PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Works

John Lightfoot (1602-1675) · 3,989,977 words · 17733 min

Large work readerShowing section 65 of 144. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 65/144
From the threshold to the Court. 5. From the Court to the Altar side. 6. From thence to the Altar top. 7. From thence to the outmost wall. 8. From that wall to the City. 9. From the City to Mount Olivet, 10. From Mount Olivet to the Wilderness, and from the Widerness it went up. So also the great Sanhedrin had ten flittings: From the Chamber Gazith to Hhanoth (the Tabernae or place of the Shops) From Hhanoth to Jerusalem. From Jerusalem to Jabneh. From Jabneh to Osha 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 From Osha to Shepharaam 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 From Shepharaam to Beth Shaaraim. From Beth Shaaraim to Tsipperis in Galilee. From Tsipperis to Tiberias.

Now whereas there are but eight removes here mentioned, yet they speak of ten, it to is be understood, as the Gloss gives us notice, that from two of these places they removed forward and backward and forward again, as from Jabneh to Osha, from Osha back to Jabneh, and from Jabneh to Osha, a second time.

Their first coming to Jabueh was in the days of Rabban Johanan ben Zaccai; from Jabueh to Osha, in the days of Rabban Gamaliel the last; and to Jabueh back again in the days of Rabban Simeon. To Shaaraim and to Tsipperis in the days of Rabbi Judah: And to Tiberias in the days of Antonius.

These their flittings, by their own confession, began forty years before the destruction of the Temple. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Forty years, say they, before the destruction of the Temple, the Sanhedrin flitted and betook itself to sit in Hanoth, or the Tabernae. And the reason is given Because there were then many Thievs and Murderers, and they judged not of capital matters: which meaneth to this purpose: they held that while they sat in the room Gazith, they were bound to judge and determine of all matters that came before them, and that all their determinations were obliging, but now, when beside the curb of the Roman power that was upon them, by which their power was abridged, villainy and insolency was also grown too strong for them, they thought as the Gemara in Avodah Zarah, speaks their mind, It is good for us to rise and flit from this place, of which it is written, And thou shalt do according as the men of that place shall show thee.

Now in what part of the Mountain of the House Hhanoth or the Tabernae were placed, may be best conceived, by observing the place of the great Sanhedrins sitting, before they came to sit in the room Gazith; and for this purpose a Text of Jeremy doth give us light, which is in Chap. XXXV. 4. where it is said thus, I brought the Rechabites into the House of the Lord, into the Chamber of the Sons of Hanan the Son of Igdaliah a man of God, which was by the Chamber of the Princes, which was above the Chamber of Maaseiah the Son of Shallum the keeper of the door. Now by the Princes we cannot understand the Princes of the blood, for what had Jehojakims Sons to do here? Their residence was in the Palaces of Zion, and their way into the Temple, was at the gate on the West quarter, which was called Shallecheth and Coponius, whereas this gate whereof the Son of Shallum was keeper or Porter, was the East gate, as is apparent from 1 Chron. IX. 17, 18.

By the Princes therefore are to be understood, the great men of the Sanhedrin, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Acts IV. 8. who sat in Council and Judicature in a Chamber near the East gate or the gate Sushan, namely, over the Porters lodge. Here they sat in the time of the first Temple, but under the second Temple, namely, from the times of Simeon Ben Shetah, they removed further inward and sat even by the side of the Court of Israel, in the room called Gazith, which we shall survey in its due place.

Now when they were put to remove and flit out of Gazith, and to sit there no more, whither should they betake themselves, but to some room near to the East gate again, where the place of the Sanhedrins sitting had been of old? It is observable in Jeremy, that in his time, they sat in two East gates of the Temple, sometimes in the one and sometimes in the other, namely, in this East gate of the Mountain of the House, as appeareth by the Text produced: and in the East gate of the Court, which was also called The New Gate, Jer. XXXVI. 10. of which hereafter.

Now in after times when they sat in the room Gazith, there was a Sanhedrin of three and twenty Judges sat in either of these gates, as is copiously testified by the Jewish records and antiquities. By the East gate therefore of the Mountain of the house may we best conclude, the Hhanoth or Tabernae, to have been seated, namely, that they were as Shops in the lower rooms of the buildings that stood on either side of the gate Sushan, and the rooms over head were employed for some other use, and among the rest, one for the sitting of the great Sanhedrin, when they were removed from Gazith; and when they sat in Gazith, for a Sanhedrin of twenty three.

And whereas Maimonides speaketh of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 A Divinity School in the Mountain of the House, where the Sanhedrin sat upon Holy days, we know not where better to place it than hereabout, where their sitting was in the first and last times of the Temple. All the gates that we have viewed, were beautified with gallant buildings on either side them, but the East most eminent, because the greatest and commonest entrance into the Temple. And whereas there is mention in Scripture of women lodging in the Temple, as 2 Chron. XXII. 11, 12. Jehoshebeath and Joash and his Nurse lodged many years there: and Luke II. 37. Hanah is said not to have departed from the Temple for many years more: their lodgings were in the buildings near some of the gates of this outmost wall (but which undeterminable) for that all within this inclosing was called The Temple in the Scripture, and the common Language, is so apparent, that it needeth no demonstration.




CHAP. X. The dimensions and form of Solomon's Temple, and of that built by the returned out of Captivity.

HAving thus gone through and observed the compass of the Mountain of the Temple, and the wall that did inclose it in so large a square, with the Cloisters, gates and buildings that were in that wall and affixed to it: before we can come to cast out the Courts, Partitions and buildings that were within, and speak of their places and uses particularly; it will be necessary in the first place, to take a survey of the measure and situation of the Temple itself, that from it, and from this outer wall as from standing marks, we may measure all the proportions, fsbricks and distances, that we are to go through.

The floor of the Mountain of the House was not even, but rising from East to West, so much in the whole, that the floor of the Porch of the Temple was two and twenty cubits higher than the floor of the Gate Shushan, or the East-gate in the outmost wall: which in equality was cast into several levels one above another; and the outmost wall accordingly did sometime run level, and sometime rise from level to level, even as the evenness or risings of the floor itself did call for it.

The measures of the Temple built by Solomon, are said to have been, by the first measure, 2 Chron. III. 3. that is, by the same cubit, that measured the first Tabernacle, which is the same that we fix upon; and by this measure to have been seventy cubits long, 1 Kings VI. 2. 2 Chron. III. 3. in these several spaces. The most holy place twenty cubits, the holy place forty cubits, and the Porch ten. And the breadth of all these was twenty cubits.

About the height there is some obscurity, for the Book of Kings saith it was thirty cubits, but the Book of Chronicles nameth no sum at all; only it saith that the Porch was one hundred and twenty cubits high. Now David Kimchi doth dispute it, whether this was the height of the Porch only, or of the whole house throughout: and he shows how it may be construed of the whole house; namely, that the height of it to the first floor was thirty cubits (according to the reckoning of the Book of Kings ) and then the chambers over in several stories did rise to ninety cubits more. Yet both he and R. Levi Gershom could well be persuaded to think that the Temple itself was but thirty cubits high, but are somewhat swayed by the opinion of some of their Rabbins which runneth another away. For from their words it appeareth (say they) that there were chambers over the Temple and over the Porch: and this they hold from 1 Chron. 28. 11.

The words of that Text are these, David gave to Solomon his son the Pattern of the Porch and the houses thereof, and the Treasuries thereof, and the upper chambers thereof, and the Parlors thereof, and the place of the mercy seat: where all these particulars are so couched together (except the last) as if they were all within the Porch: But the Holy Ghost speaketh of the Porch, as the first part in sight, as you came up, it being the front of all, and the rest of the parcels mentioned, are to be conceived of, not as all crowded in it, but as distributed and disposed in other parts of the fabric, as the Holy Ghost relateth and layeth down elsewhere. And as for the upper chambers here spoken of, we need not to confine them so, as to set them all either over the Porch (though there were some,) nor over the body of the Temple, but to place them also as the Text doth elsewhere, round about the house without▪ in several stories.

The careful considering the measures of the Temple built by the Children of the Captivity, will reasonably help to put us out of doubt about the matter that we have in dispute. The measures they brought along with them out of Persia, in Cyrus his Commission, The foundations to be strongly laid, the height sixty cubits, and the breadth sixty cubits, with three rows of great stones, and a row of new timber, and the expenses to be given out of the Kings house.

Where we may observe, 1. That the length is not mentioned, because that was to be of the former measure. 2. That the breadth, doubled the breadth of Solomon's building, the side chambers and all taken in. And 3. That the height was double to the height of Solomon's, as it is expressed in the Book of Kings, and as indeed the height of the Temple was, though the Porch were higher. For it seemeth utterly against reason, that Cyrus should offer to build the house as broad again as it was before, and yet not so high as it was before by half. It is no doubt but Cyrus had consultation with some of the Jews about the building, and that either they counseling him, should advise the abatement of so much of the height, or he enlarging the breadth and the house one way, should cut it short of the height and lessen it the other way, is exceeding improbable; the length could not be doubled, because that would have lessened the measure of the Courts before it, which might not be endured, but the two other ways of dimension which could be allowed, he allowed double to what they were before.

Therefore the two Texts in Kings and Chronicles, are to be taken properly as they there lie before us, namely, that the Porch was one hundred and twenty cubits high, and that the rest of the Temple was but thirty; and the form of the whole House was thus. It stood East and West, the most Holy place Westward, and the Porch or Entry Eastward, and the length of all from East to West was seventy cubits, the breadth twenty cubits, besides the breadth of the side Chambers: The height of the Holy and most Holy place thirty cubits, and the Porch stood at the East end like one of our high Steeples one hundred and twenty cubits high: And indeed Solomon's Temple did very truly resemble one of our Churches, but only that it differed in this, that the Steeple of it (which was the Porch) stood at the East end.

Now round about the sides thereof, North and South, and the West end, Solomon built Chambers of three stories high and five cubits was the height of every story, the whole being fifteen cubits high in all, and they joined to the wall of the House without. The highest story was a cubit wider than the middle, and the middle a cubit wider than the lowest, and yet the outmost wall of them was even and straight, and jutted not over at one story or other, any whit at all. But the reason of this different breadth of the Stories was this, the wall of the Temple for five cubits from the ground upward, was thicker by a cubit than it was from thence above. At the height therefore of those five cubits there was a bench of the wall of a cubit breadth left outerly round about the House, on which they laid one end of the beams and timber, which was the roof of the lowest rooms, or the floor of the second Story. And then again for five cubits above that, the wall was thicker by a cubit, than it was above; and at the height of those five cubits there was such another bench left again, and on that they laid the beams for the roof of the second story, which was the floor of the third. And so likewise for five cubits above that, the wall was yet thicker by a cubit, than it was above, and there the like bench was left again, and there were laid the beams of the roof of the third Story and of the whole building.

And this is the meaning of that verse, 1 King. VI. 6. The neathermost Chamber was five cubits broad, the middlemost six cubits broad, and the third was seven cubits broad, for he made abating to the House on the outside round about: that the beams should not have hold of the very walls of the House.

And thus did these Chambers take up half the height of the House, being as the lower Leads of our Churches to the higher: the use of the Chambers we shall observe hereafter.

Now above these Chambers in the wall of the Temple, and in the outer wall of these Chambers themselves there were Windows to let in light, which the Text saith were 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 open and shut, or broad and narrow, which the Chaldee Paraphrast and Theodoret have well interpreted, wide within and narrow without: namely, narrow without to receive the light, and wide within to disperse and dilate it. Though there be some Jews, that construe it the clean contrary way, viz. broad without and narrow within, different from all other Windows 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for God, say they, had no need of such light.

The people that returned out of Captivity, were forty and six years in building their Temple before they could complete it, and bring it to perfection, and yet when all was done, it proved so far inferior in beauty and stateliness to that of Solomon's, as that to those that had seen both, it was as nothing: the dimensions made not the difference, for it was two ways, as large again as his, (even as his was every way as large again as Moses Tabernacle) but this wanted that sumptuousness and bravery of building that his had. And it wanted those five things which were the glory and excellency of the former, namely, The Ark, Urim and Thummim, Fire from Heaven, The Cloud of glory upon the Mercy seat, and The Spirit of Prophesy: The weeping therefore of those persons that had seen the former House, at the laying of the foundation of this, was not as if they saw any lessening of the House in comparison of the former, in compass and measure, (for the foundations promised a larger) but it was upon remembering the glory of the former, both in its magnificence, and in these five excellencies, and to think of the burning of that, and it was also in comparing their present servile and poor condition, with the liberty, state and gallantry of the Nation when the other stood.

Their measures were prescribed by Cyrus, not because he would curb the building, but enlarge it, for whereas Solomon's Temple was but thirty cubits broad, Chambers and all, he gave liberty of sixty cubits breadth; and whereas Solomon's was but thirty cubts high all the body of the House, he doubled the measure to sixty.

And therefore those words of Josephus are cautelously to be understood, when he saith, That they brought up the roof of Solomon's Fabric, of white stone, the height sixty cubits, the length as much, and the breadth twenty. In which account of the height of it, he differs both from Scripture and from all other of his own Nation, and by what measures or counters he reckons it is hard to understand: And so it is also to construe that which follows: 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 : which I English thus, And by this there was another piece raised of equal measures: so that the whole height of the Temple was an hundred and twenty cubits: By which piece I conceive he means the Porch, and his own words clear it; but how to apprehend that it was of equal measure with what he had spoken of before, I acknowledge I do not understand. And whereas, he saith, That the whole height of the Temple was an hundred and twenty cubits, his own context shows that he cannot mean, that it was so high throughout, but it is to be construed of the Porch of which he is speaking, namely, that the Temple in some part of it rose to an hundred and twenty cubits high.

And so are those words of Herod to be understood in the Oration that he made to the people, when he tells them of his resolution to build the Temple. Our Fathers (saith he) built the Temple to the great God, after their coming up again from Babylon, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; But it wanted as to the greatness of it, sixty cubits in height: for so much did the former Temple which Solomon had built exceed it. Which is not to be understood of the whole house, but of the Porch only: for the Children of the Captivity either built no Porch at all, (and then their Temple was a perfect Cube, length and height and breadth exactly equal) or if they did, yet did not the height of it exceed the rest of the house, as Solomon's did, but only equal it, the whole being sixty cubits high, all alike, according to the dimensions that Cyrus had prescribed.

Now in his Patent for the building of the Temple, there are these words, which are of no small difficulty to be understood, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Ezr. VI. 4. Josephus renders this passage thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Three houses of hewn stone, and one house of wood within: By the three houses, seeming to mean the three parts of the Temple, Porch, Holy, and most Holy place; and by the one wooden House, the seiling of the House within. And in this sense Rabbi Solomon seemeth also to understand it, who renders the words to this sense, The Walls were of Marble, and there was a Wall of Wood within, like the building of the House which Solomon built. The Septuagint have Translated 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Houses, and Josephus followed them in so rendering it: But the Chaldee Paraphrast doth use the word, to signify Ranks or Rows of Stone or Timber, as Hag. II. 15. Before a Stone was laid upon a Stone; he utters it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and so he renders 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 by the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Ezek. XLVI 23. &c. And in this sense doth Ibn Ezra understand the word, and so hath our English Translated it, Three rows of great Stones, and a row of new Timber.

But we are yet to seek for the meaning of the clause, though we be satisfied with this sense of the word: Three rows of Stone, and one of Timber. Is this to be understood of three rows of Stone Pillars and one of Wood, all standing up, or of three rows of Stones laid in the Walls, and one row of Timber lying upon them? And is this meant in the Body of the Temple itself, or in some other Walls that were about it? If we look into 1 Kings VI. 36. I suppose some resolution of these doubts may arise thence, for there it is said parallel to what is spoken, Ezr. VI. 4. That Solomon built the inner Court with three rows of hewn Stone, and one row of Cedar-beams: And it is almost past peradventure, that Cyrus gave his Commission after that pattern, having learned it from some Jews that were about him. Having therefore prescribed the dimensions of the Temple itself, in verse. 3. he giveth also warrant and platform for Walling in the Court, even after the fashion that Solomon had used, namely, three rows of great Stones to bring up the Wall, and a row of Cedar-beams, either to crest it, or to lie between as the Wall rose. And so do Levi Gershom, and D. Kimchi, expound these words, in 1 King. VI. The Walls were three rows of hewn Stones, and one of Timber of Cedar upon them.

The Jews upon their return out of Captivity, did first build the Altar, before they set upon the building of the House, Ezr. III. 3. for their necessity and occasions did call upon them to sacrifice, and the very place did warrant their Sacrificing, though the Temple were not yet built. In the second year after their return, in the second month of the year, which was the second year of Cyrus, they lay the foundation of the House, but in the next verse the Work is hindered, and so continues forlorn till the second year of Darius, Ezr. IV. 24. On the twenty fourth day of the sixth month of that year they begin to prepare for the Building again, and on the twenty fourth day of the ninth month they set to Work. Compare Hag. I. 15. & II. 18.

The fashion and pattern which they followed in the particular Structures and Fabrics about the House, was as the Authors of their own Nation assert, the Temple which Ezekiel hath described, Chap. 40. & 41. &c. The children of the Captivity (say they) made the building according to the form that they saw in the building of Ezekiel in divers things; which although they could not imitate to the full, especially in the spaciousness of his measures, and sumptuousness of his Fabric, (that pattern of his being as well a figure of a Temple not earthly, and not built with hands, as it was an earnest and promise of an earthly Temple, to be built by them upon their return) yet did they lay that copy before them, and did in very many things imitate that fashion and form, and platform their buildings, and Courts thereafter: And so did Herod by the counsel of the wise Men that were in his favor (as Hillel, Shammai, and Menahem, &c.) when he repaired, or rather rebuilt the Temple, though he did in divers things exceed the dimensions of the children's of the Captivity, yet did he observe their platform and fashion as they had done Ezekiel's. And so (as to the form and composure of the things and places themselves) there is so little difference betwixt the buildings of the returned Captives, and the buildings of Herod, that the Talmudicks do still account both but one Temple, and account that that stood to the destruction of Jerusalem, to be but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The second Temple, to Solomon's first; and so indifferently shall we take it up.




CHAP. XI. The measures and platform of the Temple, as it stood in the time of Our SAVIOUR.

