end of these miracles was not to raise up their bones out of the grave & to worship them, in regard that such superstitious facts plainly repugned to the sum of their faith and doctrine. Now by good reason the Papists are reduced to this strait, that either they must prove that the adoration of dead men's bones was a point of ELISEVS doctrine, and PROTASIVS faith, or else these miracles were wrought to teach men to raise out of the grave, and to worship the dead bones of the Prophets & martyrs of God. And AUGUSTINE himself clearly declareth what was the issue of this miracle. First, men took occasion by the sight of hat miracle to glorify God, but not to worship PROTASIVS & GERVASIVS bones. The other end of the working of that miracle was to stay the fury of IVSTINA the mother of VALENTINIAN the second in persecuting of AMBROSE B. of Milan, albeit the fame and notoriousnes of this miracle did not convert her to the true faith, yet it auailed to abate her fury and rage in persecuting the innocent feruant of Christ. August ibid. confess. lib. 9. cap. 7.
Again, if it be objected that the dead bones of BABYLAS stopped the mouth of APOLLO, so that he could not utter his oracle, until BABYLAS bones were raised, and transported into another place. Sozom. lib. 5. cap. 19. and therefore there is virtue in the bones of the Saints to help the godly, and to confound the power of the devil. For answer I say we should not hearken to the deceitful speeches of Satan, who seeing Christians already inclined to transport the dead bones of the Saints, for all his simular and feigned dumnesse, yet he could speak that whereby superstition afterward should be mightily increased and augmented. Hist. Magdeb. Cent. 4. cap. de miraculis. But arguments drawn out of the fountains of Scripture, if they were rightly inferred, should have greater countenance, credit and regard, then the testimonies of all the fathers joined together. Therefore they will not seem to be destitute of this armor also. The shadow of PETER Acts. 5. 15. was helpful to diseased persons, and the napkins, and hand-kercheefes taken from the body of PAUL, helped diseases, and made unclean spirits to depart from men. And therefore (say they) to attribute virtue to relics of Saints, is no derogation to the glory of God, but rather a great confirmation of God's truth. To this I answer, that scripture having intention to glorify God indeed doth in these miracles neither magnify PETER nor PAUL, nor PETERS shadow, nor PAUL'S napkins, wherein there was no saving virtue, but the text clearly saith that Godw ought miracles by the hands of PAUL Acts 19. ver. 11. Which verse is cast in of purpose to turn our hearts from PAUL the instrument, alanerly to God the author of these miracles. And if the holy Scripture will not suffer us to repose upon PETER and PAUL, and other Apostles, as if by their own power and virtue they had made any man whole, Acts 3. ver. 12. how much less can God be pleased with this, that power and virtue be attributed to PETERS shadow, and PAUL'S napkins? And albeit virtue had been in these things, yet PETERS shadow could not have been kept as a permanent relique to the posterity, nor yet PAUL'S napkin, except miraculouslie, could have continued so long. But this sufficeth our purpose, that in all the scripture there is not a word of the worshipping of PETERS shadow, nor PAUL'S napkin. If I were disputing upon words, I would demand of those that reckon PETERS shadow among relics, by what reason they do it, seeing that it hath no remaining amongst us, after that his body is taken from us, and therefore, cannot be called a relique? But I leave off to speak of the shadow of words as well, as of the shadow of bodies.
Let us remember this well, that GOD worketh great works by very contemptible means, to the end the glory may be attributed to GOD alone. Now seeing that GOD wrought great works by the sheep-herds staff that was in the hand of MOSES, he dantoned the land of Egypt, divided the red sea, and by the stroke of the staff brought forth waters out of the hard rock: Seeing (I say) that God wrought so great works by so contemptible a mean, what became of this shepherds staff after the death of MOSES? Some of the learned say that God buried it with MOSES in the plain of Moab, lest it should have been an occasion of idolatry: How ever it be, the remembrance of it is buried in scriptures, and we cannot tell what became of it. But if it had been in time of Popery, it had been laid up and worshipped among their principal relics.
The c •… oak of ELIAS where-with ELIZEVS divided the waters of Jordan seemeth to be a relique of ELIAS, having virtue to work miraculous works, but the text it self declareth the contrary, that there was no power in the cloak, but in the GOD of ELIAS for when ELIZEVS came to the river side, he lifted up his heart to GOD, saying, where is now the GOD of ELIAS? 2 Reg. 2. ver. 15. So that all scripture both in old and New Testament with one consent sendeth us from cloaks, staves, shadows, hand-kerchiefes, and such like means, to the power of almighty GOD, working where, when, and by what means he pleaseth.
Now if all things whereby or wherein God wrought miracles, should be kept as holy relics, then the church of the Jews might have surpassed the Roman church infinite degrees. For who can deny but God wrought miraculous works in and by ail the coats, hose▪ shoes shirts, headcouerings, napkins, and such other garments that were among the people of the Jews? Their garments waxed not old, and their feet swelled not all the space of forty years that they were in the wilderness. D •… ut. 8 ver. 4. If all these garments had been laid up in store after they entered into the land of Canaan, the Jews might say that their Church was holier then all the Churches in our days, if holiness be esteemed according to the multitude of relics. Let us now set forward and declare when this corruption of worshipping of relics crept in into the Church of God. In the Apostles days no such thing. In time of the ten persecutions was burying of Martyrs and celebration of Natalitia Martyrum, as hath been declared. From the three hundredth year of our Lord, till the four hundredth, & almost till the five hundredth yere there was some transporting of holy men's bones to be buried in a more honorable place (as said is) but not worshipping. There were torches and wax candles carried to the sepulchers of the martyrs, which custom was disallowed by some, and excused by others: there was also banqueting at the sepulchers of the Martyrs, which custom hath not great allowance of AUGUSTINE, de moribus ecclesiae catholicae, cap. 34. for he thought that some of them who banquetted in such places, buried themselves above buried men. Yet all this time no worshipping of relics,
But after the five hundredth year of our Lord, in the days of ANASTASIVS, IVSTINVS the elder, IVSTINIAN, IVSTINVS the younger, TIBERIVS, MAVRITIVS, PHOCAS &c. superstition began to abound and relics were worshipped, and the very pens of ecclesiastical writers, who wrote the history of that time such as EVAGRIVS, smell of superstition. We read that the cross of Christ was carried through Apamia, & worshipped Euag. lib 4. cap. 26. The relics of S. SEBASTIAN were carried out of Rome to Ticinum, & laid upon an altar for staying of the devouring plague. PAVLVS DIACONVS de gestis Longobard. lib. 6. cap, 2. SERGIOPOLIS is said to bce preserved from the fury of COSROES king of Persia by the virtue and holiness of the relics of the martyre SERGIVS. gEuagr. lib. 4 cap. 28. Yea, the blind guides of this time were not content to fill the world with the relics of the Saints, but also to ground this opinion in the people's hearts, that these relics ought to be worshipped, they found out a thousand lieing miracles, so that it was fulfilled that was spoken by the Apostle PAUL, that the coming of the Antichrist should be by the operation of Satan in all power, and sig •… es and Wonders of lying. 2 Thess. 2. ver. 9 Surely at this time the fore-runners of the Antichrist were ryding post, and busilie preparing the way to that man of sin, and child of perdition, and therefore lying miracles were never more frequent then at this time.
The miracle wrought at Apamia in the bearing about of the cross by THOMAS Bishop of Apamia, is more regarded then many other miracles, because EVAGRIVS witnesseth that he himself was present in the town, and that he saw the bearing about of the cross. Likewise, that he saw a fire compassing the cross, and the Bishop THOMAS whithersoever he went: and that this sight was more miraculous, that this fire had a shining virtue to increase light, but not a consuming power to offend the Bishop that bare the cross. And the sight of this miracle so moved the heart of EVACRIVS, that he himself fell down & worshipped the cross that was in the hands of THOMAS Bishop of Apamia.
To this I give these answers. First, that EVAGRIVS in describing the delivery of. Apamia from the expected siege of COSROES King of Persia, and the miraculous deliverance of SERGIOPOLIS and EDESSA two towns besieged, indeed is so fabulous, that he deserveth no more credit in this narration, then in the description of the life of BARS ANVPHIVS an Egyptian monk of whom EVAGRIVS writeth, that he enclosed himself within a shop beside Gaza fifty years, seen of no man, and using no kind of earthly thing, that is, neither meat, drink, raiment, nor any other refreshment of earthly things. Euagr. lib. 4. cap. 33. He who can excuse this oversight of EVAGRIVS, let him accuse me that I give not credit to all that EVAGRIVS writeth.
Secondly the authority of THOMAS Bishop of Apamia & EVAGRIVS an ecclesiastical writer, are both nothing in comparisō of the authority of AMBROSE, who was nearer unto the Apostles days, & took better attendance to the scriptures of God then EVAGRIVS did: he writeth of HELENA the mother of CONSTANTINE who is said to have found out the cross whereon Jesus suffered, yet he saith of her Regem adoravit non lignum, that is, sh •… worshipped the king & not the tree, for that had been (saith he) the error of Ethnics, & the vanity of ungodly people, Ambrose. de obitu Theodosu.
Thirdly I affirm that in scripture is set down two sortes of lying miracles, & both are to be misregarded alike. 1. false miracles wherein the senses of men only are deluded, but nothing wrought neither contrary to nature nor above nature, such as were the miracles wrought by the sorcerers of Egypt, Exod. 7. 8 9. Other miracles are called lying miracles, not because the senses of men are deluded, but because they are brought forth by the operatiō of Satan to cōfirm a lying doctrine, Deut. 13. 1. 23, And in 2. Thess. cap. 2. 9. they are called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , because they are both wrought and alleged to confirm a doctrine of lies. In this rank let us eount the miracle cited by EVAGRIVS.
Finally I say that if the confidence in the cross was so powerful as to stay COSROES king of Persia frō besieging Apamia, why was it not also as powerful (the people remaining no less superstitious thē they were afore) to save Apamia frō the siege of ADAARMANES the captain of the army of COSROES who afterward took the town of Apamia & set it on fire? Euagr. lib. 5. cap. 10. Notwithstanding of their confidence in the cross this superstitiō was no defense unto them, but rather fuel to augment the flame of the wrath and indignation of God against them. And thus I leave EVAGRIVS sporting himself with his own conceits, whereof what account I make, I have already declared.
In end, Satan counting the ignorance of mankind to be his gaining, brought in false relics into the world, which were worshipped with no less reverence and devotion then the true relics were. And Satan used the world as the Philistim •… used SAMSON, Judge. 16. First they bound him, secondly they pulled out his eyes, thirdly they compelled him to grind in their mil: and last of all they made a play-soole of him. But when they were at the hight of their contempt, then suddenly came their destruction. Even so after that Satan had bound the world with the bands of idolatry, and blindfolded them, and made them to serve in vile and filthy offices, in end with false and forged relics, he would mak a playfoole of the world: but then in the mercy of God the kingdom of the devil began to be shaken and overturned. The coat of Christ, his purple garment, his tears, the foreskin of his circumcision, the crown of thorns, the spear, that pierced his side, the lots that were cast for his garments, the linen clothes whereinto his blessed body was wrapped, all these relics the Romaine Church brag that they have them, together with the very house of Bethleam wherein the Lord was borne, miraculously transported from Judea to Italy: so impudent are they in forging lies. But if all these things had been left by Christ in testamental Legacy to the Church of Rome, they had not been so careful in keeping of thē, as the negligent keeping of the purity of the word & holy sacraments clearly declareth: for they have lost the key of knowledge. They have added many things to Baptism, and paired a substantial part from the Supper of the Lord. And no doubt if the forenamed relics had been left in Testament also to the church of Rome (like unto false executers) they had made havoc of these in like manner.
The false relics attributed to the blessed Virgin the mother of our Lord, to MICHAEL the Archangel, and to the martyrs & saints, some of them have such babish conceits in them, others such absurdity, as it were a shame to make rehearsal of them, if so be we had not to do with a shameless harlot, who hath dighted her mouth, & saith, I have committed none iniquity, Prov, 30. ver. 20. The virgins hair in quantity more then is beseeming to attribute to one person, her milk in quality better then is beseeming to attribute to any mortal creature: her comb wherewith she combed her hair, her girdle & many other relics unknown to antiquity. In the strife of MICHAEL the Archangel of God against the devil for the body of MOSES, epist. Iud. ver. 9. the dagger and shield wherewith he fought, are among the number of Popish relics: as if Satan could be overcome with the weapons of corporal warfarc, whē as men themselves are taught by the Apostle to fight against spiritual wickedness with spiritual armor. Ephes. 6.
The coals of S. LAVRENCE, the incorruptible finger of JOHN Baptist that pointed out Christ, the iron chain that bound PETER, the teeth of APOLLONIA, the body of S. DIONISE cōplet aleged to be both in France & Germany, the multiplied body of S. SEBASTIAN & innumerable other forged relics whereof they who have invented thē have cause to be ashamed. And what shall we say of the superlative degree of all absurdity in defending forged relics? The arrows that pierced S. SEBASTIAN, the stones that stoned S. STEPHAN, the 30. pieces of money which the traitor IVDAS received to betray his master, shall all these also be consecrated & worshipped? SIMON MAGVS money was cursed & execrable as well as himself, Act, 8. 20. because he thoght that the gift of the holy spirit could be bought with money. Shall not the 30. pieces of money wherewith the blood of Christ was bought be also cursed & execrable? Now we see in our time a filthy stable full of forged reiiques & more filthy then ever the stable of AVGIAS king of Eli’s was, which couldby no other means be purged, but by the river of Alpheus, which being let in into the stable the great heap of 30 years dung was in few days washed away: Even so the great heap of forged relics, wherewith the world hath been bewitched these many hundredth years, can by no other means be abolished but by the spate of the authority of godly Princes, whose harts the Lord stir up to purge the world from the filth & stink of false relics by false teachers so obstinately defended.
The best remedy to correct all abuses in the Church was ever this, to reduce all things unto the first & original purity which was this, to do as the men of God in the Apostles days did. They followed the saints in so far as the saints followed Christ, 1. Cor. 11. If the saints departed this life, they buried them honestly, as devote men did bury STEPHAN, Act. 8 2. with some lamentation, but not excessive as they do who are without hope, 1. Thess. 4. 13 After their death if they remembered any good they had done in their lifetime, they commended it, that others might follow their example, because Christ saith that the fact of MARIE should be told for a memorial of her, & that in all places wheresoerver the Gospel should be taught, Mat. 26. ver. 13. If they had patiently suffered any evil for Christ's sake, they kept a memorial of that also, as the godly fathers of the primitive Church did in natalitus martyrum. Thus doing, we honor the saints and follow them as they followed Christ, but we cloth them not with the royal apparel which is only due to Christ, to whom be everlasting glory and honor.
CENT. 3. A Treatise of the supremacy of the B. of Rome.
ALbeit that the Bishop of Rome was not openly proclaimed to be the head of all Bishops, until the year of our Lord 607. by the Emperor PHOCAS, yet is this supremacy coloured with forged lies & appearance of greater antiquity, & for refutatiō of alleged antiquity I cast in this treatise in the third Century. And first of all let us consider the grounds of this alleged supremacy, next let us consider the steps of this ladder (not like to the ladder of JACOB leading up to heaven, but like to the manifestation of the man of sin) whereby the B. of Rome, by little & little climmed up unto this soueraignitie, that in end he sat as a lawgiver in the chair of Christ. And thirdly God-willing we shall declare the tragical event of this supremacy.
