Commentary on the Old Testament Volume 2-4
And he shall be as the light of the morning when the Sun riseth, &c. the vulgar Latin, as the light of the morning, when the Sun ariseth, without these words connecting it with the former Verse, and he shall be, and therefore it is by Lyra applied to the manner of God's speaking unto David, and by him Vers. 2. as if it were meant, that his speaking was not obscure and as it were, clouded, but clear and perspicuous, as a morning, wherein the Sun ariseth clear. And whereas the next words may seem not to agree to this, as grass groweth out of the earth by rains, that he applieth to Christ, to set forth whose coming of a Virgin the comparison is used, because as the ground is barren and bringeth forth no fruit, but by the rain falling upon it, so that virgin could not have brought forth a Sun, but by the Spirit of God making her fruitful. Pelican following R. David applieth it to David's kingdom thus, as the morning light ariseth, and the Sun always increasing and shining, so shall or let my kingdom be always fair and never troubled with clouds, because if the morning be cloudy, one while clear and then rainy, it never profiteth such things, as grow out of the earth. Hugo Card applieth it to the word of Christ, thus his word is like the morning light, which illuminateth and maketh fruitful, so as that his rising again is like the morning rising without any clouds of infidelity, and he shone by miracles and made the ground of believers hearts fruitful, as the rain the earth, by the preaching of the Word. Peter Martyr expounding this and the next Verse together understandeth it of the kingdom of the Messiah, of which it is hereby prophesied, that it should be clear, as the fairest day, as the Sun shining in his strength overcometh and annihilateth all cloudinesse, so overcoming all that opposed themselves against it, and such was the covenant of God made with him touching it. And for the other similitude of the rain, hereby he saith was meant, that persecutions notwithstanding should arise, but they should be improved as rain to the making of the earth fruitful, yet he saith, that his house should not be thus, because the rain falling upon the earth produceth fruits that are fading, but the fruit of this covenant should be everlasting, because of the Kingdom of the Messiah there should be no end; but of the last word, because he shall not make it to grow, he saith nothing, and so leaveth all indeed obscure. Junius having expounded the former of these Verses of them, that he should rule over, for he supplieth these words, and they shall be as the morning light, &c. he rendereth this, as the reason of the next words, although my house be not so, that is, although it be not so clear without clouds of sin, yet God's covenant with me is firm and sure, when he maketh it not to grow, that is, when for sin my house for a time shall not enjoy such prosperity. There are also divers other translations, as in the vulg. Latin, Vers. 5. Neither is my house so great with God, that he should make with me an everlasting Covenant, &c. Neither is there anything of him, that shall not bud. The Geneva translation, after these words, the morning without clouds, hath it thus, Vers. 4. so shall my house be, and not as the grass of the earth is by the bright rain, supplying all these words, so shall my house be, and not, which are not in the Hebrew, Vers. 5. the last words, therefore all my health and whole desire is, that he would not make grow so, where so, again is supplied, not being in the Hebrew. Our new translation followeth Junius. Hebr. it is, And as the light of the morning, the Sun, he shall arise, the morning, not clouds, the tendergrasse from the earth from the shining after rain, for my house is not so with God, and then the last words, for all my salvation and all my love, for he shall not make it grow. For the meaning, Junius giveth the best light into it, for some words must needs be supplied in such an abrupt and concise kind of speaking, that the sense may be attained to, thus going forward here to prophesy of the Messiah, under the name of a just ruler, he further saith, that he shall be as the Sun, the light of the morning, which is clear and without all clouds, for he is called the Sun of righteousness, Mal. 4. for his glory, wherein he excelleth the Sun, and for a more superexcellent spiritual light coming from him, the tender grass, that is, he is also as the green grass, which the bright Sun causeth to shoot out apace after a large rain, because his kingdom increased so fast, the Gospel being received and Churches planted in so many countries far and wide over all the world in a short time. For my house is not so with God, that is, my house I grant is but mean, and not of that greatness, that God should out of it bring such a ruler, for I was at the first but a shepherd, yet God out of his mere grace & mercy towards me, hath made a firm Covenant with me, and given me a sure promise, that cannot be broken, but shall stand forever, that such a ruler shall come of me, and this is my salvation and delight, for by him I hope to be saved eternally. For he shall not make to grow, or although he shall not make, &c. for thus also may 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the word here used be expounded, that is, as Junius before, although my house flourish not constantly in my posterity, but be sometime so crushed, as that it may seem to be without all possibility of growing up to such a glorious kingdom, yet that which hath been said, shall be verified: so that these words seem to be added, as pointing at the desperate state that the house of David should be in under the Babylonish captivity, and afterwards through Herod's tyranny, to denote which and yet to give hope of the Messiah, Esa. 11. 1. it is said, a branch shall come out of the trunk or root of Jesse, that is, his house cut down, as it were, to the roots.
But the sons of Belial shall be all as thorns thrust away, because they cannot be taken with hands. But the man that will touch them must be fenced with iron and the staff of a spear, and they shall be utterly burnt with fire in the same place, the vulg. Latin comburentur usque ad nihilum, Hebr. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 ad cessationem, i. ad nihilum. This, saith Lyra, is to be understood of the wicked Jews, who were as thorns to those that handled them, that is, to Christ and his Apostles, wherefore they were by the Romans destroyed by force of Arms, and many of them with their City and Temple burnt with fire, and after that, because they died in infidelity, they were burnt everlastingly in hell fire. Others generally understand this of all the wicked compared to thorns, because they bear no good fruit, but pricks to hurt those that meddle with them by way of instruction or reprehension, wherefore as a man dealeth with thorns, so they shall be dealt withal, that is, powerfully proceeded against, and finally burnt in the place where they stand, that they may do no more hurt to such as come near them. Yet Martyr in this bringeth the Jews also for example, who were destroyed by Titus and Vespasian in their own City. Pelican will have Antichrist and his adherents, the greatest enemies of Christ understood, whom he shall consume by the breath of his month, as by fire. I hold with Lyra, because it is a prophesy of things most remarkable happening about the kingdom of the Messiah, that his greatest enemies and first oppugners, the Jews, are particularly meant, who were therefore justly destroyed by the Romans. And morally we may [Note.] note, what the end of all the incorrigibly wicked shall be, viz. destruction forever in hell fire.
These are the names of the valiant men, which David had. As the sacred history doth first and chiefly set forth the gests of King David, as being a man singularly chosen of God, so it seemed good to the Spirit of God, that the valiant men about him with their worthy gests should be put upon record for their honor, whereby is implied that they were not only most valiant but faithful also both to God and the King, and godly, for Joah who murdered two men most treacherously, Abner and Amasa, and presumptuously transgressed against the Kings charge touching Absalom, is not for these his wickednesses named amongst them, nor Amasa, who had rebelled with Absalom against the King, but only such, as constantly followed him in adversity and prosperity, and helped him both in the time of his persecution under Saul, and against Ishbosheth the son of Saul to obtain the kingdom, to which God had chosen him, being for this purpose extraordinarily assisted with valor and might to subdue the enemy, and obtain unto him a very large dominion over all the neighbouring nations, who had hitherto possessed a great part of the Land, which was given for inheritance to the children of Israel; some yet stand for Joah to be meant by him sitting in the chair: but Hugo, Rupert and Martyr hold, that he was excluded from his ill deserts before spoken of.
And herein David was a figure of Christ, who had also his worthies, the Apostles, and 72. more Disciples, whom he sent out and instructed with power extraordinarily to conquer for him, by showing signs and working miracles, and the putting off the names of David's worthies upon record in holy Scripture, figured out the writing of the names of Christ's faithful Ministers [Note.] in heaven, as Martyr partly noteth, that we all might be encouraged to fight manfully under Christ's banner, and never for any danger be made to shrink from him; for the valor of any faithful servant of God in this kind shall assuredly be registered, and he shall not lose the praise thereof at God's hands, as it is said of the Jew within, that his praise is not of men but of God. And in that David kept such men about him, who were both valiant and godly, it is commended hereby to other Kings and Princes to do the like, and not to keep about them vain and vicious persons to the corrupting and weakening of their states and kingdoms.
Of these worthies of David here are reckoned up 36. and yet Vers. 39. they are summed up 37. Joab also, saith Junius, being understood, although he be not named. Comester numbereth David for one, as the head of them all, and so maketh up 37. and this he groundeth upon the vulg. Latin, where it is, David sitting in the chair was most wise, but Hebr. there is no mention made of David anymore, but that these were the valiant men, that David had, and then it is said, sitting in the chair, the most wise, the head of the three, he was Adino the Eznite, or as in our new translation rather, the Tachmonite sitting in the chair, he was Adino, for the word rendered, the most wise, Hebr. is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which, although 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifieth wise, cannot well be rendered most wise, but rather Tachmonite, as setting forth the place, of which he was, as the Eznite doth his family. But Junius for sitting in the chair, &c. hath it, Josheh bashebeth Tachcemonites, huic gratum fuit hastato una vice invadere 800. taking the two first words for his proper names, which are commonly rendered, sitting in the chair, and Adino according to the signification (which is commonly taken for a proper name, but only in the vulg. Latin, where it is expounded by tenerrimus) for grammei, it was delightful to him, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 being armed with his spear, which is commonly rendered Eznite. The Hebrews will have David described here, as the chief of the most valiant, because it is for Kings and Masters to sit in chairs, and he, saith Lyra, is called most tender, because he was gentle to his friends, although terrible to his enemies, for which is added ligni vermiculus, as the vulg. Latin rendereth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 because as the worm eateth into the hardest wood, so he pierced his strongest enemies by his might and destroyed them. But because David's worthies and not David himself are here propounded to be numbered, neither do we read that ever he slew 800. enemies at once, it is certain that some other man and not David is meant. Some think that Joah is thus described, because he was Captain of all the Army, but this is not probable for the reason before rendered, why he is not put into this Catalogue at all, or according to others because his gests were sufficiently set forth before, and the purpose of the Spirit here was not to reckon up any, but such valiant men of David, as either had hitherto been passed over in silence, or without any hint giving of their valor, or although something were spoken hereof, yet not the gest most memorable: for so Sibbecai, whose killing of a Giant is spoken of Chap. 21. is here omitted, and Elhanan and Jonathan only cursorily named, that we might gather, when we recount their valiant gests before set forth, what the rest of the 30. who are only named were, but Abishai there spoken of is here again commended for another most valiant act of his, viz. slaying 300. at once. Vers. 18. It seemeth to me, that Sibbecai spoken of, Chap. 21. but here omitted, is also to be understood, who being added, as he may well be from thence, maketh up the number of 37. and indeed without understanding him the second ternary is imperfect, there being in it but two expressed, Vers. 18, 19, 20. And for the former words, sitting in a chair, they may best be referred to David thus; these are the valiant men, which David sitting in the chair of State had, and thus the Tygurin translation rendereth it: the Tachmonite, who was the chief of the three, he was otherwise called Adino the Eznite, &c. That of Junius doth not arride me, because if Adino be rendered gratum ei, the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is redundant, and there is no reason to take the two first words for a proper name contrary to the stream of all interpreters. And for the making up of this number of 37. that Sibbecai is to be understood may be gathered from 1 Chron. 11. where he is also named: but there are many more also named, so that the Catalogue here is imperfect, and these 37. were not all David's worthies, for there are named about 13 more, these were all, that it pleased the Spirit of God to set down here, the rest being reserved to be registered in that place, happily because they came not all unto him so soon as these 37. but when he was in Hebron, and Ishbosheth Saul's son was now dead, for then many more of great valor of all the Tribes are also named, 1 Chron. 12. But 1 Chron. 11. 11. it is Jashobeam, the Hachmonite, who is first mentioned, but he is generally held to be the same, although called by another name, and whereas there it is said, that he slew 300. at once here 800. by Josephus 900. some think, that 300. of these 800. were slain by his spear, the rest otherwise, but others better, that he did that valiant act at another time. If any man shall think it incredible, that one man should in one day slay so many in a battle, he must remember, how Sampson alone slew 1000. men with the Jaw-bone of an Ass, and Jonathan and his Armor-bearer alone set upon the whole Army of the Philistines and brought confusion to it, and Gideon with his 300. men overthrew the Army of the Midianites being as the Grashoppers for multitude. The Lord promised to such as served him, that one should chace a 1000. the enemy seeing the valor of this man might be so astonished through fear, as to become feeble and unable to resist, or to flee from him wounding and killing them, as the beasts are said to fall down for fear before the Lion pursuing them near. Now for the method here used in making this Catalogue. 1 Here are two ternaries of the most valiant, together with their most memorable gests. 2 An enumeration of the names of 30. more, and the same method is followed, 1 Chron. 11. Touching the two ternaries, the first three are said to be superior to the other three, and yet those other three of wonderful valor also.
The second was Eleazar the son of Dodo, which word signifieth his uncle, and so it is by some rendered, but it is more commonly and better taken for a proper name, he is said to have been of that valor, that he slew the Philistines till his sword did cleave to his hand, and then the people which before were fled from him for fear of the Philistines returned only after him to take the spoil.
The third was Shammah the son of Agee, who defended a piece of ground full of Lentiles against a troop of the Philistines, when all others fled from the Philistines for fear, and obtained a great victory. The history touching these two differeth much from this, 1 Chron. 11. 12, 13. where that is ascribed to Eleazar, which is here to Shammah, no mention being made o • Shammah, but implicitly. He was with David in Padammim, and the Philistines were gathered together to battle, where there was parcel of Barley, and when the people fled from before the Philistines, they set themselves in the midst of the parcel and delivered it and slew the Philistines To reconcile this difference some think, that the History of Shammah is quite omitted, 1 Chron. 11. rendering therefore the plural, they stood in the midst of the parcel by the singular, he stood, as the Septuagint, and Tostatus, and because it was in a parcel of a Barley field where Eleazar fought, but of Lentils, where Shammah, and it seemeth to be only a more full description of the valiant act of Eleazar, the occasion of his fight being but in part set forth here, but in the other part there, and the name of the place, where he was, when he entered into this fight, Pashdammim, which is here omitted. For the plural used there, it may be reconciled, that some of his men seeing him to defend that ground alone were gathered unto him again, but it was his valor alone, by which this was done. Some others think, that the histories of both these are conjoined in the Chronicles, and whereas Lentils are spoken of here, but there Barley, there might be stacks of both, which the Philistines would have burned Lyra saith, because Eleazar was the chief in defending that ground, he only is mentioned, but Shammah also implied in that the plural number is used. And this is the more probable, because Vers. 15. it is spoken of three, that together did also another most valiant act in breaking through the host of the Philistines for water, when as two only had been expressly named before, intimating, that the third was left to be understood from 2 King. 23. Whereas Vers. 9. it is said, when they defied the Philistines that were there gathered together, some think rather it should be read, when the Philistines defied and objected cowardice unto them, but the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 signifieth also their exposing of themselves to danger, as Pagninus hath it, and the word rendered the Philistines, is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 against the Philistines; wherefore Junius, when they exposed their lives to danger against the Philistines, and this is best, because it is not likely, that they would reproach the Philistines, and then flee away from them, and the words agree not to the other reading, the Philistines reproached them.
And three of the thirty went down to David, &c. here by thirty is to be understood the whole number of David's valiant men, who might be so called although they were more, because happily so many were by David chosen at the first, and had the name of the thirty worthies given unto them, and authority and command over others accordingly, but some others afterwards also showing great valor were joined unto them, but they were still called by the name of the thirty, as the 12. Apostles, when Paul and Barnabas were added, and Epaphroditus, Junius and Andronicus, of whom, Rom. 16. 7. it is said, that they were of note amongst the Apostles, were still called the 12. Apostles. These three came to David to the Cave of Odullam in the time when he was persecuted by Saul, a Garrison of the Philistines being then at Bethlehem, and when David longed for some of the water of the well of Bethlehem, which was a well, that of old he happily had used to drink of, for he was of that City and knew it to be very good, these three adventured to fetch him some water thence, &c. and this is noted to have been done in the harvest time, when it was hot, and when it was brought he would not drink thereof, but considering that they with peril of their lives had fetched it, he poured it out for a drink offering to the Lord for the health and safety of these three, saith Pelican: he offered it for a drink offering, saith Martyr, in way of thanksgiving to God, who had given him such worthy men, and preserved their lives in this great danger, and he called it the blood of those men, because gotten with danger of their lives, as the wine in the Sacrament is also called blood figuratively: a notable example for Princes and Captains to be tender over the [Note.] lives of their servants, to be prodigal of their blood is tyranny. And their readiness to give content to their Captain serveth to commend ready obedience to all servants, although not in imitating desperately this example, when there is no such great need: but in time of necessity for the safety of the King, and the Commonwealth, subjects ought to put themselves upon apparent dangers. Some think, that David bade them fetch this water to try their valor, but his astonishment, when he saw, that they had done it, plainly manifesteth the contrary. Kimhi ascribeth this fact to the next three, but this is against the order of the history, yet Hugo will have these three to be Abishai, Sobbecai and Jonathan, following the vulgar Latin, Nec non ante descenderant tres, qui erant de 30. and following Jerome he saith, that David's being in the Cave of Odullam in Saul's time is not meant here, but after his sin with Bethshebah, and that the water being brought, which he so greatly desired, he being thirsty yet would not drink it, to teach his soldiers fortitude and constancy. Lyra contrariwise saith, that it cannot be understood of any but of the first three, because it is concluded, these were the three most valiant, and he saith, that David by sacrificing this water shown, that who so endanger themselves by fighting against infidels, do offer unto God a most acceptable sacrifice. Junius illustrateth the fact of these three the more by saying, that the Garrison of the Philistines kept the way to this well. Hugo in affirming these three to be the second followeth Jerome in Tradit. Hebr. So likewise doth Dionysius and Tostatus, but enough hath been said by Lyra already to confute this.