HEROD (surnamed the Great ) when he was a young Gallant, before he came to be King, had slain one Hezekiah, and some others with him, for which he was called before the Sanhedrin to be judged for killing a man: where some of the Council fearing him, and some favoring him, and not executing justice as he had deserved; Shammai the Vice-president of the Council, did boldly and plainly tell them, before his face, That whereas they were so favorable and partial to him now, the time would come when he would not show them such favor, but should kill them. And so Herod did, when he was King afterward, destroying the whole Sanhedrin, unless it were two men, Hillel the President, and Shammai the Vice-president, who had been so plain with him. And afterwards, as it were in way of expiation of this horrid fact, he was persuaded by Baba ben Bota to repair the Temple, which he did so thoroughly, that he made it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Larger in compass, and most glorious in height, taking down the old foundation, and laying new. This work he began in the eighteenth year of his Reign, and in eight years he finished it (some nine years before our Savior's birth:) in all which time, if you will believe the Jews, they will tell you, That it never rained in the day time, lest the work should be hindered. The sumptuousness of this building the same Authors in the Treatise Succah in the Gemara do magnify in these expressions. He that never saw Jerusalem in her glory, never saw lovely City. And he that never saw the Sanctuary with its buildings, never saw goodly buildings. Rab. Hasda saith, It was Herod's building, And of what did he build it? Rabba saith, Of goodly stone and marble. And some say, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of marble painted or full of curious veins and divers colors. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 one border or edge went in and another out; which the Gloss express thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 It seemed like the wavings of the Sea, one row of stones did so curiously go in, and another come out.

The measures of this Temple, as it stood in our Savior's time, and till the destruction of Jerusalem was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 an hundred cubits long, an hundred cubits broad, and an hundred cubits high: And yet not an exact cube, but very far from it, as we shall show ere long, for it narrowed so behind, saith the Talmud and Maymony, that it did carry the proportion of a Lion.

The form and fashion of this pile on the outside (for of that only we will take a survey as yet) was thus. It was built of white marble (as Josephus saith) in which were such veins and colors as are spoken of before; the stones of a size and bigness unto admiration, and the Walls rose to that great height of an hundred cubits by these distinctive measures.

  • 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the foundation six cubits high: not in the ground (though there was also a foundation laid deep enough) but from the ground six cubits upwards. As it is commonly seen in stonebuildings of a great pile, that near the ground, the Fabric is made thicker than the wall above, to support the whole weight the better, even so was it here for, six cubits height.
  • 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The height of the wall forty cubits. That is, from this foundation the Wall rose forty cubits plain, without any juttings, borderings or standings out as there was elsewhere. And then was,
  • 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 A carved and curiously wrought border, of a cubit broad. I translate 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a curious wrought border, upon the warrant of R. Nathan, who partly out of the Talmud, and partly out of the Chaldee Paraphrast render it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Picturing or Pourtraying (with which there is the concurrency of Bartenora, who saith, it was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 because it was gilt with gold and graven with curious ingravery: It may be along the length of the building the stones were so laid in and out as to resemble the waving of the Sea, as the Talmud speaks, but there was no crossing border (as it may be called) till the wall came to this height: Above this embroidered border was,
  • 4. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 A ledge or gutter to take off the, rain, and to carry it clear from dropping upon the wall below 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The height of two cubits was prepared for the droppings to come in there, for so doth sense and necessity cause the word to be interpreted, though Baal Aruch tell us, that there be some that gave it another construction; when we have observed the two next particulars above this, we shall understand what this was the better.
  • 5. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The timber or place for the laying on of the roof, a cubit.
  • 6. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The roof itself a cubit. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is of some difficult construction: It seemeth to be derived, as R. Nathan giveth intimation, from that word, Neh. III. 8. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which our English hath rendered, They fortified and R. Solomon, They raised with Earth. And there Ibn Ezra speaks of this very word that we have in hand, and saith that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 there and the word we have before us, are both of the same sense: and so the same, word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is used again, Neh. IV. 2. And he telleth us withal that there are some that do render that clause 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Exod. XXIII. 5. according to this construction: If thou see the Ass of him that hateth thee lying under his burden, Thou shalt surely raise him with him.

But as for our word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which is not to be found in Scripture, but used by the Talmudic Writers, we must have recourse to the Talmud for the meaning of it: And there as Aruch pointeth us to the places we find it spoken of and handled in the Treatise Baba Mezia, and Baba Bathra. In the former Tract are these words, Is a house and a chamber over it in two men's possession? And the chamber over goes to decay: if the Owner of the house (below) will not help to repair it: let him that owes the chamber, go and dwell below till he do repair: R. Jose saith, The Owner of the lower room is to lay on the roof-timber, and the Owner of the upper-room the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And in the other Tract are these words A man shall not set up a furnace (or oven) within a house unless there be the space of four cubits over it (namely, for fear the flame should catch in the roof or floor above) And if he do set up a furnace in an upper-room, it is necessary that there be a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of three fingers thick under it. And the reason is also given for fear of danger of fire.

Now the Gemara upon the former place in explanation of the word, and Aruch in explanation of the Gemara say, that it was a crustedness made of divers materials, as reeds, chalk, stones and such like plaistering; which it seemeth by the former place cited was laid on the top of the house instead of leads to keep out wet; and by the later, to be made under their furnaces in upper-rooms to prevent fire, burning downward. And the determination of R. Jose (that the dweller below should lay on the roof, and the dweller above the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) seems to result to nothing else but this, that the one should lay on the timber of the roof, and the other a cover of plaster to be laid on the roof upon reeds, of such materials tempered together as should keep out the rain from dropping through: And so do I understand the word in our work that we are viewing; that this was a thick well wrought plaster of materials to compact, that being once grown hard was as a stone, and this was as leads on the roof to keep out wet; the use of sheets of lead being either unknown to them, or lead being scarce and not to be had: And thus are we come up to the lower leads; for so let me call them, as being an expression best known among us.

And here let us take in a passage of Josephus. He speaking of the measures of the Temple, and of the stones of which it was built, saith, That they were twenty five cubits long, eight cubits high, and twelve broad, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 saith he, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , &c. It was made afer the fashion of the royal cloister, lower on either side, and highest in the middle, so that it was to be seen many furlongs off, &c. Now the Cloister royal was so built (as was observed before) that three walks running along together, roofed over and born upon pillars, the roof of the middle was raised far higher than the two of either side it.

And so we are by Josephus to understand accordingly of the Temple. It was indeed of an hundred cubits high, but not so as rising in an equal square, from the bottom to the top, but rising square fity one cubits, as hath been proportioned out: The main foundation six cubits high: the Wall plain about it, forty cubits, a carved border above that, one cubit; the place for casting off the rains, two cubits; above that the floor laying on one cubit thick, and the plaster cover one cubit thick; but then the rise of the building grew narrower; for from thence it was carried up so towards the middle, as that there were left leads, as one may call them, on the North and South sides all along, from the East unto the West: A familiar example of this for the better understanding of it we have in the building of exceeding many of our Churches: the pile riseth of alike breadth to the lower Leads, and then it riseth only in the middle, to the height or roof of the Church: And so was it with the Temple: Go either to East or West end, and stand in the middle and look up, and it was one hundred cubits; but go any whit like toward the right or left hand, and it was but half so high, for there were the lower Leads. Leads I cannot but call them, for that language is best understood amongst us, though they were not covered with Lead (a covering not so well known in those times as now) but with a plaster or parget of a cubit thick, and so strongly wrought, and tempered, as that it differed not from the hardness of stone.

We must not forget 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that we passed over even now, but must look back upon it a little, before we leave these Leads, or this first rising that we are now upon. For the passing away of the rains that dropped off this roof, that they should not run down along the wall, and so both molder and deface the stones, there was immediately above the embroidered border that was spoken of, a row of stones that jutted out of the building more than their fellows, which were neatly and artificially guttered or riggeted, and as artificially jointed together in the guttering (that no rain should drop through) the rigget laid just under the edge of the Leads, (or spouts from the leads) that cast off the rains, that the droppings falling therein were conveyed away to either end of that side on which they were, and so sent to the ground either in pipes, or in a great fall from these gutters.

And now to follow the building up still to its perfect height; conceive it to be narrowed now to half the breadth, and so to rise in the middle of the pile, as that th Leads on either side, were twenty five cubits broad.

  • 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The height of the room above, or the rising above the Leads in a straight wall was forty cubits: this is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or an upper room, because it was directly over the holy and most holy places.
  • 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Another carved or engraven border; such an one as was mentioned before, the breadth of one cubit.
  • 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The gutter two cubits as before, for putting off rains; not that this gutter was two cubits deep, but that it was two cubits from these gutters to the laying on of the roof.
  • 4. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The floor or roof, a cubit.
  • 5. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , The plaster cover, a cubit.
  • 6. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The battlements three cubits; This word is used, Deut. XXII. 8. and not elsewhere in Scripture, and yet saith Ibn Ezra, is the sense of it plain enough from the Text. And so indeed it is, for the Lord there enjoineth, that when a man buildeth a new house he should make 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 battlements, lest any one should fall off, and so bring blood upon his house; The roofs of their houses were flat in those Countries, Jos. II. 6. 2 Sam. XVI. 22. Act. X. 19, &c. and there they used to walk, 1 Sam. IX. 25. and therefore lest any should fall off, they were to make battlements round about, ten handbreadths, or two common cubits high at the least, lest any one should fall off, and be slain or maimed: so howsoever it may be well supposed, that they walked not upon the Temple roof so ordinarily as they did upon their own houses (nor was the Temple roof altogether so flat as their roofs) yet were battlements also made to it, partly, because it should not come short of the beauty of other buildings, and partly because there was occasion sometimes to go upon the roof of it.
  • 7. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The scarcrow one cubit; what this was, let us first take R. Nathan's information for it. Because, saith he, of the holiness of the first Temple, and the divine glory dwelling there, birds flew not on it at all: But as for the second Temple, they feared, that the holiness of it should not be as the holiness of the first; and lest birds should fly over it, and leave some defilement upon it, therefore they set up a picture, to cause birds to keep off the roof of the Temple, and they called it, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the scarcrow, as meaning, that it keeps the Ravens from flying upon the Temple roof, and this Image or Picture was such an one as they use to set upon corn: But by other of the Jews it is defined to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 A pike of iron like a rapier of a cubit high, upon the top of the battlements round about, made that birds might not light upon it. And by some again concluded, that there were no such thing as either the one or other, but only that the battlement was four cubits high: But however it may be a fancy not to be fancied, that there was or could be any such course taken as to keep Birds off the Roof of the Temple, (see Psal. 84. 34.) yet upon the so concurrent testimony of the Hebrew Writers, as is to be found, joined with the thought of what an ornament it would add to the building itself, it may very well be concluded, that there were pinnacles upon the battlements round about: as Kings College Chapel in Cambridge is decked in the like manner to its great beauty. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is construed according to this sense by divers Expositors, Matth. IV. 5. The roof was not a perfect flat, as was the roof of other houses, but rising in the middle 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 till the very crest of the middle came up as high as the height of the battlement; as Kings College Chapel may be herein a parallel also; And the like battlements and pinnacles are likewise to be alloted to the lower Leads.



CHAP. XII. The Breadth, Chambers, and Stairs of the Temple.

THUS were the risings of the Temple to its height, in the parcels named: it is now equally requisite to take notice also of the length and breadth of it, and to observe into what lesser measures those dimensions were divided.

The length of it was from East to West, and it was an hundred cubits, and so was the breadth from North to South, in some part of it, but not in all. That part of it that bare this breadth, was only the Porch, for the building behind it was only seventy cubits broad. And the Porch stood before it as a cross building, reaching fifteen cubits South, and fifteen cubits North further out than the breadth of the Temple; which spaces on eithe •• de were thus taken up, The thickness of the wall of the Porch at either end was five cubits, and from that wall to the wall of the Temple on either side were ten cubits.

So fair a Front there was at the entering; an hundred cubits broad, and an hundred and twenty cubits high; for so is Josephus to be understood, when speaking of the Temple built by Herod, he saith, it was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ; An hundred long, and twenty cubits above an hundred high; Not all the house throughout so high, for that the Talmud denies, giving so particular and exact account of an hundred only, as we have observed, but the Porch of this height rising twenty cubits above the height of the rest of the house.

Just in the middle of this fair Front was the Gate of the Porch, forty cubits high, and twenty cubits broad: It had no doors to it at all, but it was an open Gate, into which whosoever stood in the Court might look and see the space of the Porch within. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 &c. All this front was gilt with gold, and through it all the first house (that is, the Porch within) might be seen, and that glittered with gold also: Now by all this Front, Josephus, (for they are his words) meaneth not the whole face of the Porch, or all the hundred cubits long, and hundred and twenty high, but the very front of the Gate, or entrance only, which he showeth to have been seventy cubits high, and twenty five broad: And herein the Talmud and he do not clash, though the Talmud say, that the height was only forty cubits, and the breadth but twenty, for it speaks only of the very hollow entrance, but he speaks also of the Posts and head or front of the whole Gate-house, as we observed about the other Gates before.

The Talmud likewise speaks of five 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 beams of some choice wood (the Learned Buxtorfius translates it quercinae ) that were laid over this Gate, curiously wrought with knots and flowers, and a row of stone still laid between beam and beam: The lowest beam that lay on the head of the Gate was a cubit on either side longer than the Gate was broad: then was laid on that a row of stone: After that another carved beam a cubit on either end longer than the other; and then a row of stone. Then another beam, and so of the rest, every beam being a cubit at either end longer than that that lay below it. These were thus laid over the Gate to bear the weight that was above; they rose to a great height, were curiously engraven, and gilt, and from the highest there was a neat descending border gathered at either end of the beams, still inward and inward, as the beams shortened, and at last it ran down by the cheeks of the entry two cubits and an half broad, on either side the Gate: And this was the front that Josephus meaneth.

And now turn behind this Porch, at whether end you will, and look Westward: There ran the body of the Temple itself, pointing exactly upon the middle of the Porch, or just upon this entrance that we have been speaking of, the breadth of it between wall and wall, just equal with the breadth of this entrance; but the walls and chambers built on either side, of such a breadth, as that the whole came to seventy cubits broad: and thus doth Ariel or the Lion of God, as the Jews interpret it, represent the proportion of a Lion, broad before in the large front the Porch, which was of an hundred cubits breadth, and narrow behind, in the buildings of the house reduced in breadth to seventy cubits; which breadth to take up in its several parcels, we will begin at the North side, and thus we find these particular measures.

  • 1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The wall of the Gallery five cubits thick, this was the outmost wall of all, and it rose to the battlements or first Leads mentioned before; where the foundation for six cubits high, was said to be six cubits thick: but that odd cubit is not here reckoned, because they count it not from the very foundation, but from the wall above, as any one would count in such a building.
  • 2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The gallery three cubits broad.
  • 3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The wall of the chambers five cubits thick.
  • 4. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The chambers themselves six cubits broad.
  • 5. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The wall of the Temple six cubits thick.
  • 6. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The breadth of the Temple within from wall to wall twenty cubits.
  • 7. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The other wall of it six cubits thick.
  • 8. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The breadth of the chambers six cubits.
  • 9. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The wall of the chambers five cubits thick.
  • 10. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The place of the coming down of the water, three cubits broad.
  • 11. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The outmost wall five cubits. Seventy in all.

Now the Chambers were in number eight and thirty, fifteen upon the Northside, fifteen upon the South, and eight at the West end. They were in three stories, five in the lowest stories, and five over them, and five over those; thus on the North and South sides: but at the West end there were three on the ground, and three over them, and two over those. Every Chamber was six cubits broad, and twice as long (only the two highest Chambers at the West end were of a greater length). And there was a space between the Chambers on the same floor, in manner of an entry of some seven cubits and an half broad, that you might pass in it betwixt Chamber and Chamber, to every Chamber door which was upon the side.

Before these Chambers there ran a Gallery from the East end of the building to the West (but at the West end there was none such) of three cubits broad, by which you were carried along to any of these Entries between the Chambers, and so to any Chamber door: In the outmost wall of the Fabric, toward the North and the South, there were four doors on either side, into four entries (for so many there were between five Chambers) but as soon as you were come within the doors, there ran a Gallery along on your right hand and left, over which you stepped into the entry that was before you: or if you went not in at the door that was just opposite to the Entry that you would go to, you might go in at any door you thought good, and this Gallery would lead you to that Entry.

Thus was it with the lowest Chambers, and the like Gallery and Entries were also in the middle story, and in the highest: Now the way to go up into them, was by a large pair of turning stairs, in a Turret at the North-East corner of the North side; by which stairs you went up to the first floor, and there if you would, you might land in the Gallery, and go there to what Entry or Chamber you would; or if you would go higher, you might do so likewise into the Gallery in the third story; and if you had a mind, you might yet go higher up these stairs, up to the Leads, to walk over the Chambers, on the roof, round about their whole pyle.

But besides this Staircase-turret, which thus conveyed to the roof of the buildings, there was such another, at the furthest end of everyone of the Entries that have been spoken of, which carried up to the first and second floor, or to the upper Chambers, but went not so high, as to convey to the roof: And so had you gone in at any of the four doors to the ground Chambers, either on the North side of the House, or on the South, stepping over the Gallery, you came into the Entry between two Chambers, one on your right hand, and another on your left, and their doors opening into the Entry, and facing one another; but before you, towards the Temple wall, there was a round large Turret-like stair case, into which you might go out of either Chamber, and so go up stairs into the Chambers over head: and from thence up stairs again, into the Chambers over them. And thus are we to understand that Talmudic passage, of no small difficulty at the first sight. There were three doors to everyone of the Chambers, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 One to the Chamber on the right hand, and another to the Chamber on the left (that is, one door to the Entry on the one side, and another to the Entry on the other,) and one to the Chamber over head, that is, into this Stair-case that carried up to the Chambers above. And thus one went up from the lowest story to the highest by the middle: for they went up with winding stairs into the middle story, and out of the middle into the third.

The West-end Chambers had no Gallery at all before them, but you stepped immediately through the doors that were in the outmost wall into the Entries, and at the end of the Entries there was such a Stair-case as this, which conveyed and carried you up from story to story. On the South there were such Galleries in the three heights, as there were on the North, and such Stair-cases at the end of the Entries, joining to the Templewall, but that space where the Galleries were, was called by another name. Not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Mesibbah, as it was called on the North-side, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the place of the coming down of the water: Not as if here were the gutters to carry off the rains from the whole House, but because in this space were laid the pipes that brought water down from the Fountain Etam, to the Cistern or Well, in the Well-room that was made to receive them: They were so laid, as that they hindered not the access or passage in the Galleries, to any of the Chambers, and it may be they were not to be seen at all, but lay under ground in the ground gallery; but they were glad thus to distinguish between the North and Southsides, by these different names, as that they might the easier and quicker be understood, when they spake of a Chamber in the Mesibbah, or of a Chamber in the conveyance of the water.

These Chambers, which were of this number, measure, posture and composure that hath been spoken, and whose floor and roof-beams rested upon benches in the Templewall, as was observed before, were for the laying up some choice Treasures and Utensils, as also for Corn, Wine, and Oil, and whatsoever was brought in of Tithes, and first Fruits, for the sustenance and subsistence of the Priests that attended upon the Altar, and they were as Treasuries or Storehouses for that purpose, Neh. XII. 44. Mal. III. 10.