Now first the principal ground whereupon Papists do ground the supremacy of the Pope, is the supremacy of PETER above the rest of the Apostles, which if it were grantes they will infer the superiority of the Bishop of Rome, as his successor above all Bishops. In this argument I perceive great business to advance the Antichrist, and to set him up into an eminent chair, like as when Christ was borne there was great business to make him out of the way, Mat. 2. but all in vain, the cruelty and craft of HEROD, cannot vn do the counsel of God: so great business is to advance the Roman Antichrist, and to make us believe that Christ himself hath set him in his own chair, & givē unto him a sovereign government over all his sheep, but all this travel is also taken in vain: for the room of Christ must not be filled until it be vacant, & the breath of Christ's mouth destroying the man of sin, will one day declare that Christ is living, sitting in his own chair, and mighty in operation to make his enemies his footstool, Psal. 110,
Now to examine the parts of this argument, the first part is, PETER is the head of the Apostles, and this they prove by the words of Christ, I Will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven, &c. Mat. 16. In the contrary we affirm that if •… in these words Christ had given any supremacy to PETER above the rest, then afterward when they strove who should be greatest, Christ had not damned this fault in all his disciples, but he had only damned the eleven disciples, for that they were not voluntarly subject to PETER whom he had already made head of all the rest. But in so far as striving for superiority is damned in them all, Mat. 18. it is certain that Christ appointed none of the Apostles to be supreme head of all the rest. And CYPRI AN plainly affirmeth in his book de simplicitate Praelatorum. Hoc erant utique 〈◊〉 & cateri Apostoli quodfuit Petrus pari consortio praediti & honoris & potestatis. that is, Al the rest of the Apostles were that same thing that PETER was furnished with like fellowship and honor. The second part of the argument that the Bishop of Rome is the successor of PETER hath been already entreated in the head of succession.
Another argument proving the supremacy of the Romaine Bishops is taken out of the decretal epistles attributed to the Bishops of Rome who lived in the second Century making mention of the superiority of the Bishop of Rome above all other Bishops. To this I answer, that these epistles attributed unto them are supposititious and false, as hist. Magdeburg. clearly proveth by many reasons, whereof I shall rehearse a few. First, the style and ditement of all these epistles declareth that one and the selfsame man hath endited them all.
Secondly the ineptitude and barbaritie of language, no wise agreeing with the tightnesse of the Latin tongue used in this age.
Thirdly, these decretal epistles agree not with the estate of the Church at that time persecuted by Tyrants, troubled by Heretics, & slandered by the world. If these forenamed Bishops had writ̄ epistles indeed they had contained exhortations to patiēt suffering, apologies against slādrous mouths, refutatiō of Heretics: but seeing they sound for the most part to the establishing of their own supremacy the very circumstance of time declareth that they are supposititious & forged.
Fourthly the reasons whereby these epistles do prove the supremacy of the Romaine chair, are foolish, ridiculous & unworthy to be attributed to so worthy men. As namely, that PETER was called CEPHAS, that is an head, for his supremacy. Likewise PETER and PAUL died at Rome, therefore the Romaine B. is head of all other Bishops. Also PAUL said that he had continual remembrance of the Romans in his prayers. Rom. 1. therefore the Romaine Church must be head of all other Churches.
Fifthly, these decretal epistles were unknown to IVSTINVS martyr, IRENEVS, CLEMENS ALEXANDRINVS who lived about this time, as likewise to IEROME an accurat searcher of all an tiquities, for none of thē mak mentiō of these decretal epistles.
Sixthly, when the question of appellation to the Romaine Bishop, and the question of supremacy was reasoned in the sixth Council of Carthage, if such decretal epistles had been then exstant the ambassadors of the Bishop of Rome had alleged them for corroboration of their cause, but they were not as yet fashioned and shaped.
Finally in these decretal epistles CLEMENS B. of Rome is brought in writing to JAMES surnamed IVSTVS after the death of PETER: & it is known by the history that JAMES surnamed IVSTVS was slain at the least 8. years before the martyrdom of PETER. For James was slain before NERO intended his persecution, but PETER was martyred in the very furic of NEROES persecutiō, Joseph antiq. I. 20. c. 8 Euseb. I. 2. c 23 & 25.
The 3. principal argument they use is taken from the utility of the Church of God whereinto unity is very requisite, John. 17. & for keeping of unity one ministerial head under Christ is necessary, like as in the Church of the Jews one high Priest, to whom all the people were subject in matters of religion, was a band of unity amongst the Jews: even so say they, one ministerial head (viz. the B. of Rome) is necessary for keeping unity: peace & concord amongst Christians-To this I answer, that all things happened to them in figures, 1. Cor. 10. and like as the nation of the Jews had one high Priest as a band of unity, so likewise they had one altar, & one city of their conuentions, Isa. 33 & these also were bands of unity to keep the nation of the Jews into an holy fellowship: yet no man will say that it is necessary to us in our days to resort thrice in the yere to any one city for keeping the unity of Christ No more is it necessary in our days for keeping of unity to have one high Priest upon whom we shall all depend, but rather this being a figure (as said is) teacheth us to depend upon Jesus Christ the great b •… shop of our souls, because we are all members of his body, we are quickened with his spirit, we have one hope of calling, we have one faith & one Baptism, Eph. 4. These are the bands of our cōjunctiō both with Christ our head & with his menbers: but the Apostle PAUL in reckoning out the bands of our conjunction with Christ and amongst our selves speaketh nothing of one ministerial head vnderChrist: neither is it possible that there can be on •… ministerial head in all the world, as there was one high Priest in one nation of the Jews.
The second head of this treatise is to consider the steps & degrees whereby the B. of Rome was moūted up in the chair of Christ. 1. The honorable stiles attributed by other churches unto the chair of Rome began to puffed up some of them into great conceit of thenselves. The chair of Rome was called the Apostolic chair & the B. of Rome was called the universal Bishop: such honorable stiles by hyperbolical speeches given unto them should not have puffed them up in pride to conceit supremacy over all other Bishops, because the like stiles of dignity are attributed to other Bishops and other chairs who never usurped superio •… itie over all Churches, Nazianz. in laudem Cypriani saith that he was counted in his time not only a govern our of the Church of Carthage and of all Afric & of all the regions of the West, but also of all the East & South & North. The like is written of ATHANASIVS, Nazian in laudē Athanas •… . The like also the EmperorCONSTAN TINE spak of EVSEBIVS PAMPHILIB of Cesarea Palestinae whē he refused the bishopric of Antiochia. In this (saith CONSTAN TINE to EVSEBIVS) thou art blessed that by the testimony of y e world thou art thoght worthy to be B. of the whole church Euseb. invita Cōstantn. l. 3. c. 59 yet for all this neitherCYPRIAN nor ATHANASIVS nor EVSEBIVS were puffed up in pride to think more of themselves then became the humble dispensators of the mysteries of God. Here is to be noted that similitude of BASILIVS, that a good Christian should be like unto a straight line, that neither crooketh upward nor downward: evē so a goodChristian should neither be dashed with infamy & trouble, nor puffed up with honor & prosperity.
The second step of this unhappy supremacy was the appellations of Heretics, and men living inordinately from the discipline of their own Bishops unto the Bishops of Rome, whom they received under their shadow, not so much for favor to their dishonest causes, as for desire of supremacy above all other Churches. For APIARIVS appealed to the B. of Rome, & EVTYCHES Abbot in Constantinople appealed frō his B. FLAVIANVS to LEO B. of Rome, to whose excommunication albeit in end LEO agreed in the Council of Chalcedon, yet it is certain that the cause of the propagation of EVTYCHES error was the lingering of LEO B of Rome, who did not incontinent separate this pestilent Heretic frō his communion: albeit FLAVIANVS B. of Constantinople had most justly excōmmunicat him. Likewise BASILIDES and MARTIALIS Bishops of Asturica & Emerita in Spain who had sacrificed to idols, and defended their apostasy in writ̄ books, after they were both excommunicate & deposed by the Bishops of Spain, they had recourse to STEPHANVS B of Rome: whose false apologies were so much the more favorably heard, that they sought refuge under his wings. But CYPRIAN gathered a Council in Afric, & absolutely damned these Apostates, Hist Magd. cent. 3, Cypr. lib. 1. epist. 4. And albeit the African Councils labored to remead this insolency in time by ordaining these persons to be excommunicate who should appeal frō their own Bishops to any other beyond sea, yet it was hard to correct by reason or authority of Councils that error which the Romaine Bishop (being once admitted to be called primaesedis Episcopus) did receive and embrace. Yea the filthy dash the Romaine Bishops gote in the sixth Council of Carthage, wherein the act of the Council of Nice alleged by them to prove the B. of Rome to be supreme Judge of all appellations was found to be supposititious and false, this filthy dash (I say) did not correct their effrorr-Ited impudency. And with that learned Moderne I. CALVIN I wonder what malice or ignorance moved GRATIANVS 2. quaest. 4. c. placuit. when he had mentioned the fore-said decrcet of the 6. Council of Carthage, that these persons who should happen to appeal to bishops beyond sea should be excommunicate, he addeth this exception, unless they appeal to the chair of Rome. What shall be done (saith he) to those beasts who are so void of common sense, that they except from the Law, that thing alanerlie for whose cause the Law was made and constitute, for it is evident that the foresaid constitution in damning those that made appellations to Bishops beyond sea, was expressly made to inhibit men of Africa from appealing to the B. of Rome.
Also the defection and beastly cowardliness of some Bishops dwelling in places where the pride of the Roman Bishops had been chiefly abandoned, their defection (I say) from the footsteps and good decrees of their antecessours, gave encouragement to the Roman B. to set forward his usurped supremacy, as namely EVLALIVS B of Carthage, dam ned the decrees of the Councils of Carthage, and submitted himself to the chair of Rome in the days of BONIFACIVS 2. promising to do all things according to his advise and direction. Of the which victory BONIFACIVS 2. rejoiced, and gloried, and wrote to the Bishop of Alexandria, that this promise of subjection which EVLALIVS made to the chair of Rome, should be divulgat and notified unto other Churches. But the argument taken from the authority and example of EVLALIVS, is like unto himself. If he being weighed in a just balance, will be found foolish unconstant, timorous, rash & naughty, what can we say of the argument taken from his authority and example but the like? Beside this from the 6. Council of Carthage, until the days of BONIFACIVS, B. of Rome, and EVLALIVS B. of Carthage interveened 100 years All this time the godly and learned fathers that were in the sixth Council of Carthage (not AUGUSTINE himself except) were under the sentence of CELESTINVS cursing and yet we hope in the mercy of GOD, that AVRELIVS B. of Carthage, AUGUSTINE B. of Hippo, and the rest of the fathers whom he cursed, are reigning with Christ in heaven, notwithstanding of CELESTINVS foolish cursing & EVLALIVS more foolish repentance. This is well noted by PHILIP MORNEY that Phoe nix of France. Lib. myster. iniquitatis.
The Roman Bishops hunting foral occasions of preferment were like to a wild hawk in the morning, hungry, and swiftly soaring in the air, if he cannot catch a Partridge, he will make a Lauerock his prey: even so the Bishops of Rome, taking their vantage by every light occasion, labored to bring their brethren in subjection to their soueraignitie. In witness whereof ACACIVS B. of Constantinople, used the advise and counsel of FELIX 3. B. of Rome, in disauthorizing and excommunicating PETRVS MOGGVS a favorer of the Eutychian heresy. This thing ACACIVS did by no necessity, but of good will, and as a brother seeking the advise and support of another brother. After this PETRVS MOGGVS being both disauthorized & excommunicate, he repented, forsook his error, and offered his supplicant bill to ACACIVS craving relaxation from that fearful sentence of excommunication. FELIX 3. on the other side, because his advise was not craved in the relaxation as well as in the excommunication, he cursed ACACIVS B. of Constantinople, and GELASIVS 1. his successor did the like. What meeting ACACIVS gave to FELIX it is not needful to rehearse, it is sufficiently known he was not behind with him. Here every man may see that the Rom an bishops made vantage of these who sought their counsel, as if it were necessary that he who craveth our advise in one thing should be bound to do nothing without our advise in any time to come.
Moreover, the hearts of the Roman bishops being excessively bent to preferment, could not abstain from flattering of Emperors & Princes, thereby gaining vantage & prefer meant, but lossing the favor of God, and falling under that heavy sentence of the curse of God, spoken by ISAIAH the Prophet. Woe unto them which speak good of evil, and evil of good, which put darkness for light, and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for sour. Isa. 5. ver. 20. It is not known to the world that BONIFACIVS 3. flattered PHOCAS emperor, who by treason & unspeakable cruelty, put out of the way MAVRITIVS him master, his wife and children: And for this cause he was advanced to this honor to be called bishop of all bishops. But mark well by whom, by PHOCAS a tyrant, a traitor & a murderer of his master MAVRITIVS. Yet the chair of Rome should had less rebuke, if this flattery had begun at the person of BONIFACIVS 3. or yet ended in him, but before him GREGORIVS 1. of whom the Roman Church braggeth so much, he also in whose days that detestable fact was committed, flattered the tyrant PHOCAS, abusing the celestial song of the Angels of God in the time of Christ's nativity, Luc. 2. 13 14 This same holy song gloria in excelsis, GREGORIVS singeth rejoicing for the inauguratiō of this wicked emperor. Greg. lib. 2. epist. 36. And in epist, 48 anent the same purpose, Laetentur coeli, & exultet terra, & de vestris benignis actibus universae reipublicae populus htlarscat, that is to say, Let the heavens & earth rejoice, & let the whole multitude of the cōmonwelth rejoice for the bountifulness of your actions. O flattring GREGORIVS counted the worst among the best & the best among the worst, but a flatterer indeed from whom the tongue of DEMOSTHENES & CICERO both cannot rub away this foul spot of flattery SABINIANVS the successor of GREGORIVS 1. a Halke of the right nest continued but few months in his government, there fore I will not opē his grave, but I let himly still. BONIFACIVS 3. barked not without a bone. BALAAM loved the wages of iniquity, but got thē not BONIFACIVS loved thē & got them but not in mercy, but in the wrath of God. What ZACHARIAS B. of Rome did afterward more prosperously thē devoutly in favor of PIPINVS anno 750. he is very ignorant of history that misknoweth. CHILDERICVS the lawful heir of the kingdom at the commādemēt of ZACHARIAS was shavē, & thrust into a monastery, & PIPINVS son of CAROLVS MARTELLVS, was made king. STEPHANVS 2. after ZACHARIAS walking on still in the paths of flattery, obtained from PIPINVS king of France, not only aid against AISTVLPHVS king of Lombar •… 's but also the exarchat of Ravenna & Pentapolis. And to the end that this great territory pertaining justly to the emperor of Constantinople, should not return back againto the righteous owners of it, what order was takē by PAVLVS 1. STEPHANVS 3. & ADRIAN 1 the changing of the Empire from the East to the West, and setting up CAROLVS MAGNVS clearly declareth. So that the fifth step of the Roman eminency was falsehood and flattery as hath been declared.