Abishai the brother of Joab was also chief among three. Thus it is said also, 1 Chron. 11. but here are two worthies only named, he and Benaiah, how then shall this number of three be made up? Pelican thinketh, that he is said to be the chief of the three with relation to two more mentioned, Chap. 21. who also slew two Giants, thus also Lyra and Hugo annumerating to him Sobbecai and Jonathan; but so there will not be three but four. Wherefore Sobbecai or Sibbecai, as I said before, may most probably be understood and not Jonathan, as some would have him, for he is named afterwards, Vers. 32. unless that be another Jonathan, because he is called the son of Jashen, and not of Shammah, David's brother, as Ch. 21. 21.
And Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, the son of a valiant man of Kabzeel: Of Jehoiada mention is made 1 Chron. 12. 27. that he was Captain of 3700. Aaronites, which came to David to help him, and of this Jehoiada Benaiah seemeth to be the son, and so Josephus accordingly calleth him a Priest, as all the Aaronites were: Cabzeel, of which he was, was of the tribe of Judah, for which cause Theodoret will have him of that tribe and son to David's brother. Touching Benaiah it is said, first, that he slew two Lionlike men of Moab, Hebr. two lions, but it is generally held, that they were men for their valor called Lions. 2. He slew a Lion in the time of Snow in a pit, the Lion, saith Josephus, being deceived by the Snow that covered the pit fell into it, and roaring there so, as that the people near were scared, he went valiantly thither and slew the Lion. This by some is called in question, whether it were true valor or temerity, because although to slay a Lion, when a man is enforced to fight with him, be valor, as in Samson and David, yet when there is no necessity to do it, it is rashness, and by the Roman Laws such as fought with beasts causelessly only for ostentation of their strength, were censured as infamous, and this they say was the case of Benaiah. But the commemoration of this in sacred writ to his praise doth sufficiently clear him from all such calumnies, he did it to deliver the country from that fear, in which they were, as David o deliver his Lamb from the Lion caught him by the beard and slew him. 3. He slew an Egyptian, a goodly man, having a spear in his hand, 1 Chron. 11. 23. he is said to have been of great stature, and his spear like a Weavers beam, but Benaiah had only a staff in his hand, and therefore plucking through his great valor his spear out of his hand he slew him with his own spear. This and the former fact of his are by the Hebrews expounded of Joab, who they say, was meant by the Lion, and Shimei meant by this Egyptian, for Benaiah slew them both: but neither the time nor circumstances do agree, wherefore it is only mentioned by expositors and rejected as a putid comment, and because Jerome hath it de tradit. Hebr. it is questioned, whether that book were his or no. And for these his valiant gests David set him over his guard, that is, as hath been said before, over the Cheretbites and Pelethites. Hebr. it is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 rendered in the vulg. Latin, auricularium à secreto, his Privy Counselor, Martyr, ad auditum suum, that is, saith he, over his Privy Counsel, but he approveth rather of the other exposition, over his guard, who are set forth by his audience, because they were always at hand to hear his commands to execute them.
Next followeth Asahel, who was before commended from his swiftness of foot, he was slain being but a young man by Abner, then Elhanan the son of Dodo, Chap. 21. 19. the son of Jare Oregim, of which names see there; it is probable, that he is not set after Asahel, of whom no such famous exploit is commemorated, but only for honors sake to Asahel, who was near a kin to David.
The third Semmah, 1 Chron. 11. Sammoth: the fourth Elika, omitted 1 Chron. 11, &c.
Mystically by David's longing after water out of the well of Bethlehem may be understood his longing for the Messiah that should be borne there, who was made a sacrifice for our sins, and by his blood, as by water poured out cleanseth us from them, so many as believe in his name: thus the Ordin. Gloss applying also morally his refusing to drink of this water to his penitency for his unlawful desiring of the wife of Uriab, for according to the Gloss following Josephus, he is understood to have been in Jerusalem at that time in the fort of Zion, after his sin committed with Bathsheba, but this agreeth not with the Scripture, wherein he is said to have been then in the Cave of Odullam.
CHAP. XXIV.
AGaine the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, that he moved David to say, go and number Israel and Judah, 1 Chron. 21. 1. Satan stood up against Israel, and provoked David to number Israel. By comparing these two together we see, that by the fury of the Lord Satan is meant, whom he used in his wrath to stir up David to sin, that he might therefore bring a judgment upon the people, with whom he was offended for their sins. He brought one judgment of a three years famine, 2 Sam. 21. for the sin committed amongst them in the matter of the Gibeonites, now they had also greatly sinned otherwise, although it be not here specified, for which he brought the judgment of the Plague in this Chap. Martyr conjectureth, that after that famine plenty being restored, and the people living in peace they were much corrupted in their manners, as is usual by such means: and we may add, that all their enemies being subdued, they most probably grew secure, and having such worthies, and they being so many, they trusted to their own strength, and hereby the Lord was provoked thus to abate their number. And whereas it may seem, that if their sins were the cause of this judgment, he might have brought it upon them without David's further stirring him up by numbering the people, it is true, but because they had greatly sinned against David also, whom he had chosen, by being so ready to follow other usurpers as Absalom and Shebah in rebelling against him; it seemed good unto the Lord to permit him thus to offend, that through him they might be punished, who had always forborne himself to take revenge upon them, that it might appear, that God is the avenger of wrongs, and not avenge ourselves, but commit it to him, as he hath commanded. And that all may take notice, how far stretching the sin of a King is, and therefore pray for their well-doing above all others, as 1 Tim. 2. 1. They were before judged for Saul's sin, of which they were doubtless guilty by giving assent thereunto, and now they are judged again for David's sin, to which they were also accessory, by being together puffed up by their great multitudes, and invincible forces. But if it were a sin in David to command the people to be numbered, it may justly both be inquired, wherein that sin [Qu.] lay, and also how God is said to move him hereunto, seeing he is the author of all good, but not of any evil? To the first of these it is generally answered, that pride was his sin, for being puffed up in beholding the catalogue of so many valiant men, which he had, he thought it would add much to his glory to have a Register made of all his other men also throughout his whole kingdom. Some think that he sinned, because in numbering the people, he caused not the tribute to be gathered of each man for the sanctuary, as was commanded to be done, when the people were numbered, that no plague might be sent amongst them, for the Lord would have this one end always of numbering the people, that an oblation might be made for them, for the reconciling of God's favor towards them. And thus the heathen Romans, when the number of the people was taken, which was once in five years, ordained that a sacrifice should be offered for their health, of a sow, a sheep, and three bulls; and happily they learned this from the Hebrews. But David thought not upon this law, only he would have the people numbered for no other end, but that he might know the number of them to be lifted up the more. And if he had propounded this end, viz. to raise a tribute for the sanctuary, saith R. Kimhi, unless he had had some other lawful end of numbering, it had not been justifiable, for God would not have his people oppressed with tributes. To the second, that God is not the author of any evil, as it is simply evil, but he suffereth it sometime to be done for a punishment of precedent sins: as here, Satan by his suggestion moved David to number the people, as 1 Chron. 20. but the anger of God is said to have done it in this place, because he being offended with Israel for sin, permitted Satan to work thus in David and gave him not the grace to withstand such a sinful motion: but of this see more at large in my comment upon Rom. 9. Touching the number of the people, it is committed to Joab to bring it in, going through the whole land from Dan, which was north, to Beersheba, which was south. This he was unwilling to, as knowing it to come from vain glory and therefore tending to the provoking of God to anger, but the King being resolute, he did it, and in nine months brought in the number of all, that were able to go to war: whereby we may gather, that none were numbered under 20. and none above 60. which happily might be as many more. And that none under 20. were appointed to be numbered is expressly said, 1 Chron. 27. 23. because the Lord had promised, that they should be innumerable, as the stars of heaven. But it is said, that not only Joab, but the rulers of the people also were appointed to go and number them, of which rulers it seemeth to be spoken, 1 Chron. 27. 16. that they were 12. of each Tribe one; and 2 Sam. 24. 4. The Captains of the host are said to have gone with Joab to number, which were 12. others, 1 Chron. 27. 1, 2. The way that Joab went with the Captains was first over Jordan to begin with the Reubenites and Gadites first, which were farthest off eastward, then they came to Dan Iaan, and Zidon north; and lastly, by the Cities of the Hivites and Canaanites westward to the south of Judah and Beersheba. And they finished their numbering and brought in the number of all Israel 800000. and of Judah 500000. at the end of nine months and twenty days to Jerusalem; but 1 Chron. 21. 5. of Israel 1100000, and of Judah 470000. For the reconciling of which difference, it is to be understood, that the divers Rulers of the Tribes had their several books, into which the people numbered were written, and out of them they were again all written, or should have been written into one book for the King: but because the fact seemed abominable to Joab, he brake off from setting down all the numbers into the Kings book, and no more came in to that, but 800000 of Israel, as in this place; but the Writer of the book of the Chron: gathering the whole number out of those several books without cutting off any, set down 1100000. And whereas he maketh fewer by 30000 of the Tribe of Judah, then 2 Kings 24. Tostatus thinketh, that so many were left out, because they were unfit for war, being not so valiant; and this is the more probable, because 1 Chron. 21. 5. to the men of Judah, the number of whom is there set down, it is added, which drew the sword, but not 2 Sam. 24. Or it may be thought, that not only the men of Judah, which came of Judah, are numbered, 2 Sam. 24. but also Proselytes of other Countries dwelling amongst them and serving David, 1 Chro. 21. 5. they are left out, for there might be of these 30000. as Sallianus hath it. Peter Martyr thinketh, that Joab gave up a less number to David, because the Tribe of Levi was left out of the number, and it may be Jerusalem was not yet numbered, nor the Kings bands. But if so, the number of Judah should rather have been increased, 1 Chron. 21. whereas it is made less, and it is said expressly of Israel, that they were 1100000. Levi and Benjamin not being numbered. Some think the difference to be nothing, because the lesser number is contained in the greater, but who so being asked what number such a man mentioned, shall say 8. for 11. cannot be justified. Some think, that so many of the Tribe of Judah were smitten by the plague, and so were left out, 1 Chron. 21. and some, that 500000. are mentioned, 2 Sam. 24. although there lacked 30000. ob rotunditatem numeri. Jerome resolveth it, that Joab found a greater number, but gave up a less to the King, that he might be the less puffed up. And when I consider seriously that 1 Chron. 21. 6. The Tribe of Levi and of Benjamin he numbered not, it seemeth to me to be spoken in this sense, he put not the number of them into the book exhibited to the King, the number indeed of all Israel, as it was taken in divers books, was 1100000. and of Judah 470000. but he cut off the Levites in that account and all Benjamin, which together might well be 270000. that is, 300000. more to Israel, but 30000. less to Judah, because so many of the tribe of Levi might be numbered amongst them, 2 Sam. 24. but 1 Chron. 21. put in their proper place, that is, amongst those of Israel. And the rather may we rest satisfied in this resolution, because 1 Chron. 27. 24. it is said, that Joab began to number, but left off because of the Plague, neither was the number put into the Kings Chronicles, that is, the full number, as it goeth in the book of the Chronicles.
Afterwards David's heart smote him, when he had numbered the people, &c. Nine months and twenty days were first past, saith Martyr, wherein he lay in this sin, which was double; 1 of pride, 2 of forgetting the Law of levying a tribute for the sanctuary. But now it repenteth him greatly, by what means he was brought to this is not said, but that his heart smote him, the Spirit of God doubtless working in his conscience to make him consider his great vanity and to be humbled for it, which when he was doing this [Note.] thing he considered not, as being a while left unto himself, to show what the very best are, if they be not continually assisted by the grace of God. In our new translation it is, Vers. 11. For when David was up in the morning the Prophet Gad came unto him, whereby it may be gathered, that by his coming he was put in mind of his sin and repented. But in the Hebr. it is not for, but and. Some think, that he was smitten by some inward terror sent by the Lord to stir him up. Howsoever, it is to be noted, with what quietness of mind and immunity from trouble and pleasure so ever, sin is committed, trouble and perplexity will come for it afterwards, and this sweet [Note.] will end in bitterness, for the conscience will not always sleep, but at length awake and smite the sinner, as it did our first parents also.
And David rose in the morning, and the word of the Lord came to Gad, David's seer, &c. that is, at the same time that he caused David's heart to smite him, that night he spake thus by vision to Gad, who came unto him the morning following, and not before, by his admonitions to bring him to repentance, as Josephus, who saith, that the Prophets admonished him of his sin, and then he repented, and prayed for forgiveness. And the Lord used Gad to speak unto him, and would not speak immediately to him, as before he had used Nathan, although David also was a Prophet, to show his anger the more, as a father being offended with his child dealeth with him by interlocutors to humble him the more, when he seeth his fatherly affection thus estranged from him. Whereas 1 Chron: 21. 7. it is said that God smote Israel and then David confessed his sin, and Gad came to him, v. 8. it is Hysteron-proteron, or first in brief it is shown, that Israel was smitten, and then the order of God's proceeding against them more at large.
Gad then offered to David to choose one of these three judgments, either to flee three months before his enemies, or to suffer by famine seven years, or by a pestilence of three days. Now this offer was made in mercy upon David's repentance, to lenifie the suffering the more, because when we are constrained to endure misery it is more grievous, then when we voluntarily suffer it. For seven years famine, 1 Chron: 21. 11. it is three years famine, which is by Junius and others thus reconciled, here because three years of famine had lately been ch: 21. and now it was most likely was the fourth, wherein although God began to send rain, yet presently there followed not fruitfulness, seven years are spoken of, as including these and three more: but there because no mention had been made of those three years famine before going, three years only are named. Martyr and Pelican say, that seven a certain number is put for an uncertain, many being meant hereby. I prefer that of Junius, because although no such exact reckoning be made, yet if three years more of famine had been sent now so soon after the other, it had been of seven years continuance reckoning from the beginning to the end. Moreover for a three days pestilence, 1 Chron: 21. 12. it is, three days the sword of the Lord, even the pestilence in the land, the angel of the Lord destroying throughout all the Coasts of Israel, more expressly noting, of what nature the pestilence was, as in the execution of this judgment, is further declared, viz: destruction coming from the immediate hand of God and his Angels.
David being thus put to it, answereth, Let me fall into the hands of God, for his mercies are great, and not into the hands of man, and hereby, as expositors generally hold, he meant, let us be smitten with three days pestilence, and not with famine or sword of the enemy, because although even destruction by enemies may be said to be God's hand, yet it is not so immediate, but men are used, as instruments; and although famins are sent by God, yet hereby occasion is given to seek to men of other countries for relief, amongst whom the Jews were likely to be misused, as being of a religion differing from other Nations, and to hear their God reproachfully spoken of, as not able now any longer to sustain them in the country, to which he had brought them. In answering thus, David is thought by Martyr to have shown both piety towards God, and love to his country. For by any of the other two judgments there could not but be danger of great dishonor to redound to God, by the blaspheming of enemies, and Kings commonly can provide well enough for the feeding of themselves in the time of famine, and for the safety of their own persons in time of war, and their Subjects only for the most part, and that the meaner sort are swept away by either of these judgments. But when the immediate hand of God smiteth, as in pestilences, the King is in danger as well as the Beggar. Wherefore although his choice were given him, he conceiving his sin to be the cause, voluntarily submitted himself to such a judgment, as whereby he might be endangered as well as his people, a certain token of a true penitent, patiently to bear even to the loss of life the Lord's chastisement. And he shown also a great deal of confidence in God's goodness, although he had [Note.] offended him, that we might learn to trust in God's mercy, and hereby comfort ourselves in our greatest miseries, for he preferred falling into God's hands although he saw that he saw him, to be full of wrath against him.
