The Ancient Christian Religion
And who can be ignorant that the Holy Canonical Scripture, as well of the Old as of the New Testament, is contained within her certain Limits; and that it is so preferred before all latter Writings of Bishops, that it cannot in any wise be doubted or disputed of, whether it be true or whether it be right. Whatsoever is written in it, is certain: But that the Writings of Bishops which have been written, or are now written, after the Canon is confirmed, may be lawfully reprehended both by the more wise Speech perhaps of any man that is more skillful in the Matter, and also by the more grave Authority, and more learned Prudence of other Bishops; and by Councils, if anything in them perhaps have strayed from the Truth. And even Councils themselves, which are gathered in every Region or Province, without all doubt must give place to the Authority of General Councils, which are gathered out of all the Christian World, [if indeed it were possible to obtain a Free Council of that Nature.] And that oftentimes the former General Councils themselves may be corrected by the latter, when by any trial of Matters, that is opened which was shut, and that is known which was hidden, without any swelling of sacrilegious Pride, without any stiff-neck of puffing Arrogance, without any contention of cankered Envy, with holy Humility, with Catholic Peace, with Christian Charity.
Thus Augustine, (who with as much modesty and reason as can well be expressed in a matter of this difficulty) and we with him, dare not look upon any Writings or Decrees of General Councils to be infallible, but that they may admit of Correction or Emendation. Yet doubtless they are to be esteemed as the Council of Fathers, and must needs outweigh (ordinarily) the Opinion of private Christians, at least to quiet strife in the Church about things disputable. And here that Text, Heb. 13. Obey them that have the Rule over you, is of great force, and the Faith of our lawful Pastors is to be followed, with consideration to be had of the end of their Conversation, and that they follow Christ. For as Augustine again, My consent without exception I owe to no man, be he never so well learned, as to the Holy Scripture. Nor may we receive the Doctrine of an Angel of Heaven, if he preach contrary to the Gospel, Gal. 1. 6, 8.
One thing here we may not intermit concerning the Decrees of that Holy Council at Jerusalem, Act. 15. which though the Infallible Dictates of the Holy Ghost are disobeyed, by those who pretend the greatest Reverence to the Determinations of General Councils, to wit, the Papists, and the Protestants also generally. And it is in the case of abstinence from Blood and things strangled, which is expressly in the said Decrees, Act. 15. 28. prohibited to all that from the Gentiles were turned to God; and it is granted by the Papists, That all Christians did obey that Decree with the rest for some Ages after: and yet they presume to violate this Decree, by eating Blood and strangled things, in opposition to the Authority of the Holy Ghost, and this Sacred Council, and against the Evidence of the Scriptures elsewhere prohibiting the same:
First upon a Moral ground, because it is the Life of the Creature, Gen. 9. 5. But Flesh with the Life thereof, which is the Blood thereof, thou shalt not eat. See also, Levite. 17. 14.
Secondly, Upon a Religious account, viz. Because God had reserved it to make atonement for the Soul, Levite. 17. 10, 11. And now,
Thirdly, Prohibited as a necessary thing, even among things not to be dispensed with, viz. The pollution of Idols and Fornication. Now though the Second Consideration should not oblige Christians, yet the First and Third ought, or else a Gap is opened to fall into great Licentiousness. Thus men that cry up the Authority of General Councils, do contrary to the Decrees of this best of Councils, and in despite of its Authority (which they pretend was but for a time only, without the least show of proof) will eat Blood, and things which are strangled; and this they do also in contempt of Antiquity. For;
Tertullian, who lived in the Second Century, in vindication of the Christians who were accused for Enemies to Mankind, and for devouring Infants in their Blood, saith thus: How can that be true in the Christians, whose Custom is to abstain from all Blood and things strangled, so that it is not lawful for them when they feed at their Tables, to meddle with the Blood of any Beast. With what face or conscience can a Papist burn those who cannot obey the Council of Trent in the case of Transubstantiation, and yet justify themselves and others in eating Blood, against those who religiously obey this Infallible General Council at Jerusalem?
SECT. IV. What Sort of Christians are to give Voice deliberative or decisive in General Councils or Assemblies.
It is evident from Act. 15. 6. That the Apostles, or Messengers and Elders of the Churches are principally concerned, to convene and to order the business of General Assemblies, both to discuss and determine the Cases there controverted. Nevertheless it is very evident that a multitude of other Brethren were by the Apostles admitted to be present, and to dispute the things which concerned the Cognizance of that Assembly, ver. 12. For when it is said that all the multitude kept silence, and gave ear to Barnabas and Paul, &c. It shows they (or many of them at least) had been engaged in the Disputation spoken of before, ver. 7. And it is also very clear, that the Decrees here made, are ratified in the Name, and as the Act of the whole Assembly, of the Apostles, Elders, and Brethren, ver. 23. The Apostles, Elders, and Brethren, send greeting to the Brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch, Syria, and Sicilia. Yea not the Apostles only, but they with the whole Church agreed to send chosen Men of their own Company unto Antioch, ver. 22. From all which it's without doubt, that in General Assemblies the Brotherhood are to be admitted; such (no doubt) as are judicious, and apt to lend assistance in such weighty Affairs: and the Reason is evident, because the Gifts of the Holy Spirit are common to the whole Brotherhood, by virtue whereof they are allowed to speak in the Church, 1 Cor. 14. 31. And consequently in General Assemblies also, where the Use of all manner of Gifts are needful.
But this the Papists do count an absurd thing, and upbraid the Protestants with it as an Error. From this notwithstanding they do very well acquit themselves by the Pen of Dr. Field, who saith thus, or to this effect.
1. That Christ only can decide in such Assemblies, by the Authority of his bare Word.
2. Any Lay-men as well as Clergy-men, may give voice decesive, not upon the bare Word of him that speaketh, but upon the Evidence of Proof which he bringeth: for whosoever it is that bringeth convincing Proofs, decideth a Doubt in such sort, as no man ought to resist against it.
And so clear is this Case, that even Panormitan a Papist doth avouch it against his Brethren, saying; That the Judgment of one private man is to be preferred to the Sentence of the Pope, if he have better authority of the Old and New Testament to confirm his Judgment.
And Gerson a Papist also, teacheth, That any Learned Man may and ought to resist against a whole Council if he discern it to err of Malice or Ignorance: And that whatsoever Bishops determine, their Determinations bind not the Conscience, further than they approve what they propose some other way, than by their Authority only. So that, saith the Doctor, Bishops must not proceed Praetor-like, but all that they do must be but in the nature of an Enquiry; and their Decrees of no farther force than reason doth warrant them.
In the First Council of Nice we find many that were not ordained to the Ministry, who were permitted to dispute of the Points in difference. There were present (saith Socrates ) many of the Layety which were skillful Logicians ready to defend each others part; and then he mentions one: A Lay Person of a simple and sincere mind, who set himself against the Logicians, and told them in plain words, That neither Christ nor his Apostles had delivered unto us the Art of Logic — but an open and plain mind to be preserved by us with faith and good works. The which when he had spoken, all that were present had him in admiration, and held with his Sentence. Nor is it to be dissembled or hid, that the Bishops of this Famous Assembly, were generally, or at least many of them, plain men and unlearned, in respect of human Literature; though it is also certain that many, (among whom Eusebius ) was well seen in such learning. But that which is to our present purpose, we find it so plain, that no man can deny, but that there were many beside Bishops permitted to deliberate upon the Matters in Question; nor see I any reason to doubt but that their Agreements were signed by others as well as those of the Ministry: For thus saith Socrates out of Eusebius, Now therefore the Canons concluded by common consent of all, were ratified by the Subscription of everyone, and recorded for Posterity. Thus then, according to the evidence of Sacred Scripture, and the practice of Antiquity, the present Baptized Churches do celebrate their General Assemblies of Messengers, Elders, and Brethren, according to the liberty and opportunity which God is pleased to give under the Magistrates where God hath placed the Bounds of their Habitations; who, though they are a People small and despised, yet do they labor to keep the Lord's Precepts, and to esteem all his Commandments concerning all things to be right, and to hate every false way. And when it shall please God to put it into the Hearts of the Rulers of the Nations, to permit a Free and General Assembly, of the differing Professors of Christianity, for the finding out of Truth, we trust that some of the Baptized Churches will (if permitted) readily make their appearance with others to help on that needful Work.
CHAP. XI. Of that Holy Discipline which is appointed of God for the Christian Church.
SECT. I.
BY Discipline we mean the due Execution of those Laws or Rules which are ordained by God, and recommended by us in his Word, for the Correction or Prevention of the Offences incident to his People, while sojourning in this World. There is no man that liveth and sinneth not, saith the Prophet, 1 King. 8. Not as if I were already perfect, saith the Apostle, Colos. 3. 12. In many things we offend all, saith James 3. 2. If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us, saith the Apostle John, 1 Ep. 1. 8. And Elias was a Man subject to like Passions as we are: There must therefore needs be some Holy Discipline for the Mortification of those Corruptions even in the better Part of the Church. And since it is foretold that grievous Impieties will be found in many professing the way of Righteousness in the latter days, so as to be Lovers of Pleasures more than Lovers of God, heady, disobedient, &c. As also of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the Faith. It is of necessity that the Church of God have power, and an Holy way allowed of God to purge herself from such evil Workers. And for the opening this Case, we shall do these four things.
1. Shew the Duty of Fasting and Prayer, a Discipline very holy and needful for the best Christians, and profitable for the Churches in general.
2. The Way ordained of God for the healing of private Offences among Christians.
3. The way to proceed in correcting those who sin against the Lord to the scandal of Religion.
4. How the Church is to proceed with men in cases of Heresy.
SECT. II. Of the Christian Duty of Fasting and Prayer, &c.
Prayer with Fasting upon the account of our Imperfection, is a Religious Duty, and hath been piously observed by Holy Men, Psal: 69. 10. and 109. 24. Jer. 36. 6. 2 Cor. 11. 27. Thus David chastened his Soul until his Knees were weak through Fasting. And Paul was exercised in fastings often, Hence Marlorat doth truly define Fasting with respect to the Duty on our part to be a measurable castigation or chastising of the Body, and a certain Discipline: always used of the Saints of God to this end, that the Substance of Heavenly things might be the more amiable, and the desires of the Body the more quenched. But Basil defines it of the Spiritual Part (according to that in the Prophet Isa. 58.) True fasting, saith he, standeth in a departure from Vices, in the right government of the Tongue, in suppressing Wrath, in cutting off Concupiscence, Backbiting, Malice, and Perjuries. Thus both from the Holy Scripture, and other judicious Writers, we have the true definition of this Duty, to be a beating-down the Body, that it may fly from sin, and more feelingly taste the Heavenly Doctrine of Godliness. Hence Paul is said to serve the Lord with Fasting; and exhorts others to attend the same course as occasion requires, 1 Cor. 7. 5.
But since we are to treat of this Duty as it is more public, we would extend it to the utmost bounds; and then all Mankind is concerned in it, as we gather from the case of the Ninevites, Jonah 3. 7, 8, 9. Here a Fast is proclaimed even by those who were not a People in Covenant with God, but what is common to Mankind; and this Duty grounded upon the mercifulness of God, who therefore accepts their Humiliation, and diverts the Judgment impending: Here we see the Love of God to Sinners, and how unwilling he is that they should perish in their Iniquity.
Howbeit the Church of God is in a more especial manner to attend this Service, as having a greater sense both of the Goodness and severity of God than others, and whose provocations therefore are of an higher nature, by how much they are against greater Favors. Hence Israel kept a Fast on the 5 th and 7 th months for about 70 years together, for the Sin which had caused them to go into captivity, Zech. 7.
But as in all religious performances men are apt to err, and so to lose the Blessing which usually attends the due observation of them; so it fell out in this long service of Fasting. For First, they did not fast to the Lord, ver. 5. Speak unto all the People of the Land, and to the Priests; when ye fasted and mourned in the Fifth and Seventh Month, even those 70 years, did ye at all fast unto me, even unto me? 2. The Mercies which they received, they did not faithfully improve, ver. 6. And when ye did eat, and when ye did drink, did ye not eat for yourselves and drink for yourselves? 3. The whole charge is proved because they did not hearken to the Word which God sent by his Spirit in the former Prophets, but pulled away their Shoulder from obedience, ver. 7. 11.
Wherefore that we may miss the Rocks against which these dashed themselves even in their Solemn Devotions, we shall consider, 1. The true Cause of Fasting. 2. The Time for public Fasting, 3. The Manner how. And 4. The End for which.
For the First, There be many causes assigned by some, but we shall insist upon that which gives Being to all the rest, and that is the Sin or Condition whereinto sin bringeth the Children of Men; for when these shall be wholly taken away, there shall be no cause of fasting. And though it be very true that God's People sometimes fasted, &c. for deliverance of Enemies, &c. Ezra 8. yet the Original Cause of that Danger was Sin, and so the true cause of the Fast, which was there proclaimed. Indeed we find the Judgments of God either impending or inflicted, proving the immediate Cause of Fasting. But there was a previous cause why these Judgments came, and that was Sin. Holy Men have fasted sometimes for their own Sin, Psal. 109. 24. sometimes for the Sin of others, Psal. 35. 13, 14. and sometimes for Mercies, Blessings, or Favors to be communicated, Act. 14. 23. Humiliation being the Way to fit them for the Mercies desired.
2. Of the Time for public Fasting, it ought to be as occasion requires, God having prescribed no set time for it; Quibus oportet jejunare, &c. saith Augustine. Upon what days we must fast I find not appointed by any Commandment either of our Lord or of his Apostles. Nor is this the only Service which hath no time affixed to it; the Table of the Lord is of the same consideration in that respect, though the Duty be strictly commanded. The same may be said of Alms deeds, or relieving the Poor, When ye will, ye may do them good, saith our Lord.
But if the Question be, Who hath power to assign the Time for Public Fasting and Prayer? The Answer is;
1. That the Judgments of God either impending or inflicted upon a Nation, the King or Chief Magistrate thereof may call all his Subjects to Humiliation; by the good Example of the Ninevites, as well as by the Principles of general Piety; seeing there is no King, but hath equal Authority with the King of Nineveh in that Case.
2. If any of the Churches of Christ find cause to humble themselves for any Judgment which Sin hath brought upon them, or for any Blessing they come short off, or danger which attends them: Then the Pastors, or Leading-Men in such Churches, with the Advice of the Brotherhood which shall be in these days, may do it warrantably, by the Example of Mordecai, Ezra, and Nehemiah. The first having no Authority from the King, but rather acted herein against the Authority of Ahasuerus. The Church at Antioch kept a Fast unto the Lord, Act. 14. without the intervening Power of the Magistrate: and there is no reason why other Churches may not do the like, since every Church is the most capable to judge of the necessity which they have to wait upon God in such Services. When our Lord foretells the days wherein his Disciples should fast; He gives clear intimation of a time of suffering Tribulation, and therefore not like to have any Call from public Authority to devote themselves to God by Prayer and Fasting, and therefore may warrantably do it without such Authority; especially since our Savior's Prediction hath also the force of a Direction to that Duty in such Cases.
3. Of the Manner how to perform the Duty of Fasting, and of the duration of the particular times of that Devotion, we shall speak briefly. Although the Kingdom of God standeth not in Meat and Drink, but in Righteousness, &c. yet God is well▪pleased that his Servants deny themselves in that respect: And the Faithful have accordingly abstained from Food, from Pleasure, and from Labor, that they might the more effectually humble themselves before the Lord. Thus did Israel order their Fast, Judge. 20. and prevailed with God: They fasted until Evening, ver. 26. And the like again, 1 Sam. 7. 6. They fasted that day, and they also put away their Idols, and their God was entreated of them. David and his Men hearing that Saul and Jonathan were slain, fasted until Evening. The Ninevites fasted three days, and God approved it. Cornelius was fasting till the 9 th hour, and God accepted his Devotion. So that duration of solemn Fasts is various. Nevertheless to abstain from Food for a day, is the most frequent Order which we meet with in the Sacred Scriptures. It is also to be observed that this Abstinence is not from some kind of Food only, when solemnly performed by a Nation, or by the Church of God, but a total forbearance of all Nutriment, (except necessity require an indulgence, 1 Sam. 14. 27, 29. For God will have Mercy rather than Sacrifice ). To this Purpose Jerome ad Nepot. Tom. 1. Lay upon thee such manner of Fasting as thou canst bear, that thou have pure, chaste, and moderate Fastings, not superstitious. See also Origen to the same effect, Hom. 10. in Levite. c. 16.
4. The true end and use of this Service is the Mortification of our Corruptions, and consequently the Reformation of our Lives, and therewithal the obtaining a Relaxation from the Judgments due for our Prevarications, which through the Mercy of God we may obtain, when we sincerely humble ourselves before the Lord, by keeping such Fasts as he hath chosen, Isa. 58. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Which standeth not so much in the outward castigation of the Body, (though that also is necessary, 1 Cor. 9. 27. I keep under my Body, I bring it in subjection, &c.) but in the powerful Reformation of those disorders which by carelessness have been contracted, even to loose the Bands of Wickedness, to undo the heavy Burthens, and to let the oppressed go free, to break every unlawful Yoke, to deal our Bread to the Hungry, to harbor the Poor, and to clothe the Naked; otherwise the Carnal or Worldly-minded Man may seem to reap some outward profit by his Servants abstinence from their daily Provision, if Fasting should not be accompanied ordinarily with Alms-deeds. But in a special manner our Fasts are to be attended with the Reformation of our Souls in things pertaining to the Service of God, 1 Sam. 7. 3, 6. — If ye return unto the Lord with all your Hearts, then put away the strange God's, and Ashtaroth from among you, and prepare your Hearts unto the Lord and serve him only, and he will deliver you, &c. Yea, saith God, Then shall thy Light break forth as the Morning, and thine Health shall spring forth speedily, and thy Righteousness shall go before thee, and the Glory of the Lord shall be thy Reward. Then shalt thou call, and the Lord shall answer; thou shalt cry, he shall say, Here am I. Isa. 58. 8, 9. To conclude, as this Duty is public, and to be performed by the Church of God in special, and by Mankind in general; so there is a private Use of it also in respect of Individuals, or particular Persons or Families; concerning which our Savior hath given special direction, That in such Humiliations men carefully avoid all Hypocrisy in desiring to be seen or known of men to use such devotion, Mat. 6. 16, 17. And the Apostle shows the Duty to be necessary in Christian Families, especially in the Leaders or Governors thereof; and that such Services are so Sacred, as that there ought to be an abstinence from that Society between Man and Wife, which at other times is both Lawful and Necessary, 1 Cor. 7. 5. Defraud ye not one another, except it be with consent for a time, that you may give yourselves to Fasting and Prayer, and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency. Hence we learn the great Purity and Solemnity of this Holy Discipline, as it concerns the Servants of God in private Humiliations; and the same (in a more general Consideration) is set down by the Prophet, Joel 2. 16, 17. Gather the People, sanctify the Congregation, assemble the Elders, gather the Children and those that suck the Breasts: Let the Bridegroom go forth of his Chamber, and the Bride out of her Closet: Let the Priests, the Ministers of the Lord weep, &c. Let them say, Spare thy People, O Lord! &c.
SECT. III. Of the great Abuse of this Part of God's Service, both in former and later times.
