PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

A Key Opening Mysterious Texts of Scripture

Daniel Featley (1582-1645) · 490,523 words · 2180 min

Large work readerShowing section 9 of 15. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 9/15
in these eyes. When the heart is enflamed with rage, the eyes are red and fiery, whereof Aristotle in his Problemes yields this reason, Quia ad partem violatam ascendit calor, because the eyes are most offended at the presence of the object, which is hateful unto us; and therefore nature sends the beat thither, to arm that part with revenge. If Christ's eyes be like flaming fire, let the heart of all presumptuous sinners melt like wax before him. Let none gather too far upon his titles of the Lamb of God, and Prince of peace, and Savior of the world. For as he is the Lamb of God, so he is the Lion of the Tribe of Judah: as he is the Prince of peace, so he is the Lord of Hosts: as he is the Savior of all, especially the Elect, so he is the Judge of quick and dead: and here he is brought in by Saint John with fire in his eyes to consume, and a sword in his mouth to smite, and brass in his feet to stamp his enemies to powder.

And his feet like fine brass. Some of the Interpreters demand, why brass is here preferred to gold? and they yield this reason, because brass is a stronger and harder metal, and the purpose of the Holy Ghost was to represent not only the glory of Christ in the splendor of this metal, but also his power in the strength and solidity thereof. Now gold is a soft and bowing metal, not so apt to represent Christ his invincible power; and therefore here it is said, that his feet were like fine brass, not burnished gold. The Heathen attributed to their gods feet of a heavier and baser metal, to wit, of lead; whence grew that Proverb among them, That God had leaden feet, but iron hands: in which their meaning was, that God proceedeth slowly to the punishment of wicked men, but when he overtakes them, pays them home; tarditatem supplicii gravitate compensans: but our Savior, you see in my Text, hath feet of a quicker, stronger, and more precious metal, of finest brass, to support his Church, and to knock and tread down whatsoever exalteth it self against his truth and kingdom. Now I marvel not that Saint John thought not himself worthy to unloose Christ his shoe latchet, who hath such precious and beautiful feet, resembling fine brass glowing in a furnace, on which Bullenger engraveth this posy, Our Lord hath most clean and pure feet, wherewith he tramples on Satan, he treads down all impiety, and burneth up all heresy and impurity as he walketh in the midst of the seven golden Candlesticks. But I may insist no longer upon these brazen feet of our Savior, I must haste to that which followeth.

I know, that is, I approve. God's knowledge of anything in the Scripture phrase often implieth his approbation, as Psal. 1. v. ult. As on the contrary, those whom he condemns he is said not to know: Depart from me, I know you not, ye that work iniquity. I know you not, that is, I acknowledge you not, or take no special notice of you. God doth not willingly know anything but that which is good; whereas on the contrary, most men by their good will will know no good by any, but all the evil they can: like flies they light nowhere but upon the scars and sores of their brethren, and after the manner of horse-leaches they greedily suck out their corrupt blood. Whereas they might gather many sweet flowers in the Spouse her garden, they cull out nothing but weeds; much like the covetous Vintner, who sold abroad all his best wine, and kept the worst for his house; and being asked of one who saw him walking in his cellar what he was then adoing, answered, In abundance and store of good I seek for bad. I would we had not just cause to renew the complaint of Gregory Nazianzen; The only godliness we glory in, is to find out somewhat whereby we may judge others to be ungodly: the only virtue is to find vice in others, as if to soil others were the readiest means to clear ourselves. To convict us of this malevolent disposition I need no other proof than the use of the verb animadverto in Latin, and mark in English: for animadvertere in aliquem signifieth to censure, or punish; and to show that we mark nothing so much as men's vices and deformities, the very word mark in English, without any epithet added unto it, signifieth a deformity: as when we say, Such an one is a marked man; and, Take heed of those whom God hath marked. As venomous Serpents are nourished with poisonous roots and herbs, so men of corrupt minds greedily feed upon other men's corruptions, and desire to know nothing more than the wants and infirmities of their brethren; herein direct contrary to the goodness of God, who is here said to know that only which he knoweth to be good and approveth; as the opposition between this sentence and that which followeth (Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee) maketh it manifest. I know then, that is, I like, or I approve of

Thy works, and charity, and service, and faith, and patience. And thy works, that is, thy works begun, and thy works ended; the works of thy faith, and the works of thy calling; thy works at the first, and thy works at the last. I commend thee for thy love of me, and thy service to me, and thy faith in me, and thy patience for me, and thy proficiency in all these, which most evidently appears by this,

That thy last works are more than the first. Take we here by the way an infallible note of a true Christian, which is growth in grace and godliness: he is like Vespasian in the Poet, melior pejore aevo, better in his worser age. He never standeth at a stay, but goeth on from strength to strength: like the trees planted in the house of the Lord, they still bring forth more fruit in their age. As the water-pots of stone, which our Savior filled with wine by miracle, yielded the best wine at the last; Thou hast kept the good wine even till now: and as the light of the Sun shineth more and more till it be perfect day: as the branches of the true vine, bearing fruit in Christ, are purged and pruned by the Father, that they may bring forth more fruit. Herein the supernatural motions of the Spirit resemble all natural motions, which, as the Philosopher teacheth us, are velociores in fine quam in principio, swifter in the end than in the beginning. Of all the proper marks of the elect children of God this is the most certain, and therefore St. Paul instanceth in it only: This one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind, and reaching forth to those things which are before. I press towards the mark for the price of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus. And St. Peter closeth with it, as the upshot of all: Ye therefore, beloved, beware lest ye fall from your own steadfastness: but grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. It is not so in the spiritual as in the corporal augmentation: for the body groweth, according to all dimensions, but to a certain age; but the soul may & must grow in spiritual graces till the hour of death: and the reason of the difference is, because the aetas consistentiae of our body is in this life, but of our soul in the life to come. Here the body arriveth to the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 highest pitch of perfection, but the soul arriveth not to hers til we come to the heavenly Jerusalem, and to the Church of the first borne, and to the spirits of just men made perfect. O that our blessed Redeemer had here made an end of his letter, and sealed up all the Angels praises with this sweet close! what an admirable president should we have had of a perfect Pastor? what joy should have been in the presence of the Angels for the unspotted integrity and absolute perfection of this Angel? But because (as St. Jerome acutely observeth) that there was no use of honey in the sacrifices of the old law, because nothing pleaseth God which is only sweet, and hath not in it somewhat of biting truth; therefore after the sweet insinuation, I know, &c. there followeth a sharp reprehension, there is a Notwithstanding that standeth in this Angels light, and obscureth the luster of all his former virtues.

Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee. Origen handling those word, Nigra sum, sed formosa, I am black, but comely, draweth the face and lineaments of Christ's Spouse, if I may so speak, with a black coal: How (saith he) can she be fair that is all black? I answer, she hath repented her of her sins, and her repentance hath given her beauty, but such as may be in a Negro or Blackmoore. Philosophy teacheth that there is no pure metal to be found in the Mines of the earth, nor unmixed element in the world. What speak I of the earth? the stars of the sky are not clean, nor the Angels of heaven pure in God's eyes: ( Job 25.5. Behold even to the moon, and it shineth not, yea the stars are not pure in his sight. ) how much less sinful man, whose conception is lust, and birth shame, and life frailty, and death corruption? After St. Augustine had blazoned his mothers virtues, as Christ doth here the Angels, he presently dasheth them all through with a black line, Attamen vae laudibili vitae hominum, si remotâ miserecordiâ discutias eum, Woe be to the most righteous upon earth, if God deal with them in strict justice. As for me (saith that humble Saint) I confess my sins to thy glory, but my own shame: my sinful delights contend with my godly sorrows, and on whether side standeth the victory I know not: woe is me, Lord have mercy upon me. Again, my ungodly sorrows contend with my holy joys, and on which side standeth the victory I know not: woe is me, Lord have mercy on me. Behold, I hide not my wounds: thou art a Physician, I am sick; thou art a Surgeon, I am thy Patient; thou art pitiful, I am in misery. If the light be darkness, how great is the darkness? If our righteousness be as menstruous clouts (Isaiah 64.6.) what are our monstrous sins? Yet the Prophet saith not that the covers of our sins, but the robes of our righteousness are as filthy rags. Whereupon Origen groundeth that question, which may gravel all those that build upon the sinking sands of their own merits: Who dare brag of his righteousness, when he heareth God saying by his Prophet, All our righteousness is as filthy rags? Surely Pope Gregory was no Papist, at least in this point: for he prizeth the best endeavors of grace in us at a lower rate than Luther or Calvin; they say our purest coin is allayed with some quantity of baser metal, he, that it is no better than dross: All human justice (saith he) examined according to God's strict justice, is injustice. Therefore if we say or think God hath nothing against us, he hath much against us for so saying or thinking. For who knoweth how oft he offendeth? O cleanse thou us all from our secret faults. Had we arrived to the perfection of this Angel in my text, and could exhibit letters testimonial signed by our Savior, such as this Angel of Thyatira might; yet were it not safe to capitulate with God: notwithstanding all our virtues and graces he hath somewhat against us, either for sins of omission, or sins of commission, or at least sins of permission. I have somewhat against thee, that thou sufferest

The woman, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . Ambrosius Ansbertus, Richell, Dionysius, Carthusianus, and Hugo Cardinalis, translate the word in the Original, uxorem, thy wife: which is the rather worth the noting in these Popish Interpreters, who yet condemn Priests marriage. Doubtless this Angel was a good Bishop, for he is highly commended by our Savior; yet had he his wife by their confession. Why therefore may not sacred persons enter into the sacred bands of matrimony? Is it because, as Pope Sirycius, and after him Cardinal Bellarmine, bear us in hand, conjugal acts and matrimonial duties stand not with the sanctity of the Priests function? Now verily this is a strange thing, that marriage, according to the doctrine of their Church, is a Sacrament conferring grace, and yet a disparagement to the most sacred function: marriage is a holy Sacrament, and yet Priests are bound by a Sacrament (that is, an oath) never to receive it: marriage was instituted in Paradise, in the state of man's innocence, when the image of God, which the Apostle interpreteth to be holiness and righteousness, shined most brightly in him, and yet it is a cloud, nay, a blur to the most holy calling: marriage was appointed by God as a special remedy against fornication and all uncleanness, and yet is an impeachment to holiness. The Aaronical Priesthood by God's own order was to be continued in the line of Aaron by generation, not election; and yet marriage cannot stand with the holiness of Priesthood. Who of the Patriarchs before the Flood was holier than Enoch, who walked with God, and was translated, that he should not see death? of the Prophets under the Law, than Ezekiel? of the Apostles, than St. Peter and Philip? and yet of Enoch we read, that he begat sons and daughters: and Saint Chrysostom bids us take special notice of it, that the Holy Ghost saith in the same Verse, he walked with God, and beg at sons and daughters, to teach us that the bonds of matrimony are no such fetters, that they hinder us from walking with God. Ezekiel's wife is mentioned in his prophecy, and Peters wives mother in the Gospel, and Philip's daughters that prophesied in the Acts: with whose examples Clemens Alexandrinus mightily confoundeth, and convinceth those ancient Heretics, the fore-runners of our Papists, who disparaged this holy ordinance of God: What, saith he, will they blame the Apostles themselves? For Peter and Philip begat children; Philip also gave his daughters in marriage. Neither can our adversaries evade these instances, by saying that the Apostles indeed had wives before they were ordained Priests, but after they entered into that holy calling, forsook them, and had no more commerce with them. For Clemens informeth us, that Saint Peters wife kept with him till her death, and that when he saw her led to martyrdom, he called to her by name, and encouraged her, saying, Remember the Lord.

Howbeit the major part of the Expositors take not Jezebel here for the Bishops wife, but a disciple of the Nicolaitans, who is here named Jezebel, because she resembled Jezebel especially in three particulars.

1. As Jezebel brought amongst the Israelites the false worship of the Idol Baal; so this woman labored to bring into this Church of Thyatira, Idolatry and other pernicious errors in doctrine and practice.

2. Jezebel was given to fornication, for which vice the Holy Ghost brandeth this woman also.

3. Jezebel was a woman of authority, and by her place and dignity did countenance and maintain▪ Idolatry; and so it is likely that this was a woman of some place and rank, which she abused to countenance wicked opinions, and seduce God's servants. Jezebel in the Hebrew signifieth fluxum sanguinis, or stirquilinium, an issue of blood or dung; both which were verified in the wife of Ahab, whose abominable life and fearful death ye may see set forth in lively colors in the book of Kings, to breed in all men and women a detestation of the one, by the shame and horror of the other. A lamentable spectacle (dear Christians) to see the daughter and wife of a King trampled underfoot in the dirt, and the dogs tearing her flesh, and licking up her blood. She who spent so much time in dressing and tricking up her self at the window, is thrown down headlong out of that window: she that looked so high, falls full low, and is trod underfoot by her servant: she who spilled Naboth's innocent blood in Jezreel, expiateth the place with her own blood: that face, on which she a little before had laid costly colors and ointments, is now besmeared with dirt, and stained with her own blood: that flesh of hers which she pampered with all kinds of delicious meats, is now cast to dogs.

Let them hear this and fear who wear Jezebels colors, and tread in her steps; who defile themselves with corporal or spiritual fornication; who either idolatrize or idolize, worship painted images, or make themselves such. Jezebel was the first we read of, that took the pensill out of the hand of her Maker, endeavoring to mend his workmanship; and what became of her you heard but now. And howsoever some of late, as they have sowed pillows under men's elbows, so have tempered colors also for women, and made apologies for painting, yet all the ancient Fathers condemn it as a foul sin. Saint Cyprian thus schools a young Jezebel in his days: Art not thou afraid, saith he, that plaisterest thy face, and paintest thy body, lest at the day of judgment thy Maker will not know thee? but when thou pressest among the rest to receive the promised rewards to his servants, will put thee back, saying: Who art thou? what face do I see? this is none of my workmanship, I never drew this feature. Saint Jerome takes the like up in his time as sharply: What makes paint and complexion on the face of a Christian? it is no other than the fire of youth, the fuel of lust, the evidence of an unchaste mind: How can she weep for her sins, for fear of washing away her paint, and making furrows in her face? How dare she look her Maker in the face, who hath defaced his image in her self? But because I see it will be to no purpose, to draw this their sin of painting in its proper colors before them (for they cannot blush) I therefore leave them, and come to her in my Text

Which calleth her self a Prophetess. As Novatus the Schismatic ordained himself a Bishop, so Jezebel the Nicolait anointed (or rather painted her self) a Prophetess, that by this means she might teach more freely, and persuade more powerfully. The true Prophets of God received their name and calling from God, and wonderfully confirmed the sincerity of their doctrine by the truth of their miracles, and the truth of their miracles by the holiness of their doctrine. So many tongues as they spake with, with so many testimonies; so many miracles as they wrought, with so many hands they signed and sealed their calling: but deceivers and impostors grace themselves with high and strange titles, and glorious names, to blear the eyes of the simple. So Psaphon called himself, and taught the birds to call him, magnus deus Psaphon, great god Psaphon. Theudas said he was some great one. Simon Magus styled himself the great power of God, and gave it out among his scholars, That he delivered the Law to Moses in Mount Sinai in the person of God the Father, and in the reign of Tiberius appeared in the likeness of the son of man, and on the day of Pentecost came down upon the Apostles in the similitude of cloven tongues. Montanus arrogated to himself the title of Paracletus, the comforter, and to his three minions, Priscilla, Maximilla, and Quintilla, the name of Prophetesses. Manes bare himself as if he were an Apostle immediately sent from Christ; and his followers would be thought to be termed Manichei, not from their mad master, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , but because they poured manna out of their mouths. The great Seducer of the Jews, who in Theodosius time drew thousands after him into the sea and there drowned them, persuaded his followers that he was Moses: and the abomination of the Turks Mahomet calleth himself God's great Prophet. Pliny derideth the vanity of the Greeks in this kind, who usually set golden titles on leaden Treatises. And Heretics always, like Mountebankes, set out their drugs with magnificent words. Nestorius, though he were a condemned Heretic, yet covered himself with the veil of a true Professor, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . Ebion, though he held with the Samaritans, yet would be held a Christian. The Turks at this day, though it appears out of all stories that they descended from Hagar, yet assume to themselves the name of Saracens. The Donatist Schismatics impropriate to their conventicles the name of the true Church. And no marvel that the Salmonian offspring of Ignatius Loyola christen themselves Jesuits, since the Prince of darkness not only usurpeth the name, but also taketh upon him the form of an Angel of light. It is a silly shift of a bankrupt disputant in the schools to argue a vocibus ad res, from the bare name of things to their nature: and yet Bristow in his motives, and Cardinal Bellarmine in his book of the notes of the Church, and other of the Pope his stoutest Champions, fight against us with this festraw, We are (say they) surnamed Catholics, therefore we are so. By this kind of argument Pope Alexander the sixth his incestuous daughter might prove her self to be a chaste matron, because she was called Lucrece.

—Lucrecia nomine, sed re
Thais; Alexandri filia, sponsa, nurus.

And Philemon his thievish servant might prove himself to be honest, because his name was Onesimus: and the three Ptolomies, whereof the first killed his Father, and the second his Mother, and the third his Brother, might prove themselves to be full of natural affection, because the one was surnamed Philopater, the other Philometor, the third Philodelphus. Were men's names always correspondent to their nature, Philip of Macedon had lost a witty jest, which he brake upon two brothers, Hecaterus, and Amphoterus, thus inverting their names, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , He whose name is either of the two deserveth to be called both, because he is worth both; and he whose name is both shall be called neither, because he is of no worth at all.

