Exposition of Job 38-42
When the Lord said to Abraham (Gen. 12.1.) Get thee out of thy Country, and from thy Kindred, and from thy Fathers house, unto a Land that I shall show thee, he never disputed the case, but (saith the Apostle, Heb. 11.8.) Obeyed and went out, not knowing whither he went. He never inquired what the place was to which he was to go, nor what accommodations he should find when he came thither: Abraham knew he was to go whither God called him to go, though whither he was to go he knew not. And when long after this the Lord called to Abraham (Gen. 22.1.) he said, Behold, here I am; or, Behold me; as if he had said, Lord, I am here ready to obey thy command, to go of thy errand, to carry whatever message thou shalt put into my mouth, to do whatever work thou shalt put into my hand; and that Abraham did not complement with God, it appears in the same Chapter; for though when God commanded him to offer up his Son, his only Son Isaac, whom he loved, every word was enough to wound his heart, & the last deepest (to part with a Son is hard, with an only Son harder, with a son dearly beloved, is hardest of all, especially when he must be not only passive but active in this loss, & his own hand must give the parting blow) yet Abraham being called to this hard and hot service, said, Here am I, and readily obeyed. This readiness at the call of God, David professed from his own experience ( Psal. 27.8.) When thou saidst, seek ye my face, my heart said unto thee, thy face Lord will I seek. That is, as thou hast commanded that I should worship thee, so I do; or, what thou, O Lord, sayest, is my desire; thy command is not only the resolution, but the request and supplication of my soul. We have the like readiness of that holy Prophet Isaiah, who (after the Angel with a coal from the Altar had touched his lips, and cleansed him from his filthiness) hearing the Lord inquire for a messenger, Whom shall I send? presently answered (as the lightning in the Text) Here am I, send me (Is. 6.8.) Lord, I am ready to go whithersoever thou wilt send me. This should be, &, in some measure is the temper of all believers; though they may have, & to their sorrow, find many reluctancies and stops, yet this is in the heart of every true believer, to be ready at the call of God, & to say, Here I am. When the Apostle Paul had a call to preach the gospel of Christ, which once he persecuted, Immediately (saith he, Gal. 1.16.) I conferred not with flesh and blood; he made no delays, much less any excuses, least of all any d • nials, but was obedient to the heavenly Vision. As soon as he had that vision and call from God to go and preach the Gospel, he never stood reasoning and conferring with flesh and blood, he put no questions, he asked not this or that man's opinion, whether it were best for him to go or not; neither did he confer with the flesh and blood in his own heart, he conferred not with himself, he consulted not his own safety, nor any carnal interests, but did as he was commanded. And unless we do thus, not only will the ordinary practice of servants to Masters rise up in judgment against us ( Mat. 8.9. I am a man under authority (said the Centurion) having soldiers under me; I have a superior officer, and I have inferior soldiers, and I say to one go, and he goeth; and to another come, and he cometh: Such is or ought to be the carriage of soldiers and servants towards their Superiors. Now I say, unless we readily obey the voice of God, not only will the daily practice of servants, but the practice (if I may so speak) of the lightnings from the clouds, will rise up in judgment against us and condemn us. Shall a servant say, Here I am, at the call of man? Shall the lightning say, here I am, at the call of God? and shall not man say so at God's call? Shall men put questions to God's commands? Shall they query, Will the world bear it if I do this? or, will this stand with my ease and profit, with my credit or commodity, when God requires it? If any do so, the lightning may flash in the face of their consciences, and not only blast them as stubborn and disobedient, but brand them for foolish and unwise, or, at least, for want of wisdom; about which the question is put to Job in the next verse.
Vers. 36. Who hath put wisdom into the inward parts? and who hath given understanding to the heart.
Some Interpreters conceive, that at this verse the Lord enters discourse with, or begins to question Job concerning living creatures; and beginning here with man, the chiefest of visible living creatures, he proceeds to inferior living creatures, the beasts of the earth, and the fowls of the air, as followeth in the 39 th Chapter: Yet the very next verse offers a great objection against this opinion; for there return is made to the former matter, the works of nature. Vers. 37. Who can number the clouds in w • s • om? or who can stay the bottles of heaven?
And therefore I rather conceive, that this 36th verse is to be joined with the two former already opened; as if here the Lord would convince man, that as he hath not power sufficient to command, so not wisdom enough to dispose, either of the Rain or of the Lightnings; under which, by a Synecdoche, all other creatures may be comprehended. As if God had said, Whatever wisdom man hath, is of my putting into him; now I have not given him wisdom enough, nor taught him how to order and dispose the clouds and lightnings; and if I have not given him wisdom for these things, whence should he have it? So then, according to this way of interp • etation, the 37th verse which followeth, gives a reason why man cannot attain to this privilege, the government of the clouds, the disposal of rain and lightnings, even because God hath not given him any such wisdom. All the wisdom which man hath, is the gift of God; but God hath not given man wisdom to order the clouds and lightnings, therefore he hath no such wisdom.
Wi •••• may be taken either generally for knowledge, which is the 〈◊〉 of the mind, and may be called speculative knowledge •• 〈◊〉 p •• ticularly, for prudence, which is practical knowledge, in the du • ordering and manage of things before us. Who hath pu • w • s ••• , 〈◊〉 either sort,
The word which we translate inward parts, signifies sometimes the Reins, and sometimes the Heart. The Chaldee paraphrase renders, Who hath put wisdom into the heart: The matter is not much, to which of them we determine it; for, though the heart in Scripture, is usually put for the seat of wisdom, and the Reins for the seat of the affections; yet David saith, My reins instruct me in the night season (Psal. 16.7.) To instruct or teach, is properly the work of wisdom. The word is well rendered by us, the inward parts, for that takes in all; wisdom lieth within ( Psal. 51.6.) Behold thou desirest truth in the inward parts, and in the hidden (part) thou shalt make me to know wisdom. The inward parts, in the fo • mer part of that verse, and the hidden (part) in the latter, are the same; by both, or either, he means his soul in all the faculties or operations of it. And indeed, neither the Reins not the Heart, nor any, nor all the members of the body, are properly o • strictly wisdoms seat. Wisdom is lodged in the soul, in the man of man, as some call it; and therefore that must needs be intended here: but because Naturalists speak of wisdom, as lodged and exercised in bodily parts, some placing it in the heart, some in the head, others in the reins; therefore we may well place it (as our Translation expresseth it) in the inward parts. The original word strictly imports, that which is covered over, the root is rendered to cover; and Grammarians give this reason of it, because the reins and kidneys are covered with fat. But seeing all the inward parts of man are in a sense covered parts, that notation of the word may very well sort with our Translation; as also with that which is the exposition of the inner parts, the mind or soul of man. So then, Who hath put wisdom into the inward parts, is plainly this; Who hath planted it in the mind or soul of man? who hath rooted it there? who hath made man wise? some give the sense thus, Who hath made man a reasonable creature? or bestowed that rational faculty upon man, whereby he is able to apprehend the truth of the works of God, and to inquire into, and find out many secrets in nature? Thus some (I say) expound it, specially of that rational power with which man, as man, is naturally endowed, and not of wisdom attained in Schools and Academies by study, or in the woe • ld by experience, which is but the lightning of reason, or of that natural wisdom planted by God in man as a reasonable creature. Taking this sense, Who hath put wisdom into the inward parts, is no more but this; Who hath made man a rational creature? who among men, can take this honor to himself, and say, I have put this wisdom, called reason, into myself or any man? surely none: 'It is the sole prerogative of God to put wisdom, in the lowest and commonest notion of it, reason, into the mind of man. Who hath put wisdom into the inward parts?
Hence observe;
All wisdom floweth from God, the eternal and inexhaustible fountain of wisdom; it is of God that all men have reason, as well as that any men have grace. Reason is a very great gift, take it barely, as unpollished and unheightned, by study, by Arts, Sciences and experiences: Wisdom, as planted in nature, is a high favor. As grace sets one man above another, so this natural wisdom sets every man above the best of bruits. And as this wisdom in man (which is properly called wisdom) so that Analogical wisdom, or that appearance of wisdom, that is in many subtle b • uits, is of God's putting & planting too. And if so, then much more those higher endowments, the pollishings and the inrichings of man's reason, are of God. Reason is that ground o • soil, which being tilled and dressed, manured and well wrought upon, brings forth those excellent fruit • of wi • dom which ennoble the mind of man. ( James 1.17.) Every good gift, and every perfect gift is from above. The good gift, may be taken for natural wisdom; that's of God: and the perfect gift, for infused wisdom, especially in spiritual things; that's more of God, that's chiefly from above, and c • mes down from the father of lights, with whom there is no variableness nor shadow of turning. From this point we may infer,
Fi • st, Seeing wisdom, both that which is planted in man, as a rational creature, and that also which man acquires by industry, is of God, Then God knoweth how wise any man is, and what any man's wisdom amounts to. God can easily compass the wisest man in the world. The wisdom of some men is beyond the compass of many men; but the wisdom of all men, is infinitely within the compass of God. He that hath put wisdom into man, is himself wiser than all men. Thus David argued ( Psal. 94.9.) He that planted the ear, shall not he hear? and he that formed the eye, shall he not see? doubtless he doth. God hath made sight and hearing, and therefore the seeing and the hearing powers are transcendently in God. And as it followeth ( verse. 10.) He that teacheth man knowledge, shall not he understand? certainly he doth. He understands and knows, not only what men understand and know, but he understands how much understanding, and what knowledge any man hath; God looks through all.
Secondly, If God hath put wisdom into man, then he can take wisdom from man, he can destroy the wisdom of the wise, he can turn the wisdom of an Achithophel into foolishness. As he can make a fool wise, so he can make a wise man a fool, or befool the wisest men.
Thirdly, If all wisdom be of the Lord's putting in, then let none be proud of their wisdom. There is nothing that we are so apt to be proud of as of our wisdom. If we have but better natural parts than others, we are presently lifted up above others; if we have better acquirements than others, we are apt to be proud of ourselves. A little knowledge puffeth up, and indeed that which puffeth up is but a little. True wisdom, though great, doth not puff up, for that leads us to him that gives us wisdom, and that will keep us humble.
Fourthly, We may infer, if the Lord hath put wisdom into man, then man ought to be thankful to the Lord for the wisdom he hath. As man should not be p • oud of his wisdom, because how much soever he hath, he hath received it; so man ought to be very thankful for wisdom, because how much or how little soever it is he hath received it. If all receipts from God call for thanks, how much more this receipt of wisdom? which, next to grace, is the most precious thing we receive from him, and is itself sometimes put for grace.
Fifthly, If wisdom be of God's putting into man? then let men be careful to use their wisdom for God. That stock which another man hath put into our hands, he expects we should use it for him; especially, that we should not use it against him, or to his disadvantage. How wicked are they, who are so far from using their wisdom for God, that they use it against God, that is, against his interest, truth, and servants. Pharaoh said ( Exod. 1.10.) Come on, let us deal wisely with them. And what was it for, but to vex and enslave God's first born, the people of Israel. He that employs his wisdom to any evil purpose, employeth it against God, and so arms himself with what he hath received from God to resist God: Woe to those who do so. Wisdom is of God's giving; use it then for him, and dedicate it to him; above all, take heed of using it against him. It had been better for that man that he had been a brute, than that he should be so brutish, as to employ his understanding and reason against God.
Sixthly, If the Lord hath put wisdom into man; Then man must be accountable to God for his wisdom, as also for all the other talents which he hath received. Wisdom is a great talent; they who are so wise as to know what that means, will use it tremblingly, that they may give their account rejoicingly. They are wise indeed who daily consider, whence or from whom they had their wisdom, and before whom they must come to a reckoning, what they have done with it, even before him who hath put all their wisdom into them. Who hath put wisdom into the inward parts?
This latter part of the Verse is of the same sense with the former, only it is doubled to show the certainty of the thing; understanding in the heart is the same with wisdom in the inward parts.
Yet here is a word in the Original used for the heart, different from what is commonly used, and so occasions a difference among Interpreters and Translators. Grammarians derive it from a word that signifieth to look or behold, to see and and foresee, and the Noun signifieth a picture, because pictures are pieces of art, which draw all men's eyes to behold and look upon them; and the heart is therefore expressed by this word, because it forms, and as it were (by its imaginative faculty) draws the picture of all things in itself, or because in the heart or mind of man the forms of all things are represented: Mans imagination delineates and shapes a thousand varieties within itself, or man hath the picture and prospect of all matters in his heart, and therefore the same word signifies the heart and a picture, drawn and delineated to the life. That's the force of the word which here we render heart.
The Latin translation renders at a great distance from us, yet the letter of the Text may bear that reading also. Who hath given understanding to the Cock? Interpreters following this translation, conceive that here the Lord begins to question Job about irrational living creatures; Having said, who hath put wisdom into the inward parts? to wit, of man; he now adds who hath given understanding to the Cock? The same word that signifieth the heart, signifies also a Cock; as the heart foreseeth and looketh upon things afar off, so the Cock foreseeth the rising of the Sun and the break of day, and therefore hath his name from his fore-sight. They who follow this Translation, speak many things of the wonderful fore-sight of the Cock: and surely God hath placed a natural wisdom in that creature constantly to understand the hours of the night. A Cock is a natural clock to any family, he hath his first, and second, and third crowings; and having a kind of natural instinct concerning the course and return of the Sun, he claps his wings and crows, as rejoicing at his coming, and willing to awaken all to entertain him and prepare themselves for labor, study and business, at his approach. But I shall not stay upon this; And the general stream of interpreters keeps in the former channel, expounding this latter part of the Verse as the former, with respect to man. Who hath given understanding to the heart? It is a truth (I grant) which the Jewish Talmudists teach, that God is to be praised who hath given such understanding to the Cock, that he is able to distinguish the hours of the night, and tell us of the approaching day, that it surprise us not like sluggards unawares. The natural Histo • ian reports the useful qualities of the Cock: And one of the Ancients wittily takes notice of the Cocks crowing in the Gospel, which awakened Peter, according to Christ's prediction, Before the Cock crow twice, thou shalt deny we thrice: The Cock (saith he) was a Preacher to call Peter to repentance. Christ made use of a Cock to press that eminen • Disciple into a conviction of, and sorrow for his sin; for at the crowing of the Cock, he remembered the words of Christ, went out and wept bitterly.
But that the question propounded to Job in this Verse concerns the wisdom given to man, not to beasts or birds, is plainly proved by the questions put him in the two Verses following. Which show that though God hath given man wisdom sufficient for many great purposes, yet not for the purpose there expressed, as not for several other purposes.
Vers. 37, 38. Who can number the clouds in wisdom? or who can stay the bottles of heaven, when the dust groweth into hardness, and the clouds cleave fast together?
In these two Verses we have two questions more propounded by God to Job. The first whereof is about the numbering, the second (though under another title) about the stopping of the clouds.
The word rendered clouds is sometimes translated heavens, and so a learned Interpreter gives it here; to which he adds this gloss, Who hath made the heavens with such wisdom in that number wherein they are? who can number them? The word rendered number signifieth both to number things Arithmetically, and to demonstrate them Logically; and it may be taken in either or both senses here, who can number the clouds in wisdom? that is, who hath wisdom sufficient to tell how many clouds there are? Man hath not arithmetick enough to number them. The clouds are many in their sorts or kinds, and they are many more in their singula •• , or (if I may so speak) individuals; there are many sorts of clouds, and there are many of every fort; as there are many sorts of living creatures, and very many of every sort, so of the clouds; we may as well number the waves of the sea or the stars, as the clouds of heaven. If we look up to one part of heaven, we may see more clouds than we can number; how great then is the number of the clouds in the whole circumference of the heavens?
Again, taking the word as it signifieth to demonstrate logically, or to declare, the question imports thus much; Who can clearly and perfectly set forth the nature of the clouds or the various effects which they produce, and services which they are employed in? Who can, either in the former sense or in this, number the stars of heaven?
Hence note;
As the number and nature of the stars, so of the clouds (which are beneath the stars) exceed man's wisdom. The least and lowest works of God are above man's reach, how much more his greatest works, and those which are far above?
Yet further, from this word which we translate to number, to declare, or demonstrate, that precious stone the Sapphire, mentioned often in Scriptures hath its name; and so the Text is rendered thus, who can make the clouds saph • rine, or like a Sapphire? the meaning is, who can make the clouds bright and clear l ke the Sapphire-stone? The Sapphire is a most pleasant resplendent and beautiful gem: That glorious throne which was shown the Prophet in vision ( Ezek. 1.26.) had the ap • earance • f a Saph •• -stone, that is, it had a most excellent and illustrious appearance. Now saith the Lord who can make the clouds (dark of themselves) like a Sapphire-stone? that is, serene, pleasant, beautiful, and delightful to the eye. God can make bright clouds (Zech. 10.1.) clouds wonderful fair and pleasant to behold, even as pleasing to the eye as a precious Sapphire. As this translation holds out a truth in itself, so 'tis very suitable to that which followeth,
Clouds darken the heavens, but when the Lord stayeth the clouds from rain, then the heavens are clear like a Sapphire; God can make the heavens cloudy or clear.
Who can stay the bottles of heaven? that is, the clouds, who can stay them, or (as the Hebrew strictly) who can cause them to lie down? Master Braughton renders, who can destill the barrels of heaven? The word here used signifies a bottle, or any vessel wherein liquor is preserved; and it may be taken either fo • a bottle made of skin, a leathern bottle, or for a bottle made of clay, an earthen bottle, a Potters bottle, as 'tis called ( Isa. 30.14.) The clouds are like a leathern or an earthern bottle, which as it holds the liquor, so being unstopped and held up, the liquor runs out; who can stay the bottles of heaven? that is, if God once unstop the clouds, they presently pour down in and who can stay them from raining? no man can. That's a plain sense; as if the Lord had said, who can hinder the clouds from giving down rain, if once opened? who but I can restrain the rain (which is heavy of itself and tends naturally downwards) from falling out of the clouds?
There is another reading of this part of the verse, who can slay the harmony of heaven? The Vulgar Latin renders, who can make the music of heaven sleep, that is, cease, or be quiet. The reason of this translation is this, because the same word which signifieth a bottle, signifies also a musical instrument somewhat resembling the form of a bottle ( Psal. 33.2.) Thus some take it here, as intending that musical or melodious harmony, which ancient Philosophers have affi • med is made by the motion of the heavenly spheres; yet by this they do not mean a proper musical sound or harmony, such as the Pythagoreans dreamed of, which some other learned men have said is so sweet and ravishing, that if we did but hear i • , we could neither eat, nor drink, nor sleep: Yea, they tell us, that Moses while he did not eat, nor drink, nor sleep those forty days in the Mount, was all that while taken up, and ravished with that Music; but you may put that among Jewish fables.