The First abuse of this Holy Duty lieth in men's prideing up themselves in performance of it, as if they had thereby merited some great thing at the hands of the Lord. Thus the Jews in Isaiah's time were ready to challenge God himself: Wherefore have we fasted, say they, and thou seest not? Wherefore have we afflicted our Souls, and thou takest no knowledge. And after the same manner did the Pharisees deceive themselves as our Savior declareth by a Parable, Luke 18. 11, 12. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself: God I thank thee that I am not as other men are — I fast twice in the week, &c. So hard is it to be found in any virtuous Action, and to give the whole Glory thereof to God only. The Second Abuse is, when men do this Service by the half part, and for evil ends and purposes, as God knows that is a common Case, being too able to plead its Antiquity, and I fear its Universality also. The Prophet tells us how the Jews in the day of their Fast found Pleasure, and did exact all their Labor; and not only so, but that they did fast for strife and debate also. It's not Christian-like to wish or seek the hurt of any man, much less in their Devotions to desire it. Here David is a good President, Psal. 35. 13. But as for me, when they were sick, my clothing was Sack▪clothe, and humbled my Soul with Fasting. Or if this Passage have relation to Christ, (as it is not improbable, Psal. 69. 9. to ver. 22.) then it is still of the greater force to Christian Men.
Thirdly, Those who prescribe Laws for fasting, with respect to certain times Yearly, and with respect to some kind of Meats only, so as to bind the Consciences of God's People to their Prescriptions, is certainly injurious to this Sacred Duty, for example, To enjoin a forty days Fast before the time called Easter; to prohibit the eating of Flesh on Wednesdays and Fridays (so called), cannot be warrantable by good authority: as one well saith. In firmness beholding it, I do see Fasting commanded; but I do not find it to be defined by God's Commandment or the Apostle's, in what time, or day we must fast or not fast. And indeed the variety of the usages of Antient Christians touching the Lent Fast, shows it to be an Innovation, and not of Divine Authority: No, the Observation of Easter itself is acknowledged by Socrates Scholasticus to have crept into the Churches. The drift of the Apostles (saith he) was not to lay down Canons and Decrees concerning Feasts and Holy Days, but to become unto us Patterns of Piety and Good Life, and Godly Conversation. I am of opinion that as many other things crept in of custom in sundry places, so the Feast of Easter to have prevailed of a certain private Custom and Observation; insomuch (as I said before) not one of the Apostles hath any-where prescribed to any man as much as one rule of it. And much to the same purpose he speaks of the Lent Fast (which is pretended a Preparative to the Feast of Easter ); showing the great Diversity between the Romans, Grecians, and Alexandrians, and those of Illiricum; some fasting three weeks, some six, and some seven, or rather but fifteen days; yet that they all call it Forty days Fasting, or Lent: Othersome have derived the Etymology of this Word as it pleased them best, and according to the Invention of their own Brain. Neither is this diversity only about the Number of Days, but likewise about the Kinds of Meat; some do abstain from every living Creature; so others of all living Creatures feed only upon Fish; others together with Fish feed upon the Fouls of the Air — Others eat neither Nuts, Apples, neither any other kind of Fruit, nor Egs. Some feed only upon dry Bread, some other receive no not that. There are some that when they have fasted until nine of the Clock, refresh Nature with diverse sorts of Meats; other Nations have other Customs; the Manners and Causes are infinite. But insomuch there is no man able to show a President or Record thereof in writing: It is plain that the Apostles left free choice and liberty unto every man — to addict himself to that which seemed good and commendable. Thus far Socrates. Now what ground Pope Gregory the 7 th had to command the Lent-Fast upon pain of deadly sin, and therein to be rather a Follower of Montanus than of the Apostles, is easily cast.
Whose Steps they tread in, forbidding diverse kinds of Meats, is apparent also; at least it's evident they follow not Christ nor his Apostles, but seem to be pointed at as departed from their Sacred Doctrine, 1 Tim. 4. 1, 2, 3. True Fasting therefore (if for a day or short space of time, in respect of abstinence from the Creatures) must be a total forbearance (except in cases of necessity) and not to forbid Flesh, and allow all Dainties beside. Jerome severely checks such vain pretence to Fasting. What profit is it (saith he) not to eat of the Oil, and to seek certain Dainties and difficult kind of Meats? As Figs, Pears, Nuts, Fruits of Palms or Dates; the Flower of Wheat, of Honey, and such kind of Meats. There is no kind of Garden Fruit wherewith we do not torment ourselves, to the end we eat not of Bread. And whilst we do follow pleasures, we are drawn from the King of Heaven. Further I have heard, that some who against the Rule of Nature drink no Water, and eat no Bread, but do eat of delicate Suppings and of Panned Leeks — What a shame is this? How are we not ashamed of such Follies? How are we not wearied of such Superstitions? Do we seek in Delicates the Renown of Abstinence? Wherefore avoiding the Vanities of the Papists or others, let us study the Simplicity of this Service, and the holy Ends thereof. Let us observe the occasions which call for humiliation this way both National, Congregational, and Particular: Let those in Authority look to the First, and call their Subjects thereunto. Let Christ's Ministers look to the Second, and stir up the Churches to this Religious Duty. Let every Christian look to the Third, especially Masters of Christian Families, and as occasion requires devote themselves to God in this Holy Exercise.
And thus much touching that Holy Discipline ordained of God for the Good of Mankind, especially for his Church and every Member thereof. We now proceed.
SECT. IV. Of the Way ordained of God to heal Private Offences between one Christian and another.
Having spoken of the Way ordained by God as helpful to recover ourselves, when fallen into any trespass against the Lord. It remains that we take an account of that care which belongs to us in respect of each other, especially when we trespass one against another. Wherein Christian Charity is wonderful, or the Law of Christianity shineth forth as a Law of Love beyond the pretence of any other Law whatsoever: Insomuch that if thy Brother trespass against thee seventy-seven times or seven times in a day, and turn to the saying, He repenteth, thou must forgive him.
For whilst the Trespass is only against thy Brother, and not a Sin against the Lord, it is in the Power of one Christian to forgive another, for so hath the Lord ordained. And it is his Pleasure to entrust them with such Authority, to try how they will follow him as dear Children in Acts of Mercy, Patience, and Forgiveness: and that he may enforce this heavenly Virtue, he tells them plainly; That if they do not from their heart forgive their Brethren, their Heavenly Father will not forgive them. Nevertheless, lest that the party offending (upon this Grace and Favor shown) should presume to go on in his Trespasses against his Brother, God hath enjoined him Repentance upon his Brothers Admonition: Mat. 18. 15. If thy Brother trespass against thee, go and tell him his Fault between thee and him alone. Here Christ confirms that old Command of Brotherly Love, Levite. 19. 17. Thou shalt not hate thy Brother in thy Heart; thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy Neighbor, and not suffer Sin upon him. It is to be lamented to see the great neglect of this Law of Charity among men professing Christianity; and surely this Error in the beginning of Controversies among Brethren brings great confusion into the Church, and alienateth the Heart of one Christian from another, which would be endeared to the offended Party by private and brotherly Admonition; it being hardly possible to engage a Man more by anything, than by concealing his Infirmities, and to preserve his Reputation among men, wherein it may lawfully be preserved. Wherefore that Christians might be deeply engaged in the Affections of each other, our Lord hath given them power to remit each others Offences, in such things as concern themselves, and hath prescribed a Law or Rule to do it by, to the greatest advantage of the Trespasser, and with as great comfort to the Party offended. If he hear thee, thou hast gained thy Brother. How great this Gain is appears, in that this very Sin persisted in, will expose the Offender to the loss of his Privileges in the Church, and in Heaven also, ver. 18. Hence the Apostle James tells us, If one convert his Brother from the evil of his way, he shall save a soul from death, and cover a multitude of Sins, Jam. 5.
As our Lord is longsuffering, so must his Children be: and as the man is blessed whose Sins are covered by the Lord, ( who sees no Sin in Jacob, nor marks transgression in Israel ) so would he have his Children to cover each others Infirmities, if it may be; wherefore if the offender neglect or refuse to hear thee, take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three Witnesses every word may be established; according to that good Law formerly given, Deut. 19. 15. Thus are we to mix a little severity with mercy, and put the Offender to a little shame, if peradventure he will thereby be reformed. And here it is to be noted, That a Brother is bound to go to the offender, only these two times; and upon his refusal to hear this second Admonition, the matter is to be brought before the Church, who is yet invested with Authority to remit the offense committed, if the Sinner hearken to them; or otherwise to retain his Sin, or to hold him Excommunicate for his pertinacity in the trespass which he committed: for Rebellion and Stubbornness is compared to the sin of Witchcraft and Idolatry, 1 Sam. 15. 23. And now he is made a public spectacle in the face of the whole Congregation (not a Convention of the Ministers only, as Diodate, and some others would understand it) who may hereby take the better heed to avoid him, to have no company with him, no more than the Jews were to hold with an Heathen man or a Publican. And by the Law we know it was an unlawful thing to eat common food, or to keep company with such, see Act. 10. 28. compared with Math. 18. 17. For our Savior speaks here according to the force of the Law which was then in being; and therefore though that Law was afterward abrogated, yet this direction concerning Excommunicate Persons, is to be understood according to the force of that Law, when our Savior gave this form of Discipline, as is further evident, from 1 Cor. 5. 11. But now I have written to you, if any that is called a Brother be a Fornicator, or Covetous, or an Idolater, or a Railer, or a Drunkard, or an Extortioner, with such a one [not to keep company] no not to eat. And again, 2 Thess. 3. 14. If any obey not our word by this Epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed: yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a Brother.
It is a great question how long a person under Excommunication may be admonished as a Brother. It may be answered, so long as he is not debauched in Life, and there is any hope of his recovery: for since this Ordinance is for the saving of the Soul, we are not to be impatient, but still as we may to call upon the Sinner to remember from whence he is fallen, and to repent, and to pray for his return. Indeed, such may the nature of the offense be of some persons excommunicate, as the Church may not pray for it, but must leave him to the great God in the great day of account, 1 John 5. 16. There is a Sin which is unto death, I do not say that ye shall pray for it. This sin may very fitly be expounded of the sin against the holy Spirit, since excepting that, all Sins and Blasphemies are pardonable unto men, as our Savior testifies. Wherefore, as God is gracious and longsuffering, and waits upon Sinners, the Church must show forth the same disposition towards those that err from the Truth; and to tread the steps of the holy Apostle, who, as he travelled in birth for the recovery of the backsliding Galatians, so he was ready to bewail many that had sinned, and had not repented of their Uncleanness, Fornication, and Lasciviousness which they had committed in the Church at Corinth. 2 Cor. 13. 21.
SECT. V. Of the way of God to proceed against such as Sin openly in the Church of Christ.
Sins which are committed directly against the Lord, as Idolatry, Murder, Whoredom, Theft, Drunkenness, Covetousness, Swearing, &c. these are not within the Compass of that Rule, Matt. 18. If thy Brother trespass against thee, &c. and therefore cannot lawfully be remitted by any private person to whom the same may be acknowledged, as in the case of private offenses between Brother and Brother. But crimes of this nature are to be punished with greater severity, and the Church ought speedily to censure such evil doers, as unfit for Christian society, till reformed of such impieties, 1 Cor. 5. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. Here the Sin committed by one in the Church of Corinth was Fornication: the Church is reproved, for that they had not put him out of their Communion, who whiles he remained among them was as Leaven, to infect the whole lump; wherefore the Apostle commands them (and in them all other Churches) to put away the wicked from among them. This great power hath God given to every Church: In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my Spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, to deliver such a one unto Satan for the destruction of the Flesh, that the Spirit may be saved in the day of our Lord Jesus.
That earnest charge to Timothy (and in him to all Pastors) 1 Tim. 4. 20, 21. is carefully to be observed for the preservation of all Churches from the Infection of Sin. Them that sin, rebuke before all, that others also may fear: I charge thee before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the Elect Angels, that thou observe those things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality. For as in the great House, the Church, there are vessels of dishonor, as well as vessels of honor; so the way to preserve the vessels of honor is to purge away those dishonorable vessels, 2 Tim. 2. 20, 21.
Now whether persons sinning so notoriously ought to be cast out of the fellowship of the Faithful, albeit they do submit themselves to the Church (at least for a time) is I confess a difficult question; yet he that seriously considers the scope of the Apostle, 1 Cor. 5. will find cause to believe it ought to be so, when the sin committed is of such a crying nature as that was; to the end they may bear their shame who sin so against the Lord; and that the Truth may retain its credit. I find the ancient Christians were very severe on that account, and censured by Dr. Field and others, as over strict in that case. But when the case of Miriam Numb. 12. 14, 15. is duly weighed, who was put out of the Camp seven days; and compared with Paul's words, Put away from among yourselves that wicked person; It may rationally be conceived, that it's the will of God that in such cases of transgression, the offender ought to give some proof of his sincere humiliation, before his admission to the Communion of the Church of God. It's evident it was a considerable time before the Fornicator at Corinth could be admitted to his Privileges in the Church, though his sorrow was very great. True it is, as Paul blames them for not hasting to put him out of the Church; so afterward he moderates their severity, and concludes, that the punishment that had then been long upon him, was sufficient, and wills the Church to restore him, and to confirm their love to him least he should be swallowed up of over-much sorrow, 2 Cor. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
The Novations indeed (if that be true which is storyed of them) were too severe, in not readmiting those that fainted in the time of perfection, though with Repentance they desired it. For without doubt there is mercy for those that sin after Baptism. And yet though this inordinate zeal was justly condemned by the Ancients, 'tis said that some of themselves would not admit some offenders to Communion under seven years experience of their humiliation: which severe course, however it manifests their great hatred of Sin, yet can as little be justified as the Novatians. Surely extremes are always hurtful, and some that find fault with the Fathers, are fallen into another extreme, even to indulge almost all manner of naughtiness; the most Profane, as well as Hypocritical Time-servers are now countenanced, not in respect of Communion in general, but honored with places of Trust, in the Parochial Churches of this and other Nations, to the scandal of Religion, and the inevitable prejudice of the Reformation so zealously begun by our pious Predecessors.
Howbeit, through the grace of God the pristine and pure Discipline of the Gospel is asserted and executed in the Baptized Churches generally, insomuch that no known or notorious offender can possibly retain his Communion there, but is sure to meet with that censure which the Law of Christ awards him, nor can he be readmitted, without such Reformation (at least in appearance) as the Gospel calls for in such cases.
Finally, to tell the World how this Ordinance of Christ concerning the Discipline of the Church hath been abused by Popish Pardons on the one hand, and Penance on the other; what abominable Merchandize they have made of the Sins of Men: or to set down the present Mercenary proceedings of the Protestant Churches in their Ecclesiastical Consistories (where the simplicity of Christian Discipline cannot enter) is but to weary the Reader, who as he runs may read the black Characters of such unchristian proceedings from day today, which every good man desires to see amended.
SECT. VI. Of the way of the Lord to deal with Heretics according to the Gospel.
That place of the Apostle, Tit. 3. 10, 11. A man that is an Heretic after the first and second Admonition reject, knowing that he that is such, is subverted and sinneth, having damnation of himself; Made some think, that Heretics being so Admonished, can never be received into the Communion of the Faithful. But then it must be only such an obstinate Heretic as these words do set forth: otherwise, the consequence would be dreadful, if all that are led astray by Heretical Doctrine, should be exposed to such a severe Censure.
This Opinion, with respect to contumacious Heretics seems to be strengthened by 1 Cor. 16. 22. If any man love not our Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha. Where the Sentence seems irreversible in this World, as if Sinners of that kind were to be wholly left to the Judgment of Christ himself at his coming to judge the World, since he alone knoweth both the Sins of Men, and all the aggravations thereof. But what shall we say? How few are there that love Christ? nay, how few so ever there where, his Gospel is in some measure received. But we are certain, the Jews do not love him, yet this Text hardly concerns them. For Paul speaks more hopefully of that wretched Nation, Rom. 11. 11. Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall, Salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to Jealousy. More safely therefore may we understand the Sentence of the Apostle; to conclude only those, who after they have known Christ; or rather, have been known of him; do withdraw their love from him, despise and deny him, or at least, but lightly esteem of him. These doubtless are grossly injurious to Christ, and their own Souls, and are rather to be left to the judgment of the Judge himself, then to be released by the Church his Substitute in this World.
The Apostle was not more industrious to gain the Galatians who were fallen into Heretical Opinions, than sharp and severe against those that seduced them. Gal. 5. 12. I would they were cut off which trouble you! which seems to import the irrecoverable Estate of those false Apostles, and deceitful Workers, as he elsewhere calls them. Whom Jude calls, Trees twice dead, plucked up by the Roots: and consequently uncapable of bearing fruit in God's Vineyard forever.
Of the same force are these two places, Heb. 6. 4, 5, 6. Heb. 10. 26, 27, 28, 29, 30. For when Men have destroyed a state of Faith, (in respect of themselves) trodden underfoot the Son of God; counted the blood of the Covenant wherewith they were Sanctified an unholy thing, and thus doing despite to the Spirit of Grace; These Men cannot, (as Chrysostom notes upon the place) be twice made Christians; and there being but one Sacrifice for Sin, there remains no more for such presumptuous Heretics as have contemned the virtue thereof. For look how there was no mercy for such as DESPISED Moses 's Law under two or three Witnesses; the Punishment must needs be very great to such as despise the Lord Christ himself, after they have been admonished the first, and second times.
Whether Heretics ought to be put to Death, seems now to be happily resolved in the Negative by His Majesty Charles the Second, and his Honorable Court of Parliament, Anno 1677. Whiles by a public Act they have worthily Repealed the Sanginary Laws, which heretofore have been Enacted, to the great prejudice of Christianity; and particularly, that Fiery Law, De Heretico comburendo. May His Majesty and great Council still proceed in such virtuous Acts, to the Glory of God, and their Peace and true Honor, both here, and to Eternity. And blessed be the Lord, that we have not occasion to write upon this bloody Subject, which is so foreign to Christianity, as scarce anything can be more. For Fire and Sword is Popish Discipline; but no Discipline of the Church of Christ.
CHAP. XII. Showing the Reasons why the Christian Church is not bound to the observation of the Seventh-days Sabbath according to the Law of Moses. And yet that they are under the Obligation of the Moral part of the Fourth Commandment in the Decalogue, Exod. 20.
SECT. I.
FIrst, I hold it meet to demonstrate the Position, wherein I say the Fourth Command, Exodus 20. is partly Moral, &c. This Morality whereof I speak, lieth in this, i. e. That God the Creator of all Men, hath put a Law in Mans heart, by which he understandeth that part of the time he is allowed to live upon the Earth, is to be set apart for the service of his Creator, and not all to be spent in doing his own work. A time of repose he also knoweth by the same Law to be necessary, as well for his Servants and Cattle, as for Himself; and this also the fourth Command in the Decalogue doth teach us.
But now if the Question be, How much of this time Man must set apart to serve and worship the Lord his Creator, and for the repose of his Servants and Cattle? The Answer will be according to the Letter of the fourth Precept only, the Seventh day of every week. But in the Moral consideration, it will be, so much time as is sufficient to answer these ends; which as things may, and often do fall out, may require more than seven days time together, notwithstanding the Letter of the fourth Precept, which saith, Six days shalt thou labor, or Six days may work be done. And this is the sense wherein I take the fourth Command in the Decalogue to be Moral, and under this consideration, I say, it obligeth Universally; I mean, it bindeth all men in all times and places, to set sufficient time apart to worship their Creator, and to give their Servants and Cattle convenient rest; and this the Light of Reason, or Law of Nature doth clearly teach. And hence our Apostle might well say, the Gentiles having not the Law, do by nature the things contained in the Law; since all Nations (so far as I ever yet heard) do reserve a competent time for his Worship, whom they acknowledge for their God.
But whereas the fourth Command doth precisely limit a certain point oft time ( viz. ) the Seventh-day of every week, not requiring more or less: In this respect, I say, the fourth Command in the Decalogue is Ceremonial, and done away by Christ. Done away, I say, as it was part of the yoke of Bondage, as also other things of like nature were; for example, The place of Worship, which in many respects was only the Temple at Jerusalem; neither of which are so done away, as to destroy either time or place for serving the Lord▪ but rather, so, as that all times, and all places are so far sanctified unto us by Christ, as that we may in every place, and at all times, serve him with as great acceptation, as if we were in the Temple of Jerusalem on the SABBATH DAY.