But how doth this saying agree with that 1 Sam. 2. 25. if a man sin against [Qu.] God, who shall plead for him, and Heb. 10. 31. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of God? Answ: it is meant when God punisheth in wrath the obstinate sinner against the known will of God, not when the end of his punishing is mercy, as it is always to the penitent, and this was David's case.
So the Lord sent a pestilence, and there died from the morning to the time appointed 70000 men. Here because it is not said in three days expressly, but from the morning to the time appointed, some gather, that it is meant, till the evening sacrifice, because the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is commonly used to set forth that time, so the Hebrews, and Vatablus, Rupertus, Comestor, Sa, Tostatus saith it is the common opinion, that although a pestilence of three dayeswas propounded, yet out of God's mercy to the penitent it continued but one day, so likewise Martyr, and Lyra, yea some make the time less, saying that it continued but till dinner time, which was meant by the appointed time, so Josephus, and after him Origen, Theodoret and Ambrose, hereby extolling the mercy of God, who abridged a plague of three days into six hours, which was but the 24 part thereof. But Junius will have three days meant by the appointed time, because that was the time set for this destruction, and Sallianus argueth strongly for this, and by our Collect for a time of plague it seemeth, that this appointed time was so understood by the compilers thereof.
For my part, I cannot but assent rather to the most, 1. Because at the entreaty of David God commanded the destroying Angel to stay his hand, therefore he suffered not the plague to destroy all the time that was set, for without bidding, the Angel would then have ceased. 2. Because Gad came to David the same day to bid him build an Altar, and to sacrifice, v: 18. that the plague might cease. For the shorter time stood for by Josephus, &c. there is no reason, because the word here used is never found to set forth any such time. If it be urged against the other, and for the three years continuance, this was the time set, and if God varied herefrom, he is mutable. Lyra answereth well, in all threatenings it is to be understood, that it shall be so, unless by repentance God's wrath be lenified, as towards Nineveh, yet always temporal punishments are not averted, although there be repentance, as in another case of David's sinning, 2 Samt 12. Moreover here was no absolute decree propounded of a pestilence to endure three days, but only it was put to David's choice, and because he so humbly submitted to the stroke of God, and shown himself to have so great confidence in his mercy, it was none other like, but that God would deal with him in mercy in abridging the time of this judgment. Now for the manner how the people were destroyed by this pestilence, Josephus saith, they were consumed divers ways, some dying with vehement pain and bitter torment, some with less pain even in the hands of the Physicians, who went about to cure them, others, as it were, being choked, and darkness coming upon their eyes, and others, even as they were burying their dead suddenly. It is said indeed, that an Angel was seen with a sword in his hand, but this vision or apparition, was only for a sign, to show that they who died were slain by God's Angel, but not through the smiting of any visible sword, but of some mortiferous poison injected to their hearts, and presently killing them, as if they had been thrust into the heart by a sword. So that this pestilence was not like other plagues, which come from the infection of the air, but killed immediately by the ministry of God's Angel.
For the number of 70000 said here to be slain, the Hebrews have 270000 to make good that their reconciliation of the different numbers before spoken of there being so many missing in Samuel of the number 1 Chr: • . that the cause of this difference was, that in Samuel such as died are left out, but in Chron: reckoned also, but they are herein contrary to all scripture, wherein, it is but 70000. And all these were men destroyed all over Israel, from Dan to Beershesheba, as the numbering had gone. The Hebrews except Benjamin and Levi, of which Tribes, they say none were smitten, because they were not numbered, but seeing the numbering alone was not the cause of this evil, but the people's sins, as was before shown, it is not to be doubted, but that if these Tribes were guilty, some of them were destroyed also. If it be demanded, whether any besides wicked men were now destroyed? Martyr answereth, that happily some who fell amongst others, were not of the wicked, because all are subject to the stroke of death, but because Ezek. 9. the godly are marked to be spared, when God's Angels destroyed others, I think it more probable, that the Angel was also now directed so, as that they were spared. And if it be demanded whether all these were men only that fell, it is answered, yes, for both men only were numbered, and not women or children, and they only had formerly rebelled against their King.
And when the Angel stretched out his hand upon Jerusalem to destroy it, the Lord repented him of the evil, &c. 1 Chr. 21. 15. And God sent an Angel to Jerusalem to destroy it, and as he was destroying, the Lord beheld, and repented, &c. Here it is not properly to be understood, that God repented, for repentance is not incident unto him, 1 Sam. 15. 29. but it is said thus, after the manner of men, because when a man saith, that he will do anything and doth it not, it is because he repenteth, as David against Nabal, so when God altereth his purpose upon the repentance of men, he is said to repent per anthropopatheian, and this showeth, that the pestilence threatened for three days continued not so long, but determined the first day, for otherwise how could God be said to repent of the evil, but that he suffered not the destruction to extend so long as he had threatened? Whereas it may seem by the words here, that at the first coming of the Angel to Jerusalem to destroy, the judgment ceased and so Jerusalem escaped without any destruction, it is made plain, 1 Chr. 21. 15. that the pestilence destroyed there also, for it is said, as the Angel was destroying there, the Lord repented of the evil, that is, to see so many cut off so suddenly, and although the men of Jerusalem rebelled not with Sheba, yet they rebelled with Absalom, and so were as worthy to be punished. And it is added, v: 17. David spake unto the Lord when he saw the Angel smite the people, so that the people in Jerusalem were smitten also, 1 Chron: 21. 16. it is said before this. David saw the Angel of the Lord standing between heaven and earth with a sword stretched over Jerusalem, and he and the elders of Israel being clothed with sackcloth fell upon their faces, v: 17. then David said, Is it not I that commanded the people to be numbered? it is I that have sinned, but these sheep what have they done? let thy hand be against me, &c. He thought that God smote them only for his sins, and therefore he speaketh thus of the people, as being innocent, but, as was shown before, God took occasion only upon his numbering to send this judgment, but he had been provoked before to wrath by their sins which he now thus punished. It shown David's great love and tender affection over the people committed to his government, that he spake thus for them, and all Kings should from him take example to be likewise affected with the grievances and miseries of their people. But what is it, that he prayeth that God's hand might be against him and his fathers house? was not his fathers house nearest of all unto him? Answ. He meant if the striking of him would not suffice, his punishment should be aggravated in cutting off his kindred also, who being about him, were more accessory to this sin then others; or he speak by an Hyperbole.
And Gad came that day to David, 1 Chron: 21. 18 The Angel of the Lord commanded Gad to go to David, and he came and said, Go to the threshing floor of Ornan, here it is Araunah the Jebusite, and set up an Altar there, &c. the difference is nothing, God commanded by his Angel, or the Angel of God commanded, and the same man was called Araunab and Ornan. David must set up an Altar and sacrifice thereon, that the pestilence might cease, a propitiation for sin being thus made, as sometime a plague consuming the people, Aaron took incense and went and stood with his censer between the living and the dead, and so the plague ceased. The Hebrews say, that Zadok offered upon this Altar, but it is rather to be thought, that it was Abiathar because Zadok ministered before the Tabernacle in Gibeon, but Abiathar before the Ark at Jerusalem. But what need was there of sacrificing now, when as the Lord had bidden the Angel before to stay his hand? Answ. It is to be understood, the humiliation of David and the Elders being premised, this direction being first given and sacrifices being offered, then the destroying Angel was forbidden to smite anymore, and not before, although it be first placed, the historiographer making hast to write of the compassion wherewith God was moved, and then showing by what means, and in what order.
But why must David go to the possession of a Jebusite, an heathen, and one of the seven nations appointed to be destroyed before Israel? Kimhi contendeth, that he was none of these Jobusites, but of the kindred of Abimelech; howsoever, it seemeth that he was a faithful person, and a true hearted subject to David, and one, as some think, that helped him to get the possession of Zion. David's being sent to his floor, figured out the faith amongst the Gentiles to whom the Jews must come by believing in like manner, if ever they will be saved, for he that believeth with the Gentiles in Christ, sets up an Altar amongst them, seeing the Altar served to figure out Christ, so Martyr, & the place, where Araunah his threshing floor was, being mount Moriah, the Lord did now show, that he would have his house built there, and that this was the place chosen for the Ark to rest in perpetually, 2 Chro. 3. 1. before David came to set up his Altar, 1 Chro. 21. 20. it is said, that Ornan saw the Angel of God, and his four sons with him hid themselves. Of the people of Israel it is not said, that any saw the Angel but David, only Ornans eyes and his sons were opened to see him, to show, that the Gentiles should beinlightned to see the Angel of the new Covenant, Christ Jesus, but the eyes of the Jews should be held from seeing, except some few selected ones. His sons being terrified with the vision hid themselves, but it is said, that he was threshing Wheat, and seeing David to come towards him he went out of the floor to meet him; although some say, that both he and his sons hid themselves; David then telling him the cause of his coming, viz. to buy the floor of him to build an Altar upon it to offer sacrifice thereon, that the Plague might be stayed, he offered to give it him, and Oxen for sacrifice, as a King. Hebr. Araunab, a King, whereupon Vatablus and others gather, that he was King of the Jebusites, and now a tributary to David, and a Proselyte embracing the true Religion. Some Hebrews gather from this that David would not build an Altar upon his floor, but being first bought of him, that he was an Idolater of the heathen, and this was the cause why he would needs buy it. But it is more probable, as was said before, that having lived so near unto David now about 30. years he was a convert, or otherwise, David would not have suffered him; moreover his liberal offer shown his goodness and desire to further this service of God, which David came about for the good of the people, unto whom he was united by embracing the same Religion. And because David knew, that this floor must be perpetually used for the service of God and for the building of a Temple there, and not at this time only, there was good reason that he should buy it. Moreover it is said, Prov. 3. 7. Honor God with thy substance, and Eccles. 34. 24. he that sacrificeth of the substance of the poor, is as one that sacrificeth the son before the father. And it was for David's sin and the people's, that sacrifice was now to be made, therefore it must be his cost, and not a strangers. And it is said, that Araunah offered not only the floor, but the Oxen, that is, saith Junius, the Oxen, which troad out the Corn which were at hand, and the threshing instruments, and other instruments of Oxen for wood, that is, the wood works, wherewith the Corn was threshed, and which were used about the Oxen in this labor, for wood to burn the sacrifice withal, because they were both there ready and most apt to burn as being dry and sear, 1 Chron. 21. 23. it is added, and Wheat for the meat-offering, for besides burnt-offerings there were peace offerings, in which fine flower was used.
So David bought the floor and the Oxen for 50. shekels of silver, therefore Vers. 23. these words, All these Araunah as a King did give unto the King, are to be understood thus, he offered to give them, 1 Chron. 21. 25. He is said to have given for the floor 600. shekels of gold. This by Lyra is thus reconciled, the price of the floor is not spoken of, 2 Sam. 24. but only of the Oxen, and 1 Chron. 21. the price paid for the floor only; so likewise Comestor, and Tostatus, who saith, it is the common opinion of all expositors; yet some say, that the Oxen and floor, which were first bought to set up an Altar only, cost but 50. shekels, but afterwards all the ground about it for the Temple and Court was boought at 600 shekels of Gold. Some that the Tribes paid all but 50. shekels. And lastly some plainly against the Text, that the shekels, 2 Sam. 24. were shekels of Gold, and those, 1 Chron. 21. shekels of Silver, whereof 600. were no more then 50. of Gold. But I rest in the first and most commonly received. For the value of 50. shekels in our money counting 15 d. to the shekel, it was 3 l. 2 s 6 d. and 600. shekels, the shekel being counted 15. s. were in our money 450. l. all this money was given both for the floor and all the ground about it, which must needs be very spacious for the Temple and all things pertaining to it.
Then an Altar being set up, David offered burnt-offerings and peace-offerings, and the Lordwas entreated for the land and the Plague was stayed, 1 Chron. 21. 26, 27. he offered burnt-offerings and peace-offerings, and called upon the name of the Lord, and he answered him by fire upon the Altar, and the Lord commanded the Angel to put up his sword into the sheath; all things being more fully set forth then before. God's anger was pacified b • sacrifice, which always had reference to Christ, who is the true propitiation for our sins. Of God's acceptance of this service he gave a sign by fire from heaven, as also afterwards when Solomon sacrificed in the Temple, which he had built. And hereby this place was declared to be the place, which God had chosen to have an house built for his service, as David gathered, 1 Chron. 22. 1. and was long before intimated, when Abraham was called in this place to offer up his son Isaac in sacrifice. Moreover, 1 Chron. 21. 28. it is added, When David saw that the Lord had answered him in the threshing floor of Ornan, he sacrificed there. For the Tabernacle, &c. was in Gibeon. And David could not go thither to inquire, for he feared the sword of the Angel. He used now this altar and place for sacrificing and offering more oblations, for he was so weakened through fear of the Angels sword, whom he had seen, that he was not thenceforth able to go to Gibeon anymore, so Lyra. But I think rather, that the meaning is, he having begun upon the occasion before said to offer sacrifice here, and finding it by the miraculous coming down of fire and by divine direction to be the place which God had chosen, continued to offer in this place only from thence forward, and went no more to Gibeon, which is also further confirmed, 1 Chron. 22. 1.
A COMMENTARY UPON The first Book of the KINGS.
This Book as Junius noteth, containeth an history of 118 years, wherein reigned Solomon 40. and four Kings of Judah, Rehoboam 17. Abijam 3. Asa 41. and Jehoshaphat 17. in whose times reigned 8 Kings of Israel, Jeroboam 21. Nadab 1. Baasha 23. Elah 1. Zimri 7. days. Omri 11. Ahab 21. and with Omri sometime Tibni.
CHAP. I.
NOW King David waxed old, and they covered him with clothes, but he gat no heat.] 1 Chron. 22, this being omitted and what else followeth in this chapter, it is shown, how David provided for the building of the Lord's house, and spake of the youth of Solomon his son and of the greatness of this work, &c. for all related in that chapter and thenceforth to the end of 1 Chron. must needs be yielded to have been done after the inauguration of Solomon to the Kingdom, because David speaketh of Solomon's building the Temple, which was not made known to the people till after the said inauguration, the manner of which is set forth here. For although David had long before determined, and God had so appointed, that Solomon should reign after him, yet hereby it appeareth, that the very Princes knew not of it, because Joab and Abiathar went with Adonijah to make him King, as thinking that of right it belonged to him, as to David's eldest son then living, and not knowing anything to the contrary.
To begin then with the history of this chapter, as being first in order, David is here said to have been old, viz. 70. as may be gathered from 2 Sam. 5. 4, 5. But touching his coldness at this age, because it was extraordinary, divers conjecture diversely. The Rabbins say, that it was a punishment laid upon him, that no clothes could keep him hot, because he once cut off the lap of Saul's garment. Tostatus, that he had the palsy; some that this coldness came upon him, when he saw the Angel with his sword stretched over Jerusalem: others impute it to the loss of his blood in war, and some to the old age of his parents, when he was begotten. But the true cause indeed was partly his great pains taken in his youth, and the hardship which he endured in body, when he fled from Saul, and lived sometime in one place, and sometime in another ten years together, enduring the brunts of many wars; partly the trouble of his mind being often in great straits, and much perplexed for his children's wickedness; partly many sicknesses, as we may gather from divers of his Psalms, all which together wasted and dried up his radical heat, whereupon this coldness ensued. But though he were cold in body, his understanding continued good still, as appeareth by his wisely ordering of everything about the Temple, and the speeches made by him to his son Solomon and to his Princes before his death, although the coldness of old age is generally observed by the Physicians to be a duller of the wit, whereby they, that are very aged become foolish and doting. But as Martyr noteth, not only David was kept from this, but also many others, who were very wise and judicious in age. Plato wrote at 80 years of age, and Isocrates at 95. and Pythagoras, Xenocrates, and Democritus, and Sophocles; likewise Themistocles in his old age grieved that he must die, when he began to be wise.