But to throw away foils, and come to the sharp: Will they thus argue in good earnest, Protestants are called Sectaries or Schismatics, and Papists Catholics, therefore they are so? Will they condemn the Primitive Christians for Atheists, because the heathen usually so termed them, in regard they had no faith in their gods? Will they brand St. Paul for an Heretic, or the Truth himself for a Seducer, because ignorance and malice fastened these calumnies and blasphemies upon them? Protestants are termed Heretics by Papists, and are not Papists also by Protestants? what gain then the Papists hereby? Papists are termed Catholics; I would know by whom? If by any Protestant, they know well it is but by a Sarcasme, or Irony; as Alexander was called a god by the Lacedaemonians, Quoniam Alexander vult esse deus, sit deus.

Yea, but they are so styled by all that adhere to the Church of Rome: and were not the Arians called Catholics by Arians? the Nestorians Orthodox by Nestorians? the Novatians the best Christians by Novatians? the Donatists sole members of the Church by Donatists? the most impure Sect of Anabaptists the Family of love by those of their own cut? If this argument may pass for currant; Papists term themselves Catholics, therefore they are so: what exception can be taken against these and the like? The Turks call themselves Saracens, therefore they are the offspring of Sarah: they of Satan's Synagogue call themselves Jews, therefore they are Jews indeed: the Angel of Sardis had a name that he lived, therefore he was not dead: the Angel of Laodicea said he was rich, and needed nothing, therefore he was not wretched, & miserable, and poor, & blind, and naked: Jezebel called her self a Prophetess, therefore she was so indeed. Without question Jezebel set some fairer color upon the matter than this, else she could never have dazzled the eyes of God's servants: well she might offer to teach in the Church under this pretence, which yet S. Paul expressly forbids a woman to do; but certainly she could never have foiled any servant of God with so weak an argument, grounded upon a bare title assumed by her self: yet the Spirit saith, that she not only taught, but prevailed also with some, and seduced them.

To teach and seduce my servants. I doubt not but at the reading of these words your thoughts trouble you, and you begin to question whether this doctrine is not a seduction, to teach that any of God's servants can be seduced. Can any elect child of God fall from grace? Is it possible to pluck any of Christ's members from his body? Can the Sun-beams by any wind or tempest be stirred out of their place? Doth not St. John dispute strongly? They went away from us, because they were not of us: for if they had been of us, they would not have departed from us. Is not St. Cyprians observation as true as it is elegant? The wind bloweth not away the corn, neither is a tree that hath taken a deep root in the earth overthrown in a tempest: it is but chaff which the wind scattereth abroad, and they are hollow and rotten trees, that are blown down in a tempest.

To dispel all mists of ambiguity, and clear the truth in this point, I must acquaint you with two sorts of Christ's servants, or retainers at least; some wear his cloth and cognizance, but do him little or no service, others perform faithful service unto him: some give him their names only, others their hearts also: some profess outwardly that they are Christians, but have unbelieving hearts: others are within that they profess without: some are called only to the knowledge of the truth, others are chosen also to be heirs of salvation. Of these latter our Savior speaks in St. John; My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me, and I will give unto them eternal life, and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hands. But of the former the words of my text seem to be meant.

Howbeit, because the Discerner of all hearts calleth them his servants, saying, to seduce my servants; and it is not likely that he would grace hypocrites with so honorable an appellation: we may yield somewhat more in this point, and without prejudice to the truth acknowledge, that the true servants of God, and ministers also of Christ Jesus, may be sometimes seduced out of the right way, but not far, I am sure not irrevocably. The difference between them and others in this respect, is like that which the Orator observeth between the Corinthian and common brass: as the brass of Corinth is longer ere it rust, and when it is rusty is sooner scoured, and more easily recovers the former brightness than other brass; so good men are hardlier withdrawn from the true faith, and more easily reclaimed from their errors, than those who bear no sincere love to the truth, but are wedded to their own opinions whatsoever they are, and oftentimes blinded by obstinately setting their eyes against the bright beams of the Word. Out of the Ark of Noah, which was a type of the Church, there flew two birds, a Raven and a Dove; the Raven after he had taken his flight returned not again, but the Dove came back with an Olive branch in her bill. The Dove (saith Saint Cyprian) represented the seduced Catholic, who after he is gone out of the Church, never findeth rest till he return back with an Olive branch of peace in his mouth, and be reconciled to the Church: But the Raven is the obstinate Heretic, who leaveth the Church with a purpose never to return to her again. And many such Ravens have been of late let fly out of the Ark, which never return again; or if they return, it is to prey upon the sick and weak members of our Church, and to pick out the eyes of her dearest children: and I pray God we may never have cause to renew the Poets complaint,

Dat veniam corvis, vexat censura columbas.

To commit fornication. Fornication, as Lyranus harpeth upon the word, is committed four manner of ways.

  • 1. By the impure lust of the heart.
  • 2. By the unclean act of the body.
  • 3. By the religious worship of Images or Idols.
  • 4. By the immoderate love of earthly vanities.

For when the soul turneth away from God, and setteth her love wholly upon vile and base creatures, so far below her, that God hath placed them under her feet; what doth she but like a Lady of noble descent, married to a Prince, which disloyally leaveth his bed, and maketh love to the groome of her chamber? Certainly this is sordidum adulterium, not only filthy, but base adultery.

Howbeit, I take it, this was not the stain of the Church of Thyatira; but either fornication properly so called, which is corporal Idolatry; or idolatry, which is spiritual fornication. For idolatry defileth the Spirit, as adultery polluteth the fl sh: idolatry provoketh God, as adultery doth man to jealousy: as adultery is a just cause of separation between man and his wife, so idolatry maketh a breach betwixt God and the soul, and causeth in the end a divorce: by reason of which separation for disloyalty and unfaithfulness, Saint Cyprian wittily termeth certain virgins widows before they were married wives, yea and adulteresses too; not to their husbands, (which they had not) but to Christ, to whom they had plighted their troth. And look how a jealous husband would be transported with passion, if he should find his wife embracing a stranger in bed; so doth the wrath of God burn like fire, and his jealousy break out like a bright flame against such as Pygmalion -like entertain an Idol for him in the bed of their soul, and commit fornication with it.

To commit fornication, and to eat meat sacrificed unto Idols. There is so near affinity betwixt carnal and spiritual fornication, that few defile their souls with the one, but are defiled in body with the other; as Jezebels scholars here, who by eating meat sacrificed unto Idols, were provoked to corporal uncleanness. One sin, as it breedeth, so it feedeth another: and as blindness of eyes was inflicted upon Elymas for his blindness of heart, so God in his secret and just judgment here punished the Nicolaits spiritual with corporal fornication; that as they provoked him to jealousy by familiarly and freely conversing with Idolaters, so they were provoked to jealousy by their wives keeping company with adulterers.

Touching eating meats sacrificed unto Idols, which the Spirit in this place, and Saint Paul, and all the Apostles in their decretal Epistle so strictly forbid, you are to understand that the Christians in the Primitive Church, in respect of their acquaintance and alliance with the heathen that dwelt among them, did not stick, when they were invited by them, to go to their banquets and feasts, which they kept in the Temples of their Idols, when they sacrificed unto them, and there they spent the remainder of such cates and wines as had been offered to their Paynim gods. The pretence which the Christians had for their resorting to these feasts was this, that they knew the Idol was nothing, and therefore, giving thanks to God for his creatures, they did eat of all things without any scruple of conscience, howsoever they had been used, and to whomsoever they had been offered. This our Savior here reproveth the Thyatirians for, and St. Paul the Corinthians in the place above alleged; showing, that though the Idol was nothing in it self, yet since the Gentiles did offer such things as were served-in at their Idols feast, not to God but to Devils, the Christians could not sit at the same tables with them, rejoicing and feasting in the names of them, but they must be partakers of their idolatry. The main argument he useth may be thus reduced to form.

They that eat of things offered unto Idols are partakers of the Devils table, and are as it were in mess with him: But none of God's family may table with the Devil; therefore all Christians ought to make conscience of accepting the heathens invitation to such feasts, wherein they were to feed upon the Devils relics. Now that the servants of God may not meddle or make with the Devil or any of his instruments, needs no proof at all. For what Communion hath light with darkness? or what fellowship hath Christ with Belial? And that they that keep gaudy days for the Devil, and make merry with his relics, have fellowship with him, the Apostle showeth by the like examples. They that eat of the sacramental bread have their communion with Christ, they that eat of the legal sacrifices are partakers of the Altar; even so they that eat things offered unto Idols divide commons as it were with the D vell.

Thus have I glanced at all the parts of this Scripture; but my principal aim was from the beginning at Jezebel, set as a fair or rather foul mark in the midst of this verse (I have somewhat against thee, that thou sufferest Jezebel.) It is not only evil to do, but also to suffer evil, when it is in in our power to hinder it; as I proved heretofore at large by arguments drawn

1. From the Law, forbidding to plow with an Ox and an Ass, and punishing Idolaters with death.

2. From the Gospel, denying the service of two Masters, and interdicting all fellowship and communion of light with darkness, or Christ with Belial.

3. From the Spirits bill of indictment, framed against the Angels of Pergamos and Thyatira, for tolerating the Nicolaitans.

4 From God's threatening to cut off all such as swear by him, and by Malchim.

5 From the Kings command in the parable, to compel all the guests that were bid to come to his marriage feast.

6. From the imputation which is laid by the Spirit upon many Kings of Israel and Judah, for not taking away the high places.

7. From the examples of Asa, Josiah, Hezekiah, Nebuchadnezzar, Constantine, Jovian, Theodosius, and other religious Princes, who by severe laws restrained heresy and idolatry, and constrained the true worship of God.

8. From the verdict and depositions of the ancient Fathers, Tertullian, Cyprian, Jerome, Augustine, Leo, Gregory, Clemens Alexandrinus, Epiphanius, and Bernard, who all strengthen the arms of the Magistrate, and sharpen his sword against heretics.

9 From the laws of the ancient Grecians, Romans, and almost all the heathen, who censured some way or other all innovation in religion, and profanation of divine worship.

Lastly, from the great danger of heresy, which like a canker soon spreads over the whole body of the Church, and, if it be not looked into, killeth, and that eternally, thousands of souls, breaketh the bands of nature, and cutteth asunder all sinews of human society; putteth enmity, variance, and implacable discords in families, soweth seeds of sedition in the State, reacheth dagges and daggers to subjects to assacinate the sacred persons of the Lord's anointed, layeth trains in the deep vaults of disl yall hearts, to blow up Parliaments, and offer whole Kingdoms for an Holocaust. It now remaineth that I appeach the Whore of Babylon of Jezebalisme, and discover her filthy abominations, and abominable filthiness in the face of the sun.

The Spirit here describeth Jezebel by three marks:

  • 1. Imposture, She calleth her self a Prophetess.
  • 2. Impurity, She teacheth to commit fornication.
  • 3. Idolatry, She alloweth eating meat sacrificed unto idols.

With these three crimes I dare more confidently charge the Roman Synagogue, because with a whorish forehead she seemeth rather to stand upon the justification of them, than the denial. For among her religious practices she reckoneth pious frauds, as if she verily believed that which heathen Varro writeth, That it is expedient for men to be cheated in matter of religion. And hereupon Vincentius Bellovacensis in the life of Saint Dominic, entitles one chapter, De sanctâ ejus hypocrisi, Of his holy hypocrisy: And for impurity, Casa the Archbishop of Beneventum layeth colors of eloquence upon that foul sin, which God punished in Sodom with fire and brimstone. And for idolatry, Gregory de Valentiâ, the prime of the School-men, professedly pleads for it, and endeavors to prove it to be lawful out of the words of Saint Peter; When ye walked in lasciviousness, lusts, revellings, banquettings, and unlawful and abominable idolatries. What need (saith he) Saint Peter deter us from unlawful idolatries, if some kind of idolatry were not lawful? Good God! Idolatry lawful, holy hypocrisy, pious frauds, honest sodomy! Did ever Nicolaus of Antiochia, or Jezebel of Thyatira set abroach such impure and unsavory doctrine? did ever the Carpocratians, who let the reins loose to all kinds of lewdness and villainy, maintain more damnable positions?

But to keep close to the pattern in my text, and to draw a perfect picture of the Church of Rome by notes taken from Jezebel.

First, Jezebel called her self a Prophetess: and doth not the Church of Rome usurp the same title, and boast of her Propheticke Spirit? If any be ignorant hereof, let him cast but a look into Bellarmine his book of the notes of the Church, there shall he see Lumen propheticum, the light of prophesy, drawn out in a fair and goodly character, for the twelfth note of the Roman Church. You see the first mark of Jezebel visible in the Church of Rome: As Jezebel calleth her self a Prophetess, so the Church of Rome arrogateth to her self that supernatural gift.

The second mark is as foul as the other is fair in show: She teacheth to commit fornication. I would be loath to cast so foul an aspersion upon the Roman Church, if the ancient Rubric in the Canon law blushed anything at these words, He that hath not a wife, ought to have a concubine instead of her: or the Pope his holiness were ashamed to draw a revenue of many thousand Ducats by the year out of somewhat worse than Vespasian his tribute ex lotio. But since the Marozia of Sergius, the Matildis of Gregory the s venth, the Lucretia of Alexander the sixth, the Magdalena of Leo the tenth, the Constantia of Paul the third, were as infamous as Ovid's Corinna; since ancient Popes have erected stews, and later take toll of them at this day in Rome, Avennion, and elsewhere; since ancienter Popes have dispensed with unnatural lusts, and the later with incestuous marriages; since the Riarius of Sixtus the fourth, the Germanus of Julius the second, the Hippolytus of Leo the tenth, and Innocentius de monte of Julius the third, gave but too much cause to Mantuan, and other later Poets to proclaim to the world,

Sanctus ager scurris, venerabilis ara cinoedis
Servit, honorandae divûm Ganymedibus aedes.
Since their own Wicelius professeth himself scandalized at the allowed concubines of Mass-Priests; and the Germans in their grievances put up this for one, That the Bishops and their Officials do not only tolerate concubines in Priests, so they pay a certain rate for them, but also constrain Priests, who live continently, and keep no concubines, to pay the former tax: since Picus Mirandula (in ep. ad Leo. 10.) and Cardinal Alliacus in his treatise of the reformation of the Church, report of their Cels, that they were become mere stews: since Costerus, yea and Cardinal Bellarmine, teach in express words, That it is a greater sin in a Priest or Votary to marry, than to commit fornication; Est majus malum sic nubere quàm fornicari: since Panormitan their great Lawyer delivereth it for a ruled case, That a Clergy man is not to be deposed for simple fornication: nay, since the Council of Toledo admitteth such persons to the holy Communion, who keep a concubine (so they be not married:) no Papist can have an action of slander against me, for charging their Church with somewhat more than bare toleration of simple fornication. Verily Espenceus had good cause to affirm, That more naughtiness and filthiness might be learned out of Taxa camerae Apostolicae, (whereunto I add Zanche's de Matrimonio, and other Casuists) than out of all the obscene satyres, and epigrams of profane Poets. What Christian ears can endure that preface of Pope Gregory, For adultery and other lesser sins the Bishop may dispence with a Priest after penance.

But I list not to bring to light other of their works of darkness; let the night cover her own shame. I proceed from Jezebels corporal to her spiritual whoredom, wherein the Church of Rome exceedeth her. For Jezebel taught only that it was lawful to keep company, and make merry with Idolaters, and partake of their offerings: but the Church of Rome partaketh with them in their Idol-worship. For albeit she pretendeth that she tendereth no religious service to the Idols of the Heathen, the enemies of God, but to the images of Saints, and shrines of Martyrs; this no way cleareth her from spiritual uncleanness. For it will not be allowed for a good plea in a disloyal wife, to say that she gave no entertainment to any of her husbands enemies, but only made much of his dearest friends, and admitted them into bed for his sake. The adultery in it self is foul, with whomsoever it be committed; and Idol-service in it self is abominable, to whomsoever it be performed. To pay the debt of conjugal love to any save her husband in a wife is adultery; and to tender divine honor to any save God is idolatry. Therefore if we can bring any good proof hereof, that the Church of Rome doth this, and avoweth the doing of it, we do her no wrong to call her the great Whore, of whose cup of abominations whosoever drink become so giddy, that they fall before stocks and stones; like men whose brains are intoxicated, take images and pictures for men and women, bring presents to them, put costly apparel on them, speak to them, embrace and kiss them. O sottish folly! the living image of God falleth down before dumb and dead pictures and statues; men to whom God hath given sense and reason, adore unreasonable and senseless creatures; they who are capable of wisdom ask counsel of stocks and stones; they who receive their souls from heaven, do homage, and perform religious service to the vilest and basest creatures on the earth.

O curvae in terra animae, & coelestium inanes.

But to draw a formal bill of indictment against the Church of Rome.

Whatsoever Church attributeth divine honor to a creature, is guilty of abominable Idolatry:

But the Church of Rome attributeth divine honor to divers creatures;

Ergo she is guilty of abominable Idolatry.