Be it further considered, That the Relief of the Poor, and the maintenance of such as are Ministers of God's Word, do appertain to Moral duty, being grounded upon the Law of Right reason, Do to others as you would be done to. Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Ox which treadeth out the Corn, &c. Now saith Paul, For our sakes no doubt this is written; that is; for the sake, or in the behalf of the Ministers of Christ. But now if the Question be, What is the portion of the Poor and such as minister the Word? The Answer will be according to Moses 's Law, The tenth part of the increase of thy Land, must be set apart for that purpose, [ yea before Moses, it is evident, that Tythes were paid, but before Moses no man can be assigned that ever kept the Sabbath ] But in Moral consideration, the Answer to the Question will be this, So much as is necessary ought to be set apart for the Poor, and for such as minister the Word. So then it is clear, that some part of our time, some part of our substance, and some place must be set apart for the Worship of God, &c. And what part that must be, either Christ and Right reason, or the Law of Moses must inform us. If Moses 's Law, then the Seventh day of every week, the Temple at Jerusalem, and Tythes must be assigned: But if Christ and right Reason, then the time is, whensoever you can; the place is, wheresoever you can; and for substance, what you can, or what is necessary.
The two last (I suppose) will not be denied; and for the first, it may thus appear; The Lord's Supper is ordained as a standing Ordinance in the Church of Christ, as the Passover was in the Church under Moses; but yet there is no set time assigned by Christ for its Celebration, as we know there was for the Celebration of the Passover. Again, the Church under Moses were commanded to offer many Sacrifices to the Lord, and had their respective times limited wherein to do it. Christians are bound to offer to the Lord spiritual Sacrifices, even the fruits of their lips, giving thanks to his Name. But this without the limitation of time, having rather this general rule in that case, namely, to do it continually; that is, as often as we can. Furthermore, the work of Exhortation is a standing Ordinance in Christ's Church, but not limited to any set time, but rather to be performed daily, that is to say, as frequently as we can. And hence we may perceive a very great difference as to the liberty of time in things pertaining to God, between the Law of Bondage and the Gospel of Christ: for, certainly the work of Christian exhortation, praising the Lord, and the celebration of his Divine Supper, doth as it were comprize the whole body of Christian Worship (as it consists in Practicals) and answers to that which comprised the body of Legal Worship; but with this remarkable difference, the one is left free as to the circumstance of time, while the other was tied to their strict points of time, under which consideration we have cause to say (as the Apostle said) of some (who went from Christ to Moses ) ye observe days, and months, and times, and years; I am afraid of you, &c. Among which days, I have no doubt the Jews Sabbath-day was included, and that because it was of a ceremonial consideration, and so done away by Christ. And that it was of such a consideration, I shall endeavor to demonstrate by the grounds which here ensueth.
SECT. II. Containing Seven Reasons or Arguments, why Christians are not bound to observe the Seventh-day Sabbath.
Because nothing which is really Moral is impossible. But upon due consideration it will be found impossible for the whole Universe, i. e. all Mankind (with their Cattle) to observe one certain point of time to rest from labor, &c. because the bounds of their Habitations have made the time so far various, as the time of mid-night is the time of mid-day in their respective Regions where they live: so that unavoidably, one part of the world will be found in the dead of the Night, asleep on their Beds, when the other in the heat of the day, are in devotion to the Lord.
But that which makes this matter the more considerable, is the great diversity of time which happens to those, who live in the far Southern and Northern parts of the world, a day in these places being as long as many of ours: so that to enjoin a Sabbath-solemnity in those places, would prove a strange undertaking, and would not answer the Morality of the fourth Command, which undoubtedly requires a sufficient time of rest for Man and Beast, and that his Name may be sanctified by all Men in the celebration of his Ordinances.
To this Reason it hath been Answered.
If the Inhabitants of these remote places do observe the Seventh-day consisting of Evening and Morning, it will answer the intent of God in the fourth Precept, as to the letter of it.
To which I reply, Then it is clear, that it was not God's intent to bind all men to one point of time in Sabbath-solemnities, which I desire may be well observed, and how the precise point of time, the Seventh-day, can then be Moral, I cannot conceive.
Secondly, Let it be observed, that it will follow from this Answer, that these remote Inhabitants may lawfully work for many of our Sabbath-day-evenings; for six days of theirs, counting from Evening to Morning, will contain a good part of six of our weeks, all which time they keeping no Sabbath, will badly answer the intent of God in the fourth Precept; and their Servants and Cattle would soon complain against them.
Precepts which are purely Moral give not place to Precepts Ceremonial, but when two such Laws come in Competition, that which is Ceremonial gives place to that which is Moral: Go ye and learn what this meaneth, I will have mercy and not sacrifice.
But it is evident that the Seventh-days-Sabbath frequently gave place to Ceremonial Laws, John 7. 22. 23 — Ye on the Sabbath-day circumcise a Man, &c. that the Law of Moses should not be broken. Here the Law of Circumcision takes place in point of observation before the Sabbath; for, Circumcision did not only prevent the Circumcisers from resting, but the Circumcised were especially incapacitated to Sabbathize, and thus the Law of the Sabbath was broken (if I may so speak, as doubtless I may) by the interposition of a Ceremonial Law.
To this instance we will join another, Matt. 12. 5, 6, 7. where it is plainly said, That the Sabbath was profaned, or broken; and that in the Temple at Jerusalem, and yet the profaners thereof were blameless, because their profanation lay in the observation of certain Ceremonies of Moses 's Law, as killing, and dressing of Beasts and Sheep, to, be offered for Sacrifices on that day; and not only for the Sabbath-day, which was done continually, but also for the yearly Sabbaths or Festivities if they fell on the Sabbath-day, as they often did; in which cases there was (as I take it) seven times as much labor in killing and dressing Beasts for Sacrifices on such solemnities, as on the weekly Sabbath. See Num. 28, 29 Chapters.
It is in any-wise to be seriously considered, how clearly our Savior doth rank the Sabbath with Laws Ceremonial, seeing all the instances which he brings to vindicate his Disciples; are instances out of the Ceremonial Law. For, when his Disciples were found fault with, for rubbing the ears of Corn, &c. on the Sabbath-day, Christ defends them by alleging David, who in a like hungry condition, broke the Ceremonial Law of Shew-bread; and the Argument seems to conclude thus; If David being hungry, might without blame do contrary to the Ceremonial Law of Shew-bread, then my Disciples beingal so hungry; may without blame do contrary to the Ceremonial Law of the Sabbath. And certainly, if the Argument lie not here, a worse thing will follow: for then our Savior brought an instance very unsuitable, and such as will be dangerous, as will be discerned if it be considered, that it is no reasoning from God's dispensing with a ceremonial Law, to his dispensing with a moral Law: for then one may reason thus: God dispensed with David breaking his Law concerning Shew-bread in a case of necessity, therefore he will dispense with another in worshiping a false God, if he be necessitated, which God forbid.
So then, it is plain, that our Savior compared the Sabbath with the Law ceremonial, which is yet more evident by the next instance of the Priests profaning the Sabbath, (to which I have spoken) as also from the conclusion he makes upon the whole matter, in these words, Go ye and learn what this meaneth, I will have Mercy and not Sacrifice; where it is evident the word Mercy, hath relation to Moral Duty, and is applied to the Disciples preservation from hunger; and the word Sacrifice, hath relation to the Ceremonial Law, and is applied to the Sabbath-day.
All Commands purely Moral, are indispensible in cases of Necessity: it is better to die for hunger, than to deny the true God to obtain meat to preserve Life; yea, he that should so save his life, should lose it; Nor may I commit Murder, Adultery, or bear false Witness against my Neighbor, to preserve my own life, for I know no necessity that can make my so doing in any-wise dispensible.
But behold, the Sabbath-day is such in its observation, as it hath been frequently dispensed with in very low cases of Necessity, insomuch, that the saving the life of a Beast, is preferred before its observation, as to the point of time, the Seventh-day; and then much more in cases of necessity which concern the life of a Man: insomuch, that I conceive, there was never yet a Sabbath-day but it was broken, and that by lawful cases of necessity; I say, Lawful cases, (considering the cases still by the Moral Law) notwithstanding the Law of the Sabbath (in the Ceremony thereof) to the contrary.
No man that reads the Scriptures, can lightly be ignorant, how much our Savior insisteth upon cases of Necessity, as sufficient Answers to those, whoever carped at his doings on the Sabbath-day; whose Conclusion was, that he was not of God, because he kept not the Sabbath. And certainly, if we consider the Fourth Precept, according to the letter of that Law, our Savior both did, and commanded to be done, some things utterly inconsistent with the Sabbatical observation of the Seventh-day; as appears by comparing, Jer. 17. 22. with John 5. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. John 9. 14. Hence it is plain, that our Savior went further than cases of necessity in the non-observation of the Sabbath, since there was no necessity for the Lame to carry his Bed on the Sabbath-day; nor yet for our Savior to make Clay on the Sabbath, since he frequently wrought Cures by the words of his lips, and could have done it on the Sabbath, as well as at other times. I conceive therefore it was his Pleasure to do thus on the Sabbath-days, that he might hereby give some intimation of the abrogation of the Sabbath, as he did the like concerning other Ceremonial Observations: for Example, his eating with Publicans and Sinners; as also, his taking persons off from their esteem of the sanctity of one place above another: thereby fore-showing that he would take away the Sanctity which had been ascribed to the Jewish Nation above the Gentiles, and to Jerusalem above Samaria; and then why not the same kind of Sanctity ascribed to one day above another? I say, the same kind of Sanctity; for certainly, the Seventh-day hath no real Sanctity in it above any other day, no more than the Jewish Nation had above any other Nations, or the City Jerusalem above Samaria; the holiness in all these being only Ceremonial. Of this Reason S. J. takes no notice: therefore I proceed to the next.
Thus saith the Lord to the Christian Church, Let no man judge you in meat or in drink, or in respect of an holy-day, or the new Moons, or of the Sabbath-days: which are a shadow of good things to come, but the body is of Christ. From these words it appears, that, not only the holy-days, yearly to be observed by the Jews (which are confessed on all hands to be Ceremonial) but also the Sabbath-days themselves were with the rest to pass away, as a shadow, when Christ the Body was come: which will yet more fully appear by Hebr. 4. from the 3d. verse. to the 12. where it is evident, that the Seventh-day-Sabbath is reckoned among other legal Types: for here Israel's Rest in Canaan, and the Seventh-days Rest are both made Typical of our entering into Rest by Faith in Christ; wherefore let all that are entered into Rest by Faith in him, take heed how they stand upon this Sabbatical shadow, lest they know not how to avoid other things, which (though Legal shadows) will claim a place with it.
The Seventh-day-Sabbath was a sign of their Sanctification to whom it was given, therefore of a Ceremonial nature, and not given to all men. Exod. 31. 13. Ezek. 20. 12. Thus saith the Lord, speak thou also to the Children of Israel, saying, Verily my Sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you, throughout your generations, that you may know that I am the Lord that do sanctify you. Hence it appears, that as other holy (or if I may so speak) Sacramental Constitutions are peculiar to the Church, and not delivered to all men; even so the Sabbath was peculiar to the Church of the Jews [as for the strangers among them, &c. their resting was no more a Sabbathizing, than the rest of the Cattle, and so not to be accounted a divine solemnization of the Sabbath] for how could it be a sign that the Lord did Sanctify the World in general, who had no part in such privileges, they being without God, without hope, and strangers and aliens from the Covenants of Promises, Ephes. 2. 12.
Again, from this form of speech, It shall be a sign, or it is a sign. It appears, that the Sabbath is Ceremonial, because such Laws as are Moral and imprinted in the heart of man, are nowhere called signs, that I know of, but this kind of speech (when used with respect to Laws) is appropriate to such as were temporary, and ordained upon some special occasion, for the Church as such, and hence Circumcision is called a sign or token of the Covenant, Rom. 4. Gen. 17.
Now let us consider wherein the Sabbath was a sign, that so we may the better perceive to whom it was given. First then, it was a sign of Israel's cleansing from Sin, to which, Exod. 31. 13. Ezek. 20. 12. do well agree, showing that the Sabbath was a sign that Israel might know that the Lord did Sanctify them. Here it is plainly of a Sacramental use and appropriate to the Church; it is a sign between me and you, i. e. between me as your God, and you as my Church.
Secondly, The Sabbath was a sign of remembrance, that Israel should remember they were once bondmen in Egypt, where convenient rest was denied them, and that now they should let their servants rest as well as themselves, Deut. 5. 15.
Thirdly, It was a sign that the true Sabbathizing, is to take up our Rest by faith in Christ, Heb. 4. As for the thousand years Rest at Christ's second coming, and eternal Rest in Heaven, of which some would have the Sabbath to be a sign or Type, I will not insist upon them, because I have not yet met with clear Texts to satisfy me therein. But admit the Sabbath for a sign in all these respects, yet will it not prejudice, but rather strengthen us, in saying, the Seventh-days-Sabbath was Ceremonial, and particular, in respect of the persons to whom it was given.
For first, The Sabbath could not be a sign to all men, or the World universally, that They were sanctified, because in the time of the Law the whole World, except the Jewish Nation, was counted unclean, that is to say, unsanctified.
Secondly, Neither could the Sabbath be a sign (literally, or spiritually) to the whole World, of their deliverance out of Egyptian Bondage, for literally the whole World was never in Egypt, and spiritually they are not yet delivered from the bondage thereof, 1 John 5. 19.
Thirdly, The Sabbath could not be a sign to the whole World of their entering into Rest by Faith in Christ; because, as such they are, and ever were in unbelief.
Fourthly, Neither could the Sabbath be a sign to the whole World, in either of the two last respects, since as such, they have no part in the first Resurrection, nor yet in the eternal Inheritance of the Saints in Light. From these considerations it may appear, that the Sabbath was never given as a sign to all Men, and thence I conclude, it was never given to all Men. For the more ready discerning the meaning of this Ground or Reason, I will digest it into this Syllogism.
Those to whom the Sabbath was given, to them 'twas a sign of their present Sanctification. But it was no sign of the present Sanctification of the whole World. Therefore it was never given to the whole World; therefore of no moral consideration: therefore Ceremonial.
The Festivals of the Jews, were Ceremonial, and therefore the Seventh-day-Sabbath was Ceremonial.
Thus saith the Lord, The Feasts of the Lord which ye shall proclaim to be holy Convocations, even these are my Feasts: Six days shall work be done, but the seventh-day is the Sabbath of rest, an holy Convocation, ye shall do no work therein; it is the Sabbath of the Lord in all your dwellings — The fourteenth day of the first Month is the Lord's Passover, and on the fifteenth day of the same Month is the feast of the unleavened-bread — In the first day ye shall have an holy Convocation, &c.
We learn from these Scriptures, that as the Passover, so the Seventh-day-Sabbath was a Feast unto the Jews, and equally called the Feast of the Lord, and therefore reasonably to be concluded, to be one and the same Ceremonial Consideration, and by consequence to vanish, or terminate with them.
If this be denied, let us see what will follow; we must then hold that some of the Jewish Feasts were Moral and perpetual; and so obligatory to such as had not the Law, as well as to those that had it: Or else, that the Sabbath was delivered as a Feast to the Jews, but not so to the rest of Mankind; but the first of these can never be proved (as I conceive) and if the latter be accepted, it must be proved, which I take to be a very difficult undertaking: and if it could be proved, it will confirm what we have said (at least in part) because it will evince the Seventh-day-Sabbath to be Ceremonial, to that part of Mankind to whom it was delivered as a Feast. And here it may well be inquired, from what ground men do now pretend to keep the Seventh-day-Sabbath according to the Law of Moses, and yet keep it not as a Feast of the Lord in all their dwellings? And because we see here the Seventh-day-Sabbath reckoned with the Ceremonial Feasts of the Jews, it will not be impertinent here to add a parallel between the Seventh-day-Sabbath, and the yearly Sabbath, as also the Sabbath of years, that so we may the better discern it to be of a Ceremonial consideration.
To begin with the Institution; Most certain it is, that no mention is made in the Book of God, of the observations of any of these Sabbaths, neither weekly, nor annual, &c. until the Seed of Abraham became a Nation, to whom the Law of all the Sabbaths was given by Moses; neither is the Seventh-day-Sabbath the first in observation, for the Passover (in which were Sabbaths of rest) was in use before it, and the rest followed it.
The second Parallel is in the time of the continuance of these Sabbaths, the Seventh-day-Sabbath having nothing in that respect above the rest, as will be seen by the Scriptures following.
- For the continuance of the weekly Sabbath, see Exod. 31. 16.
- For the continuance of the Pascal Sabbath, see Exod. 12. 14.
- For the continuance of Penticost Sabbath, see Lev. 23. 21.
- For the continuance of the Expiation Sabbath, see Lev. 23. 31.
- For the continuance of the Feast of Tabernacles Sabbath, see Lev. 23. 41.
The Third parallel is in the Service of these Sabbaths, and that I have shown already, wherein it appears, that the Services of the annual Sabbaths was not only greater than those of the weekly, but to be done as exactly; yea, though they fell upon the Seventh-day; Numb. 28, 29 Chap.
The Fourth Parallel is, of forbearing Labor, which was as strictly to be observed on the yearly, as on the weekly Sabbaths, Exod. 31. 14. compared with Lev. 23. 30.
The Fifth Parallel, of the time to begin to keep the Sabbath, which is supposed to be the Evening before; but in this, the annual Sabbaths are not only equal to the weekly, but indeed the pattern; for of one of them only it is said, From Even to Even shall you sanctify your Sabbath, Lev. 23. 32.
The Sixth Parallel is of the Penalties, which was death, and was as well the penalty for breach of the yearly Sabbaths, as for breach of the Seventh-day-Sabbath Lev. 23. 30. And although it be not expressed, that the Magistrate must execute the penalty for breach of the yearly Sabbath, yet it may be gathered, that he must do it. See and compare these Scriptures, Exod. 30. 28. and Exod. 31. 14. And this may serve as an answer to some, when they bid us show that the penalty of death was ever to be inflicted upon the breakers of any Law, but the Moral Law. Nor is this the only instance; for the holy Perfume might not be imitated under pain of Death, Exod. 30. 28. Neither might Man or Beast so much as touch the Holy Mount, but be punished by stoning, or by being thrust through with a Dart, Exod. 19. 23. compared with 12, and 13 verses of the same Chapter.
The Seventh and Last Parrallel shall be of the Sabbath of years; in which we may observe, that at the giving thereof to Israel, the Lord gave them the bread of three years, the year before the Sabbatical year, as he gave them the bread of two days, before the Sabbath-day.
Now let it be considered, what solid Reason there remains for the continuation of the Seventh-day Sabbath, more than for the yearly Sabbaths, and Sabbath of Years, since there is no more express Prohibition of the one, than the other, in the Scriptures, (except in Col. 2. 16. where in truth, the Seventh-day Sabbath is rather more expressly prohibited than the rest) and seeing we do as constantly enjoy the time of first-Fruits, in gathering, &c. as the Jews did, wherein they held holy Sabbatisms, to rejoice before the Lord, for all the good things wherewith he blessed them; it might very justly be inquired of some, why they observe not these solemnities, together with the Seventh-day?
The Observation of the Seventh-day Sabbath, according to the Law of Moses, cannot stand without the Execution of the Penalty of Death upon such as break it. Were it not so, it should not be the Religious Observation of the day which is in itself a thing tolerable, and about which Christians need not judge one another; I say, were it only this, it should not offend me. But now, these which stand for the observation of the Seventh-day, according to the Law of Moses, do also stand for the penalty of Death, to be inflicted upon such as they judge willful breakers thereof; confessing even in their Printed Books, that the reason why they do not execute that Penalty, is, Because they are no Magistrates; So then, it seems such Men want but opportunity; and doubtless, by how much Men are the more zealous, by so much they would drive the more furiously.