His servants seeing that no clothes could heat him, propounded another way that is, a young Virgin to be brought unto him to lie in his bosom, and so Abishag a fair Virgin was brought unto him, and she ministered unto him, &c. These his servants are generally held to be his Physitia •• ▪ who being careful of his good, would have this remedy provided against hi 〈…〉 ordinary coldness. If it be demanded, whether it were lawful? It is ans 〈…〉 ▪ that without doubt he took her to wife for he had put away his concubines ev 〈…〉 e Absalom's defiling of them, and his wife Bathsheba and others, whom he had formerly taken, were probably too old to supply this his defect by lying with him. Yet Jerome holding it absurd to understand this to be done according to the letter, expoundeth it altogether allegorically, of wisdom, which in his old age he had, and the heat of zeal warming him, when his body was so cold. But both Lyra, and Martyr and other Expositors confute this, because Adonijah afterwards desired this woman to wife. And it is added, the King knew her not, to show that although she lay in his bosom and cherished him, yet nature being now spent, he had no camall knowledge of her, but only he took her for his necessity to wife, and this she weth, that she was a true woman according to the letter. That he took her to wife is the opinion of all Expositors, but only of Tostatus, who seemeth to be of another mind, but whether this fact be justifiable in David is doubted: because it was •• injury to the woman, forasmuch as he was not now able to do the office of an husband. Martyr saith, that if she knowing the case consented, she was not injur •• , and it might be thought, that by physical helps having her he might come to more heat and strength. Lastly, it was for the good of the kingdom.
Then Adonijah the son of Haggith advanced himself, and said, I will be king, 〈◊〉 prepared him chariets and hersemen and 50. men to run before him. He trod in the very steps of Absalom, and accordingly was soon cut off, as he was well worthy for his ambition. The thing that put him on to this ambition, was his fathers indulgence, who it is said never reproved him, v. 6. and his priority in age, for he was the eldest now living, being next to Absalom, and beautiful as he. When Eli was thus indulgent to his sons, the Lord dealt more severely with him, but their wickedness indeed was greater to the bringing of God's service into contempt. But it was doubtless a sin in David to wink at his sons wickedness, for he could not be ignorant of his ambitious proceedings, although some think that he knew not of it, because v. 11. Nathan said to Bathsheba, Adonijah reigneth and David is ignorant of it. But although he knew not of that particular, it proveth not, that he was ignorant of his preparations of chariots and horsemen, &c. For although he came not abroad, it is most probable that some about him told him of it. Whereas some excuse David, although he knew of it, saying, that being his eldest son he might permit him this pomp, not fuspecting to what it tended: for so soon as he heard of his usurping the kingdom, he opposed him. It is answered by Martyr, and others, that he should have called him in question about it, especially seeing that Absalom had made the like preparations before to the same end. The assistants of Adonijah were chiefly Joab, and Abiathar; Joab the Captain of the Host took part with him, because he feared, if he stayed, till David appointed his successor in the Kingdom, it would go ill with him in respect of his great wickedness against the will of the King in slaying Abner, Absalom and Amasa, to prevent which he thought it his wisest way to provide for his own safety by setting up another King, whose favor he might by this means make sure unto him. But on God's part, he permitted it, that Joab at length might come to the punishment which he had deserved. Abiathar the high priest also took part with him, because, as the Hebrews say, since the time of Absalom's conspiracy, the Lord had not given answer by him, wherefore he feared that he should be put down from the high-priesthood, if another King were made without him. But on God's part, he permitted it, that his threatening against the family of Eli, of which he was, might be fulfilled; occasion being hereby taken to remove the priesthood from him to Zadok. Moreover they saw that David was now so feeble, that they thought he could make no resistance to their proceedings, and Solomon, if they knew of the Kings determination to make him King was so young, that they feared not him, he being now, as the Hebrews say but 12. years old. Yet by God's providence there was a division amongst the great ones of the land, for Nathan the Prophet, and Zadok and Benaiah, and other mighty men of David were not for Adonijah with them, and so they were disappointed of their purpose, as hereafter is shown.
And Adonijah sacrificed oxen and sheep, and other fat things by the stone of Zoheleth near to En Rogel, and 〈…〉 vited all his brethren the kings sons, and the men of Judah the kings servants; exc ••• Nathan, &c. and Solomon. Of En Rogel see before, 2 Sam. 17. 17. it was not far from Jerusalem. Adonijah for the more prosperous beginning of his reign pretended pietic by sacrificing, but God abhorreth such sacrificing, and by feasting the people with him he sought to win the more love. But such as he suspected would not consent to his proceedings, he invited not unto it, as Zadok, Nathan, Benaiah, &c.
And Nathan said to Bathsheba Solomon's mother, &c. Here follow the means, whereby God overthrew all the preparations of ambitious Adonijah, and advanced Solomon the sooner to the Kingdom, which he had promised him. It was not by the means of men of might, but by Nathan a prophet and Bathsheba, a woman, weak instruments, and such as he and his company doubtless contemned, accounting her no better then an adulteress, and Solomon for whom she and the prophet stood, no better, then the son of one infamous for whoredom and unworthy to reign over them. But they knew well enough, that they did but kick against the pricks, in seeking to frustrate God's determination, of which it appeareth, that they were not ignorant, because amongst all his brethren Adonijah left Solomon alone out, as a competitour of the kingdom, when, he invited them; for the appointing of Solomon to be King is expressly mentioned, 1 Chron, 22. 9. See here as Martyr observeth, how God by weak means confoundeth the mighty, and worketh for the [Note.] accomplishment of his own will, and the more the wicked enemies of such as God loveth labor to hinder their advancement, by his over-ruling power their contrary endeavors are made to work for the hastening thereof. But what did Nathan say to Bathsheba? he counseled her to go in to the King, and to tell him of Adonijah his usurping the kingdom, and to urge him with his oath, whereby he had sworn unto her, that her son Solomon should be king after him. When David took this oath, it is nowhere said, but it is plain, that he did, for he acknowledgeth it v. 30. Of the Rabbins conceit hereupon see before, 2 Sam. 12. 24. The reason why Nathan was so careful for Solomon, was because he knew it to be the will of God, that he should be king, and happily Bathsheba had told him of David's oath made unto her, and it is thought, that Solomon was by David committed to his tuition, that he might by the instructions of so holy a man be the better fitted to manage such weighty affairs, as he was destined unto. Pelican thinketh that he having fore-told unto the King, that Solomon, whom he was sent to call Jedediah, should reign after him and build God an house, David the King thereupon making that oath, was now sent to remember him of these things, that he might do accordingly.
Bathsheba then going in to the King, after due reverence done speaks unto him, as Nathan had directed her, and hereupon Nathan also came in and seconded her, so as that the king sware again, that Solomon should reign. Then Bathsheba doing low reverence the second time prayed, that the king might live forever, that is, as Pelican, in the world to come, for she saw that he could not live long in this; for although the everlasting life be but little spoken of in the Old Testament, yet it is not to be doubted, but that the faithful then had the hope thereof, as we now have.
Then the King commanded to call unto him Zadok, Nathan, and Benaiah, and he said, take the servants of your Lord, and set Solomon my son upon my mule, &c. By the servants of their Lord he meant the Cherethites and Pelethites, which were his guard, of whom Benaiah was Captain, 2 Sam. 8. 18. and therefore when they went according to David's direction to anoint Solomon King, it is said, Then went Zadok, Natan, Benaiah, and the Cherethites and Pelethites, verse. 38. see the same phrase also, 2 Sam. 20. 7. The place, to which he would have them bring Solomon to anoint him, was Gihon, and the same, saith Pelican, was also called Shiloh, where waters ran continually, and to this place he would have him brought to be anointed, to show the perpetuity of his kingdom, as the waters there did run perpetually; and he must be anointed by the priest and the Prophet, as Samuel had before anointed Saul and David, both to show the graces of the spirit, with which the king must be endued, and also that he should be subject and ready to hearken to the priests and prophets instructions, who could best inform him of the will of God. And he would have him to ride upon his own mule, and to be guarded by his servants to show, that it was done by his authoritic, that all the people might take notice of it, and the more readily obey and follow him; for it was unlawful for any man to ride upon the Kings mule, but only for the King. And to the same end he would have the trumpet sounded, and lastly acclamations added, God save King Solomon; The grace of God which was needful for him for the good of the kingdom, being thus desired by all. Martyr by his anointing in this place, where the waters come from the foot of mount Zion, and are said to run softly, understandeth the condition of a King to be set forth, he should govern mildly as much as may be. And for the anointing of Kings, he saith, it was a sacrament instituted of God, and when it was rightly used, hereby gifts were given, whereby Kings were the better enabled to their office. None were anointed, that we read of amongst the Jews before Saul, and after him David; but there had been no need, saith R. Kimhi, and Levi, that his son should have been anointed also, had it not been for Adonijah, the competitour of the kingdom, because the father was anointed not only for himself, but for his posterity, but this is only their conceit.
According to the Kings directions they did; and Solomon was made King and sat upon David's throne. But of what age he then was, is not agreed amongst Expositors. The Hebrews, whom many follow, say that he was but 12. and to this Jerome seemeth to assent, because David said of him, that he was young and tender. And whereas it is objected, then he must have begotten Rehoboham at 10. or 11. years of age, because he was 40. when Solomon died, and Solomon by this account was at his death but 52. He answereth, that although in the common course of nature one cannot beget a child so young, yet extraordinarily at some time it may be so done, when God will have it; as he saith in his time a Nurse was gotten with child by a boy of 10. years old, whom she lasciviously provoked unto it, for the discovering of her so great wickedness. Others yet hold, that Solomon was not so young, when he entered upon this royal dignity, but 18. or 20. years old: for Tostatus upon that speech of David to him, 1 King. 2. 9. thou art a wise man, saith that Solomon was now 17. or 18. years old; Lyra that he was 20; some that he was 24. In the sacred history there is nothing said of his age, when he began to reign, or when he died, but only that he reigned 40. years, and that in his old age, his wives turned his heart away so as that he served idols; which implieth, that he was an old man, before he died, and therefore certainly 60. at the least. And Josephus saith nothing of his age when he was made King, but most enoneously of his age, when he died, that he was 80. But we may well conjecture, that he could not be so little as 12. when he began his reign, although both Ierem held so, and Euseb. ex Enpolemo, Isidor. de vita sanctor. Ignatius Epist. ad Magnes. &c. for they all took it from the Rabbins, and did not so duly examine it: First, because, as was said before, otherwise he could not have been said by his father to be a wise man, and one that of himself knew what was best to be done. 2. Because he was old some years before he died. 3. Because he begat Rehoboam 41. years before the end of his reign, which if it had been at 11. it could not be without a miracle, and it agreed not with the discretion of his father to marry him so young, or with his sanctimony to be then so libidinous. Lastly, the course of the history from the time of his birth hitherto evinceth, that he was much above 11. For Amnon was hated of Absalom for the abuse offered to Tamar 2. years after his birth; then he slew him and fled and stayed at Geshur 3. years, after that he lived apart at Jerusalem 2. years, then by Joab being brought to David he must needs have 2 years at the least for preparation before his rebellion; lastly his rebelling and being subdued, and the Kings returning again to Jerusalem could not be be less then 1 year, which altogether make 10 years. After this followed Shebah his rebelling and being subdned and a famine of 3 years; then 4 battles and victories over the Philistines 4 years: after which, David being at rest, compiled a song unto God, and ma •• great preparations for the temple in 2 years at the least; then the people we •• numbered and plagued, after all which he being old and cold, for a time his servants sought to heat him otherwise, but at length brought Abishag to him, and when he had kept in thus a year, Adonijah rebelled, and Solomon was set up against him, being by this computation full 20. whereas it is objected that he was young and tender, it is answered, he was so indeed, although of this age, in respect of that office, which he now came unto, and the weighty business to be done of building the Temple. When Solomon was anointed King, there being great shouting & rejoicing, and the sound of trumpets, Joab & they with Adoniiah heard it; and enquiring the reason, and understanding, that David had made Solomon King, they were afraid, and fled every man to his own and left Adoniiah, who also fled and laid hold upon the horns of the Altar. He that brought the news to Adoniiah and his company, was Jonathan the son of Abiathar, the same man that was used as an intelligencer before for David, 2 Sam. 17. 17. He was most probably left behind by his Father, if there were any occasion, to come after and certify; as he now did. Then Joab whom it concerned most to hearken after any tumult arising, because he was the general, entertained Jonathan with flattering words saying, that he was a good man and brought good news; wherein he spake, as he hoped, and would have had it, remembering also the good news brought by him in times past unto David. But Jonathan denied that he came with good news, and then he told all that had been done; whereupon they were so dismayed, that they fled, and Adoniiah fled to Gibeah, for there the tabernacle was, and the altar, so taking sanctuary for fear of Solomon, in danger to be cut off; by whom he knew, that he was for his usurping of the Kingdom. This altar was not that of incense, to which the Priests only might come: but the other which was for sacrifices, whereunto the people might come sometimes. He that being in danger fled hither was sometimes protected, as in a city of refuge: as we may gather, Exod. 21. 14. wherefore Adoniiah, his case growing desperate, sought to this place, but in vain, had not Solomon the King in some other respect spared him; for he caused him to be brought from thence, and Joab afterwards who fled thither also and slew him, not fearing to do so to a guilty person for the sanctimony of the place, seeing holy places were for the protection of such as offended un wittingly, but not otherwise: as hath been before she wed upon Exod. 21. 14. Adoniiah in flying to God's house in time of danger, but without benefit; doth not unaptly [Note.] let forth such as come to God by prayer at such times, who to serve they never regard at other times, but it is to be feared, that they all shall speed no better then he did and Joab. Solomon hearing where Adoniiah was, sent to fetch him thence, and he requiring that the King would swear unto him, that he would not slay him, Solomon promised by his messengers that if he would show himself a worthy man, there should not one hair of him fall to the ground; but contrariwise, if wickedness were thence forth found in him: for so it must be understood, because he desired saying, Let King Solomon swear unto me this day; that is, say the Hebrews, remitting what hath been passed before this day, that he will not slay me for that. The new King was easily entreated, as being willing to begin his reign with showing mercy, and promised, that not a hair of him should fall to the ground; that is, that he should not have the least hurt for his former ambition, so that he refrained from all ambitious courses for time to come. And thus Adoniiah was brought from the altar, not by force, but by persuasion; and came and did Homage to Solomon, the elder brother younger, as Joseph's elder brethren had to the worshipped him, the submission of the greatest in the world unto Christ, who was at the first neglected and contemned, (as Solomon had been) being herein typified. And hereby Martyr will have the Popes deiction at the last figured out; when the trumpet of the Archan gell shall sound, who hath usurped the Kingdom, and feasted with his flatterers and followers, not regarding God's faithful servants, but neglecting them, as heretics, as Adoniiah did Zadok, Nathan, and Benaiah. Then Solomon said, go to thine house, meaning, that he should thenceforth lead a private life, and not intermeddle with state matters, o • •• old hold such pomp of horses and chariots, and men to run before him as fo 〈…〉 he had done.
CHAP. II.
HEre is set forth first the death of David and his exhortation made to his son Solomon before his death. But before this and after Solomon's Coronation, there are divers other memorable passages recorded. 1 Chron. 22. &c. which because they are wanting here, be there supplied; as 1. His providing of workmen and materials for the building of the house of God, v. 2, 3, 4, 5. The chapter beginneth with these words, then David said, this is the house of the Lord and the altar of burnt offerings for Israel, and he commanded to gather together the strangers that were in the land of Israel, &c. To whom said he thus? doubtless to his Princes and Elders of the people assembled together after Solomon's inauguration, that they might take notice of his succeeding his Father in the Kingdom and be obedient unto him, although this be not expressed; for verse 6. he called for Solomon and spake unto him, and v. 17. to the Princes, and ch. 23. 1, 2. it is expressly said, that he gathered together all the Princes, Priests, and Levites, after that he had made Solomon King; and they spake to him and to them, ch. 28. and 29. and that which is spoken in this chapter, could not be before he was made King, because nothing was known thereof, till the day that it was done. It was then most probably at that time, all the ceremonies about Solomon's inauguration being ended, and many coming voluntarily upon this occasion to the Court, that David spake so unto them: after which, there was an assembling of all the Princes generally, 25 ch. 23. He being ascertained, as was before said, that the threshing floor of Araunah was the place chosen of God, signified the same to all about him; and he called it the house of God because his house should be built there. Some think that this was spoken before Solomon's Coronation, immediately after the sign given there by fire from heaven, and after he spake; as v. 5, 6. &c. and immediately prepared for the building of the Temple there, gathering together for this purpose workmen in abundance, even all the strangers in the land, fo whom the Masons only are here spoken of, but chap. 28. 21. all manner of skillful workmen, and 2 Chron. 2. 17. their number is set down 150000. and 3600. who these strangers were, see 1 Kings 9. 20. 21. the children of the Amorites, Canaanites, and Perizzites, &c. whom the children of Israel could not cast out, a poor and contemptible sort of people, these were employed in the work of God's house to figure out the despised Gentiles gathered together under the Gospel to make the spiritual Temple, none of the Jews being set to this work, but made men of war, Princes, Rulers of his Chariots, and Captains, &c. And he prepared iron in abundance, and brass without weight, to make the brazen sea and other vessels of brass, and it is said to be without weight by an hyperbole, to show the wonderful great abundance thereof, and abundance of Cedar wood, and v. 5. it is said praeparavit omnes impensas, vulg. lat. yet 2 Chron. 2. 8. Solomon sends to Hiram for Cedar trees. Sol. Hugo saith, that it is meant, that David provided of all sorts of things, and money to bear the charge of all, but Hebr. it is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 copiose, as Junius renders it, he prepared copiously; and v. 14. having spoken of timber that he had prepared, he saith, and thou mayest add thereto: hereby it appeareth, that the number of Cedars used about the Temple was exceeding great, seeing when David had provided so many, Solomon yet had need to provide many more. And he would have the Temple built with Cedars, because it was wood incorruptible, to show the incorruption of the Church.