Sober men following this translation, who can stay the music of heaven? understand by it only the harmonious concord and agreement, which all the heavenly Orbes unfailably observe in their several courses, without the least jarr or discord. That's a truth, showing the great wisdom and power of God, who hath put the heavens into such a sweet order, that they move, not only constantly, but harmoniously. Though the motion of the heavens makes no audible or proper music, yet it makes an intelligible or metaphorical music, that is, the heavens move orderly, there is an agreement in their motion, which is the the sweetest music in heaven among Saints and Angels, and among good men on earth. We say of men moving peaceably in their places, as becomes them, there is a harmony among them. And how blessed a thing would it be, to see all sorts of men moving orderly in their spheres? what a harmony would it make, to see everyone doing his duty, and doing it in his place? whereas to omit duty, makes our lives useless; and to do it out of our place, makes us troublesome and unharmonious. And therefore, though I insist not upon this reading, yet it were well if all would insist upon the moral of it, laboring to make harmony (as much as may be) in all their motions. But I pass from it, and rest in our own,
Who can stay the bottles of heaven, that is, who can make them leave raining? The Lord by a late question convinced Job that no man can make it rain ( verse. 34.) Canst thou lift up thy voice to the clouds, that abundance of waters may cover thee? and by this question he would convince him, that no man can obstruct or hinder the rain. Who can stay the bottles of heaven?
Hence observe,
Should not the Lord put stopples into those bottles? should not he close up those barrels, they would drop down continually? and instead of watering, drown the earth. When in the days of Noah the Lord opened the bottles of heaven forty days together, who could stop or stay them? Did not the clouds pour down till the whole world was over-whelmed? and unless the Lord did now stay the clouds, and forbid them to give out their whole stock, they would again over-whelm the world. There are Seas of waters above our heads, God keeps them in from hurting the earth, and lets them out to help i • . The next verse intimates at least this power of God over the clouds and the season when he exerciseth it: Who can stay the bottles of heaven?
Vers. 38. When the dust groweth (or is poured) into hardness, and the clods cleave fast together?
The Margin of our Bibles gives us the former part of the verse in a very different translation, thus, When the dust is turned into mire. The earth hath had its fill, if not too much rain, when the dust is turned into mire? And when 'tis so, who but God stayeth the bottles of heaven from pouring down overmuch?
But I shall only open the reading in the Text, of which there are two interpretations.
First, Some expound it of staying the rain when there is most need of rain, or when the earth wants it most, or in a time of drought: For then the earth groweth hard like a molten-pillar, and the clods thereof cleaving one to another make clefts in the body of the earth. In a time of great drought, the earth at once cleaves asunder, and runs closet together, as it were to succor itself. Who stayeth the bottles of heaven, when the earth is chapt and gapes for rain to soften and cool it? Surely man doth it not, nor can he be said to do it (unless meritoriously ) It is God alone who efficiently stays the clouds from rain in a time of drought, or when the necessities of the earth call aloud for it. Taking the words in this sense.
Observe;
I (saith the Lord Amos 4.7.) have withholden the rain from you when there were yet three months to the harvest, and I caused it to rain upon one City, and caused it not to rain upon another City; one piece was rained upon, and the piece whereupon it rained not, withered. One months drought before harvest threatens a scarcity or dearth of Corn; but two, yea, three months drought, must needs usher in a dreadful famine.
The second interpretation of these words seems yet more clear, Who can stay the bottles of heaven, when the dust groweth into hardness, and the clods cleave fast together? that is, who but God can stop rain when there is no farther need of rain? As it the Lo • d had said, When the bottles of heaven have given out so much rain as may sit the earth for fruit-bearing, or when the ground hath had its fill, so that the light dust is turned into lumps of earth, and that dust which was raised and tossed with every breath of wi • d, is clodded and agglutinated by water into a massy substance; when, I say, 'tis thus with the earth, who can stay or stop the bottles of heaven, from raining more, to the sp • il of all, but myself? So then the true use of rain is held forth in this 38. verse. namely, that the dust of the earth being moistened with rain, may coalesce or be joined close together. This, I conceive, is the most natural and proper sense of the Text. For the earth, which by drought was cru • bled into dust, rain falling plentifully upon it, is knit again into one body, like meal or flower into which leaven is put, and so is made ready to receive, nourish, and b ing forth whatever grain is cast into the bosom of it.
Rain falling upon the dust embodies it. The ground moulders in a time of drought; but when rain comes, that hardens it. The dust (as we commonly say) slyes before, but as drought cleaves the earth, so rain causeth the parts to unite; an • then the earth, which like a heap of sand would not hang together, becomes solid and fit for tillage. Now when so much rain hath fallen as prepares the earth, and (as the word imports) fermentates or levens it to receive the seed cast into it, then, who stayeth the bottles of heaven?
Hence note, First,
As moisture loosens compacted things, so it compacts or knit, together loose things. The earth is soon made dust by droughts, and it would be a very dust-heap, if it had no moisture to reunite it. The Lord threatens his people, in case of disobedience ( Deut. 28.24.) to make the rain of their Land powder and dust; that is, they should have dust and powder, instead of water. Long drought turns the earth to dust. In this learn, how great a mercy there is in rain.
Secondly note,
And therefore (unless in judgment) he will not let the clouds run wast; he will stay his bottles from letting down one drop more, when once the dust (by rain falling upon it) groweth into hardness, and the clods cleave fast together.
Note Thirdly,
As it is a duty, when we have drank enough, to stop the bottle, that is, to give over drinking; so 'tis a mercy, that the Lord stops the bottles when the earth hath drank enough. When the earth hath enough, the Lord sometimes will not stop the bottles of heaven, but lets them pour down rain, till the fruits of the earth are utterly spoiled; and this he doth for the punishment of man's sin always, and sometimes for the punishment of those special sins, man's unthankfulness for, and abuse of the fruits of the earth; that is, because he did not stay the bottle, when he had taken enough.
Now, if the Lord knows when to give rain, and when to stop it, with respect to husbandry, and the natural fruits of the earth, then doubtless he knows and will take care to give rain for the souls of his people, when they have need. ( Psal. 68.2.) Thou, O God, didst send a plentiful rain, whereby thou didst confirm thine inheritance, when it was weary; which is specially meant of spiritual rain. There are bottles of heaven which water souls. The Preachers of the word are those bottles or clouds, which hold and destil the mystical rain; & the Lord will not stop them, till he sees the hearts of men made fit to bring forth the fruits of righteousness & holiness; he will not stop (I say) that spiritual rain, till this be effected, unless in judgment to a people, that have despised the rain, and slighted those showers of divine doctrine; against such the Lord will stop the bottles of heaven, & then their souls turn to dust, and their hearts become hard as rocks, or like the mountains, upon which neither rain nor dew falls, fruitless and barren of every good word and work.
JOB, Chap. 38. Vers. 39, 40, 41.
39.
Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion? or fill the appetite of the young Lions,
40,
When they couch in their dens, and abide in the covert to lie in wait?
41.
Who provideth for the Raven his food? when his young ones cry unto God, they wander for lack of meat.
THe Lord having by a multitude of questions proposed to Job concerning inanimates, or creatures without life, such as are the Earth, the Sea, the Heavens, the Clouds and Meteors, (having, I say, by these questions) convinced him of his weakness and insufficiency, as also, of the transcendent power and wisdom, which abideth and resideth everlastingly in himself; he now undertakes Job for the same ends, by putting him questions about the living creatures, and those of three forms or sorts:
First, About the beasts of the earth.
Secondly, About the fowls of the Air.
Thirdly, About the fish of the Sea.
The Lord gives particular instance, or makes inquiry about thirteen kinds of living creatures; whereof seven abide upon the earth, five in the air, one in the waters.
The seven creatures inquired about, which abide on the earth, are, First, The Lion; Secondly, The wild Goat; Thirdly, The Hind; Fourthly, The wild Ass; Fifthly, The Unicorn; Sixthly, the Horse; and, Seventhly, The Elephant, under the name of Behemoth, as is most generally conceived.
The five creatures inquired about, that live in the air, are, First, The Raven; Secondly, The Peacock; Thirdly, The Ostrich; Fourthly, The Hawk; and, Fifthly, The Eagle.
Of the third sort, namely, such as live in the water, or in the Sea, Job is questioned only about one, the Leviathan, or the Whale, a creature of a vast magnitude; of so vast a magnitude, that take all the other twelve creatures and join them together, the Leviathan exceeds them all in magnitude; as will appear in the description given of him at large, in the one and fortieth Chapter.
The Lord in this latter discourse with, or questioning of Job, seems to descend, or to put matter of easier resolution to him than he had done before, and doubtless he doth; yet he doth it for the greater and fuller conviction and humiliation of Job. As if the Lord had said, If (O Job) thou findest thyself puzzled and unable to give any tolerable answer and resolution to the questions which I have proposed, about the whole bulk or body of the earth and Sea, or about those great things that are wrought in the heavens, and in the air, then consider, how thou art able to answer my questions about these lesser things, which are also near unto thee, the beasts of the earth, fowls of the air, and the fish of the Sea. The Lord even in these works, makes manifest his glorious perfections, far exceeding the reach and apprehension of man, as well as in, yea more than in, those other works of his mentioned before.
There are two things especially, of which the Lord would convince Job, with respect to these living creatures:
First, Of his care and providence in the provision that he daily makes for them.
Secondly, Of his power and wisdom, in the extraordinary strength and strange qualities which he hath bestowed upon them, and endued them with; in some of which they much surpass man, the master-piece, and master of the whole invisible Creation.
The general scope and aim of God, in putting questions to Job about these living creatures, seems to answer a secret doubt which some might have concerning his p • ovidence. True, the Lord governs the Heavens, the Stars, the Thunder, the Lightnings, the Rain; but doth he look after things below? Yea, the Lord's care and providence about inferior creatures, is very great, condescending to the very wild beasts of the earth, to the fowls of the air, as also, to the fish of the Sea; and hence the Lord would have Job understand, that surely he had a much greater care of him, and of the affairs of the children of men. Who can but conclude, That if the Lord hath such a respect to these irrational creatures, which live only the life of sense, then much more hath he a care of man, and among men, of good men, who are his children, and of them most of all in their afflictions and troubles. So that, the Lord by these questions, seems to bespeak Job thus: How comes it to pass, that thou shouldst so much as doubt, whether I take care of thee or no, when I take care of, and look to the wild beasts of the earth, to the fowls that fly in the air, yea, to the fish that swim unseen in the Sea? Or thus, Am I thus solicitous to look after Lions and Goats, Hinds and Unicorns, the Ostrich and the Peacock? &c. am I so careful to look after these creatures, many of which are of very little use to man, and some of them a trouble to man? and dost thou think I will not have a care of thee? learn therefore from what I now question thee about, that I can never be cruel to thee, or forgetful of my faithful servants, who am mindful of the brute beasts and ravenous birds. This seems to be the general tendency of the Lord's discourse with Job, continued from the close of this 38. Chapter, quite through the 39. a great part of the 40. and the whole 41 Chapter.
Having thus given a prospect of the whole, I shall now proceed to the particular animals here named, and to that first which is not only named in the order of the Text, but is looked upon also as first in dignity, a King among beasts, the Lion.
Vers. 39. Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion?
The Lord speaks thus, because the Lion is a beast of prey, he liveth by hunting, by hunting, catching, and seeding upon other beasts; the Lion is a Nimrod in the world, a mighty Hunter: Naturalists say, he is so curious in his diet, that he scorns to feed upon any carcase that he hath not hunted and killed himself, or that hath not been hunted by a Lion. He will not touch a carcase that lies dead in the field; but what he feeds upon, is what he conquers and kills, and that therefore it is here said, Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion? thou needest not, he is able enough to hunt for himself.
Yet some Travelers report, that there is a little beast called Jackal, somewhat bigger than a Fox, who usually doth that service for the Lion, to hunt the prey for him, and may be called the Lions Hunter. Mr. Purchas, in that Book called his Pilgrimage, ••• s us this relation; The Lion (saith he) hath the Jackal for his Usher, which is a little black shag-haired beast, about the bigness of a Spaniel, which when the evening comes, hunts for his prey, and coming on the foot, follows the scent with open cry, to which the Lion as chief hunter gives diligent ear, following for his advantage. If the Jackal set up his chase before the Lion comes in, he howls out mainly, and then the Lion seizeth on it, making a grumbling noise, whilst his servant stands by barking; and when the Lion hath done, the Jackal feeds on the relics. Thus far that industrious collector of observations from most of the remote parts of the world. And though neither Pliny, nor any natu • all Historian, no nor any Interpreter upon this Text (that ever I met with) have given any intimation that the Lion hath such a servant to hunt the prey for him; yet the testimony of those ingenious Travelers or Navigators, upon whose report of what they have seen or heard in those Countries, the worthy Author above-named makes this relation (this testimony I say) may be a probable ground for such an Exposition of the Text, that the Lord had in his wise providence provided one to hunt the prey for the Lion. Though I conceive the sense of the place to be mo • e general, namely, that the Lord himself hath one way or other taken care, that even the Lion shall have his prey, and that neither Job then nor any one else needed take care in that matter. How great an argument that might be, both for Jobs conviction and consolation, will appear afterwards. Wilt thou hunt the prey
The word rendered Lion, signifies a stout Lion; Mr. Broughton renders, the hardy Lion; others, the old Lion, Wilt thou hunt the prey for the old Lion? and there's a double interpretation with respect to that translation, That either here is meant a Lion come up to his full strength, and so every way able to provide for himself; or, that by the old Lion, is meant a Lion g • own so old and weak with old age, that he can no longer provide for, nor hunt the prey for himself; and therefore the Lord saith, Wilt thou hunt the prey for the old Lion, that cannot hunt for himself? dost thou provide for the Lion, that cannot p • ovide for himself? 'It is I, who provide a prey for the old Lion, that cannot hunt the prey for himself. This is a good sense, and I shall touch it in the Observation.
However, 'tis plain, that by the Lion in the first part of the verse, is meant, an old Lion; for he stands opposed to the young Lion, in the latter part of the ve • se: Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion?
Naturalists speak many things of the nature of the Lion, to whom I refer the Reader, I shall have occasion to touch some of them, while I mention what the Sc • ipture saith of him. The Lion bears a four-fold resemblance in Scripture.
First, The Lion is the emblem of a King. Judah, whose tribe was the stock of Kings, or the tribe Royal, is called a Lions whelp (Gen. 49.9.) Thus spake Jacob, Judah is a Lions whelp; from the prey my Son th • s art gone up; he stooped down, he couched as a Lion, and as an old Lion; who shall rouse him up? The Kings of the earth are compared to Lions; First, Because of their greatness and supe iotity: What the Lion is among beasts, Kings are among men, their chiefs. Secondly, Because of their stoutness and courage. Solomon saith of the Lion ( Prov. 30.30.) He is strongest among beasts, and turneth not away for any; That is, he is not afraid of any beast. To be bold as a Lion, is a sacred as well as a common proverbi • l, noting greatest boldness. Aristotle saith, the Lion never flies o • makes any hasty retreat, let the danger be what it will in open view, but goes off, keeping his own pace. A modern Writer speaks thus: The Lion in Africa is more fierce than in colder climate; He shrink • not in danger, except some covert of Woods h • d • s him from witnesses, and then he will take the benefit of a flight, which otherwise he seems to disdain. Such is the true spirit of Kings; they are much above ignoble fears. Thirdly, Lions resemble Kings, because of their mildness and nobleness to them that submit. Fourthly, Because of the stateliness of their gate, and majesty of their a • pect. Fifthly, Because of their vigilancy and watchfulness. The Lion sleeps (say Na • uralists) with his eyes open, he sleeps as if he were not asleep; and as some observe, he often moves his tail while he sleepeth, as giving notice, that he is not (as we speak) fast asleep.
And as the Lion is an emblem of earthly Kings, so, Secondly, of the Lord Jesus Christ, the King of heaven and earth, the King of Kings: To show his supe • eminent excellency, he is called a Lion ( Rev. 5.5.) There was found none w • rthy to open the Book, but the Lion of the tribe of Judah. Now Jesus Christ is compared to a Lion upon all those accounts before named, for which worthy and heroic Kings are so compared: for, First, Jesus Christ is King of Kings, and Lord of Lord's ( Rev. 19.16.) He is highly exalted; he hath a name given him above every name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth (Phil. 2.9, 10.) And as Jesus Christ is like the Lion for his superiority, so, Secondly, for his clemency & true nobleness of spirit towards those who yield unto him! 'It is enough indeed, to humble ourselves before this Lion. How ready must Christ be to receive and embrace humbled sinners, who humbled himself to death, that he m • ght save sinners, even while they were proud and rebelled against him. Thirdly, Jesus Christ is a Lion also, in respect of his watchfulness over his Church. This Lion that keeps Israel, neither slumbers nor sleeps (Psal. 121.4.) and, Fourthly, for his invincible courage and strength, always ready to be put forth for his Church. The Prophet ( Isa. 31.4.) compares Christ to a Lion, that will not be frighted; Like as the Lion (saith he) and the young Lion roaring on his prey; when a multitude of Shepherds is called out against him, he will not be afraid of their voice, nor abase himself for the noise of them; so shall the Lord of Hosts himself come down to fight for mount Zion, and for the hill thereof. As if the Prophet had said, God will protect Jerusalem against all her enemies (the Assyrian forces are there specially intended) no more regarding or fearing them, than a fierce Lion in the prime of his strength, will regard or fear a company of simple Shepherds, that shall attempt to rescue his prey from between his teeth. And because of this Lion-like power and courage of Christ so his Church, another Prophet saith, that t • e Church herself shall be as a Lion ( M • c. 5.8.) And the remnant of Jacob (that is, the true Church) shall be among the Gentiles, in the midst of many people (who are enemies and unbeliev • ng) as a Lion among the beasts of the forest, as a young Lion among the flocks of sheep; or rather (as the Margin ha • h it) Goats, who if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none can deliver. That is (as our late Annotators express it) The faithful shall be endowed with an invincible force of the Spirit of God, to overcome and overthrow the devil, the world, and all their enemies.
Thirdly, The Lion is the emblem of oppressors and tyrants. They in evil qualities resemble Lions. Thus the Apostle Paul called Nero (as it is generally conceived) a Lion. I was (saith he) delivered out of the mouth of the Lion (2 Tim. 4.15.) which though it may be taken in a general sense, for deliverance out of any great danger, yet 'tis specially and particularly applied to the person of Nero, who was cruel as a Lion, and had the Apostle Paul in his paws at that time. David speaking of the multitude of his cruel opp • essors, tells us, his soul was among Lions ( Psal. 57.4.) that is, among those that were cruel, as the next words explain it; I lie amo • g them that are set on fire (with rage and malice) even the sons of men, whose teeth are spears and arrows, and their tongue a sharp sword. The Lion is (though in some cases a clement, yet) mostly a cruel, a devouring creature. Naturalists say, he will swallow down whole gobbets of flesh without chewing; yea, that he will swallow down such a quantity at once, as will serve him two or three days without eating more. And as oppressors are shadowed out by the Lion with respect to their cruelty, so likewise with respect to their subtlety and treachery ( Psal. 10.8, 9, 10.) He (that is, the wicked enemy) sitteth in the lurking places of the Villages; in the secret places doth he murder the innocent; his eyes are privily set against the poor; He lieth in wait secretly as a Lion in his den; he lieth in wait to catch the poor, &c. Evil men have as much of the Lions craft, as of his cruelty, and both from him.