Finally, I offer it to the consideration of sober Men, whether it would be Gospel-like, for Believers in Christ to compel their Families to celebrate the Sabbath, such of them especially as are of Faith and Religion contradistinct to them in that Point? and yet behold, this must they do (according to Moses ) for the Law of the Sabbath requires the Master of the House to order his Children and Servants in point of Sabbatizing.
SECT. III. Answereth the most important Allegation of the New Testament, usually brought for the observation of the Seventh-day Sabbath, according to the Law of Moses.
In Matth. 24. 20, 21. we read thus, But pray ye that your flight be not in the Winter, neither on the Sabbath day: for then shall be great Tribulation.
Object. Whence some pious Christians do conceive, That our Savior allows the Sabbathical Observation of the Seventh-day according to the Law, even among his own Disciples, for forty years after his desc • ase, and consequently to the end of the World.
Answ. This Objection is of no Validity, because our Lord doth not here enjoin any person whatsoever to keep the Sabbath at the time when Jerusalem should be Destroyed, but rather fore-shows, the danger which his Disciples might probably be in, by reason of other Men's observation of it, namely the Jewish Nation, and specially the Pharisaical Sect, who still were carping at our Lord himself, about keeping the Sabbath. This is evident, because our Savior compares that kind of observation of the Sabbath to the Winter season, which would be an aggravation to the affliction of the afflicted, because it would obstruct their flight from the face of their Enemy, even as the Winter also would be obstructive on that account.
But certainly our Savior, who had so plainly shown, That it was Lawful to preserve Life on the Sabbath day, whether of Man or Beast, albeit the preservation thereof called for great Labor; would not now suppose it to be unlawful for his poor Disciples to preserve their Lives by escaping an Enemy, who sought to destroy them on the Sabbath day. For it is clear, that when this calamity should happen, it was the will of Christ that the Afflicted should fly, (be it on what day soever) and that with all possible hast or expedition: for verse. 16. He saith, Then [mark that] Let them which be in Judea fly to the Mountains. And he likewise that was upon the House-top, is allowed, yea willed to haste away, and not go into his House to take any part of his stuff with him: As also, He which was in the Field had direction from Christ to escape to the Hill Countries. So that we safely conclude▪ Christ here delivers his Disciples from all manner of scruple of flying to preserve themselves though it should fall out to be upon the Sabbath-day; and consequently, this place can be no obligation to them to keep the Seventh-day, as a day of rest, or Sabbath. But now on the other hand, if we consider the Zeal of the blinded Jews, who would by that time be more blind than ever; for that now they had rejected the true Light, Christ Jesus; and consequently more enraged than ordinary against all that should intrench upon their Ceremonies, and especially, their observation of the Sabbath: it must needs be very perilous for any to fly on that day, seeing there was scarce a Country or Town through which they should fly, but would intercept them, if not destroy them; which calamity God was able to prevent: and therefore our Lord puts his followers upon Prayer as the means to obtain comfort in that dreadful day. Which (according to the account we have of those sad times) was graciously afforded to the Christians by a Voice from Heaven, crying, Away to Pella, away to Pella: and this before the City was taken.
Wherefore the reason of our Savior's exhortation to Prayer, being taken from a cruel and unrighteous observation of the Sabbath day; and his instructions as they refer to that time, being directly against that observation of the Sabbath; and also, considering that Christ gives no direction at all to his Disciples in this place, how to observe the Sabbath: It is impossible for any man to give a rational demonstration, how this place, Matt. 24. 20, 21. should lay Christian Men under any necessity to keep the Sabbath-day according to the Law of Moses.
The Sabbath retaining its name till that time, is no Argument for its being observed by Christians (and yet that is all that looks like an Argument from this place:) for by the same reason Circumcision also might claim a place in the Christian Churches; yea the whole Law of Ceremonies also, for they still retain those Appellations; when yet, that Circumcision, was truly, the Concision, and that Law, was no Law.
In vain do some pretend, that the aggravation of Calamity by the Christians Flight on the Sabbath day, is meant of the grief of heart that should attend them, for that they were constrained to break the Sabbath by flying. But this was so far from that, that it was their express Duty from Christ's own direction, as well as from the Principles of Morality, to preserve their Lives by flight at what time soever it should happen, upon the occasion of Jerusalem being exposed to ruin by reason of an Army of the Romans.
SECT. IV. Showing the Opinion of some of the Jewish Rabbins concerning the Sabbath-day. And certain Antient Christians concerning the Sabbath-day, and the First-day.
We read saith Pet. Gallatinus, on the Jews gloss upon these words, The Lord hath given you the Sabbath; What means these words, The Lord hath given you? Because it was given to the Jews, and not unto the Gentiles.
Rabbi Johanan saith, That whatsoever Statute God gave Israel, he gave it to them publicly, except the Sabbath, and that was given to them in secret, according to that of Exodus, It is a Sign between me and the Children of Israel.
Josephus in his Book of Antiquities, and Wars of the Jews, calls the Sabbath a National and Local custom; a Law peculiar to that People.
Justin Martyr saith, None of the Righteous Men, and such as walked with God, were either Circumcised or kept the Sabbath until the several times of Abraham and Moses.
Irenaeus saith, That Circumcision and the Sabbath were both given for Signs, and that all the Multitude of the Faithful before Abraham, were justified without the one ( i. e. Circumcision) and that the Patriarchs, which preceded Moses, were justified without the other.
Tertullian requires the Jews to prove (if they can) that the Fathers of former times [meaning before the time of Abraham ] were Circumcised, or kept the Sabbath, or that thereby they obtained to be called (or accounted) the friends of God.
Eusebius saith, The Religion of the Patriarchs of old, was like the Christian, and he proves it thus, They were not circumcised, no more are we; They kept not the Sabbath, no more do we; They were not bound to abstain from sundry kinds of meats, no more are we.
And elsewhere he saith, Melchesideck was a Priest of the most high God, neither being circumcised, nor anointed with the holy Oil, &c. no not so much as knowing that there was a Sabbath, &c. and living most agreeable to the Gospel.
Ignatius was of this mind, That both the Seventh and First days were to be observed; these are his words. —
Justin Martyr saith, Upon the Sunday all of us assemble in the Congregation, as being the First day wherein God separated the Light from the Darkness, Created the World, and Jesus Christ our Savior rose again from the Dead.
Augustine saith, The Lord's day was made known to us Christians by the Resurrection, and from that began to be accounted holy.
CHAP. XIII. Concerning the observation of the Lord's day, or First day of the Week in the Christian-Church; and how the same is grounded on the Authority of holy Scripture, and the consent of the best Antiquity; and first, whether that passage, Psal. 118. 24. Be meant of that day.
SECT. I.
WHat grounds we rest upon for the non-observation of the Seventh day according to the Law of Moses, we shall give some account of, in that part of this Work where we treat of divers Cases of Conscience. But here we shall offer to consideration, the grounds wherefore we keep holy the Lord's Day, or First day of the Week. And first,
Of that remarkable passage, Psal. 118. 24. This is the Day which the Lord hath made, we will be glad and rejoice in it. That these words do point by way of Prophesy at the day of Christ's Resurrection, viz. the first day of the week, (and indeed the only day, which we find the Christians to observe with any special note of religious exercise) is rationally gathered from the coherence, verse. 22, 23. The stone which the builders rejected, is become the head stone of the Corner: this is the Lord's doing and it is marvelous in our eyes. This is the Day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it. For the sense seems to be this, The same Day on which Jesus Christ was made the head of the Corner, is the Day which the Lord made, wherein the Church should rejoice before him, for the marvelous work which he had therein shown forth in raising up Jesus from the Dead, to give Light and Life to sinners: Notwithstanding all the envy and power of the Builders, to wit, the Pharisees and Priests of the Jewish Nation. For assuredly, if this place speak of any day properly, it can be no other day, so fitly as the Day of the Resurrection. And so clear is the evidence of this place for the Lord's Day, that those who oppose us herein, have not a better answer, than to say, this place is to be understood only of that particular First day of the week when Christ did actually arise from the Dead.
But then it is to be considered, how the other Prophesy must be fulfilled, We will be glad and rejoice in it; seeing the Church scarce knew on that particular day, that he was risen, and therefore very few did, or could rejoice and be glad on that particular day. But this Prophecy clearly points at the joy of the whole Church under the Gospel, both of believing Jews and Gentiles, at what time they should be united in one Body by this Corner-stone, or Jesus Christ his being made the head of the Corner: yea, this is the Day wherein the high Praises of God should be celebrated in his Church, as the next verse. shows, Save now I beseech thee, O Lord, O Lord I beseech thee, send now prosperity. And let but this Psalm be diligently read from verse 21. to verse 30. and the Exposition here given, will appear the more acceptable. Thus we find the solemnity of the Lord's day, to be founded in this Prophecy which was observed long ago, by Mr. Perkins in his Case of Cons. page 107. The Day of Christ's Resurrection (saith he) was prefigured by that Day wherein the stone which the Builders refused was made the head of the Corner, Psal. 118. 24. and in that it was prefigured, it was appointed by God: for then it appeared to be true, which Peter saith of Christ, That God had made him both Lord and Christ, Act. 2. 36. And the same may be said of the Sabbath of the New Testament, that it was in the figure preordained, and therefore limited and determined by our Savior unto the Lord's Day.
And further, it is observed by the Learned, that all the Antient Fathers that purposely took in hand to expound this place, Psal. 118. 24. do understand it of the Resurrection Day, and the religious observation of that Day weekly in the Christian Churches. But that which will best confirm what is said from this place, will be the concurrant practice of the Churches in the New Testament, which we will briefly consider, and leave this Exposition as probable only.
SECT. II. Of the New Testament Texts, which prove the observation of the First Day warrantable in Christian Churches.
The first thing to be considered here, is that honorable Title, The Lord's Day, Rev. 1. I was in the Spirit on the Lord's Day; which Title must either belong to some particular day, or else John must speak out of the reach of all common capacities, and perhaps all other Men, since he does not at all explain himself. If of any particular day, then either of the First day of the week, or some other: But he cannot be understood to speak of any other day of the week. Not of the Seventh day (which is pretended by some) because that day had a special Title by which it had been known and honored among the Jews throughout many Generations, namely the Sabbath day; and frequently known by that name in the Old Testament: and other-whiles by the common Title, the Seventh day. Heb. 4.
Wherefore since there was no reason for John to speak in a phrase so hard to be understood, had he meant the Seventh day; and so much beside the common usage of the Jews, and much more of the Gentiles; we can with no show of reason take the Lord's day here, to be the same with the Sabbath in the Old Testament. But on the contrary, great reason there is to understand this Title, The Lord's Day, to respect that glorious Day on which he triumphed over Death, the Grave, and the Law. And the rather, for that it is affirmed by the Learned, that a certain ancient Greek Copy, doth call the First day of the week in 1 Cor. 11. 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Lord's Day. And that the Syriac Translation tells us, that the Christians meeting together to receive the Lord's Supper, 1 Cor. 11. 20. was upon the Lord's Day; which passage is much strengthened by the practice of the Church at Troas, Acts, 20. 7. who came together on the First day of the Week to break Bread. I confess, I have not seen that ancient Greek Copy, all that I have read, hath it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 per unum Sabbatorum, on the first of the Sabbath, or first day of the week. But this cannot prejudice its being called the Lord's day, anymore than to call the Sabbath, sometimes by the name of the Seventh day. And certainly, as we know how to distinguish the holy Table of the Lord, from our Common Suppers and all Legal manducations, and particularly the Passover by this Epethite, the Lord's Supper; even so we may distinguish the day of Christian solemn Services, from our Working days, or the Jewish Festival days, and particularly their Sabbath, which were a shadow of good things to come, but the body is of Christ.
Again, when it is particularly recounted, that on the First day of the week the Disciples came together to break Bread, Act. 20. 7. What can we think less then that it was their use to do so? hereupon (saith Bucanus ) the Ancients called this day, Dies Panis, the day of Bread. And without controversy, all such Churches, as by this one president, do meet upon the First day of the week to commemorate the dying of the Lord Jesus, do act very warrantably therein, and consequently may hence justify their keeping that day holy to the Lord. For when we consider, the solemnity of the Service, the preparation which ought to go before it; it is rational to think, that the Christians at Troas, did not just drop out of their worldly Employments, and out of the Markets, to one of the most Sacred, and significant of the Gospel-Ordinances: especially, considering that the Jews Sabbath was but the day before, and had they thought that day most fit for this Gospel-Service, they would in likelihood have broken Bread that day. But this they did not, but chose the day following, even the First day of the week, deeming as it seems, that day most fit for that honorable Solemnity.
Some indeed will object, That by breaking Bread, here is meant to eat common meat; or that if it were the Lord's Table, yet they did not celebrate till the next day, &c. But these Objections are of small force. For, if they came to eat common food only, they gave the Apostle slender entertainment, to let him fast till Midnight: otherwise it must be allowed, that they had eaten common food with him before that time of the Night. And though the Apostle preached a long Sermon at that time, yet the Lord's Table might be celebrated at, or about Midnight; and so small a variation, upon such a pious occasion, from their usual custom could be no Trespass. However, it is undeniable, they came together to do that holy Duty upon the First day; which is Argument enough, that either they thought that day most meet for that work, or else it was their custom to celebrate the Lord's Table on that day: In which they had the Apostles approbation also Wherefore, unless the Christian Churches be obliged to observe two days in each week in the public Service of God (which nobody will adventure to affirm, (though some are fallen into such practice) then the First being set apart, (after the example of the Apostle, and the Church at Troas ) by any Churches since their times; it will be hard to censure them, though they do not observe the Seventh day according to the Law of Moses.
Of the same consideration is that place, 1 Cor. 16. 2. As I have given order to the Churches in Galatia, so do ye, upon the First day of the week let everyone of you lay by himself in store as God hath prospered him, that there be no gathering when I come. For as we find not that the Apostle kept so much as one Seventh-day-Sabbath in the solemn Services of the Christian Church, in any one Church of the Gentiles; so on the other hand we do find, he did keep one First-day holy with the Church at Troas, in those services which concern the Churches more especially. And now in this place, he Ordains, that the Collection for the Poor be made upon the First day of the week. And here the work of the day, and consequently the day itself (being singled out by the Holy Ghost for that purpose) standeth upon Divine Authority; and this Ordinance was also given to the Churches in Galatia.
It is most rational to conceive, that the reason why the Apostle ordains, that Collections be made for the poor Saints in the Churches of Christ upon the First day of the week, was, because he knew they were then met together upon the great concerns of Christian Religion; of which, this of relieving the poor Brethren is not the least.
And this Contribution was to be freely performed, as God had prospered them, or according to the Vulgar, ei been placuerit, as liketh him best. And where it is said, Let everyone lay by himself in store; It cannot intend that they should do this at their own Houses, for so there should be the greatest Collection of all when he came, which he labors to prevent; But the meaning may be this, Let every Man act himself in this work of Charity, let him not be acted by another; But as every man himself is purposed in his heart, so let him give not grudgingly, or of necessity (but cheerfully as God hath prospered him) for God loveth a cheerful giver. I conclude from the Premises, that • ll such Churches as come together upon the First day of the week to hear the Word preached, to break Bread, to make Collections for the Poor (which comprehend the whole of that constant Public Worship which we owe to God in the Gospel) have all the grounds which are necessary to justify such a Religious Observation of that Day: and much more than can be shown from the practice of any Church of Christ (when met about Gospel-Services more especially) for the observation of the Jewish Sabbath, and especially in any of the Gentile Churches.
SECT. III. Of the practice of the Antient Churches, succeeding the first Churches touching the religious observation of the First day, as the Lord's day.
As the many thousand Jews which believed were all zealous of the Law, Act. 21. 20. And very hardly brought off from Circumcision and other Ceremonies, so it may be presumed they were no less zealous for the Sabbath; And hence it is very probable, that some in the succeeding Ages kept both the Seventh and First days holy to the Lord. As the Ebionites are said to observe the Jewish Sabbath; and other Ceremonies they observe alike with the Jews. Here note the Sabbath is put upon the account of the Jewish Ceremonies by this Author, They Celebrate the Sundays, as we do, in remembrance of the Resurrection of our Savior. This Ebion (the Author of this Sect) is said to live in the latter end of the first Century: so that here we find the observation of both days in the first Age of the Gospel, albeit we are certain God nowhere requires the observation of two days in seven. Yea, Mr. Tillam (an Apostate from the Gospel) is forced to confess, that some of the Churches, for several Centuries, did observe both days; so hard a thing was it to bring the Jews off from that Sabbath as commanded by Moses. However we find the First day honourably esteemed together with it, which shows, that these Churches did understand, that the Christian Religion had given being to it for an holy solemnity.
Ignatius, contemporary with some of the Apostles, delivers his mind to this effect: Intermitting the Sabbath, let all that love Christ, make the Lord's day Holy, the Queen of days, the Resurrection day, the highest day.
And giving account of some Jews which were Converted to the Faith, tells us, They did no longer keep the Sabbath, but led their life according to the Lord's day, in which our life arose. And Justin Martyr, is brought in saying, TETOU HELIOU LEGOMENE HEMERA, &c. Upon the day called Sunday all that abide within the Cities or Villages do meet together in some place: — we send up our prayers to Heaven, which being ended, there is given unto us Bread and Wine, &c. then those of the richer sort, everyone as his good will is, contributes something towards the relief of the poor Brethren. This Justin Martyr lived in the second Century. Thus we have the full explication of these two Texts, Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 11. 1, 2. from this Antient Doctor of the Church, and it were easy to trace the practice through the following Ages which we here contend for. But this being done by others, and by none more satisfactory than by Mr. Warren, I shall refer the Reader to his learned Labors on that Subject.
I shall only insist a little upon the Disputations which were between the Antient Christians and the Jews about this matter. Tryphon the Jew objected three things against the Christians, viz. That they did neither observe the Festival days, nor Sabbaths, nor Circumcision. Justin Answers, We verily should observe these things, did we not know the reason for which these things were imposed upon you. Where we have to observe, that the Antient Christians even in the second Century, took the Jewish Sabbath to be no more obliging to Christian men than Circumcision and the other Festivities. But Tryphon presseth him with this demand, Whether a Christian observing these Customs of the Law, might be saved? Justin Answereth, Such a one in my judgment may be saved, provided he do not industriously labor to persuade others, (especially those among the Gentiles which are converted unto Christ) to observe the same things, as that without which they cannot be saved. And this moderation may now be as needful (in my judgment) as in the days of Justin Martyr.
CHAP. XIV. Of the places of Christian Assemblies; and of the Superstition and Vanity which hath prevailed in that respect, to the prejudice of the Truth.
SECT. I.
AS the time for the Public Worship of Christian Men, ought to be fixed, and known: there is the like Reason, that some convenient places be publicly known also; otherwise the Christian Religion must needs be kept in obscurity. Howbeit there is a great difference between the Jewish and Christian Churches in this case. The Jews being tied to one certain place, to wit the City and Temple of Jerusalem, for performance of a great part of their Public Services, Deut. 16. 16. Three times in a year shall all thy Males appear before the Lord thy God in the place which he shall choose: In the Feast of unleavened Bread; and in the feast of Weeks; and in the Feast of Tabernacles. Deut. 12. 13, 14. Take heed to thyself that thou offer not thy burnt Offering in every place that thou seest, but in the place which the Lord thy God shall choose, in one of thy Tribes, there shalt thou offer thy burnt-Offerings, and there shalt thou do all that I command thee. And unto this place the Tribes went up to worship the Lord, as unto a most Holy place.