Then David said, Solomon my son is young and tender, &c. And he called Solomon his son and commanded him to build the house of God and said, that he had a purpose once to have done it, but was not permitted, because he had shed much blood, &c. of which see 2 Sam. 7. 9. and then it was promised, that he should have a son, who should live in peace, and be therefore called Solomon, as is here remembered, v. 9. but there omitted 〈…〉 that he should build him an house. And indeed nothing is there spoken of the ••• e said reason, why David might not build, but it was left to be recorded here, yet it being fetched from hence is there expounded. And he doth not only command him to build, but prayeth God to be with him, and chargeth him to fear God and to keep his law and to govern righteously, and then he promiseth prosperity unto him, and biddeth him not to fear: whereby is intimated, that this is the chief thing, that everyone should apply his mind unto, that he might be blessed of God, and not trust without this in any cost done to the honor of God, or most ample sacrifices; see Ps. 50. Mich. 6. 6. Isaiah 1. 12. Out of my poverty I have prepared 100000 talents of gold, and 1000000 talents of silver, and brass, without weight; &c. For what use all this gold and silver, brass and iron should serve; he further showeth, chap. 28. 14. viz. the gold to make vessels and candlesticks of gold, and the silver for vessels of silver; &c. and he gave the just weight for every particular thing, and the pattern and form of the Temple, and all things about it; wherein he saith, that he had received direction in writing from the Lord, v. 19. Moreover unto this great treasure of gold and silver, he addeth, ch. 29. 3. 3000 talents of gold more, and 7000 talents of silver of his peculiar substance, and verse 2. all manner of precious stones and marble. And this he calleth his peculiar substance, because the treasures spoken of before were long ago dedicated out of the spoils, which he had taken from divers nations, whom he subdued, 2 Sam. 8. 11. 12. The gold, if we reckon it by the talent of the sanctuary, which was 4500l. amounted to four hundred and fifty millions of pounds, the silver to three hundred seventy five millions of pounds, reckoning to a talent 375l. Thus much of the fore-dedicated gold and silver, and of his peculiar 135000l. in fine gold, and 2625000l. in silver. And whereas David saith, that out of his poverty he had given all this, Lyra saith it is spoken comparatively in respect of God, to whom it was dedicated, in comparison of whose inestimable rich treasures, all that the richest men have, is but poverty; or in respect of his poor beginning. Pelican, in respect of true spiritual riches of grace and glory; with which, if all the wealth in the world be compared, it is but poverty. Josephus fearing that the report of such excessive treasures would never be credited by the heathen to whom he wrote, hath deducted the tenth part, whereby [Note.] we may see how little he is to be credited. This wonderful great treasure which David had now gathered together, showeth how easily God can enrich those whom he pleaseth, to those that seek his Kingdom and the righteousness thereof, adding all other things in this world. Thou hast also many artificers, cutters of stone, and masons, skillful in all arts, and in gold and silver, &c. So that Solomon having both materials and workmen, might now after his death without any delay set upon this great work, and perfect it. For he would have it, as God had directed him, both for matter and curious working, to excel all other buildings, that by the outward beauty thereof, the rude people might be drawn from the temples of Idols, and the high places to worship here.
Then David exhorted the Princes of the people to help his son Solomon in this work, &c. Notwithstanding the great preparations which he had made, the work was so great and sumptuous, that he thought not all this sufficient for it, but required the Princes to aid Solomon with their cost, seeing it was for the honor of God, and the good of the whole nation. How they satisfied this his desire, and what they contributed, see ch. 29. 6. 7. And he omitted not to warn them also to fear God and to keep his laws, as being the thing that would most conduce to their welfare.
Mystically by the temple is to be understood the Church of God, by the gold the governors, by the silver the preachers, who are most excellent, that make a silver sound; by the brass other meaner preachers; by the iron; such as protect and fight in the defense of the Church; by the Cedars which are high, such as lead a contemplative life, and by the stones, such as lead an active life, sustaining others; thus Lyra out of Greg.
1 Chr. ch. 23. David growing nearer and nearer to his end, after the coronation of Solomon, having before spoken somewhat to •• hing the intended building of an house for God, now causeth all the Princes, Priests▪ • nd Levites to be assembled together unto him, that he might appoint to everyone his office about this house, and the things thereof; and that the Princes being before prepared might bring in their contributions towards this work, that everyone knowing what he was to do, might be ready to perform it: and so without delay after his death, this building might go forwards. And first they who are named last, were numbered; viz. the Levites, and their offices distinguished; then the Priests, ch. 24. and lastly, the Princes; ch. 27. The Levites are said to be numbered from 30 years and upward, yet v 24. and 27. from 20 years old. For the reconciling of which difference, some say that there was a • au •• in the writer, 3 • being put for 20. some, that to these words from 30 years old and upward, is to be understood olim, in times past; but now by a new way of numbering, to which David was directed by divine inspiration, they were numbered from 20, as then from 30, Num. 4. 30. The Vul. lat. followed by Lyra and Hugo hath it in both places, from 20 years old and upwards. I do not think it safe to yield, that there was any corruption in the text, but rather the meaning is, that being numbered as was of old appointed from 30. their number was 38000 but now after the building of the temple, the labor of carrying the Ark from place to place being no more imposed upon them, to which they were thought unfit, before they attained to the age of 30, David appointed that they should hereafter be numbered from 20. and come in to help in this service. Of this number 24000 were appointed to the ministry of the house of the Lord; 6000 to be Rulers and Judges, 4000 door-keepers, and 4000 singers. The service about the house of God, wherein these 24000 were employed, was as Lyra hath it, the excoriating and washing of beasts for sacrifice, and divers other things; so likewise Dionis. and Cajetan. But Tostatus better; they were to take the sacrifices to wash and bring them to the Priests, they were also to prepare flour, wine, oil, salt, and frankincense, and to see that wood and water might never be wanting, when the Gibeonites had first hewed the wood and drawn the water, according to the office appointed unto them, and to be at hand to serve the Priests in their ministry, as they should require them. For the excoriating of beasts belonged properly to the Priests, and not unto the Levites; but when extraordinarily necessity required their help herein, as we may gather from 2 Chron. 29. 34. the Priests were few, so as that they could not excoriate the beasts, but the Levites helped them herein. Touching the 6000 Rulers and judges, these Pelican will have to be as Rectours of Churches throughout the kingdom, instructours of the people in the laws and ordinances of God, and some of them instructours of the junior Levites, and some as Judges to resolve the right according to the law in divers cases: Lyra saith, that some will have the Rulers, or Prepositi, to be such as were set over the holy vessels or treasures, to keep them; and the Judges teachers of the people: but according to others, they were both one. Viz. Teachers, and more probably the Porters were some of them keepers of the treasures of the temple, locking up and making fast the doors wherein they lay, and opening them as occasion served. Josephus saith, that these Rulers and Judges were the same, the first word setting forth the dignity, and the other the office; and they were joined two to every Judge in lesser causes, in every city of Israel; that by their assistance, they telling what the law of God was, he might proced in judgment rightly, which is not improbable, but withal it is to be understood, that they were teachers of the people in their Synagogues also. Touching the 4000 Porters, they were not only to watch and ward at the gates and doors of the temple, to keep unclean persons from coming in, and to open and shut them, but also, as was said before, to keep the treasures, holy vessels, end vestments. And whereas so great numbers might seem too many, it is to be understood, that the Porters and others, that ministered about the temple, served there by course, some retiring home to their own houses, and others coming in their rooms continually, wherefore, v. 6. David is said to have distributed them by their courses.
Touching the 4000 singers, it is said that they should stand morning and evening to sing praises to God at the times of sacrificing, and on the Sabbaths and new Moons, &c. v. 30, 31, 32. and to play upon instruments of music, ch. 25. 6. and they were divided by their courses, v. 9. which were 24. This singing and music whilst the sacrifices were offering, was to stir up men's minds to praise God, and to grace this part of God's worship, which otherwise might seem to have been but a butchering and dressing of meats. Over the show. bread, and the sacrifice of fine flour and unleavened bread; and every weight and measure. The Vulg. lat. before these words hath it, But the Priests over the show-bread, and v. 30. but the Levites to stand and sing. Which words Tostatus saith, were added for further explication; because to offer the show-bread, belonged to the Prests. Levite. 21. 6. least it should be thought now contrary to the law to be otherwise appointed. But without this addition it may well be understood, that the Levites 〈…〉 to bring it to the Priest to be set before the Lord, and to take them away when new was to be set on; and to look that the fine flour were pure, and the just weight and measure: bringing it also to the Priest, that he might offer it. See chap. 9. 32. Here are 5 sorts of Levites set forth, Ministers, Judges and Rulers, Porters, Singers, and Priests, which served about the temple: in imitation whereof, there are in the Church of Rome. 1. Priests, that offer the bread and wine in the Sacrament. 2. Deacons, who carry it to the people. 3. Sub-deacons, who prepare it, by putting it into the holy vessels. 4. Acolithites, who make it. 5. Exorcists, who east out evil spirits, as Judges do malefactors. 6. Door-keepers, who keep out unbelievers and excommunicated persons out of the Church. 7. Readers. Thus Lyra; but for all these we read only in the New Testament, of Priests, and Deacons.
1 CHRON. 24.
The Levites being distinguished, as before, ch. 23. into Ministers, Judges, Porters and Singers; and touching those that ministered about the sacrifices, who were 24000, it being shown only in general, that they were distinguished by their courses, v. 6; Now followeth the distinction of the Priests by their courses in particular, and of some principal Levites, who were next in honor to the Priests in general, and over all the rest. v. 20. The Priests were distinguished by Eleazar and Ithamar, the two sons of Aaron, the eldest of each family being from generation to generation, the chiefest of all the Priests of that family; and at this present Zadok was the chiefest of Eleazars, and Abiathar, or Abimelech (for one and the same man was set forth by both these names) of Ithamars. Now because there were many more of the family of Eleazar then of Ithamar, that had 16 courses, and Ithamars 8. And the names of the chief of every of these courses are set down, it being to be understood, that all the other Priests served in their courses under them, a like number being assigned to each one in his course to assist him in the execution of his Priestly office, respect being still had, that they only were appointed to serve in the courses of those of the family of Eleazar, that were of his family, and they in the courses of the family of Ithamar, that were of his family. Touching the means used to distinguish these courses who should have the first, who the second and third, &c. It is said to have been done by lots, the names of all the chief of their houses being written in 24 several pieces of paper and put in one vessel by themselves, and the courses being written in 24 papers and put in another vessel, then they being shaken together, one was appointed to put one hand into one vessel and to draw a name without seeing, and another into the other vessel, and to draw a course likewise; and look what number was written upon it, that was his course, whose name was drawn together with it. And the Priests of the first course were to serve but one week at a time beginning at the Sabbath in the evening and continuing about the Temple till the evening of the next Sabbath; at what time they departed to their own houses, and the next course came and served likewise, and then the third and fourth; till that all the 24 having served in their courses, they began again. And during the time of their service, there were chambers about the courts of the Lord's house, wherein they lodged.
For the Levites next named, it is to be understood, that they were not of the common sort, but Princes as is expressly said of Iesias, Prince Iesias, v. 21. and they were of 2 families, Kohath, and Merari, and had their courses also by lot, ver. 31. Of these it is not said, what the office was, but most probably they were chief next unto the Priests of whom one was always about the temple, as Prince of that course, which served them according to the order wherein they were placed.
CHAP. 25.
Here followeth the distinction of the Levites, who were to serve in the temple by singing and playing upon instruments of music, the chief fathers of whom were 3. Asaph, Iduthun, &c. Heman, who came of the three sons of Levi. Heman of Kohath, Asaph of Gershom, and Iduthun of Merari, as is most probable from 1 Chron. 6. 33, 34. &c. where Heman and Asaph are expressly said to be of Kohath & Gershom, and for 〈…〉 , whereby it seemeth that these were two names of one and the same man. Of these some were so famous for wisdom, that Et ••• and Heman are spoken of in comparing the wisdom of Solomon. The Sons of these 3 were 24. according to which number the courses of the singing Levites were distinguished, as the Priests were, and these 24 were appointed one to be the chief in one course, and another in another; so that the first course came in and went out with the first course of the Priests, and likewise the other in their order. The chief of these did both direct the rest, and by the spirit composed some divine songs to be sung to the praise of God. The chief are said to be 288. that is, 12 to every course of the 24. for 24 times 12 make 288. Now for the use of singing and music in the temple, it was to stir up men's minds to praise God, and when they did sing and play, a sacrifice of praise was offered.
CHAP. 26.
Next unto the singers the Porters are distinguished by the 4 gates of the temple, East, West, North, and South, and one Prince is appointed to be over one gate, and one over another, 4 over all, that kept the 4 gates by course, v. 14. For it is not to be doubted, but that the Porters being 4000. were distinguished into 24 courses as well as the singers and Priests, coming and going upon every Sabbath, as they did which is also expressed; 1 Chron. 9. 24. And therefore here are 24 named in the beginning of the chapter, which may well be understood to be the chief of these 24 courses. And of Obed Edom, it is noted in special, that there were more of his house, then of any other; because the Lord blessed him, v. 5. wherein Expositors generally think, that respect is had to the time, when the Ark abode at his house, 2 Sam. 6. For then it is said God blessed Obed Edom, and all that he had, one way of which blessing was by increasing his house, and giving him many children. And the 24 hitherto named were of the posterity of Kohath and Merari. Now besides these and their brethren of their courses there were some Levites of Gershom, that were set over the treasures of the temple, and the spoils of the enemy, which were dedicated by David, Samuel, Saul, Abner, and Joab, &c. See before, Ch. 9. 28. Lastly, for works without, they are named who were over the 6000 that were appointed to be rulers and Judges of the people in matters concerning God and the King, that is, in teaching and instructing the people in their Synagogues, and sitting with the Judges in particular cities to judge in criminal causes.
CHAP. 27.
After the distinction of the Priests and Levites, here followeth the distinction of the Princes, and first of those, that were over the men of war, who are distinguished by the 12 months of the year, each one having under him 24000 valiant men; of these one with his 24000 attended upon the King one month, and the other another; so as that each Prince with his men was at liberty to return and attend upon their own domestic affairs eleven months in the year, except extraordinary occasion of war required the service of them altogether. The end seemeth to be for the safety of the King, and the appeasing of tumults, if any should arise, and that so great a number being exercised in arms at the least one month in the year (for we must not think that they lived idly about the court in the month of their attendance, but were exercised in military discipline) the King might never be unprovided of a sufficient Army upon short warning to fight against his enemies. And by this means it is not unlikely, that Solomon came to enjoy so peaceable a reign all his days, there being no e 〈…〉 that durst stir against him, who was continually so well provided of men 〈…〉 ition to quell his proudest enemies. And whatsoever King shall take the same course, it is not to be doubted, but with God's help he should have a very safe kingdom.
Then the Princes are named, who were over the several tribes, there being of each tribe one, but over the Levites and Priests, two and two, over the two half tribes of Manasseh, because of their separated dwellings.
But David numbered not them that were under 20 years, because the Lord had said, that he would multiply the Israelites, as the stars of heaven. Joab had begun to number, but he finished it not &c.