And now let us go up the stairs of the great Turret, in the North-East corner on the North-side (for there was none such on the South) that will carry us to the roof of this building, or on the Leads. At the top of the stairs he went out at a wicket, and his face was then towards the West. He walked upon the Leads along upon the North-side till he came to the West corner: when he came thither he turned his face toward the South corner: when he came to the South, he turned his face Eastward, and went all along on the South-side, till he came up a good way, and there was a door through the Temple-wall into the rooms over the Holy and most Holy places. In this room over them (which was fifty cubits from the ground, and so were the Leads) there were these three things worth taking notice of.

  • 1. That as soon as a man was stepped within the door, there were two Cedar beams or Trees laid close together, sloping still upward, and lying along the wall, by which (they were laid so handsomely slope, and steps were either cut in them, or nailed upon them) one might go to the very top of the Temple, and this was the way to the higher Leads.
  • 2. Just over the parting between the Holy and most Holy place, there were some little Pillasters set, which shown the partition.
  • 3. In the floor over the most holy place, there were divers holes like Trapdoors, through which, when occasion required, they let down Workmen by cords, to mend the walls of the most holy place as there was need. And they let them down in Chests or close Trunks, or some such things, where they could see nothing but their work before them, and the reason of this is given by the Jews 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That they might not feed their Eyes with looking upon the most holy place. Once a year between Passover and Passover, they whited the Temple walls within: and for this and other necessary work about the House within, it was desired and endeavored that Priests or Levites should do the work; but if such were not found to do it, then other Israelites were admitted, and they were admitted to go through the doors into the most holy place, if Chests or Trunks, were not to be found in which to let them down.



CHAP. XIII. The Porch.

SECT. I. The steps up to it.

IN taking particular account of the length of the building from East to West, (which was an hundred cubits) we will first begin at the Porch (which was the beautiful Front Eastward) and view severally every special place and parcel till we come to the West end.

The spreading of the Porch in length was an hundred cubits, and in height an hundred and twenty cubits higher than the height of the Temple: And this Porch which was a cross building to the Temple itself, and so high above it, may not improperly be conceived to be that place whither Satan brought our Savior in his temptation, when he is said to have brought him 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , properly to the wing of the Temple.

There were several things at this Front, before we stir from it, that were very remarkable, and cannot be passed without observation: And the first that we will look upon, shall be the steps that rose up out of the Court into this entrance, which were twelve in number, every step half a cubit rising, six cubits in the whole rise, and so much was the floor of the Porch higher than the floor of the Court. And here we meet with a passage in the Treatise Middoth, in the place cited in the Margin, which is exceeding hard to be understood, and the very same also in Maimonides, in whom it is harder. The words are these: Having spoken of the steps that went up to the Porch, that they were twelve, and that the rise of every step was half a cubit, and the breadth of it to stand upon a cubit, it comes on and saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Which applied to the steps, and their rising, I should translate to this sense, At every cubits rise there was a half pace of three cubits broad, and at the highest cubits rise there was a half pace of four cubits broad. The meaning is this, That as you had gone up two steps (which being half a cubit high apiece, made but a cubit rise) at the third step the space you tread upon was enlarged, and was three cubits broad, whereas the steps themselves that you had come up, were but one cubit breadth: And so from this enlarged breadth, or half space, step two steps further and there was another, and after two steps more another, and after two steps yet more there was the highest, which was an half space, or inlargment of four cubits breadth: And so every third step of the twelve was an half pace, or such an enlargement, which made the Ascent exceeding beautiful and stately. And this helpeth to understand a passage in the Treatise Joma, which at the first reading is not easy to be understood. Where relating how when the High Priest on the day of Expiation had slain his own Bullock, he gave the blood to one to stir it, to keep it from congealing, it saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That he stirred it about, upon the fourth half pace of the Temple; which Maymony expresseth, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He stirred it about that it should not congeal, upon the fourth half pace of the Temple without; that is, upon the very top of these twelve steps that went up into the Porch. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Baal Aruch (after the production of many examples of it) renders by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Standings, or Pillars, or Benches; I find not a fitter word for it here to express it by than Half-pace.

Now Maymony in Beth habbechirah, or in his Treatise of the Temple, having to deal with these words of the Talmud that we have been speaking of, doth utter them thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Round about the Walls of the Porch from below upward they were thus: One cubit plain, and then an half pace of three cubits, one cubit plain (or an ordinary rising of steps) and then another half pace of three cubits, and so up; so that the half paces did go about the Walls of the Porch; His meaning is the same with what was said before, but he addeth somewhat more, and that is, that these twelve steps thus beautifully spreading, every third step into an half pace, did not only go up to the entrance into the Porch, but also there was such steps all along the front of the Porch Eastward; and also such steps at either end of it, North and South; and the reason of this was because the floor of the Porch was higher so much than, the floor of the Court, and there then were Doors in the Buildings besides the great Door that gave passage into the Temple, and into these Doors you could not get without such steps.

SECT. II. The two Pillars Jachin and Boaz.

OF the Gate or entrance into the Porch, and so into the Temple, and of its dimensions and beauty hath been spoken before, and therefore as to that particular we need say no more here, but may be silent: but one main part of the Ornament and beauty of it was there omitted, and reserved to this place, and that is the two famous Pillars that in Solomon's Temple stood at the cheeks of the entrance or passage in, Jachin and Boaz. I find not indeed mention among the Jews Antiquities of any such Pillars set at the entrance of the Temple, that we are surveying (which was the Temple built by Herod, the Temple that was in the days of our Savior) though Ezekiel speak of such Pillars at the door of his Temple, Chap. XL. 49. yet because we desire to give account chiefly of what we find recorded in Scripture concerning the Temple in general, we cannot pass over two such memorable Monuments as these two Pillars, of whom the Story and relation is held out by the Scripture so largely and exactly.

  • 1. These two Pillars (which were of brass) consisted either of them of two parts, the Pillar itself, and the Boll and Chapiter that was set on the head of it. The Pillar itself was hollow, the circle incompassing the hollow four fingers thick, and the compass of that circling twelve cubits about, Jer. LII. 21. 1 King. VII. 15. the whole thickness or diameter of either Pillar four cubits, or three cubits, and four fifth parts of a cubit, as is the reckoning of Levi Gersom. The Chapiter or Boll likewise of either Pillar was hollow, and was a huge piece of Brass Boll or oval fashion, which had a very large hole in it, into which the top of the Pillar was let, and so this Chapiter sat upon it.
  • 2. The length or height of either Pillar was eighteen cubits, besides the Chapiter, for the Text doth clearly reckon the height of Pillar and Chapiter distinctly. Now the Book of Chronicles summeth the length of both Pillars together, and saith they were five and thirty cubits high, 2 Chron. III. 15. in which it cometh short a cubit of that account and sum that is given in the Book of Kings and Jeremiah, which say, That either Pillar was eighteen cubits, and so the whole of both was six and thirty: But half a cubit of either Pillar was taken up, and hid in the hole of the Chapiter that sat upon it: and so that Text in the Book of Chronicles, measures them as they stood with the Chapiters upon them; two and twenty cubits and an half high, Pillar and Chapiter and all.
  • 3. The Chapiter or oval on the head of either Pillar is called in Hebrew 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which Rabbi Solomon renders in the vulgar 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Pumels, Kimchi, A Crown, with which the Chaldee agrees, who expresseth it by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Corona; but Levi Gershom more exactly, saith, it was like two Crowns joined together. It was a huge great oval of five cubits high, and did not only sit upon the head of the Pillars, but also flowred or spread them, being larger about a great deal than the Pillars themselves.
  • 4. Whereas it is said both in 1 King. VII. 16. & Jer. LII. 22. that the height of either Chapiter was five cubits, and yet in 2 King. XXV. 17. it is said, that the height of the Chapiter was three cubits; it is generally and well answered by the Jews, that the lowest two cubits of the Chapiter were plain, and without any graving or imbroidering, but the three upper cubits were of such embroidery. To which may be added, and some of them do add it, that the two lower cubits were but the rising into the spreading or belly of the Chapiter, and that they there are not reckoned in that place, but only from the belly upward the account is taken.
  • 5. The ingravery or embroidery, or both of these Chapiters is thus described by the Holy Ghost in various particulars; As.

1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 King. VII. 17. which our English renders, Nets of Checkerwork: And so the Seventy useth the word Nets also: The original word doth properly signify the inwrapping and infolding of the branches of Trees one within another, as Neh. I. 10. Gen. XXII. 13. Jer. IV. 7. Isaiah. X. 34. As Vines or Thickets, (saith Kimchi explaining the word) that are caught and infolded one within another: And so some others express this clause 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That the embroidery was like the branches of Palm Trees: or like the handful of branches they used to carry in their hands at the Feast of Tabernacles: This I conceive to be the proper meaning of the words, that the Chapiters were curiously wrought with branch-work, seven goodly branches standing up with their feet from the belly of the oval, and their boughs and leaves curiously and lovelily intermingled and inwoven one with another. And the words might not improperly be translated thus, for the clearer understanding of their meaning, and of the manner of the work itself. With thickets of branch-work, and wreaths of chain-work.

2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Wreathes of Chain-work. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in Deut. XXII. 12. signifies the fringes that they wore upon their Garments for memorials of the Law, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Chaldee Paraphrast: And according to such a sense is it to be taken here, that about the belly of the Chapiter was a curious Fring or border of wreathen and intwined work, upon which border stood the feet or root of the branchwork spoken of before; and those branches from thence went upward spreading upon the swelling of the Chapiter, and bowing toward the top of the oval as the oval bowed, and they there growing into their contracted tops.

3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Two rows of Pomegranates, were wrought artificially below the boughs of these branches, as if they had been the Apples that those branches bare, but only that they were not scattered dispersedly among the branches, as Apples use to be in their Trees, but were ranked into two several rows or borders severally below them.

But here we had need to look upon the Text with much seriousness, for in two things about this very thing it speaks obscurely and with much difficulty: For first in speaking of these rows it saith, That the Chapiters were above or upon the Pomegranates, 1 King. VII. 18. Now it is so harsh to hear of the Chapiters being upon the Pomegranates, whereas it is most undoubted that the Pomegranates were upon the Chapiters, that some Copies, as David Kimchi tells us, have been so bold as to change the word, and instead of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 upon the head of the Pomegranates, to read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 upon the head of the Pillars; but as he well observes, the Masoreth by putting a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 upon it, or a note that it is not read so anywhere else, doth conclude that it is and must be read so here, upon the head of the Pomegranates: Now the construction of this may be fetched from 2 Chron. III. 16. where it is said, That he put the Pomegranates upon the chains; that is, the two rows of the Pomegranates were close above the Fring or border of chain-work, which was as it were the bottom and basis of the embroidery; and so the bulk and body of the Chapiter where the embroidery was, was above these rows of the Pomegranates; and though the stalks of the branches rested upon the Fringe or Chain-work, yet did they not spread into their leaves and branches till their stalks had carried them above the Pomegranates: therefore the construction and sense of that Verse, viz. 1 King. VII. 18. is to be taken thus, Thus he made the Pillars: And there were two rows round about by the branch-work which branch-work was for to cover the Chapiter, even that of the Chapiter that was above the Pomegranates. Secondly, There is no small scruple about the number of the Pomegranates, because the Text doth sum them up in several countings, for in 2 Chron. III. 16. there is mention only of an hundred. In 1 King. VII. 20. of two hundred. And in 1 King. VII. 42. of four hundred: In all which diversity the main difficulty rests in the count of Jeremy; for there was an hundred Pomegranates in every row, according to the reckoning of the Book of Chronicles; and so there were two hundred upon either Chapiter, as is the account of the Book of Kings in the former place cited, that is four, hundred upon both Chapiters, according to the sum of the later quotation; but what to make of Jeremiah 's ninety six is somewhat intricate at the first sight: His words are these, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 wherefore the last word is hard to translate, and breeds all the scruple. The Chaldee and Seventy render it, The Pomegranates were ninety six on a side, and so doth the Italian and our English; but this is of a very hard construction, since the rows of Pomgrenates were in circles, the Chapiter being round; and whereas there were but an hundred in a row, how could ninety six of them be upon one side? The word is more easy to pharaphrase, than verbatim to translate. The meaning of the clause is this, That whereas there was an hundred Pomegranates in every row; when the Pillars were set to the Wall, four of every row could not be seen, but ninety six might, the other four being hid behind the Pillar as it stood close up to the Wall: And so the Pomegranates were ninety six only in sight. Therefore the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 may well be translated in the clause thus, And the Pomegranates were ninety six on the open sides, or toward the open air: for in this sense I conceive 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to stand here.

4. It is said moreover, in the Text in the Book of Kings, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 Kings VII. 19. And the Chapiters which were on the top of the Pillars had Lily-work in the Porch four cubits; for so should I rather translate it, than were of Lillywork; and that upon these grounds: 1. Because the work of the Chapiters is so exactly described before to be of Branch-work and Pomegranates, and that but for three cubits or thereabout, that I cannot possibly imagine how they should be said besides, to be of Lily-work four cubits. 2. The Text expressly telleth afterward, That the Lily-work was on the top of the Pillars, verse. 22. and not on the top or sides of the Chapiters. 3. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 In the Porch, or by the Porch, hath its special emphasis and intention; for it is not said at all, that either the Chapiters or the Pomegranate-work were in the Porch, but the thing is referred only to the Lily-work.

The meaning thefore of the Verse appeareth to be this, That at the head of the Pillar, even at the setting on of the Chapiter, there was a curious and a large border or circle of Lily-work, which stood out four cubits under the Chapiter, and then turned down, every Lily or long tongue of Brass, with a heat bending, and so seemed as a flowred Crown to the head of the Pillar, and as a curious Garland whereon the Chapiter had its seat: And that particular expression, that it was in or by the Porch, intendeth to show that these long tongues of Brass which were made like Lilies, did not suddenly decline, and lie down upon the sides of the Pillars, nor suddenly ascend and stick upon the sides of the Chapiter, but stood out into and along the Porch a four cubit circle, after the manner of a spread Lily, and then the tongue bended downward, as the Lily doth.

And this construction of that Verse, helpeth to clear and explain the next Verse that follows after it, which otherwise would cost some pains to translate it out of the original, or to make facile sense of it being translated: In consonancy and contexture to the Verse before, so understood as hath been held out, this Verse may be intrepreted and paraphrased thus: And the Chapiters upon the two pillars were also above this Lily work, for they sat upon the growing out of it, even from over against the belly, which was by the Branch-work▪ for the Lily-work wrought out, as far as the belly of the Chapiters wrought out, with an accurate bowing or swelling upwards towards the belly, where the stalks of the branch-work, and the rows of the Pomegranates were; even as a Lily gently swelleth up, before the tongue or utmost point of it turneth down again.

5. The place where these Pillars stood is somewhat uncertain; the Text indeed saith, they stood before the House, 2 Chron, III. 15. and before the Temple, verse. 17. but yet it is to seek, whether within the Porch at the entering in, or without the Porch, or within the Porch at the Temple door, which last is the opinion of Rabbi Sol. upon the Text cited. Upon these four reasons I am induced to conceive that they stood within the Porch, even at the very entering into it, joining or standing up to the very cheeks of the Gate or entrance. 1. Because Ezekiel hath so placed his two Pillars in the Porch of his Temple, namely, at the top of the steps, by the posts or cheeks of the entrance itself; Ezek. XL. 49. 2. Because, as we observed before, it is said, that the Lily-work under the Chapiters was four cubits in the Porch. 3. Because the Book of Kings saith That Solomon set up the Pillars, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for the Porch, as the word properly signifies, though David Kimchi, and our English translate it In: The expression seemeth to intimate these two things, First, That the Pillars were set up for the Porch door, and not for the Temple door, as was the opinion of Solomon Jarchi cited before: And, Secondly, That they stood for the Porch, or very entrance into the building, as doorcheeks or posts at that entrance 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , At the door cheeks of the Porch, as saith Josephus. 4. That obscure passage of Ezekiel, Chap. XL. 48. The breadth of the Gate was three cubits on this side, and three cubits on that side, cannot be so understood, as if the entry or passage into the Porch were but six cubits broad (and why also should he speak of this side, and that side, if he meant but one entire breadth?) but it is well understood by Kimchi to mean, that on either side of the entry there was something standing out into the breadth of the entry, three cubits, which made the passage itself but fourteen cubits broad: which measure of three cubits, though it fell short one cubit of the thickness of these Pillars cast by Solomon, yet suiting with the measure of Ezekiel 's Pillars, it may do this for us, as to show us how these Pillars that we have in hand were placed, by the disposing and placing of those of his, namely, on your right hand, and on your left, as soon as ever you were stepped within the Porch.

The names of the two Pillars (to omit the fancies of some Jews about them) were Jachin and Boaz, 1 King. VII. 21. which words denote Establishment and Strength, Jachin signifieth he will establish: from God's promise to establish the Throne of David, and his people Israel: And Boaz denoteth Herein is strength; namely, alluding either to God's promise, in which was all their strength and settlement: or to the Ark which was within, which is called, The strength of the Lord, Psal. LXXX. 2. and CV. 4.

SECT. III. The Closets for the Butchering Instruments. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

YET before we enter into the Porch, and so into the Temple, there is one thing more calls for our observation, and that is, certain Closets or places that were in this pile of the Porch, in which were laid up the Knives and instruments that were used by the Priests, about the killing, and slaying, and cutting up the Beasts to be Sacrificed. The Treatise Middoth giveth intelligence and account of these places in these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The Porch was broader than the Temple, fifteen cubits on the North, and fifteen cubits on the South and that that exceeded was called Beth hachillapoth, where they laid up the knives.

The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 doth signify the butchering Knives of the Temple, Ezr. I. 9. from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 saith Ibn Ezra, as it betokeneth cutting off, which it doth, Isaiah. II. 18. Prov. XXXI. 8. And so saith Kimchi on the same place 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are Knives: And of this sense is Beth hachillapoth, for because they laid up the Knives there; therefore the place was called, The Chamber of the laying up of the Knives 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

There was therefore on either end of the extent of the Porch for that space that it stood out further than the buildings of the Temple, a Chamber, one at the end towards the North, and another at the end towards the South, in which two large Chambers were four and twenty little Closets; wherein the Knives were laid up severally for the four and twenty courses of the Priests: And these and such like little Closets the Jews call 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Fenestrae, or Windows; because they were Closets or Boxes joining to the Wall. And besides these that we are speaking of where the Butchery Instruments were laid up, Maymony reckons fourscore and sixteen more, for the laying up of other things, four for everyone of the four and twenty Courses. There were (saith he) ninety six Closets 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Temple, wherein to lay up the Vestments, four Closets for every Course. And the name of every Course was written upon their Closets, and they were all shut: And when the men of any Course came into the service upon the Sabbath, they opened their Closets, and took out the Utensils: and when they went out of the service they restored their Vestments to their Closets again, and shut them up. And why made they four Closets for every Course? Namely, that the Utensils might not be jumbled together, but all the Breeches were in one Closet, and upon it was written, Breeches; Girdles in another Closet, and upon it written, Girdles; All the Bonets in another Closet, and all the Coats in another.