The proposition of this syllogism is impregnable; and if it be assaulted, we have an army of authorities already mustered for the defense of it; therefore I fortify the assumption against which the Adversarie is like to lay his batteries. Whosoever allow the same honor to the Image, and to him whom it representeth, that is to say, to the Image of God and God himself, to the Image of Christ and Christ himself, they by a necessary consequent yield divine honor to Images, which are creatures: but Alexander Alensis, Thomas Aquinas, Cajetan, Bonaventure, Marsillius, Almaine, Carthusian, Capreolus, Henricus, and many other jointly teach, that the same honor is due to the Image, and to the person represented by it: and particularly Suarez contendeth, that divine honor is to be given to the Images of the Trinity, by the decrees of the Council of Trent: therefore the Church of Rome by her chiefest pillars supporteth and maintaineth idolatry in the highest degree. Which will yet appear more evidently by these few instances: 1 Do they not devote themselves, dedicate Temples, consecrate Altars, appoint offices, make daily prayers, vow pilgrimages, and present offerings to the blessed Virgin, and do all such outward acts as properly appertain to Latria? Is not this to equalize her with her Son? Surely Vega and Biels words import no less: She is placed (saith Vega) above all creatures, and whosoever boweth the knee to Jesus, falls down flat before his mother; the glory of the mother and the sons I account to be the same. Almighty God (saith Biel) hath divided his kingdom between himself and her, in such sort that all matter of justice he reserveth to himself, but matter of mercy he referreth to her. In which consideration, or some such like, it is, that in countries subject to the See of Rome, all men and women, wheresoever they are, in the City or the field, thrice a day, when the Ave marie bell rings, send up their united devotions to her; and where one professeth himself a devoto to our Savior, whose Towns devote themselves to her: where one prayeth at a crucifix, ten pray at her Image: where one fasteth on Friday, which they account our Lord's day, many fast on Saturday, which they count our Ladies day. To conclude: they conclude all their prayers with an Ave Maria, as we do with our Lord's prayer, and most of their treatises with Laus deiparae Virgini, praise be to the Virgin mother of God: and in the Psalter called Bonaventures, they have entitled all the hundred and fifty Psalms of David to her; and where he saith Lord, they put Lady.

2. Secondly, do they not make an Idol of the Cross of Christ, when they profess that they worship it cultu latriae? To omit Aquinas and Andradius alleged by me else-where, Gretzer the Jesuit in his book of the Cross saith, We affirm, according to the more common and received opinion in the Schools, that the Cross of Christ is to be worshipped with latry, that is, divine worship.

3. Thirdly, do they not make an Idol of the Sacramental bread, or the Host, as they call it; to which they pray and confess, before which they fall down, when it is carried in solemn procession on corpus Christi day?

Lastly, do they not make Idols of their Images, and Relics of Sanits, before which they burn incense, and bow down when they pray, directing their prayers toward them, and fastening their eyes on them?

Here to stop the mouths of our clamorous adversaries, who traduce us for nothing more than partiality in handling controversies; I will acquaint you with the answer they give to the former Bill of indictments.

1. Some of them say, that they worship not the Image, but God by the Image.

2. Others confess, that they worship Images, but deny them to be Idols: to worship an Idol is idolatry, not to worship an Image, say they.

3. Others salve all with a distinction of dulia and latria; they give dulia to Saints and their Images, and hyperdulia to the blessed Virgin, but latria only to God.

But they shall not so evade: for to their first evasion we oppose these bars:

  • First, that it is idolatry to worship God in, or by an Image.
  • Secondly, that their learned Clerks of later time maintain, that the image it self is to be worshipped.

That it is unlawful and offensive to the Highest, to worship him by a proxie, or set up an image to convey honor unto him by it; I evict out of the fortieth of Isaiah, Ver. 18.21. To whom will ye liken God? or what likeness will you compare him unto? And out of the fourth of Deuteronomy, Ver. 15. Take good heed therefore unto yourselves: for ye saw no manner of similitude in the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeb, beware lest you corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure. Certainly, if God cannot, if he will not be likened by anything, he will not like of that worship which cometh to him by or through an image; if it be unlawful to make an image of God, what suppose you is it to make a god of an Image, by adoring it in God's stead? Was not Phoedra an adulteress, when she lay with Hipolytus, because she protested that she embraced Theseus in him, whom he so near resembled? Were the Jews that worshipped the Calf, or they that worshipped the brazen Serpent, or the image of Baal, free from idolatry? They dare not say it, because the Spirit of God condemneth them for Idolaters; yet they might plead for themselves, as Papists do, that they worshipped God in the Calf, and Christ to come in the Serpent, and him that dwelleth in a light that cunnot be approached unto in the image of Baal or the Sun. For they were not such Calves as to fixe their devotion on a Calf of their own making; they were not so deceived by the old Serpent, as to attribute divine power to a Serpent of brass; their eyes were not so dazzled with the beams of the Sun, that they mistook the Sun for God: No, the words of Aaron, To morrow is a feast Jehovae, to the Lord: and those of God himself, Thou shalt call me no more Baal: for I will take away the names of Baalim out of their mouth; make it a clear case, that they made but a stale of the Image who bowed down before it, intending the honor to God himself, as Josephus testifieth of Jeroboam: Jeroboam, saith he, appointed that God should be worshipped in those Calves which he set up in Dan and Bethel. And what shall we say, if Papists are indebted to the Heathen for this answer? who set this varnish upon their idolatrous practice, as you may see in Lactantius, Tyrius, and Clemens Romanus. Saint Paul also testifieth as much of the Heathen in general ( Rom. 1.23.) They changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and to four footed beasts, and to creeping things. And of the Athenians in particular ( Acts 17.23.) Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. The greatest God, as Tyrius speaketh, the invisible God, as Clemens, the incorruptible God, as the Apostle, the God whom Paul preached, the Lord Jehovah is the true God that made heaven and earth: yet the Jews and Gentiles, who worshipped him by an image, or according to their own imaginations, in Scripture stand charged with Idolatry, and for ought appears to the contrary as deeply, as if their devotion had pitched and settled upon the image of the Calf, the Serpent, the Sun, the star Rempham, the similitudes of men, birds, or creeping things, and not glaunced by them to their Maker. Ye hear that the Papists plea, take it at the best, is no better than the idolatrous Jews plea, the Priests of Baals plea, the Gentiles plea: and what if the learnedest of their own side debar them of this plea also? what if their great Doctors teach, that the image is to be worshipped for it self, and not only in relation to the prototypon, as they speak? what if they curse all those who make any scruple of the veneration of Images? Certainly Cardinal Bellarmine his words are plain enough: The Images of Christ and Saints are to be worshipped not only by accident and improperly, but also by, or for themselves, and properly in such sort, that they bounded & termined the worship, as they are considered in themselves, and not only as they stand for the samplar, that is, the person or thing they represent. This his assertion he there endeavoreth to prove out of the second Council of Nice, and the late Conventicle at Trent, which who so readeth, cannot but see that speech of the Prophet David verified in the Patrons thereof: They that make Images are like unto them, and so are all they that put their trust in them. To which text Clemens Alexandrinus, as it seemeth to me, had an eye, in that his pleasant allusion, whereby he representeth the folly of Idolaters: As (saith he) the natural birds were beguiled by the counterfeit, and flew to the Pigeons that were drawn in the Painters shop; so natural stocks fly to artificial, senseless men to senseless Idols. How wardeth the Cardinal off this blow? after this manner: We have no recourse unto, nor perform any religious service to any Idol, though we both teach and practice Image-worship. Why? what is the difference between an Image and an Idol? An Image (saith he) is the representation of something which really subsisteth, as of God, Angel, or man; but an Idol is the semblance of a thing feigned or imaginary, that hath no being at all, but in the fancy of the deviser. God in the Law forbiddeth us to worship the later sorts of similitudes, not the former.

Let us try this new coined distinction by the touch-stone of God's Word: How is it written? Thou shalt not make to thyself Pesell, that is, anything that is carved or graven, as not only the interlineary, Vatablus, Tremellius, and the Septuagint; but the vulgar Latin also, corrected by Sixtus, and revised by Clemens, render the Hebrew.

Admit that the word Pesel signifieth not an Image, as Justin Martyr translateth it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , but an Idol, say these first words of the commandment meet with the worshippers of Idols, not of Images, yet certainly the clause following (nor the likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth) reacheth home to all Images. For all Images are likenesses of something in heaven, earth, or under the earth. The Idol of Baal was the likeness of something in heaven, the Calf of something on earth, Dagon of something in the waters under the earth. For the first was the representation and similitude of the Sun, the second of a Beast, the third of a Fish: yet the Scripture calleth these images Idols, and their worshippers Idolaters: therefore the Papists are in the same damnation with them, and contradict themselves in terminis, in saying they worship Images, not Idols. For every Image worshipped is an Idol. True (say the later Papists) if it be worshipped cultu latriae, with divine worship, not cultu duliae, which is an inferior kind.

To cut off this third head of Hydra with the sword of the Spirit.

First, we ought not to distinguish where the Law distinguisheth not: It is a good rule in the civil Law, and holds in Divinity; but this distinction of dulia and latria hath no ground in Scripture, where the words dulia and latria are indifferently used; and as latria is attributed unto men, so dulia to God.

Secondly, the Commandment forbiddeth expressly all both inward and outward worship: all outward in those words; Thou shalt not bow down before them: all inward in the words following, nor worship them. If therefore their dulia imply either an inward, or an outward worship of the likeness of anything that is in the world, it is prohibited in the second Commandment.

Thirdly, if it should be granted them, that there is some difference between dulia and latria, proper worship and improper, per se and per accidens, absolute and relative; yet questionless the honest vulgar are not able to tithe this Mint and Cumin, and cut these scholastical distinctions to a hair, their dulia is latria, and latria dulia; and as Ludovicus vives confessed before they clipped his tongue, they exhibit a like manner of devotion to Saints, and their Images and Relics, to that which the Heathen did to their gods and goddesses.

Fourthly, all worship is either civil or religious; to perform civil worship to Images, as if they were our concives, is ridiculous: to yield religious, is impious. If by cultus duliae they mean civil complement, they must show what familiarity or civil society the living have with the dead, and what courtesy their Images can return back again. Indeed we read of an Image of our Lady that turned her back parts to a Carthusian that came tardy to Matins; but never of any that performed any complement before. No civil respect therefore is due to any Image, and much less religious: for Saint Austin teacheth expressly, that the Apostle forbiddeth any worship of religion to be given to a creature.

Lastly, the Jesuits and Schoolmen before alleged teach, that the Image of God, and of Christ, and of the Cross; and all Papists teach, that the elements of bread and wine after consecration in the Sacrament, are to be worshipped cultu latriae, or with divine worship. Therefore notwithstanding all their slips and evasions, the second Commandment taketh hold of them, and God's fearful judgment against Idolaters will seize on them also, if they avert them not by turning from dead Images to the living God.

I will cut off the thread of my discourse with Aristotle his sharp censure of the Milesians, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , The Milesians are not fools, yet they do just the same things which fools do: even so though we forbear to fasten the name of Heathenish Idolaters upon Papists; yet surely they do the same things as they did.

First, the Heathen carried their gods of gold and silver upon their shoulders; so do the Papists bear out their Images and Relics, enclosed in chasses of gold and silver, in their solemn procession on high days.

Secondly, the Heathen decked their Images, as if they were men and women, with apparel (yet cannot these gods save themselves from rust and moth, though they be covered with purple raiment ) and who knoweth not that Papists put costly apparel on their Images? almost every Saint among them hath his holy day and working day suit.

Thirdly, the Heathen lighted candles before their Images, though the Image seeth not one of them: and do not Papists set tapers before theirs?

Fourthly, the faces of the Heathen Idols were blacked with smoke: so are the Popish Images with the fume of the incense they burn to them.

Fifthly, the Heathen spake to their Idols as if they were able to understand them: so do the Papists to the wood of the Cross; Ave lignum spes unica.

Sixthly, the Heathenish Priests beards and heads were shaven: and so are our Popish Priests crowns.

Seventhly, Baals Clergy (if I may so speak) was divided into Priests and Chemarims, so termed for the black attire they ware: so is the Popish into Seminary Priests and Jesuits, birds of the same feather with the Chemarims.

Eighthly, the Heathen about the calends of February visited all their Temples with lights: a like ceremony the Papists use at Candlemasse.

Ninthly, at the beginning of the Spring the Heathen kept their Hilaria feasts, in which it was lawful to revel & riot in all kinds of disorder: in place whereof the Papists have brought in their Carnivals about the same time.

Tenthly, the Heathen commended every City and Village to the protection of some god or goddess: Juno was Lady guardian of Carthage, Venus of Cyprus, Diana of Ephesus, Pallas of Athens, &c. and have not the Papists likewise multiplied their Saints according to the number of their Cities? and do they not share the patronages of them between them? Doth not Venice fall to Saint Markes lot? Paris to Saint Genoviefe's? Spain to Saint James's? France to Saint Dennises? Scotland to Saint Andrew's? Ireland to Saint Patrickes? England to Saint Georges?

Eleventhly, the Heathen assigned several offices to several gods, calling upon Ceres for corn, upon Bacchus for wine, upon Aesculapius for health, upon Mercury for wealth, Apollo for wisdom, &c. In like manner the Papists address themselves to particular Saints upon particular and special occasions; to Saint Genoviefe for rain, to Saint Marc an for fair weather, Saint Michael in battle, Saint Nicholas in a sea tempest, Saint Eustace in hunting, Saint Roch and Sebastian for remedies against the plague, Saint Raphel against catarres, Saint Apollonia against the tooth-ach, St. Anthony against inflammations, Saint Margaret for safe delivery in child-birth, and to other Saints upon other occasions, as if God had granted a kind of Monopoly of the sev rall commodities of this life to several Saints.

Twelfthly, will you have yet more? Hercules hath left his club to Saint Christopher, Janus hath resigned up his keys to Saint Peter, Lucina her office of midwife to Saint Margaret, the Muses their instruments of music to Cecilia, and Jupiter Hammon his horns to Moses.

Sentio me jam de faece haurire, I now draw very low, the very lees and dregs of Popery, which whosoever sucketh, unless he cast them up again by repentance, is like to sup up the dregs of the vial of God's wrath. And now (me thinks) I see the Son of man look upon some of the reformed Churches with eyes sparkling like fire, and stamping with his brazen feet, to see these abominations of Jezebel winked at as they are in so many places. I meddle not here with any deliberation of State, fitter for the Council Table than the Pulpit: but discover to every private Christian what his duty is, to refrain from the society of Idolaters; & I beseech them for the love of him, who hath espoused their souls to himself, and hath decked them with the richest jewels of his grace, and made them a joynter of his Kingdom, to beware that they be not enticed to spiritual fornication, to forbear the company of all those who solicit them in this kind: nay farther, to detect such persons to authority, that they may learn not to blaspheme the truth of our Religion, nor seduce his Majesty's subjects from their allegiance to the Prince, and conformity to his Laws. Pliny writeth of certain Efts in Tyrinth, and Snakes in Syria, that do no hurt to the natives, but sting strangers to death: it may be some have the like conceit of our English Seminary Priests and Jesuits, who have done so great mischief beyond the Sea, that they have no power or will to hurt any here at home; and therefore dare more boldly converse with them, because their outward carriage is fair. But I beseech them to consider that the Panther hideth her ugly visage, which she knoweth will terrify the beasts from coming near her, alluring them with the sweet smell of her body; but as soon as they come within her reach, she maketh a prey of them. Therefore as you tender the salvation of your body and soul, your estate in this life, and the life to come, take heed how you play at the hole of the Cockatrice, and familiarly converse with the great Whore, or any of her Minions, lest they draw you to naughtiness and spiritual lewdness. Have no part with them that have no part in God, or have part with abominable Idols. If the good Bishop Saint Ambrose, being commanded by Valentinian the Emperor to deliver up a Church in his Diocese to the Arians, gave this answer, That he would first yield up his life: Prius est ut vitam mihi Imperator, quàm fidem adimat: shall we give up our souls, which are the Temples of the living God, to Idolatrous worship? If Saint John the Evangelist would not stay in the bath with Cerinthus the Heretic; shall we dare freely to partake with worser Heretics in the pledges of salvation, and wash our souls with them in the royal bath of Christ's blood? Constantius the Emperor thought himself polluted, if he had but seen an Heathenish Altar; and Saint Ambrose proposeth it as a thing most absurd and intolerable, that a Christian should be present at the sacrifices of the Heathen. Our Savior in this place, and Saint Paul in the first Epistle to the Corinthians, would not have Christians to eat any of those things that were sacrificed unto Idols: Nay, the Prophet David professeth, that he will not so much as name an Idol: Their offerings of blood will I not offer, nor make mention of their names in my lips.

I end, and seal up my meditations upon these words spoken to an Angel, with the words spoken by an Angel: If any worship the Beast and his Image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, the same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone before the holy Angels & the Lamb: and the smoke of their torments shall ascend forever & ever. And they shall have no rest neither day nor night, which worship the Beast and his Image, & whosoever receiveth the print of his name.

Gracious Lord, who gracest the Ministers of the Gospel with the title of Angels, make them in their knowledge and life angelical: keep them not only from sins of omission and commission, but also from sins of permission; that all may see their works, and their love, and their service, and their faith, and their patience; their love of thee, and their service to thee, and their faith in thee, and their patience for thee, and their growth in all these graces, and that thou mayest have nothing against them. And since thou hast displayed the Romish Jezebel unto us by her three marks, of imposture, impurity, and idolatry, breed in us all a greater loathing and detestation of her abominations: preserve us by the sincere preaching of the Word, and powerful operation of thy Spirit, that we be neither deceived by her imposture, to believe her false prophesies, neither defiled in our body by her impurity, to commit fornication, nor in soul by her idolatry, to eat things sacrificed unto Idols.

SERMONS PREACHED AT OXFORD.

FOURE ROWES OF PRECIOUS STONES. A Rehearsall Sermon preached in Saint Mary's Church at Oxford, Anno 1610. THE XXXV. SERMON.


EXOD. 28.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.

15. And thou shalt make the breast-plate of judgment with cunning work.

16. Four square shall it be, being doubled.

17. And thou shalt set in it settings of stones, even four rouse of stones: the order shall be this, a Rubie, a Topaze, and an Emrald, in the first row.

18. And in the second row thou shalt set a Carbuncle, a Sapphire, and a Diamond.

19. And in the third row a Turkeise, and an Agate, and an Amethist.

20. And in the fourth row a Beril, and an Onyx, and a Jasper: and they shall be set in gold in their inclosings or imbosments, Hebrew, fillings.