It was said before that the Levites were numbered from • 0 years old and upward. Now in speaking of others that were of the other tribes & of the numbers that were under the 12. Princes of David's Armies, because nothing hath been said hitherto from whatage they were numbered, that is here inserted, that according to the law, Num. 1. 3. they also were numbered from 20 years old and upward, but not under; a general reason being yielded, why they under 20 were not reckoned from Gen. 15. viz. the promise of God to Abraham that his children should be as the stars in multitude, that is, innumerable; if all without exception of any age should be numbered, the numbers would be so great, as that it would exceed all count. Wherefore to attempt a numbering of them thus, could not but be a great sin, both because it was against the law of God, and a presuming to go about the disproving of that which God had so confidently affirmed, who most probably to provent it, had limited the age from which at any time they might be numbered. Thus much for David's not numbering of any under 20. now it is further added, that Joab had hegun to number by David's command, and finished it not, because wrath therefore fell upon Israel; it being meant, that although David had been most cautelous, and his Captain Joab not to number, but according to the law; yet when this was done, God sent a plague of pestilence, ch. 21. whereby it came to pass, that neither then the numbers were perfected, nor now when the number of all the Levites was taken, durst they adventure to number all Israel also for fear of God's wrath again to break out against them; and therefore the sin of the children of Israel is not set down as of Levi here; and this was the cause of commemorating this thing in this place.
Now besides the Princes of the tribes before mentioned, there were others also set over the goods and chattels of the King, as over his treasures in Zion and Jerusalem. 2. In the villages, fields, cities, and towers. 3. Over his husbandry. 4. His vineyards. 5. His wines. 6. Over his olives and figs. 7. His oils. 8. His herds. 9. His Oxen. 10. His Cammels; over which was an Ishmaelite, because the Ishmaelites had most skill about these. 11. His asses. 12. His sheep, over which was an Agaren, one of that nation, which used to dwell in tents, which might be removed from place to place.
Lastly, his Counselors are named, whereof two are said to have been with the Kings sons; that is, according to the Hebrews, to instruct them, then Achitophel is named, into whose place, when he had hanged himself, Benaiah came, and Joab was general of all the Armies. Whereby it appeareth, not only what a well ordered common wealth this was, but well also the Kings peculiar estate was ordered and managed.
CHAP. 28.
The numbering of the Princes, Priests and Levites, being ended, here followeth the oration which David made unto them standing up, that he might be the better heard. And herein he showeth what his intent was about building an house to the Lord, and how he had prepared; but God had appointed Solomon his son to do this great work and denied it unto him, as sometime Moses was denied to enter into the land of Canaan, which he much desired; and Joshua was set up to lead the people in thither. Some think that his rising up was from his throne; but according to other more probably it was from his bed, and he called the house which he would have built, the house for the Ark, and his footstool, that is, the mercy seat which was, as it were, the seat of God. Concerning h 〈…〉 t, and the Lord's holding him from building, see before, ch. 22. 7, 8. A 〈…〉 e them the more willing to submit themselves to Solomon, as their Ki 〈…〉 commemorateth 1. God's electing of the tribe of Judah before all oath 〈…〉 . Of his Fathers house before all the families in Judah. 3. Of him before any other in that house. 4. Of Solomon before all his other sons, together with God's speech touching Solomon, he shall build me an house, and I will be to him a Father, and I will establish his throne forever, if he continueth steadfast in my precepts; &c. whereupon he exhorteth both them and Solomon his son so to do, threatening him, if he did otherwise, that God would reject him forever, which is not to be understood of reprobating him to perish in hell forever, because 2 Sam. 7. 14. 15. he had promised if he sinned against him, to correct him; but not take his mercy from him forever: but what should be done for the continuing of the kingdom to his posterity, should not be out of respect unto him, but unto David; with whom he had made a covenant unalterable, and upon him there should remain a blot forever; showing God's estranging of his fatherly affection from him, when for his sins 10 tribes should be rent away from his heirs, and so his kingdom should be irreparably diminished unto them forever.
Then David gave unto Solomon the pattern of the Porch and Temple, &c. saying, that all came written to him with the hand of the Lord, which according to some Hebrews, is to be understood, saith Pelican, by the direction of Samuel, by others, of Nathan the Prophet; Lyra saith, that it may be he had all revealed unto him by God. Cajetan, that these things were by God written in his mind, and not in a book; but he described them by writing unto Solomon for his direction. Tostatus contrarily that he had them delivered unto him by God ready written, as Moses had the commandments. That of Cajetan seemeth more probable, because v. 12. it is said, which David thought in his heart, so that God's writing of this form was in his mind by internal revelation. And David spake thus to Solomon, that he might not adventure to vary from this pattern, and to commend the fabric as being of God's devising, and not of man's; and he might not fear to go about this great work, to the devising of the doing whereof rightly, all the wit of man would not suffice, because the platform was set by God himself in everything.
CHAP. 29.
And David spake to all the congregation, &c.] Happily the congregation being a while dissolved, and then meeting again, because the Kings strength would not suffice to say anymore at that time, he spake again in commending the building of the temple unto them, setting forth the greatness of the work, as whereunto all that he had hitherto spoken of would not suffice. Wherefore he both addeth 3000 talents of most pure gold, and 7000 talents of silver to cover and guild over the walls of the most holy place, and exhorteth the Princes to a liberal contribution. The reason, why he would have them also to contribute, when as he alone had provided all things sufficiently, was according to some, that their treasures being exhaust, they might be the less able to rebel against Solomon, if any of them were so minded, but this had been to make again of godliness; a better reason therefore hath been already yielded, ch. 22. 17. and it is to be noted, that in exhorting them to a liberal contribution, he useth the phrase of filling their hands and offering, which used to be spoken of sacrificing, to show that it was a sacrifice most acceptable unto God to give of their goods to this work.
Then the Princes and Nobles, &c. offered willingly 5000. talents of gold, and 10000. drachmaes, whereof 12000. saith Junius, make a talent, and of silver 10000. talents, &c. that is, they set down each man so much to be given, as together amounted to these sums to be afterwards gathered by collectours appointed by the King. All which if it be compared with David's gifts Ch. 22. 14. is nothing, for he gave 100000. talents of gold, and 1000000. of silver.
Then David seeing their cheerfulness in offering, blessed God therefore, and acknowledged all, which he and they had offered, to come from God, beseeching him to continue this mind in them, as knowing the mutability of men, and lastly, he prayeth for Solomon his son, that God would give him a perfect heart, that he might do all things commanded, and having exhorted them to bless God, likewise they did it by bowing themselves, and then bowing to the King they gave him thanks for all the benefits, which they had enjoyed under his government; although Junius will have their worshipping of the King to be understood of Solomon.
Then the day following in token of their thankfulness to God, they sacrificed 1000. bullocks, 1000. rams, and 1000. lambs, and they feasted together and made and anointed Solomon King the second time. The sacrifices, saith Joseph. were holocausts, & after these ended were many thousands more slain for peace-offerings, wherewith the people feasted, but because no more are here spoken of, it is rather to be thought, that some of these only were holocausts & the rest peace-offerings, for we never read of so many beasts, or near so many, wholly burnt at one time, in any age. When Soloman sacrifieed afterwards in Gibeon, a most ample sacrifice, he offered but 1000 burnt offerings, and Hezekiah but 70. Bullockes, 100. Rams and 200. Lambs. And now they anointed not only Solomon King, but also Zadok for Priest, that is, high Priest in the room of Abiathar, who had conspired with Adonijah: and thus the word of the Lord against Eli's family began to be fulfilled; how the Priest was anointed, see Levite. 8.
And all the Princes and sons of the King gave their hand to Solomon, &c.] that is, sware fidelity unto him, and this was the cause why he was anointed for King the second time, that it being done by the consent of all the Princes, he might the more peaceably reign over them, and peace being thus settled, he might the better go on in building the temple: for when he was anointed before, they were divided. For those that anointed him, because Zadok the Priest and Nathan the Prophet did it before, it is not to be doubted, but that they anointed him now again. And here Josephus bringeth in David speaking again to his sons, and exhorting them to be obedient to Solomon, and not to envy him, although a younger brother, because God had chosen him to be King, as he did before himself, before his brethren, who were elder, yet none of them envied him this honor.
Here the Author of the Chronicles hasteneth to set forth the death of David, and how long he had reigned over Israel and Judah, but because 1 King. 2. from which we have hitherto digressed, doth more fully declare his death, and speeches used before it to his son Solomon, let us now look back to the said 1 King. 2. 1.
When the days of David drew near, that he should die, he commanded his son Solomon, saying, &c.] The charge, which he gave him, was to keep God's laws, that his throne might be established, to which effect he was brought in speaking before, 1 Chron. 28. 9. and 1 Chron. 22. 12, 13. Only here is a charge added, first touching Joab, v. 5.
Thou knowest, saith he, what he did unto me, and to the two Captains of Israel, Abner and Amasa, &c.] The Hebrews, saith Pelican, think by that, which he did unto him, was meant the showing of his letters to others, which he wrote for the bringing of Uriah to his death, which was greatly to his disgrace, so that he was not faithful to him, and how treacherously he slew Abner and Amasa, when he pretended friendship, was notoriously known. Wherefore David spake of him, as a man, that ought not to be suffered to live, because, if he were suffered, he might unawares slay Solomon also, and thus interrupt his peaceable reign. The conceit of the Rabbins is uncertain; but that he disobeyed David's express charge about Absalom, and imperiously threatened him to cause him to come forth and to cease mourning when he had slain Absalom, is certain; for which his disloyalty to his sovereign, he was worthy to die. Theodoret also addeth, for his taking part with Adonijah, whom David could not be without all fear, that he would seek to set up again, and so to make a division in the Kingdom. And the rather, because he being privy to David's dealing with Uriah, that he might obtain Bathsheba, of whom Solomon came, never loved Solomon, as thinking him unworthy to reign for his scandalous birth. Whereas David did not himself execute justice against Joab before, it seemeth to have been, because Joab being Captain of the Hoast had been hitherto too powerful; but now he being aged, and Jehoiadah being of great power, by reason that he was over the Cherethites and Pelethites, and Joab's power being weakened by the Armies falling from him, as it seemeth, because he fled to the horns of the Altar and not to his soldiers, David wisely thought it a fit time to execute justice upon him, which had been hitherto deferred.
But to the sons of Barzillai show kindness, &c.] Because it is the part of a good King to be no less careful to show thankfulness to such, as deserve well of him, then to punish evil doers, David provideth thus for the requital of Barzillai: what he did for Machir and Zob, who also shown him the like kindness, is not said; what is to be thought hereof, see 2 Sam. 19. 40.
Thou hast also with thee Shimei, &c.] How David could without prejudice to his oath appoint Solomon his son to provide, that he might not come in peace to his grave, see 2 Sam. 19. 23. And David's oath bound him no longer then he lived, his successor in the kingdom was free, notwithstanding this oath to do justice upon him according to his discretion. Moreover David doubtless still perceived, that he was ill-affected to his house, and adhered to the house of Saul, and so might afterwards become troublesome to the State, wherefore he justly committed him to be dealt withal by Solomon according to his wisdom.
Then David slept with his fathers, &c. and the time that he reigned over Israel was 40. years, &c.] Of these times of his reign and his age, when he began to reign and when he died, see before upon 2 Sam. 5. 5. and 2 King. 1. 1. For the place of his burial it is said to be in his own city, that is, not Bethlehem, as some have thought, but Zion, where the Kings his successors might afterwards be buried also. Josephus saith, that his son Solomon buried him magnificently in Jerusalem, and that into his Sepulcher were put very great riches: for out of it 1300. years after Hyrcanus took 3000. talents to give to Antiochus to remove his siege, and after that Herod took out much money out of another Cell. And Benjamin a Jew in his Itinerary telleth of two workmen, who digging up the stones of an old wall espied a den, and entering into it, saw a Palace with pillars of marble and a table of silver before it with a scepter and crown of gold upon it, but when they attempted to go into that palace, they were smitten with a whirlwind down dead, and having lien so till night they were revived again and then heard a voice saying, arise and go out of this place. Wherefore that hole was by the command of the Patriarch stopped up again, none daring to enter into it anymore. And here an end of David, who many ways was a figure of Christ; first in his tribe Judah and city Bethlehem. 2 In his favor, for Christ also was comely, vox suauis & faties decora. 3 He chased away the evil spirit from Saul, killed a Lion and a Bear, so Christ cast out devils and destroyed their power. 4 He lived obscurely 30. years as Christ did. 5 He slew Goliath not by force of arms but with a sling. 6 His brethren envied him and Saul sought to slay him. 7 He having given a dowry of 200 fore-skins for Merob had her not, but Michal: so Christ had not a Spouse of the Jewish Church but of the Gentiles. 8 David was thrice anointed King, so Christ had a threefold right to reign; first, as God; second, as David's successor in his line; third, because as God and man all power was given unto him. 9 He ordered the Priests and Levites, so Christ the Apostles. 10 He prepared matter for the Temple, &c.
Then Solomon sat upon the Throne of David his father, and his kingdom was greatly confirmed] That is, after the slaughter of three Rebels hereafter spoken of, viz. Joab, Adonijah, and Shimei, for although they durst yet attempt nothing, yet afterwards some stirs might have been made by them, but now were prevented.
And Adonijah the son of Haggith came to Bathsheba the mother of Solomon, &c.] Here is shown upon what occasion Adonijah the competitour of the kingdom was cut off, and immediately after Joab, and Abiathar put down from the High-Priesthood. Adonijah as Expositors generally think, by their counsel sought to have Abishag to wife, who was wife to his father David, which was both contrary to the law of God, and as Pelican hath it, it was not lawful for any in that Common-wealth to marry her, that had been the wife of a King, unless he himself were a King. Wherefore Adonijah in seeking this, sought to come as near to the kingdom, as he could, and having the chief captain Joab and the chief Priest Abiathar on his side, he was not without hope by this means to attain unto it, at the least his ambitious mind might be fed with such a conceit. This Solomon through his wisdom saw into, but his mother not; but when by his speech she perceived it, most probably she was content to have her request denied. Some call in question Solomon's justice for putting Adonijah to death upon this occasion, and that without being first tried, as Theodoret and Procopius; and Cajetan saith, that he knoweth not how it may be excused, and that it seemeth to have been done unjustly, seeing no treason against the King did evidently appear herein. But Lyra and Pelican and others, justify Solomon in this fact, because he knew by his wisdom, that he went about thus to make a way to the kingdom, and in such evident cases it had been the manner of David before, without further proceedings to give sentence immediately against offenders; as against him, that brought him Saul's crown, and against Rechab and Baanah. And Adonijah his former ambitious causing of himself to be made King made it plain, that he had still the same mind within him, for which it was just with Solomon now to cut him off, although he had spared him hitherto, seeing it was but upon condition, if he did show himself worthy. Ch. 1. 52.
And to Abiathar the Priest, the King said, go to Anathoth thy field, for thou art worthy to die, &c.] Anathoth was a city of the sons of Aaron, Josh. 21. 18. here the family of Abiathar dwelt, and to this place he was now confined, and not permitted anymore to remain or to come to the city of David; that being removed from the Court, there might not be any danger afterwards of his conspiring against the King anymore. In that he was thus censured at this time, it appeareth, that he was guilty of a second conspiracy with Adonijah, as also Joab, whose judgment followeth next. God suffered them both to fall again, that Solomon might have just occasion of proceeding against them; both that the word of God against Eli's family might be fulfilled; as is noted in the next words, v. 27. and so great wickednesses as Joab had formerly committed might not go unpunished. Here some make a question, how the King, could censure the high-Priest, seeing he was not subject unto him? Tostatus answereth, that under the Old Testament he was subject, because the spiritual and temporal powers were not then distinguished. But Sallianus according to Theodoret, that the ordinance of God did intervene, of which Solomon was only the executer; and it is probable saith Sallianus, that it was done with the consent of Zadok, for in the case of life and death, the Priest only hath power to judge of the Priest, and to punish him; because Pashur the chief Priest committed Jeremiah to prison, thus he. But let every soul be subject to the higher powers, and let these powers be described by bearing the sword, as Rom. 13. and then this question falleth utterly to the ground; not only temporal but spiritual persons, have been and now are subject to the King: and if the chief Priest had power over Jeremiah to commit him, it was but a power derived from the King, as they that have commissions from him in our land have power.