In the fourth place, The Lion in some things resembles the devil himself, the worst of all creatures. The Apostle Peter gives it expressly (1 Epist. 5.8.) Be sober, be vigilant; for your adversary the devil goeth about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour, or swallow down at a draught, as the word signifies. The devil is like a Lion in his wrath, rage, malice and subtlety, to ca • ch and ensnare poor souls, and to make a prey of them.
Lastly, The Lion is an emblem of a godly man, First, For his boldness and gracious confidence in a good cause ( Prov. 28.1.) The righteous is bold as a Lion. Secondly, For his gratefulness to them who have done him good. Some of the ancients have rela • ed strange things of the hospitality of a Lion entertaining a man, and of the gratitude of a man healing a Lion, with the consequents of both. Thus by these Scripture-resemblances, we may learn much what the Lion is, and what his qualities are. Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion?
Possibly the Lord speaks of filling the appetite of young Lions because young Lions have appetites so strong, that a small matter will not fill them. Young ones of any kind, have stronger appetites than those that are old; young Lions especially, whose constitution (say Naturalists) is very hot and dry: that being the temperament of Lions; young Lions must needs require a great proportion of food to satisfy their stomach, and find work for their quick concoction. 'It is but a while, that the milk of the Lioness will serve their turn, they must have stronger meat; young Lions are soon ready for prey; 'It is said ( Judge. 14.5.) that when Samson passed by, a young Lion roared against him, or (as the Margin reads it) a young Lion meeting him roared; and why did he roar? not so much for anger, as for hunger, desiring to make a prey of Sampson.
Wilt thou fill the appetite of the young Lion? Some translate it, Wilt thou fill the company, or troop of young Lions? that is, all the Lions that are in the den. The word signifies a company or troop, so its rendered ( Psal. 68.30.) Rebukes the company of spear-men, or of those that carry the cane. But though the word may signify a company, yet it is not so used, but where it refers (as in that Psalm ) to a company of men; and therefore, though that be a good sense, and may well be included in our Translation, which being (according to the Text) in the plural number, young Lions, takes in the whole company, how many soever they are. Wilt thou fill the company of the young Lions? canst thou give all the whelps in the kennel their dinner or supper? yet I rather adhere to those, who render the word Appetite, as we do, than to those who render it Company.
Canst thou fill the appetite (or soul) of the young Lions. The word is translated life or soul, in the 20. Chap. of this Book ( ver. 22.) as also in the 33. Chap. of this Book ( ver. 18.) 'It is likewise translated appetite (Prov. 23.2.) and when we read greedy dogs (Isa. 56.11.) we put in the Margin, strong of appetite, implying that the persons intended under that disgraceful denomination greedy dogs, were such, who though they had little appetite or stomach to their work, yet had even an insatiable appetite or stomach after their wages or reward. The appetite being so quick and lively a faculty, is expressed by the same word that signifies life or liveliness, which is the spring and original of appetite. When life ceaseth, appetite ceaseth; and the more lively any are, the quicker is their appetite.
Wilt thou fill the life or appetite of the young Lions? These young Lions are opposed to the old Lion spoken of before; and we may take them either for Lions so young, that they are not able to hunt or fetch their own prey, and therefore must have prey brought in to them; or we may take them for young Lions that have strength enough to go forth to seek their prey. So then, as the Lion before may be taken for an old Lion, for a Lion so old, that he cannot go forth to catch his prey; and the young Lions, for Lions so young, that they never had strength to go forth and catch their prey: So we may take the Text in general for old and young, whether able or unable to catch prey for themselves. Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion? or fill the appetite of the young Lions?
Hence note, First, The way how Lions live, or get their liveli-hood.
There is no work spoken of that the Lion doth to get his living by, there's nothing spoken of any service the Lion doth, all his care is for his belly, he hunts his prey: Wicked men in this are like Lions, they are like Nimrod, all for hunting, all for catching the prey. The Prophet Nahum (Chap. 2.12.) describes the oppressing power of Nineveh, by a Lion tearing in pieces enough for his Whelps, and strangling for his Lionesses, and filling his holes with prey, and his dens with ravin. Tearing and strangling, filling all with prey and ravin, is all that Lions do; not is the work of oppressors and cruel men any other in their kind, nor any whit better. Some of the Ancients speaking of the Lion, say, that when he roareth, the poor Beasts that are within hearing are so amazed and affrighted, that though they might escape by flight, yet they stand still and yield themselves up to him for a prey. Such frights are poor men often put to, by the roaring throats of merciless oppressors.
Secondly note;
God feeds not only Sheep and Lambs, but Wolves and Lions. This note gives us the chief scope of the whole con • ext, which is to show the care of God over all. It is said ( Psal. 104.21.) The young Lions roar after their prey, and seek their meat from God. It is a strange expression, that young Lions when they roar after their prey, should be said to seek their meat of God; implying, that neither their own strength nor craft could feed them without help from God. The strongest creatures left to themselves cannot help themselves. As they who fear God are fed by a special providence of God, so all creatures are fed and nou i • hed by a general providence. The Lion, though he be strong and subtle, yet cannot get his own prey; we think, a Lion might shift for himself, no, 'tis the Lord that provides for him; the young Lions seek their meat of God: Surely then, the mig • tiest of men cannot live upon themselves, as it is of God that we receive life and breath, so all things needful for the maintenance of this life. The Prophet Jeremiah gives check to all flesh ( Chap. 9.23.) Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom; let not the mighty man glory in his might. As if he had said, neither a wise man by his wisdom, nor a mighty man by his m • ght, can bring any work to an effectual issue. That is also the conclusion which the Spirit of God made, by the wisest and one of the mightest men that ever was in the world, King Solomon (Eccles. 9.11.) The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill, but time and chance happeneth to them all: though men have suitable qualities and abilities for the attaining of their ends (what suits better the winning of a race than swiftness?) yet they cannot attain them, without the power and presence of God in some kind and degree or o • her; the strong Lions would starve, did not the Lord help them to hunt their prey.
Thirdly, If we take the Lion in the first part of the Vers. for the old decreped Lion, and the young Lions for such as a e not able to go abroad for their prey, the Lord providing for Lions under both these considerations, yields us this observation.
There's a special providence of God over them that have special need. The old Lion, that once could, but now cannot the young Lions that never could hunt the prey, are yet provided for. Old Lions that are strong are taught by natural instinct to get prey for their young ones while weak; and the natural Historian tells us, that the younger Lions, which are strong, are taught by a like instinct to hunt the prey for the old ones that are weak.
Fourthly, From the latter words, wilt thou fill the appetite of the young Lions?
Note,
God, as I may say, keeps a good, a bountiful house for all his creatures; the young Lions that have such strong stomachs shall have their fill: Hence we may infer.
First, If the Lord doth thus provide for Lions young or old, one or other, then much more will he provide, and hunt the prey for his faithful people. David (Psal. 34.10.) gives us the Lord's word for it, The young Lions do lack and suffer hunger, but they that seek the Lord shall not want any good thing. That is, the young Lions may lack, or though the young Lions should lack and suffer hunger, yet they that seek and serve the Lord shall not. Lions have a good assurance that they shall not lack, but the servants of God have a far better assurance that they shall not. Doth God take care for Oxen? was the Apostles question (1 Cor. 9.9.) or saith he it altogether for our sakes; for our sakes (speaking of Gospel Ministers) no doubt this is written, (ver. 10.) As if he had said, if the Lord did not give that law to the Jews, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Ox that treadeth out the corn altogether for our sakes, yet questionless he gave it chiefly for our sakes, and had a far greater respect to us in making that law than to Oxen. Thus from the text and point in hand, I may say, Doth God take care for Lions? Surely, he hath caused this to be written, that we may know, he will much more take care of his sheep, of all that fear him and call upon his name. A Lion may come into a starving condition, but those that fear God shall not. Lions, though they are very strong & subtle cannot always get their prey, but the Lord hath promised to minister to his people, at least a supply of their necessities; as David speaks, I have been young, and now am old; yet have I not seen the righteous forsaken, nor his seed begging bread (Psal. 37.25.)
Secondly, Doth the Lord provide to satisfaction for the young Lions? doth he fill their natural appetite? then surely, he will p • ovide for the satisfying of his people in spiritual things ( Luke 1.53.) He filleth the hungry with good things. Who are the hungry? doubtless, he the holy Virginmeant the spiritually hung • y. And what are the good things he fills them with? doubtless, spiritual good things; they shall have not only some tastes of these good things, but their fill of them; he fills the hungry with good things. (Psal. 81.10.) Open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it. God hath much respect to fill us with outward good things; but much more to fill us with spi • i • ual good things, open thy mouth wide, and raise up thy desires after the things of heaven, growth in grace, increase in faith and love, in patience and holiness, and I will fill it. He that fills the appetite of the young Lions with natural food, will fill the appetite of his Servants with spiritual food, which is best of all; they shall be abundantly satisfied with the goodness of his house, and he will make them drink of the river of his pleasures: (Psal. 36.8.) He that fills the appetite of the young Lions, will not send hungry souls away emp • y. We may rest in much assurance that God will deal well with us, both for soul and body, while he questions Job whether he would do that which himself only doth; Wilt thou hunt the prey for the Lion? or f • ll the appetite of the young Lions?
Vers. 40. When they couch in their dens, and abide in the covert to lie in wait.
This Verse gives a further description of the Lion, whether young or old. Before we had them hunting abroad in the fields, here we have them couching in their dens, and abiding in their covert.
This couching or bowing down in their dens, may be upon a three-fold account, and so there is a three-fold interpretation of the words.
First, Some taking the Lion for the old Lion and the young Lions for such as are very young, interpret this couching as proceeding from weakness; they couch in their dens, as not being able to go abroad.
Secondly, Others say, they c • uch in their dens only for rest and ease, having tired themselves in hunting for their prey.
Thirdly, That they couch in their dens upon design to catch their prey, thus the latter part of the Verse seems to carry it; where 'tis said, they lie in wait. So then, this couching in their dens, is either from necessity, as not being able to go forth; or it is a couching in policy, which I rather pitch upon.
As if they were asleep, as if they minded nothing but their ease; yet even then they are busily minding how to catch their prey. As if the Lord had said, Hast thou (O Job) taught the Lion that art and cunning, to lie couchant in his den, that he may steal upon beasts passant, and surprise them unawares. They couch in their dens,
The word rendered Covert signifieth a Tabernacle or Tent in which men abode for a time, and is therefore here opposed (as some conceive) to the Lions dens or houses spoken of in the beginning of the verse. Beasts (say they) are aware of Lions dens, and so avoid them; but they may pass unawares by the coverts and thickets, where they lie in ambush. But I suppose we need not be thus critical in distinguishing between dens and coverts, both words may signify the same place and thing; or at least in both places Lions do the same thing, Lye in wait. It is said of the Lord himself ( Jerem. 25.38.) he hath forsaken his covert as a Lion. The meaning of the Prophet was to show the Lord's purpose to come forth, and tear and rend his enemies by some sore judgment, as a young Lion that rangeth about for his prey. We read a little before (at the 34th verse) of the howling of the shepherds, that is, of the rulers and governors, and of the cry of the principal of the flock, that is, of the wealthiest among the people. When the Lion came forth of his covert, there was a howling and a cry made; why so? the Lion came forth to destroy both sheep and shepherds. Thus the Lord comes forth, even as a young Lion, full of wrath and fury to destroy the wicked: He is sometimes like a Lion couching in his den, and abiding in his covert, but he doth it as the Lion,
This expression may have a twofold allusion. First, To Fowlers and Hunters, who (in some cases) keep out of sight, that they may with the more advantage take birds or beasts in their sna • es and toils; For in vain (saith Solomon, Prov. 1.17.) the net is spread in the sight of any bird. Secondly, To Soldiers, who lie in ambush to surprise their enemy. Thus do Lions; They (saith the Text) couch in their dens, and abide in the covert to lie in wait. Here,
First, Taking that interpretation of the words, which supposeth, the Lion lying down in his den through age and weakness,
Observe,
The Lion is the strongest among beasts, yet he cannot always range in the fields and hunt for prey, he must come to his den, and keep house there. 'It is so with men, how strong soever they have been, yet old age necessitates them at last to keep house and home. All must submit to time, and yield to those infirmities, which old age inevitably bring upon us. Time is called, The eater of things; 'It is so also of persons, that great eater will eat out the strength of the eater himself, that is, the Lion, as Sampson called him in his riddle proposed to the Philistines (Judge. 14.14.) Time reduceth our strength to weakness, our life to death. Time confines us first to our chambers, then to our beds, and then to our graves. The Lion must give over his hunting and couch in his den.
Secondly, Taking the Lion as politically abiding in covert, and waiting for his prey;
Observe,
There are creatures of little strength which have much craft, others have little craft but much strength, in some both meet together; and among them we may number the Lion, he is a crafty one as well as a strong one; he hath his covert, there he waits for his prey. We may parallel men with beasts in this regard; among them some are strong but not crafty, others are crafty but not strong, and not a few are both. Such David compared to a Lion ( Psal. 10.4, 8, 9.) The wicked through the pride of his countenance will not seek after God: What will he seek after then? the 8th. and 9th. verses tell us, He sitteth in the lurking places of the villages, in the secret places doth he murder the innocent, his eyes are privily set against the poor, he lieth in wait secretly, as a Lion in his den, he lieth in wait to catch the poor, he doth catch the poor when he draweth him into his net: He croucheth and humbleth himself, that the poor may fall by his strong ones. Thus the subtle practices of a wicked man are set forth, by the subtlety of the Lion. He coucheth and croucheth, he waits for the innocent, he draws him into his net; he first entangles him, and then devours him. David gives a like description of evil men in another place ( Psal. 17.11, 12.) They have now compassed us in our steps, they have set their eyes bowing down to the earth; like as a Lion that is greedy of his prey, and as it were a young Lion lurking in secret places. These Scriptures plainly show the natural subtlety of the Lion, waiting in his covert that he may do mischief unawares; and that in this piece of mischievous policy wicked men are not behind him, they show as plainly.
Thirdly, Whereas in the former verse the Lion is said to hunt his prey in the field, and this in to abide in his covert to lie in wait for it;
Observe;
We say, of craft or power, 'tis hard to say which is most dangerous or undesirable in an enemy. Where these two meet, where craft & power, ability and subtlety are joined, what will they not do? We may say of men, in whom these are united, as the Lord said concerning the men of the new world, soon after the Flood, who were united in heart and tongue (the people are one, and they have all one language) nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do (Gen. 11.6.) The devil is always like a Lion, both strong and subtle: He is so strong, that he sometimes hunts his prey (as I may say) in open field, and overcomes by fine force. He is so crafty, that at other times he knows 'tis best for him to abide in his covert, and lie in wait to catch souls. He goeth about like a roaring Lion (saith the Apostle Peter, 1 Epist. 5.8.) but he is craftier than to roar always like a Lion, when he goeth about seeking whom he may devour; he often fawns and flatters; he useth his wits, and puts tricks upon poor souls whom he would devour. We (saith the Apostle, 2 Cor. 2.) are not ignorant of his devices. Christ adviseth all his Disciples to join the wisdom of the Serpent, with the innocence of the Dove; subtlety and honesty, craft and innocence, working together, work well, or make good work: But where there is the strength and craft of a Lion, without a dove-like integrity, what sad work do men make? Godly men, or men truly fearing God, sometimes have the wisdom of the serpent, together with their dove-like innocence; and when to both the former, the Lions strength is joined, what good may they not do? they may do (as we say) a world of good in an evil world.
Fourthly, In that the Lion coucheth in his den, and retireth sometimes to his covert; we may take notice of the good providence of God towards man. God hath ordered it, that the Lion coucheth all day in his den, and is quiet, that men may go out quietly to their labor. The Psalmist commends the providence of God in this ( Psal. 104.20, 21, 22.) Thou makest darkness, and it is night, wherein all the beasts of the Forest do creep forth: the young Lions roar after their prey, and seek their meat from God. Thus they are roaring and raging for their prey all night; but how is it with them, or what do they in the day? The next words tell us, The Sun riseth, they gather themselves together, and lay them down in their dens. (Then it follows) Man goeth forth to his work, and to his labor until the evening. Such is the care of God, that he clears fields and Countries of these ravenous beasts, that man may go safely to his work, and not be troubled. When the Lion comes forth in the day, 'tis usually to execute some judgment of God; witness that of the Prophet, who going out of God's way, God told him by another Prophet, a Lion shall meet thee and tear thee; and so it came to pass, a Lion met him, and executed the judgment of God upon him, because he went beyond the command he had received from God (1 King. 13.24.) We read also, that God sent Lions to vex the people continually, when they fell to idolatry and false worship (2 King. 17.26.) It was of the Lord that Lions which used to keep their covert in the day time, were so bold as to come by day to their houses and destroy them. And such is the mighty power of God, that though hungry Lions are altogether for prey, yet God can stop their mouths, and check their appetite ( Dan. 6.8.) When Daniel was cast into the Lions den, amongst a company of hungry Lions, yet not one touched him, but were as meek to him as so many lambs; whereas no sooner were his enemies and accusers let down into that den, but they brake their bones before they came to the ground. Thus much of the Lion, a King among the beasts of the earth. The Lord's next question concerns the Raven, none of the best, if not one of the worst among the birds of the Air.
Vers. 41. Who provideth for the Raven his food? When his young ones cry unto God, they wander for lack of meat.
As the Lion is a devourer among beasts, so is the Raven among birds. The Lion (as was said) is so curious, that he will not feed upon a carcase in the way, but the Raven feeds upon any dead or corrupted body; and that is the reason why in many great Cities there's a Law or custom that Raven sneer them, shall not be shot at nor terrified, because they eat up the filth and carrion, which might infect the air, and breed pestilential diseases.
Now the Lord puts the question, Who provideth for the Raven? As if he had said, I provide not only for the Kingly Lion, but for the carrion-eating Raven. The Lord made provision of food for Lions and Ravens, for all sorts of beasts, and birds, and creeping things, in the work of Creation; and in his works of providence, he makes all things ready, and brings them to hand for their use and sustentation: He, as it were, dresseth and disheth out meat for all his creatures, and then sets it before them, that they may eat and be satisfied.
