PPuritanSearch
Primary source research library
English Puritan & Reformed

Body of Divinity

Edward Leigh (1602-1671) · 537,836 words · 2390 min

Large work readerShowing section 14 of 18. Corpus search still uses the whole work; source find opens the first matching section.
Section 14/18
Cas. of Consc.

It was but a bare prudential thing in the Church, whether it were Hyginus of Rome, that first brought in God-fathers and God-mothers about the year of Christ, 140. as Platina and others write, or some other, it is not greatly material. Ford of the Covenant between God and man. Vide Zepperum de Sac. Some urge Isa. 8. 1, 2, 3. for it.

Because from the beginning those that were of years when they were to be baptized were asked divers Questions, Whether they believed? Whether they renounced the Devil? The same custom also remained even then when Infants alone were offered: and the Papists cannot be moved from thence, Chamier. de Canone lib. 11. c. 9.

The Churches by an unadvised imitation drew the interrogatories ministered in the Primitive Church to those which were of years to profess their faith in Baptism unto young children. Cartw. on Mat. 3.

Whether the immediate or remote parents give the children a right to Baptism?

Some say immediate Parents only can give the children a right.

Because if we go higher to remote Parents, Where shall we then stop? May we go to Noah or Adam (say they?) Where shall we stay? Why may not the children of Jews and Turks then be admitted into the Church, since they formerly descended from believers? This Objection carries some force with it, and there is a very strong Objection likewise against this opinion, since those for the most part that maintain this, say, the Parents that give the federal right to their children must be visible Saints or Church-members, as they phrase it. The Argument then is this, The wickedness of a Jew could not prejudice the childes right that was to be circumcised, therefore neither the wickedness of a Christian a childes right that is to be baptized. And whether their Baptism be not null which had no right, and so they ought to be rebaptized, should be seriously considered by them that hold that tenet.

Quest. What if the immediate Parents be believers only in show?

Answ. 1. The profession of the faith is sufficient: 2. Children have right to Baptism by virtue of the first Covenant with Abraham, in whom we have as true an interest as the Jews ever had, Act. 8. 12, 13, 38. with 10. 47. Gal. 3. 29. Rom. 11. 17. So that the wickedness of the immediate Parent doth not prejudice the right of the child: for then Hezekiah should not have been circumcised, because he had a wicked father. Master Lyford's Principles of Faith and good Conscience, Chap. 49.

Object. The children of the faithful only are to be baptized, because only those Infants are judged to be in the Covenant, and only holy.

Answ. 1. We are not to regard the ungodliness of such as are their natural Parents of whom they were begotten, but the godliness of the Church, in which and of whom they were born: for the Church is as it were their mother.

2. We must consider not only their immediate Parents but their forefathers and ancestors which have led a godly life, Rom. 11. 16. By the name of root in that Nation of the Jews, he doth not understand the next Parents who peradventure were profane and ungodly, but those first Parents of that people, viz. Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, to whom the promise was made, and the Covenant confirmed.

They are to be baptized who in charity may be thought to be in the Covenant. Such are all that profess them to be of the Christian faith, and also their children Act. 10. 45. 1 Cor. 7. 14. D. Gouge his Catechism.

Parents being in the Church by the profession of Christian Religion, their children are within the Covenant, Ezek. 18. 20. So that the impiety of the Parents prejudiceth not the child that is born in the Church.

2. By Parents are to be understood not those alone of whom children are immediately begotten and born, but their Progenitors and Ancestors also who feared God and lived in the Church, though many generations before. For God made not his Covenant with Abraham and his immediate seed only, but with all his seed after them in their generations, Gen. 17. 7.

Lastly, Be the next Parents whosoever they will be, yet their children being born in the Church, the Church is their mother, and the faith and piety of the Church investeth such as are born in her unto the Covenant. Down of the faith of Infants.

Either by Baptism men are admitted into the particular Church, or the whole Church, or no Church: but not into the particular Congregation, no man is baptized into the particular Congregation, it is not the seal of the particular Covenant: therefore it is into the whole or none: If a Heathen be converted in a Congregation, first he receives Baptism, afterward is admitted a member of the particular Congregation. M. Huds. Vindicat. c. 5. See him c. 6. p. 134, 142.

A baptized person is baptized not to that particular Church only, but to all Churches, and in every particular Church where he cometh he hath all the privileges of a baptized person. All circumcised persons had right thereby to eat the Passover in any society, Exod. 12. 4, 48. Deut. 16. 1, 2. In the place where God should choose to put his name there: so all baptized persons have right to the Lord's Supper, in every Church where God hath set his name. M. Ainsworth to M. Paget.

Sealing the promise by an initial Sacrament, is not only in reference to a particular Church, either National or Congregational, but principally in reference to the Catholic Church. Churches Divine Warrant of Inf. Bapt.

M. Ball in his Catechism hath this passage. Baptism is a Sacrament of our engraffing into Christ, Communion with him, and entrance into the Church, for which he citeth Matth. 28. 19. Acts 8. 38. And afterwards explains himself; It doth (saith he) solemnly signify and seal their engraffing into Christ, and confirm that they are acknowledged members of the Church, and entered into it. And that we are thereby admitted members, not of a particular Congregation, but the Catholic Church, appears, because we are baptized into one body, 1 Cor. 12. 13. See M. Huds. ib. Quaest. 2. p. 239. See p. 238.

Whether the children of Infidels ( viz. Jew , Turks and Pagans) may be baptized?

Baldwin a Luther an Cas. cons. l. 4. c. 8. cas. 8▪ maintains it lawful to baptize the children of professed Infidels, if jure belli, or the like way they come to be under the power of Christians, but he saith, Si Infans valetudinis sit satis firmae, utile est, ut prius in principiis doctrinae Christianae instituatur, quàm ad Baptismum afferatur.

Rivet on Gen. 17. allows the baptizing of the children of mere Pagans, if they be in the power of Christians to dispose of them as their own, in that Abraham's servants bought with money, or born in his house were to be circumcised.

There is a large promise to Abraham, stretching Covenant to his seed, not only to the children of his own body, and to his proselyte servants, but also to all them that were born in his house, or bought with money, Gen. 17. 12, 13. which happily may grant so much liberty to a Christian Sponsor, that if a stranger or wicked man should give him his child from his infancy to be brought up as his own, it may be baptized as his own.

Whether the children of Papists may be baptized.

Many hold that the children of Papists being either offered by them, or in the tuition of others, are not to be excluded from Baptism, since the Papists (though grossly erroneous) do profess the substance of Christian Religion.

Baptism celebrated in the Church of Rome is true Baptism, because albeit the Papacy be not the true Church, yet the true Church is in the Papacy, God preserving the remnants of it in the midst of the bowels of Antichrist. Attersol of the Sacrament, lib. 2. cap. 3. See cap. 6. Vide Balduinum de Cas. Consc. lib. 4. cap. 8. Cas. 7.

I dare not wholly take away the name of a Church from Rome. I know that Antichrist shall sit in the Temple of God: That Baptism cannot be administered out of the Church: And when the entire form of Baptism is observed, S t Augustine is resolved, Non haereticus, sed haeretici manu Christus baptizat. Therefore the Council of Nice determined very gravely, That there should be no rebaptization of such as were baptized by heretics. Doctor Hampton in his Sermon on 1 John 2. 19.

Although there be many devises of men sinfully annexed to Baptism in the Church of Rome, and some wicked opinions erroneously held concerning it among them: yet Baptism both was there, Rom. 6. 34. & 1. 7. as God's Ordinance, before these corruptions and errors, and so hath been continued in that Church to this day; and ought also still to be retained: the corruptions only and the errors being renounced and rejected. Johnson's Christian Plea, ch. 3. p. 53.

There is one Baptism, as there was one Circumcision. And Baptism had in the Apostate Churches of Christians, is answerable to Circumcision retained in Israel's Apostasy. Now Circumcision being once received in the Apostasy of Israel, was not repeated again at their returning to the Lord, and leaving of their idolatrous ways to serve him according to his Word: but they that were so circumcised were (without any new Circumcision of the flesh) accepted at Jerusalem, and admitted to the Passover, of which none might eat that was uncircumcised. In like manner also, Baptism being once received in the Apostatical Churches of Christians, is not to be repeated again, when any so baptized return unto the Lord, and forsake their Idolatries, submitting themselves to the truth of the Gospel, John's. ibid. c. 3. p. 27.

Whether the children of such as are excommunicated, may be baptized?

M. Cotton and M. Hooker oppose this, The Sacraments (saith he) are given to the visible particular Churches of Christ Jesus, and to the members thereof; such therefore as are cut off from their member-like Communion with the visible Church, are cut off also from the Seals of that Communion, Baptism and the Lord's Supper. As therefore we do not receive an Heathen to the fellowship of the Supper, nor their seed to Baptism, so neither dare we receive an excommunicate person (who is to us as an Heathen) unto the Lord's Supper, nor his children to Baptism.

M. Perkins in his Cases of Conscience, lib. 2. cap. 9. gives several reasons to prove that children of Parents which are professed members of Christ (though cut off for a time upon some offense committed) have right to Baptism.

Attersol of the Sacraments, l. 2. c. 6. saith, The children of excommunicate persons may be baptized.

Repetition of Baptism, or Rebaptizing.

There is but one Baptism, as there is but one body, Ephes. 4. 5.

Reasons against Rebaptization of such as are rightly baptized:

  • 1. Baptism is primarily and properly the Sacrament of our new-birth, Tit. 3. 5. of our insition into Christ which is done but once .
  • 2. In no place where the institution of it is named, is there any mention directly or by consequence of any rebaptizing of it, nor any order taken about it, whereas in the other Sacrament we have a Quotiescunque in the very Institution.
  • 3. Baptism succeeds Circumcision, which was but once administered, nor to be administered anymore, as is clear from the total silence of the Scripture, and osh 5. 4.
  • 4. It is numbered among Heresies in the ancient Church to reiterate a Baptism, which was acknowledged to be valid. M. Martials Def. of Infant-Bap. p. 68.

The Error of Rebaptizing arose upon a corrupt understanding and interpretation of that place, Act. 19. 5. They are not the words of Luke the writer, but of Paul the speaker, continuing his speech of John's Disciples and hearers, and are not to be understood of the twelve Disciples.

Some prove from that place that John's Baptism and Christ's do differ, but few urge it or the reiterating of Christ's Baptism.

Baptisma est irreiterable Sacramentum. Galatinus de Ar an. Cathol. verit. lib. 10. cap. 3.

The Anabaptists (or Antipaedobaptists) themselves will rather deny our Baptism to be a Sacrament, then grant a necessity of rebaptizing.

Private Baptism.

From S t John's preaching and baptizing in open meetings, we conclude that both preaching and baptizing ought to be in public Assemblies.

The Baptism of Midwives and in private houses, rose upon a false interpretation of John 3. 5. where some do interpret the word rather of the material water wherewith men are washed, whenas Christ takes it there by a borrowed speech, for the Spirit of God, the effect whereof it shadoweth out, cleansing the filth of sin, and cooling the great heat of an unquiet conscience, as water washeth the thing which is foul and quencheth the heat of the fire.

It is not a private action of faith, but public, and of the whole Congregation, whereby another member is received into the visible Church, and as it were incorporated into the body, all ought to have their part in it, as they are members of the same Church, and so it ought to be then done when all may best t ke knowledge of it. As in Corporations both of the Universities and also of the Cities and Towns, none are admitted in them but in a full Congregation, or in a public Assembly where all may be present, and give their consent: So in the visible Church by Baptism they ought then to be incorporated when the Assemblies are greatest, and when all may most conveniently be present, which is the Lord's Day.

There was no public Assembly when the Eunuch Acts 8. and the Goaler, Acts 16. were baptized.

Whether wanting Water, we may baptize with Sand, or Water distilled and compounded?

This came at first from that opinion, That they are damned which die unbaptized.

The Minister may not baptize with any other liquor and element, then with natural, common and ordinary water.

We may allow mixture of water with wine in the Lord's Supper, as well as the mixture of compound water with common in the Sacrament of Baptism.

If no composition may be used, then much less may any other sign be used, and so the element clean changed, and the Ordinance of God altered: for the Church of God hath no liberty to bring in any other sign in place of water. See Levite. 10. 2.

Whether it be lawful to use the sign of the Cross in Baptism?

In S t Augustine's time, yea before it, the Christians as they used to sign their fore head with he Cross in token that they were not ashamed of Christ crucified, (whom the Jews and Gentiles reproached for the death which he suffered on the Cross▪) so they brought thereof into the Sacraments, and used both the figure of the Cross, and crossing in other things of God also. Doctor Rainolds against Hart, p. 504.

In the Revelation the worshippers of the Beast receive his mark, and the worshippers of the Lamb carry his mark, and his Fathers in their fore-heads. Hence came the first use of the Cross in Baptism, as the mark of Christ, into whom we are initia ed, and the same afterwards used in all Benedictions, Prayers and Thanksgivings, in token they were done in the name and merit of Christ crucified. Mede on Ezek. 20. 20.

Had not the Popish abuse and superstitions about the Cross made us jealous of all use of it, who would not have thought this a decent ceremony at the administration of Baptism, to remind all the Congregation of their Christian profession and warfare to which the Sacrament itself doth oblige them? D. Burgess. See Weemses Christian Synagogue, p. 208. and Boys his Remains, p. 166. and Masons Sermon on 1 Cor. 14. 10.

The unconformists dispute against the Surplice and Cross, not only as monuments of Idolatry, but as signs analogical of mystical or sacramental signification, in nature and use, one with the Jewish Ceremonies, a will-worship, having no ground nor warrant from the Scripture, and against the second Commandment. M. Ball.

The Heathens did object to the Christians in time past in reproach, That the God which they believed in was hanged upon a Cross. They thought good to testify therefore that they were not ashamed of the Son of God by the often using of the sign of the Cross. But we now live not among Turks that contemn the Cross of Christ, but Papists which esteem more of a wooden Cross then of the true Cross of Christ, that is, his suffering. We ought therefore to take away the use of it, to take away the superstitious estimation of it. Cartwrights Reply to D. Whitgift in Defense of the Admonit. pag. 136. See Parker of the Cross per totum, and part. 1. cap. 3. pag. 106. against symbolical, sacramental, signifying signs in the worship of God, he urgeth that of the Civil Law, Nemo est signandus in front, quia non debet facies hominis ad similitudinem Dei formata foedari.

CHAP. IX. The Lord's Supper.

THere are divers names and appellations of it, of which Casaubone speaks Ex. 16. ad Annal. Eccles. Baron.

This Sacrament is called The Supper, from the time of its institution, because it was instituted by Christ after a common Supper, and the eating of the Paschal Lamb, in the night in which he was betrayed, 1 Cor. 11. 23.

This word Coena is not liked of the Roman Church, because it signifies a common Supper, and by consequent cannot be applied to private Masses, nay nor to public Masses neither, in which oftentimes the Priest eats all alone. Scena est plane, non Coena Dominici corporis & sanguinis id quod agitur. Sacerdos ad altare assistit, theatrali vest magnifice indutus. Post multas gesticulations manuum, multas corporis gyrations, tandem crustulum manibus supra caput elatis, elatum à populo aversus ostendunt. Audiunt qui ad sunt quod non intelligent, vident quae non percip unt, adorant quod nesciunt. Simplicii Varini. Epist. de libro postumo Grot. p. 263.

The Lord's Supper, 1 Cor. 11. 20. because instituted by Christ our Lord. The Fathers often call it so. Cyprian hath written a Tractate, De Coena Domini.

The breaking of Bread, Acts 2. 42. & 20. 7. The breaking of the Eucharist, so the Syriac in both places. Vide De Dieu, because it representeth the crucifying of Christ.

The Eucharist, so it was called not long after the Apostles, because the Evangelist Luke and the Apostle rehearsing the institution of this Sacrament, do write that Christ 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 did give thanks, Luke 22. 19. 1 Cor. 11. 24. and it is also still celebrated in the Church with thanksgiving. This title is used by the Fathers and Reformed Churches.

The Table of the Lord, 1 Cor. 10. 21. because our Lord Christ instituted this Sacrament, and celebrated it at a Table, and the Apostles received it there. See Mat. 26. 20. Mark 14. 18. Luke 22. 14. John 13. 12.

A Communion, 1 Cor. 10. 16. because it is a bond of that mutual charity and symbol of the brotherly unity which is among all the faithful, 1 Cor. 10. 17.

The Papists acknowledge no Communion in participating of this Sacrament, no marvel therefore if they dislike the name.

It is called by the Ancients Syn xis, which is a Greek word, and signifies the same with Congregation, or a meeting together, 1 Cor. 11. 20. it is a collection, gathering together, or assembling of the faithful.

The Papists call it A Mass, The Sacrament of the Altar, and The Sacrifice.

Some things are necessary in their nature, as love and fear of God; Some only by a Law are necessary to our life, so all institutions of Christ. Paul calls it the Lord's Supper, which imports Christ the Author, as indeed he was, as the Evangelists do witness. See 1 Cor. 11. 23. It is a standing Ordinance, he enjoins the use of it, Till the Lord come, ver. 26. which cannot be meant of coming in the Spirit, for so he was already come according to his promise made before he departed from the world.

The Lord's Supper is thus described by one:

It is an Institution of Christ or second Sacrament of the New Testament, consisting of bread and wine, wherein by performance of divers acts about it the Covenant of Grace is confirmed to every worthy receiver. This is too obscure and confused.

Others thus:

It is the second Sacrament of the New Testament instituted by Christ himself, wherein by taking and eating of bread, and by taking and drinking of wine, the Covenant of Grace is confirmed to every worthy receiver.

It is the eating and drinking of consecrated bread and wine given to seal up our feeding and nourishment in Christ Jesus.

Doctor Featley in his Grand Sacrilege of the Church of Rome, c. 15. thus defines it, It is a Sacrament of the New Testament, sealing unto us the perfect nourishment of our souls, by the participation of the sacred elements of bread and wine.

Doctor Go ge in his Catechism thus defines it, It is a Sacrament of our spiritual nourishment, wherein by receiving of bread and wine according to Christ's institution, our Communion with Christ is represented and sealed up unto us.

It is a Sacrament of our nourishment and our growing up in the Lord Jesus, and therefore it is appointed by him to be frequently used, as being one of the standing dishes which the Lord Christ hath provided for the daily diet, and the household provision of his faithful ones who are of his family, 1 Cor. 11. 26, 34. Bread sustains the hungry, Wine refreshes the thirsty, both satisfy to the full: Christ saves perfectly all that come unto him. Hookers Survey of the Sum of Church-Discipline, part 3. c. 2.

Here we have more immediately to do with the person of Christ: we draw high to God in prayer, but we become one with him in the Supper, 1 Cor. 10. 16. here are the sweetest refreshings that ever we receive, other duties seem rather to be our work, this is our meal: all other duties are to fit us for the Supper, Examination, the Word, Prayer. This is a duty of the highest and most mysterious signification, Epitome Evangelii: here are the benefits of the Covenant in one rite, 1 Cor. 11. 25. the whole contrivance of salvation is represented in a bit of bread and drop of wine, it is a duty wherein God seals up to his people the assurance o his love and special favor, John 6. 33.