But this Ceremonial sanctity or distinction of place, is wholly taken away by the coming of the Lord Jesus, all places being so far sanctified for the performance of all Gospel-Worship, as that his People may as acceptably serve him therein, as the Jews when appearing in the Temple at Jerusalem, Matt. 18. 20. For where two or three are gathered together in my Name, there am I in the midst of them. 1 Tim. 2. 8. I will therefore that Men Pray everywhere, lifting up holy hands without wrath or doubting. Which gracious liberty was foreshown by the Prophet, Mal. 1. 11. For from the rising of the Sun to the going down of the same, my Name shall be great among the Gentiles, and in every place Incense shall be offered to my Name, and a pure Offering: for my Name shall be great among the Heathen, saith the Lord of Hosts.
Hence it was no doubt, that the Christians for some Ages after Christ, did not build any Oratories, nor consecrate any Places for their public Devotions; at which that Enemy of Christ Celsus, took occasion to bespatter the Christians in the time of Origen. For though it may be very expedient to have public Oratories, when the number of Disciples do require it; yet it's every way as lawful to hold such holy Assemblies in our proper Mansions or dwelling-Houses: after the example of the Apostles, who taught both publicly and from house to house, Act. 20. 20. And daily in the Temple, (so long as they could be permitted) and in every House they ceased not to Teach and Preach Jesus Christ. As also in the Fields, Mountains, and by the Seaside, as well as in the Synagogues, or places where Prayer was wont to be made, Act. 16. 13. Matth. 5. 1. &c. Yea, we read of a Church in the house of a certain Christian, Rom. 16. 5. (to wit, the Assembly which used to meet at his House.) For saith Diodat, there were divers small Assemblies of Believers in one and the self same City. 1 Cor. 16. 19. Colos. 4. 15. So that it is not only lawful for Christians to meet in such small companies, and in their dwelling-houses, but such Assemblies are expressly allowed the Title of a Church, by the holy Apostle: which may serve to take off that great contempt which is sometimes cast upon the Baptized Churches, for such their innocent meeting or Church-Assemblies.
SECT. II. Of the Superstition of many professing Christianity about the Places of their Devotion.
Here the Papists do justly lead the Van; and indeed, who else so fit to lead Men to Superstition, (not to say Idolatry:) Do not the Prodigious consecration and hallowing their Temples with holy Water, Crossings, and multitude of Ceremonies, proclaim to all the World their Vanity? as if by such devised Ceremonies God is worshiped, well-pleased, and the Devils affrighted and terrified, as not daring to come within the Circles made by those Artists, nor to endure the sound of those Bells which they have Sanctified. Or as if the Crosses, whether real or otherwise, made by their Hands, could confer some extraordinary Sanctity, and make such places the receptacles of him that inhabiteth Eternity. And that he might not be at any time without Attendants, how prodigiously do they Erect Images of Christ, his holy Mother, of Saints and Angels, adoring the work of their Hands? yea, the very places they have thus abused, as if some Sacred quality (at the least) had now by these their devises possessed the whole Fabric; as if it were all one to mingle Abbey dust with common Earth, as to shed the Blood of a Prince and a Peasant together, or rather the first to hold the greater disproportion.
Now had the Lord Christ required any such things as these, God forbid we should move a Pen against them; but since he hath not done it, what a vanity is it to think, that the Godhead is like to Silver or Gold? or that he is worshipped with Men's Hands? Act. 17. 25. Neither dwelleth he now in Temples made with hands, as sometimes he was pleased to presence himself in the Temple at Jerusalem, verse. 24. compared with John 4. 21.
When Bernard saw the vanity of Men in this kind of Superstition, or having those pretendedly Sanctified Fabrics in such Veneration, he cried out, Ye look too much upon the Walls; affirming, That the Mountains, Caves, and Prisons were more sure places to him: meaning (I suppose,) he could sooner find the Church of Christ there, than in those Magnificent Temples.
Nor do I know how to justify men's calling those places by the name of Churches, from some tincture at least of Superstition; because there is nothing more Sacred upon Earth than the Church of the living God: However, it is certain, the evil which hath attended this custom is very great. I have met with more than one, and some very aged, that did not only know any other Churches than these, but were in no wise to be prevailed with to believe there were any other. This I speak not as if I had a quarrel with these public places of Worship, or with the zeal of our Ancestors who built them: For as they are an ornament to the Nation, so are they very convenient for the exercise of Religion.
SECT. III. That the places of Christian Assemblies ought to be Public, &c.
Our blessed Savior and his Apostles did frequently convene their Auditors in very public and open Places, coming to the Light that their deeds might be made manifest that they were wrought in God. Yea, it is the property of Heavenly Wisdom to put forth her Voice in the top of the high Places, by the Way, in the places of the Paths; She crieth at the Gates, at the entry of the City, at the coming in of the doors. Prov. 8. 1, 2.
God commanded Peter (by his Angel) Act. 5. 20. To go stand and speak in the Temple unto the People all the words of this Life. Nor know I any reason why the Public places of Devotion in our Nation, should not be free for Christians of differing Apprehensions, they not interrupting one another: And why this might not be the most likely way to beget Unity, and in time much unity in the Truth, I do not understand.
But being denied this just right, It is the duty of Christians to endeavor to hold forth their Light, in the most public manner they may, because Christ hath ordained his Church to be the Light of the World, a City on an Hill, not to be hid; at least, not to hide herself. A Candle on a Candle-stick to give Light to all that sit in darkness. Christians are expressly required not to forsake the assembling of themselves together, but to hold fast the profession of their Faith without wavering, Heb. 10. 25. And not to be ashamed of Christ or his words, before an adulterous and sinful Generation, Mark 8. 38. An excellent Example we have, with the Lord's commendation upon it, Rev. 2. 13. I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan's seat is; and thou holdest fast my Name, i. e. The profession of my Name, and hast not denied my Faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful Martyr, who was slain among you where Satan dwelleth. Wherefore, though the Baptized Christians be denied the liberty of those convenient public Oratories (which yet they are liable to repair and uphold in common with others; and consequently in reason should not be denied the use of them, at least when it might be without the disturbance of others;) yet let them remember, that our Savior foretold it should be so, John 16. 2. And let them not doubt but God will accept their sincere Services in what place soever, seeing (as Tindal well observes) Christ taking away the differences of places, will be worshipped in every place. Neither is there in his Kingdom one place holy, and another profane, but all places are indifferant. Neither canst thou more heartily or better believe, or love God in the Temple — than in the Barn or Kitchen. And saith Origen, Locum sanctum in Terris non requiro positum, sed in Corde. I do not seek a holy place in Earth, but in the Heart.
CHAP. XV. Of the provision which God hath made for the outward support of his faithful Ministers in the Gospel, though Tithes be not due to them.
SECT. I.
ALthough it doth not appear that God hath appointed Tithes for the maintenance of Gospel Ministers, as under the Law he was pleased to do for the Tribe of Levi: yet certain it is, he hath not forgotten to provide for those, even in things pertaining to this Life, whom he hath separated to that Sacred Ministry. But who would have thought that Deut. 25. 4. had been the Law from whence to infer the right of the Ministers maintenance, had not the Lord empowered his Apostle so to expound it, Thou shalt not muzzle the Ox, when he treadeth, or thresheth out the Corn. It is true, we may rationally think, that he that will not have the brute Beast discouraged when he laboreth for us Men, will never take it well from those who are more cruel towards his Servants in the Gospel. But that this should then be written, and stand for that Law on which to fix in a case of such importance, none but God himself could so unfold the Scripture; which being thus opened by the key of the holy Ghost, it is all one as if the Lord had said, Thou shalt not withhold any due encouragement from my Minister, when he preacheth unto thee the Word of Life.
The Apostle spends a good part of 1 Cor. 9. to enforce the equity of this Duty; and first from his case who undertakes to warfare for his Country, Who goeth to warfare any time at his own Charge? verse. 7. All men know such a Cause ought to be managed at the common charge; 'tis enough that the Soldier adventure Life and Limb, and lay out his whole strength and industry for the safety of his Country; to make him bear the Charge too, is against all the reason in the World. And verily, this is as clear in the Case of Christ's Ministers, whom he hath chosen to be his Soldiers, to stand in the defense of the Gospel against opposers, against Satan, and all his Ministers. And therefore as the same Apostle reasons, 2 Tim. 2. 4. they ought not to be entangled in the Affairs of this Life, that they may please him that hath chosen them to be his Soldiers.
His next Argument is no less rational, seeing all must grant, That he which plants a Vineyard, ought to eat of the fruit thereof. And though this, and perhaps the former Argument, do more directly issue in the case of a Travelling Ministry; yet his next is as strong for the supply of a fixed Ministry, Who feedeth a Flock, and eateth not of the milk of the Flock? plainly showing, the equity of the case, as it respects those who are chosen to feed the Flock of God, which he hath purchased with his own Blood, Act. 20. 28. 1 Pet. 5. 2. And that no Man should imagine these Arguments to be carnal or too low; he foresees the Objection, and avers, that the Law of God contains these Allegations, and that he speaks not these things as a Man, but refers them to the Law of God, Deut. 25. And proceeds to prosecute his Argument taken from the Ploughman, and the Thresher, in whose case, none can deny a Recompence to be due, according to their Labors respectively. And though it is most true, that the Ministers Labor is of a far higher consideration, and their reward in Heaven, and shall be abundantly given to them, when the chief Shepherd shall appear, 1 Pet. 5. 4. Yet are the Churches their debtors also, and bound to supply them with such Honors, as their comfortable subsistence in the World requires; and should account the exchange not valuable, since they do but impart as it were Brass for Gold. If we have sown unto you Spiritual things, is it a great matter if we reap your Carnal things.
Finally, he argues from the care that was taken for the Ministry under the Law, verse. 13. That since the equity of the Law remains, the conclusion is rationally deduced, That even so they that Preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel. For so hath the Lord Ordained, verse. 14. Thus the Law of God, right Reason, common Equity, and true Friendship, do all concur to enforce this great Duty, that God's Ministers be cared for by the Churches, with all things necessary. Yea,
It is expressly required, Gal. 6. 6. Let him that is taught in the Word, communicate to him that teacheth in all good things. And though this form of speech may sometimes bear the force of an Advice or Counsel only; yet here it may be taken imperatively: 1. Because it is grounded upon the Law of God, and the highest Principles of Reason. And 2 lie. because it is enforced with a severe threatening, that such as refuse to obey, shall reap their Portion among those that mock God, or think to deceive him, when in truth he cannot be mocked, or deceived.
It is certain, that as God requires some part of our time to be devoted to his Service, so he hath reserved part of our Substance to that blessed end, and that as the way to be more prosperous in our Labors. Prov. 3. 9, 10. Honor the Lord with thy Substance, and with the First-fruits of thine Encrease; so shall thy Barns be filled with plenty, and thy Presses shall burst over with Wine. Yea, Blessed are they of the Lord, who sow beside all waters (or propagate the Gospel among all the people) that send forth thither the foot of the Ox and the Ass. A Metaphor taken from the most laborious Creatures, and may very fitly serve to set out the painful Stewards of God's Mysteries, even the Ministers of the Gospel.
Our blessed Lord himself, did not only receive supplys from his followers, Who ministered to him of their substance, Luk. 8. 3. But also wills his Ministers to be without carefulness, touching meat and drink; and to put that upon the account of their Labor, as being no more than a due recompense, Matt. 10. 10. Luk. 10. 7. because the Labourer is worthy of his meat. So that we have all the grounds which are necessary, to conclude that it is beyond the reach of contradiction that a competent supply of all outward things, is the due of all faithful Ministers of Christ for their works-sake.
SECT. II. Of the Proportion or Quantity, in respect of outward supplies which belong to the Ministers of the Gospel.
Here the case differs greatly, between the Ministers of the Gospel, and those of the Law; the latter having a certain determinate proportion set out according to their Tribe, instead of that portion of the Land of Canaan, which should otherwise have fallen to them by Lot, Num. 26. 62. Numb. 18. 20, 21, 26. But as the Ministers of the Gospel are not raised out of the Tribe of Levi, more than any other Tribe or Family in the Earth; nor denied any inheritance in common with other men: so neither hath the Lord determined any limited Portion for them upon the account of their Service, but hath provided for them in general such things as are necessary, and this to be given or communicated freely by his People, as a fruit of those virtues which by the Gospel are planted in them. Gal. 6. 6. Let him that is taught, communicate to him that teacheth, &c. being fruitful in every good work, Colos. 1. 10. There is no Reason, no Law, no President for any indenting between the Church and the Ministers of the Gospel. Christ leading us the way, takes what is freely communicated, and allows his Ministers to do the same, as is shown.
Paul who kept close to Christ, having occasion to commend the Philippians for their pious care of him in his wants, professeth he did not speak it to enforce a gift from them, but only desired fruit; namely, That they should still cherish the grace of God in them, that they might not cease to do such good works as they had opportunity, that in the end they might find them, to turn to their account. Because it is the patient continuing in well-doing, which God will recount, and repay, Rom. 2. 7. And in this respect we are to consider the Excellency, as well, of the Spirit of the Christian Church, above what was found in the Jewish Church generally, as of the Ministration which they are under; where all such Works as these are to be done in respect of their measures, according to the general rules of Piety and Equity: and that we may hereby give demonstration of the power of Godliness dwelling in our hearts; that as the love of God constrains the faithful Minister to deny himself of those Earthly advantages which he might embrace, that he might serve the Church of God; so the same love of God should constrain the Church to hold such in reputation, and to minister necessaries to them.
And though God hath not precisely assigned the portion to be communicated, yet it may be estimated in general from the places before remembered. As thus, It ought to be such (in strictness of Equity) as may keep the Minister indemnified in his Domestic concerns; else he goeth a warfare at his own charge: but of that he ought to be disburdened, save only in a case of common Calamity, and there the Minister as well as the Soldier must suffer with the rest: yea, then it will become him to lead the way, and teach the Church to take joyfully the spoiling of their Goods by his Heroic and cheerful example.
Were this moderate care only taken over the faithful Ministers of Christ, more would not be desired; nay, though there might happen some failure, yet would he not complain, but rather follow his Pattern, 1 Cor. 9, Where Paul used not his power to forbear working, but labored with his hands, and was careful to make the Gospel without charge. Yea, let all Christ's Ministers beward of Covetousness, let them not desire any man's Silver, Gold, or Aparrel, though they may lawfully be burthensome as the Messengers of Christ, 1 Thes. 2. 5, 6. Let them weigh the temper of the time they live in, wherein the Poor have been oppressed, and the Rich vexed with the mercenary Ministry, which makes everything of kindness done to Christ's Servants look like it. Let them consider how honorable it is to Preach the Gospel freely, 1 Thess. 2. 8. For,
Though Christ hath ordained, That such as Preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel; yet we have no reason to believe he designed to make them rich in this World by Preaching: No, he requires them to take heed and beware of Riches. And Paul advises Timothy, and in him all Ministers of Christ, that having Food and Raiment to be therewith content; and tells him also of the danger of Riches, 1 Tim. 6. 8, 9, 10. Not a word speaks he of any hope, that Timothy might have to arise (by his supplies from the Church) to the degree of a Lord in this World, nor yet for any that were to succeed him.
And let the Baptized Churches be exhorted to consider, that whilst others have exceeded, they have been too short, in caring for their Ministers, who though they have generally with great cheerfulness served them in the Gospel of God freely, yet that will not justify the Churches in the neglect of their duty. And beside, the Ministry are rendered by this neglect the less capable to serve them, being generally much diverted by worldly employments from that serious Study and exercise of Reading; which ordinarily conduces much to the furtherance of the Gospel, in the more ample preaching thereof. For, when Paul advises Timothy to this course of reading and study, to the intent he might show himself a Workman that need not be ashamed rightly dividing the Word of Truth, 1 Tim. 4. 13. 2 Tim. 2. 15. who yet was undoubtedly a Man of very rare parts; how much more should we, who come so far short of him (in all likelihood) stir up ourselves to that needful exercise? not that Men should depend upon such Studies, but use the means, and depend upon God for the benefit and blessing thereof in their Service in the Ministry.
SECT. III. Tythes not due by the Law of God to the Ministers of the Gospel.
This Point I shall not discourse largely, but briefly propound certain Arguments, to show, that Christ's Ministers have no true claim to Tythes by the Law of God; and the first is this.
But the Sons of Levi only had a command to take Tythes: Ergo, Tythes are not due to the Ministers of the Gospel, &c.
The major is evident of itself. The minor is proved, Heb. 7. 5. And verily, they that are of the Sons of Levi, who receive the Office of the Priesthood, have a commandment to take Tythes of the People according to the Law. So that the Law empowered no other to take Tythes, save those Priests only. What was given by Abraham to Melchizedek comes not within the compass of a Law, but was a voluntary Donation.
The major is evident: because whatsoever the Ministers of the Gospel have right to by Divine Authority (for of such a right we dispute) it must first be found in Christ or his Apostles. But it is evident our Lord sprang out of Judah; of which Tribe Moses spake nothing concerning the Priest-hood, Heb. 7. 14. And therefore nothing concerning Tythes: and consequently, his Ministers can claim nothing on that account as they hold of Christ.
The major is evident: because there cannot be a greater piece of injustice, than for a Man to lose his right for asking, and demand another man's goods instead thereof. The minor is true: because what the Apostles pleaded in respect of the right they had to a supply by free Donation, is not to be questioned.
But to assert the Maintenance of Christ's Ministers, by paying Tythes doth so. Ergo Tythes are not due to the Ministers of Christ.
The major is not to be denied; the minor is evident. 1. Because what Men are compelled to by Law, can be no gift on their part, and consequently no fruit can arise from thence, anymore than to pay a just debt. 2 lie. Because a rich Man that hath Money and Land only, shall pay no Tythes; whilst the poor Husbandman must pay the utmost farthing. Now howsoever Almighty God might permit this in the Jewish Church, which was National, and where the National Priesthood was denied an Inheritance in the Land, for that they were to have the Tenths, yet in the Church as constituted by Christ, it cannot be rational, but very unequal.
The major is evident. The minor is clear by all experience: for Tythes being asserted by Law, become a great Interest, and cannot be managed in any Nation without the Civil Power: And we see that a Ministry which depends upon Tythes for their support, always (generally) serve the Times, though many of them against their Conscience. And how much the Faithful Ministers of Christ are suppressed by these Men, is too evident: now take away Tythes or a forced maintenance, and this generation of men would vanish; and faithful Ministers, such as seek not Silver, but the good of Souls, would come in their places.
But God bore Witness against Tythes being paid to Gospel-Ministers, as poison poured into the Church. Ergo, Tythes do not belong to the Ministers of Christ.
The major is true without Controversy. The minor is true also, if the Histories of these times, approved by the Learned Writers, may be credited.
CHAP. XVI. Of that Humility and Brotherly respect which ought to be found in Christ's Ministers one towards another: and of the carriage of the Brotherhood towards their Pastors.
SECT. I.
OUr Blessed Lord knowing the Infirmity of Man to be such, as that he is scarce more averse to anything than Humility, to be little in his own eyes, and to give the glory of all the good he doth; and of all the Grace wherewith he is entrusted, to God only: was pleased both by Doctrine and Example, to train up his Ministers in the steps of true Humility.
And having a fit occasion for it, through their folly, in reasoning among themselves which of them should be the greatest; shows them by the simplicity and humility of a little Child, what manner of Men they ought to be, Luk. 9. 46, 47, 48. And that the way to be great in the Kingdom of God, was to be least in their own esteem, whilst they were the greatest Servants.