The Hebrew word rendered provideth, hath two significations, which wonderfully set forth the care of God towards this creature: First, the certainty of their provision, for the word signifies to establish; as if the Lord did give them a necessary, settled, or constant diet. Secondly, It notes the suitableness and pleasingness of their food to their nature and constitution, yea, to their gust and appetite; as if the Lord fitted their food, as we say, to their tooth or palate, and gave them not only meat, but savoury meat to them (like that which Isaac bespake of his son Esau ) such as they love; for though the food of Ravens be unpleasant to us, yet it is pleasing and toothsom and savoury to them. What the Lord p • ovides for Ravens, is to them dainties and delicacies; carrion is so to them, because 'tis suitable to their nature, & such as their stomach likes very well. The suitableness of any food to our taste and palate, makes it delightful to us: What makes sin, which is as odious as a carrion or corrupt thing to God and good men, pleasant to carnal and wicked men, but the suitableness of it to their nature? they can feed upon sin as heartily and hungrily, as a Raven doth upon a putrefied carcase. And what's the reason that the ways of God are so pleasant to a godly man? is it not because his heart is made (through grace) suitable to them? To do the will of God is meat and drink to a godly man; but his soul being in a right frame) can no more delightfully do, anything that is sinfully evil, than he can delight to feed bodily upon putrifaction or poison.
Who provideth his food
The Hebrew word for a Raven signifies bl • ckness, darkness, or the evening. The Raven is the true Black-bird, a dark-coloured creature; black as a Raven, is the Scripture language for perfect blackness. The Greek word for a Raven, intimates her hoarse, harsh and unpleasant cry, or croaking. As the coat of the Raven is eminent for a beautiful blackness, so his note is well known by his unpleasant and jarring hoarsness. The note of the Crow or Raven, sounds like the Latin, Cras, cras; in English, To morrow, tomorrow, or the day to come. And hence men, who when called to present repentance and forsaking of their sins, desire time, and say, tomorrow, tomorrow, are said to resemble Crows and Ravens, whose only song is cras, cras. 'It is reported concerning Athanasius, that walking in the streets of a Heathenish or Gentile City, a Raven slew over his head and crooked; the Heathens that stood by, laughed and smiled to see the Raven fly and croak so near him; and they asked, What said the Raven to thee? He answered, The Raven cried, tomorrow, tomorrow; for tomorrow the Emperor will send out such an Edict or Decree, as will put a stop to your superstitious observation of Heathenish Feasts: And though he knew nothing of the Emperors purpose at that time, to put forth such a decree, yet the next day there came a command from the Emperor, that they should no more observe them: And then the Heathens cried out against Athanasius, and said that he was a Witch.
Further, The Raven is so called in our language, from her ravening; her name speaks her nature, as Nabal's did his (1 Sam. 25.25.) yet even Ravens are under the Lord's inspection. Who provideth for the Raven his food?
Hence note;
The Lord doth not give Job an instance of his care in the people of Israel, for whom he provided a long time in Egypt, and whom he fed forty years in the wilderness; nor in Elias, fed by Ravens, but in his feeding Ravens; nor among fowls, doth he instance in the Hawk or Falcon, which are highly prized and fed by Princes; nor in the sweet singing Nightingale, or such like musical pretty birds, which men keep choicely and much delight in; but in that hateful and malicious bird, the croaking Raven, whom no man values, but as she eats up the carrion which might annoy him. Behold then, and wonder at the providence and kindness of God, that he should provide food for the Raven, a creature of so dismal a hue, and of so untuneable a tone, a creature that is so odious to most men, and ominous to some. There is a great providence of God seen, in providing for the Ant or Pismire, who gathers her meat in Summer ( Prov. 6.8.) but a greater in the Raven, who though he forgets, or is careless to provide for himself, yet God provides and layeth up for him. One would think the Lord should say of Ravens, let them shift for themselves or perish; no, the Lord God doth not despise any work of his hands; the Raven hath his being from God, and therefore the Raven shall be provided for by him; not only the fair innocent Dove, but the ugly Raven hath his meat from God. As the Lord feeds not only Doves, but Ravens, in kind, so he feeds not only Doves, but Ravens, in a figure; that is, he feeds not only dove-like or innocent men, but raven-like or wicked men. ( Mat. 5.45.) He causeth his Sun to rise on the evil and on the good, & sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust: Thus he feeds Ravens in the likeness of men. Such men whose minds feed upon carrion, the Lord feeds their bodies with excellent dainties, they fare deliciously every day, as the rich Glutton is said to do, who was but a Raven. The Lord, I say, doth not only provide for his better and more excellent ones, but he provides for the bad, for the evil, for the wicked; such an indulgent father and provider is God towards all his creatures. We find this reported to the praise of God ( Psal. 104.10, 11.) He sendeth the Springs into the valleys, which run among the Hills; they give drink to every beast of the field; the wild Asses quench their thirst. And again ( Psal. 145.15, 16.) The eyes of all wait upon (or look unto) thee, and thou givest them their meat in due season: thou openest thy hand, and satisfiest the desire (that is, the hunger and thirst) of every living thing. He that gives life to all, upholds the lives of all. As it shows the great power of God, that he hath made some living creatures (the Angels and souls of men) which need no mear, so it is a very great glory that he provides meat for all that • eed it. God hath a great household, and he keeps a plentiful house; the meanest of his household have food convenient for them.
Now, Doth the Lord provide a table for the Ravens? Remember Christ • Inference from it; Then much more will he provide a Table for his children who fear him, and trust upon him. Behold, (saith Christ, Mat. 6.26.) the fowls of the air; for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns, yet your heavenly father feedeth them: Are ye not much better than they? And that which Christ spake in general there concerning the fowls of the air, he in the 12th of Luke (ver. 24.) spake particularly of the Raven; Co • sider the Ravens, for they neither sow nor reap, &c. and God feedeth them; how much more are ye better (as if the Lord had said, than the fowls?) Ye are much better than the best of fowls; then how much better than the worst, the Ravens? and be ye assured, that as much as ye are better than the Ravens, by so much is my care for you, greater than for the Ravens. As God is the Savior of all, especially of those that believe (1 Tim. 4.10.) so he is a provider for all, but especially for those that believe. The Lord, who alike cares for all, doth not care for all ali • e; there would be much inequality in that equality. As creatures vary in their kinds and degrees, so the Lord (who is a God of judgment) varies both the kind and degree of his care towards the creature. Therefore we may conclude; Doth God put forth any kind or degree of care for Ravens? doubtless then he will take care of his beloved children and faithful servants.
There's no temptation with which the children of God are mo • e oppressed, than with this; What they shall eat? and what they shall drink? and wherewithal shall they and theirs be clothed? n • r doth anything cast them upon more dangerous rocks than these distrustful queries; How shall we live? and who shall provide for us, especially in a hard and dear year? But may we not s • an • amazed to hear such queries proceed out of their mouths, who have he • d of this word which once proceeded out of Ch ists mouth, That God feedeth the Ravens? who believing that, can but beli • ve that God will feed him! Nor doth the Lord provide for and feed the old Raven only, but his young ones also. As it follows,
The Raven in the former part of the ve • se, is the old one that hath young ones. How can that feed the you •• , that cannot feed himself, but by God's p • oviding? As if the Lord had said, As it is not by thy providence, O Job, but by mine, that the old Ravens are fed; so that the young ones being early forsaken of the old, and wanting skill to shift for them selves, wandering here and there, have their cries (which nature hath taught them to put up to Go • in their necessity) heard and answered with supply of food.
The Hebrew is, When his children cry unto God; children are properly the young ones of men, yet the young ones of any c • eature may be called children.
The word rendered to cry, notes a very strong cry for help for food. The young ones of the Raven being pinched with hunger, make a loud confused cry for food; but to whom do they cry? the Text saith, They cry
No creature can properly be said to cry unto God, but the rational creature; and there's none among the rational creatures that indeed cry unto God, but those that have faith: How then is it said, The Ravens young ones cry unto God?
I answer, First, They are said to cry to God, because man hears them not, or if he do, he regards them not; what man regards the cry of a young Raven? therefore they cry to God if to any, who alone takes notice of their cry.
S • condly, They cry to God, not properly, but equivalently; they cannot be imagined to make any formal or direct prayers to God in their necessities, but their necessities which force them to cry, have the force of a cry, or of a prayer unto God.
Thirdly, They may be said to cry unto God, because God takes or interprets their cry when hungry, as a prayer to himself: And God may be said to hear their cry, because he provides for them, and helps them, as he doth those who put up powerful prayers to him. There is in all creatures a desire of that which is needful for them, or proper to them, and when that is wanting they cry, that is, make some signification of their want. And as all young ones are apt to cry (that being all they can do) for food; so the Scripture, as here, so elsewhere represents young Ravens crying more than other creatures ( Psal. 147.9.) He giveth to the beast his food, and to the young Ravens which cry. The beasts are not said to cry for food when God gives it them, but the young Ravens are. Crying seems to be the property of young Ravens, as if the least lack of food made them cry.
But how come young Ravens to be in such want of food, that they should cry for it? and when they cry, why are they not said to cry to their parents (if I may so speak) or to the old ones, but to God for meat? In answer to these queries;
First, Some Naturalists say, the Raven is a forgetful creature, and leaves her young ones altogether unprovided of food, and therefore (as the last resort of all helpless ones) they are supposed to cry unto God.
Secondly, Say others, the Raven is not only a forgetful, but an unnatu • all creatu • e. Ravens have not those bowels of natural compassion to their young ones, which other creatures have, who will presently bestir themselves to get food for their young ones; therefore some say, that their young ones, as it were, cry to God of the impiety and unnaturalness of the old ones, in not providing for them, and in a manner accuse them for it. The Apostle saith, He that provides not for those of his own house, hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. A beast will provide for his own, and most birds provide for their young, but the Raven provides not for his own young ones; and therefore his young ones are brought in, as crying or complaining to the Lord of their pa • ents unnatural astorgy, or want of pity: And indeed paren • s, who do not provide for their own house, may justly be put among the Ravens. Remember (by the way) the power of God, who could make Ravens feed Elias, and be kind to him (1 King. 17.16.) though naturally they are cruel to their own kind, and refuse to feed their young ones.
Thirdly, There's another reason given by Naturalists, why Ravens feed not their young ones: For when the Raven hath hatched her young, they look whitish, which the old ones cannot abide, being themselves black, and therefore the Raven forbears to feed his young ones for seven days (saith my Author) that is, till their feathers begin to grow black, whereby he knows them to be his own, being loath to bring up a spurious brood; so that all this time of their estrangement and forbearance, the Lord feeds their young ones, some say, with a dew from heaven, or with little flies (say others) bred out of their dung. But I shall not stay upon these things, especially considering that they who professedly write of the nature and manners, both of beasts & birds, are very silent, as to any such observations concerning the Raven; yet because so grave an Author as is noted in the Margin insists upon this latter reason, take this Note from it.
A Raven doth not love her young, till she perceives them in her own likeness. It is said also of the Eagle, that when her young are first hatched, she will not own them for hers, till having held them up to the Sun, she finds they out-face it; & here 'tis said, the Raven will not own her young till they are black. Now, if it be thus in nature, if it be a truth, that the Raven is not delighted in her young till they grow black, 'tis doubtless true in spirituals, like to like. God loves none with delight, but holy and pure ones, and the more holy and pure any are, the more he loves them; the reason is, because himself is altogether infinitely pure and holy. Where God sees most of his own image, which is pu • ity and holiness, there he loves most, and for such he will certainly provide, such he will surely feed.
But, which way soever the young ones of the Raven come to want food, whether it be through the forgetfulness, or the unnaturalness of the old Raven, or because they are hatchr white, upon what account soever (I say) it is, that they come to want food, the Text saith they are in such want, that they cry to God, yea, that
This is a further evidence of their distress, they cry when they are in their nest, and there God provides for them; and when they wander (from their nest) for lack of meat, God feeds them too. Some restrain this wandering to a narrow compass, and say, 'tis only in their nest, where they struggle and are unquiet for want of meat; but this their wandering for want of meat, may be conceived to be out of the nest, rather than in it; for a nest being a strait place, it cannot be congruously said, that the young ones wander while they are in it. And therefore, which clears the matter sufficiently, Naturalists tell us, That when the Raven hath fed his young in the nest, till they are well fledged and able to fly abroad, then he thrusts them out of the nest, and will not let them abide there, but puts them to get their own living. Now when these young ones are upon their first flight from their nest, and are little acquainted with means how to help themselves with food, then the Lord provides food for them. 'It is said by credible Authorities, that the Raven is marvelous strict and severe in this; for as soon as his young ones are able to provide for themselves, he will not fetch anymore food for them; yea, some affirm, the old ones will not suffer them to stay in the same Country where they were bred; and if so, then they must needs wander. We say proverbially, Need makes the old wife trot; we may say, and The young ones too. It hath been, and possibly is, the practice of some parents towards their children, who as soon as they can shift for themselves, and are fit in any competency to get their bread, they turn them out of doors, as the Raven doth his young ones out of the nest. Now saith the Lord in the Text, When the young ones of the Raven are at this pinch, that they are turned off, and wander for lack of meat, who then provides for them? do not I the Lord? do not I who provide for the old Raven, provide for his young ones, both while they abide in the nest, and when they wander for lack of meat?
Hence note first, (which was in part touched before.)
As some deny providence, so others restrain it to greater matters, or more eminent creatures, as if it were true of Jehovah, which Heathens said of their Idol Jupiter; He is not at leisure to mind little things. But the Lord Jehovah disdains not to look after the least things, he looks into birds nests, to see they want nothing, or to supply their wants. Young Ravens are inconsiderable creatures, yet the Lord remembers and considers them. And if God take care of young Ravens, then I may again infer, he will much more take care of their young ones or children, who are themselves heirs of the promise, the spiritual seed of Abraham.
Secondly, in that young Ravens are here said to cry unto God,
Observe;
The worst of men, yea, the very beasts will pray in their kind, or after their manner, when they are pinched with extremities, either of want or fear. The Heathen Mariners in Jonah, being greatly distressed, cried everyone to his god. There may be a cry of prayer to God in the mouth; where there is no grace in the heart. The Apostle saith, Rom. 10. Whosoever calleth upon the name of the Lord shall be saved; but then it must be in faith, for so it follows there, How shall they call on him on whom they have not believed? Many call upon God, that shall not be saved ( Psal. 18.41.) They cried, but their was none to save them, even to the Lord, but he answered them not. The cry of graceless men is seldomer heard than the cry of reasonless beasts or birds. Hence,
Thirdly, Note;
He hears the cry of beasts, and he hears the cry of Ravens. Though wicked men stop their ears, and will not hear his commands, yet he sometimes hears their cries in outward troubles, and doth them good many ways.
Hence also we may infer;
If he hears the croaking cry of young Ravens, who have no intention to pray to him, how much more will he hear the believing cry, the deep groans and sighs of Saints, who set their faces purposely to pray unto him, and seek his face. This poor man cried (a man rich in grace doubtless he was) and the Lord heard him, and saved him out of all his troubles.
Fourthly, Note;
When you are in want, whither soever you go, if you go not to God, you go to a wrong door: The Ravens tell you whither to go when you are in want; it is not to this or that creature, to this or that means, to this friend or that, but you must go to God for help; and if we have help anywhere else, and not in God, our help is worse than our distress. Wants are an evil of affliction, but the help we get out of wants in any way, with neglect of God, is an evil of sin, therefore cry to God. The Lions are said to seek their meat from God, and here the Ravens are said to cry unto God; the young Lions and the Ravens, will condemn those, who in their distresses do not cry to God the fountain, but run to broken cisterns. It was the sin of that good King Asa, that in his disease he sought not to God, but to the Physicians (2 Chron. 16.12.) not that Asa had cast off prayer to God, or did not at all seek unto him (it cannot be that so good a man as the Scripture reports him, should so much at once forget God and himself) but the meaning is, he was very cold and negligent in calling upon God for help, and over confident of help by his Physicians.
Lastly, consider, God provides for the young Ravens, when the old ones leave them, or put them out of their nest.
Hence note;
When they whose duty it is to take care of us, prove unnatural, like the Raven to his young ones, then God will take care of us. When my father and mother forsook me (saith David, Psal. 27.9, 10.) then the Lord took me up. The Lord who seeds outcast Ravens, will give entertainment to his outcast servants. ( Psal. 68.5.) A father of the fatherless, and a judge of the widows, is God in his holy habitation. They that are fatherless by their parents deserting of them, or fatherless by the decease of their parents, God (they committing themselves to him) will be a father unto them, he will do the office of a father to them, that is, provide for them. Thus much of the Lion, chief among the beasts of the earth, and of the Raven, one of the worst among the fowls of the Air. The wisdom of God hath chosen out these creatures, that in testifying his care of them, he might convince Job, that he had not cast off the care of him, but would provide for him, possibly in unknown ways of providence, as he did for the Lions and the Ravens.
JOB, Chap. 39. Vers. 1, 2, 3, 4.
1.
Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rock bring forth, or canst thou mark when the hinds do Calve?
2.
Canst thou number the mouths that they fulfill? or knowest thou the time when they bring forth?
3.
They bow themselves, they bring forth their young ones, they cast out their sorrows.
4.
Their young ones are in good liking, they grow up with corn: they go forth, and return not unto them.
IN the former context, which was the close of the 38th Chap. The Lord gave Job an account of his care in providing food for the Lion, and the young Lions; for the Raven and his young ones. In this context and Chapter the Lord proceeds to show his care and providence concerning both the production and sustentation of several other creatures, of whom men take no care nor make any provision for at all. The wild Goats and the Hind, the wild Ass and the Unicorn.
There are some creatures which live under man's inspection, and are provided for by him, being tame and serviceable; there are others which have no commerce (as I may say) with man, but are savage, living at la • ge in the fields and for • ests, upon hills and mountains, yet these are preserved in thei • generations and increase, as well as those which are the under the eye and daily care of man. The wild Goats are preserved as well as the sheep, and the Hinds of the Forest as well as the Calves of the Stall. In and by all these examples the Lord would have Job take special notice, that his providence extendeth both to the feeding or nourishing of all kinds of creatures, as also to their births and bringing forth, for the preservation of their several kinds.
So then, the providence of God is here magnified in continuing and multiplying several sorts of four footed beasts of the earth and winged fowls of the air; some of which being tame are kept by the care of man; others being wild and avoiding the presence of man (he scarce knowing the nature of them, nor having any service by them) are perpetuated in their kinds by the only care of God.
In these four verses there are two things in general, about which the Lord holds forth his care of these savage creatures. First, About the bringing forth of their young ones. Secondly, About the bringing up of their young ones. The bringing forth of their young ones, we have in the three first verses of this Chapter; the bringing up of their young ones, we have in the 4th verse.
About the bringing forth of their young ones the Text speaks two things. First, The season of it; and secondly, The painful manner of it.
The season of it in the two first Verses. Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rock bring forth? (verse 1.) and then of the hinds ( ver. 2.) Canst thou number the months that they fulfill?