The Lord's Supper is,

  • 1. A spiritual medicine to cure the remainder of corruption.
  • 2. Spiritual food to strengthen our weak graces.
  • 3. A spiritual cordial to comfort our distressed consciences.
  • 4. A strong obligation to all acts of thankfulness and obedience unto Jesus Christ.

What are the special and spiritual ends for which the body and blood of Christ is exhibited and applied in the Lord's Supper?

1. In the transacting of the services there done the whole Covenant of grace is sealed and personally applied, the body and blood of Christ may be held forth in a Sermon, God renews unto them all that he hath promised, Matth. 26. 22▪ This Cup is the New Testament in my blood, as the New Testament is founded in the blood of Christ, so it is exhibited and sealed therein.

2. It serves for the nourishing and building up of his people in all graces, it is called eating and drinking, He that eats my flesh and drinks my blood.

Two things are comprehended under nourishment:

  • 1. The maintenance and preservation of the stock of spiritual life which we have got already, as by our meat and drink we are preserved and continued in our life.
  • 2. In children it serves to augment their parts, make them larger, stronger, the Lord's Supper was appointed by Christ to be one of the great means of our spiritual augmentation.

The Sacraments are not properly Seals unto our faith, but of the Covenant. They may be said to be seals of our faith consecutive, by a consequence of speech, because as seals confirm a thing, so faith is confirmed and strengthened by receiving; but they are not formaliter, in a true proper sense, seals unto anything but the Covenant.

All graces are nourished and increased by the Lord's Supper, because the new Covenant is sealed, but three cardinal Graces especially, as in the body: nourish the stomach, liver, brain, heart, lungs, nourish them and you nourish all the rest.

  • 1. The in-dwelling virtue of the Spirit of God, they receive an increase of the Spirit.
  • 2. Faith, nourish that and you nourish all, it is called the life of faith. Faith is the condition of the Covenant, and we seal to our condition.
  • 3. Love to God and his people, it doth enflame thy love to God and his people, it is a communion, we are all made one Spirit.

This Sacrament doth not beget but increase and strengthen Grace where it is already wrought.

Christ is conveyed in this Sacrament by way of food. The Word was appointed to work conversion, Faith cometh by hearing; This ordinance is not appointed for conversion, but it supposeth conversion, it seals men's conversion; therefore in the Primitive times they let all come to the hearing of the Word, and then when the Sermon was done, there was an Officer stepped up and cried, Sancta Sanctis, Holy things for holy men, and then all others were to go out, and therefore it was called missa (though the Papists did corrupt it, and so called it the Mass afterwards, by mixing their own inventions instead of the Supper of the Lord, but it had that name at first) because all others were sent away; and only such as were of the Church and accounted godly stayed.

Reasons. 1. The nature of it, being the seal of the Covenant of Grace requires it, it must be supposed that all which come hither must be in Covenant with God. The condition of the Covenant of Grace, is, Believe and be saved, therefore it is appointed for believers.

Secondly, It is the Ordinance of spiritual nourishment, there must be first life before there can be any nourishment received in. If it be appointed to nourish and increase grace, then surely there must be grace before.

Thirdly, We are required to examine ourselves, 1 Cor. 11. and of our godliness, examine what work of God hath been upon the soul.

Fourthly, It is a Sacrament of Communion with God and with the Saints, and What Communion hath light with darkness? Or, What fellowship hath Christ with Belial?

All ignorant profane scandalous persons, and such as are merely civil are hence excluded.

Conversion is sometimes (and that improperly in Scripture, as Matth. 18. 3.) taken for the renewed exercise of faith and repentance in one that is already converted, but the Question is, Whether the first work of Regeneration, the infusing of the first habits, principles and seed of grace, be effected by the Lord's Supper received?

It is one thing to be converted at a Sacrament, another to be converted by the Sacrament; There is some expounding, praying. It is one thing intentionally to convert as an Institution, and another accidentally to convert as an occasion. Philip Goodwin's Evangelical Communicant.

The Assembly upon these grounds thought it fit that scandalous sinners (though not yet cast out of the Church) should be suspended from the Sacrament.

  • 1. Because the Ordinance itself must not be profaned.
  • 2. Because we are charged to withdraw from those who walk disorderly.
  • 3. Because of the great sin and danger both to him that comes unworthily, and also to the whole Church. The Scriptures from which they did prove all this were Matth. 7. 6. 2 Thess. 3. 6, 14, 15. 1 Cor. 11. 27. to the end of the Chapter, compared with Jude v. 23. 1 Tim. 5. 22.

Another proof added by the Assembly, was this, There was power and authority under the Old Testament to keep unclean persons from holy things, Levite. 13. 5. Numb. 9. 7. 2 Chron. 23. 19. And the like power and authority by way of Analogy continues under the New Testament, for the authoritative Suspension from the Lord's Table, of a person not yet cast out of the Church.

Wicked men (saith Master Hildersham ) should not be admitted to the Table of the Lord, Ezra 6. 21. holy things are profaned thereby, Ezek. 22. 26. 1 Cor. 5. 6.

There should be a public confession for scandalous sins. David was more honored for this, Psal. 51. then dishonored for his sin. Solomon left his Ecclesiastes as a monument of his Repentance. Paul frequently mentions his faults, Tertul. de poenit. and others speak of it.

Ebrius, infantes, erroneous, atque furentes,
Cum pueris, Domini non debent sumere corpus.

It was their great sin in the Church of Corinth, that they did not cast out the incestuous person, and it was a commendation to that Church, Revel. 2. that they could not endure the Nicolaitans.

A profane person in Augustine's, Chrysostom's time, Tertullian's and Cyprians time, in Paul's, in John's time, could not come to the Sacrament. They are called Tremenda mysteria, mysteries which the soul is to tremble at, the Fathers call it the most terrible day and hour, as if it were a day of Judgment.

This Suspension is called by the Schoolmen, Excommunicatio minor.

The power of suspending one from the Sacrament, is given not uni, but unitati, to the Eldership, not to any one either Minister or Elder. M. Gillesp. Aaron's Rod bloss. l. 3. c. 1.

Church-officers should not admit all promiscuously, but be careful whom they admit to the Supper.

That they be not cruel to the souls of them they admit, and to the Nation, and their own souls, by being guilty of other men's sins. Pareus said to those of Heidelburg, When I see your Sacrament profanation, I wonder not at the war.

Of receiving with the wicked.

It is lawful to join with a known unsanctified man in the service of God, 1 Sam. 15. 30, 31, Christ knew Judas to be an hypocrite, a devil, a traitor, yet admitted him to be at the last Passover which ever he received, though not to the Supper▪ for that was not administered till his departure, not because it had been unlawful to have received with him.

Because the Lord who commandeth his worship, never puts in any such limitations and exceptions, unless a wicked man be present.

Object. Christ was the Son of God, and as so knew the theft and hollowness of Judas, and therefore his example in this case cannot be our warrant.

Answ. Though he did know as God his wickedness, yet he did receive the Passover with him as man, and how he came by the knowledge of his faultiness it matters not, since he knew him faulty. Therefore our Savior also went up to the usual feast, and to the Temple, when he was sure to meet there with the most abominable Scribes and Pharisees, 1 Sam. 2. 2. Hannah and Elkanah went up to the house of God to Shiloh to worship there with the sons of Eli, Hophni and Phineas, there not alone with wicked people but Priests they did partake in divine service.

Some endeavor to prove out of 1 Sam. 2. 17. that wicked men by coming to the Sacrament do pollute it, because the sinful carriage of Eli 's sons, caused men to abhor the offering of the Lord: but note the reason why the offering became abominable, because they offered not the Sacrifice according to the Commandment of God, they would not have sodden flesh but raw: If the doctrine of the Sacrament be corrupted, if it be celebrated under one kind, if water be mingled with wine, this is to pollute the Ordinance.

Object. We are commanded to separate ourselves from the wicked, and to come out from amongst them. 2 Cor. 6. 17.

Answ. We must indeed come out from amongst those which do serve false gods, and separate ourselves from the familiar society of wicked persons, but other separation was never practiced by any Prophet or Apostle, or ever meant. Immediately there it follows, Touch not the unclean thing, that is, do not join with others in their pollutions, Ephes. 5. 6, 7, 11.

Some say he speaks to professors of Christian Religion concerning Heathens, to leave familiar fellowship with them, as joining in marriage, and the like, which is the thing he had spoken of immediately before.

To have none good is the property of a Church malignant, to have all good and none bad is the property of the Church triumphant, to have some good and some bad is the property of the Church militant.

Men openly wicked and scandalous should be cast out of the Congregation of Saints, but it follows not that because such should be cast out and be not, therefore others should abstain from the Assemblies of the Saints.

The Brownists abstain from coming to the Word and Sacrament amongst us, because many openly profane and known wicked men are admitted to our Assemblies, therefore they think they cannot with good conscience serve God with such persons, but no good man in the Scripture did therefore withdraw himself from the Temple or their Synagogues. See M. Hilders. on John 4. 22.

This Ordinance (saith M. Burroughs ) must be received in a holy Communion, or in a Communion of Saints, 1 Cor. 10. 16, 17. therefore all that come to receive the Sacrament, must so come as they must be one body, one spiritual corporation.

This Sacrament (saith he ) is not defiled to the right receivers of it, merely because wicked men are present there, but because the Congregation neglects their duty of casting out the wicked from thence, when they discover themselves. The example of the incestuous Corinthian, 1 Cor. 5. (saith he) is a plain place for it, A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. The Lump there is the Church communion, and the Leaven the incestuous person; while this leaven continues, if you do not your duty to cast out this scandalous person, your whole lump, your whole communion will come to be defiled. Particular persons and communicants come to be defiled in this, if they neglect the duty that belongs unto them as Christians, Matth. 18. 15, 16, 17. if thou ast done this duty to all scandalous persons in the Congregation, then the sin be upon the Church, thou mayest receive the Sacrament with comfort, though wicked men be admitted there.

As I never found one word in Scripture where either Christ or his Apostles denied admittance to any man that desired to be a member of the Church, though but only professing to repent and believe; So neither did I ever there find that any but convicted Heretics, or scandalous ones (and that for the most part after due admonition) were to be avoided or debarred our fellowship M. Baxter's Saints everlasting Rest, c. 4. Sect. 3. See more there.

The rest of the Congregation is not polluted by the mixture of unworthy persons with them, unless they be consenting to their wickedness, no more then in the duties of hearing and prayer with the wicked in a mixed Congregation. M. L fo. Princip▪ of Faith and a good Consc. c. 52.

For that Objection, A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump.

Answ. This is a Metaphorical speech, the meaning of it is not, that one or two sinners cause the whole Congregation to be so corrupt and unpleasing to God, that whosoever joineth with them is polluted, but alone this, One sinner suffered and not punished, the infection spreads farther and farther.

Objection. We are commanded not to eat with a brother, if he be so and so.

Answ. It signifieth to have familiar civil society with them, in inviting them or feasting them. But if one may not have familiar civil conversation with such, much less may he eat with them at the Sacrament. It follows not, for in withdrawing ourselves from them we punish them, and show our dislike of them, but in withdrawing ourselves from the Sacrament, because of them we punish ourselves. The Church of Israel in the time of Hophni and Phineas was a mixed multitude. In the time of Christ the Church of Jerusalem, for they plotted Christ's death, and had decreed to cast out of the Synagogue everyone that should confess him.

M r Downame saith, None ought to refrain coming to the Lord's Table, because they see scandalous sinners and unworthy guests admitted. For

  • 1. The Apostle, 1 Cor. 11. 28. doth not enjoin us to examine others but ourselves.
  • 2. Because the Apostles, yea even Christ himself did join with those Assemblies in the service of God, and particularly in the use of the Sacraments which were full of corruptions, both in respect of doctrine and manners, as viz. this Church of Corinth itself. See 1 Cor. 11. 21. The word usually signifies to be drunk, and here they are sharply reproved for a great fault.
  • 3. Because one man's sin cannot defile another, nor make the seals of the Covenant ineffectual to him who cometh in faith and repentance, and even hateth that sin which he seeth committed, especially when he hath no power committed unto him by God and the Church, of repelling the wicked from this holy Communion.
  • 4. Because the punishment denounced against unworthy receivers is appropriated to them who thus offend, and reacheth not to the innocent because they are in their company, 1 Cor. 11. 29.

It were much to be desired (saith M. Downame ) that all wicked persons were excluded from this outward Communion with the Saints (for what have dogs to do with holy things, or swine with pearls?) and it were a great comfort to the godly if none but such as are like unto themselves, had fellowship with them at this feast; our Love, Zeal, and Devotion is more enlivened in this action by our mutual prayers, when with one mind and heart we join together, yet it should not wholly discourage us from coming to this sacred Feast (though wicked persons be there present) if we ourselves be duly prepared. For though we would not willingly eat with slovenly persons, nor permit them to put their unclean hands into our dish, yet if we have a good appetite and cannot help it, we will rather admit such inconvenience then for want of food pine with hunger.

Theodosius the Emperor being a man guilty of rash effusion of blood, coming upon a Sabbath-day to the place of public worship, would have received the Sacrament: Ambrose seeing him coming, goes and meets him at the door, and speaks thus to him, How dare those bloody hands of yours lay hold on the body and blood of Christ, who have been the shedders of so much innocent blood? Which speech did so startle him that he went away and was humbled for his sin, and afterwards came and made his public confession, and then was received in. Whence we may see that Kings, yea Emperors have been kept back from the Sacrament.

The Canons of our Church ( Can. 26.) straitly charge every Minister, That he shall not in any wise admit to the Communion any of his flock which are openly known to live in notorious sin without repentance.

Whether Judas received the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper?

M. Gillespie in his Aaron's Rod blos oming, chap. 8. holds he did not, and chap. 9. questions, Whether he received the Sacrament of the Passover that night in which our Lord was betrayed: and chap. 10. saith, If it could be proved that Judas received the Lord's Supper, it maketh nothing against the Suspension of known wicked persons from the Sacrament.

One saith, The evidence of this fact hath ever appeared so fully to the Church, that this alone hath been ground sufficient to deduce their right of free admission. D. Drake in his Barre to free Admission to the Sacrament, pag. 5, 6. urgeth reasons that Judas did not receive the Sacrament, and saith, that it makes nothing for free Admission if he did.

M. Selden De Synedriis veterum Ebraeorum cap. 8. saith, Serio perpendatur, Judam ipsum, Furem, Proditorem, Scelestissimum, hisque nominibus satis notum & publice peccantem in ipsa institution cum reliquis undecim, Sacramenti Eucharistiae, juxta plerosque & Veterum & Recentiorum, participem fuisse, nec omnino ea interdictum. He hath much more there out of divers ancient and modern Writers to confirm that opinion.

At what time the Lord's Supper was instituted:

Christ instituted it at night, because occasion so required: we have not the like occasion, therefore are not bound unto it. In Trajans and Tertullian's time Christians did celebrate the Sacrament before day, Tempore antelucano, because of persecution they durst not receive it in the day time; in S t Augustine's time, Tempore Antemeridiano, so now. It behooved that Christ should suffer at the time of the Passover, to show himself the true Passover, 1 Cor. 5. 7. and immediately after the eating of the last Passover should institute this Sacrament, to show that now he abrogated the Jewish Ordinance, and did appoint this instead of it. A fair intimation that Baptism follows in the room of Circumcision, as the Lord's Supper doth the Passover.

The consideration of this circumstance should be of great force to make us respect and reverence the Sacrament, seeing Christ instituted it then when he was about to depart out of this life, and to suffer death for us: we usually remember the words of a dying friend.

The Elements of the Eucharist:

They are two, not only differing in number, but also in their kind, Bread and Wine, the first of which is solid and belongs to meat, the later liquid and serves for drink. The body is sufficiently nourished if it have bread and drink. Christ calls himself both, John 6. 58.

Bread because it strengtheneth the body is therefore called Christ's body, and wine because it turneth into blood, is therefore called Christ's blood. Isidor.

These two creatures are, 1. Of ordinary use, not rare, gotten in every Country.

2. Such creatures as God of old made representations of his grace, Isa. 25. 6. and 55. 3.

3. They are creatures best in their kind, of all things we eat, bread is most nourishing and universally necessary for all kind of bodies, Panis à pascendo, and wine of all drinks.

1 Cor. 10. 17. We are all one body, in as much as we are partakers of one bread. The Analogy standeth thus, as many grains of Corn make one loaf of bread, and many Grapes make one measure of wine in the Cup: So, many Christians partaking faithfully of this Sacrament become one mystical body of Christ by the union of faith and love.

The Lord hath appointed those Elements to show that men should come with an appetite and thirsting, to receive the Sacrament in ancient times was as much as desiderare, e cujus manu desideravit.

In Baptism we have one sign as the material part, in the Supper we have two signs, partly to note out our whole, full, and perfect nourishment in Christ, having whatsoever is requisite for our salvation; and partly to show a fuller remembrance of his death, for the wine which is a figure of his blood, doth as it were represent it before our eyes. Attersol of the Sacr. l. 3 c. 5. Vide Aquin. Sum parte 3. Quaest. 74. Art. 1.

There are two representing signs in the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper:

  • 1. That we might know tha •• Christ w have whole and perfect spiritual nourishment, and whatsoever is •• q isite to all ••• ion.
  • 2. For a more •• vely representation of Christ his death and p ssion, in which his blood was separated from his body.

These elements are to be administered in both kinds severally; Christ at his last Supper delivered first bread by itself, and then wine, and not bread and wine together in a sop, or bread dipt in wine. In the sop the wine is not d un but eaten.

Of receiving the Sacrament in both kinds, Bread and Wine.

The Communion was instituted by Christ in both kinds, as three Evangelists show Mark 14. 23. & Luke 22. 20. Matth. 26. 27. It was administered by the Apostles in both kinds, 1 Cor. 11. 26, 28. & 10. 16. It was received in the ancient Church for the space of fourteen hundred years in both kinds, as it is confessed by their own Council of Constance, and that of Trent also. This was constantly practiced in the Church for divers hundred years, until the Council of Constance in the year of the Lord 1414.

Some Northern Councils there are (saith Bellarmine Tom. 3. de Sacr. Eccles. l. 4. c. 28.) where wine is not to be had, therefore for uniformity sake the Church thought fit that everywhere the Sacrament should be administered but in one kind.

Although there be not wine or wheat in some Countries, yet it may easily be carried to all, as much as sufficeth for the use of this Sacrament. Aquinas part. 3. Quaest. 74. Art. 1.

Object. Some (saith Bellarmine ) are abstemious and abhor wine, they cannot endure it, and it may offend sickly persons.

Answ. Extraordinary cases must not justle out ordinary laws and custom, Vinum in modica quantitate sumptum non potest multum aegrotanti nocere. Wine moderately taken cannot much hurt the sick. Aquin ubi supra.

Object. Whosoever shall eat this bread or drink this Cup unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of Christ, the conjunction Or (say they) doth so dis-join both kinds, that it is free to take one without the other.