This he further teacheth in that remarkable Example, when he washed his Disciples Feet, John 13. 13 to 18. declaring the end of it to be their pattern and Instruction in that great Virtue of Humility. If I then your Lord and Master have washed your feet, ye ought also to wash one another's feet. Not that our Savior did here institute any Divine Ordinance, but only upholds a laudable custom of courteous and friendly respect, very fit to demonstrate the reality of friendship; and the like friendly custom he upholds, when he gave his Disciples direction, That when they entered into any house they should salute it, i. e. give some testimony, that they come in the way of peace and true friendship. Let not your carriage be morose or churlish, nor yet affected; but amicable, free and courteous. Thus these friendly customs among Men are approved of by Christ: but yet he hath not turned them to Divine Sanctions for his Churches observance only; seeing there can be no doubt but washing of feet was still as laudable among the Jews, as among the Disciples of Christ; and is as commendable among all men, as among Christians themselves, at this day; and therefore not to be accounted an Institution of Christ in his Church. And that they should ever remember upon this occasion, of Christ's abasing himself to do this Office, (than which there was not a lower to be undertaken) they should abhor all thoughts of superiority, or domination one over another. For this our Savior did chiefly for the instruction of his Ministers; for so it is, that Men in Authority are more apt to bear it high against their Competitors, than against their Inferiors. And if once this spirit of Pride get hold of the Leaders in Churches, it soon inserts itself into the Churches themselves. For the Minister is so prevalent an Example (either good or bad) that the holy Ghost hath left it as a Proverb to posterity, Hosea 4. 9. Like People, like Priest: and I will punish them for their way.
But notwithstanding our Savior's Doctrine and Pattern in this behalf, a spirit of Pride brake into the Churches both in the Apostles days, and the Ages succeeding; and that chiefly among the Leaders, insomuch, that Paul was contemned by them, as weak. 2 Cor. 10. 10. His bodily presence is weak, and his speech contemptible. Nor would Diotrephes receive those Ministers who went forth for the Namesake of Christ, but rejected John himself, 3 Ep. John.
The foresight of mischiefs of this kind occasioned the denouncing of that Woe, Matt. 18. Woe to the world because of offenses. His Disciples had a little before been reasoning, which of them should be the greatest. And hence our Savior fore-shows, that it must needs be that offenses shall come, and that from those who should be as the right Eye, right Hand, or right Foot in the Body. All which hath been abundantly fulfilled in after-Ages, as well as the first times of the Gospel. A timely instance we have of it, in Clemens, who bewails that ungodly Sedition (as he justly calls it) in the Church at Corinth, about superiority in the Ministry; which resulted in the thrusting out the ancient and faithful Pastors: and how the following Ages grew from bad to worse, is at large declared by Eusebius, Socrates, and Evagrius, in their Histories, respectively.
It were happy, if the present Churches had no cause to complain of the same inconvenience. However, let me entreat and beseech the Ministry of the present Baptized Churches, to watch against this cankered root of Pride; and let them more study to prefer one another than themselves, as ever they expect to be found true Servants to Christ and his Churches. For suppose the question should be, Which is the highest Office in the Church? Truly, on which side so ever it is cast, the just inference must be, That he who supplies that place in any of the Churches, is to be the least; yea, a Minister or a Servant to the rest. It is not in the Church, as it is in the World; where the Princes are not called Servants but Benefactors, or Magnificent, Luk. 22. 25. No, It shall not be so among you, saith Christ: But he that is greatest among you (to wit, of the Ministry) let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve, verse. 26. Yea, they are to serve even the lowest members in the body, after the example of Christ, Who came not to be ministered unto, but to minister. And sets forth the duty and office of his Ministers, by the office of such as serve at the Table; whilst others feed upon that which these Servants set before them. And by this form of speech our Lord would instruct his Ministers in the great duty of Humility: and encourageth them therein, by the honor that should be confer'd upon them, when they should sit at his Table in his Kingdom. We see then there is no way for any man to advance in the Church of God, let his place be what it will; but by being ready to serve the rest, to do business, and not to possess an empty Title, whilst others do the Services signified thereby.
And the better to put an end to all strife, about greatness among the Ministers of Christ: let it be considered, that setting aside the chief Apostles, who had immediate missions from Christ, and were the Foundation-layers, on which all subsequent Teachers are to Build; there is no plain Testimony, that one Bishop or Elder hath any Soveranity above another. Though Timothy and Titus were Apostles (or Messengers subordinate to the chief Apostles,) yet are not found to possess greater Authority, than the Bishops which they Ordained, at least in the Churches to whom they were particularly related▪ only these Messengers had a larger Circuit, business in many places; and so greater Servants: but for any jurisdiction which they claimed over other Bishops, I find none at all. Nevertheless, as those Elders who labor most in the Word and Doctrine, are to be accounted worthy of double honor, 3 John 8. And since we are willed to hold such in reputation, who for the Name-sake of Jesus Christ labor in remote places to propagate the Gospel; it always becomes the fixed Ministers to receive them, and these reciprocally, of a generous mind, to confer those respects on each other, which may comport with the honor of the Gospel, and of the trust committed to them respectively; Let a man so account of us as Ministers of Christ, and Stewards of the Mysteries of God, 1 Cor. 4. 1.
SECT. II. Of the behavior of the Christian Brotherhood to the Ministers.
Although God hath made his Gospel-Ministers Servants to the Churches for Jesus sake, 2 Cor. 4. 5. Yet it also is the will of God, that his People should not therefore despise, but obey, and honor his Ministers under imminent danger of God's displeasure. Tit. 2. 15. Let no man despise thee, 1 Thess. 4. 8. He therefore that despiseth, despiseth not Man, but God, who hath also given unto us his holy Spirit: 1 Pet. 5. 5. Likewise ye Younger submit yourselves to the Elder. Which considered with the scope, shows the duty, or submission of Christians to their Pastors, verse. 2, 3, 4. As Christianity teacheth the Governors of Churches to rule in Love and Humility: so it teacheth the Governed to obey, from the same Principles; Let all your things be done in Charity.
The carriage of Christians towards their Ministers should hold agreement with the deportment of wise Children to their Parents. For though we may neither call, nor account any man Father upon Earth, as God is our Father; yet in respect of that care which God hath committed to the Pastors, they are esteemed Fathers in the Churches of Christ; especially, those whose labors God hath Crowned with success. When John writes to Fathers, young Men, and Children, in a Christian State, we may not only understand those who had continued long; but withal, those who had the care of the Churches upon them. When Paul saith, 2 Cor. 12. 14. The Children ought not to lay up for the Parents, but the Parents for the Children: It is manifest, that he speaks it of the care which Christ's Ministers should have for the good of the Churches to whom they are related; after the Example of the Apostle, 2 Pet. 1. 15. I will endeavor that you may be able after my decease to have these things always in remembrance.
The duty of Children then is to love their Parents. This grace was once excellent, in the Galatians towards Paul, Gal. 4. 15. I bear you Record, that if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes to have given them to me. Yea, there was a very great affection in the first Christians towards their Ministers, which eminently appeared in that notable instance, Act 20. 37, 38. And doubtless their love was not to Paul alone, but to all Faithful Ministers of the Gospel of God. How greatly Peter was beloved of the Christians, appears by the constant Prayers they made to God for him when he was a Prisoner, Act. 12. 5. Would the Lord's Children duly pay this debt of Love to Christ's Ministers, it would certainly stand in the stead of many other Duties; or rather, be a motive to them all.
'It is the duty of Children to honor and obey their Parents; and by all means to shun the things which grieve them. Heb. 13. 17. Obey them that have the Rule over you, for they watch for your Souls, as they that must give an account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief, for that is unprofitable for you.
Let all Christians therefore show an obedient disposition towards God's Ministers, so as to follow their Faith; and to consider the end of their Conversation: yet, with this Caution, as they follow Christ: For further then that, the Apostle desires none to follow him. 1 Cor. 11. 1. Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ. And thence he proceeds to teach those duties which become the Christian profession, in point of that Authority which God hath given to his Church: and the duties of Subordination as it concerns the members of the Body, in respect of their sex and qualities respectively: of which we have spoken, Chap. 8. of this Book.
Let all Christians study to behave themselves reverently in Christian Assemblies, in the presence of God and his Ministers, whose office is to speak unto them the Word of God. For God is greatly to be feared in the Assembly of his Saints, and to be had in reverence by all that are about him. Let Christian Women behave themselves in such a presence, with that modesty and shamefacedness, which is there signified by the vailing of their faces; and let Men beware they dishonor not God by effeminate deportments. Let all Christians beware they discourage not their Teachers by a careless or slothful behavior. When thou goest to the House of God, take heed to thy feet, and be more ready to hear, than to offer the Sacrifice of Fools: for they consider not that they do evil. It is near upon the matter, to reject the Minister of Christ, as not to regard what he speaks by Commission from him. He that cannot behave himself like a Christian towards his Pastor, whiles he is ministering holy things to him, is not very like to do it at other times. Nor can it be thought that man can esteem very highly of his Teacher for the Works-sake, who is not affected with the Work itself.
Christianismus Primitivus.
The Third BOOK. WHEREIN IS SHEWED, The Duty of all Christians to Civil Governors and Government. AND The nature and necessity of Christian Moderation about their differing Apprehensions. With many particular Cases of CONSCIENCE Demonstrated and Resolved.
CHAP. I. The Baptized Churches unjustly charged with seditious Principles. They are strictly obliged by their Principles, to obey Magistrates as God's Ordinance.
SECT. I.
VEry great have been the Prejudicies which the Baptized Churches have sustained, by the loud Clamours which have been heard almost from every Pulpit, and the Pens of prejudiced (though otherwise Learned) Men, representing us to the World, as a People disaffected to Magistracy; how justly, it will concern us a little to inquire in this place. And surely, those that accuse us on this account, must ground what they say either on our Principles, or Practices, the Reports of our Enemies, or their own Imaginations. If on the two latter, 'tis frivolous to undertake their Confutation, otherwise than by a just Retaliation; public Clamours being as loud against them, as any whom they would accuse. And by the way, let it be remembered, that Christ himself, the great Master of the Christian Faith and Practice, was accused as if he were no Friend to Caesar; ( Herod also out of conceit that Christ would take away his Kingly Dignity, murdered a multitude of innocent Children, with hopes to have murdered Christ among them); and yet behold, there was nothing in his Design, or Doctrine, which ten ded to weaken Kingly Power among Men. Indeed, Christ came to reign in the hearts of Men by Faith, his holy Word and Spirit, to reform their Lives, to teach them to serve God aright, that they might be saved; but yet reserving to Caesar, and all Princes throughout the World, both their Titles and Honors; plainly showing that God's right over Men, did not annul the right of Magistrates who are his Substitutes, and therefore called God's: which great Title Christ made not Void, but rather Confirmed.
Paul was counted a pestilent Fellow, a mover of Sedition among all the Jews; though his Deportment, and the Testimony of the Scripture concerning him, shown the contrary. Acts 25. The Jews which came down from Jerusalem stood round about, and laid many and grievous things to his Charge, which they could not prove: Whilst Paul answerad for himself; Neither against the Law of the Jews, neither against the Temple, nor yet against Caesar have I offended anything at all. It is not then what any interested Persons have either spoken, or written, which is to be received by any to the prejudice of the Accused; but much less ought that which is reported out of other Nations, in former times, be brought against a People who are mere strangers to such Principles and Actions as are objected against them. If therefore Men would deal fairly with us, they must either demonstrate, that our Principles, as we differ from others, do naturally lead to Sedition, or else they say nothing: For suppose some foolish Men in the same form of Profession with us, should break due Bounds, to the disturbance of the Civil Peace, yet this ought not to prejudice our Churches in general, who oppose such Exhorbitances as much as any. Witness that Testimony which was given by the Messengers and Elders of Baptized Churches in this behalf, some Years before the return of King Charles the Second to his Crown and Dignity. The Contents whereof are in these particulars:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
And because Mr. Tombs, a Learned Assertor of the Principles of the Baptized Churches in the case of Baptism, hath spoken the Mind of many of those Churches, in respect of their Judgment touching Magistratical Government, in his explication of the several Scriptures in the New Testament which concern that important Matter, I will therefore insert that wholesome Testimony which he hath left to Posterity, in the next Section.
SECT. II. Mr. Tombs his Opinion and Testimony touching Christian Subjection to Magistrates, taken out of his Book, Intituled, Saints no Smiters, p. 16, &c.
Against vilifying or resisting the Civil Magistrate, he first proposes three Texts, viz. Matth. 22. 21. Mark 12. 18. Luke 20. 27. and then saith; Our Lord being by the Disciples of the Pharisees and Herodians, posed with this Captious Question, — Is it lawful to give Tribute to Caesar, or not? — Resolves them, That they were to render to Caesar the things that were Caesars; to wit, Tribute, Honor, and that subjection which was then given to him as Emperor. Now it is known that the Emperor, or Caesar, then reigning, was Tiberius Caesar, Luke 3. 1. who came to the Empire by wicked Practices; and not only led a most wicked and vicous Life, in Uncleanness and Irreligion, but also was a bloody Oppressor of the Senate and People of Rome; as may be seen in Tacitus his Annals, Suetonius in the Relation of his Life, and other Historians. Therefore the Doctrine that teacheth Disobedience, denying of Tribute, Honors, Subjection to Kings and Princes, as being Oppressors, Enemies to Christ, &c. — is contrary to Christ's Precept, which requires Tribute, Honors, &c. — to be given to them, though by wicked ways obtaining the Empire, and most wickedly Ruling, and putting Christ himself to death.
The next is that full and plain Precept of the Apostle Paul, Rom. 13. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. where St. Paul requires of every Soul (therefore of the most enlightened Saints) to be subject to the Higher or Supreme Powers, who are termed Rulers, Princes, and such as bear the Sword. Therefore Civil Magistrates who had power of punishing Men, even unto Death, — It is not said the Powers that should be, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the Powers that are in being, — and he that beareth the Sword; not he only that ought to bear the Sword, but he that hath it in possession. — The Apostle strictly enjoins Titus, to put the Christians, over whom he was, in mind of this, Tit. 3. 1. That they should be subject to Principalities and Powers, to obey Magistrates; intimating thereby, That Christians had need to be minded of it, because it was a necessary Duty, notwithstanding provocations to the contrary.
I shall add to these the plain Precepts of St. Peter, 1 Pet. 2. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17. where he thus chargeth Christians, Submit yourselves to every Ordinance of Man for the Lord's sake; whether it be to the King, as Supreme; or unto Governors, as unto them that are sent by him, &c. Now it is to be observed, that the Caesars, Powers, Rulers, Principalities, who then bare the Sword, the Kings and Governors, were all of them great Idolaters; took the title of Pontifex Maximus, as being chief about the Idol Service of Jupiter, and other Heathen God's. — In whose time St. Peter and St. Paul are thought to have written their Epistles, yet did they require subjection to them; and therefore to teach they are to be resisted and smitten for those Qualities, to whom the Apostles, notwithstanding them Qualities, requires Subjection, Honor, and payment of Tribute, is directly to gainsay the Apostles Doctrine.
SECT. III. That the Principles of the Baptized Churches, in Point of Religion, have nothing of a State-seditious Spirit in the nature of them.
Should the Principles of the Baptized Churches be censured, as of a State-seditious Nature, I see not how Primitive Christianity itself can escape. For whether we consider, first,
Their Principles in reference to the Deity, Christ's Incarnation, Death, Resurrection, Ascension, and second Coming to judge all the World in Righteousness: In all these Points, they hold in general with all sound Christians, both Ancient and Modern. Among whom, notwithstanding there hath been some differing Apprehensions about the Extent of the Ransom, occasioned, especially with respect to these latter Times, by Calvin 's too much rigidity about Predestination, Election, and Reprobation; so that nothing from hence can be inferred to be of dangerous consequence to the Worldly Government, but it must equally reflect upon the first Christians. No, not that Point of their Faith concerning the Kingdom of Christ, to be established upon the Earth a thousand Years. For assuredly this was the Opinon, or Faith, of the Primitive Christians. And indeed, seeing we all believe that Christ shall come to Judge the World; and that till his coming, we are to keep the Word of his Patience; yea, to be patient until the coming of the Lord: How can it be offensive to any professing Christianity, (or any other Person) that some hold he shall judge the World in a short, and some in a longer time? But if any Man be impatient of Christ's coming, and would be doing anything to the disturbance of the Civil Peace of Nations, as if he must usher the Lord Christ into his Seat of Judgment: We look upon such Men to be more busy than wise, and do exhort them to study to be quiet, and do their own business, and let God Almighty, and his Holy Child Jesus alone, as to the accomplishment of what he hath promised in this behalf. And let it suffice us to do what we are allowed in this case, and that is, to pray daily, Thy Kingdom come; thy Will be done, as in Heaven, so on Earth, &c.
Mean while, let all Christians seriously consider, That the Scriptures seem not to be more express in anything, than in taking care that Christians be not of a State-disturbing Spirit, but to render to all their dues, Honor, Fear, Custom, Tribute, &c. Yea, that every Soul be subject to the Higher Powers; and that because there is no Power but of God; for by him Kings Reign, and he it is who putteth down one, and setteth up another; sometimes he doth this in Mercy, sometimes in Justice. Now the Christian Man is under a constant direction to pray for Kings, and all that are in Authority; to obey Magistrates, and to be ready to every good work: to speak evil of no Man, — but to show all meekness to all Men. Yea, to be short, To fear God, and honor the King, are his indispensible Duties. In all Religious things God must have his due; In all Civil Obedience Caesar must have his due. And of this Doctrine care was taken by the Apostles, that the succeeding Ministry should put the Brethren in remembrance of these things.
For assuredly Christianity is never like to be acceptable to Magistrates who yet know not Christ, if once they have just cause to suspect it to be destructive to Civil Government; nor will the Christians themselves be comforted in their Sufferings, when their Provocations do procure them. Let none of you suffer — as an evil-doer, as a busy-body in other Men's matters. Yet if any suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed, 1 Pet. 4. 15, 16.
2. If we consider the Baptized Churches, with respect to their Principles touching a Church State, and the public Worship of God, surely here also they are free from a Seditious Spirit. However, their Principles are innocent: for here they preach the common Doctrine of Christianity, Repentance from dead Works, and Faith towards God, as the first things to be learned by every Man that will be a Christian. The next, that Men be baptized with Water, in the Name of the Father, Son, &c. for the Remission of Sins, and thence to walk in newness of Life, according to the Doctrine of the Lord Jesus Christ: An Epitome whereof we have in those six particulars, Heb. 6. And herein they follow Christ and his first Churches, as hath been fully shown above.
For that Separation which we maintain, in the Treatise next following this, we trust it is clearly evidenced to be made upon warrantable and necessary grounds. However, here it may suffice to say, That all which hold anything conscientiously, in reference to Christian Religion, do also maintain their Separations respectively. As the Papists, How severe are they for Separation from the Protestants, and all whom they are pleased to count Heretics, may be seen in the Rhemists Testament, or their Annotations on 2 Cor. 6. 14. where they make it utterly unlawful to have to with such, especially in Religious Exercises. And as stiffly on the other side do the Protestants maintain their Separation from the Papists, to be necessary from the same Scripture. And the like is done by Presbyterians and Independents (at least many of them) from them both. And it must be granted by all that profess Christianity, that upon a supposition, that the things which we alleadg are true, on which we ground our Separation, it is more clear and rational, according to the Principles of Religion, than any of the Separations maintained by them: For, No Baptism, no Church, is a Proposition so convincing, as very few have hitherto had the boldness to deny it. Whereas on the contrary, the Parties aforesaid do all acknowledge the same Baptism; and upon any Person coming off from one of these Parties to the other, they allow the Baptism fore-received to be valid. Yea, and if Ordination have been received there, they ordinarily do ratify it also, and yet defend their Separations respectively with great vehemency. But the case is far more pressing on our part: And we do unfeignedly profess, that did we believe that these differing Parties, or any of them, had lawful Power as Ministers, and true (or a valid) Baptism, we durst not (as now we do) maintain Separation from them; especially such as are of pious and sober Conversations. Wherefore we conclude, That it is not rational, or at least less rational, to charge the Separation maintained by the present Baptized Churches, with Sedition or Disturbance to Civil Government, than the Separation maintained by any of the fore-mentioned Parties.