When Joab heard this, he fled to the Tabernacle of the Lord, and took hold of the horns of the Altar, &c.] Because he knew himself to be guilty of the same conspiracy with Adonijah and Abiathar, he hearing how the King had dealt with them, feared his own life and therefore took Sanctuary as Adonijah had done before, ch. 1. 50. where I have shown, who were to be protected there and who not. About the former words of this verse, there is a difference from the Hebrew in the vulgar Latin. For whereas it is Hebr. The report came to Joab, for he had gone after Adonijah, although he went not after Absalom. The vulgar Latin hath it, A messenger came to Solomon, that Joab went after Adonijah, but not after Solomon; thus in the translation followed by Lyra: but in others it is corrected, in the last place there being Absalom, for Solomon. But it was not Solomon, that heard now of Joab's conspiring with Adonijah, for he knew that long before, but Joab heard what Solomon had done to the man, that he sought to advance, plotting now the second time for him, and finding by his proceedings against Abiathar, that it was not hidden from Solomon, he despaired of all favor, because he thought, that the King would easily gather, that his heart was quite estranged from him, seeing that in David's time, when Absalom sought to be King he would not take part with him but slew him; but now Adonijah seeking the kingdom and to put down Solomon, not once but twice, he conspired both these times with him.
And when it was told King Solomon, that Joab was fled to the Tabernacle, &c. Solomon sent Benaiah, saying, fall upon him, &c.] Here by anticipation is set forth, what Solomon lastly commanded Benaiah to do. For first, as is shown in the next words, he went to Joab and said, thus saith the King, come forth; and when he refused, the King being certified bad slay him there. Lyra saith, that Rab. Solomon yieldeth this reason, why Benaiah slew him not at the first: viz. Because Joab said unto him, that when he had slain Abner, David cursed him to suffer by the Leprosy, the Gout in his feet, and the want of bread; wherefore if now he were punished by death, it would be unjust, unless Solomon would take these curses upon himself and his posterity. Then Benaiah returning this answer to the King, he took these curses upon him, and sent again and slew Joab there; that is, as is most probable, being taken away by violence from the Altar, as is commanded, Exod. 21. 14. and accordingly, he saith, it fell out: for Uzziah had the Leprosy, Asa the Gout in his feet, and Hezekiah being besieged, wanted bread. But this is so vain, that it is not worth the naming; for those Kings were thus punished for other faults; and Joab deserved to die also for slaying Amasa: and it cannot be imagined that Solomon would take curses upon himself. Lastly, David had given Solomon a charge to slay Joab: therefore it is not to be doubted, but justly, seeing that charge came from so holy a King. Of all Expositors, Pelican only justifies Joab to have been a most faithful servant to David, and seemeth to tax it, as a point of ingratitude in David towards him to appoint him to be slain; by his example warning all Courtiers of their uncertain condition. But Joab certainly now received according to his deserts for his blood-shed and faction, which must not go unpunished. Whereas it is said, v. 34. that he was buried in his own house in the desert, the Hebrews say that this house was an Hospital, which he built in the way for the harbouring of poor passengers; and because he did such a deed of charity, they gather that although he was punished in this world, yet his soul was saved. But as P. Martyr saith, of this we cannot judge, because the Scripture saith nothing of it, and therefore it is to be left unto God. For his house in the desert he noteth out of Kimhi, that it is not only called a desert, which is uninhabited, but also which is not tilled but used for forests and pastures, and in such a place most probably Joab had an house, where he kept cattle.
Abiathar being put down from the high-Priesthood, and Joab slain, Zadok is put into the place of the one, and Benaiah of the other. Of his commendation that was now made high Priest see before, 1 Sam. 2. 35. where he who should be advanced thus in Eli's steed is described, but not named.
Then the King sent and called Shimei, and said unto him, build thee an house in Jerusalem, and dwell there, and go not out, for the day that thou goest out & passest the brook Kedron, thou shalt surely die.] Shimei was the third man, touching whom David gave a charge unto Solomon for his cursing and railing upon him, when he fled from Absalom, not to suffer him to come to the grave in peace. But because he could not justly slay him for that, seeing David had promised him that he should not die, the wise King beginneth with him, as reason required, by consining him to Jerusalem, and restraining him from going to his own city Bahurim, to come unto which a man must go over the Brook Kedron; because if he were permitted to dwell amongst those of his own tribe of Benjamin, there might be some danger of his exciting to rebellion, forsomuch as he had formerly declared himself to be ill-affected to the house of David, which danger would be avoided by keeping him to Jerusalem. The proposition of the King Shimei liked well, as one that feared that he should have been dealt worse withal, and therefore, as it appeareth afterwards, this decree was confirmed by oath, Shimei approving it. And so he came and dwelt in Jerusalem three years without going forth. But after this, his servants running away from him, and he hearing that they were in Gath, pursued them thithes, and returning suffered death therefore. But forsomuch as the brook Kedron lay eastward from the city and Gath west, how could Shimei be condemned to die, seeing he went not over contrary to the Kings charge? Answ. The meaning was not precisely, that he should not pass over that brook only, but no way else go out of the city: and he was expressly commanded, dwell in Jerusalem and go not out either hither or thither, and Kedron only was mentioned as the way, that he would most probably go, because his lands and possessions lay in Bahurim, and this was the way thither. Thus by a singular providence it was brought about, that Shimei did bear the punishment of his wickedness at the last, although he escaped long, and so shall all the wicked.
CHAP. III.
IN the last verse of the former chapter, having said, that the kingdom was established to Solomon after the death of Joab, Adonijah, and Shimei, and the putting down of Abiathar from the high Priesthood, so that no enemies now remained to the endangering of his estate; here it is added, that he sought further to establish his kingdom by contracting affinity with Pharaoh, a mighty neighbor king, by marrying his daughter. He was sure saith Pelican, by the promises of God, that his kingdom should stand firm, yet human means were not to be neglected, and without doubt he being so zealously affected to the true God, did not take her but to instruct and convert her. And Martyr saith, that Expositors agree, that a covenant of her embracing the true religion did intervene, and so she was a type of a Church to be gathered out of the Gentiles to become the spouse of Christ: yet entering upon a long dispute, whether a marriage may be made betwixt those, that are of divers religions, and having brought reasons pro and contra, he concludeth, that Solomon had done better, if he had not married an Egyptian daughter, because Pharaoh King of Egypt was not better then Ahab, with whose daughter yet when Joram the son of Jehoshaphat married, it was reproved, and he was thereby corrupted; and such kind of marriages are rather snares then marriages. In his dispute, he handleth two questions; first, whether a believer may marry with an infidel? Secondly, whether one that holds the true faith with an heretic? To the first he saith, that infidels are either of Canaan or of other nations: with the daughters of Canaan, no marriages might be made for fear of being corrupted, Exod. 23. Deut. 7. and ch. 12. and because they all were adjudged to destruction without sparing any, for their great abominations. But with the daughters of other nations, some circumstances observed they might sometime marry, as when one was in love with a fair woman taken captive, she having first her hair shaved, &c. by deforming her thus, if it might be, the heat of his love being cooled towards her. And with the Ammonites or Moabites in the tenth generation, with the Edomites and Egyptians in the third. Yet because we read of Salmon marrying Rahab a Cannaanite, and Boaz Ruth a Moabite, and David the daughter of the King of Geshur, he determineth, that if any heathen woman did turn and embrace the true religion, she might by a particular dispensation be taken to wife; otherwise it was to yoke an ox and an asse together, which was unlawful. Cyprian lamented this detestable vice in Christians, saying, that the Members of Christ were thus prostituted to the Gentiles. And Jerome, that thus Christian parents did prostitute their members to idols, and that Christian women were thus made ribs of the devil. Ambrose bringeth two arguments against these marriages; first, because the married should receive their blessing under the sacerdotall veil, which, if one were heathen, they could not do. Secondly, because they should oftentimes pray together, and therefore he affirmeth that it is no marriage, which is against the decree of God. Tertullian against such marriages alledgeth the saying of the Apostle, let her marry in the Lord, and affirmeth them to be nullities, and therefore that they who marry so, are guilty of whoredom. Moreover he saith, that no good subject will be familiar with his Kings enemy, therefore the enemy of God is not to be placed in ones bosom. And by the old law a servant might not marry without the consent of his master, and if any woman married a servant, she came hereby into the same condition to be his servant also; likewise Christians may not marry but according to their Lord's will, and if they do with those of another religion, who are the devils servants, they are hereby made the devils servants also. In other things the saying is, tu tibi sum parem, therefore in marrying it should be done likewise. For the second Concilium Agathense forbad not only marrying with infidels, but also with Heretics; Likewise Concilium Vrbanense & Laodicense, and Tit. 3. 10. it is said, Avoid heretic after one or two admenitions, and John. 4. the Jews meddled not with the Samaritans. Thus far Martyr. But I do think with the common stream of interpreters, that Solomon offended not in this marriage; both because he is commended here v. 3. for walking in the statutes of God, and Psal. 45. Pharaohs daughter is set forth, as a type of the Church, and in the song of Solomon; wherefore she did doubtless embrace the true religion, and the motion to take her to wife came of God, as before it is said of Samson taking a Philistines daughter. Nicholaus de Lyra justifying this marriage of Solomon, answereth these objections. First, that an Hebrew might not marry with one of another nation, saying, that this is indeed to be understood of all strange nations, and not of the Canaanites only; because Ezra 10. he cause them that had married so, to put away their wives. But this was the difference between the Canaanites and those of other nations, these might be taken if they left their superstition, those not only in this case, but upon some other singular cause added to this, as Rahab was taken by Salmon to wife, because she had so well mertied of the Hebrews by saving their spies. Secondly, that Solomon is blamed for loving women of other nations, ch. 11. 1. and in particular Pharaohs daughter, saying, that this is not a thing recited there by way of reproof, but his marrying strangers, that turned him to idolatry: she being only reckoned up first, because his love was chiefly to her; and therefore when it is said, v. 8. that he built abominations to all his strange wives, it is not to be understood without exception, for it was only to such, as offered incense to idols, as is there expressed; and therefore Pharaohs daughter being before converted, was none of them.
Only the people sacrificed in high places, because the house was not yet built to the name of the Lord.] That is, saith Junius, in that at Gibeon, the reason whereof is rendered; 2 Chron. 1. 3. and in Zion where the Ark was, v. 17. For Solomon loved the Lord, v. 3. wherefore he would not suffer the people to sacrificed. elsewhere, but in the places where David his Father had sacrificed. Lyra contratywise following the vulg. lat. but the people sacrificed in the high places, v. 3. but Solomon loved the Lord, Saith, that this is mentioned as a fault in Solomon, wherein he came short of David: for although it was lawful till the building of the Temple, yet he should rather have followed the example of David restreining the sactifices only to the threshing floor of Araunah in Zion, where the Ark was; seeing God had shown unto David that this was the place which he had chosen; P. Martyr agreeth with Lyra, holding that they sacrificed in any high place, and not only where the Ark and Tabernacle were, which yet he denieth not to have been lawful before the building of the Temple. Pelican agreeth with Innius, and I with them, that nothing is here spoken to detract from Solomon, for he is immediately commended for his love to the Lord, and said to have walked in all the precepts of David, except his sacrificing in the high place, which is not mentioned as a fault in him, but because in this particular he varied from him, who after he had begun in the threshing floor of Araunah, never sacrificed anywhere else. For to Gibeon where the Tabernacle of Moses was, and the Altar, Solomon came purposely in greatest devotion, to honor God, and God shown how well he liked hereof, because he appeared there unto him. But it may seem strange that three years being now expired since the death of David, Solomon did not yet begin to build the Temple, seeing all things were before prepared by David, for he began not to build it, till the 4 year of his reign, ch. 6. 1. For this it may be conceived, that still more preparation of materials was to be made, as is shown, ch. 5. about which so many thousands are there said to have been employed, and sent over into the country of Tyrus to work there, that the levying of men, sending Ambassadors to that King, the cutting down of Cedars and Fir-trees, and making the stuff ready, that no knocking or he wing might be at the building, and the transporting thereof, could not take up less time; and happily because the work was so great, and required extraordinary wisdom in him that should undertake it, he thought himself not yet sufficient for it, and therefore stayed till that he had obtain wisdom of God, as is shown that he did in this chapter.
Then the King went to Gibeon, to sacrifice there, for that was the great high place, and there he offered 1000 burnt offerings. 2 Chron. 1. 3. He went with all the multitude to the high place at Gibeon, where was the Tabernacle which Moses the servant of God made in the wilderness, v. 5. &c. and the brazen Altar which Bezaleel made, &c. Comestar following Josephus saith, that by Gibeon no particular high place was to be understood, but only an high place, as the word signifieth; and that the high place to which Solomon went was in Hebron; but the Chronicles make it plain that Gibeon is a proper name here, both because it is said the high place at Gibeon, and described by the Tabernacle there, and the Altar, which was the reason why Solomon was drawn thither, to offer sacrifice; and Zadok who was made high Priest instead of Abiathar, ministered th •• . The thousand burnt offerings which he offered here, were according to the Hebrews, either offered in divers days, or which he offered there in all his time, but the first is most probable. Although this his going to Gibeon to sacrifice be spoken of after his marrying of Pharaoh's daughter, yet some think that it was before, because so holy a man would not do any other act of great consequence before that he had sought wisdom, whereby to be directed. And in the book of Wisdom he saith, that he sought wisdom in his youth, ch. 8. and as it seemeth, ch. 9. at the beginning of his reign. To this, that he sought wisdom in the first year of his reign, I assent, although the relation hereof cometh after Shimei his death, which was when Solomon had reigned 3 years, and it is not improbable, but that he married Pharaoh's daughter in the first year also. For to the end, that all the history of the destruction of David's enemies might be set forth together, the destruction of Shimei also was set forth before this marriage, although it happened after. But that his sacrificing at Gibeon was before this marriage, I can yet see no reason of force to persuade, and both the text and Josephus are for another order, placing the marriage before his sacrificing. He went then after this marriage solemnized to Gibeon to sacrifice, that he might the better prosper in this estate, by thus seeking God's blessing, and to be the better prepared to the great work of building the temple, to which he thought it now time to address himself.
In Gibeon the Lord appeared to Solomon in a dream by night and said, ask what I shall give thee, 2 Chron. 1. 7. That night the Lord appeared to Solomon, &c.] When Solomon had presented the Lord so liberally with sacrifices, thus earnestly seeking his favor, the Lord did him this grace to appear unto him, and then he discovered the end of his so great devotion to be to obtain wisdom, and herein he prevailed; [Note.] and for worldly riches and glory also, so that there is nothing lost by being profuse in honoring God, but much gained.
Then Solomon said, thou hast shown mercy to thy servant David my Father, as he walked before thee in truth and righteousness, and uprightness of heart.] He knowing saith Lyra, that God made him this offer for David's sake, spake thus: the truth whereby he commends David, is by Martyr expounded of the uprightness of his heart, the righteousness of his just dealing, and the uprightness of his true care in all things to walk according to the commandments, for which he is said to be righteous before God, because he was by him accepted for such, although he sometime sinned greatly.
And now thou hast made me to reign, who am a child, &c.] of what age Solomon was when he began to reign, hath been before discussed upon ch. 1. 39. and he saith, that he knew not how to go in and out, that is, to manage the weighty businesses of the Kingdom. He craveth therefore an understanding heart, and this is necessary for all Kings, because that if any King wanteth wisdom, although his council be wise, there will be great danger of being misled to his own, and the hurt of his subjects. And it is not Solomon's case alone to ask this wisdom and obtain it, but whosoever asketh it in faith, hath a certain promise, I am. 1. 5. that he shall obtain it. The prayer of Solomon for wisdom is more largely set forth in the book of wisdom, ch. 9. see also Ecclesiast. 51. 18. 19. &c. With this petition of Solomon God was so pleased, that he gave him both wisdom exceeding that of all others before and after him, and riches and honor, and promised him long life also, if he continued to walk in his commandments. But is it meant, that in wisdom he should excel all other men? Was he wiser then Adam, Moses, the Prophets and Apostles, and then Christ Jesus? And did he excel all Kings without exception, in riches and glory, as Croesus, Xerxes, Alexander, and Nebuchadnezzar? Sol. Jesus Christ was not only man but God, and therefore he cannot come in question in this comparison: as for Adam also before his fall, without doubt he was as wise as Solomon and both in natural and divine things: the comparison therefore is made between Solomon and all other mere men, since the fall. In things natural none was ever so suddenly made so wise as he in youth; for Eccl. 7. he saith, that it was given unto him to know the constitution of the world and elements, and the nature of beasts, trees, plants, &c. but in divine things no doubt, but the Prophe •• and Apostles excelled him. It is meant therefore, first for natural and politick wisdom enabling to govern, there was none like unto him: secondly, for all kind of wisdom no King was ever comparable to him, and the comparison is expressly made betwixt him and all other Kings: lastly, for riches and glory no King of Israel was ever like him; and for other Kings, taking all three together, wisdom, riches and glory, there was never any, that might be compared unto him in any country. For although one might have a larger dominion, and more riches, yet he came short of Solomon in wisdom, which is the greatest glory. Whereas long life is promised him, if he kept the commandments: herein it seemeth, that God fore-seeing his foul falling into idolatry, spake thus; and the event answered the prediction, for he died before he was very old, viz. about 60. according to the Hebrews, at 52.