Now he neither telleth where these Closets were; nor speaketh he among them all, of these for the Knives, that are before us: and the reason of this later, is easily given, because in the place where he hath the words that are produced, he is only speaking of the installing and arraying of the Priests: But where to find these ninety six Closets he hath left us at uncertainty. Were they in the rest of the building of this Porch? It is not like they were, because the Priests usually came ready with their Vestments on, into the Court, and especially so high as the Porch, and came not thither for their Vestments to put them on: there was room enough in the other buildings about the Courts to lodge all these Closets in; but where to point them out we must suspend.

But what became of the other Rooms of the Porch, besides the entrance; and these two at either end of the building; for there were five and twenty cubits between the entrance and these Chambers on either side upon the ground, and there were divers Chambers and several Stories over head, the building being so very long, and so very high? There is not express intimation to be had, either in Scripture, or in the Jews Antiquities, as far as I can find, how these several parts were disposed of, and therefore we can assert nothing, but leave it to censure.

A renowned monument the Jews speak of, namely, Crowns that were laid up 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 In Closets, for a memorial: as it is said in the Prophet Zacharias (for they take that literally) Zach. VI. 14. And the Crowns shall be to Helem, and to Tobiah, and to Jedaiah, and to Hen the Son of Zephaniah, for a memorial in the Temple of the Lord. And they say, that the young Men or Candidates of the Priesthood did use to climb up Golden Chains which were fixed to the roof of the entry of the Porch, that they might look up into the Closets to see these Crowns.

SECT. IV. A Golden Vine in the Porch, and a Golden Candlestick: and a Marble and a Golden Table.

AND now let us go in at the entrance of the Porch. And there Josephus his prospective doth represent it to us in these colors, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , &c. That it had no doors, because it did represent the open Heaven, and all the front of the Gate was gilt with Gold; and through the Gate you might see all the Porch within, which was large (for it was twenty cubits long, and eleven over) and all about the inner door shining with gold.

Over this inner door (which meaneth the door of the Temple) there was a great golden Vine, of so vast a bigness that (as the same Josephus relateth) it had 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , bunches of Grapes as big as the proportion of a Man. And like a true natural Vine, it grew greater and greater, till it came up to so great a bigness by time and degrees, for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Men would be offering, some Gold to make a leaf, some a Grape, some a bunch, and these were hung up upon it, and so it was increasing continually.

Over the Temple door also there was a golden Candlestick, which was given thither by Helena the Queen of Adiabeni, a Woman of famous renown, and of great benefactorship, towards the Jews; of whom, and of whose Sons Izates and Monobazes, Josephus hath a large Story, Antiq. lib. 20. cap. 2. whither I refer the Reader. Of this Candlestick of her bestowing, there is mention in the Talmudic Treatise Joma, in this passage. Ben Kattin made the twelve Cocks for the Laver, whereas before it had but two; he also made the Engine for the Laver, (of which hereafter) that the water of it might not be unclean, by staying in it all night. Munbaz (Monobazes) the King made all the handles of the Vessels which were for the service of the day of Expiation, of Gold. Helena his Mother made the Golden Candlestick over the Temple door: she also made the Golden Table whereon was written the Section about the suspected Wife, &c.

In the Porch on either side of the Temple door there was a Table. On the right side, a Table of Marble, and on it they set down the Shew-bread as they carried it new into the Temple: And on the left side was a Table of Gold on which they set the old Bread down for a while, when they fetched it out: And the reason why they began on the Marble Table, and ended on the Golden was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Because they rose higher and higher with holy things, and went not lower and lower.




SECT. I. The steps up to it.

IN taking particular account of the length of the building from East to West, (which was an hundred cubits) we will first begin at the Porch (which was the beautiful Front Eastward) and view severally every special place and parcel till we come to the West end.

The spreading of the Porch in length was an hundred cubits, and in height an hundred and twenty cubits higher than the height of the Temple: And this Porch which was a cross building to the Temple itself, and so high above it, may not improperly be conceived to be that place whither Satan brought our Savior in his temptation, when he is said to have brought him 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , properly to the wing of the Temple.

There were several things at this Front, before we stir from it, that were very remarkable, and cannot be passed without observation: And the first that we will look upon, shall be the steps that rose up out of the Court into this entrance, which were twelve in number, every step half a cubit rising, six cubits in the whole rise, and so much was the floor of the Porch higher than the floor of the Court. And here we meet with a passage in the Treatise Middoth, in the place cited in the Margin, which is exceeding hard to be understood, and the very same also in Maimonides, in whom it is harder. The words are these: Having spoken of the steps that went up to the Porch, that they were twelve, and that the rise of every step was half a cubit, and the breadth of it to stand upon a cubit, it comes on and saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Which applied to the steps, and their rising, I should translate to this sense, At every cubits rise there was a half pace of three cubits broad, and at the highest cubits rise there was a half pace of four cubits broad. The meaning is this, That as you had gone up two steps (which being half a cubit high apiece, made but a cubit rise) at the third step the space you tread upon was enlarged, and was three cubits broad, whereas the steps themselves that you had come up, were but one cubit breadth: And so from this enlarged breadth, or half space, step two steps further and there was another, and after two steps more another, and after two steps yet more there was the highest, which was an half space, or inlargment of four cubits breadth: And so every third step of the twelve was an half pace, or such an enlargement, which made the Ascent exceeding beautiful and stately. And this helpeth to understand a passage in the Treatise Joma, which at the first reading is not easy to be understood. Where relating how when the High Priest on the day of Expiation had slain his own Bullock, he gave the blood to one to stir it, to keep it from congealing, it saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That he stirred it about, upon the fourth half pace of the Temple; which Maymony expresseth, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He stirred it about that it should not congeal, upon the fourth half pace of the Temple without; that is, upon the very top of these twelve steps that went up into the Porch. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Baal Aruch (after the production of many examples of it) renders by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Standings, or Pillars, or Benches; I find not a fitter word for it here to express it by than Half-pace.

Now Maymony in Beth habbechirah, or in his Treatise of the Temple, having to deal with these words of the Talmud that we have been speaking of, doth utter them thus, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Round about the Walls of the Porch from below upward they were thus: One cubit plain, and then an half pace of three cubits, one cubit plain (or an ordinary rising of steps) and then another half pace of three cubits, and so up; so that the half paces did go about the Walls of the Porch; His meaning is the same with what was said before, but he addeth somewhat more, and that is, that these twelve steps thus beautifully spreading, every third step into an half pace, did not only go up to the entrance into the Porch, but also there was such steps all along the front of the Porch Eastward; and also such steps at either end of it, North and South; and the reason of this was because the floor of the Porch was higher so much than, the floor of the Court, and there then were Doors in the Buildings besides the great Door that gave passage into the Temple, and into these Doors you could not get without such steps.




SECT. II. The two Pillars Jachin and Boaz.

OF the Gate or entrance into the Porch, and so into the Temple, and of its dimensions and beauty hath been spoken before, and therefore as to that particular we need say no more here, but may be silent: but one main part of the Ornament and beauty of it was there omitted, and reserved to this place, and that is the two famous Pillars that in Solomon's Temple stood at the cheeks of the entrance or passage in, Jachin and Boaz. I find not indeed mention among the Jews Antiquities of any such Pillars set at the entrance of the Temple, that we are surveying (which was the Temple built by Herod, the Temple that was in the days of our Savior) though Ezekiel speak of such Pillars at the door of his Temple, Chap. XL. 49. yet because we desire to give account chiefly of what we find recorded in Scripture concerning the Temple in general, we cannot pass over two such memorable Monuments as these two Pillars, of whom the Story and relation is held out by the Scripture so largely and exactly.

  • 1. These two Pillars (which were of brass) consisted either of them of two parts, the Pillar itself, and the Boll and Chapiter that was set on the head of it. The Pillar itself was hollow, the circle incompassing the hollow four fingers thick, and the compass of that circling twelve cubits about, Jer. LII. 21. 1 King. VII. 15. the whole thickness or diameter of either Pillar four cubits, or three cubits, and four fifth parts of a cubit, as is the reckoning of Levi Gersom. The Chapiter or Boll likewise of either Pillar was hollow, and was a huge piece of Brass Boll or oval fashion, which had a very large hole in it, into which the top of the Pillar was let, and so this Chapiter sat upon it.
  • 2. The length or height of either Pillar was eighteen cubits, besides the Chapiter, for the Text doth clearly reckon the height of Pillar and Chapiter distinctly. Now the Book of Chronicles summeth the length of both Pillars together, and saith they were five and thirty cubits high, 2 Chron. III. 15. in which it cometh short a cubit of that account and sum that is given in the Book of Kings and Jeremiah, which say, That either Pillar was eighteen cubits, and so the whole of both was six and thirty: But half a cubit of either Pillar was taken up, and hid in the hole of the Chapiter that sat upon it: and so that Text in the Book of Chronicles, measures them as they stood with the Chapiters upon them; two and twenty cubits and an half high, Pillar and Chapiter and all.
  • 3. The Chapiter or oval on the head of either Pillar is called in Hebrew 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which Rabbi Solomon renders in the vulgar 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Pumels, Kimchi, A Crown, with which the Chaldee agrees, who expresseth it by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Corona; but Levi Gershom more exactly, saith, it was like two Crowns joined together. It was a huge great oval of five cubits high, and did not only sit upon the head of the Pillars, but also flowred or spread them, being larger about a great deal than the Pillars themselves.
  • 4. Whereas it is said both in 1 King. VII. 16. & Jer. LII. 22. that the height of either Chapiter was five cubits, and yet in 2 King. XXV. 17. it is said, that the height of the Chapiter was three cubits; it is generally and well answered by the Jews, that the lowest two cubits of the Chapiter were plain, and without any graving or imbroidering, but the three upper cubits were of such embroidery. To which may be added, and some of them do add it, that the two lower cubits were but the rising into the spreading or belly of the Chapiter, and that they there are not reckoned in that place, but only from the belly upward the account is taken.
  • 5. The ingravery or embroidery, or both of these Chapiters is thus described by the Holy Ghost in various particulars; As.

1. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 King. VII. 17. which our English renders, Nets of Checkerwork: And so the Seventy useth the word Nets also: The original word doth properly signify the inwrapping and infolding of the branches of Trees one within another, as Neh. I. 10. Gen. XXII. 13. Jer. IV. 7. Isaiah. X. 34. As Vines or Thickets, (saith Kimchi explaining the word) that are caught and infolded one within another: And so some others express this clause 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That the embroidery was like the branches of Palm Trees: or like the handful of branches they used to carry in their hands at the Feast of Tabernacles: This I conceive to be the proper meaning of the words, that the Chapiters were curiously wrought with branch-work, seven goodly branches standing up with their feet from the belly of the oval, and their boughs and leaves curiously and lovelily intermingled and inwoven one with another. And the words might not improperly be translated thus, for the clearer understanding of their meaning, and of the manner of the work itself. With thickets of branch-work, and wreaths of chain-work.

2. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , Wreathes of Chain-work. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in Deut. XXII. 12. signifies the fringes that they wore upon their Garments for memorials of the Law, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Chaldee Paraphrast: And according to such a sense is it to be taken here, that about the belly of the Chapiter was a curious Fring or border of wreathen and intwined work, upon which border stood the feet or root of the branchwork spoken of before; and those branches from thence went upward spreading upon the swelling of the Chapiter, and bowing toward the top of the oval as the oval bowed, and they there growing into their contracted tops.

3. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Two rows of Pomegranates, were wrought artificially below the boughs of these branches, as if they had been the Apples that those branches bare, but only that they were not scattered dispersedly among the branches, as Apples use to be in their Trees, but were ranked into two several rows or borders severally below them.

But here we had need to look upon the Text with much seriousness, for in two things about this very thing it speaks obscurely and with much difficulty: For first in speaking of these rows it saith, That the Chapiters were above or upon the Pomegranates, 1 King. VII. 18. Now it is so harsh to hear of the Chapiters being upon the Pomegranates, whereas it is most undoubted that the Pomegranates were upon the Chapiters, that some Copies, as David Kimchi tells us, have been so bold as to change the word, and instead of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 upon the head of the Pomegranates, to read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 upon the head of the Pillars; but as he well observes, the Masoreth by putting a 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 upon it, or a note that it is not read so anywhere else, doth conclude that it is and must be read so here, upon the head of the Pomegranates: Now the construction of this may be fetched from 2 Chron. III. 16. where it is said, That he put the Pomegranates upon the chains; that is, the two rows of the Pomegranates were close above the Fring or border of chain-work, which was as it were the bottom and basis of the embroidery; and so the bulk and body of the Chapiter where the embroidery was, was above these rows of the Pomegranates; and though the stalks of the branches rested upon the Fringe or Chain-work, yet did they not spread into their leaves and branches till their stalks had carried them above the Pomegranates: therefore the construction and sense of that Verse, viz. 1 King. VII. 18. is to be taken thus, Thus he made the Pillars: And there were two rows round about by the branch-work which branch-work was for to cover the Chapiter, even that of the Chapiter that was above the Pomegranates. Secondly, There is no small scruple about the number of the Pomegranates, because the Text doth sum them up in several countings, for in 2 Chron. III. 16. there is mention only of an hundred. In 1 King. VII. 20. of two hundred. And in 1 King. VII. 42. of four hundred: In all which diversity the main difficulty rests in the count of Jeremy; for there was an hundred Pomegranates in every row, according to the reckoning of the Book of Chronicles; and so there were two hundred upon either Chapiter, as is the account of the Book of Kings in the former place cited, that is four, hundred upon both Chapiters, according to the sum of the later quotation; but what to make of Jeremiah 's ninety six is somewhat intricate at the first sight: His words are these, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 wherefore the last word is hard to translate, and breeds all the scruple. The Chaldee and Seventy render it, The Pomegranates were ninety six on a side, and so doth the Italian and our English; but this is of a very hard construction, since the rows of Pomgrenates were in circles, the Chapiter being round; and whereas there were but an hundred in a row, how could ninety six of them be upon one side? The word is more easy to pharaphrase, than verbatim to translate. The meaning of the clause is this, That whereas there was an hundred Pomegranates in every row; when the Pillars were set to the Wall, four of every row could not be seen, but ninety six might, the other four being hid behind the Pillar as it stood close up to the Wall: And so the Pomegranates were ninety six only in sight. Therefore the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 may well be translated in the clause thus, And the Pomegranates were ninety six on the open sides, or toward the open air: for in this sense I conceive 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to stand here.

4. It is said moreover, in the Text in the Book of Kings, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 Kings VII. 19. And the Chapiters which were on the top of the Pillars had Lily-work in the Porch four cubits; for so should I rather translate it, than were of Lillywork; and that upon these grounds: 1. Because the work of the Chapiters is so exactly described before to be of Branch-work and Pomegranates, and that but for three cubits or thereabout, that I cannot possibly imagine how they should be said besides, to be of Lily-work four cubits. 2. The Text expressly telleth afterward, That the Lily-work was on the top of the Pillars, verse. 22. and not on the top or sides of the Chapiters. 3. The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 In the Porch, or by the Porch, hath its special emphasis and intention; for it is not said at all, that either the Chapiters or the Pomegranate-work were in the Porch, but the thing is referred only to the Lily-work.

The meaning thefore of the Verse appeareth to be this, That at the head of the Pillar, even at the setting on of the Chapiter, there was a curious and a large border or circle of Lily-work, which stood out four cubits under the Chapiter, and then turned down, every Lily or long tongue of Brass, with a heat bending, and so seemed as a flowred Crown to the head of the Pillar, and as a curious Garland whereon the Chapiter had its seat: And that particular expression, that it was in or by the Porch, intendeth to show that these long tongues of Brass which were made like Lilies, did not suddenly decline, and lie down upon the sides of the Pillars, nor suddenly ascend and stick upon the sides of the Chapiter, but stood out into and along the Porch a four cubit circle, after the manner of a spread Lily, and then the tongue bended downward, as the Lily doth.

And this construction of that Verse, helpeth to clear and explain the next Verse that follows after it, which otherwise would cost some pains to translate it out of the original, or to make facile sense of it being translated: In consonancy and contexture to the Verse before, so understood as hath been held out, this Verse may be intrepreted and paraphrased thus: And the Chapiters upon the two pillars were also above this Lily work, for they sat upon the growing out of it, even from over against the belly, which was by the Branch-work▪ for the Lily-work wrought out, as far as the belly of the Chapiters wrought out, with an accurate bowing or swelling upwards towards the belly, where the stalks of the branch-work, and the rows of the Pomegranates were; even as a Lily gently swelleth up, before the tongue or utmost point of it turneth down again.

5. The place where these Pillars stood is somewhat uncertain; the Text indeed saith, they stood before the House, 2 Chron, III. 15. and before the Temple, verse. 17. but yet it is to seek, whether within the Porch at the entering in, or without the Porch, or within the Porch at the Temple door, which last is the opinion of Rabbi Sol. upon the Text cited. Upon these four reasons I am induced to conceive that they stood within the Porch, even at the very entering into it, joining or standing up to the very cheeks of the Gate or entrance. 1. Because Ezekiel hath so placed his two Pillars in the Porch of his Temple, namely, at the top of the steps, by the posts or cheeks of the entrance itself; Ezek. XL. 49. 2. Because, as we observed before, it is said, that the Lily-work under the Chapiters was four cubits in the Porch. 3. Because the Book of Kings saith That Solomon set up the Pillars, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for the Porch, as the word properly signifies, though David Kimchi, and our English translate it In: The expression seemeth to intimate these two things, First, That the Pillars were set up for the Porch door, and not for the Temple door, as was the opinion of Solomon Jarchi cited before: And, Secondly, That they stood for the Porch, or very entrance into the building, as doorcheeks or posts at that entrance 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , At the door cheeks of the Porch, as saith Josephus. 4. That obscure passage of Ezekiel, Chap. XL. 48. The breadth of the Gate was three cubits on this side, and three cubits on that side, cannot be so understood, as if the entry or passage into the Porch were but six cubits broad (and why also should he speak of this side, and that side, if he meant but one entire breadth?) but it is well understood by Kimchi to mean, that on either side of the entry there was something standing out into the breadth of the entry, three cubits, which made the passage itself but fourteen cubits broad: which measure of three cubits, though it fell short one cubit of the thickness of these Pillars cast by Solomon, yet suiting with the measure of Ezekiel 's Pillars, it may do this for us, as to show us how these Pillars that we have in hand were placed, by the disposing and placing of those of his, namely, on your right hand, and on your left, as soon as ever you were stepped within the Porch.