No less Irrational is it to charge our Preaching and Praying together, with Sedition, (though we be forbidden by the present Authority) when it is most certain, that they have all done; and upon occasion, do frequently justify the same thing; though for so doing they have suffered the loss of Goods, Liberty, and Life itself, as well as many of ours have done. And yet they rejoice in such their Sufferings respectively, counting it their Martyrdom. And surely, the Premises duly and impartially considered, we have no less, but rather much more cause to rejoice in our Sufferings, for meeting together to Preach, Pray, and edify one another in the use of all the Holy Ordinances of the Gospel. Thus ad Hominem: which may very well abate the hard thoughts of many against us.
But we shall also show some (as we trust) convincing Reasons why we cannot but uphold our Christian Assembles, as of late we have done, notwithstanding the severity of human Laws against us in that behalf, in a Chapter by itself hereafter in this Treatise: But now shall proceed to show the innocence of the Baptized Churches, as to the charge of Sedition, by reciting their Apologies in that behalf, printed upon occasion of some Emergencies requiring such Testimonies.
SECT. IV. Containing the Humble Apology of some, commonly called Anabaptists, in behalf of themselves, and others of the same Judgment with them: With their Protestation against the late Wicked and most horrid Treasonably Insurrection and Rebellion acted in the City of London. Together with an Apology formerly presented to the King's most Excellent Majesty.
WE should be stupid and senseless, if we did not deeply resent those black Obloquies and Reproaches cast upon those of our Profession and Practice in the Point of Baptism, by occasion of the late most horrid Treason and Rebellion in this City of London.
We most sadly see and feel, that among many it is become enough to render any Man criminal to be called an Anabaptist, or at least a ground sufficient to question his Loyalty and Fidelity to the King's Majesty.
We may not therefore be so negligent of our Duty unto God, in respect of our Profession, or unto ourselves and Families, as silently to suffer our Names and Profession to be buried under such causeless Infamy: Neither may we be so much wanting of our Duty to our King, as by such sullen silence to offer his Majesty just occasion of being jealous and suspicious of our Loyalty and Obedience; or to leave him without all possible rational Security of our humble Subjection and Fidelity to Him. We acknowledge, that the Histories of Germany relate most dreadful things of the impious Opinions and Practices of some reputed Anabaptists, destructive to all Government and human Society. Although it's to be observed what Cassander, a learned and moderate Papist, relates, in his Epistle to the Duke of Gulick and Cleve, to this purpose; That there were certain People in Germany, bearing the denomination of Anabaptists, who resisted and opposed the Opinions and Practices of those at Munster, and taught the contrary Doctrine; Whereby (in his Opinion) they appeared to be incited by a Godly Mind, and rendered themselves rather worthy of Pity, than Persecution and Perdition. And that in Holland, those who have succeeded them, do in Doctrine and Practice adhere to the same peaceable Principles, is publicly known. But the misguided Zeal of some (otherwise-minded in the Point of Baptism ) hath frequently, though unduly, imputed the like Impious Opinions, Designs, and Intentions, unto all that are called by that Name; although their Souls abhor the very memory of such Impious Doctrines, and their Bloody Consequences. That such evil Opinions and Practices, are no natural or necessary Concomitants or Consequences of the Doctrine about Baptism, nor of any possible connection with it, is easy to be discerned: Yet by the like mistake we now suffer under Jealousies, through the wicked Treason, Rebellion and Murder, of a few heady and distempered Persons; pretending to introduce a Civil and Temporal Reign and Government of Jesus Christ by their Swords, and to subvert all Civil Government and Authority.
Yea we cannot imagine a Reason why their Bloody Tenants, and Tragical Actings, should reflect upon those of our Perswasion, the Persons not being of our Belief or Practice about Baptism; but, to the best of our Information, they were all (except one) Assertors of Infant Baptism, and never had Communion with us in our Assembles; nor hath there been any Correspondence or Converse between us: but contrariwise, in their Meetings, they have inveighed bitterly against us, as Worshippers of the Beast, because of our constant declaring against their conceited, wild Interpretations of Dark Prophecies, and Enthusiastical Impulses, and professing and practicing our Duty of Subjection to the Civil Magistracy.
And it is notoriously known, the very same Persons, or at least the Leaders, and the most of them, formerly advanced their pretended Standard of Jesus Christ, as much against us as against any others. And it is as publicly known, that even in this their Rebellion, such of us as were called thereunto (which were many) were ready to hazard our Lives to suppress them.
And if such a constant continued Opposition unto the Impious Tenants and Practices of these Persons, both in our Doctrine and Lives, will not be esteemed a pregnant and cogent Evidence of our unspotted innocence from their Treason and Rebellion, and satisfy every Man, that our Souls never entered into their Secrets, we can only appeal to the All-seeing God, the Judge of all the Earth, to vindicate us in his Righteous Judgment, who we are assured will judge and do right. In whose presence we Protest, that we neither had the least foreknowledge of the said late Treasonable Insurrection, nor did any of us, in any kind or degree whatsoever, directly or indirectly, Contrive, Promote, Assist, Abet, or Approve the same: but do esteem it our Duty to God, to his Majesty, and to our Neighbor, not only to be Obedient, but also to use our utmost industry to prevent all such Treasons, Murders, and Rebellions; and to use, in all our Assemblies, constant Prayers and Supplications for his Majesty.
Wherefore we humbly beseech his Majesty, and desire all our Fellow Subjects, that our Actions, Doctrines and Lives, may be the only Glasses through which they will look into our Hearts, and pass judgment upon us; and that the Tenants or Opinions of others, either in this or Foreign Kingdoms, may not be imputed to us, when our Doctrines and Lives do declare our abhorrency of them: We believing, that Jesus Christ himself, his Apostles, and Christian Religion, do consist with, and obey the Imperial Government that then was in the World; and that we ought to obey his Majesty, not only for Wrath, but for Conscience-sake.
We desire therefore that it may be considered, without prejudice, Whether our Perswasion in the matter of Baptism, hath any connection with these Doctrines against Government? Or whether these can be the probable Consequences or Inferences from our Doctrine concerning Baptism? And we pray that it may be seriously considered, whether it be Rational, Just, or Christian, to impute all the Errors and Wickednesses of any Sect of Christians in one Age or Country, to the Persons of another Age and Country, called by the Name of the former? especially when these Errors or Impieties gave not the Name to the Sect, (as in our case) nor can be reasonably supposed to be the Consequences of that Opinion, from whence the Sect had its denomination.
It would not be holden just, to aver every Protestant to belive Consubstantiation, or absolute Predestination and Reprobation, because Luther was zealous in the one, and Calvin in the other: Why therefore should the Errors and Impieties of others be imputed to us, whilst we earnestly contend against them? And as to our Doctrine of Baptism, we hope every Christian that hath searched the Scriptures, knoweth, that there wants not so much evidence, at least for our Opinion and Practice, as Christian Charity may well allow; though in some Men's Judgments we should be esteemed mistaken: And it will easily be granted by the Learned, That there is no Impiety in our Doctrine of Baptism, nor opposition to Civil Government, or his Majesty's Authority: Neither can the injury of our Neighbor be the natural Consequence of it.
And therefore we humbly hope, That the Omnipotent Power of Heaven and Earth, will so dispose his Majesty and his Peoples Hearts, that we may worship God in peace and freedom, according to the Faith we have received, living a peaceable and quiet life, in all godliness and honesty.
POSTSCRIPT.
That it may yet more fully appear, That our Principles suggested in this Apology, about subjection to Magistracy and Government, against the contrary Opinions and Practices, are not new, much less proceeding from us upon the succeslesness of this Tragical Enterprise, we have thought fit herewith to publish an Apology of our Ancient and Constant Principles, presented with our humble Petition to the King's most Excellent Majesty, some months since, in the Year 1660.
- William Kiffen.
- John Batty.
- Thomas Cooper.
- John Pearson.
- Henry Hills.
- Edward Harrison.
- Samuel Tull.
- John Cox.
- Jam. Knight.
- Chr. Blackwood.
- Henry Den.
- Thomas Lamb.
- Philip Travors.
- Thomas Penson.
- Fran. Smith.
- John Gosnold.
- Tho. Bramhall.
- Samuel Stanton.
- John Browning.
- Thomas Lathwel.
- Edward Roberts.
- John Man.
- Z. Worth.
- John Spilsbery.
- Jer. Zanchi.
- Joseph Simpson.
- John Rix.
- John Clayton.
- Daniel Royse.
- Mark Cam.
SECT. V. Containing an Apology of some, called Anabaptists, in and about the City of London, in behalf of themselves and others of the same Judgment with them.
Forasmuch as it hath been our portion all along to suffer, not only some hard things in many of our Persons, but also very much in our Reputations, through the unjust Aspersions and Calumnies of our Adversaries; and such, who, though they daily behold our Inoffensive Conversation, and do, or may know our Faith and Doctrine, will not yet be delivered from those groundless and injurious Reports, which they have, without proof, concerning Things, or Persons, taken up, but contrariwise continue in Press, Pulpit, and common Discourse, industriously to divulge things tending to our Defamation; and more especially for that purpose, watching the opportunity of all Revolutions and Changes of Persons exercised in Government, which hath often happened in these Nations of late Years.
And in as much as the design of our Adversaries therein hath appeared to be the rendering of us Obnoxious to those that have had most power in their hand to offend and harm us, and have for that purpose invented such Calumnies as might best accomplish that design; which although they have been various, and sometimes manifestly cross and contradictory one to another, yet having no other ground (that we know of) than the forementioned evil purpose, they have therefore both one and other, even all of them, been generally accompanied with the charge of disobedience to Magistracy, and Civil Government.
We have therefore been necessitated (as Alterations in Government have happened) to renew our Vindications in this public manner, having very seldom opportunity otherwise to inform either Magistrates or People of the injuries done unto us, and which is much more, to the Truth we do profess. And that in this present conjuncture of Affairs, the misrepresentation of us, either formerly, or now, may not take impression upon any to the damage of us and our Profession, we have thought it requisite not to bring to light any new matter, but only to extract out of our former Confessions of Faith, and Declarations, our constant Principles to which we have been (and shall always endeavor (the Lord assisting us) that our Practice may still be) conformable in this great point concerning Magistracy and Civil Government, as by these Extracts following may appear.
That Civil Magistracy is an Ordinance of God, set up by him for the punishment of evil doers, and for the praise of them that do well; and that in all lawful things commanded by them, subjection ought to be given by us in the Lord, not only for Wrath, but for Conscience sake; and that we are to make supplications and prayers for Kings, and all that are in Authority, that under them we may live a peaceable and a quiet life, in all Godliness and Honesty.
We who are falsely called Anabaptists, being as ready to obey our Civil Magistrates, as to profess our subjection to them in all lawful Commands, whatever is preached, or printed of us, by any to the contrary; and whosoever have, or shall accuse us either to the Magistrates, or to the Common People, that we will not obey Authority, do falsely accuse us.
And however it be a thing very desirable to Godly Men, to have such to be their Governors as fear the Lord, in as much as together with their Moral Principles, they are under more solemn Bands of engagement as Christians, to execute Judgment and Justice, and faithfully to discharge their Trust; and in as much also as they will be more ready to protect Godly Men, which generally are hated of the World, and to propagate the Gospel in their Territories, than other Men will be: Yet whatever the Magistrate is in point of Religion, he is to be reverenced and obeyed in all those Commands of his, which do not intrench upon, or rise up in opposition to the Commands of God.
And we do freely acknowledge that Kingly Government established, guided and bounded by just and wholesome Laws, is both allowed by God, and a good accommodation to Men.
That all People in every Nation, as well Members of Churches as others, ought for Conscience sake, to honor such as by the wise disposing Providence of God are their Rulers; and are to submit to the Civil Commands, not only of such Rulers as are faithful, but even to Infidels.
Although we cannot answer in justification of every individual Person that is of our Profession in matters of Religion, no more than our Christian friends of other Perswasions, can do in behalf of all of their Perswasions; yet we can say this, and prove it to all the World, that it hath been our Profession, and is our real Practice, to be obedient to Magistracy in all things Civil, and willing to live peaceably under the Government established in this Nation: For we do believe and declare. Magistracy to be an Ordinance of God, and ought to be obeyed in all lawful things.
These things we have herein recited, the rather because that such judgment as shall be made by any concerning us, may be fairly and duly taken and calculated from our own Writings, and not from the Aspersions unjustly cast upon us, by such who have not only rendered many guilty for the offense sake of someone Person, but also called others after the same Name given to us, with whom we have had, or held no correspondency, or agreement; endeavoring to blemish our Profession, by charging the whole Party, not only with the guilt of many strange unsound Opinions, such as were never received, or allowed by them, but also with many Actions wherein they have been least of all, if at all concerned. And as for those things wherein any of us, or other of our judgment have been actually concerned, we hope it hath proceeded from a due regard to those invariable Rules given in the holy Scripture, for the ordering our conversation with respect unto Magistracy, according to the best judgment could be made of them; and pursuant thereunto, done in observance of those public Edicts and Declarations, whereunto the most universal obedience, and constant adherence hath been required by those that have had the power over us, and who have admitted us the least of any People, to dispute the reason of Governments and Laws.
And for that the subjection yielded by us to the Powers that have been over us, hath proceeded from a Conscience not daring to disobey, unless in such things which we could not understand to be lawful; and the affections that have been manifested therein, have arisen from the enjoyment of that due Liberty and Protection which we have had in matters of Religion; we do hope and desire that none of us upon the Re-establishment of the present Government, shall now be adjudged Criminal by our present Governors, but that we may notwithstanding reap the benefit of that Favor that hath been declared and tendered by the King's Majesty, and be Protected from all Injury and Violence whatsoever, equally with others his Majesty's Subjects in the quiet and peaceable enjoyment of our Religious and Civil Rights and Liberties: We desiring and endeavoring to behave ourselves in all good Conscience towards God and Man, remembering that Rule of our Lord, That we are to render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's, and to God the things which are God's. And that we, as well as Rulers, must certainly at the Great Day, be accountable to the Just and Righteous Judge of all the Earth, for all our doings.
CHAP. II. Of the great Duty which lieth upon the Rulers of this World.
HAving asserted the Duty of all Christians, as well as of other Men to the Powers, or Governors of the World, and clearly, I hope, shown our Innocency as to the Charge laid against the Anabaptists, by Mr. Calvin, Mr. Perkins, and others, who have represented them as a People, denying Magistracy, &c. which indeed were to make Mankind less than Men, and little more than Beasts.
It will not be out of our way, if now we treat briefly of the Duty if Magistrates: For it is certain they are but Stewards, though of an higher Rank, and must as surely be accountable for their Stewardships, as the meanest Pesant upon the Earth. Yea, let me add, That by how much a greater Trust is committed to them, by so much the greater is their Duty to God, and Men too; whom though they Rule, yet they also Serve, and must give account to God, how their Lives, Liberties, and Estates, have been preserved, or destroyed, so far as the public exercise of Worldly Power hath been concerned therein.
'It is true, Earthly God's they are, (an honorable Appellation) but then it concerns them to take the God of Heaven and Earth for their Pattern, and first to consider, how in great Wisdom he Rules in the Universe: Wisdom is the principal thing, saith Solomon that wisest of Kings, who therefore in his entrance to his Regal Capacity beg'd of the King of kings a wise and understanding Heart, that he might know how to Rule his People.
Jethro 's counsel to Moses was very prudent, and written, to inform us what manner of Men are fit for Government, Exod. 18. 21. Moreover, thou shalt provide — able Men, such as fear God, Men of truth, hating Covetousness, and place such over them to be Rulers of thousands, &c. Yea, they must be such as knew the Laws of God. And indeed, where the Laws of God are known, it must needs become Princes, and all Rulers, to meditate in the Law of the Lord Day and Night; for there they will find the Mind of the Lord, and the Nature of his Government for their direction in general. Although it must be granted, that as to the particular Laws for the Civil Government of such or such Nations, the Scriptures cannot be the Platform, the Civil Constitutions therein mentioned, being generally adapted to the state of the Tribes of Israel, and most proper for the Land of their Inheritance. So that of necessity the Civil Magistrate must have power to make wholesome Civil Laws for his Subjects, according to the differing State of Nations, and the Blessings where-with Nations do more or less abound. The most important Caution being this, That no Laws be made against the Law of God, or right Reason; if otherwise, such Laws are void as soon as made: As is granted by those that are learned in the Fundamental Laws of this Realm.
As the making, so the execution of Laws, require great Wisdom; and especially in a patient and diligent enquiry into the cause of the Dilinquent, which being often wanting by rash precipitation, the good Subject is often injured, and the injurious encouraged. Doth our Law, saith Nicodemus, judge any Man before it hear him, and know what he doth? We read of Philip of Macedon, who being heavy with sleep when he once gave Sentence against a Delinquent, the censured Party appealed from Philip asleep, to Philip awake. Nor is the Story of Alexander less worthy of Memory, who was wont to stop one Ear to the Complainant, saying, that he reserved the other for the accused Party. And the Scripture tells us, it was not the manner of the Romans, to condemn Men before the Accused was face to face with the Accuser, and had license to answer for himself, concerning the Crimes laid against him. Which Equity among Heathens, I fear (and in part know) is hard to be found sometimes in Courts who have far better means of Light, than those Romans had. Now a wise and understanding Heart, teacheth to abhor such Injustice, and to consider what may be his own case another day; and therefore will the Magistrate, in whom such Wisdom dwelleth, be as careful of the preservation of all Men's Lives, Liberties, or Estates, as his own, not enduring to see them destroyed without necessity, (not in pretended Policy) when he sees otherwise wholesome Law and Justice will be violated. And herein the Distich of Seneca, may not be unfit.
SECT. II. Of Magistratical Justice.
Justice, as well as Wisdom, is originally in the most High God, and thence derived to Mankind, and to be put into exercise by all Men; but the public Execution thereof in the Nations, pertains to the higher Powers. He bears not the Sword in vain; He is (as the Apostle gravely phraseth it) the Minister of God; a Terror to evil Works; a Revenger to execute Wrath upon him that doth evil. But they only do worthily answer to this Description, when they adhere to the Just God, whose Wrath is revealed from Heaven against all unrighteousness of Men; and he is that Judge of all the Earth, which will do Right. David professed, That when he should receive the Kingdom, he would deal uprightly, and to that end, doubtless, had set the Lord always before his Face. Lev. 19. 15. Ye shall do no unrighteousness in Judgment: Thou shalt not respect the person of the Poor, nor honor the person of the Mighty; but in Righteousness shalt thou judge thy Neighbor.
That which hinders Justice, is commonly one of these three things. First, Want of Courage. God is dishonored by pusilanimity in a Judge, he should fear the face of no Man. Deut. 1. 17. Deal courageously, and the Lord shall be with the Good. Josh. 1. 6, 7. Be strong, and of a good Courage, — Only be thou strong, and very courageous, that thou mayest observe to do according to all the Law. Secondly, Bribes. Exod. 23. 8. And thou shalt take no gift, for the gift blindeth the Wise, and perverteth the words of the Righteous. It was a saying of Isadore, Lib. 3. He that judgeth rightly, and for that looketh for a reward of Recompence, is a trespasser against God; because for Money received he selleth Righteousness, which he ought to bestow freely. And surely, where Justice is bought and sold, there Men's Lives, Liberties, and Possessions, are bought and sold; which is a most crying Sin, and therefore cried against by the Prophet, Isa. 1. 23. Thy Princes are companions of Thieves, everyone loveth Gifts, and followeth after Rewards; they judge not the Fatherless, neither doth the cause of the Widow come unto them. And thus Justice being taken away, we may say with Augustine, What are Kingdoms but great Robberies? Thirdly, Partiality is a great impediment to Justice, when Men's Causes are not known, but their Persons only: This the Lord expressly forbad, and complains of the violation of his Precept in that behalf. Therefore have I made you contemptible and base before all the People, according as ye have not kept my Ways, but have been partial in the Law. It is reported in the old time, Judges were wont to be veiled, and to hear the bare Causes only, without knowing the names of the Persons whose Causes they were. For as Seneca well observes, Judgment is clean overthrown, when Affection hath predomination. And Tully, no less truly; He putteth off the person of a Judge, that putteth on the person of a Friend, or Enemy.