Now if there be any interstice or interval between the fifth & sixth step, marueill not at it, because it is a great point, and he who was a let to the man of sin behooved to be made out of the way 2. Thess. 2. that is (as CHRYSOSTOME exponeth it) the Emperors power behooved to be utterly trode under foot before the man of sin could usurp absolute authority, & sit as God in the Lord's Temple, Chrysost. in 2. Thess. 2. homil. 4. Therefore the next attempt was the investiment of Bishops per baculum & annulū (as the custom then was) must be violently extorted & wrung out of Emperors hands. This was hard to bring to pass in respect the Emperors had been in so long possession of this right, but it was so necessary a point that the absolute soueraignitie whereat they aimed of a long time, could no otherwise be obtained. Therefore the Bishops of Rome put on their armor, & batter at the authority of the Emperors with all their might, specially with the thunderbolts of their cursings, to have the investiment of Bishops, per baculum & annulum given over into their hands. This bargain began in the days of GREGORY the 7. and inthe days of HENRY 4. and lasted almost 200. years, some call it bellum Pontificium. HENRY 4. was cursed by GREGORY 7. HENRY 5. by PASCHALIS. LOTHARIVS 2. was rather content to give over the investiment of Bishops, then to contend with INNOCENTIVS 2. and so escaped the sentence of cursing. CVNRADVS 3. was occupied in warfare against the Saracens and was traitorously deceived by EMANVEL Emperor of Constantinople: but if he had tarried long at home, there was great appearance of a bargain because he received not his coronation from the B. of Rome. FRIDERICVS the first called BARBAROSSA was cursed by ALEXANDER the third, who also in VENICE, and in the porch of the Church of S. MARKE trampled upon his neck. HENRY 6. was cursed by CELESTINVS, who also when he repented and was crowned Emperor by him, he put on the crown upon HENRYES head with his hand, and dang it off again with his foot. PHILIP brother to HENRY 6 was cursed by INNOCENTIVS, OTTO 4. was cursed by INNOCENTIVS 3. FRIDERICK 2, by HONORIVS 3 GREGORIVS 9. and INNOCENTIVS 4. CVNRADINVS the nephew of FREDERICKE 2. instead of cursing was beheaded by the special advise of CLEMENS 4. such elemencie was in our holy fathers. This large history I have only touched in few words to let you understand that the Bishops of Rome can be serious in main points, whereinto the standing or falling of their supremacy doth consist. If the investiment of bishops be thrown out of the hands of the emperors, then will all bishops follow the bishop of Rome, and not their own sovereign Lord's, and therefore moe curses then ever were pronounced out of mount Ebal. Deut. 27. were thundered out: but against whom I pray you? Against the anointed of the Lord, of whom it is said, Thou shalt not curse the Prince of thy people. Exod. 22. ver. 28. But wonder not good reader of the great difference between the curses pronounced out of mount Ebal, and the curses pronounced out of mount Tarpeius. The curses from mount Ebal were given out to bring the people under the obedience of God. but the curses pronounced out of mount Tarpeius, were set forth to bring Princes under the soueraignitie of the Roman bishop.
The seuinth step is nothing else but an appendicle of the sixth, to wit after that the Bishops of Rome had obtained the right of investmēt not by reason but by force & might, then the ancient order must be inverted. Of old no man could be made bishop of Rome without the advise of the Emperor. Now by the contrary, no man must be Emperor without the Popes coronation. What is this but like a nauigation to the East Ind •… ? We lose the sight of the North pole, and find the degrees of the elevation of the South pole. The authority of the Emperor is utterly trodden under foot, & what remaineth but to see that man of sin and child of perdition with absolute soueraignitie commanding all things at his pleasure?
One thing is yet inlacking to perfect this mystery of iniquity. The B. of Rome, must have power also to convocate general coūcils: thenselves or else their substituts must be moderators in these Councils, and their determinations must have equal authority with the written word of GOD. All these things were obtained, as it were, without stroke of sword, and without gainsaying & reluctance. For albeit Emperors were in continual custom of appointing general Councils, and the place of their meeting, and to point out the person, who should be moderator, yet after the investment of bishops was violently plucked out of the Emperors hands & the Emperors must receive their coronation from the B. of Rome, all the courage of Emperors utterly failed, and the B. of Rome, will needs convocat general Councils, & will guide all at his own appetite & pleasure. It is known that CONSTANTINE convocated the Council of Nice, THEODOSIVS the Council of Constantinople. THEODOSIVS 2. and VALENTINIAN the Council of Ephesus, MARTIANVS the Council of Chalcedon. IVSTINIAN the fifth general Council, CONSTANTINVS POGONATVS the sixth, CONSTANTINVS COPRONYMVS the seuinth BASILIVS emperor of Constantinople gathered the eight general Council. Hitherto the Emperors kept their right of convocating O Ecumenick Councils, neither was their right so much as once controlled. The main question between the Emperors & the bishops of Rome was de investitura as said is. This being once settled in the persons of the Bishops of Rome the question anent gathering general Councils slept, from the eight general Council, till the Council of Lateran, that is, about 400 years. And then INNOCENTIVS 3. at his own hand no man making opposition in the contrary steppeth to the rudder, gathered the general Council of Lateran in Rome anno 1215 and the bishops following him did the like, no man making opposition in the contrary, except in such Councils as were to be gathered for impairing the Emperors estate. And they gave out to the world such laws and ordinances as shall be declared hereafter Godwilling. GREGORIE 10. gathered a general Council at Lions in France, ann. 1273. CLEMENS 5. gathered a general Council at Uien anno 1311. Pope JOHN 23. gathered the Council of Constance ann. 1414. with advise of SIGISMVND the Emperor, but welcome God against your will. There were three Popes at one time contending for the Popedom, JOHN, GREGORIE, and BENEDICT: and Pope JOHN to obtain favor at the Empesours hands, maketh him associat to himself in cōvocating the Council of Constance, but sore against his heart vouchsafeth he upon the Emperor a lap of his own garment. EVGENIVS 4, gathered the Council of Basil an. 1431. as likewise the Council of Florence, an. 1439. And finally the Council of Tr •… nt was gathered by PAVLVS 3. an. 1546. Now we have conveyed by historical narration the B, of Rome to the top of the mast, Prov. 23. ver. 34. where we leave him fast asleep, and the world also bewitched with his enchantments sleeping into a dead sleep, until it please the Lord with his terrible tempest to give them both a wakening.
The last head of this treatise is to declare the tragical event of this supremacy of the Roman B. not like to the supremacy of AARON & his successors, which was a band of unity amongst the nation of the Jews: but like unto the supremacy of ABIMELECH, tending not only to the murthering of his brethren, but also to the utter undoing of the Sichemits who by unlawful means advanced him to that honor. Judge. 9. But in the beginning of the last head before I say any further, in few words I will institut a comparison between Christ & the Antichrist, as a Preface to the last head. Christ Jesus after his humiliation ascended unto heaven, led captivity captive, & distributed good things to men, Eph. 4. ver. 8. Psal. 68. ver. 18. & the hier he ascended the greater benefit redounded to mankind: the Apostles received the gift of tongues Act 2. & strength promised from above Act I & a sanctified memory to remember all things that Christ had taught his disciples. John 14. And more then this, seeing he ascended to the heavens to sit at the right hand of his father Psal. 1 10. and to be our Advocate. 1. John 2. it is certain that not only the Apostles, but also all Christians have a great & unspeakable benefit by the ascēsion of Christ on high. Howbeit this ascension of Christ, and sitting at the right hand of his Father is not a new dignity that Christ had not before, but this excellent glory was something obscured 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . Heb. 2. that is, through the suffering of death. But when he ascended to heaven, that misty cloud was removed, and the glory of Christ was clearly known.
But when the Antichrist ascended on hie, not by the decreet of the mercy of God appointing him to sit at the right hand of the father, ps 11 •… , but by such unlawful means, as have been declared before, and by the operation of Satan, 2. Thess. 2. ver 9 and by the decreet of the justice of God punishing the world for the contempt of his truth ibid. ver. 12. Then I say, gifts were not distributed to men, but the great Vials of the wrath of God were poured upon the earth, as shall clearly appear by a particular declaration of the miseries that happened to the world by the advancement of the B. of Rome to the supremacy foresaid. And above all other things when as he was not content to sit in the chair of PETER, but also he would make himself a new law-giver, not only equal to Christ, but also 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 an adversary to Christ, and exalting himself above Christ. 2. Thess. 2. ver, 4. Then I say, the fountains of the great deep were broken up and the windows ofheauen were opened Gen. 7. not to bring down rain, as in the days of NOAH, but to reueil the wrath of God from heaven against all ungodliness and vnrighteoufnesse of men, who with-hold the truth into unrighteousness. Rom. 1. ver. 18
Now to keep some order in this great Ocean, whereinto I am embarked, the principal Tragedies following the Roman supremacy I divide them in three. First the war •… alled bellam sacrum, that is the holy war followed upon the neck of this supremacy. Secondly, the war called Pontificium. Thirdly, laws and constitutions since the 1215. year of our Lord, so flatly repugnant to the ordinances of Christ, that no man can be Christ's servant, except he shake off this unhappy yocke of the ordinances of the Antichrist.
After GREGORIVS 7. and VICTOR 3, succeeded VRBANVS 2 This man gathered a Council at Claremont in France, and incitat the Christian Princes to undertake a most hazardous and dangerous warfare for recovery of Jerusalem, and the holy land out of the hands of the Turks and Saracens, for both these people were massed together, as PLATINA granteth in vita Vibani 2, This warfare was undertaken in the yere of our Lord 1084. Bullinger de Conciliis saith 1096. Three hun dreth thousand men marched to this warfare under the con duct of GODFREY Duke of LORAINE, and BALDVINE, and EVSTACE his brethren. ROBERT Duke of Normandy, and ROBERT earle of Flanders, HVGO brother to the king of France, BOEMIVS duke of Apulia, and TANCREDVS son to ROGERIVS BOEMVNDS brother. In the first entry of this warfare at A •… tiochia and at Jerusalem, such abundance of blood was shed, as BVLLINGER by the testimony of VSPERGENSIS citeth that the horse dipped their legs in blood unto the knees. At Askelon a cruel battle was foughten between the Christians & the Saracens, under the conduct of the SVLTAN of Babylon, wherein an hundredth thousand men were slain. Thus was Jerusalem recovered out of the hands of the Saracens with great effusion of blood, and GODFREY crowned king of Jerusalem. But it was so dear bought, and so soon lost again (for this kingdom continued not 100. years) that God gave clear testimonies to the world that he liked not that unhappy Counci •… l of Claremont •… whereby the peace of the world was perturbed, and blood was shed abundantly like water poured out upon the ground, the minds of the infidels so exasperat against Christians, that albeit they have paid us home again with the conquest of Thracia, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Gracia, Ploponesus, and a great part of Hungaria, and illyricum, yet are not their hearts satisfied, but set on edge through remembrance of the army that came to besiege Jerusalem. I leave off to speak of the unprosperous success of CONRADVS 3. and howe his army besieging Iconium, was empoisoned by the falsehood of EMANVEL Emperor of Constantinople: and the success of LEWES king of France, and ROGERIVS duke of Sicil, to whom all things succeeded not to their contentment, as the siege of Damascus clearly declareth. No better success had PHILIP king of France, and RICHARD king of England who enterprised likewise to recover again all that was lost but king RICHARDS shipwreck, captivity & ransom 〈◊〉 that the voyages to the holy lande seldom had a good succ •… sse. The calamity of BARBAROSSA who seemed to prosper, but was pitifully drowned in the passage of a river: And finally the compelled returning of FRIDERICKE the 2. in the mids of his victories to save his own dominions from the outrage and oppression of the Pope: the bad success, I say of all these expeditions and other moe declareth that God gave not his blessing to the Council of Claremont. So that in very deed the advancement of the Bishop of Rome tendeth to the calamity of the whole world.
The second tragedy that followed the high advancement of the B of Rome was bellum pontificium, others call it bellum Imperatorium, a cruel and hateful warfare between the Emperors and Bishops of Rome, wherein no sort of villainy, falsehood & barbarous cruelty was left vnpractised against noble and worthy Emperors. GREGORIE 7 caused the Emperor HENRY 4. at Canusium in sharp winter weather to stand barefooted, and to crave absolution from him. He uttered a false prophecy of the Emperors death within year and day: which when the issue declared to be a lying prophecy, he took him to his shifting mental meaning, that he spake of the spiritual death of the Emperors soul, and not ofhis bodily deathPope. PASCALIS 2. stirred up HENRY 5. against his own natural father HENRY 4. and caused raise the body of the noble Emperor HENRY 4 out of his sepulcher, so that it remained 5. years unburied. Pope ADRIAN 4. was offended because the Emperor BARBAROSSA held his left stirrup instead of the right stirrup when the Pope mounted up upon his horse. Pope ALEXANDER3. trampled upon the same Emperors neck. Pope GREGORY 9. by his cursings compelled the Emperor FREDERICKE 2. to lead an army to Asia against the Turks and Saracens, and in his absence like unto a deceitful traitor invaded the kingdom of Naples, and the rest of the dominions which in heritage belonged to the Emperor. Thus we see clearly in this second tragedy that the B. of Rome was like unto the melt in the body, when it waxeth great by swelling and hardness, all the rest of the noble parts are lessened and become weak: even so the excessive preferment of the Bishops of Rome was the undoing of the Emperors and princes of the earth.
The Bishops of Rome not contented with the two tragedies already mentioned, to wit, to have filled the world with blood, and to have trampled the Emperou •… s & princes under foot, they added the third tragedy woe •… st of all. They would be lawgiuers, sitting in the very chair of Christ, and making of none effect the ordinances of Christ, to the ende that place might be given to their constitutions. INNOCENTIVS 3 in the Council of Lateran confirmed the blasphemous doctrine of transubstantiation Ann. 1215. In the general Council holden by GREGORIE. 10. Ann. 1273. forgiveness of sins was promised in most ample manner to those that would be marked with the badge of the cross, and would go and fight against the Saracens. But Christ promiseth remission of sins to such only as repent their sins believe in him, & in token of true repentance to these who bear the easy yocke & light burden of Christ, Mat. 11. ver. 28 29. & 30. In the general Council gathered by CLEMENS 5. in Vienne Ann. 1311. it was ordained that the Pope should not be subject to the Emperor, but rather the Emperor to the Pope, & that the Emperor shall give his oth of alledgance to the Pope express contrary to the written word of God. Let every soul be subject unto the hier powers, Ro. 13 ver. 1. John 23. with advise of SIGISMVND gathered a general Council at Constance, Ann. 1414. wherein the very testamental legacy of Christ was altered and impaired by sacrilegious prelates in taking from the people the use of the holy cup in the sacrament. And the clause, Non obstante set down in their act, made the whole people of Christendom to tremble that they durst not set their mouths against the heaven and correct the ordinance of Christ, and that in such rude manner, that notwithstanding that Christ instituted this sacrament under forms both of bread & wine yet the church thought meet that the sacrament shall be given to laicke people under the form of bread only. The late Councils of Basil & Florence are flat repugnant one to another in the head of supremacy. And last of all the Council of Trent wherein some piece of reformation was expected made it known to the world, that the whore will never reform the Borthell, and the Antichrist will not be consumed with the breath of his own mouth, but with the breath of the mouth of Christ, which thing the Lord perform in his own time.
A SHORT COMPEND OF THE HISTORIE OF THE FIRST TEN PERSECVTIONS MOVED AGAINST CHRISTIANS, DIVIDED INTO III. CENTVRIES.
WHEREVNTO ARE ADded in the end of every Century treatises arising upon occasion offered in the history, clearly declaring the novelty of Popish Religion, and that is neither flowed from the mouths of Christ's holy Apostles, neither was it confirmed by the blood of the holy Martyrs who died in these ten persecutions.
IEREM. 6. ver. 16.
LVC. 10. ver. 42.
EDINBVRGH, Printed by Andro Hart, and are to be sold at his shop on the North side of the high street a little beneath the Cross, ANNO DOM. 1613.
A SHORT COMPEND, OF THE ARRIAN and EVTYCHIAN PERSECVTIONS, Comprised in the IIII. V. and VI. CENTVRIES.