The names of the two Pillars (to omit the fancies of some Jews about them) were Jachin and Boaz, 1 King. VII. 21. which words denote Establishment and Strength, Jachin signifieth he will establish: from God's promise to establish the Throne of David, and his people Israel: And Boaz denoteth Herein is strength; namely, alluding either to God's promise, in which was all their strength and settlement: or to the Ark which was within, which is called, The strength of the Lord, Psal. LXXX. 2. and CV. 4.




SECT. III. The Closets for the Butchering Instruments. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

YET before we enter into the Porch, and so into the Temple, there is one thing more calls for our observation, and that is, certain Closets or places that were in this pile of the Porch, in which were laid up the Knives and instruments that were used by the Priests, about the killing, and slaying, and cutting up the Beasts to be Sacrificed. The Treatise Middoth giveth intelligence and account of these places in these words, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The Porch was broader than the Temple, fifteen cubits on the North, and fifteen cubits on the South and that that exceeded was called Beth hachillapoth, where they laid up the knives.

The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 doth signify the butchering Knives of the Temple, Ezr. I. 9. from 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 saith Ibn Ezra, as it betokeneth cutting off, which it doth, Isaiah. II. 18. Prov. XXXI. 8. And so saith Kimchi on the same place 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 are Knives: And of this sense is Beth hachillapoth, for because they laid up the Knives there; therefore the place was called, The Chamber of the laying up of the Knives 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

There was therefore on either end of the extent of the Porch for that space that it stood out further than the buildings of the Temple, a Chamber, one at the end towards the North, and another at the end towards the South, in which two large Chambers were four and twenty little Closets; wherein the Knives were laid up severally for the four and twenty courses of the Priests: And these and such like little Closets the Jews call 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Fenestrae, or Windows; because they were Closets or Boxes joining to the Wall. And besides these that we are speaking of where the Butchery Instruments were laid up, Maymony reckons fourscore and sixteen more, for the laying up of other things, four for everyone of the four and twenty Courses. There were (saith he) ninety six Closets 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Temple, wherein to lay up the Vestments, four Closets for every Course. And the name of every Course was written upon their Closets, and they were all shut: And when the men of any Course came into the service upon the Sabbath, they opened their Closets, and took out the Utensils: and when they went out of the service they restored their Vestments to their Closets again, and shut them up. And why made they four Closets for every Course? Namely, that the Utensils might not be jumbled together, but all the Breeches were in one Closet, and upon it was written, Breeches; Girdles in another Closet, and upon it written, Girdles; All the Bonets in another Closet, and all the Coats in another.

Now he neither telleth where these Closets were; nor speaketh he among them all, of these for the Knives, that are before us: and the reason of this later, is easily given, because in the place where he hath the words that are produced, he is only speaking of the installing and arraying of the Priests: But where to find these ninety six Closets he hath left us at uncertainty. Were they in the rest of the building of this Porch? It is not like they were, because the Priests usually came ready with their Vestments on, into the Court, and especially so high as the Porch, and came not thither for their Vestments to put them on: there was room enough in the other buildings about the Courts to lodge all these Closets in; but where to point them out we must suspend.

But what became of the other Rooms of the Porch, besides the entrance; and these two at either end of the building; for there were five and twenty cubits between the entrance and these Chambers on either side upon the ground, and there were divers Chambers and several Stories over head, the building being so very long, and so very high? There is not express intimation to be had, either in Scripture, or in the Jews Antiquities, as far as I can find, how these several parts were disposed of, and therefore we can assert nothing, but leave it to censure.

A renowned monument the Jews speak of, namely, Crowns that were laid up 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 In Closets, for a memorial: as it is said in the Prophet Zacharias (for they take that literally) Zach. VI. 14. And the Crowns shall be to Helem, and to Tobiah, and to Jedaiah, and to Hen the Son of Zephaniah, for a memorial in the Temple of the Lord. And they say, that the young Men or Candidates of the Priesthood did use to climb up Golden Chains which were fixed to the roof of the entry of the Porch, that they might look up into the Closets to see these Crowns.




SECT. IV. A Golden Vine in the Porch, and a Golden Candlestick: and a Marble and a Golden Table.

AND now let us go in at the entrance of the Porch. And there Josephus his prospective doth represent it to us in these colors, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , &c. That it had no doors, because it did represent the open Heaven, and all the front of the Gate was gilt with Gold; and through the Gate you might see all the Porch within, which was large (for it was twenty cubits long, and eleven over) and all about the inner door shining with gold.

Over this inner door (which meaneth the door of the Temple) there was a great golden Vine, of so vast a bigness that (as the same Josephus relateth) it had 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , bunches of Grapes as big as the proportion of a Man. And like a true natural Vine, it grew greater and greater, till it came up to so great a bigness by time and degrees, for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Men would be offering, some Gold to make a leaf, some a Grape, some a bunch, and these were hung up upon it, and so it was increasing continually.

Over the Temple door also there was a golden Candlestick, which was given thither by Helena the Queen of Adiabeni, a Woman of famous renown, and of great benefactorship, towards the Jews; of whom, and of whose Sons Izates and Monobazes, Josephus hath a large Story, Antiq. lib. 20. cap. 2. whither I refer the Reader. Of this Candlestick of her bestowing, there is mention in the Talmudic Treatise Joma, in this passage. Ben Kattin made the twelve Cocks for the Laver, whereas before it had but two; he also made the Engine for the Laver, (of which hereafter) that the water of it might not be unclean, by staying in it all night. Munbaz (Monobazes) the King made all the handles of the Vessels which were for the service of the day of Expiation, of Gold. Helena his Mother made the Golden Candlestick over the Temple door: she also made the Golden Table whereon was written the Section about the suspected Wife, &c.

In the Porch on either side of the Temple door there was a Table. On the right side, a Table of Marble, and on it they set down the Shew-bread as they carried it new into the Temple: And on the left side was a Table of Gold on which they set the old Bread down for a while, when they fetched it out: And the reason why they began on the Marble Table, and ended on the Golden was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Because they rose higher and higher with holy things, and went not lower and lower.




CHAP. XIV. The Holy Place.

SECT. I. The Temple door.

THE entrance out of the Porch into the Temple was through two Gates, and either Gate had two doors or folding leaves: for the better understanding of which, let us first look upon the dimensions of this passage as we have done upon the others.

The Talmud and Josephus do seem at the first sight exceedingly to differ, about the measure of this Gate: the Talmud reckoning it but twenty cubits high, and ten broad; and he five and fifty cubits high and sixteen broad. In which diversity, if we take the proper meaning of either party, the difference between them will not be so vast, as at the first scanning it doth seem to be. It is the manner of the Talmud in measuring of the Gates to speak only of the open space through which the passage was, but Josephus, as hath been observed before, measures 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the whole front of the Gate both above the open space and the spreading of the posts on either side it: and after this their usual manner they both of them measure this Gate through which we are going: The very open space that gave the passage was but twenty cubits high and ten broad; and of this measure were the two doors: but the front of the Gate was three cubits (curiously wrought and richly gilt) on either side, and thirty five cubits above the Gate to the roof or first floor of the entry of the Porch: and this is the meaning of Josephus, as it appeareth plainly enough by these his two passages. For as to the first he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , That the Gate of the House (meaning this that we are about) was gilt all over, and so was the Wall all about it: And as to the second, he hath this saying, somewhat difficult, but well understood resolving the matter according as hath been spoken. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . But the Temple having two floors, or being double roofed, that within was lower than that without, and had gilded doors of fifty five cubits high, and sixteen broad.

Now by what he saith that the Temple was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or double floored or roofed, his meaning is, that as you stood in the Temple there was a first floor over your head, and a room above that, which was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of which we have spoken before, and above that there was the roof; Had all the House been open to the very roof, as our Churches are, there could have been no difference between the height of the Holy and most Holy place to the roof, but both had been alike.

But both places being floored over, and having an upper Chamber above them, there was a difference made in the height of this first floor: for in the Holy place it was five and fifty cubits from the ground, but in the Most Holy place it was but twenty, as shall be shown. Now the Porch had its floor lay at the least as high if not higher than the floor of the Holy place: and so the space above the Gate to the first floor was a goodly space, and made a fair front: It seemeth by our Author that the first floor of the Porch was ninety cubits high, yet doth he reckon the height of the Gate but five and fifty, because he reckons only to the height of the floor of the Holy place, and the height of the front of the Gate of the Oracle, for he speaketh of them both alike.

Thus much being observed concerning the height and breadth of this Gate; it is also to be remembered that the Wall of the Temple was six cubits thick, as was observed when we measured the breadth of the building. The two Leaves of the Gate therefore which were five cubits broad apiece, were hung up a little within the thickness of the Wall from the Porch, so that when they were opened they covered the whole thickness of the Wall on the right hand and the left, that as you passed through you could not see it.

Now at the very farthest of the thickness of the Wall towards the Holy place, there was a two-leaved Door likewise paralleled to this that we have surveyed, which when the Leaves opened, they fell back to the Wall which was at the lower end of the House, and covered a place which was ungilded: for all the Walls were gilded but only the places where the Leaves of the Doors fell back.

And thus had you two several Doors of two folding Leaves apiece to go through between the Porch and the Temple, the one standing within a cubit of the Porch, and the other at the very edge of the Wall within, and so when they were both shut there was a five-cubit space between them, which was so much space in the thickness of the Temple Wall.

The outer Door is called commonly by the Jews, the great Door of the Temple, not but that the inner Door was as big, but because of the great front that this Gate had, which the other had not: And of this outer Door there are these memorials or remarkable things recorded among them. First, That the Morning Sacrifice was never killed till this Door was opened: And so it is recorded in the Treatise Tamid, or concerning the daily Sacrifice 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That he that was to slay the Sacrifice, killed him not till he heard the noise of the great Gate opening.

And there they relate the noise of this Gate might be heard to Jericho, and so the noise of divers other things there mentioned, in which they do Hyperbolize for the glorifying of the matters of the Temple. And a second thing for which this door is renowned among them, is, For that it had two Wickets in it, in either leaf one, one in the North leaf, and another in the South: And that through that in the South no Man passed, but that that was it of which Ezekiel saith, This Gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no Man shall enter in by it, &c.

Now for the opening of these Doors every morning, the way was thus: One took a Key and opened the Wicket in the North leaf of the Door, and went in, into the five cubit space between the two Doors: and there he went in at a Door into the very Wall where there was a hollow passage into the Holy place, coming forth in the place where one of the Leaves of the inner Door fell to the Wall.

Being come in, he opened that inner Door, and then he came and opened the outer Door, at the noise of the opening of which the killer of the Morning Sacrifice went about that work: In this five cubits space between the two Doors even behind the leaf of the Door on the right hand, there was a Marble Flag of a cubit square lay loose in the floor with a ring fastened in it to pull it up, and when the Priests tried and suspected Wife, they came hither and pulled up this stone, and took dust from under it, to put into the water to make her drink, as was enjoined, Numb. V. 17, &c.

SECT. II The Veil.

BEtween these two Doors also in this five cubit space, there hung a Veil answerable to the Veil at the Door of the Tabernacle, Exod. XXVI. 36. And so it is testified by Josephus, who speaks of two Veils, one at the entering into the Holy place, and another to distinguish betwixt the Holy and Most Holy. And he describes the Veil to have been of the measures that he had newly spoken of before, namely five and fifty cubits deep and sixteen cubits broad (yet the Gate where it hung was but ten) and that it was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Josh. VII. 21.) Babylonian Tapistry-work, of blue, purple, scarlet, and fine twined Linnen, which he resembles to the four Elements.

Other Jews likewise give us intimation of such a Veil hanging at the entrance into the Holy place. For the Talmudic Treatise Tamid, mentioned but a little before, speaking of the High Priest going into the Holy place to worship, saith, there were three that held him, one by his right hand and another by his left hand, and a third by the precious Stones in the Brest-plate. And when the president heareth the sound of the High Priests feet coming out, he lifteth up the Veil for him: and then himself goeth in and worshippeth, and after him his Brethren the Priests go in and worship.

There were thirteen Veils in all about the Temple: namely, seven for the seven Gates of the Court: one at the Gate of the Porch, one at the Gate of the Temple, and two betwixt the Holy and the Most Holy place, and two just over them in the room above: And there was an Overseer of the Veils, that took care for the supply and the right ordering of them: and if they were defiled by any common uncleanness, they were taken down and washed and hung up in the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Chel to dry: And when new Veils were made, they were hung up on the Gallery in the Court of the Women, that they might be viewed by all the people to see that they were right.

SECT. III. The Holy place itself.

THIS place was forty cubits long and twenty broad: and in Solomon's Temple it was thirty cubits high, having no floor at all on this side the roof, but in Herod's Temple it was sixty: For the the Children of the captivity building their Temple sixty cubits high, they floored it not over, but left it open to the roof in the Holy place as Solomon's Temple had been, and according to the same height was the floor laid, when it was floored over in the time of Herod.

And here two things are to be remembered; 1. That whereas the lower leads of the building which were over the side Chambers, were but fifty cubits high, as hath been described, and there was a passage off those leads into the upper Chamber over the Holy place, and it was by steps of ten cubits high, partly without the Wall, and partly within the thickness of the Wall itself. 2. That there was an inequality of the height of the floors in the three parts of the House, the Porch, the Holy place and the Most Holy. The first floor of the Porch was ninety cubits high, the Holy place sixty, and the most Holy but twenty. And therefore whereas there was a floor over the most Holy place, even with the floor over the Holy place, viz. at sixty cubits height, that was not the first floor over it, but there was another floor forty cubits beneath that.

The beauty and richness of this place was exceeding great: The floor of it upon which they trod was planked with Firr boards, and they gilt with gold; and the Walls were also cieled or wainscoted with Cedar, and that gilt likewise: This gilding was from the ground floor, even to the floor over head, all the sixty cubits high up the Walls; and this is meant when the Text saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He built the Walls of the House within with boards of Cedar from the floor of the House to the Walls of the covering: that is, up to the very Walls of the floor over head, as it is well expounded by the Rabbins upon that place.

For fifty cubits height of the Walls was the embroidery of Branches and open Flowers, &c. and for the ten cubits above, it was the place of the Windows: for the side Chambers without the House, in three stories, did take up the height of fifty cubits high, so that for so high no Windows could be made into the House, but the space of ten cubits above, was the place for the Windows which were made narrow without and broad within.

The deckage or carving of the Wainscot of the Walls is said to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The carving of knops and open flowers, as our English renders it: but the Hebrew Doctors are somewhat nice about the construction of these words. The Chaldee expounds it, the engraving of the likeness of Eggs (Ovals) and wreaths of Lilies: as if he meant that he wrought the Walls with the work of Lily garlands▪ and an Oval in the midst of a garland: Levi Gershom understands 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Ovals, as the Chaldee doth, but he takes them to be such Ovals as are the buds of Flowers, and that out of them came 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the flowers spreading and opening as in their maturity. David Kimchi takes 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for wild Gourds, and so our English hath it also in the Margin; and this I take to be the proper construction of the words, and this the embroidery of the Walls: That there was the carving of Cherubims and Palm-trees, and the carving of Gourds and open Flowers interchanged thus: first a border of Gourds or Pompions or such like Apple-fashioned sculpture intermixed with Marigolds, Gilliflowers, and such opening flowers, and this border or wreath went round about the House: upon this wreath as upon a base, were set the feet of Cherubims, and the rooting of Palm-trees both which stood up from this wreath a Cherub and a Palm-tree, a Cherub and a Palm-tree round about: above the Heads of the Cherubims and Palm-trees was such another wreath, and Cherubims and Palm-trees set upon that again, and so interchangeably to the top. By all which was signified the attendance of Ministers, Heb. I. 14. and flourishing condition, Psal. XCII. 12, 13. of those that serve the Lord and wait upon him. Everyone of the Cherubims was pictured with two faces, one of a man that looked toward the Palm-tree on one hand, and the other of a Lion that looked toward the Palm-tree on the other.

Whereas it is said that twenty cubits were built on the sides of the House with boards of Cedar from the floor to the Walls, 1 Kings VII. 16. the Jews do expound these twenty cubits by way of breadth and not of height, as thinking that they mean, that besides the sides of the House on either Hand, which were forty cubits long, he also made the like work upon either end of the room, which was twenty cubits broad: But the Text doth speak it more peculiarly of the most Holy place, and showeth what was the height of that, which was different from the outer room or Holy place, as we shall see hereafter.

SECT. IV. The Candlestick.

THERE were three remarkable and renowned things in the room of the Holy place, which next come to our observing, and those were the Candlestick, the Table of Shew-bread, and the Altar of Incense: The first of Gold, and the other two gilded, so that here in this room could nothing be seen but Gold. Josephus sets out these three things with this Encomium. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That they were three most wondrous workmanships, and to be renowned amongst all men: And that the seven Lamps in the Candlestick resembled the seven Planets: And the twelve Loaves upon the Shew-bread Table, the twelve Signs in the Zodiac or the Year: And the Incense Altar, whereon Incense was offered, which came partly out of the Sea, and partly from Land, denoted that all things are of God and to him.

The Candlestick was eighteen hand breadth high, which according to the cubit of six hand breadth, was a yard and an half: It had three feet, which almost lay flat upon the ground: As three hand breadth height, there was a flowring of a Coronet work curiously spreading out, then went the shaft up, two hand breadth high; and there was a dish, a boss, and a flowring above the boss, and all in a hand breadth compass: thence the shaft went up again, plain for two hand breadths, and then was there a boss of a hand breadth, and there went out two branches, which were carried out, bowed on either side, till they were to be brought up straight to an equal height to the top of this middle shaft out of which they proceeded. Then was there an hand breadth of the shaft plain, and a boss of an hand breadth, and then came out two branches more on either side: And again, one hand breadth of the shaft plain, and a boss again of an hand breadth, and then came out two branches more: Above them was two hand breadth of the shaft plain: And for the three hand breadths above, there were three cups, and three bosses, and three flowrings in that space, and so the Lamp stood in a flowring.

In every branch that came out of this middle shaft, there were three Cups at a handsome distance one from another, and above the highest a boss, and above that a flowring, and in that flowring the Lamp stood: And before the Candlestick there was a Stone with three steps cut in it, on which he that mended the Lamps stood, and on which he set down his dishes whilst he was about that work.

