PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Exposition of Job 38-42

Joseph Caryl (1602-1673) · 442,869 words · 1968 min

Large work readerShowing section 6 of 13. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 6/13
his meaning is, The Horse is of so stout a spirit, that he will not only not be afraid like the Grasshopper, but no more afraid than a Lion. So then, I conclude this part of the verse contains not a similitude, but a dissimilitude between the horse and the Grasshopper; not a likeness between the horse and the Grasshopper in nimbleness, but their unlikeness in fearfulness. Canst thou make him
Afraid?

The word notes such fear as is caused by an Earth-quake, Isa. 13.13. Joel 2.10. Psal. 109.23. Nah. 3.17. As importing, that though the horse should hear a crashing or rushing sound, like that of an Earth-quake, when the ground under us opens and shakes, yet he is not moved nor quakes, as Mr. Broughton renders. The horse is rather enraged, than scared like a Grasshopper, by any noise; His spirit is rather whetted and inflamed, than cowed (as we say) and cooled by the strongest alarms; as will further appear in the latter part of this description. Horses are observed sometimes (as also men) quaking before a battle, yet not for fear, but with indignation. Canst thou make him afraid? &c.

Hence note, First;

The Horse is a valiant and stout-hearted creature.

Not to fear, is a sign of valor; but not to be made afraid, is much more a sign of it than not to fear. When any one hath such a spirit, that he doth not only fear, but cannot be made afraid, there's courage to the height: Such is the courage of the horse, nothing can make him afraid.

Observe, Secondly;

The courage, as well as the strength of the Horse, is from God.

As every creature is not strong, so not courageous. Some are very fearful, so fearful, that they are grown into a Proverb for fearfulness: Such are Hares and Harts, and the Ostrich before spoken of. Nor hath every horse courage and boldness. Horses given to start, are fearful. God puts such courage into some horses, that nothing can make them start or fear. Courage is a gift of God bestowed upon some men, and not upon others; some are courageous as Lions, and others are fearful as Hares and Harts, or Grashoppers. We cannot keep some from fear; we cannot make others afraid. Canst thou make him afraid, as the Grasshopper?

Note, Thirdly;

Where God gives courage, it is not in man to make afraid.

The courage of the horse appears yet higher in the next verse.

The glory of his nostrils is terrible.

The nostrils are very considerable in horses, and the largeness or openness of them, is a sign of their goodness and stoutness. The glory of his nostrils is terrible, or terror, that is, very terrible, his breathings are mere terror. This expression of the Horse, is somewhat like that given of St. Paul, while Saul (Acts 9, 1.) Saul yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter. Paul, before his conversion, breathed flames of fire, as it were, he breathed terror out of his mouth against the faithful people of God. Thus here, The glory of his nostrils is terrible.

But, what is this glory of his nostrils? Some say, these words are a description of his neighing; and I grant, that sound proceeding from his nostrils, as from a trumpet, may well enough be called the glory of them; nor can it be denied, but that the neighing of great horses is terrible. According to which reading, some say, the word which we translate Nostrils, signifieth in this place, that sound of his nostrils called neighing; and that the word by us rendered glory, doth rather signify excellency or vehemency. And thus our old English Translation gives it; His strong neighing is fearful; or as others; His vehement neighing is terrible.

The Hebrew (as was touched before) is Terror; nothing being more common in that language, than to use substantive words adjectively, or, as if they were Adjectives. Taking this sense of the words, they describe generous horses neighing, when they go to battle, as if they would thereby at once proclaim and trumpet out their own courage, and terrify or daunt the enemy; or, as if they would not only show their own fearlessness, but make their opposers afraid. This is a fair interpretation, yet because (according to one Exposition given, and much received, of the latter part of the former verse, Hast thou clothed his neck with thunder? ) the neighing of the horse hath been already spoken of, I rather conceive, that these words, The glory of his nostrils is terrible, may be expounded either of these two ways.

First, That his wide, fuming, smoking nostrils (which are the glory and commendation of a horse) strike others with terror. Poets describing the horse, fancy him sending fire out of his nostrils, or breathing fire. And thus when God is angry, smoke and fire are said to go out of his nostrils (2 Sam. 22.9.) Some understand that ( Isa. 2.22.) of an angry furious man. As if the Prophet had said, fear not man, make no account of him, though enflamed with wrath and anger. The glory of his nostrils is terrible.

Secondly, Reading the words thus (as was said) The glory of his nostrils is terror; they may be expounded, not as implying the terror and fright which the horse strikes others with, but which others would fright the horses with, while they brandish their swords, shake their spears, sound their trumpets; from all which terror, the horse is so far from running, that rather his courage is increased, and his spirit heated. Such noises, clashings and clamours, will not scare the horse, as they do the Grasshopper; but the terror or matter of fear which is presented before him, is the glory of his nostrils, that is, it will but provoke him to anger and rage, or excite his courage, which makes his nostrils smoke like fire, it cannot at all put him into a fear, and that's his glory.

Hence note, First;

That which any creature excels in, is his glory.

The horse glorieth in his strength; the courage & fierceness of the horse, appearing in his nostrils, are his glory also. Whatever good man excels in, is his glory: if he excels in knowledge, or in strength, or courage, or in holiness, it is his glo y; yea, men who excel in evil, count that their glory ( Ph l. 3.19.) That which God excels in, is his glory; what is that? He (blessed be his name) excels in pardoning our sins, in covering our iniquities, and therefore, It is the glory of God to conceal a thing (saith Solomon, Prov. 25.2.) that is, sin, by pardoning it. Kings must search out the matter, but it is the glory of God to conceal a thing. That which any creature excels in, is his glory; that which the Scriptures declare God to excel in, is his glory, and that is mostly his pardoning mercy.

Note, Secondly;

The greatest glory which some creatures have, is to be terrible to others.

To put others in fear, is all their glory, all that they glory in; their glory is not to save and to deliver, to comfort and to do good to others, but to vex and to terrify.

From the second interpretation, take this Note.

That which is very terrible to some, is a glory to others.

That is, It occasions them to show their glory, or causeth their glory to appear the more. Terror is the glory of the horse; his nostrils are never so glorious, as when you attempt to terrify him. When that which is terrible is put to a true believer, then the glory of his soul breaks out, then he shows forth his faith in God, hi integrity and faithfulness towards God; terror is the glory of his soul, as terror is the glory of the horse, that is, it gives him occasion to show forth his glory.


Vers. 21. He paweth in the valley, and rejoiceth in his strength; he goeth on to meet the armed men.

These words give a further proof of the courage of the horse, or a sign of it; for 'tis the property of the highest metal'd and best spirited horses to do so, as impatient of a check by the b idle, and desirous rather to be spurred upon an engagement with the enemy in battle. He paweth

In the valley.

Why in the valley? because there battles, especially horse battles, used to be fought, rather than upon hills or uneven grounds.

There is another reading of the verse; for the word translated to paw, signifies also to dig: Hence some give it thus; He diggeth in the valley. The pawing of a horse, is a kind of digging; for he hollows the earth, and makes a cavity in it by pawing. A mettl'd horse cannot keep his feet, but will be traversing his ground, and pawing with his feet, as vext at any delay or stop of the battle; he cannot endure to be curbed by the bit, having such a mind (as was touched before) to be upon the spur, in a full carreer against the enemy. Of such pransings, or (as the Margin hath it) tramplings or plungings of the horse, Deborah spake in her triumphant song ( Judge. 5.22.) He paweth in the valley.

Hence note;

What we would fain have, or be at, we are very unquiet, and think long till we are at it.

This we may take in a spiritual sense; A soul which hath a mind to do good, how impatient is he when he is stopped from doing it! A soul that hath a desire to have communion with God on earth, how much troubled is he to be hindered! And a soul that hath a great mind to be with God in heaven, how doth he paw in the valley of this lower world, till he get higher and ascend up to him! Austin said, My heart is unquiet, I can have no rest till I am with thee again. So the Apostle ( Phil. 1.23.) I desire to depart, I would fain be out of this world; why am I thus wind-bound in the harbor? let me hoise sail and be gone. the Seaman is troubled to lie at an anchor, when he would be under sail. Thus the generous Horse paweth in the valley, and

Rej yceth in his strength.

And because of that, he rejoiceth in the battle; and because of that, would fain be at the battle. A horse being confident of his strength, goeth on cheerfully.

The word rendered strength, signifieth not only bodily robustiousness, but any other abilities or excellent endowments. In which larger notion it is used ( Dan. 1.4.) where it is said, The children that were to be chosen and bred up for the King, were such as had ability to stand in the Kings Palace; that is, such as were well qualified for that service and attendance. In strength of both kinds, a well disciplined horse may be said to rejoice.

The word rendered rejoiceth, may rather (say some) be here translated, Exulteth, which imports somewhat more than rejoicing, or great rejoicing; & may not unfitly be attributed to beasts, especially to horses, & chiefly to such horses as this Text speaks of. Exultation is the expression of any inward joy, by some outward act or gesture of the body; and to do that is very usual with brave horses, who being proud of, at least much pleased with themselves, are often seen pransing and jetting as they go, and even artificially forming and composing their bodies, their heads and legs especially, at every step they take. So that these words, He rejoiceth, or exulteth in his strength, seem to imply, that the horse knoweth his own strength and powers. It is commonly said, If a horse knew his strength, he were not to be dealt with; but whether this be true or no, it appears by these words in the Text, that he hath some knowledge of his strength, else he could not be said to rejoice in it. And this is very aptly inserted here, because hence it comes to pass, that the horse rusheth so fiercely and fearlessly into the battle, which is the great scope of the whole description given of him in this context. He rejoiceth in his strength.

Hence note, First;

They that have much strength for any work or service, are joyful to go on to it.

David (Psal. 19.5.) compares the Sun to a strong man, that rejoiceth to run a race, A strong man is not afraid of, nor troubled at the race, but rejoiceth exceedingly in it.

Secondly, Note;

What we have much of, or excel in, we are apt to rejoice in.

The horse hath much strength, and he rejoiceth in it. This appears in all things; If we have much riches, how apt are we to rejoice in them! If we have much wisdom, or understanding, or parts, how apt are we to rejoice in them! and therefore the Lord gives us that caveat ( Jer. 9.23.) Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom (as if he had said, If a man have a great deal of wisdom, or but a little more than his neighbor, he will be glorying in it, as the horse in his strength) and let not the mighty man glory in his might, nor the rich man glory in his riches. All these stops upon glorying, show, that what we have much of, we are apt to glory in.

Note, Thirdly;

To rejoice in any strength, or in anything but in God and his favor, or as we enjoy God in anything, is brutish, 'tis to rejoice as the horse.

They only rejoice as Christians, who rejoice in their strength, and in their riches, and in their graces, as they find God in them, and as they flow from God. The Gospel way of rejoicing, is to rejoice in the Lord, not in our graces, not in our wisdom, not in our righteousness, but in the Lord. The horse rejoiceth in his strength,

He goeth on to meet the armed men.

The Hebrew is, He goeth on to meet the Armor, or rather Arms; that is, offensive weapons, pikes and spears, which gall horses, rather than defensive, such as shields, bucklers, and helmets, which only preserve men from hurt & wounds; or we may take it in both, and so the meaning is, the armed men. He goeth on to meet them; he needs not be beaten, nor whipt, nor spurred on to the battle. The courageous horse goes on, he retreats not, he retires not, he is a volunteer in the War, he is pressed by nothing but the nobleness and height of his own spirit, he goes to meet the armed men; though they meet him with deadly arms, with sword and spear, yet he goes to meet them. The word which we translate, Armed men, properly signifies to kiss, or to salute, because they who come to battle, do as it were, join hands and salute one another, though very coarsely, rudely, and roughly. He goeth on to meet the armed men.

Hence observe;

The sense of ability, much more confidence in ability, puts on to activity.

The horse rejoiceth in his strength, he is sensible of, or finds his strength for the war, and therefore he puts on.

Secondly, Note;

Whatever any man hath a mind or a delight to do, that he will go on in, or is free to do.

The horse goes on to meet the armed men, he doth not stand to receive a charge, but he seeks it. What any have a great mind to, that they are very forward in; you need not press a volunteer, nor spur a free, a valiant horse on to the battle, you can hardly hold him in with bit & bridle. 'It is so in any service; where there is a heart set to it, with a love to it, O how do we go forth to it! we need not to be hailed nor driven to it. So in spirituals, a heart of that temper, answers every call ( Psal. 27.8.) When thou saidst, seek my face; my heart said unto thee, thy face Lord will I seek. He presently answers the Lord's call to any duty, who hath a heart for it. What zeal, what freedom, what forwardness have we, to that we have a will and a mind to! An up-hill way, is all down-hill to a willing mind.


JOB, Chap. 39. Vers. 22, 23, 24, 25.


22. He mocketh at fear, and is not afraid, neither turneth he back from the sword.


23. The quiver rattleth against him, the glittering spear and the shield.


24. He swalloweth the ground with fierceness and rage, neither believeth he that it is the sound of the trumpet.


25. He cries among the trumpets, Ha, ha, and he smelleth the battle afar off; the thunder of the Captains and the shoutings.

THese four verses continue and complete the description o the goodly valiant War-horse, in his second qualification of boldness and courage, of which this Text gives as many proofs as can be imagined or expected.


Vers. 22. He mocketh at fear.

And what greater argument of valor than that? Fear, the abstract is here put for the concrete; he laughs at fear, that is, at those things which are most to be feared, or which carry the greatest command of fear in them. It is usual in Scripture, to express things greatly to be feared, by fear. As things greatly lie hoped for are called our hope, and things rejoiced in greatly are called our joy, so things greatly to be feared are called our fear; and in that sense, above all, God is called the fear of his people; he is so much the object of fear, that the Scripture calls him fear. Jacob in his treating and contract with his Uncle Laban (Gen. 31.53.) Sware by the fear of his father Isaac, that is, he sware by God, who alone hath this high honor to be sworn by in a sacred way. To swear, is a great part of divine worship, and is sometime put for the whole of worship. Jacob sware by the fear of Isaac, that is, by God, who his father Isaac feared, and in whose fear he walked all his days. Thus spake the Prophet ( Isa. 8.12, 13.) Sanctify the Lord of Hosts in your hearts, and let him be your fear, which is quoted by the Apostle (1 Pet. 3.15.) Now as God himself is called fear, because he is so exceedingly to be feared; so those things which carry in them much fear, or which are much f ared, in Scripture sense and eloquence, are called fear; He scorneth or mocketh at fear. Those things which make others tremble, he, as it were, makes a sport at and plays with them. So the words are an exposition of what was spoken at the close of the 21th ver. He goeth on to meet the armies, or the armed men, who are much to be feared and dreaded.

In general, whatsoever is or may be matter of fear, that the horse mocks or laughs at, that is, he counts no more of it, than we do of those things we laugh at. What men regard not, care not for, that they laugh at, mock at. We say of a valiant stout-hearted man, he knows not what fear means. When once a Noble person, in great danger, was admonished not to be afraid; he laid his hand upon his breast, and said, Fear was never here yet, and I hope shall never enter. Thus the Horse is here represented, as one into whose he t fear never entered; he mocketh at fear,

And (as it followeth) is not affrighted.

The word which we render affrighted, imports the greatest consternation of mind, when the mind lies, as it were, prostrate under utter dispondency, breakings of spirit, and discouragements, ( Deut. 1.21.) Neither any dreadful noise nor terrible sight, neither the appearance nor the reality of danger, abate the spirit or prowess of the Horse; He is not affrighted.

Hence, Note;

Danger is the element of courage.

We see it in the Horse, and it is much more seen in courageous men. You can no more cast down true courage by representing dangers, than you can drown a fish by casting it into the water; it is in its element. It was the speech of that great Alexander, being in a most hazardous undertaking, Now I see a danger suitable to my mind, a match for my courage. The Horse mocketh at fear.

Note, Secondly;

That which is not feared, is usually derided.

It is so with beasts, and it is so with men; and what more usual with some men, than to mock most at those things which they should be most afraid of. As there is a nobleness of courage in some men, which makes a mock of fear; so besides that, there is a baseness of spirit, a stupidness in other men, that make a mock at fear. Such was the spirit of Lots Sons-in-law ( Gen. 19.14.) who when Lot reported to them, the most dreadful thing that ever was in the world, a shower of fire and brimstone, ready to fall down from heaven, upon the whole City to consume it, He was to them as one that mocked; the meaning is, his Sons-in-law mocked at what he reported, they laughed at his admonition. Such a kind of mocking at fear, we read in those hardened and debauched spirits among the ten Tribes, when that good King sent and admonished them to return to the true worship of God, and laid before them those dreadful judgments that would surely overtake them if they did not (2 Chron. 30.10.) They laughed to scorn the messengers, and mocked them: As if they had said, What do you tell us of the wrath of God, and of his judgments, if we persist in our way and course; we scorn your admonition, we regard not your threatenings. The character given of that people (2 Chron. 36.16.) when wrath was breaking out upon them without remedy, was this, They mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words. To such mockers at fear, I might take occasion to say, as the Prophet in a like case ( Isa. 28.22.) Be ye not mockers, least your bands be made strong. There are some fears that it is our honor to mock at; but there are other fears that will be our shame and ruin to mock at: Of all such, that will be true which the Lord spake by wisdom ( Prov. 1.26.) I will mock when their fear cometh. They who mock when fear, that is, when fearful things are threatn'd in the name of the Lord; the Lord will mock at their fear when fearful evils fall upon them. Sinners will have little mind to mock at last. Such mockers at fear are prophesied of, before the coming of Christ, in those two Epistles which are of a near complexion and constitution (2 Pet. 3.4.) Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days (mockers, or) scoffers, walking after their own lusts, saying, where is the promise of his coming. And in the Epistle of Jude (ver. 17, 18.) we have the same caution, Beloved, remember ye the words that were spoken before, of the Apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ, how that they told you, there should be mockers in the last time, who should walk after their ungodly lusts. Take heed you be not found thus like the Horse mocking at fear, though there be many cases wherein it is the honor of man, especially, of the servants of God, to be in this point like the Horse, Who mocketh at fear,

Neither turneth he back from the sword.

This latter part of the verse is only a confirmation of what was said before, and therefore I shall briefly pass it. Those appearances or reallities of danger, at which we are affrighted, cause us to turn back; but the horse not being affrighted with, turneth not back from, the sword. The Hebrew is, he turneth not back from the face of the sword; further, the Hebrew is plural, from the faces of the sword. The sword hath a face, it hath (as it were) many faces, and they all look very terribly; therefore not to be afraid of the faces of the sword, is a high expression of fearlesness. Not to turn back from the face of the sword may have this sense, not to fear when the sword is very near him; when the sword looks the horse in the face, and makes dreadful faces, then he turns not back from it, nor yields a foot of ground. The Horse doth not only mock at fear, or at things which are to be feared, when they are afar off, but when they are near, even, when the sword is drawn and brandished before his face. To talk great words, when an enemy is far from us, is the cowards guize; but when we see his face, to stand to it, is the trial of courage. The Lioness is a very fierce and stout creature, and yet it is reported, that when she is fighting for her whelps (at which time she is most fierce and furious) she casts her eyes down to the ground, as not being willing to behold the weapons or hunting arms of those who pursue her. But though the natural Historian reports some kind of fear in the Lioness, yet Solomon reports the courage of the Lion altogether fearless and undaunted ( Prov. 30.30.) He turneth not away for any; The Hebrew saith, from the face of any; we may say, man or beast, that is, she takes not a step back for any; neither man nor beast can make him afraid. An ancient Writer, describing the Lion, tells us, He never feareth, nor flieth, nor hasteth away in the sight of any; but though oppressed with the multitude or number of his pursuers, he makes his retreat softly and gradually, or by several stands, to see who dares engage him, as was shown before at the 38th Chapter (ver. 39, 40.) Thus the valiant horse behaves himself at the appearance and face of the sword; he doth not only not turn quite away from the sword, but doth not so much as turn his eyes from it, but looks it full in the face, though it showeth a dreadful and bloody face. God, who hath made the horse for the service of man in war, hath given him a spirit suitable, he is not afraid of the sword, nor of any other weapon of war, as will further appear from the next verse, when from these words, I have briefly Noted,

First;

The face or appearance of the sword is terrible.