21. And the stones shall be with the names of the children of Israel, twelve, according to their names, like the engravings of a signet, everyone with his name shall they be, according to the twelve Tribes.

Right Worshipful, &c.

QUintilian instructing parents how to lay the ground-colors of virtues in the soft minds of tender infants, and acquaint them with the rudiments of learning, adviseth, Eburneas literarum formas iis in lusum offerre, To give them the letters of the Alphabet fairly drawn, painted or carved in ivory, gold, or the like solid and delectable matter, to play withal, that by their sports, as it were, unawares those simple forms might be imprinted in their memories, whereby we express all the notions of our mind in writing: even so it pleased our heavenly Father, in the infancy and nonage of his Church, to win her love with many glorious shows of rites and ceremonies, as it were costly babies, representing the body of her husband Christ Jesus: and to the end she might with greater delight, quasi per lusum, get by heart the principles of saving knowledge, and easilier spell the letters of the Gospel, he vouchsafed to work them in embroidered silks, and engrave them in gold, silver, and such precious treasure as fill the rouse in my text. Thus much concerning the legal Hieroglyphics we learn by St. Paul, who in his Epistles to the Galatians, Corinthians, and Hebrews, expounding divers types and stories of the old law spiritually, satis ostendit caetera quo{que} ejusdem esse intelligentiae, teacheth us plainly that the rest are of the same nature, and admit of the like interpretation. And hereto S. Origen fitteth the words spoken to the Spouse in the Canticles, Faciemus tibi similitudines auri, cum puncturis argenti, we will make thee golden resemblances of true things, cum puncturis argenti, id est, scintillis quibusdam spiritualis intelligentiae. According to which allusive interpretation of that allegorizing Writer, the gold it self of the Altar was but a similitude of the true gold, proffered by our Savior to the Angel of Laodicea, and the precious stones named in my text are but similitudes of that precious stone to which St. Peter pointeth, Behold, I lay in Zion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: whereupon St. Jerome sweetly infers, that all the Jewels mentioned in my text are to be sold by the wise Christian Merchant, to buy that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , pearl of great price mentioned in the Gospel; Omnes istae gemmae Prophetarum & Apostolorum sunt, quae comparatione Christi venduntur in Evangelio, ut ematur preciocissima Margarita.

Sardonychas, Smaragd', Adamantas, Jaspidas, uno
Portat in articulo stella, Severe, tuus.

O Severus, thou settest out thy mistress most richly, with every joint in her fingers laden with Jewels, Rubies, Emralds, Jaspers, and Diamonds: but pardon me if I believe there are more gems of art in thy verses, than of nature on her fingers.

Multas in digitis, plures in carmine gemmas
Invenies: inde est haec puto culta manus.
Behold here in Aaron's breast-plate all those and many more precious stones, in all twelve, bearing the name of the twelve Patriarchs, set in ouches of gold, and tied to the golden rings of the Ephod, a sacred vestment which Aaron and his successors were to put on before they gave judgment, when the people asked counsel of God. So much of the pectoral is clearly set down in this book: but that Aaron's breast-plate of judgment was a perfect astrolab is but Abenezra his fantasie without judgment, refuted by Tostatus. Likewise, that together with the names of the Patriarchs there was engraven in every stone the name of some Star or Angel, ut confirmaretur memoria tribus apud Deum, is but a muddy talmuddie tradition, implying ridiculously and impiously, that God needeth or useth the helps of artificial memory. Josephus telleth us a fair tale (and Baronius graceth his annals with it) of an unusual and marvelous lightning of some of these gems, which clearly foreshowed victory to the people when they asked counsel of God by the Ephod, before they went into war: a strange kind of prophetical illumination, not by the irradiation of the Spirit into their minds, but by the scintillation and luster of stones to the eye. But the Scriptures silence in a matter of such note, and Josephus his own confession, that for the space of two hundred years before his time there was no such new kind of soothsaying (not by the aspect of the heavens, but of the Priests breast, not by twinkling stars, but by sparkling stones) giveth us just cause to suspect the truth of this narration; and much more of an appendix thereunto which we find in Soudas and Epiphanius, that the Diamond in the second row of stones, as it clearly foreshowed victory by the extraordinary glare of it; so it portended bloody slaughter by suddenly turning into a red color, and final desolation by changing into black. For in the book of Judges we have the manner of God's revealing future events to the Priests when they had on the linen Ephod, set down not by mute signs, but by created voice; and therefore St. Augustine accounteth the former relation to be a mere fable: Fabulantur quidam lapidem fuisse, cujus color, sive ad prospera, sive ad adversa, mutaretur. Howbeit, since the Author of the book of wisdom affirmeth, that the glory, or, as others translate, the memorable acts of the patriarches were engraven in the four rouse of stones, whether in the choice of these jewels, respect were not had to such as fittest resembled by their beauty or virtue something memorable concerning the Patriarch, or his posterity whose name it bare, I determine not absolutely on either side. First, because neither the Jewish nor the Christian Interpreters agree in the reckoning of the stones, or the order of the Patriarchs names engraven in them. The Targum of Jerusalem and the Chaldee Paraphrase express them after this manner:
Upon the 1 Sardine, was graven 1 Reuben, Sons of Leah.
2 Topaze, 2 Simeon,
3 Smaragd, 3 Levi,
4 Chalcedonie, 4 Judah,
5 Sapphire, 5 Issachar,
6 Sardonyx, 6 Zebulon,
7 Hyacinth, 7 Dan, Of Bilhah Rachel's maid.
8 Chrysoprase, 8 Naphtali,
9 Amethyst, 9 Gad, Of Zilpha Leah's maid.
10 Chrysolite, 10 Asher,
11 Beryl, 11 Joseph, Of Rachel.
12 Jasper, 12 Benjamin.

Others differ in translation of the stones, and conceive the names of the Patriarchs to have been graven in them according to the order of nature; according to which after Judah they place Dan, and then Naphtali after Gad, then Asher after Issachar, then Zebulon, then Joseph and Benjamin.

The Author of the vulgar translation, which the Council of Trent defineth to be authentical, thus ranketh the stones in the four rouse:

  • In the first,
    • 1 Sardius.
    • 2 Topazius.
    • 3 Smaragdus.
  • In the second,
    • 4 Carbunculus.
    • 5 Saphirus.
    • 6 Jaspis.
  • In the third,
    • 7 Ligyrius.
    • 8 Achates.
    • 9 Amethystus.
  • In the fourth,
    • 10 Chrysolitus.
    • 11 Onychinus.
    • 12 Beryllus.

The Kings Translatours thus:

  • In the first,
    • 1 Sardius.
    • 2 Topaze.
    • 3 Carbuncle.
  • In the second,
    • 4 Emrald.
    • 5 Sapphire.
    • 6 Diamond.
  • In the third,
    • 7 Alygure.
    • 8 Agate.
    • 9 Amethyst.
  • In the fourth,
    • 10 Beryl.
    • 11 Onyx.
    • 12 Jasper.

Secondly, because Ibn Ezra a great Rabbin ingenuously confesseth, that there is no certainty to be had of these stones and their distinction: because Gehon interpreteth them Kirtsono at his pleasure; neither is there extant any tradition in their Cabala concerning them: yet because we may have undoubted certainty of most of them, either from their names in the Hebrew or Chaldee, as of the Sapphire, Turkeys, and Jasper; or from their etymologies, or by comparing them with the twelve precious stones mentioned in the Apocalypse: and because the rouse and stones in them may serve for places and Images in artificial memory, to imprint more firmly in our mind some remarkable story of the Patriarchs, whose names were engraven in them, I will observe some congruities between them.

1 The first precious stone is the Sardius, Sardonix, or Rubinus, in Hebrew Odem, ab Adam, signifying red earth, in English a Rubie; and the first son of Jacob, whose name by the consent of all was engraven in it, was Reuben. Behold Reuben in a Rubie. And as their names, so their qualities agree: a Rubie is an orient jewel, and Reuben is called the excellency of dignity: yet the goodliest and most glorious Rubie, saith Ystella, nubeculâ quâdam offunditur, is over-shadowed with some cloud: so was Reuben's glory, as it followeth ver. 4. Thou shalt not be excellent, because thou wentest up to thy fathers bed. A Rubie in Latin is called Carneolus, in Greek 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , quasi 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , because it is of the color of flesh: and did not Reuben deserve the name of Carneolus, when he had carnal society with his fathers Concubine?

2 The second stone is the Topaze; so the Seventy, Saint Jerome, Josephus, Junius, and all the Transl tours of note whom I have seen, render the Hebrew 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : to whose authority I add a conjecture out of Strabo, where he maketh mention of a precious stone found in the Island called Ophias, near the Eastern Ethiopia, now called the country of the Abyssens. This jewel he calleth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , from the great search made for it, even by the Kings of Egypt, who, as he there saith, hired great multitudes to seek for it in all places of the Island; and that after they found store of them, the Island changed his name, and was called Topazium: which testimony of this Heathen Historiographer is somewhat confirmed by the words of Job, Non aequabitur ei Topazius Aethiopiae; Hebr. Phitdah cush. The Topaze is a Gemme (as the Naturalists describe it) in the day time between a green and yellow, but in the night of a fiery color, which well resembleth the fiery rage of Simeon, the second son of Jacob, whose name was engraven in it.

3 The third stone is an Emrald, in the Chaldee is Smaragden, in the Arabic Zamrad, in Greek 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in Latin Smaragdus, in Hebrew 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 derived from Baraq, signifying to lighten, because this stone resembleth lightning out of a thick cloud; or, as Buxtorfius affirmeth, à fulgore, from the luster of it, which more delighteth the eye than the splendor of any other precious stones, because it is a perfect green stone, and doth not dazzle the eye as others, but comforteth it rather. Borrhaeus writeth of it, that it is a great cooler and preserver of chastity: he reporteth also (I know not how truly) that being worn upon the finger of an unclean person, in flagrante crimine fractus legitur, it brake suddenly, as a Venice glass with poison. Which may put us in mind, as of the special act of Levi (whose name was engraven in this stone) mentioned in revenging his sisters rape upon the Shechemites, so in general of chastity, of all men best becoming the Levites. Moreover, in that an Emrald glass-like representeth the shape of all things before it, and therefore Nero, as Pliny writeth, beheld all Pageants and Fencers prizes through his Emrald, we may take occasion to remember St. Peters exhortation to Pastors, who are the Levites of the Gospel, to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , samplars to their flock, and in their lives to represent the perfect shapes of all virtues.

4 The fourth stone, according to Junius, is a Chrysoprasus or Chrysolite, in Hebrew Nophek, from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to blow or breathe, because, as Rueus writeth, this Gemme hath a singular virtue in helping the breathing parts, and curing those that are short breathed; but the Radicals in 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are not the same with those in Naphach; in the one the last Radicall is Cheth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in the other it is Caph 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and therefore I rather render the word with the Geneva Translatours, and Josephus, and Munster, the Carbuncle; because the Seventy render it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and St. Jerome, excellently learned in the Hebrew, Carbunculus. This Gemme is of a red color, glowing like a coal, with a streake of milk drawn circle-wise about it, (as the expert Naturalists describe it) which well agreeth with that we read of Judah, whose name was engraven in this stone; He washeth his garments in the blood of the grape, his eyes shall be red with wine, and his teeth white with milk. Moreover, it is prophesied of Judah, that he should give the law to his brethren, and make them take up and bear his yoke: and Rueus observeth out of Aristotle, concerning the Carbuncle, quod solus possit figuram suam aliis Gemmis imprimere, that the Carbuncle alone, if he be put by other precious stones, imprints his color and form in them.

5. The fifth stone is a Sapphire, which retains his name for ought appeareth in all languages, in Latin Saphirus, in Greek 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , in Hebrew 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , to number or write, because this gemme is the aptest of any to be engraven on; and it is a tradition amongst the Jews, that the stones in which God wrote the Commandments were Sapphires. The Sapphires of the richest kind are of an azure color, like that Serpent to which Dan is compared (whose name was engraven in this stone) Dan shall be a Serpent by the way, a Snake by the path. Dioscorides saith, the Sapphire is a special cordial, which may have some reference to the haughty courage of Dan: of whom it is also prophesied, Dan shall judge his people. And in the vision of Ezekiel, The likeness of the Throne of judgment is said to be as the appearance of a Sapphire stone.

6. The sixth stone, according to the author of the vulgar Latin, which all Papists hold for authentical, is Jaspis, the Jasper stone; but this is an apparent error: for it is confessed on all sides, that in all the four ranks the stones were several, as likewise were the twelve Patriarchs, whose names were engraven in them: but the Jasper is the last stone in the fourth row, in the Hebrew Jasphe: Therefore the third stone in the second row cannot be the Jasper. What stone then was it? in all probability the Diamond, as the Seventy and Josephus render it, and Ibn Ezra and Buxtorfius prove it from the Hebrew etymology, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the word in the Hebrew signifieth a stone that is stronger than all other, and will break them in pieces. In this stone was the name of Naphthali written, who was so named by Rachel, because she got the upper hand of her sister: With great wrestlings have I wrestled with my sister, and I have prevailed, and she called his name Naphthali. Moreover, we read a prophesy in the land of Naphthali, that the people which sat in darkness should see a great light, which was fulfilled in our Savior's preaching there: now what fitter jewel in the world to prefigure and show forth this wonderful great light than the Diamond, which is incomparably the brightest of all precious stones?

Thus I might parallel the twelve stones, and the twelve Patriarchs; but to avoid saciety, and meet with your expectation, I leave that task, and observe only for the present, that the names of the twelve Patriarchs, which were engraven at large in these jewels shining on the breast-plate of Aaron, were engraven again in a lesser character in the two Onyx stones on his shoulder; which is both a warrant for, and an emblem of my present work, which must be a repetition and contraction of those precious doctrines, which before you saw expressed by the four Preachers in divers methods and stiles, as it were in divers rouse, with the point of divers Diamonds. It is very probable also, that the self same stones, as Saint Jerome observeth, decked the crown of the King of Tyre, and are laid in the foundation of the heavenly Jerusalem: which may teach us, that precious doctrines and observations, like so many jewels, may be again and again presented to your spiritual view. Were I to vindicate this exercise from the often repeated cavells against repetitions, I would answer them as Martial doth those who carped at him for handling the same subject twice, and falling upon like conceits:

Lascivos leporum cursus, lususque leonum,
Quod major nobis charta minorque gerit:
Et bis idem facimus: nimium si, Stella, videtur
Hoc tibi; bis leporem tu quoque pone mihi.
But to you, my beloved and much reverenced brethren, I allege for my apology the example not only of the Gentiles at Antiochia, who besought the Apostles to preach unto them the same words the next Sabbath: and of Saint Paul, whom it grieved not to write to the Philippians the same things: but also of our Savior Christ, who in his prayer repeated the third time the same words; and John 17. often quavereth upon that sweet close, I in them, and they in me; and, that they may be one, as thou and I are one. It is not once plowing, but the often breaking up of the earth which maketh it fruitful; nor is it the incident, but the reflected beam of the Sun that giveth the greatest heat: in which consideration, they who have performed this great task before me, might receive great warmth of comfort, because the light of heavenly doctrine incident upon their memories, like the beams of the Sun upon glass or other polite bodies, were reverberated from them per radium reflexum, and thereby received greater virtue: but now the same cast back from my fluid and waterish memory per radium refractum, cannot but lose much of their light and grace. The brighter the color is, the more duskie the shadow must needs be; the perfecter the discourse, the more imperfect and difficult the epitomy: for in all such the thronging the parts is the wronging the whole, and contraction can be no better than detraction. Had these learned Sermons been like Vines, that run into many superfluous stemmes, I might conceive some hope by pruning them, to effect that for which Saint Jerome commendeth the Athenian Orators, Ut eloquentiae torcularia, non verborum pampinis, sed sensuum quasi uvarum expressionibus redundarent: but these were rather like the rouse of precious stones in my Text. Now concerning such, the rule of the Jewellers is, If there be any grain, cloud, or specke in a gemme, which cannot be ground out without sensible abating the stone, not to meddle with it, because the loss in the matter being so precious, cannot be recompensed with any beauty that art can give.

The first of them, for the fair blossoms of eloquence in it, and the Authors flourishing style, deserveth the name of terra florida in America.

The second, for the happy plenty of all things in it, the name of the fortunatae Insulae.

Reddit ubi cererem tellus inarata quotannis,
& imputata floret usque vinea:
Germinat, & nunquam fallentis terms olivae,
suamque pulla ficus ornat arborem.
Or rather of Tocape in Pliny, wherein under a fair palm tree you may see an olive, under an olive a fig-tree, under a fig-tree a vine, under a vine corn, under corn all manner of wholesome herbs, all growing in one year; so that if as it was demanded of Porus, how he would be dealt withal, it were of me how I would have an argument handled in a Sermon; my answer should be the same with that Indian king Porus, Regio more; in eo enim insunt omnia.

The third I know no better country to compare unto, than terra de Labradorâ in the west Indies, in regard of the accurate and elaborate composition.

The fourth may be fitly termed Promontorium bonae spei, not so much in respect of the hopeful parts of the speaker, as the subject of his discourse, which was the promise of our Savior, I will ease you. This indeed is Caput bonae spei, the only Cape of good hope.

If these allusions seem defective, and not so apposite; as before I searched the land, so now I will the sea for fitter, and the fittest of all seem to me to be these four seas:

  • 1. Rubrum,
  • 2. Orientale.
  • 3. Mediterraneum.
  • 4. Pacificum.

The first, because it ran all upon the bloody passion of our Savior, I liken to the read sea.

The second I compare to the orientall Ocean, not only in respect of the immensity of matter in it, depth of the authors judgment, and rare pearls of wit and art; but especially, because

Extulit Oceano caput aureus igniferum sol.
because out of this Eastern Ocean we saw the Sun of righteousness, Christ Jesus arising.