This Candlestick of seven branches (to which allusion is made, Apoc. I. Zechar. IV. 2. Apoc. XI. 4.) was set on the South-side of the House, but so as that the arms or branches of it spread North and South: All the Lamps or Lights that were set in the six branches that came out of the shaft, were turned bending, and looking towards the Lamp which was in the middle in the shaft itself, and the Lamp in that, was turned bending towards the most Holy place, and therefore it was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The Western Lamps: These seven Lamps (which denoted the seven Spirits of God, Rev. IV. 5. & V. 6. which the Jews call, the Seven Spirits of Messias from Isaiah▪ XI. 1, 2, 3.) did burn continually or if any of them were gone out, every Morning and Evening they were lighted again, and their perpetual Light resembled the Word and Doctrine of Salvation, the Light of the Lord, in which we see Light.

These Lamps were called the Candle of the Lord, 1 Sam. III. 3. where it is said, before the Candle of the Lord went out, the Lord called to Samuel, &c. upon which words, David Kimchi giveth this Gloss, If this be spoken concerning the Lamps in the Candlestick, this was somewhat before day: for the Lamps burnt from Even till Morning; yet did they sometimes some of them go out in the Night. They put Oil into them by such a measure as should keep them burning from Even till Morning, and many times they did burn till Morning; and they always found the Western Lamp burning. Now it is said, that this Prophesy came to Samuel, before the Lamps went out▪ while it was yet Night, about the time of Cocks crowing▪ for it is said afterward, that Samuel lay till Morning: Or allegorically it speaks of the Candle of Prophesy; as they say the Sun ariseth, and the Sun sets: Before the holy blessed God cause▪ the Sun of one righteous Man to set, he causeth the Sun of another righteous Man to rise. Before Moses his Sun set, Joshua's Sun arose; before Eli's Sun set, Samuel's Sun arose: And this is that which is said, Before the Candle of God went out.

The Lord needed no light of Candles (no more than he needed Bread which was set upon the Shew-bread Table) nor the Priests needed no Candles in this room neither, for the Windows though they were high, yet did they give light into the Room abundantly, but God by these Candles did as it were enlighten the People to teach them Spiritual things by these Corporal, and to acquaint them with the necessity of the light of his Word, and the Bread of Salvation which came down from Heaven. And therefore when Solomon did make ten Candlesticks, and ten Tables, and set them intermixedly by five and five on either side the House, he added nothing to God, but he added only more splendor to the service, and more luster to the Doctrine of the necessity of the light of the Word, and of the Bread of Life, Our wise Men say (saith Baal Hatturim) that the Western Lamp (which never went out) was a testimony that the Divine glory dwelt amongst Israel.

SECT. V. The Shew-bread Table.

ON the North-side of the House which was on the right Hand, stood the Shew-bread Table of two cubits long, and a cubit and a half broad, in the Tabernacle of Moses, but wanting that half cubit in breadth in the second Temple (the reason of the falling short not given by them that give the relation.) It stood length ways in its place, that is East and West, and had a Crown of Gold round about it, toward the upmost edge of it, which the Jews resemble to the Crown of the Kingdom.

Upon this Table there stood continually twelve Loaves, which because they stood before the Lord, they were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , The bread of setting before, for which our English hath found a very sit word, calling it the Shew-bread: The manner of making and placing of which Loaves was thus.

Out of four and twenty 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Sata (three of which went to an Ephah) that is, out of eight bushel of Wheat being ground, they sifted out four and twenty tenth Deals or Omers of the purest Flower; and that they made into twelve Cakes, two Omers in a Cake; or the fifth part of an Ephah of Corn in every Cake: They made the Cakes square, namely ten Hand breadth long, and five broad, and seven Fingers thick: They were made and baked in a room that was in the great building Beth mokadh, on the North-side of the Court, as we shall show anon, and they were baked on the day before the Sabbath.

On the Sabbath they set them on the Table in this manner: Four Priests went first in, to fetch away the Loaves that had stood all the week, and other four went in after them to bring in new ones in their stead; Two of the four last, carried the two rows of the Cakes, namely six a piece: and the other two carried either of them a golden dish, in which the Frankincense was to be put to be set upon the Loaves, and so those four that went to fetch out the old Bread, two of them were to carry the cakes, and the other two the dishes: these four that came to fetch the old Bread out, stood before the Table with their Faces towards the North, and the other four that brought in the new stood betwixt the Table and the Wall, with their Faces toward the South; those drew off the old cakes, and these as the other went off slipped on the new, so that the Table was never without Bread upon it, because it is said, that they should stand before the Lord continually.

They set the cakes in two rows, six and six, one upon another, and they set them, the length of the cakes cross over the breadth of the Table (by which it appears that the Crown of Gold about the Table, rose not above the surface of it, but was a border below edging even with the plain of it, (as is well held by Rabbi Solomon ) and so the cakes lay two hand breadths over the Table on either side; for the Table was but six hand breadth broad, and the cakes were ten hand breadth long: Now as for the preventing that, that which so lay over should not break off, if they had no other way to prevent it (which yet they had, but I confess that the description of it in their Authors I do not understand, yet their manner of laying the cakes one upon another, was such, as that the weight rested upon the Table, and not upon the points that hung over.

The lowest cake of either row they laid upon the plain Table: and upon that cake they laid three golden Canes at distance one from another, and upon those they laid the next cake; and then three golden Canes again, and upon them another cake, and so of the rest; save only that they laid but two such Canes upon the fifth cake, because there was but one cake more to be laid upon. Now these which I call golden Canes (and the Hebrews call them so also) were not like Reeds or Canes, perfectly round and hallow thorough, but they were like Canes or Kexes slit up the middle, and the reason of laying them thus betwixt cake and cake, was, that by their hollowness Air might come to every cake, and all might thereby be kept the better from moldiness and corrupting; and thus did the cake lie hollow, and one not touching another, and all the golden Canes being laid so, as that they lay within the compass of the breadth of the Table, the ends of the cakes that lay over the Table on either side, bare no burden but their own weight.

On the top of either row was set a golden dish with a handful of Frankincense, which when the Bread was taken away, was burnt as Incense to the Lord, Lev. XXIV. 7. and the bread went to Aaron and his sons, or to the Priests as their portions to be eaten.

What these Loaves did represent and signify, is variously guessed: the number of twelve in two rows seem to refer to the Twelve Tribes, whose names were so divided into six, and six in the two Stones on the High Priests shoulders: And as Bread is the chief subsistence and staff of our mortal life, so the offering of these might denote an acknowledgment of the people, of their receiving of all their subsistence from the Lord, to whom they presented these as their Tribute: and these as well as the Lamps standing before the Lord, might show, that their Spiritual and Temporal support were both before him. But our pursuit is to look after the things themselves, leaving the allegorizing of them unto others: for in such things men are most commonly more ready to give satisfaction to themselves, than to take it from others, for as much as the things themselves may be bended and swayed to various application.

SECT. VI. The Altar of Incense.

THE Candlestick stood on the one side of the House, and the Table on the other, and this Altar in the middle: not just betwixt them, but somewhat higher in the House toward the most Holy place than they were: These three Ornaments and furnitures of the Holy place, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a were set in third part of the House; that is, whereas the House (meaning the Holy place) was forty cubits long, when you had gone up six and twenty cubits, and two third parts of a cubit into the room, there stood the Table and Candlestick, and somewhat further higher towards the Veil stood this Altar.

It was a cubit square, and two cubits high, had four Horns at the four corners of it, and a Crown about the brim or edge of it, which the Jews say denoted the Crown of the Priest-hood: It stood not so nigh the Veil of the most Holy place, but that one might go about it; and so how the Priest did on the day of Expiation, and besprinkled the Horns of it with Blood, we observe elsewhere.

On this Altar (commonly called the golden Altar) Incense was offered Morning and Evening every day: a Figure, if you apply the action to Christ, of his Mediation; and if to man, a resemblance of the duty of Prayer. The twelve cakes which resembled the sustenance and sustentation of the Twelve Tribes, which was ever before the Lord, were renewed only once every week, but the Lamps dressed, and the Incense offered twice every day, for we have more need of the light of God's Word, and of Prayer, than of our daily food. And if we will apply all the three to Christ, The Kingly Office of Christ provided Bread for his People, his Prophetick Office provided the light of his Word, and his Priestly Office the Incense of Mediation.




SECT. I. The Temple door.

THE entrance out of the Porch into the Temple was through two Gates, and either Gate had two doors or folding leaves: for the better understanding of which, let us first look upon the dimensions of this passage as we have done upon the others.

The Talmud and Josephus do seem at the first sight exceedingly to differ, about the measure of this Gate: the Talmud reckoning it but twenty cubits high, and ten broad; and he five and fifty cubits high and sixteen broad. In which diversity, if we take the proper meaning of either party, the difference between them will not be so vast, as at the first scanning it doth seem to be. It is the manner of the Talmud in measuring of the Gates to speak only of the open space through which the passage was, but Josephus, as hath been observed before, measures 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the whole front of the Gate both above the open space and the spreading of the posts on either side it: and after this their usual manner they both of them measure this Gate through which we are going: The very open space that gave the passage was but twenty cubits high and ten broad; and of this measure were the two doors: but the front of the Gate was three cubits (curiously wrought and richly gilt) on either side, and thirty five cubits above the Gate to the roof or first floor of the entry of the Porch: and this is the meaning of Josephus, as it appeareth plainly enough by these his two passages. For as to the first he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , That the Gate of the House (meaning this that we are about) was gilt all over, and so was the Wall all about it: And as to the second, he hath this saying, somewhat difficult, but well understood resolving the matter according as hath been spoken. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 . But the Temple having two floors, or being double roofed, that within was lower than that without, and had gilded doors of fifty five cubits high, and sixteen broad.

Now by what he saith that the Temple was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , or double floored or roofed, his meaning is, that as you stood in the Temple there was a first floor over your head, and a room above that, which was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 of which we have spoken before, and above that there was the roof; Had all the House been open to the very roof, as our Churches are, there could have been no difference between the height of the Holy and most Holy place to the roof, but both had been alike.

But both places being floored over, and having an upper Chamber above them, there was a difference made in the height of this first floor: for in the Holy place it was five and fifty cubits from the ground, but in the Most Holy place it was but twenty, as shall be shown. Now the Porch had its floor lay at the least as high if not higher than the floor of the Holy place: and so the space above the Gate to the first floor was a goodly space, and made a fair front: It seemeth by our Author that the first floor of the Porch was ninety cubits high, yet doth he reckon the height of the Gate but five and fifty, because he reckons only to the height of the floor of the Holy place, and the height of the front of the Gate of the Oracle, for he speaketh of them both alike.

Thus much being observed concerning the height and breadth of this Gate; it is also to be remembered that the Wall of the Temple was six cubits thick, as was observed when we measured the breadth of the building. The two Leaves of the Gate therefore which were five cubits broad apiece, were hung up a little within the thickness of the Wall from the Porch, so that when they were opened they covered the whole thickness of the Wall on the right hand and the left, that as you passed through you could not see it.

Now at the very farthest of the thickness of the Wall towards the Holy place, there was a two-leaved Door likewise paralleled to this that we have surveyed, which when the Leaves opened, they fell back to the Wall which was at the lower end of the House, and covered a place which was ungilded: for all the Walls were gilded but only the places where the Leaves of the Doors fell back.

And thus had you two several Doors of two folding Leaves apiece to go through between the Porch and the Temple, the one standing within a cubit of the Porch, and the other at the very edge of the Wall within, and so when they were both shut there was a five-cubit space between them, which was so much space in the thickness of the Temple Wall.

The outer Door is called commonly by the Jews, the great Door of the Temple, not but that the inner Door was as big, but because of the great front that this Gate had, which the other had not: And of this outer Door there are these memorials or remarkable things recorded among them. First, That the Morning Sacrifice was never killed till this Door was opened: And so it is recorded in the Treatise Tamid, or concerning the daily Sacrifice 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That he that was to slay the Sacrifice, killed him not till he heard the noise of the great Gate opening.

And there they relate the noise of this Gate might be heard to Jericho, and so the noise of divers other things there mentioned, in which they do Hyperbolize for the glorifying of the matters of the Temple. And a second thing for which this door is renowned among them, is, For that it had two Wickets in it, in either leaf one, one in the North leaf, and another in the South: And that through that in the South no Man passed, but that that was it of which Ezekiel saith, This Gate shall be shut, it shall not be opened, and no Man shall enter in by it, &c.

Now for the opening of these Doors every morning, the way was thus: One took a Key and opened the Wicket in the North leaf of the Door, and went in, into the five cubit space between the two Doors: and there he went in at a Door into the very Wall where there was a hollow passage into the Holy place, coming forth in the place where one of the Leaves of the inner Door fell to the Wall.

Being come in, he opened that inner Door, and then he came and opened the outer Door, at the noise of the opening of which the killer of the Morning Sacrifice went about that work: In this five cubits space between the two Doors even behind the leaf of the Door on the right hand, there was a Marble Flag of a cubit square lay loose in the floor with a ring fastened in it to pull it up, and when the Priests tried and suspected Wife, they came hither and pulled up this stone, and took dust from under it, to put into the water to make her drink, as was enjoined, Numb. V. 17, &c.




SECT. II The Veil.

BEtween these two Doors also in this five cubit space, there hung a Veil answerable to the Veil at the Door of the Tabernacle, Exod. XXVI. 36. And so it is testified by Josephus, who speaks of two Veils, one at the entering into the Holy place, and another to distinguish betwixt the Holy and Most Holy. And he describes the Veil to have been of the measures that he had newly spoken of before, namely five and fifty cubits deep and sixteen cubits broad (yet the Gate where it hung was but ten) and that it was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Josh. VII. 21.) Babylonian Tapistry-work, of blue, purple, scarlet, and fine twined Linnen, which he resembles to the four Elements.

Other Jews likewise give us intimation of such a Veil hanging at the entrance into the Holy place. For the Talmudic Treatise Tamid, mentioned but a little before, speaking of the High Priest going into the Holy place to worship, saith, there were three that held him, one by his right hand and another by his left hand, and a third by the precious Stones in the Brest-plate. And when the president heareth the sound of the High Priests feet coming out, he lifteth up the Veil for him: and then himself goeth in and worshippeth, and after him his Brethren the Priests go in and worship.

There were thirteen Veils in all about the Temple: namely, seven for the seven Gates of the Court: one at the Gate of the Porch, one at the Gate of the Temple, and two betwixt the Holy and the Most Holy place, and two just over them in the room above: And there was an Overseer of the Veils, that took care for the supply and the right ordering of them: and if they were defiled by any common uncleanness, they were taken down and washed and hung up in the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Chel to dry: And when new Veils were made, they were hung up on the Gallery in the Court of the Women, that they might be viewed by all the people to see that they were right.




SECT. III. The Holy place itself.

THIS place was forty cubits long and twenty broad: and in Solomon's Temple it was thirty cubits high, having no floor at all on this side the roof, but in Herod's Temple it was sixty: For the the Children of the captivity building their Temple sixty cubits high, they floored it not over, but left it open to the roof in the Holy place as Solomon's Temple had been, and according to the same height was the floor laid, when it was floored over in the time of Herod.

And here two things are to be remembered; 1. That whereas the lower leads of the building which were over the side Chambers, were but fifty cubits high, as hath been described, and there was a passage off those leads into the upper Chamber over the Holy place, and it was by steps of ten cubits high, partly without the Wall, and partly within the thickness of the Wall itself. 2. That there was an inequality of the height of the floors in the three parts of the House, the Porch, the Holy place and the Most Holy. The first floor of the Porch was ninety cubits high, the Holy place sixty, and the most Holy but twenty. And therefore whereas there was a floor over the most Holy place, even with the floor over the Holy place, viz. at sixty cubits height, that was not the first floor over it, but there was another floor forty cubits beneath that.

The beauty and richness of this place was exceeding great: The floor of it upon which they trod was planked with Firr boards, and they gilt with gold; and the Walls were also cieled or wainscoted with Cedar, and that gilt likewise: This gilding was from the ground floor, even to the floor over head, all the sixty cubits high up the Walls; and this is meant when the Text saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 He built the Walls of the House within with boards of Cedar from the floor of the House to the Walls of the covering: that is, up to the very Walls of the floor over head, as it is well expounded by the Rabbins upon that place.

For fifty cubits height of the Walls was the embroidery of Branches and open Flowers, &c. and for the ten cubits above, it was the place of the Windows: for the side Chambers without the House, in three stories, did take up the height of fifty cubits high, so that for so high no Windows could be made into the House, but the space of ten cubits above, was the place for the Windows which were made narrow without and broad within.

The deckage or carving of the Wainscot of the Walls is said to be 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The carving of knops and open flowers, as our English renders it: but the Hebrew Doctors are somewhat nice about the construction of these words. The Chaldee expounds it, the engraving of the likeness of Eggs (Ovals) and wreaths of Lilies: as if he meant that he wrought the Walls with the work of Lily garlands▪ and an Oval in the midst of a garland: Levi Gershom understands 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Ovals, as the Chaldee doth, but he takes them to be such Ovals as are the buds of Flowers, and that out of them came 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the flowers spreading and opening as in their maturity. David Kimchi takes 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 for wild Gourds, and so our English hath it also in the Margin; and this I take to be the proper construction of the words, and this the embroidery of the Walls: That there was the carving of Cherubims and Palm-trees, and the carving of Gourds and open Flowers interchanged thus: first a border of Gourds or Pompions or such like Apple-fashioned sculpture intermixed with Marigolds, Gilliflowers, and such opening flowers, and this border or wreath went round about the House: upon this wreath as upon a base, were set the feet of Cherubims, and the rooting of Palm-trees both which stood up from this wreath a Cherub and a Palm-tree, a Cherub and a Palm-tree round about: above the Heads of the Cherubims and Palm-trees was such another wreath, and Cherubims and Palm-trees set upon that again, and so interchangeably to the top. By all which was signified the attendance of Ministers, Heb. I. 14. and flourishing condition, Psal. XCII. 12, 13. of those that serve the Lord and wait upon him. Everyone of the Cherubims was pictured with two faces, one of a man that looked toward the Palm-tree on one hand, and the other of a Lion that looked toward the Palm-tree on the other.

Whereas it is said that twenty cubits were built on the sides of the House with boards of Cedar from the floor to the Walls, 1 Kings VII. 16. the Jews do expound these twenty cubits by way of breadth and not of height, as thinking that they mean, that besides the sides of the House on either Hand, which were forty cubits long, he also made the like work upon either end of the room, which was twenty cubits broad: But the Text doth speak it more peculiarly of the most Holy place, and showeth what was the height of that, which was different from the outer room or Holy place, as we shall see hereafter.




SECT. IV. The Candlestick.

