PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

A Check to Brittanicus

William Prynne (1600-1669) · 2,923 words · 13 min

The source for this document is https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A91161.0001.001

Project Note

This is licensed under Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND. This license allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

The source of this document is the Early English Books Online (EEBO-TCP) website. Those books were transcribed in a character for character manner and can be very cumbersome to read since there was no standard spelling during that time. Many spelling variations such as "unlesse", "vnlesse", and "vnles" regularly appear.

This project was conceived to clean up those books as much as possible and make them more accessible to the interested reader, leading to the creation of a massive list of variant spellings and their corrections. This was used to clean up the text, but is of course only as complete as the list itself. Because of the nature of the original transcription, some words have missing characters or places where the original language (e.g., Greek) was not transcribed. This effort does not change that. Be aware that the original transcription can also be faulty and in some cases entire sentences may be missing.

Although this is no substitute for a properly compared, proofed, and scholarly edition, I believe that the result is a document which is far more accessible, particularly for searching for terms using standard spelling. The document has been cleaned and presented in what I hope is a pleasing and useful format for the vast majority of Christian brothers and sisters who just want access to read these spiritually nourishing works.

However, a word of warning: The Puritans were a very diverse group of people and their age was characterized with godliness, but also much upheaval, disputation and strife. They disagreed on many doctrines and some of these works contain less orthodox or Scriptural views than others. The reader is strongly advised to read with discernment, particularly if it is unknown whether author is trustworthy.

This project took a huge amount of time and skill to bring to fruition. I would particularly like to thank David Jonescue for the initial list of Puritans he found on EEBO and the concept behind this project as well as the continuous, unceasing efforts toward seeing this complete. Without his labor, this would not be available. Alex Sarrouf was invaluable in providing the initial list of over 7,000 spelling variations he had identified and corrected, as well as continuing to review more than 16,000 additions to that list for any typos.

Logan West
(with David Jonescue and Alex Sarrouf)
www.puritansearch.org

A CHECKE TO BRITTANICUS, FOR HIS Palpable Flattery and Prevarication, in justifying condemned NAT: FIENNES. Published for the present Necessary Vindication of his traduced Judges, Prosecutors, and of Truth and Public Justice, till an exact Relation of all the Proceedings in that Trial be set forth by the Council of War, and his Antagonists for their further justification, and satisfaction of the World, so miserably abused with Mis-reports of that Action, for which he was condemned.


IER. 9. 3.
And they bend their tongues like their Bow for LIES, but they ARE NOT VALIANT for the Truth, upon the Earth; for they proceed from evil, to evil.

ISAIAH 28. 15. 16. 17.

Because ye have said, We have made a Covenant with Death, and with Hell are we at agreement, when the Overflowing scourge shall pass through it shall not come unto us, for we have made Lies our Refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves;

Therefore thus saith the Lord, judgment also will I lay to the line, and righteousness to the plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and the waters shall overflow the hiding place; And your covenant with death shall be disanulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand.

LONDON, Printed by John Dawson for George Hutton, 1644.

A Checke to Brittannicus, for his palpable Flattery, and prevarication in justifying condemned NATH. FIENNES.

W EE are informed that Brittannicus during his last weeks silence, hath been visiting Nath: Fiennes late Governor of Bristol since his condemnation, at the Lord Cottingtons Country House; who now not daring to show his head in London for fear of losing it, and despairing of his own credit, after so many false Relations wherewith he hath deluded the world; instead of giving in an Account of his Receits at Bristol, and craving pardon of the Parliament and Kingdom in a penitent Recantation, and acknowledgement of his former grand disservices to the State, hath bribed Brittannicus, to trumpet forth his unknown eminent deserts, and public virtues to the people; to acquit him from the least imputation of Treachery or Cowardize, in his ignoble surrender of the famous strong City and Castle of Bristol, in less then three days Seige, to the Enemy, upon very dishonorable conditions, without the least necessity, (there being not one Out-Fort taken, nor one shot made against the City or Castle walls) upon the entry only of 150. Enemies within the line, who might have been easily cut off; notwithstanding his many promises, to dispute every inch of ground, to hold out the City, and the Castle to the utmost, and when he could no longer keep it, then to lay his bones therein. For which most unsouldierly & unworthy action, (carrying Cowardize and Treachery in its very Front, were there no other evidences, as there were store produced at the hearing;) he had this ensuing Judgment pronounced against him, by that very Council of War to which himself appealed from the Parliament, after nine days full defense, and seven days deliberation; which will sufficiently proclaim his guilt, and justify his Judges.