Answ. If this be true, then it shall be lawful also to take the Cup without the Bread, that disjunctive is put not for that it is lawful to take one kind and omit the other, but that greater caution may be used, and he spake of both severally, because irreverence may be used in both signs, and to show that it sufficeth not to carry ourselves holily in part, unless we finish the whole action holily, otherwise in the same place Bread and Wine are joined together eight times.

Object. Act. 2. 42. & 20. 7.

Answ. Suppose the bread of the Lord's Table be there meant, yet it is a Synecdoche whereby the part is put for the whole, otherwise you may as well say they had no thanksgiving, because Luke maketh only mention of prayers, as to say they had not the Cup, because mention is made only of bread, verse. 46▪ speaking of the common Table (from the similitude whereof the Lord's Table is taken) he useth the same phrase of breaking of bread without making mention of any drink, he saith breaking bread they took bread, which can hardly be said of the Lord's Supper.

Christ as fore-seeing the sacrilege of the Papists commandeth all, not to eat of the bread, but to drink of the Cup, Matth. 26. 27. Mark 14. 23. 1 Cor. 12. 13. and Mark saith, They all drank of it.

Certainly I persuade myself, that our Savior expressed the note of universality, viz. in delivering the Cup to all, saying, Drink you all of this: and not so in giving the bread, of set purpose, to prevent that abuse which the Romish Church of late hath brought, by taking away the Cup. As in like manner the Apostle saith of marriage, It is honorable in, or amongst all men, Heb. 13. 4. and he saith not so of Virginity or single life, although it be honorable, because the holy Ghost foresaw, that some heretics would deny marriage to be honorable amongst all, and prohibit it to some, viz▪ the Clergy. Which two Texts of Scripture the Romanists leudly pervert, and ridiculously contradict themselves in the interpretation of them, extending all to the Laity in the one, and excluding the Clergy; and extending all to the Clergy in the other, and excluding the aity: Marriage is honorable among all, say they, that is, all, save Priests. Drink you all of this, that is, all, save the people. Doctor Featleys Grand Sacrilege of the Church of Rome, ch. 2.

Drink you all of this, saith the Author of the Sacrament: he saith not expressly, Eat you all of this; as foreseeing that impiety, which in time human presumption should bring in upon and against his own institution, fulfilled in the Church of Rome at this day. B. Mountag. Answ. to the Gagger of Protest. Sect. 36.

The Papists say, That the universal particle All belongs to the twelve Apostles, who were Priests, say they, and alone present at the institution of this first Supper, and therefore it belongs only to Priests, not Lay-men, and they receive the blood with the body ration concomitantiae. By this reason they may as well take away the bread from the people.

The Apostles in the first Supper did not represent the order of Priests, but the whole Church of Communicants, and Christ administered the Sacrament to them not as Apostles, but as Disciples, therefore Paul extends this particle All, to all the Christians in the Church of Corinth, and to men of all order, condition, state and sex, 1 Cor. 11. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29. The Sacrament represents Christ's death and his blood shed out of his veins, Matth. 26. 27, 28. That Helena of concomitancy, which the Lutherans also admit, (as we may see in Gerhard ) doth abound with so many absurdities, and was so unknown to antiquity, that it is a wonder that judicious men will defend it, only that they may maintain their figments of Consubstantiation and Transubstantiation.

This Argument from Concomitancy proveth as well that they may drink the wine only, and not receive the bread.

2. Though Christ wholly be sealed to us in the use of the bread really, yet not wholly sacramentally. Vide P cher. de missa cap. 4.

Object. Bellarmine de Eucharist l. 4. c. 25. saith, There is a plain difference between the Bread and Cup, for 1 Cor. 11. he saith of the Bread absolutely Do this, but of the Cup conditionally, As oft as ye do it, therefore those words do not signify that the Cup should always be given when the Sacrament is administered, but they only prescribe the manner, that if it be so, then it should be done in memory of Christ's passion.

Answ. But this is a most frivolous cavil, for the words do both command the thing, and also show the end of doing it. In the verse immediately following the Apostle hath those words, speaking as well of the Bread as Cup. As often as ye eat of this bread and drink of this Cup. Therefore there is one and the same reason of both, the Bread and the Cup. We must take and eat the one, and take and drink the other, and whensoever we do so we must do it in remembrance of Christ's death.

Object. More irreverence will be shown to the Sacrament by spilling of it, to which in a great multitude of Communicants the wine must needs be subject to.

Answ. Reverence due to the Sacrament consists in a religious partaking of it, not in a necessary abstinence from one of the Elements.

The Papists have cut out their Sacrament according to the measure of their doctrine, for as they teach Christ to be but half a Savior, by making their works joint-purchases of their salvation with him, so they minister half a Sacrament of salvation. Cartw. against the Rhem. on John 6.

Our practice and profession is the receiving the Communion in both kinds: for which I join issue with all Papists living; that it is the prime, original institution of our Savior, which giveth birth and being to a Sacrament; that it is sacrilege to alter it therefrom; that it was never otherwise used in the Church of God, for above two thousand years after Christ. Let all the Papists living prove the contrary, and I will subscribe to all Popery. B. Mountag. Answer to the Gagger of Protest. Sect. 36.

This was the custom in all the Fathers times, as I could deduce almost out of everyone. This is everywhere the custom in all the world unto this day, but in the Roman exorbitant Church, as Cassander saith; and was not quite abolished in that Church till about thirteen hundred years after Christ, and by much art, colluding and fine forgery, was retained from being cast out of that Church in the late Conventicle of Trent, only kept in for a faction, but mightily opposed by learned, honest and conscionable Catholics. Id. ibid.

First, If none may drink of the consecrate wine but the Priests, then none should eat of the bread but Priests, for to whom Christ said, Take and eat, to those he gave the Cup, and said, Drink ye: The signs being both equal, all Communicants must drink of the one, as well as eat of the other, there being the same warrant for the one that there is for the other.

Secondly, The Cup is a part of Christ's Will and Testament, Galat. 3. 15. Hebr. 9. 16, 17. the dead man's Will may not be changed. The Lord's Supper is a Sacrament proper to the New Testament, Luke 22. 20.

Thirdly, The blood of Christ shed upon the Cross belongeth not only to the Pastors and Teachers, but to all the faithful that come to the Table of the Lord, Matth. 26. 28. Luke 22. 20. why then should the Cup of the Lord be barred from them?

Fourthly, All the faithful that come to the Lord's Table must show forth his death until be come, and this is done by them as well by drinking of the Cup as by eating of the bread, therefore all the Communicants must receive the Sacrament under both kinds.

To which these reasons may be added:

  • 1. From the institution, for Christ commanded them to drink the wine as well as to eat the bread, therefore this is a violation of God's command.
  • 2. The Apostle bids everyone to try themselves, and so to eat of that bread and drink of that wine, so they did not only eat and drink then, but they were commanded so to do.
  • 3. To celebrate the Sacrament otherwise, is to make void Christ's two main ends in appointing the Sacrament,
    • 1. To represent his death and blood shed out of the veins.
    • 2. To show that Christ is full nourishment to the soul, as bread and drink to the body.

The bread and wine being the matter of the Sacrament may not be changed in the Lord's Supper.

Reasons.

  • 1. The institution of the Supper, and the example of Christ himself, whom the Church is to imitate and follow, 1 Cor. 11. 25.
  • 2. No other signs are so significant and effectual as these are for this purpose, to strengthen and comfort them that are in trouble and almost in the present estate of death, Psal. 104. 14, 15. Prov. 31. 6.
  • 3. The matter and form of everything do constitute its essence: So it is in the Sacraments, where the signs are the matter, and the words of institution the form.
  • 4. If the bread and wine might be changed in the Supper, and yet the Sacrament in substance remain: then in like manner, water in Baptism might be changed, and yet be true Baptism: but the Minister cannot baptize with any other liquor or element, then with water, as the matter of that Sacrament.
  • 5. If we grant a change in the signs at the pleasure of men, why may we not also change other parts of the Sacrament? why may we not instead of the Minister appointed o God and called by the Church, admit private persons, and receive other alterations enforced upon the Church by the Papists?

Bucan institut. loc. 48. Beza Epist. 2. think, that where there is no store of bread and plenty of wine sufficient for this purpose, some other thing may be taken instead of them.

Thus it may come to pass (saith Attersol ) that we shall have nothing which Christ commanded and sanctified by his example, and yet boast that we have his Supper, and do that which he appointed. For whereas we make four outward parts of this Sacrament, the Minister, the Word, the Signs and the Receiver: There are which hold there is no necessity of the Minister: Others, that there is no necessity of the words of Institution: Others, that there is no necessity of the Signs: Others, that there is no necessity of the Receiver: So if we once admit any alteration in any of the parts, we open a gap to all innovation, and being in great uncertainty in the Sacraments.

Whether the breaking of the bread be an indifferent Ceremony.

Some make the breaking of the bread to be simply necessary, and an essential part of the Supper, so that without it there can be no Sacrament.

  • 1. Because the Sacrament is called the breaking of bread, and this breaking of bread is said to be the Communion of the body of Christ, Cor 10. 16.
  • 2. Others make this breaking to be merely indifferent and not necessary▪ accidental, and not of the substance.
  • 3. Others hold a middle way between both extremes, that it is necessary, yet not as an essential but an integral part.

The Ceremony of breaking bread was continually observed by Christ's first institution, by the practice of the Apostles, by the ancient and universal custom of the whole Church of Christ, as well Greek as Latin.

This act of breaking of bread is such a principal act, that the whole celebration of this Sacrament hath had from thence this appellation given to it by the Apostles to be called breaking of bread; it is also a Symbolical Ceremony betokening the crucifying of Christ's body upon the Cross, 1 Corinth. 11. 24. But the Papists yet do not break it but g ve it whole, and this they pretend to do for reverence sake, least some crumbs of bread should fall to the ground.

Three Evangelists mention the breaking of the bread.

It is not material whether the bread be broken or cut, but it is more probable that Christ broke it from the custom of the Jews, saith Vossius: but Balduinus the Lutheran saith, they receive a perfect Sacrament who intermit this fraction in the use of the Supper, because Christ broke the bread that he might distribute it, therefore say Gerhard and he, Perinde est, sive in ipsa action coenae, sive antea rangatur. Balduin quotes Beza, Aretius, Zanchius to that purpose, to show that raction may be omitted in the very act of the Supper.

But Zanchi in an Epistle to a noble man hath this passage. The bread is to be broken before the people after the example of Christ, the Apostles and all the ancient Church, and also to express the mystery of the passion and death of Christ which are lively represented by that action.

The breaking of the bread signifies:

  • 1. How we should be broken in humiliation for our sins, and the pouring out of the wine, how our blood and life should be shed and poured out for our sins, if we had that we deserve.
  • 2. They represent unto us how the body of Christ was broken, and his blood poured out for our sins. M. Perkins.

Not the Palatine, the French or English Churches have lately invented or brought in the breaking of the bread, but the whole Apostolical, ancient Church above 1500 years ago, and since that time have used it according to Christ's command, Do this. Pareus de Ritu fractionis in S▪ Eucharistia. c. 5. See his 6 th Chapter, where he shows how frivolous that argument is, Frangere, Hebraica phrasi nihil aliud est, quàm distribuere, and gives this rule, Where ever in Scripture the word Break concerning bread is put alone, it is an Hebraism, and signifies to distribute, because the Hebrews above other nations used not to cut bread with a knife, but to break it with their hands, when they took it themselves, or gave it to others to take, but when the word ive is expressly added to it, it signifieth the true breaking or dividing of the whole bread into parts, as Matth. 14. 19. Mark 6. 41. Luke 9. 26. Matth. 15. 36. Mark 8. 6. and in the institution of the Supper, Mat. 26. 26. Mark 14. 22. Luk. 22. 19.

It is not necessarily required, that the Lord's Supper be administered in unleavened bread. For bread is often times named and repeated: but the word (unleavened) is never added. Wherefore as it is in itself indifferent whether the wine be red or white, and whatsoever the kind or color be (if it be wine:) so it is not greatly material whether the bread be leavened or unleavened, so it be bread. Attersol of the Sac. l. 3. c. 5.

The Papists pretend the institution of Christ, who (say they) made the Sacrament of unleavened bread, instituting it after he had eaten the Passover, which was to be eaten with unleavened bread, according to the Law of Moses, neither was there any leaven to be found in Israel seven days together. We deny not (saith Attersol ) but Christ m ght use unleavened bread at his last Supper, having immediately before eaten the Paschal Lamb, yet no such thing is expressed in the Gospel. The Evangelists teach, He took bread: but make no mention or distinction what bread b he took, nor determine what bread we should take, no more then limit what wine we shall use, but leave it at liberty to take leavened bread or unleavened, as occasion of time, place, persons, and other circumstances serve, so we take bread. If Christ on this occasion used unleavened bread: it was because it was usual, common and ordinary bread at that time, as we also should use that bread which is common. It is therefore no breach of Christ's Ordinance, nor a transgression of the first original institution of the Lord's Supper, to eat either the one or the other.

The Papists give a mystical reason why the bread must be unleavened, because hereby is signified our sincerity, but this is ridiculous, for if unleavened bread because it is unmixed must signify my sincerity, then the wine because it is mingled with water must signify my duplicity and hypocrisy.

Whether it be leavened or unleavened bread, we will not strive, but take that which the Church shall according to the circumstance of the times and persons ordain, Yet this we dare boldly say, That in the use of leavened bread we come nearer to the imitation of Christ's action then those which take unleavened. For our Savior took the bread that was usual and at hand, there being only unleavened bread at the Feast of the Passover, and no other to be gotten. We therefore taking the bread which is in ordinary use, and causing no extraordinary bread to be made for the nonce, are found to tread more nearly in the steps of our Savior Christ. Therefore (unless you will renew the Jewish Passover of banishing all leaven at the time of the holy Communion) your precise imitation of unleavened bread is but apish .

Although Azymes were used by Christ, it being then the Paschal Feast, yet was this occasioned also by reason of the same Feast which was prescribed to the Jews: Protestants and Papists both grant it not to be of the essence of the Sacrament that it be unleavened, but in its own nature indifferent .

When the Ebionites taught unleavened bread to be necessary, the Church commanded consecration to be made in leavened bread.

The Grecians use leavened bread, the Papists unleavened, and that made up in such wafer-cakes that it cannot represent spiritual nourishment.

We hold either indifferent, because in the institution we read of bread without commanding leavened or unleavened. De panis qualitate nos non contendimus, si modo verus sit & solidus panis; quod de hostia Papistarum, vix potest affirmari. Ames. Bell. Enerv. Tom. 3. Disp. 32.

Cassander himself complaineth that the Papists bread is of such extreme thinness and lightness, that it may seem unworthy the name of bread. Whereas Christ used solid and tough bread which was to be broken with the hands, or cut with the knife.

The custom of the Christian Church by the space of above a thousand years, was to put upon the sacred Table, after Christ's and the Apostles example, a solid loaf which was broken into pieces among the Communicants: for all the people did communicate. Now this quantity of bread is reduced into round and light wafers, in the form of a penny, whereof they give this mystical reason, because that Christ was sold for thirty pence, and because that a penny is given for a hire unto those that have wrought in the Vineyard, Matth. 20. 10. Upon these Hosts they have put the Image of a Crucifix. Pet. du Moulin of the Mass, lib. 1. cap. 7. & lib. 3. cap. 3.

The use of the Wafer-cake is defended by the Papists and some Lutherans, as Gerh. loc. commun. Tom. 5. de Sacra Coena, c. 7. but Christ used it not whose action is our instruction, and also there is no Analogy, or a very obscure one between the sign and thing signified.

Whether it be necessary to mingle water with the Eucharistical wine.

Aquinas saith, Water ought to be mingled with wine, but it is not de necessitate hujus Sacramenti.

Some Papists for mingling water with wine pretend the Antiquity of Councils and Fathers: But we say,

  • 1. There is no such thing in the Institution.
  • 2. The authority of these is not divine but merely human.
  • 3. It was an ancient custom in Tertullian's time to give milk and honey in Baptism to the Infant, yet the Papists themselves do not keep it: So that unless we had Christ's institution we cannot do it, especially knowing that it is dangerous to add to any essential part of the Sacrament such as the wine is. But then they are most ridiculous, when they will make a mystical signification in this, that the union of the water with the wine must signify the union of the people (which is denoted by waters, Revel. 17.) with Christ; Thus Bellarmine. But it signifies not this union either naturally, for then it would signify so in common feasts: nor by divine institution, for then then the Scripture would have delivered it. Besides Rev. 17. Great waters (not a few drops) signify the people, and that not of believers, but Heathens, and if it signify the communion of the people with Christ, why do they deny it them?

The drink then used being called the fruit of the vine, Matth. 26. 29. it is evident that there was no mixture of water, for then it had not been the fruit of the vine, but another drink compounded of water and wine.

Some say this reason is not of force, for he that drinks vinum dilutum; drinks the fruit of the grape as well as he that drinks merum. And therefore that our Savior Christ and his Apostles ever mingled water with wine in the sacramental Cup, cannot be shown by any testimony out of the word of God.

As for the water gushing forth with the blood out of our Savior Christ, it is frivolous: the wine in the Cup is not a Sacrament of the blood of Christ which was shed after that he was slain, but of the blood which he shed before his death.

This was an ancient custom, Justin Martyr makes mention of it, and Cyprian pleads for it, yet Jansen doth ingeniously confess that there are evident testimonies of Scripture for wine, but none for water, though Bellarmine impudently affirm, That there is as much proof for the one as the other, viz. Tradition for both, Scriptures for neither, and labors violently to wrest the plain places another way, yet at length he doth not deny, but it is Calix Domini, though there be no water in it, and he tells us that the greater part of Divines hold, that water is not de necessitate Sacramenti. Jansen saith, it appears by Scripture, though not expressly, yet implicitly, that there was water in the Cup which Christ consecrated, because there was wine in it, and in those hot Countries they used not to drink mere wine, but allayed with water, this is an uncertain conjecture.

The beginning of it was lawful, because there were in the Church that could not beat the strength of the wines, especially in the East and South Countries where the wines are strong.

The Christians in the Primitive Church had a custom of mixing water with the wine (as there came water and blood out of Christ's side) which how ever it might have a natural reason because of the heat of the Country to correct the heat of the wine with water, yet it was by them used for a mystical sense to express the mixture (whereof this Sacrament is an effectual instrument) of all the people who have faith to receive it with Christ's blood, water being by the holy Ghost interpreted for people and Nations.

The Aquarii used only water in the Eucharist in pretence of Sobriety which Cyprian confuted only upon this ground, viz. That this practice was not warranted by the Institution of Christ, wherein Christ ordained wine and not water only.

In the Scripture we find the fruit of the vine, but not water, therefore we account not that to be of any necessity in the celebration of the Lord's Supper. In the Primitive Church water was used first of Sobriety, then of Ceremony, at length it grew to be counted of necessity. D r Fulk against Martin.

Of the Consecration of the Elements.