Whereunto is added, TREATISES, DECLARING THE novelty of POPISH Religion.
EDINBURGH, PRINTED BY ANDRO HART, Anno Dom. 1615.
TO THE MOST NOBLE, VERTVOVS, AND ELECT LADIE, MARIE, COVNTES OF MARRE, Wisheth grace, mercy, and eternal felicity.
T HE provident care of our GOD (most noble Lady) hath appointed, that the virtues of his Saints like unto gold, should be tried in the furnace, purged from dross, & counted precious. In the first 300. years of our LORD, the faith & patience of Christians was tried with the yoke of ten cruel persecutions. In the next 300. years, the knowledge of the Church was tried by heretics, who by the misty clouds of error, endeavored to blind-fold the eyes of men, and to lead them captive from the simplicity of the truth of God: But in these ages also the power of the light of God was manifested, ever dissipating darkness, as the Sun rising abolisheth the darkness of the night. This is an encouragement to us, when we see false Teachers daily renewing their Fortes, to fight against the truth, as the Philistines did, who faught against David in the valley of Rephaim, after they had been oft overcome by him. The last period of all their obstinate reluctance against the Anointed of the Lord, was loss and hurt unto them selves, and dishonor to their gods, whom they were compelled to leave behind them, and David took them, and brunt them with fire, and the place was called Baal. perat-zim, that is, the rupture of Baal. The adversaries of the Gospel, in our land, by renewing their forces again, are procuring a new name unto their idols. They cannot be content with the names of Baal-P •… or, Baal-Meon, Baal-Tamar, Baal-Chatsor, Baal-Gad: But they will spread out their banners in the valley of Rephaim, against our Sovereign LORD, his Highness Statutes and Laws, longing for the last name Baal-Peratzim. The grandeur of the speeches of Scottish Papists, is not unknown to me: but tumour and swelling in the flesh, is seldom joined with salubritie and health. It is time for me to be afraid of the din of empty pitchers, when I find them furnished within with holy Lamps, and to be backed with the sound of holy Trumpets, blown by the Commandment of GOD: I mean such as were in the Army of Gedion. Of this I am fully persuaded, that the light of GOD, the trumpet of GOD, the sword of GOD, and Gedion shall have the upper hand in GOD'S appointed time. Some of them seem to be devout, and they lament for us, as Jacob lamented for his son Joseph, whom he supposed to have beenedead: But our lamentation for them, is grounded on better knowledge •… , as the lamentation of Joseph was, when he fell upon his Fathers face, and wept upon him, and kissed him. Always (Madame) consider, that the sense of feeling, the chief of all senses, the most inseperable companion of the spiritual life, is most inlaking in them, who strive against the Gospel of CHRIST preached in this land. They have so many easy remedies at hand to vnladen their souls of the heavy burden of sin, such as sprinkling of holy water, auricular confessions, and penance, indulgences and pardons, that they never suffer men to enter into a deep consideration of their own misery, & of the superabundant compassions of GOD, freely pardoning sin: but they are content with the superfice and scruif of new invented remedies. In the mean time (Madame) receive under the shadow of your Ladysh. favorable protection, this Book also, Of the Arian and Eutychian persecution, wherein, as in a viue mirror, is represented the falsehood, deceit, and subtlety of lying Teachers; and likewise their mercylesse inhumanity and cruelty against GOD'S servants, when they are assisted by the supporting strength of secular powers. And let your La. and your noble house continually beware of Teachers, whom ye find to be deceitful and bloody, for they walk in the way of Cain.
Now the mercies of the LORD JESUS, the author and finisher of our faith, attend upon my Lord your Husband, upon your Ladyship and all your noble house, for now, and ever,
Your La. humble servant, P. SIMSON.
TO THE READER.
I N writing of COMPENDES, every man, who hath presumed to do such a work, hath found difficulties: and it hath not been an easy thing to any man, to satisfy either himself or others, being inuironed with many straits. If he be short in his Compend, he seemeth obscure: if he write at length, then his Compend seemeth to have need of another Compend, to abridge his prolixity. Yet in all these difficulties, it is better to set forward, to do some good, both to our selves and others, then to spend our time in idleness, lest our cogitations be like unto the upper and lower Milne-stones, lacking good grain to grind upon, they rub violently one upon another, until both be broken: and incase our cogitations be not well exercised, our thoughts will be spent upon vain things, which will procure harm both to our souls and bodies.
In my TREATISES I have overpassed with silence the question anent Festuall days, lest I should seem •… t one time to contend both against friends & foes, as some men have done, who if they had more increased their charity, and diminished the fervent heat of their contentious spirits, they had benefited the Church of Christ more then they have done. Would GOD LUCAS OSIANDER had walked in the foot-steps of Christian love.
Now I will beg this favor at thee, Christian Reader, that my weak travels may be taken in good part. The house of our GOD in this land is large and ample (praised be his moste holy NAME therefore) it hath need of bright-shining torches, for the Halles, Parlors, and Chambers: and it hath need of smaller Lightes, for Sellers and office houses: let my penny Candle give light in the lowest Seller of the House of our GOD, and mine heart is fully content.
CENTURY IIII.
CHAP. I. OF EMPEROVRS.
CONSTANTINE.
T HE CHURCH of CHRIST flourished in time of the ten persecutions, as a Palme tree groweth under the burden, and spreads out her branches by increasing growth toward Heaven. Satan on the other part that piercing and crooked serpent, who strives against the militant Church of GOD, both by might and slight: when his might faileth, it is time to try his slight: which he did by the Canker-worm of heretical doctrine. Now therefore, let us entreat of the ARRIAN and EUTYCHIAN Persecutions in the three subsequent CENTURIES. Other Heretics albeit they were fierce and cruel, such as the Donatists, yet their cruelty was like unto the stighling of a fish, when the water is ebbed, and she is not covered with the deepness of over flowing water: the more stir she maketh, the nearer she is unto her death. But the Arian and Eutychian Heretics found Emperors favorably inclined to the maintenance of their errors, such as Constantius and Valens protectours of the Arian heresy, and Anastatius and Heraclius favorers of the Heresy of Euiyches. This support they had of supreme powers, strengthened the a •… me of Heretics, and made them able to persecute the true CHURCH of CHRIST.
Notwithstanding, betwixt the ten great Persecutions, and the Arian pers •… cution, a short breathing time was granted by GOD unto his CHURCH, who will not suffer the rod of the wicked perpetually to lie upon the righteous, lest they put out their hand unto iniquity. The days of the reign of Constantine, were the breathing days of the persecuted CHURCH: Men banished for the cause of CHRIST, by the Emperors edicts were returned from their banishment, restored to their offices, dignities, and possessions, which duly belonged unto them. The heritage and goods, of such as had suffered death for the cause of CHRIST, were alloted to their nearest kinsmen, and incase none of these were found alive, then their goods were ordained to appertain unto the CHURCH. These beginnings of an admirable change of the estate of persecuted men, wrought in the hearts of all people a wonderful astonishment, considering within themselves what could be the event of such sudden and unexpected alteration.
The care that Constantine had to disburthen persecuted Christians of that heavy yoke of persecution, that pressed them down so long, was not only extended to the bounds of the Roman Empire, whereinto Constantine was sovereign lord, and absolute Commander: But he was careful also to procure the peace of Christians, who lived under Sapores King of Persia, who vexed Christian people with sore & grievous persecution: so that within his Dominions, more then sixteen thousand were found, who had concluded their lives by martyrdom. Amongst whom Simeon Bishop of Selentia, & Ustazares the kings eldest eunuch, & his nurs-father in time of his minority, Pusices ruler of all the kings artificers, Azades the kings beloved eunuch, & Acepcimas, a Bishop in Persia: all these were men of Note and Mark, who suffered martyrdom under Sapores king of Persia.
While the cogitations of Constantine were exercised with meditation, by what means the distressed estate of Christians in Persia might be supported: by the providence of GOD the Ambassadors of Sapores, king of Persia, came to the Emperor Constantine: whose petitions when he had granted, he sent them back again to their lord and master: and he sent with them a letter of his own, entreating Sapores to be friendly to Christians, in whose Religion nothing can be found, that can justly be blamed. His letter also bare the bad fortune of the Emperor Valerian the VIII. persecutor of Christians, and how miserably he ended his life: and on the other part, what good success the LORD had given unto himself in all his battles, because he was a defender of Christians, and a procurer of their peace. What peace was procured to distressed Christians in Persia by this letter of Constantine, the History bears not: always his endeavor was honest and Godly.
In Constantine's days the Gospel was propagated in East India, by Frumentius and Edesius, the brother sons of Meropius, a man of Tyrus. This History is written at length by R •… ffinus, Theodoretus, Sozomenus, and many others. Likewise it was propagated in Iberia, a country lying in the uttermost part of the Euxien sea eastward, by the means of a captive Christian woman, by whose supplications, first a child, deadly diseased, recovered health, and afterward the Queen of Iberia her self was relieved from a perilous and dangerous disease, by her prayers made to CHRIST. The King of Iberia sent Ambassadors to Constantine, craving of him, that he would send Preachers and Doctors to the country of Iberia, who might instruct them in the true faith of CHRIST. Which desire also Constantine performed, with great gladness of heart.
Now to return and to speak of the Dominions subject to the Roman Empire, Constantine the son of Constantius Chlorus, begun to reign in the year of our LORD 310. and he reigned 31. years: he gave commandment to re-edify the Temples of the Christians, that were demolished in time of the persecution of Dioclesian. This commandment was obeyed with expedition, and many more large and ample Churches were built, meet for the conuentions of Christian people. Likewise, the Temples of Idols were locked up: better they had been demolished, and equalled with the ground: then had it been a work of greater difficulty to Julian the Apostate, to have resto •… ed again Heathen Idolatry. Many horrible abuses, both in Religion and manners were reformed by the auzhoritie and commandment of the Emperor, such as cubitus mensuralis, called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in Egypt, whereunto was attributed the virtue and cause of the inundation of Nile by the Egyptians: therefore by the Emperors commandment this 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 was transported out of their Temples. In Rome the bloody spectacle of Gladiatores, that is, of Fencing men, with swords killing one another in sight of the people was discharged. In Heliopolis a town of Phoenitia, the filthy manners of young women, accustomed without controlment, to prostitute themselves to the lust of strangers, until they were married: this filthy custom (I say) by the commandment of the Emperor Constantine was interdicted and forbidden. In Judea, the Altar built under the Oak of Mambre, where the Angels appeared to Abraham, and whereupon the Pagans offered sacrifice in time of solemn Fairs, for bying and selling of Merchand waires in that place: This Altar (I say) was commanded to be demolished, and a Temple to be built in the same place, for exercise of divine service.
The care this good Emperor had, to quench the schism that began in Alexandria, shall be decla •… ed in the own time, GOD willing. In somethinges Constantine was not unlike to King Solomon, who finding his Kingdom to be peaceably settled, he gave himself to the building of the Temple, of Palaces, and of Towns, which he fortified & made strong. Even so Constantine finding that no enemy durst enterprise any longer to molest the peaceable estate of his settled Kingdom he built magnificke Temples in Bethlehem, the place of the LORD'S Natiuitie, upon Mount Olivet, from whence CHRIST ascended to Heaven, upon Mount Caluarie, where CHRIST'S Sepulcher was. He built also a City in Bithinia, and called it Helenopolis, for honor of his Mother Helena, and another in Palestine, and called it Constantia, by the name of his Sister. Also he built a glorious Temple into Antiochia, which his son Constantius perfected, and to the dedication of that Temple a great number of Bishops were assembled, as shall be declared hereafter if the LORD please. And finally, he built the great City of Constantinople in Thracia, and called it nova Roma, whereas before it was called Byzantium. This town was built, anno 336.
In end the good Emperor intended to have made war against the Persians, and by the way he was purposed to have been baptized in Jordan, where our Savior CHRIST was baptized by John: but the LORD had disposed otherwise: for the good Em. fell sick at Nicomedia, & was baptized in the suburbs of that principal town of Bithynia, not in Rome, nor by •… ilvester, but in Nicomedia, and by Eusebius. Howe this Eusebius coosoned the Emperor, and obscured the wicked purpose of his Heretical heart from him, and continued in good favor and credit with the Emperor, until the last periode of his life, so that he had the honor to baptize the good Emperor it will be declared hereafter, GOD willing. In his testamentall legacy, he left his Dominions to his sons, ended his life happily, and was buried in Constantinople.
Constantius, Constance, and younger Constantine.
CONSTANTIUS governed the East parts of the Roman Empire, and he reigned 25. years. The other two brethren governed the West parts. Constantine the younger was slain at Aquileia, after he had reigned with his brethren 3. years. The Emperor Constance reigned 13. years, and was slain in France by the Tyrant Magnentius: so after the death of Constance, the whole government of the Empire turned to the hands of Constantius. He overcame Magnentius in battle, who fled to Lions, and slew his mother, his own brother, and himself: And so the Tyrant Magnentius brought himself and his kindred to a miserable ende. Constantius was infected with the Heresy of Arius, by the means of an Arian Priest, who had been in Court with CONSTANTIA, the sister of the Emperor Constantine, and relict of Licinius. When she was bound to bed by infirmity, and sickness, whereof she died, She recommended this Arian presbyter to Constantine her brother, whereby it came to pass, that he had favor and credit in the Emperors Court. He procured the returning of Arius from banishment, and was the first reporter to Constantius of his fathers testamentall legacy: And finally, he perverted Constantius from the true faith, which his father had professed. So pernicious a thing is it to have deceitful Heretics lurking in the Courts of Princes.
During the lifetime of his brother Constance, Arianism had no great upper hand, because Constance the Emperor of the West protected Paulus Bishop of Constantinople, and Athanasiu •… Bishop of Alexandria, and the rest of the Bishops whom the Arians had most unjustly accused, deposed, and persecuted. But after the slaughter of Constance, the Arians were encouraged by the inconstancy of the Emperor, whose flexible and instable mind, like unto a reed shaken with the wind, was inclined to follow the course, that the fore-mentioned Priest put in his head. This Priest informed the Emperor Constantius, that the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, Consubstantial, was not found in holy Scripture, and that the inserting of this word in the sowme of faith set down by the Nicene Council, was the occasion of many debates and contentions in the CHURCH of GOD and that the returning of Athanasius from banishment, was the ground of a terrible tempest, whereby not only the estate of Egypt was shaken, but also the estate of Palestine and Phae-nitia, and other places not far distant from Egypt. Moreover, he added, that Athanasius had been the author of intestine dissention betwixt the Emperor Constantius and his brother Constance, so that Constance wrote minassing letters to his brother, either to repossesse Paulus & Athanasius into their places again, else if he linguered in so doing (since their innocence was cleared in the Council of Serdica) he threatened to lead an army to the East, and to see them repossessed into their own rooms again. The Emperor Constantius was easily incited to wrath against Athanasius, and he sent Sebastianus, one of his captains, accompanied with 5000 armed men, to slay Athanasius: but the LORD delivered him miraculously out of their hands, when there seemed to be no way of escaping, because armed soldiers were planted round about the Temple: yet he went safely through the midst of them, and was not discearned, albeit many Arians were present of purpose to design and point him out by the finger, as a sheep ordained for the slaughter.