And whereas he promiseth nothing of victories over his enemies, and power to destroy them, it may be thought also, that this was omitted, because God foresaw the rebellion of Jeroboam, who escaped his hands. Some think, that Solomon asked all kind of wisdom not only to govern, but also to understand all divine mysteries and all natural things, because his understanding was enlarged herein, and yet in the grant God doth not express this, but other things, which he asked not he expresseth; whereby is intimated, that this was asked. But the text is plain, that he asked only wisdom to govern, and to manage the great affairs committed unto him; but God, who is wont to give more to his faithful servants, then they ask, gave him a most large understanding in all other things also. Yet it is not to be thought, that he had such a knowledge of heavenly mysteries, but that others especially under the Gospel were more enlightened herein, for these were hidden in times past, but now revealed: And therefore most Expositors subscribe to this. As Dionys. Tostatus, Caietau, &c.
And when Solomon awaked, behold it was a dream, &c.] But by the spirit of God, which sent it, he knew that it came from God, and was no illusion, as dreams commonly are, and he found it to be true by experience, for that his heart was by and by enlarged with understanding, and hereof a proof was given, at his return to Jerusalem, v. 16. 17. &c. Thus Martyr. Lyra, he knew that it was a dream, that is, that it was true, because God used to reveal himself by dreams. And immediately he returned to Jerusalem, and offered more sacrifices before the Ark in way of thankfulness for this singular mercy, and with part of the peace-offerings he made a royal feast.
Then came there two harlots and stood before the King, &c.] Vatablus for harlots hath victuallers, because the word signifieth either, and it is not likely, that they were harlots, because either such conceivednot, or if they did, they desired rather the death, then the life of their children. But Josephus saith, that they were women that made a gain of playing the harlots, and both the Sept. and Vulg. lat. render it harlots. But the Chaldee paraphrast, victuallers, and Peter Martyr, either victuallers or washers of clothes, holding it improbable that they were harlots, because so godly a King would never have suffered a whore to live in Jerusalem contrary to the law of God, so likewise Pelican. Junius saith, that they were victuallers, and such as secretly played the whores, because it is not probable that they durst in the time of so godly a King make public profession of such wickedness, or as harlots to have appeared before him, and to this do. I subscribe. A case most difficult is by God's providence now brought before the King to try his wisdom for none but a most wise man could judge rightly of it, both plead for one infant, the one affirming it to be hers, the other hers, and that another infant which died by being overlaid in the night, belonged to neither of them. What the truth was, there was no witness to prove their ages, one being born but 3 days he fore the other, could not distinguish them, and it seemeth that there was no mark to do it, that any neighbors took notice of. The wise King therefore having a while while heard them both began to consider that a true mother who loveth her child, as it seemeth either of these did, through her natural affection would not suffer any hurt to be done unto it. Wherefore he called for a sword, and commanded the living child to be divided between them, and then it soon appeared which was the true mother of the child, and it was given unto her. And agreeably to this it is said, Wisdom 7. that by the wisdom given unto him, he knew the thoughts of men. Josephus saith, that he commanded the dead child to be divided also, but because it exceeds the relation of the holy Scripture, this is not to be believed, and because there was no reason why it should be divided, seeing they did neither of them desire any part in it. If it shall seem to have been a matter too mean to be brought before the King, happily saith Martyr it was first brought before some other judge, but he for the difficulty not being able to decide it, it came before the King, as, matters most difficult sometime before Moses. When Solomon began to enter into this way of exploration, to find out the true mother, it is supposed that the Courtiers standing by, first derided him in their hearts, as being about to do childishly, but in fine they perceived the depth of his understanding, and feared him; that is, the just reverenced him for his singular endowments, conceiving that they should have justice done them, although they had to deal with subtle adversaries; and the wicked feared him, as conceiving they could not lie hid, but should surely be found out having a King of such sagacity, and so bear the punishment of their evil doings.
CHAP. IIII.
HAving shown a proof of Solomon's wisdom in the case of the two Harlots in the former Chapter, this is spent in showing his riches and glory, his gift of wisdom being further amplified also, that it might appear to be so done unto him, as the Lord had there promised. For to his Kingly glory pertained this, that he reigned over all Israel, v. 1. and had so many noble Princes under him, v. 2, 3, &c. the multitude of his subjects, v. 20. the extent of his dominion, v. 21. and the large provision spent daily in his court, v. 22, 23. together with the great multitude of his chariots, and horses, v. 26. 2 Chron. 1. 14. Touching his riches, what here is omitted, is shown 2 Chron. 1. 15. they were so great, that gold and silver were as plentiful as stones in the street in his days. Lastly, that his wisdom might the more appear, it is extolled v. 29, 30. above the wisdom of all the wise of the East and of the Egyptians, &c. And for a further proof, it is shown v. 32. his great number of proverbs and songs, and discourses of the nature of all things are meationed.
And Solomon was King over all Israel.] That is, there being no division of Judah from the rest, as had been in David's time; nor conspirators to trouble his universal reign.
These are the Princes which he had, Azariah the son of Zadok the Priest.] Here because no office is ascribed to Azariah, as is to all that are named after him, some have thought that the word Priest is to be understood of him, as if it had some have thought that the word Priest is to be understood of him, as if it had been said, Azariah the Priest the son of Zadok holding him to have been the Kings household Chaplain, and this reading is followed by Lyra, Versio aldina, & Regia; and in 8 manuscripts, as saith Francis Lucas. But both the Vulg. lat. Pagnin, and Vatablus join it to Zadok thus, Zadok Sacerdotis. Junius rendereth the word translated Priest, president; and saith, that he was the son of some other Zadok, and not of the Priest Zadok. Tostatus and Cajetan think that he was one of the Kings scribes, and therefore refer the word scribes both to him, and to the other two named next after him. But I hold with P. Martyr that he was not one of his Scribes, for David had but one; and therefore if Solomon had two, it is not to be thought that he had more, and the verse wherein he is named, is distinguished from that wherein the other two are named. Moreover the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 doth plainly show that he was his Priest, for so it most commonly signifieth; and not a president, as Junius would have it: and this is plain also, because his father was a Priest; neither can I see any reason why he should say that it was some other Zadok, seeing we read of none of this name before, but the high Priest only: yet with the Hebrew Expositor it is to be held that he was not his immediate son, but the son of his son Ahimaaz. He would have a peculiar Priest saith Martyr, to offer prayers daily for him, and when he came before the Lord in public to offer his sacrifices by themselves, and not amongst those of the people.
Elihoreph, and Ahijah the sons of Sisa Scribes.] What the Scribes office was, see before 2 Sam. 20. 25. where Sejah is said to be David's scribe, whom Martyr thinketh to be the same with this Sisa; and if so, his sons continued in the same office in Solomon's time. Touching the offices of Jehoshaphat also, and of Benaiah who are named next; see 2 Sam. 20. 25. But whereas Zadok and Abiathar are said to be Priests, when as Abiathar was at the beginning of Solomon's reign put down from the Priesthood; occasion is given hereby of divers conjectures, some thinking that he served still upon request made to the King as an ordinary Priest, some that he at sometimes executed the office of the high Priest when he was unclean; as R. L. Ben Gerson: some that he was another man of the same name, as Kimhi. Others that he is so called still, and had only the title, but executed not the office; and this last I think with Martyr to be most probable. For if he had been employed as an ordinary Priest, why should he be named with the high Priest Zadok more then any of the rest? and if in the case of uncleanness happening at any time unto Zadok, he executed the high Priests office; why was there not one provided from the beginning in the like case to do the like: and touching another of the same name, it is a mere conjecture.
And Azariah the son of Nathan was over those that attended upon the King.] that is, those of his household, but whether he were the son of Nathan the Prophet, or of Nathan the Kings brother is uncertain, but most think, that he was the prophet Nathan's son, with whom Solomon had been brought up, and therefore he favoure him so much, as to prefer him before others, that were about him. And Zabud the son of Nathan the Priest, the kings friend. This man also is by the most held to be the son of Nathan the prophet, by his familiarity with Solomon in his youth, with whom he was brought up in his fathers house, attaining to this friendship; whereas he is called a priest, it is not to be understood, as if he were of the tribe of Levi, but as other princes are sometimes called by this name 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 , which signifieth a priest or prince, 2 Sam. 9. 4. as Junius divideth the chapter, but according to the common dividing, 2 Sam. 8. 18.
Ahishar was over his house, and Adoniram the son of Abda over the tribute.] Of Adoram, who was over the tribute in David's time see before, 2 Sam. 20. 24.
And Solomon had 12. Princes over all Israel, who made provision for the King and his house, everyone a month in the year.] These twelve were so seated, as may be gathered from the description of their countries here following, as that each one of them might most conveniently furnish the King from his country with provision for his month, and it was abundance which was spent in his court every month, as will afterwards appear v. 22, 23. so as that there was need to gather it from all parts of his kingdom. But it is not to be thought, saith Martyr, that this provision was taken up without paying a just price therefore, seeing if otherwise the people had been exacted upon, they would have groaned under the burden where as now they are said to have been eating and drinking and rejoicing, v. 20. If any man shall wonder, how such abundance of provision should be spent daily in Solomon's court, it is to be understood that he had not only his household servants to maintain, but many men for the wars, and to defend his kingdom; and the retinue of wives and concubines with their attendants, was excessive. Whereas two amongst these Princes are said to have married two of Solomon's daughters, it is to be understood as spoken by anticipation, because he could not yet have daughters marriageable being himself so young, but it is meant, that afterwards when they were grown up, they took them for their wives.
Judah and Israel were many as the sand upon the sea shore.] This is spoken hyperbolically to set forth their excessive number to the greater glory of their King, to whom it is a glory to have a multitude of subjects.
Solomon reigned over all kingdoms from the river to the land of the Philistines, and to the border of Egypt.] By this river Junius understandeth Euphrates, from whence to the Philistines land which lay South, seemeth to be the latitude of the country; or if Palestine lay West, the longitude: and then the latitude was from Egypt South, to mount Libanus, North. P. Martyr.
And the provision for Solomon's house for one day, was 30. Cores of fine flower, and 60. Cores of bread. corn.] A Core was 10. Ephaes or bushels, but according to Budaeus, an Ephah was a bushel and a peck, according to others, a bushel wanting a pottle. If it be taken for a bushel and a Core was 10. then 30. Cores amounted to 300. bushels, and 60 to 600. all together 900. And forasmuch as an Ephah contained 10. Omers, and an Omer was allowed for one person for a day, when they were sed with Manna and nothing else, but with other meat, as now they were fed, half so much would suffice, there could not be sewer then 20. fed with an Ephah, and with 900. Ephaes then were fed eighteen thousand at the least, which showeth the greatness of Solomon's court. Lyra makes these measures a great deal less, that it may seem the more credible, saying, that a core was but 30. measures, and that a measure was but a little quantity, seeing Ruth carried away from Boaz his threshing floor 6. measures of barley. And Sallianus, who acknowledgeth that a Core containeth 10. Ephahs, addeth, or 30. measures, saying that a measure sufficed a day for one person, and therefore 90. cores being 2700. measures, there were no more persons fed with this provision but 2700. But it being granted, that a Core contained 10. Ephaes, not 3. but 20. persons might well be fed with an Ephah and other meat together, seeing it is plain, that an Ephah was 10. Omers, and then the whole number must needs be 18000. at the least, as was said before. Now in these large daily expenses of provision, it is not to be thought, as Martyr saith, that Solomon sinned by excess, for it is spoken to his commendation and the setting forth of his glory; and God by his example would teach that the riches of this world are at his disposing; and when it seemeth good unto him, he can extraordinarily enrich his servants; and natural men will not be taught this but by example; for when in the primitive Church Christians were poor, the heathen said sorely their God was a weak and poor God, because otherwise he would have enriched them. And that in all this expense there was no excess may be gathered, because there is no mention made amongst all his provisions of wine, which amongst those that exceed is wont to be most plentiful. Other great Princes are noted in histories to have been unreasonably profuse in their feastings, as Lucius Verus a Romman the son of Marchs Antoninus, who spent at one feast 6000 Sestertii, and one Sestertium was 7 pound 16 shillings 3 pence, which Antoninus hearing said, that the common wealth of Rome should sustain great loss if another such feast were made. Caligula would have his bread guilded to spend the more, and M. Antonius contended with Cleopatra, in prodigal spending upon a banquet.
For he reigned over every place beyond the river from Thizpah to Azzah, &c.] Here the extent of Solomon's kingdom is set forth in other terms then before, v. 21. for there it was bounded by the river at one end, and the Philistines country at the other, but thereby was meant only the kingdoms inhabited by Judah and Israel in the land of Canaan, here the whole length is set forth beyond the river Jordan also, where not only Israelites but other nations inhabited to Azza or Gaza, which was of the Philistines, and this Thizpah saith Jerome, lay Eastward, and Azzah Westward; although Tostatus saith, North and South. Thizpah, saith Junius is otherwise by historians called Taphach lying at the river Euphrates, being since called Amphipolis. Plin. lib. 5. nat. hist. c. 24. so that hereby we may gather his kingdom to have been exceeding great. The Hebrews, saith Pelican, will have by these two the uttermost parts of the world meant, holding that Solomon reigned over all countries of the whole world. This indeed is true touching Christ, who was by Solomon figured out, but his limits were not so large, and as the people of Israel then enjoyed peace, which is set forth in the next words.
Judah and Israel dwelt safely everyone under his own vine and fig tree from Dan to Beersheba.] so by Christ cometh to all the subjects of his kingdom the greatest peace of all, the peace of conscience and everlasting rest. For the limits here named, Dan lay farthest North of all the land of Israel, and Beersheba farthest South.
And Solomon had 40000 stables of horses, and 12000 horses.] 2 Chron. 1. 14. it is said, he had 1400 Chariots, and 12000 horsemen. It is to be understood, that many of the horses before spoken of were for these chariots, and the rest for others of his retinue to ride upon. 2 Chron. 9. 25, It is said, that Solomon had 4000. stables of horses, here 40000. This difference may thus be reconciled, here the partitions in the stables are to be understood, there standing in one but one horse, as is the manner in the stables of many great persons; there the whole stables, whereof everyone contained 10. such partititions, so Lyra and Junius. If any man shall ask what Solomon did with so many horses, it is answered, that he used some of them for the defense of his kingdom, some for carriages and some for his servants to ride upon; they being placed for these ends in several parts of the kingdom.
But God gave Solomon very much wisdom and understanding, and largeness of heart, as the sand upon the sea shore.] Some, saith Martyr, will have the largeness of Solomon's heart compared to the sea-shore, because as that comprehends innumerable grains of sand, so his heart comprehended innumerable notions of all sorts; others, because the most vast sea is terminated with the shore, so all knowledge was contained within the heart of Solomon. But he saith, that the comparison is made in respect of the largeness of the sea shore, it being a spacious plain, that compasseth the sea round about. I think, that nothing else is meant, but that as the sea-shore abounds with innumerable sands, so did his heart abound with all kinds of knowledge, none that lived abounding herein like unto him, which is further expressed in the comparisons and declarations here following, as no place abounds with sands like the sea-shore: Thus also Pelican, who applying this to the true Solomon Christ Jesus, saith, it was abundantly verified in him, because in in him were hid all the treasures of wisdom.
And the wisdom of Solomon excelled the wisdom of all the men of the East, and of the Egyptians.] By the wise men of the East are meant the Magicians, Chaldeans and Astrologers, and all that were the finders out of the nature of things: for to attain this knowledge many travailed far, as Pythagoras, Empedocles, Demuritus, Plato, &c. And to show that the East was the place, where wise men, who were seen into greatest secrets, were, it is said Matth. 2. that when Christ was born there came wise men out of the East. For the wise men of Egypt here also were Magicians, whom Pharaoh called for, to do by their skill such wonders as Moses did. These were greatly seen into the secrets of nature, and if there were any skill in picture-making aptly to represent things, they had it. But Solomon