The sword is one of the most terrible things, which the Lord at any time threateneth against a sinful people; the face of the sword makes many men's faces gather paleness, and puts a palsy into their hands.

Note, Secondly;

Where there is true courage, not only dangers afar off, but dangers at hand are not turned from.

It is said ( Psal. 78.8.) that, the children of Ephraim being armed, and carrying bows (they had both offensive and defensive weapons, yet) turned back in the day of battle. They marched on possibly a great while very valiantly, as well as any in the army, and possibly made great boasts what they would do; but when it came to the day of battle, when they saw the face of the sword, then saith the Text, they turned back. A man of right metal turns not back, his courage fails not, no not at present danger; and that's it which we are to consider ourselves in, as to our spiritual courage. It is an easy matter to slight dangers when they are unseen and only talked of; but when it comes to the day of battle, when swords are drawn, and you see their terrible faces, then not to turn back, that's courage indeed. And so we may understand the words of the Apostle ( Heb. 10.38.) where he brings in the Lord speaking thus; If any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him. If any man draw back as a coward, or takes his heels in the day of battle (for of that he spake in the 34th verse, telling us of those, Who endured a great fight of affliction, even of those that took joyfully the spoiling of their goods, and doubtless were ready to take joyfully the spoiling of their lives too; If any man in their case turn back f om the very face of the sword) My soul (saith God) shall have no pleasure in him; he is no soldier for me, he is not fit for the spiritual warfare.

As in this verse we have the sword, so in the next, there is an enumeration of several other terrible Arms, the sight whereof gives no trouble to the horse.


Vers. 23. The quiver rattleth against him, the glistering spear and the sword.

Yet he turns not back; so we are to connect it.

The quiver ratles against him.

It was usual in those times to make much use of bows and a rows in war; and not only did the foot-men use the bow, but the horse-men too. Some understand this rattling of the quiver, to be either of foot or horse that come to charge; but we are rather to understand the rattling of the horse-man's quivers. Most creatures take fright at rattling noises, but this rattling makes not the horse either to start or turn, he flincheth not, nor draweth he back at the rattling of the quiver.

The quiver rattleth against him. There is a twofold interpretation of these words, arising from the ambiguity of the preposition ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) by us rendered against, which others translate by (super) upon, conceiving that here mention is made of those weapons which the horse with his Rider bear; as if the meaning were, The quivers which Archers on horse back, carry at their sadles or by their sides, ratle upon him. But most (as our translation hath it) render that preposition by, against, and so understand the whole verse of those arms, which the enemy or contrary party use in conflict. And that this is the better and more proper exposition, is clear from the series and tendency of the words; for here the valor and generosity of the horse is painted to the life, towards which the mention of those arms, which the horse himself or the horse-man managing him beareth, doth not contribute the least line or shadow; but the mention of those rattling arms or of the rattling of those arms, which the adverse party bear and brandish against him, tends to a notable demonstration of his courage. 'It is a great evidence of a horses boldness, to rush upon or charge an enemy, whose arms ratle against him, and who holds out weapons purposely fitted to wound, kill, and slay all that come near him. So that, what is said ( ver. 21.) He goeth on to meet the armed men; and ( ver. 22.) He mocketh at fear, neither turneth he back from the sword, is here further illustrated and heightened, by recounting several other deadly weapons of which the horse is as dreadless. When the horse moves much, the quiver ratles, so also do both spears and shields (as it followeth in the Text.)

The glittering spear and the shield.

Well furbisht spears and shields glitter, or (as the Hebrew hath it) flame. The heads & points of spears being burnished & brighten'd, seem like burning fire or flames; yet the horse is not moved by them. We read of a flaming sword in a higher sense ( Gen. 3.24.) as here of flaming spears and shields. Now as the clashing and rattling of arms, so the brightness of them is terrible; but neither the one nor the other, neither the rattling quiver, nor the glittering spear and shield trouble the courageous horse. Mr. Broughton translates, not shield but, javelin, which is an offensive or missive weapon; the word is rendered spear ( Josh. 8.18. 1 Sam. 174 5.) as also at the 29th verse of the 41th Chapter of this Book. These things laid together bring in, or make up a fuller proof of the horses courage; the quiver rattleth against him, the spear and shield ratle too, yet he is not discouraged.

Hence Note, First;

The confused noise of weapons in war, wounds the ear and the heart, or the heart at the ear, as well as the sharpness of their point or edge wounds the flesh.

It is matter of amazement to hear the sounding, the rattling, the clashing of arms, and other dreadful noises that the field is filled with in a day of battle ( Isa. 9.5.) Every battle of the warrior is with confused noise; and 'tis much that the confusion of the noise, doth not make a confusion in the spirits of those that are engaged in battle.

Note, Secondly;

Not to be terrified with noises and dreadful sounds, shows strength and stoutness of spirit.

It is a piece of valor in the horse, not to be troubled with or at the rattling of the quiver. The Lord to show that he would totally take away the spirit of courage from his own people for their sins (who had been so valiant to sin against him, and would run upon sin, notwithstanding the rattling of his quiver, his threatenings, denounced against them) telleth them ( Levite. 26.36.) I will carry you into the land of your enemies. What then? And (saith he) upon them that are left alive of you, I will send a faintness into their hearts, in the land of their enemies, and the sound of a shaken leaf shall chase them. Now as it shows an extreme cowardice and faintness of spirit, to shake and run at the shaking of a leaf; so to stand firm, to keep our ground and not be moved, when there is such a noise and clattering, as even shakes the earth, and confounds all the elements (as it were) this shows a mighty courage.


Vers. 24. He swalloweth the ground with fierceness and rage, &c.

Still the expressions rise higher and higher, the courage of the horse transports him so far, that he even swalloweth the ground. We say of some hard and great students, they swallow up books, they make no bones of great books. So here, to show the mighty courage and fierceness of the horse, he is represented, as if he would eat up or swallow the very ground he treads on.

Yet many Expositors are not satisfied, that the Hebrew word here used ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) should be rendered to swallow; and therefore they translate, He diggeth the earth with fierceness and rage; and expound it of his making holes in the ground, by pawing in the valley spoken of verse 21. Master Broughton gives it thus; With snaking and stirring he beateth upon the earth: The Chaldee Paraphrase saith, He makes a hole in the earth. The authority of the Chaldee (saith Bootius ) gives credit to this exposition and strengthens it; because it shows, that the word in the Syriac tongue (many of which are used in this book of Job ) may well signify to dig or make a hole, seeing from this Verbe a Noun is derived, which in that language signifies a hole or pit. And if we take this interpretation (saith he) the words would not be a bare, much less a needless repetition of what was said ( ver. 21.) He paweth in the valley. For though (according to this reading) the Text in both places speaks of hollowing the earth, yet we may give this difference; the former being to be understood of those lighter touches, which wanton lusty horses with one foot give the earth; but this latter, of great and deep impressions which they make in the earth with all their feet, while heated with a desire to charge the enemy, they are restrained and held in, till the signal be given.

Secondly, Others laying a side the metaphorical sense of the word swalloweth, expound it properly of his biting or gnawing the earth. A generous horse, to show how he would eat up the enemy when he comes at him, before he comes at him, doth not only paw in the earth with his foot, but gnaws the earth with his teeth, as if he would swallow it up. And to swallow up a thing imports in all languages, at least a supposed or conceited easiness of doing it. We, speaking proverbially, use to say, we could do such or such a thing, as easily as we can eat or drink. The horse when he cannot come presently to wreek his rage upon the enemy, doth it upon the earth; in gnawing of which he seems to tell his enemies, that he will tear their flesh, and gnaw their bones as soon as he can come at them. And I find one, who by earth in this place, understands men (as all are) made of earth; but though it may bear a tolerable sense, to say, that a ho se in his fierceness and rage, would even eat or swallow up the enemy; yet to expound the earth by the enemy, exceeds (saith a learned Author) all absurdity. But,

Thirdly, I rather conceive (as some of the Rabbins, and not a few of our Modern Writers do) that by swallowing the earth with fierceness and rage, we are to understand only the swiftness of his course or motion, when once he hath but the reins let loose to the battle, he will run as if he would swallow the ground, and that shows his courage too. We say of a man that runs with speed, he doth not feel the ground: The horse is in such extreme hast to be gone, and to be at the battle, that he runs, as if he neither felt nor left any earth under him. This interpretation is strongly contended for, by learned Bochartus, in opposition to the former, and illustrated by many ancient testimonies concerning the fierceness and swiftness of the horse, which the Reader may consult if he please. He swalloweth the ground with fierceness and rage.

Hence note;

In strong and outrageous passions, we think we can do impossibilities,

Even eat up the earth, and swallow the ground.

Neither believeth he it is the sound of the trumpet.

Beasts have some kind of faith; they do somewhat which looks like believing. The O iginal word signifieth the proper work of faith.

But how can the horse be said, either to believe, or not to believe?

I shall give two interpretations of the words, in answer to this question.

First, thus: He believes not that it is the sound of the Trumpet; that is, whereas it might be thought, that the sound of the trumpet should terrify him, he regards it no more than a man doth that which he doth not believe, he cares not for it, he is not at all troubled at it. Thus our old English Translation hath it; He regardeth not the noise of the trumpets.

Secondly, thus: He believes not that it is the sound of the trumpet; that is, he hath so great a mind to the battle, that when the trumpet sounds indeed to the battle, he doubts it is not so, 'tis too good news to be true; he scarce believes his own ears; or, he desireth the battle so much, that he believes the signal of it very little, and fears it is not so, but some false alarm. This is a good and probable interpretation, it being usual among men (from whom in proportion to beasts, especially to gallant horses, this affection may be transferred) hardly at first to believe or give credit to those things which they extremely desire and wish, yea, long for. In this sense it may well be said of the Horse, He believes not that it is the sound of the trumpet.

Hence note;

That which is much desired, is in some cases hardly believed.

'It is usually said, We easily believe that which we would or desire to have; yet sometimes we hardly believe that which we would have; that is, when we hear 'tis so, we are full of fears and doubts that the thing is not so, we are afraid that we shall not obtain so wished and longed for an enjoyment; and do therefore not only question the reports of others concerning it (as Jacob did the report of his other sons concerning the life and high advancement of his son Joseph in Egypt (Gen. 45.26.) for as soon as he heard it, the Text saith, His heart fainted, for he believed them not, Now, not only do some (I say) in such cases hardly believe the reports of others) but even that which our own eyes behold. It is said of the disciples of Christ, when he appeared to them after his Resurrection, and shown them his hands and his feet ( Luke 21.41.) They believed not for joy; they were so glad of the thing, they could not believe their own eyes. In which sense we are to understand that of Job, at the 24th verse of the 29th Chapter; If I laugh •• on them, they believed it not. When the Angel told Abraham in the Tent ( Gen, 18.10.) I will certainly return to thee according to the time of life; and loe, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. Sarah over-hearing this good news, Laughed within herself (verse. 12.) Though it pleased her exceedingly, that she should have a son, yet she laughed also in unbelief, and was therefore reproved ( verse. 15.) If she had laughed as Abraham did, at the day of Christ, who saw Christ's day and rejoiced (John 8.56.) that is, he laughed in faith, in assurance that it would come; but Sarah laughed, as doubting, sure this will never be; though might she have had her wish, she would of all things in the world, have desired and wished a son. Once more ( Acts 12.15.) when Peter was in prison, and prayer made by the Church night and day, doubtless they prayed in faith for his delivery, yet when Peter was delivered, and knocked at the door, they said to the Maid, who told them it was Peter, Thou art mad (verse. 15.) They could not believe it was so, while they heard it was so, and had been earnestly praying it might be so. The valiant horse desires nothing more than an engagement in battle, but believes not it is the sound of the trumpet.

Thus of the second exposition of these words, Neither b l eveth he that it is the sound of the Trumpet. Yet some conceive, that though it be true, that generous and brave horses are not only not affrighted at the sound of the trumpet, but rather rejoice (in their kind) at it, as is said expressly in the next verse; yet it cannot be conveniently said, that he hath so great a joy as to produce this dis-belief: For so to rejoice, as to be in a manner overcome with joy, & not to give credit to our eyes and ears, never happens, but as in extremely great and extraordinary joys, so in unaccustomed and unexpected joys, which surely cannot well be affirmed of that joy which horses are taken with at the sound of a trumpet, signalizing a battle to ensue.

And therefore (because it avoids this difficulty) I shall rather adhere to them, who render the words thus, Neither doth he stand still (or keep his ground) when the trumpet soundeth. So Mr. Broughton renders expressly; Neither stands he still when the sound of the trumpet is heard. This interpretation suits best with the scope of the place; nor doth the force of the Hebrew Verb oppose it: for the Adjective, which comes from the Participle of it, is often used to signify firm, stable, sure, durable; yea, and the Verb itself is often taken in that sense ( Psal. 78.37.) They were not steadfast, or stood not fast in his covenant. So ( Deut. 28.59.) the Lord threatened Plagues of long continuance, that is, standing Plagues, or such as should hold long, and not stir from the place. Thus also it is said ( Exod. 17.12.) The hands of Moses were steady until the going down of the Sun. The same word doth elegantly signify, both to believe and to be steady, or stand fast; seeing it is faith or believing in God, which alone makes us steady or stand fast, in all occasions or temptations to the contrary; and therefore in this place we may most conveniently render, He standeth not firm, he stands not still, or keeps not his place at the sound of the trumpet, but is unquiet and in motion, as having an ardent desire to be in the battle, as soon as ever he hears the trumpet sound. One of the ancient Poets expresseth this quality of a valiant horse, almost in the same words, and altogether to the same sense; He knows not how to keep his place; or, he cannot (as we say) for his heart, stand still. So that as the eagerness of the horse for the battle, even before the signal given, is set forth in those words ( verse. 21.) He paweth in the valley; and in the former part of this verse, where 'tis said, He swalloweth the ground with fierceness and rage; so the same height of spirit after the signal given, is further expressed in these words, thus translated, He standeth not still (no ground will hold him, he will be gone if he can get head) when once he hears the sound of the trumpet.

Hence note;

What we have much mind to do, we are glad of an opportunity to do it, and readily embrace it.

The Apostle saith of the old Patriarchs ( Heb. 11.15.) Truly if they had been mindful of (that is, if they had had a mind to) that Country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned. Now, as a man will not do that for which he hath an opportunity, when he hath no mind to it; so if a man hath a mind to do anything, how soon doth he make use of the very first opportunity to do it. And doubtless it was a great trouble to the Philippians, who had a true desire to show their care of, and love to the Apostle Paul, that they lacked opportunity to show it, and give a real proof of it ( Phil. 4.10.) As opportunity is a gale to carry us on to action, so a willing mind is a gale to carry us to the improvement of any offered opportunity for action. Let us do good (saith the Apostle, Gal. 6.10.) as we have opportunity. He that is slack to do good when he hath a fair gale of opportunity to it, declares plainly, that his mind is becalmed, and that he hath not the least breath or gale of willingness in his mind to do good. It is our duty, not only to accept an opportunity to do good when it falls tight in our way, but even to step out of our way (so it be in a good way) to seek it. David's enemies sought occasion, and so did Daniel's (Chap. 6.) to do him a mischief; and shall not we seek occasions to show mercy? &c. Let us (like the horse in the Text) no sooner hear the sound of the Trumpet, a lawful call to any duty, for which we have also an open door, but (as he) rejoice in it, stand still no longer with a dull, shall we, shall we, in our mouths, but be gone, up and be doing.


Vers. 25. He saith among the trumpets, ha, ha, and he smelleth the battle afar off, the thunder of the Captains and the shouting.

This verse seems to give a reason of what was last said in the former, especially according to the latter Translation of it. As if it had been said, Therefore the generous horse cannot stand still, but is impatient of every moments delay, when he hears the trumpet sound, because he is not only not astonished at it, but rejoiceth, wishing for nothing more than the battle, of which he knows the sounding of the trumpet to be a signal.

He saith among the trumpets, Ha, ha.

Some render these words, not barely as we, among the trumpets, but thus; At the full sound of the trumpet; or, When the trumpet hath sounded long and sufficiently, then he saith, Ha, ha. Reading the words thus, we may connect them with the latter part of the former verse, Neither believeth he that it is the sound of the trumpet; that is, when the trumpet begins to sound, he doubts whether it be to the battle or no; but when the trumpet sounds long, when the sufficiency of the trumpet sounds, or when it sounds sufficiently, so that it manifestly appears the battle is nigh, or at hand, then he saith, Ha, ha.

That the word de in Bede is significative, and imports sufficiency, is the opinion of many interpreters, and that it is of the same sense in this Text, as in that ( Isa. 40.16.) Lebanon is not sufficient to burn, nor the beasts thereof sufficient for a burnt-offering. Thus here, at the sufficiency of the trumpet, that is, when the trumpet sounds sufficiently, abundantly, or clearly; or (as our old English translation hath it) when the trumpets make most noise, he saith, ha, ha.

There are others of note, who judge that ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) de is only a syllabical addition of no signification, or adding nothing to the Preposition (ב) Be; and so render the words only thus: At the sound of the trumpet; or as we, Among the trumpets, he saith, ha, ha. And that ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) De, is only expletive, not significative, and so that word ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) Bede is no more than the Preposition (ב) Be, put alone, some would confirm by other Texts of Scripture, where it is conceived to be so used ( Hab. 2.13.) Behold, is it not of the Lord that the people shall labor ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) in the fire; and the people shall weary themselves ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) for vanity? These words are sound also ( Jer. 51.58.) in both which (saith a learned Author) that ( 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ) De cannot signify sufficiency, both the sense of the place shows, and almost all interpreters agree. And this also may be further confirmed by a like use of the same word, as it is put after ב Judge. 6.5. and after מ Isa. 66.23. The Learned Reader consulting the original, will easily observe (saith he) that in both those places 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 hath no special signification.

Yet doubtless (considering that not one Iota or tittle in the Scripture is in vain) that additional word hath its use, and possibly is of more use than any have as yet well understood. For though it be granted, as Rabbi David saith in his Dictionary, that 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in all those places is paragogical; yet Paragoges may have more in them, than merely the ornament of speech. Our Translators intimate as much ( Hab. 2.13.) where they do not render barely, in the fire, and for vanity, but in the very fire, and for very vanity. And therefore (with the good leave of that learned Author) I apprehend (with the Rabbin, whom he quotes, but likes not for this opinion) that in all places where this word is used, it hath a special force, declaring the greatness and continuance of the thing spoken of. And so in this place, we may take the meaning thus: As the generous horse is always forward for the battle, so when the trumpet begins to sound; but when the trumpet soundeth long (as the Lord spake to Moses at the giving of the Law, Exod. 19.13.) then the horse (being fully assured that the battle will suddenly begin) is mightily affected with a kind of joy, which he expresseth as well and as fully as he can in his language, saying, Ha, ha, now 'tis as I would have it.

That this Interjection, ha, ha, imports joy and exultation, all agree; and it may note, not only that inward joy with which the horse is affected at the sound of the trumpet, but also that outward expression which he makes of it by neighing, which may not improperly be called his ha, ha; the sound which we hear in the air, when a horse neigheth, symbolizing much with this Interjection, ha, ha, spoken by a man. And all men know (who know anything of the qualities or customs of gallant horses) that it is usual with them to neigh when they are much pleased, and are upon a near attainment of their desire, or the enjoyment of their pleasures. Comparing the latter part of the former verse, according to the second exposition of our Translation, with this,

Observe;

Assurance of what we would have, breeds extreme joy and triumph in his spirit that would have it.