THERE were three remarkable and renowned things in the room of the Holy place, which next come to our observing, and those were the Candlestick, the Table of Shew-bread, and the Altar of Incense: The first of Gold, and the other two gilded, so that here in this room could nothing be seen but Gold. Josephus sets out these three things with this Encomium. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 That they were three most wondrous workmanships, and to be renowned amongst all men: And that the seven Lamps in the Candlestick resembled the seven Planets: And the twelve Loaves upon the Shew-bread Table, the twelve Signs in the Zodiac or the Year: And the Incense Altar, whereon Incense was offered, which came partly out of the Sea, and partly from Land, denoted that all things are of God and to him.

The Candlestick was eighteen hand breadth high, which according to the cubit of six hand breadth, was a yard and an half: It had three feet, which almost lay flat upon the ground: As three hand breadth height, there was a flowring of a Coronet work curiously spreading out, then went the shaft up, two hand breadth high; and there was a dish, a boss, and a flowring above the boss, and all in a hand breadth compass: thence the shaft went up again, plain for two hand breadths, and then was there a boss of a hand breadth, and there went out two branches, which were carried out, bowed on either side, till they were to be brought up straight to an equal height to the top of this middle shaft out of which they proceeded. Then was there an hand breadth of the shaft plain, and a boss of an hand breadth, and then came out two branches more on either side: And again, one hand breadth of the shaft plain, and a boss again of an hand breadth, and then came out two branches more: Above them was two hand breadth of the shaft plain: And for the three hand breadths above, there were three cups, and three bosses, and three flowrings in that space, and so the Lamp stood in a flowring.

In every branch that came out of this middle shaft, there were three Cups at a handsome distance one from another, and above the highest a boss, and above that a flowring, and in that flowring the Lamp stood: And before the Candlestick there was a Stone with three steps cut in it, on which he that mended the Lamps stood, and on which he set down his dishes whilst he was about that work.

This Candlestick of seven branches (to which allusion is made, Apoc. I. Zechar. IV. 2. Apoc. XI. 4.) was set on the South-side of the House, but so as that the arms or branches of it spread North and South: All the Lamps or Lights that were set in the six branches that came out of the shaft, were turned bending, and looking towards the Lamp which was in the middle in the shaft itself, and the Lamp in that, was turned bending towards the most Holy place, and therefore it was called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The Western Lamps: These seven Lamps (which denoted the seven Spirits of God, Rev. IV. 5. & V. 6. which the Jews call, the Seven Spirits of Messias from Isaiah▪ XI. 1, 2, 3.) did burn continually or if any of them were gone out, every Morning and Evening they were lighted again, and their perpetual Light resembled the Word and Doctrine of Salvation, the Light of the Lord, in which we see Light.

These Lamps were called the Candle of the Lord, 1 Sam. III. 3. where it is said, before the Candle of the Lord went out, the Lord called to Samuel, &c. upon which words, David Kimchi giveth this Gloss, If this be spoken concerning the Lamps in the Candlestick, this was somewhat before day: for the Lamps burnt from Even till Morning; yet did they sometimes some of them go out in the Night. They put Oil into them by such a measure as should keep them burning from Even till Morning, and many times they did burn till Morning; and they always found the Western Lamp burning. Now it is said, that this Prophesy came to Samuel, before the Lamps went out▪ while it was yet Night, about the time of Cocks crowing▪ for it is said afterward, that Samuel lay till Morning: Or allegorically it speaks of the Candle of Prophesy; as they say the Sun ariseth, and the Sun sets: Before the holy blessed God cause▪ the Sun of one righteous Man to set, he causeth the Sun of another righteous Man to rise. Before Moses his Sun set, Joshua's Sun arose; before Eli's Sun set, Samuel's Sun arose: And this is that which is said, Before the Candle of God went out.

The Lord needed no light of Candles (no more than he needed Bread which was set upon the Shew-bread Table) nor the Priests needed no Candles in this room neither, for the Windows though they were high, yet did they give light into the Room abundantly, but God by these Candles did as it were enlighten the People to teach them Spiritual things by these Corporal, and to acquaint them with the necessity of the light of his Word, and the Bread of Salvation which came down from Heaven. And therefore when Solomon did make ten Candlesticks, and ten Tables, and set them intermixedly by five and five on either side the House, he added nothing to God, but he added only more splendor to the service, and more luster to the Doctrine of the necessity of the light of the Word, and of the Bread of Life, Our wise Men say (saith Baal Hatturim) that the Western Lamp (which never went out) was a testimony that the Divine glory dwelt amongst Israel.




SECT. V. The Shew-bread Table.

ON the North-side of the House which was on the right Hand, stood the Shew-bread Table of two cubits long, and a cubit and a half broad, in the Tabernacle of Moses, but wanting that half cubit in breadth in the second Temple (the reason of the falling short not given by them that give the relation.) It stood length ways in its place, that is East and West, and had a Crown of Gold round about it, toward the upmost edge of it, which the Jews resemble to the Crown of the Kingdom.

Upon this Table there stood continually twelve Loaves, which because they stood before the Lord, they were called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , The bread of setting before, for which our English hath found a very sit word, calling it the Shew-bread: The manner of making and placing of which Loaves was thus.

Out of four and twenty 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Sata (three of which went to an Ephah) that is, out of eight bushel of Wheat being ground, they sifted out four and twenty tenth Deals or Omers of the purest Flower; and that they made into twelve Cakes, two Omers in a Cake; or the fifth part of an Ephah of Corn in every Cake: They made the Cakes square, namely ten Hand breadth long, and five broad, and seven Fingers thick: They were made and baked in a room that was in the great building Beth mokadh, on the North-side of the Court, as we shall show anon, and they were baked on the day before the Sabbath.

On the Sabbath they set them on the Table in this manner: Four Priests went first in, to fetch away the Loaves that had stood all the week, and other four went in after them to bring in new ones in their stead; Two of the four last, carried the two rows of the Cakes, namely six a piece: and the other two carried either of them a golden dish, in which the Frankincense was to be put to be set upon the Loaves, and so those four that went to fetch out the old Bread, two of them were to carry the cakes, and the other two the dishes: these four that came to fetch the old Bread out, stood before the Table with their Faces towards the North, and the other four that brought in the new stood betwixt the Table and the Wall, with their Faces toward the South; those drew off the old cakes, and these as the other went off slipped on the new, so that the Table was never without Bread upon it, because it is said, that they should stand before the Lord continually.

They set the cakes in two rows, six and six, one upon another, and they set them, the length of the cakes cross over the breadth of the Table (by which it appears that the Crown of Gold about the Table, rose not above the surface of it, but was a border below edging even with the plain of it, (as is well held by Rabbi Solomon ) and so the cakes lay two hand breadths over the Table on either side; for the Table was but six hand breadth broad, and the cakes were ten hand breadth long: Now as for the preventing that, that which so lay over should not break off, if they had no other way to prevent it (which yet they had, but I confess that the description of it in their Authors I do not understand, yet their manner of laying the cakes one upon another, was such, as that the weight rested upon the Table, and not upon the points that hung over.

The lowest cake of either row they laid upon the plain Table: and upon that cake they laid three golden Canes at distance one from another, and upon those they laid the next cake; and then three golden Canes again, and upon them another cake, and so of the rest; save only that they laid but two such Canes upon the fifth cake, because there was but one cake more to be laid upon. Now these which I call golden Canes (and the Hebrews call them so also) were not like Reeds or Canes, perfectly round and hallow thorough, but they were like Canes or Kexes slit up the middle, and the reason of laying them thus betwixt cake and cake, was, that by their hollowness Air might come to every cake, and all might thereby be kept the better from moldiness and corrupting; and thus did the cake lie hollow, and one not touching another, and all the golden Canes being laid so, as that they lay within the compass of the breadth of the Table, the ends of the cakes that lay over the Table on either side, bare no burden but their own weight.

On the top of either row was set a golden dish with a handful of Frankincense, which when the Bread was taken away, was burnt as Incense to the Lord, Lev. XXIV. 7. and the bread went to Aaron and his sons, or to the Priests as their portions to be eaten.

What these Loaves did represent and signify, is variously guessed: the number of twelve in two rows seem to refer to the Twelve Tribes, whose names were so divided into six, and six in the two Stones on the High Priests shoulders: And as Bread is the chief subsistence and staff of our mortal life, so the offering of these might denote an acknowledgment of the people, of their receiving of all their subsistence from the Lord, to whom they presented these as their Tribute: and these as well as the Lamps standing before the Lord, might show, that their Spiritual and Temporal support were both before him. But our pursuit is to look after the things themselves, leaving the allegorizing of them unto others: for in such things men are most commonly more ready to give satisfaction to themselves, than to take it from others, for as much as the things themselves may be bended and swayed to various application.




SECT. VI. The Altar of Incense.

THE Candlestick stood on the one side of the House, and the Table on the other, and this Altar in the middle: not just betwixt them, but somewhat higher in the House toward the most Holy place than they were: These three Ornaments and furnitures of the Holy place, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 a were set in third part of the House; that is, whereas the House (meaning the Holy place) was forty cubits long, when you had gone up six and twenty cubits, and two third parts of a cubit into the room, there stood the Table and Candlestick, and somewhat further higher towards the Veil stood this Altar.

It was a cubit square, and two cubits high, had four Horns at the four corners of it, and a Crown about the brim or edge of it, which the Jews say denoted the Crown of the Priest-hood: It stood not so nigh the Veil of the most Holy place, but that one might go about it; and so how the Priest did on the day of Expiation, and besprinkled the Horns of it with Blood, we observe elsewhere.

On this Altar (commonly called the golden Altar) Incense was offered Morning and Evening every day: a Figure, if you apply the action to Christ, of his Mediation; and if to man, a resemblance of the duty of Prayer. The twelve cakes which resembled the sustenance and sustentation of the Twelve Tribes, which was ever before the Lord, were renewed only once every week, but the Lamps dressed, and the Incense offered twice every day, for we have more need of the light of God's Word, and of Prayer, than of our daily food. And if we will apply all the three to Christ, The Kingly Office of Christ provided Bread for his People, his Prophetick Office provided the light of his Word, and his Priestly Office the Incense of Mediation.




CHAP. XV. The most Holy place.

SECT. I. The Partition space. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

THE Holy and the most Holy place were divided asunder by a threefold partition, namely by a cubit space, and by two Veils, on either side of that space: The partition space which was a cubit broad, and no more, by the Jews is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which Rabbi Nathan confesseth to be a Greek word, and he saith it signifieth within or without, as meaning, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that it was doubtful to them, whether it were within or without; and thus it is interpreted in the Jerusalem Talmud: Maymony helps us to their meaning thus, In the Temple there was a Wall which parted between the Holy and most Holy place, a cubit thick. But when they built the second Temple, they doubted whether the thickness of that Wall belonged to the measure of the Holy place, or to the measure of the most Holy place: Therefore they made the most Holy place twenty cubits long complete: and they made the Holy place forty cubits long complete. And they left a space betwixt the Holy and most Holy place of a cubit breadth; and in the second Temple they built not a Wall there, but they made two veils, one at the end of the most Holy place (Eastward), and the other at the end of the Holy place (Westward) and between them there was a cubits breadth, according to the thickness of the Wall that had been in the first Temple: But in the first Temple there was but one Veil.

The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 therefore is well conceived by the Learned Lempereur to be the Greek 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which signifieth a disease in the Eye, distempering the sight, and hindering it, and so were the Eyes of the understanding of the builders of the second Temple at a stand about this place, whether it should belong to the Holy or most Holy place, and thereupon they called the place itself 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

The Wall that Solomon built for the parting of the Holy and most Holy place, being a cubit thick (instead of which this space was left) had these things regardable and considerable in it, and not easy to be understood.

First, For the entering of the Oracle, he made doors of Olive-Tree. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 King. VI. 31. These later words are very difficult of construction, and if we go to Glossaries for the explication of them, they will give us variety of senses, but little facility of understanding. The Chaldee renders it only, Their posts with its lintel were orderly set, taking the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the sense of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ranked in order, and giving but very little light unto the obscure place. David Kimchi, and Rabbi Solomon seem to understand it, that the posts of the doors were not four square but five square, if we may use such a word, or wrought into five ribs, as their own words are. But Levi Gershom hath a far fetch for it, for he thinks 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meaneth the fifth Gate that was in the Temple as you went forward; the Temple door the fourth, the Porch door the third, the door of the inner Court the second, and of the outer Court the first.

To me the words seem to bear this construction; The post which was the door cheeks was at the fifth cubit; meaning from either Wall of the House, come inward five cubits, and there was the door cheek, and so the House being twenty cubits broad, the door hereby is concluded to be ten. And this may the rather be so interpreted, because the Text had been taking notice of the breadth of the House immediately before; as when it was speaking of the Cherubims Wings, it saith, the Wing of the one touched the one Wall, and the Wing of the other touched the other Wall; and speaking of the adorning of the House, it saith, all the Walls of the House were Carved, and the Floor Gilt, and then he comes on to speak of the partition betwixt the one House and the other, and saith, That the Oracle had a two leaved door of Olive-tree, and the fifth cubit from either Wall was the post which served for the cheeks of the door: And so it is said in verse. 33. He made for the door of the Temple posts of Olive-tree, from the fourth cubit; that is, four cubits from either side Wall he set up an Olive beam for a post on either side the door, of a cubit thickness, and so the door came to be ten cubits broad.

A second thing of difficulty to be understood about this partition Wall in Solomon's Temple, is that which is spoken in verse. 22. of the same Chapter 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And he made bars in chains of gold before the Oracle, and he overlaid it with gold. All the difficulty lies in the first word, for it is generally agreed by the best skilled in the Language, the Chaldee and the Rabbins that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifieth chains, but, what is meant by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is the Question. The word properly signifieth, He caused to pass over, but in this place, R. Solomon, and D. Kimchi take it in a Chaldee propriety, as signifying to make bars, because 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 bars, in the Hebrew is translated 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Chaldee. The sixteenth verse of 2 Chr. III. giveth some light to this obscurity, for there it is said, He made chains as in the Oracle, and put them on the heads of the pillars; by which he means the flower wreaths that we spake of before that went about the Chapiter, and the like is to be understood here. That upon this Wall which was before the Oracle, and divided betwixt the Holy and most Holy place, be made borders or chained wreaths, with a swelling in the border like a bar in it, carried from the one side of the House to the other upon this Wall.

SECT. II. The Veil.

THE Veils were two, as was observed before, and the reason given why; and these two Veils were renewed every year, the old ones taken away, and new ones put in their room: It was woven of four colors, blew, purple, scarlet, and fine white linen yarn, everyone of these threads twisted six double, and woven upon hair for the warp, of seventy two hairs twisted into every thread. These two Veils rent at our Savior's death from the top to the bottom, Matth. XXVII. 51. and gave demonstration of the laying open and common of those Ceremonious things which had thitherto been reserved in such recluseness and singularity. The Evangelist indeed calleth it by the name of One Veil, and so also doth Josephus, when he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , It was parted by a Veil. For, 1. Though they were two, yet hung they up to be but as one partition. 2. Had they known where the proper place of one Veil had been, there had been but one in this second Temple and no more.

Imagine what an amazement it would prove to the two Priests that were that Evening that our Savior suffered, to mend the Lamps, and to burn the Incense, to see, and for the rest of the people to hear that the Veils rent of their own accord from the top to the bottom, and no Hand upon them. Had not a Veil been upon the Eyes of that Nation, they might have seen more in this matter than they did, and made a better use of it than they made. Whether that story that is both in Josephus and in the Talmudicks, about the Gate of the Temple opening of its own accord, which we shall relate ere long, refer not to this story in the Gospel, be it referred to the Reader to judge. The Apostle himself gives us the typical application of this piece of the Sanctuary, Heb. X. 19, 20. Having boldness to enter into the Holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which he hath consecrated for us, through the Veil, that is to say, his flesh.

SECT. III. The most Holy place itself.

THE most Holy place in Moses his Tabernacle was a perfect cube of ten cubits long, and ten cubits broad, and ten cubits high: And the like was it in the Temple that was built by Solomon of twenty cubits every way, 2 Chron. III. 8. For though the Temple itself were thirty cubits high, yet did he floor over the most Holy place at twenty cubits height: And to this sense is that verse to be understood, in 1 King. VI. 16. He built twenty cubits on the sides of the House, both the floor and the Walls with boards of Cedar; he even built them for it within, even for the Oracle, even for the most Holy place.

The beauty of the Walls of this place, was agreeable to the other; decked with Cherubims and Palm-trees, and some precious Stones intermixed, Floor and Walls, and Roof and all gilded with Gold. It is said in 2 Chron. III. 9. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that he overlaid the upper chambers with gold, which may move a just Query, for over the Holy place there was no upper chamber at all, (that is, in the Temple built by Solomon, for of that we are speaking) but it was all open to the Roof, being but thirty cubits high: and over the most Holy place there was indeed an upper room of ten cubits high; but why this should be called Chambers in the plural number, and why it should be gilded at all, since there was no coming into it, nor no way to come there, is not easy to apprehend: And as for the side Chambers, that were set on the outside of the House, is there warrant or reason to suppose them overlaid with Gold, where they were to lay up Corn and Wine, and such other things of Tythes and first Fruits? Therefore by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 might be understood, not the upper Chambers in the common sense in which the word is used, for there was none over the Holy place but the upper Floor, or the Roof of the Holy and most Holy place, and so the Text showeth that the Rooms were all overlaid with Gold everywhere, both the Floor on which they trod, and the Walls and the Floor or Roof over head.

But another Text in the Book of Chronicles helpeth to resolve this doubt, and that is, 1 Chron. XXIX. 3. Moreover because I have set mine affection on the House of my God, I have of mine own proper good; of Gold and Silver which I have given to the House of my God, over and above all that I have prepared for the holy House: Even three thousand talents of Gold, of the Gold of Ophir, and seventy thousand talents of refined Silver, to overlay the Walls of the Houses withal; where these two things are remarkable. First, That he saith this preparation was above what he had prepared for the holy House, and yet, he saith, he had prepared it for the House of God. And secondly, That here is mention of Silver to overlay the Walls withal, whereas it is plain, that within the Temple itself all the overlaying was of Gold. Therefore it is thus to be understood, that beside the store of Gold that David had provided for the gildings of the House within, in the Holy and most Holy place, he had also laid by a stock of Gold and Silver both, to gild and overlay the Chambers over the Porch (for there were upper Chambers diverse in it, the height of it being one hundred and twenty cubits) and to beautify the side Chambers, and the other Chambers that were about the Courts.

Now in the Temple after the Captivity, we do not find that they were so curious to reduce the compass of the most Holy place to a cubick form, but that the height of it did exceed the breadth, it being twenty cubits long, and twenty cubits broad, like that of Solomon's, but the height far more for ought I find determined to the contrary.

SECT. IV. The Cherubims and Ark.