The painful manner of bringing forth their young is expressed at the 3d verse, They bow down themselves, they bring forth their young ones, they cast out their sorrows.
The bringing up and growth of their young ones is given ( ver. 4.) Their young ones are in good liking, they grow up with corn, &c. Thus we have the general scope and parts of this context. I shall now deal with the particulars.
Vers. 1. Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rock bring forth?
The first question concerns the wild Goats, and the season of their bringing forth.
These words intend more than a bare naked knowledge of the time, they take in the knowledge of the whole disposal or administration of God, concerning the wild Goats in their bringing forth.
Knowest thou the time? The word rendered time, signifies the opportune time, the fit time, the appointed time; knowest thou the time or that time,
What these Goats here called wild Goats, and wild Goats of the rock, are, is commonly known. The word which we render wild Goats, signifies in the Hebrew ascending or clambering, because Goats are clambering creatures, getting up the steepest rocks, and ascending the height of hills and mountains, which they do many times exceeding dangerously, seeming rather to hang by their feet than to go upon them. Thus the old Poet fancied them, when he said, You may see the wild Goat hanging upon the rock, you may hope she will tumble down presently; But she deceives the hunter and his hounds; though she seems to hang uncertainly, yet she keeps her footing steadily. The Latins have a word signifying wild Goats, which critics say, comes from another latin word signifying a bird or flying fowl, because Goats may be said rather to fly than go upon those craggy places, or rather to use wings than feet. Such are the creatures here called wild Goats, and that with an addition, wild Goats
Because they specially delight in rocky places, or because they breed and bring forth in rocks. It is said (1 Sam. 24.2.) that Saul in his pursuit of David, came with a select army of three thousand men, to seek him and his men upon the rocks of the wild goats; which Scripture fitly answers this which calls them wild Goats of the rock. Saul did not seek David only in the plains and valleys, where flocks of sheep feed; but upon the craggy rocks and precipices, where wild Goats take up their quarters or use to feed. This shown his implacable rage, and revengeful spirit against an innocent person, that rather than not take him and have his will on him, he would undertake an expedition, not only tedious but very hazardous to himself and his army. Wrathful men will not only not spare others, but not themselves. But to the Text, Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rock
The word translated bring forth signifies pain and sorrow. There is so much pain in bringing forth, that bringing forth and pain may well be signified by one word. The pains of the wild Goats in bringing forth here implied, are expressly spoken of at the third Verse.
But why did the Lord inquire of Job here, whether he knew the time, the exact time of their bringing forth? is that a secret? I answer, doubtless it is a secret, and such a secret as few are acquainted with. Wild Goats come little under the eye or sight of men in that work; they bringing forth upon inaccessable place • , c • aggy rocks and mountains, men cannot without much difficulty reach that piece of knowledge. And therefore the Lord might well ask of Job, Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rock bring forth? I may say also, the Lord puts this familiar question to Job, that he might the more awaken him into the consideration of his own weakness, and utter inability to find out the secret of his other works. As if the Lord had said, thou canst not discover so much as the birth of the wild Goats, how then canst thou find out the births of my wonderful providences? My providences bring forth wonderful births, and much more unknowable by thee than the birth and bringing forth of the wild Goats. Thus the Lord would check his curiosity; he who was unable to give him an account concerning the state of those poor creatures, must not think himself able to pry into the great and unsearchable works of God, in the amazing products of his providence towards the children of men.
Before I pass from these words it will not be unprofitable to mind the Reader, how (as one of the Ancients hath hinted) we may moralize or spiritualize this Text, there being much of the disposition or condition of a godly man, especially of a faithful Teacher, typed or fairly represented in the nature and qualities of these wild Goats.
First, As these wild Goats seek both their food and rest, their repast and refuge in rocks; So the godly abide and dwell in the rock, that is, in the Lord Jesus Christ, they look to him alone both for refuge and refreshing, both for comfort and safety while they are in this world. Christ is the rock upon which the Church is built ( Mat. 16.18.) And as the state of the true Church in general, so of every true believer, is built upon this immovable rock the Lord Jesus Christ.
Secondly, As the rocks, so the mountains are much desired by the wild Goats ( Psal. 104.18.) The high hills are a refuge for the wild Goats. Thus David was eying the hills for help ( Psal. 121.1.) I will lift up mine eyes to the hills, from whence cometh my help. What were these hills? Surely, neither the material nor metaphorical hills of this world, of which latter the people of God spake ( Jerem. 3.23.) disclamingly, Truly in vain is salvation hoped for from the hills, and from the multitude of mountains, that is, from the greatest power of man or men. What the hills were to which David lifted up his eyes for help, himself tells us at the second verse of that Psalm, My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth. As the affections of a godly man are set upon the things above, not upon things below ( Col. 3.2.) so his confidences are set upon God who is above, not upon men here below.
Thirdly, These wild Goats are very agil & active creatures, much in motion, full of life, full of spirits; and so they resemble a godly man, he is a man of motion, of spiritual motion; and he desires his motions and speed may be more and more speedy in the ways of God. As David resolved to run the ways of God's commandments, when God should please to enlarge his heart; so doubtless he prayed, that God would enlarge his heart to run those ways. And how often did he pray for quickening grace and liveliness, that being delivered from a slow, dull, flegmatique spirit, he might be active and full of holy fire about the things, and for the things of God.
Fourthly, Wild Goats of the rocks, in those countries where they abound, are much pursued and di • quieted by hunts-men, as that passage which I before quoted from a Heathen Poet intimates; so good men, the best of men are often hunted and disturbed in this world, there are hunters of men, as well as hunters of beasts. Nimrod was a mighty hunter ( Gen. 10.9.) he was a hunter of men. Saul hunted David even as a wild Goat on the rocks, or as a Partridg on the mountains.
Fifthly, They who hunt the wild Goats are at a very dangerous pleasure, they often fall upon the rocks, and sometimes fall from the rocks. Is it not so with those who without cause pursue good men? have they not a dangerous service of it? get they not many a fall? The wicked (saith David, Psal. 37.12, 13.) plotteth, or (as the Margin hath it) practiseth against the righteous, he gnasheth upon him with his teeth. But shall it go well with him who doth this evil? The next words answer, The Lord shall laugh at him, for he seeth that his day is coming. What day? surely a black day, even the day of his destruction; which is yet further confirmed in the 14. and 15. verses of the same P • alm. The wicked have drawn out the sword, and have bent their bow to cast down the poor and needy, and to slay such as be of upright conversation, or the upright of way. But shall this end well with them? or shall it be well with them in the end? The next words tell us what their end shall be, even this, which is a dreadful end, Their sword shall enter into their own heart, and their bows shall be broken.
Sixthly, 'It is observed of these wild Goats, that when they seem to be very near falling from the rock and high places, yet they fall not, and that though they fall they take little or no hurt at all. Some say they have a natural art to save themselves, they know how to fall upon their feet, and so escape without harm. This also is applicable to the case of godly men, they are often near falling, yet they do not fall, and when they fall, they take no hurt; they have a divine art to preserve themselves; and 'tis a truth, that though they do receive hurt in the flesh, yet their spirit or better part takes no hurt. Though a good man fall (into affliction or temptation) he shall not (saith David, Psal. 37.24.) be utterly cast down, for the Lord upholdeth him with his hand. Yea, though he falleth (saith Solomon, Prov. 24.16.) seven times (that is, often, into affliction, 'tis true also of his falling into sin) yet he riseth again, out of affliction by deliverance, out of sin by repentance. With respect to the former, the Church warned her insulting enemy ( Mich. 7.8.) Rejoice not against me O mine enemy; when I fall, I shall arise. Babylon shall fall and rise no more; but though Zion may fall, yet she shall assuredly rise again.
Lastly, It is said of the wild Goats, that when they receive hurt, they, by a natural instinct, seek out the herb Betany, growing among the rocks and upon mountains, which gives a present and perfect cure to their bruises or hurts. Thus when good men receive hurt in and from the evil world, they have some herb or other, some comfort or other for their cure; they go to the Word of God, to the Scriptures, there they find Medicine for all their sicknesses, Betany for all thei • bruises, and a Salve for every sore. Thus we may spiritualize our meditations upon these wild creatures the Goats of the rocks, in allusion to the state of godly men in this life. Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rock bring forth?
Here's another sort of wild ones, the Hind. Canst thou mark? the word imports the most strict and heedful marking; 'It is used by Jacob (Gen. 37.11.) when Joseph had told his dream, his Brethren envied him, but his Father observed the saying, that is, he marked what his Son had said. The word is often used to note our dutiful keeping or heeding the commands of God, which should be done with the greatest strictness, care and observation. Now saith the Lord to Job, canst thou mark (or observe) when the Hinds do calve? as if the Lord had said, dost thou keep their reckoning exactly? art thou able to tell the day and hour when they will calve? The word rendered Hind comes from a root signifying strength. Hinds are strong, though timorous and fearful creatures; and for their fearfulness they have a help besides their strength, that is, their speed or swiftness; and though their strength doth not serve them sufficiently to stand and make head against their pursuers, yet it serves them (as we may say) to show their pursuers a fair pair of heels, or to run from them and escape their danger. Canst thou mark when the Hinds
It is the same word in the Original, which in the former part of the verse is translated to bring forth; but because that special word calving is more proper to Hinds, therefore we wave the general sense bringing forth, which is applicable to any kind of beasts; and take this, not rendering as before, when the Hinds bring forth, but when they calve. The Hind is a wild beast often spoken of in Scripture, and well known in nature; the male we commonly call a Stagg or Hart, of which naturalists observe two things.
First, That perceiving himself to grow fat in the latter end of summer, and being conscious of his own inability to help himself by flight, he retires naturally to covert in secret places, that so he may be free from the pursuit of hunters.
Secondly, (Say they) when he hath cast his horn, then also he retires and gets into the thicket, as far from sight as he can, being sensible he hath lost his arms, his defense, and is therefore unwilling to come abroad where danger is, till his head be grown again, and he furnished with weapons for his own defense.
The Hind in the Text is the female, and the Scripture speaks of the Hind in a twofold allusion. First, In allusion to Christ. Secondly, In allusion to those that are Christ's.
Jesus Christ him • elf is often alluded to under this name, and that in a three-fold respect.
1. For his swiftness and speediness in coming to the relief and help of his Church ( Cant. 28.9.) Behold, he cometh leaping upon the mountains, and skipping upon the hills; my beloved is like a Roe, or young Hart, or Hind, 'tis the same word. His leaping and skipping notes 1. His cheerfulness. 2. His speediness in coming. The mountains and hills upon which he leaps and skips, note the great obstacles and difficulties, which stand in his way when he comes to help his Church, his beloved Spouse. Again ( Cant. 8.13.) Be thou like the young Roe, or young Hart upon the mountains of spices: The Church describes the gracious hast which she desires Jesus Christ would make to help, comfort, and relieve her, by the speedy running of the young Hart.
2. Jesus Christ is so compared with respect to his lovingness; that's the Epithet which Solomon gives the Hind ( Prov. 5.19.) Let her (thy Wife) be as the loving Hind and pleasant R • e. Now as the Wise should be tendered by her Husband as a loving Hind, so Jesus Christ is like the Hind for his exceeding lovingness to his Spouse or Wife. Christ is so full of love, that he is called love itself. One of the Ancients speaking of Christ dying, said My Love was crucified.
3. Jesus Christ is shadowed by the Hind, with respect to his sufferings, for he was hunted as a Hind with Hounds, with blood-hounds, with the hell-hounds of this world, the worst of wicked men. Therefore it is remarkable, that in the 22. Psalm, which is throughout a prophecy of Christ (the first words being the last he spake in this world, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? ) The title of that Psalm is, To the chief musician, upon Aijeleh Sahar; and if you would know what that signifies, look into the Ma • gin of your larger Bibles, there you shall find, The Hind of the morning. Hunters use to single out that special Deer, Hart or Hind, early in the morning, which they purpose for game that day; signifying that Jesus Christ, who is so much spoke of in that Psalm, was a Hind, not only sorely and fiercely, but early hunted by wicked men to death.
Again, The Scripture speaks of the Hind, with respect unto godly men.
First, As to the freeness and cheerfulness of their spirits, in the ways and things of God. The Prophet ( Isa. 35.6.) shows how it shall be with those that receive the Gospel, though they have been lame, impotent cripples before, not able to take one step Godward, yet, saith he, The lame shall leap as a Hart, or as a Hind; that is, they shall exceedingly rejoice at the receiving of the Gospel, and be very active in the obedience of it.
Secondly, As to that exceeding thirst, strong appetite or desire, which true believers have to and after Jesus Christ, who is the living water, the water of life. Thus David spake of himself ( Psal. 42.1.) As the Hart panteth after the water-brooks, so panteth my soul after thee, O God. Some render, as the she Hart, that is, the Hind, panteth after the water brooks, &c. When David would express the exceeding ardency of his souls thirst after Christ, he compares it to the thirst of a hunted Hart or Hind.
Thirdly, The Hind is very swift of foot; so are believers: as they have strong desires, so speedy pursuits after Jesus Christ. David had a holy confidence, that God would make him swift in spirit, when he said ( Psal. 18.33.) The Lord shall make my feet like Hinds feet; that is, he will make me very active, agile, and nimble, not only for the avoiding of corporal evils, but also in following of spiritual good things.
F • u thly, The Hind loves high places, or to be and breath in the free air. Thus the Prophet Habakkuk speaks of himself ( Hab. 3.19.) The Lord will make my feet like Hinds feet, he will make me walk upon my high places. He means not the high places of worldly preferment or power, but of peace and safety; nor either of them, so much as those truly high places of a holy life and joy, in spiritual meditation and conversation, to which we resort by the wings of saith in, and love unto God. Upon these high places thou wilt make me to walk. As if the Prophet had said, I shall go lightly and sweetly on in my journey to heaven, having my soul supplied and suppled (as it were) with the oil of spiritual joy and gladness. As it is said of Jacob (Gen. 29.1.) after that he had that blessed vision at Bethel, in the close of the 28th Chapter) He we • t on his journey; or (as we put in the margin) He lift up his feet; his feet were like Hinds feet, lithe and nimble for his journey, going on in faith towards God, and in the light of his countenance.
Fifthly, It is observed by Naturalists, that Hinds are very charitable and helpful one to another; and they give that special instance, when swimming over any River or deep water, the second is supported by the first, and the third by the second, and so to the last they help one another over; which doth excellently shadow the usefulness that should be among Christians, and their helpfulness mutual; they should be as Harts and Hinds always in this respect, and then most when they come into the Rivers and deep waters of sorrow and trouble, then they should support and bear up each one his brother. The Apostles word is ( Gal. 6.2.) Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfil the Law of Christ. The burdens which he there intends, are not only the infirmities which are in us, but the afflictions and troubles which possibly we may at any time be in. And again ( Phil. 2.4.) Let not every man mind his own things, but let him mind the things which are another's; that is, let him be helpful to others in outward things, much more let him be helpful to others in spiritual things. Thus the Scripture speaks, both of Jesus Christ, and of those that are his, under the similitude of the Hind.
From both parts of the verse, in that the Lord puts the question here to Job, Knowest thou the time when the wild Goats of the rocks bring forth? or canst thou mark the time when the Hinds do calve?
Note, First;
The care and tenderness of God toward beasts, turns to his praise, as well as the care which he hath of, and the tenderness which he shows to believers. And as it doth exceedingly advance the glory of God, that he takes care of wild beasts, so it may exceedingly strengthen the faith of man, that he will take care of him. Doth the Lord take care of wild Goats and of Hinds, then certainly he takes care of those that particularly belong to him; as hath been already shown or inferred from such like instances as we have here in the Text.
Secondly, From the particular Point, upon which the care of God is here intimated, with respect to the wild Goats and Hinds; namely, their bringing forth and calving, we learn, that
He (if I may so speak with reverence) shows his Midwifry, in helping these savage beasts when their pains come upon them. As the Lord takes man (in an eminent manner) out of the womb (Psal. 22.9.) so in a manner, he takes beasts out of the womb too ( Psal. 29.8, 9.) The voice of the Lord shaketh the wilderness, it shaketh the wilderness of Kadesh. So we translate it; but the word which we render shaketh, is the same with this in the Text, which signifieth to bring forth: And hence some very learned in the Hebrew tongue, do not render as we, The voice of the Lord shaketh the wilderness, but, The voice of the Lord maketh the wilderness to bring forth; The Lord maketh the wilderness of Kadesh to bring forth; which is not to be understood of the vegetative creatures (that's a truth, the Lord makes the Trees of the Forest to bring forth both leaves and fruit) but it is meant of animals or living creatures there: And then, when he saith, The voice of the Lord maketh the wilderness to bring forth, the meaning is, The Lord makes the wild beast of the wilderness to bring forth; which seems to be the clear sense of the place, by that which followeth; for the Psalmist having said this in general at the 8 h verse, The voice of the Lord maketh the wilderness to bring forth, he in the 9th verse, gives the special instance of the Hind, The voice of the Lord maketh the Hinds to calve.
So much concerning the wild Goats bringing forth their young, and the Hinds calving. In the next verse the Lord enquires of Job, the time how long they go with young before they bring forth and calve.
Vers. 2. Canst thou number the mouths that they fulfil?
As if the Lord had said, Canst thou tell how long they, that is, the wild Goats or the Hinds, bear their natural burdens? Canst thou number their months? the Hebrew is, their Moons. The Jews reckoned their months by Moons; and we distinguish between Luna • y and Solary months. Moon-months consist of twenty eight days, Sun-months of thirty. Canst thou reckon the Moons or months that they fulfil? To this the Prophet alludes ( Jer. 2.24.) speaking of the wild Ass that snuffs up the wind at her pleasure; that is, who takes pleasure, or (as the Margin reads it) The desire of whose heart is to snuff up the wind; in her occasion (sai h he) who can turn her away? He compares wanton vain persons, idolatrous and superstitious persons especially, who of all others are the w • ntonnest and vainest persons, to an Ass, when she is in the heat of her lust and pleasure; all they that seek her, will not weary themselves, that is, they will not weary themselves to seek her, while she is in that condition, but in her month they shall find her, that is, when she is burdened with young, when her sorrows and pains are near coming upon her, then she may be dealt wi • h. Thus the Lord would show his people, that however being so lusty, so wanton, there was no dealing with them, yet a month of sorrow was coming upon them, even as upon one with young, wherein they should feel, and be under such sad pains, as would burden them to purpose (as we say) and then they would be found, and might be spoken with. Wilde Asses have their months, their months of bearing, and their month of bringing forth; about those and this the Lord enquires of Job, Canst thou number the months that they fulfil? The question is not so to be understood, as if the number of the months which they fulfil were so many that they could not be numbered; but the Lord speaks thus, because of the uncertainty of the time (as to man) when those months are fulfilled. David prayed ( Psal. 39.4.) Lord, show me the number of my days; not as if the number of his days were so many, that he could hardly find out the number of them Arithmetically, but being so uncertain, he needed the Lord's instruction to teach him how to count the number of them spiritually. So here, Canst thou number the months that they fulfil; that's as great a secret as the number of any man's days in this world are.