When the horse finds it is the battle indeed, then he rejoiceth greatly. Men often break out into such exclamations, when having been long doubtful of a thing, and fearful how it might issue, they at last see its issue answering the utmost of their wishes and expectations ( Psal. 40.15.) Let them (saith David) be desolate for a reward of their shame, that say, Ah, ha, Ah, ha; that is, let them be rewarded with desolation, for their shameful doings, in saying, Ah, ha, Ah, ha, because they see me cast down. To say, Ah, ha, at what is done, is as much as to say, it pleaseth us well, it gives us high content. Thus also they cried out ( Psal. 35.21.) Ah, ha, our eyes have seen it. As the vision we shall have in heaven, is faith perfected in the highest assurance imaginable; so in any case in this world, what of our desires our eyes see, we take high content in. It is comfortable when we have some hope of what we desire; but when we once see it, then we cry Ah, ha, if what our eyes see, be to us as theirs was to them in the same Psalm, where they are again brought in saying, Ah, ha, so would we have it (ver. 25.) now it is as it should be; we have been looking for such a day a long time, but now it is come; Ah, ha, Ah, ha, So would we have it. And consider it either in natural or spiritual things; there is a time as to spiritual things, when we do not believe the silver trumpet of the Gospel sounds mercy to us, that sin is pardoned, that God is gracious; but when once there is a convincing sufficiency of the trumpets sound, when once our unbelief is fully overcome, and our hearts wound up to assurance, then the soul is in its triumph, and cries out (as the horse, when he perceives the desired battle approacheth) Ah, ha, Ah, ha.

This content of the horse appears yet further in the next words.

He smells the battle afar off, the thunder of the Captains, and the shouting.

These words hold out another matter, which doth much set forth and commend the honor of the horse, and his desire of the combat; He smells the battle. To be in battle pleaseth him so well, that the smell of it is to him a delightful and pleasant odour. The very stink of a Camp (as the Prophet calls it, Amos 4.10.) is a sweet perfume to his nostrils. He smells a battle,

He smelleth the battle afar off.

The Hebrew word signifieth properly to smell, or take the scent of anything. And almost all interpreters, ancient and modern, retain that signification here; yet some there are who take smelling, in this place metaphorically, for perceiving, fore-apprehending, or presaging. For the Hebrew (as some very well skilled in that language assure us) having no word which answers the Greek and Latin words (noted in the margin) signifying to perceive and feel, maketh use of this word in the Text for those purposes. Thus 'tis said ( Judge. 16.9.) When it (that is, the thread ) toucheth (or as our old translation hath it, feeleth) the fire. So ( Isa. 11.3.) He (that is, Christ the Messias) shall be quick of understanding in the fear of the Lord. The Hebrew is, He shall smell or be quick-scented in the fear of the Lord. His very senses shall be, as it were, touched with or dipt in the fear of the Lord, that is, he shall religiously sense or judge all things. The fear of the Lord shall be the rule or guide of all his senses, as it follows in that verse, He shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears, that is, according to outward appearances and reports. Thus we may take the word in this passage; the horse smelleth, that is, he perceiveth or apprehendeth the battle. Naturalists report wonders about the understanding of the horses, and his sagaciousness in fore-seeing or presaging battles: And this he doth, saith the Text,

Afar off.

Our translation (with most others) take the Hebrew word as an Adverb of place; yet some conclude it to be an Adverb of time. So 'tis used ( Isa. 25.1.) where the Prophet be speaks the Lord thus; Thy counsels of old (that is, those counsels which thou, O Lord, hast had a long time ago, or long before time) are faithfulness and truth. We also render the word, by long ago (1 King 19.25.)

But it may be objected, Though the word in those places notes time, yet it cannot do so in this place of Job; for in those places alleged, it signifies a vast space of time before, whereas here in Job, if it denotes time, it is but a very short space of time, no more than the space of time, between giving the signal of a battle by sound of trumpet, and the joining of the battle. To this, the answer is; That this Hebrew word may be applied to a short space of time, as well as to a long one, seeing both the Greek and Latin words (set in the Margin) of the same signification, are used to note sometimes a very long, and sometimes but a short space of time.

Now according to this sense of the word, this latter clause of the verse is thus translated; He smelleth, or, perceiveth the battle is near at hand, or will shortly be: Which gives a very fair meaning of the Text, if that word, which all grant signifies time as well as place, doth also signify a short, as well as a long space of time; for then the verse runs clearly thus, At the full sound of the trumpet, he saith, Ha, ha, smelling (or perceiving) that the battle is at hand. I leave this to the Readers judgment. Our own translation is an undoubted truth, both as to the signification of the word, and the experiences of the thing. A Gallant horse trained up, and accustomed to War, when he sees much stirring in an Army, and hears the trumpets sounding, perceives a battle will be, though the armies be possibly a good distance of ground one from the other. Thus he smells the battle afar off, especially when he hears that which follows in the close of the verse.

The thunder of the Captains and the shouting.

This is music to him. Here are two other antecedents of a battle, which the horse takes notice of.

First, The thunder of the Captains or Princes; that is, of the great Commanders and Generals of the field; who when they give out the word, they give it with a loud voice, they thunder it out. 'It is no time to whisper when armies are ready to join battle; and therefore Commanders lift up their voices like trumpets, or like thunder out of the clouds, that the Soldiers may hear them. And when Captains or Generals give exhortation to the Soldiers, they thunder out arguments to encourage them, and fire their spirits to the battle. The horse doth as it were hear this thunder; oh! it pleases him when the military oration is made, and the Captain-general gives order for the battle.

And the shouting.

What's that? Surely, the acclamation of the whole army: when the Captain, or Commander in chief, hath made his military Oration, then usually the Soldiers shout and make an acclamation, in token of their willingness to fight, and readiness for the battle: Thus the horse smells the battle afar off, the thunder of the Captains and the shouting. The whole verse may be read in this form; At the sufficient sound of the trumpet, and the exhortation of the Captains, together with the acclamations of the Soldiers, he saith, Ah, ha, (or rejoiceth) perceiving that the battle (though the armies be not yet joined, but keep their ground at a distance) is at hand, or will suddenly be.

Having opened this whole context concerning the horse, and given several observations from the parts of it; I shall for the close of all show how aptly this description of the horse represents, or is applicable unto two very different sorts of men.

First, The Horse, as here described, is the emblem of a bold and hardened sinner. The Spirit of God speaks this expressly ( Jer. 8.6.) I harkened, and heard (saith the Lord) but they spake not aright, no man repented him of his wickedness, saying, what have I done; everyone turned to his course (what course? his sinful course, how?) as the horse rusheth into the battle; as the horse mocks at fear, and will not turn back from the sword; As the horse will not be affrighted at the rattling of the quiver, nor at the shaking of the spear; so hardened sinners rush on, though you tell them there's deadly danger in it, and that the Sword of the Word points directly at them, and will cut them off: Yea, they will not turn back, though the Lord should brandish a flaming sword, as he did against Adam, to keep him from the tree of life, so to keep them from the tree of death; they, will for all this, rush on as the horse to the battle. The wicked man is thus described, in one place of this book of Job (Chap. 15.25, 26.) where Eliphaz saith of him, He stretcheth out his hand against God (here's war with God) and strengthens himself against the Almighty (that is, draws all his forces together; and what then? just as the horse in the Text) He runs upon the thick bosses of his buckler, even upon his neck. A wicked man, like the horse, runs upon God, even upon the thick bosses of his buckler. The Lord is there represented, by Eliphaz, as holding out a buckler against the sinner; what's that? the Law, his Word of command, that's God's buckler; and this buckler hath thick bosses and sharp points, especially, in the middle, a great boss with a pike, such are all divine threatenings, yet the sinner runs, as a horse, upon these thick bosses of God's buckler, his severest threatenings. Thus the horse, and a bold sinner are alike.

Secondly, The horse is also the emblem of a bold Saint, or of a faithful servant of God. Such, specially, were all the holy Martyrs; A chief among the Ancients saith expressly, that in the Horse the Martyr may be seen; whom none account valiant but God himself, and they who are born of God. I may Parallel a holy Martyr and the Horse, in every particular mentioned in this context. First, As the horse is said to receive his strength from God (hast thou given strength to the horse?) so it was God who gave strength to the Martyrs, to stand it out in the day of battle. Secondly, As God gives courage to the horse, so it was God that gave courage to the Martyrs; and such courage he hath sometimes given, as hath made poor weak women as strong and courageous, as the horse in the Text: Persecutors could not make the old martyrs run like Grashoppers; they have even mocked at fear, and would not turn back from the face of the sword drawn out against them; no rattling of the quiver, nor clashing of weapons could terrify them; they have not been affrighted with Lions, Bears, Tigers ready to devour them; they have not been affrighted with the fiery furnace, nor with the most exquisite torments that the wit or malice of man could invent. Jesus Christ having instructed the Church his Spouse ( Cant. 1.8.) what to do, he at the 9th verse commends the Church in two things. First, For her courage. Secondly, For her beauty. For her courage first, at the 9th ver. and in that respect he compares her to a Company of horses in Pharaoh's chariots. But why doth he compare the Church to a Company of horses in Pharaohs Chariots? I answer, it is well known, that the Kings of Egypt were called Pharaoh, and Egypt was very famous for horses of war: therefore Christ makes this comparison, to show, that the Church b ing directed to keep close to the shepherds tents, must expect that the world or the false Church, would vex and persecute her; but faith Christ, my spouse is like a company of horses in Pharaoh's chariots, that is, she will be as valiant in this war, in standing for the truth against all false doctrine & idolatrous worship, as the most valiant horses that ever were in Egypt, or in any part of the world have been in any day of battle. Experience (we know) hath made this good; for the true Spouse of Christ, though poor, comtemptible and weak, though women and even but children, though helpless sheep and tender lambs, yet in battles of suffering for Christ, they have become as mighty as the mightiest war-horses, they have withstood all the powers of the world undauntedly, and made them admire their courage, yea, vexed and madded them with their courage. Who but the Lord could arm his people with spiritual weapons, with power and courage, to overcome all their enemies, or to over-overcome them, as the word is ( Rom. 8.37.) which we render, more than conquerors; over what? over sword, and nakedness, and perils, and danger, and death; we more then overcome all these (saith the Apostle there) though we are killed all the day long, and counted as sheep for the slaughter, as he speaks at the 36th verse. And hence the Prophet said ( Zach. 10.3, 5.) that though the Church, there called, the house of Judah, be weak like a flock, yet the Lord makes them as his goodly horse in the battle. Our late Annotators give the sense of the Prophet in those words expressly thus. Now that the Lord hath turned his favorable countenance towards his people, he hath endowed them with valor and strength; so that of sheep they are become a great war-horse, with which the Lord will overcome and trample down his enemies; which may in part be understood of the Maccabeees victory, but most perfectly of the whole Churches victories over the world and the devil. This victory the Church obtains over the devil by resisting, and over the world by suffering.

Thus far of the valiant horse. The Lord's discourse proceeds from this noble beast of the earth, to those noble birds of the air, the Hawk and the Eagle.


JOB, Chap. 39. Vers. 26, 27, 28, 29.


26. Doth the Hawk fly by the wisdom, and stretch out her wings towards the South?


27. Doth the Eagle mount up at thy command, and make her nest on high?


28. She dwelleth and abideth on the rock, upon the crag of the rock, and the strong place.


29. From thence she seeketh the prey, and her eyes behold afar off.


30. Her young ones also suck up blood: and where the slain are, there is she.

IN this context the Lord passeth from the beasts of the earth, to give a further demonstration of his power and wisdom, appering in the fowls of air; and here we have two instances, both in birds of p ey, The Hawk and the Eagle.

Job is first questioned about the Hawk in the 26th verse; In which the Hawk is set forth two ways. First, In general, by her flying, Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom? Secondly, in special, by the course of her flight, and stretch forth her wings toward the South?

Secondly, Job is questioned about the Eagle, concerning which (Queen among birds) fix things are here expressly set forth, or distinctly expressed.

First, Her high flying or mounting upwards, in the former part of the 27th verse, Doth the Eagle mount up at thy command?

Secondly, Her high nesting or making her nest on high, in the latter part of the same verse; doth she, at thy command, make her nest on high?

Thirdly, She is here described by the choice of her abode, dwelling or habitation ( ver. 28.) she dwelleth and abideth on the rock, on the crag of the rock, and in the strong place.

Fourthly, We have here the sharpness of the Eagles appetite, and her quick endeavor to get food for the satisfying of it, in the former part of the 29th verse. When she is abiding upon the rock, upon the crag of the rock, and in her strong place, from thence she seeks her prey; she is not idle there.

Fifthly, She is described by the sharpness of her sight, in the latter part of the 29th verse, her eyes behold afar off. As if the Lord had said, though she dwells thus high upon the rock, and the crag of the rock, yet this doth not hinder her in the pursuit of her prey, for her eyes behold afar off.

Sixthly and Lastly, We have here the matter, or nature of her own food and diet, together with the food of her young ones. We have here (as I may say) a Bill of the Eagles fare ( ver. 30.) it is blood, and the flesh of the slain, Her young ones suck up blood; and where the slain are, there is she: That's her chief food and diet, the flesh and blood of the slain. These are the particulars which the spirit of God layeth down in the descriptions, bo h of the Hawk and Eagle.

From the whole I shall give only this general note, as to the Lord's purpose in speaking of these birds of prey, the Hawk and the Eagle, rather than of the Dove, or of any other fowl of a more harmless nature. I say, the Lord doth this to show, that seeing his providence disposeth of, and watcheth over these fowls of the air, which are so able to shift for themselves, and are in their kind so little useful to man; then surely, he will not neglect man, nor any creature that is of necessary use to man.


Vers. 26. Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom?

The word rendered Hawk comes from a root which signifies a feather or plume of feathers; because, feathers are the instruments by which the Hawk flieth. The same word signifies also to fly; the Hawk being a fowl of such an excellent flight, may well be expressed by a word which properly signifies flying.

The Hawk is numbered among the unclean birds in the Law of Moses, which the Jews might not eat of ( Levite. 11.16. Deut. 14.15.) The Hawk in its kind, or all kinds of the Hawk, are excepted out of their food, or not admitted at their table. Those creatures which were useful to get man some kind of food, might not then be at all the food of man, in the Jewish Nation.

Nor will it be unprofitable, upon this occasion, to take notice how the Lord then set bounds and limits to the appetite of man, which is so apt to exceed: He forbids several creatures to the Jews, for some of which, possibly, we can give no reason but his Sovereignty, he would have it so; and others were forbidden, because possibly, feeding upon them was not so wholesome for the body of man; and others God did except from the table of the Israelites, because of some qualities which he did not like in them; and for that reason it is conceived the Hawk was excepted. The Jews might not feed upon the Hawk, because she is a bird of prey, and lives by ravening and killing other birds; such was the law among the Jews: and though that law be now taken away, as the vision shown Peter (Act. 10.15.) yet there are few that make Hawks their meat, or eat of them.

The word by which the Hawk is expressed in the Latin, signifies to take or catch, whereby her ravening nature is denoted, because she catches and snatches all she can for her living. Some of the Ancients tell us, that the Hawk is a very princely bird, who though she h th not much in bulk of body, yet hath much in the generosity of her mind, and is therefore joined here with the Eagle, as if this were the Princess, and the Q een of birds. And some report, that there is no other among all the fowls of the air, that dares contend with the Eagle, but the Hawk. Aristotle reckons up ten sorts of Hawks, and Pliny sixteen: But I shall leave that discourse to Faulconers. It is enough for the opening of this Scripture, to intimate somewhat in generat of the Hawk.

Doth the Hawk fly.

The Hawk is described as flying. Some creatures are for going, some for running, but the excellency of the Hawk is in flying: And flying here is not to be taken in a general sense, as opposed to running or going, for so it is common to all the birds of the air; there's not the least, not any of the winged kind, but can fly little or much: But when he saith, Doth the Hawk fly? flying is to be understood specially, of swift flying, and of long continued flying. The Hawk flies with wonderful swiftness. Hence among the Egyptians, the Hawk was a Hierogliphick of the winds. And as the Hawk moves with wonde full swiftness, so with great perseverance. Naturalists tell us, and it is the experience of many, that the Hawk will abide upon the wing, two, three, yea, four hours together in the pursuit of, or in waiting for her prey; and hence some of the Ancients have made the flying of the Hawk, or the Hawk in his flying, an emblance of perseverance. The Hawk moves in the air, as if he abode immoveably there.

Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom, or understanding?

Thou seest how perseveringly the Hawk flies, and how cunningly, or wisely, to her best advantage: Doth the Hawk fly thus by thy wisdom, or hast thou taught the Hawk to fly thus? hast thou instructed the Hawk to make this use of her wings? no, the Hawk flieth by my wisdom, I have given her this strength, and taught her this skill, for God takes it unto himself, it is by my wisdom and instruction that the Hawk flieth.

The Vulgar Latin reads thus, Doth the Hawk feather herself, or get her feathers by thy wisdom? Our Translation runs to the use of her feathers, this to the groweth of her feathers; as if it had been said, D th the Hawk get her feathers by thy wisdom, or hast thou set her feathers so exactly in her wings? This reading may be taken two ways. First, Dost thou make the Hawks feathers grow at first, dost thou plant those feathers in her wings? surely, no. Secondly, Dost thou renew the Hawks feathers? When the Hawk hath mued or least her feathers (as they who are acquainted with Hawks know their natural custom is) dost thou cause them to grow again? surely, no, thou didst neither at first plant her wings with feathers, nor when she hath cast her feathers, dost thou cause those feathers to renew; that's a good reading: But I shall keep to our own. Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom?

Hence note, First;

The Lord hath given man some creatures more to serve his pleasure, than his necessities.

Whatever service the Hawk doth to man in catching the prey, the Partridge, or Phesant, or other fowl, man might serve himself of them (as many do) some other and cheaper way, and not by hawking. The Moralists could say (speaking of such like creatures) Man was loved by the supreme Maker of all things, even to his delight and content. God hath given such swift wings to the Hawk, not only to set forth his own power, but for man's pleasure. Hawks are for the sport and delight of Princes and great men; and seeing God hath made some creatures for the delight, more than for the necessity, for the pleasure, more than for the need of man; O how should man take heed of displeasing God! Doth the great God of heaven and earth provide Hawks for man's pleasure, and shall man take no care to please God! 'It is lamentable to consider, how most men displease God by oaths and profanations of his Name, while they are taking that kind of pleasure. And I may say, there is no kind of sport which the indulgence of God hath allowed man, wherein God is more provoked and dishonored, than in this: What swearing, what cursing, is there in following this Game; If Hawks and Spannels please not men in the pursuit of their pleasures, how is the Name of God rent and torn, to his high displeasure! How vain is that man, who takes pleasure in sin, or who sins in taking his pleasure! He makes his short pleasure-time a seed-time (without repentance) of his everlasting pains and sorrows.

Secondly, Whereas the question is put, Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom?

Note;

It is by the wisdom and teaching of God that the Hawk flieth.

Not only hath the Lord put the general power of flying into the Hawk, as into other birds, but that special excellency to fly so swiftly and strongly, so cunningly and artificially. 'It is not so much the Faulconer, who teacheth the Hawk, as God; then let us admire the wisdom of God in the properties of every creature. It must be confessed, that Hawks do strange things; but but whence is it? it is of God. Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom; canst thou manage the Hawk, or bring her to thy Lure; canst thou make her go off after her prey? canst thou reclaim her at thy pleasure? Thou canst not; only God can. And hence we may infer, If the flying of the Hawk be from the wisdom of God, then see the wisdom of God in the goings and doings of man. The way of man (saith the Prophet, Jer. 10.23.) is not in himself; it is not in him that walketh, to direct his steps; the wisdom of the Lord doth it. If the wisdom of the Lord orders the flying of a bird in the air, surely then 'tis the wisdom of the Lord which manageth the motions of men on earth; he orders both the course and discourse of man: when he pleaseth he can take wisdom from the wisest men, and make even Judges fools. Judges are supposed and accounted the wisest among men, yet the Lord can befool them so, that they shall not be able to see the things that belong either to their own peace, or the peace of others. The Lord, who gives wisdom to beasts and birds, can take it from men. Doth the Hawk fly by thy wisdom? That's the general; then follows a special instance concerning the course of the Hawk;

And stretch (or spread) her wings towards the South.