The third, because it interveyned between the former & the latter sea, and passed through the whole continent in a manner of Divinity, I call the Mediterranean or mid-land sea.

The fourth, for the equal current of it, but especially for the subject and matter, resembleth mare del zur, commonly called Pacificum: for his whole discourse tended to this, that though the life of a Christian be a sea, yet that it is so calmed by Christ's promise, I will ease you, that to every child of God in the end it proves mare pacificum. My peace I give unto you, be not troubled, nor fear; Et si vultis accipere, these judicious and methodical Sermons, four in number, are the four rouse in Aaron's breast-plate of judgment, the jewels are their precious doctrines, the imbossments of gold, in which these jewels were set, were their texts of Scripture: Sed ubi spiritualis tabernaculi Bezaliel, qui pretiosas divini dogmatis gemmas exculperet fideliter, adornaret sapienter, adjiceret gratiam, splendorem, venustatem? I know not how it comes to pass, that as sometimes in Israel, though there were much metal, yet no Smith; so at this time in this famous University, though we have store of jewels, yet there is none who will profess himself in this kind a Jeweller. If the true reason hereof be the difficulty & danger of this work, wherein we fish as it were with a golden hook, Cujus jactura nullâ piscium capturâ compensari potest: then have all sorts of auditors great reason favourably to interpret their best endeavors, who for their sake not only undertake so great a task, but hazard so great a loss. If the Rehearser acquit himself never so well, what can he expect for all his pains but the bare commendation of a good memory? but if he fail, not only his memory, but his judgment and discretion also are called in question. In which consideration, when authority first laid hands on me, I drew back with all my might, till the command for repeating being repeated again and again, in the end the power of authority more prevailed with me, than the sense of mine own infirmity; Adamas ferrum à magnete tractum ad se rapit vehementiùs, though the iron, as Agricola observeth, is drawn powerfully by the load-stone; yet if a diamond be in place, the load-stone loseth his force.

Artificial memory, as Cornificius saith, consisteth of images and places. We need not go far for them, we have them both in my Text, places, Ver. 17. Thou shalt set it full of places for stones; & images most resplendent in the Verses following: and very happy were I, if as here I have the names, so I had the natural effects attributed to some of these jewels: for,

  • 1. The Agat keepeth a man moist, saith Dioscorides.
  • 2. The Beril sharpeneth the wit, saith Ystella.
  • 3. The Carbuncle infuseth spirits, saith Barraeus.
  • 4. The Chrysolite helpeth the breathing parts, saith Rueus.
  • 5. The Emrald is good for the sight and memory, saith Vincentius.
  • 6. The Onyx strengtheneth the whole body, saith Albertus.
  • 7. The Sapphire freeth a man from wrath and envy, saith Tostatus.
but I persuade myself, that many of these authors, when they wrote these things, had an Amethyst on their fingers, the last jewel in the third row, in Hebrew called המלחא, from מלח. Amethystus lapis pretiosus, sic dictus, quod gestantibus eum somnia inducit, and therefore leaving such incredulous relations to Rabbinical and Philosophical legends, in a warrantable
Scripture phrase I will pray to Almighty God, to touch my tongue with a coal mentioned by the Prophet Isaiah, which S. Jerome interpreteth a Carbuncle, that I may enflame the hearts of this great assembly with a zeal of his glory, and both now, & whensoever I am to speak to the edification of his people; so to furnish me with materials, and assist me in laying them, that upon the true foundation Christ Jesus, I may build not hay and stubble, but gold, silver, and precious stones, such as shine in my Text; which I divide according to the four rouse into four parts.

THE FIRST ROW.

And in the first row a Ruby, a Topaze, and an Emrald.

WHether the Ruby fit not the modesty of the Speaker; the Topaze, quae sola gemmarum limam sentit, his limate and polished style; the Emrald the fresh and green verdour of his sentences, I leave to your learned censures: sure I am, the green and ruddy stones, some of them generated in the red sea, lively set forth the green wounds and bloody passion of the worlds Redeemer, the subject of his discourse. The Ruby hath a perfect color of flesh, whence it is called in Latin Carneolus; but with a luster and resplendency far above the nature of flesh. What fitter emblem of the rays of divine majesty shining in the flesh of our Savior? which was the argument of the Preachers first part. This Ruby nubeculâ quâdam offundebatur (as the natural) to wit, in his passion, and then changed color, and resembled the other two gems, death displaying its colors in his flesh, which he suffered to pay the wages of sin for us; which was the scope of his latter observations. The imbossment of gold, in which these gems of divine doctrine were set, was his Text taken out of


JOHN 11.50.

It is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people.

BEhold, I bring you a prophesy, but of no Prophet; I present you lying malice speaking truth, unwittingly, unwillingly, and savage cruelty providing a salve to cure the wounds of all mankind. Out of one fountain bitter and sweet, out of one field tares and wheat, out of one mouth proceeds cursing and blessing. Behold an ambitious simoniacall Priest of the Roman constitution, and that but for a year, vaunt over him that is a Priest forever after the order of Melchizedek. Behold bloody Caiaphas consulting, nay determining to put Christ to death, not for any fault of his, but because it was profitable to the Priests (it is expedient for us): yet doth he color his blood-thirsty appetite with a varnish of common good: If we let him alone, all men will believe in him, and believing him to be a God, will advance him to be a King, & the Romans will come & take away this place and our Nation. He is but one man, what is the blood of one man to the quiet of a public state? Melius est ut pereat unus, quàm unitas, let one man die, that the whole Nation perish not. This is Caiaphas his meaning: vouchsafe we a look to it, before we consider the meaning of a much better spirit. Solomon his Lily is most beautiful among thorns. The Rose, says Plutarch, is never so fragrant, as when it is planted by the Nettle: the doctrine of the Holy Ghost seemeth never more excellent, than when it is compared with the doctrine of Devils. It is expedient he should die, he saith not it is just or lawful: Bonum commodis non honestate metitur. Caiaphas profit is become the rule of justice; in whose hands now it is not only to judge according to the rule of law, but to over-rule the law also. In imitation of whom I verily think it was, that Clemens the fifth being demanded how the Templer Knights might be cut off, made this answer, Si non licet per viam justitiae, licet saltem per viam expedientiae.

But if it be profitable, to whom, cui bono? to whom is it so? to us: now he speaks like himself. To S. Paul all things were lawful, yet many things did not seem expedient: to Caiaphas that is expedient which is not lawful. But shall a just innocent man, a Prophet, nay more than he that was more than a Prophet, lose his life for nothing but your commodity? the answer is, that though he be all these, yet in a manner he is but unus, one man, and we are many; better it were that he suffer a mischief, than we an inconvenience; therefore be his quality what it may be, let him die.

Ne saevi magne Sacerdos:
Let not the high Priest be angry; will nothing but his death appease you? You have a guard, keep him sure, manacle his hands, fetter his feet, only spare his life, bring not his blood upon your head. Tush, it is for our profit, His blood be upon us. Thus crudelitas vertitur in voluptatem, & jam occidere hominem juvat, it was meat & drink to them to spill the blood of Christ Jesus; and being pleased to consider him but as a man, they trampled on him as a worm and no man. Behold here in another sense Caiaphas a bloody Ruby; yet, as the Rubies about Egypt aureâ bracteâ sublinuntur, so hath he gold foil Scripture in his mouth, the words of the Holy Ghost, who not only out of the mouth of babes and sucklings will have his praise, out of the mouth of asses and brute beasts will have his power to be known; but also out of the mouth of reprobates and incarnate devils will have the same truth in the same words confirmed, which holy Prophets, and the holy Spirit, by which they spake, would have revealed. For not only holy men (as the Preacher observed) but sometimes also unholy men speak as they are moved by the Holy Ghost: Agit Spiritus Dei, & per bonos, & per malos, & per scientes, & per nescientes quod agendum novit, & statuit; but in a different manner. The Holy Ghost so touched the hearts of holy Prophets, that their hearts enditing this matter of Christ's passion, their tongues became the pen of ready writers: but on the contrary, as Caiaphas did honor God with his lips, while his heart was far from him; so (saith Saint Chrysostom ) the Spirit of God touched his lips, but came not near his heart. (It is expedient.) In the exposition of Caiaphas, the meaning is, it is good for us pretending common good, to kill Jesus; but the sense of the Holy Ghost is, that the precious death of our Savior would be expedient for us, and his alone blood once shed for his people an all-sufficient ransom for their souls.

Expedient it was, and behoovefull in the first place, that he who should satisfy for sin (the wages whereof is death) should be a man subject to death. Secondly, that he should die. Thirdly, inasmuch as with respect to his people he became a man subject to death; so that he should in the end lay down his life for the people. Fourthly, that he should be sufficient by his alone death to satisfy in their behalf, for whom he died. Lastly, we must inquire whether the profit of his passion be such as extendeth to ourselves, or not; we shall find it doth: for so are the words of the Text, It is expedient for us.

Expedient it was that the Savior of man should be a man, Ecce homo, behold he is so: for coming to save man, suscepit naturam quam judicavit salvandam, he became in all things, sin only excepted, like unto us. It was fit it should be so; for if the Deity had opposed it self, non tam ratio quàm potestas Diabolum vicisset, what mystery had there been for God to vanquish the Devil? how should the Scripture have been fulfilled, The seed of the woman shall break the Serpents head? yet there is an experiment beyond all this,

Experiar Deus hic discrimine aperto an sit mortalis,
saith the spiritual Lycaon; if he carry about with him 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , a body subject to dissolution, doubtless he is a man. Thus therefore that he might show himself a man, it was expedient that he should die. Is this thy reward, O sweet Savior, for stouping thine infinite majesty so low as to become earth, and thirty three years to converse amongst us, must thou die? It must be so, yet not for any necessity of justice in respect of himself; for never Lamb more innocent: nor of constraint; for at the very time of his apprehension, when he had less than twelve Apostles, he had more than twelve Legions of Angels at his beck; at the breath of his mouth, the majesty of his countenance, the force of those his words, I am he, a whole troupe of his persecutors fell backwards: but it must be so, because the determination of the Trinity, and the conformity of his own will thereunto will have it so: Oblatus est quia voluit (saith the Prophet:) I lay down my life (saith himself:) Yea, Caiaphas said as much in effect, It is meet, not that one should be put to death, but that he should die: Mori infirmitatis est, sic mori virtutis infinitae. There wanted not other means to redeem man, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , it was meet, that by the death of the Son of God we should be redeemed:
Sanguine quaerendi reditus animâque litandum.
No escaping the stroke of the Angel, but by sprinkling the Lambes life blood: no means to return from exile, till the death of the high Priest. Must he die then? and are the Scriptures so strait in this point? O death, how bitter is thy remembrance? witness our Savior: Si fieri potest, transeat hic calix; but since for the reasons before named that was neither possible nor expedient, since die he must, what death doth the Holy Ghost think to be most expedient? If he may not yield to nature, as a ripe apple falleth from the tree, but must be plucked thence, there are deaths no less honorable than violent: shall he die an honorable death? No, he must be reckoned among the malefactors, and die a shameful death. In shameful deaths there is a kind of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , rid him quickly out of his pain: Misericordiae genus est cito occidere. No, that was not expedient, Feri ut se sentiat mori, it was expedient that he should die a tedious and most painful death, wherein a tract of lingering misery and lasting torment was to be endured: What death is that? I need not amplify; even by the testimony of the Holy Ghost the death of the Cross was for the torture most grievous, for the shame most infamous: He humbled himself, and became obedient unto death. Could his humility go on one step further? Yes, one step, even to the death of the Cross, that is a death beyond death; the utmost and highest of all punishments, saith Ulpian: Having in it the extent of torture, saith Apuleius: The quintessence of cruelty, saith the Roman Orator. It is not amiss to know the manner of the execution of this death. First, after sentence given, the prisoner was whipped, then forced to carry his Cross to the place of execution, there in the most tender and sinewie parts of the body nailed to the Cross, then lifted up into the air, there with cruel mercy for a long while preserved alive; after all this, when cruelty was satisfied with blood, for the close of all, his joints were broken, and his soul beat out of his body. This was part of his pain; I say part, I cannot express the whole, the shame was much more: Infoelix Lignum, saith Seneca truly, and unhappy: for until this time the curse of God was upon him that was hanged. It is a trespass to bind, 'tis wickedness to beat, it is murder to kill: Quid dicam in crucem tollere? Look we to the original, it was first devised by Tarquinius, as the most infamous punishment of all, against such as laid violent hands upon themselves. Look we to the use of it, they accounted it a slaves, nay a dogs death; for in memory that the Dog slept when the Geese defended the Capitol, every year in great solemnity they carried a Goose in triumph, softly laid upon a rich carpet, and a Dog hanging upon a cross. Look we to the concomitancy, Non solent suspensi lugeri, saith the Civilian, no tear was wont to be shed for such as were crucified. And was it expedient that our Savior should die this death? It was expedient, that the prophesy of Isaiah might be verified, We saw him made as the basest of men; and of David, A scorn of men, and the outcast of the people; and of himself, They shall deliver him to the Gentiles, to mock, scourge, and crucify him. These were prophesies that it should be so; yet we want a prophesy that saith, It is expedient: That we do not, Oportet filium hominis exaltari, ut Moses extulit Serpentem; for that Serpent, lifted up to cure all that looked upon it, was an emblem of Christ. Thus himself, who was a high Priest forever, did prophesy of himself, being now both priest and sacrifice. It was expedient that he should die, & thus die: to be forsaken of his friends, falsely accused by his enemies, to be sold like a slave, mocked like a fool, spit upon like a made man, whipt like a thief, crucified like a traitor; make up a misery, that the sun shamed, the earth trembled to behold it: yet it was expedient, it must be done, God hath said it. Mee thinks, I hear our Savior say in this baptism of blood, as he said in his baptism of water, Thus it becometh us to fulfill all righteousness, and thus it became him, for whom, & by whom are all things, to consecrate the Prince of our salvation through afflictions. The prophesies had said it, it should be so, and it was expedient that he to whom they pointed should fulfill them, that so in fullness of truth he might take his leave of the cross, and say, Consummatum est, those things which were written of me have an end.

All this while we see not the reason why he should be thus tormented: Go to Pilate, his answer will be, I am innocent of the blood of this man: Enquire you of the Scribes and Pharisees, their answer will be, We have a law, and by this law he must die, because he made himself the Son of God. This was no fault, he was so, and therefore without robbery or blasphemy might both think and declare himself to be so. Go we further, from popular Pilate and the cruel Jews to God himself, and though we be but dust and ashes, for the knowledge of this truth presume we to ask, Cur fecisti filio sic? How may it stand with thy justice that he should die, in whom there was found no fault worthy death, nay no fault at all? the unswer is, Expedit mori pro populo: yet, O Lord, wilt thou slay the righteous with the wicked? nay, which is more, wilt thou slay the righteous, and spare the wicked? nay, which is yet more, wilt thou slay the righteous for the wicked? shall not the Judge of all the world do right? God cannot choose but do right, the wages of sin is death; though he have not sinned, the people have. If the principal debtor cannot pay, the surety must; if the prisoner dare not appear, the baile must: Christ was the surety, the baile of the people, and so God might permit his justice against sin, to take hold on him, and he must die for the people, if he will not have the people die.

It being known that he died for the people, it is worth the while to know who these people were, for whom he died. Caiaphas had respect to the Jews only, and their temporal good; but the Holy Ghost intended the spiritual good of the Jews primarily, though not of them alone: but of the people also through the world. But is it possible, that of all people he should die for the Jews? Ab ipsis, & pro ipsis? these were they that spit upon him, whipped him, smote him on the face, crowned him with thorns, tare him with nails; these were they, who in the act of his bitter passion, when his soul bereft of all comfort, laden with the sin of all the world, and fierceness of his Fathers wrath, enforced from him that speech, than which the world never heard a more lamentable, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? then instead of comfort they reviled him, If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross, all this notwithstanding though they persecuted him, he loved them; though they cried Away with him, he died for them, & at his death prayed for them: Father, forgive, and pleaded for them, they know not what they do; and wept for them, offering supplications in their behalf with prayers & strong cries. Greater love than this can no man show, to lay down his life for his friend: yet thou, O blessed Savior, art a pattern of greater love, laying down thy life for this people whilst they were thine enemies; but not for this people only, (the Holy Ghost so speaks) O Lord, we were thine enemies as well as they, and whilst we were thine enemies, we were reconciled to God the Father by the precious death of thee his Son. For the Scripture setteth forth his love to us, that whilst we were yet sinners he died for us.

He for us, alone for us all: the same spirit which set before him expedit mori, did sweeten the brim of that sour cup with this promise, that when he should make his soul an offering for sin, he should see his seed: that as the whole earth was planted, so it might be redeemed by one blood; as by one offense condemnation seized upon all, so by the justification of one, the benefit might redound unto all to the justification of life. And this blood thirsty Caiaphas unwittingly intimated, saying, Expedit unum mori pro populo.

If one, and he then dead could do thus much, what can he not do now, now that he liveth forever? He trod the wine-press alone, neither is there salvation in any other. S. Stephen was stoned, S. Paul beheaded, Nunquid pro nobis? No, it cost more than so, it is done to their hands, there is one, who by the oblation of himself alone once offered, hath made a perfect and sufficient sacrifice for the sins of the whole world.

And that whilst it is a world: for our Savior, that stood in the gap betwixt God's wrath & us, catching the blow in his own body, hath by his blood purchased an eternal redemption; everyone that believeth in him shall not perish, but have life everlasting. In the number of which believers if we be, then is the fruit of his meritorious passion extended to us, we may challenge our interest therein; and in our persons the Prophet speaketh, He bare our infirmities and carried our sorrows, he was wounded for our transgressions, the chastisement of our peace was upon him, and by his stripes are we healed.