Georgius, an Arian Bishop, was seated in Alexandria, in the place of Athanasius, a wolf in the chair of a true Pastor, whose fury and madness was helped by sebastianus, who furnished unto him armed soldiers, to accomplish all his wicked and devilish devises. A fire was kindled in the town: Christian Virgins were stripped naked, and brought to the fire, and commanded to renounce their faith: but the terror of the fire made them not once to shrink. When the sight óf the fire could not terrify them, he caused their faces to be so dashed with strokes, & misfashioned their countenances, that they could not be known by their familiar friends: but they, like unto victorious soldiers, patiently endured all kind of rebuke for the NAME of CHRIST. Thirty Bishops of Egypt and Libya were slain in the fury of this Arian Persecution. Fourteene Bishops (whose names are particularly mentioned by Theodoretus) were banished, of whom some died in the way when they were transported, others died in the place of their banishment. Fourtie good Christians in Alexandria were scourged with wandes, because they would not communicate with the Arian wolf Georgius: and so pitiously demained, that some pieces of the wands were so deeply fixed in their flesh, that they could not be drawn out again, and many through excessive pain of their wounded bodies concluded their lives. Here is a viue portrat of the mercies of the wicked, which are cruel.
The like cruelty the Arians practiced in Constantinople. Paulus Bishop of Constantinople was banished to Cucusus, a little town in Cappadocia, where he was strangled by the Arians. Macedonius was placed in his room, a notable Heretic, who used no less cruelty, in compelling the Christians of Constantinople, to communicate with him, then was used of old, to compel Christians to sacrifice to the Idols of the Gentiles.
The exquisite diligence of the Arians in procuring Councils to be gathered for establishing of their error, shall be declared in the own place, GOD willing. Now to return to the civil estate of Constantius. After that Magnentius had made an end of his own life in most desperate manner, as said is, and his associate Britannio had humbly submitted himself to Constantius, and obtained pardon: yet was not the Emperors estate quiet and free of trouble: for there arose another Tyrant, called Silvanus, whom the Captains of Coastantius army in France did hastily cut off, and make out of the way. Also the Jews of Diocaesaria, a town of Palestine, rebelled against him, who were overthrown by Gallas the Emperors coosen, and the City of Diocaesaria was levelled with the ground. This good success made Gallus somewhat insolent, and he slew Domitia •… us, the Emperors great Treasurer in the East: therefore the Emperor gave commandment to cut him off. Finally, the Germans, who had assisted him in his wars against Magnentius, they rebelled against him. And he sent against them his coosen Julian, the brother of Gallus, who subdewed the Germans, and he likewise waxed insolent, and suffered the soldiers to salute him with the name of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, of an Emperor. This was not unknown to Constantius, who made haste to prevent all further usurpation. But by the way as he was leading his army through Silicia, he concluded his life, sorowing for this, as Theodoretus writes, that he had changed the form of the Nicene faith.
Julianus.
IN the year of our LORD 365. Julian began to reign, and he reigned 3. years. Ruffinus assigns unto him one year, 8. months only: he was Constantius near kinsman, namely. his uncles son: But he dealt unkindly with Constantius, who made him Caesar, and give unto him in marriage Helena his sister: He was brought up in Christian Relig on, but was perverted by Maximus an Ephesian Philosopher, whom Valentinian the Emperor afterward punished unto the death, as a practiser of Magicall arts. In the beginning of his reign he restored those Bisshops to their places again, whom Constantius had banished, not for love of Religion, but to impare the fame of Constantius▪ yet immediately after, he manifested his affection toward Heathnicke superstition, and opened the doors of the Temples of the gods of the Heathen, which Constantine had locked up, and encouraged others by his own example, to offer sacrifices to the gods of the Gentiles.
Julian abstained, for a time, from cruelty, and shedding of blood: not for pity, and compassion of Christians: but rather for envy: For he enuyed the glory of Christian Martyrs, whose magnanimity, courage, and constant perseverance in the faith of CHRIST unto the death, was commended in the mouths of all men. But he endeavored by subtle and crafty means to undo Christian Religion. He debarred the children of Christians from Schools, and from the use of Learning: Also he debarred them from war-fare, from offices of government of Roman Provinces, and from offices of Collectorie of money: and burdened them with payment of heavy taxations: which taxations also the auaritiousnes of the Deputies of Provinces increased, & made them more grievous and intolerable. Nevertheless, when Christians complained of the unrighteous dealing of the Deputies, the Emperor mocked them, and said, their happiness was increassed, according to the speech of CHRIST their LORD and Master, Blessed are they, who suffer persecution for righteousness sake.
Likewise, in the market places of Cities, he set up his own Image, with the Effigies of the gods of the Heathen pictured round about it: to the ende, that whosoever should do ciail reverence to the Emperors Image, might also seem to worship the gods of the Gentiles: And by the contrary, they who would not bow to the gods of the Gentiles, might seem also to refuse all due reverence to the Emperor. When he distributed gold to his Captains and Warriours (as the custom was) he used a form of distributing not accustomed before, to have an altar near unto his Princely throne, and coals burning upon it, and incense upon a table near unto the altar: whereby it came to pass, that no man received gold, before he cast incense upon the coals of the altar: by this subtle artifice circumuenting many, who knew not, that it was Julian's purpose to entangle them with the rites of idolatrous service. In Antiochia, and in the Region round about, he dedicated all the Fountaines to the Goddesses of the Gentiles, and caused all the victual that was to be sold in market places, to be sprinkled with Heathnicke holy water. Neu •… rthelesse, Ch •… istians, without scruple of conscience, drank of the water that was in the Welles, and ate of the meat which they bought in the market, being fully persuaded, that to the clean all things are clean: and again, it is written, Whatsoever is sold in the •… hambles, eat ye, and ask no question for conscience sake. The liberty that Iuuentius and Maxentius, two worthy Warriours, used in reproving the Emperor in his face, for his Heathnicke superstition, moved Julian to such wrath, that he punished them unto the dea •… h: And so by degrees the policy and wisdom of Julian in end breaks forth into the fruits of cruelty and shedding of blood.
Albeit no public mandate of Julian was set forth, commanding to persecute Christians, yet by many evident testimonies it was known to the people, that the Emperor hated them, and that no man would incur punishment, for outrage and violence used against them. Therefore in the town of Sebaste, the Sepulcher of John the Baptist was opened, his bones were brunt, and the ashes scattered abroad. Likewise the wicked men of Gaza and Askelon, killed Preachers and holy Virgins, ripped their bellies, filled them with barlie, and cast their bodies to the swine to be eaten. Cyrillus also, a Deacon in Hierapolis, a town of Phoenicia, at the foot of Mount Libanus, who in time of the reign of Constantine had broken in pieces the images of the Gentiles, was taken by them, his belly was ripped, his liver was drawn out of his body, which with Barbarous inhumanity they chawed with their teeth. But the LORD suffered not such vnkouth cruelty to escape unpunished: for the teeth of those who committed this fact of unnatural inhumanity, fell out of their jaw-bones, their tongues: otted within their mouths, and their eyes were darkened and blinded: a just and deserved punishment of brutish Savages practiced by men. Marcus A •… ethusius had his body ouerlaide with honey, and it was hung up in hot summer weather, to be molested with wasps and flies. In Alexandria many Christians were slain for discovering the abominations of the Pagans, especially in sacrificing to Mythra bloody sacrifices of reasonable creatures. Among others, Georgius the Arian Bishop was bound unto a Camel, and both he and the Camel were burned with fire: whom no man counts a martyr, because he kept not the true faith. In the country of Phrygia, and town of Miso, Macedonius, Theodulus, and Tatianus, for breaking in pieces images, were broiled upon hot grattes of iron. The persecution of Athanasius, which with great hazard he escaped, by a stratagem, of turning back his ship in the face of the persecuting enemy, was procured by Philosophers, Sorcerers, and Enchanters, who were about Julian, and affirmed that all their travails would be spent in vain, if Athanasius, the only bar, and obstacle of their doings, were not made out of the way.
The wrath of Julian was highly kindled against the inhabitants of Casarea in Cappadocia. This town of old was call •… d Maza, but the Emperor Claudius changed the name of it, and called it Casarea. The inhabitants of the City, for the most part, were Christians, and they had of old overthrown the Temples of Jupiter and Apollo, and the Temple of Fortune (which only remained) they overthrew in Julian's own time. For this cause Julian rased the name of Cesarea, out of the roll of Cities and exacted from them 300 pound weight of gold, compelled their Clergy to serve in warfare: And finally, he threatened to punish unto the death all the inhabitants of Casarea; but the righteous LORD cutted the cords of the wicked, and he had not power to perform all his bloody designs.
He had intention to fight against the Persians, yet would he do nothing without consultation of his gods. He sent his most assured friends to all the Oracles within the Roman Dominions, and he himself would inquire at the Oracle of Apollo in Daphne, what should be the success of his enterprises. The answer of Apollo was, that he was hindered by the dead, to give his responses. Hereof it came to pass, that Julian gave liberty to Christians, to transport the bones of the Martyr Babylas. About the same time fire came down from heaven, and destroyed the Temple of Apollo in Daphne, and beat the image of Apollo in pieces, like unto the lightest and smallest powder, or dust.
Moreover, he gave liberty to the Jews, to return to Jerusalem, to build their Temple, & to offer sacrifices conform to the law of Moses: not for love he carried toward the Jews, but for hatred of the Christians: therefore the work prospered not, but was hindered by earthquake, fire & a mighty tempest of wind. Mark how everything this hateful enemy of CHRIST enterprised, had an evil success. Julian arrived at Ctesiphon the Metropolitan town of Chaldea, after that Babylon was ruined. The king of Persia had his people in better preparation then the Emp. looked for: therefore he took deliberation to return back again to the bounds of the Roman dominions: but he who was deceitful all his days, was in end deceived by an old Persian captive, who led the Emp. into a barren wilderness, where he concluded his life, wounded with a darte: but it remains uncertain by whom he was slain.
Jouinianus.
AFTER the death of Julian, Jovinian was chosen, by the Roman army, to be Emperor, but lived not fully 8. months in his Imperial dignity. He accepted not the souerainty, until the time the whole army with uniform consent acknowledged themselves to be Christians. He made a covenant of peace with the K. of Persia, such as the necessity of a distressed army compelled him to condescend unto: for Nisib •… s, a great City in Mesopotamia, with some dominions in Syria, were resigned over to the king of Persia. The blame of this scathfull capitulation, was imputed to the temerity of Julian the apostate, who had brunt with fire the ships that should have brought victualles to the army, and gave hasty credit to a Persian captive. When he had reduced the army to the bounds of the Roman dominions, he buried the dead body of Julian in Tarsus, a town of Silicia: and he reduced from banishment the worthy captain Valentinian, whom Julian had banished, together with the Bishops banished from their places, or compelled to lurk: & inspecial Athanasius, whose counsel he was resolved to follow in matters of Faith & Church government. In end, he took purpose to go to Constantinople: but by the way, in the Confines of Galatia and Bithinia, he concluded his life in a Village called Dadastana.
Valentinianus and Valens.
AFTER the death of Jovinian, the Roman army chose Valentinian to be Emperor, who reigned 13. years. In whom was accomplished which is promised in the Gospel, to render an hundredth-fold in this life, to them who suffer any loss for for CHRIST'S sake, & in the world to come eternal life. Valentinian CHRISTES sake lost his office in Julian's Court, and he received in this world a kingdom, and hath a greater recompense of reward laid up for him in heavē. The magnamimus courage of Valentinian in beating on the face that heathē Priest, who sprinkled holy water upon his garments, whereby he thought his garments to be contaminate, & not his body sanctified. This courageous fact was the cause wherefore Julian banished him to Miletina, a town in Armenia. He was relieved from banishment in the days of Jovinian, & was made Emp. after his death. He was borne in a town of Panonia, called Cibale: he addressed himself immediately after his acceptation of the Emperial souerainty, to Constantinople, and within the space of 30. days he chose his brother to be his associate in the government: in such sort, that the Emp. Valentinian governed the West, and the Emp. Valens governed the Eastern parts of the Roman Dominions.
The Emp. Valens finding the Persians to be quiet, and disposed to keep the covenant of peace bound up in the days of Jovinian, he undertook an unsupportable war-fare against the Homousians. The usurpation of the Tyrant Procopius, did somewhat slacken the readiness and quickness of his attempts: but after Procopius was delivered into the hands of the Emp. Valens, by Agelon and Gomarius his Captains, he rent in pieces the body of Procopius, by bowing down to the ground the tops of strong trees, whereunto he caused the legs of Procopius to be fastened. The bodies of Agelon and Gomarius, the two Captains who betrayed Procopius, were cutted in twain with sawes of iron. In which fact the Emp. Valens had no regard to the oath of GOD, which he made unto them for their safety.
Procopius being subdewed, he bended all his might against the Homousians: He banished Mil •… tius, Bishop of Antiochia, to Armenia: Eusebius Bishop of Samosata to Thracia: Pelagius Bishop of Laodicea, to Arabia. The town of Samos •… ta was so affectioned to their own Pastor Eusebius, that they would not communica •… e with Eunomius, whom the Arians sent to fill his place, Val •… ns was filled with wrath against the Fathers convened in the Council of Lampsacum (this is a town near unto the strait firth of Hellespontus) because they adhered fast unto the Nicene faith. In Constantinople he not only banished the Homousians, but also the Novatians, & their Bishop Agelius, because they would not consent with the Arians in the matter of faith. In Edessa, a town of Mesopotamia, the Emperor gave commandment to slay the Homousians, who were assembled together in the Church: but the fervent zeal of one woman, that ran in haste through the ranks of soldiers, drawing with her, her young and tender child, together with her courageous answer to the Captain, stayed the rage of the Emperor wonde •… fully: for she counted it a sweet fellowship, that she and her babe should be found amongst the number of these, who were counted worthy to suffer death for the NAME of CHRIST. Nevertheless the Emperor banished of men who dwelt in Edessa. especially of such as were in spiritual offices, to the number of fourscore, whom he commanded, by two and two, to be dispersed through Thracia, Arabia, and Thebaida. The invincible courage of Basilius, Bishop of Casarea in Cappadocia, the peaceable death of Athanasius, which happened in the very time of the Persecution of this Arian Emperor Valens, together with the surie & madness of the Arian Bishop Lucius, intruded in Alexandria, All these things, GOD willing, shall be touched in their own places.
Amongst all the facts of unspeakable cruelty committed by Valens, o •… e fact ouerwent all the rest. While the Emperor was at Nicomedia, fourscore Ambassadors were directed unto him: amongst whom Menedemus, Urbanus, and Theodorus, were the chief. These complained to the Emperor, of the manifold injuries done to the Homousians. The Emperor gave commandment to Modestus, the Governor of his army, to embarke them into a ship, as if they were to be banished unto some remote and far distant place: but secret direction was given unto the ship-men, to set the ship on fire, & to retire themselves into a boat. So it came to pass, that these fourscore Martyrs circumvented by the craft of Valens, glorified the NAME of CHRIST, by patient suffering of many deaths at one time, both tormented by fire, and drowned in water.
Terentius and Traianus, two worthy Captains, used some liberty in admonishing the Emperor to abstain from persecuting of innocent people, because his fighting against GOD procured good success to the Barbarians: but the LORD was minded to destroy him, therefore he could receive no wholesome admonition: for a number of the nation of the Goths, whom he entertained as soldiers, meet to defend his Dominions against the invasion of foreigners and strangers, they began to waste the country of Thracia: and they faught against the Emperor Valens, and prevailed against him: so that he fled, and was overtaken in a certain Village, which the Goths set on fire. So this Emperor died miserably, brunt with fire by his enemies, without succession, and left his name in curse and execration to all ages, after he had reigned fifteen or sixteen years, as Sozomenus reckoneth.