The word rendered South, signifies the right hand. The South is so called, because when a man turns his face to the East, or Sun-rising, then the South is on his right hand.

But why is the Hawk said to stretch forth her wings to the South? we may expound it two ways.

First, Thus: She stretcheth her wings to the South, when she is upon the change of her feathers, of which a touch was given before. As if the Lord had said, When the time cometh, that the Hawk casts her feathers, doth she by thy wisdom (for that we are to take in) stretch her wings towards the South, (as Naturalists tell us she doth) for the cherishing of her new feathers? The South wind being a warm wind, opens the pores of the body, and then the old feathers easily fall off, and the new ones come on; therefore when the Hawk loseth her feathers, she stretches out her wings towards the South. And as the wild unmanaged Hawks, who are at their own liberty, turn themselves to the South at such times, so the Places where Faulconers keep Hawks to train them for service, are built towards the South, that the warmth of the Sun may help the growth of their feathers.

'It is not unworthy our remembrance, which some teach allegorically from this natural instinct of the Hawk, helping herself more easily, both to cast and recover her feathers. A sinner in his natural state, is so feathered as he comes from the old Adam, that he had need to cast the old and get new ones. Now if the sinner would do thus, or when he doth thus, he is taught by the wisdom of God (not by the wisdom of the flesh) to stretch himself towards the South, that is, towards the pleasant wind, and warm Sun of the Spirit of God, by which his old feathers of sin drop off, and those new feathers of grace and holiness, of faith and repentance, of meekness and humility, of patience and self-denial come on. Thus man is feathered by the second Adam, when he hath cast those of the first; He turns himself to the South, he applieth himself to Jesus Christ, the Sun of righteousness, whose blessed warmth fetcheth off his old black feathers, and clothes him with new and beautiful ones. The Lord who teacheth the Hawk to stretch her wings to the South, must teach us to stretch ourselves to the Lord Jesus Christ, that our old feathers may fall away, and that we may be renewed by his Spirit.

Secondly, There is another account given about the Hawks stretching her wings to the South; for not only when the Hawk renews her feathers, doth she return to the South; but wild Hawks that are at liberty, living in colder climates, use in Winter to change their quarters, and turn to the South, that is, to those coasts which are more favored by the Sun, as they who write the nature of beasts and birds make report. All kind of Hawks are tender, and cannot well abide the Winter cold, but get into the Sun, and sometimes dust themselves in the sand, when heated by the Sun, as in very hot seasons they delight to bath themselves in water. It is said, that the Egyptians used of old to picture, or represent the Sun in the shape of a Hawk; First, because the Hawk is a great lover of the Sun; Secondly, because of the lively heat and sp'ritfuness of the Hawk, like that of the Sun; Thirdly, because of the longevity of the Hawk (the Hawk is a long-lived creature.) Fourthly, because of the quick-sightedness of the Hawk, whence they called the Hawk All-eye. And Lastly, because of the swiftness of the Hawk. The Hawk flies with such a speed, as if he did emulate, or would imitate the Sun. The Hawk being thus like the Sun, and such a lover of the Sun, they shadowed the Sun by the figure of a Hawk; all which may give us some intimation of the ground of what is here said, That she stretcheth her wings towards the South.

Hence note;

God hath given irrational creatures a knowledge of what is most convenient for their own preservation.

Why doth the Hawk spread forth her wings to the South? she finds it best for her, and therefore doth ( Jer. 8.7.) The Stork in the heaven, and the Crane, and the Swallow know the time of their coming; Whither? surely to some warmer climate, when the weather is cold and offensive to them in the place where they are; and when the heat returns to the coasts from whence they came, thither they return again; They know the time of their coming, they know when 'tis good for them to be in one Country, and when in another. And is not this a rebuke (as the Prophet there applieth it) unto a man, who many times knows not what's good for himself, knows not the judgment of the Lord; that is, what God would have him do, or what course to take in such a time and season, or under such a dispensation of providence; knows not (as I may say) Winter and Summer, heat and cold, and so is not so wise as the fowls of the air generally are, or as the Hawk in particular is here said to be, Who stretcheth her wings to the South. All the children of men have, and the children of God know they have a South to stretch their wings unto; that is, the goodness and power of God, as the Psalmist spake, Under the shadow of thy wings shall be my refuge, till these calamities be overpast. I will stretch myself to the South, to the love and favor of God; 'tis best for all men to stretch their wings toward those wings of God in an evil day. All should do as the Lord gives the invitation ( Isa. 26.20.) Come my people, enter thou into thy chambers, and shut the doors about thee; hide thyself, as it were, for a little moment, until the indignation be over-past. Thus the Lord directs his people to stretch themselves to the South, when 'tis cold and hard weather abroad in the world; and the creatures spoken of by the Prophet, as well as the Hawk in the Text, will rise up in judgment against us, if we stretch not our wings to the South, when we feel the Northern cold, and Winter frost taking hold of us.

I shall pass from this part of the verse concerning the Hawk, when I have only minded the Reader, that some have found a twofold resemblance in the Hawk.

First, They resemble the Devil and evil spirits, to the Hawk, because of their devouring nature. The old Poet said, We hate the Hawk, because she is always in arms. And so is the Devil, he is always in arms, and at war with the Church of God, and with the souls of men; and we ought always to be in arms against the Devil, yea, to take to ourselves the whole armor of God, spoken of ( Eph. 6.) to resist him, and defend ourselves.

Secondly, The Hawk is like wicked men, especially in three things;

First, For their ravenous nature, they love to destroy and live upon the spoil of others ( Isa. 33.1.)

Secondly, They are like the Hawk, preying mostly upon those that are most innocent. The Psalmist saith, The wicked devours the man that is more righteous than he. The Hawk pursues the Dove and poor Partridge, harmless creatures.

Thirdly, The Hawk is high-prized when alive, but when dead, cast out upon the dunghill, no man regarding her. He that took great delight in his Hawk while alive, will not call for it to his Table when dead. Thus wicked men may be in great esteem while they live, but when once dead, they are as thrown upon the dunghill, their memorial rots, and is unsavory. So much for the 26th verse, wherein the Spirit of God calls Job to consider the nature of the Hawk at any time flying, and sometimes turning her flight to the South. And now the question passeth from the Prince of birds, to the Queen of birds.


Vers. 27. Doth the Eagle mount up at thy command, and make her nest on high?

The Eagle is a King or Queen, chief among the fowls of the air, as the Lion is among the beasts of the earth; and therefore the great King of Babylon is shadowed by a great Eagle with great wings (Ezek. 17.3.) And the Romans, who Lorded it long over the world, bare the Eagle in their Ensign.

The Hebrew word rendered Eagle, hath a double derivation. According to the first, it signifies to Behold. The Eagle is so exp est, because she hath (as the Historian describes her) not only a quick and clear, but a strong sight, able to look full upon the Sun shining in its strength, as if the name of the Eagle in Engglish, were a Looker; the Eagle can look the Sun in the face. But according to a second derivation given by Grammatians, it signifies strait, or right forth. And the Eagle is so called, because she makes a direct course, as it were by a strait line, in pursuit of her prey. Doth the Eagle

Mount up?

The word in the Hebrew, signifies to get high, very high, extreme high, and is therefore used in the Noun, to set forth the highness of God ( Job 11.8. Psal. 113.6. Isa. 5.16. Isa. 52.13.) It notes also the highness of heaven ( Isa. 55.9. Psal. 103.11.) which is called the Throne of God, and the habitation of his Holiness, and of his Glory. 'It is used also to denote the height of a proud man's spirit, which would fain rise up to the high of heaven, and be like to the most High, yea, higher than the most High (1 Sam. 2.3. Psal. 131.1. Isa. 2.11. Ezek. 16.15.) In all these places, and many more, the word is applied to the highness of a proud man's spirit, which though it be indeed the lowest and basest thing in the world, yet it puts man upon high thoughts of himself, and upon high designs for himself, he would be mounting like the Eagle. Doth the Eagle

Mount up?

The Eagles flight, or mount, exceeds the Hawks; or any other of the winged train, in three things;

First, In the swiftness of it. The Eagle hath great and long wings ( Ezek. 17.3.) and she can make great hast with them; therefore Solomon calling upon us, not to set our eyes upon riches, gives the reason of his counsel ( Prov. 23.5.) For riches certainly make themselves wings, they fly away as an Eagle towards heaven; that is, they are suddenly gone, and will not return at thy call. The Eagle will not come to the Lure, like the Hawk. To fly away as an Eagle, notes two things concerning riches; First, That they will fly away swiftly, speedily, they are soon gone; such is the Eagles flight. Secondly, That they (often) fly away irrecoverably, there's no recalling them. The Scripture often expresseth the more than ordinary swiftness of men, by the swiftness of the Eagle. David lamenting the death of Saul and Jonathan, gives them this character (2 Sam. 1.23.) They were stronger than Lions, and swifter than Eagles; that is, they were exceeding swift. Our adversaries were swifter than the Eagles, said the poor captivated Church, when the Assyrian came in against them ( Lam. 4.19.) Read also Deut. 28.49. Hos. 8.1. Hab. 1.8. Cicero the Orator, in his second book of Divination, tells us, that when one who was to run a race, reported to an Interpreter, that he dreamed he was turned into an Eagle; the Interpreter presently answered, Then you shall overcome, or get the mastery: For the Eagle is the strongest and swiftest of all flying fowls.

Secondly, The Eagle exceeds all, as in swiftness, so in the uprightness of her flying: She flies right up; that's it which the Text takes notice of, She mounteth up; she mounts up like an arrow out of a bow, whereas other fowls, when they fly high, they do it obliquely, or side-long, by gyration, or fetching a compass; but the Eagle asce ds directly, not (as I may say) by winding stairs, but in a right line.

Thirdly, As the swiftness and uprightness of the Eagles motion, so the highness of it is wonderful. The Eagle mounts till she is quite out of sight; no bodily creature can reach the Eagles altitude. One of the Ancients saith, The Eagle soars above the air (he means, I suppose the lower region of the air) as if she would visit the starry heavens: And hence it is said proverbially of anything which we cannot easily reach or come at, 'It is an Eagle in the clouds. Her common attribute or epithet is, The high-flying Eagle.

If it be questioned, why doth the Eagle mount up so high? these two reasons may be given of it;

First, That she may come down, or stoop with greater force upon her prey; and that makes the Eagle so formidable to all the fowls of the air. And hence the Poets call her a Thunder bringer, because she mounts up on purpose to that amazing height, that she may come down upon her prey more forcibly, even like a thunder-bolt. And thus proud men desire to get on high, that they may more easily make a prey of, and crush (as the Eagle doth) those that are below them.

Secondly, The Eagle mounts thus high to please herself, 'tis suitable to her spirit. Everyone would be in action, as he is in disposition. The Eagle hath a high spirit, and she must fly high, and at high things. The Eagle will not catch flies; she scorns that game. Doth the Eagle mount up

At thy command?

The Hebrew is, At thy mouth; so the word is rendered in several other Scriptures ( Numb. 13.3.) And Moses by the commandment of the Lord sent them from the wilderness of Paran; that is, he sent the men that were to search the Land; The Hebrew is, Moses by the mouth of the Lord sent them to search the Land. Again (2 Kings 24.3.) Surely at the commandment of the Lord came this upon. Judah, to remove them out of his sight, for the sins of Manasseh. As if it had been said, When the enemy made inroads upon the children of Israel and Judah, how came this to pass? surely at the command of the Lord, or at the mouth of the Lord, came this upon Judah. It is the word in the Text; Doth the Eagle mount up at thy command? or, at thy mouth? One would think, that it is not only the Eagles nature to mount up; there is somewhat in that, but that's not all, it is at the Lord's mouth, at his command, and that we are specially to take notice of here. What means this discourse about the Hawk and Eagle, but to make us mount up our hearts to God, and acknowledge him in the motion of every creature? It is at God's mouth that the Eagle mounts up; but what's the command that the Eagle receives from God? Doth not the Eagle mount up by a natural instinct, or according to the Law of nature planted in her? I answer, she doth. Yet because that natural instinct of the Eagle is of God, therefore we are to look upon the Eagle mounting up; as by a special order and command of God. And thus we are to understand the motion of all the creatures, as consequential of a command given out by God ( Psal. 148.8.) Fire and hail, snow and vapor, stormy wind, fulfilling his word, or his command. Though there be a natural cause of the creatures motion, of the motion of the wind, of the vapor, of the snow and hail, yet we must not stop at the natural causes, and look no farther; neither rain nor snow fall, nor winds blow, but at the command of the Lord: Not doth the Eagle mount up at the bidding or teaching of man, but at the command of God, acting her natural instinct in doing so. Doth the Eagle mount up at thy command?

Hence Note;

The special motions of the creature are of God.

Mans mouth or command, cannot make any creature stir foot or wing. Who can make the Eagle mount, the wind blow, or the rain fall besides God?

Secondly, As to the manner of this motion, its a mounting motion.

Note;

The motion of the creature upward, hath much of the command of God in it.

Some have (I know) mounting motions at the command of the Devil (the Lord hath the command of them, though they are not commanded by him) that is, the proud imaginations, the lofty thoughts of man, these mounting motions, are not at the command, but against the command of the Lord; the Lord suffers them, but they are from Satan, he puffs men up, he blows them up with pride. But both the natural moun ings of the sensitives creatures, and the gracious mountings of the new creature on high, are by the command of God. True believers have lowest or lowliest spirits, yet highest and noblest aims, not grovelling on nor bowing to the earth, but like an Eagle, mounting up on high: As this high flight of the soul is highly pleasing unto God, so 'tis made by his strength, and at his command. A believer flies high;

First, In the contemplation of divine things. What towering thoughts hath he concerning God, and the concernments of salvation by Jesus Christ! he is not mingling his soul with the dust, nor mudding it upon the dunghills of this world: As his conversation or trade is for things above, so his mind and meditation is upon them.

Secondly, As he flies high in his contemplation about, so in his love to, and desire of high things; he doth not nakedly contemplate things above, as a Philosopher may do, but he hath strong affections to, and longings after the enjoyment and possession of the things that are above; he is as much on high in his desires and affections, as he is in his studies and speculations. And in both respects he mounts on high, in the power and at the command of God; who, as he hath taught the Eagle, so man much more, whither, and how far to ascend. And he therefore mightily triumphs over this lower world, because his soul is lifted up as an Eagle, by and upon the wings of divine support and acceptation. Doth the Eagle mount up at thy command?

And make her nest on high?

The Eagle doth not only mount on high (that may be from a sudden overture or occasion) but she makes her nest on high. The word which we render on high, signifies separated, because high places are places separated from ordinary concourse. Eagles covet to make their nests in places furthest remote from all access both of men and beasts. The best of high things, spiritual things, are separated from this world, they are above the wisdom and way of the world, and that's the reason why the world cannot bear them. I touch that only from the notation of the word.

The Eagle makes her nest on high. But doth she so, O Job, at thy command? dost thou direct her, where to make her nest or how? It seems the Lord teacheth birds to make their nests. The least bird is directed by God as well as the Eagle: It is by his counsel that some birds make their nests very low, and that others (among which the Eagle especially) make their nests on high. Pliny saith, no man can reach or touch the Eagles nest. We look and find birds nests in every bush, but whoever found the Eagles nest, such an Eagles nest as is here spoken of: There are (I grant) some Eagles that make nests in high trees, but the Eagle here intended makes her nest upon in accessible rocks. When the Lord would reach the hight of man's wisdom, in setting himself above the reach of d nger, it speaks thus ( Jerem. 49.16.) Though thou shouldst make thy nest as high as the Eagle, I will bring thee down from thence, saith the Lord. 'It is a proverbial speech, and 'tis joined with setting our nest among the stars, in the 4. v. of the Prophecy of Obadiah. The Idumeans, with and about whom the Prophet there spake, dwelt in mountainous places, and slattered themselves in the strength and safety of the country, as if it had all been an Eagles nest. The Eagle makes her nest so high that 'tis, as it were, next to the stars. But why doth the Eagle make her nest so high? there are two or three rersons given of it, by the searchers of nature.

First, For her safety, high things probably are most out of danger, there is a hight which is very dangerous, and there is a hight that is out of the reach of danger, such is the height of the Eagles nest.

Secondly, Naturalists say, the Eagle makes her nest so high, because she cannot, without some difficulty, raise herself from the earth; if she sits low, she cannot easily mount up, she hath a heavy body though a strong wing: and therefore the wisdom of God instructs her to make her nest on high, that she may with that advantage rise out of it, and mount up from it. The Eagle doth not as the Ostrich, lay her eggs in the dust, or in the sand, but she makes her nest in high places, that so she may be both safe in her nest, and the sooner take her flight out of it.

Thirdly, The Eagle makes her nest on high, because there the air is purest, and she is greatly delighted and pleased, with the purity and sweetness of the air.

Fourthly, 'It is said also the Eagle makes her nest on high, because she loves, from thence, as from a watch-tower, to behold and feed her eyes, upon the fair and beautiful face of the heavens.

In these four respects we should be like the Eagle, and make our nest on high. The Eagle doth not only mount high, but makes her nest on high. Some men mount high, that is, have high notions and speculations, in which they seem to be wrapped up (as the Apostle once truly was) to the third heavens; yet they make not their nest on high, they do not abide there, their delights are here below, and so is there nest, the residence and rest of their souls. The nest of the rich man's soul, in the Gospel, was in his full barns. O how many speak high, discourse high, profess highly, heaven-high; yet, when all's done, their nest is upon the earth; They talk as high as the Eagle mounts, yet their nest is as low as that of the O trich, in the dust. Let us remember, as to mount high, so to make our nest on high. The Apostle could say (1 Phil. 3.20.) Our conversation is in heaven; not only must we be speaking high, but acting on high too; we must sit and brood there, as the Eagle upon her nest. Let us say of God, as Moses the man of God did in his prayer ( Psal. 90.1.) Lord, thou hast been our dwelling place in all generations; thou art so, and thou shalt be so forever. Thus we are taught, not to imitate the foolish Ostrich, building our nest in the dust, but like the noble Eagle (being lifted up by the mighty power of the holy Spirit) making our nest or taking up our rest in heaven, which is, as the highest, so the safest place of all.

Thus far of the Eagle in two of her properties. First, Her high flight. Secondly, Her high nest.

The third thing spoken of in this context concerning the Eagle, is the choice of her abode or habitation.


Vers. 28. She dwelleth and abideth on the rock, upon the crag of the rock, and the strong place.

As the Eagle flieth very high, so she abideth on high places. Her abiding so high, shows the nobility and generosity of her nature; she doth not only mount upon high sometimes, and make her nest on high in breeding time, but she dwells on high, she dwelleth and abideth there. The word which we render abideth, signifieth properly tarrying for a night, or taking up a nights-lodging; but we are not to confine the Eagles abode to a night, to this or that night, here the word notes constant, continued residence, she dwelleth and abideth on the rock, there's her place, her palace, there this Queen of birds keeps Court, there she abideth, excepting in two cases. First, When she is minded to mount up and take her pleasure. Secondly, When she flies off to seek her prey, as will appear further in the next verse, but take her generally there she abides. Naturalists describe a sort of Eagles, which choose, and love to dwell in or inhabit woods, plains, and by the sea shore; but the Eagle here described dwells on the rock, and not only so, but

Upon the crag of the rock.

The Hebrew is, upon the tooth of the rock. Master Broughton renders, In the edge of a rock. The crag of a rock doth much resemble both a tooth and the edge of a thing; for 'tis sharp like an edge, and appears in form like a tooth: Now upon that part of the rock, which is most craggy and stands out like a tooth, there the Eagle abides, there she pearcheth. And Naturallists tell us, though she pearches upon a hard rock, yet she is very careful of her talons, least they should be blunted or receive any injury from the hardness of the rock, she is very curious of them, knowing of what use they are to her. Thus she abides upon the rock, and upon the crag of the rock; or upon the tooth of the rock. It doth not satisfy the Eagle to build or abide upon any part of the rock, but she chooseth that part of it for her habitation which is most inaccessible, lest she should have any disturbance by ill neighbors, or the air be insected with ill smells. Saint Jerome saith, the Eagle builds in this manner, least Adders or Snakes should spoil her Eaglets or young ones; and that the Amythist-stone, which is an Antidote or preservative against poison, is found in her nest. She abides on the crag of the rock,

And the strong place.

