PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Eight Queries

William Prynne (1600-1669) · 1,860 words · 8 min

The source for this document is https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo2/A91178.0001.001

Project Note

This is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND. This license allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

The source of this document is the Early English Books Online (EEBO-TCP) website. Those books were transcribed in a character for character manner and can be very cumbersome to read since there was no standard spelling during that time. Many spelling variations such as "unlesse", "vnlesse", and "vnles" regularly appear.

This project was conceived to clean up those books as much as possible and make them more accessible to the interested reader, leading to the creation of a massive list of variant spellings and their corrections. This was used to clean up the text, but is of course only as complete as the list itself. Because of the nature of the original transcription, some words have missing characters or places where the original language (e.g., Greek) was not transcribed. This effort does not change that. Be aware that the original transcription can also be faulty and in some cases entire sentences may be missing.

Although this is no substitute for a properly compared, proofed, and scholarly edition, I believe that the result is a document which is far more accessible, particularly for searching for terms using standard spelling. The document has been cleaned and presented in what I hope is a pleasing and useful format for the vast majority of Christian brothers and sisters who just want access to read these spiritually nourishing works.

However, a word of warning: The Puritans were a very diverse group of people and their age was characterized with godliness, but also much upheaval, disputation and strife. They disagreed on many doctrines and some of these works contain less orthodox or Scriptural views than others. The reader is strongly advised to read with discernment, particularly if it is unknown whether author is trustworthy.

This project took a huge amount of time and skill to bring to fruition. I would particularly like to thank David Jonescue for the initial list of Puritans he found on EEBO and the concept behind this project as well as the continuous, unceasing efforts toward seeing this complete. Without his labor, this would not be available. Alex Sarrouf was invaluable in providing the initial list of over 7,000 spelling variations he had identified and corrected, as well as continuing to review more than 16,000 additions to that list for any typos.

Logan West
(with David Jonescue and Alex Sarrouf)
www.puritansearch.org

VIII QVERIES Upon the late Declarations of, and letters from, the ARMY: Proposed to all true Lovers of their Country and Parliaments, And conscientious Soldiers in the ARMY.


1 John 4. 1.

Beloved believe not every spirit, &c.

London, Printed in the Yeare 1647.

Eight Queres upon the late Declarations of, and Letters from the Army; proposed to all true lovers of their Country and Parliaments, and conscientious Soldiers in the Army.

1 WHether an whole well-minded and well-meaning Army, may not by specious pretences be abused to carry on the ambitious and pernicious designs of some persons they most confide in, as well as others; and be drawn on by degrees to act and demand that at last, which their judgments and consciences at first abhorred, as well as Hazael, 2 Kings 8. 12, 13? And whether all who have religious and specious pretences in their mouths, have the like real intentions in their hearts and reins, which the Anabaptists proceedings in Germany disprove, who had as holy and just pretences, as any now inclining to their way and opinions?

2. Whether an Army, formerly dutiful and meritorious, yet now so far distempered, as to rule (if not over-rule) their own General and Officers; to seize and remove the Kings own person, (with the Commissioners of both houses appointed to attend him) from the place designed for his residence by the Parliaments of both Kingdoms (upon mere ground-less and proof-less surmises, never revealed to any in Authority) without the Parliaments privity, in high affront of their privileges and power; endeavoring to over-awe, if not to force the Parliament which raised them, by marching up against them; laboring to dis-engage the People, City, and Kingdom, from; and engage them against it, contrary to their solemn Covenant; refusing to disband for the Kingdoms ease and peace; and acting for the present by their own mere power and will; can be a probable and fitting instrument of redressing those Arbitrary and injurious proceedings in the Houses, Committees, and others, of which they now complain? And whether their refusal to dis-band, or to remove farther off from London, or obey the Parliaments present just Commands (upon what ever specious printed pretexts) be not a very sad public president, likely to conjure up a spirit of Universal Disobedience to Parliaments, Magistrates, and superiors of all sorts throughout the Kingdom, to its utter ruin, if not timeously prevented, dis-liked, opposed by all well-wishers to the weal and tranquility of Church and State?

3. Whether Jack Cades and his confederates traitorous forcing of the Parliament in former times, upon popular pretences; Henry Jermins, Percies and Gorings Treason, in practicing to bring up the Northern Army towards London, to over-awe and force the Parliament soon after its commencement; and the Kings coming to the Commons House with an armed Traine of Cavaliers, to demand the five Members, Jan. 4. 1641. ( Voted to be a Treasonable Act, and high breach of the Rights and Privileges of Parliament, and so resented by the whole Kingdom, though varnished over with most specious pretences, and the public good) will not be all justified, if not exceeded by the Armies seising and removing of the Kings person, refusal to disband, and marching up to London, to over-awe the Parliament demand Members, and dis-engage the City and people from them? And how their Offences can be differenced or justified, where their proceedings and pretences are the same?