Christ's actions in the administration of the Sacrament were four:

First, He took bread into his hand, and so likewise wine, which signifies the purpose of God decreeing to give Jesus Christ in the flesh to work out our Redemption.

Secondly, Christ blessed it, and gave thanks, and sanctified it to that use by his own prayer to God, which as it is effective to make the elements now fit for a spiritual use, so it is significative representing the action of God, wherein he fitted Christ's manhood in the fullness of his Spirit and power, to work out our Redemption.

Thirdly, He brake the bread, which signifies the action of God satisfying his justice in Christ's manhood for the sins of all the Elect by breaking him in the Garden, and on the Cross especially, besides other sufferings throughout his life, and by rending his soul and body asunder.

Fourthly, Christ gave it to everyone, signifying that God doth offer particularly to everyone, and give to the Elect the body and blood of Christ, with the merit of. it, and power of the same to blot out their sins, and free them more and more from the same.

The Text saith of the Bread, He blessed it, and of the Cup, When he had given thanks. By the which word Blessing he implieth a consecration of this Sacrament. The Papists attribute it to the repetition of these words, Hoc est enim corpus meum, For this is my body, For this is my blood. Hence they call them Verba operatoria, and say, there is such a power and operation in them, that by them the bread is turned into the body of Christ. The Elements of which the Sacrament is composed are natural, the things having nothing of themselves whereby they may be Sacraments, and therefore an institution is necessary, whereby they may be made what they are not. Now we say this is done by reciting the institution of Christ, and by prayer.

The Papists order that the Priest should read all the other words with a loud voice, yet when he comes to this, For this is my body, he speaks it secretly, so that none can hear him, and this is one of their reasons, because Christ prayed alone, what is this to the consecration? did he so at the Sacrament time?

2. The Minister or Priest speaks it secretly, because if he speak aloud, he cannot be so intent to what is said; why then do they command such loud noise by their Organs in singing? How can they be attentive then?

3. Least that form of words should be vilified, Why not then in Baptism?

It is most expedient,

  • 1. For the receiver to receive the Bread and Cup into his hand: This custom (saith Vossius ) was long in the ancient Church. It is unseemly to have the Bread put, or the Wine poured into the mouth by the Minister; this custom came from a superstitious worshipping of the signs.
  • 2. The receiver must eat the Bread and drink the wine, which signifies the particular applying of Jesus Christ with all the benefits of his mediation to ones own soul.

Whether Christ be corporally present with the symbols in the Eucharist?

Corpore de Christi lis est, de sanguine lis est.
Lis est de modo, non habitura modum.

Christ is ascended into heaven, and he is contained there, Acts 3. 21. till he come to Judgment, therefore he is not there under the shape of bread and wine. See Matth. 26. 11. John 16. 7. Acts 3. 21.

2. All the circumstances about the first Institution of the Sacrament do declare that Christ was not bodily there, especially Christ eating and drinking of it himself, which Cloppenburg , Peter du Moulin and D. Featley hold, urging Matth. 26. 29. & Mark 14. 25. for that purpose. Those words (say they) necessarily imply, that before he uttered them he had drunk of the Cup which he gave to them. Aquinas also holds this, and the Fathers likewise, saith Peter du Moulin.

The nature of the action (saith Peter du Moulin in the place last quoted) required that Christ should communicate to show the Communion he had with us, as also he did partake of our Baptism, Matth. 3. 16. from whence cometh the custom of the Church, that the Pastor first communicates, and the people afterwards.

When the public Authority of this Land were for the Papists, subscription was not urged upon such violent and bloody terms unto any Articles of their Religion, as unto that of the real presence. D. Jack. Epist. to the Read.

For the same Christ was not visibly at the Table and spake, and yet invisibly under the bread and wine, he did not eat and drink himself.

The end of the Sacrament is a remembrance of Christ's death, Do this in remembrance of me, and You show forth his death till he come. Now how can there be any remembering of him when he is present.

His corporal presence and eating is made unprofitable, John▪ 6. though Christ said, his flesh was meat indeed, yet he did not mean that it should be eaten and and drunk corporally: the flesh profiteth nothing, but his words are Spirit and Life.

Our Union and Conjunction with Christ is inward and spiritual, which consists in Faith and Love; it is true we are united to his body, but not after a bodily manner.

It is against reason and sense:

We believe Christ to be present spiritually in the hearts of the Communicants, sacramentally in the Elements, but not corporally.

Real is,

  • 1. Opposed to that which is imaginary, and importeth as much as truly.
  • 2. To that which is merely figurative and barely representative, and importeth as much as effectually.
  • 3. To that which is spiritual, and importeth as much as corporally or materially.

The presence of Christ in the Sacrament is real in the two former acceptions of real, but not in the last, for he is truly there present and effectually, though not carnally or locally. Doctor Featleys Transubstantiation Exploded.

Really and corporally are not all one, that which is spiritually present is really present, unless we will say that a Spirit is nothing. The blood of Christ is really present in Baptism to the washing away of sin. Christ is really present to the faith of every true believer, even out of the Sacrament. Downs Defense against the Reply of M. N.

We deny that Christ is so present in the Sacrament under the forms of bread and wine, as that whosoever receive the Sacrament, do truly receive Christ himself.

The Papists say, Christ's natural body is present; we, that the merit and virtue of his body broken upon the Cross and of his blood shed upon the Cross is present to the believing soul in the Sacrament. The body of the Sun is in heaven in its sphere locally and circumscriptively, but the beams are on the earth. And when the Sun beams shine into our house, we say, here's the Sun, though it be the beams not the body of the Sun. So the Scripture saith of the Sacrament, This is my body, Christ ascended up into Heaven: as for that exception, he is visibly in heaven, but invisibly here, it answereth not those testimonies which prove he is so there that he is not here, Mat. 28. 6. q. d. he could not be in both places at once, an angelical argument. Aquinas saith, It is not possible by any miracle, that the body of Christ should be locally in many places at once, because it includeth a contradiction by making it not one, for one is that which is not divided from itself. It is impossible (say the Papists) according to the course of nature, but not absolutely impossible, by divine miracle it may be.

Consubstantiation overthroweth the grounds,

  • 1. Of reason, the body of one and the same man cannot be present in many places all together, but must needs remain in some definite and certain place.
  • 2. Religion, because Christ was taken up into heaven, there to abide till the end of the world.

It was above a hundred years before Transubstantiation.

They did adore Christ as co-existent with the bread which perhaps gave occasion to Averroes to say, That Christians did adore their God and then eat him. Averroes his resolution was, Quandoquidem Christiani adorant quod comedunt, sit anima mea cum Philosophis.

The quarrel between Luther and Zwingli was about Christ's presence in the Sacrament, which Luther held to be by way of Consubstantiation, which how it could be unless the body of Christ were everywhere, Zwingli and others could not conceive. Luther being pressed therewith, he and his followers not being able▪ to avoid it, maintained that also. But how? By reason of the hypostatical Union and Conjunction thereof with the word. For the word being everywhere, and the human nature being nowhere severed from it, How can it be, say they, but everywhere? The humanity of Christ according to its Essence or natural Being is contained in one place, but according to its subsistence or personal being may rightly be said to be everywhere. Zanch. Misc. Iud. de Dissid. Coen. Dom. and D. Field, lib. 3. c 35. of the Church.

The Papists constant Doctrine is, That in worshipping the Sacrament they should give unto it, Latriae cultum qui vero Deo debetur, as the Council of Trent hath determined, that kind of service which is due to the true God, determining their worship in that very thing which the Priest doth hold betwixt his hands.

This is artolatry, an idolatrous worship of the bread, because they ado e the host even as the very person of the Son of God. It is true, they conceive it not bread, but the body of Christ, yet that doth not free them from bread-worship, for then if the Heathen did take his stone to be a God it did free him from idolatry. Hence, saith a Jesuit, If the bread be not turned into the body of Christ, we are the greatest and worst idolaters that ever were, as upon my soul, saith he, it is not.

Adoration is not commanded in the institution of it.

2. Nothing is to be worshipped with Divine Worship but God.

Of Transubstantiation.

The word Transubstantiation (as the Papists grant) was not used of any ancient Fathers, and it was not so named among them before the Council of Lateran, which was 1215 years after. Vocabulum ante Concilium Lateranense inauditum.

The Jesuits (which call Protestants in scorn Tropists, because they defend a tropical and figurative sense in that speech of Christ, This is my body ) are yet themselves constrained to acknowledge six tropes in the other words of Christ's institution of this Sacrament, a figure in the word Bread, another in Eat, a third in Given, a fourth in Shed, a fifth in Cup, a sixth in Testament. B. Morton of the Mass, lib. 6. cap. 2. Sect. 4.

The Papists to avoid one sign run into many strange ones; by the demonstrative Hoc, they understand they know not what, neither this Body nor this Bread, but an individuum vagum, something contained under the accidents of Bread, which when the Priest saith Hoc, it is Bread, but when he hath muttered out Meum, it is Christ's body. By the copulative Est, is, they understand either shall be as soon as the words are spoken, or is converted unto, or by Body, they understand such a Body as indeed is nobody, without extension of place, without faculty, sense or motion.

The very term Matth. 26. 26. manifestly evinceth the truth. This, What? That which he took, viz. Bread, therefore it must needs be a figurative speech, 1 Cor. 10. 4.

The Apostle speaking of the Bread being consecrated, still calleth it Bread, six times at least. He calleth it indeed the Bread, and this Bread, to show the difference of it from other Bread, and the excellency of it above other bread, but yet bread. Therefore it is still bread of the same substance as other bread is, though in respect of use incomparably better. And so for the wine Matth. 26. 29. after consecration, he saith, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the Vine. He doth not say in general, Of the fruit of the Vine, but particularly with a demonstrative pronoun, Of this fruit of the Vine, viz. that which he had blest and delivered to the Apostles.

Transubstantiation was first occasioned by the unwary speeches of Damascene and Theophylact, they were hyperbolical in their expressions about the real presence of Christ in the Sacrament.

Some of the ancient Fathers speaking of the sacramental Elements after consecration, being then set apart from common use, called it a mutation, saying that the Elements were changed into another nature, but withal they express their meaning to be, not the changing of their substance, but their use, from being common bread and wine to become sacramental or sacred. 1 Cor. 11. 27. The Apostle distinguisheth these four things, Bread, Body, Cup and Blood, the Bread and Wine therefore receive no other change, but that of use, signification and relation, 1 Cor. 10. 16. He distinguisheth also Bread from the Body, Bread is the subject of the proposition, and the Communion of his Body the predicate.

Reasons against Transubstantiation:

First, Then Christ must hold himself in his own hands, eat and drink his own flesh and blood, for the Papists say, He did eat the Sacrament with his Disciples.

Secondly, Christ must needs have two Bodies, the one broken and having the blood separated from it in the Cup, the other whole and having the blood in it which holds the Cup.

Thirdly, Christ's blood then should be shed before his crucifying, and so a propitiatory Sacrifice offered to God before the Sacrifice of Christ upon the Cross.

Fourthly, One body should be now in a thousand places at a time.

Fifthly, A true body should be without bigness, void of all dimensions. Corpus non quantum.

Sixthly, Accidents should be without a subject, but Aristotle saith, Accidents are entis rather then entia. Accident is esse est inesse, the very essence of an Accident as it is an Accident, is to be in some subject. Vide Aquin. 1a; 1ae. Quaest 90. Artic. 2.

Seventhly, The same thing should be and not be at the same time, or should be before it was.

Eighthly, This is an inhumane thing, none eat man's flesh but Cannibals.

Ninthly, Then the senses should be deceived, we see bread, we smell bread, we touch bread, and taste bread.

Tenthly, There is no alteration in the sign of Baptism, and there is the same use of the sign of the Lord's Supper.

Matth. 26 26. Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave it to his Disciples, and said, Take, Eat, This is my Body. What our Savior took, that he blessed; what he blessed that he brake; what he brake, he delivered to the Disciples; what he delivered to them, of that he said, This is my Body. But it was Bread that he took, the Evangelist so saith, and Bread therefore that he blessed, Bread that he brake, Bread that he delivered, and Bread consequently of which he said, This is my Body.

The universal custom of the Scripture in all places where like kind of speaking is used, plainly leads us to a figure, see 1 Cor. 10. 4. The Hebrews wanting a proper word to set forth that which we mean by signifying, do ever instead of that use the word is. When Joseph had heard Pharaohs dream, he saith, The seven years of good corn are seven years of plenty, and the seven thin ears seven years of dearth, Gen. 41. 26, 27. so the seven fat kine are seven years, that is, by way of signification and representation. So Ezek. 37. 11. & Dan. 2. 38. & 7. 17. whence it comes that in the New Testament where the manner of speaking by the Hebrews is imitated, the word is in matter of signs, is used for the word signify. So in the Parable, That which is sowed upon stony ground is he that heareth, and after. The seed is the Word, Luk. 8. 11. the Reapers, the Angels, so, I am the Vine, Revel. 17. 12. The ten Kings are ten horns. Hagar is mount Sinai in Arabia. 2. The Apostle Paul clearly goes before us in this interpretation, for he saith, the bread which we break is the communion of the body of Christ, because it was appointed for a certain means of making us partakers of his body.

Our Savior said long before, viz. John 6. 63. that the flesh profiteth nothing, that is, the flesh by eating of it profits nothing, for in no other sense can it be said to profit nothing. See 2 Cor. 5. 16, 17.

Their Legend tells us, that some Boys getting by heart, and pronouncing the words of Consecration, Hoc est Corpus meum, turned all the Bakers bread in the street into flesh.

In the Book of the Conformities of S t Francis there is a miracle recorded for Transubstantiation; that on a time Prier Francis saying Mass, did find a Spider in the Chalice, which he would not cast out, but drink it up with the blood. Afterward rubbing his thigh and scratching where it itched, the Spider came whole out of his thigh without any harm to either.

It is a spiritual eating because it is wrought by the aid of the holy Ghost, and this mystery is perceived by faith, which the Spirit of God works in our minds, and this excellent nourishment belongs to a spiritual and eternal life. Sadeel de spirit, manducat. corporis Christi. c. 1.

A conjunction includes a presence, and as the conjunction between Christ and us is spiritual, so also is his presence.

Of the keeping of the Eucharist.

We grant that in antiquity there was a custom of breaking of some pieces of Bread which was blest, and sending of it home to some that were sick, or to other Parishes as a testimony of Communion, but this is nothing to that reservation of it in the pix, and to carry it up and down for Adoration. Now we say contrary, that the Sacraments are no longer then the mere use of them, that they are not absolute and permanent things, but relative and transient. Now that all such reservation is unlawful, appeareth

  • 1. By the express precept even for the eating as well as the taking of it, so that if it be not taken it is no Sacrament.
  • 2. A promise is not to be separated from the precept, now the Sacramental promise is only to the Bread in the use of it, Take, Eat, This is my Body, that is, this Bread so blest, so distributed, so eaten.
  • 3. The Bread is called a Body in reference to us, now as a stone which is a Bound-mark, removed remaineth a stone, but ceaseth to be a Bound-mark: So here.
  • 4. As the water in Baptism is not an actual Sacrament till sprinkled; so neither Bread and Wine unless used.

The reserving of the Eucharist which the primitive Christians used for the benefit of those who either by sickness or persecutions were withheld from the meetings of the Christians (as in those days saith Justin Martyr many were) is by the Papists now turned into an idolatrous circumgestation, that at the sight of the Bread the people might direct unto it the worship that is due only to the person whose passion it represents.

Of the Circumgestation of the Sacrament, and the Popish Processions.

For the solemn Circumgestation of this Sacrament, Cassander hath confessed, that seeing it is but a late invention, it may well be omitted without any detriment unto the Church, yea with emolument.

Some among our Adversaries have noted these pompous processions to have proceeded from an imitation of heathenish Rites and Ceremonies, and to be most ridiculous and sottish as they use them.

The ancient Fathers concealed heretofore, as carefully as they could, the matter and the rites used in the celebration of the holy Sacrament, the Papists show it now openly, and carry it publicly abroad every day through the streets, and sometimes also go in solemn Procession with it: which custom of theirs is of very late standing among Christians, and heretofore would have been accounted rather profane and unlawful. Daille of the right use of the Fathers, l. 2. c. 6.

CHAP. X. Of the Mass.

THe Papists call the Lord's Supper by this name, which implies horrible Idolatry. The Fathers using of the word was the occasion of that dangerous error, if we would keep out the error we must likewise keep out the name.

The very name of Mass is against private Mass, and quite overthrows it. For missa is as much as missio, or dimissio, à dimittendis Catechumenis antequam Sacrificium inchoaretur. It signifies as much as dimission or sending away of such out of the Church, as were not prepared and fit to receive, before the Sacrament began to be celebrated. Probabilissima est Bellarmino eorum sententia qui missam dici volunt à mission seu dimissione populi. D. Prid. de missae Sacrificio. Rhenanus in Tertul. l. 4. adverse. Marcion.

Picherellus and Sadeel think it is a Latin word, which signifies as much as missio, so remissa is used for remission both by Tertullian and Cyprian.

Chemnitz in parte secunda Exam. derives it from the Chaldaical signification of the word missa, for the sufficiency of the Papists is from the Mass. Una & potissima quaestura regni Pontificii est cauponatio & nundinatio privatarum missarum. Chemnit. ubi supra, Vide Drus. in Deut. 6. 16. Some dispute hard to derive the word Mass from an Hebrew root, either Gnasah to do, and sometimes to sacrifice, or from Misbeach an Altar▪ others fetch it from Mas a Tribute. But the learned Papists, as Bellarmine and others, do wholly reject this, for this reason, if it had been an Hebrew word, the Apostles and Grecians afterward would have retained it, as they have done Amen, Hallelujah, and Hosanna, but they did not.

D r Taylor saith, The word is neither Hebrew, Greek nor Latin, nor taken from any other language of any Nation, but raked out of the bottomless pit without all signification, unless it agree with our English word (Mass) that is, an heap, a lump, a chaos of blasphemies and abominations.

The Mass is like a beggars cloak patched up with many pieces, whereof some were put in an one time, some at another: one Pope puts in one patch, another another: and it was not fully patched up as now it is, till twelve hundred years after Christ. Acts and Monum. p. 1274.

Christ hath ordained the holy Communion in remembrance of himself. Men do neither retain any remembrance of Christ nor yet Communion, but have changed all the whole matter into a gay show, and almost a stage-play. Paul saith, That Christ hath once entered into the holy place, and hath with one only Sacrifice, and with one oblation made perfect all things: Men say, that they can sacrifice Christ himself again every day in very deed, and that in infinite places. B. Jewel on 1 Pet. 4. 11.

For the thing itself.

It is a work in which the Priest in whispering over those five words, Hoc est enim Corpus meum, makes Christ of the Bread (as the Papists suppose) and offers him to the Father, as a Sacrifice for the expiating of the sins of the living and the dead. First, As soon as he hath rehearsed the words of consecration, and by the uttering of them made his Maker, as they conceive, he presently bowing his knees adores the host consecrated by him, and likewise the Cup. After he hath worshipped it he riseth up, and turning from the people with great reverence, lifts up the Host with both his hands over his head, and shows it to the people's view, that they may worship it as Christ himself, and in the like manner after also the Cup. While the Sacrament is elevated a little Bell rings, by which as by a sign given, the people with great veneration worships the Sacrament as Christ himself.