We might well enough conceive, that when it is said she dwells on the rock, that she dwells on the strong place, for the rock is a strong place; yet the Holy Ghost is pleased to set it out distinctly, On the rock, upon the crag of the rock, and the strong place. Master Broughton translates it, On a fortress; she dwells on the rock, as on her Castle or Tower. The word signifies any place of defense, and Grammarians tell us, it comes from, or hath near cognation with, a word that signifies to hunt or pursue the game; and the reason given for it, is, because when persons are pursued in war or troubled in peace (as weaker birds by birds of prey) they have their recourse to strong places for refuge and safety. The Eagle needs a strong place, for she hath enemies, and therefore is taught to fortify herself, or to get into strong places for he security against them. From all these expressions, that the Eagle dwelleth on the rock, upon the crag of the rock, and strong place,

Note;

Nature teacheth the creature in general, much more man, to provide for his own safety.

That is, God hath put such an instinct into the nature of all the creatures, as to provide for their own safety; The Eagle will dwell on the rock, she will, not venture herself everywhere. And according to the state and condition of creatures, such is the provision which they make for their safety ( Psal. 104.18.) The high hills are a refuge for the wild Goat, and the stony rock for the Coney. The wild Goats have their refuge, and the Coneys have their refuge, and they are taught whither to fly from the face of danger. There is no creature but hath a refuge in time of danger, and therefore we commonly say, Times of danger discover our refuge.

Now if the Lord hath taught the fowls of the air, and the beasts of the earth to look to their own safety, to get to the rock, and the strong place; then doubtless, he hath taught his servants, all that are godly, to seek and hasten to a refuge, both for their spiritual and corporal safety. David often discovers his refuge in the Psalms (Psal. 18.2.) When at the first verse, he had in plain language called the Lord his strength, I will love thee, O Lord, my strength; he presently adds a number of metaphors, to shadow out the same thing, The Lord is my fortress, my rock, and my deliverer, my God, my strength, in whom I will trust; my buckler, and the horn of my salvation, and my high tower. He calleth God his rock twice in that verse. God is not only a rock, but the only rock in which his faithful people find shelter. Moses said in his prayer ( Psal. 90.1.) Lord thou hast been our dwelling place in all generations. Where do believers dwell? in God himself; as the dwelling of the Eagle is in the rock, so the dwelling of a believer is in God, his rock. They may be sure of safety who are so housed, who are housed in God ( Psal. 91.1.) He that dwells in the secret places of the most high, shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty: I will say of the Lord, he is my refuge, and my fortress, my God, in him will I trust. Thus, as the Lord hath taught the Eagle to look out a strong place for herself, so he hath taught his people; and it will be as much their wisdom, to learn of the Eagle to provide against danger, as to learn of the Ant to provide against hunger.

As in this 28th verse we have had the dwelling of the Eagle described, so in the next, we have both the sharpness of her appetite and the quickness of her sight.


Vers. 29. From thence she seeks her prey, and her eyes behold afar off.

The fourth thing considerable in the Eagle, is the sharpness of her appetite; she hath a great heat of stomach, and a strong digestion, therefore she must be seeking prey.

From thence.

That is, from the rock her dwelling place, from the tooth of the rock; From thence she seeks her prey. And 'tis conceived, that the reason why she builds so high is, that she may from thence with more advantage spy out and seek her prey. The Hebrew is she diggeth her prey from thence. That an Eagle should dig, and dig in the air, is an elegant expression. Diligent seeking or searching, is signified by digging in the Hebrew language. They that dig for a thing seek it earnestly; and therefore to show how earnestly the Eagle seek her prey, she is said to dig for it. The Lord to show the open sinfulness of Israel told them ( Jer. 2.34.) In thy skirts is found the blood of the souls of the poor innocents. That which is in a man's skirts is easily seen; and hence the Lord adds, I have not found it by secret search, or as the Margin hath it, by digging; that's the force of the word, it notes a diligent search or seeking; the Eagle seeks, as if she were a digging for

Her prey

What is her prey? The Eagle hath a strong stomach, and the word here used signifies anything eatable. Naturalists say she feeds upon fowls of the air, the Dove, &c. she feeds also upon Sheep, Lambs, Hares; and 'tis said, she hath a great mind to Hares, they being not only meat, but medicine to her. Naturalists tell us also, that the Eagle feeds upon fish, and that in her flight she can discern the fish in the Sea: and some tells us, that she loves shell-fish, the Crab-fish especially very much; this is her prey: from thence she seeks her prey, whither moving in the air, or upon the land, or in the water; she seeks her prey where-ever 'tis to be had, and she will have it if it be to be had above ground, yea, if it be to be had in the water.

Hence note;

Hunger makes active.

We say hunger breaks thorough stone-walls or strong-holds. Whither will not the Eagle dig to satisfy her appetite? I need not stay upon the general truth; I would only add this, it is certainly so in spirituals. Soul hunger, our hunger after righteousness will make us active. Those Eagles, the Saints, having a strong appetite to the things of God, will dig for their satisfaction, they will seek after food for their souls till they are satisfied. Sometimes possibly there is a glut of food, and then they will scarcely look after it; but if once they are pinched with famine, then they look after food. That of the Prophet ( Amos 8.11.) answers this of the Text, I (saith the Lord) will send a famine among you: not a famine of bread, but of hearing the Word of the Lord. And what then? Why then they shall wander from sea to sea; and from the North even to the East, they shall run to and fro to seek the Word of the Lord, and shall not find it. The Eagle here seeks her prey & gets it; but they shall seek the Word of the Lord, and not have it, because they were unthankful for it, and unprofitable under it, when they had it. 'It is a sad hunger to be pinched. with the want of the word, which is spiritual food; but that's a blessed hunger which is not from want of, but from a true and strong desire after the Word or spiritual food. True believers, abiding in a right frame, have a great desire and hunger after spiritual food, even when there is greatest plenty of it; when there is (as we say) a glut of it, they are not glutted with it; the more they are satisfied with it, the more they would have of it; their appetites and satisfaction are interchangable; they are hungry, yet satisfied; they are satisfied, yet hungry; and therefore they are always seeking their spiritual prey. It is a sore judgment when they that have had much of this spiritual food, and have not had a hunger after it, are cut short and deprived of it. The Lord often lets those hunger after it in want, who have not hungered after it in enjoyment.

As the Eagle hath an eager appetite, a sharp stomach; so an excellent eye, a sharp sight, as it followeth.

Her eyes behold afar off.

To behold or see, is the work of the eye, and to behold afar off, is the excellency of the eye in that work. The Eagle seeks after her prey, and her eyes behold afar off. Some render which her eyes behold afar off, that's a good reading; the conjunctive particle and is not in the Original Text, and therefore we may supply it by the relative (which) as well as by the conjunction (and) Naturalists tell us, that the Eagle hath so sharp a sight, that when she is mounted quite out of our sight, out of the sight of any man, and is as it were in the clouds, that even then she doth perfectly behold her prey, and that is afar off indeed; even at that distance she beholds the Hare in the bush, and the fish in the water. There are almost incredible things related, as to the accuteness of the Eagles sight; and the reason given by some of her quicksightedness, is this in nature, because her eye lieth very deep in her head, and so hath a great advantage in seeing, the light being the more compassed by, and the rays the more strongly gathered into her eye. I shall not discuss the validity of this reason, all agreeing in the thing, that the Eagle sees very exactly and afar off: And as she hath a very clear, so a very strong sight, so strong that she can steadily behold the Sun shining in its strength (as it was touched before) those beams which blind us, and oppress our eyes, are pleasing to hers. It hath been a torture which some Tyrants have used, to hold open a man's eye directly to the Sun-beams, and so blind him, and quite extinguish the sight of his eye. Now that which blinds us, and puts out our eyes is pleasant, delightful, and as some express it, healing and refreshing to the eyes of the Eagle: and hence 'tis said of her, that she tries her young ones, whether they be of a right breed or no, in this manner; she holds them up to the Sun, and if they can bear the beams of the Sun with open eyes, they are right, otherwise spurious. The Eagle is so sharp-sighted, that, An Eagles eye is the proverb for a sharp sight. Her eyes behold afar off. Not in the sense we find the phrase used ( Psal. 138.6.) where it is said, Though the Lord be high, yet hath he respect unto the lowly, but the proud he knoweth afar off, that is, he regards them not. We put a word of that significancy in the Meeter, He contemning, knows them afar off, that is, as persons that he cannot abide to have near him. The proud and lowly are alike near in place to God, yet not in respect. But of that only by the way. The Eagles beholding things afar off, is not (I say) like the Lord's beholding persons afar off; those things which are afar off, in place from the Eagle, she sees them as if they were at hand: Thus she beholdeth afar off.

Hence, Observe;

God hath given more excellent senses to some sensitive creatures than to others of that kind, yea, than to those of a higher kind, the rational.

Not only doth the Eagle exceed other fowls of the air, but all the men on earth in eye-sight. And as an Eagle hath a natural eye-sight beyond man; so a godly man hath a spiritual eye-sight beyond all other men, the eye-sight of faith, by which he sees not only things afar off, but things invisible, yea, him that is invisible, as Moses did ( Heb. 11.27.) A believer hath an Eagles eye; his eyes, as hers, behold afar off.


Vers. 30. Her young ones also suck up blood, and where the slain are, there is she.

This verse holds out the sixth property of the Eagle; what kind of food she and her young ones live upon is here expressed.

Her young ones.

Or her putters forth. By which we are to understand such young ones as are ready to put forth feathers, but cannot yet fly abroad to shift for themselves; or they are so called, because young ones are put forth of the eggs. What do they? they suck up blood. The word notes a very greedy sucking, it is a double word, & so implies, as it were, a double drinking, a drinking with such hast, that they are ready to choke; and so Master Broughton translates it expressly, Her young ones near choke swallowing blood, they swallow it so greedily that they are ready to choke themselves with it; that's a good reading. The Septuagint, say her young ones are sprinkled with blood, as they that feed upon raw flesh, especially when newly killed or torn, are speckl'd or sprinkled with blood: Her young ones are rolled or wallowed in blood, saith another. All readings show what provision she makes for her young ones while under her keeping, and how they keep themselves when gone off from her hand; she brings up her young ones to her own trade, feeding them with flesh, and acquainting them with the sweet of blood; she and her young ones are all of a diet. 'It is said of the Eagle, that she never drinks water, nor is at all thirsty; but both she and her young ones suck up blood.

Hence note;

What young ones are used to, that they will afterwards follow.

Young Eagles are used to blood in the nest, and therefore delight in blood all their days afterwards ( Prov. 22.6.) Train up a Child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it. If a Child be trained up in a good way, he will not depart from it when he is old; 'tis usually so, or probably it will be so. Though the golden youth-age, of some hath ended in a leaden old age, yet it is most probable, if a Child be bred up in a good way, he will hold it, and if in an ill way, he will hardly leave or be beaten out of it: Usually, such as the institution and instruction of youth is, such will their after-conversation be. Her young ones also suck up blood, and, as it follows,

Where the slain are, there is she.

This shows us yet more fully, what the Eagle lives upon. Where carcasses be, resort they, saith Mr. Broughton. Some interpret the Text, not of bodies slain, but of bodies to be slain; where battles are to be fought, thither the Eagle resorts. Natural Historians tell us, Eagles will prefage or smell a battle, some say, seven days before 'tis sought, others three, at least two; so that not only where the carcasses are, but are like to be, thither the Eagles gather. Yet some contend very much, that there is a sort or race of Eagles so noble, that they will not feed upon a dead carcass, but live upon he bs; but that most Eagles feed upon bodies slain, none deny. This Scripture of Job is alluded to by Christ himself ( Mat. 24.28. Luke 17.37.) and both upon the same accounts, the destruction of Jerusalem, the glorious coming of Christ, and the end of the world. In Matthew he saith, Wheresoever the carcass is, there will the Eagles be gathered together: And in Luke, Wheresoever the body is, thither will the Eagles be gathered together. St. Matthew saith, Where the carcass is, and St. Luke saith, Where the body is. There are various interpretations of these two Scriptures, both quoted (as is generally conceived) from the Text under hand. Some expound them only of the destruction of the Jews by the Romans, and give the sense thus; That whereas Christ had foretold the destruction of the Jewish State and Temple by the Romans, and that it should fall upon all places, even at once like lightning, so that it would be in vain for them to run from one City or Country to another, in hope to avoid the vengeance, because wheresoever the Jews should be, or whithersoever they should retire to hide and save themselves, thither would the Romans Armies come (whose Ensign was the Eagle) and finding them out, slay and destroy them. As if the Lord Ch ist had said, This threatened desolation, will be universal and unavoidable; where ever any Jews are, there the Romans will be. Thus the whole body of the Jewish Nation is compared to a carcass or body, and the Romans to Eagles. That ancient Prophecy ( Deut. 28.49.) may be applicable to this final destruction of the Jewish Nation; The Lord shall bring a Nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth (as swift) as the Eagle flieth, a Nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand.

But though it be both very probable in itself, and very suitable to the words of Christ in St. Matthew, that the dest uction which the Roman Eagles broug •• upon the body of the Jewish Nation, is there implied; yet Christ speaking of his own coming to judge the world (as well as of the Romans to destroy the Jews ) there is (I conceive) more in it than that, when Christ saith, Wheresoever the carcass is, there will the Eagl •• be gathered together. And why may we not say, that Christ compares himself to the carcass or body, and believers to the Eagles, who shall reso t and be gathered to him wheresoever he shall appear? Taking the words in this latter sense.

Some expound them of true believers gathering to Christ, as the carcsse or body, every day by faith. One of the Ancients saith, when Christ being laid in the grave, was first resorted to by Mary, the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene, and Mary the Mother of our Lord, and by the Apostles, then were the Eagles gathered about the carcass: And ever since Christ arose from the dead, believers have gathered together about him, and fed upon him as crucified, or as that blessed carcass who procured life for them by his death; wheresoever Christ crucified is preached, thither true believers gather, and many who believe not are added to the Church.

Again, others expound it of the Saints gathering to Christ at the last day. Our late Annotators dealing with these words, as reported ( Luk. 17.37.) say, that by the flight of the Eagle is signified the sudden assembling of the Saints unto Christ coming unto judgment, answerable to that of the Apostle, 1 Cor. 15.52. as also to that, 1 Thes. 4.17.

Now though according to this allegorical interpretation of the Texts in St. Matthew and Luke, Christ is the carcass, and believers the Eagles; yet I shall close my interpretation of th s Text in Job, to which both the Evangelists allude, by showing that in other Scriptures, such things are spoken of Christ himsel , as hold out a likeness between him and the Eagle, in many respe •• s

First, As the Eagle is the royal bird, the Princess or Queen of birds, so Jesus Christ is the Prince of the Kings of the earth (Rev. 1.5.) And again ( Rev. 19.16.) King of Kings, and Lord of Lord's. As the Eagle among birds, so Christ among both men and Angels, hath the preeminence.

Secondly, As the Eagle mounts up, so also did Jesus Christ ( Psal. 68.18.) Thou hast ascended on high; yea, so high hath Christ ascended, that the Eagl annot follow him: The Heaven to which natural Eagles mount, is (as I may say) but a pavement to that which Jesus Christ ascended to Christ had a high slight, he mounted up to the heaven of heavens, far above all visible heavens. ( Eph. 4.10.) he is made higher than the Heavens ( Heb. 7.26.)

Thirdly, Hath the Eagle a piercing eye? so hath Jesus Christ; he (not only from the height of the clouds, whither the Eagle mounts, but) from the highest heavens, can look into the secret of every man's heart, even into the hell of a bad man's heart, and see what's doing there, what's lying there. It was said of Christ while on earth ( John 2.25.) He needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man; and still he looks quite through man, through the wisest, closest, and most reserved among the sons of men. All things are naked and open before the eyes of him (this Eagle) with whom we have to do; his eyes behold afar off.

Fourthly, Historians tell us, the Eagle fights or wars with Dragons and Serpents, and overcomes them. Jesus Christ, this Eagle, hath fought with that great dragon the devil, and bruised the head of the Serpent ( Gen. 3.15.)

Fifthly, The Eagle is very tender and careful of her young ones. Now, as an Eagle (saith Moses, Deut. 32.11, 12.) stirreth up her nest (that is, those in her nest) fluttereth over her young, spreadeth abroad her wings, taketh them, beareth them on her wings; so the Lord alone did lead him, and there was no strange God with him. God bare the Israelites on Eagles wings (out of Egypt) and brought them to himself (Exod. 19.5.) that is, he brought them speedily and safely, and so he bore them all the years of their journeying in the wilderness. The Eagle beareth her young ones upon her wings, that they may be safe (she must be hurt before her young ones can, while she bears them there.) Thus Christ bears his people on his wings, yea, in his bosom, The eternal God is their refuge, and underneath are the everlasting Arms (Deut. 33.27.)

Sixthly, Naturalists tell us, the Eagle gives her young ones of her own blood, when she cannot get other blood for them to drink or suck. This is most true of Christ; he suffered himself to be wounded for us; his hands and feet, yea, his very heart was pierced, that we might have his blood to drink in believing. My blood (saith he, Joh. 6.) is drink indeed.

Seventhly, The Eagle is long lived. The Greek expresseth her by a word signifying longevity; and some give the reason, not only from the excellent temperament and constitution of her body, but also because she lives in such pure air, free from ill vapors and noisome smells. Jesus Christ is not only long lived, but he lives forever, he was from everlasting, and will be to everlasting, he is the King eternal (1 Tim. 1.17.) the eternal father, (Isa. 9.6.)

Thus we see how Christ is like the Eagle, in these seven particulars; I shall show seven more, wherein true Christians also are like the Eagle.

First, Doth the Eagle fly high? so do they by the wings of faith; They mount up (saith the Prophet, Isa. 40.31.) with wings as the Eagle.

Secondly, Hath the Eagle a clear sight? doth she see far off? so Saints by faith can see far off ( Isa. 33.17.) Their eyes see the King in his beauty, they behold the Land that is very far off. Which Scripture, though it be properly and literally meant of beholding King Hezekiah in his earthly glory, yet it is much more verified of a believers seeing his King, the Lord Jesus Christ in his heavenly glory, and of his beholding Heaven, which may well be called the Land of farness and distances, or (as we translate) The Land very far off. Stephen the Protomartyr, had a clear intellectual spiritual eye, when he said ( Acts 7.56.) Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of man standing on the right hand of God. Believers have a clear Eagle-eye here, and they shall have a much clearer eye hereafter, when they shall see Christ as he is (1 John 3.2.) All Saints will be more than eagle-eyed in glory.

Thirdly, Doth the Eagle dwell on a rock? so doth every true believer ( Isa. 33.16.) His place of defense shall be the munitions of rocks; bread shall be given him, his water shall be sure. The Apostle tells us who the rock is (1 Cor. 10.4.) The rock which followed them was Christ.

Fourthly, Doth the Eagle renew her strength? So do believers when any oldness is coming upon the new creature (as it doth sometimes) then they renew their strength by looking to Jesus Christ, who is at once their righteousness and their strength: He satisfieth their mouth with good things, so that their youth is renewed as the Eagles (Psal. 103.5.) As the Lord often b ings his people low by bodily sickness and weakness, and then renews their natural health and strength: So when there are decays and declinings upon their souls, he renews their spiritual health and strength ( Isa. 40.31.) They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength, and then (as was said before) they shall mount up with wings as Eagles. The Eagles youth is renewed by the growth and succession of new feathers (of the same kind) in the place of the old; but a believer reneweth his youth or strength, by casting off gradually the remainders of the old man which is corrupt, and by putting on more of the new man (who is quite of another kind) created after God in righteousness and true holiness (Eph. 4.24.)