4. Whether the Armies present disbanding now they have proposed their grievances and demands to the Houses, in a dutiful and peaceable manner upon receipt of their Arrears, without marching nearer London, to ease the Kingdom of new taxes and Free quarter, to expedite the relief of Ireland (interrupted by their mutiny) and prevent new civil broils, be not a more conscientious, just, probable, safe, and honorable way to obtain all their just demands on their own and the Kingdoms behalf, from both Houses, then their refusal to disband, or marching up to London? Which as it will savor of high disobedience, violence, and breach of privilege at the least, if not of some dangerous design of higher nature; so it will certainly endanger the adjournment or dissolution of the Houses, the pillaging of the City, the imbroyling of the Kingdom in a new War; blemish the Armies former reputation, and fidelity, encourage Malignants, grieve the well-affected, and procure more mischiefs then it can redress; and bring* just damnation on the contrivers of it; who in point of conscience ought not to do evil that good may come of it. And therefore the justification of their proceedings and not disbanding from the Scots (whose proceedings here though more dutiful and respectful to the Parliament then theirs, were yet much declaimed against by them and their party) and Netherlands, who raised Forces, as the Parliament did now, only in case of absolute necessity for their own and Kingdoms necessary preservation against their oppressing Princes, when there was no other remedy; is no ways suitable to their or our condition, in relation to the Parliament; who need no Armies, nor external violence (especially from their own friends) to enforce them to do justice and redress all public grievances, which they have solemnly covenanted to perform and will accordingly execute, though you disband?

5. What assurance, can the Parliament, City, or Kingdom receive from a discontented Army, holding their guns and Weapons in their hands, if not balanced by an equal armed force for their defense, if all their present demands, that are just & reasonable, be granted; they will not afterwards proceed to demand that which is neither honorable, just, nor reasonable for the Parliament to grant, and yet dangerous to deny, for fear of violence and new tumults, since their demands do daily multiply; & some of their Heterodox Chaplains, Officers, and Soldiers in Anti-Magistratical Principles, Writings, Speeches, ingender a just fear, of such subsequent demands, of whose justice or reasonableness themselves will be the Judges, not the Parliament? And how they shall be ascertained that when they have demanded and removed some Members (opposite to them and their proceedings, perchance only out of grounds of conscience, which they grant must not be forced, especially in Parliaments, where there should be most freedom both of speech and Votes) that they will not demand and remove all others who are not of their party or confederacy, and recruite the House with new members of their own, and thereby gain a power (which some fear is their real design) to change the Laws and Government of Church and State, and dispose of all Offices and places to their own Creatures, as they have done for the most part in the Army? To avoid which justly feared mischief they have cause both in conscience and honor to disband upon the Parliaments command which raised them. The rather, because their refusing to disband till such Members and others whom they intend to impeach as incendiaries and enemies to the Army, be tried, will be contradictory to their own principles and desires, of free and impartial Public Justice; which cannot be reputed free or unbiassed, when the Parliament and Judges shall be awed and terrified with an whole Army of Accusers and prosecutors; by whose over-awing power, Terror, Menaces (the highest Champarty and Maintenance that can be) justice will probably if not certainly be perverted, the Judges, witnesses, and parties terrified, mere innocents condemned; and Members of the Armies party (though perhaps justly impeached of higher crimes and misdemeaners then any of their opposites) escape either un-impeached or un-censured, contrary to their present pretences.

6. Whether the Armies complaint of undue elections if impartially examined by impartial Judges, will not light heaviest on their own friends and members the greatest sti lers in, and the occasions of them? Whether their general exceptions against elections in Cornwall and Wales, proceeded not from their Chaplain Mr. Peters (who hath gained more by the wars then any two Presbyterian Ministers) whose sickness hindered his presence at them, to bring in Members of his own party? And whether the Officers and Soldiers of the Army themselves, have not in some places, deprived the people of their freedom in elections, to bring in themselves, to strengthen their party in the House? And if so (as may be proved) they have most cause to complain against themselves; there being no complaint or Petitions that we hear of against the unjustness of any Elections in Cornwall, or Wales, though many against the Elections of divers of their party in other parts; and they must disband their Army, that so all future elections may be free as they desire.

7. Whether the Independent party and some of the Armies friends, have not been more arbitrary, exorbitant, and irregular in their Votes and proceedings in the Houses, Committees, and several Employments; disposed of and fingered more of the Kingdoms Treasure; carried and disposed of more Offices and gainful places, received greater rewards, Salaries, and far more and better pay for the most part, and pursued their own ends and interests more then any others they asperse? And whether their private listing of many thousands to recruite the Army since the wars ended without the Public knowledge of the Houses, to increase the Kingdoms charge, gives not the Parliament and others just occasion, (in regard of the Armies present and late actions) to suspect the carrying on of some desperate and destructive designs in England, rather then any hints or jealousies or other private listings of men without authority of Parliament, (suggested but not proved in the fourth page of the late Declaration.) And whether such new Recruites can with equal justice take and Challenge Arreares, as well as those gallant Soldiers employed in action all the Wars; or any of the Army challenge pay from the time they were voted to disband, for continuing together against the Houses Order, and marching up against their Privileges, which they were raised to defend?

8. Whether the Armies late proceedings, if not qualified by their speedy disbanding and future Obedience to the Parliament; will not eclipse and nullify all their former merits, glory and esteem, in the eyes of all the world; draw perpetual scandal on the Profession of Religion, amaze all their friends abroad and at home, endanger the loss of dying Ireland; rejoice the hearts, elevate the hopes and accomplish the designs of our Malignant Prelatical and Romish Enemies; bring perpetual shame, if not utter ruin to our Nation; and in conclusion to the chief Contivers and Fomenters of them? If so, We confidently hope, that all Consciencious Officers and Soldiers in the Army, upon second thoughts, and serious perusal of these Queries, will give over their intended designs and distand, as many of them have done; and if any obstinately persevere to force the Parliament & infringe their Privileges, or disburb the Public peace; that the whole Kingdom, City, and Country, according to their solemn Covenant, will Unanitnously withstand them, and chastise their dangerous disobedience to the Highest Powers; which many fear they project to over-awe and subvert.

FINIS.