We acknowledge that in the Sacrament there is a solemn praising of God which sometimes is called a Sacrifice, as likewise that the believers did offer up charitable alms which sometimes is called a Sacrifice, as likewise that there is a representation and commemoration of Christ who was our Sacrifice: But to hold that here by the Priest is offered up again the body and blood of Christ though after an unbloody manner, is a falsehood, and many that swear by the Mass know not the horrible impiety of it. They hold that the offering up of this to God is efficacious for the quick and dead, and those in Purgatory.

The Fathers oft term the Lord's Supper a Sacrifice, partly in regard of the spiritual Sacrifice therein offered; and partly because it is a lively representation and commemoration of Christ's Sacrifice once offered on the Cross; and partly also because it succeedeth in the room of the Passover, and those other Sacrifices that in the Old Testament were offered. But that they ever dreamed of any other Sacrifice distinct from the Sacrament, no Papist shall ever be able to prove. M. Gatak. of Transub. p. 113.

In Sacrificiis offerimus, in Sacramentis accipimus. Beza.

A Sacrifice and a Sacrament cannot stand together, for by a Sacrifice something is offered to God, but by a Sacrament something is received from God. Therefore the Paschal Lamb was not a Sacrifice, as the offering up of Bullocks and Lambs, but only a Sacrament and sign of our redemption by Christ, Heb. 7. 10. there needs no other expiatory oblation, Why should I offer then to expiate sin when it is expiated already?

The Papists say, It is a Sacrifice properly so called. The whole essence of a Sacrifice depends upon the institution of Christ, say Suarez and Salmeron, if any Sacrifice had been instituted, it must have appeared by some word or act of Christ, neither of which can be found, 1 Cor. 11. after the words, Do this. Paul, ver. 25. immediately expounds what was meant by doing, expressing the acts of doing, As often as you shall eat, which was spoken generally to all the faithful in Corinth, not to the sacrificing Priests. They prove it from Virgil's Calf,

Cum faciam vitulâ pro frugibus ipse venito.

See Iansen Concord. c. 13. p. 904. & Rhemists on Luke 22. 20.

Object. Almost all things are by the Law purged with blood: and without shedding of blood is no remission, Heb. 9. 22. But in the Sacrifice of the Mass there is no effusion of blood, therefore there is no remission made for sins, and by consequent it is not a propitiatory Sacrifice.

  • 1. Nothing therein is properly sacrified, not the Bread and Wine, for they are transubstantiated (say they) before the Sacrifice; not Christ's body, for no living thing can properly be sacrificed unless it be slain, but Christ being once dead dieth no more.
  • 2. The Papists say, it is an external Sacrament, yet Christ there appears to no sense, but is concealed under the accidents of Bread and Wine.
  • 3. They say it is Sacrificium incruentum, an unbloody Sacrifice, yet Christ's blood is there truly and really shed and drunk by the Communicants with the mouth.
  • 4. It is a perfect and all-sufficient Sacrifice, yet they repeat it daily.

Propitiatory is either that which pacifieth the wrath of God, and pleaseth him by its own virtue and efficacy, which is only the Sacrifice of Christ in his own self, or else by God's gracious acceptance and indulgence, Rom. 12. 1. Heb. 13. 16. Phil. 4. 18. Heb. 9. & 10. the Apostle from the iteration of Sacrifices doth conclude the insufficiency of them, for if Christ be offered again and again, he is an imperfect Sacrifice, and we need something else. The Apostle also in those Chapters doth often inculcate the once offering and once oblation, by Christ offering up of himself once, we are free from the guilt of our sins, Heb. 3. 9. The entrance of Christ into the heavens is compared with the old High-priests entrance into the holiest of holies, and therefore as none but the High priest might go in there, so none could offer this Sacrifice but Christ himself, and withal it implieth that to the perfection of Christ's Sacrifice is required his continual appearing in heaven for us.

Malachi 1. 11. useth the word offering, which was properly a part of the service used in the Church in his time to signify the Gospel-service which succeeds in the New Testament, and to express it more particularly, he calls it a pure offering, no longer carnal and gross, but wholly spiritual.

Irenaeus by the pure offering in Mal. 1. 11. understandeth the Eucharist now in use, and many of the Ancients suppose it resembled in that action of Melchizedek, Gen. 14. 18. And they call it the Christians Sacrifice succeeding in the room of the Jewish Sacrifices; the Sacrifice, I say, of the Eucharist, not their Sacrifice of the Mass. M. Gatak. of Transub.

The pure prayers and worship of God that should be in all Churches under the Gospel, as Tertullian, Eusebius, Jerome and Augustine expound it. M. Sh p. Reply to M. Ball. Vide Grot. in loc.

There was a Controversy of late years fomented by some through Popish compliances, That the Lord's Supper might be styled a Sacrifice, the Table an Altar, which produced in the discussion of it (as all controversies do in the issue some further truth) the discovery of this true decision of it: That it was not a Sacrifice, but a feast after and upon Christ's sacrificing of himself. Participatio Sacrificii, as Tertullian calls it, a sacrificial fe st commemorating and confirming all those ends for which the only true and proper Sacrifice of Christ was offered up.

Private massing, or the alone communicating of the Priest, is not according

  • 1. To the institution of Christ, saying in the plural to them, Drink ye all of this.
  • 2. To the practice of the Apostles, Act. 2. 46.

The Council of Trent saith, We commend the Priests communicating alone, which is as good as conferring or covenanting alone.

The Apostle 1 Cor. 11. 28. requires that every man first examine himself, and then eat, and he testifies verse. 23. That what he delivered he received also of the Lord. And so we know that the Lord himself gave unto all which were present with him, and suffered none only to be by and look on.

2. It is against the nature of the Sacrament, for it is a spiritual Feast.

3. It is against the name of the Sacrament, for it is commonly called a Communion, which name seems to be fetched from 1 Cor. 10. 16, 17. but what Communion is there when one alone receiveth and not them which are present with him.

4. Against the Canon of the Mass, the Priest ever speaks in the Plural number.

The words of our Savior, Take, Eat, this is my Body, Mat. 26. 26. were spoken to all future Communicants, as well as to the Apostles then present, for they contain in them an institution of a Sacrament to be celebrated in all Christian Churches, till the end of the world, as the Apostle teacheth us from 1 Cor. 11. from verse. 23. to 28. especially at the 26. verse. as often as ye eat this Bread and drink this Cup. ye show the Lord's death till he come. This the Apostles in their persons could not fulfill, for they lived not till Christ's second coming: they must of necessity therefore be extended to all that in succeeding ages should be present at the Lord's Supper, who are as much bound by this precept of Christ to communicate with the Priest, or dispenser of the Sacrament, as the Apostles were to communicate with Christ himself, when he first in his own person administered it; otherwise if the precepts, Tak , Fat. Do this in remembrance of me▪ appertained to the Apostles only, What warrant hath any Priest now to consecrate the elements or administer the Sacrament? Nay, what command have any faithful at all to receive the Communion?

The Sacrifice of the Mass being idolatrous, it is not lawful to be present at it. 1 Cor. 10. 20. In their Mass-book they call the Cross itself, our only hope.

Those Texts are against going to Mass, Psal. 26. 4. 1 Cor. 10. 7, 14. 2 Cor. 6. 14, 16, 17. 1 John 5. 21.

Many will say, They keep their hearts to God though they be present at a Mass. This is as if a man should catch his wife in the act of adultery, and she apologize, that the other had her body, but he her heart, 1 Cor. 6. 27. Rom. 11. 4. God's people have their knees for God as well as their hearts, 1 Kings 19. Origen said, he could not bend the knees of his body to God, and the knees of his heart to Satan. See B. Daven. Determ. 7. Revel. 7. 3. They have a mark in the fore-head, because they must not be ashamed of their profession, that mark is obvious to all the world. Our Savior by this policy might have over-reached the devil himself, who required only external bowing, keeping his heart still unto God, Matth. 4. 10.

In some case a man may be present at Mass and not sin: As

  • 1. When he is there by violent comp lsion, this is not his sin but theirs.
  • 2. If in travel a man be in a fit place to see and observe their folly, so as he shows no reverence at all or approbation by bending his knee, uncovering his head, or otherwise.

King Edward the 6 th would not suffer the Lady Mary to have Mass in her house. Foxes vol. 2. p. 653.

The bowing of Naaman spoken of in 2 King. 5. 8. was genuflexio obsequii, not imitativa, a bowing to the King, not to the Idol.

2. Elisha 's words do not necessarily import an approbation or permission of that which was propounded, but a mere form of valediction, as if he had said in our language, Adieu or Farewell, or there may be an Enallage temporis very usual in the Hebrew, and have relation to the time past.

Of private Receiving of the Lord's Supper.

The Passover was to be eaten in such a Family, Exod. 12. 46. to signify that the Church was then but a handful or household, in respect of the fullness of the Gentiles which were to follow: but the Lord's Supper was not to be eaten in a private separated Family, but the Church was to come together, and to stay one for another, 1 Cor. 11. 33. that in the confluence of the people and publicness of the action the increase and multitude of the Church might be expressed.

1 Cor. 11. 22. Paul opposeth the Congregation wherein the Lord's Supper should be taken, unto a private house, where men satisfy their hunger.

It is noted of a Christian Jew, desperately sick of the Palsy, that he was with his bed carried to the place of Baptism.

The purest and best reformed Churches this day, in Savoy, Germany, France, and divers others, administer the Sacraments only in the ordinary meetings.

In my judgment (saith Master Cartwright ) it is unmeet to administer either of the Sacraments in private houses, and it is less tolerable in the holy Supper, which hath a special mark and representation of brotherly Communion, more then Baptism.

The Necessity of the Eucharist.

The administering of the Communion to Infants is a Rite as ancient as Cyprians time, and a Rite that did continue in the Church above 600 years.

Innocentius the first and Augustine concluded a necessity of children's receiving this Sacrament from John 6. 53. it may well conclude for those which are of years, and capable of that mystery, for though it speaketh rather of a spiritual eating and drinking, yet because the sacramental is a sign and pledge of that, and whosoever doth indeed spiritually eat the flesh of Christ, and drink his blood, cannot choose but also be willing and forward to do it sacramentally when opportunity is offered, and there is no impediment to hinder.

Christ requireth in all persons about to communicate three principal acts of reason, one is before, and two are at the time of receiving; The first is 1 Cor. 11. Let man examine himself; The second, to discern the Lord's body; The third is, to remember the Lord's death until his coming again. All which three being acts of judgment cannot agree unto Infants, being persons void of judgment.

The Ends for which God hath instituted the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper.

They are four:

First, The remembrance of the death of Christ, Luke 22. 19. This do in remembrance of me.

  • 1. Christ's person, Phil. 3. 8, 9. we can have no interest in his benefits till we be united to him, Cant. 5. 10. to the end.
  • 2. His actions and sufferings, 1 Cor. 11. 24, 26.
  • 3. The benefits that flow from these all that Christ did and suffered was not only satisfactory but meritorious, Luke 22 20.
  • 4. With what affection Christ instituted this Sacrament, his bowels were then full of compassion to his people, it was the last solemn act of his life.

Secondly, It is a strengthening Ordinance, the Lord hath appointed it only for those that are new-born, the elements there are our greatest matter of nourishment.

Thirdly, It is a sealing Ordinance, The New Testament in my blood.

Fourthly, An Ordinance of the Communion of Saints whereby that should be renewed, all are one bread and one body, John 6. 54. 1 Cor. 10. 16, 17.

The Lord's Supper is

  • 1. A badge of a Christians profession.
  • 2. A seal of the Covenant of grace.
  • 3. A map of heaven.
  • 4. A means and pledge of our Communion with Christ, 1 Cor. 10. 16.

The Supper promotes this Communion:

  • 1. Because it is a visible profession of our union with Christ.
  • 2. A lively resemblance of it, meat and drink are converted into our substance, made a part of us, there are significant rites invested with a promise, and the assurance of a blessing.
  • 3. It is a pledge and seal, Christ is there conveyed over to a believers use, This is my Body, a pledge whereby whole Christ with all his merits, and all that he is, is made over to a believer.
  • 4. A means of exhibiting Christ to the soul. The Sacraments are Instrumenta quadantenus moralia, they are accompanied with the power and virtue of the holy Ghost.

We must therefore receive the Sacrament:

To confirm our faith, Communion with Christ, and all saving graces in us, to keep in remembrance the Lord's death until he come again, and to testify our love one towards another.

  • 1. Our Faith. God is able and willing to save us:
    • 1. Able to save to the utmost, look upon him 1. In his Natures, God-man, Man that he might suffer, God that he might satisfy. 2. In his Offices, he is a Prophet, Priest and King, Mat. 8. 2.
    • 2. Willing, he died to save humble and penitent sinners, Rom. 8. 34. & Rom. 4. ult. if he spared not his life for us, he will spare nothing else. There is merit and grace enough in him (what ever my sins are or have been) for pardon of them and salvation.
  • 2. Communion with Christ and all saving graces in us. God's end in instituting of Ordinances is that we might meet him there, and have Communion with him, Exod 20. 24. it should be our end in frequenting Ordinances. God's eye is specially on our end in all religious duties, Matth. 11. 7, 8. Hos. 7. 14. Zech. 7. 5.
    • 1. He pondereth the heart.
    • 2. He judgeth of our actions by the end.
    • 3. The answer will be suitable to our end. The Sacrament is the nearest and visiblest Communion with Christ on earth. We come to God by Christ in prayer, as our Intercessor, in the Word as our Teacher, in the Supper as the Master of the Feast, Rom. 6. 11.
  • 3. To keep in remembrance the Lord's death until he come again, 1 Cor. 11. 26. that is,
    • 1. The Doctrine of it; the bread represents his body, the wine his blood, we show our belief of this Doctrine.
    • 2. The Necessity of his death, we hereby testify to God our consciences, fellow-Christians, the world, our need of Christ, as bread is necessary for our bodies.
    • 3. The Sufficiency of Christ's death, no two creatures are more universally sufficient for all sorts of men then bread and wine, therefore God made choice of them for this purpose.
    • 4. The Application of Christ's death; it is the receiving of bread and wine into our stomachs that nourisheth us, when the conscience beginneth to be oppressed with the heinousness of sin, and the fear of God's vengeance, we should consider Christ bare the curse for our sins upon his body, that we might be delivered from them, and made perfect satisfaction to his Fathers justice, that we might be received into favor, Rom. 8. 34, 35.
  • 4. To testify our love one toward another, that I shall speak of afterward.

Of du Preparation for the Sacrament.

We must labor to perform all holy duties in a right manner. God requires preparation to every service, to the Sabbath, Sacrament.

Some say the scope of the first Commandment is, that Jehovah alone must be our God whom we must worship; of the second, that he must be worshipped alone with his own worship; of the third, that he must be worshipped after his own manner.

God is more delighted with Adverbs then Nouns. None might approach to the holy things of God having his uncleanness upon him. Nadab and Abihu through carelessness, or hast brought common kitchen fire, whereas it should have been heavenly fire, therefore God punished them.

God makes admirable promises to prayer, yet if we perform it not in that manner which God requires, he abhors it, Psal. 109. 8. The word is the power of God to convert and strengthen us, 2 Cor. 2. 16. The Sacrament is a seal of the Covenant, yet if it be received unworthily it is a seal to a blank. Judas took the Passover at least, and the devil entered into him. See 1 Cor. 11. 18, 20. so the great duty of fasting if not rightly performed is unacceptable, Isa. 14. 12. See 2 Chro. 25. 2. and prayer Prov. 15. 8.

Reasons. 1. Because the Lord requires and orders the manner as well as the matter, our obedience must have Gospel-perfection, sincerity and integrity. In the Passover the Lamb must be perfect, of the first year, the man and the Lamb prepared, and it offered in the appointed time. See Exod. 12. 9. 2 Chron. 30. 18, 19. There were four days preparation for the Passover, the Lord's Supper both succeeds and exceeds it.

The Ark was to be carried on the Priests shoulders, 1 Chron. 15. 13. God made a breach on them because they sought him not after the due order.

2. The manner of performing the duty is the most spiritual part of it, Non tantum considerandum est id quod agimus, sed etiam quibus circumstantiis.

This shows the true cause why our attending upon God proves so unprofitable and uncomfortable to us, because we rest in the work done.

Secondly, We should labor to perform the Ordinances aright, and that we may do so

  • 1. The person must be accepted, God had regard to Abel and his offering. Cain's Sacrifice for the matter was as good as Abel's, the person is only accepted in Christ, This is my beloved Son in whom I am well-pleased, in him with us.
  • 2. Ever bring God the best thou hast, in thy approaches to God bring the best devotion, affection, Cursed is the deceiver that hath a whole one, and brings a blemished one, Mal. be troubled thou canst bring no better.
  • 3. Come in faith, rest upon the promise of Christ that thy services shall be accepted, mingle faith with hearing, prayer.
  • 4. Bring an humble Spirit. Let thy soul be rightly possessed with the majesty and holiness of that God to whom the duty is tendered, Revel. 4. 3. The Lord is to be looked on as a King in his Glory, in his Throne, we have a principle of envy in us, whom we envy we undervalue.
  • 5. Bring a right estimation of the excellency and ends of the Ordinance, Isa. 2. 3. Hear and thy soul shall live: Take heed how you hear, with what measure you mete it shall be measured to you again, according to your diligence in the duty will God measure out his blessing.
  • 6. There must be a serious meditation beforehand of the spiritual manner of performing the duty, Heb. 12. 28. Do not utter indigested prayers, a Minister should speak as the Oracles of God.
  • 7. One should labor to stir up the graces suitable to the duty, and keep down the sins opposite thereto, 1 Pet. 2. 1, 2. I am. 1. 18, 19.

It is the duty of Christians in a special manner to examine themselves, that they may come prepared to the Lord's Supper.

1 Cor. 11. 20. to the end, the Apostle proves the necessity of preparation, both from the nature of the Ordinance, or the institution of it, the benefit that we reap by coming prepared, and the mischief that befalls those that come unworthily, and the scandal given to others. Our hearts are deceitful, Ier. 17. 9. sin is deceitful. Satan is full of stratagems. The holy Ghost often warns us, Be not deceived, Let no man deceive you, James 1. 26. Of all deceit self-deceit is the worst.

Vers. 28. Examine himself ] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is borrowed from civil affairs. For among the Athenians before any were admitted to any office or place of Magistracy, they were examined whether they were fit or no.

And so let him, &c.] Do it in Christ's manner, and to his end, Eccl. 5. 1. 1 Sam. 16. 5. 2 Chron. 35. 6.

The Church of Christ in all ages have required solemn preparation for the Sacrament, as the Liturgies and Directories of Reformed Churches show.