Fifthly, Can the Eagle look fully upon the Sun? Surely helievers have not only as clear, but as strong a sight as the Eagle, they can look upon Jesus Christ the Son of righteousness with open face. For as this Son of righteousness hath said, behold me, behold me (Isa. 65.1.) and again, Look to me and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth (Isa. 45.22.) that is, all ye that dwell on earth, even to the ends of it; so he gives a power, or a spiritual eye to behold and look upon him; and that beholding or looking is a healing to them, as the beholding of the Sun is to the natural eye of the Eagle ( Mal. 4.2.) To them that fear my name shall the Son of righteousness arise with healing in his wings.

Sixthly, Do Eagles suck blood both young and old? so do believers. The first living of the new creature is upon blood; every godly man drinks the blood of Jesus Christ by faith, as offered to him, both in the promises and in the Ordinances of the Gospel. A believer could not live a moment, nor have any subsistence in grace, if he had not (as the Eagle) blood to suck in and drink. A godly man is nourished, by a believing contemplation upon the sufferings of Christ, and the effusion of his blood.

Seventhly, Doth the Eagle feed upon the slain? so believers feed upon Christ as slain. Christ by his death is become our food to eternal life, ( Joh. 6.51, 53.) Though the raised and glorified body of Christ be entered into the full possession of a divine and eternal life, and though we by faith look to Jesus Christ, not according to the flesh, nor as dead, but as living and sitting forever at the right hand of the Father, there making intercession for us; yet we must look to him as entering into the holy place by the sacrifice of himself, and with his own blood, not with the blood of others (Heb. 9.24, 25, 26.) The Apostle told the Corinthians, I determined to know nothing among you, but Jesus Christ and him crucified; that is, so to know him as to feed upon him myself, and so to make him known to you, that you might feed upon him also.

Further, It is considerable, that as believers in Scripture are compared to Eagles, and the Lord is said to have born the old Church of the Jews upon Eagles wings; so under the Gospel Eagles wings are said to have been given to the Christian Church, whereupon she was born out of the reach of danger ( Rev. 12.13, 15.) And when the Dragon saw that he was cast to the earth, he persecuted the woman that brought forth the man-child. And to the woman were given two wings of a great Eagle, that she might fly into the Wilderness, (that is, convenient and sufficient means to further her slight and retirement) into her place (wheresoever it is) where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent. All the means of the Churches escape from danger are shadowed by two wings; not but that God hath more means than two, by which his providence works and procures the safety of the Church; but, because it had been improper, speaking of her flight, to express more wings than two: For the Seraphims, which are described, having each one six wings (Isa. 6.2.) yet two of them only were put to that use of flying. And these two wings given the Church, are said to be the two wings of an Eagle, because among all the winged tribes, Eagles are st ongest and swiftest of wing; they can fly fastest, and they can fly furthest, as in height, so in length. Nor are the wings given the Church, barely called the wings of an Eagle, but of a great Eagle, implying not only the best kind of wings, but the best wings of that kind; not only the wings of an Eagle, but of a great Eagle. By all which is meant, the wise and tender care of God over his Church in times of greatest danger, when the Dragon become a Serpent, or the Serpentine Dragon seeks most to annoy her.

Thus far the Lord hath been interrogating Job, not only about the inanimate creatures, the Heavens, the Air, the Sea, the Earth, but also about several Animals; in the least of which, because they not only have a being, but life, sense and motion, more of the power, wisdom and goodness of God shines forth, than in the greatest of the former. And all the questions proposed to Job in these two Chapters have (as hath been hinted heretofore, and should be constantly minded) this general scope to convince (as then Job, so now) all men, both of their own nothingness, and of the all-sufficiency, wisdom, care and power of God, who hath so wisely made, and doth so wisely dispose of all the creatures which he hath made. And therefore, man who hath received more from God than they all, and of whom God is more tender than of them all, should submit to the dispose of God in all things without disputing about, much more without murmuring at, or complaining of his dispensations in one kind or other.

The Lord (though he had done much in the way of interrogating) hath not yet done interrogating Job concerning the works of his hands. Nevertheless, before he proceeded any further, to inquire of him about the creatures, he saw it fit to feel his pulse a little, by a close application of what he had already said, mingled with high language and cutting reproofs, thereby to try what effect this forepassed discourse had wrought upon him, or whether he were come to a more humble and submitting frame than before, as will appear in opening the former part of the Chapter following.


JOB Chap. 40. Vers. 1, 2.


1. Moreover, the Lord answered Job, and said,


2. Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty, instruct him? he that reproveth God, let him answer it.

IN the two former Chapters we have heard what the Lord said to Job out of the Whirlwind, with what questions he apposed him about the works of Creation and Providence: To all or any of which Job being unable to make Answer, especially to give a present and perfect Answer, the Lord (it seems) gave him some little respite to recollect himself, in expectation of his Answer; but finding him silent, proceeds in this Chapter, to urge him yet further upon the whole matter, for an Answer; yea, the Lord having said all this to him, sets it home upon him with this sharp reprehension.

Moreover, the Lord answered Job, and said, shall he, &c.

As if he had said, O Job, hadst thou diligently considered my work of Creation in making, and my work of Providence in governing this whole world, even the motions of the least and most inferior Creatures therein contained; surely thou hadst never ventured to think what thou hast uttered, and now thou canst not but see how unduly thou hast complained of my proceedings with thee; nor canst thou be unconvinced how unable thou art to enter into the secrets of my Counsel, for as much as the causes of many lesser and common things in the world are secrets unto thee, and such as exceed the reach of thy understanding. Thus we may conceive the Lord at once speaking to, and severely reprehending Job, in the words which follow.


Verse 2. Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him?

Shall he, or can he, surely he shall not, surely he cannot. There are several readings of this former part of the verse; I shall only name four, and then come to the explication of the words as they lie in our Translation.

First, The words are rendered thus, Is it wisdom or learning to contend with the Almighty? This reading puts the latter words first. Is it wisdom or instruction, or is that man well instructed, or well in his wits, who contends with the Almighty? The sense of that reading is plain, and the improvement of it might be very useful: for indeed these two are utterly repugnant and contrariant, To contend with God, and to be wise; to contend with God, and to show ourselves well taught. That man hath not received instruction either by or about divine correction, who mutters or quarrels at God correcting him: For how wise soever he is in his own eyes, he shows himself a very fool, at least, as to that point or attempt, very foolish. So then 'tis a great truth which this reading holds forth, Is it wisdom, is it learning, to contend with the Almighty? Whosoever doth so, errs in doing so, and will at last both see and feel his error by sad experiences.

Secondly thus, Should he be instructed who contends with the Almighty? This Translation may have a double interpretation. First, Surely that man deserves not to be instructed, but corrected, who contends with the Almighty; he deserves not to be taught, but to be punished. Should he be taught that contends with the Almighty? Doubtless only, as Gideon taught the men of Succoth, (Judge. 8.16.) with briars and thorns of the wilderness; that is, with severest chastisements. Secondly, Should he be instructed, that contends with the Almighty? That is, is a learner a competent match for God? is one that needs instruction and teaching, fit to take up the bucklers and enter the field of dispute with God? He had need to be a Master, not a Scholar; a Teacher, not a Learner, that undertakes to deal wi h God. That man had need be skilled and well furnished, he had n ed be (as e speak) his Crafts-master (and all little enough, yea all too little) who contends with the Almighty.

Thirdly, The word which we render to instruct, signifies also to correct: taking it so, the Text is thus rendered, Shall he contend with the Almighty, whom he corrects; or, Shall a man corrected by or under the correcting hand of the Almighty, contend with him? Shall any give God words for his blows, or expostulate the matter with him? No man may (with such a spirit) say unto God, What dost thou? whatsoever he suffers; nor may any man be displeased with what God doth, whatsoever he is pleased to do either with himself or others.

Lastly (which was hinted in the second) Doth not contending with the Almighty deserve chastening? Certainly it doth; or, Is not chastening due to contending (that is, to contenders) with God? Doubtless it is. He that will contend with God, though but in words, is worthy of no answer nor satisfaction but in blows. Everyone of these Translations hath a fairness in it, as also with the Hebrew Text; but I shall insist upon our own reading only, and give you some few notes from that.

Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty, instruct him?

There is a twofold contending.

First, By force and strength of arm, or strength of arms. We cannot suppose the Lord speaking here of such a Contention. There were a sort of robustious men, Giants, of old, called fighters with God; and many profane Atheists have blasphemously set themselves against heaven, as if they would pull God from his Throne. Such as these are not the Contenders with God here intended; Job was far from being a man of that spirit.

Secondly, There is a contending with God by force of Argument, or by reasonings. This I conceive is here meant; Job was often found in these contendings with God. But shall any think to logic it with God? to enter a dispute with God? to argue with or reply upon him, as the Apostle speaks ( Rom. 9.20.) O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Arguing and replying are a kind of contending, and this is of two sorts;

First, With the Word of God, declaring what God would have us do, or what God would have us believe. Thus many contend with God, even as many as submit not to his Word. This is a common quarrel, whether the Word of God or man's will shall stand, whether the Law of God or the lusts of men shall carry it, and bear the sway. The Apostle is express in it ( Rom. 8.7, 8.) The carnal mind is enmity against God; and if so, then it contendeth with God, for enmity will be contending; and what kind of contending is there meant, appears in the next words, it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. Every natural man, till subdued and conquered by grace, is contending with the Word of God; he submits not to what God would have him do, nor to what God would have him believe; he will not form either his faith or his life as God would have him. Infinite are the Contentions of man with God in this notion; but neither is this the contending here aimed at, and I would speak to no more than is directly to the scope of the Text. Therefore

Secondly, There is a contending with the works of God, or with what God himself hath done or is doing. Thus also there are many Contenders with God in the world, and this is the Contention here spoken of; a Contention about the works of God, what God either hath done or is doing. All the debate which Job had with God, was about his dealings with him. God had laid him low, and stripped him naked; God had broken his estate, and filled his body full of sores and pains; God had wounded his spirit, and filled his soul with gall and wormwood; God had with-drawn hiimself or his comforts from him, and his friends were against him, or at best, but miserable comforters were they all: Now though he was a patient man, yet under these pressures he often broke out into impatient speeches. Thus Job contended with the Almighty, Moreover the Lord answered Job, and said; shall he that contendeth with the Almighty (about what he is doing)

Instruct him?

Shall he have the better of him, and be able to teach him, or put him in a better way than he is in? Shall he give God the rule, the law how to guide the world more equally in general, or him in particular. Whether the Contention lieth about the providence of God to the whole world, or any Nation, family, or person, it comes under the same question, Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him? That is, Can he direct God to do and order things better, or put them into a righter or more equitable course than they are disposed in? No, he cannot. Who is the pleader (saith Mr. Broughton) that will instruct the Omnipotent? let him come forth and try his skill. Thus the Lord (yet in a tender and fatherly way) derides the folly of Job, who would needs attempt (upon the matter) to teach him who is perfect in knowledge, and to over-rule his decrees and determinations, who is not only, The Lord Chief Justice of all the World, but Justice itself, and the sole rule of it. Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him?

Hence observe;

First, There is a spirit in man, in weak sinful man, ready to contend with the Almighty God.

The question in the Text may be resolved into this position, There are Contenders with God. There are Contenders with the Word of God (as was shown before) There are Contenders also with the Works of God, or with God about his Works, as I shall show further now; and this will soon appear, if we do but compare the 4th verse of the 51th Psalm, with the 4th verse of Rom. 3. In the Psalm David made Confession of his sin, of that special enormous sin Adultery, with the Murder that followed it. Against thee only have I sinned, and done this evil in thy sight, that thou m ghtest be justified when thou speakest, and clear when thou judgest. As if David had said, I humbly confess my sin, my adultery and my murder; that whenever the Lord shall bring any chastisement upon my person or upon my family, when ever he shall afflict me or mine greatly, he may be justified in so doing; or that all the world may see that God had great reason to correct me, and so justify him in it. For some possibly may say, with wonder, at the hearing of it, What! the Lord correct David? such a man as David? so holy a man as David? so just and upright a man as David? Yes, and the Lord is just in doing it; and D vid confessed his sin; that God might be justified when he should speak terrible things, and be cleared when he should judge, that is correct and afflict him terribly; as the word is used (1 Cor. 11.31.) If we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged, that is, we should not be chastened, as 'tis expounded ( verse. 32.) When we are judged (saith the Apostle there) we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world. Now those words spoken by David, are applied by the Apostle ( Rom. 3.4) to vindicate the honor of God against all aspersions whatsoever, in his proceeding with man; Let God be true, and every man a liar, as it is written; that thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged. In the Psalm the words are active, That thou mayest be clear when thou judgest. But St. Paul following, as I remember, the Septuagint, renders them passively, That thou mayest overcome when thou art judged. As if he had said, Some take upon them to judge God (they who judge him, contend with him) that is, they judge and pass sentence upon his works; now (saith the Apostle) Let God be true, and every man a liar, that thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged; that is, that all men may see and say thou art righteous, though thou afflictest the godly (for they sin) and though thou condemnest the wicked, for they sin and repent not of their sins.

These two Scriptures considered either apart, or compared together (besides many more which might be called into this service) are a clear proof that there are Contenders with God about his works. Yet possibly some may say, surely there are none to be found so bold and presumptuous; What contend with God?

I answer, First, There are some who do it very openly, avowedly, and with a bare face; they stick not to speak their dis-satisfaction concerning the works of God, and belch out blasphemy against what he hath done, or is doing in the world. Such doubtless were they, of whom it is said ( Isa. 8.21.) They shall pass through it hardly bestead and hungry; and it shall come to pass, that when they be hungry, they shall fret themselves, and curse their King and their God, and look upward; not in faith and patience, as they who in such extremities call earnestly and humbly upon God, but in passion and vexation, as they who wickedly curse God, and depart from him. Such also are they spoken of ( Rev. 16.9.) who being scorched with great heat at the pouring out of the fourth vial upon the Sun, blasphemed the Name of God, who had power over those plagues, and repented not, to give him glory.

Secondly, I answer, There are many who do this secretly, or within their teeth; they bite in their words, yet 'tis the language of their hearts in tumultuating thoughts, arising and working there about the works of God: and thus a good man, a Job (who was a good man of the first form) may be found contending with the works of God. Any discontent with the works of God, is a degree of contending with God about them. Any secret rising of heart against what God doth, is, in this sense, a striving with God; yea our being not fully pleased and satisfied with what God doth, is in some sense a contending with God: And if all this be to contend with God, how many are there that contend with God! and who almost is there that doth not? Who can say in this thing, my heart is clean? Who can say, but at one time or other, he hath contended with God. Remember, when we would have things after our mind and mode, when we are not free to comply with the will of God, this is to contend with God. There are two Cases, as to the common state of the world, in which the hearts even of good men, are very apt to rise against the work of God.

First, When they see the wicked prosper, and carry all before them in the world; then they are ready to say, Why doth God suffer this? Jeremiah had much ado to keep his heart from contending with God in this case ( Jer. 12.1.) And David could hardly keep his from it ( Psal. 73.2, 3.) As for me, my feet were almost gone, my steps had well nigh slipped; for I was envious at the foolish, when I saw the prosperity of the wicked. And for this he befooled himself ( verse. 22.) So foolish was I, and ignorant; I was as a beast before thee. Thus David was, and many more have been offended at the work of God, in giving good to bad men; and that's the first Case.

Secondly, When good men are vexed, oppressed, and trodden under feet, as mire in the streets; what risings of heart, and what unsatisfiedness of spirit is there in many good men! In both these Cases there is much contending with God, though in both, our hearts (upon many accounts) should acquiesce and rest in the will of God; who, in the former, doth not declare himself a friend to evil men; nor doth he in the latter, declare himself an enemy to those who are good.

But seeing there is a spirit in man, even to contend with God; let us watch ourselves in this thing, that such thoughts rise not: or let us carefully suppress them as soon as they are risen. It is good for us, and our duty, to keep down the Contendings of our hearts with men, for we are very apt to be out with one another. 'It is sad to see breaches, the fruit of heart-burnings, between man and man. But much more should we keep down those contendings, yea q ench the first sparks which may kindle heart-burnings about the works of God, for they may soon come to be Contendings with him. For the close of thi point, take these four Considerations, which may move all sorts of men to watch their hearts against Contendings with God, whether as to his dealings in the world, or with themselves.

First, Remember, Whatsoever the Lord doth, he may do; for he is an absolutely sovereign Lord, and therefore not to be contended with about anything he doth, because no way accountable for anything he doth, as hath been shown upon several occasions offered in opening this Book. He is Lord of our being, and hath given to all life, breath, and all things, as the Apostle told the superstitious Athenians (Acts 17.25.) and may not he do what he will to all beings, in whom all have their being; and who hath given all things to all which concern that being? He is our Maker, and hath not the potter power over the clay, to do what he will with it? Hath not the Creator power over the creature, to dispose of it as he pleaseth? ( Isa. 45.9.) Let the potsherd strive with the potsherds of the earth. If any will be striving, let them strive with their like; potsherds with potsherds, not potsherds with the potter, to whom they are so unlike. The Lord used no other a gument but this to quiet all ( Psal. 46.10.) Be still, and know that I am God; remember that, and you will either not begin, or quickly have done contending with God: Yet in that Psalm the Lord is represented making most dreadful work, Come, behold the works of the Lord, what desolations he hath made on the earth. Though God make that which was as a garden, to become a desolate wilderness, yet contend not with him; be still, and know that he is God.

Secondly, Remember whatsoever work the Lord makes in the world, it is all righteous work ; there is nothing amiss in it. He is a rock (said Moses, Deut. 32.4.) His work is perfect, for all his ways are judgments (not as judgments are opposed to mercies, but to injustice, as it followeth in that verse) a God of truth, and without iniquity, just and right is he. To this David gives witness ( Psal. 145.17.) The Lord is righteous in all his ways, and holy in all his works. Not only is he righteous and holy in this and that way or work, but in all his ways and works; in ways of judgment as well as in ways of mercy, in ways of destruction as well as in ways of salvation. He is righteous in pulling down as well as in building up, in rooting up as well as in planting. Now if there be a righteousness in all the ways and works of God, who shall contend with him about any of his ways or works?

Thirdly, All the works of God have an infinite wisdom in them; they are done wisely, even in exactest wisdom; and shall we fools contend with him, who is not only a wise God, but the God only wise (Rom. 16.27.) and all whose works are done in, and according to the Idea or platform of his own infinite and eternal wisdom. The foolishness of God (saith the Apostle, 1 Cor. 1.25.) is wiser than men; that is, the wisest men are mere fools to God; or that work of God, which some men call foolishness, is infinitely more wisely done, than the wisest work that the wisest men in the world ever did, or can do, with all their wisdom.

Fourthly, Let all that fear and love God, especially, take heed of contending with God about any of his works; for God is good to all such in all his works, and all his works are good to such. Shall any contend with God about that which is for their own good? Not only are those works of God good to such which are good in themselves, that is, which we call good, being favorable providences, and for our comfort and support in this world; but even those works of God which we call cross providences, or providences which bring the Cross with them, are all good to such, even to all them that love God; and are the called according to his purpose (Rom. 8.28.) Shall they contend with God about anything, who hear and may be assured, that he hath an intendment of good to them in all things? ( Psal. 73.1.) Truly God is good to Israel; that is, though he afflicts them, and the Cup be very bitter which he gives them to drink, yet he is good to them. Or thus, Truly God, not the world (or though the world be not) is good to Israel. Once more, we may take the Psalmist thus, Truly God is good to Israel, not so (as to them) to the world, though (as it followeth in the Psalm) they enjoy never so much worldly good.