SECT. III. Of Magistratical Mercy.
Should Justice proceed without Mercy, it would cease to be Justice, Man's frailty considered; for Mercy presupposeth the infirmity, or necessity of him to whom it is extended. God hath spoken once (saith David) twice have I heard this, that Power belongeth unto God. To the Lord also belongeth Mercy; for thou renderest to every Man according to his Work. God takes notice of the Virtues that are found in Men, as well as of their Weakness, though he would in no wise justify the Wicked, Psal. 82. 3, 4. Now the Mercy which lieth within the reach of the Magistrate, is in such things as these, viz. To defend the Poor and Fatherless, who cannot help themselves: Yea, to rid them out of the hand of the Wicked, who under pretence, or rigor of Law, would devour them; for summam jus, is no less than summam injura. And though Human Laws must be made with great exactness, yet since the intent of all good Laws are to preserve Men from Ruin, the execution must be tempered with Mercy; as our Savior shows in the Parable, Mat. 18. 23, to 35. And as there is forgiveness with the Lord, that he may be feared, else none could stand before him; so also must Men learn, that God will sometimes accept at their hands the exercise of Mercy, rather than Sacrifice. Mercy and Truth (saith Solomon) preserve the King; and his Throne is upholden by Mercy. Hence the Counsel is (or rather the Reproof upon the neglect thereof) Prov. 24. 11, 12. recommended to our consideration, that such as can, are to deliver them that are drawn unto death, and those that are ready to be slain. Nor shall Men be excused by pretending they knew it not. For, Doth not he that pondereth the heart, consider it? And he that keepeth thy soul, doth he not know it? And shall not he render to every Man according to his works? Doubtless, Magistrates should tread the steps of Mercy, as holy Job did, who delivered the Poor that cried, and the Fatherless, and him that had no helper. And so, The blessing of him that was ready to perish came upon him, and he caused the Widows heart to sing for joy. He was Eyes to the Blind, Feet to the Lame, a Father to the Poor, and the cause which he knew not, he searched out, Job 29. Thus Mercy and Truth were sweetly combined.
CAAP. III. Of the Power of Magistrates in matters of Religion.
WHether Civil Magistrates, by virtue of their Power Magistratical, have to do in Cases of Religion, is a question much controverted; nor are the Learned of the Papal and Reformed Way, agreed in this Point. I will briefly show the disparity in a Passage or two, instead of many that might be shown: And first, the Papists write thus:
Neither is there anything in all the New Testament, that proveth the Prince to be Head, or Chief Governor in Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Causes, more than it proveth any Heathen Emperor of Rome to have been: for they were bound in Temporal things, to obey the Heathen being lawful Kings, — and more no Scripture binds us to do to Christian Kings.
Princes (be they Men or Women) ought to have care of their Subjects Souls, and to provide for the same, by making Ecclesiastical Laws, and compelling their Subjects to serve God according to his Laws. Doctor Fulks answ. to Rhem. Annot. on 1 Cor. 14. Sect. 16.
Though Heathen Kings abused their Authority to Persecute the Church, &c. yet were they set up of God as well to maintain, by their Laws and Authority, true Religion and the Church. Dr. Fulks answ. to the Rhem. Annot. on 1 Pet. 2. Sect. 6.
Thus wide is the difference between these Potent and Learned Parties, in which I may not presume to interpose my Judgment; knowing (as indeed none can be ignorant) that they have both stirred up the Princes of this World to punish with Imprisonment, and Death itself, such as have opposed them in matters of Religion; though of late, the Magistrate hath not concerned himself in such Employment, as to shed Blood on that account. Glory be to God for so far moderating the Hearts of any that are in Authority.
But now to the Question, which I confess to be difficult, I shall humbly offer something briefly to consideration. And first, Religion may fairly admit of this distinction, viz. 'It is either Natural, or Positive. And so far as Religion is Natural, I cannot see any reason why that Power which God hath given to his Vicegerents here below, should not be used to encourage the same, and to obstruct what is contrary to it. And by Natural Religion, I intend the knowledge and acknowledgment of one God, the Maker, and Preserver of all things; whom therefore all are bound to love, and serve, by being thankful for the Blessings they receive daily at his Hands, and to glorify him only as their God; Rom. 1. 21. When they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful.
And that open Idolatry, as the worshipping and serving a Creature, more than the Creator, may lawfully be restrained by Magistratical Power, seems very clear, from Job 31. 26, 27. If I beheld the Sun when it shined, and the Moon walking in brightness, and my Heart hath been secretly enticed, and my Mouth hath kissed my hand: This also were an Iniquity to be punished by the Judge, for I should have denied God that is above. And Religion thus considered, every Man can discern, or make judgment of, and consequently the Magistrate hath cognizance judicial in this Case; because right Reason is the substance of the Law he must maintain, as that on which all his Laws for Government are founded, so far as they are justifiable.
Moreover, when we hear the Book of God telling us, that Kings shall be Nursing Fathers, and Queens Nursing Mothers to the Church of God. I see no reason to doubt, but it is a very lovely thing for those in Authority, to encourage Christianity in general, and their undoubted work to suppress Vice, or Debauchery, the Enemy to all Religion.
But now to affirm that Princes may and ought to make Laws in Cases of Religion, as well as in Civil Causes, and to bring Arguments and Scriptures to prove it, which only prove thus much; That the Kings of Israel had power to suppress Idolatry by stoning the Idolaters, and burning their Cities with Fire (with the Inhabitants and their Cattle) Deut. 13. 13, to the end. That Joshua said to the Priests, Take up the Ark of the Covenant, Jos. 3. 6. That David consulted with his Brethren, about fetching the Ark of God to them, 1 Chron. 13. 1, 2, 3. & 15. 1, 11, 16. That David and Solomon appointed the Courses of the Priests to their Service, and the Levites to their Charge, to praise and minister before the Priests, as the duty of every Day required, 2 Chron. 8. 14. In a word, the Kings of Israel were to read in the Book of the Law continually, and keep the Statutes therein contained, Deut. 17. 19. I say (not to stand upon this) that many of the Kings of whom these things are spoken, were Prophets, and in that capacity might do these things); yet these Passages will not satisfy the Question, as it concerns Kings and Rulers universally: Because it is certain the Kings of Israel had their Peculiarities, and so had the People whom they were to govern, in matters of Religion, both Typical and Practical, above what any Nation ever had before, or shall have after them. For first,
The whole Nation was consecrated to God as his Church, upon the account of the Covenant made with the Seed of Abraham according to the Flesh; and hereupon their Church was National, and the Forms of their Church-Government, and State-Government, were delivered by God to Moses, and by Moses to the whole Nation, as the Oracles of God, (only diversified by several Offices for the convenient management of the same) the holy Scripture being the Statute-Book for both.
2. They might not (as other Nations) repeal or add to the Laws and Statutes which God gave them by Moses, but were straitly inhibited in that case, and required to keep to the Law of God. And in cases of immergency or difficulty, as where the Law said nothing, they were assisted by the standing Oracle of Thummim and Urim; as also by Prophets extraordinary; till their Iniquity deprived them of such Favors, and finally of the Government itself.
It is therefore no sound reasoning from what Power the Kings of Israel had in Matters of Religion, to the Power of all Kings as having the same; but our measures by which we must be directed in this Point, ought to be taken from that which God hath ordained to be the general Rules of worldly Government throughout the World. For seeing Christianity is a Religion fitted for all Nations, and is no Enemy to Magistracy in any Nation of the World: Magistracy therefore may best be asserted upon the Principles, in or according to which it hath been given to the World; else it cannot comport with Christianity, but proves an Enemy to it; and this only, because not regulated in the Nations of the World, according to the natural Principles thereof; fulfilling that which is said, Psal. 82. 5. They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: All the Foundations of the Earth (among which Government is one of the chief) are out of course.
And that we may be the better understood in this Great Case, we shall digest, what might be drawn out into much length, into a few Propositions, and then result our Conclusion, as to the Matter in hand, from the scope and contexture of the whole.
SECT. II. The great Question of Magistrates Power in Religion, digested into ten Propositions.
-
- Proposition 1.
Magistracy is a great Ordinance of God for the benefit of all Nations, to whom all sorts of Men in all Nations are to be subject. -
- 2.
That the Jewish Magistracy (supposing they were settled in their own Land) hath nothing partaining to them in Religious Cases, more than what of right partains to the Rulers of other Nations throughout the World. Because, -
- 3.
Their High Priesthood, and Kingly Dignity, as they were Typical, so they ceased de jure, when Christ had fulfilled his Priesthood upon the Cross, and was exalted at the right hand of God to be a Prince and a Savior, &c. -
- 4.
Christ's Church consists not of Nations in gross, but of such only in every Nation as (professedly at least) fear God, and work Righteousness, as is fully shown above; and hence it follows, that she must have a Government distinct from the Government of Nations, although she is to be as subject to National Government, as any sort of People whatsoever. -
- 5.
The New Testament is not written as a form of Government for any one Nation, (though it justify National Government) much less to be a Form of Government to all Nations. -
- 6.
The New Testament was not delivered into the Hands of the Princes of the World as such (as we know the Law was to the Kings of Israel ) and consequently not ordained as the Law for the Civil Policy of Nations; and yet it is true, that there are contained excellent general Rules for the Civil Affairs of Nations, as well as for Matters of Religion. -
- 7.
The Judicial Law of Moses is not fitted for the Civil Policy of all Nations; nor perhaps for the Policy of that of the Jews under the Gospel: particularly the Laws respecting Marriage, and the Sabbath; the penalty of the latter, to such as broke it, being no less than Death; and the like to be inflicted upon him that should smite, or curse, Father or Mother; as also for Adultery. -
- 8.
Magistratical Government, as it is Universal, or appointed as God's Ordinance, always did and now doth concern Men, as Men only; in respect of things Human, and that Religion which is Natural and Universal. -
- 9.
That Magistrates in all Nations have Power, as Magistrates, to make good and wholesome Laws, for the Vindication of Natural and Universal Religion, as well as for Vindication of the Civil Rights of all Men. -
- 10.
That though a Christian may lawfully be a Magistrate; yet he is not this as he is a Christian, but as a Man, ordained of God to Rule Men as Men, and not as Christians: And though a Man be no Christian, yet being by God's Providence put into Authority, is as lawful a Magistrate as if he were a Christian.
And having (we trust) given to Caesar his due, we may (without offense) give unto Jesus Christ the Government of the Church as Christian; and on that account shall say,
That the Christian Faith and Religion, as it is a distinct Profession from other Forms of Worship, whether Judaical, or that which is used by any Nation in the World; and as it excels or goes beyond that Religion which is Natural and Universal, is not within the cognizance, or under the Power of the Laws of Nations. But all Christians are therein under Christ's Authority only, held forth and exercised in the Scriptures, and by the Church assisted with his Holy Spirit; which is sufficient for the Government of his Kingdom, which is not of this World, and for her defense, as such, against all Opposers.
And to make the Reason of this Conclusion the more perspicuous, I will instance in a few cases, which certainly will never be fairly brought under any Authority, save Christ's only, as aforesaid. And first,
That Jesus Christ is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , God-Man, is a great Point of the Christian Faith; and hence the pre-existence of the Son is asserted. Now how shall Worldly Authority interpose in this case? Must Fire and Faggot be the Portion of such as cannot believe it? what then shall become of the Jews? Must they be destroyed from off the Earth, because of their blindness in this case? And if not (as sure it would be too bloody a Sentence) then why shall not such as believe in, and love Christ the Savior, and yet differ from others in this matter, be from under the reach of the Magistrates Sword in this case?
2. Suppose the Question be about the Ordinances of Christ, and particularly the Ordinance of Baptism, and thereupon who are the true Church of Christ? How shall Worldly Government (as asserted upon the Principles which it naturally and universally rests on) punish or justify the Baptist, or Pedo-Baptist, or those who suppose there is no need of Baptism at all?
3. It is a rational presumption, That if our Savior's mind had been, that Men should have been Fined, Imprisoned, or put to Death about these things, he would, either by himself, or by his Apostles, have delivered it to us in his Word: But instead thereof, his Parable of the Tares, and his express Doctrine thereby held forth, that they ought to be let alone till Harvest, shows plainly that Men are not to be taken out of the World, because they err in things pertaining to the Christian Faith and Religion, as before distinguished (in our Conclusion): for otherwise our Savior did never take away the Power of Magistrates, either in Matters of Humanity, or Piety, considered as naturally Moral, and so Perpetual and Universal.
4. That which makes our Conclusion the more manifestly rational, is the consideration of the subjectness of Men in high Places in this World, to err in the things of Christianity (which are weak things in Man's Judgment) more than other Men: Yea, of the Kings of Israel and Judah there were but few good, notwithstanding the advantages they had to keep them from Error; as the outward pomp and glory of that form of Worship, which they were conceived in, suiting with their greatness, (besides what we noted before on that account). Now God knew all these things before, and therefore it cannot be thought, that God would commit such Authority to Men, in matters of the Christian Faith, whom he foreknew would generally oppose it, and destroy them that held it; as was too evident in the first Centuries, and is yet verified in many Nations, who reject the Gospel altogether.
5. But now if any Man deny the Worlds were made, and blaspheme him that gives Being, Life, and Motion to Men, with Rain and fruitful Seasons; And should, in spite of God, set up an Idol, and worship the Work of his own Hands: Here the Magistrate may as easily discern, and as lawfully punish the Offender, as to judge him that should kill his Father, or refuse to obey his Master or Superior. For by what reason we know the Subject in any State of Life ought to honor his Superiors respectively, and not to betray them, and give that Obedience to their Inferior; by the same Reason we know, That the Maker of all things, and the Preserver of the same, is much more worthy of all the honor and service which he requires, or we can give unto him: and consequently the Offender in this case more worthy of condign punishment, for violating the Principles of Reason and Piety, graciously communicated to Mankind, to dignify him above the Beasts of the Field; as it is also written, Job 35. 11. Who teacheth us more than the Beasts of the Earth, and maketh us wiser than the Fowls of Heaven.
SECT. III. Antiquity against Persecution for differing Apprehensions about Christianity; being an Abridgment out of Dr. Jer. Taylor 's Liberty of Prophesying. With a brief mention of the Letter of King Charles the Second from Breda, concerning Liberty for Tender Consciences in Matters of Religion.
Finally, We shall humbly take leave to mind and keep in memory the Liberty of Tender Consciences, which the King's Majesty declared from Breda; and shall yet live in hope and expectation to be partakers of the benefit thereof, being reasonably persuaded, That the same Principle that led his Majesty to assert such Christian Liberty, still remains with him to the allowing and protecting his peaceable Subjects in their Religious Concernments; humbly praying that God may order his Heart, and the Hearts of his Great Council, to proclaim Liberty by a Law, and the openings of the Prisons to them that are bound. That these Desires may not seem novel, or suggested by us in the day of our distress, we have herewith inserted the Testimony of the Ancients, collected out of Dr. Jer. Taylor 's Liberty of Prophesying; which we pray may be impartially considered.
It is observable, That restraining of Liberty, imposing upon other Men's Understandings, being Matters of their Consciences, and lording it over their Faith, came in with the Retinue and Train of Antichrist; that is, they came as other abuses and corruptions of the Church did, by reason of the Iniquity of the Times, and the cooling of the first heats of Christianity; and the Increase of Interests, and the Abatement of Christian Simplicity.
When the Churches Fortune grew better, and her Sons grew worse, and some of her Fathers worst of all; for in the first 300 years, there was no sign of persecuting any Man for his Opinion, though at that time there were very horrid Opinions commenced, for they then were assaulted by new Sects. And they who used all the means, Christian and Spiritual, for their disimprovement and conviction, thought not of using corporal force, otherwise than the blaming such proceedings. To which I add, That all wise Princes, till they were over-born with Faction, or solicited by peevish Persons, gave Toleration to differing Sects, &c.
And the experience which Christendom hath had in this last Age, is Argument enough, That Toleration of differing Opinions, is so far from disturbing the Public Peace, or destroying the Interest of Princes and Common-Wealths, that it does advantage the Public, or secure Peace, because there is not so much as the pretence of Religion left to Persons to contend for it, being already indulged to them, &c.
When the French fought against the Huguenots, the spilling of her own Blood was Argument enough of the imprudence of that way of promoting Religion: but since she hath given permission to them, the World is Witness how prosperous she hath been ever since. Indeed then 'tis great reason to give Toleration to disagreeing Persons, whose Opinions by fair means cannot be altered; for if the Persons be confident they will serve God according to their Perswasions; and if they be publicly prohibited, they will privately convene, &c.
And it is also a part of Christian Religion, That the Liberty of Men's Consciences should be preserved in all things; where God hath not made a limit, or set a restraint, that the Soul of Man should be free, and acknowledge no Master but Jesus Christ; that Matters Spiritual should not be restrained by Punishments corporal; and that the same Meekness and Charity should be preserved in the promotion of Christianity, that gave it foundation, and increment, and firmness in the first publication; that Conclusions should not be more dogmatical than the virtual Resolution, and efficacy of the Premises; and that the Persons should not more certainly be condemned, than their Opinions confuted.
And lastly, That the infirmity of Man, and difficulty of Things, should be both put in a Ballance, to make abatement in the definite Sentences against Men's Persons.
And therefore the best of Men, and most glorious of Princes, were always ready to give Toleration; but never to make Executions for Matters disputable; as Eusebius in his second Book of the Life of Constantine reports.
Also King James writing to the States of the United Provinces, dated the 6 th of March 1613, among other things saith, That you charge them to maintain Peace, by bearing with one another in such differences of Opinions and Judgments. The like Counsel in the Divisions of Germany, at the first Reformation, was thought reasonable, by the Emperor Ferdinando, and his excellent Son Maximilian; for they had observed, that Violence did exasperate, was unbless'd, was unsuccesful, and unreasonable, and therefore they made Decrees of Toleration, and appointed Tempers and Expedients to be drawn up by discreet Persons. And Immanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy, repenting of his War undertaken for Religion against the Piedmontans, promised them Toleration, and was as good as his word. As much is done by the Nobility of Polonia. So that the best Princes, and best Bishops, gave Toleration and Impunity also in Rome itself; till the time of Justinian the Emperor, the Catholics and Novatians had Churches indifferently permitted; and the Popes were the first Preachers of Force and Violence in Matters of Religion, and yet it came not so far as Death; but the first that preached that Doctrine was Dominick, the Founder of the Begging Order of Friars, the Friar- Preachers; in memory of which, the Inquisition is entrusted only to the Friars of his Order.
In England, although the Pope had as great Power here as anywhere, yet there were no Executions for Matter of Opinion until Henry the Fourth; which (because he usurped the Crown) was willing by all means to endear the Clergy, by destroying their Enemies, that so he might be sure of them to all his Purposes. Indeed it may become them well enough, who are wiser in their Generations than the Children of Light; it may possibly serve the Policies of evil Persons, but never the pure and chaste Designs of Christianity.
By this time I hope it will not be thought reasonable to say, He that teacheth Mercy to erring Persons, teaches indifferency in Religion, unless so many Fathers, and so many Churches, and the best of Emperors, and all the World (till they were abused by Tyranny, Popery, and Faction) did teach Indifferency: for I have shown that Christianity does not punish Corporally, Persons erring Spiritually; but indeed