29. Decemb. 1643.

Colonel Nath: Fiennes, you have been arraigned and convicted before this honorable Council, for surrendering the Town and Castle of Bristol, with the Forts, Magazine, Arms, Ammanition, Victualls, and other things thereto belonging, and for not having held the same to the utmost extremity, according as to your duty you ought to have done. For which offense, this honorable Council hath adjudged you to be executed according to the tenor of the Article of War, by having your head cut off. God have mercy on your Soul.

Yet Brittannicus (the professed Advocate of this Champion) to the unsufferable slander of his Excellency and that honorable Council (which shown him more Favor, then ever any Malefactor of that nature received, though he hath most ungratefully requited them, in appealing from their sentence, and raising many ignominious reports against their justice) hath now proclaimed it in print (I know not upon what occasion, it being no ways pertinent to his weekly Intelligence;) That neither the Sentence of death, nor his Pardon do in the least impeach him, either of Treachery or Cowardize; and thereupon stiles his pretended Pardon, (of which the Parliament which must grant it, is wholly ignorant) a noble Act of his Excellencies Justice. (Oh strange Iusticiary! whose very Treason, ex condigno, demerits Pardon,) not of his indulgent mercy. Pitty is it, but that he should receive Justice in the highest degree, who esteems his undemerited free Pardon a mere act of Right, not Favor. Were not Nath: Fiennes now grown past grace, as well as shame, (as his strange prevarications, and underhand proceedings in this business apparently discover,) he durst not presume so impudently to justify this his dishonorable action in print, even after judgment passed against him, in such a braving manner, as makes some of his best friends conjecture, he hath already lost the best part of his head (his brains ) since his Judgment; and must even in point of justice lose the residue of it, unless he will so far under-value not only his well-deserving Prosecutors, and the Council of War, whom he causelessly asperseth, but even the High Court of Parliament, and his Excellency, as frantickly to opine, they will all now voluntarily hazard their own Honors, Justice, and the whole Kingdoms safety, (inconsistent with his over-daring practices) to keep his unworthy head upon his shoulders, and uphold his sunk Reputation, to do the Republic more ill offices.

Mercy it self will not, cannot save an impenitent, obdurate, capital Delinquent, who will neither confess, nor recant his offenses, but still justify them to the world in despite of Justice.

But Brittannicus, out of his foolish pity, pleads thus for him. That it is pity we should bury the eminent deserts, and public virtues of that Gentleman, (in surrendering Bristol to the loss of the West, the hazard of the Kingdom, and seeking to f meant, if not raise differences between his Excellency, and Sir William Waller, on whom he would translate this damage) in the Sepulcher of an unfortunate action: I am sorry to see his Advocate, put to so poor a shift, as thus to transform him into a Roman Catholic, and make him plead Eminent Merits, yet undiscerned; and public virtues (not hitherto visible,) to save h s Head-pe ce: Its ill pleading Justification by such works, as have already condemned their Author, in a Court of Justice. His ensuing shift is yet more miserable; That we should put a difference in Offences, and sooner pity then prosecute the failings of the best, and not make our sufferings the only Argument of his. For is it not a far grander and more capital crime actually to surrender such a place as Bristol to the Enemy, without necessity, to the Kingdoms incomparable prejudice, then only to practice its surrender without success, before it was either fortified or stored? with what justice then can Fiennes (not yet proved the best who put Col: Essex from the government of that place, upon a groundless pretence he would not keep it, & actually executed Yeomans & Butcher only for plotting Bristols surrender before it was fortified, or ammunitioned, though their project proved successeles) expect a Pardon, when as himself actually surrendered it, withal the Arms, Ammunition, Magazines, Cannons, Colors in it, before any extremity enforced him, or the Enemy had so much as battered the City or Castle walls? If they by his own sentence (though penitent) endured the halter, I am certain he still stouting it, much more deserves the Axe: And for the latter part of his Apology it is so irrational, that every man who hath but common sense or honesty will conclude; that he who hath caused many thousand Innocents, & the whole Kingdom to suffer in the loss of such a place of consequence as Bristol, deserves not to go Scot-free, but to suffer more then the Governor of Beeston Castle, and others put to death for losing places of less importance.