These Considerations may persuade all not to contend with God about his works, to which I shall add only this counsel. If the works of God are grievous to us at any time, let us go the right way to work in our Contendings with him. For I do not urge this point, as if we should sit still, and let the Lord alone (as he seemingly said to Moses, Exod. 32.10.) when he dealeth out hard and grievous things to us. There is a contending with God by supplication and prayer, by mourning and humiliation; this becomes us when the works of God are hard, when they are breaking, desolating, scattering, and afflictive towards us. Take heed of discontent with providence, yet wrestle and contend earnestly with God by prayer, when providences go hard with you, or with the whole Israel of God. Moses in a holy manner assaulted God and contended with him in that case, and therefore the Lord said to him (in the place last mentioned) Let me alone, as we say to a man that contends and strives with us, Let me alone. Moses was contending with the Lord about that dispensation, but it was in a gracious way: and so may we, yea so must we. The Lord expects prayer in all such cases, which if it be (as it ought to be) earnest and fervent, is a striving, a contending with him, very pleasing and acceptable to him. When the providences of God were grievous to Jacob, and he feared they might be much more grievous to him, the Text saith he wrestled with the Angel; but how was that? the Prophet Hosea tells us (Chap. 12.4.) it was by weeping and making supplication. The Apostle useth the same expression ( Rom. 15.30.) I beseech you brethren, that you strive together with me in your prayers to God for me; that is, let you and I set our shoulders to it, wrestling with God in the actings of faith for mercy. This is a dutiful contending with God, a blessed striving with God; Let us strive so, and we shall (as Jacob did) prevail with God, and obtain the blessing. We may warrantably and confidently venture upon this contention with God; as for any other, take heed of it, so bear it, why should we meddle to our hurt, as the King of Israel cautioned the King of Judah, when he would needs be contending with him (2 Kings 14.10.) The Lord may contend with us, and he will when we give him cause; yet he hath assured his people that he will not contend forever, nor be always wroth ( Isa. 57.16.) But we must humble ourselves under his mighty hand always (as the Apostle directs, 1 Pet. 5.6.) and not contend with him at all, unless in the sense and way last opened. It is as much our duty to let God do what he will, what he pleaseth with us, patiently, as to do readily whatsoever his will and pleasure is.

Secondly, In that the Text saith, shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him?

Observe;

They who contend with God, or are discontent with the works of God, seem to themselves able to instruct and teach God.

That's the thing at the bottom which the Lord would convince Job of. Discontented persons seem to say unto God, they could put things into a better way, if they had the handling of them; or that they could model the government of the world more equally, if it were in their hands. Such is the pride and sinfulness, or the sinful pride of man's heart, that he thinks himself able to instruct God, and teach him to mend his work. Some have been so arrogant and presumptuous, as to say, they could have mended some things in the natural fabric of the world, had they been the contrivers of it; and many have said, at least in their hearts (where the fool saith there is no God) that they could mend the providential fabric or course of it. Beware of these presumptions. Remember, it is our duty to be instructed by God, to receive instruction from God. Woe to those who would give him instruction ( Job 22.22.) Acquaint thyself now with him, and receive the law at his mouth, that is, the rule of all thy actions, but do not give the law to him. No man hath mo e need of instruction than he who thinks he can give instruction to God. It is said proverbially, when we see an inferior, much more a smatterer in any Art or Science, offer to control a perfect Artist; What, A Sow or a Swine teach Minerva! how much more may we say so of the most learned, that control God or contend with him about his works! The works of God of every kind are so exact in every kind, that it is impossible to find any real defect or redundancy in them. To go about to mend them, is to mar them; to alter them, were to deface them. Those things which men call or count the blemishes of God's works, are the true beauty of them; and what they contend with him about, is the commendation of them, and the glory of his workmanship. And as at last Jesus Christ will Present the whole body of believers, or the persons of all that believe, to himself a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing (Eph. 5.27.) so he will at last represent the providences of God, or his works of providence, both in the Church and all over the world, without spot or wrinkle, or any such thing. Only here will be the difference, the Church will be presented not having spot or wrinkle, or any such thing (she hath had her spots and wrinkles, and many such things) But the works of God shall then be represented, as never having had any spot or wrinkle, or any such thing; that is, then it shall be made appear, that they were always without spot or wrinkle, altogether just, righteous and perfect.

Further, From the whole sentence, in that here we have an intimation of man's contending with God, and presuming to instruct him, take these two inferences from it.

First;

There is much pride in the heart of man.

There would never be any contending with God, were there not much pride in the heart of man; For (Prov. 13.10.) only by pride cometh contention: If so, then, where no pride is, there is no contention. There are indeed several other occasions of contention; some out of covetousness, others out of malice, contend with their neighbors, yet all may be resolved into this, the pride of man's heart; pride bears part with all the occasions and causes of contention. It should be matter of great humiliation to us, that our hearts are proud at all; but that they rise even to such a hight of pride as produceth contention, and trying Masteries (as it were) with God himself, how should that humble us. And if to contend with man, our equal, be a symptom of pride, what is it to contend with God, who is infinitely above all men!

Secondly, Take this Inference from it.

There is a great deal of folly bound up in the heart of man.

If man were not vain and foolish? he would not willingly do anything, that should have the least signification of a contention with God, much less that which can signify nothing else. Solomon saith, fools will be meddling; it is highest folly to be thus meddling with God's matters. Again, it is a sufficient proof of our ignorance and folly, to attempt (in any way) to instruct God or teach him, either what to do or how to do, either when to do or in what measure to do, or towards whom to do any of his works; but they who are unsatisfied with the works of God, and in that sense contend with him about them, make an attempt always in some of these respects, sometimes in all of them, to instruct and teach him: Is not their folly manifest to all men, who are not as foolish as themselves? Shall he that contendeth with the Almighty instruct him?

He that reproveth God let him answer it.

This second part of the verse is of near alliance to the former. Contending with God, is indeed a reproving of God: These two Acts expound each other yet more distinctly, to reprove supposeth,

First, The finding of a fault.

Secondly, A rebuke given for that fault. There must be a fault found, else we cannot justly reprove; and a fault being found we may justly rebuke the fault. So then, to reprove God implies a finding of a fault with God's works, and then a kind of rebuking God for that fault; and if all this be in a reproof, rhen to reprove God for any of his works, is a daring work indeed. I grant the word rendered reprove may be taken in a milder sense, He that argueth or pleadeth with God; Our reading heightens the sense of the Hebrew word, or takes it in the highest sense, he that reproveth God

Let him answer it.

That is;

First, Let him answer the former question, whether he be able to instruct God or no, or (according to the other reading) whether he doth not deserve punishment for contending with God?

Secondly, Let him answer it, that is, let him answer all those questions proposed in the two former Chapters. As if God had said, Job, thou hast reproved my works, yet canst not answer my questions. So Master Broughton carrieth the sense; Let the reprover (saith he) of the puissant speak to any one of these things.

Thirdly, Let him answer it, that is, let him answer for so doing, let him bear his punishment. There is a twofold answering; First. A Logical answering. Secondly, A Forinsecal answering. Or there is an answer in Schools, and an answer in Courts.

And answer in Logic is made three ways. First, By denying. Secondly, By granting. Thirdly, By distinguishing or limmitting the proposition and matter proposed. Logicians in Schools answer by denying, or by granting, or by distinguishing. The distinguisher grants somewhat, and denies the rest.

An answer in Law, if the matter be criminal, is made by pleading guilty or not guilty to the Inditement. If the matter be civil, to answer, is to show our right, to take off the charge, or defend our title. There is also an answering in Law by submitting, and that two ways. First, By submitting to the mercy of the Court. Secondly, To the penalty of the Law.

Now, when the Lord saith in the Text, Let him answer it; I conceive we may take it not only in a Logical sense, let him answer it (if he can) by reasoning, but in a Court sense, let him answer it by bearing the penalty of his rashness and folly; as we say to one that hath wronged us, It shall cost you dear, you shall answer it: I conceive (as was said) we may understand it here both ways. Let him that reproves God answer it, either as a disputant in Schools, or as a defendant in Courts of Law; and if he cannot answer it as a Logician, by giving a reason for what he hath done, he shall certainly answer it in Court, by undergoing the penalty of the Law, for what he hath done.

Some translate thus, He that argues with or reproves God, ought to answer it; that is, he must not think it enough to put in a charge or to give a reproof, but he must make it good. He that reproveth a man ought to give a ground of his reproof; how much more he that reproveth God! The Text concludes it should be so, yea, that it shall be so. He that reproveth God let him answer it.

Hence note, First;

'It is dangerous, 'tis at our peril, to find fault with what God doth.

He that doth so, must and shall answer it; there's no avoiding it. There are two sorts of reproving which are our duty. First, The reproving of other men, when we have an opportunity and a call ( Levite. 19.17. Gal. 6.1.) As all they who reprove God shall answer it; so many shall answer it, because they have not reproved men. Secondly, It is a duty to reprove ourselves, and a great point of wisdom to see what is reproveable in ourselves. Many are quick-sighted at finding faults in others, but very blind as to finding out their own. I may add, it is both a great duty, and a sign of much grace, meekly to take and receive a reproof from others▪ Now, as it is our duty to take a reproof from others, when we have failed, and to see our own faults and reprove ourselves for them; as also wisely to reprove others for the faults we see in them, so it is our sin, danger and peril, to reprove God, in whom there is no fault, nor can be. And if any say, we never had a thought of reproving God, know, if you find fault with the works of God, you reprove God; to find fault with what God hath done to you, or your relations, is to reprove God, and this you must answer, or answer for it. Will a Master in any Art, endure that an ignorant person should find fault with his work? how then will the Lord take it, if men shall come into his great shop, the world, and find fault with this and that, and the other work of his? There is no temptation that Satan our great enemy doth more follow us with, than this, even to make us find fault with the works of God. There are these two things about which Satan labors much; First, to keep us from finding out the faults of our own works, which are almost nothing else but faults. Satan would persuade us that we have done all well, when we have done that which is altogether evil, or stark naught for the matter of it, and how doth he hinder us from seeing our faults, in the manner of our doing good works! he would not suffer us to have the least suspicion that we may have done evilly, while we have been doing good. Secondly, Satan's great business is to put us upon finding faults (where none are) in God's works. Almost all the murmurings of the sons of men, arise from this misconceit in man, that there is somewhat amiss in the works of God towards them, or that he hath not dealt well and wisely with them. This false and blasphemous principle Satan would plant and water in the hearts of all men, as he did (to the overthrow of mankind) in the heart of the first man: This, this is his work; and he hath got a great victory over that soul, who either sees not the faults of his own works, or finds fault with the works of God.

Further, these words, Let him answer it, may imply the Lord's gentleness and mildness in speaking to Job. The Lord doth not thunder against him, but saith, come let me see what you can answer, let me hear what you can say in favor of yourself, either to show the equity of what you have said in reproving me, or any iniquity in what I have done in afflicting you; I give you free leave to speak for yourself. Some insist much upon this sense, and it may yield us this note;

God is very gracious in condescending to man.

He is willing we should answer for ourselves, and do our best to clear ourselves, when we have done our works amiss, or have spoken amiss of his.


JOB, Chap. 40. Vers. 3, 4, 5.


3. Then Job answered the Lord, and said,


4. Behold, I am vile, what shall I answer thee? I will lay my hand upon my mouth.


5. Once have I spoken, but I will not answer; yea twice, but I will proceed no further.

IN the former verse, the Lord urged Job to answer; He that reproveth God, let him answer it. Job being thus urged by the Lord to answer, gave his answer, and the answer which he gave was this in general, That he could not answer: Or, we have here,

First, An humble confession of his utter inability to answer.

Secondly, His settled resolution not to answer. His inability to answer, appears at the 4th verse, Behold, I am vile, what shall I answer thee? I will lay my hand upon my mouth. His resolution not to answer, or only to give this for an answer, That he could not answer, is expressed in the 5th verse; Once have I spoken, but I will not answer; yea, twice, but I will proceed no further.

Jobs spirit, it seems, was much appaled by the Lord's appearance to him, and immediate parley with him; his understanding also was much puzzled, yea, non-plust, with those many and intricate questions which God had put to him; and therefore he submits, at once acknowledging he had done amiss in his overfree discourses before, and promising that he would run that course no more.


Vers. 3. Then Job answered the Lord, and said,

What he said by way of answer, followeth.


Vers. 4. Behold, I am vile, what shall I answer?

Behold. Job doth not conceal nor cover, but calls all eyes to the view of his own vileness. Behold. Let God behold, let Angels behold, let men behold, what now I myself behold, that

I am vile.

The root of the word, which we translate vile, signifies three things. First, To be light, or of little weight; and because light things are lightly esteemed, therefore it signifies, Secondly, To be contemned, or that which is contemptible; and, Thirdly, Because light things, and things contemptible, are also vile things; therefore, as we translate, it signifies vile. As if Job had said, I am light, I have no substance, no solidity in me; I am but as chaff, or, as a feather, I bear no weight, I deserve no esteem, no respect, I am vile. As the Hebrew word for honor and glory is derived from a root which signifies heaviness or weightiness, whence the Apostles phrase in the Greek tongue (2 Cor. 4.17.) which we translate, an exceeding weight of glory. Glory is such a weighty thing, that we must have other manner of shoulders, other manner of strength, than now we have, before we can be able to bear the weight of it. Flesh and blood, as it is unrefined, or merely natural, would soon sink under that weight. Now I say, as glory and honor are expressed by a word which signifies weightiness; so that which is vile and contemptible, is expressed by a word that signifies lightness, or to be light. Thus saith Job, Behold, I am light, or, Behold, I am vile.

There are two other translations of these words; whereof, the one refers to the speeches, the other to the actions of Job.

First, The old Latin translation saith thus, I have spoken lightly; how shall I answer thee? Ours refers to his person, I am light, or, I am vile; that to his words, I have spoken lightly. To speak lightly, or vainly, is to be vain and light. Some words have a great deal of weight in them: words of truth, words of soberness, holy words, gracious words, are weighty words; evil words, impertinent words, unprofitable words, specially corrupt, filthy, sinful words, are light words; how many words soever of those sorts any man speaks, they are all light words, they have not a grain of goodness, and therefore not a grain of weightiness in them. That's a good sense.

Secondly, One of the Greek translators renders, Behold, I have done, or, acted lightly. There is lightness in our actions as well as in our speeches. We say, such a man is of a light, that is, of a vain carriage; and we say of another, he is a grave man, or there is gravity in his carriage. Thus some speak and act gravely, or weightily; others speak and act loosely, lightly. When Job saith, Behold, I am vile, it may take in both, I have spoken lightly, I have done lightly, and therefore I am light, therefore I am vile, or contemptible.

Yet further; The greek Septuagint translates, I am nothing; they carry the sense to the lowest and least imaginable: There is nothing less than nothing. How shall I answer thee, seeing I am nothing? All that I am is so light a thing, that I am nothing at all; that is, nothing of worth, nothing of value; I am of so little validity, that I have scarce any entity. From all these readings, we may fully gather up Jobs sense in this self-abasing confession, Behold, I am vile.

Lastly, For the clearing of these words, consider, we are not to understand Job when he saith, I am vile, as speaking only with reference to his then present, sad, sorrowful, deplorable condition: sometimes such are accounted vile by men, who are low and mean in the eye of the world. Job did not count himself vile upon that consideration, because stripped of all his worldly greatness, power and glory, health and strength; he did not call himself vile, because of the present dispensation of God towards him, but he called himself vile, with respect to the common natural condition of mankind, or as he was a sinful man, though his providential condition had been never so good and prosperous. Behold, I am vile.

Hence observe, First;

Man at his best estate is vile.

David saith, he is even then altogether vanity (Psal. 39.5.) and what is vile if that be not? or what can be viler than that which is altogether vanity? Man is vile,

First, If we consider the matter of his body: Was he not originally made of the dust, and molded out of the clay, which we tread upon, and trample unde feet? In which sense, among others, the Apostle ( Phil. 3.21.) calls o r body a vile body; the materials of it being vile, it i •• so vile.

Secondly, Man is very vile, ch ••• y vile, through the sinfulness both of his nature and life. Sin re ders us vile indeed; corruption makes us of no rep •• ation. Th ugh man, as to the matter of his body, might have b en called vile i the day of his creation, yet he had never deserved that diminishing title, if he had not sinned. Sin hath degraded man, and laid him low; sin hath dishonored man, and made him vile, even viler than the dust out of which he was made.

Thirdly, Man is vile, with resp ct to all those evil consequences and effects of sin, which have possessed, or are ready to possess, First, our bodies; such are weakness, sickness, pains, and all manner of diseases. Secondly, our names; such are reproach, infamy and disgrace. Thirdly, our estates; such are poverty and want. Fourthly, our persons; imprisonment and restraint. Fifthly, our souls; such are blindness and ignorance in our minds, stubbornness in our wills, inordinacy in our affections. These consequences of sin, as well as sin itself, especially those consequences of sin which are themselves sinful (as those last mentioned are) render us vile.

From this first Observation, take these four inferences.

First, If man be vile in that threefold respect before spoken of (he is so in many more) then let not any man prize himself much. We do not prize vile things without us; why then should we much prize ourselves who are vile? We are very apt to have thoughts of ourselves beyond ourselves, or to think of ourselves beyond what is meet. Did we remember that we were vile, high thoughts of self would soon down, and we would cease from ourselves, as well as from other men, saying, Wherein are we (men) to be accounted of? (Isa. 2.22.) The best man, of mere men, hath but a little breath in his nostrils, and he hath much sin in his soul; wherein then, or for what (as a natural man) is any man to be accounted of? Did we know ourselves more (understandingly) we should know ourselves less (valuingly) In which sense Job said ( Chap. 9.21.) Though I were perfect, I would not know my soul. It is our ignorance, who and what we are, which causeth us to have high thoughts of ourselves; as it is our ignorance, who and what Christ is, which causeth us to have such low thoughts of him, and such slow or slight desires after him ( Joh. 3.10)

Secondly, As because we are vile, we should take heed of prizing ourselves much, so we should more take heed of being proud of ourselves at all. Indeed where the former is, where any person, man or woman sets too high a price upon self, it is very hard to abstain from pride in self; for, pride in self, arises from over-prizing of self: We first think too well of ourselves, and then are lifted up in ourselves. As it is through the power of faith, that our hearts are lifted up to God and in God; so whensoever our hearts are lifted up in ourselves (glorying in our own attainments) or to ourselves (gaping after our own ends) it proceeds from pride.

Thirdly, See the exceeding goodness of God, who hath put honor upon vile man. We have made ourselves vile, and so we should reckon ourselves; yet the Lord is pleased to esteem his people highly, and make them honorable ( Isa. 43.4.) Since thou wast precious in my sight, thou hast been honorable. Job was vile (as he confessed) in his own sight, yet he was precious in God's sight. And thus the Lord estimates all that are godly, all that are true believers; hough vile and of no value in themselves, nor in their own sight, yet precious they are in his sight; Since thou wast precious in my sight thou hast been honorable. We are never truly honorable, till precious in the sight of God. There is a bubble which the world calls honor, a wind of fame, with which many are much affected, and with which some are invested, who are not at all precious in the sight of God. The best, the truest honor, ariseth from preciousness in the sight of God; they who are esteemed by God, are indeed persons of estimation. His grace shown favourably and freely to us, his grace working mightily and effectually in us, puts a blessed worth upon us, though we are vile in ourselves, and so accounted by the world.