Which great benefit, as it is our bounden duty to remember at all times, so this time, this day Vivaciorem animi sensum, & puriorem mentis exigit intuitum, recursus temporis, & textus lectionis, as S. Leo speaketh, The annual recourse of the day, and this text fitted to it, calleth to our mind the work wrought, & the means by which it was wrought on this day: to him a day of wrath, of darkness, of blackness, & heavy vengeance; but to us a good day, a good Friday, a day of deliverance & freedom, a day of jubilee and triumph. For as on this day by the power of his Cross were we delivered from the sting of sin, and tyranny of Satan, so that whereas we might forever have sung that mournful Elegy, O wretched men that we are, who shall deliver us from death & hell? we are now enabled to insult over both, O death, where is thy sting? O hell, where is thy victory? Which victory of our Savior, and ours through him so dearly purchased, when we call to mind, let us consider withal, that as the cause of this conflict on his part was his love to us; so on our parts it was the heinousness of our sin, not otherwise to be expiated than by his death. And as the first ought to raise us up to give annual, daily, & continual thanks to him, who did and suffered so much for us; so the second should withhold us, & keep us back from sin: that since our Savior died for our sin, we should die to sin, & rather die than sin. This blood once shed is good to us; Expedit nobis, if to faith in that blood we join a life beseeming Christianity: but if by our crying sins & trespasses we crucify him again, we make even that blood, which of it self speaketh for us better things than the blood of Abel, instead of pardon to cry for vengeance against us.

Let us therefore look up to him the author and finisher of our salvation, beseeching him, who with the blood of his passion clave rocks & stones asunder, with the same blood, which is not yet nor ever will be dry, to mollify and soften our hard hearts, that seriously considering the heinousness of our sins, which put him to death, and his inexpressible & inconceivable love, that for us he would die the death, even the death of the Cross; we may in token of our thankfulness endeavor to offer up our souls and bodies as a reasonable sacrifice to him that offered himself a sacrifice for us, and now sitteth at the right hand of God; to this end, that where he our Redeemer is, there we his people and dearest purchase may be forever.

THE SECOND ROW.

And in the second row thou shalt set a Carbuncle, a Sapphire, and a Diamond.

THat the second Speaker, that sweet singer of Israel, whose ditty was, Awake, & sing ye that sleep in dust, made (according to my Text) a row, or Canticum graduum, a Psalm of ascents or degrees, I cannot but even in a duty of thankfulness acknowledge, for the help of memory I received from it: had not he made a row, that is, digested & disposed his matter in excellent order, I should never have been able to present to you the jewels set in this row, which are all (as you see) most orient. Of all red stones the Carbuncle, of all blew the Sapphire, of all simply the Diamond hath been ever held in highest esteem: Maximum in rebus humanis pretium adamas habet, non tantum inter gemmas. Carbunculus (saith S. Jerome) videtur mihi sermo doctrinae, qui fugato error tenebrarum illuminate corda credentium, hic est quem unus de Seraphim tulit farcipe comprehensum ad Esayae labra purganda. Whether this second Preacher (in S. Paul's phrase a Prophet) his tongue were not touched with such a coal, I refer myself to your hearts and consciences, Nonne ardebat cor vestrûm in vobis, cùm exponeret vobis Scripturas? The second jewel was a Sapphire, according to the Hebrew derivation from Sepher, a book, wherein we may read both the doctrine and graces of the second Speaker:

Hic lapis (ut perhibent) educit corpore vinctos,
saith Vincentius; and was not his doctrine a Jail-delivery of all deaths prisoners? It is a constant tradition among the Rabbins, that the tables of stone, wherein the ten Commandments were written with the finger of God, were of Sapphire. For although Pliny affirmeth, that the Sapphire is a stone altogether unfit for sculpture, yet this can be no just exception against this tradition, since the engraving of the ten Commandments was done by the finger of God above nature. Moreover, it is clear out of this Text, that the name of one of the Patriarchs was written in the Sapphire. Such a Sapphire was the second Speaker, having the Laws of God imprinted in his heart. The third jewel is a Diamond, in Hebrew called Jahalom, because it breaketh all other stones; in Greek Adamas, that is, unconquerable, because it can neither be broken by the hammer, nor consumed in the fire: nay, the fire (saith Zenocrates ) hath not so much power as to stain the color, much less impeach the substance of this stone. Call to mind among the virtues of a Magistrate, conspicuous in this divine Orator, his unconquerable courage & unstained integrity, and the comparison is already made. Pliny reporteth, Adamantem sideritem alio Adamante perforari: think you not, that if a man could have a heart as hard as the Adamant, this Adamant, pointed with sacred eloquence, could break it and make it contrite? Lastly, Pliny addeth, that the Diamond is a sovereign remedy against poison, Et ideo regibus charissimus, iisque paucis cognitus, in high esteem with Princes: if, as our gracious Sovereign hath, so all Christian Princes had such Diamonds as this; if such Preachers were their ear-rings, they should be free from the danger of all poisoned and heretical doctrine.

If as the stones placed in the second row agree with the gifts of the Speaker, so they sort as well with the doctrines of his Text, I am sure you will all say, that this second order of stones is not out of order. A most remarkable story of the Carbuncle we have, that cast in the fire among live coals, it seemeth to have no grace in it; but quench the other coals with water, & it shineth more gloriously in the ashes than ever before: so our Savior in the brunt of his passion, while he was heat by the fire-brands of hell, Scribes & Pharisees, Jews & Romans, seemed to be dead, and lose all his color & beauty, nay, was indeed dead according to his human nature (his soul being severed from his body:) but after the consummation of his passion, and the extinction of the fiery rage of his persecutors with his blood, in his resurrection he shown himself a most glorious Carbuncle, shining in majesty, & burning in love. After his resurrection, in the day of his ascension, he taketh possession of his throne in heaven, which, in Ezekiel is said to be like a Sapphire stone, & now sitting at the right hand of God the Father, having conquered sin, death, & hell, & made all his enemies his footstool, he is become the only true orient Diamond in the world: whether you take the name from the Greek ἄδαμασ, ab & δαμαω, or the Hebrew םלהי from םלה, being invincible himself, and overcoming all adverse power, breaking his obstinate enemies in pieces, like a potters vessel, with a rod of iron.

The embossment of gold, in which these gems of divine doctrine were set, was his Text taken out of


ESAY 26.19.

Thy dead men shall live together, with my body shall they rise: awake and sing ye that dwell in dust; for the dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth shall cast up her dead.

IT would ask the labor of an hour to settle this one only member, I find such a Babel of tongues at odds about so few words. Whereas we read terra projiciet, or ejiciet, the earth shall cast up or bring forth, as it doth her herbs and winter prisoners, Junius hath, Dejecisti in terram, Castalio, terram demoliris, the Seventy, Terra cadet, S. Jerome, Dejicies in terram, the Chaldee paraphrase, Trades in infernum: and for mortuos, in Hebrew Rephaim, from a word signifying to cure, per antiphrasin the Seventy read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , the wicked or ungodly; S. Jerome, Gigantes, stout and robustious against God. But to set you in a right and inoffensive way, I reduce almost an infinity of distractions to two heads. For all of them either speak of the resurrection of the dead indefinitely, which they do that say, Terra ejiciet, to wit, postquam in terram dejecisti. For the earth cannot cast up that it hath not: and, Manium terram demoliris; or of the destruction of the wicked, one only species of the dead, which the Seventy call impios, others Giants, mighty to transgress; both senses, as the Northern and Southern rivers running from contrary points meet in the Ocean; so these from sundry and discrepant conceits run into one common place of the general resurrection, save that the latter add a strain to the former of God's vengeance, and wrath prepared for the wicked.

Thus having set the letters of my Text together, & accorded the words, it remaineth that their scope and intent be freed from question. There is not one of the learned Scribes, old or new, Jew or Christian, whose spirit and pen hath not fallen upon one of these two senses (viz.) that the Prophet either speaketh of the resurrection of the dead at the last day, or of the restitution and enlargement of the people from their present straights: in which (say they) calamity is a kind of death, captivity as the grave, God's people as the seed in the ground, God's grace and favor as the comfortable dew, to revive and restore them to their wonted being. Of these two companies some go after the literal gramatical sense, lending not so much as the cast of their eye toward the allegory, as Strigelius, Clarius, Brenz: Others on the other side of the bank standing for the shadowed resurrection, are not so peremptory; but si quis aliter sentire mavult, per me liber hoc faciat: and Calvin himself in his commentary lays out as it were a lot, as well for the true as the typical resurrection: Falluntur Christiani, qui ad extremum judicium restringunt, Prophetatotum Christi regnum ab initio ad finem usque complectitur. Aquinas equally joineth them both; Hìc est propositio resurrectionis, vel corporalis in die novissimo, vel à miseriâ captivitatis. To conclude then, as in the 37. chapter of Ezekiel the resurrection of the dead is brought in as an argument by God himself, to ascertain the people of their delivery from thralldom; an argument à majore ad minus: Can he raise and revive the dead? and can he not much more restore the distressed? yet I will be bold to say, that the proper resurrection of the dead, without the veil of a metaphor in the hardest construction that can be made of the words, is either the scope of the Prophet, or his proof, his intent or his argument, his main and principal conclusion, or his strongest principle to demonstrate his conclusion. And M r . Gwalther giveth a good reason why all other comforts are sealed up with this doctrine and promise of the universal resurrection, Quod nulla alia sit certa & solida consolatio, because all other calms are temporary, flux and mutable, from which there are recidivations and relapses into subsequent storms. By this time I am secure, that no mist of an allegory can so trouble or dim your eyes, but that you clearly behold in the true glass of my Text a fair and undoubted image of the resurrection of the dead; which being the proper subject of this feast, I hope I have sufficiently warranted the choice of my theme, and so I proceed to the explication.

Thy dead shall live, with my body shall they rise, awake and sing, &c. Ye see how many members there are in the body of my Text; yet in resolution and in issue they are all but one: It is a totum similare. As the whole water of the sea is but water, and yet every drop of the sea is water too; so the whole bulk and shock of my Text is the resurrection, and yet every part and parcel thereof is the resurrection also: for mark the words,

Vivent, resurgent, evigilabunt, cantabunt, germinabunt, projicientur. mortui, cadaver, pulvis, habitatores pulveris, herbae, inferi seu manes.
What is this in the whole composition, what in every limb & joint apari, but the ecchoing and resounding from one to the other the doctrine of the resurrection?

To omit (besides all these which have their tabernacle in the sun, and are evident and apert professions thereof) many secret & mineral arguments couched in the bowels and bosom of my Text, which shall be extracted in their due time. Bees are not so like Bees, but that there are individual differences between them; neither are the members of my Text so like, but that they may be distinguished. Thus then by way of objection and answer you may perceive their distinction and order, as also the main scope to which they tend.

Doth any object, Nihil est post mortem, death is an utter extinction? It is answered, not so: for thy dead shall live. Doth he go on and say, they may live in their spirits, which never die; but what for their bodies? It is answered, With my body shall they rise. Rise, do you say? but by what authority? what shall be the instrument and means thereof? The shrill sound of the last Trump awaking them out of their sleep, and the voice of God, Awake ye that dwell in dust. Awake they may and rise, but to no less wretchedness and misery than before: Answer, They shall awake and sing; it shall be a triumphant and joyful resurrection. Yea, but show us any sign thereof, and we will believe it: Answer, Thy dew is the dew of herbs; nature hath printed this truth in every garden thou walkest in. Lastly, if they say the earth hath devoured our bodies, how shall we then arise? It is answered, Terra projiciet, the earth shall be driven to disgorge and cast them up again.

There are degrees and ascents in my Text: 1. Vivent may be in soul; but 2. Resurgent must be in body. 3. Evigilabunt may be to sorrow; but 4. Cantabunt must be to joy. 5. Ros herbarum is but a light from nature; but 6. Terra projiciet is an act of irrisistible compulsory power. The first is the fundamental proposition, and showeth the entity, what is and shall be, Vivent mortui. The second is exposition, and showeth the manner, Resurgent. The third is confirmation, and showeth the efficiency, Evigilabunt. The fourth is congratulation, and showeth the quality, Cantabunt. The fifth is illustration, and showeth the probability, Ros herbarum. The sixth and last is conclusion, and showeth the necessity, Terra projiciet. There is a time of gathering, and a time of scattering. These six, either members or remarkable points and joints of my Text, hitherto severed, since the Prophet hath construed together, I will reduce to three combinations, and so handle them. The

  • 1. Vivent and resurgent.
  • 2. Evigilate and cantate.
  • 3. Ros tuus and terra projiciet.

The first combination or conjugation is Vivent and Resurgent. There is a difference between them; the former is partial & incomplete, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were alive (as is proved by our Savior's argument: Deus non est Deus mortuorum, sed viventium ) when their bodies were not living; the latter is total and absolute, and addeth the life of the body to the life of the soul. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is of that whereof before there was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 they shall live therefore & rise, but who? Mortui, the dead; the dead is the common genus & sagena, that comprehends all sorts good and bad: Moritur pariter doctus & indoctus, in hoc tertio we all agree. In the first and archetypall world, when one man was as nine men, had nine men's ages, yet the end & period of all their acts is, Et mortuus est: and whatsoever the chronicles of the Kings of Judah and Israel omit besides, they omit not this, Et dormivit cum patribus. Death is that Syncope or Elision, that cutteth not out letters or leaves, but lives; and which not Grammar, but nature shall cause us to understand:

—Mors ultima linea rerum,
our whole life being but linea circumducta rediens ad idem punctum, à pulvere ad pulverem, the assured period and full point after all other points, pawses, sections and intersections, changes and vicissitudes of this mortal life: after all our eatings and drinkings the symbolum or shot that must be paid, the center, to which our corruptible body, which presseth down the soul, doth by its weight and proneness forcibly tend.

Mortui. Consider once for all the subject of this clause, and all the proposition, & how it climbeth; first mortui: secondly, cadaver: thirdly, pulvis: fourthly, habitatores pulveris: fifthly, inferi and manes; free Denizons among the dead, such as might say to corruption, thou art our father; and to worms & dust, ye are our brothers and sisters. Yet these dead carcasses, carrion, dust, inveterate dust, netherlanders, shall live and rise: Non obstat potentiae Dei diuturna putredo, walk but a pace or two backward, ye shall find a negative to this affirmative, the dead shall not live. Is there yea and nay in the Holy Ghost? Yea, and both true. For elucidation whereof take the rule of Brenz in his Nominibus, meum & tuum ita est tota vis concionis: Thy dead shall rise, that is, the Lord's dead, either mortui propter Dominum, as Martyrs; or in Domino, as all believers; or quorum tota vita martyrium, whether they live or die they are the Lord's: Interfecti mei in some readings, in the genuine cadaver meum, the dead being, or which are my body, and then by collection, as Junius well observeth, cadavera mea quoque, all the bodies of my Saints, which are as it were mine, because they belong to my mystical body. Now then when it was said Mortui non resurgent, Mortui was put simply, and without addition, as Hyperius saith: but in these propositions mortui vivent, cadaver resurget, you have a specifical difference, not omnes mortui, but tui, that is, God's: cadaver, non omne, sed meum, that is, Christ's: opposite whereunto are mortui Satanae, & cadaver Antichristi. Hence cometh that seeming antilogie, or contradictio linguarum, strife of tongues, Resurgent, non resurgent, they shall, they shall not rise. But shall not all live, and rise again? Doubtless they shall, the righteous in a right and real acception: their life is a life indeed, vital, immortal, Angelical, nourished at the tree and fountain of life, animated and perpetuated from the Lord of life, and they rise as the morning Sun fairer and fairer, to a glorious, joyful, incorruptible, and celestial resurrection. Non sic impii, non sic, they live, or rather die a death, and that the second, and that second a thousand fold; or rather they live a life, a term without term, of being and not being, corrupting and not ceasing, burning and not consuming: Ignis eorum non interit, they shall never be able to extinguish their fire, nor their fire them; absumit ut servet, servat ut cruciet, the Salamanders of hell fire are kept in torment and vexation for evermore: and they rise, ut lapsu graviore ruant; as Jezebel was mounted to the window to be cast down to the dogs: as Herod to his throne, for a more woeful and spectable ruin: as Lucifer, or rather Tenebrifer (as Bernard calleth him) to the side of the mountain, for a more astonishable confusion. Our Savior knits up both in two words: Some shall rise to the resurrection of life, there is the true vivent & resurgent; some to the resurrection of condemnation, there is the opposite.

The second combination is Evigilate & cantate: ye shall observe in this and divers other passages in this Prophet divers interlocutions, prosopopeia's, and changing of persons. First, here the Prophet speaketh to God, or God to Christ, Thy dead shall live: Secondly, Christ to his Father, With my body shall they rise: Thirdly, here is God's apostrophe to the dead, Awake and sing: Fourthly, the answer of the dead to God, Ros tuus, that is, quem tu irrorasti; or God's apostrophe to his Church, Ros tuus, id est, qui super te cadet, O Ecclesia mea: Last of all, as it were the chorus and consent of all, Terra projiciet.

Awake and sing are God's alarm to the dead; habitatores pulveris, the household and meniall to dust. Now what voice, but the voice of God shall I say, like a Trumpet, or the roaring of a Lion, or the sound of many waters, or a clap or crack of thunder (all come too short) were able to inform and actuate dust and rubble to audience? Loquor ad Dominum might they say with Abraham, cùm sim pulvis & cinis? Howsoever pulvis & cinis in synthesi may do it, I am sure pulvis & cinis in analysi cannot. We attempt not to rouse up those that are in a dead sleep without loud cries, but is any man so mad as to spend his voice, though a stentorian, and rend his throat against deaf rocks? Behold, God doth more than this by that powerful instrument of his glorious Word, that gladius delphicus, that is more than Moses rod, wherewith he wrought wonders: more than Jacob's staff, wherewith he prospered: more than Judah's scepter, wherewith he governed: more than Joseph's cup, wherewith he divined: I say, by that powerful instrument, by which he said Fiant to heaven and earth, and they were created; Effata to deaf ears, and they were opened: Tace to the raging of the sea, and it was stilled: Obmutesce to the crying Devil, & he was silenced: Exi foras to the dead carcasses, & they came forth; by that doth he say to these dead and moultred in the earth, Awake and sing.