Yet it may be objected; surely it is no such hard matter to number the months which Hinds and wild Goats fulfil: For if the question be, what time of their age Goats first conceive, and how long they continue bearing, Pliny answers? Sometimes they conceive at a year old, always at two years old; and (saith he) they continue bearing eight years. Secondly, If the question be, about what time of the year they conceive and bring forth? the same Author answers, They conceive in November, and b ing fo • th in March, so that they go burdened five months. Again, if the question be about the Hinds, he thus resolves it; They conceive about the latter end of September, and bring forth about the middle of April, the whole time they go, being about eight months; so that there seems no such difficulty in numbering the months, which either wild Goats or Hinds fulfil, that is, how long they go with young.
I answer; Though the general time which they fulfil may be known, or is known and set down by Writers, yet the precile particular time, the day of the month, or hour of the day, or (which is the thing inquired) when their months come out and are fulfilled, that's a secret. Though it be commonly known, that a woman goes nine months with child, yet who knows, or can a woman herself know exactly to a day, or an hour, when her pains and travel will come upon her? Many women have been under great mistakes in that ca • e, and rarely do any hit the time right, but reckon a day two or three over or under the just account. So then, though the general time is known, yet the exact particular time is not known. I may say in this case, as our Lord Jesus Christ said about the end of the world, Of that day and hour knows no man; we may know the general time, we may know it will not be long before the world shall end. The time which the world shall go with its great birth, is commonly said to be six thousand years; but the day and hour of its travel, and of the consummation of all things according to the decree of God, no man, no nor Angel, knows. Here the Lord questions Job about the exact particular time, which himself keeps, as he doth all special seasons, in his own h nd or power, under his own lock and key, as Christ told his Disciples, ( Act. 1.7.) Canst thou number the months that they fulfil? dost thou keep their reckoning?
'It is the same in effect that was spoken before, therefore I shall not stay upon it.
From the whole verse observe:
The reason is implied in the Text, Because he only knows the certain time of their extremity. None can give exact and timely help to the necessity of another, but he that knows the exact time of his extremity. The Lord can and will give deliverance to his people, in the very nick of time, when the months of their sorrow and burdens are fulfilled, for he knows the number of them. The children of Israel had long and sore bondage in Egypt, but no longer than the months which were appointed; for as soon as they were fulfilled, their bondage was ended, and they delivered; mark how the Spirit of God records it to a day ( Exod. 12.41.) And it came to pass at the end of the four hundred a • d thirty years, even the self-same day it came to pass, that all the h sts of the Lord went out from the Land of Egypt. Nor doth the sacred Record leave it thus, but adds ( verse. 42.) It is a night to be much observed; or (according to the letter of the Hebrew) A night of observations unto the Lord, for bringing them out from the Land of Egypt: This is that night of the Lord, to be observed of all the children of Israel in their generations. But Moses said in the former verse, It was the self-same day. Why doth he say here, It is a night, &c? And this is that night of the Lord, &c. The reason I conceive was this; The word day may be taken largely, for a natural day consisting of twenty four hours; now because the four hundred and thirty years were fulfilled and ended at the beginning of that day, (the Jewish account of days beginning at evening) • herefore their deliverance began then, and did not stay till the morning. Thus exact is the Lord, keeping his word not only to a day, but to a piece, yea, to the very hour of a day. And as the Lord gave that people deliverance just when those years were fulfilled, according to that ancient prophecy; so doubtless when the forty two months, or (which is the same) the thousand two hundred and threescore days for his witnesses prophesying in sack-cloth ( Rev. 11.2, 3.) shall be fulfilled, then they also shall come out of their bondage from under mystical Egypt and Babylon. Men have been long guessing at the fulfilling of those forty two months, but may we not say to them concerning the birth of that prophecy, in the same sense that the Lord doth here to Job, concerning the particular time when the wild Goats of the rock, and the Hinds bring forth, Canst thou number the months that they fulfil? As the particular time of the Hinds fulfilling her months, so of Zion's fulfilling her months of sorrow in this world, is a secret which the Lord hath reserved to himself, and keeps fast locked up in the Cabinet of his eternal counsels. Knowest thou the time when they bring forth?
The Lord having thus questioned Job about the time of the bringing forth of these two creatures, in these two verses, proceeds to question him about the manner of their bringing forth, or the painfulness of it.
Vers. 3. They bow themselves, &c.
These words are a description of the hard travel of the Hinds, not of the Goats, as Interpreters generally agree. Bowing of the body is the posture of any creature in travel to bring forth. As if the Lord had said, Is it thou, O Job, that hast, or I, that have given them an instinct in nature to put their bodies (as wild as they are) considerately, into such a posture (when their pains come upon them) as may be most easeful for themselves, and least hurtful to their offspring, by bowing their bodies to dilate the passages of nature, and so by a natural Midwifry to deliver themselves of their burdens? as followeth,
The word rendered bring forth, signifies to cleave asunder, implying their extreme pain in bringing forth; or that it is to them as grievous as the rending and cleaving of their bodies could be. So the word is translated (Chap. 16.13.) where Job making a lamentable complaint about his sufferings under the hand of God, expresseth it thus; His archers compass me round about, he cleaveth my reins asunder. Such torture have these poor creatures in bringing forth their young; which is more plainly set down in the close of the verse,
Which may be understood two ways; First, bowing to free themselves of their young ones, their sorrows end, or there is an end of their sorrows, they are cast out. Secondly, Thus they cast out their sorrows; that is, their young ones are cast out which have put them to much sorrow & grievous throws, & so may well be called their sorrows; as Rachel called that child with which she had such hard travel, Ben-oni, The son of her sorrows (Gen. 35.18.)
The word which we render sorrows, signifies cords and bonds, implying, that these creatures are girded and bound about with extreme pain, until (by the power of God in nature) they receive deliverance. Some are bound and girded with troubles, in and from the world, who yet are not sorrowful; we through faith may even glory in tribulation (Rom. 5.3.) but they who are sorrowful, are always bound; and therefore the same word signifieth bonds and sorrows. They cast out their sorrows.
Hence note;
This is part of that vanity brought by man's sin upon the creature, of which the Apostle speaks ( Rom. 8.22.) We know that the whole creation (or every creature) groaneth and travelleth in pain together until now. The creatures groan, as b • ing laden with a heavy burden, and they travel in pain, as a woman with child, to be eased and delivered of her burden, even those creatures which in proper sense, neither travel nor bring forth, yet are said to groan and t • avel in pain, by reason of the sin of man; and therefore the Apostle • aith, They groan and travel in pain together; that is, all the creatures join in this. They do not some groan, & others sing, some travel in pain, and others travel in or take their pleasure, but they are all (as it were) sensible of their sad change, and bewail it sadly; and (saith the Apostle) they groan and travel until now, or unto this now; not as if their groaning did then cease when this was said, but to show that it had continued without ceasing, until that instant now; and so it will continue until the manifestation of the sons of God, spoken of ( verse. 19.) As soon as man sinned, the Lord laid that affliction on the woman, In sorrow shalt thou bring forth (Gen. 3.16.) Now that which was first declared an affliction, with respect to the woman, is fallen upon all creatures in their degree; they all are more or less pained in travel, or travel in pain. The sin of man hath brought sorrow upon the whole world, even upon sinless creatures; & therefore man should pity poor creatures in their sorrows, his sin having brought those sorrows upon them. How vile then are they, who merely to satisfy their lusts, increase the sorrows of the creature, and cause them to travel more than needs, in pain every day?
Secondly, The Lord instanceth here in the Hinds for hard travel; and Naturalists observe, the Hind hath the sorest travel in bringing forth of any creature, woman excepted. And, that the Hinds have very sore travel in bringing forth, beside what Naturalists speak, may be collected from those expressions in the Text, They bow themselves, they bring forth their young ones, they cast out their sorrows. That Scripture also intimates as much ( Psal. 29.9.) when among other wonderful effects of thunder, The breaking of Cedars, &c. This is added, The voice of the Lord maketh the Hinds to calve; as if it did require the special help of God, to give the Hinds ease and deliverance in the time of their travel, The voice of God doth it; that is, either the thunder, or some extraordinary power, sent out for that purpose, doth it.
And here we may consider the goodness of God, even to this wild beast, in ordering her natural helps, to ease her the more speedily of her grievous pains in bringing forth her young ones.
The natural Historian tells us concerning the Hind, that she by common instinct, a little before she calves, feeling her pains coming upon her, seeks out a certain herb called Seselis, feeding upon which doth exceedingly facilitate her pains in bringing forth. Women, who have understanding and reason, as also the assistance of friends about them, have many means for their ease in that hour of extremity; but the Lord hath made this poor creature, both Physician and Midwife to herself. Further, 'tis reported of them, that when they have brought forth, they use the same and other herb to help themselves against their after-pains. Once more, Naturalists observe, that they usually bring forth at that time of the year when there is much thunder, according to that before mentioned ( Psal. 29.) The voice of the Lord, (or thunder) maketh the Hinds to calve. For the Hind being of a fearful nature, that dreadful noise doth so astonish her, that it either makes her put out all her strength to bring forth, or makes her less sensible of her pains in bringing forth. That's the second thing here considerable in Hinds, their painful bringing forth, They bow themselves, they bring forth their young ones, they cast out their sorrows.
Hence take this inference, with respect to women who come under the like pains. This should be a staff of consolation to them, in the time of their travel. If the Lord directs these creatures to the best posture, and most proper means for their help and ease in that condition, how much more will he take care of them, especially of them who call upon him, and trust in him? We may well make that interpretation of the Apostles words (1 Tim. 2.15.) She shall be saved in child-bearing, if they continue in faith, and charity, and holiness, with sobriety. This early care of God for mankind, is described ( Psal. 22.9, 10.) Thou art he that took me out of the womb; I was cast upon thee from the womb; thou art my God from my mothers belly. And again ( Psal. 71.6.) By thee have I been holden up from the womb; thou art he that took me out of my mothers bowels; my praise shall be continually of thee.
St. Augustine applies this matter of the Hinds bringing forth, to the spiritual birth; First, Because the time is unknown, or known only to God, when any soul comes to the new birth. Secondly, Because every soul which travelleth with this new birth, boweth and humbleth himself greatly under the sense of sin before the Lord. Thirdly, Because this new birth is usually accompanied with great and grievous pangs, always with the truth of godly sorrow.
The Lord having spoken thus of the Hinds bringing forth their young ones, speaks next, as I may say, of the education and bringing up of their young ones.
Vers. 4. Their young ones are in good liking, they grow up with Corn, they go forth and return not unto them.
This Verse holds out three things:
First, The good plight of their young ones, They are in good liking. As if it had been said, Though the Hinds have much pain in bringing them forth, yet they are slick and fat, as soon as, or soon after they are brought forth. The word which we render in good liking, notes a growing into health and strength, which we call recovering (Isa. 38.9, 16.) The writing of Hezekiah King of Judah, when he had been sick and was recovered, &c. And 'tis said of Naaman (2 Kings 5.14.) his flesh came to him, or he recovered his flesh, as the flesh of a little Child. The same word is used ( Psal. 126.1.) When the Lord turned the Captivity of Zion, we were like to them that dream; which others translate thus, and conceive it nearer the O • iginal Text, When the Lord turned the Captivity of Zion, then we were like them that are fed and grow fat at the dugg, and so are chearely or in a comfortable condition. Thus the Hinds young ones grow fat, lusty, and strong; As the Lord takes care for their bringing forth, so of their bringing up; he that maketh the Hinds to calve, makes their calves of good liking too; as he makes the Babe thrive at the Mothers breast, so the Calf at the Hinds dugg. And when they have a while grown fat at the dam's dugg, then
They come to harder meat, they soon leave sucking and feed upon corn. Some read, they grow up in the fields, or by the field, that is, by that which groweth in the field. Thus it is with our Children, they are fed first at the breast & spoon, afterwards with flesh or any wholesome food. According to every degree of life, God provides suitable food; the Infant shall have milk, and when a little grown, stronger meat. As it is in spirituals, when we are new born babes in Jesus Christ, we are fed with milk, that is, with plain and easy truths, called by the Apostle, The first principles of the doctrine of Christ; afterwards we go on (as the Apostle there speaks) to perfection, and then we can digest and profit by the deeper Mysteries of the Gospel. Thus 'tis said of the young Hinds, or of the Hinds young ones in the Text,
The word signifies to grow apace, to thrive much in strength and stature, and being thus thriven and grown, their Dam's hear no more of them. For as it followeth
First, they had the duggs of the Dam to nourish them, soon after they fed upon corn, at length they go forth and return not unto them; they trouble the old ones no further, they shift for themselves. One of the Naturalists commending the qualities of the Hind, notes this chiefly; They are very diligent to instruct their young ones, how to ge • , or where to seek food for themselves, before they put them out of their own care.
Hence note, First;
This intimates the duty of Parents, to take care of their Children till they are able to get their living.
Secondly, Forasmuch as those young ones go forth, and return not again when once they can live of themselves,
Note,
Children must not think to burden their Parents always, but stick to their own labor; the very brute beasts will condemn those children who do not: When the Hind hath sufficiently instructed her young ones by her example, where and how to get food, having also breathed them well, and taught them how to hasten away when in danger; having, lastly, led them to precipices, & taught them to leap or jump, then they go forth & return no more. The Patriarch Naphtali was called ( Gen. 49.21.) a Hind let loose, because strong and able to live alone. Thus we have here both the care of the Hind, to provide for her young ones as long as they need, which layeth a great obligation upon Parents to take care of their Children. He that provides not for his own, especially, for those of his household, for his own Children and Servants, is worse than an Infidel, yea, he is worse than a hind. But then, let Children, when they have been well provided for, and taught how to get a living in the world, take heed of lasiness and idleness, as if they were to live upon their Parents pains or provision always. Let them go forth and not return, but to show kindness and thankfulness to their Parents, for their care and cost bestowed on them in their tender years, and while under their inspection; yea, let them learn (as the Apostle gives them in charge 1 Tim. 5.4.) To show piety or kindness at home, and requite their Parents; helping their Parents (if need be) in their old age, as their Parents helped and brought them up when they were young. Which dutifulness of Children the Greeks express by a word alluding to Stork • , who are so much noted for their tender care towards their aged Parents, that their name signifies the thing, not only in that famous language, but in the Sacred Language, namely, piety and pity.
JOB, Chap. 39. Vers. 5, 6, 7, 8.
5.
Who hath sent out the wild Ass free? or who hath loosed the bands of the wild Ass?
6.
Whose house I have made the wilderness, and the barren land his dwellings.
7.
He scorneth the multitude of the City, neither regardeth he the cry of the driver.
8.
The rang of the mountains is his pasture, and he searcheth after every green thing.
THe Lord continues his speech with Job, to show his provident care of, yea, and bounty towards the wildest creatures.
The question put in these four Verses concerns the wild Ass, and there are three things considerable in the description given him in these four Verses.
First, His liberty and freedom ( v. 5.) Who hath sent out the wild Ass free, &c.
Secondly, His dwelling and habitation ( v. 6.) whose house I have made the wilderness, and the barren land his dwelling. He scorneth, &c.
Thirdly, His food or manner of feeding ( ver. 8.) the range of the mountains is his pasture, and he searcheth out every green thing. Thus the Lord proposeth to Job the example of these wild and untamed creatures, for whom no man provides nor bestows a thought upon towards their livelihood, yet God provides for them, and feeds them, and houseth them, and preserveth them in as good a condition, as those which are tame, and under the daily care and inspection of man.
Vers. 5. Who hath set the wild Ass free?
The wild Ass is at liberty, he is free; love of liberty is the property of the wild Ass; and here it is questioned, whence he hath his liberty, or who made him free? that is, so stout, that he will not be taught subjection to the command of man, nor do him any work, as not only other creatures, but other Asses do; who hath made him thus free? Surely, not any man, not any company, society, or brotherhood of men; the wild Ass hath not his manumission by them, but by God, he hath bestowed that privilege (such as it is) upon the wild Ass, God hath set him free. Some beasts are, as it were, Apprentiz'd or bound to the service of men, and men have special services, uses, and employments to which they appoint them; there are other creatures, as it were, manumitted from man's service, man hath no command of them, nor work done by them, they are free, and amongst these the wild Ass is eminent for freedom.
The Hebrew text which we render the wild Ass, is but one word; and from thence some derive the Latin word which signifies wild beasts in general; conceiving also that the Hebrew word comes from a root signifying to multiply and increase, because wild beasts (usually) multiply and increase more than tame. Thus they understand this former part of the verse, not as we of that special sort of wild beasts the wild Ass, but in common of all sorts of wild beasts; and then (say they) in the latter part of the verse, the wild Ass is especially spoken of under another term; for though we have he wild Ass, according to our translation, in both parts of the Text, yet under different appellations, by which some understand two so • ts of wild Asses, but others take the first only in general for wild beasts of any sort, and the latter for this particular sort of wild beasts the wild Ass. But I conceive, we need not be so curious, for though we take both the former and the latter word for the same, the sense is clear, and the same: Who hath sent out the wild Ass free?
But was the wild Ass, here spoken of, at any time in bonds, and now set free? I answer, The Lord speaks thus figuratively, not that the wild Ass was ever in bonds, but that because he is so intractable, and will by no means be mannag'd, he seems to be as one loosed from bonds, even as Oxen and Horses which serve man, and are under his power, seem bound to his service. So then, as the former, so this latter part of the verse is not to be expounded, as if the wild Ass had ever been under restraint, and afterwards was sent forth free and loosed from his bonds, but both expressions intend only, that as his disposition is for freedom, so in his condition he is, and always hath been, free from bondage; for not only is he free from bondage, who having been in bondage is delivered, as slaves and captives oftentimes are; but he may be said to be free from bondage, or to have his bonds loosed, who was never in bonds, who was either born free, or who by his wit, skill and policy, or the help of others, hath been preserved from bondage. A man may be said to be free from sickness, that never was sick, as well as he that is restored from sickness to health; and so a man that never was in bonds, may be said to be free from bonds, as well as he that is delivered from bondage. Thus the wild Ass in the Text is said to have his bonds loosed, though he never was in bonds. As the Lord hath made all creatures, so he hath made some free, others servile; he hath set some at liberty, but holds others at hard labor all their days, in drawing, travelling, or bearing heavy burdens. The words are plain; the sum and scope of them may be thus conceived: As if the Lord had asked Job, by whom this natural inclination was given to the wild Ass, that he should so earnestly desire liberty; as also, who gave him that fo • ce and stoutness, that he should be able to live without Law, to follow his own lust, not at all submitting to, nor guided by the will of others. Who hath sent out the wild Ass free?