Now to return to the Emperor Valentinian: He was a defender of the true faith, and was so highly offended against his brother Valens, that he would make him no support against the invasion of the Goths: for he said, it was an impious thing, to strengthen the hand of a man, who had spent his days in warfare against GOD, and his CHURCH. In his days the Sarmatians invaded the bounds of the Roman Dominions. Valentinian prepared a mighty army to fight against them: but they sent unto him Ambassadors, to entreat for peace. When the Emperor saw that they were but a naughty people, he was moved with excessive anger, whereby he procured the ruptu •… e of some arters, or veins, whereupō followed great effusion of blood. And so he himself died, leaving behind him two sons, Gratianus, whose mother was Seuera, and Valentinian the second, whose mother was Iustina.
Gratianus, Valentinianus the second, and Theodosius.
GRATIANUS, the son of Valentinian, after the death of Valens his fathers brother, had the gouernament both of West and East. His brother Valentinian the second, was his associate in the government of the West: But when he perceived, that the weighty affairs of the kingdom required the fellowship of a man, who was ripe in years, he chose Theodosius, a man of Noble parentage in Spain, to whom he committed the government of the East, contenting himself and his brother Valentinian, with the government of the West. Gratianus in the beginning of his reign, reduced from banishment those Bisshops, whom the Arian Persecuter Valens had banished. He was slain by Andragathius, Captain of the army of Maximus, who usurped the Empire of the West. This Andragathius, not by valor and might, but by circumvention, falsehood, and treason, overthrew the good Emp. Gratian: for he made a report to pass in Lions, where the Emp. Gratian had his remaining, that his wife was coming to visit him: and he in simplicity went forth to meet his wife beyond the river of Rhonne: but Andraga •… hius (who was covertly lurking in a chariot) stepped out, and slew Gratianus, after he had reigned with his father, with his brother, and with Theodosius, 15. years.
His brother Valentinian, young in years, was seduced by the enticing speeches of his mother Iustina, after the death of her husband, in whose days she durst not presume to avow the Arian Heresy: yet after his death, she enticed the flexible mind of her son, to persecute Ambrose, Bishop of Millane, because he would not consent to the Arriane doctrine. The zeal of the people affectioned to their faithful Pastor, hindered the cruel purposes of Iustina. Likewise the miracle wrought at the sepulchers of Protasius and Geruasius, opened the mouths of the people to glorify GOD, and to magnify that Faith, which Protasius and Geruasius had sealed up with their blood: these holy men of GOD were martyred in the second great Persecution moved by the Emp. Domitian. The dolorous tithinges of the death of Gratianus, and the near approaching of the tyrant Maximus to Italy, compelled Iustina to leave the persecuting of Ambrose, & to fly to Illy •… , for safety of her own life, & her sons life. Theodosius being mindful of the kindness of Gratianus toward him, led an army against the tyrant Maximus. The captains of Maximus army, terrified with the rumor of he might of Theodosius army, delivered him bound into the hands of Theodosius, & he was justly punished unto the death. Andragathius, who slew the Em. G •… atian (as said is) seeing no way to escape, threw himself headlonges into a river, & so ended his wretched life. About the same time Iustina the mother of Valent. the II. she died, her son was peaceably possessed in his kingdom, & Theodosius returned to the east again. But within few days he was compelled to gather a new army & fight against the tyrant Eugenius, & his chief captain A bogastus, who had conspired against Valent. the II. & strangled him while he was lying in his bed. This battle went hardly at the beginning, but Theodosius had his recourse to GOD by prayer: & the LORD sent a mighty tempest of wind, which blew so vehemently in the face of Eugenius army that their darts were ramue •… sed and turned back by the violence of the wind, in their own faces. Of which miraculous support, sent from above, the Poë •… Claudian writes these Verses:
The tyrant Eugenius fell down at the feet of Theodosius, to beg pardon: but the soldiers pursued him so stra •… tly, that they slew him at the Emp. feet. Arbogastus, the author of all this mischief, he fled, & being out of all hope of safety, slew himself. Like as there was no sacrifice, wherein dung was not found, evē so the life & actions of this noble Emp. was spotted with some infirmities. Against the inhabitants of Thessalomca the Emp. was moved with excessive anger so that 7000. innocent people were s •… in, invited to the spectacle of Plays, called Ludi circenses, & in the Grieke language, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . For this fault the good Em. was reproved by Ambrose Bish. of Millane, & confessed his fault in sight of the people with tears: and made a law, that the like commandments anent the slaughter of people, should not h •… ue hasty execution, until the time that 30. days were overpassed: to the ende that space might be left either to mercy, or to repentance. In like manner, he was angry out of mea •… ure against the people of Antiochia, for overthrowing the brazen portrate of his beloved bed-fellow Placilla. The Emp. denuded their town of the dignity of a Metropolitan City, conferring this eminent honor to their neighbor town Laodicea. Moreover he threatened to set the town on f •… e, and to redact it unto the base estate of a Vil age. But Flauiannus, Bishop of Antiochia, by his earnest travails with the Emperor, mitigated his wrath: (for the people repented their foolish fact, & were sore afraid) & the good Emp. moved with pity, pardoned the fault of the town of Antiochia. His lenity toward the Arians, whom he permitted to keep conuentions in principal Cities, was with great dexterity & wisdom reproved by Amphilochius, Bishop of Iconium: For he came in upon a time, and did reverence to the Emperor, but not unto Arcadius his son (albeit already associated to his Father in gouernament, & declared Augustus) whereat Theodosius being offended, Amphilochis very pertinentlie, and in due season, admonished the Emperor, that the GOD ofHeauen also would be offended with them, who tolerated the blasphemers of his only begotten Son, the LORD JESUS CHRIST. Wherupon followed a law, discharging the conuentions of Heretics in principal Cities. In all these infitmities, it is remarkable that the good Emperor 〈◊〉 gave place to wholesome admonitions. The excessive rains he was compe •… led to undertake in Wa •… re-fare, hastened his death: for he contracted sickness soon after his returning from the battle faught against Eug •… nius. and died in the 60 year of his age, and in the 16. year of his reign. He left behind him his two sons, Arcadius to g •… uerne the East, and Honorius to govern the West.
CHAP. II. Of Pastors and Doctors.
AFTER Eusebius, Miltiades governed the Roman Church 4. years, 7. months, and 8. days, as Platina writeth. His ministration was in the days of the reign of Constantine, to whom the Emperor remitted the controversy betwixt Cecilianus and the Donatists, to be judged by him and his Collegues Rheticus, Maternus, and Marinus. The Donatists would not acquiesce to the determination of Miltiades, and his Collegues. The good Emperor appointed this cause of new again to be judged in A •… les, by a number of Bishops of Spain, Italy and France, because the Donatists would not acquiesce to the determination of Miltiades and his Collegues. In the Council of A •… les, Cecilianus was likewise absolved, and the Donatistcs again succumbed in their probation. Notwitstanding they appealed to the Emp. Constantine: and when the Emp. heard the cause of Cecilianus pleaded before himself, the Donatists could not prove, that either Cecilianus had been admitted Bishop of Carthage by a man who was Proditor, or yet that he had admitted any other man culpable of the like fault to an Ecclesiastical office. If the Bishop of Rome had been supreme Judge in all Ecclesiastical causes, Constantine had done him wrong, to appoint other Judges to cognosce in this cause, after the Bishop of Rome, and his Collegues, had given out their definitive sentence. His ordinance anent prohibition of fasting upon the LORD'S day, was expedient at that time to be a distinguishing note of true Christians, from Manichean heretics, whose custom was upon the LORDES day to fast. The purple garment, the palace of Lateran, the superiority of the town of Rome, and gouernament of the West, which honors some allege were conferred by Constantine to Miltiades and Silvester is a fable, not worthy of refutation: all these honors the Emperors of the West, successors of Constantine, poss •… ssed, and not the Bishop of Rome, for the space of many hundredth years.
To Miltiades succeeded Silvester, and ministered 23. years, 10. months, & 11. days. In his time was the Heretic Arius excommunicated by Alexander, without the fore-knowledge of the Bishop of Rome: It was enough, that after excommunication intimation was made to other bishops, which duty the Bishop of Alexandria neglected not Learned men should be ashamed of fables, to say that Constantine was baptized by Sylvester, for Sylvester was dead before Constantine was baptized. And Platina himself is compelled to grant that Marcus, the successor of Sylvester, governed the Church of Rome in Constantine's days. And Eusebius testifieth, that Constantine was baptized in Nicomedia, immediately before his death. Concerning the donation of Co •… stantine, wherein he conferreth the dominion of the West to the Bish. of Rome. it is like unto a rotten egg, which is cast out of the basket, lest all the rest be set at the less avail. No ancient writter maketh mention of any such thing. Yea, Constantine, in his testamentall legacy, allotted the Dominion of the West to two of his sons, namely, to Constantine younger, and to Constance. How then had he, by an anteriour disposition, resigned these Dominions to the Bishop of Rome? If Papists be not better countenanced by Antiquity in other things, then in this point, they have no great cause to brag of Antiquity.
To Sylvester succeeded Marcus, and ministered 2. years, 8. months, and 20. days.
After Marcus, Julius governed the Roman Church, 15. years. Sozomenus attributes to Julius 25. years. His ministration was in the days of the Emperor Constantius and his brethren. He was a defender of the true Faith, and a City of refuge to those who were persecuted by Arians: as namely, to Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria, Paulus Bishop of Constantinople, Asclepas Bishop of Gaza, Marcellus Bishop of Aneyra, and Lucius Bishop of Adrianopolis: All these were unjustly deposed from their offices by the Arians, and had recourse to Julius. He was neither ashamed of the Gospel of CHRIST, nor of his afflicted servants. In the Council of Serdica great honor was conferred unto him, to wit, that men unjustly condemned by Arians should have refug •… to Julius: to whom they gave power of new again, to judge their cause. This was an Act of the Council of Serdica, and not of the Nicene Council (as was confidently allege •… d in the Council of Carthage) and a personal honor conferred to one man alone, for respective causes: but not extended to his successors, as though all the Bishops of Rome at all times should be Judges of appellation. The Arians were sore grieved for this, that Julius both in word, and deed, and writ, assisted Athanasius and his complices. The chafing letters, and mutual expostulations, that passed betwixt Julius and the Arians convened in the Council of Antiochia, are to be read in the History of Socrates. Platina, in the grandoure of his speeches, is inconsiderate, as if Julius had damned the presumption of the Oriental Bisshops, who durst conuocate an assembly without license before obtained from the Bishop of Rome. Noah such thing is contained in the letter of Julius, but only an expostulation, that they did not advertise him of their Council, to the ende he might have sent his Ambassadors, and given unto them his best advise. Julius knew the Constitutions of the Nicene Council, which gave power to every Patriarch within his own bounds, to conuocate Councils.
To IULIUS succeeded LIBERIUS, and continued six years: some assign unto him eighteen years, others ninetecne years: so uncertain is the computation of the years of their gouernament. He governed the Church of Rome in the days of CONSTANTIUS, by whom also he was banished to Thracia, because he would not consent to the depositi •… n of ATHANASIUS: which point was seriously urged in the Council of Millane. THEODORETUS give •… h ample testimony of his constancy and freedom of speaking to the •… mperour (not disagreeing with his name) before his banishment. In his absence FOELIX the second was chosen to be Bishop of Rome: to whom THEODORETUS giveth this praise, that he adhered firmly to the Nicene Council: but blameth him for this that he received his ordination from Arians. N •… twithstanding he was more hated by the Arians, then was LIBERIUS, and was put to death by them, after he had governed one year, four months, & two days. After two years banishment, LIBERIUS returned back again to Rome. THEODORETUS is silent in the matter of his praises after his returning. Hilarius, Bishop of Poitiers affirmeth, that he both consented to the deposition of Athanasius, and to the council of Sirmium. There is nothing inlaking now to give out a determinate sentence, whether or no the Bishop of Rome may err in matters of Faith: but only the compearance of the great Advocate of all evil causes Onuphrius, who will needs find out some old partchment, or some unknown manu-script, to free the chair of Rome from all suspicion of error in matters of faith. But Bellarmine gives over his cause, and can find no sufficient Apology for him, because his letters written to the Emp. Constantius after his returning from banishment, smells of Arianism.
After the death of Lib •… rius, succeeded Damasus, and ruled 18. years, in time of the reign of Julian, of Jovinian, and of Valentinian: his competitor Ursinus had many favorers, in so much that the question who should be elected Bishop of Rome, was tried by the sword, rather then by reasons, suffrages, and votes: so that in the Church of Sisinum were slain to the number of 137. persons. Damasus prevailed, and had the upper hand. He was friendly to Peter Bishop of Alexandria, whom Lucius an Arian Bishop imprisoned: but he escaped, and fled to Rome, as Athanasius had done before in the days of Julius. He damned the Heresy of Apollinaris, in a Council conucened at Rome. His Epistle written to the Oriental Bishops, whereinto he intimates unto thē the condamnitour sentence pronounced against Apollinaris and his disciple Timothy, is indi •… ed with the swelling pride of a lofty mind, breathing soueranity and preeminence above all other Churches, as if the Roman Church were that only Apostolic chair, whereunto all other Churches aught homage and reverence. So that Basilius, Bishop of Casarea in Cappadocia, complains of the pride of the West, because they cared only for their own preeminence, but not for the estate of their persecuted brethren in the East, under the Arian Emperor Valen •… , whose estate they knew not, neither sent they m •… ssengers to visit them, neither would they receive true information concerning the estate of their brethren. Yea, and Basilius saith, that he purposed oft times, to have written to the chief of them, that is, to Damasus, that he should not count the splendor of pride to be true dignity, & honor. Where it is to be marked, that whē he speaks of Damasus, he calleth him 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , that is, the principal of them, to wit of the Ch •… rches of the west: but not the supreme governor of the uniuersal Church, neither the souera •… gn cōmander of the Churches of the East. It is ignorance of the Ecclesiastical history, that makes men to imagine, that the supremacy of the Bishop of Rome is an ancient thing. When Damasus damned the Heresy of Apolbnaris, in the Council convened at Rome, it was the year of our LORD 379. according to the computation of Ierum: and at this time the very aiming to supremacy is counted Splendor Supubiae, that is, the splendor of pride. Damasus wrote concerning the lives of the bishops of Rome preceeding his time: & was familiarly acquainted with Jerome, as Jerome's writings clearly proports.
To Damasus succeeded Siricius, and ministered 15. ye es: at what time Gratianus and Valentinian obtained the Imperial gouernamēt: he ordained, that married men, who were admitted to Ecclesiastical offices, after their ordination should abstain from the company of their wives: as if it were great devotion to a man to transgress against the wife of his youth, the wife of his covenant, and his companion in all his wearisome labors His prohibition of the seconde marriage, smelleth of the Heresy of Montanus. In his time with pride of the 〈◊〉 at Rome was joined insatiable auaritiousnes increasing daily by degrees, so that the Emperors Valentintan the II. and Theodo •… us, were compelled by a law, to inhibit widows under pretence of devotion, to leave their houses, treasures, and house-hold-stuff, to the Church, to the utter impoverishing and undoing the estate of their children.
Bishops of Alexandria.
IN the third CENTURIE we rested at the name of 〈◊〉 Bishop of Alexandria, whose successor was Alexander. His accurate disputation anent the unity in the Tiinitie, made Arius a presbyter in Alexandria, to think that Alexander was entangled with the er •… our of Sabellius: Hereof arose contertious dispu •… ations, new opinions, exulc •… er te minds & open schisms. This intestine malady was not unknown to the good Emperor Constantine, who sent Hosius Bishop of Corduba, a man singularly beloved of the Emperor, together with persuasiue letters from the Emperor, exhorting both Alexander and Arius, to leave accurate & profounde disputations, and keep inviolably the peace & unity of the Church: But no means could avail, until this question was desided by the determination of the general Council of Nice.