AS there were two Cherubims upon the Ark itself, so also did Solomon cause two Cherubims besides, to be made to stand over the Ark, it standing between them: they are so plainly and facilely described, in 1 Kings VI. 23. that I shall refer the Reader thither for the story of them, and say no more concerning them but only this, that as the two Cherubims upon the Mercy seat, may very well be resembled to Christ's two natures, so these two that stood by, to the two Testaments; which in their beginning and end reach the two sides of the World, The Creation, and the last Judgment, and in the middle do sweetly join one to another.

The Ark ( the strength and presence of the Lord, Psal. CV. 4. and the glory of Israel, 1 Sam. IV. 22. the most pregnant and proper resemblance of our Savior, in whom God dwelleth among men) described, Exod. XXV. 10, &c. and XXXVII. 1. &c. was set upon a stone, up toward the West-end of the most Holy place, even under the middle wings of the two tall Cherubims that stood besides it: For the Cherubims spread forth their two wings over the place of the Ark, and the Cherubims covered the Ark, and the staves thereof above. And they drew out the staves, that the ends of the staves were seen out in the Holy place before the Oracle; and they were not seen without, 1 King. VIII. 7, 8. 2 Chron. V. 8, 9. For before the Temple was built, while the Ark was in a moving posture, the staves whereby the Ark was born, were of an equal length on either side it, ready for the Priests shoulders when there was occasion for the Ark to flit; but now when they had brought it into Solomon's Temple, where it was to fix and remove no more, they drew out the staves towards that side that looked down the most Holy place. Levi Gershom is of opinion, that these staves were not the same that were made by Moses, but of a longer size, and that they raught down to the very Door; and that though there were Doors betwixt the Holy and most Holy place, yet those Doors could not shut because of these staves. And Kimchi, and Jarchi come up very near to the same supposal, conceiving that the Ark stood not up near the Western Wall of the House, but more downward, towards the Door, and that the staves raught down to the Door; and on the day of Expiation, when the High Priest went into the Holy place, he went up to the Ark between these staves, and could not go off to one hand or other.

But that that hath strained from them this conception is, 1. Because they have strictly taken the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Text in the Book of Kings, for the Holy place without the Veil, whereas the Book of Chronicles doth expressly render it by the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The Ark; for whereas the one place saith, that the heads of the staves were seen, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the other hath it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And so the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meaneth not the whole room, either of the Holy or most Holy place, but that singularly Holy place that was under the wings of the Cherubims; for of that place had the Text spoken immediately before, when it said, The Priests brought the Ark into the most Holy place, under the wings of the Cherubims. For the Cherubims spread forth their wings over the place of the Ark, &c. and then he comes on and saith, And they drew out the staves, so that the ends of the staves appeared out of that holy place, meaning under the wings of the Cherubims. And 2. The Authors alleged have strictly taken 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to mean so, as one standing at the Door betwixt the Holy and most Holy place, had the most Holy place before him; whereas it signifieth in the same sense that it doth in that clause, in Gen. I. 20. Let the Fowl fly upon the Earth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which our English hath well rendered, in the open Firmament of Heaven. And so is it to be taken here, and the verse in hand may be properly understood thus; And they drew out the staves at length, so that the ends of the staves were seen from that Holy place in the open face of the Oracle: but they were not seen without. The staves were the same that were made by Moses, and their length not great, but only so much as to fit a Mans shoulder on either side of the Ark; and now when they had set the Ark between the two standing Cherubims on the Floor, the Cherubims inner wings covered the Ark, and the staves that were above at the ends of the Ark, but the rest of the staves drawn out downward toward the Oracle Door, shot out from under the Cherubims wings, and appeared in the open Face of the most Holy place, and the High Priest when he came to offer Incense at the Ark on the day of Expiation, he stood before the Ark between the staves.

It is fancied by the Jews, that Solomon when he built the Temple, foreseeing that the Temple should be destroyed, he caused very obscure and intricate Vaults under ground to be made, wherein to hide the Ark when any such danger came, that howsoever it went with the Temple, yet the Ark which was as the very life of the Temple might be safe. And they understand that passage in 2 Chron. XXXV. 3. Josiah said unto the Levites, Put the Holy Ark in the House which Solomon the son of David did build, &c. as if Joah having heard by the reading of Moses his Manuscript, and by Huldahs Prophesy, of the danger that hung over Jerusalem, he commanded to convey the Ark into this Vault, that it might be secured, and with it, say they, they laid up Aaron's Rod, the pot of Manna, and the anointing Oil: For while the Ark stood in its place, upon the Stone mentioned, they hold that Aaron's Rod and the pot of Manna stood before it, but now were all conveyed into obscurity, and the Stone upon which the Ark stood, lay over the mouth of the Vault. But Rabbi Solomon, which useth not ordinarily to forsake such Traditions, hath given a more serious Gloss upon the place; namely, whereas that Manasseh and Amon had removed the Ark out of its Habitation, and set up Images and abominations there of their own, Josiah speaketh to the Priests to restore it to its place again: what became of the Ark at the burning of the Temple by Nebuchadnezzar we read not, it is most like it went to the fire also. How ever it sped, it was not in the second Temple, and is one of the five choice things that the Jews reckon wanting there. Yet had they an Ark there also of their own making, as they had a Breast-plate of Judgment; which though they both wanted the glory of the former, which was giving of Oracles, yet did they stand current as to the other matters of their Worship, as the former Breast-plate and Ark had done.

And so having thus gone through the many parts and particulars of the Temple itself, let us but take account of the several parcel measures, that made up the length of it an hundred cubits, and so we will turn our Eye and survey upon the Courts.

  • 1. The Wall of the Porch was five cubits thick.
  • 2. The Porch itself eleven cubits broad.
  • 3. The Wall of the Temple six cubits thick.
  • 4. The Holy place forty cubits long.
  • 5. The space between Holy and most Holy place one cubit.
  • 6. The length of the most Holy place twenty cubits.
  • 7. The Temple Wall six cubits thick.
  • 8. The breadth of the Chambers at the end six cubits.
  • 9. The Wall of the Chambers five cubits thick.



SECT. I. The Partition space. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

THE Holy and the most Holy place were divided asunder by a threefold partition, namely by a cubit space, and by two Veils, on either side of that space: The partition space which was a cubit broad, and no more, by the Jews is called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which Rabbi Nathan confesseth to be a Greek word, and he saith it signifieth within or without, as meaning, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that it was doubtful to them, whether it were within or without; and thus it is interpreted in the Jerusalem Talmud: Maymony helps us to their meaning thus, In the Temple there was a Wall which parted between the Holy and most Holy place, a cubit thick. But when they built the second Temple, they doubted whether the thickness of that Wall belonged to the measure of the Holy place, or to the measure of the most Holy place: Therefore they made the most Holy place twenty cubits long complete: and they made the Holy place forty cubits long complete. And they left a space betwixt the Holy and most Holy place of a cubit breadth; and in the second Temple they built not a Wall there, but they made two veils, one at the end of the most Holy place (Eastward), and the other at the end of the Holy place (Westward) and between them there was a cubits breadth, according to the thickness of the Wall that had been in the first Temple: But in the first Temple there was but one Veil.

The word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 therefore is well conceived by the Learned Lempereur to be the Greek 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which signifieth a disease in the Eye, distempering the sight, and hindering it, and so were the Eyes of the understanding of the builders of the second Temple at a stand about this place, whether it should belong to the Holy or most Holy place, and thereupon they called the place itself 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 .

The Wall that Solomon built for the parting of the Holy and most Holy place, being a cubit thick (instead of which this space was left) had these things regardable and considerable in it, and not easy to be understood.

First, For the entering of the Oracle, he made doors of Olive-Tree. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 King. VI. 31. These later words are very difficult of construction, and if we go to Glossaries for the explication of them, they will give us variety of senses, but little facility of understanding. The Chaldee renders it only, Their posts with its lintel were orderly set, taking the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the sense of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ranked in order, and giving but very little light unto the obscure place. David Kimchi, and Rabbi Solomon seem to understand it, that the posts of the doors were not four square but five square, if we may use such a word, or wrought into five ribs, as their own words are. But Levi Gershom hath a far fetch for it, for he thinks 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meaneth the fifth Gate that was in the Temple as you went forward; the Temple door the fourth, the Porch door the third, the door of the inner Court the second, and of the outer Court the first.

To me the words seem to bear this construction; The post which was the door cheeks was at the fifth cubit; meaning from either Wall of the House, come inward five cubits, and there was the door cheek, and so the House being twenty cubits broad, the door hereby is concluded to be ten. And this may the rather be so interpreted, because the Text had been taking notice of the breadth of the House immediately before; as when it was speaking of the Cherubims Wings, it saith, the Wing of the one touched the one Wall, and the Wing of the other touched the other Wall; and speaking of the adorning of the House, it saith, all the Walls of the House were Carved, and the Floor Gilt, and then he comes on to speak of the partition betwixt the one House and the other, and saith, That the Oracle had a two leaved door of Olive-tree, and the fifth cubit from either Wall was the post which served for the cheeks of the door: And so it is said in verse. 33. He made for the door of the Temple posts of Olive-tree, from the fourth cubit; that is, four cubits from either side Wall he set up an Olive beam for a post on either side the door, of a cubit thickness, and so the door came to be ten cubits broad.

A second thing of difficulty to be understood about this partition Wall in Solomon's Temple, is that which is spoken in verse. 22. of the same Chapter 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And he made bars in chains of gold before the Oracle, and he overlaid it with gold. All the difficulty lies in the first word, for it is generally agreed by the best skilled in the Language, the Chaldee and the Rabbins that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifieth chains, but, what is meant by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is the Question. The word properly signifieth, He caused to pass over, but in this place, R. Solomon, and D. Kimchi take it in a Chaldee propriety, as signifying to make bars, because 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 bars, in the Hebrew is translated 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Chaldee. The sixteenth verse of 2 Chr. III. giveth some light to this obscurity, for there it is said, He made chains as in the Oracle, and put them on the heads of the pillars; by which he means the flower wreaths that we spake of before that went about the Chapiter, and the like is to be understood here. That upon this Wall which was before the Oracle, and divided betwixt the Holy and most Holy place, be made borders or chained wreaths, with a swelling in the border like a bar in it, carried from the one side of the House to the other upon this Wall.




SECT. II. The Veil.

THE Veils were two, as was observed before, and the reason given why; and these two Veils were renewed every year, the old ones taken away, and new ones put in their room: It was woven of four colors, blew, purple, scarlet, and fine white linen yarn, everyone of these threads twisted six double, and woven upon hair for the warp, of seventy two hairs twisted into every thread. These two Veils rent at our Savior's death from the top to the bottom, Matth. XXVII. 51. and gave demonstration of the laying open and common of those Ceremonious things which had thitherto been reserved in such recluseness and singularity. The Evangelist indeed calleth it by the name of One Veil, and so also doth Josephus, when he saith, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , It was parted by a Veil. For, 1. Though they were two, yet hung they up to be but as one partition. 2. Had they known where the proper place of one Veil had been, there had been but one in this second Temple and no more.

Imagine what an amazement it would prove to the two Priests that were that Evening that our Savior suffered, to mend the Lamps, and to burn the Incense, to see, and for the rest of the people to hear that the Veils rent of their own accord from the top to the bottom, and no Hand upon them. Had not a Veil been upon the Eyes of that Nation, they might have seen more in this matter than they did, and made a better use of it than they made. Whether that story that is both in Josephus and in the Talmudicks, about the Gate of the Temple opening of its own accord, which we shall relate ere long, refer not to this story in the Gospel, be it referred to the Reader to judge. The Apostle himself gives us the typical application of this piece of the Sanctuary, Heb. X. 19, 20. Having boldness to enter into the Holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which he hath consecrated for us, through the Veil, that is to say, his flesh.




SECT. III. The most Holy place itself.

THE most Holy place in Moses his Tabernacle was a perfect cube of ten cubits long, and ten cubits broad, and ten cubits high: And the like was it in the Temple that was built by Solomon of twenty cubits every way, 2 Chron. III. 8. For though the Temple itself were thirty cubits high, yet did he floor over the most Holy place at twenty cubits height: And to this sense is that verse to be understood, in 1 King. VI. 16. He built twenty cubits on the sides of the House, both the floor and the Walls with boards of Cedar; he even built them for it within, even for the Oracle, even for the most Holy place.

The beauty of the Walls of this place, was agreeable to the other; decked with Cherubims and Palm-trees, and some precious Stones intermixed, Floor and Walls, and Roof and all gilded with Gold. It is said in 2 Chron. III. 9. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that he overlaid the upper chambers with gold, which may move a just Query, for over the Holy place there was no upper chamber at all, (that is, in the Temple built by Solomon, for of that we are speaking) but it was all open to the Roof, being but thirty cubits high: and over the most Holy place there was indeed an upper room of ten cubits high; but why this should be called Chambers in the plural number, and why it should be gilded at all, since there was no coming into it, nor no way to come there, is not easy to apprehend: And as for the side Chambers, that were set on the outside of the House, is there warrant or reason to suppose them overlaid with Gold, where they were to lay up Corn and Wine, and such other things of Tythes and first Fruits? Therefore by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 might be understood, not the upper Chambers in the common sense in which the word is used, for there was none over the Holy place but the upper Floor, or the Roof of the Holy and most Holy place, and so the Text showeth that the Rooms were all overlaid with Gold everywhere, both the Floor on which they trod, and the Walls and the Floor or Roof over head.

But another Text in the Book of Chronicles helpeth to resolve this doubt, and that is, 1 Chron. XXIX. 3. Moreover because I have set mine affection on the House of my God, I have of mine own proper good; of Gold and Silver which I have given to the House of my God, over and above all that I have prepared for the holy House: Even three thousand talents of Gold, of the Gold of Ophir, and seventy thousand talents of refined Silver, to overlay the Walls of the Houses withal; where these two things are remarkable. First, That he saith this preparation was above what he had prepared for the holy House, and yet, he saith, he had prepared it for the House of God. And secondly, That here is mention of Silver to overlay the Walls withal, whereas it is plain, that within the Temple itself all the overlaying was of Gold. Therefore it is thus to be understood, that beside the store of Gold that David had provided for the gildings of the House within, in the Holy and most Holy place, he had also laid by a stock of Gold and Silver both, to gild and overlay the Chambers over the Porch (for there were upper Chambers diverse in it, the height of it being one hundred and twenty cubits) and to beautify the side Chambers, and the other Chambers that were about the Courts.

Now in the Temple after the Captivity, we do not find that they were so curious to reduce the compass of the most Holy place to a cubick form, but that the height of it did exceed the breadth, it being twenty cubits long, and twenty cubits broad, like that of Solomon's, but the height far more for ought I find determined to the contrary.




SECT. IV. The Cherubims and Ark.

AS there were two Cherubims upon the Ark itself, so also did Solomon cause two Cherubims besides, to be made to stand over the Ark, it standing between them: they are so plainly and facilely described, in 1 Kings VI. 23. that I shall refer the Reader thither for the story of them, and say no more concerning them but only this, that as the two Cherubims upon the Mercy seat, may very well be resembled to Christ's two natures, so these two that stood by, to the two Testaments; which in their beginning and end reach the two sides of the World, The Creation, and the last Judgment, and in the middle do sweetly join one to another.

The Ark ( the strength and presence of the Lord, Psal. CV. 4. and the glory of Israel, 1 Sam. IV. 22. the most pregnant and proper resemblance of our Savior, in whom God dwelleth among men) described, Exod. XXV. 10, &c. and XXXVII. 1. &c. was set upon a stone, up toward the West-end of the most Holy place, even under the middle wings of the two tall Cherubims that stood besides it: For the Cherubims spread forth their two wings over the place of the Ark, and the Cherubims covered the Ark, and the staves thereof above. And they drew out the staves, that the ends of the staves were seen out in the Holy place before the Oracle; and they were not seen without, 1 King. VIII. 7, 8. 2 Chron. V. 8, 9. For before the Temple was built, while the Ark was in a moving posture, the staves whereby the Ark was born, were of an equal length on either side it, ready for the Priests shoulders when there was occasion for the Ark to flit; but now when they had brought it into Solomon's Temple, where it was to fix and remove no more, they drew out the staves towards that side that looked down the most Holy place. Levi Gershom is of opinion, that these staves were not the same that were made by Moses, but of a longer size, and that they raught down to the very Door; and that though there were Doors betwixt the Holy and most Holy place, yet those Doors could not shut because of these staves. And Kimchi, and Jarchi come up very near to the same supposal, conceiving that the Ark stood not up near the Western Wall of the House, but more downward, towards the Door, and that the staves raught down to the Door; and on the day of Expiation, when the High Priest went into the Holy place, he went up to the Ark between these staves, and could not go off to one hand or other.

But that that hath strained from them this conception is, 1. Because they have strictly taken the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in the Text in the Book of Kings, for the Holy place without the Veil, whereas the Book of Chronicles doth expressly render it by the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The Ark; for whereas the one place saith, that the heads of the staves were seen, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the other hath it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 And so the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 meaneth not the whole room, either of the Holy or most Holy place, but that singularly Holy place that was under the wings of the Cherubims; for of that place had the Text spoken immediately before, when it said, The Priests brought the Ark into the most Holy place, under the wings of the Cherubims. For the Cherubims spread forth their wings over the place of the Ark, &c. and then he comes on and saith, And they drew out the staves, so that the ends of the staves appeared out of that holy place, meaning under the wings of the Cherubims. And 2. The Authors alleged have strictly taken 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to mean so, as one standing at the Door betwixt the Holy and most Holy place, had the most Holy place before him; whereas it signifieth in the same sense that it doth in that clause, in Gen. I. 20. Let the Fowl fly upon the Earth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which our English hath well rendered, in the open Firmament of Heaven. And so is it to be taken here, and the verse in hand may be properly understood thus; And they drew out the staves at length, so that the ends of the staves were seen from that Holy place in the open face of the Oracle: but they were not seen without. The staves were the same that were made by Moses, and their length not great, but only so much as to fit a Mans shoulder on either side of the Ark; and now when they had set the Ark between the two standing Cherubims on the Floor, the Cherubims inner wings covered the Ark, and the staves that were above at the ends of the Ark, but the rest of the staves drawn out downward toward the Oracle Door, shot out from under the Cherubims wings, and appeared in the open Face of the most Holy place, and the High Priest when he came to offer Incense at the Ark on the day of Expiation, he stood before the Ark between the staves.

It is fancied by the Jews, that Solomon when he built the Temple, foreseeing that the Temple should be destroyed, he caused very obscure and intricate Vaults under ground to be made, wherein to hide the Ark when any such danger came, that howsoever it went with the Temple, yet the Ark which was as the very life of the Temple might be safe. And they understand that passage in 2