If he conceit, the Noblenes of his blood may apologize for his impunity; though he hath forfeited it in this ignoble action: all understanding men will conclude, that as it aggravates his guilt, and heightens his offense; so it pleads most effectually for his execution: since an exemplary President of justice upon an eminent offender of Noble extraction, will strike more terror into, and do more good upon other Governors, then twenty Laws, or a thousand executions of inferior persons, for sleighter offenses; And seeing he hath given the Parliament and Kingdom incomparably the most fatal blow, and the enemy the richest booty they ever yet received, in the loss of Bristol; there is little reason or justice, that he should escape after such a public trial, and judgment of his own seeking; the best service he can now do for the Common wealth, being this▪ to become a spectacle and Monument of public Justice to Posterity in a military way, as Strafford was in a Politick. We read in Meteranus, Grimston, Thuanus, and other Historians a memorable history of justice in this kind upon a young Nobleman of as good or better descent then himself, Van Hemert a Dutchman, who was condemned and lost his head with two of his Captains in the year 1587. by the Earl of Leicester and Queen Elizabeth's direction, notwithstanding the Nobility and greatness of his family, the powerful mediation of his friends, and the confession of his Errors, with promise to expiate it by serving the Queen by Land or Sea at his own charges, only for surrendering the Town of Grave, (of far less consequence and strength then Bristol ) to the potent enemy, after full 3. months (not 3. days) siege, and that upon honorable terms punctually observed, (the soldiers marching out with their arms and baggage, and the Citizens with their goods) and that when the walls of it with many batteries of the Canon were levelled to the ground, and the town threatened with a present general assault, which made most of the Soldiers and Inhabitants to importune him upon their knees with tears, to parly with the Enemy, and to yield the Town upon good conditions. This sentence and execution was thought over-severe by some, but the Earl of Leicester, and the wisest men deemed it necessary to reform the ancient neglects of military discipline then much decayed; and to preserve other Forts from over-sudden surrenders before utmost extremity: and the wisest Statesmen, soldiers have affirmed, that the loss of this great man's head was more advantageous to the States in regard of the President, then the saving of his, or a thousand men's lives of his rank, in such a case could be. The story needs no application: he who will not adventure his life, to defend his charge, and a place of such importance as Bristol for the Kingdoms safety, and keeping out of the Irish Rebels, now actually possessed of it, deserves at least to lose his head for such a Cowardize, and cannot do the Kingdom greater service, nor Justice more Right, then to suffer for it, and become a President for the benefit of Posterity, especially when he grows so obstinately perverse as neither to acknowledge nor lament his Error.

Certain considerable Queres of public concernment touching Colonel FIENNES.

[ I] WHether Colonel Fiennes being actually attainted and condemned of high Treason against the Kingdom, by a reference from the Parliament, can or may be permitted in Law or Equity to go at liberty, or to continue a Member of the Commons house? Whether the House Ex officio mero, ought not in Honor and Justice to expel him, as well as other less-Capitall Delinquents? to inquire diligently where he now hides his forfeited Head, and to exact the forfeiture of it, to prevent future Cowardize and Treachery in others?

[ II] Whether in case the loss of his Head-piece be remitted ▪which cannot possibly be imagined without a public confession, and penitent submission, of which there is not as yet the smallest shadow appearing,) his whole real and personal Estate ought not at least to be confiscated, towards the reparation of those inestimable damages and losses, the whole Kingdom, and private Persons have sustained through his cowardly Surrender of Bristol?