After the Council of Nice had damned the opinion of Arius as Heretical, Alexander continued not above 5. months alive: In the last period of his life he called for Athanasius, but he was not present: Of whom Alexander said, Thou hast escaped, but shalt not escape, fore-prophesying that Athanasius should undergo that wieghtie charge, which he, giving place to nature, & to the calling of GOD, was leaving. Athanasius in his young years and childish plays was counterfeiting divine mysteries, & baptizing children: yet after such due form of interrogatories & answers preceeding Baptism that Alexander then Bishdurst not presume to rebaptize those who apparently in childish simplicity had been made partakers of divine grace. He began no sooner to accept the weighty charge of the Church of Alexandria, anno 333. but the Arians began to fret and offend, knowing how diligently he attended upon Alexander his predecessor, at the Council of Nice, and how vigilantly & wisely he had detected the lurking absurdities of the vile 〈◊〉 of Arius: And they thought the preferment of Athanasius was the utter undoing of their opinion. Therefore they conspired against him, and by a multiplied number of false accusations prevailed somewhat against him, even in the days of the good Emper. Constantine. But in the days of Const •… ntius and Julian, almost the whole world conspired against him: so that except he had been up-holden by that grace that cometh from above, it was not possible that he could have consisted and borne out such unsupportable hatred. Justly did Nazianzen compare him in time of adversity to the Adamant, and in time of prosperity to the Magnet In time of adversity no trouble overcame him, in time of prosperity, he allured the hearts of men more intractable then iron, to embrace the truth of GOD.
Now seeing Athanasius lived six and forty years, governor of the Church of Alexandria, his great troubles cannot be comprised in better order, then by declaring shortly what troubles he sustained: first in Constantine's days, next under the reign of Constantius: thirdly, under the reign of Julian: and last to speak of his peaceable end under the reign of the Emperor Valens, albeit he was an Arian Persecuter. In the days of Constantine first he was accused by an effronted harlot, whom the Arians had suborned to bear false witness against him: but Athan. guided the matter with wisdom, & suffered Timothy a worthy presbyter, to speak (whom he had brought in with him to the Council) but he was silent himself. The impudent woman pointing out Timothy by the finger (as if he had been Athanasius) with clamours void of all womanly modesty, affirmed that he had abused her in whosedome, so that all who were present were ashamed of her impudency. This was done in the Council of Tyrus, to the perpetual shame of the Arians, who suborned an harlot to accuse the faithful servant of CHRIST without a cause.
Secondly they accused him for this, that he had cutted off the hand of Arsenius, some time his own servant: and for great •… r evidence, they produced in the Council of Tyrus before the Judges the hand of a man enclosed in a case, which hand they affirmed that Athanasius had cut off from Arsenius. This they spake the more confidently, because they supponed that Arsenius remained still secretly kept in their own custody: but by the providence of GOD he escaped, came to Tyrus, and was presented before the Council, having both his hands perfect, sound, and vnmutilated, After this the Council was full of confusion, for the Arians cried, that ATHANASIUS by magic arts deluded the senses of men: and they were purposed, by violence and force to lay hands upon him, and to tear him in pieces: But he fled by a ship, and came to Constantinople, where the Emperor was, as shall be declared, GOD willing, in the fourth CHAPTER. The rest of his accusations, and howe they dealt against him moste unjustly and falsely, and gave out a sentence of deposition against him in his absence I remit unto the place foresaid.
Under the reign of Constantius, Athanasius was compelled to fly at two diverse times. First, while the Emp. Constance was yet alive who procured a Council to be gathered in Serdica, wherein the cause of Athanasius was tried, and he found innocent: and was sent back again and re •… ored to his place: For Constantius feared the mina •… ng letters of his brother Constance, who threatened to lead an army to the Fast, and to poss •… sse Athanasius in his place again, incase his brother linguered in doing of it. After the death of Constance, Sabinianus was sent to kill Athanasius, but he escaped miraculously, as hath been declared.
Again he was compelled first to fl •… e, and afterward to lurk in the days of Julian: He was restored again by the good Emp. Jovinian: and he continued in his ministration until the days of Valentinian and Valens: And although Valens was a crew I persecutor, yet he abstained from persecuting of Athanasius, for honor of his gray hairs and for that he was reverently regarded of all men. Thus Athanasius, full of days, died in peace, after he had governed the Church of Alexandria 46. years.
To worthy Athanasius succeeded Peter, whom the Emp. Valens caused to be imprisoned, and Lucius an Arian bishop, to be seated in his room. Lucius was made bishop of Alexandria, against all kind of Ecclesiastical order: neitheir did the people crave him, nor the Clergy of Alexandria approve him, nor any Orthodox bishop give him ordination. Peter escaped out of prison, and fled to Damasus bishop of Rome. Lucius like unto a ravenous wolf, not only banished the Homousians out of Al •… xandria and Egypt, but also that which was more insolent, and never attempted before, he persecuted the Monks who dwelt in solitary places of the wilderness, and banished them, who had •… lready banished themselves from all the delicate pleasures of the world. But mark, To what place could men be banished, who inhabited the desert places of barren wildern •… sses? He caused them (especially Macarius & Isidorus) to be transported unto an Isle, whereinto no Christians were to be found, but only Pagans and worshippers of devils. When these prisoners of CHRIST approached near unto the Isle, the devil left his old habitation, to wit the mouth of the image, from whence he was accustomed to speak, and he pos •… essed the Priests daughte who ran unto the shore, and cried words not unlike to those which were spoken to Paul and Silas in Philipp •… , by the maid who had the spirit of divination: and after this the devil left her, lying upon the ground, as though she had been dead: But the men of GOD, by their supplications to GOD, restored the young woman to health, and delivered her to her father. The inhabitants of the Isle, who saw the wonderful works of GOD, received the faith, and were baptized in the Name of CHRIST. LUCIUS was so dashed with the fame of this wonderful work, and with the out-crying of the people against him, that he permitted the foresaid monks to return back again to their own places.
Afrer Peter succeeded Timothy, for one cause worthy to be blamed, because he favored the usurpation of Maximus Cynicus, who presumed without a lawful calling to be Bishop of Constantino. And after him Theophilus succeeded, whose attempts against Chrysostom I remit to the next CENTURIE.
Bishops of Antiochia.
IN Antiochia, after Tyrannus, succeeded Vitalius, about the time that the rage of the tenth Persecution began to be asswaged: therefore he re-edified a Church in Antiochia, which had been demolished in time of the Pe •… secution of Dioclesian, and his successor Philogonius, perfected the building. To whom succeeded Eustatius who was present at the Council of Nice, & was Moderator and Mouth to all the rest. Eusebius, sometime bishop of Berytus, afterward bishop of Nicomedia, and last of all •… bishop of Constantinople, did insinuate himself in favor with the Emperor Constantine, and obtained from him liberty to go to Jerusalem, and to visit the Temples that Constantine had lately built in Bethlehem. Jerusalem, & upon Mount Oliuct. To him resorted a number of Arian Bishops, who had all •… secretly conspired against Eustatius. and suborned a vile woman to accuse him of whoredom. The Arians upon the simple deposition of a woman suborned by themselves, contrary •… all kind of order, dep •… sed Eustatius, and persuaded the Emp •… rour to banish him, as a man convict both of adultery, and of tyranny. But the LORD laid his correcting hand upon the woman, whom the Arians had suborned, so that she died, sore tormented with a grievous sickness, and confessed that money was given unto her, to accuse Eustatius, & that she had sworn deceitfully, because the child procreated with her, was begotten by Eustatius a smith of that name, but not by Eustatius bishop of Antiochia.
The Arians, in the days of Constantine, had no great upper hand, except only in the matter of Athanasius his banishment to Triere, and in the deposition and banishment of Eustatius to Illyricum. But in the days of Constantius they took boldness, and planted Arian bishops in all principal places: so that in Antiochia (after Eustatius) Eulalius, Euphronius, Placitus, Leontius, Eudoxius, all these were Arian bishops, and placed by them in Antiochia. In end Meletius was ordained bishop of Antiochia, a man of great gifts, whom the Arians transported our of Sebastia in Armenia, and placed him in Antiochia, supposing that by the means of his excellent learning, many should be allured to their opinion: But it fell out far otherwise: for Meletius professed the true faith. Only the reproueable form of his entry, by receiving ordination from Arian bishops, was the ground of remediless schisms in the Church of Antiochia. There had been already two factions in the town, to wit, Arians, and Eustatians: now the third faction is added of them, who were called Meletiani, with whom Eustatiani did not communicate, but abhorred them as they did the Arians. This schism endured after the death of Meletius for the space of fourscore and five years. Meletius was banished in the days of Constantius, and Euzoius an Arian bishop placed in his room. He was restored again by Julian, only for desire he had to undo things done by Constantius, and to bring his name to disgrace. Likewise under the reign of the Emperor Valens, he was banished the seconde time. He governed the Church of Antiochia five and twenty years, and died in Constantinople, immediately after the second general Council and was carried to Antiochia, to be buried there.
The ordination of Paulinus to be Bishop of Antiochia, Meletius being yet alive, was the foolish fact of Lucifer bishop of Calaris, in the Isle of Sardinia. He was restored from banishment in the days of Julian. And took purpose, accompanied with Eusebius, bishop of Vercellis in Liguria, who was likewise restored at that same time, to visit the estate of their brethren. Eus •… bius addressed himself to Alexandria, and conferred with Athanasius: But Lucifer went to Antiochia, where he found miserable distractions, even amongst those, who professed one & the self same Faith. When exhortations to unity could prevail nothing, but the dissention daily increased, he ordained Paulinus presbyter of Antiochia, and the chief of those who were called Eustatiani, to be bishop of Antiochia. This fact of Lucifer was like unto fuel added unto the fire, and mightily augmented the schism. Theodoretus blameth him for so doing, and Eusebius Vercellensis, when he came back from Alexandria, disliked also the fact of Lucifer. Wherefore Lucifer would not communicate any longer with Eusebius. These sorrowful times of multiplied schisms, alienated the hearts of a great number of people from the true CHURCH. Meletius was restored from his seconde banishment, in the days of the Emperor GRATIANUS. Paulinus would upon no condition communicate with him, because he had received ordination from the Arians. When Meletius had ended his life, the people would not admit Paulinus to be their bishop, because they said, it was not meet that he should be his successor, who despised his fellowship and counsel in his life time.
To MELETIUS succeeded FLAVIANUS, a worthy m •… n. Paulinus albeit he appointed Euagrius to be his successor, yet such forms manifestly repugnant to the approved order of the Church could take no place. The bishops of Rome Damasus, Siricius, and Anastatius, were great adversaries to him, and misinformed the good Emperor Theodosius against him: but when he compeared before the Emperor, he spake before him both freely and wisely, words that liked the Emperor well, as they are reported by Theodoretus: O Emperor, if any man do blame my Faith as perverse, or my life as unworthy, I am content to be judged by my very adversaries: but if the disputation only boe anent principality, and eusinent places, I will not contend with any man, but denude myself of all superiority, and come •… it the chair of ANTIOCHIA to whom ye like best. The Emperor admired his courage and wisdom, and sent him back again to govern his own flock, and was slow to hear frivolous accusations in time to come against Flarianus. This was that worthy Bishop, who associated 〈◊〉 Chrysostom to be his fellow-laborer in Antiochia: and who mitigated the wrath of Theodosius conceived aga •… nst the City of Antiochia, for misusing the imag •… of his wife Placilla.
Bishops of Constantinople.
CONSTANTINOPLE was built by Constantine, anno 336. in a pla •… e where Asia and Europe nearly confines, b •… eing separate •… d only by a narrow firth, called of old Bo •… phorus Thracius. The cause wherefore this Imperial City was built in this place was not to resign the town of Rome, and the gouernament of the West to the bishop of Rome: but, as Sozomenus writes, that Constantinople, or new Rome, might be as a sovereign Lady to all those who in the East, West, North, or South, were obedient to the Roman Empire. Learned men in our days are ashamed to maintain all the foolish fables of the Roman Church, for they see clearly the cause of the building of this great City was to keep firmly both the East and the West under the Souerainitie of Constantine, and his successors.
Alexander bishop of Constantinople, proved a worthy man, in the days of the Emp. Constantine. The Arians finding themselves to be utterly rejected by Athanasius, they addressed themselves to Constantinople, under the conduct of Eusebius, bishop of Nicomedia: and threatened Alexander, that incase he would not voluntarily receive. Arius into the fellowship of the Church, then they should bring him in authorized with the Emperors command, to the grievance of his heart. Alexander clothed himself with the armor of GOD, and all the night long prayed in this sense: LORD, if Arius be to be received tomorrow into the communion of thy CHURCH, then let thy servant depart in peace, and destroy not the just with the wicked: but, LORD, if thou wilt spare thy CHURCH. whereunto I am assured. thou wilt be favorable: then LORD, turn thine eyes toward the words of the Eusebians, and give not thine inheritance to a desolation and reproach: and cut of Arius, lest while he entereth into the CHURCH, his heresy also seem to enter with him, and so no difference seem to be betwixt Piety and Jmpietie. The day next following the prayer of Alexander, Eusebius bishop of Nicomedia, with his retinue came with great confidence & pomp, to perform all which they had threatened they would do: But Arius was compelled to go to a secret place, whereinto his bowels gusihed out: and he concluded his wretched life, with ignominy and shame.
To Alexander succeeded Paulus: His lot was to govern this Church under the reign of an Arian Emperor Constantius, who rejected him, and seated Eusebius, bishop of Nicomedia, in his place: But this great parrone of the Arian Heresy, scarcely was placed in Constantinople, when he ended his life. The Homousians received again Paulus to be their bishop: The Arians chose Macedonius. This was the c •… use of great debate in Constantinople, and the people divided in factions, hatefully invaded one another. The Emperor hearing of the tumult, sent Hermogenes, the general commander of his hors •… -men, to remove Paulus from Constantinople: Hermogenes was very ready to execute the Emperors commandment, but the people being affectioned toward their Pastor, arose up with pop •… re tumult, compassed the house of Hermogenes, set it on 〈◊〉 sl •… w himself, and fastened a cord to his legs, and trailed him along the streets. For this cause the Emper. Constantius willing to punish the authors of this tumult, hastened to come to Constantinople. The people went forth to meet him, and with rears confessed their fault, and craved pardon. The Emperor abstained from punishing them unto the death, but he cutted off the one half of the victual which the liberality of his father had bestowed upon Constantinople, to be paid yearly out of the tributes of Egypt. He banished Paulus the second time and seated Macedo •… ius in Co •… stantinople, not without effusion of blood. Paulus was again restored by the means of the Emp. Constance: but after the death of Constance, he was banish •… d to Cucusus, a town of Armenia, where he was strangled by the bloody Arians.