In the Primitive Church there was rather an excess then defect. Zanchi observes that it was the occasion of instituting of Lent, because of their coming to the Sacrament at Easter.

The ancient Fathers and primitive Christians the night before they received sat up and prayed, which they called their vigiliae.

Reasons. First, Because of God the Lord and Master of the Feast, Job 13. 11. Prov. 23. 1.

Observe five things in that Parable, Matth. 22.

  • 1. The King comes to see his guests, God observes what hearts we come with into his presence.
  • 2. He makes diligent enquiry, takes notice of everyone personally, there was but one without the wedding garment, and he could not lie hid.
  • 3. Mark his impartiality, as soon as he espies him, he saith, Friend, how ca •• est thou in hither?
  • 4. How inexcusable those are that abuse the Ordinance: when he was charged that had not the wedding garment, he was silent.
  • 5. The rigor and indisposableness of the sentence, v. 13.

Secondly, Because of the Feast itself, being heavenly and for the soul. At this Ordinance we have the highest and most solemn intercourse with God that we have in any Ordinance, we renew not the Covenant in prayer and reading the Word.

Thirdly, Christ's practice before his institution doth teach as much, in that he washed his Disciples feet, John 13.

Fourthly, Our hearts are naturally profane and wicked and indisposed to this duty, if we were so perfectly holy as we should be, we should be ever ready for holy performances, but our hearts gather soil exceedingly. Purge out the old leaven before you come to eat Christ our Passover that was sacrificed for us, 1 Cor. 5. 7. What he meaneth by the old leaven he telleth you in the next verse, it is the leaven of malice especially that we must be careful to purge out. According to our preparation will our profit be, if one come fitly it is a means of a great deal of good, Communion with God, sealing the Covenant, the Lord and we are made friends under seal, partaking the body and blood of Christ. It is like our evidences in the time of trial, when our Land is questioned 2 Chron. 30. 3. our hope in the Resurrection lies in this, John 6. 54. it seals our initiation and exhibits our growth in Christ. A Sermon will confirm but one particular grace, as patience or the like, but the Sacrament confirms the body of graces, and a man receives an influence of grace into his whole soul.

The Apostle in the Conclusion of the 1 Cor. 11. appoints this as a great remedy to prevent the judgment of God for their abuses about the Sacrament, to judge ourselves,

  • 1. Self-abasing will follow self-judging.
  • 2. Justifying God, Rom. 3. 4.
  • 3. Sin will be bitter to such an one.
  • 4. He will not judge others, Rom. 14. 3, 4.

A child of God may receive unworthily:

  • 1. By coming carelessly and negligently to the Sacrament.
  • 2. By coming in the guilt of any one sin unrepented of.

Fifthly, Because of the danger of coming unprepared, Matth. 22. the Devil will enter into s as into Judas, Luk. 22. 3. compared with John 13. 27. If we receive not Christ we receive Satan. Cyprian saith of the Lord's Supper, P tro remedium, Iudae venenum, 1 Cor. 11. 17. 27, 29, 36.

The staying away will not prevent the danger, Matth. 22. those that would not come to the Supper when invited, were destroyed as well as those that came without the wedding garment. Not to come is to starve our souls, to come unworthily is to poison them.

One is said to be guilty of the blood of Christ, 1 Cor. 11. 27. that is, a murderer of Christ, divers ways.

  • 1. Christ is really present, though not corporally and locally, he looks upon the injury done to the Elements as done to himself, if one wrong insignia majestatis, the Kings coin, or the like, it is treason.
  • 2. The same bent and disposition of heart that carries a man to profane the Elements, would carry him to crucify Christ: Christ is sacramentally united to the bread and wine.
  • 3. In the Sacrament Christ is set forth as crucified, Gal. 3. 1. Isa. 53. 6. our sins crucified him; he whose heart is not affected with such an object allows the deed of the Jews, is an accessory post factum▪
  • 4. There is a great resemblance between Judas his act and yours.
    • 1. He was a Disciple, so thou a Christian.
    • 2. He did betray Christ for a small matter, Zech. 11. 10, 11. so thou preferrest a base lust before him.
    • 3. He betrayed him with a kiss, thou at the Sacrament.
  • 5. Thou wouldst make Christ die in vain, Christ's death is useful for satisfaction and sanctification; satisfaction of God's wrath and sanctification of our hearts, we trample his blood under our feet as unholy, that is, common.

Vers. 29. He that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation, or judgment to himself. Damnation if he be a reprobate and impenitent hypocrite, judgment though he be regenerate and a true believer. M. Hilders.

God punisheth this sin in his children with inward and outward chastisements. The Lord abhors the like offense in the Sacrifices, Mal. 1. 7.

This worthy receiving is not a legal worthiness, Secundum absolutam dignitatem, wherein one can plead that the thing he doth deserves the thing he would have, but an Evangelical worthiness, Secundum divinam acceptationem The original of all our worthiness is the change of the Covenant, Exod. 12. 43. Every man by nature is under the Covenant of works, he that was uncircumcised might not partake of the Jewish Passover. Circumcision notes two things, 1. A change of the Covenant. 2. Sanctification of a man's nature, Col. 2. 11. He that was uncircumcised was out of Abraham's Covenant and unregenerate. This change of the Covenant comes by the change of your Head, your union with Christ, Gal. 3. ult. Corpus Christi non edunt qui de corpore Christi non sunt.

We must seriously examine our state, whether we be in the state of grace, 2 Cor. 12. 5. The children of God mistrust their own searching, and desire God to search them, Psal. 139. lat. end. Thou must be a new creature cut off from the old stock, and engraffed into a new, thou must close with Christ and accept of him, and then virtue will come from him, Gal. 2. 20. Bread and Wine are turned into the substance.

When the Sacrament is received without due and diligent preparation, it is received unworthily, verse. 28. The Apostle prescribes this remedy against unworthy receiving; we should diligently prepare for every religious duty. We should be much in examination, the strongest acts of grace are reflex acts, this is a Gospel command, therefore carries with it a Gospel-promise, it is a duty at all times. Our examination is a setting ourselves in the presence of God, and passing sentence on our ways, as God would have us.

There is a twofold preparation required,

  • 1. Habitual, standing in the having of all such dispositions and graces as qualify a man for the work of receiving, knowledge, faith and repentance, love, obedience, this is at our first conversion, Ephes. 2. 10. & 6. 14.
  • 2. Actual, which stands in the exciting and awakening of those graces and dispositions, and renewing of them when one is to receive. Both these must be in him that will receive in due order.

Actual preparation consists

  • 1. In the solemn sequestration of a man's self.
  • 2. In examination of our sins and graces.
  • 3. In being humbled for our sins, and in renewing and quickening the former graces.
  • 4. In raising and stirring up in ourselves strong desires after Christ.
  • 5. In stirring up in ourselves a strong expectation of the benefit of the Sacrament.
  • 6. In seeking God in special, and more then ordinary manner by prayer.

1. A solemn sequestration of the soul from all other avocations whatsoever. There must be some sitting of a man's self for the duty, from the time that a man hath notice of the Sacrament to be administered. But at the day before, a man should at the least toward the end of the day separate himself from all other thoughts and occasions, and mind wholly the work of preparation to the Sacrament.

This sequestration of a man's self stands in two things,

  • 1. In setting aside all lawful thoughts, occasions and businesses of our callings.
  • 2. In summoning, calling and collecting together all the powers and faculties of the soul to attend upon the business now in hand.

Examination of our sins and graces, of the multitude and heinousness of our sins, of the truth of our graces, the growth of them, and our wants.

I shall lay down the rules of examination, and the things to be examined:

1. The Rules whereby we are to examine ourselves are the Law and Gospel.

  • 1. For finding out the number of our sins.
  • 2. The uses of them for finding out the measure of them.

The things to be examined, are our sins and graces.

I. Of the Rules.

The Law.

The Sum of the Law is set down in the ten Commandments, and they are divided into two Tables.

The Commandments of the first Table are the four first, and they teach us our duty which we owe unto God immediately. The Commandments of the second Table are the six last, and they teach us our duty which we owe unto our Neighbor.

Our duty to God is to love him with all our hearts, with all our strength, with all our might, with all our thoughts. Our duty to our Neighbor is to love him as ourselves both in soul and body, goods, good name, person, chastity.

The first Commandment is, Thou shalt have no other gods but me, or, before me.

The general duty of it is to make God my God, by yielding unto him all such respect as appertaineth to him in regard of his being our Creator, and the first fountain of all being. This is a total and general subjection of the whole man unto him.

Duties required herein, are

  • 1. Of Dependance, whereby we make God the chief and principal object of all the powers of our whole man, so far as they are capable of him.
  • 2. Of Conformity, whereby we order all our powers toward other things in that manner and measure that he doth require, and so become subject to that authority, power and command that he hath over us as a Creator.

1. Duties of Dependance.

We must set all the powers of the soul principally upon him.

  • 1. The Understanding,
    • 1. To know him as he hath revealed himself in his Word and Works.
    • 2. Faith to believe him, that is, to think things true, because he saith them.
    • 3. Humility, acknowledge him to be the first and best Essence, rightly discern the infinite distance and difference between him and us, and confess his unspeakable excellencies above us, and our most vile baseness in comparison of him.
  • 2. The will, willing his glory above all things, and then choosing his favor and grace.
  • 3. The imagination or thinking power, to be thinking of God more plentifully, largely, constantly, then of all other things.
  • 4. Memory, perpetually to remember him, and to set him at my right hand, as David saith.
  • 5. The affections of Love, Fear, Joy, Confidence, must be set upon him with all their strength.

We should also speak more abundantly of God and his Excellencies, then of all things else besides.

2. Duties of Conformity.

All the powers of man are to be set on other things according to his direction and appointment.

  • 1. The Understanding,
    • 1. To know his will.
    • 2. To believe his promises and threats.
    • 3. To make use of the things we know.
    • 4. To esteem of heavenly things above earthly.
  • 2. Conscience, or a knowing with God, in which 1. The acts it is to perform. 2. The rule which it must follow in performing those acts.

The acts it is to perform are twofold:

  • 1. In regard of our estate to acquit and condemn.
  • 2. In regard of our actions.
    • I. Before the doing, if need be to admonish me to them.
      • 2. If sinful, to restrain me from them.
      • 3. If indifferent, to leave them to our wills.
    • II. After the doing.
      • 1. To comfort in them if commanded.
      • 2. To check for them if forbidden.

        The Rule which it must follow in performing these acts is the revealed will of God.

    • III. In the manner of doing.
      • 1. Sincerely in checking for one sin as well as another.
      • 2. Tenderly, for a little thing.
      • 3. Effectually, so as not to suffer corruption to gain-say▪
      • 4. Peaceably, to drive to God not from him.
    • 3. The will to be flexible to God's will.
      • 1. Obedience, a full purpose to do all that God requires, and leave all that he forbiddeth for his sake.
      • 2. For good things received, thankfulness, for evil, patience.
    • 4. The thinking power, Memory, Speech, Senses and Affections to be exercised more abundantly on heavenly things then earthly.

    The general Duty of the second Commandment is to perform such solemn worship to God as he requires in his Word, to worship him in spirit and truth.

    Divine Service must be according to God's command:

    • 1. For Matter of it, in regard
      • 1. Of the Person worshipped, the living God alone, conceived of in the pure apprehension of the mind, without any sensible representation.
      • 2. The parts or kinds of worship, that they be by him appointed, which are
        • 1. Ordinary, such as are to be done constantly, and in a settled course, which are three-fold,
          • 1. Public.
          • 2. Private.
          • 3. Indifferent.
            • 1. Public
              • 1. Preaching of the Word.
              • 2. The administration of the Sacraments, Baptism and the Lord's Supper.
            • 2. Private
              • 1. Conference.
              • 2. Meditation.
            • 3. Indifferent
              • 1. Prayer.
              • 2. Reading the Scriptures or other good 〈…〉 .
              • 3. Catechizing.
              • 4. Singing of Psalms.
        • 2. Extraordinary, such services as are t be •• ne now and then upon special occasions.
          • 1. Fasting.
          • 2. Fea •• ing.
          • 3. Vows.
    • 2. The Manner of the performance of Divine Service is three-fold,
      • 1. A due preparation before.
      • 2. A right carriage in them, doing them
        • 1. Truly and sincerely upon the right Motives, Causes, God's Commandment and Will, and our own Duty and need, and for the right ends, viz. the pleasing of God, and procuring of Grace and increase of virtue in our souls.
        • 2. Reverently, with a special apprehension of God's presence and greatness.
        • 3. Faithfully, with a believing of God's truth therein, and promising to ourselves the blessing he hath promised.
        • 4. Devoutly, that is, with a diligent attention of the mind to the words and matter, and whole work in hand.
      • 3. A right making Use thereof after.

    The third Commandment enjoins the common worship of God, that is, the right carriage of ourselves to his honor in all our common affairs, so far forth as we have anything to do with him therein.

    The general duty of it is to live holily.

    To sanctify God,

    • 1. Inwardly, by seeing him in his works,
      • 1. Of chastisement, to be patient, penitent.
      • 2. Of Mercy, to be thankful and obedient.
    • 2. Outwardly,
      • 1. In word, by the lawful use of an Oath, by a reverent mention of God's Titles and Attributes upon any occasion, by good conference, and making confession of his truth.
      • 2. In our Deeds and Actions,
        • 1. In General, to aim at his glory in all our works, and live to him and not to ourselves.
        • 2. More Particularly, in two things,
          • 1. In suffering Persecution cheerfully for Righteousness sake.
          • 2. By a sanctified use of God's creatures, of anything whatsoever we do, whereto four things are required,
            • 1. Knowledge out of the word of God concerning the lawfulness of our doing such things.
            • 2. Craving God's blessing in the use of Meat, Drink, Marriage.
            • 3. Returning Thanks to God for his goodness.
            • 4. Moderation in the use of them.

    The fourth Commandment appoints the consecrating of a special time, viz. every seventh day after six of labor to holy and religious exercises.

    The full Sum of it, is, After thou hast bestowed six days in ordinary and common businesses, thou shalt bestow the seventh day in exercises of piety and religion.

    The things commanded in this precept are two

    • 1. Preparation to the Sabbath, in the word Remember, which is done two ways,
      • 1. All the week long by diligence, fore-sight, moderation in the labors of our calling.
      • 2. On the sixth day towards the end of it by a seasonable breaking off our labors, and making all things ready for the Sabbath.
    • 2. Celebration of the Sabbath, not only observing and keeping it ourselves, but preserving it, and looking that our Inferiors and others under us at the least outwardly keep it.

    We must

    • 1. Rest from thoughts, words and deeds that concern worldly things, but only for necessity and mercy.
    • 2. Sanctify it by bestowing it in the exercises of Religion, which for the manner are to be done cheerfully, consecrating the Sabbath unto the Lord as a delight.

    The fifth Commandment enjoins the performance of all such duties as appertain to men in regard of their place, that we show due respect to our Superiors, Equals and Inferiors.

    Our Duty to our Governors is to honor and reverence their persons willingly, to obey all their lawful commandments, to bear their reproofs and chastisements submissively, patiently, and fruitfully.

    The particular Duty of Children to their Parents, besides these common duties, is

    1. To love them very much, to maintain them if need be in sickness and age, and to be guided by them in marriage.

    The particular Duty of Servants is to be trusty and painful in the business committed to them by their Governors, as well in their absence as presence.

    The particular Duty of Subjects to their Kings and inferior Magistrates, is to defend their persons against all violence offered to them by any according to their places, and to render them willingly all due services and payments.

    The Duty of People to their Teachers and spiritual Pastors, is to submit to their Ministry, and to reward them with plentiful maintenance.

    The Duty of the younger to their betters in age, is to behave themselves toward them reverently, and to take their good advice.

    Our Duty towards our betters in gifts, is to take notice of their gifts and to respect them accordingly.

    The common duty of all Governors towards those that are under them, is to rule them wisely, mildly, and equally, taking care by their authority to plant true Religion among them.

    The particular Duty of Parents toward their children, is to give them fit instruction and correction, to help them to some honest Calling, to dispose of them fitly in marriage, and to lay up for them according to their means.

    The particular Duty of Masters toward their servants, is to use them justly and mildly for work, diet, reward and chastisement.

    The Duties of man and wife each towards other, are these

    Both must love each other above all other persons; he must cherish her as his own body, and she must be an helper to him, and yield to him as her Head.

    The particular Duty of Kings and other Magistrates, is to make fit Laws, and to see them duly executed for the maintaining of peace, honesty and godliness.

    The Duty of Ministers toward their people, is to guide them in the right way by life and doctrine, to oversee their carriage, and to administer the Sacraments duly to them.

    The Duty of the ancienter toward their younger, is to further them in goodness, by grave carriage and good counsel.

    Their Duty that have better gifts then others, is to use the same readily and humbly for the help of such as want them.

    The Duty of Equals is

    • 1. To think better of their Equals then themselves, and to esteem of them above themselves.
    • 2. In giving honor to go one before another.
    • 3. To be glad and well-satisfied at the raising and advancement of their equals to places above themselves.

    The sixth Commandment enjoins all due care of our own and neighbors safety, Temporal and Spiritual.

    For our own temporal safety we must shun all distempered passions and needless perils, using food, rest, and other means of health and strength, cheerfully and moderately.

    For our spiritual safety, we must carefully lee all sins, and the occasions of them, and use all means of getting grace and salvation.

    For our neighbors natural safety, we must keep wrath, malice and hatred out of our hearts, heartily loving all men, even our enemies. We must also pity and help the distressed, show kindness and meekness to all, even those that hurt us, not revenging ourselves, nor hurting or grieving any by evil deeds or speeches.

    For our neighbors spiritual safety, we must exhort, comfort and admonish one another with all meekness, and must pray one for another.

    The seventh Commandment requires all care to preserve our own and our neighbors chastity.

    To preserve our own chastity we must abhor all impure desires, behaviours, speeches and deeds with all occasions provoking thereto, and must use temperance and sobriety with fasting and praying at fit times, and diligence in our calling.

    We must preserve our neighbors chastity by modesty and shame-fac'dnesse in attire, words, countenance and gesture.

    The eighth Commandment requires a right carriage of ourselves in regard of our own and our neighbors goods.

    In respect of our own goods, we must get them justly, and keep them thriftily from evil and idle expenses, use them liberally for good purposes, and not set our hearts upon them.

    For our neighbors goods, we must neither take nor keep anything from any man (whose own it is) by force, fraud or unequal bargains, we must seek the profit of our neighbors as our own profit.

    2. We must do to them as we would have them do to us, and not corrupt justice and equity by partiality and self-love.

    The ninth Commandment requires all due care of maintaining our own and our neighbors good name and credit:

    • 1. Our own by lowliness and esteeming meanly of ourselves, accounting others better then ourselves, by being true, sparing and holy in our speeches, innocent and humble in our carriage, sling ill company and all appearances of wickedness, and abounding in good works.
    • 2. Our neighbors by judging and speaking the best of them, their words and deeds, praising their virtues and defending their innocence.

    The tenth Commandment requires that we be fully contented with our own condition, and keep out all inclinations and motions after the things that pertain to others.