Hence observe,
It would be both a vanity and a high presumption, to ask the reason why the Lord hath appointed some creatures to spend the whole time of their lives in liberty, and that others should be continually groaning under bondage, laboring and sweating, tyring and wearying themselves out in the service of men, seeing we cannot change the orders of God. And as we must not busy ourselves with enquiring, why he hath not subjected the wild Ass to the same bonds and burdens as he hath tame Asses? So we must not say unto God, why hast thou made some men to serve, others to rule? no, nor why he handles some men more gently, others more grievously? We must resolve all these questions into the will, dominion and sovereignty of God; and we may well conceive, that the Lord would in this question about the wild Asses, intimate unto us, as well as unto Job, that he hath a power in himself, which no man ought to question, to free some men from the bonds of service, and to bind others, to free some men from the bonds of affliction, sorrow and trouble in this world, while others are hamper'd and held fast in them all their days. What Job sp • ke in reference to the various dispensation of bodily health ( Chap. 21.23, 24, 25.) One dieth in his full strength, being wholly at ease and quiet, his breasts are full of milk, and his bones moistened with marrow; and another dieth in the bitterness of his soul, and never eateth with pleasure; the same may be said about the dealings of God with men, as to bodily liberty; one dieth free, he girded himself all the days of his life (as Christ said to Peter of his younger days, Joh. 21.) and went whither he pleased, no man asking, whither goest thou? or why stayest thou here? another is laid by the heels, or girded by others, and never enjoyeth the freedom of his own person or motions, he (poor man) is bound in fetters, and holden in the cords of affliction, as Elihu spake in the 36th Chapter of this book. This was Jobs case; he was in the bonds and cords of affliction, while others enjoyed peace and liberty. Now man ought no more to question the Lord, why one man is afflicted and another free, then why the wild Ass is free, and the tame a servant. As the whole creation (which was occasionally shown at the third verse) is subject unto bondage, by reason of the sin of man, and groaneth till it be delivered; so the sovereignty of God hath laid this bondage heavier upon some parts of the creation, or upon some creatures, than upon others. And as we should daily and deeply bewail it, that our sin hath brought bondage upon the creature, so we should humbly submit to whatsoever bondage or hard travel the sovereignty of God hath designed us in one kind or other, while we are in this world.
Secondly, Consider to whom 'tis granted to be free, and to have their bonds loosed; it is to wild Asses.
Then observe;
It is but the privilege of an Ass; and as it is but a low privilege to be free from service, so it is a great sin to cast off service. Some under pretence of liberty, cast off obedience, and will not bear the yoke of duty or good government; this is indeed to be free as the wild Ass is free. Such are spoken of ( Psal. 2.2, 3.) Come let us break their bonds, and cast their cords from us. They that would break the bonds and cords there spoken of, desire only, and look after a sinful liberty, a meaner liberty than that of the wild Ass. The Prophet going to the great men ( Jer. 5.5.) said, These have altogether broken the yoke, and burst the bonds; that is, the yoke of duty which God hath laid upon them. They have no cause of boasting, that are free from the bonds of service; but they who cast off the bonds of duty, have great cause to be ashamed. Thus the Prophet reproves that people, as one man ( Hos. 8.9.) They are gone up to Assy i • , a wild Ass alone by himself. As if the Prophet had said, Th • y lo • k not up to the high God for help, but to Assyria; the high God was not so high in their eyes as Assyria: doing thus, they we • e like a wild Ass (saith the Prophet) and so they were in two things; First, They we • e extreme stubborn, resolved to have their will, and satisfy their lusts. Eph • aim was as violent in his way as a wild Ass. Secondly, • hey were like a wild Ass, they would be alone; A wild Ass alone by himself; that is, they would be at liberty, free from all command, to do what they list; they had rather be in a barren wilderness where none could control them, than in good pastures under anything that looked like a restraint, or a rule. This is a very unworthy spirit; this is liberty in a way of licenciousness, this liberty is libertinism. They who submit to no rule but that of their unruly head-strong passions and affections, nor will be reclaimed nor tamed by any, whether fair or foul means, these in Scripture are compared to the wild Ass for their folly and vanity. Z • phar offered this rebuke to Job, in the 11th Chapter of this book, verse. 12. and possibly he could not altogether free himself from it, Vain man would be wise, though he be born like a wild Asses colt; that is, though this be all his wisdom to be free from that subjection which he oweth to God and man. The Prophet ( Jer. 2.24.) compares the whole people of Israel, when they cast off the service of God, to a wild Ass (which Scripture was touched at the second verse upon another occasion) that snuffeth up the wind at her pleasure; in her occasion who can turn her away? all they that seek her, will not weary themselves, in her month they shall find her: There is no bringing such into compass, till they are compassed with pains. We may call all such nominal Israelites real Ishmaelites, it being said of Ishmael (Gen. 16.12.) that he was ( pere Adam) a wild man, having more of the wild Ass than of the man in them. Thus it is with vain and unbridled spirits, they cannot bear the yoke of service; and therefore remember, though this be spoken of as a privilege, yet it is a low privilege to be free from any honest service; and to be be free from all service, is worse than the worst of outward servitudes. 'It is a mercy to be free from slavery to man, but to be free from service to man, is to be unmanly; every man should be a servant in one kind or another, and therefore the Law saith, To call a man a servant, distinguisheth no man, seeing every man is supposed in the way of his life a servant. The Apostle speaking to those whose very calling is to serve, and are therefore in strict sense called servants (1 Cor. 7.21, 22.) saith, Art thou called, being a servant, care not for it (that is, be not troubled that thou art a servant (service to man is not inconsistent with the service of God) but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather; for he that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's free man. Let every man (v. 24.) wherein he is called, therein abide with God; that is, let him continue to serve man in all things, according to the will of God. To be wholly free from the service of man, is no better than the freedom of the worser sort of beasts, the wild Ass. Christ ( Mat. 11.29, 30.) calls his to the yoke; and Christ's yoke implieth all manner of dutiful service, even service to man as well as to God: Come unto me all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest; take my yoke upon you, and learn of me, &c. for my yoke is easy, and my burden is light. If we refuse Christ's easy yoke, we may quickly get a heavy one, yea, an iron one, as the Prophet told him who broke the wooden one ( Jer. 28.13.) There are some yokes, which to bear is our honor; 'tis surely so, to bear the yoke of Christ; to be under Christ's bonds, is a favor; woe to those that seek to be loosed from them. The Prophet Jeremiah tells us ( Lam. 3.37.) It is good for a man to bear the yoke in his youth.
There is a threefold bond or yoke, from which it is a favor to be wholly freed, and that freedom we should seek after; but neither of the three is a freedom from duty and service, or from due service.
First, To be free from the yoke of sin, and to have the bonds of our iniquities loosed, that is a blessed privilege ( John 8.36.) If the Son make you free, you shall be free indeed. The chief part of a Sons freedom, which we have by Christ, the Son, is freedom from sin. Freedom from the condemning power of sin, and freedom from the ruling power of sin, is our spiritual or Gospel freedom. Peter said to Simon Magus (Acts 8.23.) I perceive thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity; thou art still a prisoner, a slave to sin, the guilt of sin holds thee fast; nor art thou delivered from the filth of it. To have our sin-bonds loosed, is to be free like Saints; to loose ourselves from duty-bonds, whether to God or man, is to be free like wild Asses.
Secondly, There is a great mercy in being loosed and made free from the curse of the Law. Thus also the Son makes us free ( Gal. 3.13. Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law, being made a curse for us; that is, enduring the curse for us, or dying acursed death for us, that we might have, and forever enjoy a blessed life: This is a glorious liberty.
Thirdly, To be freed from the old legal ceremonies, is the privilege of all believers under the Gospel; and 'tis such a privilege as the Apostle exhorted the Galatians, and us with them, to maintain with all our might ( Gal. 5.1.) Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage; that is, with the bondage of the ceremonial Law, from which Christ hath made us free ( Gal. 4.26.) Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all; free, First, from the slavery of sin; free, Secondly, from the curse of the Law; free, Thirdly, from the yoke of legal ceremonies. All believers are made thus free by Christ, but Christ hath not made so much as one believer free from service. Christ makes us free to serve, not free from serving. To be be free to serve, is infinitely better than to be free from service; nothing is more ingenuous, nothing shows a more noble spirit in man, than to be free to serve, as all are, being once freed from spiritual or sin-slavery ( Rom. 6.19.) As ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness, and to iniquity unto iniquity, even so now yield yourselves servants to righteousness unto holiness; for (as it follows) when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness, or (as it is in the margin) free to righteousness; not free to do righteousness, but free not to do it. Righteousness had then no command (yielded to) no power (submitted to) over you; whereas over a gracious heart, righteousness hath the greatest command. A godly man is at the beck of God, in all the ways of righteousness: and, as he is free to serve Masters, so he is free to be subject to Magistrates, or higher powers, according to that rule of the Apostle ( Rom. 13.1.) And that all in their places may be mindful of this duty, they are upon all occasions to be put in mind of it, as the same Apostle directed Titus in his Epistle to him ( Chap. 3.1.) The Lord having spoken of the freedom of the Ass, proceeds to described his dwelling.
Vers. 6. Whose house I have made the wilderness, and the barren laid his dwellings.
These words contain the second part of the care and providence of God towards the wild Ass; he hath not only made them free, and loosed their bonds, but he hath provided a dwelling for them; and where? in the wilderness; a wild place, and therefore fit for wild beasts. The wilderness; strictly taken, is the dwelling of beasts, not of men; we read (I grant) in Scripture not only of Houses, but of Cities in the wilderness, yet take the wilderness strictly, and 'tis a place un-inhabited by man; and that's the place where the Lord hath appointed the wild Ass to dwell; 'tis his house, there he abideth as men do in their houses. The wilderness is a place undressed, untilled, uncared for by man, yet by the care and goodness of God it affords sufficient provision for the support of these creatures, whom no man provides for.
The wild Ass hath a large and open house, some conceive the wilderness here intended was the wilderness of Arabia, which as (Historians tell us) was much stocked or abounded with wild Asses. The word Arabia signifies a wilderness; the whole country being so like a wilderness, is so called after its own likeness. The Chaldee Paraphrast reads it, whose house I have made a plain, as if these wild Asses were in this opposed to the wild Goats, (ver. 1.) who live on high hills and craggy rocks. The word is translated a plain (Deut. 1.1.) yet rather, as we, the wilderness.
A barren place, and a salt place, are the same ( Judge. 9.45.) When Abimelech took that City, he sowed it with salt, in token that an everlasting curse of barrenness should come upon it, according to that ( Psal. 107.34.) A fruitful land turned he into barrenness, the margin saith into saltness. Once more ( Jer. 17.5, 6.) Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, he shall be like the heath in the desert, and shall not see when good cometh, but shall inhabit the parched places in the wilderness, in a salt land and not inhabited, that is, in a barren land, unfit for any to inhabit. There is a reason in nature why salt land is barren; salt being hot and dry, draweth up the strength and moisture of the land that should make is fruitful: This salt or barren land, which yields little grass or herbage, the Lord hath appointed for the wild Ass to dwell in.
Hence note, First;
Where the wild Ass shall dwell or inhabit, comes under a Divine appointment. How much more hath God appointed dwelling places for the children of men. The Apostle tells us ( Acts 12.26.) That he hath not only made men to dwell on all the face of the earth, but he hath also determined the bounds of their habitation, that is, God hath not only made the whole earth habitable for man-kind, but he hath by his providence disposed every man to his special habitation in this or that part of the earth.
Secondly;
This wild creature dwells in a wild place, in a wilderness. This barren creature (as to any benefit he brings to man) God appoints to dwell in a barren land. It is said of Nebuchadnezzar (Dan. 5.21.) when for his pride he was put from his dominion, that he had his dwelling with wild Asses; he himself carried it like a beast, and he had a dwelling suitable to his beastial disposition among the beasts; he was proud, and would not bare the Lord's yoke, he cast off the bonds which God laid upon him, and thought it enough for him to lay bonds upon men, therefore the Lord (to humble him) thrust him among the beasts. As like will to like mostly in way of election, so sometimes like shall to like, though they like it not, in way of compulsion; and usually like are put to like persons or places, in way of gracious ordination. God himself appoints wild beasts to the barren wildernesses, tame beasts to the fruitful enclosed pastures; he placeth men in well built Houses, Towns or Cities; and he hath appointed faithful men and women his Church to dwell in, which is therefore called (though in a wilderness) the house of God, (1 Tim. 3.15.) David found that house more pleasing to him than any of his Royal Palaces, and therefore made it his great request, The one thing of his desires (Psal. 27.7.) That he might dwell in the house of the Lord forever: Even as he bitterly complained ( Psalm 120.5,) Woe is me, that I sojourn in Mesech, that I dwell in the tents of Kedar. And as the Lord hath provided suitable habitations for beasts, wild and tame; for men, good and bad here on earth; so he hath provided suitable habitations for all men, when they leave this earth. He hath provided hell for their house and dwelling place forever, who are disobedient 〈◊〉 • nbelieving▪ and he hath provided heaven for their house and dwelling place forever, who believe and obey. As now all godly men dwell in God by faith ( Psal. 90.1.) so they shall hereafter dwell always with him by fruition. He that gives the wilderness for a house, and the barren land for a dwelling to the wild Ass, will provide a Paradise for the house, and a Spring-garden of everlasting joys and sweetnesses for his faithful servants.
Thirdly, From these words (the barren land his dwelling)
Note;
Some lands become barren by a curse from God; Thus he turns a fruitful land into barrenness, for the wickedness of those that dwell therein (Psal. 107.34.) Now as some lands are made barren (besides the general curse which befell all lands upon the fall of man into sin) by some special curse, for special causes, so, 'tis merely an act of Divine Sovereignty, that some lands, as to their very soil and constitution are barren, while others are fruitful.
Hence note;
As every land, the best land is barren and unprofitable to them who will not take pains to improve it; so 'tis pity they should dwell in a fruitful land, who will not take pains in it.
Fifthly, Note;
God hath use for barren wildernesses, as well as for the richest pastures.
Sixthly, The wild Ass living according to nature, is satisfied with a barren Land.
Hence note;
They have always enough, who desire no more. A cottage is as good as a Palace, and a barren Land as good as a fruitful one, to a contented mind. Yet I cannot approve either their principle or practice, who have a kind of ambition (possibly they call itself-denial, and reckon it a high piece of their Religion) to dwell, as the wild Ass, in the wilderness; such are those popish votaries, called Hermits, from the wilderness where they dwell: These in devotion (such as it is) make the wilderness their house, and the barren Land their dwelling, that they may be free from the cares and temptations of this world; these retire themselves utterly from converse with man, that they may more freely converse with God (an excellent end, but that way to it is nowhere commanded by God) Let such remember, that God hath not appointed the wilderness and desert places for man's dwelling, but for the dwelling of wild beasts: Let them also remember, that they who have the wilderness for their house, may yet have the City in their hearts. It was said by one of the Ancients, concerning such retirements, What doth it advantage us to have a solitary place for our bodies, whilst our souls are in the thickest thro • gs of the world.
There are only two cases wherein men should desire such solitary places.
First, In case of persecution, to get out of the hands and reach of cruel men. Thus David desired the wilderness ( Psal. 55.3, 4, 5, 6.) Because of the voice of the enemy, because of the oppression of the wicked; for they cast iniquity upon me, and in wrath they hate me; my heart is sore pained within me, and the terrors of death are fallen upon me, &c. And what followeth? O that I had wings like a dove, for then would I fly away and be at rest; Lo, then would I wander afar off, and remain in the wilderness. It is better to be in the wilderness among savage beasts, than to live among beastly savage men. The Apostle ( Heb. 11.38.) tells us the reason why many worthy ones of the Jewish Church (of whom the world was not worthy) inhabited the wilderness; They were stoned and sawn asunder, and were slain with the sword, &c. And what then? then they who remained alive, to avoid those extremities, avoided the society of men, and wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens, and caves of the earth. In such a hot day we may choose the shadow of a desolate wilderne • s, rather than a City to dwell in. And thus it is said ( Rev. 12.13, 14.) When the Dragon (that is, Heathenish Rome) persecuted the woman (that is, the Church) which brought forth the man-child; then to the woman were given two wings of a great Eagle (that is, sufficient means, strength and opportunity to make her escape) that she might flee into the wilderness; which as it hath been often verified in a metaphorical sense, Professors then lying close and retired in their several places, so it hath been true in the letter, the Church hath sled into the wilderness for safety, and hath there been preserved from the face of the Serpent.
Secondly, We may desire such retirements to, and a dwelling in solitary places, in case of the extreme wickedness of those among whom we dwell; though they break not out into open persecution, yet their evil conversation makes their society int llerable. This caused the Prophet Jeremiah to cry out ( Chap. 9.2.) O that I had a place in the wilderness, that I might leave my people and go from them (why?) for they be all adulterers, an assembly of treacherous men. For, as it is better to dwell in the corner of the house top, than with a brawling woman in a wild house (Prov. 21.9.) so it is better to get into a corner, or into a wilderness, than to live in a City, or in the fairest Palaces among men of wicked and ungodly spirits, such as vexed Lot in Sodom (2 Pet. 2.8.)
In these two cases we may imitate the wild Ass, and dwell in the wilderness; but for any to make it their choice, let them consider where they have a rule for it. Man is a sociable creature, and ought to be helpful and useful to others, and not wholly to confine himself to himself, as they do, who are and are called Anchorets and Hermits. To serve our Country, and to observe the Law of Nations for the common good of mankind, is better than upon any pretence of devotion, or converse with God, to seclude ourselves totally from the company and converse of men. And seeing God hath made us for the good of human society, it is inhumane, voluntarily and electively to disjoin and exempt ourselves from the Laws of society. Aristotle said, concerning decliners of society, He that affects solitude, is either a God, or a beast; h • either lives above man as God doth, or below man as beasts do. The Reader will easily pardon me this short diversion against unnecessitated solitude, thus occasioned by the solitary dwelling of the wild Ass in the wilderness and barren Land. And I have the rather touch it, because I find the wits of some running somewhat wild in the Allegory of the wild Ass in the Text, as if he were a very fitting resemblance of a contemplative man.
I grant a godly man should be, and the more godly any man is, the more he will be, I am sure, the more he would or desires to be free from the thoughts, and loosed from the bands both of love to, and cares about the things of this life, that he may be the more in the meditation of, and preparation for, a better life. In those meditations he retires from the throng of worldly desires, as much as a man living alone in a wilderne • s withdraws from worldly businesses; he is weaned from, and mortified to the plenty and pleasures which a City life courts him with; nor is he afraid of the threatenings of any who would drive him from his duty. His soul searcheth after, and he feeds upon the green things which everywhere grow upon the mountains of the holy Scriptures, both for his instruction and consolation. All this I grant, as was said before, is true of a godly man raised to any high degree of spiritualness, and walking much in the Spirit. He is in the world, yet sits loose and free from the bands and baits of it. Howbeit, this warrants no man to loose himself from all bands of service in the world, much less to be so gross, as literally to make that his house, which God hath made the house of the wild Ass, The wilderness, or to take the barren Land for his dwelling.