The Church of Constantinople was miserably troubled with Arrianis •… ne, under the reigns of Constantius & Valens. The reigns of Graiianus and Theodosius was a breathing time to the professors of the true Faith. At this time Nazianzenus a constant defender of the Faith, was chosen Bishop of Constantinople, who notwithstanding voluntarily left the great City, in regard the Bishops assembled in the second general Council, gave not a full and uniuers •… ll consent to his admission: Yet gave they all without hesitation their consent to Nectarius, a man of noble birth, of the country of Silicia, at that time 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and who had received no ecclesiastical preferment before that time. This man (I say) they made Bishop of Constantinople, with full cons •… nt and allowance, both of the Council and people: ouerpassing Nazianzenus: so frail are the cogitations of men, even in general Councils, that they are oft times more ruled with affection then reason. Nectarius continued in that office until the third year of the reign of Arcadius, that is, until the year of our LORD 401. In his time the confession of sins done in secrete, to presbyter poenitentiarius, was abrogated in the Church of Constantinople, upon this occasion as Socrates writeth, A certain noble woman was confessing in secret her sins to presbyter poenitentiarius, and she confessed adultery, committed with one of the Church Deacons. Eudaemon (this was the name of the father confessor) gave counsel to Nectarius, to abrogate this custom of auricular and secrete confession, because the Church was like to be slandered, and evil spoken of by these means. Socrates can scarce give allowance to this fact of Nectarius, in respect that by abrogation of this custom, the unfruitful works of darkness were less coargued and reproved. But Socrates considered not, that CHRIST, when he talked with the Samaritan woman at the Well, sent away his disciples to buy bread, to the ende the poor Samaritan sinner might more freely pour out her secrete sins in the bosom of CHRIST, who knew all things that were done in secrete. It is not my purpose to contend with Socrates, he is writing an history, I am writing but a short Compend of an history: he taketh liberty to declare his judgment concerning this fact of Nectarius, in abrogating confession of secrete sins to pres byter poenitentiarius. No man can blame me to write my judgment concerning auricular confession. It is in our days not like unto the mantle where with Sem and Japheth covered the nakedness of their Father Noah: but it is in very deed a lap of the mantle of the devil, covering the nakedness of his children, that is, the horrible treasons that are plotted in secrete by the children of the devil, against Christian Magistrates. Now is auriculare concession for greater causes to be abrogated, then of old presbyter poenitentiarius was discharged by Nectarius.
Bishops of Jerusalem.
TO Thermon succeeded Macarius, anno 318. about the 7. year of the reign of Constantine: In his time it is thought, that Helena, the mother of Constantine, found the Cross of CHRIST: but Ambrose writes, that she worshipped it not, for that, saith he, had been Gentilis error, & vanitas impioram, that is, an error of Pagans, and vanity of ungodly people. But now to lay aside the inexcusable fault of adoration of the tree whereupon our LORD suffered, What necessity had Helena to be so serious to seek out this tree. and to commit it to the custody. of all posterities? seeing that Joseph of Arimathea, who sought the body of JESUS at the hands of Pilate, to the end he might bury it honourably, yet sought he not the tree whereon CHRIST was crucified, which with little ado might have been obtained. Secondly, during the time that the Cross was easy to be found, and e •… sie to have been discerned from other crosses, How could the blessed virgins the mother of the LORD, and holy Apostles, have committed such an oversight, in not keeping that precious treasure, if so be in the keeping of it there be so great devotion, as the Roman Church now talks of? Thirdly, what is the cause, that the Roman Church brags so much of antiquity? when as the worshipping of the cross, one of the main points of their Religion was unknown to the first 300. years of our LORD: & now in the 4 Cent. the cross is found, but not worshipped yea, and the adoration of it is detested & abhorred, as an error of Pagans.
To Macarius succeeded Maximus, who had be ne his fellowlabourer, as of old Alexander was to Narcissus. Macarius governed the Church of Jerusalem, in the peaceable days of Constantine, but Maximus governed that same Church himself alone, in the days of Constantius. He was present at the Council of Tyrus: but Paphnutius a Bishop and conf •… ssor in Thebaida pitied the simplicity of Maximus, whom the Arians with deceitful speeches had almost circumueened, and he stepped to him, and suffered him not to sit in the assembly of ungodly people: where •… upon followed a bande of indissoluble conjunction, not only with Paphnutius, but also with Athanasius, who was charged with many false accusations in that wicked Council of Tyrus. This warning made him circumspect and wise in time to come: so that he was no •… present at the Arriane Council of Antiochia, gathered under pretence of dedication of the Temple which Constantine began to build, but his son Constantius perfected the building of it.
To Maximus succeeded Cyrillus, a man greatly hated by the Arians, in so much, that Acacius bishop of Casarea Palestine deposed him (no doubt by some power granted to him by the Emp. Constantius, with advise of Arian Bishops) Notwithstanding Silvanus Bishop of Tarsus received him, and he taught in that Cong •… egation with great liking and contentment of the people. The strife of Acacius against him in the Council of Seleucia, I remit unto the own place. In time of famine he had a great regard to poor indigent people and sold the precious vessel and garments of the Church for their support. This was a ground of his accusation aft •… rward, because a costly garment bestowed by the Emp. Constantine to the Church of Jerusalem, Cyrillus sold it to a merchant in time of famine, and again, the merchant s •… ld it unto a lascivious woman: and such frivolous thi •… ges w •… re aggreaged by the Arians, who hated the men of GOD.
Of other Pastors and Doctors, in Asia, Africa, and Europe.
BESIDES the Patriarchs of principal places, GOD raised up in this CENTURI •… a great number of learned Preachers, who were like unto the Ibides of Egypt, a remedy prepared by GOD, against the multiplied number of venomous and flying Serpents. Even so learned Fathers of whom I am to speak, were instruments of GOD, to undo the Heresies which abounded in this age, above all other ages. Did not Nazianzenus undo the Heresy of Apollinaris? Basilius the Heresy of Eunomius? Hilarius like unto a s •… conde Deucalion saw the over-flowing speate of Arianism abated in FRANCE. Ambrosius, Epiphanius, and Jerome set their hearts against all Heresies, either in their time, or prece •… ding their days. It were an infinite labor, to write of them all, who in this age, like unto glistering stars with the shining light of celesticall doctrine illuminated the darkness of the blind world: but the names of some principal Teachers (GOD willing) I shall remember.
Eusebius Pamphili, Bishop of Cesarea in Palestine lived under the Emp. Constantine, with whom he was familiarly acquainted. He was desired to supply the place of Eustatius bishop of Antiochia, whose deposition the Arians without all form of order had procured most unrighteously: but he would not consent to accept that charge, so that the chair: of Antiochia vaked without a Bishop e •… ght years. Some expecting the restitution of Eustatius, others feeding themselves upon vain hopes, that Eusebius would accept that place. The Emp. Constantine commended his modesty, and counted him worthy to be bishop of the whole world. Nevertheless he was not altogether free of the Heresy of Arius before the Nicene Council, and he was remiss and slack in the cause of Athanasius. He was so familiarlie acquainted with Pamphilus, who suffered martyrdom in Cesarea, that he clothed himself with his name, and called himself Eusebius Pamphili. He died about the time that Athanasius first returned from banishment by the means of Constantine the youn •… er, about the year of our LORD 342.
Nazianzenus lived in the days of Constantius, Julian, and Theodosius. He was borne in a little town of Cappadocia, called Nazianzum, from which he received his name. He was trained up in learning in Alexandria & in Athens: his familiarity with Basilius Magnus began in Athens, and it was increased in the wilderness: he preached in Sasima, but because it was a place unmeet for studies, he returned to Nazianzum, and was a helper to his aged father. After his fathers death he went to Constantinople, where he found the town in a moste desolate condition, in regard the Arian & Macedonian Heresies had so mightily prevailed, that all the principal Churches w •… re occupied by them. Nazianzenus only had liberty to preach in a little Church called Anastatia, because the truth of GOD, which seemed to have been buried, now by the preaching of Nazianzenus was revived again. In the second general Council gathered by Theodosius, because some Bishops of Macedonia and Egypt murmured against his admission, he counterfeited the fact of Jonah, and was content to be cast out of his place, to procure peace and concord amongst his brethren. He benefited the CHURCH of CHRIST in the days of Julian, by writing books of Christian Poesie, whereby the Christian Youth should have no harm by the interdiction of Julian, prohibiting the children of Christians to be brought up in the schools of learning. He detected the Heresy of Apollinaris, and the abominations of Heathen idolatry, whereunto Julian had sold himself, more clearly then any other man had done. A man worthy for excellency of gifts, to be ca •… led THEOLOGUS.
Basilius Magnus Bishop of Cesarea in Cappadocia, was so united in heart and mind with Nazianzenus, that the pen of Socrates will net separate the treatises of their lives. His father Basilius, his mother Eumele, his nuise that fostered him, named Macrina, all were Christians. His father was martyred under the persecuting Emp. Maximus. He left behind him five sons: three of them were Bishops, namely, Basilius bishop of Cesarea, Peter bish. of Sebasta and Gregorius B. of Nyssa. He was instructed in all kind of learning in Cesarea, in Constantinople, in Athens under Himerius and Proaeresius, in Antiochia under Libanius At his second returning to Athens, he acquainted himself with Nazianzenus. They spent too much time in searching out the deepness of human learning: and it repented Basilius, that he had spent so much time in searching out things that are not necessary to eternal life. He was ordained a Deacon by Meletius B. of Antiochia and a presbyter by Eusebius B. of Cesarea in Cappadocia. The good carriage of Basilius toward Eusebius is worthy of remembrance, albeit Eusebius conceived indignation against him without a cause yet he would not expostulate with his Bishop, but he departed to a solitary place in Pontus, where he remained until the days of the Emperor Valens. Then did the Arian Heresy so mightily prevail, that necessity compelled the Churches of Cappadocia to entreat Basilius to return again lest in his absence Arianism should get a full upper hand. Basilius returned, not without the fore-knowledge & good advise of Nazianzenus his dear friend, who counseled him to preueene Ensebius, & to overcome him in courtesy & humanity: So was he reconciled to Euseb. & after his death was ordained B. of Cesarea in Cappadocia, whom GOD so blessed, that the Arians & Eunomians, who seemed to be excellently learned, when they encountered with Nazianz. & Basilius, they were like unto men altogether destitute of learning. In the persecution of Valens he was led to Antiochia, and presented before the deputy of Valens, who threatened him with banishment & death: but he answered with invincible courage, so that the deputy was astonished at his answers. He was not afraid of banishment, because the earth is the LORD'S: neither was he afraid of death, but wished to have that honor, that the bands of his earthly tabernacle might be loosed for the testimony of CHRIST. The Emp. son Galaces at this time was sick unto the death, & the Empresse sent him word, that she had suffered many things in her dream for the B. Basilius, so he was dismissed, and suffered to return to Cesarea. The provident care of GOD over-ruling all human cogitations, kept before-hand some sponkes that were not quenched in the fervent heat of this Persecution. The multiplied number of his letters sent to the Bisshops of the West, whereof he received no comfortable answer, gave unto Basilius just occasion to suspect affectation of supremacy in the West as his own words do testify, which I cite out of the Latin version as most intelligible: Nihil nos fratres separate, nisi animi proposito, separationi causas robúrque demus: unus est Dominus, una Fides, Spes eadem. Sive caput universalis Ecclesiae vos ipsos esse reputatis, non potest pedibus dicere caput, non est mihi opus vobis, &c. That is, There is nothing, brethren, that separates us, except the purpose of our own minds furnish both cause and strength to separation, There is one GOD, one Faith, one Hope. Or if ye suppose yourselves to be head of the universal CHURCH, yet the head cannot say unto the feet, I have no need of you.
Nyssa is a City of Mysia, of old called Pythopolis. The brother germane to Basilius Magnus, named Gregorius, was Bishop of this town. In the second general Council to him was committed the o •… er-sight of the Country of Cappadocia. Albeit the volume of his books be not extant, yet he is renowned in the mouths of the L •… arned: and the fragments of his writings declare that he hath been a man of Note and Mark. Anent sin he said, that albeit the Serpentes that stinged us, were not slaughtered, yet we have sufficient consolation in this, that we are cured from their venomous bits and stinges. Anent pilgrimage to Jerusalem, Mount Olivet, and Bethlehem, he said, that a pilgrimage from carnal lusts, to the righteousness of GOD, is acceptable to the LORD but not a journeying from Cappadocia to Palestine: and that GOD will give a reward in the world to come, only to things done in this world, by warrand of his own Commandment.
Epiphanius was borne in a little Village of Palestine, called Barsanduce in the field of Eleutheropolis. He was brought up amongst the Monks of Palestine and Egypt. In ende he was ordained bishop of Salamina the Metrapol •… tane town of the Isle of Cyprus. He refuted the Heresies preceeding his time in his book called Panarium, and set down a sum of the true faith in his book called Anchoratus. He had a great regard to the poor: in so much, that he was called oeconomus pauperum. And like as Cyprus was naturally situated in a place near approaching to Asia the less, and to Syria, and to Egypt, and Pentapolis, and not far distant from Europe: so it fell out, that Christians, who were disposed to support their indigent brethren, they sent their collections to Epiphanius, and he distributed them to the poor. With all these commendable virtues, there was mixed a reproueable simplicity in him: he was circumueened by Theophilus Bishop of Alexendria, and took a dealing against John Chrysostom Bishop of Constantinople, because he would not be sudden in damning the books of Origen. Also he taught in Constantinople, with endeavor to alienate the hearts of the people from their own Pastor, and celebrated the communion, & ordained a deacon in Constantinople, without the foreknowledge & consent of Chrysostom, & contrary to Church order. Chrysost. on the other part sent him advertisement, that incase he received any disgrace or harm in the fuery of populare commotions, he should blame himself, who by his own inordinate doings was procuring the same. After this Epiphanius ceased from such doings, and entered into a ship, of purpose to return back again to Cyprus, but he died by the way. It is reported of him, that when he entered into the ship, he said, he left three great things behind him, to wit, a great town, a great palace, and great hypocrisy.
It were a matter of infinite labor, and not agreeing with the nature of a COMPEND, to write of all the worthy men of GOD in the Eastern partes, who did fight a good Fight, run a good race, and kept the faith. Asclepas in Gaza, Lucius in Adrianopolis, Basi •… us presbyter in Ancyra, a mighty adversary to the Arians, under the reign of Constantius, and to the Pagans under the reign of Julian, in whose time he was martyred: Philogonius bishop of Antiochia, Hellanicus bishop of Tripolis, and Spyridion, who of a keeper of cattle, became bishop of Trimythus, Hermogenes bishop of Cesarea in Cappadocia, who was present at the Council of Nice, James bishop of Nisibis, in Misopotamia, in the days of Constantius, by whose prayers the army of Sapores king of Persia was miraculously disappointed, Paulus bishop of Neocaesarea: this town is situated upon the banks of Euphrates, and Paphnutius bishop in Th •… baida, two notable Confessors, who were both present at the Council of Nice, Eusebius Samosatenus, to whom many of Basilius Epistles are directed, and who refused to redeliuer unto the Emperor Constantius the subscriptions of the Arian Bishops, who consented to the admission of Meletius to be bishop of Antiochia, which subscriptions were put in his custody. And albeit the messenger sent from the Emperor, thr •… tned to cut off his right hand, incase he d •… liuered not the subscriptions foresaid, yet he constantly refused to deliver them: and the Emp. both admired and commended his constancy: Barses bishop of Edessa in Mesopotamia, Eulogius and Protogenes presbyters there, under the reign of Valens were banished to Antinoe in Thebaida, whose travails GOD wonderfullie bl •… ssed, to the conversion of many souls to the kingdom of GOD: Theodulus bishop of Trianopolis, Amphilochius bishop of Iconium in Lycaonia, Pelagius Laodicenus, whose name is the more famous for his insolent fact: for he married a young woman. & the first night after her marriage, he persuaded her to prefer Virginall chastity, to matrimonial copulation. Antiochus the brother sone of Eusebius Samosatenus could not abide the imposition of the hands of an Arian bishop. Le