Awake: but with what eyes to behold the light of heaven? when the windows of their bodies have been long since shut down, their crystal glasses of nature broken, their seers sunk into the holes of their head, clay dwelleth in their tabernacles, and rottenness in their circles, and the scorn of the Idol in Baruch is fallen upon them, They cannot wipe the dust from their eyes.

And sing. How shall they sing in a strange land? what be their instruments to sing to? where is their living harp, and well tuned cymbal? is it hung upon the willows of Babylon, or rather tied to the roof of their mouth? where are their songs of praise and thanksgiving, which they sang in the land of the living?

—Olim ego longas
Cantando memini solitum consumere noctes;
Nunc oblita mihi tot carmina.
We are now laid in the land of forgetfulness, we have taken up and made our beds in the dark, our mouth is filled with gravel, and the slime of the pit sticketh in our throats: all this notwithstanding, they that are in their tombs & graves shall hear the voice of the Son of man, & earth, earth, earth in Jeremy winnowed and boulted by death into the smallest dust, shall be effigiated and shaped anew into living men; Et ex his vermiculis & pulvere, saith Saint Bernard, instaurabuntur muri coelistis Jerusalem.

Before I end this second combination, I remember that I noted unto you two things: first, the efficiency in the exuscitation, Awake; where forget not in the mean while to reserve for a latter meditation, that death by the phrase of my Text is a sleep: secondly, the quality; for since they are willed to sing, that imports a joyful resurrection: Musica in luctu importuna, and it must be a most joyful resurrection, when such as shall partake thereof not only 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (so the Seventy) but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (Aquilas) and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (Symmachus) and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 (Theodotian.) Agreeable hereunto is that of our Savior, Lift up your heads, for your redemption draweth nigh. And here once more to the wicked we send libellum repudii: Non est vobis pars, ne{que} sors, ye may not consort with us in our blessed harmony, the voices of Ashdod and Canaan cannot tune together: to you belongeth, plangent tribus terrae, & tribulabitur ibi fortis, your singing shall be turned to sighing, your Tabrets & Shaumes into everlasting beatings and hammerings on the anviles of your breast, your showting into howling and yelling, your clapping of hands into gnashing of teeth, your praising into blaspheming & cursing, & all your rejoicing shall be as the mourning of Hadradrimmon in the valley of Megiddo; yea much more than of Hadradrimmon, because in the valley of Hinnon, is the lake and furnace of endless disconsolation. This Prophet shall conclude, Behold my servants shall rejoice, and ye shall be ashamed: my servants shall sing for joy of heart, and ye shall cry for sorrow, and howl for vexation of mind.

The third combination is, Ros tuus & terra projiciet, which giveth a double proof of the former doctrine: the one as it were of course, nature and common sense teacheth; the other of force, the creature must and shall accomplish it. Terra projiciet, that is, saith Rabbie David, Thou (O God) shalt command it. The learned in their Commentaries distinguish these proofs by a discrepancy of words, Elicere proper to the dew, and projicere fatal to the earth: the dew gently allureth, and calleth forth the herbs; so doth the Word & Spirit of God sweetly and easily bring up (may I say) these embryo's of death. But say that the earth withhold them, opposing her locks and bars, and pleading perhaps the prescription of hundreds or thousands of years, there is then place for projiciet, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , angry and impatient though she be, reddet, non sua, she must cast them up, as the stomach a surfeit, and a woman an abortive fruit. See how God hath furnished us with all sorts of arguments: if Liber foederis will not serve, we may read in the book of nature, or rather Bibliotheca librorum, described with a text hand, in fair and capital letters, the resurrection of the dead. Interroga jumenta, saith Job: Interroga olera, saith my Prophet: Considera Lilia agri, saith our Savior: look into the fields, or sit still in your gardens, everyone under his own vine, and behold the growth of the plants and flowers, how after the cold of Winter, when the deadness of the year had blotted and blurred as it were the face of the earth, and the print of nature seemeth to be quite razed out; yet (as Isaiah speaketh of the Oak and Elm) there is a substance in them, and by the comfort of the vernall sun-shine, and fatness of the clouds dropping on them, they garnish and cover the earth again, as with the carpets of Egypt, and clothe it as with a Josephs coat, with all the variety of colors nature can invent. Nature is full of such demonstrations; I could bring you a band of creatures to strengthen this point. The bird of Arabia that riseth out of her own ashes, the insecta animalia that spend the Winter season in a shadow of death, the seed that lieth and dieth in the earth, our sleepings and awakings, nights and days, winters and summers, autumnes and springs; but I leave them all, and cleave to the resemblance in my Text, Thy dew is as the dew of herbs; but when this dew and soft distillation is too weak to work this effect, God hath a torrent and flood to do it: Terra ejiciet, & contermina terrae, the sea that is married to the earth & lieth in her arms & bosom. He shall say to the sea, Give; and to the earth, Restore, and all creatures in them, and in all the world besides that have devoured and swallowed the flesh of his chosen, when that day cometh, shall find that they have eaten morsels like asps, and drank a draught of deadly poison, too strong and hard of digestion for their over weak stomachs. I end with the words of this Prophet, chapt. 66. Quis audivit unquam tale? quis vidit huic simile? nunquid parturiet terra in die unâ? & tota gens parietur simul? at this day it shall be so.

Saphirus aureis punctis collucet, the best kind of Sapphire, saith the Naturalist, hath something like points of gold in it: Such were these we now handled; give me leave to use the Speakers phrase, though not in his sense, spare me to recapitulate, or rather from recapitulation: for what have I done else all this while?

Mee thinks the six parts of this Text are like the six cities of refuge, to which those that had slain, shall I say? nay, rather those that are slain may fly, to save shall I say? nay, but to recover and restore their lives: and they are all like the wheels in Ezekiel's vision, Rota in rotâ: or as the celestial Spheres one in the other, all moving alike to the same purpose: all striving for an Article of faith, one of the twelve flowers in the garland of our Creed, one of the twelve stones in the foundation of the holy City. I remember in the inheritance of Judah, among the rest there fell to their share sex civitates, & villae earum. Is there any such a desert so barren, so hopeless, so waste, as death and the grave, desertion of life and being, when milk forsaketh the breasts, marrow the bones, blood the veins, spirit the arteries, and the soul the body? yet when you are brought to this desert of deserts, you shall find sex civitates, & villas earum, six main and eminent proofs of the resurrection, with as many less, like suburbs, granges, and appertinent villages. For first, Mortui vivent is a main argument, grounded upon the Word and Promise, like civitas; but mortui tui is civitas & villa, a main with an appendant argument drawn from the propriety that God hath in us. Secondly, Cadaver resurget is civitas, but cadaver meum is civitas & villa, a main argument, with an appendant drawn from the society between the head & the members: he that raised Christ shall quicken us. Thirdly, Awake & sing are civitates, main arguments drawn from the command & power of God, who saith, Return ye sons of Adam, and they return; but that the nature of the phrase should import a sleep, & no death, no privation of speech, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 pythagoricam, for a while, till God loosen the strings of the tongue, and put breath into the organ again, these are civitates & villae earum. Yet further, by Montanus his collection, pulvis & habitatores pulveris are villae, appendant arguments, the one from the matter of our creation, when we are at the worst we are but dust, from which our creation was, and why may not from thence our recreation be? the other from the term of our abode, habitatio; which (saith he) is not of those that take up their mansion or long home, but of sojourners and factors, who continue for a while in foreign countries till they have dispatched their affairs. Add lastly to all these the map of the whole earth, in every leaf of grass describing the truth of this doctrine:

—inscripti nomine vitae
nascuntur flores—
with those insufferable passions, pangs, and angariations, which the common mother to us all is put unto, till she be rid of us, as the Whale of Jonas.

A word of application, and it shall be the explication, which some very learned Expositors give upon cadaver meum. We have hitherto taken it to be the word of Christ to his Father; they say rather it is the word of the Prophet to his brethren, as if in effect he had said, I preach to you no other doctrine than that I believe myself: I teach that the dead shall live, and I am assured that with my body shall they rise. In which sense it is a parallel to that Magna Charta, that great and memorable record which Job transmitteth to all posterity, I know my Redeemer liveth, and I myself shall see him with these eyes, and no other; concionantur profani homines, the fashion of these worldly men is to prate of the life of the righteous, as Balaam of their death, like men in a trance, without sense or affection after it. The food of the soul is unto them as Barzillai his bodily food was unto him, they eat it without any appetite or relish: (Hath thy servant any taste in that he eateth, saith he to David?) and the comforts of the Gospel to them as music to him: (Can I hear the voice of singing men or women?) They behold Canaan from the Mount, and the goodness of God afar off: my meaning is, they can talk of cadavera aliorum, but mind not, or at least hope not for cadaver meum: Odi sapientem qui sibi non sapit; qui sibi nequam, cui bonus? Nequam, saith Saint Bernard, is as much as nequaquam: all that this man knoweth or doth is as much as nothing, since it availeth not himself; his case is like that of Tantalus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , as Plato saith, who hath apples at his lips, and water at his chin, and yet pines for want. O unhappy man, go to the prodigal child, he came to his father with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , and to that child of the world, who came to our Savior, Magister, dic fratri ut dividat mecum haereditatem, that is, suffer not a goodly inheritance of a joyful resurrection to be taken away by the violent, but thrust thou in for thy part among them, and when they shall say, corpora nostra, our bodies shall rise, say thou with a fiducial faith, cadaver meum, so shall my body rise: and let everyone that heareth me this day say with the Prophet, Remember me, O Lord, with the favor of thy people, and visit me with thy salvation, that I may see the felicity of thy chosen, and rejoice in the joy of thy people, and glory with thine inheritance.

THE THIRD ROW.

And in the third row a Turkeys, an Agate, and an Amethyst.

FEw there are but know the Turkeys, tanquam ungues digitosque suos, wearing it usually in the pale of their rings. An excellent property it is said to have of changing color with the sick party that weareth it, and thereby expressing a kind of sympathy. Rueus a great Lapidary avers upon his own knowledge as much: I was acquainted (saith he) with a man whose Turkeys suddenly upon his death changed color, and fell in the price. The Agate is a gemme of divers colors, spots and lines, the concourse whereof is sometimes so happy, that it representeth the lineaments of men, beasts, and other natural bodies:

Nunc formas rerum dans, nunc simulachra deorum.
Of all, that of Pyrrhus was held by him in greatest estimation, of others in admiration, wherein the lines and spots were so drawn by nature, that Apollo with the nine Muses and their several instruments were conspicuous in it. As for the Amethyst, it is a gemme of a middle color, between wine and violets, so named either because applied to the navel it is a remedy against drunkenness, ab 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 steretico & 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or (as saith Pliny) quod ad vini colorem accedens priusquam degustet in violam desinat. Of this third rank of stones this may suffice for the application to the third Speaker, and his doctrine: himself, touching the infirmities of the Clergy & Laity, so feelingly resembled the Turkeys, which the Jewelists make the emblem of compassion. His Sermon, for the variety of good learning in it, was a curious Agat, & most like that of Pyrrhus above mentioned, wherein the nine Muses were portrayed: the parts thereof were like the Amethyst, parti-coloured, partly like wine, partly like violets: like wine in his matter of confutation, strong and searching; like violets in his exhortation, sweet and comfortable. His description of Christ's bloody death was like wine, the blood of the grape; but of the resurrection like violets, the first-fruits of the Spring.

The embossment of gold, wherein these gems of divine doctrine were set, was his Text taken out of


APOC. 1.18.

I am he that liveth and was dead, and behold I am alive for evermore, Amen, and have the keys of hell and of death.

THese words are a parcel of that book, the reading whereof the ancient Church esteemed so profitable and needful, that they enjoined all upon pain of excommunication to read it once a year, between Easter and Whitsuntide: Qui eam à Paschate ad Pentecosten non legerit, excommunicationis sententiam habeat. The words of my Text in special are verba pronuntiata verbi annuntiati, the words spoken of the word fore-spoken, the Son of God, who is so careful not to break the bruised reed, that he seeketh to expectorate all fear out of the minds of all true believers by the force of many arguments.

The first is drawn à potentiâ Dei, I am the Creator and Judge of your persecutors; therefore fear them not.

The second à praerogativâ Christi, I am the first and the last, and will take notice of everyone that hath been unjustly put to death, and make inquisition of blood, from the blood of the righteous Abel, to the blood of the last Martyr that shall be shed upon the earth, and will require it of them that have spilled it. I am the first: for, in principio erat Verbum; and I am the last, novissimus Adam, manifested in novissimis diebus, to come in novissimâ tubâ, and take account of novissimus quadrans; I am he that liveth, &c.

Here omitting the vain glosses and collections of some, who turn an history into a mystery, and apply ridiculously S. Johns falling before Christ's feet, mentioned Ver. 17. to the kissing of the Popes Pantofle; and the description Primus & novissimus, the first and the last, to a Prelate or Pastor, who ought to be primus ad laborem, novissimus ad requiem, first at his labor, and last at his ease; I take these words with Saint Augustine to be Symbolum abbreviatum, wherein we are to observe,

  • 1. The death:
  • 2. The resurrection of Christ,
    • 1. Prefaced with a note of attention, Behold.
    • 2. Sealed with a note of certainty, Amen.
  • 3. The fruits and issue of both,
    • 1. In us,
      • 1. Freedom from death.
      • 2. Assurance of life.
    • 2. In him, the power of the keys,
      • 1. Authoritative.
      • 2. Possessive, I have.

I am alive, and I was dead. Et quando vixisti, bone Jesu? when didst thou live, sweet Jesu? from the time thou leftest thy Fathers bosom, and satest on thy mothers knee, jam extunc dura pati coepisti, saith Saint Bernard. Many a time have they fought against me from my youth up may Israel, nay, the God of Israel say. And this some will have to be signified in the phrase, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , I was made dead, not struck down at one blow; that might have been a favor: Quid dabis ut uno ictu mortem afferam filio? but he was put to a tedious and lingering death: [Doctr. 1] Nay, Saint Gregory saith, Tota vita Christi crux fuit. The Son of God humbled himself; that is not enough, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , he emptied himself, made himself of no reputation, and became Homo, & in homine infra hominem: nam flagellari ingenui non est, to be scourged is no ingenuous punishment. But it may be the shame was lessened, because of his Crown: What Crown, I pray you? thorns platted upon his temples? O Regem, O Diadema, O King, O Crown, saith Bernard: See, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, behold King Solomon with the Crown wherewith his mother the Synagogue crowned him. But the worst is behind, he is condemned to die: Why, what hath he done? Is he a disturber of the peace, who being scarce borne gave peace to all the world, who himself is the Prince of peace, and his word the Gospel of peace, and his messengers the Angels of peace, and his mandate the same with that of Theodosius to Demophilus: Si tu pacem fugis, ego te ab Ecclesiâ meâ fugere mando, If thou flyest peace, I command thee to get thee packing out of my Kingdom? Did he blaspheme, because he said, I am the Son of God? Si opera Dei facit, quid prohibit Filium Dei appellari? Was he against the tradition of the Elders? only against such as annihilated the Law of God, against such upon whom the name of blasphemy is written: such as are those of the Church of Rome. Traditio multis partibus superat Scripturas, saith Costerus: and Salvâ Ecclesiae tradition, non multùm refert etiamsi Scripturae aboleantur. Was he a malefactor, of whom all the people witnessed, Recte omnia fecit? All this notwithstanding he is condemned to die, and to that death which the Holy Ghost speaks not of without a gradation; Mortem autem crucis: nor the Heathen Orator without a Quid dicam in crucem tollere? Yet all this is but Joseph his coat torn with the teeth of wild beasts: Vasculum Anaxarchi, non Anaxarchus. We hear of the outward man in agone, not the inward man in agoniâ. I dare not set the pains of the damned, God's wrath, and Christ's body in a balance; Crux Christi statera est, saith Saint Bernard. I like in such points rather a Divine of the temper of the Lacedaemonians, In ea quibus fidit vix ingredientem, than an Athenian, Supra vires audacem, liable to Archidamus his check, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Aut add viribus, aut adime animo.

[Use 1] Is it so (Beloved?) was Christ dead indeed? here seemeth to be matter for them that are without, to scoff at Christian Religion: Hominem colitis, hominem Palaestinum & crucifixum adoratis pro Deo: and, Deus vester patibulo affixus est, say the Heathen, Ye worship a God who was put to death and crucified. We do so, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , nay, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , it was necessary and expedient that he should so die: If the wheat corn die not in the earth, it abideth alone; but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit: Gratias ago tritico quod sic mori voluit & multiplicari. We say with Tertullian, Quod Deo indignum est, nobis expedit: with Saint Jerome, Injuria Domini nostra gloria: and conclude with Saint Ambrose, Quanto major injuria, tanto major ei debetur gratia.

[Use 2] Was Christ dead? then was our old man crucified in him, and we are dead to sin: how then shall we live therein? I have put off my clothes, saith the Spouse, how should I put them on? I have washed my feet, how should I defile them? To lay down our sins, or put them off is not sufficient, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , they must be mortified: and this is that death which Saint Leo saith is precious in the sight of God, cùm occiditur homo non terminatione sensuum, sed fine vitiorum.