    II. The Gospel.

    The Law holds forth the holiness and purity of God, the Gospel holds forth the grace and favor of God, Rom. 2. 4.

    There are two great ends of the Gospel and the Ministry of it:

    • 1. Union with Christ, 2 Cor. 11. 2.
    • 2. Reconciliation with God, 2 Cor. 5. 20. The Angels sang (when Christ was born) on earth peace, and good-will toward men.

    The Gospel hath two parts, as some say.

    • 1. All are cursed and damnable sinners. This must be believed so firmly, as that we assent to the particular, comprehended under the general, bringing it home to myself, and saying to myself, I am a cursed and damnable sinner.
    • 2. Jesus Christ is a perfect and all-sufficient Savior, he can and will save all penitent sinners, and me also among the rest upon my turning to him. He hath sealed this to me in Baptism, which is the Baptism of repentance for remission of sins, which doth assure me, that upon repentance shall by the blood of Christ attain full remission of all my sins, this is •• believe the Gospel.

    We have gone asiray like lost sheep, but he hath laid upon him the iniquities of us all.

    Rom. 3. 23, 24. For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God. Being justified freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ.

    The terms of the Gospel are three:

    • 1. To choose Christ as he is there offered, John 6. 40.
    • 2. To receive the Gospel with readiness, Act. 17. 17. Mat. 13. 44.
    • 3. That we should give up all for Christ, and to him. Rom. 12. 1.

    It requires three things especially of us:

    • 1. True Repentance for sins committed.
    • 2. True Faith in the Mediator, which expiates sins.
    • 3. A sincere desire to obey God which hath pardoned us our sins.

    Impenitency, unbelief and disobedience then are sins against the Gospel.

    Sins against the Gospel are greater then sins against the Law, Heb. 2. 3. because committed against greater light and greater love, the love of the Father in sending of Christ, of Christ in coming, of the Spirit in manifesting, therefore the curses and punishment of the Gospel are grievous, Mat. 3. 10. Mark 16. 16. He that loveth not the Lord Jesus, let him be Anathema Maranatha.

    Psal. 2. 12. Christ is the best friend and worst enemy. His wrath is

    • 1. The wrath of a Mediator and Deliverer, who then shall speak a good word for you? Psal. 50. 22.
    • 2. He is able to execute his wrath, he hath all power in his hand as well as all love in his heart.

    Two sorts of sins ripen men for wrath:

    • 1. Sinning against Ordinances, Ezek. 10. 2. Amos 8. 1.
    • 2. Sinning against the Gospel, Matth. 3. 10.

    Having laid down the rule, viz. the Law and Gospel for the finding out the number of our sins, I shall now show the uses of them for finding out the measure of them.

    First, For the Law, we must not be content to rip up our sins by the Law, but aggravate them.

    • 1. By the greatness of the Commander, the great God of all the world that gave the Law with thunder and lightening is offended. He is glorious in his Essence, Subsistence, working sin provokes the eyes of his glory, Isa 3. 8.
    • 2. By the latitude and extent of every Commandment, Psal. 119. 96. it binds the conscience and commands the heart, forbids all sins at all times, together with their causes, occasions, provocations, signs.
    • 3. Consider the filthiness and sinfulness of sin , it is called filthiness itself, and is worse then hell, for that is of God's ordaining. Persons and things are termed evil from it, evil Angels, men, times.
    • 4. Consider the price of the blood of Christ, and the greatness of his punishment, sin was such a heinous and notorious thing that nothing else could satisfy God, all the Angels in heaven could not expiate one sin.
    • 5. Aggravate sin by the person sinning, from the evil circumstances and unprofitable ends, by the effects, giving scandal, 2 Sam. 12. 14. by the manner of committing it, willfully and with a high hand▪

    Secondly, We should labor especially to mourn for Gospel-sins.

    • 1. Because the sins of the Gospel carry the greatest guilt.
      • 1. They are against the second Covenant, the Heathens perish under the guilt and curse of the first Covenant, the second Covenant was never offered to the Devils, when they fell from God they had never a second offer of mercy.
      • 2. They are against the blood of the Son of God, Heb. 6. 6. & 10. 29. To sin against God in his Son, is a greater sin then to sin against the Law, the Law is subservient to Christ in the Gospel.
    • 2. No man lies under such fierce wrath, 2 Cor. 2. 15, 16. no condemnation is confirmed by an oath but theirs, Heb. 3. 11, 12.
    • 3. That which should have been for your welfare becomes your snare, Acts 26. 18. Heb. 6. 10. Isa. 28. 13. The Gospel is like Paracelsian Physic, if it do not cure it will kill.
    • 4. None do lose such high services, Matth. 7. 22, 23. they do not the work of the Gospel with a Gospel-spirit, and out of a Gospel▪principle.
    • 5. Satan will insult and triumph over none so much as Gospel-sinners, Matth. 12. 43, 44.
    • 6. The worm of conscience will not feed so fiercely on any, Mar. 9 43. when he compares his former hopes with his present irrecoverable condition, because no sinners had those helps, nor were raised to those hopes.

    Ponder on your own sins what they are and what they have deserved. Look on original corruption, the foul sea of all wickedness, which is called a body of sin, Rom. 6. 6. A Law in our members, Rom. 7. 23. Consider that thou hast a naughty nature, whereby thou art averse from God and goodness, and extremely prone to all sin, Psal. 51. 5. Isa. 48. 8. all men in every part are under the guilt and power of it, Rom. 3. 16, 23.

    2. Humble thyself; Labor to be base for this, though thou hast not committed such foul sins as others, yet if God should leave thee to thyself and thine own evil heart thou wouldst soon be as bad as the worst.

    3. Call to mind likewise the gross actual sins thou hast committed before or since thy calling: Wast not thou given to all manner of pollution before the Lord gave thee knowledge of him, and since thy calling?

    4. Consider thy continual daily slips and infirmities, thy sins of omission and commission; how apt thou art to be angry, impatient, thy carnalness in good duties, and distraction in the performance of them, thy forgetfulness of God, and thy later end.

    5. Consider also whether there be not some unknown secret fault that thou hast not yet repented of, and pray to God to discover it to thee.

    Lastly, Call to mind what sins thou hast committed since the last Sacrament, and bewail them.

    Meditate also on the sufferings of Christ for these gross sins and daily iniquities. His great abasement, Psal. 22. 6, 7, 14. to 19. v. Isa. 53. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. to the 11. v. He was born like a beggar, lived like a beggar, the Devil tempted him, he was falsely accused, betrayed by one of his Disciples, denied by another, forsaken by the rest. He was amazed with fear, and encompassed with sorrow, Mark 14. 34. Two of the most tormentful passions, was in an agony, and did sweat drops of cloddy blood in such abundance as it fell to the ground, was condemned, mocked, spit upon, whipped with rods after the manner of the Romans , crowned with thorns, laden with the Cross, nailed on it, stretched and retched in all his joints.

    He suffered much in his body, but his chief sufferings were in his soul, Isa. 53. 10, 11, 12. He took our soul as well as body, and came to redeem it, that being the chief part, Quicquid induit Christus, obtulit. He suffered

    • 1. As a public person, as the second Adam, Rom. 5. 14.
    • 2. For our sakes and benefit, Isa. 53. he is said six times to bear our iniquities.
    • 3. Not only for our good, but in our room, Heb. 7. 22. not only nostro bono, but nostro loco, 1 Tim. 2. 6. Mat. 20. 28. for otherwise he should have suffered no more then other men; the Martyrs suffered for the good of the Church, Col. 1. 24. 2 Tim. 2. 10.
    • 4. He took upon him the burden of our sins by way of imputation, 1 Pet. 2. 24. 2 Cor. 5. 21.

    Smite on your breasts, and say, For my worldliness, anger, all these evils befell my Savior: Lord, for thy mercy sake in Christ pardon and heal me, Shall I pollute my body with uncleanness, when Christ suffered so bitter things? Shall I ever be angry again? O Lord by thy grace I will not: Let me have thy power to kill these sins.

    See the strictness of divine justice, and the dreadfulness of God's wrath, God spared not his own Son, and when his Fathers wrath lighted on his soul, he was much troubled, and the great evil of sin, it caused Christ's human nature to be •• raid, Matth. 26. 38.

    The desert of sin is seen in Christ's suffering,

    • 1. In respect of the person who suffered for it, God's only Son who never provoked him. John 3. 16. Rom. 8. 31.
    • 2. In respect of the penalties he underwent for sin, it made him to cry, sweat and pour out strong supplications, Isa. 53. 10.

    The Law shown the filthiness and evil of sin by the many Sacrifices and aspersions of blood which it required, but they were of beasts and their blood; but the Gospel shows the demerit of sin more fully, and how odious it is to God, since Christ must die to expiate it, and also the abundant love both of the Father in delivering his own Son to death for the salvation of sinners, John 3. 16. 1 John 4. 9, 10. Rom. 8 32. and of Christ in taking upon him our nature, and in exposing himself to so much misery here on earth, and at last to an accursed death for us, Phil. 2. 7, 8.

    We are to remember Christ in the Sacrament:

    • 1. Because the Lord will have in the Sacrament of the New Testament, the great end of the Passover to be accomplisht, Exod. 12. 14.
    • 2. That we may answer the goodness of Christ to us, he hath us always actually in remembrance, Exod. 28. 21, 29.
    • 3. Because if we have any benefit by this Sacram nt God must remember Christ for us.
    • 4. Upon our actual and affectionate remembrance of Christ depends all our benefit by this Sacrament.

    We have dispatched the examination of our sins, in the next place our graces are to be examined.

    The graces that must be tried and examined, are our Knowledge, Faith, Re 〈…〉 , Love, and hungering after Christ, the truth, growth or wants of them, 〈…〉 examined.

    The truth of them.

    1. Knowledge. The words, examine, show forth, discern and judge, all betoken knowledge.

    We must get Knowledge:

    • 1. Of the Law of God.
    • 2. Of the Doctrine of Redemption by Jesus Christ.
    • 3. Of the Nature, Necessity and Use of the Lord's Supper.

    We must know our estate by nature and by grace:

    • 1. Because otherwise we cannot be thankful to God for his benefits as we ought.
    • 2. In the Sacrament Christ is offered, and the Covenant sealed. By nature we are dead in sin and bondslaves of Satan, by grace we come to be children of God, and heirs of salvation.

    We must know what the elements and actions in the Sacrament signify. That the bread signifies the body of Christ, and the wine his blood, that the breaking of bread betokens the crucifying of Christ, that the giving of the bread and wine notes the action of God the Father offering Christ to all and bestowing him effectually upon every worthy receiver, the receiving of the bread and wine signifies our receiving and feeding upon Christ by faith.

    2. Faith is required in those that come worthily to the Supper of the Lord.

    There must be an active and lively faith in the Sacrament to take Christ by an a of confidence, and give up ourselves by an act of resignation.

    The great spiritual graces of the Gospel are Faith and Love:

    • 1. Faith is the great command of the Gospel, Believe in the Lord Jesus.
    • 2. It is the great promise of the Gospel, Ephes. 2. 8.
    • 3. It is the great condition on which all the promises hang, Isa. 79. Heb. 11. 6.

    Faith empties the soul more of itself then all other graces, it gives all the glory to God, Rom. 4. 20. and often besides in that Chapter. It is the eye of the soul whereby we discern Christ, Heb. 11. 1. 2 Cor. 4. lt. it is the stomach of the soul. Christ describes believing by hungering and thirsting, it is the foot of the soul whereby we approach unto Christ, Heb. 10. 22. He that comes unto me shall never hunger, and he that believes in me shall never thirst. It is our hand to embrace the promises, Heb. 11. 30. therefore believing is often called eating and drinking, John 6. He that eats my flesh and drinks my blood hath eternal life. Gal. 2. 30.

    Faith makes Christ precious, 1 Pet. 2. 7. and the soul also to Christ, 2 Pet. 1. 2. Faith is an assent to all truths revealed, yet the special act of justifying faith is our closing with Christ, our rolling ourselves on him. It is a cleaving to the whole word of God, and an obediential resting upon Christ alone for salvation. This is the only grace that jus ifieth, Whom he hath set forth for our propitiation through faith in his blood. No grace brings so much comfort to the soul, The just shall live by his faith.

    Reasons why we must bring faith to the Sacrament:

    1. It is the Table of the Lord, therefore none must be admitted, but those which are of his family, Gal. 6. 16. Christ hath instituted it that he might give himself by it, he gives himself only to his members, true believers.

    2. It is a seal of the Covenant of grace, therefore belongs to none but such as are in Covenant, none are in Covenant with God and Christ but believers, 1 John 3. 24.

    3. Because the Sacrament was instituted for the confirming and further strengthening of our faith, it begets not faith but presupposeth it, Rom. 10. 14, 17. & 4. 11.

    4. The word profits not without faith in them that hear it, Heb. 4. 2. the same thing is held forth in both. Christ is held forth in the Word sounding to the ear, and offered in the Sacrament by the promise, there he is visible to the eye of faith, John 3. 14, 15. and is offered for spiritual nourishment. Faith is the hand and mouth of the soul, whereby we receive and feed on Christ, John 1. 12. John 6. 19.

    In bodily feeding there is, 1. Sense of want, so in spiritual of the want of Christ. 2. Apprehension of the suitableness of the food to ones condition, so here. 3. Appetite, earnest desire in the soul after Christ. 4. Taking of food, so the soul of Christ. 5. Eating. 6. Digesting. 7. Distribution of the nourishment.

    5. No benefit is to be expected from any Ordinance but by faith, Christ himself profits not unbelievers, Tit. 1. 15. we cannot receive the Sacrament to our comfort without it.

    2 Cor. 13. 5. Of all Texts in the Scripture there is none so full for the trial of this grace as this, here are three several words to press this duty. Interpreters generally say, the meaning is, whether you have faith or not, but this is a higher expression, Acts 8. 33. Rom. 8. 8, 9. We say of a very malicious man, such a one is in malice; and of one that is drunk, such a one is in drink.

    1 Pet. 1. 7. The trial of Faith is precious,

    • 1. By this trial we attain to a certainty.
    • 2. By this it attains purity: God tries it by affliction, men by examination, by both it is refined.
    • 3. The trial of gold is but for a little time, By faith you lay hold on eternal life; the purer the faith, the surer the hold.
    • 4. By trying it hath a higher esteem, Revel. 3. 18. The trial of gold makes it the more precious in your esteem, and the trial of Faith makes it more precious in God's esteem.

    Marks of Faith.

    First, Know whence we had Faith, God gives it, and whether we have received it in the ordinary way by which God▪ works it, the Word, I am. 1. 18. Faith comes by hearing, and it is increased by the same means by which it is begotten, Dost thou highly prize the Word? Hath it wrought Faith in thee?

    Secondly, Try by what steps and degrees faith hath been wrought in thee.

    • 1. Such see their misery by sin, and their inability to help themselves, Acts 2. 37.
    • 2. God reveals to such the excellency of Christ. He is held forth to us as every way able to do us good, Isa. 55. 1. hereby one is brought to deny himself and his duties, and to have recourse to him, and rest on him for comfort.

    Thirdly, From the effects, where Faith is it will show itself.

    • 1. It purifieth the heart, he is clean in heart and life, 2 Cor. 7. 1. Acts 26. 9. & 18.
    • 2. Overcomes our spiritual enemies, the world, This is the victory whereby we overcome the world, viz our Faith, John 5. 4. Satan, 1 John 2. 18. & 5. 18. Gal. 5. 6.
    • 3. It works by love, Ephes. 1. 15.

    Fourthly, True faith is ever growing, a true faith may be weak, but all living things grow though one do not perceive it. Do you trust God now the better for the many experiences you have of him? Art thou sensible of thy doubting and unbelief?

    Motives to persuade men to believe:

    Consider,

    • 1. Who offers Christ, God, how will he take it if he be refused?
    • 2. The gift, the greatness of the good offered in the Gospel, Heb. 2. 2, 3. 1 Tim. 1. 13.
    • 3. The excellencies of faith, but that I have shown before.
    • 4. The heinousness of infidelity, 1 John 5. 10. a sin both against the Law and Gospel. The first Commandment commands us to believe what ever God shall reveal, it is the condemnation, with a witness, John 3. 2. it exposeth us to the temptations of Satan, Heb. 3. 12. 2. To the fearful judgments of God, John 3. ul . to his displeasure, Prov. 15. 8. Heb. 11. 7. to eternal wrath, John 3. 17. Mark 16. 16. 3. It makes all the Ordinances of God ineffectual, the Word, Heb. 3. 2. afflictions, the Sacrament, 1 Cor. 11. 29.
    • 5. The willingness of God to receive a poor sinner.
      • 1. God alone provided the medicine that should cure us, Rom. 3. 24.
      • 2. He wrote it in the Gospel, this is a true saying.
      • 3. Propounds Christ, hath set him forth.
      • 4. Invites sinners, Matth. 11. 1 Cor. 5. 20. He commands you to believe, 1 John. 3. 23. threatens if you refuse, John 3. ult.
    • 6. Christ consented to all this, he voluntarily came into the world to save sinners, he hath paid the ransom, hath promised that those which come to him he will in no wise cast away.

    Means to get and improve or strengthen faith:

    • 1. To get it.
    • 1. Labor to see yourselves in a lost condition.
    • 2. Know that there is no way in the world to save you but by Christ.
    • 3. Bewail your condition to God, tell him that you are a lost creature, and say, Lord, help me to believe.
    • 4. Plead the promises, there are promises of grace as well as to grace; say, Lord, thou hast said thou wilt be merciful, and why not to me?
    • 5. Wait upon God in the use of the means, hearing and the like, Rom. 10. Acts 10. 44.
  • 2. To improve and strengthen it.

You that have faith, labor to improve it, 2 Thess. 1. 3, 4.

I shall premise four Cautions:

  • 1. There is a common, dead faith, an ungrounded presumption gotten by the devil and men's false hearts, which is rather to be destroyed then increased. When men put all their confidence in Christ, and yet can live in all kind of ungodliness, whereas true faith is wrought by the Spirit of God, and brings forth a holy life.
  • 2. Among true believers there are several sizes as it were of faith, some are strong and some weak in the faith.
  • 3. The weakest faith, if true, will certainly save the soul, the weakest believer is united to Christ, adopted, reconciled, justified, hath the Spirit, all promises belong to him, and shall partake of glory.
  • 4. There is none of God's servants in this world do attain so much faith as they might, the Apostles Luke 17. 5. make this their joint Petition, Lord increase our faith.
  • 1. It increaseth in the use of it, To him that hath shall be given. Spiritual things increase by exercise.
  • 2. Diligently attend on all the Ordinances, and treasure up experiences.
  • 3. Study thyself daily, see what a wretched, worthless creature thou art, what a dead barren heart thou hast, real self-abhorring makes a man to hang on Christ.
  • 4. The more thou knowest Christ, the more thou wilt believe in him, Psal. 9. 9. study to know Christ's person, Offices, the tenor and indulgence of the Covenant of Grace.
  • 5. Labor to get some evidence of the work of faith in thee, that thou art in a league of love with Christ: if the ways of Christ be suitable to thy Spirit, and the bent of thy heart be against all sins, and especially thy bosom sin, it is a good sign.
  • 6. Remove all impediments.