Fourthly, See the goodness of God in this also, that though we are vile, yet he is pleased to set his heart upon us, and to mind us. We little mind vile things; light things, trifles, we lightly pass by. We are but a light thing, a vile thing in ourselves, yet God not only hath us in his heart, but sets his heart upon us. Thus spake Job in the lowest ebb of his outward felicity, and he spake it admiringly as well as truly ( Chap. 7.17) What is man, that thou shouldst magnify, and that thou shouldst set thine heart upon him! When he saith, What is man? it is as it he had said, Man is but a vile thing; yet the Lord is mindful of him, yea, magnifieth him. And though the Lord forbids us to set our hearts or affections on earthly things ( Col. 3.2.) on the best of earthly things, all which are comprehended under that one word or title, Riches (Psal. 62.10.) And though the reason why he forbids us to set our hearts upon these things, is because they a e vile, yet he is pleased (O infinite goodness!) to set his heart upon us though we are vile, and considered as sinful, much more vile than they, even than the vilest of them. We have the like question put again ( Psal. 144.3.) Lord, what is man that thou takest knowledge of him, or the son of man, that thou makest account of him? What is man! 'It is a diminishing question, implying, that man is a vile thing, or a nothing. Is it not then a wonderful thing? is it not the fruit of rich and free grace, that God should take an account, or make such an account of man? And if God sets his heart upon man, who is so vile, how should man set his heart upon God, who is so infinitely excellent! God may be said to descend, surely he condescends exceedingly, when he sets his heart upon vile man. The Lord humbleth himself (saith David, Psal. 113.6.) to behold (that is, to take any notice of, or to take into his consideration) the things that are in heaven, and in the earth; how much more doth he descend, condescend and humble himself, when he sets his heart upon vile man! Now, doth God set his heart upon vile man (which is an humbling to him) and shall not vile man set his heart upon the great and glorious God, which is not only his duty, but his felicity, his honor, and exaltation!

Again, Job saith, I am vile. What was Job? a godly man sure, a holy man by God's own testimony, yet even he speaks at this low rate of himself, Behold, I am vile.

Hence note, Secondly;

The better we are, the less we esteem ourselves; and still the better and better we grow, the lower are our thoughts of ourselves.

There is no greater argument of height in grace, than low thoughts of self. Next to faith in Christ, self-denial, or to deny ourselves, is the great duty of the Gospel ( Mat. 16.24.) Now, as to deny ourselves is to be very low in our own eyes, so it is one of the highest acts of grace in us, and requires not only truth of of grace, but much strength of grace to act it. And hence it comes to pass, that the higher and stronger any are in grace, they are still lower and lesser in their own sight, bacause true height and strength of grace works the soul to more self-denial. And therefore, as a godly man is vile, so he is made more sensible of his own vileness, the more he increaseth in godliness; so that, if any have low thoughts of him, he hath lower of himself. None can think him lower in truth, than he thinks himself; I am light, saith he, I am vile. Though he well understands his state, his privilege, and his interest in Christ through grace, and understands it so well, that he values it above all the world, and would not part with it for the whole world, yet he is still vile in his own eyes, and low in his own rate-books. Abraham, the chief of believers, said ( Gen. 18.27.) Behold, now I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, who am but dust and ashes. So David (2 Sam. 7.18.) What am I? and what is my fathers house, that thou hast brought me hitherto? How sensible was he of his own vileness, who spake thus, who yet was a man after God's own heart, and the best of Kings?

Further, Consider the time when Job was brought to this humble confession and acknowledgement of his own vileness; he had not spoken thus before, but was much in justifying himself, especially as to the sincerity of his heart and ways, and he did it even to offense; but the Lord having dealt roundly with him, he cries out, I am vile.

Hence, Observe;

The dealings of God with man aim mostly at this great mark, to humble him, and to make him see his own vileness.

We quickly see, or are quick-sighted to see and take notice of any good in us, or done by us, to make us proud instead of thankful; but we are dull of sight to see or take notice of that in us, or done by us, which may humble and lay us low: And therefore we put God to it to show us our vileness, by severe and humbling dispensations. There are two great things which God would bring man to. First, To make him know how vile he is. Secondly, To make him know how excellent, how glorious himself is. The Lord never left battering Job by afflictions, and following him with questions, till he brought him to both these points; Behold I am vile (saith he in this place) I know thou canst do everything, and that no thought can be with holden from thee, said he afterwards ( Chap. 42.2.) in which words he highly exalted God, in the glory both of his power and wisdom. As one great purpose of the Gospel is to exalt man and lift him up unto a most glorious condition in and through Christ; so another great purpose of the Gospel, is to lay man low in himself, or to take him quite off from his own bottom. The Apostle often insists upon that, as one grand design of the Gospel with respect to man (1 Cor. 1.26.) Ye see your calling brethren, that not many wise men after the flesh, &c. are called. He tells us at the 29th verse why it is so, Even that no flesh should glory in his presence; But ( ver. 31.) that according as it is written, he that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord. All the dealings of God, both in Law and Gospel, both in his providences and in his ordinances, tend to bring man off from, and out of himself; and till that be effected, neither ordinances nor providences have their due effect upon him. We must come to Jobs acknowledgment, that we are vile, that we are nothing, and that God is all to us in Christ, before we are Christians indeed.

Fourthly, The former discourse showeth, that God was come very near to Job, he spake to him out of the whirl wind, his appearance was very dreadful: And then Job cried out, Behold I am vile.

Hence Observe;

The more we have to do with God, and the nearer God comes to us; the more we see, and the more we are made sensible of our own vileness.

Man is clearly discovered and known to himself, when he beholds God in the shinings of divine light, and not till then. Job was higher in his own thoughts than became him, till God came thus near to him; and when God came yet nearer to him, and discovered himself (as he afterwards did) yet more fully to him, then Job did not only say (as here) I am vile, but I abhor myself, and repent in dust and ashes. This first approach of God in so eminent and illustrious a way or manner, wrought much upon him, but the second more. The light of God shows us our darkness, the power of God our weakness, his wisdom our folly, his purity our uncleanness, his Majesty our vileness, and his Allness or all sufficiency being seen, gives us to see our utter deficiency and nothingness. Still in proportion to the nearness of God to us, or our nearer and clearer apprehensions of him by faith, we are carried further out of, and further off from ourselves; and thus 'tis in our attendance upon God in the Ordinances of worship. The reason why many come to ordinances with proud hearts, and go away proud, is, because they have little or no communion with God in them by faith, or God doth not manifest himself to them by his blessed Spirit. They who have seen the power and glory of God in the Sanctuary (as David professed he had sometimes done, and longed to see it again ( Psal. 63.1, 2.) they will say with the same David (Psal. 131.1, 2.) Lord, our heart is not haughty, nor our eyes lofty, our soul is like a weaned child.

Lastly, Job was waiting for the goodness of God to him, or for deliverance out of his sad condition; and doubtless he was convinced, that the most probable way to it, was to leave off contending with God, and to be found humbling himself before him, in this or a like confession, Behold, I am vile.

Hence note;

There is nothing that doth more sweeten and molifie God (or, I may say, any ingenuous adversary) towards us, then an humble acknowledgement of our own vileness and unworthiness.

When our hearts are truly humbled, mercy and deliverance are at hand. Job was no sooner made deeply sensible of his vileness, but mercy came in. The only skill of this excellent wrestler (as one calls him) was to cast himself down at God's foot. There is no way to get within God and to prevail with him, but by submitting to him. The Lord layeth down his rod, when we lay down our pride; and casts his sword out of his hand, when we cast ourselves at his feet. And in all our afflictions, whether personal or national, till we acknowledge (not formally, but in a deep sense of our own vileness) that we are vile, in vain do we cry for deliverance, or hope for mercy. When we are lowest in our own eyes, we are nearest to our exaltation; when once we say in our hearts we are nothing, we deserve nothing, we have spoken lightly, we have done lightly, salvation will not tarry. (1 Pet. 5.7.) Humble yourselves under the mighty hand of God, and he will lift you up in due time. If we would be lifted up out of any affliction, we must be at this humbling work. We shall never work (as I may say) upon the heart of God, unless we are thus at work with our own hearts, or till this work be done upon our hearts. Our great work lies within, especially in a day of trial and tribulation, such as Job was in. Job was speedily reduced to his former honor and greatness, when once (through grace) he had wrought his heart to this confession. Behold, I am vile;

What shall I answer thee?

As if Job had said, truly I have nothing to answer thee; Thou, O Lord, hast given such demonstrations of thy greatness, of thy power, of the excellency of thy wisdom, of thy goodness, that I have nothing to say, but this, that I can say nothing. What shall I answer thee? I know not what to answer, or I have nothing to answer. As in a great strait, when we know not what to do, we usually say, What shall we do? So here, it showeth that Job was no way able to answer, when he said, What shall I answer? The Hebrew is, What shall I return or turn back? We may exemplify this passionate interrogation, by that of the Patriarch Judah (Gen. 44.16.) when Joseph would have detained Benjamin (having found the cup in his sacks mouth) Judah said, What shall we say unto my Lord? what shall we speak? or how shall we clear ourselves? Here are three questions to show that he had nothing to answer. First, What shall we say to my Lord? Secondly, What shall we speak? Thirdly, How shall we clear ourselves? Truly, we know not what to say, nor speak, nor how to clear ourselves. The plain truth is, we have nothing at all to answer for ourselves, but to yield ourselves to thy mercy. Thus Job, I am vile, what shall I answer thee, the great God, the holy God, the mighty God, the wise God? what shall I answer thee?

Hence note;

When God is opponent, no man can be respondent.

God can put such questions, and make such objections, as no man is able to answer. Thus spake Job at the 3d verse of the ninth Chapter; If he (that is, God) will contend with him (that is, with man) he cannot answer him one of a thousand: Which implieth, that not only not one among very many men, but that not one among all men, or that not any man is able to answer, if God will contend. The Apostle saith of all men in a state of sin ( Rom. 3.19.) We know, that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law; that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. If the Lord should make objections against, or charge sinners, according to the strictness and severity of the law; the best, the holiest of men could not find an answer, or no answer would be found in their mouths: how much less could any answer him, who not only were altogether born in sin, as all are, and as the proud Pharisees told the poor man in the Gospel he was ( Joh. 9.34.) but abide and continue in sin? How will the mouths of all such be stopped with a sense of their self-guiltiness? how mute, how answerless will they stand before God? or say, as Job in the Text (but in a ten thousand times sadder plight than he) What shall we answer? It is the happiness of humbled sinners that they have Christ to answer for them, seeing in that case no sinner can answer for himself. And such is the Majesty and glory of God, when it breaks forth in any case to a poor creature, that it leaves him quite answerless, and takes away not only all matter of dispute, but of speech; and therefore Job resolves upon silence, as appears by what he saith in the last clause of this verse.

I will lay my hand upon my mouth.

As if he had said. That all may see I know not what to answer, I will stop up the conveyance of answers. What this Scripture phrase, to lay the hand upon the mouth, imports, hath been opened ( Chap. 21.5.) In brief, Jobs meaning in resolving thus, was, as if he had said, I will impose silence upon myself. Or thus, Lord, thou shalt not need to silence me or to stop my mouth, I will do it myself; I know not what to answer thee; but if I did, if I could gather up something that might look like an answer, yet I will not answer, I will lay my hand upon my mouth.

Further when he saith, I will lay my hand upon my mouth, it may imply, that he would fain have been answering, though he could not tell what to answer. The tongue, if left at liberty, if not checked, will be making answers, when it cannot answer anything to purpose; and therefore as David said ( Psal. 39.1.) I will keep my mouth with a bridle, while the wicked is before me. So would Job here, while the Holy one was before him, fearing he might give further offense, while he went about to take off offenses. The tongue of a good man needs a bridle; and the better any man is, the more he bridles his tongue.

Job had offended with his tongue; though he had not spoken wickedly, yet he had spoken rashly and inconsiderately, and now he saith, I will lay my hand upon my mouth.

Hence note;

We should be very watchful over that which hath been an instrument or an occasion of sin.

He that hath offended with his mouth, should lay his hand upon his mouth, and take order with his tongue. It is better to be silent, than to offend in speaking. Pamb (as the Church Historian reports) confessed, that in forty nine years he had scarcely learned the meaning of, or the duty contained in the first and econd verses of the thirty ninth Psalm, concerning the due restraint and government of the tongue.

Secondly, Note;

It is necessary sometimes to abridge ourselves in what we may do, lest we should do what we may not.

This is a holy revenge; and it is one of those seven effects of Godly sorrow which works repentance, not to be repented of (2 Cor. 7.11.) We should (in some cases) forbear to speak at all, for fear we should speak amiss. They who are truly wise, are much ashamed to speak, when once they see their error in speaking, or how apt they are to err in speaking; and therefore lay that penalty upon their tongues, either to spare speaking, or to speak very sparingly. 'It is seldom that the tongue is left loose but it speaks loosely, and it often speaks those things which give occasion of offense both to God and man. As all iniquity shall (at last) stop her mouth (Psal. 107.42.) that is, evil men (the abstract is put for the concrete) shall be so ashamed and confounded for their evil deeds, that when they are charged with them or convinced of them, they shall hold their peace, as if their mouths were stopped, or like the man that came to the feast in the Gospel without his Wedding-garment, they shall be speechless (Now, I say, as all iniquity shall stop her mouth for shame) so it is good for the best sometimes to stop their own mouths, for fear they should speak any iniquity. This godly fear, as well as a gracious shame, for what he had spoken amiss before, caused Job to say, I will lay my hand upon my mouth, which resolve he further confirms in the next verse.


Vers. 5. Once have I spoken, but I will not answer; yea, twice, but I will proceed no further.
Once have I spoken.

That is, once have I spoken amiss: not that he never spoke but once, for he had spoken often; but once he had spoken amiss, and been too forward with his tongue.

But I will not answer.

That is, I will not speak so again. But had Job spoken amiss but once? he confesseth more in the latter part of the verse.

Yea, twice, but I will proceed no furthor.

Once, yea twice. Some Interpreters are much in showing what that once or twice speaking should be.

First, Some say it was that he so importunately desired to plead with God. Secondly, Others, that he did so much justify himself; for though he did well in maintaining his integrity, yet his over-doing it or being so much in it, was not well. Others, That his once was his complaining of the afflictions of the godly, especially of his own, as if they were too heavy, and he not weighed in an even balance, at least afflicted more than needed. That his twice, was his heightening the prosperity of the wicked, as if God favored them; at least, that he did not punish them as they deserved, nor show displeasure enough against them. But we need not stay upon such particulars, nor take once and twice strictly. This expression, once, yea twice, implies only, that he had spoken often; I have spoken not only once, but twice, that is, I have spoken several times amiss. The first step beyond once is twice; and who knows how much beyond twice he had spake? when he said once have I spoken, yea twice, the meaning plainly is, I have several times spoken amiss. We had this form of speech ( Job 33.14.) where Elihu told Job that the Lord speaketh once, yea twice, yet man perceiveth it not; that is, he speaks often, in a dream, in a vision of the night, and man understands not the meaning of it. So here, I (saith Job ) have spoken once, yea twice, or many times.

But I will proceed no further, or I will not add saith the Hebrew. I will no more apologize for myself, nor stand in my own defense (for in so doing, I shall stand in my own light) but lay myself low in the presence of God. As if he had said, My sin is already too great, in that I have divers times spoken too boldly and freely, if not presumptuously about thy proceedings, but I will refrain from offending in that kind anymore. The sum of all that Job had spoken may be thus conceived. Now Lord I confess to thee, and before all the world, my sin and folly in questioning any of thy dealings with me, instead of submitting to them, especially in urging a hearing of my cause in thy presence: Therefore I revoke my challenge, and cast myself at thy footstool, acknowledging myself (in comparison of thee) every way vile and base, utterly unable to satisfy any of thy demands. And, as I myself purpose, so I humbly beg leave of thee, that I may be silent. I grant all that thou hast said of thy own greatness, and of my vileness, and I bewail my over-daring rashness: I will not defend pertinaciously, what I have said unadvisedly; and to make sure of that, I am resolved to say no more; lest carried out in he of speech, I should heat my passions; l st, multiplying words, I should multiply my errors, and so dash against the same reck again.

First, In that Job confesseth once have I spoken, yea twice.

Note;

A good man may fall often.

Once and more than once, once and twice, yea, more than twice. We cannot limit the number, nor say to this or that number the failings or sinnings of a good man may come and no further. Though it be very sad to multiply sins, yet the best of men have multiplied them.

From the latter words, I will proceed no further.

Note, Secondly;

Though a good man may fall often, yet a good man will not take leave to sin often, no nor once.

He will not give himself a liberty to proceed or continue in sin. When he hath sinned once or twice, he does not say, possibly I may sin again, therefore what should I trouble myself about it? who knows how often any man may sin? no, though he knoweth not how often he may sin, yet he will not, give himself liberty to sin, not only, not knowingly, but not at all, once more; but saith, in the strength of Christ, I will proceed no further, I will do so no more. A gracious heart is so far from taking liberty to sin often, that he takes up a resolve not to sin, and will to the utmost watch against and keep himself pure from sin, especially from his special sin; as David did, who said ( Psal. 18.21.) I have kept myself from mine iniquity. As if he had said, There is an iniquity, which dogs me, and follows me, a sin, which easily besets me; but I have kept myself, to the utmost of my power, from falling into that iniquity. And, I say, though a good man may multiply iniquity, yet woe to those who give themselves scope to multiply iniquity, or to commit any one iniquity. The voice of true repentance is this, I will sin no more. Though I deny not, but a man, who hath truly repented of some particular sin, and sincerely purposed not to commit it anymore, may (being over-powered by corruption and temptation) be overtaken with the same sin again; yet the voice of true repentance is this, and thus the penitent soul speaks in truth, I will sin no more, I will proceed no further.

Again, Job had been confessing his fault, his failings, Once have I spoken, yea, twice. The words are a penitent confession, or the confession of a penitent. Now saith he, I will proceed no further.

Hence note, Thirdly;

When sins and failings are heartily and penitently confessed, they are not persisted nor persevered in.

He that hath really confessed his sin, will (to his utmost) put a stop to his sin; he will be so far from renewing or continuing in it, that he sets himself might and main (and prays in aid from God) against it. True confession of sin is always seconded and followed with forsaking of sin. The Prophet calling the people of Israel to repentance, said ( Isa. 1.16.) Cease to do evil. It will not avail us to say, we have done evil, unless we cease to do evil. The promise of mercy is not to bare confessors, but to those who are also forsakers of sin ( Prov. 28.13.) He that confesseth and forsaketh his sin, shall find mercy (Prov. 30.32.) If thou hast done foolishly, lifting up thyself, or if thou hast thought evil, lay thy hand upon thy mouth, do no more; that is, do not open thy mouth to speak a word in defense of it, do not put forth thy hand anymore to act it. Every unfeigned confession of any one sin, is a real profession against that, and against all other sins. That man (let him be who he will) is not a confessor of sin to God, but a mocker of God, who confesseth a sin, and takes no care to keep himself pure, not only from that, but from every sin. The Apostle John doth not only say, Whosoever is born of God, doth not commit sin, but, he cannot sin, because he is born of God (1 Epist. 3.9.) Not that he hath not a natural power to sin; but he hath not a will, a mind to sin, or he sins not with the full consent or swing of his will, or he hath a sincere bent of will against every sin, and would sin no more. How wicked and bent to backsliding were those Jews, to whom the Lord said by his Prophet ( Isa. 1.5.) Why should ye be stricken anymore? ye will revolt more and more. The will of a wicked man is wholly for sin: the will of a godly man (as such) is wholly against sin; so that when he sinneth, he may be said to sin against his own will, as well as against the will of God; and therefore, being convinced that he hath sinned, though but in passion or by impatient words (as Jobs case was) he gives his honest word for it (as Job here did) that he will proceed no further.

In these three verses, Job hath shown his repentance for his unwary speeches and excesses in language; he hath confessed his own vileness, and sits down as silenced by God, yea, as imposing silence upon himself. Thus he is got a good way in the work of humiliation; yet he was not come quite through, he had not yet made such a confession of his sin, nor was his heart so humbled as it ought to be, before God would raise him up; and therefore in the following part of this Chapter, and in the next, God sets upon him again, and speaks to him a second time out of the whirlwind. The Lord had begun to humble him, and Job had begun to humble himself, yet the Lord deals further with him to humble him more, and speaks to him again out of the whirlwind: What again out of the whirlwind? Yes; Then answered the Lord unto Job out of the whirlwind, and said, &c.

And not only so, but after the Lord had put many questions to him, about himself, as before about several creatures, he had a reserve of two creatures more to question with him about, that would more astonish him than all the rest, Behemoth and Leviathan.

Thus we see, when once the Lord begins to humble a soul, he will make through work of it, and never give it over, till he hath brought him to the dust indeed. Job