Behold, I am alive for evermore. Of the divers significations of Ecce two serve for our purpose; Ecce insultationis, and Ecce consolationis: Ecce insultationis, as behold he cometh with the clouds, &c. Ecce consolationis, as behold the stone that the builders refused is become the head of the corner. So here for the terror of Infidels and Persecutors of Christ's Church, and for the comfort of the faithful an Ecce is prefixed: Behold, he that was dead is alive. Behold the sweet flower of Jesse withered and defaced in his Passion, but re-flourishing again in his resurrection, and in him is the blooming and springing of all that love his Name.

I am alive. Other doctrine, saith Tertullian, Christ preached per semetipsum; but this of the resurrection in semetipso. Alive forever. The Scripture speaketh of some that rose mortui, sed morituri. Christ so rose, ut nunquam cadere adjiciat, being risen from the dead he dieth no more, death hath no more power over him. Amen is a note of certainty, like Selah in the Psalms, which (as a seal) is put by the finger of the Holy Ghost to the words of that God, who is Deus Amen, and whose promises are Yea and Amen.

[Doctr. 2] From this Amen and the former Ecce we are taught, That the Holy Ghost laboreth to secure us and confirm us in the certainty of the doctrine of the resurrection, knowing it to be the faith and patience of the Saints: Fiducia Christianorum resurrectio mortuorum, saith Tertullian. If our hope were in this life only, we were of all men most miserable, saith Saint Paul. And the rather doth the Spirit ascertain this doctrine, because it hath many enemies, Atheists, Libertines, and sundry sorts of Heretics besides. The Atheist thinketh there is no resurrection, because he seeth no reason for it: to whom, though it were sufficient to answer with Gregory, Fides non habet meritum, ubi ratio humana praebet experimentum; and with Saint Ambrose, Credimus piscatoribus, non dialecticis: yet to reason a little with these unreasonable men in the words of Saint Paul, Why seemeth it incredible unto you, that Christ should raise the dead? Is it not as easy to restore life, as to give it at the first? to raise man out of ashes, as to create him at first out of the dust? Considera autorem, & tolle dubitationem, saith Saint Augustine. The Libertine would have no resurrection, that he might still enjoy the pleasures of sin, and sacrifice to his belly: but for him there is first a Text of counsel, Awake to live righteously; and if that will not serve, a Text of judgment, Whose end is damnation, whose god is their belly. Of Heretics that professedly oppugned the doctrine of the resurrection, some taught that there is no resurrection at all, as the Sadducees; some that the resurrection was already past, as Hymineus and Philetus. Satan is a subtle Serpent, and turneth divers ways to get in his head. Before Christ's death he worked powerfully in the children of disobedience; in Judas to betray him, in the Pharisees to accuse him, in Pilate to condemn him: but after knowing that the time was come, that the Prince of the world was to be cast out by the death of Christ, he was much troubled, and labored by all means to hinder Christ's Passion: Utinam ne in nemore Pelio, he wisheth there were no wood in all the world to make a Cross of: he works remorse in Judas, giveth him a halter to hang himself: he employs Pilate's wife to send to her husband, to have nothing to do with him. When he was fast nailed to the Cross, he setteth the Jews upon him, to see whether they could persuade him to descend from thence. After this he spreads abroad a rumour, that Simon Cyreneus was crucified for him, or if he were crucified, that it was but in appearance only, and that he was falsâ pendens in cruce Laureolus: and when his resurrection was so palpable, that it needed no other argument than the amazement of the watch, and Pilate's letter to the Emperor, he suborned a desperate rout to swear, that his Disciples stole him away by night. After all this he stirred up certain Heretics, who taught, that albeit Christ were indeed risen, yet that we were not to expect any future resurrection, because the resurrection was past already. But all these shall find, that there is a resurrection for them, to wit, Resurrectio ad condemnationem.

[Use 1] Is it so, that Christ our head is risen? then shall we his members rise also. For he is primogenitus mortuorum, & primitiae dormientium: the first fruits are carried already into the celestial barn, and the whole crop shall follow. And this may be a staff of comfort to all drooping and fainting souls, ut tali exemplo animati, sub ictu passionis, as Cyprian speaketh, non retrahant pedem, that they draw not back, but courageously go on forward to make a good profession, as being secure, Christi milites, non perimi sed coronari, & bonam mortem esse quae vitam non perimit, sed adimit ad tempus, restituendam in tempore, duraturam sine tempore. This was Jobs comfort, I know my Redeemer liveth: and of other distressed ones, who would not be delivered that they might be partakers of a better resurrection. An ancient father giveth these words for a Christians Motto: Fero, taceo, spero; Fero meam crucem, ut ill suam: taceo, quia tu, Domine, fecisti: spero, quia utique fructus erit justo.

[Use 2] Is Christ risen from the dead? then we that are his, are risen with him, at least in the first resurrection: if therefore ye are risen with Christ, seek the things that are above, where Christ sitteth at the right hand of his Father.

This indeed ought to be so, but we find it otherwise; never more preaching of the resurrection, and never less fruit. For all seek their own, and none the things that are Jesus Christ's. So that Bernard's observation fitteth our time: Vides omnem Ecclesiasticum zelum fervere pro solâ dignitate tuendâ, honori totum datur, sanctitati nihil: and again, all men learned and unlearned press to Ecclesiastical cures, Tanquam sine curis quique victuri sint, cùm ad curas pervenerint. The Apostle telleth us, Qui Episcopatum desiderat, bonum opus desiderat: non dignitatem, saith Saint Jerome, sed laborem: non delicias, sed solicitudinem: non crescere fastidiis, sed decrescere humilitate: Nay, not only opus, but onus also in Saint Bernard's judgment, though perhaps some Atlas's may think they never have load enough. But are the Laity more excusable, who buy and sell the poor for shoes and gay apparel, and strong drink? to whom (me thinks) I hear the poor cry, Et vos vanitate peritis, & nos spoliis perimitis. How many are there of them, who engross the Lord's portion, and bestow hallowed things upon worse than vanity? We have a saying against them also out of the same Saint Bernard: De patrimonio crucis Christi non facitis codices in Ecclesiâ, sed pascitis pellices in thalamis; adornatis equos, phalerantes pectora, capita deaurantes. Is this our resurrection from sin? Saint Paul giveth this lesson with a memento, Remember, saith he, O Timothy, that Christ is raised from the dead. It is a truth as stable as the poles of Heaven, that we shall have no part of the second resurrection to the life of glory, if we have not a good part in the first to the life of grace.

And I have the keys of Death and of Hell. They are well called keys of Hell, because there are Inferorum portae mentioned in the sixteenth chapter of Saint Matthew: 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . There are many opinions about these keys; some will have them to be two, Clavis cognitionis, and Clavis authoritatis: but Allensis and the Schoolmen deny knowledge to be a key, except in an improper speech, Quia requiritur ad usum clavis; and they do well to deny it: for what key of knowledge had that Priest, of whom the Master of the Sentences maketh mention, who baptized in nomine Patria, Filia, & Spiritua sancta? Bonaventure ingenuously confesseth, Quidam in Ecclesiâ habent clavem, quidam claviculam, quidam nullam. Neither do they stand much upon it; for another of them saith, Dicit Doctor meus, & citat divum Thomam, quod quando Apostoli erant ordinati, Sacerdotes erant sine scientiâ. Yet Bernard in his Epistle ad Eugenium maketh knowledge one of the keys, Claves vestras qui sanùm sapiunt, alteram in discretione, alteram in potestate collocant. [Doctr. 3] The most received opinion of the reformed Churches is, That there is but one key in essence, and that is Ministerium Verbi. The Kingdom of God is compared to a house, the door of this house is Christ, the key to open and shut this door is the preaching of the Word: We are the savor of death unto death unto some, there is the power of binding; to others of life unto life, there is the power of loosing. He that refuseth me, the word which I have spoken shall judge him, there is the power of binding; again, The truth shall make you free, there is loosing. But how many soever the keys be, Christ hath them, Non solùm authoritative, sed etiam possessive. What meaneth then Bellarmine in his books de Romano Pontifice to imply, that the keys remain in Christ's hands only at the vacancy of the Popedom? What a blasphemy is that of Cusanus, who saith, that potestas ligandi & solvendi non minor est in Ecclesiâ, quàm fuit in Christo? and that of Maldonatus, Christus Petro vices suas tradidit, ipsamque clavem excellentiae, that key of David, which openeth, and no man shutteth? Or if he have not this key so absolutely as Christ, yet beyond all comparison above other Bishops; they have the keys of Heaven, sed quodam modo, and with an huc usque licet. Whereupon Petrus de palude observeth, that it was said of them, Quaecunque solveritis in terrâ, erunt soluta in coelo: but of Saint Peter, Brunt soluta in coelis. Pardon, I beseech you, the enlargement of this point; Blasphemiae dies haec est, Rabsakeh hath blasphemed the living God. The Pharisees and Scribes accounted it blasphemy to attribute forgiveness of sins to any but God. I am he that blotteth out thine iniquity, saith God by the Prophet Isaiah: Whereupon Saint Jerome commenting, saith, Solus peccata dimittit, qui pro peccatis mortuus est: and Saint Augustine accordeth with him, Nemo tollit peccata, nisi solus Deus; tollit autem dimittendo quae facta sunt, adjuvando ne fiant, & perducendo ad locum ubi fieri non possunt. What then doth the Minister upon confession and contrition? He pronounceth the penitent absolved; or to attribute the most unto him, he absolveth the person in facie Ecclesiae, remitteth not the sin absolutely before God. Saint Ambrose shall make up the reckoning: Verbum Dei dimittit peccata: Sacerdos est Judex, Sacerdos officium exhibet, sed nullius potestatis jura exercet.

[Use 1] 1. Hath Christ the keys of death and hell? O then let us kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and so we perish out of the right way.

[ 2] 2. Hath Christ the keys of hell and death? if then we belong to Christ, and follow his banner, let us not care what death or hell, man or devil can do against us:

Transvectus vada Tartari,
Pacatis redit inferis.
Jam nullus superest timor,
Nil ultrà jacet inferos.
Jesus of Nazareth is returned from hell, not as Theseus and Hercules, with a Cross and a Flagge; but with principalities and powers chained before his triumphant chariot: he doth not now threaten death, as before, O mors, ero tua mors; but insulteth over it: O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? Thanks be unto God, who hath given us victory, through Jesus Christ our Lord. Cui, &c.

THE FOURTH ROW.

And in the fourth row a Chrysolite, an Onyx, and a Jasper.

A Jasper is a mixed stone, consisting at least of two kinds of gems; and therefore may not unfitly decipher our Savior, consisting of two natures, who by inviting all to come unto him, animi constantiam promovet, comforteth fainting spirits; which (as Rueus saith) is the virtue of the Chrysolite: after his invitation promising to secure and rest all burdened and weary souls, he proveth himself an Onyx, wherewith (as Nile saith) the Nobles of Egypt made supporters for their beds. If we admit the Beryl into this fourth rank, because it is mentioned with the rest in the Apocalypse, and set here in the first place by Saint Jerome, Junius, Tostatus, and the Kings Translatours, we shall lose nothing by the change: for the Beryl (as Abulensis and others affirm) is of singu ••• ertue to cure waterish and running eyes. True it very well may be in the stone, but true I am sure i 〈◊〉 •• e doctrine, which this stone (according to his rank and my ••• her division) standeth for. This promise of our Savior, I will ease you, is the only Beryl in the world, which can stay the water of their running eyes, who weep for, and sigh under the heavy burden of sin. Ye see this fourth order is not out of order, but sorteth well with the doctrine of the fourth Speaker; and doth it not as well sort with the parts of the Preacher? The Chrysolite is a solid stone, not spangled or spotted with golden points, as other gems, but as it were gilt all over; which may well represent the solidity of his proofs, and uniformity of his whole discourse. The Onyx, a transparent gemme, resembleth the perspicuity of his style; and the Jasper, a stone full of veins, setteth before us the plenty of Scripture sentences, which (like little veins) were diffused through the whole body of his Sermon; and in respect of these we may more truly say of it, than To status of the Jasper, Quot venae, tot virtutes, so many veins, so many virtues.

The embossment of gold, wherein these gems of divine doctrine were set, was his Text, taken out of


MATTH. 11.28.

Come unto me all ye that are weary and heavy laden, and I will ease you.

MAn at the first was made a goodly creature, in the image of his Maker, having so near neighbourhood with the eternal Majesty, that he dwelt in God, and God in him: but by his woeful revolt he deprived himself of that sweet contentment he still should have enjoyed in God, and by his proud rebellion erected a Babel and partition wall, whereby he debarred himself of the fruition of him, whom to behold is the height of all that good, any creature can desire. But man's Creator retaining his love to that which he had made, though altogether blemished with that which we had done, looked down upon us with a compassionate eye of his tender mercy, suffered us not (being desirous of the means of salvation) with bootless travels still to wander in darkness, as strangers from the life of God: but sent from his bosom his word of truth, light into darkness, who in the fullness of time offered by the light of his countenance to bring us again to God's inaccessible brightness, and by the veil of his flesh not only to shelter us from the scorching flames of his Fathers fury (as the pillar of cloud did the Israelites from the heat of the Sun) but also by soliciting our peace, to demolish that partition wall which we had raised against ourselves, and to reunite us again inseparably to him, from whom we had rent and dissevered ourselves, crying in the midst of you as you hear, Come unto me, &c. The voice of God, and not of man, or rather of the eternal wisdom, which was God and man.

In these words, which I term Ch •• sts Proclamation of grace and peace to all soul-sick sinners, we may note,

  • 1. An invitation, Come unto me.
  • 2. The reward of our obedience, I will ease you.

In the first part note we,

  • 1. The party inviting, Christ.
  • 2. The thing he adviseth to, Come.
  • 3. The object to whom, Mee.
  • 4. The parties that are envited singled out by their qualities, all that are weary and heavy laden.

In the second part note we,

  • 1. The party promising, I.
  • 2. The reward it self, ease and rest, will ease you.

Here then you see,

  • 1. Love inviting, Come.
  • 2. Truth directing, To me.
  • 3. Necessity inciting, All that are weary.
  • 4. Reward alluring, And I will ease you.
    • 1. Love inviteth, that we fear not to come.
    • 2. Truth directeth, that we err not in coming.
    • 3. Necessity inciteth, that we slack not to come.
    • 4. Reward sustaineth, that we faint not in coming.

[Doctr. 1] Come. Venite, fides exigitur, studium desideratur, saith Saint Ambrose. Christ his proselytes life must not be as his confidence in Isaiah, chapt. 30. in ease and quietness: for then Moab-like he will soon settle on his lees, and have his taste remaining in him, Jerem. 48.11. The Chaldean Sagda (as Solinus reporteth) by the spirit enclosed in it, riseth from the bottom of Euphrates, and so closely sticketh to the boards of the ships that pass that river, that without slivering of some part of the bark it cannot be severed; so sin by the power of the evil spirit arising from the bottomless pit of perdition, adhereth so fast to us, that till our brittle Barkes of flesh be slivered off, this Sagda of sin, can never be removed, but like Dejanira's poisoned shirt,

—Qua trahitur, trahit illa cutem.
And therefore this sore travel God hath allotted to all the sons of Adam, from the first time they become new borne babes in Christ, till they breath out their languishing souls into the hands of their Redeemer, to wrestle with their inbred corruptions, and to seek to shake off the sin which hangeth on so fast; that howsoever it cannot be altogether dis-severed before we are dissolved; yet it may not be a Remora to our ships, much less get such strength as to over-rule us. Howbeit, because the flesh is weak, where the spirit is most ready, and the spirit it self is not so ready as it should be, because the faculties thereof through the malignity of sin are much imbezelled, God spareth not by frequent Scriptures to stir us up to go on, and traverse the way of his commandments: some to rouse us up from sleep, as, Awake thou that sleepest, and stand up from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light. Some to incite us to go on forward when we are raised, as, Follow peace and holiness, without which no man shall see God. Some to encourage us that we faint not, as, Be not weary of well doing: for in due time ye shall reap if ye faint not. Once indeed it was said to the Israelites, Stand still, and behold the salvation of God: but now, Come, behold, and stand not still, if you desire the salvation of God. Now no more sit still, as it was once said to the daughter of Babel; but arise and depart: for here is no resting place. Jacob saw Angels ascending and descending, but none standing or sitting on the ladder. There are many rounds in our Jacob's ladder, whereby we climb to the Mount of God: Non debemus pigri remanere, non debemus superbi cadere, saith Saint Augustine. Paul that honorable vessel of God, though he laid so fast hold on Christ by faith, and was so knit to him by love, that he challengeth all powers in heaven and earth to try if they were able to separate him from the love of his Redeemer (Rom. 8. Ver. 35.) yet reckoning with himself as if he had not comprehended him of whom he was comprehended, he forgot that which was behind, and followed hard to the mark, for the price of the high calling of God in Jesus Christ. So true is that of Saint Bernard, Ubi incipis nolle fieri melior, ibi desinis esse bonus.

[Use 1] Here then let us track out by the footsteps of our spirits motion, how forward we are in the way of the Lord. If the longing desire of our heart be unsatisfied, till we enjoy again our happy communion with God: if when God saith, Seek ye my face, thy soul answer, Thy face, Lord, will I seek: if when Christ soundeth his Venite, thy heart springing for joy resound David's Ecce, Loe I come; and thy spirit so out-strip the slow motions of thy sluggish flesh, that with the Spouse in the Canticles thou desire to be drawn after him; then be thou assured, that this is the finger of God. For no man can come to Christ, but he whom the Father draweth.

[ 2] But contrariwise, if when the World saith, Come, we hearken to it, and for Hippomanes golden balls we refuse to follow Christ: if when the Devil saith, Come, we listen to his lure, and for his omnia tibi dabo, bow to his will: if when the flesh saith, Come, we trudge to it, and for lascivious lulling in Delilah's