[ III] Whether the honorable Council of War, openly traduced by him and his, for their just Sentence against him after nine days full hearing, by order from the Parliament, ought not to demand and receive such public satisfaction for this high affront; and his un-voluntary Prosecutors, engaged by himself, such reparation for the slanders raised of them, as may deter others from such bold daring attempts against Justice?

[ IIII] Whether he and his, have not been the principal Authors, and Fomentors of the late unhappy (but now composed) differences between his Excellencie and Sir William Waller, and their Officers? Seeing his manifold malicious aspersions cast upon Sir William, with his impudent loud-lying averrement to the Council at the trial, That the prosecution of this Bristol business against him (proceeding only from his own braving motions in Parliament, and public Summons posted up at Westminster, upon hopes to make his prosecutors cry peccavi, or else to come off with Honor by the Potency of his friends, not Honesty of his Cause ) came by the instigation and confederacy of Sir William Waller and his Lady, who set it on merely for the great affection, which he and his family did bear, and the good services they had done to my Lord General, his Officers and Army: (a most parasiticall seditious calumny) do more then intimate as much.

[ V] Whether he ought not in justice to be forced to give in a speedy account, of all the vast sums of monies, and plunder received by him and his Officers during his Governement of Bristol, that so he may not escape Count-free though Head-free; and so prove a gainer by his very capital censure?

[ VI] Whether he and his have not caused M r . William Prynne appointed an Auditor for the grand long-deferred Accounts of the Kingdom by the House of Commons, to be raised out of the list of Auditors, in the House of Peers, and upon what just grounds of exception (besides his known integrity and impartiallity for the public weal,) for which he hath gratis done and suffered much without any pay, or recompense for his losses?) And whether it be just or meet, that Accountants should have a Negative or Affirmative vote in the Election of their Auditors?

[ VII] Whether Nath: Fiennes since his good service in surrendering Bristol, and bestowing it on the King beyond expectation, with all the fortifications, Cannons, Arms, Magazines, Colours, Wealth, Ships, and Provisions in it, be not far better beloved, and befriended at Oxford, then Sir William Waller? The extravagant testimony of Captain Temple (his own Kinsman and witness) at the trial, with others of that nature, clearly intimating as much? And whether the sparing of his head will not be far more pleasing and advantageous to the King, and his Malignant Cavaliers, then to the Kingdom and well affected party?

[ VIII] Whether his Majesty in all probability had not gained the actual possession of all the Towns, and Forts through England, ruined the Parliament, yea enslaved us and our Posterity forever in less then one months space, had the Governors of other besieged Towns (especially Manchester, Gloucester, Hull, Plimmouth, Lime, Namptwich, and Warder Castle ) made no better or longer resistance of his forces, progress, or shown no more valor, Resolution, and Fidelity, to their Country then Fiennes did at Bristol, (more strong and tenable then most, and of greater consequence then all the forenamed Towns,) which he held not 3. whole days, and most cowardly yielded up before any one Outfort taken, or the Town or Castle walls once battered or assaulted?

[ IX] Whether cowardly and avaricious Governors or Commanders (who aim at naught but pay) do not always prove the greatest Traitors of all others, to those who trust them, in times of danger and extremity? whether such will not rather lose a Kingdom, yea and their own souls, then hazard their lives or estates? And whether it be wisdom to employ any such, or spare them when they grossly betray their trusts, out of a foolish pity or indulgent partiality?

[ X] Whether Col: Fiennes since the wars began, did ever personally for all the pay received by him, perform the least piece of Martial service for the state, except his fortifying and furnishing of Bristol for the Enemy? And whether any credit can be given to his words, or reports, who contrary to his own knowledge and Printed Papers, denied Colonel Essex or himself to be ever Governor of Bristol, or that ever he had a Commission to keep it, or sought for any Commission, though his own witnesses proved, and himself thereupon at last confessed, he hath writ, sent Letters for, and received an Independant Commission? which made him so Independant both on the Parliament, His Excellency, and God's Protection, as without their privity, and beyond their expectation to surrender up Bristol to the Enemy, when they gave themselves for dead men, and many of them retreated thence, with a resolution never to come on again.

FINIS