II. Repentance.

It is taken sometimes largely, and so it comprehends all the three parts of Conversion, Contrition, Faith and new Obedience.

2. Strictly for contrition alone, Act. 13. 24.

In General, it is a turning from sin to God: Or thus,

It is a supernatural work of God's Spirit, whereby the humbled converted sinner doth turn from all sin with grief and detestation of it, because thereby God is offended, and to the ways of God, loving and embracing them, and resolving to walk in them for the time to come.

  • 1. The efficient cause or author of repentance is God's Spirit, Acts 1. 51. & 11. 18. 2 Tim. 2. 18. it is a supernatural work, such a work as never is nor can be wrought in any but by the almighty work of God's Spirit in a way above corrupt nature, Ier. 31. 18, 19. A man can do something toward legal duties, but one hath no principle for evangelical duties, but something against them.
  • 2. The Subject in whom this grace of repentance is found (say some) is an humbled and converted sinner, 1. Humbled, that is, legally sensible of the misery it is brought to by sin. 2. Converted, that is, by God, one whose inward man is changed, Ezek. 25. 26. Repentance seems rather to precede conversion, Act. 3. 19. though full Repentance be Conversion.
  • 3. The general nature of it, a turning with the terms from which and to which, an aversion from sin, and a conversion to God, Joel 2. 12. Ezek. 16▪ lat. end.
  • 4. The manner of it, with detestation of sin with delight in God's will and ways, Hos. 14. 8▪ Surely, shall one say, in the Lord I shall find righteousness and peace. It is a mourn ng for sin as sin, as it is offensivum Dei, aversivum à Deo, as it is an act of disobedience, an act of unkindness.

There are several kinds of Repentance:

  • 1. Antecedent, which goes before Remission and Justification, Acts 2. 38. & 3. 19. & 8. 22.
  • 2. Consequent, Repentance, melting of the heart toward God after assurance of pardon, Luke 7. 47. 1 Tim▪ 1. 12, 13, 14. Ezek. 16. ult.

Initial Repentance when one is converted, Act. 8. 22.

2. Continual, Rom. 7. 24. John 13. 10.

3. Personal or Ecclesiastical.

Some say the parts o Repentance are to eschew evil and do good, Psal. 34. 15. Isa. 1▪ 15, 16. & 55. 7. Amos 5. 15. Rom. 12. 9.

In sin there is an aversion from God, and a conversion to the creature.

2. In repentance there must be an aversion from the pleasures of sin, and a returning to Communion with God. The virtue and grace of Christ is not only to mortify but vivify, Rom. 6. 11. Sin must be mortified before the image of God can be superinduced into the soul, Col. 1. 13. In renouncing of sin four affections are to be exercised, true humiliation is begun in fear, continued in shame, carried on in sorrow, and ends in indignation.

1. Fear ariseth from application of the curse to the provocation, we compare the sins we have committed with the threatenings of the Word, Job 22. 23. Heb. 12. 28. Shame ariseth from comparing filthiness, Psal. 73. 22. Ezra 9. 6. Rom. 6. 21. Sorrow ariseth from thoughts of God's goodness and our own unkindness, Zach. 12. 10. Ezek. 36. 31. Luke 7. 47. Indignation (the highest act of hatred) ariseth from the unsuitableness of it to our interest in Christ, Isa. 30. 22. Hos. 14. 8. Rom. 6. 2. Fear looks on sin as damning, shame looks on it as defiling, sorrow looks on it as offensive to God, indignation looks on it as misbecoming our profession.

In turning to the Lord:

  • 1. There is a serious and solemn consideration of our state and danger out of Christ, Psal. 22. 27. & 119. 59. Hab. 1. 5.
  • 2. A firm resolution, Luk. 15. 18. Psal. 32. 5. & 119. 106.
  • 3. A mutual exercise of holy affections, desire, hope and delight, Psalm. 119. 49.
  • 4. A consecration or resignation of ourselves to God, Rom. 12. 1. 2 Cor. 5. 16.
  • 5. A constant care of making good our engagement, Prov. 23. 26. Hos. 5. 4.

D r Twisse against Corvinus saith, there are three parts of Repentance, The Confession of the mouth, Contrition of the heart, and Amendment of life.

M. Calamy on Acts 17. 3. p. 37. saith, it consists in five things:

  • 1. There must be a true and right sense of sin, as to Gospel-faith there must be a true sight of Christ, John 6. 36. so to Gospel-repentance there must be a right sense of sin.
  • 2. Sorrow for sin, a spirit of mourning goes along with Gospel-repentance, Zec. 12. 10. Ezek. 7. 16. Hos. 11. 12. a sorrow according to God, 2 Cor. 7. 10.
  • 3. A self-judging, Psal. 51. 4. condemning his acts, and judging himself worthy of all the curses of the Law.
  • 4. A turning from sin to the Lord, Hos. 14. 8. Dan. 4. 27.
  • 5. It must be grounded upon the apprehension and hope of mercy, Isa. 55. 7. Poenitentia non est sola contritio, sed sides, Luther. Therefore the Lutherans commonly make faith a part of repentance, it is the foundation of it, Non pars sed principium. P. Martyr.

One saith, True repentance consists in four things:

  • 1. In a humble lamenting and bewailing of our sins, our sinful nature and wicked lives, whereby we are subject to God's wrath and eternal death, even a giving ourselves so to consider and feel the cursed effects of sin, in that it angers God, and enforceth his justice to punish us, till it makes our hearts to ache and be troubled, perplexed and disquieted, 1 Sam. 7. 6. Psal. 38. 18. Joel 2. 12. I am. 4. 9. so David and Peter wept for their sins.
  • 2. A confessing the same to God particularly, Prov. 28. 13. Psal. 32. 3, 5. judging ourselves worthy to be destroyed therefore, and to perish eternally. David saith, I will confess mine iniquity, and be sorry for my sin: And John, If we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins.
  • 3. An earnest crying to God for pardon of sin, and for power against it in the name of Christ. David, Psal. 51. saith, Sprinkle me with hyssop, that is, forgive me for his blood sake whom that hyssop represented. We must take words, and beseech the Lord to receive us graciously.
  • 4. A hearty and sincere purpose to reform our heart and life, to cast away all our transgressions, to resist and forbear the practice of sin in all things, and to exercise ourselves in all righteousness, i. e. A firm purpose to leave all the evil that I know condemned, and to do all the good that I know required, a fixed resolution of heart so to do in consideration of God's goodness and grace that hath sent Christ to save the penitent.

The Antinomians say, The Saints of God once justified and in Christ, need not repentance, they cry down this as an un▪Gospel-like practice, and dislike mourning for sin, they would have nothing but faith in Christ, and rejoicing in him.

To be troubled for sin (they say) is a dishonor to the grace of God and satisfaction of Christ, our repentance and humiliation indeed cannot satisfy God, Christ hath done that, laid down a price answerable to the debt, but the Lord hath inseparably annexed repentance and remission. Act. 2. 38. & 3. 19. & 8. 22. and he requires not only an initial repentance in reference to a man's state, but a daily repentance in reference to the acts of sin, he must daily wash his feet. See Gal. 5. 31. The sin against the holy Ghost is therefore unpardonable, because the Lord will not give repentance, Heb. 6.

Repentance is Evangelical, and a Duty in regenerate persons:

First, Because it is a fruit of the holy Ghost, Act. 11. 18.

Secondly, Because none but regenerate persons can perform it, to bewail sin, and aggravate it, justifying God, condemning themselves, and laying hold on Christ.

Thirdly, The Gospel enjoins it, and threatens the neglect of it. Some places join Repentance and pardon together, Act. 5. 31. Luke 24. 47. Some it and faith, Mar. 1. 15. Act. 20. 21.

Fourthly, Christ, John Baptist and all the Apostles preached repentance, Mat. 3. 2. & 4. 17. Mark 6. 12.

Fifthly, Because it may and doth work most kindly in and with faith, when they look upon Christ whom they have pierced, and consider that they have crucified him.

Sixthly, Because it conforms us to God and Christ, in hating and subduing sin in us, it breedeth in us a loathing of sin, and gives us a victory over it. What the Pump is to the Ship, Repentance is to the soul, it keeps it clean.

Seventhly, Because we have still flesh in us to be awed, as well as the Spirit in us to be cherished.

Object. Justification is but one indivisible act of grace pardoning all sins past, present and to come.

There is a twofold forgiveness:

  • 1. In foro poli, in the Court of God, so all sins past, present and to come are actually pardoned at the first act of believing and repenting.
  • 2. In foro soli, in the Court of Conscience, so they are not pardoned, we shall have no comfort or assurance of their pardon till we actually repent of them.

Repentance is a part of the exercise of our whole Christian conversation, and a work to be ordinarily practiced, though there be one great and universal repentance for the change of our state. In Revel. 2. & 3. chap. among the duties God requires of the seven Churches which were all converted, of four of them he requires the exercise of repentance, Revel. 2. 5. & 3. 13, 19.

But there are some special seasons wherein God in a more special manner calls his people to repent, when he would have the practice of it more full and extraordinary, 2 Cor. 7. 11. when we should more strictly examine ourselves, and our sorrow should be much enlarged, 1 Sam. 7. 6. Judge. 2.

There are five special times for renewing of Repentance:

First, The time when God's hand is upon us in any special correction.

  • 1. God expects and requires it then, Isa. 22. the first 15 verses. Zeph. 2. begin.
  • 2. The servants of God have ordinarily practiced it then, Jeremiah, Job, David, Lam. 3. 39, 40.
  • 3. God hath severely threatened them when they have not repented at such times, 2 Chron. 28▪ 22. Ier. 5. 3. Amos 4. The reason is, because the Lord hath appointed this exercise of repentance as the only means to remove the rod, or turn it to a blessing.

Secondly, Another special time when God would have his servants to renew their repentance, is upon their fall, when they have committed any gross sin, as David after defiling Urijahs wife, Psal. 51. and when he had fallen into the sin of numbering the people, 2 Sam. 24. So Ezra 9. when the people had married with strange wives, they wept exceedingly. So when the Church of Corinth had wrapped themselves in the guilt of the incestuous persons sin, 2 Cor. 7. Peter when he had denied his Master. Our sorrow doth not make God amends, or pacify his wrath when it is kindled; it is only a condition of the Covenant of Grace; the exercise of repentance, it satisfieth not God but the Church, it is a help to our own souls whereby our sins are subdued.

Thirdly, When the Lord calls any of his people to any special service that he would have them do for him and the Church, then they ought to renew their repentance: When God called his people to renew their Covenant, there was a special humiliation before, Ezra 8. 21. Isa. 6. When Joshua was called to build the Temple, and be an high-Priest to God, Zech. 3. When they were to come to the Sacrament they were to examine themselves thoroughly and judge themselves, so Exod. 19. 14. Else our unworthiness may stand as a bar that we shall not comfortably go on in the work of the Lord, Gen. 35. begin.

Fourthly, When we look to receive any special mercy, when we either need or expect by virtue of a promise, that God will do some great thing for us, as Isaac when he looked for his Fathers servant to return with a wife. Dan. 9. The whole Chapter is the humblest exercise of repentance that we read of, the occasion was, he expected that the Lord would now break the Babylonian yoke. Moses called the people to deep humiliation and repentance when they were to possess the Land of Canaan.

Fifthly, The time of death, when we expect our change, then is a special time for the exercise of the duty of repentance, that is a fitter time to finish then begin repentance , then we should specially look to our hearts and examine our ways. It was the commendation of the Church of Thyatira, that their last works were best; and it is the last time that we shall have to do with repentance; we carry love and joy to Heaven, and most of the Graces except Faith and Hope, there shall be no use of them; when we go hence we go to the greatest Communion with God that the creature is capable of. Esther the night or two before she went to lie with Ahasuerus, was most careful to have her body perfumed and oiled.

Motives to provoke us to the practice of Repentance, two especially, which are the great Motives to any duty.

1. The necessity of it: 2. The Utility of it.

I. The Necessity of it.

Repentance is necessary to remission,

  • 1. Necessitate praecepti, Ezek. 18. 30.
  • 2. Necessitate medii, one must condemn his sin, and loath himself, and prize a pardon afore he obtain it, Ezek. 20. 43. Luke 7. 47.

The Schoolmen demand, why repentance should not make God satisfaction, because it hath God for its object as well as sin, 2 Cor. 7. 10. The offense takes it measure from the object, the good duty from the subject, therefore Christ only could make satisfaction.

It is necessary, because every man must appear before the judgment seat of Christ, and receive an everlasting doom, and our plea must then be either that we have not sinned, or else that we have repented, Except ye repent ye shall all perish, while one remains impenitent, his person and services are abominable in the sight of God, Isa. 1. & Isa. 66. liable to all the curses written in the book of God. The Jews have a Proverb (saith Drusius) Uno die ante mortem poenitentiam agas, Repent one day before death, that is, every day, because thou mayest die tomorrow.

There is an absolute necessity of Repentance for a fruitful and worthy receiving of the Sacrament.

First, Without this there can be no true desire to come to this Supper; Faith is the hand, Repentance the stomach; by a sight of sin we see our want and need of Christ.

Secondly, Without it there can be no fitness to receive Christ. We must eat this Passover with bitter herbs.

Thirdly, All should labor to have assurance of the pardon of their sins, This Cup is the New Testament in my blood for the remission of sins, without repentance there is no remission, Act. 5. 31.

Fourthly, Because sin is of a soiling nature, and doth de ile God's Ordinance to a man's soul, and if we come in sin, we cannot profit by the Lord's Ordinance.

II. The Utility of it. The Necessity of it should work on our fear, the Utility of it on our love, the two great passions of the soul.

First, It is infinitely pleasing to Almighty God, Luke 15. per totum. the intent of three Parables there is to show what content it is to God to see a sinner to turn from his evil ways, him that had lost his Groat, his Sheep, and the Prodigal Son.

Secondly, The benefit of it is unspeakable to thine own soul.

  • 1. It will remove all evil:
    • 1. Spiritual, all the guilt of sin, and the defilement of it, 1 John 1. lat. end. Isa. 1. 16, 17, 18. no more prejudice lies against thee then if thou hadst never sinned against him. Mary Magdalene was infamous for her uncleanness, yet Christ first appeared to her after he rose from the dead, all the curses due to sin are laid on Christ.
    • 2. Outward Evil, When I speak concerning a Nation, if they repent I will repent of all the evil I thought to do. See Joel 2.
  • 2. B ing all Good, it brings God's favor, that flows on the soul, God hath promised grace and means of grace to such, Ier. 3. 13, 14, 15. Prov. 1. 23. temporal blessing, Job 22. Everlasting life is their portion, it is called Repentance unto life, Act. 11. 18. Unto Salvation, 2 Cor. 1. 10. it is a means conducing to that end.

Means of Repentance:

  • 1. Diligently study to know how miserable your state is without it, read over thy doings that have not been good every day. See the evil and danger of sin, Acts 2. 21. & 3. 17, 18. & 26. 18. Ier. 31. 18. 2 Tim. 2. 25.
  • 2. Repentance is the gift of God , he granted also repentance to the Gentiles, beg earnestly at God's hand that he would make sin bitter to thee, and cause thee to hate it, Zech. 12. they mourned apart, then God poured on the house of David the Spirit of supplication, Ier. 3. 18. Turn me Lord, and I shall be turned.
  • 3. Attend upon the Ministry of the Word, the preaching of the Word is called the word of Repentance, the preaching of the Law, God's word is a hammer to break the hard heart, especially the preaching of the Gospel, the discovery of Christ, They shall look on him whom they have pierced. Rom. 2. The goodness of God should lead thee to repentance.
  • 4. Faith in the blood of Christ; when thou seest thyself lost and undone, venture thyself upon the free grace of God revealed in the Gospel, faith in Christ will purify the heart, Acts 15. that is, instrumentally, the holy Ghost is the principal agent, You have received the Spirit by the preaching of faith.

Three things are required in Repentance:

  • 1. The sight of sin by the Law.
  • 2. Hearty and continual sorrow for sin by considering the filthiness and desert of it, God's judgments due for sin, his mercies bestowed on us, Christ's suffering for our sins, our own unthankfulness notwithstanding God's benefits.
  • 3. Amendment, an utter and well-advised forsaking of all sin in affection, and of gross sin in life and conversation.

Renewing of Repentance, lies

  • 1. In renewing a man's humiliation and godly sorrow.
  • 2. In renewing his obligation to duty.

The consideration of our Savior's death for our sins should be unto us a most powerful motive to repentance. Two things are necessary in the point of repentance, for sins past to confess and lament them before God, humbly craving pardon, and for the time to come to reform and amend our lives, casting away all our transgressions, and applying ourselves to all holiness and righteousness.

Now to the performance of this duty the death of Christ must needs be to him that considers of it, the most effectual argument and mighty motive in the world. Do we not here see that the sins we have lived in are most loathsome to God, for had he not hated them with infinite hatred, would he have inflicted such horrible punishments upon our Savior his only Son by them? Do we not see that they are most dangerous to ourselves, exposing us to the suffering of intolerable evils, unless by virtue of Christ's death we be freed from them, which can never be but upon our Repentance. God hath in the death of Christ discovered such infinite abomination of sin, and withal such infinite grace to the sinner, that this should prevail with us. Paul saith, All we which are baptized into Christ are baptized into his death, and we are buried with him by baptism into his death, and we are crucified together with him, that the body of sin may be abolished. We must be made partakers of the death of Christ, if ever we will be made partakers of his resurrection; we must be made conformable to his death, if ever we will live and reign with him.

Marks to know whether our repentance be right:

  • 1. If it be speedy and without delay, Satan always saith, it is either too soon to repent, as in youth; or too late as in old-age.
  • 2. Constant, not cast it aside, because we repented at our first conversion.
  • 3. Voluntary, and so a filial not a forced repentance, voluntary repentance speaks love to God, forced love to ourselves.
  • 4. It must be deep and thorough repentance suitable to our sins: the greatest sinners if gracious, have the greatest sorrow, and their joy is the more full after, Psa. 22. 4. 2 Sam. 14. 14.

III. Love.

This is a special grace of the Gospel, it is a longing desire for the good of our brethren, or a willing that good to one which is proper to him.

There is a double Union:

First, Mystical with Christ the Head by faith, and with one another by love.

Secondly, Moral, an agreement in judgment and affection, John. 17. 11. See 21, 22, 23. v. Act. 4. 32.

Christ was,

  • 1. Incarnate for this end, that his people might be one, Ephes. 1. 10.
  • 2. This is often inculcated in Christ's Sermons, John 15. 17. He came from heaven on purpose to propound to us a pattern of charity, Ephes. 5. 2. Unity is the beauty, strength and safety of the Church, Act. 1. 14. See Isa. 11. 6.
  • 3. Christ died for this end, Isa. 2 15, 16.