As this verse hath shown us the house and dwelling of the wild Ass, so the next shows us how he carries it in the wilderness.
Vers. 7. He scorneth the multitude of the City, neither regardeth he the crying of the driver.
He scorneth; the Hebrew is, He laugheth at, or slighteth, &c. The Lord speaks of this wild Ass after the manner of men, who laugh at those things which they contemn, despise or scorn, as much below them or contrary to them: The word is rendered by laughing (Psal. 2.4. Job 5.22.) It is said also of the good woman ( Prov. 31.25.) She shall rejoice in time to come; which others render thus, She laughed at time to come; that is, she having so well and wisely provided for time to come, is not at all burdened with cares about it. There may be a double reason, why this wild Ass scorns, or laughs at the multitude of the City.
First, Because it is no way pleasing to his nature, he hath no desire to a City, to a sociable life.
Secondly, He may be said to scorn the multitude of the City, because though a multitude should come out of a City to take him, yea, as great a multitude as a City can make, yet he is not afraid, for he knows he can show them a fair pair of heels, and by his swiftness of foot keep out of their hands, and maintain his liberty.
Farther, The words translated, The multitude of the City, may be rendered, The abundance or plenty of the City. If there be abundance anywhere, it is in Cities; and therefore heaven is called a City, because of the great abundance of all good there, and all in God. Thus the word is rendered ( Psal. 37.16.) A little that a righteous man hath, is better than the riches of many wicked; that is, than all their large sums of money, of gold and silver, as also, than their large inheritances of houses and Lands. The word may bear that sense in the Text, and 'tis a good sense; the wild Ass scorns the abundance of the City, he can content himself with the barren Land; he cares not though he fare hard, so he may live free from hard labor; he scorneth, both the multitude and plenty of the City;
The word is, He heareth not, that is, he obeyeth not the crying of the driver. This is spoken in opposition to tame beasts, for such must regard the crying of the driver, else they must smart for it; if the driver speaks, they understand his language, they must mend their pace, and follow their work more closely, or seel the drivers lash. Here then is a farther description of the liberty of the wild Ass; he is not brought to work by anything that the driver can say or do, he is not afraid either of his words or blows.
The word which we translate Driver, signifies an Oppressor; so 'tis rendered ( Job 3.18.) It signifies also an Exactor. The seventy translate, He regardeth not the hasty call or citation of the gatherer of Taxes or of Tribute. There are two sorts of Exactors; First, those that exact Tribute; Secondly, those who exact Labor. Now he that drives cattle, urgeth them to work both by hand and tongue, and so exacts labor of them. Hence the word is used to express the Task-masters of the Israelites in Egypt (Exod. 5.6.) who indeed exacted labor of them, and made them serve with rigor. From these Oppressors, with the Exactors of labor, the wild Ass is free; he is at such liberty, that he regards not the cry of the driver, Exactor or Oppressor; nor will he be brought to work by fair means nor by foul. As that was a proverbial speech to show the tranquility of those times ( Isa. 14.8.) Since thou art laid down, no feller is come up against us; So this seems to be a proverbial speech, showing the liberty of the wild Ass at all times, He regardeth not the crying of the Driver.
From the former part of the verse,
When 'tis said, He laughs at, or scorns the multitude of the City. Taking the word City, as opposed to the wilderness or barren Land,
Note;
If good things are to be had anywhere for love or money, it is in Cities; and therefore they who dwell in great Cities, where there is such a multitude of people, and abundance of all things, should remember their privilege; 'tis a mercy they are not in a wilderness, or in a barren Land.
Secondly, In that it is said, He scorns the multitude of the City,
Note;
What cares the wild Ass for the company of men? he had rather be among the wild Asses, than among the best and wisest men. Bad men, who are like wild beasts, scorn the company of good men; and it is as true of good men, that they have no joy in the company of bad men, yea, they are often burdened with their company. The content of our lives doth very much consist in our harmony with, and congeniality to those whom the are engaged to converse with.
Thirdly, Take the word in the other sense, as noting the abundance or plenty that is in the City, the wild Ass had rather be in his barren Land than there.
Hence we learn;
Better be sometimes in a starving condition, than always in a fearing condition, always hearing the cry of the Driver. The wild Ass is content to fare hard, so he may be free: how much more then is he below a man, who parts with his true liberty, as Esau did with his Birth-right, for a morsel of meat, or a mess of broth?
Fourthly, Note;
The wild Ass regards not the crying of the Driver, because he knows the Driver cannot reach him with his cry, much less with his whip. The tame Ass must regard and attend the cry of the Driver (though he hath no will to it) whether he will or no. It was said by the Moralists, Man would be led, not driven; persuaded, not compelled. The disputes have been great what man may do, and how far he may go to that matter; but I shall not meddle with it any further, than to say, that when Christ in the Parable said ( Luke 14.23.) Compel them to come in, The compulsion there intended, is only that of argumentation, exhortation and persuasion by his Ministers, whose divine Rhetoric in beseeching sinners to come in, and to be reconciled unto God, hath such a power in it, as amounts unto, and may be called a compulsion. I grant, many use their liberty, or rather abuse it, as an occasion to the flesh, and turn it into wantonness, these are indeed no better than wild Asses; and though they are such as regard not the cry of the Driver, yet they need it.
Thus the Lord hath shown Job the house and dwelling, as also the liberties and privileges of the wild Ass; in the next verse the Lord shows him the food or diet of the wild Ass.
Vers. 8. The range of the mountains is his pasture, and he searcheth after every green thing.
This verse tells us where the Lord hath made provision for the wild Ass. The Range (or as some render, the search) of the mountains is his pasture; that is, whatsoever he searcheth and findeth out upon the mountains, is his pasture. Job speaketh of wicked men (Chap. 24.5.) after the manner of these wild Asses, finding food in the wilderness for themselves, and for their children.
Some interpret it choice things, that is, the best things, or those things that are most savoury to the palate of that beast, those he picks up for his food. Mr. Broughton translates, Chosen places in the mountains are for his pasture: As if it had been said, Though he be wild, yet he is prudent, he takes not what comes next, but he chooseth what is best for him; for as it followeth,
The word notes a very diligent search, after every green thing. Green things are his delicacies, he lives upon them, and delights in them; he searcheth after all, and feeds upon that which is best for him; he looks not that man should fodder him in winter, as they do tame and working cattle, he looks out his own living, and picks up some green thing or other all the year long.
Hence note;
God hath made the wilderness and barren places for the wild Ass to dwell in, yet there is something for him to feed on.
Secondly, His food is every green thing.
(Whence learn;
He gives green things, grass to the beasts of the field; but he doth, not feed man with grass, he feedeth man with the finest of the wheat, and with honey out of the rock ( Psal. 81.16.) And as the Lord provides suitable food for the bodies of men, so for their souls he hath spiritual green pastures for them ( Psal. 23.1, 2.) The Lord is my Shepherd, I shall not want; he maketh me to lie down in green pastures; that is, in his Word and Ordinances. They are green pastures for his people; he makes them lie down in the Promises and in the Commandments, in the holy Prophecies and Histories of the written word; all which are written for our instruction or learning, that we through patience and comfort of the Scriptures, might have hope (Rom. 15.4.) that is, that our faith having the truth of the Word (especially in the promises) to feed upon, our hope may be said to wait for the good of the Word patiently. The holy Scriptures (I say) are the green pastures which the Lord hath provided for the souls of men to feed in, and grow fat upon. The Scriptures are a bare common, a dry heath to unbelievers, they find nothing there which is food for them; but to believers they are fat pastures, and full of such green things as are most suitable to their taste, and nourishing to their souls. Thus spake the Prophet ( Isa. 49.9, 10.) Their pastures shall be in all high places; they shall not hunger nor thirst, neither shall the heat nor the Sun smite them; that is, they shall have safe passage, and sufficient food, both for soul and body, for their souls especially, when delivered out of their soul-prisons, or spiritual captivity, there spoken or prophesied of, under the Gospel.
Thirdly, Wild Asses sea • ch after every green thing, they take pains for their living; i • it be not near, they will travel for it, and seek after it.
Hence note;
They who love not labor, will yet take some pains, at least so much as serves them to get food, and keep them alive. Those beasts which are most at liberty, are in a kind of bondage to their bellies. The wild Asses (saith the Prophet, ( Jer. 14.6.) did stand in the high places, they snuffed up the wind like Dragons, because there was no grass. How will they search after grass, who are thus afflicted for want of grass! And will not spiritual hunger make us as industrious as natural hunger doth? Hungry souls will be seeking after every green thing, after every divine precept, after very precious promise; these are the green things which the soul searcheth for, and is satisfied with. Naturalists say of the wild Ass, that he utterly refuseth to feed upon those things that are dry and dead, he must have g • een. That's true of every believer, he cannot feed upon dead and dry things, upon what is chaffy and husky, he must have green, sappy, juicy, lively food; such hath God provided for him, and he will be satisfied with none but such.
JOB, Chap. 39. Vers. 9, 10, 11, 12.
9.
Will the Unicorn be willing to serve thee? or abide by thy crib?
10.
Canst thou bind the Unicorn with his hands in the furrow? or will he harrow the valleys after thee?
11.
Wilt thou trust him, because his strength is great? or wilt thou leave thy labor with him?
12.
Wilt thou believe him that he will bring home thy seed, and gather it into thy barn?
THe Lord still enquires after Jobs skill and knowledge in the book of the creatures. In the former context, Job was interrogated about the wild Ass, whose freedom was there set out, in opposition to the servitude of the home-bred, or tame Ass. Here the Lord puts the question about the Unicorn, and sets forth his liberty, in opposition to the servile labor of the Ox.
Vers. 9. Will the Unicorn be willing to serve thee? or abide by thy crib?
The Unicorns liberty is here described, first, more generally, in two things.
First, He will do no work for man.
Secondly, He will receive no reward from man.
That he hath no mind to work for man, is shown in the first words of the verse: Will he be willing to serve thee? Will he be employed in thy service?
And that he cares not to be fed or provided for by man, that he looks for no reward from man, is set down in the latter part of the verse; Will he abide by thy crib?
Secondly, The stubborn liberty of the Unicorn is described in this context, more particularly, by his refusal of that special labor which is necessary in husbandry, or for the tillage of the ground, in the whole compass of it; and here are three parts of that labor set down, all refused by the Unicorn.
First, The ploughing of the ground in the 10th verse; Canst thou bind the Unicorn with his band in the furrow? He will not go to plough.
The second labor with which beasts are wrought in husbandry, is harrowing the ground; the Unicorn will not touch that, as 'tis said in the close of the 10th verse, Will he harrow the valleys after thee? No, he will neither plough nor harrow, he will do none of these works though he have strength enough to do them, as appears ( verse. 11.) Wilt thou trust him, because his strength is great? or wilt thou leave thy labor to him?
The third part of husbandry, about which beasts are used, is the bringing of the Corn in, or the home-bringing of it; the Unicorn will lend no help to that work neither, as is shown in the 12th verse, Wilt thou believe him that he will bring home thy seed, and gather it into thy barn?
Thus the Unicorn will neither serve in general, nor do any of these particular services; he will neither plough nor harrow, nor bring home the seed. The Unicorn is a beast unsubject to, and unsubduable by man, yet subject to God, and by him easily subduable; for (as the Apostle spake in another case, Phil. 3.21.) He is able to subdue all things to himself.
We may conceive, the scope and intendment of the Lord in putting these questions to Job about the Unicorn, was to show, that if he could not time or reduce such a creature as the Unicorn to his Plow and Harrow, then he must not think of bringing God to his bow, who made both the Unicorn and man too. Surely God will be at his liberty, to do with man what he pleaseth, do man what he can, seeing the Unicorn will take liberty to do what he pleaseth, notwithstanding all that man can do. God will not be bound up to, nor tied by any man's dictates, but remains sovereignly free forever, in all his dispensations. Thus of the whole matter in general: I shall now open the particulars mentioned about this unserviceable creature the Unicorn.
Vers. 9. Will the Unicorn be willing to serve thee?
The Original word translated Unicorn, denotes an animal, high and stately. It comes from a root which signifies to be exalted or lifted up; and hence David (Psal. 92.10.) testifying his assurance that God would lift him up out of his troubles, and deliver him from his pressures, compares his hoped for exaltation to that of the Unicorn: My horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an Unicorn, I shall be anointed with fresh oil; that is, I shall have new and sufficient supplies of grace, and gifts, of joy and consolation.
This word (Reem) which in the Hebrew bears only that general signification Highness, is rendered by the Seventy in Greek Monoceros, and by the Latins Unicornis, both which answer our English term Unicorn; the notation of all these words in the Greek, Latin, and English imports a beast with one horn, whereas (I say) the Hebrew word imports only the highness or nobleness of that animal or beast intended under it.
Natural Historians, in their descriptions of, and discourses about the beasts of the earth, make report of an Indian Ass with one horn, as also of Indian Oxen with one horn, which may therefore, according to the sense of the word, be called Unicorns. Our late Annotators seem to incline, that by the word Reem here rendered Unicorn, is meant the wild Bull rather than the Unicorn, because as the wild Ass is here opposed to the tame, so the wild Bull seems to be opposed to the Ox, which is a tame creature And fitted for the service of man.
The Vulgar Latin translation reads it, the Rhinoceros, and so doth one of the Greek interpreters; and in our English translation ( Isa. 34.7.) we put the word Unicorns in the Text, and Rhinocerots in the Margin. The notation of which word (Rhinocerot) imports a beast with a horn of his nose or snout. The Rhinoceros is a large beast, near in bigness (say some) to the Elephant, only shorter in his legs. And the description or character which one of the Ancients gives of the Rhinoceros, is very suitable to, and doth fully correspond with that which the Lord gives here in this Text of that savage beast (Reem) by us rendered the Unicorn: For (saith my Author) The Rhinoceros is a proud imperious animal such as will not not be subject to man, nor be brought to obedience, living perpetually in desert places, and securing himself from danger by his horn.
Further, It is said of this Rhinoceros.
First, That he is a mortal enemy to the Elephant, whom he assaults fiercely; and having sharpen'd, or as it were whetted his horn at a ragged rock, that his weapon may be fit for the bloody battle, he wounds him under the belly, where he knows the Elephant is most in danger, that being his softest part.
Secondly, Some to carry the sense of the word Unicorn to this other creature, say, the Rhinoceros hath but one horn; whereas others affirm confidently, that the Rhinoceros hath two horns, one upon his Nose, and another upon his Brow, though not so big as that other. One of the old Poets speaking of the Roman sports, describes a Rhinoceros thus, He tossed the bear that was brought before him with his double horn. Sanctius (in his Comment upon this verse) saith he saw a Rhinoceros which was brought into Spain, in whom he observed all things answering the description given of him by the Ancients.
What the shape or form of the Unicorn is, as ordinarily painted and set up with the Lion, as a supporter of the Royal Arms, and as a sign at many common men's doors, everyone knows. Some Historians speaking of the Unico n, paint him out thus in their books and writing • . Pliny in his eig ••• Book, at the one and twentieth Chapter saith, the Monoc •• ote or Unicorn (whom he there calls a most fierce savage beast) is in the general make or bulk of his body like a Horse, and in the shape of his head like a Hart or Stag, that in the fashion of his feet he is much like an Elephant, his tail resembling the tail of a Boar, that he hath a black horn in the midst of his fore-head two cub is in length, which say others, is not smooth, but wreathed, and somewhat ragged, and at the very top or point exceeding sharp. He is of so fierce a nature, that he will not be taken alive, as the same Autho • affi ms from hear-say.
Yet there want not those who make doubt whether there be, ye who deny that there is any such beast in the compass of nature, as is commonly called an Unicorn, having such a medicinal horn as is asserted; and therefore all those Scriptures, wherein this word (Reem) in the Text translated Unicorn, is used, They who are of that opinion, translate Rhinocerote, as not being satisfied that there is such a creature as that other in the world. One of the Rabbin's collects an objection against him from that of Moses (Deut. 33.17. ) where speaking of this beast (Reem) he seems to say that he hath more horns than one, therefore no Unicorn; for there describing the flourishing and powerful estate of the Tribe of Joseph, he saith, his horns are like the horns of an Unicorn; as if that beast (whatsoever it is which is signified by that Hebrew word) had more horns than one. We indeed translate both words plurally, not the horns of an Unicorn, but the horns of Unicorns, yet the Hebrew is singular. However I conceive this objection is of no weight, to the denial of any such creature as the Unicorn, it being frequent in Scripture to put the singular number for the plural, as there Unicorn for Unicorns; and therefore that Text hath little or no force in it to invalidate their opinion, who assert that there is such an one horned animal.
Now as to the Text in hand, it may suffice my purpose (leaving farther search of these things to Naturalists) to say, that the Hebrew word Reem signifies a wild beast, very fierce and furious, usually called an Unicorn, or expressed by a word signifying a beast having but one horn in Greek, Latin, and English.
But though I shall not deliver any opinion of my own to the contrary, yet I suppose it will not be unpleasing to the ingenuous and learned Reader, if before I proceed with my own meditations, upon what is said in this Chapter, about this creature, I here insert the discourse and opinion of that learned Physician, and Divine Critick, Doctor Arnoldus Bootius, in the third Book of his Sacred Animadversions upon the Hebrew Text of the Old Testament, and the first Chapter of that Book: The substance of which I have gathered, and in most places translated word for word, as followeth
That the word Reem (saith he) is the name of some certain Animal all Writers agree; but what this Animal is, is not agreed. Jerome renders it sometimes a Rhinocerote, sometimes an Unicorn; and so do some others in translating the Bible. Pagnine translates it only once a Rhinocerote, in all other places where it occurs, an Unicorn; yet in his Dictionary he seems to incline, that the word signifieth a Rhinocerote, rather than an Unicorn. But the Greeks generally are more constant in rendering it an Unicorn, than a Rhinocerote; and in this almost all interpreters, both they who translate the Scriptures into the Latin tongue, and they who translate them into their Mother tongue, follow them, and do so too; the Rabbins also go the same way. And therefore one of them writing upon those words of Moses concerning Joseph (Deut. 33.17.) His horns are like the horns of (Reem) an Unicorn (which seems to oppose this opinion which makes Reem to be the Unicorn, a beast of one horn; he I say, to avoid this difficulty) saith that place is to be understood by an Enallage or change of the number, the word Reem Unicorn, being put for Reemim, Unicorns; with which answer several others wipe of that objection.
Nor doth it a little help this interpretation that most of those marks, which the Scripture takes notice of in that beast called